|
DEBATE OVER HOW TO USE THE BOMB
(Washington, D.C., Late Spring 1945)
Events >
Dawn of the Atomic Era, 1945
- The War Enters Its Final
Phase, 1945
- Debate Over How to Use the
Bomb, Late Spring 1945
- The Trinity Test, July 16,
1945
- Safety and the
Trinity Test, July 1945
- Evaluations of
Trinity, July 1945
- Potsdam and the
Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945
- The Atomic Bombing of
Hiroshima, August 6, 1945
- The Atomic Bombing of
Nagasaki, August 9, 1945
- Japan Surrenders, August
10-15, 1945
- The Manhattan Project and
the Second World War, 1939-1945
In
early May 1945, Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson, with the approval of President Harry S.
Truman, formed an Interim Committee of top officials charged with
recommending the proper use of atomic weapons in wartime and developing a
position for the United States on postwar atomic policy. Stimson
headed the advisory group composed of Vannevar Bush,
James Conant,
Karl T. Compton, Under Secretary of the Navy Ralph A. Bard, Assistant
Secretary of State William L. Clayton, and future Secretary of State James
F. Byrnes. Robert
Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, Arthur Compton,
and Ernest
Lawrence served as scientific advisors (the Scientific Panel),
while General George Marshall represented the military. The committee
met on May 31 and then again the next day with leaders from the business
side of the Manhattan Project, including Walter S. Carpenter of DuPont,
James C. White of Tennessee Eastman, George H. Bucher of Westinghouse, and
James A. Rafferty of Union Carbide.
At the May 31
meeting, Lawrence suggested that a demonstration of the atomic bomb might
possibly convince the Japanese to surrender. This was rejected,
however, out of fear that the bomb might be a dud, that the Japanese might
put American prisoners of war in the area, or that they might manage to
shoot down the plane. The shock value of the new weapon could also be
lost. These reasons and others convinced the group that the bomb should be
dropped without warning on a "dual target" -- a war plant
surrounded by workers' homes. On June 6, Stimson informed President
Truman (right) that the Interim Committee recommended keeping the atomic bomb
a secret until Japan had been bombed. The attack should take place as
soon as possible and without warning. Truman and Stimson agreed that
the President would stall if the Soviet Union asked about atomic weapons in
the upcoming meetings to be held at Potsdam and that it might be possible
to gain concessions from the Soviet Union later in return for providing
technical information.
The Interim Committee also
discussed the postwar fate of atomic energy. At the May 31 meeting, they
concluded that the United States should try to retain superiority of
nuclear weapons in case international relations deteriorated. Most
present at the meeting thought that atomic secrets should be protected for
the present, though they conceded that the United States monopoly could not
be held long. The meeting with the industrialists confirmed their view that
the United States had a lead of three to ten years on the Soviet Union in
production facilities for bomb fabrication. There had been some discussion
of free exchange of nuclear research for peaceful purposes and the
international inspection system that such an exchange would require.
Stimson told Truman that the Interim Committee was considering domestic
legislation and that its members generally held the position that
international agreements should be made in which all nuclear research would
be made public and a system of inspections would be devised. In case
international agreements were not forthcoming, the United States should continue
to produce as much fissionable material as possible to take advantage of
its current position of superiority.
Not all
the scientists of the Manhattan Project were satisfied that their voices
had been heard in decision-making about the bomb. They had built the
bomb and thought they had a right to help determine how it was to be used.
The Scientific Panel of the Interim Committee was supposed to be the
connection between the scientists and the policymakers, but after the
scientists of the Met Lab
were briefed by Arthur Compton on June 2 about the Interim Committee's
conclusions, the Met Lab decided to create a "second
opinion." The result was the Committee on the Social and
Political Implications of the Atomic Bomb, which was chaired by James
Franck and included Glenn
Seaborg and Leo
Szilard. Its report argued that postwar international control
of atomic power was the only way to stop the arms race that would be
inevitable if the United States bombed Japan without first demonstrating
the weapon in an uninhabited area. Oppenheimer, Fermi, Compton, and
Lawrence (the Scientific Panel) disagreed with the Franck Report, however,
and concluded that no technical test would convince Japan to
surrender. On June 21, the Interim Committee concurred. The
bomb would be used as soon as possible, without warning, and against a war
plant surrounded
by additional buildings. As to informing the Soviet Union, the
Committee concluded that Truman should mention at Potsdam that the United
States was preparing to use a new kind of weapon against Japan.
The bomb target selection group was chaired by Leslie Groves,
a responsibility he shared with General Thomas Farrell, his military aide
since February 1945. In late May, the committee of scientists and
Army Air Force officers listed Kokura Arsenal, Hiroshima, Niigata, and
Kyoto as the four best targets, believing that attacks on these cities
would make a profound psychological impression on the Japanese and weaken
military resistance. (None of these cities had yet been bombed by
Curtis LeMay's Twentieth Air Force, which planned
to eliminate all major Japanese cities by January 1, 1946.) Stimson
vetoed Kyoto, Japan's most cherished cultural center, and Nagasaki replaced
Kyoto on the target list. Now all that was left was for Truman to
give his final approval, and then it would be up to the weather to
determine which of these four cities would be the first struck by an atomic
bomb.
- The War Enters Its Final
Phase, 1945
- Debate Over How to Use the
Bomb, Late Spring 1945
- The Trinity Test, July 16,
1945
- Safety and the
Trinity Test, July 1945
- Evaluations of
Trinity, July 1945
- Potsdam and the
Final Decision to Bomb, July 1945
- The Atomic Bombing of
Hiroshima, August 6, 1945
- The Atomic Bombing of
Nagasaki, August 9, 1945
- Japan Surrenders, August
10-15, 1945
- The Manhattan Project and
the Second World War, 1939-1945
Next
Sources and notes for this page.
The text for this page was adapted from,
and portions were taken directly from the Office of History and Heritage
Resources publication: F.
G. Gosling, The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb
(DOE/MA-0001; Washington: History Division, Department of Energy, January
1999), 45-47. See also Vincent C. Jones,
Manhattan: The Army and the Atomic Bomb, United
States Army in World War II (Washington: Center of Military History, United
States Army, 1988), 530. The photograph of Robert
Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, and Ernest Lawrence
is courtesy the Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory. Click here for
information on the photograph of Ernest Lawrence, Arthur Compton, Vannevar
Bush, James Conant, Karl Compton, and Alfred Loomis. The
portrait of President
Harry S. Truman is courtesy the Truman Presidential Library.
The photographs of "Joe 1" (the first Soviet atomic test) and of Leo Szilard with Albert
Einstein are courtesy the Federation of
American Scientists. The photograph of Leslie Groves
and Thomas Farrell is reprinted from Jones, Manhattan, 512.
Home | History
Office | OpenNet | DOE | Privacy and Security Notices
About this Site | How to Navigate this Site | Note on Sources |
Site Map | Contact Us
|