DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Drive Cycle Powertrain Efficiencies and Trends Derived from EPA Vehicle Dynamometer Results

Abstract

Vehicle manufacturers among others are putting great emphasis on improving fuel economy (FE) of light-duty vehicles in the U.S. market, with significant FE gains being realized in recent years. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) data indicates that the aggregate FE of vehicles produced for the U.S. market has improved by over 20% from model year (MY) 2005 to 2013. This steep climb in FE includes changes in vehicle choice, improvements in engine and transmission technology, and reducing aerodynamic drag, rolling resistance, and parasitic losses. The powertrain related improvements focus on optimizing in-use efficiency of the transmission and engine as a system, and may make use of what is termed downsizing and/or downspeeding. This study explores quantifying recent improvements in powertrain efficiency, viewed separately from other vehicle alterations and attributes (noting that most vehicle changes are not completely independent). A methodology is outlined to estimate powertrain efficiency for the U.S city and highway cycle tests using data from the EPA vehicle database. Comparisons of common conventional gasoline powertrains for similar MY 2005 and 2013 vehicles are presented, along with results for late-model hybrid electric vehicles, the Nissan Leaf, Chevy Volt and other selected vehicles.

Authors:
 [1]
  1. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
OSTI Identifier:
1159471
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars. Mechanical Systems (Online)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars. Mechanical Systems (Online); Journal Volume: 7; Journal Issue: 4; Journal ID: ISSN 1946-4002
Publisher:
SAE International
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
33 ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS; 32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION; fuel economy; fuel consumption; vehicle efficiency

Citation Formats

Thomas, John. Drive Cycle Powertrain Efficiencies and Trends Derived from EPA Vehicle Dynamometer Results. United States: N. p., 2014. Web. doi:10.4271/2014-01-2562.
Thomas, John. Drive Cycle Powertrain Efficiencies and Trends Derived from EPA Vehicle Dynamometer Results. United States. https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-2562
Thomas, John. Mon . "Drive Cycle Powertrain Efficiencies and Trends Derived from EPA Vehicle Dynamometer Results". United States. https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-2562. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1159471.
@article{osti_1159471,
title = {Drive Cycle Powertrain Efficiencies and Trends Derived from EPA Vehicle Dynamometer Results},
author = {Thomas, John},
abstractNote = {Vehicle manufacturers among others are putting great emphasis on improving fuel economy (FE) of light-duty vehicles in the U.S. market, with significant FE gains being realized in recent years. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) data indicates that the aggregate FE of vehicles produced for the U.S. market has improved by over 20% from model year (MY) 2005 to 2013. This steep climb in FE includes changes in vehicle choice, improvements in engine and transmission technology, and reducing aerodynamic drag, rolling resistance, and parasitic losses. The powertrain related improvements focus on optimizing in-use efficiency of the transmission and engine as a system, and may make use of what is termed downsizing and/or downspeeding. This study explores quantifying recent improvements in powertrain efficiency, viewed separately from other vehicle alterations and attributes (noting that most vehicle changes are not completely independent). A methodology is outlined to estimate powertrain efficiency for the U.S city and highway cycle tests using data from the EPA vehicle database. Comparisons of common conventional gasoline powertrains for similar MY 2005 and 2013 vehicles are presented, along with results for late-model hybrid electric vehicles, the Nissan Leaf, Chevy Volt and other selected vehicles.},
doi = {10.4271/2014-01-2562},
journal = {SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars. Mechanical Systems (Online)},
number = 4,
volume = 7,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Oct 13 00:00:00 EDT 2014},
month = {Mon Oct 13 00:00:00 EDT 2014}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Revisiting the Formulas for Tractive and Braking Energy on the EPA Driving Schedules
journal, April 2013

  • Sovran, Gino
  • SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.4271/2013-01-0766

The Impact of Regenerative Braking on the Powertrain-Delivered Energy Required for Vehicle Propulsion.
conference, April 2011

  • Sovran, Gino
  • SAE 2011 World Congress & Exhibition, SAE Technical Paper Series
  • DOI: 10.4271/2011-01-0891

Quantifying the Potential Impacts of Regenerative Braking on a Vehicle's Tractive-Fuel Consumption for the U.S., European, and Japanese Driving Schedules
conference, April 2006

  • Sovran, Gino; Blaser, Dwight
  • SAE 2006 World Congress & Exhibition, SAE Technical Paper Series
  • DOI: 10.4271/2006-01-0664

A Contribution to Understanding Automotive Fuel Economy and Its Limits
conference, May 2003


Fuel Economy and Emissions Effects of Low Tire Pressure, Open Windows, Roof Top and Hitch-Mounted Cargo, and Trailer
journal, April 2014

  • Thomas, John; Huff, Shean; West, Brian
  • SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems, Vol. 7, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.4271/2014-01-1614

Analysis of Input Power, Energy Availability, and Efficiency during Deceleration for X-EV Vehicles
journal, April 2013

  • Rask, Eric; Santini, Danilo; Lohse-Busch, Henning
  • SAE International Journal of Alternative Powertrains, Vol. 2, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.4271/2013-01-1473

Ambient Temperature (20°F, 72°F and 95°F) Impact on Fuel and Energy Consumption for Several Conventional Vehicles, Hybrid and Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Battery Electric Vehicle
conference, April 2013

  • Lohse-Busch, Henning; Duoba, Michael; Rask, Eric
  • SAE 2013 World Congress & Exhibition, SAE Technical Paper Series
  • DOI: 10.4271/2013-01-1462

Works referencing / citing this record:

Greenhouse Gas Emission Impact of Autonomous Vehicle Introduction in an Urban Network
journal, April 2019

  • Conlon, James; Lin, Jane
  • Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2673, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1177/0361198119839970

Exergy Accounting: A Quantitative Comparison of Methods and Implications for Energy-Economy Analysis
journal, November 2016

  • Miller, Jack; Foxon, Timothy; Sorrell, Steve
  • Energies, Vol. 9, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.3390/en9110947

A Historical Analysis of the Co-evolution of Gasoline Octane Number and Spark-Ignition Engines
journal, January 2016

  • Splitter, Derek; Pawlowski, Alexander; Wagner, Robert
  • Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 1
  • DOI: 10.3389/fmech.2015.00016

Glass for Thermoelectric Applications
book, January 2019