DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Quantification of the transferability of a designed protein specificity switch reveals extensive epistasis in molecular recognition

Abstract

Re-engineering protein–protein recognition is an important route to dissecting and controlling complex interaction networks. Experimental approaches have used the strategy of “second-site suppressors,” where a functional interaction is inferred between two proteins if a mutation in one protein can be compensated by a mutation in the second. Mimicking this strategy, computational design has been applied successfully to change protein recognition specificity by predicting such sets of compensatory mutations in protein–protein interfaces. To extend this approach, it would be advantageous to be able to “transplant” existing engineered and experimentally validated specificity changes to other homologous protein–protein complexes. Here, we test this strategy by designing a pair of mutations that modulates peptide recognition specificity in the Syntrophin PDZ domain, confirming the designed interaction biochemically and structurally, and then transplanting the mutations into the context of five related PDZ domain–peptide complexes. We find a wide range of energetic effects of identical mutations in structurally similar positions, revealing a dramatic context dependence (epistasis) of designed mutations in homologous protein–protein interactions. To better understand the structural basis of this context dependence, we apply a structure-based computational model that recapitulates these energetic effects and we use this model to make and validate forward predictions. The contextmore » dependence of these mutations is captured by computational predictions, our results both highlight the considerable difficulties in designing protein–protein interactions and provide challenging benchmark cases for the development of improved protein modeling and design methods that accurately account for the context.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Univ. of California, San Francisco, CA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1221843
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-05CH11231
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 111; Journal Issue: 43; Journal ID: ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher:
National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC (United States)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES; computational design; recognition specificity; promiscuity; protein interaction domains; interface evolution

Citation Formats

Melero, Cristina, Ollikainen, Noah, Harwood, Ian, Karpiak, Joel, and Kortemme, Tanja. Quantification of the transferability of a designed protein specificity switch reveals extensive epistasis in molecular recognition. United States: N. p., 2014. Web. doi:10.1073/pnas.1410624111.
Melero, Cristina, Ollikainen, Noah, Harwood, Ian, Karpiak, Joel, & Kortemme, Tanja. Quantification of the transferability of a designed protein specificity switch reveals extensive epistasis in molecular recognition. United States. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1410624111
Melero, Cristina, Ollikainen, Noah, Harwood, Ian, Karpiak, Joel, and Kortemme, Tanja. Mon . "Quantification of the transferability of a designed protein specificity switch reveals extensive epistasis in molecular recognition". United States. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1410624111. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1221843.
@article{osti_1221843,
title = {Quantification of the transferability of a designed protein specificity switch reveals extensive epistasis in molecular recognition},
author = {Melero, Cristina and Ollikainen, Noah and Harwood, Ian and Karpiak, Joel and Kortemme, Tanja},
abstractNote = {Re-engineering protein–protein recognition is an important route to dissecting and controlling complex interaction networks. Experimental approaches have used the strategy of “second-site suppressors,” where a functional interaction is inferred between two proteins if a mutation in one protein can be compensated by a mutation in the second. Mimicking this strategy, computational design has been applied successfully to change protein recognition specificity by predicting such sets of compensatory mutations in protein–protein interfaces. To extend this approach, it would be advantageous to be able to “transplant” existing engineered and experimentally validated specificity changes to other homologous protein–protein complexes. Here, we test this strategy by designing a pair of mutations that modulates peptide recognition specificity in the Syntrophin PDZ domain, confirming the designed interaction biochemically and structurally, and then transplanting the mutations into the context of five related PDZ domain–peptide complexes. We find a wide range of energetic effects of identical mutations in structurally similar positions, revealing a dramatic context dependence (epistasis) of designed mutations in homologous protein–protein interactions. To better understand the structural basis of this context dependence, we apply a structure-based computational model that recapitulates these energetic effects and we use this model to make and validate forward predictions. The context dependence of these mutations is captured by computational predictions, our results both highlight the considerable difficulties in designing protein–protein interactions and provide challenging benchmark cases for the development of improved protein modeling and design methods that accurately account for the context.},
doi = {10.1073/pnas.1410624111},
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
number = 43,
volume = 111,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Oct 13 00:00:00 EDT 2014},
month = {Mon Oct 13 00:00:00 EDT 2014}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 16 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Protein modules and signalling networks
journal, February 1995


SMART 7: recent updates to the protein domain annotation resource
journal, November 2011

  • Letunic, I.; Doerks, T.; Bork, P.
  • Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 40, Issue D1
  • DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr931

Protein Interaction Networks by Proteome Peptide Scanning
journal, January 2004


PDZ Domain Binding Selectivity Is Optimized Across the Mouse Proteome
journal, July 2007


A motif-based profile scanning approach for genome-wide prediction of signaling pathways
journal, April 2001

  • Yaffe, Michael B.; Leparc, German G.; Lai, Jack
  • Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 19, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1038/86737

Optimization of specificity in a cellular protein interaction network by negative selection
journal, December 2003

  • Zarrinpar, Ali; Park, Sang-Hyun; Lim, Wendell A.
  • Nature, Vol. 426, Issue 6967
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature02178

Protein-Protein Interaction Affinity Plays a Crucial Role in Controlling the Sho1p-Mediated Signal Transduction Pathway in Yeast
journal, June 2004


Computational redesign of protein-protein interaction specificity
journal, March 2004

  • Kortemme, Tanja; Joachimiak, Lukasz A.; Bullock, Alex N.
  • Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, Vol. 11, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1038/nsmb749

Computational Design of a New Hydrogen Bond Network and at Least a 300-fold Specificity Switch at a Protein−Protein Interface
journal, August 2006

  • Joachimiak, Lukasz A.; Kortemme, Tanja; Stoddard, Barry L.
  • Journal of Molecular Biology, Vol. 361, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.05.022

Control of protein signaling using a computationally designed GTPase/GEF orthogonal pair
journal, March 2012

  • Kapp, G. T.; Liu, S.; Stein, A.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 109, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1114487109

Computational design of second-site suppressor mutations at protein-protein interfaces
journal, October 2009

  • Sammond, Deanne W.; Eletr, Ziad M.; Purbeck, Carrie
  • Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, Vol. 78, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/prot.22631

A Specificity Map for the PDZ Domain Family
journal, September 2008


The spatial architecture of protein function and adaptation
journal, October 2012

  • McLaughlin Jr, Richard N.; Poelwijk, Frank J.; Raman, Arjun
  • Nature, Vol. 491, Issue 7422
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature11500

New algorithms and an in silico benchmark for computational enzyme design
journal, December 2006

  • Zanghellini, Alexandre; Jiang, Lin; Wollacott, Andrew M.
  • Protein Science, Vol. 15, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1110/ps.062353106

Computation-Guided Backbone Grafting of a Discontinuous Motif onto a Protein Scaffold
journal, October 2011


Recognition of Unique Carboxyl-Terminal Motifs by Distinct PDZ Domains
journal, January 1997


Role of conformational sampling in computing mutation-induced changes in protein structure and stability
journal, December 2010

  • Kellogg, Elizabeth H.; Leaver-Fay, Andrew; Baker, David
  • Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, Vol. 79, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/prot.22921

A Smoothed Backbone-Dependent Rotamer Library for Proteins Derived from Adaptive Kernel Density Estimates and Regressions
journal, June 2011


Pervasive Cryptic Epistasis in Molecular Evolution
journal, October 2010


Systematic Variation of Amino Acid Substitutions for Stringent Assessment of Pairwise Covariation
journal, May 2003


Strong Epistatic Interactions within a Single Protein
journal, March 2014

  • Parera, Mariona; Martinez, Miguel Angel
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol. 31, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msu113

Additivity of mutational effects in proteins
journal, September 1990


From The Cover: The modular architecture of protein-protein binding interfaces
journal, December 2004

  • Reichmann, D.; Rahat, O.; Albeck, S.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 102, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0407280102

Enzyme Promiscuity: A Mechanistic and Evolutionary Perspective
journal, June 2010


A Despecialization Step Underlying Evolution of a Family of Serine Proteases
journal, August 2003


Evolution of Hormone-Receptor Complexity by Molecular Exploitation
journal, April 2006


A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein-protein complexes
journal, October 2002

  • Kortemme, T.; Baker, D.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 99, Issue 22
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.202485799

An Orientation-dependent Hydrogen Bonding Potential Improves Prediction of Specificity and Structure for Proteins and Protein–Protein Complexes
journal, February 2003


Works referencing / citing this record:

Epistasis in protein evolution: Epistasis in Protein Evolution
journal, February 2016

  • Starr, Tyler N.; Thornton, Joseph W.
  • Protein Science, Vol. 25, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1002/pro.2897

Ultrahigh specificity in a network of computationally designed protein-interaction pairs
journal, December 2018


Residue proximity information and protein model discrimination using saturation-suppressor mutagenesis
journal, December 2015

  • Sahoo, Anusmita; Khare, Shruti; Devanarayanan, Sivasankar
  • eLife, Vol. 4
  • DOI: 10.7554/elife.09532

Structural Perspectives on the Evolutionary Expansion of Unique Protein-Protein Binding Sites
journal, September 2015

  • Goncearenco, Alexander; Shaytan, Alexey K.; Shoemaker, Benjamin A.
  • Biophysical Journal, Vol. 109, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.06.056

Coupling Protein Side-Chain and Backbone Flexibility Improves the Re-design of Protein-Ligand Specificity
journal, September 2015


Residue proximity information and protein model discrimination using saturation-suppressor mutagenesis
journal, December 2015

  • Sahoo, Anusmita; Khare, Shruti; Devanarayanan, Sivasankar
  • eLife, Vol. 4
  • DOI: 10.7554/elife.09532