DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Reply to “Comment on ‘Optically pumped spin-exchange polarized-electron source’ ”

Abstract

In the proceeding Comment [1] on our recent report of a Rb spin-exchange polarized-electron source [2], Williams et al. contend: (a) that our source is poorly characterized compared with modern GaAs sources, (b) that we have overstated the difficulties of using GaAs photoemission sources, and (c) that our explanation of various physics issues related to the source's operating principles are not cogent.

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [2];  [3];  [2]
  1. Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA (United States)
  2. Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE (United States). Department of Physics and Astronomy
  3. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States). Physics Division
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1221411
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-15-21953
Journal ID: ISSN 1050-2947; PLRAAN; TRN: US1600369
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC52-06NA25396
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Physical Review. A
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 91; Journal Issue: 5; Journal ID: ISSN 1050-2947
Publisher:
American Physical Society (APS)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
74 ATOMIC AND MOLECULAR PHYSICS

Citation Formats

Pirbhai, M., Knepper, J., Litaker, E. T., Tupa, D., and Gay, T. J. Reply to “Comment on ‘Optically pumped spin-exchange polarized-electron source’ ”. United States: N. p., 2015. Web. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.91.056704.
Pirbhai, M., Knepper, J., Litaker, E. T., Tupa, D., & Gay, T. J. Reply to “Comment on ‘Optically pumped spin-exchange polarized-electron source’ ”. United States. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.91.056704
Pirbhai, M., Knepper, J., Litaker, E. T., Tupa, D., and Gay, T. J. Tue . "Reply to “Comment on ‘Optically pumped spin-exchange polarized-electron source’ ”". United States. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.91.056704. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1221411.
@article{osti_1221411,
title = {Reply to “Comment on ‘Optically pumped spin-exchange polarized-electron source’ ”},
author = {Pirbhai, M. and Knepper, J. and Litaker, E. T. and Tupa, D. and Gay, T. J.},
abstractNote = {In the proceeding Comment [1] on our recent report of a Rb spin-exchange polarized-electron source [2], Williams et al. contend: (a) that our source is poorly characterized compared with modern GaAs sources, (b) that we have overstated the difficulties of using GaAs photoemission sources, and (c) that our explanation of various physics issues related to the source's operating principles are not cogent.},
doi = {10.1103/PhysRevA.91.056704},
journal = {Physical Review. A},
number = 5,
volume = 91,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue May 26 00:00:00 EDT 2015},
month = {Tue May 26 00:00:00 EDT 2015}
}