DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Indirect and semi-direct aerosol campaign: The impact of Arctic aerosols on clouds

Abstract

A comprehensive dataset of microphysical and radiative properties of aerosols and clouds in the boundary layer in the vicinity of Barrow, Alaska, was collected in April 2008 during the Indirect and Semi-Direct Aerosol Campaign (ISDAC). ISDAC's primary aim was to examine the effects of aerosols, including those generated by Asian wildfires, on clouds that contain both liquid and ice. ISDAC utilized the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Pro- gram's permanent observational facilities at Barrow and specially deployed instruments measuring aerosol, ice fog, precipitation, and radiation. The National Research Council of Canada Convair-580 flew 27 sorties and collected data using an unprecedented 41 stateof- the-art cloud and aerosol instruments for more than 100 h on 12 different days. Aerosol compositions, including fresh and processed sea salt, biomassburning particles, organics, and sulfates mixed with organics, varied between flights. Observations in a dense arctic haze on 19 April and above, within, and below the single-layer stratocumulus on 8 and 26 April are enabling a process-oriented understanding of how aerosols affect arctic clouds. Inhomogeneities in reflectivity, a close coupling of upward and downward Doppler motion, and a nearly constant ice profile in the single-layer stratocumulus suggests that vertical mixing is responsible for its longevity observed duringmore » ISDAC. Data acquired in cirrus on flights between Barrow and Fairbanks, Alaska, are improving the understanding of the performance of cloud probes in ice. Furthermore, ISDAC data will improve the representation of cloud and aerosol processes in models covering a variety of spatial and temporal scales, and determine the extent to which surface measurements can provide retrievals of aerosols, clouds, precipitation, and radiative heating.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [4];  [2];  [2];  [5];  [5];  [2];  [6];  [2];  [2];  [4];  [2];  [7];  [2];  [8];  [4];  [4] more »;  [2];  [9];  [6];  [4];  [7];  [10];  [2];  [2];  [11];  [12];  [13];  [2];  [1];  [1];  [14] « less
  1. Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL (United States)
  2. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
  3. The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA (United States)
  4. Environment Canada, Downsview, ON (Canada)
  5. National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON (Canada)
  6. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
  7. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
  8. Stratton Park Engineering Company, Boulder, CO (United States)
  9. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA (United States)
  10. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO (United States)
  11. Climate Diagnostic Center, and NOAA/ESRL, Boulder, CO (United States)
  12. Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI (United States)
  13. Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
  14. Texas A & M Univ., College Station, TX (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1253673
Report Number(s):
LLNL-JRNL-423303
Journal ID: ISSN 0003-0007
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC52-07NA27344
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 92; Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 0003-0007
Publisher:
American Meteorological Society
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Citation Formats

McFarquhar, Greg M., Ghan, Steven, Verlinde, Johannes, Korolev, Alexei, Strapp, J. Walter, Schmid, Beat, Tomlinson, Jason M., Wolde, Menqistu, Brooks, Sarah D., Cziczo, Dan, Dubey, Manvendra K., Fan, Jiwen, Flynn, Connor, Gultepe, Ismail, Hubbe, John, Gilles, Mary K., Laskin, Alexander, Lawson, Paul, Leaitch, W. Richard, Liu, Peter, Liu, Xiaohong, Lubin, Dan, Mazzoleni, Claudio, Macdonald, Ann -Marie, Moffet, Ryan C., Morrison, Hugh, Ovchinnikov, Mikhail, Ronfeld, Debbie, Shupe, Matthew D., Turner, David D., Xie, Shaocheng, Zelenyuk, Alla, Bae, Kenny, Freer, Matt, and Glen, Andrew. Indirect and semi-direct aerosol campaign: The impact of Arctic aerosols on clouds. United States: N. p., 2011. Web. doi:10.1175/2010BAMS2935.1.
McFarquhar, Greg M., Ghan, Steven, Verlinde, Johannes, Korolev, Alexei, Strapp, J. Walter, Schmid, Beat, Tomlinson, Jason M., Wolde, Menqistu, Brooks, Sarah D., Cziczo, Dan, Dubey, Manvendra K., Fan, Jiwen, Flynn, Connor, Gultepe, Ismail, Hubbe, John, Gilles, Mary K., Laskin, Alexander, Lawson, Paul, Leaitch, W. Richard, Liu, Peter, Liu, Xiaohong, Lubin, Dan, Mazzoleni, Claudio, Macdonald, Ann -Marie, Moffet, Ryan C., Morrison, Hugh, Ovchinnikov, Mikhail, Ronfeld, Debbie, Shupe, Matthew D., Turner, David D., Xie, Shaocheng, Zelenyuk, Alla, Bae, Kenny, Freer, Matt, & Glen, Andrew. Indirect and semi-direct aerosol campaign: The impact of Arctic aerosols on clouds. United States. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS2935.1
McFarquhar, Greg M., Ghan, Steven, Verlinde, Johannes, Korolev, Alexei, Strapp, J. Walter, Schmid, Beat, Tomlinson, Jason M., Wolde, Menqistu, Brooks, Sarah D., Cziczo, Dan, Dubey, Manvendra K., Fan, Jiwen, Flynn, Connor, Gultepe, Ismail, Hubbe, John, Gilles, Mary K., Laskin, Alexander, Lawson, Paul, Leaitch, W. Richard, Liu, Peter, Liu, Xiaohong, Lubin, Dan, Mazzoleni, Claudio, Macdonald, Ann -Marie, Moffet, Ryan C., Morrison, Hugh, Ovchinnikov, Mikhail, Ronfeld, Debbie, Shupe, Matthew D., Turner, David D., Xie, Shaocheng, Zelenyuk, Alla, Bae, Kenny, Freer, Matt, and Glen, Andrew. Tue . "Indirect and semi-direct aerosol campaign: The impact of Arctic aerosols on clouds". United States. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS2935.1. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1253673.
@article{osti_1253673,
title = {Indirect and semi-direct aerosol campaign: The impact of Arctic aerosols on clouds},
author = {McFarquhar, Greg M. and Ghan, Steven and Verlinde, Johannes and Korolev, Alexei and Strapp, J. Walter and Schmid, Beat and Tomlinson, Jason M. and Wolde, Menqistu and Brooks, Sarah D. and Cziczo, Dan and Dubey, Manvendra K. and Fan, Jiwen and Flynn, Connor and Gultepe, Ismail and Hubbe, John and Gilles, Mary K. and Laskin, Alexander and Lawson, Paul and Leaitch, W. Richard and Liu, Peter and Liu, Xiaohong and Lubin, Dan and Mazzoleni, Claudio and Macdonald, Ann -Marie and Moffet, Ryan C. and Morrison, Hugh and Ovchinnikov, Mikhail and Ronfeld, Debbie and Shupe, Matthew D. and Turner, David D. and Xie, Shaocheng and Zelenyuk, Alla and Bae, Kenny and Freer, Matt and Glen, Andrew},
abstractNote = {A comprehensive dataset of microphysical and radiative properties of aerosols and clouds in the boundary layer in the vicinity of Barrow, Alaska, was collected in April 2008 during the Indirect and Semi-Direct Aerosol Campaign (ISDAC). ISDAC's primary aim was to examine the effects of aerosols, including those generated by Asian wildfires, on clouds that contain both liquid and ice. ISDAC utilized the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Pro- gram's permanent observational facilities at Barrow and specially deployed instruments measuring aerosol, ice fog, precipitation, and radiation. The National Research Council of Canada Convair-580 flew 27 sorties and collected data using an unprecedented 41 stateof- the-art cloud and aerosol instruments for more than 100 h on 12 different days. Aerosol compositions, including fresh and processed sea salt, biomassburning particles, organics, and sulfates mixed with organics, varied between flights. Observations in a dense arctic haze on 19 April and above, within, and below the single-layer stratocumulus on 8 and 26 April are enabling a process-oriented understanding of how aerosols affect arctic clouds. Inhomogeneities in reflectivity, a close coupling of upward and downward Doppler motion, and a nearly constant ice profile in the single-layer stratocumulus suggests that vertical mixing is responsible for its longevity observed during ISDAC. Data acquired in cirrus on flights between Barrow and Fairbanks, Alaska, are improving the understanding of the performance of cloud probes in ice. Furthermore, ISDAC data will improve the representation of cloud and aerosol processes in models covering a variety of spatial and temporal scales, and determine the extent to which surface measurements can provide retrievals of aerosols, clouds, precipitation, and radiative heating.},
doi = {10.1175/2010BAMS2935.1},
journal = {Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society},
number = 2,
volume = 92,
place = {United States},
year = {2011},
month = {2}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 121 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referencing / citing this record:

Intercomparison of the cloud water phase among global climate models: CLOUD WATER PHASE IN GCMs
journal, March 2014

  • Komurcu, Muge; Storelvmo, Trude; Tan, Ivy
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013jd021119

Mixed-phase cloud phase partitioning using millimeter wavelength cloud radar Doppler velocity spectra: MIXED-PHASE CLOUD PHASE PARTITIONING
journal, June 2014

  • Yu, G.; Verlinde, J.; Clothiaux, E. E.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013jd021182

Intercomparison of large-eddy simulations of Arctic mixed-phase clouds: Importance of ice size distribution assumptions
journal, March 2014

  • Ovchinnikov, Mikhail; Ackerman, Andrew S.; Avramov, Alexander
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013ms000282

Modeling immersion freezing with aerosol-dependent prognostic ice nuclei in Arctic mixed-phase clouds: PAUKERT AND HOOSE
journal, July 2014

  • Paukert, M.; Hoose, C.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014jd021917

Representation of microphysical processes in cloud-resolving models: Spectral (bin) microphysics versus bulk parameterization: BIN VS BULK
journal, May 2015

  • Khain, A. P.; Beheng, K. D.; Heymsfield, A.
  • Reviews of Geophysics, Vol. 53, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014rg000468

Unique manifestations of mixed‐phase cloud microphysics over Ross Island and the Ross Ice Shelf, Antarctica
journal, March 2016

  • Scott, Ryan C.; Lubin, Dan
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 43, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015gl067246

Why are mixed-phase altocumulus clouds poorly predicted by large-scale models? Part 1. Physical processes: MIXED-PHASE CLOUDS IN NUMERICAL MODELS
journal, September 2017

  • Barrett, Andrew I.; Hogan, Robin J.; Forbes, Richard M.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 122, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016jd026321

Sulfate Aerosol in the Arctic: Source Attribution and Radiative Forcing
journal, February 2018

  • Yang, Yang; Wang, Hailong; Smith, Steven J.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 123, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017jd027298

Large-eddy simulations of an Arctic mixed-phase stratiform cloud observed during ISDAC: sensitivity to moisture aloft, surface fluxes and large-scale forcing: LESs of Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds during ISDAC
journal, September 2014

  • Savre, J.; Ekman, A. M. L.; Svensson, G.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 141, Issue 689
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.2425

Representation of Arctic mixed-phase clouds and the Wegener-Bergeron-Findeisen process in climate models: Perspectives from a cloud-resolving study
journal, January 2011

  • Fan, Jiwen; Ghan, Steven; Ovchinnikov, Mikhail
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 116
  • DOI: 10.1029/2010jd015375

Testing cloud microphysics parameterizations in NCAR CAM5 with ISDAC and M-PACE observations
journal, January 2011

  • Liu, Xiaohong; Xie, Shaocheng; Boyle, James
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 116
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011jd015889

Tropospheric clouds in Antarctica
journal, January 2012

  • Bromwich, David H.; Nicolas, Julien P.; Hines, Keith M.
  • Reviews of Geophysics, Vol. 50, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011rg000363

The dependence of ice microphysics on aerosol concentration in arctic mixed-phase stratus clouds during ISDAC and M-PACE: AEROSOL EFFECTS ON ARCTIC STRATUS
journal, August 2012

  • Jackson, Robert C.; McFarquhar, Greg M.; Korolev, Alexei V.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 117, Issue D15
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012jd017668

Characterization of Arctic ice cloud properties observed during ISDAC: ISDAC ARCTIC ICE CLOUDS
journal, December 2012

  • Jouan, Caroline; Girard, Eric; Pelon, Jacques
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 117, Issue D23
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012jd017889

Cloud Optical Properties Over West Antarctica From Shortwave Spectroradiometer Measurements During AWARE
journal, September 2018

  • Wilson, A.; Scott, R. C.; Cadeddu, M. P.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 123, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018jd028347

Processes Controlling the Composition and Abundance of Arctic Aerosol
journal, November 2018

  • Willis, Megan D.; Leaitch, W. Richard; Abbatt, Jonathan P. D.
  • Reviews of Geophysics, Vol. 56, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018rg000602

Dust Radiative Effects on Climate by Glaciating Mixed‐Phase Clouds
journal, June 2019

  • Shi, Yang; Liu, Xiaohong
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 46, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019gl082504

Cloud Ice Processes Enhance Spatial Scales of Organization in Arctic Stratocumulus
journal, December 2019

  • Eirund, Gesa K.; Lohmann, Ulrike; Possner, Anna
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 46, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019gl084959

Comparison of Antarctic and Arctic Single‐Layer Stratiform Mixed‐Phase Cloud Properties Using Ground‐Based Remote Sensing Measurements
journal, September 2019

  • Zhang, Damao; Vogelmann, Andrew; Kollias, Pavlos
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 124, Issue 17-18
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019jd030673

Local and Remote Controls on Arctic Mixed‐Layer Evolution
journal, July 2019

  • Neggers, R. A. J.; Chylik, J.; Egerer, U.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 11, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019ms001671

Resilience of persistent Arctic mixed-phase clouds
journal, December 2011

  • Morrison, Hugh; de Boer, Gijs; Feingold, Graham
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 5, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo1332

Intensification of ice nucleation observed in ocean ship emissions
journal, January 2018


Lidar Measurements for Desert Dust Characterization: An Overview
journal, January 2012


Simulating Arctic Ice Clouds during Spring Using an Advanced Ice Cloud Microphysics in the WRF Model
journal, July 2019

  • Keita, Setigui; Girard, Eric; Raut, Jean-Christophe
  • Atmosphere, Vol. 10, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.3390/atmos10080433

Moisture and dynamical interactions maintaining decoupled Arctic mixed-phase stratocumulus in the presence of a humidity inversion
journal, January 2011

  • Solomon, A.; Shupe, M. D.; Persson, P. O. G.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 11, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-10127-2011

Variability of mixed-phase clouds in the Arctic with a focus on the Svalbard region: a study based on spaceborne active remote sensing
journal, January 2015

  • Mioche, G.; Jourdan, O.; Ceccaldi, M.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 15, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-15-2445-2015

Observed microphysical changes in Arctic mixed-phase clouds when transitioning from sea ice to open ocean
journal, January 2016

  • Young, Gillian; Jones, Hazel M.; Choularton, Thomas W.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 16, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-13945-2016

Vertical distribution of microphysical properties of Arctic springtime low-level mixed-phase clouds over the Greenland and Norwegian seas
journal, January 2017

  • Mioche, Guillaume; Jourdan, Olivier; Delanoë, Julien
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 17, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-17-12845-2017

How important are future marine and shipping aerosol emissions in a warming Arctic summer and autumn?
journal, January 2018

  • Gilgen, Anina; Huang, Wan Ting Katty; Ickes, Luisa
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-10521-2018

A model intercomparison of CCN-limited tenuous clouds in the high Arctic
journal, January 2018

  • Stevens, Robin G.; Loewe, Katharina; Dearden, Christopher
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-11041-2018

Simulated and observed horizontal inhomogeneities of optical thickness of Arctic stratus
journal, January 2018

  • Schäfer, Michael; Loewe, Katharina; Ehrlich, André
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-13115-2018

The relative impact of cloud condensation nuclei and ice nucleating particle concentrations on phase partitioning in Arctic mixed-phase stratocumulus clouds
journal, January 2018

  • Solomon, Amy; de Boer, Gijs; Creamean, Jessie M.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-17047-2018

Arctic ice clouds over northern Sweden: microphysical properties studied with the Balloon-borne Ice Cloud particle Imager B-ICI
journal, January 2018

  • Wolf, Veronika; Kuhn, Thomas; Milz, Mathias
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-17371-2018

The influence of local oil exploration and regional wildfires on summer 2015 aerosol over the North Slope of Alaska
journal, January 2018

  • Creamean, Jessie M.; Maahn, Maximilian; de Boer, Gijs
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-555-2018

Variability, timescales, and nonlinearity in climate responses to black carbon emissions
journal, January 2019

  • Yang, Yang; Smith, Steven J.; Wang, Hailong
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 19, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-2405-2019

Concentrations, composition, and sources of ice-nucleating particles in the Canadian High Arctic during spring 2016
journal, January 2019


Cloud and boundary layer interactions over the Arctic sea-ice in late summer
journal, January 2013

  • Shupe, M. D.; Persson, P. O. G.; Brooks, I. M.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, Vol. 13, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.5194/acpd-13-13191-2013

Ground-based remote sensing of thin clouds in the Arctic
journal, January 2012

  • Garrett, T. J.; Zhao, C.
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions, Vol. 5, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.5194/amtd-5-8653-2012

Cloud-microphysical sensors intercomparison at the Puy-de-Dôme Observatory, France
journal, January 2015

  • Guyot, G.; Gourbeyre, C.; Febvre, G.
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions, Vol. 8, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.5194/amtd-8-5511-2015

Lidar measurements for desert dust characterization: An overview
other, January 2012

  • Mona, L.; Liu, Z.; Müller, D.
  • London : Hindawi
  • DOI: 10.34657/1052

A model intercomparison of CCN-limited tenuous clouds in the high Arctic
text, January 2018


Cloud and boundary layer interactions over the Arctic sea ice in late summer
journal, January 2013

  • Shupe, M. D.; Persson, P. O. G.; Brooks, I. M.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-13-9379-2013

Arctic marine secondary organic aerosol contributes significantly to summertime particle size distributions in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago
journal, January 2019

  • Croft, Betty; Martin, Randall V.; Leaitch, W. Richard
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 19, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-2787-2019

Ground-based remote sensing of thin clouds in the Arctic
journal, January 2013


Simulated and observed horizontal inhomogeneities of optical thickness of Arctic stratus
text, January 2018


How important are future marine and shipping aerosol emissions in a warming Arctic summer and autumn?
text, January 2018