National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for wie sehen wir

  1. Responses to Public Comments on Draft Vitrification Melter Evaluation...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Evaluation for the Vitrification Melter" (Draft WIR Evaluation) available for public and state review and comment and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) consultation review. ...

  2. Responses to Public Comments on Draft Vitrification Melter Evaluation

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    available for public and state review and comment and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) consultation review. The public comments on the Draft WIR Evaluation were submitted to...

  3. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard ¬タモ First...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    River Protection 1 previous Non-Impacting U.S. EPA NOV GREEN (0 0) GREEN (7 7) WIR N ... The site was expecting additional documentation from Ohio EPA and U.S. EPA on this NOV, ...

  4. Environmental Compliance Performance Scorecard ¬タモ Fourth...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    River Protection 1 previous Non-Impacting U.S. EPA NOV GREEN (0 2) GREEN (0 7) WIR N ... DOE submitted revision 3 of the management plan to EPA and Ecology on October 7, 2009. ...

  5. S

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    Wir schaffen Wissen - heute fr morgen SHE Symposium, College Station, Texas USA ; March 30-April 1 2015 SHE Symposium, College Station, Texas USA ; March 30-April 1 2015 Paul S ...

  6. EM SSAB CHAIRS Bi-Monthly Conference Call

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ... One third of the FY 2013 LLWMLLW is forecast to come from Portsmouth's Gaseous Diffusion Plant D&D project. EM is expected to complete its Waste Incidental to Reprocessing (WIR) ...

  7. strategic-plan-for-advanced-model-development

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    Strategic Plan for Advanced Model Development at CMAP Kermit Wies List of Authors ... detailed multi-year plan for establishing advanced travel modeling in the Chicago region. ...

  8. U.S. Department of Energy Responses to Public Comments on the Draft Waste- Incidental-to-Reprocessing Evaluation for the West Valley Demonstration Project Concentrator Feed Makeup Tank and Melter Feed Hold Tank

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is providing responses to the comments received from the public and from state and county agencies on the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) Draft Waste-Incidental-to-Reprocessing (WIR) Evaluation for the Concentrator Feed Makeup Tank (CFMT) and the Melter Feed Hold Tank (MFHT), referred to hereafter as the Draft Evaluation.

  9. QER- Comment of ND Ethanol Council

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    To whom it may concern, Attached please find comments from the North Dakota Ethanol Council regarding infrastructure constraints in preparation for the OER Public Meeting, which will be held in Bismarck, N.D., on August 8. Sincerely, Deana Wies

  10. BIGHORN SHEEP: SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYSIS TO THE FOREST PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT„INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAM MEETING

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    1/05/13 Page 1 of 2 TANK WASTE COMMITTEE - 3 MONTH WORK PLAN (SUBJECT TO REVISION) February Committee meeting placeholder: Wednesday, February 13 Committee call placeholder: Tuesday, February 19 @ 3:00 p.m. * Waste Incidental to Reprocessing (WIR) facility (timely?) * Performance Assessment integration, Waste Management Area C (joint w/ RAP, TWC lead?) * SST Integrity Milestones * Site-Wide Waste Transfer Systems (joint w/HSEP, TWC lead) * WESF - viability of concrete, dose (joint w/

  11. Microsoft PowerPoint - 9 Sherri Ross

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG) Review of Waste Management Area C Performance Assessment (WMA-C PA) Hanford Site Sherri Ross LFRG Review Team Lead LFRG Review of the WMA-C PA  Team chartered to review the PA for technical acceptability to support DOE publication  PA prepared to serve as technical analysis for a future waste determination (WD) per the waste incidental to reprocessing (WIR) evaluation requirements of DOE Manual 435.1-1.  WD requires compliance with DOE

  12. West Valley Melter Draft Waste Evaluation Released for Public Comment |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Department of Energy Melter Draft Waste Evaluation Released for Public Comment West Valley Melter Draft Waste Evaluation Released for Public Comment March 11, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Bill Taylor (513) 246-0539 william.taylor@emcbc.doe.gov West Valley, New York - The U.S. Department of Energy today released a Draft Waste Incidental to Reprocessing (WIR) Evaluation of a vitrification melter at the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP) for review and comment by the public,

  13. THE ROLE OF LIQUID WASTE PRETREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES IN SOLVING THE DOE CLEAN-UP MISSION

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Wilmarth, B; Sheryl Bush, S

    2008-10-31

    The objective of this report is to describe the pretreatment solutions that allow treatment to be tailored to specific wastes, processing ahead of the completion schedules for the main treatment facilities, and reduction of technical risks associated with future processing schedules. Wastes stored at Hanford and Savannah River offer challenging scientific and engineering tasks. At both sites, space limitations confound the ability to effectively retrieve and treat the wastes. Additionally, the radiation dose to the worker operating and maintaining the radiochemical plants has a large role in establishing the desired radioactivity removal. However, the regulatory requirements to treat supernatant and saltcake tank wastes differ at the two sites. Hanford must treat and remove radioactivity from the tanks based on the TriParty Agreement and Waste Incidental to Reprocessing (WIR) documentation. These authorizing documents do not specify treatment technologies; rather, they specify endstate conditions. Dissimilarly, Waste Determinations prepared at SRS in accordance with Section 3116 of the 2005 National Defense Authorization Act along with state operating permits establish the methodology and amounts of radioactivity that must be removed and may be disposed of in South Carolina. After removal of entrained solids and site-specific radionuclides, supernatant and saltcake wastes are considered to be low activity waste (LAW) and are immobilized in glass and disposed of at the Hanford Site Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF) or formulated into a grout for disposal at the Savannah River Site Saltstone Disposal Facility. Wastes stored at the Hanford Site or SRS comprise saltcake, supernate, and sludges. The supernatant and saltcake waste fractions contain primarily sodium salts, metals (e.g., Al, Cr), cesium-137 (Cs-137), technetium-99 (Tc-99) and entrained solids containing radionuclides such as strontium-90 (Sr-90) and transuranic elements. The sludges contain many of the