DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Modeling background radiation using geochemical data: A case study in and around Cameron, Arizona

Abstract

Here, this study compares high-resolution forward models of natural gamma-ray background with that measured by high resolution aerial gamma-ray surveys. The ability to predict variations in natural background radiation levels should prove useful for those engaged in measuring anthropogenic contributions to background radiation for the purpose of emergency response and homeland security operations. The forward models are based on geologic maps and remote sensing multi-spectral imagery combined with two different sources of data: 1) bedrock geochemical data (uranium, potassium and thorium concentrations) collected from national databases, the scientific literature and private companies, and 2) the low spatial resolution NURE (National Uranium Resource Evaluation) aerial gamma-ray survey. The study area near Cameron, Arizona, is located in an arid region with minimal vegetation and, due to the presence of abandoned uranium mines, was the subject of a previous high resolution gamma-ray survey. We found that, in general, geologic map units form a good basis for predicting the geographic distribution of the gamma-ray background. Predictions of background gamma-radiation levels based on bedrock geochemical analyses were not as successful as those based on the NURE aerial survey data sorted by geologic unit. The less successful result of the bedrock geochemical model is most likelymore » due to a number of factors including the need to take into account the evolution of soil geochemistry during chemical weathering and the influence of aeolian addition. Refinements to the forward models were made using ASTER visualizations to create subunits of similar exposure rate within the Chinle Formation, which contains multiple lithologies and by grouping alluvial units by drainage basin rather than age.« less

Authors:
; ORCiD logo; ; ; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Nevada Test Site/National Security Technologies, LLC, Las Vegas, NV (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
1325309
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1302512
Report Number(s):
DOE/NV/25946-2556
Journal ID: ISSN 0265-931X; S0265931X16302429; PII: S0265931X16302429
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC52-06NA25946; NA0001982
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Journal of Environmental Radioactivity
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Journal of Environmental Radioactivity Journal Volume: 165 Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 0265-931X
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Subject:
58 GEOSCIENCES; 73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS; airborne; Gamma-ray; radioactivity; geology; predictive model

Citation Formats

Marsac, Kara E., Burnley, Pamela C., Adcock, Christopher T., Haber, Daniel A., Malchow, Russell L., and Hausrath, Elisabeth M. Modeling background radiation using geochemical data: A case study in and around Cameron, Arizona. United Kingdom: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.07.012.
Marsac, Kara E., Burnley, Pamela C., Adcock, Christopher T., Haber, Daniel A., Malchow, Russell L., & Hausrath, Elisabeth M. Modeling background radiation using geochemical data: A case study in and around Cameron, Arizona. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.07.012
Marsac, Kara E., Burnley, Pamela C., Adcock, Christopher T., Haber, Daniel A., Malchow, Russell L., and Hausrath, Elisabeth M. Thu . "Modeling background radiation using geochemical data: A case study in and around Cameron, Arizona". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.07.012.
@article{osti_1325309,
title = {Modeling background radiation using geochemical data: A case study in and around Cameron, Arizona},
author = {Marsac, Kara E. and Burnley, Pamela C. and Adcock, Christopher T. and Haber, Daniel A. and Malchow, Russell L. and Hausrath, Elisabeth M.},
abstractNote = {Here, this study compares high-resolution forward models of natural gamma-ray background with that measured by high resolution aerial gamma-ray surveys. The ability to predict variations in natural background radiation levels should prove useful for those engaged in measuring anthropogenic contributions to background radiation for the purpose of emergency response and homeland security operations. The forward models are based on geologic maps and remote sensing multi-spectral imagery combined with two different sources of data: 1) bedrock geochemical data (uranium, potassium and thorium concentrations) collected from national databases, the scientific literature and private companies, and 2) the low spatial resolution NURE (National Uranium Resource Evaluation) aerial gamma-ray survey. The study area near Cameron, Arizona, is located in an arid region with minimal vegetation and, due to the presence of abandoned uranium mines, was the subject of a previous high resolution gamma-ray survey. We found that, in general, geologic map units form a good basis for predicting the geographic distribution of the gamma-ray background. Predictions of background gamma-radiation levels based on bedrock geochemical analyses were not as successful as those based on the NURE aerial survey data sorted by geologic unit. The less successful result of the bedrock geochemical model is most likely due to a number of factors including the need to take into account the evolution of soil geochemistry during chemical weathering and the influence of aeolian addition. Refinements to the forward models were made using ASTER visualizations to create subunits of similar exposure rate within the Chinle Formation, which contains multiple lithologies and by grouping alluvial units by drainage basin rather than age.},
doi = {10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.07.012},
journal = {Journal of Environmental Radioactivity},
number = C,
volume = 165,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Thu Dec 01 00:00:00 EST 2016},
month = {Thu Dec 01 00:00:00 EST 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.07.012

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 6 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referencing / citing this record:

Differences in natural gamma radiation characteristics of Erinpura and Malani granites in NW India
journal, May 2019

  • Scharfenberg, Lars; Jandausch, Sebastian; Anetzberger, Lina
  • Journal of Earth System Science, Vol. 128, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1007/s12040-019-1166-x