Reply to “Comment on ‘Molybdenum sound velocity and shear modulus softening under shock compression’”

Nguyen, Jeffrey H.; Akin, Minta C.; Chau, Ricky; Fratanduono, Dayne E.; Ambrose, W. Patrick; Fat'yanov, Oleg V.; Asimow, Paul D.; Holmes, Neil C.

doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.92.026102

Title: Reply to “Comment on ‘Molybdenum sound velocity and shear modulus softening under shock compression’”

Abstract

Here, we respond to the Comment by Errandonea et al. [Phys. Rev. B 92, 026101 (2015)] on their reinterpretation of our published data [Nguyen et al., Phys. Rev. B 89, 174109 (2014)]. In the original paper, we argued that there is no solid-solid phase transition along the Hugoniot at 2.1 Mbars. There is, however, a softening of the shear modulus starting at 2.6 Mbars. Errandonea et al. [Phys. Rev. B 92, 026101 (2015)] reinterpreted our data and concluded that there is a structural change near 2.3 Mbars on the Hugoniot. Finally, we will explore the differences and agreements in the two interpretations of our data.

Authors:

Nguyen, Jeffrey H. ^[1]; Akin, Minta C. ^[1]; Chau, Ricky ^[1]; Fratanduono, Dayne E. ^[1]; Ambrose, W. Patrick ^[1]; Fat'yanov, Oleg V. ^[2]; Asimow, Paul D. ^[2]; Holmes, Neil C. ^[1]

Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
California Inst. of Technology (CalTech), Pasadena, CA (United States)

Publication Date:: Wed Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2015

Research Org.:: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)

Sponsoring Org.:: USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

OSTI Identifier:: 1234584

Alternate Identifier(s):: OSTI ID: 1202639

Report Number(s):: LLNL-JRNL-671144
Journal ID: ISSN 1098-0121; PRBMDO

Grant/Contract Number:: AC52-07NA27344

Resource Type:: Accepted Manuscript

Journal Name:: Physical Review. B, Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Additional Journal Information:: Journal Volume: 92; Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 1098-0121

Publisher:: American Physical Society (APS)

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

Subject:: 75 CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS, SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND SUPERFLUIDITY

Citation Formats


                    Nguyen, Jeffrey H., Akin, Minta C., Chau, Ricky, Fratanduono, Dayne E., Ambrose, W. Patrick, Fat'yanov, Oleg V., Asimow, Paul D., and Holmes, Neil C. Reply to “Comment on ‘Molybdenum sound velocity and shear modulus softening under shock compression’”.  United States: N. p., 2015. 
Web.  doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.92.026102.

Copy to clipboard


                    Nguyen, Jeffrey H., Akin, Minta C., Chau, Ricky, Fratanduono, Dayne E., Ambrose, W. Patrick, Fat'yanov, Oleg V., Asimow, Paul D., & Holmes, Neil C. Reply to “Comment on ‘Molybdenum sound velocity and shear modulus softening under shock compression’”.  United States.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.026102

Copy to clipboard


                    Nguyen, Jeffrey H., Akin, Minta C., Chau, Ricky, Fratanduono, Dayne E., Ambrose, W. Patrick, Fat'yanov, Oleg V., Asimow, Paul D., and Holmes, Neil C. Wed .  
"Reply to “Comment on ‘Molybdenum sound velocity and shear modulus softening under shock compression’”".  United States.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.026102.  https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1234584.

Copy to clipboard


                    
@article{osti_1234584,

  title        = {Reply to “Comment on ‘Molybdenum sound velocity and shear modulus softening under shock compression’”},

  author       = {Nguyen, Jeffrey H. and Akin, Minta C. and Chau, Ricky and Fratanduono, Dayne E. and Ambrose, W. Patrick and Fat'yanov, Oleg V. and Asimow, Paul D. and Holmes, Neil C.},

  abstractNote = {Here, we respond to the Comment by Errandonea et al. [Phys. Rev. B 92, 026101 (2015)] on their reinterpretation of our published data [Nguyen et al., Phys. Rev. B 89, 174109 (2014)]. In the original paper, we argued that there is no solid-solid phase transition along the Hugoniot at 2.1 Mbars. There is, however, a softening of the shear modulus starting at 2.6 Mbars. Errandonea et al. [Phys. Rev. B 92, 026101 (2015)] reinterpreted our data and concluded that there is a structural change near 2.3 Mbars on the Hugoniot. Finally, we will explore the differences and agreements in the two interpretations of our data.},

  doi          = {10.1103/PhysRevB.92.026102},

  journal      = {Physical Review. B, Condensed Matter and Materials Physics},

  number       = 2,

  volume       = 92,

  place        = {United States},

  year         = {Wed Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2015},

  month        = {Wed Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2015}

}

Copy to clipboard

Journal Article:

Free Publicly Available Full Text

Accepted Manuscript (Publisher)

Accepted Manuscript (DOE)

Publisher's Version of Record

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.026102

Other availability

Search WorldCat to find libraries that may hold this journal

Citation Metrics:

Cited by: 6 works

Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Export Metadata

Save to My Library

Works referenced in this record:

Constraints on the phase diagram of molybdenum from first-principles free-energy calculations
journal, February 2012

Cazorla, C.; Alfè, D.; Gillan, M. J.
Physical Review B, Vol. 85, Issue 6
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.064113

Comment on “Molybdenum sound velocity and shear modulus softening under shock compression”
journal, July 2015

Errandonea, D.; Boehler, R.; Ross, M.
Physical Review B, Vol. 92, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.026101

Melting of iron at the physical conditions of the Earth's core
journal, January 2004

Nguyen, Jeffrey H.; Holmes, Neil C.
Nature, Vol. 427, Issue 6972
DOI: 10.1038/nature02248

Practical uncertainty reduction and quantification in shock physics measurements
journal, April 2015

Akin, M. C.; Nguyen, J. H.
Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 86, Issue 4
DOI: 10.1063/1.4917555

Acoustic Velocities and Phase Transitions in Molybdenum under Strong Shock Compression
journal, February 1989

Hixson, R. S.; Boness, D. A.; Shaner, J. W.
Physical Review Letters, Vol. 62, Issue 6
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.637

Ab initio melting curve of molybdenum by the phase coexistence method
journal, May 2007

Cazorla, C.; Gillan, M. J.; Taioli, S.
The Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 126, Issue 19
DOI: 10.1063/1.2735324

X-ray diffraction measurements of Mo melting to 119 GPa and the high pressure phase diagram
journal, March 2009

Santamaría-Pérez, D.; Ross, M.; Errandonea, D.
The Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 130, Issue 12
DOI: 10.1063/1.3082030

Molybdenum sound velocity and shear modulus softening under shock compression
journal, May 2014

Nguyen, Jeffrey H.; Akin, Minta C.; Chau, Ricky
Physical Review B, Vol. 89, Issue 17
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.174109

Works referencing / citing this record:

Microstructures define melting of molybdenum at high pressures
journal, March 2017

Hrubiak, Rostislav; Meng, Yue; Shen, Guoyin
Nature Communications, Vol. 8, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14562

Similar Records in DOE PAGES and OSTI.GOV collections:

Reply to comment on ""Anomalies in electrostatic calibrations for the measurement of the Casimir force in a sphere-plane geometry

Journal Article Dalvit, Diego A ; Kim, W J ; Borwn-hayes, M ; ... - Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

In a recent Comment, Decca et al. [Phys. Rev. A 79, 026101 (2009)] discussed the origin of the anomalies recently reported by us in Phys. Rev. A 78, 036102(R) (2008). Here we restate our view corroborated by their considerations that quantitative geometrical and electrostatic characterizations of the conducting surfaces (a topic not discussed explicitly in the literature until very recently) are critical for the assessment of precision and accuracy of the demonstration of the Casimir force and for deriving meaningful limits on the existence of Yukawian components possibly superimposed to the Newtonian gravitational interaction.
Full Text Available
Reply to 'Comment on 'Quantum measurement and decoherence''

Journal Article Ford, G W ; O'Connell, R F ; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803-4001 - Physical Review. A

While agreeing with our exact expression for the time dependence of the motion of a free particle in an initial superposition state, corresponding to two identical Gaussians separated by a distance d, at temperature T, Gobert et al., in the preceding Comment [Phys. Rev. A70, 026101 (2004)], dispute our conclusions on decoherence time scales. However, the parameters they used to generate their figures are outside the regime of validity of our interpretation of the results and, moreover, are not of physical interest in that they correspond to T{approx_equal}0. The point is that in their figures they have chosen the thermalmore »« less
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.70.026102
Reply to 'Comment on 'Quantum time-of-flight distribution for cold trapped atoms''

Journal Article Ali, Md Manirul ; Home, Dipankar ; Pan, Alok K ; ... - Physical Review. A

In their comment Gomes et al. [Phys. Rev. A 77, 026101 (2008)] have questioned the possibility of empirically testable differences existing between the semiclassical time of flight distribution for cold trapped atoms and a quantum distribution discussed by us recently [Ali et al., Phys. Rev. A 75, 042110 (2007).]. We argue that their criticism is based on a semiclassical treatment having restricted applicability for a particular trapping potential. Their claim does not preclude, in general, the possibility of differences between the semiclassical calculations and fully quantum results for the arrival time distribution of freely falling atoms.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVA.77.026102
Reply to “Comment on ‘Comparative study of ab initio nonradiative recombination rate calculations under different formalisms’ ”

Journal Article Shi, Lin ; Xu, Ke ; Wang, Lin-Wang - Physical Review B

As pointed out by the comments of Wickramaratne et al., there was indeed an algebra error in our original publication [Phys. Rev. B 91, 205315 (2015)] in calculating the 1D model. We have corrected this error, and did a renewed calculation and comparison of the 1D model and other approximated models. The revised comparison provides some insights for the origin of the difference between the full phonon spectrum electron-phonon coupling static formula results and other approximated results, especially for how to evaluate the amplitude of electron-phonon coupling.
Cited by 6
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.97.077302

Full Text Available
Hugoniot overtake sound-velocity measurements on CsI

Journal Article Swenson, C A ; Shaner, J W ; Brown, J M - Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter; (United States)

Shock-wave overtake experiments have been used to confirm that CsI melts along the Hugoniot curve at a pressure of roughly 30 GPa. The experimental results give the pressure dependence of the bulk sound velocity in the fluid along the Hugoniot curve to 150 GPa, from which the pressure dependences of both the adiabatic bulk modulus and the Grueneisen parameter ..gamma.. can be calculated. These quantities show normal behavior, with no obvious indication of the band closure and metalization which are predicted for this region of the Hugoniot curve. The results of these experiments are combined with the shock-wave optical pyrometrymore »« less
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.34.7924

Similar Records

Title: Reply to “Comment on ‘Molybdenum sound velocity and shear modulus softening under shock compression’”

Abstract

Citation Formats

Constraints on the phase diagram of molybdenum from first-principles free-energy calculations journal, February 2012

Comment on “Molybdenum sound velocity and shear modulus softening under shock compression” journal, July 2015

Melting of iron at the physical conditions of the Earth's core journal, January 2004

Practical uncertainty reduction and quantification in shock physics measurements journal, April 2015

Acoustic Velocities and Phase Transitions in Molybdenum under Strong Shock Compression journal, February 1989

Ab initio melting curve of molybdenum by the phase coexistence method journal, May 2007

X-ray diffraction measurements of Mo melting to 119 GPa and the high pressure phase diagram journal, March 2009

Molybdenum sound velocity and shear modulus softening under shock compression journal, May 2014

Microstructures define melting of molybdenum at high pressures journal, March 2017

Constraints on the phase diagram of molybdenum from first-principles free-energy calculations
journal, February 2012

Comment on “Molybdenum sound velocity and shear modulus softening under shock compression”
journal, July 2015

Melting of iron at the physical conditions of the Earth's core
journal, January 2004

Practical uncertainty reduction and quantification in shock physics measurements
journal, April 2015

Acoustic Velocities and Phase Transitions in Molybdenum under Strong Shock Compression
journal, February 1989

Ab initio melting curve of molybdenum by the phase coexistence method
journal, May 2007

X-ray diffraction measurements of Mo melting to 119 GPa and the high pressure phase diagram
journal, March 2009

Molybdenum sound velocity and shear modulus softening under shock compression
journal, May 2014

Microstructures define melting of molybdenum at high pressures
journal, March 2017