skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Catastrophic photometric redshift errors: Weak-lensing survey requirements

Abstract

We study the sensitivity of weak lensing surveys to the effects of catastrophic redshift errors - cases where the true redshift is misestimated by a significant amount. To compute the biases in cosmological parameters, we adopt an efficient linearized analysis where the redshift errors are directly related to shifts in the weak lensing convergence power spectra. We estimate the number Nspec of unbiased spectroscopic redshifts needed to determine the catastrophic error rate well enough that biases in cosmological parameters are below statistical errors of weak lensing tomography. While the straightforward estimate of Nspec is ~106 we find that using only the photometric redshifts with z ≤ 2.5 leads to a drastic reduction in Nspec to ~ 30,000 while negligibly increasing statistical errors in dark energy parameters. Therefore, the size of spectroscopic survey needed to control catastrophic errors is similar to that previously deemed necessary to constrain the core of the zs – zp distribution. We also study the efficacy of the recent proposal to measure redshift errors by cross-correlation between the photo-z and spectroscopic samples. We find that this method requires ~ 10% a priori knowledge of the bias and stochasticity of the outlier population, and is also easily confoundedmore » by lensing magnification bias. In conclusion, the cross-correlation method is therefore unlikely to supplant the need for a complete spectroscopic redshift survey of the source population.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2]
  1. Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (United States)
  2. Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP)
OSTI Identifier:
1203553
Grant/Contract Number:  
FG02-95ER40893
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 401; Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 0035-8711
Publisher:
Royal Astronomical Society
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS; sensitivity of weak-lensing; gravitational lensing

Citation Formats

Bernstein, Gary, and Huterer, Dragan. Catastrophic photometric redshift errors: Weak-lensing survey requirements. United States: N. p., 2010. Web. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15748.x.
Bernstein, Gary, & Huterer, Dragan. Catastrophic photometric redshift errors: Weak-lensing survey requirements. United States. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15748.x.
Bernstein, Gary, and Huterer, Dragan. Mon . "Catastrophic photometric redshift errors: Weak-lensing survey requirements". United States. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15748.x. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1203553.
@article{osti_1203553,
title = {Catastrophic photometric redshift errors: Weak-lensing survey requirements},
author = {Bernstein, Gary and Huterer, Dragan},
abstractNote = {We study the sensitivity of weak lensing surveys to the effects of catastrophic redshift errors - cases where the true redshift is misestimated by a significant amount. To compute the biases in cosmological parameters, we adopt an efficient linearized analysis where the redshift errors are directly related to shifts in the weak lensing convergence power spectra. We estimate the number Nspec of unbiased spectroscopic redshifts needed to determine the catastrophic error rate well enough that biases in cosmological parameters are below statistical errors of weak lensing tomography. While the straightforward estimate of Nspec is ~106 we find that using only the photometric redshifts with z ≤ 2.5 leads to a drastic reduction in Nspec to ~ 30,000 while negligibly increasing statistical errors in dark energy parameters. Therefore, the size of spectroscopic survey needed to control catastrophic errors is similar to that previously deemed necessary to constrain the core of the zs – zp distribution. We also study the efficacy of the recent proposal to measure redshift errors by cross-correlation between the photo-z and spectroscopic samples. We find that this method requires ~ 10% a priori knowledge of the bias and stochasticity of the outlier population, and is also easily confounded by lensing magnification bias. In conclusion, the cross-correlation method is therefore unlikely to supplant the need for a complete spectroscopic redshift survey of the source population.},
doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15748.x},
journal = {Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},
number = 2,
volume = 401,
place = {United States},
year = {2010},
month = {1}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 60 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Photometric redshifts for weak lensing tomography from space: the role of optical and near infrared photometry
journal, July 2008


Systematic bias in cosmic shear: extending the Fisher matrix
journal, November 2008


Photometric redshifts for the Dark Energy Survey and VISTA and implications for large-scale structure
journal, May 2008


Weak gravitational lensing
journal, January 2001


Comprehensive Two-Point Analyses of weak Gravitational Lensing Surveys
journal, April 2009


The Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing Contribution to the Cosmic Shear Two-Point Function
journal, January 2007

  • Bridle, Sarah; Abdalla, Filipe B.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 655, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/511674

Dark energy constraints from cosmic shear power spectra: impact of intrinsic alignments on photometric redshift requirements
journal, December 2007


Spin‐induced Galaxy Alignments and Their Implications for Weak‐Lensing Measurements
journal, October 2001

  • Crittenden, Robert G.; Natarajan, Priyamvada; Pen, Ue‐Li
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 559, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/322370

Weak‐Lensing Surveys and the Intrinsic Correlation of Galaxy Ellipticities
journal, December 2000

  • Croft, Rupert A. C.; Metzler, Christopher A.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 545, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/317856

Estimating the redshift distribution of photometric galaxy samples - II. Applications and tests of a new method
journal, July 2009


Supernova Acceleration Probe: Investigating Photometric Redshift Optimization
journal, August 2008


Inhomogeneous systematic signals in cosmic shear observations
journal, August 2005


Impact of Dark Matter Substructure on the Matter and Weak‐Lensing Power Spectra
journal, November 2005

  • Hagan, Bradley; Ma, Chung‐Pei; Kravtsov, Andrey V.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 633, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/466515

Intrinsic correlation of galaxy shapes: implications for weak lensing measurements
journal, December 2000


Robustness of Cosmological Simulations. I. Large‐Scale Structure
journal, September 2005

  • Heitmann, Katrin; Ricker, Paul M.; Warren, Michael S.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 160, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/432646

Weak gravitational lensing: reducing the contamination by intrinsic alignments
journal, March 2003


The Shear Testing Programme – I. Weak lensing analysis of simulated ground-based observations
journal, April 2006

  • Heymans, Catherine; Van Waerbeke, Ludovic; Bacon, David
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 368, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10198.x

FIVE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE OBSERVATIONS: DATA PROCESSING, SKY MAPS, AND BASIC RESULTS
journal, February 2009

  • Hinshaw, G.; Weiland, J. L.; Hill, R. S.
  • The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 180, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/225

Intrinsic alignment-lensing interference as a contaminant of cosmic shear
journal, September 2004


Galaxy-galaxy weak lensing in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: intrinsic alignments and shear calibration errors
journal, September 2004

  • Hirata, Christopher M.; Mandelbaum, Rachel; Seljak, Uroš
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 353, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08090.x

Weak Gravitational Lensing and Its Cosmological Applications
journal, November 2008


Weak lensing and dark energy
journal, February 2002


Calibrating the nonlinear matter power spectrum: Requirements for future weak lensing surveys
journal, May 2005


Systematic errors in future weak-lensing surveys: requirements and prospects for self-calibration
journal, February 2006


Probing dark energy: Methods and strategies
journal, November 2001


Nulling tomography with weak gravitational lensing
journal, August 2005


PSF anisotropy and systematic errors in weak lensing surveys
journal, February 2006

  • Jain, Bhuvnesh; Jarvis, Mike; Bernstein, Gary
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2006, Issue 02
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2006/02/001

Intrinsic correlation of halo ellipticity and its implications for large-scale weak lensing surveys
journal, October 2002


The removal of shear-ellipticity correlations from the cosmic shear signal via nulling techniques
journal, July 2008


Separating cosmic shear from intrinsic galaxy alignments: Correlation function tomography
journal, January 2003


Systematic effects on dark energy from 3D weak shear
journal, September 2008


Impact of Inhomogeneous Reionization on Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy
journal, September 1998


Estimating the redshift distribution of photometric galaxy samples
journal, October 2008


Size of Spectroscopic Calibration Samples for Cosmic Shear Photometric Redshifts
journal, July 2008

  • Ma, Zhaoming; Bernstein, Gary
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 682, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/588214

Diagnosing Space Telescope Misalignment and Jitter Using Stellar Images
journal, December 2008

  • Ma, Zhaoming; Bernstein, Gary; Weinstein, Alan
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Vol. 120, Issue 874
  • DOI: 10.1086/595724

Effects of Photometric Redshift Uncertainties on Weak‐Lensing Tomography
journal, January 2006

  • Ma, Zhaoming; Hu, Wayne; Huterer, Dragan
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 636, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/497068

Theoretical estimates of intrinsic galaxy alignment
journal, June 2002


Detection of large-scale intrinsic ellipticity--density correlation from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and implications for weak lensing surveys
journal, April 2006


Precision photometric redshift calibration for galaxy–galaxy weak lensing
journal, May 2008


The Shear Testing Programme 2: Factors affecting high-precision weak-lensing analyses
journal, March 2007


Cosmology with weak lensing surveys
journal, June 2008


Photometric Redshift Error Estimators
journal, December 2008

  • Oyaizu, Hiroaki; Lima, Marcos; Cunha, Carlos E.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 689, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/592591

The clustering of luminous red galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey imaging data
journal, June 2007

  • Padmanabhan, Nikhil; Schlegel, David J.; Seljak, Uroš
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 378, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11593.x

Point spread function calibration requirements for dark energy from cosmic shear
journal, March 2008


Effects of Baryons and Dissipation on the Matter Power Spectrum
journal, January 2008

  • Rudd, Douglas H.; Zentner, Andrew R.; Kravtsov, Andrey V.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 672, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/523836

Biased dark Energy Constraints from Neglecting Reduced Shear in Weak-Lensing Surveys
journal, April 2009


The Born and lens–lens corrections to weak gravitational lensing angular power spectra
journal, March 2006


Using Galaxy Two‐Point Correlation Functions to Determine the Redshift Distributions of Galaxies Binned by Photometric Redshift
journal, November 2006

  • Schneider, Michael; Knox, Lloyd; Zhan, Hu
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 651, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/507675

Probing dark energy with cluster counts and cosmic shear power spectra: including the full covariance
journal, December 2007


The impact of non-Gaussian errors on weak lensing surveys
journal, June 2009


Karhunen‐Loeve Eigenvalue Problems in Cosmology: How Should We Tackle Large Data Sets?
journal, May 1997

  • Tegmark, Max; Taylor, Andy N.; Heavens, Alan F.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 480, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/303939

Baryons and weak lensing power spectra
journal, November 2004


Self-calibration of tomographic weak lensing for the physics of baryons to constrain dark energy
journal, February 2008


Effect of Hot Baryons on the Weak-Lensing Shear Power Spectrum
journal, October 2004

  • Zhan, Hu; Knox, Lloyd
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 616, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/426712

    Works referencing / citing this record:

    CFHTLenS tomographic weak lensing: quantifying accurate redshift distributions
    journal, March 2013

    • Benjamin, Jonathan; Van Waerbeke, Ludovic; Heymans, Catherine
    • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 431, Issue 2
    • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt276

    On using angular cross-correlations to determine source redshift distributions
    journal, July 2013

    • McQuinn, M.; White, M.
    • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 433, Issue 4
    • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt914

    Effects of unstable dark matter on large-scale structure and constraints from future surveys
    journal, February 2012


    CFHTLenS tomographic weak lensing: quantifying accurate redshift distributions
    journal, March 2013

    • Benjamin, Jonathan; Van Waerbeke, Ludovic; Heymans, Catherine
    • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 431, Issue 2
    • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt276

    On using angular cross-correlations to determine source redshift distributions
    journal, July 2013

    • McQuinn, M.; White, M.
    • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 433, Issue 4
    • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt914

    Effects of unstable dark matter on large-scale structure and constraints from future surveys
    journal, February 2012


    A General Study of the Influence of Catastrophic Photometric Redshift Errors on Cosmology with Cosmic Shear Tomography
    journal, August 2010


    Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
    journal, July 2015


    Cosmology with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope: an overview
    journal, April 2018


    Testing the origin of the CMB large-angle correlation deficit with a galaxy imaging survey
    journal, October 2011

    • Hearin, Andrew P.; Gibelyou, Cameron; Zentner, Andrew R.
    • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2011, Issue 10
    • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2011/10/012

    General requirements on matter power spectrum predictions for cosmology with weak lensing tomography
    journal, April 2012

    • Hearin, Andrew P.; Zentner, Andrew R.; Ma, Zhaoming
    • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2012, Issue 04
    • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/04/034

    DESI and other Dark Energy experiments in the era of neutrino mass measurements
    journal, May 2014

    • Font-Ribera, Andreu; McDonald, Patrick; Mostek, Nick
    • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2014, Issue 05
    • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/05/023

    Constraining neutrino mass with the tomographic weak lensing bispectrum
    journal, May 2019

    • Coulton, William R.; Liu, Jia; Madhavacheril, Mathew S.
    • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2019, Issue 05
    • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/05/043

    Accounting for baryonic effects in cosmic shear tomography: determining a minimal set of nuisance parameters using PCA
    journal, October 2015

    • Eifler, Tim; Krause, Elisabeth; Dodelson, Scott
    • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 454, Issue 3
    • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2000

    The impact of intrinsic alignment on current and future cosmic shear surveys
    journal, December 2015

    • Krause, Elisabeth; Eifler, Tim; Blazek, Jonathan
    • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 456, Issue 1
    • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2615

    CFHTLenS revisited: assessing concordance with Planck including astrophysical systematics
    journal, October 2016

    • Joudaki, Shahab; Blake, Chris; Heymans, Catherine
    • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 465, Issue 2
    • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2665

    An accurate and practical method for inference of weak gravitational lensing from galaxy images
    journal, April 2016

    • Bernstein, Gary M.; Armstrong, Robert; Krawiec, Christina
    • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 459, Issue 4
    • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw879

    Improving photometric redshift estimation using GPz: size information, post processing, and improved photometry
    journal, December 2017

    • Gomes, Zahra; Jarvis, Matt J.; Almosallam, Ibrahim A.
    • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 475, Issue 1
    • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx3187

    Weak lensing magnification in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
    journal, February 2018

    • Garcia-Fernandez, M.; Sanchez, E.; Sevilla-Noarbe, I.
    • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 476, Issue 1
    • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty282

    Estimating redshift distributions using hierarchical logistic Gaussian processes
    journal, November 2019

    • Rau, Markus Michael; Wilson, Simon; Mandelbaum, Rachel
    • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 491, Issue 4
    • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz3295

    Redshift distributions of galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification shear catalogue and implications for weak lensing
    journal, August 2016


    Looking through the same lens: Shear calibration for LSST, Euclid, and WFIRST with stage 4 CMB lensing
    journal, June 2017


    Results of the GREAT08 Challenge★: an image analysis competition for cosmological lensing: Results of the GREAT08 Challenge
    journal, May 2010


    Modelling the angular correlation function and its full covariance in photometric galaxy surveys: Angular clustering in photometric surveys
    journal, March 2011


    Sample variance in photometric redshift calibration: cosmological biases and survey requirements: Sample variance in photo-z calibration
    journal, April 2012

    • Cunha, Carlos E.; Huterer, Dragan; Busha, Michael T.
    • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 423, Issue 1
    • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20927.x