skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: On the relationships among cloud cover, mixed-phase partitioning, and planetary albedo in GCMs: CLOUD COVER, MIXED-PHASE, AND ALBEDO

Abstract

In this study, it is shown that CMIP5 global climate models (GCMs) that convert supercooled water to ice at relatively warm temperatures tend to have a greater mean-state cloud fraction and more negative cloud feedback in the middle and high latitude Southern Hemisphere. We investigate possible reasons for these relationships by analyzing the mixed-phase parameterizations in 26 GCMs. The atmospheric temperature where ice and liquid are equally prevalent (T5050) is used to characterize the mixed-phase parameterization in each GCM. Liquid clouds have a higher albedo than ice clouds, so, all else being equal, models with more supercooled liquid water would also have a higher planetary albedo. The lower cloud fraction in these models compensates the higher cloud reflectivity and results in clouds that reflect shortwave radiation (SW) in reasonable agreement with observations, but gives clouds that are too bright and too few. The temperature at which supercooled liquid can remain unfrozen is strongly anti-correlated with cloud fraction in the climate mean state across the model ensemble, but we know of no robust physical mechanism to explain this behavior, especially because this anti-correlation extends through the subtropics. A set of perturbed physics simulations with the Community Atmospheric Model Version 4 (CAM4)more » shows that, if its temperature-dependent phase partitioning is varied and the critical relative humidity for cloud formation in each model run is also tuned to bring reflected SW into agreement with observations, then cloud fraction increases and liquid water path (LWP) decreases with T5050, as in the CMIP5 ensemble.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [1];  [3];  [2]
  1. Atmospheric Sciences Department, University of Washington, Seattle Washington USA
  2. Geology and Geophysics Department, Yale University, New Haven Connecticut USA
  3. Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore California USA
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1251713
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1251715; OSTI ID: 1409979
Report Number(s):
LLNL-JRNL-736460
Journal ID: ISSN 1942-2466
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC0012580; AC52-07NA27344
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems Journal Volume: 8 Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 1942-2466
Publisher:
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
58 GEOSCIENCES

Citation Formats

McCoy, Daniel T., Tan, Ivy, Hartmann, Dennis L., Zelinka, Mark D., and Storelvmo, Trude. On the relationships among cloud cover, mixed-phase partitioning, and planetary albedo in GCMs: CLOUD COVER, MIXED-PHASE, AND ALBEDO. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1002/2015MS000589.
McCoy, Daniel T., Tan, Ivy, Hartmann, Dennis L., Zelinka, Mark D., & Storelvmo, Trude. On the relationships among cloud cover, mixed-phase partitioning, and planetary albedo in GCMs: CLOUD COVER, MIXED-PHASE, AND ALBEDO. United States. doi:10.1002/2015MS000589.
McCoy, Daniel T., Tan, Ivy, Hartmann, Dennis L., Zelinka, Mark D., and Storelvmo, Trude. Fri . "On the relationships among cloud cover, mixed-phase partitioning, and planetary albedo in GCMs: CLOUD COVER, MIXED-PHASE, AND ALBEDO". United States. doi:10.1002/2015MS000589.
@article{osti_1251713,
title = {On the relationships among cloud cover, mixed-phase partitioning, and planetary albedo in GCMs: CLOUD COVER, MIXED-PHASE, AND ALBEDO},
author = {McCoy, Daniel T. and Tan, Ivy and Hartmann, Dennis L. and Zelinka, Mark D. and Storelvmo, Trude},
abstractNote = {In this study, it is shown that CMIP5 global climate models (GCMs) that convert supercooled water to ice at relatively warm temperatures tend to have a greater mean-state cloud fraction and more negative cloud feedback in the middle and high latitude Southern Hemisphere. We investigate possible reasons for these relationships by analyzing the mixed-phase parameterizations in 26 GCMs. The atmospheric temperature where ice and liquid are equally prevalent (T5050) is used to characterize the mixed-phase parameterization in each GCM. Liquid clouds have a higher albedo than ice clouds, so, all else being equal, models with more supercooled liquid water would also have a higher planetary albedo. The lower cloud fraction in these models compensates the higher cloud reflectivity and results in clouds that reflect shortwave radiation (SW) in reasonable agreement with observations, but gives clouds that are too bright and too few. The temperature at which supercooled liquid can remain unfrozen is strongly anti-correlated with cloud fraction in the climate mean state across the model ensemble, but we know of no robust physical mechanism to explain this behavior, especially because this anti-correlation extends through the subtropics. A set of perturbed physics simulations with the Community Atmospheric Model Version 4 (CAM4) shows that, if its temperature-dependent phase partitioning is varied and the critical relative humidity for cloud formation in each model run is also tuned to bring reflected SW into agreement with observations, then cloud fraction increases and liquid water path (LWP) decreases with T5050, as in the CMIP5 ensemble.},
doi = {10.1002/2015MS000589},
journal = {Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems},
number = 2,
volume = 8,
place = {United States},
year = {2016},
month = {5}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
DOI: 10.1002/2015MS000589

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 17 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Variations in Cloud Cover and Cloud Types over the Ocean from Surface Observations, 1954–2008
journal, November 2011

  • Eastman, Ryan; Warren, Stephen G.; Hahn, Carole J.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 24, Issue 22
  • DOI: 10.1175/2011JCLI3972.1

The Community Climate System Model Version 4
journal, October 2011

  • Gent, Peter R.; Danabasoglu, Gokhan; Donner, Leo J.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 24, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1175/2011JCLI4083.1

The importance of feldspar for ice nucleation by mineral dust in mixed-phase clouds
journal, June 2013

  • Atkinson, James D.; Murray, Benjamin J.; Woodhouse, Matthew T.
  • Nature, Vol. 498, Issue 7454
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature12278

Contributions of Different Cloud Types to Feedbacks and Rapid Adjustments in CMIP5
journal, July 2013


Observed Southern Ocean Cloud Properties and Shortwave Reflection. Part II: Phase Changes and Low Cloud Feedback
journal, December 2014

  • McCoy, Daniel T.; Hartmann, Dennis L.; Grosvenor, Daniel P.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 27, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00288.1

Observational Evidence That Enhanced Subsidence Reduces Subtropical Marine Boundary Layer Cloudiness
journal, October 2013


Observational and Model Evidence for Positive Low-Level Cloud Feedback
journal, July 2009


A Comparison of the CCM3 Model Climate Using Diagnosed and Predicted Condensate Parameterizations
journal, July 1998


Positive tropical marine low‐cloud cover feedback inferred from cloud‐controlling factors
journal, September 2015

  • Qu, Xin; Hall, Alex; Klein, Stephen A.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 42, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015GL065627

The case against climate regulation via oceanic phytoplankton sulphur emissions
journal, November 2011


How may low‐cloud radiative properties simulated in the current climate influence low‐cloud feedbacks under global warming?
journal, October 2012


The ‘too few, too bright’ tropical low-cloud problem in CMIP5 models: TOO FEW TOO BRIGHT LOW-CLOUDS
journal, November 2012

  • Nam, C.; Bony, S.; Dufresne, J. -L.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 39, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012GL053421

Resilience of persistent Arctic mixed-phase clouds
journal, December 2011

  • Morrison, Hugh; de Boer, Gijs; Feingold, Graham
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 5, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo1332

An Assessment of the Primary Sources of Spread of Global Warming Estimates from Coupled Atmosphere–Ocean Models
journal, October 2008


Ice nucleation by particles immersed in supercooled cloud droplets
journal, January 2012

  • Murray, B. J.; O'Sullivan, D.; Atkinson, J. D.
  • Chemical Society Reviews, Vol. 41, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1039/c2cs35200a

Computing and Partitioning Cloud Feedbacks Using Cloud Property Histograms. Part II: Attribution to Changes in Cloud Amount, Altitude, and Optical Depth
journal, June 2012

  • Zelinka, Mark D.; Klein, Stephen A.; Hartmann, Dennis L.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 25, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00249.1

The effect of solar zenith angle on MODIS cloud optical and microphysical retrievals within marine liquid water clouds
journal, January 2014


Contrasting the impact of aerosols at northern and southern midlatitudes on heterogeneous ice formation: AEROSOL EFFECT ON ICE FORMATION
journal, September 2011

  • Kanitz, T.; Seifert, P.; Ansmann, A.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 38, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011GL048532

Occurrence, liquid water content, and fraction of supercooled water clouds from combined CALIOP/IIR/MODIS measurements
journal, January 2010

  • Hu, Yongxiang; Rodier, Sharon; Xu, Kuan-man
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 115
  • DOI: 10.1029/2009JD012384

Major Characteristics of Southern Ocean Cloud Regimes and Their Effects on the Energy Budget
journal, October 2011

  • Haynes, John M.; Jakob, Christian; Rossow, William B.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 24, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1175/2011JCLI4052.1

Ice particles in maritime clouds near Tasmania
journal, July 1970

  • Mossop, S. C.; Ono, A.; Wishart, E. R.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 96, Issue 409
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.49709640910

Influence of cloud phase composition on climate feedbacks
journal, April 2014

  • Choi, Yong-Sang; Ho, Chang-Hoi; Park, Chang-Eui
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD020582

Origins of differences in climate sensitivity, forcing and feedback in climate models
journal, April 2012


A marine biogenic source of atmospheric ice-nucleating particles
journal, September 2015

  • Wilson, Theodore W.; Ladino, Luis A.; Alpert, Peter A.
  • Nature, Vol. 525, Issue 7568
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature14986

A note on the effect of GCM tuning on climate sensitivity
journal, January 2008


Intercomparison of the cloud water phase among global climate models: CLOUD WATER PHASE IN GCMs
journal, March 2014

  • Komurcu, Muge; Storelvmo, Trude; Tan, Ivy
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD021119

Natural aerosols explain seasonal and spatial patterns of Southern Ocean cloud albedo
journal, July 2015

  • McCoy, Daniel T.; Burrows, Susannah M.; Wood, Robert
  • Science Advances, Vol. 1, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1500157

Large Particles in Supercooled Regions of Northern Canadian Cumulus Clouds
journal, August 1979


Mechanisms of marine low cloud sensitivity to idealized climate perturbations: A single-LES exploration extending the CGILS cases: LES OF BOUNDARY-LAYER CLOUD FEEDBACK
journal, May 2013

  • Bretherton, Christopher S.; Blossey, Peter N.; Jones, Christopher R.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 5, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/jame.20019

Emergent Constraints for Cloud Feedbacks
journal, October 2015


interannual Variability in Stratiform Cloudiness and Sea Surface Temperature
journal, December 1994


Reexamining the Relationship between Climate Sensitivity and the Southern Hemisphere Radiation Budget in CMIP Models
journal, December 2015

  • Grise, Kevin M.; Polvani, Lorenzo M.; Fasullo, John T.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 28, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0031.1

A review of cloud top height and optical depth histograms from MISR, ISCCP, and MODIS
journal, January 2010

  • Marchand, Roger; Ackerman, Thomas; Smyth, Mike
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 115, Issue D16
  • DOI: 10.1029/2009JD013422

Ice nuclei in marine air: biogenic particles or dust?
journal, January 2013

  • Burrows, S. M.; Hoose, C.; Pöschl, U.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-13-245-2013

Mechanisms of the Negative Shortwave Cloud Feedback in Middle to High Latitudes
journal, January 2016


Frequency and causes of failed MODIS cloud property retrievals for liquid phase clouds over global oceans: FAILED MODIS CLOUD RETRIEVALS
journal, May 2015

  • Cho, Hyoun-Myoung; Zhang, Zhibo; Meyer, Kerry
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 120, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015JD023161

Microphysical characterization of mixed-phase clouds
journal, January 2003

  • Korolev, Alexei V.; Isaac, George A.; Cober, Stewart G.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 129, Issue 587
  • DOI: 10.1256/qj.01.204

The Seasonal Cycle of Low Stratiform Clouds
journal, August 1993


Observed Southern Ocean Cloud Properties and Shortwave Reflection. Part I: Calculation of SW Flux from Observed Cloud Properties
journal, December 2014

  • McCoy, Daniel T.; Hartmann, Dennis L.; Grosvenor, Daniel P.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 27, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00287.1

Estimating Shortwave Radiative Forcing and Response in Climate Models
journal, June 2007

  • Taylor, K. E.; Crucifix, M.; Braconnot, P.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 20, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI4143.1

Extratropical Influence on ITCZ Shifts in Slab Ocean Simulations of Global Warming
journal, January 2012


Diagnosis of Zonal Mean Relative Humidity Changes in a Warmer Climate
journal, September 2010

  • Wright, Jonathon S.; Sobel, Adam; Galewsky, Joseph
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 23, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1175/2010JCLI3488.1

On the interpretation of inter-model spread in CMIP5 climate sensitivity estimates
journal, March 2013


On the Relationships between Subtropical Clouds and Meteorology in Observations and CMIP3 and CMIP5 Models
journal, April 2015


Improved Representation of Marine Stratocumulus Cloud Shortwave Radiative Properties in the CMIP5 Climate Models
journal, August 2014

  • Engström, Anders; Bender, Frida A. -M.; Karlsson, Johannes
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 27, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00755.1

A study on the low-altitude clouds over the Southern Ocean using the DARDAR-MASK: LOW-ALTITUDE CLOUDS OVER THE SOUTHERN OCEAN
journal, September 2012

  • Huang, Yi; Siems, Steven T.; Manton, Michael J.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 117, Issue D18
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012JD017800

Assessing Cloud-Phase Conditions
journal, November 2001


Mixed‐phase cloud physics and Southern Ocean cloud feedback in climate models
journal, September 2015

  • McCoy, Daniel T.; Hartmann, Dennis L.; Zelinka, Mark D.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 120, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015JD023603

Marine low cloud sensitivity to an idealized climate change: The CGILS LES intercomparison: CGILS LES Intercomparison
journal, May 2013

  • Blossey, Peter N.; Bretherton, Christopher S.; Zhang, Minghua
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 5, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/jame.20025

Intercomparison of model simulations of mixed-phase clouds observed during the ARM Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment. I: single-layer cloud
journal, April 2009

  • Klein, Stephen A.; McCoy, Renata B.; Morrison, Hugh
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 135, Issue 641
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.416

Multimodel evaluation of cloud phase transition using satellite and reanalysis data
journal, August 2015

  • Cesana, G.; Waliser, D. E.; Jiang, X.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 120, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014JD022932

Tuning the climate of a global model: TUNING THE CLIMATE OF A GLOBAL MODEL
journal, March 2012

  • Mauritsen, Thorsten; Stevens, Bjorn; Roeckner, Erich
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 4, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012MS000154

Link between the double-Intertropical Convergence Zone problem and cloud biases over the Southern Ocean
journal, March 2013

  • Hwang, Y. -T.; Frierson, D. M. W.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 110, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1213302110

Observational Constraints on the Cloud Thermodynamic Phase in Midlatitude Storms
journal, October 2006

  • Naud, Catherine M.; Del Genio, Anthony D.; Bauer, Mike
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3919.1

The MODIS cloud products: algorithms and examples from terra
journal, February 2003

  • Platnick, S.; King, M. D.; Ackerman, S. A.
  • IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 41, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2002.808301

Aircraft-Induced Hole Punch and Canal Clouds: Inadvertent Cloud Seeding
journal, June 2010

  • Heymsfield, Andrew J.; Kennedy, Patrick C.; Massie, Steve
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 91, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1175/2009BAMS2905.1

On dynamic and thermodynamic components of cloud changes
journal, March 2004


Ice Water Path–Optical Depth Relationships for Cirrus and Deep Stratiform Ice Cloud Layers
journal, October 2003


Low-cloud optical depth feedback in climate models: Optical Depth Feedback
journal, May 2014

  • Gordon, Neil D.; Klein, Stephen A.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD021052

Interpretation of the positive low-cloud feedback predicted by a climate model under global warming
journal, January 2012


A parametrization of the ice water content observed in frontal and convective clouds
journal, October 1996

  • Bower, Keith N.; Moss, S. J.; Johnson, D. W.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 122, Issue 536
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.49712253605

Evaluation of cloud and water vapor simulations in CMIP5 climate models using NASA “A-Train” satellite observations: EVALUATION OF IPCC AR5 MODEL SIMULATIONS
journal, July 2012

  • Jiang, Jonathan H.; Su, Hui; Zhai, Chengxing
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 117, Issue D14
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011JD017237

Aircraft measurements to validate and improve numerical model parametrisations of ice to water ratios in clouds
journal, June 1994


Cloud Liquid Water Path from Satellite-Based Passive Microwave Observations: A New Climatology over the Global Oceans
journal, April 2008

  • O’Dell, Christopher W.; Wentz, Frank J.; Bennartz, Ralf
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 21, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1175/2007JCLI1958.1

On the spread of changes in marine low cloud cover in climate model simulations of the 21st century
journal, September 2013


Spaceborne lidar observations of the ice-nucleating potential of dust, polluted dust, and smoke aerosols in mixed-phase clouds
journal, June 2014

  • Tan, Ivy; Storelvmo, Trude; Choi, Yong-Sang
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD021333

How Well Do We Understand and Evaluate Climate Change Feedback Processes?
journal, August 2006

  • Bony, Sandrine; Colman, Robert; Kattsov, Vladimir M.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3819.1

Reducing the uncertainty in subtropical cloud feedback: REDUCING UNCERTAINTY OF CLOUD FEEDBACK
journal, March 2016

  • Myers, Timothy A.; Norris, Joel R.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 43, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015GL067416

Quantification of Monthly Mean Regional-Scale Albedo of Marine Stratiform Clouds in Satellite Observations and GCMs
journal, October 2011

  • Bender, Frida A. -M.; Charlson, Robert J.; Ekman, Annica M. L.
  • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, Vol. 50, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1175/JAMC-D-11-049.1

Processes controlling Southern Ocean shortwave climate feedbacks in CESM: CESM SOUTHERN OCEAN CLIMATE feedbacks
journal, January 2014

  • Kay, J. E.; Medeiros, B.; Hwang, Y. -T.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 41, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013GL058315

Low cloud reduction in a greenhouse-warmed climate: Results from Lagrangian LES of a subtropical marine cloudiness transition: LAGRANGIAN BOUNDARY-LAYER CLOUD FEEDBACK
journal, February 2014

  • Bretherton, Christopher S.; Blossey, Peter N.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013MS000250

Cloud Phase Changes Induced by CO2 Warming—a Powerful yet Poorly Constrained Cloud-Climate Feedback
journal, October 2015

  • Storelvmo, Trude; Tan, Ivy; Korolev, Alexei V.
  • Current Climate Change Reports, Vol. 1, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s40641-015-0026-2

Simulation of Present-Day and Twenty-First-Century Energy Budgets of the Southern Oceans
journal, January 2010


    Works referencing / citing this record:

    The influence of extratropical cloud phase and amount feedbacks on climate sensitivity
    journal, July 2017


    Processes Responsible for Cloud Feedback
    journal, October 2016


    Impacts of Representing Heterogeneous Distribution of Cloud Liquid and Ice on Phase Partitioning of Arctic Mixed‐Phase Clouds with NCAR CAM5
    journal, December 2019

    • Zhang, Meng; Liu, Xiaohong; Diao, Minghui
    • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 124, Issue 23
    • DOI: 10.1029/2019jd030502