skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: U.S. DOE NETL methodology for estimating the prospective CO2 storage resource of shales at the national and regional scale

Abstract

While the majority of shale formations will serve as reservoir seals for stored anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2), hydrocarbon-bearing shale formations may be potential geologic sinks after depletion through primary production. Here in this paper we present the United States-Department of Energy-National Energy Technology Laboratory (US-DOE-NETL) methodology for screening-level assessment of prospective CO2 storage resources in shale using a volumetric equation. Volumetric resource estimates are produced from the bulk volume, porosity, and sorptivity of the shale and storage efficiency factors based on formation-scale properties and petrophysical limitations on fluid transport. Prospective shale formations require: (1) prior hydrocarbon production using horizontal drilling and stimulation via staged, high-volume hydraulic fracturing, (2) depths sufficient to maintain CO2 in a supercritical state, generally >800 m, and (3) an overlying seal. The US-DOE-NETL methodology accounts for storage of CO2 in shale as a free fluid phase within fractures and matrix pores and as an sorbed phase on organic matter and clays. Uncertainties include but are not limited to poorly-constrained geologic variability in formation thickness, porosity, existing fluid content, organic richness, and mineralogy. Knowledge of how these parameters may be linked to depositional environments, facies, and diagenetic history of the shale will improve the understanding of pore-to-reservoirmore » scale behavior, and provide improved estimates of prospective CO2 storage.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [2];  [2];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [1];  [3];  [4];  [4];  [1]
  1. National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA, (United States)
  2. National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Morgantown, WV (United States)
  3. Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, IL (United States)
  4. Univ. of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND (United States). Energy & Environmental Research Center
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
National Energy Technology Lab. (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA, and Morgantown, WV (United States). In-house Research
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1275480
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1325371
Report Number(s):
NETL-PUB-20182
Journal ID: ISSN 1750-5836; PII: S1750583616302109
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 51; Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 1750-5836
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
25 ENERGY STORAGE; Carbon Sequestration; storage resource; shale; carbon dioxide

Citation Formats

Levine, Jonathan S., Fukai, Isis, Soeder, Daniel J., Bromhal, Grant, Dilmore, Robert M., Guthrie, George D., Rodosta, Traci, Sanguinito, Sean, Frailey, Scott, Gorecki, Charles, Peck, Wesley, and Goodman, Angela L. U.S. DOE NETL methodology for estimating the prospective CO2 storage resource of shales at the national and regional scale. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.04.028.
Levine, Jonathan S., Fukai, Isis, Soeder, Daniel J., Bromhal, Grant, Dilmore, Robert M., Guthrie, George D., Rodosta, Traci, Sanguinito, Sean, Frailey, Scott, Gorecki, Charles, Peck, Wesley, & Goodman, Angela L. U.S. DOE NETL methodology for estimating the prospective CO2 storage resource of shales at the national and regional scale. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.04.028
Levine, Jonathan S., Fukai, Isis, Soeder, Daniel J., Bromhal, Grant, Dilmore, Robert M., Guthrie, George D., Rodosta, Traci, Sanguinito, Sean, Frailey, Scott, Gorecki, Charles, Peck, Wesley, and Goodman, Angela L. Tue . "U.S. DOE NETL methodology for estimating the prospective CO2 storage resource of shales at the national and regional scale". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.04.028. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1275480.
@article{osti_1275480,
title = {U.S. DOE NETL methodology for estimating the prospective CO2 storage resource of shales at the national and regional scale},
author = {Levine, Jonathan S. and Fukai, Isis and Soeder, Daniel J. and Bromhal, Grant and Dilmore, Robert M. and Guthrie, George D. and Rodosta, Traci and Sanguinito, Sean and Frailey, Scott and Gorecki, Charles and Peck, Wesley and Goodman, Angela L.},
abstractNote = {While the majority of shale formations will serve as reservoir seals for stored anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2), hydrocarbon-bearing shale formations may be potential geologic sinks after depletion through primary production. Here in this paper we present the United States-Department of Energy-National Energy Technology Laboratory (US-DOE-NETL) methodology for screening-level assessment of prospective CO2 storage resources in shale using a volumetric equation. Volumetric resource estimates are produced from the bulk volume, porosity, and sorptivity of the shale and storage efficiency factors based on formation-scale properties and petrophysical limitations on fluid transport. Prospective shale formations require: (1) prior hydrocarbon production using horizontal drilling and stimulation via staged, high-volume hydraulic fracturing, (2) depths sufficient to maintain CO2 in a supercritical state, generally >800 m, and (3) an overlying seal. The US-DOE-NETL methodology accounts for storage of CO2 in shale as a free fluid phase within fractures and matrix pores and as an sorbed phase on organic matter and clays. Uncertainties include but are not limited to poorly-constrained geologic variability in formation thickness, porosity, existing fluid content, organic richness, and mineralogy. Knowledge of how these parameters may be linked to depositional environments, facies, and diagenetic history of the shale will improve the understanding of pore-to-reservoir scale behavior, and provide improved estimates of prospective CO2 storage.},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.04.028},
journal = {International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control},
number = C,
volume = 51,
place = {United States},
year = {2016},
month = {5}
}

Journal Article:

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 4 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Development of innovative and efficient hydraulic fracturing numerical simulation model and parametric studies in unconventional naturally fractured reservoirs
journal, December 2014

  • Ahn, Chong Hyun; Dilmore, Robert; Wang, John Yilin
  • Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources, Vol. 8
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.juogr.2014.06.003

CO2 storage capacity estimation: Methodology and gaps
journal, October 2007

  • Bachu, Stefan; Bonijoly, Didier; Bradshaw, John
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 1, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00086-2

Carbon dioxide storage potential of shales
journal, July 2008

  • Busch, A.; Alles, S.; Gensterblum, Y.
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 2, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.03.003

Effects of physical sorption and chemical reactions of CO2 in shaly caprocks
journal, February 2009


Unconventional natural gas resources in Pennsylvania: The backstory of the modern Marcellus Shale play
journal, December 2011

  • Carter, Kristin M.; Harper, John A.; Schmid, Katherine W.
  • Environmental Geosciences, Vol. 18, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1306/eg.09281111008

High-pressure adsorption of gases on shales: Measurements and modeling
journal, June 2012

  • Chareonsuppanimit, Pongtorn; Mohammad, Sayeed A.; Robinson, Robert L.
  • International Journal of Coal Geology, Vol. 95
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2012.02.005

Production data analysis of unconventional gas wells: Review of theory and best practices
journal, April 2013


A Model To Estimate Carbon Dioxide Injectivity and Storage Capacity for Geological Sequestration in Shale Gas Wells
journal, July 2015

  • Edwards, Ryan W. J.; Celia, Michael A.; Bandilla, Karl W.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01982

Potential Global Implications of Gas Production from Shales and Coal for Geological CO2 Storage
journal, January 2013


Potential for enhanced gas recovery and CO2 storage in the Marcellus Shale in the Eastern United States
journal, October 2013

  • Godec, Michael; Koperna, George; Petrusak, Robin
  • International Journal of Coal Geology, Vol. 118
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2013.05.007

U.S. DOE methodology for the development of geologic storage potential for carbon dioxide at the national and regional scale
journal, July 2011

  • Goodman, Angela; Hakala, Alexandra; Bromhal, Grant
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 5, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.03.010

Comparison of methods for geologic storage of carbon dioxide in saline formations
journal, October 2013

  • Goodman, Angela; Bromhal, Grant; Strazisar, Brian
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 18
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.07.016

Methane/CO 2 Sorption Modeling for Coalbed Methane Production and CO 2 Sequestration
journal, July 2006

  • Harpalani, Satya; Prusty, Basanta K.; Dutta, Pratik
  • Energy & Fuels, Vol. 20, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1021/ef050434l

Effect of water on methane and carbon dioxide sorption in clay minerals by Monte Carlo simulations
journal, November 2014


Subterranean containment and long-term storage of carbon dioxide in unused aquifers and in depleted natural gas reservoirs
journal, May 1992


Influence of CO2 on New Albany Shale composition and pore structure
journal, March 2013

  • Lahann, Richard; Mastalerz, Maria; Rupp, John A.
  • International Journal of Coal Geology, Vol. 108
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2011.05.004

Assessing the feasibility of CO2 storage in the New Albany Shale (Devonian–Mississippian) with potential enhanced gas recovery using reservoir simulation
journal, September 2013


Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores
journal, June 2012

  • Loucks, Robert G.; Reed, Robert M.; Ruppel, Stephen C.
  • AAPG Bulletin, Vol. 96, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1306/08171111061

Pore-throat sizes in sandstones, tight sandstones, and shales
journal, March 2009


The importance of shale composition and pore structure upon gas storage potential of shale gas reservoirs
journal, June 2009


Recommendations for the characterization of porous solids (Technical Report)
journal, January 1994

  • Rouquerol, J.; Avnir, D.; Fairbridge, C. W.
  • Pure and Applied Chemistry, Vol. 66, Issue 8, p. 1739-1758
  • DOI: 10.1351/pac199466081739

A USANS/SANS Study of the Accessibility of Pores in the Barnett Shale to Methane and Water
journal, February 2013

  • Ruppert, Leslie F.; Sakurovs, Richard; Blach, Tomasz P.
  • Energy & Fuels, Vol. 27, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1021/ef301859s

Langmuir slip-Langmuir sorption permeability model of shale
journal, January 2016


Comparative sequence stratigraphy and organic geochemistry of gas shales: Commonality or coincidence?
journal, September 2012


Porosity and Permeability of Eastern Devonian Gas Shale
journal, March 1988

  • Soeder, D. J.
  • SPE Formation Evaluation, Vol. 3, Issue 01
  • DOI: 10.2118/15213-PA

Estimating the Carbon Sequestration Capacity of Shale Formations Using Methane Production Rates
journal, September 2013

  • Tao, Zhiyuan; Clarens, Andres
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 47, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1021/es401221j

Techno-economic assessment of industrial CO2 storage in depleted shale gas reservoirs
journal, September 2015

  • Tayari, Farid; Blumsack, Seth; Dilmore, Robert
  • Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources, Vol. 11
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.juogr.2015.05.001

Reducing the greenhouse gas footprint of shale gas
journal, December 2011


Effect of organic-matter type and thermal maturity on methane adsorption in shale-gas systems
journal, June 2012


Micro/Nano-pore Network Analysis of Gas Flow in Shale Matrix
journal, August 2015

  • Zhang, Pengwei; Hu, Liming; Meegoda, Jay N.
  • Scientific Reports, Vol. 5, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/srep13501

A method for quick assessment of CO2 storage capacity in closed and semi-closed saline formations
journal, October 2008

  • Zhou, Quanlin; Birkholzer, Jens T.; Tsang, Chin-Fu
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 2, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.02.004

    Works referencing / citing this record:

    Fracture Properties of Nash Point Shale as a Function of Orientation to Bedding
    journal, October 2018

    • Forbes Inskip, Nathaniel D.; Meredith, Philip G.; Chandler, Michael R.
    • Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 123, Issue 10
    • DOI: 10.1029/2018jb015943