DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Advantages and limitations of classic and 3D QSAR approaches in nano-QSAR studies based on biological activity of fullerene derivatives

Abstract

In this contribution, the advantages and limitations of two computational techniques that can be used for the investigation of nanoparticles activity and toxicity: classic nano-QSAR (Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships employed for nanomaterials) and 3D nano-QSAR (three-dimensional Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships, such us Comparative Molecular Field Analysis, CoMFA/Comparative Molecular Similarity Indices Analysis, CoMSIA analysis employed for nanomaterials) have been briefly summarized. Both approaches were compared according to the selected criteria, including: efficiency, type of experimental data, class of nanomaterials, time required for calculations and computational cost, difficulties in the interpretation. Taking into account the advantages and limitations of each method, we provide the recommendations for nano-QSAR modellers and QSAR model users to be able to determine a proper and efficient methodology to investigate biological activity of nanoparticles in order to describe the underlying interactions in the most reliable and useful manner.

Authors:
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1310830
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1434916
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC0001717; 309837; 295128
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Journal of Nanoparticle Research
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Journal of Nanoparticle Research Journal Volume: 18 Journal Issue: 9; Journal ID: ISSN 1388-0764
Publisher:
Springer Science + Business Media
Country of Publication:
Netherlands
Language:
English
Subject:
77 NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY; Nano-QSAR; 3D QSAR; CoMFA; Nanomaterials; Toxicity; Environmental, health and safety effects

Citation Formats

Jagiello, Karolina, Grzonkowska, Monika, Swirog, Marta, Ahmed, Lucky, Rasulev, Bakhtiyor, Avramopoulos, Aggelos, Papadopoulos, Manthos G., Leszczynski, Jerzy, and Puzyn, Tomasz. Advantages and limitations of classic and 3D QSAR approaches in nano-QSAR studies based on biological activity of fullerene derivatives. Netherlands: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1007/s11051-016-3564-1.
Jagiello, Karolina, Grzonkowska, Monika, Swirog, Marta, Ahmed, Lucky, Rasulev, Bakhtiyor, Avramopoulos, Aggelos, Papadopoulos, Manthos G., Leszczynski, Jerzy, & Puzyn, Tomasz. Advantages and limitations of classic and 3D QSAR approaches in nano-QSAR studies based on biological activity of fullerene derivatives. Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-016-3564-1
Jagiello, Karolina, Grzonkowska, Monika, Swirog, Marta, Ahmed, Lucky, Rasulev, Bakhtiyor, Avramopoulos, Aggelos, Papadopoulos, Manthos G., Leszczynski, Jerzy, and Puzyn, Tomasz. Mon . "Advantages and limitations of classic and 3D QSAR approaches in nano-QSAR studies based on biological activity of fullerene derivatives". Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-016-3564-1.
@article{osti_1310830,
title = {Advantages and limitations of classic and 3D QSAR approaches in nano-QSAR studies based on biological activity of fullerene derivatives},
author = {Jagiello, Karolina and Grzonkowska, Monika and Swirog, Marta and Ahmed, Lucky and Rasulev, Bakhtiyor and Avramopoulos, Aggelos and Papadopoulos, Manthos G. and Leszczynski, Jerzy and Puzyn, Tomasz},
abstractNote = {In this contribution, the advantages and limitations of two computational techniques that can be used for the investigation of nanoparticles activity and toxicity: classic nano-QSAR (Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships employed for nanomaterials) and 3D nano-QSAR (three-dimensional Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships, such us Comparative Molecular Field Analysis, CoMFA/Comparative Molecular Similarity Indices Analysis, CoMSIA analysis employed for nanomaterials) have been briefly summarized. Both approaches were compared according to the selected criteria, including: efficiency, type of experimental data, class of nanomaterials, time required for calculations and computational cost, difficulties in the interpretation. Taking into account the advantages and limitations of each method, we provide the recommendations for nano-QSAR modellers and QSAR model users to be able to determine a proper and efficient methodology to investigate biological activity of nanoparticles in order to describe the underlying interactions in the most reliable and useful manner.},
doi = {10.1007/s11051-016-3564-1},
journal = {Journal of Nanoparticle Research},
number = 9,
volume = 18,
place = {Netherlands},
year = {Mon Aug 29 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Mon Aug 29 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-016-3564-1

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 35 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Binding of novel fullerene inhibitors to HIV-1 protease: insight through molecular dynamics and molecular mechanics Poisson–Boltzmann surface area calculations
journal, October 2011

  • Tzoupis, Haralambos; Leonis, Georgios; Durdagi, Serdar
  • Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, Vol. 25, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10822-011-9475-4

Direct QSPR: the most efficient way of predicting organic carbon/water partition coefficient (log K OC) for polyhalogenated POPs
journal, March 2014

  • Jagiello, Karolina; Sosnowska, Anita; Walker, Sharnek
  • Structural Chemistry, Vol. 25, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11224-014-0419-1

On a simple approach for determining applicability domain of QSAR models
journal, July 2015


Zeta Potential for Metal Oxide Nanoparticles: A Predictive Model Developed by a Nano-Quantitative Structure–Property Relationship Approach
journal, March 2015

  • Mikolajczyk, Alicja; Gajewicz, Agnieszka; Rasulev, Bakhtiyor
  • Chemistry of Materials, Vol. 27, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1021/cm504406a

The Correlation of Biological Activity of Plant Growth Regulators and Chloromycetin Derivatives with Hammett Constants and Partition Coefficients
journal, September 1963

  • Hansch, Corwin.; Muir, Robert M.; Fujita, Toshio.
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 85, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1021/ja00901a033

Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins
journal, August 1988

  • Cramer, Richard D.; Patterson, David E.; Bunce, Jeffrey D.
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 110, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1021/ja00226a005

3D QSAR CoMFA/CoMSIA, molecular docking and molecular dynamics studies of fullerene-based HIV-1 PR inhibitors
journal, December 2008

  • Durdagi, Serdar; Mavromoustakos, Thomas; Papadopoulos, Manthos G.
  • Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Vol. 18, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.09.107

How the “Liquid Drop” Approach Could Be Efficiently Applied for Quantitative Structure–Property Relationship Modeling of Nanofluids
journal, November 2015

  • Sizochenko, Natalia; Jagiello, Karolina; Leszczynski, Jerzy
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Vol. 119, Issue 45
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05759

QSARINS-chem: Insubria datasets and new QSAR/QSPR models for environmental pollutants in QSARINS
journal, March 2014

  • Gramatica, Paola; Cassani, Stefano; Chirico, Nicola
  • Journal of Computational Chemistry, Vol. 35, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1002/jcc.23576

Risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials: a review of available data and approaches from a regulatory perspective
journal, October 2011


Modeling Biological Activities of Nanoparticles
journal, October 2012

  • Epa, V. Chandana; Burden, Frank R.; Tassa, Carlos
  • Nano Letters, Vol. 12, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1021/nl303144k

QSARINS: A new software for the development, analysis, and validation of QSAR MLR models
journal, June 2013

  • Gramatica, Paola; Chirico, Nicola; Papa, Ester
  • Journal of Computational Chemistry, Vol. 34, Issue 24
  • DOI: 10.1002/jcc.23361

Using nano-QSAR to predict the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles
journal, February 2011

  • Puzyn, Tomasz; Rasulev, Bakhtiyor; Gajewicz, Agnieszka
  • Nature Nanotechnology, Vol. 6, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2011.10

6-31G* basis set for third-row atoms
journal, January 2001

  • Rassolov, Vitaly A.; Ratner, Mark A.; Pople, John A.
  • Journal of Computational Chemistry, Vol. 22, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1002/jcc.1058

QSAR as a random event: Modeling of nanoparticles uptake in PaCa2 cancer cells
journal, June 2013


A critical review of recent CoMFA applications
journal, January 1998

  • Kim, Ki Hwan; Greco, Giovanni; Novellino, Ettore
  • Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, Vol. 12/14, p. 257-315
  • DOI: 10.1023/A:1017010811581

Molecular Similarity Indices in a Comparative Analysis (CoMSIA) of Drug Molecules to Correlate and Predict Their Biological Activity
journal, November 1994

  • Klebe, Gerhard; Abraham, Ute; Mietzner, Thomas
  • Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Vol. 37, Issue 24
  • DOI: 10.1021/jm00050a010

Nano-QSPR Modelling of Carbon-Based Nanomaterials Properties
journal, June 2015


Receptor- and ligand-based study of fullerene analogues: comprehensive computational approach including quantum-chemical, QSAR and molecular docking simulations
journal, January 2013

  • Ahmed, Lucky; Rasulev, Bakhtiyor; Turabekova, Malakhat
  • Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, Vol. 11, Issue 35
  • DOI: 10.1039/c3ob40878g

Quasi-QSAR for mutagenic potential of multi-walled carbon-nanotubes
journal, April 2015


QSAR Applicability Domain Estimation by Projection of the Training Set in Descriptor Space: A Review
journal, October 2005

  • Jaworska, Joanna; Nikolova-Jeliazkova, Nina; Aldenberg, Tom
  • Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, Vol. 33, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1177/026119290503300508

Novel approach for efficient predictions properties of large pool of nanomaterials based on limited set of species: nano-read-across
journal, December 2014


QSAR modeling of measured binding affinity for fullerene-based HIV-1 PR inhibitors by CORAL
journal, August 2010

  • Toropova, Alla P.; Toropov, Andrey A.; Benfenati, Emilio
  • Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, Vol. 48, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10910-010-9719-x

Applying quantitative structure–activity relationship approaches to nanotoxicology: Current status and future potential
journal, November 2013


Molecular Descriptors for Chemoinformatics: Volume I: Alphabetical Listing / Volume II: Appendices, References
book, July 2009

  • Todeschini, Roberto; Consonni, Viviana
  • Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry
  • DOI: 10.1002/9783527628766

Principles of QSAR models validation: internal and external
journal, May 2007


Investigating the influence of data splitting on the predictive ability of QSAR/QSPR models
journal, February 2011

  • Puzyn, Tomasz; Mostrag-Szlichtyng, Aleksandra; Gajewicz, Agnieszka
  • Structural Chemistry, Vol. 22, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11224-011-9757-4

InChI-based optimal descriptors: QSAR analysis of fullerene[C60]-based HIV-1 PR inhibitors by correlation balance
journal, April 2010

  • Toropov, Andrey A.; Toropova, Alla P.; Benfenati, Emilio
  • European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Vol. 45, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.12.037

Novel application of the CORAL software to model cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles to bacteria Escherichia coli
journal, November 2012


QSAR model as a random event: A case of rat toxicity
journal, March 2015

  • Toropova, Alla P.; Toropov, Andrey A.; Benfenati, Emilio
  • Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, Vol. 23, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2015.01.055

6‐31G* basis set for third‐row atoms
journal, July 2001

  • Rassolov, Vitaly A.; Ratner, Mark A.; Pople, John A.
  • Journal of Computational Chemistry, Vol. 22, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1002/jcc.1058.abs

Works referencing / citing this record:

Decrypting Strong and Weak Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Interactions with Mitochondrial Voltage-Dependent Anion Channels Using Molecular Docking and Perturbation Theory
journal, October 2017

  • González-Durruthy, Michael; Werhli, Adriano V.; Seus, Vinicius
  • Scientific Reports, Vol. 7, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13691-8

Application of Bayesian networks in determining nanoparticle-induced cellular outcomes using transcriptomics
journal, February 2019


Classical and 3D QSAR studies of larvicidal monoterpenes against Aedes aegypti: new molecular insights for the rational design of more active compounds
journal, April 2018

  • dos Santos, Ieda Maria; Agra, João Pedro Gomes; de Carvalho, Thiego Gustavo Cavalcante
  • Structural Chemistry, Vol. 29, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11224-018-1110-8

The conformation-independent QSPR approach for predicting the oxidation rate constant of water micropollutants
journal, October 2017

  • Ortiz, Erlinda V.; Bennardi, Daniel O.; Bacelo, Daniel E.
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 24, Issue 35
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0315-5

Nanotoxicology data for in silico tools: a literature review
journal, February 2020


4D- quantitative structure–activity relationship modeling: making a comeback
journal, September 2019


Nano-(Q)SAR for Cytotoxicity Prediction of Engineered Nanomaterials
journal, December 2019


A Comprehensive Cheminformatics Analysis of Structural Features Affecting the Binding Activity of Fullerene Derivatives
journal, January 2020

  • Fjodorova, Natalja; Novič, Marjana; Venko, Katja
  • Nanomaterials, Vol. 10, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3390/nano10010090