DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Optimal well placement and brine extraction for pressure management during CO2 sequestration

Abstract

Large-scale pressure increases resulting from carbon dioxide (CO2) injection in the subsurface can potentially impact caprock integrity, induce reactivation of critically stressed faults, and drive CO2 or brine through conductive features into shallow groundwater. Pressure management involving the extraction of native fluids from storage formations can be used to reduce such pressure increases. However, dealing with large volumes of extracted brine can be technically challenging and expensive. Selection of optimal well locations and pumping rates are critical for maximizing CO2 storage and minimizing brine extraction during geologic CO2 sequestration (GCS). Robust and efficient computerized algorithms combining reservoir models and optimization methods are needed to make proper decisions on well placement and pumping rates. This work presents a constrained differential evolution (CDE) algorithm for solving global optimization problems involving pressure management of GCS projects. Application of the CDE optimization methodology was demonstrated for a hypothetical CO2 storage scenario in a deep sandstone reservoir in the Southern San Joaquin Basin in California, USA. Industrial-scale storage of CO2 would generate significant pressure buildup in this formation, which in turn would raise concerns about induced seismicity due to presence of multiple faults surrounding the injection site. Through the CDE optimization algorithm coupled to amore » vertically-averaged reservoir simulator, we successfully estimated optimal solutions for brine extraction wells in the reservoir that would limit the local pressure along the faults to a prescribed threshold. Multiple realizations of the reservoir permeability field were created to understand the impact of reservoir heterogeneity on optimization results. Our results indicate that the reservoir slope and heterogeneity have significant impact on optimum extraction rates. Reservoir heterogeneity is also a significant factor for extraction well locations, suggesting that in practice decisions about extraction well placement through optimization should be made at later project stages when data from a few years of CO2 injection have allowed iterative updating and refining of the reservoir forward models. Although the study focused on optimization of brine extraction, the CDE optimization methodology presented in this paper has also potential to solve other complex optimization problems related to GCS, such as increasing storage efficiency by enhancing injectivity and capillary and dissolution trapping.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE), Clean Coal and Carbon Management
OSTI Identifier:
1474891
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1251658
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-05CH11231
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 42; Journal Issue: C; Related Information: © 2015.; Journal ID: ISSN 1750-5836
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
58 GEOSCIENCES; 97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING; geologic carbon storage; pressure management; brine extraction; optimization; differential evolution algorithm

Citation Formats

Cihan, Abdullah, Birkholzer, Jens T., and Bianchi, Marco. Optimal well placement and brine extraction for pressure management during CO2 sequestration. United States: N. p., 2015. Web. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.07.025.
Cihan, Abdullah, Birkholzer, Jens T., & Bianchi, Marco. Optimal well placement and brine extraction for pressure management during CO2 sequestration. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.07.025
Cihan, Abdullah, Birkholzer, Jens T., and Bianchi, Marco. Sat . "Optimal well placement and brine extraction for pressure management during CO2 sequestration". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.07.025. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1474891.
@article{osti_1474891,
title = {Optimal well placement and brine extraction for pressure management during CO2 sequestration},
author = {Cihan, Abdullah and Birkholzer, Jens T. and Bianchi, Marco},
abstractNote = {Large-scale pressure increases resulting from carbon dioxide (CO2) injection in the subsurface can potentially impact caprock integrity, induce reactivation of critically stressed faults, and drive CO2 or brine through conductive features into shallow groundwater. Pressure management involving the extraction of native fluids from storage formations can be used to reduce such pressure increases. However, dealing with large volumes of extracted brine can be technically challenging and expensive. Selection of optimal well locations and pumping rates are critical for maximizing CO2 storage and minimizing brine extraction during geologic CO2 sequestration (GCS). Robust and efficient computerized algorithms combining reservoir models and optimization methods are needed to make proper decisions on well placement and pumping rates. This work presents a constrained differential evolution (CDE) algorithm for solving global optimization problems involving pressure management of GCS projects. Application of the CDE optimization methodology was demonstrated for a hypothetical CO2 storage scenario in a deep sandstone reservoir in the Southern San Joaquin Basin in California, USA. Industrial-scale storage of CO2 would generate significant pressure buildup in this formation, which in turn would raise concerns about induced seismicity due to presence of multiple faults surrounding the injection site. Through the CDE optimization algorithm coupled to a vertically-averaged reservoir simulator, we successfully estimated optimal solutions for brine extraction wells in the reservoir that would limit the local pressure along the faults to a prescribed threshold. Multiple realizations of the reservoir permeability field were created to understand the impact of reservoir heterogeneity on optimization results. Our results indicate that the reservoir slope and heterogeneity have significant impact on optimum extraction rates. Reservoir heterogeneity is also a significant factor for extraction well locations, suggesting that in practice decisions about extraction well placement through optimization should be made at later project stages when data from a few years of CO2 injection have allowed iterative updating and refining of the reservoir forward models. Although the study focused on optimization of brine extraction, the CDE optimization methodology presented in this paper has also potential to solve other complex optimization problems related to GCS, such as increasing storage efficiency by enhancing injectivity and capillary and dissolution trapping.},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.07.025},
journal = {International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control},
number = C,
volume = 42,
place = {United States},
year = {Sat Aug 22 00:00:00 EDT 2015},
month = {Sat Aug 22 00:00:00 EDT 2015}
}

Journal Article:

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 48 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Applications of Optimal Hydraulic Control to Ground‐Water Systems
journal, May 1994


Evolutionary algorithms for the optimization of advective control of contaminated aquifer zones: ADVECTIVE CONTROL OPTIMIZATION
journal, June 2004

  • Bayer, Peter; Finkel, Michael
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 40, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1029/2003WR002675

Joint optimization of oil well placement and controls
journal, July 2012

  • Bellout, Mathias C.; Echeverría Ciaurri, David; Durlofsky, Louis J.
  • Computational Geosciences, Vol. 16, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10596-012-9303-5

Simultaneous CO2 injection and water production to optimise aquifer storage capacity
journal, May 2011

  • Bergmo, Per Eirik S.; Grimstad, Alv-Arne; Lindeberg, Erik
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 5, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.09.002

A Sensitivity Study on Regional Pressure Buildup from Large-Scale CO2 Storage Projects
journal, January 2011


Impact-driven pressure management via targeted brine extraction—Conceptual studies of CO2 storage in saline formations
journal, March 2012

  • Birkholzer, Jens T.; Cihan, Abdullah; Zhou, Quanlin
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 7
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.01.001

Large-scale impact of CO2 storage in deep saline aquifers: A sensitivity study on pressure response in stratified systems
journal, March 2009

  • Birkholzer, J.; Zhou, Q.; Tsang, C.
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 3, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.08.002

Pre-injection Brine Production for Managing Pressure in Compartmentalized CO2 Storage Reservoirs
journal, January 2014


Key factors for determining groundwater impacts due to leakage from geologic carbon sequestration reservoirs
journal, October 2014

  • Carroll, Susan A.; Keating, Elizabeth; Mansoor, Kayyum
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 29
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.07.007

Simulation of industrial-scale CO2 storage: Multi-scale heterogeneity and its impacts on storage capacity, injectivity and leakage
journal, September 2012

  • Deng, Hailin; Stauffer, Philip H.; Dai, Zhenxue
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 10
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.07.003

The Use of Vertical Equilibrium in Two-Dimensional Simulation of Three-Dimensional Reservoir Performance
journal, March 1971

  • Coats, K. H.; Dempsey, J. R.; Henderson, J. H.
  • Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, Vol. 11, Issue 01
  • DOI: 10.2118/2797-PA

Active and integrated management of water resources throughout CO2 capture and sequestration operations
journal, January 2011


Applicability of vertical-equilibrium and sharp-interface assumptions in CO2 sequestration modeling
journal, September 2012

  • Court, Benjamin; Bandilla, Karl W.; Celia, Michael A.
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 10
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.04.015

An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms
journal, June 2000


Abrupt-Interface Solution for Carbon Dioxide Injection into Porous Media
journal, August 2008


Multiphase Inverse Modeling: Review and iTOUGH2 Applications
journal, August 2004


Solving iTOUGH2 simulation and optimization problems using the PEST protocol
journal, July 2011


Effective models for CO 2 migration in geological systems with varying topography : EFFECTIVE CO
journal, October 2012

  • Gasda, Sarah E.; Nilsen, Halvor M.; Dahle, Helge K.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 48, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012WR012264

A review of distributed parameter groundwater management modeling methods
journal, April 1983


A vertically integrated model with vertical dynamics for CO 2 storage : Research Article
journal, August 2014

  • Guo, Bo; Bandilla, Karl W.; Doster, Florian
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 50, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013WR015215

The Footprint of the CO2 Plume during Carbon Dioxide Storage in Saline Aquifers: Storage Efficiency for Capillary Trapping at the Basin Scale
journal, June 2009

  • Juanes, Ruben; MacMinn, Christopher W.; Szulczewski, Michael L.
  • Transport in Porous Media, Vol. 82, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11242-009-9420-3

Groundwater Remediation Strategy Using Global Optimization Algorithms
journal, November 2002


The cross-scale science of CO2 capture and storage: from pore scale to regional scale
journal, January 2012

  • Middleton, Richard S.; Keating, Gordon N.; Stauffer, Philip H.
  • Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 5, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1039/c2ee03227a

Management of coastal aquifers based on nonlinear optimization and evolutionary algorithms
journal, September 2004

  • Mantoglou, Aristotelis; Papantoniou, Maria; Giannoulopoulos, Panagiotis
  • Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 297, Issue 1-4
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.04.011

Evaluation of large-scale CO2 storage on fresh-water sections of aquifers: An example from the Texas Gulf Coast Basin
journal, October 2008


Injection and Storage of CO2 in Deep Saline Aquifers: Analytical Solution for CO2 Plume Evolution During Injection
journal, March 2005

  • Nordbotten, Jan Martin; Celia, Michael A.; Bachu, Stefan
  • Transport in Porous Media, Vol. 58, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11242-004-0670-9

Vertical integration of three-phase flow equations for analysis of light hydrocarbon plume movement
journal, April 1990

  • Parker, J. C.; Lenhard, R. J.
  • Transport in Porous Media, Vol. 5, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF00144603

Controlled CO 2 injection into heterogeneous geologic formations for improved solubility and residual trapping : CONTROLLED CO
journal, February 2012

  • Shamshiri, Hossein; Jafarpour, Behnam
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 48, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011WR010455

Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces
journal, January 1997

  • Storn, Rainer; Price, Kenneth
  • Journal of Global Optimization, Vol. 11, Issue 4, p. 341-359
  • DOI: 10.1023/A:1008202821328

A method and cost model for treatment of water extracted during geologic CO2 storage
journal, January 2013

  • Sullivan, Enid J.; Chu, Shaoping; Stauffer, Philip H.
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 12
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.11.007

A CO 2 -PENS model of methods and costs for treatment of water extracted during geologic carbon sequestration
journal, February 2013

  • Sullivan, Enid J.; Chu, Shaoping; Stauffer, Philip H.
  • Desalination and Water Treatment, Vol. 51, Issue 7-9
  • DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2012.714727

A Closed-form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils1
journal, January 1980


Modeling the performance of large-scale CO2 storage systems: A comparison of different sensitivity analysis methods
journal, September 2013

  • Wainwright, Haruko M.; Finsterle, Stefan; Zhou, Quanlin
  • International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 17
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.05.007

Optimal Well Placement Under Uncertainty Using a Retrospective Optimization Framework
journal, December 2011

  • Wang, Honggang; Ciaurri, David Echeverría; Durlofsky, Louis J.
  • SPE Journal, Vol. 17, Issue 01
  • DOI: 10.2118/141950-PA

A vertical equilibrium model for assessing nonaqueous phase liquid contamination and remediation of groundwater systems
journal, April 1994

  • Wu, Yu-Shu; Huyakorn, P. S.; Park, N. S.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 30, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1029/93WR03412

Optimization of Nonconventional Well Type, Location, and Trajectory
journal, September 2003

  • Yeten, Burak; Durlofsky, Louis J.; Aziz, Khalid
  • SPE Journal, Vol. 8, Issue 03
  • DOI: 10.2118/86880-PA

Adjoint-Based Well-Placement Optimization Under Production Constraints
journal, December 2008

  • Zandvliet, Maarten; Handels, Martijn; van Essen, Gijs
  • SPE Journal, Vol. 13, Issue 04
  • DOI: 10.2118/105797-PA

Optimal well placement using an adjoint gradient
journal, September 2010

  • Zhang, Kai; Li, Gaoming; Reynolds, Albert C.
  • Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Vol. 73, Issue 3-4
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2010.07.002

Numerical simulation and optimization of CO2 sequestration in saline aquifers
journal, July 2013


On scale and magnitude of pressure build-up induced by large-scale geologic storage of CO2
journal, March 2011

  • Zhou, Quanlin; Birkholzer, Jens T.
  • Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/ghg3.1