DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models

Abstract

We quantify forcing and feedbacks across available CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation models (AOGCMs) by analysing simulations forced by an abrupt quadrupling of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration. This is the first application of the linear forcing-feedback regression analysis of Gregory et al. (2004) to an ensemble of AOGCMs. The range of equilibrium climate sensitivity is 2.1–4.7 K. Differences in cloud feedbacks continue to be important contributors to this range. Some models show small deviations from a linear dependence of top-of-atmosphere radiative fluxes on global surface temperature change. We show that this phenomenon largely arises from shortwave cloud radiative effects over the ocean and is consistent with independent estimates of forcing using fixed sea-surface temperature methods. Moreover, we suggest that future research should focus more on understanding transient climate change, including any time-scale dependence of the forcing and/or feedback, rather than on the equilibrium response to large instantaneous forcing.

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [1];  [3]
  1. Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter (United Kingdom)
  2. Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter (United Kingdom); Univ. of Reading, Reading (United Kingdom)
  3. Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1239215
Report Number(s):
LLNL-JRNL-517031
Journal ID: ISSN 0094-8276
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC52-07NA27344
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Geophysical Research Letters
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 39; Journal Issue: 9; Journal ID: ISSN 0094-8276
Publisher:
American Geophysical Union
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; 58 GEOSCIENCES

Citation Formats

Andrews, Timothy, Gregory, Jonathan M., Webb, Mark J., and Taylor, Karl E. Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models. United States: N. p., 2012. Web. doi:10.1029/2012GL051607.
Andrews, Timothy, Gregory, Jonathan M., Webb, Mark J., & Taylor, Karl E. Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models. United States. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051607
Andrews, Timothy, Gregory, Jonathan M., Webb, Mark J., and Taylor, Karl E. Tue . "Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models". United States. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051607. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1239215.
@article{osti_1239215,
title = {Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models},
author = {Andrews, Timothy and Gregory, Jonathan M. and Webb, Mark J. and Taylor, Karl E.},
abstractNote = {We quantify forcing and feedbacks across available CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation models (AOGCMs) by analysing simulations forced by an abrupt quadrupling of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration. This is the first application of the linear forcing-feedback regression analysis of Gregory et al. (2004) to an ensemble of AOGCMs. The range of equilibrium climate sensitivity is 2.1–4.7 K. Differences in cloud feedbacks continue to be important contributors to this range. Some models show small deviations from a linear dependence of top-of-atmosphere radiative fluxes on global surface temperature change. We show that this phenomenon largely arises from shortwave cloud radiative effects over the ocean and is consistent with independent estimates of forcing using fixed sea-surface temperature methods. Moreover, we suggest that future research should focus more on understanding transient climate change, including any time-scale dependence of the forcing and/or feedback, rather than on the equilibrium response to large instantaneous forcing.},
doi = {10.1029/2012GL051607},
journal = {Geophysical Research Letters},
number = 9,
volume = 39,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue May 15 00:00:00 EDT 2012},
month = {Tue May 15 00:00:00 EDT 2012}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 513 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

On the contribution of local feedback mechanisms to the range of climate sensitivity in two GCM ensembles
journal, February 2006


An alternative to radiative forcing for estimating the relative importance of climate change mechanisms: ALTERNATIVE TO RADIATIVE FORCING
journal, October 2003

  • Shine, Keith P.; Cook, Jolene; Highwood, Eleanor J.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 30, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.1029/2003GL018141

The equilibrium sensitivity of the Earth's temperature to radiation changes
journal, October 2008

  • Knutti, Reto; Hegerl, Gabriele C.
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 1, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo337

Efficacy of climate forcings
journal, January 2005


A step-response simple climate model to reconstruct and interpret AOGCM projections: A STEP-RESPONSE SIMPLE CLIMATE MODEL
journal, January 2011

  • Good, Peter; Gregory, Jonathan M.; Lowe, Jason A.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 38, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1029/2010GL045208

The time-dependence of climate sensitivity
journal, September 2000

  • Senior, Catherine A.; Mitchell, John F. B.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 27, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1029/2000GL011373

Twentieth century climate model response and climate sensitivity
journal, January 2007


Global mean cloud feedbacks in idealized climate change experiments
journal, January 2006

  • Ringer, M. A.; McAvaney, B. J.; Andronova, N.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 33, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1029/2005GL025370

Deep-ocean heat uptake and equilibrium climate response
journal, April 2012


Fast and slow timescales in the tropical low-cloud response to increasing CO2 in two climate models
journal, September 2011

  • Watanabe, Masahiro; Shiogama, Hideo; Yoshimori, Masakazu
  • Climate Dynamics, Vol. 39, Issue 7-8
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00382-011-1178-y

A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity
journal, January 2004


Dynamical aspects of climate sensitivity
journal, January 2003


Time Variation of Effective Climate Sensitivity in GCMs
journal, October 2008

  • Williams, K. D.; Ingram, W. J.; Gregory, J. M.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 21, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1175/2008JCLI2371.1

Cloud Adjustment and its Role in CO2 Radiative Forcing and Climate Sensitivity: A Review
journal, November 2011

  • Andrews, Timothy; Gregory, Jonathan M.; Forster, Piers M.
  • Surveys in Geophysics, Vol. 33, Issue 3-4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10712-011-9152-0

Radiative forcing by well-mixed greenhouse gases: Estimates from climate models in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4)
journal, January 2006

  • Collins, W. D.; Ramaswamy, V.; Schwarzkopf, M. D.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 111, Issue D14
  • DOI: 10.1029/2005JD006713

Tropospheric Adjustment Induces a Cloud Component in CO 2 Forcing
journal, January 2008


CO 2 forcing induces semi-direct effects with consequences for climate feedback interpretations
journal, January 2008

  • Andrews, Timothy; Forster, Piers M.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 35, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007GL032273

Quantifying Climate Feedbacks Using Radiative Kernels
journal, July 2008

  • Soden, Brian J.; Held, Isaac M.; Colman, Robert
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 21, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1175/2007JCLI2110.1

Importance of Ocean Heat Uptake Efficacy to Transient Climate Change
journal, May 2010

  • Winton, Michael; Takahashi, Ken; Held, Isaac M.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 23, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1175/2009JCLI3139.1

Works referencing / citing this record:

Is climate sensitivity related to dynamical sensitivity? A Southern Hemisphere perspective: SH DYNAMICAL SENSITIVITY
journal, January 2014

  • Grise, Kevin M.; Polvani, Lorenzo M.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 41, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013gl058466

The Impact of Stratospheric Ozone Feedbacks on Climate Sensitivity Estimates
journal, May 2018

  • Nowack, Peer J.; Abraham, N. Luke; Braesicke, Peter
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 123, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017jd027943

The dependence of equilibrium climate sensitivity on climate state: Applications to studies of climates colder than present: CLIMATE SENSITIVITY AND CLIMATE STATE
journal, July 2013

  • Kutzbach, John E.; He, Feng; Vavrus, Steve J.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 40, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1002/grl.50724

Atmospheric component of the MPI-M Earth System Model: ECHAM6: ECHAM6
journal, April 2013

  • Stevens, Bjorn; Giorgetta, Marco; Esch, Monika
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 5, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/jame.20015

Marine low cloud sensitivity to an idealized climate change: The CGILS LES intercomparison: CGILS LES Intercomparison
journal, May 2013

  • Blossey, Peter N.; Bretherton, Christopher S.; Zhang, Minghua
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 5, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/jame.20025

Climate and carbon cycle changes from 1850 to 2100 in MPI-ESM simulations for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5: Climate Changes in MPI-ESM
journal, July 2013

  • Giorgetta, Marco A.; Jungclaus, Johann; Reick, Christian H.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 5, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/jame.20038

Forcing and feedback in the MPI-ESM-LR coupled model under abruptly quadrupled CO 2 : FORCING AND FEEDBACK IN THE MPI-ESM-LR
journal, October 2013

  • Block, K.; Mauritsen, T.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 5, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/jame.20041

Attribution of observed historical near-surface temperature variations to anthropogenic and natural causes using CMIP5 simulations: ATTRIBUTION OF TEMPERATURES WITH CMIP5
journal, May 2013

  • Jones, Gareth S.; Stott, Peter A.; Christidis, Nikolaos
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50239

Cloud feedback mechanisms and their representation in global climate models: Cloud feedback mechanisms and their representation in GCMs
journal, May 2017

  • Ceppi, Paulo; Brient, Florent; Zelinka, Mark D.
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, Vol. 8, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/wcc.465

Tropospheric adjustment to increasing CO2: its timescale and the role of land–sea contrast
journal, October 2012


On the interpretation of inter-model spread in CMIP5 climate sensitivity estimates
journal, March 2013


On the persistent spread in snow-albedo feedback
journal, May 2013


The ocean’s role in the transient response of climate to abrupt greenhouse gas forcing
journal, September 2014


The strength of the tropical inversion and its response to climate change in 18 CMIP5 models
journal, December 2014


Regime-based evaluation of cloudiness in CMIP5 models
journal, April 2016


Effective radiative forcing from historical land use change
journal, August 2016

  • Andrews, Timothy; Betts, Richard A.; Booth, Ben B. B.
  • Climate Dynamics, Vol. 48, Issue 11-12
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00382-016-3280-7

On the relative strength of radiative feedbacks under climate variability and change
journal, November 2016


The influence of extratropical cloud phase and amount feedbacks on climate sensitivity
journal, July 2017


What can decadal variability tell us about climate feedbacks and sensitivity?
journal, February 2018


Impacts of internal variability on temperature and precipitation trends in large ensemble simulations by two climate models
journal, February 2018


Ensemble global warming simulations with idealized Antarctic meltwater input
journal, July 2018


Global ocean heat content redistribution during the 1998–2012 Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation negative phase
journal, August 2018

  • Gastineau, Guillaume; Friedman, Andrew R.; Khodri, Myriam
  • Climate Dynamics, Vol. 53, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00382-018-4387-9

Stratospheric water vapor: an important climate feedback
journal, April 2019


A refined model for the Earth’s global energy balance
journal, May 2019


Downscaling future climate change projections over Puerto Rico using a non-hydrostatic atmospheric model
journal, January 2018


Uncertainty in the 2°C warming threshold related to climate sensitivity and climate feedback
journal, December 2015


Rapid Adjustments of Cloud and Hydrological Cycle to Increasing CO2: a Review
journal, March 2015

  • Kamae, Youichi; Watanabe, Masahiro; Ogura, Tomoo
  • Current Climate Change Reports, Vol. 1, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s40641-015-0007-5

Climate Sensitivity of GFDL's CM4.0
journal, January 2020

  • Winton, M.; Adcroft, A.; Dunne, J. P.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 12, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019ms001838

Challenges and opportunities for improved understanding of regional climate dynamics
journal, January 2018

  • Collins, Matthew; Minobe, Shoshiro; Barreiro, Marcelo
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 8, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1038/s41558-017-0059-8

Anthropogenic influences on major tropical cyclone events
journal, November 2018


Impact of deep ocean mixing on the climatic mean state in the Southern Ocean
journal, September 2018


Interpretation of the Top-of-Atmosphere Energy Flux for Future Arctic Warming
journal, September 2019


Climate Comparisons and Change Projections for the Northwest Atlantic from Six CMIP5 Models
journal, June 2015


Projections of the pace of warming following an abrupt increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration
journal, September 2013


Maximum warming occurs about one decade after a carbon dioxide emission
journal, December 2014


Climate effects of non-compliant Volkswagen diesel cars
journal, April 2018

  • Tanaka, Katsumasa; Lund, Marianne T.; Aamaas, Borgar
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aab18c

The inconstancy of the transient climate response parameter under increasing CO 2
journal, November 2015

  • Gregory, J. M.; Andrews, T.; Good, P.
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 373, Issue 2054
  • DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0417

Feedbacks, climate sensitivity and the limits of linear models
journal, November 2015

  • Knutti, Reto; Rugenstein, Maria A. A.
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 373, Issue 2054
  • DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2015.0146

Interdisciplinary knowledge exchange across scales in a globally changing marine environment
journal, May 2018

  • McDonald, Karlie S.; Hobday, Alistair J.; Fulton, Elizabeth A.
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 24, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14168

Large regional shortwave forcing by anthropogenic methane informed by Jovian observations
journal, September 2018

  • Collins, William D.; Feldman, Daniel R.; Kuo, Chaincy
  • Science Advances, Vol. 4, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aas9593

Climate change adaptation and the role of fuel subsidies: An empirical bio-economic modeling study for an artisanal open-access fishery
journal, August 2019


Stability and changes in the distribution of Pipiza hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae) in Europe under projected future climate conditions
journal, September 2019


Quantifying the Influence of Jupiter on the Earth’s Orbital Cycles
journal, December 2019

  • Horner, Jonathan; Vervoort, Pam; Kane, Stephen R.
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 159, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab5365

Projected effects of declining aerosols in RCP4.5: unmasking global warming?
journal, January 2013

  • Rotstayn, L. D.; Collier, M. A.; Chrastansky, A.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-13-10883-2013

The Arctic response to remote and local forcing of black carbon
journal, January 2013

  • Sand, M.; Berntsen, T. K.; Kay, J. E.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-13-211-2013

Future changes in the stratosphere-to-troposphere ozone mass flux and the contribution from climate change and ozone recovery
journal, January 2018

  • Meul, Stefanie; Langematz, Ulrike; Kröger, Philipp
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-7721-2018

Evaluating models' response of tropical low clouds to SST forcings using CALIPSO observations
journal, January 2019

  • Cesana, Grégory; Del Genio, Anthony D.; Ackerman, Andrew S.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 19, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-2813-2019

Using CESM-RESFire to understand climate–fire–ecosystem interactions and the implications for decadal climate variability
journal, January 2020

  • Zou, Yufei; Wang, Yuhang; Qian, Yun
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 20, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-20-995-2020

Modelling past, present and future peatland carbon accumulation across the pan-Arctic region
journal, January 2017

  • Chaudhary, Nitin; Miller, Paul A.; Smith, Benjamin
  • Biogeosciences, Vol. 14, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.5194/bg-14-4023-2017

Using palaeo-climate comparisons to constrain future projections in CMIP5
journal, January 2014

  • Schmidt, G. A.; Annan, J. D.; Bartlein, P. J.
  • Climate of the Past, Vol. 10, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/cp-10-221-2014

The challenge of simulating the warmth of the mid-Miocene climatic optimum in CESM1
journal, January 2014


Long-term Surface Temperature (LoST) database as a complement for GCM preindustrial simulations
journal, January 2019

  • Cuesta-Valero, Francisco José; García-García, Almudena; Beltrami, Hugo
  • Climate of the Past, Vol. 15, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/cp-15-1099-2019

Historical and idealized climate model experiments: an intercomparison of Earth system models of intermediate complexity
journal, January 2013


Young people's burden: requirement of negative CO 2 emissions
journal, January 2017

  • Hansen, James; Sato, Makiko; Kharecha, Pushker
  • Earth System Dynamics, Vol. 8, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/esd-8-577-2017

The Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project (CFMIP) contribution to CMIP6
journal, January 2017

  • Webb, Mark J.; Andrews, Timothy; Bodas-Salcedo, Alejandro
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 10, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-10-359-2017

The NUIST Earth System Model (NESM) version 3: description and preliminary evaluation
journal, January 2018


An ensemble of AMIP simulations with prescribed land surface temperatures
journal, January 2018

  • Ackerley, Duncan; Chadwick, Robin; Dommenget, Dietmar
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 11, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-11-3865-2018

Description and evaluation of NorESM1-F: a fast version of the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM)
journal, January 2019

  • Guo, Chuncheng; Bentsen, Mats; Bethke, Ingo
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-12-343-2019

The Radiative Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (RFMIP): experimental protocol for CMIP6
journal, January 2016

  • Pincus, Robert; Forster, Piers M.; Stevens, Bjorn
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-3447-2016

The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M – Part 2: Climate response and scenario projections
journal, January 2012

  • Iversen, T.; Bentsen, M.; Bethke, I.
  • Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, Vol. 5, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmdd-5-2933-2012

First assessment of continental energy storage in CMIP5 simulations
text, January 2016

  • Cuesta-Valero, Francisco José; García-García, Almudena; Beltrami, Hugo
  • Columbia University
  • DOI: 10.7916/d8c829rj

Spatial patterns of radiative forcing and surface temperature response: Spatial Patterns of Forcing and Response
journal, June 2015

  • Shindell, Drew T.; Faluvegi, Greg; Rotstayn, Leon
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 120, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014jd022752

Dependence of global radiative feedbacks on evolving patterns of surface heat fluxes: FEEDBACKS AND SURFACE FLUXES
journal, September 2016

  • Rugenstein, Maria A. A.; Caldeira, Ken; Knutti, Reto
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 43, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016gl070907

CMIP5 models' shortwave cloud radiative response and climate sensitivity linked to the climatological Hadley cell extent: SWCRE RESPONSE AND ECS LINK TO HADLEY CELL
journal, June 2017

  • Lipat, Bernard R.; Tselioudis, George; Grise, Kevin M.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 44, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017GL073151

Cloud tuning in a coupled climate model: Impact on 20th century warming: CLOUD TUNING AND 20TH CENTURY WARMING
journal, March 2013

  • Golaz, Jean-Christophe; Horowitz, Larry W.; Levy, Hiram
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 40, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1002/grl.50232

Assessing the impact of climate change on the worldwide distribution of Dalbulus maidis (DeLong) using MaxEnt
journal, April 2019

  • Santana, Paulo A.; Kumar, Lalit; Da Silva, Ricardo S.
  • Pest Management Science, Vol. 75, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1002/ps.5379

Quantifying global climate feedbacks, responses and forcing under abrupt and gradual CO2 forcing
journal, February 2013


Climate model benchmarking with glacial and mid-Holocene climates
journal, August 2013


On the spread of changes in marine low cloud cover in climate model simulations of the 21st century
journal, September 2013


How accurately can the climate sensitivity to $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$CO2 be estimated from historical climate change?
journal, October 2019


Climate sensitivity, agricultural productivity and the social cost of carbon in FUND
journal, January 2020

  • Dayaratna, Kevin D.; McKitrick, Ross; Michaels, Patrick J.
  • Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Vol. 22, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10018-020-00263-w

Larger Sensitivity of Precipitation Extremes to Aerosol Than Greenhouse Gas Forcing in CMIP5 Models
journal, August 2018

  • Lin, Lei; Wang, Zhili; Xu, Yangyang
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018jd028821

Estimating Contributions of Sea Ice and Land Snow to Climate Feedback
journal, January 2019

  • Duan, Lei; Cao, Long; Caldeira, Ken
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 124, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018jd029093

Evaluating Climate Sensitivity to CO 2 Across Earth's History
journal, November 2018

  • Wolf, E. T.; Haqq‐Misra, J.; Toon, O. B.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 123, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018jd029262

On the Interplay Between Convective Aggregation, Surface Temperature Gradients, and Climate Sensitivity
journal, December 2018

  • Coppin, David; Bony, Sandrine
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 10, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018MS001406

Climate Sensitivity From Both Physical and Carbon Cycle Feedbacks
journal, July 2019

  • Goodwin, Philip; Williams, Richard G.; Roussenov, Vassil M.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 46, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019gl082887

Relationship of tropospheric stability to climate sensitivity and Earth’s observed radiation budget
journal, November 2017

  • Ceppi, Paulo; Gregory, Jonathan M.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 114, Issue 50
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1714308114

Quantifying stochastic uncertainty in detection time of human-caused climate signals
journal, September 2019

  • Santer, Benjamin D.; Fyfe, John C.; Solomon, Susan
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 116, Issue 40
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1904586116

Using machine learning to build temperature-based ozone parameterizations for climate sensitivity simulations
journal, October 2018

  • Nowack, Peer; Braesicke, Peter; Haigh, Joanna
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aae2be

The impact of climate mitigation measures on near term climate forcers
journal, October 2019

  • Turnock, S. T.; Smith, S.; O’Connor, F. M.
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 14, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab4222

Multiple input control strategies for robust and adaptive climate engineering in a low-order 3-box model
journal, September 2018

  • Bonetti, F.; McInnes, C.
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 474, Issue 2217
  • DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2018.0447

Solar geoengineering to limit the rate of temperature change
journal, December 2014

  • MacMartin, Douglas G.; Caldeira, Ken; Keith, David W.
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 372, Issue 2031
  • DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0134

Insights into low-latitude cloud feedbacks from high-resolution models
journal, November 2015

  • Bretherton, Christopher S.
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 373, Issue 2054
  • DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0415

Emergent Scale Invariance and Climate Sensitivity
journal, November 2018

  • Rypdal, Martin; Fredriksen, Hege-Beate; Myrvoll-Nilsen, Eirik
  • Climate, Vol. 6, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.3390/cli6040093

Characterizing half-a-degree difference: a review of methods for identifying regional climate responses to global warming targets
text, January 2017


Aerosol- and greenhouse gas-induced changes in summer rainfall and circulation in the Australasian region: a study using single-forcing climate simulations
journal, January 2012

  • Rotstayn, L. D.; Jeffrey, S. J.; Collier, M. A.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 12, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-12-6377-2012

Simulation of black carbon in snow and its climate impact in the Canadian Global Climate Model
journal, January 2015

  • Namazi, M.; von Salzen, K.; Cole, J. N. S.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 15, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-15-10887-2015

Climate responses to anthropogenic emissions of short-lived climate pollutants
journal, January 2015

  • Baker, L. H.; Collins, W. J.; Olivié, D. J. L.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 15, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-15-8201-2015

Radiative forcing in the ACCMIP historical and future climate simulations
journal, January 2012

  • Shindell, D. T.; Lamarque, J. -F.; Schulz, M.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, Vol. 12, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.5194/acpd-12-21105-2012

FRESCO-B: a fast cloud retrieval algorithm using oxygen B-band measurements from GOME-2
journal, January 2019

  • Desmons, Marine; Wang, Ping; Stammes, Piet
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Vol. 12, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/amt-12-2485-2019

Quantifying uncertainties of permafrost carbon–climate feedbacks
journal, January 2017


Multiple stressors of ocean ecosystems in the 21st century: projections with CMIP5 models
journal, January 2013


ESD Reviews: Climate feedbacks in the Earth system and prospects for their evaluation
journal, January 2019

  • Heinze, Christoph; Eyring, Veronika; Friedlingstein, Pierre
  • Earth System Dynamics, Vol. 10, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/esd-10-379-2019

The path to CAM6: coupled simulations with CAM5.4 and CAM5.5
journal, January 2018

  • Bogenschutz, Peter A.; Gettelman, Andrew; Hannay, Cecile
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 11, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-11-235-2018

Drivers of changes in stratospheric and tropospheric ozone between year 2000 and 2100
text, January 2016


Characterizing half-a-degree difference: a review of methods for identifying regional climate responses to global warming targets: Characterizing half-a-degree difference
journal, January 2017

  • James, Rachel; Washington, Richard; Schleussner, Carl-Friedrich
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, Vol. 8, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/wcc.457

Constraints on Climate and Habitability for Earth-like Exoplanets Determined from a General Circulation Model
journal, March 2017

  • Wolf, Eric T.; Shields, Aomawa L.; Kopparapu, Ravi K.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 837, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ffc

Radiative forcing in the ACCMIP historical and future climate simulations
journal, January 2013

  • Shindell, D. T.; Lamarque, J. -F.; Schulz, M.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-13-2939-2013

Future changes in the stratosphere-to-troposphere ozone mass flux and the contribution from climate change and ozone recovery
posted_content, January 2018

  • Meul, Stefanie; Langematz, Ulrike; Kroger, Philipp
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-2018-64

Is climate sensitivity related to dynamical sensitivity? A Southern Hemisphere perspective
text, January 2014

  • Grise, Kevin M.; Polvani, Lorenzo M.
  • Columbia University
  • DOI: 10.7916/d8319vrx

Impact of internal variability on climate change for the upcoming decades: analysis of the CanESM2-LE and CESM-LE large ensembles
journal, September 2019


Shortwave and longwave radiative contributions to global warming under increasing CO 2
journal, November 2014

  • Donohoe, Aaron; Armour, Kyle C.; Pendergrass, Angeline G.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, Issue 47
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1412190111

ESD Reviews: Climate feedbacks in the Earth system and prospects for their evaluation
text, January 2019


The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M – Part 2: Climate response and scenario projections
journal, January 2013

  • Iversen, T.; Bentsen, M.; Bethke, I.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 6, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-6-389-2013

Earth System Chemistry integrated Modelling (ESCiMo) with the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) version 2.51
journal, January 2016

  • Jöckel, Patrick; Tost, Holger; Pozzer, Andrea
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-1153-2016

The Impact of Stratospheric Ozone Feedbacks on Climate Sensitivity Estimates
text, January 2018


Climate change impact on a wine‐producing region using a dynamical downscaling approach: Climate parameters, bioclimatic indices and extreme indices
journal, June 2019

  • Blanco‐Ward, Daniel; Monteiro, Alexandra; Lopes, Myriam
  • International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 39, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1002/joc.6185

Past and future changes in regional crop water requirements in Northwest China
journal, December 2018

  • Song, Xiaoyan; Song, Songbai; Li, Zhi
  • Theoretical and Applied Climatology, Vol. 137, Issue 3-4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00704-018-2739-3

The Impact of Stratospheric Ozone Feedbacks on Climate Sensitivity Estimates
text, January 2018

  • Nowack, Peer; Abraham, Luke; Braesicke, P.
  • Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
  • DOI: 10.17863/cam.25519

Quantifying uncertainty from aerosol and atmospheric parameters and their impact on climate sensitivity
journal, January 2018

  • Fletcher, Christopher G.; Kravitz, Ben; Badawy, Bakr
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-17529-2018

Multiple stressors of ocean ecosystems in the 21st century: projections with CMIP5 models
journal, January 2013


The Beijing Climate Center Climate System Model (BCC-CSM): the main progress from CMIP5 to CMIP6
journal, January 2019

  • Wu, Tongwen; Lu, Yixiong; Fang, Yongjie
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-12-1573-2019