DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Grover Search and the No-Signaling Principle

Abstract

Two of the prime properties of quantum physics are the no-signaling principle and the Grover search lower bound. That is, despite admitting stronger-than-classical correlations, quantum mechanics does not imply superluminal signaling, and despite a form of exponential parallelism, quantum mechanics does not imply polynomial-time brute force solution of NP-complete problems. Herein, we investigate the degree to which these two properties are connected. We explore four classes of deviations from quantum mechanics, for which we draw inspiration from the literature on the black hole information paradox. We show that in these models, the physical resources required to send a superluminal signal scale polynomially with the resources needed to speed up Grover’s algorithm. Hence the no-signaling principle is equivalent to the inability to solve NP-hard problems efficiently by brute force within the classes of theories analyzed.

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3]
  1. California Institute of Technology (CalTech), Pasadena, CA (United States)
  2. Massachusetts Inst. of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA (United States)
  3. National Inst. of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD (United States); Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
California Institute of Technology (CalTech), Pasadena, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP); National Science Foundation (NSF); Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
OSTI Identifier:
1600495
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1324491
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC0011632; PHY-1125565; GBMF-12500028
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Physical Review Letters
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 117; Journal Issue: 12; Journal ID: ISSN 0031-9007
Publisher:
American Physical Society (APS)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS; 79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS

Citation Formats

Bao, Ning, Bouland, Adam, and Jordan, Stephen P. Grover Search and the No-Signaling Principle. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.120501.
Bao, Ning, Bouland, Adam, & Jordan, Stephen P. Grover Search and the No-Signaling Principle. United States. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.120501
Bao, Ning, Bouland, Adam, and Jordan, Stephen P. Wed . "Grover Search and the No-Signaling Principle". United States. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.120501. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1600495.
@article{osti_1600495,
title = {Grover Search and the No-Signaling Principle},
author = {Bao, Ning and Bouland, Adam and Jordan, Stephen P.},
abstractNote = {Two of the prime properties of quantum physics are the no-signaling principle and the Grover search lower bound. That is, despite admitting stronger-than-classical correlations, quantum mechanics does not imply superluminal signaling, and despite a form of exponential parallelism, quantum mechanics does not imply polynomial-time brute force solution of NP-complete problems. Herein, we investigate the degree to which these two properties are connected. We explore four classes of deviations from quantum mechanics, for which we draw inspiration from the literature on the black hole information paradox. We show that in these models, the physical resources required to send a superluminal signal scale polynomially with the resources needed to speed up Grover’s algorithm. Hence the no-signaling principle is equivalent to the inability to solve NP-hard problems efficiently by brute force within the classes of theories analyzed.},
doi = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.120501},
journal = {Physical Review Letters},
number = 12,
volume = 117,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Sep 14 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Wed Sep 14 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Journal Article:

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 12 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Optimal state discrimination and unstructured search in nonlinear quantum mechanics
journal, February 2016


Strengths and Weaknesses of Quantum Computing
journal, October 1997

  • Bennett, Charles H.; Bernstein, Ethan; Brassard, Gilles
  • SIAM Journal on Computing, Vol. 26, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1137/S0097539796300933

NP is as easy as detecting unique solutions
journal, January 1986


Quantum search with general nonlinearities
journal, January 2014


Nonlinear Quantum Mechanics Implies Polynomial-Time Solution for NP -Complete and # P Problems
journal, November 1998


Grover’s quantum searching algorithm is optimal
journal, October 1999


Quantum Algorithms for Quantum Field Theories
journal, May 2012


Black holes: complementarity or firewalls?
journal, February 2013

  • Almheiri, Ahmed; Marolf, Donald; Polchinski, Joseph
  • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2013, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/JHEP02(2013)062

Aspects of the Papadodimas-Raju proposal for the black hole interior
journal, November 2014


Integration with Respect to the Haar Measure on Unitary, Orthogonal and Symplectic Group
journal, March 2006


State-dependent bulk-boundary maps and black hole complementarity
journal, April 2014


Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels
journal, March 1993


Weinberg’s nonlinear quantum mechanics and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
journal, January 1991


Quantum computing, postselection, and probabilistic polynomial-time
journal, August 2005

  • Aaronson, Scott
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 461, Issue 2063
  • DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2005.1546

Guest Column: NP-complete problems and physical reality
journal, March 2005


Violations of the Born rule in cool state-dependent horizons
journal, January 2016

  • Marolf, Donald; Polchinski, Joseph
  • Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2016, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2016)008

No-Signaling Principle Can Determine Optimal Quantum State Discrimination
journal, October 2011


Quantum mechanics near closed timelike lines
journal, November 1991


Quantum computation vs. firewalls
journal, June 2013


The black hole final state
journal, February 2004


Closed timelike curves make quantum and classical computing equivalent
journal, October 2008

  • Aaronson, Scott; Watrous, John
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 465, Issue 2102
  • DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2008.0350

Can Closed Timelike Curves or Nonlinear Quantum Mechanics Improve Quantum State Discrimination or Help Solve Hard Problems?
journal, October 2009


Comment on "The black hole final state"
journal, March 2004


Better Late than Never: Information Retrieval from Black Holes
journal, March 2013


Weinberg's non-linear quantum mechanics and supraluminal communications
journal, January 1990


Simulation of Topological Field Theories¶by Quantum Computers
journal, June 2002

  • Freedman, Michael H.; Kitaev, Alexei; Wang, Zhenghan
  • Communications in Mathematical Physics, Vol. 227, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s002200200635

Nonlinear quantum search using the Gross–Pitaevskii equation
journal, June 2013


Computers with Closed Timelike Curves Can Solve Hard Problems Efficiently
journal, January 2003


Works referencing / citing this record: