DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Calculated fission-fragment yield systematics in the region 74 <=Z <= 94 and 90 <=N <= 150

Abstract

Background: In the seminal experiment by Schmidt et al. [Nucl. Phys. A 665, 221 (2000)] in which fission-fragment charge distributions were obtained for 70 nuclides, asymmetric distributions were seen above nucleon number A ≈ 226 and symmetric ones below. Because asymmetric fission had often loosely been explained as a preference for the nucleus to always exploit the extra binding of fragments near ¹³²Sn it was assumed that all systems below A ≈ 226 would fission symmetrically because available isotopes do not have a proton-to-neutron Z/N ratio that allows division into fragments near ¹³²Sn. But the finding by Andreyev et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252502 (2010)] did not conform to this expectation because the compound system ¹⁸⁰Hg was shown to fission asymmetrically. It was suggested that this was a new type of asymmetric fission, because no strong shell effects occur for any possible fragment division. Purpose: We calculate a reference database for fission-fragment mass yields for a large region of the nuclear chart comprising 987 nuclides. A particular aim is to establish whether ¹⁸⁰Hg is part of a contiguous region of asymmetric fission, and if so, its extent, or if not, in contrast to the actinides, there are scattered smallermore » groups of nuclei that fission asymmetrically in this area of the nuclear chart. Methods: We use the by now well benchmarked Brownian shape-motion method and perform random walks on the previously calculated five-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. The calculated shell corrections are damped out with energy according to a prescription developed earlier. Results: We have obtained a theoretical reference database of fission-fragment mass yields for 987 nuclides. These results show an extended region of asymmetric fission with approximate extension 74 ≤ Z ≤ 85 and 100 ≤ N ≤ 120. The calculated yields are highly variable. We show 20 representative plots of these variable features and summarize the main aspects of our results in terms of “nuclear-chart” plots showing calculated degrees of asymmetry versus N and Z. Conclusions: Experimental data in this region are rare: only ten or so yield distributions have been measured, some with very limited statistics. We agree with several measurements with higher statistics. Regions where there might be differences between our calculated results and measurements lie near the calculated transition line between symmetric and asymmetric fission. To draw more definite conclusions about the accuracy of the present implementation of the Brownian shape-motion approach in this region experimental data, with reliable statistics, for a fair number of suitably located additional nuclides are clearly needed. Because the nuclear potential-energy structure is so different in this region compared to the actinide region, additional experimental data together with fission theory studies that incorporate additional, dynamical aspects should provide much new insight.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2]
  1. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
  2. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
1200643
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1178486
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-14-24795
Journal ID: ISSN 0556-2813; PRVCAN
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC52-06NA25396; AC02-05CH11231
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Physical Review C, Nuclear Physics
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 91; Journal Issue: 4; Journal ID: ISSN 0556-2813
Publisher:
American Physical Society (APS)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS; Atomic and Nuclear Physics; Fission Fragment Mass Distributions

Citation Formats

Möller, Peter, and Randrup, Jørgen. Calculated fission-fragment yield systematics in the region 74 <=Z <= 94 and 90 <=N <= 150. United States: N. p., 2015. Web. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.91.044316.
Möller, Peter, & Randrup, Jørgen. Calculated fission-fragment yield systematics in the region 74 <=Z <= 94 and 90 <=N <= 150. United States. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.044316
Möller, Peter, and Randrup, Jørgen. Wed . "Calculated fission-fragment yield systematics in the region 74 <=Z <= 94 and 90 <=N <= 150". United States. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.044316. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1200643.
@article{osti_1200643,
title = {Calculated fission-fragment yield systematics in the region 74 <=Z <= 94 and 90 <=N <= 150},
author = {Möller, Peter and Randrup, Jørgen},
abstractNote = {Background: In the seminal experiment by Schmidt et al. [Nucl. Phys. A 665, 221 (2000)] in which fission-fragment charge distributions were obtained for 70 nuclides, asymmetric distributions were seen above nucleon number A ≈ 226 and symmetric ones below. Because asymmetric fission had often loosely been explained as a preference for the nucleus to always exploit the extra binding of fragments near ¹³²Sn it was assumed that all systems below A ≈ 226 would fission symmetrically because available isotopes do not have a proton-to-neutron Z/N ratio that allows division into fragments near ¹³²Sn. But the finding by Andreyev et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252502 (2010)] did not conform to this expectation because the compound system ¹⁸⁰Hg was shown to fission asymmetrically. It was suggested that this was a new type of asymmetric fission, because no strong shell effects occur for any possible fragment division. Purpose: We calculate a reference database for fission-fragment mass yields for a large region of the nuclear chart comprising 987 nuclides. A particular aim is to establish whether ¹⁸⁰Hg is part of a contiguous region of asymmetric fission, and if so, its extent, or if not, in contrast to the actinides, there are scattered smaller groups of nuclei that fission asymmetrically in this area of the nuclear chart. Methods: We use the by now well benchmarked Brownian shape-motion method and perform random walks on the previously calculated five-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. The calculated shell corrections are damped out with energy according to a prescription developed earlier. Results: We have obtained a theoretical reference database of fission-fragment mass yields for 987 nuclides. These results show an extended region of asymmetric fission with approximate extension 74 ≤ Z ≤ 85 and 100 ≤ N ≤ 120. The calculated yields are highly variable. We show 20 representative plots of these variable features and summarize the main aspects of our results in terms of “nuclear-chart” plots showing calculated degrees of asymmetry versus N and Z. Conclusions: Experimental data in this region are rare: only ten or so yield distributions have been measured, some with very limited statistics. We agree with several measurements with higher statistics. Regions where there might be differences between our calculated results and measurements lie near the calculated transition line between symmetric and asymmetric fission. To draw more definite conclusions about the accuracy of the present implementation of the Brownian shape-motion approach in this region experimental data, with reliable statistics, for a fair number of suitably located additional nuclides are clearly needed. Because the nuclear potential-energy structure is so different in this region compared to the actinide region, additional experimental data together with fission theory studies that incorporate additional, dynamical aspects should provide much new insight.},
doi = {10.1103/PhysRevC.91.044316},
journal = {Physical Review C, Nuclear Physics},
number = 4,
volume = 91,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Apr 01 00:00:00 EDT 2015},
month = {Wed Apr 01 00:00:00 EDT 2015}
}

Journal Article:

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 64 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

New Type of Asymmetric Fission in Proton-Rich Nuclei
journal, December 2010


β -delayed fission of 192 , 194 At
journal, January 2013


β -delayed fission of 186 , 188 Bi isotopes
journal, January 2013


β -delayed fission and α decay of 178 Tl
journal, October 2013


β -delayed fission of 180 Tl
journal, October 2013


Brownian Shape Motion on Five-Dimensional Potential-Energy Surfaces:Nuclear Fission-Fragment Mass Distributions
journal, March 2011


Fission-fragment mass distributions from strongly damped shape evolution
journal, September 2011


Energy dependence of fission-fragment mass distributions from strongly damped shape evolution
journal, December 2013


Calculated fission yields of neutron-deficient mercury isotopes
journal, February 2012


Relativistic radioactive beams: A new access to nuclear-fission studies
journal, February 2000


Evolution of fission-fragment mass distributions in the neutron-deficient lead region
journal, October 2014


Effect of viscosity on the dynamics of fission
journal, June 1976


Modified one-body nuclear dissipation
journal, February 1978

  • Sierk, Arnold J.; Koonin, Steven E.; Nix, J. Rayford
  • Physical Review C, Vol. 17, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.17.646

One-body dissipation and the super-viscidity of nuclei
journal, August 1978


Fission in a wall-and-window one-body-dissipation model
journal, March 1980


The influence of thermal fluctuations on the kinetic-energy distribution of fission fragments
journal, December 1979


Fission dynamics simplified
journal, March 1983


Induced nuclear fission viewed as a diffusion process: Transients
journal, May 1983


Stationary Fokker-Planck equation applied to fission dynamics
journal, August 1984


Fission-fragment kinetic-energy distributions from a two-dimensional Fokker-Planck equation
journal, December 1984


On stochastic approaches of nuclear dynamics
journal, October 1996


Langevin description of fusion, deep-inelastic collisions and heavy-ion-induced fission
journal, January 1998


Langevin calculations of fission fragment mass distribution in fission of excited nuclei
journal, April 1999


Three-dimensional Langevin calculations of fission fragment mass-energy distribution from excited compound nuclei
journal, April 2001


Fission widths of hot nuclei from Langevin dynamics
journal, May 2001


More detailed study of fission dynamics in fusion-fission reactions within a stochastic approach
journal, June 2002


Fission rate in multi-dimensional Langevin calculations
journal, June 2007


Dynamical approach to heavy-ion induced fission using actinide target nuclei at energies around the Coulomb barrier
journal, April 2012


Fission process of nuclei at low excitation energies with a Langevin approach
journal, October 2013


Fission dynamics at low excitation energy
journal, November 2014


Contrasting fission potential-energy structure of actinides and mercury isotopes
journal, August 2012


Colloquium : Beta-delayed fission of atomic nuclei
journal, October 2013


Heavy-element fission barriers
journal, June 2009


Fission barriers at the end of the chart of the nuclides
journal, February 2015


Transition Probability from the Ground to the First-Excited 2+ State of Even–Even Nuclides
journal, May 2001

  • Raman, S.; Nestor, C. W.; Tikkanen, P.
  • Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, Vol. 78, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1006/adnd.2001.0858

Nuclear Ground-State Masses and Deformations
journal, March 1995

  • Moller, P.; Nix, J. R.; Myers, W. D.
  • Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, Vol. 59, Issue 2, p. 185-381
  • DOI: 10.1006/adnd.1995.1002

Nuclear Shapes and Shape Transitions
journal, May 1984


Works referencing / citing this record:

Impact of pear-shaped fission fragments on mass-asymmetric fission in actinides
journal, December 2018


235 U(n, f) Independent fission product yield and isomeric ratio calculated with the statistical Hauser–Feshbach theory
journal, April 2018

  • Okumura, Shin; Kawano, Toshihiko; Jaffke, Patrick
  • Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, Vol. 55, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1080/00223131.2018.1467288

r -process nucleosynthesis: connecting rare-isotope beam facilities with the cosmos
journal, July 2019

  • Horowitz, C. J.; Arcones, A.; Côté, B.
  • Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, Vol. 46, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1088/1361-6471/ab0849

Nuclear fission: a review of experimental advances and phenomenology
journal, November 2017

  • Andreyev, A. N.; Nishio, K.; Schmidt, K-H
  • Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 81, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1088/1361-6633/aa82eb

Review on the progress in nuclear fission—experimental methods and theoretical descriptions
journal, September 2018


Role of channel temperature and mass window in the binary breakup of U * 236
journal, September 2019


Asymmetric fission around lead: The case of Po 198
journal, December 2019