skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Shape measurement biases from underfitting and ellipticity gradients

Abstract

With this study, precision weak gravitational lensing experiments require measurements of galaxy shapes accurate to <1 part in 1000. We investigate measurement biases, noted by Voigt and Bridle (2009) and Melchior et al. (2009), that are common to shape measurement methodologies that rely upon fitting elliptical-isophote galaxy models to observed data. The first bias arises when the true galaxy shapes do not match the models being fit. We show that this "underfitting bias" is due, at root, to these methods' attempts to use information at high spatial frequencies that has been destroyed by the convolution with the point-spread function (PSF) and/or by sampling. We propose a new shape-measurement technique that is explicitly confined to observable regions of k-space. A second bias arises for galaxies whose ellipticity varies with radius. For most shape-measurement methods, such galaxies are subject to "ellipticity gradient bias". We show how to reduce such biases by factors of 20–100 within the new shape-measurement method. The resulting shear estimator has multiplicative errors < 1 part in 103 for high-S/N images, even for highly asymmetric galaxies. Without any training or recalibration, the new method obtains Q = 3000 in the GREAT08 Challenge of blind shear reconstruction on low-noise galaxies,more » several times better than any previous method.« less

Authors:
 [1]
  1. Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP)
OSTI Identifier:
1203556
Grant/Contract Number:  
FG02-95ER40893
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 406; Journal Issue: 4; Journal ID: ISSN 0035-8711
Publisher:
Royal Astronomical Society
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS; measurement biases; gravitational lensing; data analysis

Citation Formats

Bernstein, Gary M. Shape measurement biases from underfitting and ellipticity gradients. United States: N. p., 2010. Web. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16883.x.
Bernstein, Gary M. Shape measurement biases from underfitting and ellipticity gradients. United States. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16883.x
Bernstein, Gary M. Sat . "Shape measurement biases from underfitting and ellipticity gradients". United States. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16883.x. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1203556.
@article{osti_1203556,
title = {Shape measurement biases from underfitting and ellipticity gradients},
author = {Bernstein, Gary M.},
abstractNote = {With this study, precision weak gravitational lensing experiments require measurements of galaxy shapes accurate to <1 part in 1000. We investigate measurement biases, noted by Voigt and Bridle (2009) and Melchior et al. (2009), that are common to shape measurement methodologies that rely upon fitting elliptical-isophote galaxy models to observed data. The first bias arises when the true galaxy shapes do not match the models being fit. We show that this "underfitting bias" is due, at root, to these methods' attempts to use information at high spatial frequencies that has been destroyed by the convolution with the point-spread function (PSF) and/or by sampling. We propose a new shape-measurement technique that is explicitly confined to observable regions of k-space. A second bias arises for galaxies whose ellipticity varies with radius. For most shape-measurement methods, such galaxies are subject to "ellipticity gradient bias". We show how to reduce such biases by factors of 20–100 within the new shape-measurement method. The resulting shear estimator has multiplicative errors < 1 part in 103 for high-S/N images, even for highly asymmetric galaxies. Without any training or recalibration, the new method obtains Q = 3000 in the GREAT08 Challenge of blind shear reconstruction on low-noise galaxies, several times better than any previous method.},
doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16883.x},
journal = {Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},
number = 4,
volume = 406,
place = {United States},
year = {2010},
month = {8}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 53 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Systematic bias in cosmic shear: extending the Fisher matrix
journal, November 2008


Shapes and Shears, Stars and Smears: Optimal Measurements for Weak Lensing
journal, February 2002

  • Bernstein, G. M.; Jarvis, M.
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 123, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/338085

Modal decomposition of astronomical images with application to shapelets
journal, October 2004


Handbook for the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for cosmological lensing
journal, March 2009

  • Bridle, Sarah; Shawe-Taylor, John; Amara, Adam
  • The Annals of Applied Statistics, Vol. 3, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1214/08-AOAS222

The Shear Testing Programme – I. Weak lensing analysis of simulated ground-based observations
journal, April 2006

  • Heymans, Catherine; Van Waerbeke, Ludovic; Bacon, David
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 368, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10198.x

Weak Gravitational Lensing and Its Cosmological Applications
journal, November 2008


Systematic errors in future weak-lensing surveys: requirements and prospects for self-calibration
journal, February 2006


A Method for Weak Lensing Observations
journal, August 1995

  • Kaiser, Nick; Squires, Gordon; Broadhurst, Tom
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 449
  • DOI: 10.1086/176071

Galaxy shear estimation from stacked images
journal, September 2009


Limitations on shapelet-based weak-lensing measurements
journal, February 2010


Bayesian galaxy shape measurement for weak lensing surveys - I. Methodology and a fast-fitting algorithm
journal, November 2007


Shear Recovery Accuracy in Weak-Lensing Analysis with the Elliptical Gauss-Laguerre Method
journal, March 2007

  • Nakajima, Reiko; Bernstein, Gary
  • The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 133, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1086/511957

Sérsiclets - a matched filter extension of Shapelets for weak lensing studies
journal, June 2009


Shapelets -- II. A method for weak lensing measurements
journal, January 2003


Measuring the cosmic shear in Fourier space: Measuring the cosmic shear in Fourier space
journal, December 2007


    Works referencing / citing this record:

    Origins of weak lensing systematics, and requirements on future instrumentation (or knowledge of instrumentation)
    journal, December 2012

    • Massey, Richard; Hoekstra, Henk; Kitching, Thomas
    • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 429, Issue 1
    • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sts371

    Origins of weak lensing systematics, and requirements on future instrumentation (or knowledge of instrumentation)
    journal, December 2012

    • Massey, Richard; Hoekstra, Henk; Kitching, Thomas
    • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 429, Issue 1
    • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sts371

    Bayesian galaxy shape measurement for weak lensing surveys – III. Application to the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey
    journal, January 2013

    • Miller, L.; Heymans, C.; Kitching, T. D.
    • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 429, Issue 4
    • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sts454

    im3shape: a maximum likelihood galaxy shear measurement code for cosmic gravitational lensing
    journal, July 2013

    • Zuntz, Joe; Kacprzak, Tomasz; Voigt, Lisa
    • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 434, Issue 2
    • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1125

    Masses of Galaxy Clusters from Gravitational Lensing
    journal, April 2013

    • Hoekstra, Henk; Bartelmann, Matthias; Dahle, Håkon
    • Space Science Reviews, Vol. 177, Issue 1-4
    • DOI: 10.1007/s11214-013-9978-5

    Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
    journal, July 2015


    The Third Gravitational Lensing Accuracy Testing (Great3) Challenge Handbook
    journal, April 2014

    • Mandelbaum, Rachel; Rowe, Barnaby; Bosch, James
    • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 212, Issue 1
    • DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/5

    The Canadian Cluster Comparison Project: detailed study of systematics and updated weak lensing masses★
    journal, March 2015

    • Hoekstra, Henk; Herbonnet, Ricardo; Muzzin, Adam
    • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 449, Issue 1
    • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv275

    Cosmology constraints from shear peak statistics in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
    journal, August 2016

    • Kacprzak, T.; Kirk, D.; Friedrich, O.
    • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 463, Issue 4
    • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2070

    An accurate and practical method for inference of weak gravitational lensing from galaxy images
    journal, April 2016

    • Bernstein, Gary M.; Armstrong, Robert; Krawiec, Christina
    • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 459, Issue 4
    • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw879

    Weak lensing shear calibration with simulations of the HSC survey
    journal, September 2018

    • Mandelbaum, Rachel; Lanusse, François; Leauthaud, Alexie
    • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 481, Issue 3
    • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2420

    Fourier Power Function Shapelets (FPFS) shear estimator: performance on image simulations
    journal, October 2018

    • Li, Xiangchong; Katayama, Nobuhiko; Oguri, Masamune
    • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 481, Issue 4
    • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2548

    Practical Weak-lensing Shear Measurement with Metacalibration
    journal, May 2017