skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (GeoMIP6): Simulation design and preliminary results

Abstract

We present a suite of new climate model experiment designs for the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). This set of experiments, named GeoMIP6 (to be consistent with the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6), builds on the previous GeoMIP project simulations, and has been expanded to address several further important topics, including key uncertainties in extreme events, the use of geoengineering as part of a portfolio of responses to climate change, and the relatively new idea of cirrus cloud thinning to allow more long wave radiation to escape to space. We discuss experiment designs, as well as the rationale for those designs, showing preliminary results from individual models when available. We also introduce a new feature, called the GeoMIP Testbed, which provides a platform for simulations that will be performed with a few models and subsequently assessed to determine whether the proposed experiment designs will be adopted as core (Tier 1) GeoMIP experiments. In conclusion, this is meant to encourage various stakeholders to propose new targeted experiments that address their key open science questions, with the goal of making GeoMIP more relevant to a broader set of communities.

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2];  [3];  [4]; ORCiD logo [5];  [6];  [7];  [6];  [8]; ORCiD logo [9];  [10];  [11]; ORCiD logo [12];  [13];  [14];  [1];  [15]
  1. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
  2. Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, NJ (United States)
  3. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO (United States)
  4. Laboratoire de Meteorologie Dynamique, Paris (France)
  5. NOAA Earth System Research Lab. and Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO (United States)
  6. Inst. of Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam (Germany)
  7. Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter (United Kingdom)
  8. Climate Inst., Washington, DC (United States)
  9. Univ. of Oslo (Norway)
  10. Beijing Normal Univ., Beijing (China)
  11. Max Planck Inst. for Meterology, Hamburg (Germany)
  12. Univ. of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW (Australia)
  13. Center for International Climate and Environmental Research, Oslo (Norway)
  14. Yale Univ., New Haven, CT (United States)
  15. Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama (Japan)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1228343
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-109342
Journal ID: ISSN 1991-9603; 400403809
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-76RL01830
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Geoscientific Model Development (Online)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Geoscientific Model Development (Online); Journal Volume: 8; Journal Issue: 10; Journal ID: ISSN 1991-9603
Publisher:
European Geosciences Union
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
58 GEOSCIENCES

Citation Formats

Kravitz, Benjamin S., Robock, Alan, Tilmes, S., Boucher, Olivier, English, J. M., Irvine, Peter J., Jones, Andrew, Lawrence, M. G., MacCracken, Michael C., Muri, Helene O., Moore, John C., Niemeier, Ulrike, Phipps, Steven J., Sillmann, Jana, Storelvmo, Trude, Wang, Hailong, and Watanabe, Shingo. The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (GeoMIP6): Simulation design and preliminary results. United States: N. p., 2015. Web. doi:10.5194/gmd-8-3379-2015.
Kravitz, Benjamin S., Robock, Alan, Tilmes, S., Boucher, Olivier, English, J. M., Irvine, Peter J., Jones, Andrew, Lawrence, M. G., MacCracken, Michael C., Muri, Helene O., Moore, John C., Niemeier, Ulrike, Phipps, Steven J., Sillmann, Jana, Storelvmo, Trude, Wang, Hailong, & Watanabe, Shingo. The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (GeoMIP6): Simulation design and preliminary results. United States. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3379-2015
Kravitz, Benjamin S., Robock, Alan, Tilmes, S., Boucher, Olivier, English, J. M., Irvine, Peter J., Jones, Andrew, Lawrence, M. G., MacCracken, Michael C., Muri, Helene O., Moore, John C., Niemeier, Ulrike, Phipps, Steven J., Sillmann, Jana, Storelvmo, Trude, Wang, Hailong, and Watanabe, Shingo. Tue . "The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (GeoMIP6): Simulation design and preliminary results". United States. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3379-2015. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1228343.
@article{osti_1228343,
title = {The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (GeoMIP6): Simulation design and preliminary results},
author = {Kravitz, Benjamin S. and Robock, Alan and Tilmes, S. and Boucher, Olivier and English, J. M. and Irvine, Peter J. and Jones, Andrew and Lawrence, M. G. and MacCracken, Michael C. and Muri, Helene O. and Moore, John C. and Niemeier, Ulrike and Phipps, Steven J. and Sillmann, Jana and Storelvmo, Trude and Wang, Hailong and Watanabe, Shingo},
abstractNote = {We present a suite of new climate model experiment designs for the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). This set of experiments, named GeoMIP6 (to be consistent with the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6), builds on the previous GeoMIP project simulations, and has been expanded to address several further important topics, including key uncertainties in extreme events, the use of geoengineering as part of a portfolio of responses to climate change, and the relatively new idea of cirrus cloud thinning to allow more long wave radiation to escape to space. We discuss experiment designs, as well as the rationale for those designs, showing preliminary results from individual models when available. We also introduce a new feature, called the GeoMIP Testbed, which provides a platform for simulations that will be performed with a few models and subsequently assessed to determine whether the proposed experiment designs will be adopted as core (Tier 1) GeoMIP experiments. In conclusion, this is meant to encourage various stakeholders to propose new targeted experiments that address their key open science questions, with the goal of making GeoMIP more relevant to a broader set of communities.},
doi = {10.5194/gmd-8-3379-2015},
journal = {Geoscientific Model Development (Online)},
number = 10,
volume = 8,
place = {United States},
year = {2015},
month = {10}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 17 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Sea-salt injections into the low-latitude marine boundary layer: The transient response in three Earth system models: SEA-SALT CLIMATE ENGINEERING IN THREE ESMS
journal, November 2013

  • Alterskjaer, Kari; Kristjánsson, Jón Egill; Boucher, Olivier
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD020432

Parameterization of cirrus cloud formation in large-scale models: Homogeneous nucleation
journal, January 2008

  • Barahona, Donifan; Nenes, Athanasios
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 113, Issue D11
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007JD009355

Parameterizing the competition between homogeneous and heterogeneous freezing in cirrus cloud formation – monodisperse ice nuclei
journal, January 2009


Arctic cryosphere response in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project G3 and G4 scenarios: ARCTIC RESPONSE TO G3 AND G4 IN GEOMIP
journal, February 2014

  • Berdahl, Mira; Robock, Alan; Ji, Duoying
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD020627

Reversibility in an Earth System model in response to CO 2 concentration changes
journal, May 2012


A comparison of temperature and precipitation responses to different Earth radiation management geoengineering schemes
journal, September 2015

  • Crook, J. A.; Jackson, L. S.; Osprey, S. M.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 120, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015JD023269

Regional climate changes as simulated in time-slice experiments
journal, December 1995

  • Cubasch, U.; Waszkewitz, J.; Hegerl, G.
  • Climatic Change, Vol. 31, Issue 2-4
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF01095150

A multimodel examination of climate extremes in an idealized geoengineering experiment
journal, April 2014

  • Curry, Charles L.; Sillmann, Jana; Bronaugh, David
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD020648

Preferential cooling of hot extremes from cropland albedo management
journal, June 2014

  • Davin, Edouard L.; Seneviratne, Sonia I.; Ciais, Philippe
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, Issue 27
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1317323111

Can crop albedo be increased through the modification of leaf trichomes, and could this cool regional climate?: A letter
journal, November 2010

  • Doughty, Christopher E.; Field, Christopher B.; McMillan, Andrew M. S.
  • Climatic Change, Vol. 104, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10584-010-9936-0

Microphysical simulations of sulfur burdens from stratospheric sulfur geoengineering
journal, January 2012

  • English, J. M.; Toon, O. B.; Mills, M. J.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 12, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-12-4775-2012

Climate–Carbon Cycle Feedback Analysis: Results from the C 4 MIP Model Intercomparison
journal, July 2006

  • Friedlingstein, P.; Cox, P.; Betts, R.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3800.1

Stratospheric geoengineering impacts on El Niño/Southern Oscillation
journal, January 2015


Global Indirect Radiative Forcing Caused by Aerosols
book, January 2009

  • Haywood, Jim; Donner, Leo; Jones, Andy
  • Clouds in the Perturbed Climate System: Their Relationship to Energy Balance, Atmospheric Dynamics, and Precipitation
  • DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262012874.003.0019

The impact of geoengineering aerosols on stratospheric temperature and ozone
journal, October 2009


Forcings and feedbacks in the GeoMIP ensemble for a reduction in solar irradiance and increase in CO 2 : GeoMIP: Radiative forcings and feedbacks
journal, May 2014

  • Huneeus, Nicolas; Boucher, Olivier; Alterskjaer, Kari
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD021110

The Community Earth System Model: A Framework for Collaborative Research
journal, September 2013

  • Hurrell, James W.; Holland, M. M.; Gent, P. R.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 94, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00121.1

Climatic effects of surface albedo geoengineering: SURFACE ALBEDO GEOENGINEERING
journal, December 2011

  • Irvine, Peter J.; Ridgwell, Andy; Lunt, Daniel J.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 116, Issue D24
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011JD016281

The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP): a control perspective
journal, June 2012

  • Jarvis, Andrew; Leedal, David
  • Atmospheric Science Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/asl.387

The impact of abrupt suspension of solar radiation management (termination effect) in experiment G2 of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP): THE TERMINATION EFFECT IN GEOMIP G2
journal, September 2013

  • Jones, Andy; Haywood, Jim M.; Alterskjaer, Kari
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50762

Potential climate engineering effectiveness and side effects during a high carbon dioxide-emission scenario
journal, February 2014

  • Keller, David P.; Feng, Ellias Y.; Oschlies, Andreas
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 5, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4304

The hydrological sensitivity to global warming and solar geoengineering derived from thermodynamic constraints
journal, January 2015

  • Kleidon, Axel; Kravitz, Ben; Renner, Maik
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 42, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014GL062589

Aerosol microphysics modules in the framework of the ECHAM5 climate model – intercomparison under stratospheric conditions
journal, January 2009

  • Kokkola, H.; Hommel, R.; Kazil, J.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 2, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-2-97-2009

The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)
journal, January 2011

  • Kravitz, Ben; Robock, Alan; Boucher, Olivier
  • Atmospheric Science Letters, Vol. 12, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/asl.316

Sea spray geoengineering experiments in the geoengineering model intercomparison project (GeoMIP): Experimental design and preliminary results: GEOMIP MARINE CLOUD BRIGHTENING
journal, October 2013

  • Kravitz, Ben; Forster, Piers M.; Jones, Andy
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50856

An energetic perspective on hydrological cycle changes in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project: GeoMIP ENERGETIC PERSPECTIVE
journal, December 2013

  • Kravitz, Ben; Rasch, Philip J.; Forster, Piers M.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD020502

Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP): GEOMIP MODEL RESPONSE
journal, August 2013

  • Kravitz, Ben; Caldeira, Ken; Boucher, Olivier
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50646

Future Directions in Simulating Solar Geoengineering
journal, August 2014

  • Kravitz, Ben; Robock, Alan; Boucher, Olivier
  • Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, Vol. 95, Issue 31
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014EO310010

Explicit feedback and the management of uncertainty in meeting climate objectives with solar geoengineering
journal, April 2014


The radiative forcing potential of different climate geoengineering options
journal, January 2009


An observationally based evaluation of cloud ice water in CMIP3 and CMIP5 GCMs and contemporary reanalyses using contemporary satellite data: CMIP3, CMIP5, IWC, CloudSat, GCM
journal, August 2012

  • Li, J. -L. F.; Waliser, D. E.; Chen, W. -T.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 117, Issue D16
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012JD017640

Sensitivity studies of dust ice nuclei effect on cirrus clouds with the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5
journal, January 2012


Biogeophysical impacts of cropland management changes on climate
journal, January 2006

  • Lobell, D. B.; Bala, G.; Duffy, P. B.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 33, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1029/2005GL025492

Dynamics of the coupled human–climate system resulting from closed-loop control of solar geoengineering
journal, June 2013


On solar geoengineering and climate uncertainty
journal, September 2015

  • MacMartin, Douglas G.; Kravitz, Ben; Rasch, Philip J.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 42, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015GL065391

Climate Model Intercomparisons: Preparing for the Next Phase
journal, March 2014

  • Meehl, Gerald A.; Moss, Richard; Taylor, Karl E.
  • Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, Vol. 95, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014EO090001

Modification of cirrus clouds to reduce global warming
journal, October 2009


The climatic effects of modifying cirrus clouds in a climate engineering framework
journal, April 2014

  • Muri, H.; Kristjánsson, J. E.; Storelvmo, T.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD021063

What is the limit of climate engineering by stratospheric injection of SO 2 ?
journal, January 2015


The dependency of geoengineered sulfate aerosol on the emission strategy
journal, October 2010

  • Niemeier, U.; Schmidt, H.; Timmreck, C.
  • Atmospheric Science Letters, Vol. 12, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/asl.304

Solar irradiance reduction via climate engineering: Impact of different techniques on the energy balance and the hydrological cycle: CLIMATIC IMPACT OF DIFFERENT SRM METHODS
journal, November 2013

  • Niemeier, U.; Schmidt, H.; Alterskjaer, K.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD020445

A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways
journal, October 2013


A model of the quasi-biennial oscillation on an equatorial beta-plane
journal, April 1982

  • Plumb, R. Alan; Bell, Robert C.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 108, Issue 456
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.49710845604

Tackling Regional Climate Change By Leaf Albedo Bio-geoengineering
journal, January 2009

  • Ridgwell, Andy; Singarayer, Joy S.; Hetherington, Alistair M.
  • Current Biology, Vol. 19, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.12.025

Configuration and assessment of the GISS ModelE2 contributions to the CMIP5 archive: GISS MODEL-E2 CMIP5 SIMULATIONS
journal, March 2014

  • Schmidt, Gavin A.; Kelley, Max; Nazarenko, Larissa
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013MS000265

Regional climate change mitigation with crops: context and assessment
journal, September 2012

  • Singarayer, J. S.; Davies-Barnard, T.
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 370, Issue 1974
  • DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2012.0010

Assessing the benefits of crop albedo bio-geoengineering
journal, October 2009


The aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM
journal, January 2005

  • Stier, P.; Feichter, J.; Kinne, S.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 5, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-5-1125-2005

Cirrus cloud susceptibility to the injection of ice nuclei in the upper troposphere
journal, March 2014

  • Storelvmo, T.; Herger, N.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD020816

Cirrus cloud seeding has potential to cool climate: CIRRUS CLOUD SEEDING CAN COOL CLIMATE
journal, January 2013

  • Storelvmo, T.; Kristjansson, J. E.; Muri, H.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 40, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012GL054201

Cirrus cloud seeding: a climate engineering mechanism with reduced side effects?
journal, December 2014

  • Storelvmo, T.; Boos, W. R.; Herger, N.
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 372, Issue 2031
  • DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0116

The hydrological impact of geoengineering in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP): THE HYDROLOGIC IMPACT OF GEOENGINEERING
journal, October 2013

  • Tilmes, Simone; Fasullo, John; Lamarque, Jean-Francois
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50868

A new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment designed for climate and chemistry models
journal, January 2015

  • Tilmes, S.; Mills, M. J.; Niemeier, U.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 8, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-8-43-2015

Evaluation of the carbon cycle components in the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM)
journal, January 2013

  • Tjiputra, J. F.; Roelandt, C.; Bentsen, M.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 6, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-6-301-2013

A Combined Mitigation/Geoengineering Approach to Climate Stabilization
journal, October 2006


Solar radiation management impacts on agriculture in China: A case study in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)
journal, July 2014

  • Xia, Lili; Robock, Alan; Cole, Jason
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD020630

Impacts, effectiveness and regional inequalities of the GeoMIP G1 to G4 solar radiation management scenarios
journal, June 2015


    Works referencing / citing this record:

    How geoengineering scenarios frame assumptions and create expectations
    journal, January 2018

    • Talberg, Anita; Thomas, Sebastian; Christoff, Peter
    • Sustainability Science, Vol. 13, Issue 4
    • DOI: 10.1007/s11625-018-0527-8

    Land radiative management as contributor to regional-scale climate adaptation and mitigation
    journal, January 2018

    • Seneviratne, Sonia I.; Phipps, Steven J.; Pitman, Andrew J.
    • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 11, Issue 2
    • DOI: 10.1038/s41561-017-0057-5

    A round Earth for climate models
    journal, September 2019

    • Prather, Michael J.; Hsu, Juno C.
    • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 116, Issue 39
    • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1908198116

    How geoengineering scenarios frame assumptions and create expectations
    journal, January 2018

    • Talberg, Anita; Thomas, Sebastian; Christoff, Peter
    • Sustainability Science, Vol. 13, Issue 4
    • DOI: 10.1007/s11625-018-0527-8

    Land radiative management as contributor to regional-scale climate adaptation and mitigation
    journal, January 2018

    • Seneviratne, Sonia I.; Phipps, Steven J.; Pitman, Andrew J.
    • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 11, Issue 2
    • DOI: 10.1038/s41561-017-0057-5

    A round Earth for climate models
    journal, September 2019

    • Prather, Michael J.; Hsu, Juno C.
    • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 116, Issue 39
    • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1908198116

    Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: More research needed
    journal, December 2016


    Can climate‐effective land management reduce regional warming?
    journal, February 2017

    • Hirsch, A. L.; Wilhelm, M.; Davin, E. L.
    • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 122, Issue 4
    • DOI: 10.1002/2016jd026125

    Quantifying and Comparing Effects of Climate Engineering Methods on the Earth System
    journal, February 2018

    • Sonntag, Sebastian; Ferrer González, Miriam; Ilyina, Tatiana
    • Earth's Future, Vol. 6, Issue 2
    • DOI: 10.1002/2017ef000620

    Evoking equity as a rationale for solar geoengineering research? Scrutinizing emerging expert visions of equity
    journal, September 2017

    • Flegal, Jane A.; Gupta, Aarti
    • International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Vol. 18, Issue 1
    • DOI: 10.1007/s10784-017-9377-6

    Tools of the trade: practices and politics of researching the future in climate engineering
    journal, May 2019


    The Effects of Solar Radiation Management on the Carbon Cycle
    journal, February 2018


    Increasing Arctic Sea Ice Albedo Using Localized Reversible Geoengineering
    journal, June 2018

    • Field, L.; Ivanova, D.; Bhattacharyya, S.
    • Earth's Future, Vol. 6, Issue 6
    • DOI: 10.1029/2018ef000820

    Impacts of Sulfate Geoengineering on Rice Yield in China: Results From a Multimodel Ensemble
    journal, April 2019


    The Response of Permafrost and High‐Latitude Ecosystems Under Large‐Scale Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Its Termination
    journal, June 2019

    • Lee, Hanna; Ekici, Altug; Tjiputra, Jerry
    • Earth's Future, Vol. 7, Issue 6
    • DOI: 10.1029/2018ef001146

    Climate Response to Pulse Versus Sustained Stratospheric Aerosol Forcing
    journal, August 2019

    • Duan, Lei; Cao, Long; Bala, Govindasamy
    • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 46, Issue 15
    • DOI: 10.1029/2019gl083701

    Evaluation of CNRM Earth System Model, CNRM‐ESM2‐1: Role of Earth System Processes in Present‐Day and Future Climate
    journal, December 2019

    • Séférian, Roland; Nabat, Pierre; Michou, Martine
    • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 11, Issue 12
    • DOI: 10.1029/2019ms001791

    Coastal sea level rise with warming above 2 °C
    journal, November 2016

    • Jevrejeva, Svetlana; Jackson, Luke P.; Riva, Riccardo E. M.
    • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 113, Issue 47
    • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1605312113

    Flood damage costs under the sea level rise with warming of 1.5 °C and 2 °C
    journal, July 2018

    • Jevrejeva, S.; Jackson, L. P.; Grinsted, A.
    • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 7
    • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aacc76

    The G4Foam Experiment: global climate impacts of regional ocean albedo modification
    journal, January 2017

    • Gabriel, Corey J.; Robock, Alan; Xia, Lili
    • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 17, Issue 1
    • DOI: 10.5194/acp-17-595-2017

    Extreme temperature and precipitation response to solar dimming and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering
    journal, January 2018

    • Ji, Duoying; Fang, Songsong; Curry, Charles L.
    • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 14
    • DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-10133-2018

    Geoengineering as a design problem
    journal, January 2015

    • Kravitz, B.; MacMartin, D. G.; Wang, H.
    • Earth System Dynamics Discussions, Vol. 6, Issue 2
    • DOI: 10.5194/esdd-6-1635-2015

    The Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Model Intercomparison Project (ISA-MIP): motivation and experimental design
    journal, January 2018

    • Timmreck, Claudia; Mann, Graham W.; Aquila, Valentina
    • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 11, Issue 7
    • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-11-2581-2018

    The Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP) contribution to CMIP6: investigating the causes and consequences of polar amplification
    journal, January 2019

    • Smith, Doug M.; Screen, James A.; Deser, Clara
    • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 3
    • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-12-1139-2019

    Machine dependence and reproducibility for coupled climate simulations: the HadGEM3-GC3.1 CMIP Preindustrial simulation
    journal, January 2020

    • Guarino, Maria-Vittoria; Sime, Louise C.; Schroeder, David
    • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 13, Issue 1
    • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-13-139-2020

    The CMIP6 Data Request (DREQ, version 01.00.31)
    journal, January 2020

    • Juckes, Martin; Taylor, Karl E.; Durack, Paul J.
    • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 13, Issue 1
    • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-13-201-2020

    The Model Intercomparison Project on the climatic response to Volcanic forcing (VolMIP): experimental design and forcing input data for CMIP6
    journal, January 2016

    • Zanchettin, Davide; Khodri, Myriam; Timmreck, Claudia
    • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 8
    • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-2701-2016

    Stopping the flood: could we use targeted geoengineering to mitigate sea level rise?
    journal, January 2018