National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for reference revised code

  1. Codes and standards and other guidance cited in regulatory documents. Revision 1

    SciTech Connect

    Ankrum, A.; Nickolaus, J.; Vinther, R.; Maguire-Moffitt, N.; Hammer, J.; Sherfey, L.; Warner, R.

    1994-08-01

    As part of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standard Review Plan Update and Development Program, Pacific Northwest Laboratory developed a listing of industry consensus codes and standards and other government and industry guidance referred to in regulatory documents. In addition to updating previous information, Revision 1 adds citations from the NRC Inspection Manual and the Improved Standard Technical Specifications. This listing identifies the version of the code or standard cited in the regulatory document, the regulatory document, and the current version of the code or standard. It also provides a summary characterization of the nature of the citation. This listing was developed from electronic searches of the Code of Federal Regulations and the NRC`s Bulletins, Information Notices, Circulars, Generic Letters, Policy Statements, Regulatory Guides, and the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800).

  2. RELAP5/MOD3 code manual: Summaries and reviews of independent code assessment reports. Volume 7, Revision 1

    SciTech Connect

    Moore, R.L.; Sloan, S.M.; Schultz, R.R.; Wilson, G.E.

    1996-10-01

    Summaries of RELAP5/MOD3 code assessments, a listing of the assessment matrix, and a chronology of the various versions of the code are given. Results from these code assessments have been used to formulate a compilation of some of the strengths and weaknesses of the code. These results are documented in the report. Volume 7 was designed to be updated periodically and to include the results of the latest code assessments as they become available. Consequently, users of Volume 7 should ensure that they have the latest revision available.

  3. TRUPACT-III Content Codes (TRUCON-III), Revision 2, July 2012

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    WIPP 11-3458 Rev. 2 TRUPACT-III CONTENT CODES (TRUCON-III) Revision 2 July 2012 This document supersedes DOE/WIPP 10-3458, Revision 1 DOE/WIPP 11-3458 Rev. 2 TRUPACT-III CONTENT CODES (TRUCON-III) Revision 2 July 2012 Approved by: [Signature on File] Date:_ 12 July 2012 _ J. R. Stroble, Director, Office of the National TRU Program DOE/WIPP 11-3458 Rev. 2, July 2012 3 This document has been submitted as required to: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information PO Box

  4. Reference design description for a geologic repository: Revision 01

    SciTech Connect

    1997-09-01

    This document describes the current design expectations for a potential geologic repository that could be located at Yucca Mountain in Nevada. This Reference Design Description (RDD) looks at the surface and subsurface repository and disposal container design. Additionally, it reviews the expected long-term performance of the potential repository. In accordance with current legislation, the reference design for the potential repository does not include an interim storage option. The reference design presented allows the disposal of highly radioactive material received from government-owned spent fuel custodian sites; produces high-level waste sites, and commercial spent fuel sites. All design elements meet current federal, state, and local regulations governing the disposal of high-level radioactive waste and protection of the public and the environment. Due to the complex nature of developing a repository, the design will be created in three phases to support Viability Assessment, License Application, and construction. This document presents the current reference design. It will be updated periodically as the design progresses. Some of the details presented here may change significantly as more cost-effective solutions, technical advancements, or changes to requirements are identified.

  5. Revised Analyses of Decommissioning Reference Non-Fuel-Cycle Facilities

    SciTech Connect

    MC Bierschbach; DR Haffner; KJ Schneider; SM Short

    2002-12-01

    Cost information is developed for the conceptual decommissioning of non-fuel-cycle nuclear facilities that represent a significant decommissioning task in terms of decontamination and disposal activities. This study is a re-evaluation of the original study (NUREG/CR-1754 and NUREG/CR-1754, Addendum 1). The reference facilities examined in this study are the same as in the original study and include: a laboratory for the manufacture of {sup 3}H-labeled compounds; a laboratory for the manufacture of {sup 14}C-labeled compounds; a laboratory for the manufacture of {sup 123}I-labeled compounds; a laboratory for the manufacture of {sup 137}Cs sealed sources; a laboratory for the manufacture of {sup 241}Am sealed sources; and an institutional user laboratory. In addition to the laboratories, three reference sites that require some decommissioning effort were also examined. These sites are: (1) a site with a contaminated drain line and hold-up tank; (2) a site with a contaminated ground surface; and (3) a tailings pile containing uranium and thorium residues. Decommissioning of these reference facilities and sites can be accomplished using techniques and equipment that are in common industrial use. Essentially the same technology assumed in the original study is used in this study. For the reference laboratory-type facilities, the study approach is to first evaluate the decommissioning of individual components (e.g., fume hoods, glove boxes, and building surfaces) that are common to many laboratory facilities. The information obtained from analyzing the individual components of each facility are then used to determine the cost, manpower requirements and dose information for the decommissioning of the entire facility. DECON, the objective of the 1988 Rulemaking for materials facilities, is the decommissioning alternative evaluated for the reference laboratories because it results in the release of the facility for restricted or unrestricted use as soon as possible. For a

  6. Emergency Doses (ED) - Revision 3: A calculator code for environmental dose computations

    SciTech Connect

    Rittmann, P.D.

    1990-12-01

    The calculator program ED (Emergency Doses) was developed from several HP-41CV calculator programs documented in the report Seven Health Physics Calculator Programs for the HP-41CV, RHO-HS-ST-5P (Rittman 1984). The program was developed to enable estimates of offsite impacts more rapidly and reliably than was possible with the software available for emergency response at that time. The ED - Revision 3, documented in this report, revises the inhalation dose model to match that of ICRP 30, and adds the simple estimates for air concentration downwind from a chemical release. In addition, the method for calculating the Pasquill dispersion parameters was revised to match the GENII code within the limitations of a hand-held calculator (e.g., plume rise and building wake effects are not included). The summary report generator for printed output, which had been present in the code from the original version, was eliminated in Revision 3 to make room for the dispersion model, the chemical release portion, and the methods of looping back to an input menu until there is no further no change. This program runs on the Hewlett-Packard programmable calculators known as the HP-41CV and the HP-41CX. The documentation for ED - Revision 3 includes a guide for users, sample problems, detailed verification tests and results, model descriptions, code description (with program listing), and independent peer review. This software is intended to be used by individuals with some training in the use of air transport models. There are some user inputs that require intelligent application of the model to the actual conditions of the accident. The results calculated using ED - Revision 3 are only correct to the extent allowed by the mathematical models. 9 refs., 36 tabs.

  7. Reference manual for the POISSON/SUPERFISH Group of Codes

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1987-01-01

    The POISSON/SUPERFISH Group codes were set up to solve two separate problems: the design of magnets and the design of rf cavities in a two-dimensional geometry. The first stage of either problem is to describe the layout of the magnet or cavity in a way that can be used as input to solve the generalized Poisson equation for magnets or the Helmholtz equations for cavities. The computer codes require that the problems be discretized by replacing the differentials (dx,dy) by finite differences ({delta}X,{delta}Y). Instead of defining the function everywhere in a plane, the function is defined only at a finite number of points on a mesh in the plane.

  8. Revisions

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Adjustments Revisions Adjustments Acquisitions Extensions Discoveries in Old Fields ... year + Col. 3 + Col. 4 + Col. 8 - Col. 9. Notes: Old means discovered in a prior year. ...

  9. Revisions

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    proved reserves of natural gas, wet after lease separation, 2001-14 billion cubic feet Revisions a Net of Sales b New Reservoir Proved d Change Net and and New Field Discoveries Total c Estimated Reserves from Adjustments Revisions Adjustments Acquisitions Extensions Discoveries in Old Fields Discoveries Production 12/31 Prior Year Year (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) Total natural gas (billion cubic feet) 2001 1,849 -2,438 -589 2,715 17,183 3,668 2,898 23,749 20,642 191,743 5,233

  10. NFPA, 1996 revisions to National Electrical Code, NFPA 110, and NFPA 99 that affect on-site power generation

    SciTech Connect

    Johnson, G.S.; Bell, J.; Whittall, H.

    1995-12-31

    The three most important NFPA standards for the on-site power industry are: NFPA 70-The National Electrical Code, NFPA 110 Emergency and Standby Power Systems and NFPA 99-Health Care Facilities. This paper will cover the important revisions affecting on-site power generation systems for the 1996 editions. Each of the three authors is a member of one or more of the technical committees that have responsibility for writing these standards.

  11. DEPTH-CHARGE static and time-dependent perturbation/sensitivity system for nuclear reactor core analysis. Revision I. [DEPTH-CHARGE code

    SciTech Connect

    White, J.R.

    1985-04-01

    This report provides the background theory, user input, and sample problems required for the efficient application of the DEPTH-CHARGE system - a code black for both static and time-dependent perturbation theory and data sensitivity analyses. The DEPTH-CHARGE system is of modular construction and has been implemented within the VENTURE-BURNER computational system at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The DEPTH module (coupled with VENTURE) solves for the three adjoint functions of Depletion Perturbation Theory and calculates the desired time-dependent derivatives of the response with respect to the nuclide concentrations and nuclear data utilized in the reference model. The CHARGE code is a collection of utility routines for general data manipulation and input preparation and considerably extends the usefulness of the system through the automatic generation of adjoint sources, estimated perturbed responses, and relative data sensitivity coefficients. Combined, the DEPTH-CHARGE system provides, for the first time, a complete generalized first-order perturbation/sensitivity theory capability for both static and time-dependent analyses of realistic multidimensional reactor models. This current documentation incorporates minor revisions to the original DEPTH-CHARGE documentation (ORNL/CSD-78) to reflect some new capabilities within the individual codes.

  12. Biodiesel Vehicle and Infrastructure Codes and Standards Chart (Revised) (Fact Sheet)

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    2011-02-01

    This chart shows the SDOs responsible for leading the support and development of key codes and standards for biodiesel.

  13. Natural Gas Vehicle and Infrastructure Codes and Standards Chart (Revised) (Fact Sheet)

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    2011-02-01

    This chart shows the SDOs responsible for leading the support and development of key codes and standards for natural gas.

  14. Ethanol Vehicle and Infrastructure Codes and Standards Chart (Revised) (Fact Sheet)

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    2011-02-01

    This chart shows the SDOs responsible for leading the support and development of key codes and standards for ethanol.

  15. Propane Vehicle and Infrastructure Codes and Standards Chart (Revised) (Fact Sheet)

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    2011-02-01

    This chart shows the SDOs responsible for leading the support and development of key codes and standards for propane.

  16. Electric Vehicle and Infrastructure Codes and Standards Chart (Revised) (Fact Sheet)

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    2011-02-01

    This chart shows the SDOs responsible for leading the support and development of key codes and standards for electric.

  17. Biodiesel Vehicle and Infrastructure Codes and Standards Chart (Revised) (Fact Sheet), NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory)

    Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center

    Many standards development organizations (SDOs) are working to develop codes and standards needed for the utilization of alternative fuel vehicle technologies. This chart shows the SDOs responsible for leading the support and development of key codes and standards for biodiesel. Biodiesel Vehicle and Infrastructure Codes and Standards Chart Vehicles Storage Dispensing Infrastructure Engine Testing: Fuel Systems: Fuel Lubricants: Powertrain Systems: Containers: Dispensing Operations: Dispensing

  18. Propane Vehicle and Infrastructure Codes and Standards Chart (Revised) (Fact Sheet), NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory)

    Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center

    Many standards development organizations (SDOs) are working to develop codes and standards needed for the utilization of alternative fuel vehicle technologies. This chart shows the SDOs responsible for leading the support and development of key codes and standards for propane. Propane Vehicle and Infrastructure Codes and Standards Chart Vehicle Systems Safety: Vehicle Tanks and Piping: Vehicle Components: Vehicle Dispensing Systems: Vehicle Dispensing System Components: Storage Systems: Storage

  19. Validation and verification plan for safety and PRA codes. Revision 1

    SciTech Connect

    Ades, M.J.; Crowe, R.D.; Toffer, H.

    1991-04-01

    This report discusses a verification and validation (V&V) plan for computer codes used for safety analysis and probabilistic risk assessment calculations. The present plan fulfills the commitments by Westinghouse Savannah River Company (WSRC) to the Department of Energy Savannah River Office (DOE-SRO) to bring the essential safety analysis and probabilistic risk assessment codes in compliance with verification and validation requirements.

  20. Toxic Substances Control Act. Environmental Guidance Program Reference Book: Revision 6

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1992-05-15

    This Reference Book contains a current copy of the Toxic Substances Control Act and those regulations that implement the statute and appear to be most relevant to DOE activities. The document is provided to DOE and contractor staff for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as legal guidance. Questions concerning this Reference Book may be directed to Mark Petts, EH-231 (202/586-2609).

  1. Environmental Guidance Program reference book: Toxic substances control act. Revision 7

    SciTech Connect

    1994-12-01

    This Reference Book contains a current copy of the Toxic Substances Control Act and those regulations that implement the statute and appear to be most relevant to DOE activities. The document is provided to DOE staff for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as legal guidance. Questions concerning this Reference Book may be directed to Mark Petts, EH-231 (202/586-2609).

  2. Clean Water Act (excluding Section 404). Environmental guidance program reference book: Revision 6

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1993-01-15

    This Reference Book contains a current copy of the Clean Water Act (excluding Section 404) and those regulations that implement the statutes and appear to be most relevant to US Department of Energy (DOE) activities. The document is provided to DOE and contractor staff for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as legal guidance. Updates that include important new requirements will be provided periodically. Questions concerning this Reference Book may be directed to Mark Petts, EH-231 (202/586-2609).

  3. Materials code case acceptability ASME Section 3, Division 1: Regulatory Guide 1. 85: Revision 26

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1989-07-01

    Section 50.55a, ''Codes and Standards,'' of 10 CFR Part 50, ''Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities,'' requires, in part, that components of the reactor coolant pressure boundary be designed, fabricated, erected, and tested in accordance with the requirements for Class 1 components of Section III, ''Nuclear Power Plant Components,'' of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code or equivalent quality standards. This regulatory guide lists those Section III ASME Code Cases oriented to materials and testing that are generally acceptable to the NRC staff for implementation in the licensing of light-water-cooled nuclear power plants.

  4. Ethanol Vehicle and Infrastructure Codes and Standards Chart (Revised) (Fact Sheet), NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory)

    Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center

    pipeline safety) CONTROLLING AUTHORITIES: State and Local Government (zoning, building permits) CONTROLLING AUTHORITIES: State and Local Government (zoning, building permits) CONTROLLING AUTHORITIES: DOT/NHTS (crashworthiness) EPA (emissions) Many standards development organizations (SDOs) are working to develop codes and standards needed for the utilization of alternative fuel vehicle technologies. This chart shows the SDOs responsible for leading the support and development of key codes and

  5. SCALE: A modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluation. Control modules -- Volume 1, Revision 4

    SciTech Connect

    Landers, N.F.; Petrie, L.M.; Knight, J.R.

    1995-04-01

    SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice, (2) automate the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System development has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.2 of the system. This manual is divided into three volumes: Volume 1--for the control module documentation, Volume 2--for the functional module documentation, and Volume 3 for the documentation of the data libraries and subroutine libraries.

  6. SCALE: A modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluation. Miscellaneous -- Volume 3, Revision 4

    SciTech Connect

    Petrie, L.M.; Jordon, W.C.; Edwards, A.L. |

    1995-04-01

    SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice; (2) automate the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System developments has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.2 of the system. This manual is divided into three volumes: Volume 1--for the control module documentation, Volume 2--for the functional module documentation, and Volume 3--for the data libraries and subroutine libraries.

  7. RELAP/MOD3 code manual: User`s guidelines. Volume 5, Revision 1

    SciTech Connect

    Fletcher, C.D.; Schultz, R.R.

    1995-08-01

    The RELAP5 code has been developed for best estimate transient simulation of light water reactor coolant systems during postulated accidents. The code models the coupled behavior of the reactor coolant system and the core for loss-of-coolant accidents, and operational transients, such as anticipated transient without scram, loss of offsite power, loss of feedwater, and loss of flow. A generic modeling approach is used that permits simulating a variety of thermal hydraulic systems. Control system and secondary system components are included to permit modeling of plant controls, turbines, condensers, and secondary feedwater systems. Volume V contains guidelines that have solved over the past several years through the use of the RELAP5 code.

  8. FEHMN 1.0: Finite element heat and mass transfer code; Revision 1

    SciTech Connect

    Zyvoloski, G.; Dash, Z.; Kelkar, S.

    1992-05-01

    A computer code is described which can simulate non-isothermal multi-phase multicomponent flow in porous media. It is applicable to natural-state studies of geothermal systems and groundwater flow. The equations of heat and mass transfer for multiphase flow in porous and permeable media are solved sing the finite element method. The permeability and porosity of the medium are allowed to depend on pressure and temperature. The code also has provisions for movable air and water phases and noncoupled tracers; that is, tracer solutions that do not affect the heat and mass transfer solutions. The tracers can be passive or reactive. The code can simulate two-dimensional, two-dimensional radial, or three-dimensional geometries. A summary of the equations in the model and the numerical solution procedure are provided in this report. A user`s guide and sample problems are also included. The FEHMN (Finite Element Heat and Mass Nuclear) code, described in this report, is a version of FEHM (Finite Element Heat and Mass, Zyvoloski et al., 1988) developed for the Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project (YMP). The main use of FEHMN will be to assist in the understanding of flow fields in the saturated zone below the potential Yucca Mountain repository.

  9. Electric Vehicle and Infrastructure Codes and Standards Chart (Revised) (Fact Sheet), NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory)

    Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center

    Dispensing Infrastructure NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. CONTROLLING AUTHORITIES: State and Federal Energy Regulatory Commissions CONTROLLING AUTHORITIES: Local Building and Fire Departments CONTROLLING AUTHORITIES: DOT/NHTS Many standards development organizations (SDOs) are working to develop codes and standards needed for the utilization of alternative fuel

  10. Building Energy Codes: State and Local Code Implementation Overview

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Mark Lessans Fellow Building Energy Codes: State and Local Code Implementation Overview ... building code regarding energy efficiency to the revised model code and submit a ...

  11. REFERENCES

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    FEDERAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS a. Public Law (P.L.) 93-579, Privacy Act of 1974, as amended Title 5 United States Code (U.S.C.) Section 552a. . b. P.L. 104-106, Division E, Clinger ...

  12. SCALE: A modular code system for performing Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluation. Volume 1, Part 2: Control modules S1--H1; Revision 5

    SciTech Connect

    1997-03-01

    SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice, (2) automated the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System development has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.3 of the system.

  13. Systems Analysis Programs for Hands-on Integrated Reliability Evaluations (SAPHIRE) Code Reference Manual

    SciTech Connect

    C. L. Smith; K. J. Kvarfordt; S. T. Wood

    2008-08-01

    The Systems Analysis Programs for Hands-on Integrated Reliability Evaluations (SAPHIRE) is a software application developed for performing a complete probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) using a personal computer. SAPHIRE is funded by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and developed by the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). The INL's primary role in this project is that of software developer. However, the INL also plays an important role in technology transfer by interfacing and supporting SAPHIRE users comprised of a wide range of PRA practitioners from the NRC, national laboratories, the private sector, and foreign countries. SAPHIRE can be used to model a complex system’s response to initiating events, quantify associated damage outcome frequencies, and identify important contributors to this damage (Level 1 PRA) and to analyze containment performance during a severe accident and quantify radioactive releases (Level 2 PRA). It can be used for a PRA evaluating a variety of operating conditions, for example, for a nuclear reactor at full power, low power, or at shutdown conditions. Furthermore, SAPHIRE can be used to analyze both internal and external initiating events and has special features for transforming models built for internal event analysis to models for external event analysis. It can also be used in a limited manner to quantify risk in terms of release consequences to both the public and the environment (Level 3 PRA). SAPHIRE includes a separate module called the Graphical Evaluation Module (GEM). GEM provides a highly specialized user interface with SAPHIRE that automates SAPHIRE process steps for evaluating operational events at commercial nuclear power plants. Using GEM, an analyst can estimate the risk associated with operational events in a very efficient and expeditious manner. This reference guide will introduce the SAPHIRE Version 7.0 software. A brief discussion of the purpose and history of the software is included along with general

  14. Systems Analysis Programs for Hands-on Integrated Reliability Evaluations (SAPHIRE) Code Reference Manual

    SciTech Connect

    C. L. Smith; K. J. Kvarfordt; S. T. Wood

    2006-07-01

    The Systems Analysis Programs for Hands-on Integrated Reliability Evaluations (SAPHIRE) is a software application developed for performing a complete probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) using a personal computer. SAPHIRE is funded by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and developed by the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). The INL's primary role in this project is that of software developer. However, the INL also plays an important role in technology transfer by interfacing and supporting SAPHIRE users comprised of a wide range of PRA practitioners from the NRC, national laboratories, the private sector, and foreign countries. SAPHIRE can be used to model a complex system’s response to initiating events, quantify associated damage outcome frequencies, and identify important contributors to this damage (Level 1 PRA) and to analyze containment performance during a severe accident and quantify radioactive releases (Level 2 PRA). It can be used for a PRA evaluating a variety of operating conditions, for example, for a nuclear reactor at full power, low power, or at shutdown conditions. Furthermore, SAPHIRE can be used to analyze both internal and external initiating events and has special features for ansforming models built for internal event analysis to models for external event analysis. It can also be used in a limited manner to quantify risk in terms of release consequences to both the public and the environment (Level 3 PRA). SAPHIRE includes a separate module called the Graphical Evaluation Module (GEM). GEM provides a highly specialized user interface with SAPHIRE that automates SAPHIRE process steps for evaluating operational events at commercial nuclear power plants. Using GEM, an analyst can estimate the risk associated with operational events in a very efficient and expeditious manner. This reference guide will introduce the SAPHIRE Version 7.0 software. A brief discussion of the purpose and history of the software is included along with general

  15. Savannah River Site mixed waste Proposed Site Treatment Plan (PSTP). Volumes 1 and 2 and reference document: Revision 2

    SciTech Connect

    Helmich, E.; Noller, D.K.; Wierzbicki, K.S.; Bailey, L.L.

    1995-07-13

    The DOE is required by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act to prepare site treatment plans describing the development of treatment capacities and technologies for treating mixed waste. This proposed plan contains Savannah River Site`s preferred options and schedules for constructing new facilities, and otherwise obtaining treatment for mixed wastes. The proposed plan consists of 2 volumes. Volume 1, Compliance Plan, identifies the capacity to be developed and the schedules as required. Volume 2, Background, provides a detailed discussion of the preferred options with technical basis, plus a description of the specific waste streams. Chapters are: Introduction; Methodology; Mixed low level waste streams; Mixed transuranic waste; High level waste; Future generation of mixed waste streams; Storage; Process for evaluation of disposal issues in support of the site treatment plans discussions; Treatment facilities and treatment technologies; Offsite waste streams for which SRS treatment is the Preferred Option (Naval reactor wastes); Summary information; and Acronyms and glossary. This revision does not contain the complete revised report, but only those pages that have been revised.

  16. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Department of Energy Revised Guidance for Recruitment, Retention and Relocation Incentives Revised Guidance for Recruitment, Retention and Relocation Incentives 3Rs Revised Guidance.pdf (66.78 KB) CHCO Memo_3Rs Guidance_Attachment_05-12-2016_FINAL.pdf (181.71 KB) Responsible Contacts Tiffany Wheeler Human Resources Specialist E-mail tiffany.wheeler@hq.doe.gov Phone (202) 586-8481 More Documents & Publications Manager's Desk Reference on Human Capital Management Flexibilities DOE Handbook

  17. Natural Gas Vehicle and Infrastructure Codes and Standards Chart (Revised) (Fact Sheet), NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory)

    Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center

    Natural Gas Vehicle and Infrastructure Codes and Standards Chart Many standards development organizations (SDOs) are working to develop codes and standards needed for the utilization of alternative fuel vehicle technologies. This chart shows the SDOs responsible for leading the support and development of key codes and standards for natural gas. Vehicle Safety: Vehicle Fuel Systems: Vehicle Containers: Vehicle Fuel System Components: Dispensing Component Standards: Dispensing Operations:

  18. Building Energy Code

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Mississippi's existing state code is based on the 1977 Model Code for Energy Conservation (MCEC). The existing law does not mandate enforcement by localities, and any revised code will probably...

  19. Building Energy Code

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The State Building Code Council revised the Washington State Energy Code (WESC) in February 2013, effective July 1, 2013. The WESC is a state-developed code based upon ASHRAE 90.1-2010 and the...

  20. SCALE: A modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluation. Functional modules F1--F8 -- Volume 2, Part 1, Revision 4

    SciTech Connect

    Greene, N.M.; Petrie, L.M.; Westfall, R.M.; Bucholz, J.A.; Hermann, O.W.; Fraley, S.K.

    1995-04-01

    SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice, (2) automate the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System development has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.2 of the system. The manual is divided into three volumes: Volume 1--for the control module documentation; Volume 2--for functional module documentation; and Volume 3--for documentation of the data libraries and subroutine libraries.

  1. SCALE: A modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluation. Functional modules F9--F16 -- Volume 2, Part 2, Revision 4

    SciTech Connect

    West, J.T.; Hoffman, T.J.; Emmett, M.B.; Childs, K.W.; Petrie, L.M.; Landers, N.F.; Bryan, C.B.; Giles, G.E.

    1995-04-01

    SCALE--a modular code system for Standardized Computer Analyses Licensing Evaluation--has been developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the request of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The SCALE system utilizes well-established computer codes and methods within standard analysis sequences that (1) allow an input format designed for the occasional user and/or novice, (2) automate the data processing and coupling between modules, and (3) provide accurate and reliable results. System development has been directed at problem-dependent cross-section processing and analysis of criticality safety, shielding, heat transfer, and depletion/decay problems. Since the initial release of SCALE in 1980, the code system has been heavily used for evaluation of nuclear fuel facility and package designs. This revision documents Version 4.2 of the system. The manual is divided into three volumes: Volume 1--for the control module documentation, Volume 2--for functional module documentation; and Volume 3--for documentation of the data libraries and subroutine libraries. This volume discusses the following functional modules: MORSE-SGC; HEATING 7.2; KENO V.a; JUNEBUG-II; HEATPLOT-S; REGPLOT 6; PLORIGEN; and OCULAR.

  2. Environmental Guidance Program Reference Book: Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act and Marine Mammal Protection Act. Revision 3

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1988-01-31

    Two laws governing activities in the marine environment are considered in this Reference Book. The Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act (MPRSA, P.L. 92-532) regulates ocean dumping of waste, provides for a research program on ocean dumping, and provides for the designation and regulation of marine sanctuaries. The Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA, P.L. 92-522) establishes a federal program to protect and manage marine mammals. The Fishery Conservation and Management Act (FCMA, P.L. 94-265) establishes a program to regulate marine fisheries resources and commercial marine fishermen. Because the Department of Energy (DOE) is not engaged in any activities that could be classified as fishing under FCMA, this Act and its regulations have no implications for the DOE; therefore, no further consideration of this Act is given within this Reference Book. The requirements of the MPRSA and the MMPA are discussed in terms of their implications for the DOE.

  3. Characterization of the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Environmental Assessment (EA) glass Standard Reference Material. Revision 1

    SciTech Connect

    Jantzen, C.M.; Bibler, N.E.; Beam, D.C.; Crawford, C.L.; Pickett, M.A.

    1993-06-01

    Liquid high-level nuclear waste at the Savannah River Site (SRS) will be immobilized by vitrification in borosilicate glass. The glass will be produced and poured into stainless steel canisters in the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF). Other waste form producers, such as West Valley Nuclear Services (WVNS) and the Hanford Waste Vitrification Project (HWVP), will also immobilize high-level radioactive waste in borosilicate glass. The canistered waste will be stored temporarily at each facility for eventual permanent disposal in a geologic repository. The Department of Energy has defined a set of requirements for the canistered waste forms, the Waste Acceptance Product Specifications (WAPS). The current Waste Acceptance Primary Specification (WAPS) 1.3, the product consistency specification, requires the waste form producers to demonstrate control of the consistency of the final waste form using a crushed glass durability test, the Product Consistency Test (PCI). In order to be acceptable, a waste glass must be more durable during PCT analysis than the waste glass identified in the DWPF Environmental Assessment (EA). In order to supply all the waste form producers with the same standard benchmark glass, 1000 pounds of the EA glass was fabricated. The chemical analyses and characterization of the benchmark EA glass are reported. This material is now available to act as a durability and/or redox Standard Reference Material (SRM) for all waste form producers.

  4. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Office of the State Fire Marshal is granted the authority to promulgate amendments, revisions, and alternative compliance methods for the code.

  5. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The New Jersey Uniform Construction Code Act provides that model codes and standards publications shall not be adopted more frequently than once every three years. However, a revision or amendment...

  6. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Florida Building Commission (FBC) is directed to adopt, revise, update, and maintain the Florida Building Code in accordance with Chapter 120 of the state statutes. The code is mandatory...

  7. Inverse Load Calculation of Wind Turbine Support Structures - A Numerical Verification Using the Comprehensive Simulation Code FAST: Preprint (Revised)

    SciTech Connect

    Pahn, T.; Jonkman, J.; Rolges, R.; Robertson, A.

    2012-11-01

    Physically measuring the dynamic responses of wind turbine support structures enables the calculation of the applied loads using an inverse procedure. In this process, inverse means deriving the inputs/forces from the outputs/responses. This paper presents results of a numerical verification of such an inverse load calculation. For this verification, the comprehensive simulation code FAST is used. FAST accounts for the coupled dynamics of wind inflow, aerodynamics, elasticity and turbine controls. Simulations are run using a 5-MW onshore wind turbine model with a tubular tower. Both the applied loads due to the instantaneous wind field and the resulting system responses are known from the simulations. Using the system responses as inputs to the inverse calculation, the applied loads are calculated, which in this case are the rotor thrust forces. These forces are compared to the rotor thrust forces known from the FAST simulations. The results of these comparisons are presented to assess the accuracy of the inverse calculation. To study the influences of turbine controls, load cases in normal operation between cut-in and rated wind speed, near rated wind speed and between rated and cut-out wind speed are chosen. The presented study shows that the inverse load calculation is capable of computing very good estimates of the rotor thrust. The accuracy of the inverse calculation does not depend on the control activity of the wind turbine.

  8. STREAM II-V5: REVISION OF STREAM II-V4 AQUEOUS TRANSPORT CODE TO ACCOUNT FOR THE EFFECTS OF RAINFALL EVENTS

    SciTech Connect

    Chen, K.

    2011-05-18

    STREAM II is an aqueous transport model developed by the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) for use in the Savannah River Site (SRS) emergency response program. The transport model of the Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program (WASP) is used by STREAM II to perform contaminant transport calculations. WASP5 is a US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) water quality analysis program that simulates contaminant transport and fate through surface water. A recent version of the code (STREAM II-V4) predicts peak concentration and peak concentration arrival time at downstream locations for releases from the SRS facilities to the Savannah River. The input flows for STREAM II-V4 are derived from the historical flow records measured by the United States Geological Survey (USGS). The stream flow for STREAM II-V4 is fixed and the flow only varies with the month in which the releases are taking place. Therefore, the effects of flow surge due to a severe storm are not accounted for by STREAM IIV4. STREAM II-V5 is an upgraded version which accounts for the effects of a storm event. The revised model finds the proper stream inlet flow based on the total rainfall and rainfall duration as input by the user. STREAM II-V5 then adjusts the stream segment volumes (cross sections) based on the stream inlet flow. The rainfall based stream flow and the adjusted stream segment volumes are then used for contaminant transport calculations. This paper will discuss the required modifications to STREAM II and a comparison of results between the older and newer versions for an example involving a rainfall event.

  9. Clean Water Act (Section 404) and Rivers and Harbors Act (Sections 9 and 10). Environmental Guidance Program Reference Book, Revision 4

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1992-03-01

    This Reference Book contains a current copy of the Clean Water Act (Section 404) and the Rivers and Harbors Act (Sections 9 and 10) and those regulations that implement those sections of the statutes and appear to be most relevant to DOE activities. The document is provided to DOE and contractor staff for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as legal guidance. Updates that include important new requirements will be provided periodically. Questions concerning this Reference Book may be directed to Mark Petts, IH-231 (FTS 896-2609 or Commercial 202/586-2609).

  10. Property:Incentive/CodeChgCycle | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    state Building Code Bureau. All suggested code revisions are processed through the state administrative rule-making process involving publication, public comments, and public...

  11. GETEM Manuals and Revision Notes

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Please refer to these manuals and revision notes prior to downloading and running the Geothermal Electricity Technology Evaluation Model (GETEM). Because this is a beta version, you are urged to...

  12. TAURUS: an interactive post-processor for the analysis codes NIKE3D, DYNA3D, TACO3D, and GEMINI. Revision 1

    SciTech Connect

    Brown, B.E.; Hallquist, J.O.

    1984-05-01

    This report provides a user's manual for the post-processor, TAURUS. TAURUS reads the binary plot files generated by the two and three dimensional finite element codes currently used at LLNL and plots contours, time histories, and deformed shapes. Contours of a large number of quantities may be plotted on meshes consisting of plate, shell, and solid type elements. TAURUS can compute a variety of strain measures, reaction forces along constrained boundaries, and momentum. TAURUS is operational on the CRAY-1, 7600, and VAX computers.

  13. DYNA3D: A nonlinear, explicit, three-dimensional finite element code for solid and structural mechanics, User manual. Revision 1

    SciTech Connect

    Whirley, R.G.; Engelmann, B.E.

    1993-11-01

    This report is the User Manual for the 1993 version of DYNA3D, and also serves as a User Guide. DYNA3D is a nonlinear, explicit, finite element code for analyzing the transient dynamic response of three-dimensional solids and structures. The code is fully vectorized and is available on several computer platforms. DYNA3D includes solid, shell, beam, and truss elements to allow maximum flexibility in modeling physical problems. Many material models are available to represent a wide range of material behavior, including elasticity, plasticity, composites, thermal effects, and rate dependence. In addition, DYNA3D has a sophisticated contact interface capability, including frictional sliding and single surface contact. Rigid materials provide added modeling flexibility. A material model driver with interactive graphics display is incorporated into DYNA3D to permit accurate modeling of complex material response based on experimental data. Along with the DYNA3D Example Problem Manual, this document provides the information necessary to apply DYNA3D to solve a wide range of engineering analysis problems.

  14. Nevada Test Site Radiological Control Manual. Revision 1

    SciTech Connect

    None, None

    2010-02-09

    This document supersedes DOE/NV/25946--801, “Nevada Test Site Radiological Control Manual,” Revision 0 issued in October 2009. Brief Description of Revision: A minor revision to correct oversights made during revision to incorporate the 10 CFR 835 Update; and for use as a reference document for Tenant Organization Radiological Protection Programs.

  15. Building Energy Code for the District of Columbia

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The DC Energy Conservation Code is updated regularly as national codes are revised or if a change is proposed by local code enforcement officials, industry, design professionals, or other...

  16. Codes and standards and other guidance cited in regulatory documents

    SciTech Connect

    Nickolaus, J.R.; Bohlander, K.L.

    1996-08-01

    As part of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standard Review Plan Update and Development Program (SRP-UDP), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory developed a listing of industry consensus codes and standards and other government and industry guidance referred to in regulatory documents. The SRP-UDP has been completed and the SRP-Maintenance Program (SRP-MP) is now maintaining this listing. Besides updating previous information, Revision 3 adds approximately 80 citations. This listing identifies the version of the code or standard cited in the regulatory document, the regulatory document, and the current version of the code or standard. It also provides a summary characterization of the nature of the citation. This listing was developed from electronic searches of the Code of Federal Regulations and the NRC`s Bulletins, Information Notices, Circulars, Enforcement Manual, Generic Letters, Inspection Manual, Policy Statements, Regulatory Guides, Standard Technical Specifications and the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800).

  17. Hawaii Revised Statute 182-6 Exploration | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Hawaii Revised Statute 182-6 Exploration Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Hawaii Revised Statute 182-6...

  18. REVISED MD-110 REFERENCE GUIDE SEPTERMBER 2015

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    ... CHAPTER 9: APPEALS TO THE COMMISSION * Provides that EEOC's Office of Federal Operations ... 6). * Includes that the complainant, agent, grievant, or individual class member must ...

  19. Speech coding

    SciTech Connect

    Ravishankar, C., Hughes Network Systems, Germantown, MD

    1998-05-08

    Speech is the predominant means of communication between human beings and since the invention of the telephone by Alexander Graham Bell in 1876, speech services have remained to be the core service in almost all telecommunication systems. Original analog methods of telephony had the disadvantage of speech signal getting corrupted by noise, cross-talk and distortion Long haul transmissions which use repeaters to compensate for the loss in signal strength on transmission links also increase the associated noise and distortion. On the other hand digital transmission is relatively immune to noise, cross-talk and distortion primarily because of the capability to faithfully regenerate digital signal at each repeater purely based on a binary decision. Hence end-to-end performance of the digital link essentially becomes independent of the length and operating frequency bands of the link Hence from a transmission point of view digital transmission has been the preferred approach due to its higher immunity to noise. The need to carry digital speech became extremely important from a service provision point of view as well. Modem requirements have introduced the need for robust, flexible and secure services that can carry a multitude of signal types (such as voice, data and video) without a fundamental change in infrastructure. Such a requirement could not have been easily met without the advent of digital transmission systems, thereby requiring speech to be coded digitally. The term Speech Coding is often referred to techniques that represent or code speech signals either directly as a waveform or as a set of parameters by analyzing the speech signal. In either case, the codes are transmitted to the distant end where speech is reconstructed or synthesized using the received set of codes. A more generic term that is applicable to these techniques that is often interchangeably used with speech coding is the term voice coding. This term is more generic in the sense that the

  20. Arizona Administrative Code | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Arizona Administrative Code Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: Arizona Administrative CodeLegal Abstract This...

  1. U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases ... Release Date: 11192015 Next Release Date: 12312016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane ...

  2. U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) U.S. Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases ... Release Date: 11192015 Next Release Date: 12312016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane ...

  3. Clean Air Act. Revision 5

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1994-02-15

    This Reference Book contains a current copy of the Clean Air Act, as amended, and those regulations that implement the statute and appear to be most relevant to DOE activities. The document is provided to DOE and contractor staff for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as legal guidance. This Reference Book has been completely revised and is current through February 15, 1994.

  4. Occupation Codes

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Direct Data Entry Coding Guide August 2014 Table of Contents Chapter A - Occupation Codes ................................................................................................... A-1 Chapter B - Body Part Codes ...................................................................................................... B-1 Chapter C - Nature of Injury/Illness Codes ................................................................................. C-1 Chapter D - Source, Target, and Other

  5. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Revised Manuscript 01 October 2012 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 4 D.R. Tilley 1,2 and H.R. Weller 1,3 1 Traingle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, NC 27706, USA 2 Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA 3 Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27706, USA G.M. Hale Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA Abstract: A compilation of information on A = 4 was published in Nuclear Physics A541 (1992), p. 1. Information

  6. Revision of the DELFIC Particle Activity Module

    SciTech Connect

    Hooper, David A; Jodoin, Vincent J

    2010-09-01

    The Defense Land Fallout Interpretive Code (DELFIC) was originally released in 1968 as a tool for modeling fallout patterns and for predicting exposure rates. Despite the continual advancement of knowledge of fission yields, decay behavior of fission products, and biological dosimetry, the decay data and logic of DELFIC have remained mostly unchanged since inception. Additionally, previous code revisions caused a loss of conservation of radioactive nuclides. In this report, a new revision of the decay database and the Particle Activity Module is introduced and explained. The database upgrades discussed are replacement of the fission yields with ENDF/B-VII data as formatted in the Oak Ridge Isotope Generation (ORIGEN) code, revised decay constants, revised exposure rate multipliers, revised decay modes and branching ratios, and revised boiling point data. Included decay logic upgrades represent a correction of a flaw in the treatment of the fission yields, extension of the logic to include more complex decay modes, conservation of nuclides (including stable nuclides) at all times, and conversion of key variables to double precision for nuclide conservation. Finally, recommended future work is discussed with an emphasis on completion of the overall radiation physics upgrade, particularly for dosimetry, induced activity, decay of the actinides, and fractionation.

  7. Notice of Intent to Revise DOE O 473.3, Protection Program Operations

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2014-07-17

    The purpose of the revision is to implement 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 1046, Medical, Physical Readiness, Training, and Access Authorization Standards for Protective Force Personnel.

  8. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    5 June 2012 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 11 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 11-12 was published in Nuclear Physics A506 (1990), p. 1. This version of A = 11 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers are in the NNDC/TUNL format. (References

  9. Reference Materials

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Reference Materials Reference Materials Large Scale Computing and Storage Requirements for Biological and Environmental Research May 7-8, 2009 Invitation Workshop Invitation Letter...

  10. Reference Materials

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Reference Materials Reference Materials Large Scale Computing and Storage Requirements for Basic Energy Sciences February 9-10, 2010 Official DOE Invitation Workshop Invitation...

  11. Heating Oil and Propane Update - Revision report

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Revision reports Revision report 2015-2016 Revision report 2014-2015

  12. code release

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    ... WEC-Sim (Wave Energy Converter SIMulator) Code Development and Training Class News, Partnership, Renewable Energy, Water Power WEC-Sim (Wave Energy Converter SIMulator) Code ...

  13. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    8 November 2010 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 6 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 5-10 was published in Nuclear Physics A490 (1988), p. 1. This version of A = 6 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. The introduction and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the

  14. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    9 February 2011 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 9 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 5-10 was published in Nuclear Physics A490 (1988), p. 1. This version of A = 9 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. The introduction and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the

  15. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    31 October 2013 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 10 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 5-10 was published in Nuclear Physics A413 (1984), p. 1. This version of A = 10 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and Introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Also, Reference key numbers have been changed to the

  16. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    30 October 2012 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 13 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 13-15 was published in Nuclear Physics A523 (1991), p. 1. This version of A = 13 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. The introduction and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the

  17. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    5 November 2012 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 14 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 13-15 was published in Nuclear Physics A523 (1991), p. 1. This version of A = 14 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. The introduction and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the

  18. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    November 2012 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 15 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 13-15 was published in Nuclear Physics A523 (1991), p. 1. This version of A = 15 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. The introduction and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the

  19. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    9 November 2013 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 18 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 18-20 was published in Nuclear Physics A392 (1983), p. 1. This version of A = 18 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Also, Reference key numbers have been changed to the

  20. Event reporting guidelines 10 CFR 50.72 and 50.73. Revision 1

    SciTech Connect

    Allison, D.P.; Harper, M.R.; Jones, W.R.; MacKinnon, J.B.; Sandin, S.S.

    1998-01-01

    Revision 1 to NUREG-1022 clarifies the immediate notification requirements of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, Section 50.72 (10 CFR 50.72), and the 30-day written licensee event report (LER) requirements of 10 CFR 50.73 for nuclear power plants. This revision was initiated to improve the reporting guidelines related to 10 CFR 50.72 and 50.73 and to consolidate these guidelines into a single reference document. A first draft of this document was noticed for public comment in the Federal Register on october 7, 1991 (56 FR 50598). A second draft was noticed for comment in the Federal Register on February 7, 1994 (59 FR 5614). This document updates and supersedes NUREG-1022 and its Supplements 1 and 2 (published in September 1983, February 1984, and September 1985, respectively). It does not change the reporting requirements of 10 CFR 50.72 and 50.73.

  1. Microsoft Word - references.doc

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    References May 2005 2004 Site Environmental Report R-1 References Facemire, D. F., S. I. Guttman, D. R. Osborne, and R. H. Sperger, 1990, "Biological and Ecological Site Characterization of the Feed Materials Production Center," FMPC-SUB 018, prepared for Westinghouse Materials Co. of Ohio, Cincinnati, OH. GeoSyntec, 1996, "Impacted Material Placement Plan, On-site Disposal Facility," 20100-PL-007, Revision 3, PCN 2, Prepared for the Fernald Environmental Management Project,

  2. Guidance document for revision of DOE Order 5820.2A, Radioactive Waste Technical Support Program. Revision 1

    SciTech Connect

    Kudera, D.E.; McMurtrey, C.D.; Meagher, B.G.

    1993-04-01

    This document provides guidance for the revision of DOE Order 5820.2A, ``Radioactive Waste Management.`` Technical Working Groups have been established and are responsible for writing the revised order. The Technical Working Groups will use this document as a reference for polices and procedures that have been established for the revision process. The overall intent of this guidance is to outline how the order will be revised and how the revision process will be managed. In addition, this document outlines technical issues considered for inclusion by a Department of Energy Steering Committee.

  3. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    4 January 2016 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 5 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 5-10 was published in Nuclear Physics A227 (1974), p. 1. This version of A = 5 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL format.

  4. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    5 August 2013 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 5 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 5-10 was published in Nuclear Physics A413 (1984), p. 1. This version of A = 5 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and Introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Also, Reference key numbers have been changed to the TUNL/NNDC

  5. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    March 2010 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 5 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 5-10 was published in Nuclear Physics A490 (1988), p. 1. This version of A = 5 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. The introduction and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  6. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    5 September 2014 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 6 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 5-10 was published in Nuclear Physics A320 (1979), p. 1. This version of A = 6 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the TUNL/NNDC

  7. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    3 August 2013 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 6 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 5-10 was published in Nuclear Physics A413 (1984), p. 1. This version of A = 6 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Also, Reference key numbers have been changed to the TUNL/NNDC

  8. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    7 September 2014 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 7 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 5-10 was published in Nuclear Physics A320 (1979), p. 1. This version of A = 7 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the TUNL/NNDC

  9. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    4 April 2013 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 7 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 5-10 was published in Nuclear Physics A490 (1988), p. 1. This version of A = 7 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. The introduction and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  10. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    January 2011 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 8 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 5-10 was published in Nuclear Physics A490 (1988), p. 1. This version of A = 8 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. The introduction and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  11. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    22 February 2016 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 9 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 5-10 was published in Nuclear Physics A227 (1974), p. 1. This version of A = 9 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the TUNL/NNDC

  12. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    30 September 2014 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 9 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 5-10 was published in Nuclear Physics A320 (1979), p. 1. This version of A = 9 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the TUNL/NNDC

  13. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    5 October 2013 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 9 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 5-10 was published in Nuclear Physics A413 (1984), p. 1. This version of A = 9 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and Introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Also, Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  14. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    6 October 2014 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 10 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 5-10 was published in Nuclear Physics A320 (1979), p. 1. This version of A = 10 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  15. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    9 May 2012 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 10 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 5-10 was published in Nuclear Physics A490 (1988), p. 1. This version of A = 10 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. The introduction and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  16. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    6 October 2015 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 11 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 11-12 was published in Nuclear Physics A248 (1975), p. 1. This version of A = 11 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  17. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    31 July 2014 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 11 F. Ajzenberg-Selove and C.L. Busch University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 11-12 was published in Nuclear Physics A336 (1980), p. 1. This version of A = 11 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the

  18. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    5 May 2013 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 11 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 11-12 was published in Nuclear Physics A433 (1985), p. 1. This version of A = 11 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL format.

  19. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    25 May 2016 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 12 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 11-12 was published in Nuclear Physics A433 (1985), p. 1. This version of A = 12 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL format.

  20. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    4 November 2016 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 12 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 11-12 was published in Nuclear Physics A506 (1990), p. 1. This version of A = 12 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers are in the NNDC/TUNL format.

  1. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    08 August 2016 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 13 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 13-15 was published in Nuclear Physics A152 (1970), p. 1. This version of A = 13 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  2. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    2 July 2015 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 13 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 13-15 was published in Nuclear Physics A268 (1976), p. 1. This version of A = 13 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL format.

  3. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    15 July 2015 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 13 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 13-15 was published in Nuclear Physics A360 (1981), p. 1. This version of A = 13 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Also, Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  4. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    1 March 2013 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 13 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 13-15 was published in Nuclear Physics A449 (1986), p. 1. This version of A = 13 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  5. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    9 August 2016 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 14 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 13-15 was published in Nuclear Physics A152 (1970), p. 1. This version of A = 14 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  6. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    5 August 2015 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 14 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 13-15 was published in Nuclear Physics A268 (1976), p. 1. This version of A = 14 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  7. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    8 April 2014 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 14 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 13-15 was published in Nuclear Physics A360 (1981), p. 1. This version of A = 14 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Also, Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  8. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    10 April 2013 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 14 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 13-15 was published in Nuclear Physics A449 (1986), p. 1. This version of A = 14 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  9. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    04 October 2016 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 15 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 13-15 was published in Nuclear Physics A152 (1970), p. 1. This version of A = 15 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  10. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    October 2015 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 15 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 13-15 was published in Nuclear Physics A268 (1976), p. 1. This version of A = 15 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  11. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    9 May 2014 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 15 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 13-15 was published in Nuclear Physics A360 (1981), p. 1. This version of A = 15 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Also, Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  12. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    2 April 2013 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 15 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 13-15 was published in Nuclear Physics A449 (1986), p. 1. This version of A = 15 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  13. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    6 May 2015 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 16 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 16-17 was published in Nuclear Physics A281 (1977), p. 1. This version of A = 16 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL format.

  14. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    3 June 2014 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 16 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 16-17 was published in Nuclear Physics A375 (1982), p. 1. This version of A = 16 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL format.

  15. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    31 January 2013 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 16 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 16-17 was published in Nuclear Physics A460 (1986), p. 1. This version of A = 16 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  16. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    6 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 17 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 16-17 was published in Nuclear Physics A166 (1971), p. 1. This version of A = 17 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL format.

  17. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    8 July 2015 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 17 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 16-17 was published in Nuclear Physics A281 (1977), p. 1. This version of A = 17 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL format.

  18. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    4 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 17 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 16-17 was published in Nuclear Physics A375 (1982), p. 1. This version of A = 17 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Also, Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL format.

  19. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    0 January 2013 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 17 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 16-17 was published in Nuclear Physics A460 (1986), p. 1. This version of A = 17 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  20. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    1 March 2016 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 18 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 18-20 was published in Nuclear Physics A190 (1972), p. 1. This version of A = 18 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  1. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    7 March 2015 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 18 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 18-20 was published in Nuclear Physics A300 (1978), p. 1. This version of A = 18 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  2. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    8 December 2012 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 18 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 18-20 was published in Nuclear Physics A475 (1987), p. 1. This version of A = 18 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  3. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    04 April 2016 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 19 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 18-20 was published in Nuclear Physics A190 (1972), p. 1. This version of A = 19 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  4. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    1 April 2016 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 19 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 18-20 was published in Nuclear Physics A300 (1978), p. 1. This version of A = 19 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  5. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    7 January 2014 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 19 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 18-20 was published in Nuclear Physics A392 (1983), p. 1. This version of A = 19 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  6. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    0 December 2012 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 19 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 18-20 was published in Nuclear Physics A475 (1987), p. 1. This version of A = 19 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  7. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    May 2016 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 20 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 18-20 was published in Nuclear Physics A190 (1972), p. 1. This version of A = 20 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL format.

  8. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    4 February 2015 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 20 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 18-20 was published in Nuclear Physics A300 (1978), p. 1. This version of A = 20 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  9. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    March 2014 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 20 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 18-20 was published in Nuclear Physics A392 (1983), p. 1. This version of A = 20 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL format.

  10. Revised Manuscript

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    7 November 2012 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 20 F. Ajzenberg-Selove University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6396 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 18-20 was published in Nuclear Physics A475 (1987), p. 1. This version of A = 20 differs from the published version in that we have corrected some errors discovered after the article went to press. Figures and introductory tables have been omitted from this manuscript. Reference key numbers have been changed to the NNDC/TUNL

  11. Reference Materials

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Reference Materials Reference Materials Large Scale Computing and Storage Requirements for Basic Energy Sciences February 9-10, 2010 Official DOE Invitation Workshop Invitation Letter from DOE Associate Directors Last edited: 2016-04-29 11:35:05

  12. Parallel programming with PCN. Revision 2

    SciTech Connect

    Foster, I.; Tuecke, S.

    1993-01-01

    PCN is a system for developing and executing parallel programs. It comprises a high-level programming language, tools for developing and debugging programs in this language, and interfaces to Fortran and Cthat allow the reuse of existing code in multilingual parallel programs. Programs developed using PCN are portable across many different workstations, networks, and parallel computers. This document provides all the information required to develop parallel programs with the PCN programming system. It includes both tutorial and reference material. It also presents the basic concepts that underlie PCN, particularly where these are likely to be unfamiliar to the reader, and provides pointers to other documentation on the PCN language, programming techniques, and tools. PCN is in the public domain. The latest version of both the software and this manual can be obtained by anonymous ftp from Argonne National Laboratory in the directory pub/pcn at info.mcs. ani.gov (cf. Appendix A). This version of this document describes PCN version 2.0, a major revision of the PCN programming system. It supersedes earlier versions of this report.

  13. Hanford Facility dangerous waste permit application, general information. Revision 1

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1993-05-01

    The current Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application is considered to be a single application organized into a General Information Portion (this document, number DOE/RL-91-28) and a treatment, storage, and/or disposal Unit-Specific Portion, which includes documentation for individual TSD units (e.g., document numbers DOE/RL-89-03 and DOE/RL-90-01). Both portions consist of a Part A division and a Part B division. The Part B division consists of 15 chapters that address the content of the Part B checklists prepared by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology 1987) and the US Environmental Protection Agency (40 Code of Federal Regulations 270), with additional information requirements mandated by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 and revisions of Washington Administrative Code 173-303. For ease of reference, the Washington State Department of Ecology checklist section numbers, in brackets, follow the chapter headings and subheadings. Documentation contained in the General Information Portion (i.e., this document, number DOE/RL-91-28) is broader in nature and applies to all treatment, storage, and/or disposal units for which final status is sought. Because of its broad nature, the Part A division of the General Information Portion references the Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Part A Permit Application (document number DOE/RL-88-21), a compilation of all Part A documentation for the Hanford Facility.

  14. Compiling Codes

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    wrappers will automatically provide the necessary MPI include files and libraries. For Fortran source code use mpif90: % mpif90 -o example.x example.f90 For C source code use...

  15. DOE Code

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Toggle Navigation OSTI Home DOE Code Home The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) is building a new DOE software center. DOE Code is the reimagining of OSTI's current product for the submission of software, the Energy Science and Technology Software Center, or ESTSC. Since DOE Code is still under development, if you need to submit, search, or order software, please visit the ESTSC site for instructions. DOE Code, when launched, will provide a

  16. Ohio Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Ohio Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 1 2010's 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Decreases

  17. Acquisition Planning: Revised DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 7.1 |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy is revised to remind the planner when planning for an interagency acquisition to perform a determination of best procurement approach, business case analysis and/or Economy Act determinations and findings, as applicable, in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 17.5 Interagency Acquisitions. Revisions to the guide chapter add to references FAR 17.5 and related guide chapter 17.1. Also, two revisions in the chapter are identified by vertical lines in the

  18. 15 Cal. Veh. Code § 35781 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: 15 Cal. Veh. Code 35781Legal Abstract Administrative code requiring California Department...

  19. RELAP5/MOD3 code manual

    SciTech Connect

    Sloan, S.M.; Schultz, R.R.; Wilson, G.E.

    1994-06-01

    Summaries of RELAP5/MOD3 code assessments, a listing of the assessment matrix, and a chronology of the various versions of the code are given. Results from these code assessments have been used to formulate a compilation of some of the strengths and weaknesses of the code. These results are documented in the report. Volume 7 was designed to be updated periodically and to include the results of the latest code assessments as they become available. Consequently, users of Volume 7 should ensure that the latest revision is available.

  20. Reference Materials

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Reference Materials (continued) * Generators are required to avoid Las Vegas metropolitan area and Hoover Dam (Section 6.4 of NNSS Waste Acceptance Criteria, available at ...

  1. Reference Materials

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Reference Materials Reference Materials Large Scale Computing and Storage Requirements for Advanced Scientific Computing Research January 5-6, 2011 Official DOE Invitation Workshop Invitation Letter from DOE Associate Directors NERSC Documents NERSC science requirements home page NERSC science requirements workshop page NERSC science requirements case study FAQ Previous NERSC Requirements Workshops Biological and Environmental Research (BER) Basic Energy Sciences (BES) Fusion Energy Sciences

  2. Reference Materials

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Reference Materials Reference Materials Large Scale Computing and Storage Requirements for Biological and Environmental Research May 7-8, 2009 Invitation Workshop Invitation Letter from DOE Associate Directors Workshop Invitation Letter from DOE ASCR Program Manager Yukiko Sekine Last edited: 2016-04-29 11:34:54

  3. California Water Code | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: California Water CodeLegal Abstract Code governing the usage of water resources in the state of...

  4. Microsoft Word - CCP-QP-002-Revision 39

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Separated electronically fillable forms and updated references in procedure. 14 12022003 Revision initiated to address CAR 04-002 identified during CBFO audit A-04-03 and CAR ...

  5. Revised Merit Review Guide for Financial Assistance, JULY 2013

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Merit Review Guide for Financial Assistance along with Attachments 2 and 3 of the Guide have been revised. Revisions include correcting references to attachments and updating of the information presented in the Guide and Attachments to reflect the new requirements of the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012. The revised documents can be found at http://energy.gov/management/downloads/policy-flash-2013-38-revised-meri... and are labeled: Merit Review Guide FINAL JULY 2013, ATTACHMENT 2 Sample COI ADDED WB LANGUAGE JULY 2013.docx and ATTACHMENT 3 - Sample Evaluation and Selection Plan JULY 2013.docx.

  6. Quick Reference

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    Reference 2015 Annual Planning Summary (APS) User's Guide 1, 2 PART 1 OFFICE Enter the office preparing this APS. NEPA REVIEWS Select one of two responses. SITE-WIDE EISs Select...

  7. Reference Materials

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Reference Materials Reference Materials Large Scale Computing and Storage Requirements for Fusion Energy Sciences August 3-4, 2010 Official DOE Invitation Workshop Invitation Letter from DOE Associate Directors [not available] NERSC Documents NERSC science requirements home page NERSC science requirements workshop page NERSC science requirements case study FAQ Workshop Agenda Previous NERSC Requirements Workshops Biological and Environmental Research (BER) Basic Energy Sciences (BES) Fusion

  8. Reference Materials

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Reference Materials Reference Materials Large Scale Computing and Storage Requirements for High Energy Physics November 12-13, 2009 Official DOE Invitation Workshop Invitation Letter from DOE Associate Directors NERSC Documents NERSC science requirements home page NERSC science requirements workshop page NERSC science requirements case study FAQ Workshop Agenda Previous NERSC Requirements Workshops Biological and Environmental Research (BER) Basic Energy Sciences (BES) Fusion Energy Sciences

  9. Acquisition Planning: Revised DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 7.1

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Acquisition Guide Chapter 7.1 is revised to update references to DOE orders from 413.3A to 413.3B and 430.2A to 436.1 and DOE manual 413.3-1 to DOE Guide 413.3-13. Revisions to references for the DOE orders and DOE Guide are identified by vertical lines in the left margin.

  10. 2008 MERRTT Revision Letter

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Preparedness Program (TEPP) is pleased to announce the release of the 2008 Modular Emergency Response Radiological Transportation Training (MERRTT). This revision replaces...

  11. SCALE: A modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluation: Functional modules, F9-F11

    SciTech Connect

    1997-03-01

    This Manual represents Revision 5 of the user documentation for the modular code system referred to as SCALE. The history of the SCALE code system dates back to 1969 when the current Computational Physics and Engineering Division at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) began providing the transportation package certification staff at the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission with computational support in the use of the new KENO code for performing criticality safety assessments with the statistical Monte Carlo method. From 1969 to 1976 the certification staff relied on the ORNL staff to assist them in the correct use of codes and data for criticality, shielding, and heat transfer analyses of transportation packages. However, the certification staff learned that, with only occasional use of the codes, it was difficult to become proficient in performing the calculations often needed for an independent safety review. Thus, shortly after the move of the certification staff to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the NRC staff proposed the development of an easy-to-use analysis system that provided the technical capabilities of the individual modules with which they were familiar. With this proposal, the concept of the Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluation (SCALE) code system was born. This volume consists of the section of the manual dealing with three of the functional modules in the code. Those are the Morse-SGC for the SCALE system, Heating 7.2, and KENO V.a. The manual describes the latest released versions of the codes.

  12. Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Coalbed methane proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, 2014 billion cubic feet Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries Estimated Proved ...

  13. Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries Estimated Proved Reserves Adjustments Increases Decreases Sales Acquisitions Extensions Discoveries in Old ...

  14. Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    wet after lease separation, 2014 billion cubic feet Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries Estimated Proved Reserves Adjustments Increases ...

  15. Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Crude oil proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, 2014 million barrels Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries Estimated Proved Reserves ...

  16. Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Crude oil and lease condensate proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, 2014 million barrels Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries ...

  17. Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Total natural gas proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, wet after lease separation, 2014 billion cubic feet Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field ...

  18. Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Lease condensate proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, 2014 million barrels Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries Estimated Proved ...

  19. Poroelastic references

    DOE Data Explorer

    Christina Morency

    This file contains a list of relevant references on the Biot theory (forward and inverse approaches), the double-porosity and dual-permeability theory, and seismic wave propagation in fracture porous media, in RIS format, to approach seismic monitoring in a complex fractured porous medium such as Brady?s Geothermal Field.

  20. Poroelastic references

    SciTech Connect

    Morency, Christina

    2014-12-12

    This file contains a list of relevant references on the Biot theory (forward and inverse approaches), the double-porosity and dual-permeability theory, and seismic wave propagation in fracture porous media, in RIS format, to approach seismic monitoring in a complex fractured porous medium such as Brady?s Geothermal Field.

  1. SCALE: A modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluation

    SciTech Connect

    1997-03-01

    This Manual represents Revision 5 of the user documentation for the modular code system referred to as SCALE. The history of the SCALE code system dates back to 1969 when the current Computational Physics and Engineering Division at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) began providing the transportation package certification staff at the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission with computational support in the use of the new KENO code for performing criticality safety assessments with the statistical Monte Carlo method. From 1969 to 1976 the certification staff relied on the ORNL staff to assist them in the correct use of codes and data for criticality, shielding, and heat transfer analyses of transportation packages. However, the certification staff learned that, with only occasional use of the codes, it was difficult to become proficient in performing the calculations often needed for an independent safety review. Thus, shortly after the move of the certification staff to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the NRC staff proposed the development of an easy-to-use analysis system that provided the technical capabilities of the individual modules with which they were familiar. With this proposal, the concept of the Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluation (SCALE) code system was born. This manual covers an array of modules written for the SCALE package, consisting of drivers, system libraries, cross section and materials properties libraries, input/output routines, storage modules, and help files.

  2. Risk Code?

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Identify the Task Risk Code >2 Determine if a Work Control Document is needed What is the Unmitigated Risk Code? Rev.1 09/05/14 Read and Agree to Comply with appropriate mitigation and sign Work Control Documents Is there an approved Work Control Document (WCD)? WORK PLANNING, CONTROL AND AUTHORIZATION FLOW DIAGRAM 1. Define Scope of Work 2. Analyze Hazards 3. Develop and Implement Hazard Controls 4. Perform Work Within Controls 5. Feedback and Continuous Improvement Analyze Hazards and

  3. Compiling Codes

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Compiling Codes Compiling Codes Overview There are three compiler suites available on Carver: Portland Group (PGI), Intel, and GCC. The PGI compilers are the default, to provide compatibility with other NERSC platforms. Compiler bugs affecting NERSC users are listed at PGI compiler bugs. Because Carver uses Intel processors, many benchmarks have shown significantly better performance when compiled with the Intel compilers. Compiler bugs affecting NERSC users are listed at Intel bugs. The GCC

  4. Guide to NRC reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Compiled from requirements in Title 10 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations as codified on December 31, 1993; Revision 1

    SciTech Connect

    Collins, M.; Shelton, B.

    1994-07-01

    This compilation includes in the first two sections the reporting and recordkeeping requirements applicable to US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensees and applicants and to members of the public. It includes those requirements codified in Title 10 of the code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1, on December 31, 1993. It also includes, in a separate section, any of those requirements that were superseded or discontinued between January 1992 and December 1993. Finally, the appendix lists mailing and delivery addresses for NRC Headquarters and Regional Offices mentioned in the compilation. The Office of Information Resources Management staff compiled this listing of reporting and recordkeeping requirements to briefly describe each in a single document primarily to help licensees readily identify the requirements. The compilation is not a substitute for the regulations, and is not intended to impose any new requirements or technical positions. It is part of NRC`s continuing efforts to comply with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 and the Office of Management and Budget regulations that mandate effective and efficient Federal information resources management programs.

  5. Radiological control manual. Revision 1

    SciTech Connect

    Kloepping, R.

    1996-05-01

    This Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Radiological Control Manual (LBNL RCM) has been prepared to provide guidance for site-specific additions, supplements and interpretation of the DOE Radiological Control Manual. The guidance provided in this manual is one methodology to implement the requirements given in Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 835 (10 CFR 835) and the DOE Radiological Control Manual. Information given in this manual is also intended to provide demonstration of compliance to specific requirements in 10 CFR 835. The LBNL RCM (Publication 3113) and LBNL Health and Safety Manual Publication-3000 form the technical basis for the LBNL RPP and will be revised as necessary to ensure that current requirements from Rules and Orders are represented. The LBNL RCM will form the standard for excellence in the implementation of the LBNL RPP.

  6. Compiling Codes

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Compiling Codes Compiling Codes Overview Open Mpi is the the only MPI library available on Euclid. This implementation of MPI-2 is described at Open MPI: Open Source High Performance Computing. The default compiler suite is from the Portland Group which is loaded by default at login, along with the PGI compiled Open MPI environment. % module list Currently Loaded Modulefiles: 1) pgi/10.8 2) openmpi/1.4.2 Basic Example Open MPI provides a convenient set of wrapper commands which you should use in

  7. Code_Saturne | Argonne Leadership Computing Facility

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Data Transfer Debugging & Profiling Performance Tools & APIs Software & Libraries Boost CPMD Code_Saturne GAMESS GPAW GROMACS LAMMPS MADNESS QBox IBM References Cooley Policies Documentation Feedback Please provide feedback to help guide us as we continue to build documentation for our new computing resource. [Feedback Form] Code_Saturne What is Code_Saturne? Code_Saturne is general-purpose Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software of Électricité de France (EDF), one of the

  8. Recent improvements in the R-matrix analysis code SAMMY

    SciTech Connect

    Larson, N.M.

    1994-12-31

    Additions and improvements in the computer code SAMMY provide enhanced capabilities for analysis of neutron-induced cross section data in the resolved resonance region. Major features recently added to the code include capabilities for self-shielding and multiple-scattering corrections, angular distributions, and Maxwellian (stellar) averages. Numerous technical improvements have also been made since the last revision. Important highlights are given.

  9. Michigan Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Michigan Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 276 2010's 325 151 916 103 57 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  10. Michigan Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Michigan Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 149 2010's 165 140 520 351 209 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  11. Montana Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Montana Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 34 2010's 16 14 2 28 51 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  12. Montana Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Montana Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 42 2010's 14 14 18 31 64 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  13. Alabama (with State Offshore) Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Billion Cubic Feet) Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  14. New Mexico Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) New Mexico Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 2 2010's 11 190 56 45 100 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  15. New Mexico Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) New Mexico Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 2 2010's 1 83 18 58 105 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  16. North Dakota Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) North Dakota Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 17 2010's 343 290 199 554 823 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  17. Ohio Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Increases

  18. Ohio Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Ohio Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 98 1,446 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  19. Ohio Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Ohio Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 272 1,468 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  20. Virginia Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Virginia Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 0 12 76 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  1. Virginia Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Virginia Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 0 3 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  2. Kansas Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Kansas Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 0 0 6 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  3. Kansas Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Kansas Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 0 0 3 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  4. Kentucky Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Decreases

  5. Kentucky Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Kentucky Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 3 2010's 43 11 4 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  6. Kentucky Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Kentucky Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 44 2010's 3 44 1 16 4 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  7. Wyoming Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Wyoming Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 1 2010's 2 1 0 536 98 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  8. Wyoming Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Wyoming Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 0 4 0 3 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  9. Alabama (with State Offshore) Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Billion Cubic Feet) Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Alabama (with State Offshore) Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 2 2010's 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  10. Revised Guidance for Recruitment, Retention and Relocation Incentives |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Department of Energy Revised Guidance for Recruitment, Retention and Relocation Incentives Revised Guidance for Recruitment, Retention and Relocation Incentives 3Rs Revised Guidance.pdf (66.78 KB) CHCO Memo_3Rs Guidance_Attachment_05-12-2016_FINAL.pdf (181.71 KB) Responsible Contacts Tiffany Wheeler Human Resources Specialist E-mail tiffany.wheeler@hq.doe.gov Phone (202) 586-8481 More Documents & Publications Manager's Desk Reference on Human Capital Management Flexibilities DOE Handbook

  11. Kentucky Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Kentucky Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 1 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Increases

  12. New Robust References! | OpenEI Community

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    provided document type If I,Robot doesn't exist yet, the template will return a red link specially coded to open in the Reference form so that it can be easily added...

  13. Building Energy Codes Program Overview

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Program Overview 2014 Building Technologies Office Peer Review Bing Liu bing.liu@pnnl.gov Pacific Northwest National Laboratory ADOPT COMPLY DEVELOP FY12 FY13 FY14 $6.8M $4.8M $4.0M Program Summary Timeline: Multi-year program in support of DOE statutory requirements Key Milestones: 1. Update Building Energy Codes Cost-Effectiveness Methodology (Aug 2014) 2. Revised Compliance Methodology (Sept 2014) 3. 90.1-2013 Cost Analysis (Oct 2014) 4. REScheck Update Including Enhancements (Aug 2014) 5.

  14. SCALE: A modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluation: Control modules C4, C6

    SciTech Connect

    1997-03-01

    This Manual represents Revision 5 of the user documentation for the modular code system referred to as SCALE. The history of the SCALE code system dates back to 1969 when the current Computational Physics and Engineering Division at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) began providing the transportation package certification staff at the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission with computational support in the use of the new KENO code for performing criticality safety assessments with the statistical Monte Carlo method. From 1969 to 1976 the certification staff relied on the ORNL staff to assist them in the correct use of codes and data for criticality, shielding, and heat transfer analyses of transportation packages. However, the certification staff learned that, with only occasional use of the codes, it was difficult to become proficient in performing the calculations often needed for an independent safety review. Thus, shortly after the move of the certification staff to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the NRC staff proposed the development of an easy-to-use analysis system that provided the technical capabilities of the individual modules with which they were familiar. With this proposal, the concept of the Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluation (SCALE) code system was born. This volume is part of the manual related to the control modules for the newest updated version of this computational package.

  15. Report on FY15 alloy 617 code rules development

    SciTech Connect

    Sham, Sam; Jetter, Robert I; Hollinger, Greg; Pease, Derrick; Carter, Peter; Pu, Chao; Wang, Yanli

    2015-09-01

    Due to its strength at very high temperatures, up to 950°C (1742°F), Alloy 617 is the reference construction material for structural components that operate at or near the outlet temperature of the very high temperature gas-cooled reactors. However, the current rules in the ASME Section III, Division 5 Subsection HB, Subpart B for the evaluation of strain limits and creep-fatigue damage using simplified methods based on elastic analysis have been deemed inappropriate for Alloy 617 at temperatures above 650°C (1200°F) (Corum and Brass, Proceedings of ASME 1991 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, PVP-Vol. 215, p.147, ASME, NY, 1991). The rationale for this exclusion is that at higher temperatures it is not feasible to decouple plasticity and creep, which is the basis for the current simplified rules. This temperature, 650°C (1200°F), is well below the temperature range of interest for this material for the high temperature gas-cooled reactors and the very high temperature gas-cooled reactors. The only current alternative is, thus, a full inelastic analysis requiring sophisticated material models that have not yet been formulated and verified. To address these issues, proposed code rules have been developed which are based on the use of elastic-perfectly plastic (EPP) analysis methods applicable to very high temperatures. The proposed rules for strain limits and creep-fatigue evaluation were initially documented in the technical literature (Carter, Jetter and Sham, Proceedings of ASME 2012 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, papers PVP 2012 28082 and PVP 2012 28083, ASME, NY, 2012), and have been recently revised to incorporate comments and simplify their application. Background documents have been developed for these two code cases to support the ASME Code committee approval process. These background documents for the EPP strain limits and creep-fatigue code cases are documented in this report.

  16. Hawaii Revised Statutes 174C, State Water Code | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Statute released by the Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resource Commission on Water Resource Management. Published NA Year Signed or Took Effect 2013 Legal Citation...

  17. Building Energy Code

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The Bureau of Construction Codes is responsible for the administration of the State Construction Code Act (1972 PA 230), also known as the Uniform Construction Code.

  18. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Georgia's Department of Community Affairs periodically reviews, amends and/or updates the state minimum standard codes. Georgia has "mandatory" and "permissive" codes. Georgia State Energy Code...

  19. PNNL Energy Codes Portfolio

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    ... Energy Conservation Code and ASHRAE 90.1 and the International Green Construction Code. 22 Integration and Collaboration * Participate in the national codes and ...

  20. REVISED-FINAL-1ST-QUARTER-FY-2013-SCORECARD-09-05-13.xlsx

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    REVISED MD-110 REFERENCE GUIDE SEPTEMBER 2015 BACKGROUND On August 5, 2015, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) approved the first revision to its Management Directive 110 (MD-110) since 1999. The revised MD-110 provides federal agencies with updated Commission policies, procedures, and guidance relating to the federal sector complaint process as set forth in 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 and reflects new developments in case law, as the federal workplace and EEO practices have evolved. The

  1. Cal. Sts. & High. Code § 660(b) | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    60(b) Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Cal. Sts. & High. Code 660(b)Legal Abstract Cal. Sts. & High. Code ...

  2. WAC - 220-110 - Hydraulic Code Rules | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    0-110 - Hydraulic Code Rules Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: WAC - 220-110 - Hydraulic Code RulesLegal...

  3. RCW 90.03 Water Code | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    RCW 90.03 Water Code Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: RCW 90.03 Water CodeLegal Abstract Implementing...

  4. Colorado - State Highway Access Code | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    - State Highway Access Code Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: Colorado - State Highway Access CodeLegal...

  5. Montana Code 75-20 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Page Edit with form History Montana Code 75-20 Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: Montana Code 75-20Legal...

  6. Montana Code 75-20-216 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Montana Code 75-20-216Legal Published NA Year Signed or Took Effect 2014 Legal Citation Montana Code...

  7. Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 30103 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Cal. Pub. Res. Code 30103Legal Abstract Cal. Pub. Res. Code 30103, current through...

  8. Cal. Sts. & High. Code § 117 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Cal. Sts. & High. Code 117Legal Abstract Cal. Sts. & High. Code 117, current through...

  9. Cal. Sts. & High. Code § 670(a) | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Cal. Sts. & High. Code 670(a)Legal Abstract Cal. Sts. & High. Code 670(a), current...

  10. Cal. Pub. Util. Code § 1001 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Cal. Pub. Util. Code 1001Legal Abstract Cal. Pub. Util. Code 1001, current through...

  11. Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 6370 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Cal. Pub. Res. Code 6370 Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Cal. Pub. Res. Code 6370Legal Abstract Statutory...

  12. Cal. Pub. Util. Code § 1001 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Util. Code 1001 (Redirected from Cal. Pub. Res. Code 1001) Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Cal. Pub. Util....

  13. Cal. Sts. & High. Code § 676 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Cal. Sts. & High. Code 676Legal Abstract Cal. Sts. & High. Code 676, current through...

  14. Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 25309 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Cal. Pub. Res. Code 25309Legal Abstract Cal. Pub. Res. Code 25309, current through...

  15. Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 6826 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Cal. Pub. Res. Code 6826Legal Abstract Cal. Pub. Res. Code 6826, current through...

  16. Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 25541 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Cal. Pub. Res. Code 25541Legal Abstract Cal. Pub. Res. Code 25541, current through...

  17. Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 25120 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Cal. Pub. Res. Code 25120Legal Abstract Cal. Pub. Res. Code 25120, current through...

  18. 15 Cal. Veh. Code § 35780 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Cal. Veh. Code 35780 Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: 15 Cal. Veh. Code 35780Legal Abstract Administrative...

  19. California Fish and Game Code Section 86 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    California Fish and Game Code Section 86 Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: California Fish and Game Code Section...

  20. References - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    References by Website Administrator This page provides information and links to references. Technical Standards Technical Standards Program Technical Standards Home RevCom for Technical Standards Technical Standards Crosswalk NNSA Directives National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Supplemental Directives NNSA Policies (NAPs) FAR Federal Acquisition Regulations Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) DOE Acquisition Regulations (DEAR) CFR Code of Federal Regulations CFR (annual edition) 10

  1. SARP-II: Safeguards Accounting and Reports Program, Revised

    SciTech Connect

    Kempf, C.R.

    1994-03-01

    A computer code, SARP (Safeguards Accounting and Reports Program) which will generate and maintain at-facility safeguards accounting records, and generate IAEA safeguards reports based on accounting data input by the user, was completed in 1990 by the Safeguards, Safety, and Nonproliferation Division (formerly the Technical Support Organization) at Brookhaven National Laboratory as a task under the US Program of Technical Support to IAEA safeguards. The code was based on a State System of Accounting for and Control of Nuclear Material (SSAC) for off-load refueled power reactor facilities, with model facility and safeguards accounting regime as described in IAEA Safeguards Publication STR-165. Since 1990, improvements in computing capabilities and comments and suggestions from users engendered revision of the original code. The result is an updated, revised version called SARP-II which is discussed in this report.

  2. MELCOR computer code manuals

    SciTech Connect

    Summers, R.M.; Cole, R.K. Jr.; Smith, R.C.; Stuart, D.S.; Thompson, S.L.; Hodge, S.A.; Hyman, C.R.; Sanders, R.L.

    1995-03-01

    MELCOR is a fully integrated, engineering-level computer code that models the progression of severe accidents in light water reactor nuclear power plants. MELCOR is being developed at Sandia National Laboratories for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission as a second-generation plant risk assessment tool and the successor to the Source Term Code Package. A broad spectrum of severe accident phenomena in both boiling and pressurized water reactors is treated in MELCOR in a unified framework. These include: thermal-hydraulic response in the reactor coolant system, reactor cavity, containment, and confinement buildings; core heatup, degradation, and relocation; core-concrete attack; hydrogen production, transport, and combustion; fission product release and transport; and the impact of engineered safety features on thermal-hydraulic and radionuclide behavior. Current uses of MELCOR include estimation of severe accident source terms and their sensitivities and uncertainties in a variety of applications. This publication of the MELCOR computer code manuals corresponds to MELCOR 1.8.3, released to users in August, 1994. Volume 1 contains a primer that describes MELCOR`s phenomenological scope, organization (by package), and documentation. The remainder of Volume 1 contains the MELCOR Users Guides, which provide the input instructions and guidelines for each package. Volume 2 contains the MELCOR Reference Manuals, which describe the phenomenological models that have been implemented in each package.

  3. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    NOTE: On March 9, 2016, the State Fire Prevention and Building Code Council adopted major updates to the State Uniform Code and the State Energy Code. The State Energy Code has been updated to 2015...

  4. Verification and Validation Supporting VERA Neutronics Code

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Verification and Validation Supporting VERA Neutronics Code As CASL produces its VERA software each physics capability must be tested, verified, and validated (V&V). The overarching objective of code verification is to establish that a computation- al model implemented in a code accurately represents the de- veloper's conceptual representation of the physics, while vali- dation refers to the process of determining the degree to which a computational model provides an accurate representation

  5. Methodology, status and plans for development and assessment of Cathare code

    SciTech Connect

    Bestion, D.; Barre, F.; Faydide, B.

    1997-07-01

    This paper presents the methodology, status and plans for the development, assessment and uncertainty evaluation of the Cathare code. Cathare is a thermalhydraulic code developed by CEA (DRN), IPSN, EDF and FRAMATOME for PWR safety analysis. First, the status of the code development and assessment is presented. The general strategy used for the development and the assessment of the code is presented. Analytical experiments with separate effect tests, and component tests are used for the development and the validation of closure laws. Successive Revisions of constitutive laws are implemented in successive Versions of the code and assessed. System tests or integral tests are used to validate the general consistency of the Revision. Each delivery of a code Version + Revision is fully assessed and documented. A methodology is being developed to determine the uncertainty on all constitutive laws of the code using calculations of many analytical tests and applying the Discrete Adjoint Sensitivity Method (DASM). At last, the plans for the future developments of the code are presented. They concern the optimization of the code performance through parallel computing - the code will be used for real time full scope plant simulators - the coupling with many other codes (neutronic codes, severe accident codes), the application of the code for containment thermalhydraulics. Also, physical improvements are required in the field of low pressure transients and in the modeling for the 3-D model.

  6. Title 27 California Code of Regulations: Environmental Protection...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    7 California Code of Regulations: Environmental Protection Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: Title 27...

  7. California Public Resources Code Division 3, Chapter 4 - Geothermal...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Public Resources Code Division 3, Chapter 4 - Geothermal Resources Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: California...

  8. Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 21067 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Cal. Pub. Res. Code 21067Legal Abstract Definitions section for California's...

  9. Alaska - Alaska Administrative Code - Title 3 - Commerce, Community...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Alaska Administrative Code - Title 3 - Commerce, Community and Economic Development - January 2012 Supplement Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library...

  10. Alaska Administrative Code - Title 11, Chapter 195 - Anadromous...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    1, Chapter 195 - Anadromous Fish Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: Alaska Administrative Code - Title 11,...

  11. Title 5 Alaska Administrative Code Chapter 95 Protection of Fish...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Title 5 Alaska Administrative Code Chapter 95 Protection of Fish and Game Habitat Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document-...

  12. Title 11 Alaska Administrative Code 87 Geothermal Drilling and...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    7 Geothermal Drilling and Conservation Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: Title 11 Alaska Administrative Code...

  13. Code of Colorado Regulations 2 CCR 601-1, State Highway Access...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Code of Colorado Regulations 2 CCR 601-1, State Highway Access Code Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: Code of...

  14. Revised DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 42.1 Indirect Rate Administration (October 2010)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Office of Procurement and Assistant Management (OPAM) has issued the above Acquisition Guide Chapter. DOE Acquisition Guide Chapter 42.1 Indirect Rate Administration has been revised to provide the current references and requirements.

  15. Notice of Intent to Revise DOE G 413.3-17, Mission Need Statement

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2016-01-21

    The proposed revision focuses on updating terminology and references, and alignment with Secretarial memoranda on project management issued since the last update to DOE0 413.3B.

  16. SCALE: A modular code system for performing standardized computer analyses for licensing evaluation: Functional modules F1-F8

    SciTech Connect

    1997-03-01

    This Manual represents Revision 5 of the user documentation for the modular code system referred to as SCALE. The history of the SCALE code system dates back to 1969 when the current Computational Physics and Engineering Division at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) began providing the transportation package certification staff at the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission with computational support in the use of the new KENO code for performing criticality safety assessments with the statistical Monte Carlo method. From 1969 to 1976 the certification staff relied on the ORNL staff to assist them in the correct use of codes and data for criticality, shielding, and heat transfer analyses of transportation packages. However, the certification staff learned that, with only occasional use of the codes, it was difficult to become proficient in performing the calculations often needed for an independent safety review. Thus, shortly after the move of the certification staff to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the NRC staff proposed the development of an easy-to-use analysis system that provided the technical capabilities of the individual modules with which they were familiar. With this proposal, the concept of the Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluation (SCALE) code system was born. This volume consists of the section of the manual dealing with eight of the functional modules in the code. Those are: BONAMI - resonance self-shielding by the Bondarenko method; NITAWL-II - SCALE system module for performing resonance shielding and working library production; XSDRNPM - a one-dimensional discrete-ordinates code for transport analysis; XSDOSE - a module for calculating fluxes and dose rates at points outside a shield; KENO IV/S - an improved monte carlo criticality program; COUPLE; ORIGEN-S - SCALE system module to calculate fuel depletion, actinide transmutation, fission product buildup and decay, and associated radiation source terms; ICE.

  17. Guide to the Changes between the 2009 and 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

    SciTech Connect

    Mapes, Terry S.; Conover, David R.

    2012-05-31

    The International Code Council (ICC) published the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code{reg_sign} (IECC) in early 2012. The 2012 IECC is based on revisions, additions, and deletions to the 2009 IECC that were considered during the ICC code development process conducted in 2011. Solid vertical lines, arrows, or asterisks printed in the 2012 IECC indicate where revisions, deletions, or relocations of text respectively were made to 2009 IECC. Although these marginal markings indicate where changes have been made to the code, they do not provide any further guidance, leaving the reader to consult and compare the 2009 and 2012 IECC for more detail.

  18. Revised Manuscript May

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Revised Manuscript May 29, 2013 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 3 D.R. Tilley a,b , H.R. Weller a,c and H.H. Hasan a,c a Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, NC 27708-0308 b Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8202 c Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0305 Abstract: An evaluation of A = 3 was published in Nuclear Physics A474 (1987), p. 1. Emphasis is on possible structure of A = 3 systems and final-state interactions in

  19. Revised Manuscript May

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Revised Manuscript May 20, 2014 Energy Levels of Light Nuclei A = 3 J.E. Purcell a,b , J.H. Kelley a,c , E. Kwan a,d , C.G. Sheu a,d and H.R. Weller a,d a Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Durham, NC 27708-0308 b Department of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303 c Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8202 d Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0305 Abstract: A compilation of experimental and

  20. Addendum for the Phase I Hydrologic Data for the Groundwater Flow and Contaminant Transport Model of Corrective Action Unit 97: Yucca Flat/Climax Mine, Nevada Test Site, Nye County, Nevada, Revision 0 (page changes)

    SciTech Connect

    John McCord

    2007-05-01

    This document, which makes changes to Phase I Hydrologic Data for the Groundwater Flow and Contaminant Transport Model of Corrective Action Unit 97: Yucca Flat/Climax Mine, Nevada Test Site, Nye County, Nevada, S-N/99205--077, Revision 0 (June 2006), was prepared to address review comments on this final document provided by the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) in a letter dated August 4, 2006. The document includes revised pages that address NDEP review comments and comments from other document users. Change bars are included on these pages to identify where the text was revised. In addition to the revised pages, the following clarifications are made for the two plates inserted in the back of the document: • Plate 4: Disregard the repeat of legend text ‘Drill Hole Name’ and ‘Drill Hole Location’ in the lower left corner of the map. • Plate 6: The symbol at the ER-16-1 location (white dot on the lower left side of the map) is not color-coded because no water level has been determined. The well location is included for reference. • Plate 6: The symbol at the ER-12-1 location (upper left corner of the map), a yellow dot, represents the lower water level elevation. The higher water level elevation, represented by a red dot, was overprinted.

  1. Code of Conduct

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    it conducts business in a trustworthy manner. What is LANL's Code of Conduct? Charlie McMillan 1:46 Laboratory Director Charlie McMillan introduces the code LANL's Code of...

  2. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Kentucky Building Code (KBC) is updated every three years on a cycle one year behind the publication year for the International Building Code. Any changes to the code by the state of Kentucky...

  3. Louisiana Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Louisiana Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 69 2010's 93 43 67 65 75 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease

  4. Louisiana Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Louisiana Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 100 2010's 139 100 98 91 71 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  5. Louisiana State Offshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Million Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Louisiana State Offshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 6 2010's 9 5 13 6 6 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision

  6. Louisiana--North Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Louisiana--North Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 826 2010's 1,878 3,882 10,558 2,731 2,558 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  7. Louisiana--North Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Louisiana--North Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 636 2010's 1,856 2,002 1,422 1,606 1,631 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  8. Louisiana--South Onshore Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Cubic Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Louisiana--South Onshore Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 0 0 6 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  9. Louisiana--South Onshore Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Louisiana--South Onshore Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 0 0 22 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  10. Lower 48 States Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Cubic Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Lower 48 States Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 2,486 2010's 2,914 1,668 3,871 1,998 1,020 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision

  11. Lower 48 States Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Lower 48 States Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 1,563 2010's 2,589 2,071 971 3,123 3,299 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision I

  12. Michigan Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Michigan Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 17 2010's 5 4 3 2 2 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease

  13. Michigan Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Michigan Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 21 2010's 4 5 19 4 3 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  14. Miscellaneous States Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Billion Cubic Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Miscellaneous States Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 24 2010's 2 0 1 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Decreases

  15. Miscellaneous States Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Billion Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Miscellaneous States Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 1 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Increases

  16. Miscellaneous States Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Million Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Miscellaneous States Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 2 2010's 1 2 7 5 8 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision

  17. Miscellaneous States Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Increases (Million Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Miscellaneous States Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 5 2010's 3 3 3 3 1 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision

  18. Miscellaneous States Shale Gas Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Cubic Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Miscellaneous States Shale Gas Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 22 2010's 77 27 9 29 17 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  19. Miscellaneous States Shale Gas Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Miscellaneous States Shale Gas Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 4 2010's 17 19 76 3 2 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  20. Mississippi (with State off) Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Billion Cubic Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Mississippi (with State off) Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 0 0 3 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  1. Mississippi (with State off) Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Billion Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Mississippi (with State off) Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 0 0 4 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  2. Mississippi Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Mississippi Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 8 2010's 9 13 28 15 17 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet

  3. Mississippi Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Mississippi Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 30 2010's 17 14 37 8 14 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  4. Montana Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Montana Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 29 2010's 0 3 28 4 2 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Decreases

  5. Montana Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Montana Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 23 0 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Increases

  6. Montana Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Montana Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 47 2010's 44 51 38 59 44 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease

  7. Montana Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Montana Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 72 2010's 54 54 19 75 19 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  8. Nebraska Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Nebraska Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 1 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease

  9. Nebraska Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Nebraska Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 1 2010's 1 6 1 4 7 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  10. New Mexico - East Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) New Mexico - East Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 74 2010's 65 88 148 179 189 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision

  11. New Mexico - East Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) New Mexico - East Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 95 2010's 85 97 193 182 284 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision

  12. New Mexico - West Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) New Mexico - West Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 3 2010's 2 4 3 9 14 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet

  13. New Mexico - West Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) New Mexico - West Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 7 2010's 5 14 7 29 10 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  14. New Mexico Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Cubic Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) New Mexico Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 353 2010's 565 279 602 587 532 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Decreases

  15. Alabama Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Alabama Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 2 2010's 5 1 2 2 2 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease

  16. Alabama Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Alabama Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 9 2010's 9 2 10 13 16 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  17. Alaska Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Alaska Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 152 2010's 76 129 451 392 196 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease

  18. Alaska Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Alaska Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 394 2010's 397 362 84 87 239 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  19. Arkansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Arkansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 1 3 10 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Decreases

  20. Arkansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Arkansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 3 2010's 9 0 1 5 3 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Increases

  1. Arkansas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Arkansas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 0 3 3 2 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease

  2. Arkansas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Arkansas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 5 2010's 12 31 4 15 2 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  3. Arkansas Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Arkansas Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 261 2010's 126 141 6,151 239 1,056 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  4. Arkansas Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Arkansas Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 1,585 2010's 861 502 1,533 329 96 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  5. California (with State off) Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Billion Cubic Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) California (with State off) Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 0 248 0 4 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  6. California (with State off) Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Billion Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) California (with State off) Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 912 258 68 3 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  7. California Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) California Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 119 2010's 167 230 391 116 247 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases,

  8. California Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) California Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 427 2010's 276 394 507 239 381 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  9. Colorado Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Colorado Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 566 2010's 1,557 367 1,566 1,023 198 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Decreases

  10. Colorado Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Colorado Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 126 2010's 937 698 343 789 1,162 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Increases

  11. Colorado Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Colorado Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 27 2010's 34 56 117 112 162 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease

  12. Colorado Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Colorado Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 28 2010's 52 71 149 389 356 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  13. Wyoming Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Wyoming Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 725 2010's 140 539 541 105 186 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Decreases

  14. Wyoming Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Wyoming Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 609 2010's 575 504 242 412 195 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Increases

  15. Wyoming Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Wyoming Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 55 2010's 138 74 86 77 147 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease

  16. Wyoming Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Wyoming Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 123 2010's 124 109 68 71 56 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  17. New Mexico Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) New Mexico Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 443 2010's 562 562 255 1,362 1,389 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Increases

  18. New Mexico Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) New Mexico Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 77 2010's 67 92 151 188 203 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet

  19. New Mexico Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) New Mexico Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 102 2010's 90 111 200 211 294 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  20. New Mexico--East Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Billion Cubic Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) New Mexico--East Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 30 2010's 0 2 117 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Decreases

  1. New Mexico--East Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Billion Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) New Mexico--East Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 72 11 0 71 46 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Increases

  2. New Mexico--West Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Billion Cubic Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) New Mexico--West Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 323 2010's 565 277 485 587 532 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision D

  3. New Mexico--West Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Billion Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) New Mexico--West Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 443 2010's 490 551 255 1,291 1,343 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision

  4. North Dakota Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) North Dakota Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 69 2010's 486 560 370 655 869 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases,

  5. North Dakota Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) North Dakota Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 211 2010's 709 679 744 994 683 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  6. North Dakota Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) North Dakota Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 119 2010's 528 439 901 1,056 933 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  7. Ohio Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Ohio Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 2 1 3 9 33 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease Se

  8. Ohio Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Ohio Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 6 2010's 4 1 10 9 38 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  9. Oklahoma Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 216 2010's 84 98 550 12 43 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Decreases

  10. Oklahoma Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 81 2010's 82 91 39 280 89 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Increases

  11. Oklahoma Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Oklahoma Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 93 2010's 106 116 222 240 298 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After

  12. Oklahoma Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Oklahoma Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 169 2010's 135 111 153 203 255 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  13. Oklahoma Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 865 2010's 2,117 5,024 3,771 2,019 2,881 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  14. Oklahoma Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 1,373 2010's 1,352 3,709 3,332 1,392 4,075 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  15. Pennsylvania Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Cubic Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Pennsylvania Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 1 2010's 0 2 123 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Decreases

  16. Pennsylvania Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Pennsylvania Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 29 2010's 2 1 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Increases

  17. Pennsylvania Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Pennsylvania Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 4 2010's 12 3 12 11 5 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet

  18. Pennsylvania Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Pennsylvania Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 4 2010's 13 18 22 12 12 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  19. Pennsylvania Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Pennsylvania Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 53 2010's 1,583 3,322 5,080 6,152 6,794 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  20. Pennsylvania Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Pennsylvania Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 299 2010's 1,994 5,238 4,411 6,218 8,119 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  1. Texas (with State Offshore) Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Texas (with State Offshore) Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 4 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision

  2. Texas (with State Offshore) Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Texas (with State Offshore) Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 30 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision

  3. Texas - RRC District 5 Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Million Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Texas - RRC District 5 Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 1 2010's 3 3 3 22 7 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision

  4. Texas - RRC District 5 Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Increases (Million Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Texas - RRC District 5 Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 5 2010's 3 8 11 1 3 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision

  5. Texas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Texas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 276 2010's 423 799 1,131 1,748 1,778 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After

  6. Texas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Texas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 653 2010's 846 908 1,333 1,537 2,183 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  7. Texas State Offshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Million Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Texas State Offshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 2 1 0 2 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision

  8. Texas State Offshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Increases (Million Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Texas State Offshore Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 1 2010's 0 3 0 0 1 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision

  9. Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 110 2010's 30 31 134 11 6 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Decreases

  10. Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 9 2010's 77 46 21 69 68 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Increases

  11. Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 8 2010's 21 23 45 91 297 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease

  12. Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 126 2010's 71 64 75 54 234 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  13. Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 459 199 71 201 9 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Decreases

  14. Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 219 2010's 16 87 30 87 243 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Increases

  15. West Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Cubic Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) West Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 38 2010's 25 47 10 1 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Decreases

  16. West Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) West Virginia Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 19 2010's 15 35 3 15 3 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Increases

  17. West Virginia Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) West Virginia Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 4 2010's 0 0 7 18 6 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After

  18. West Virginia Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) West Virginia Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 2 15 11 17 24 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  19. West Virginia Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) West Virginia Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 13 2010's 543 139 962 2,267 4,152 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  20. West Virginia Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) West Virginia Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 58 2010's 289 702 1,214 1,586 2,198 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  1. Colorado Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Colorado Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 2 0 1 4 1,042 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  2. Colorado Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Colorado Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 1 4 13 56 1,104 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  3. Florida Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Florida Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 2 3 1 6 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease

  4. Florida Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Florida Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 8 2010's 10 9 6 13 1 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  5. Illinois Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Illinois Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 1 2010's 4 2 1 11 1 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease

  6. Illinois Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Illinois Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 12 2010's 0 6 7 11 3 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  7. Indiana Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Indiana Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 1 0 2 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease

  8. Indiana Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Indiana Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 1 2010's 0 1 1 1 1 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  9. Kansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Kansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 107 2010's 0 14 85 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Decreases

  10. Kansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Kansas Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 8 2010's 157 24 21 71 73 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Increases

  11. Kansas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Kansas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 21 2010's 47 23 50 49 53 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease

  12. Kansas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Kansas Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 49 2010's 52 47 80 57 68 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  13. Kentucky Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Kentucky Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 3 2010's 3 2 2 1 1 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease

  14. Kentucky Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Kentucky Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 4 2010's 1 9 4 2 1 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  15. Louisiana - North Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Louisiana - North Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 6 2010's 11 4 8 7 5 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet

  16. Louisiana - North Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Louisiana - North Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 15 2010's 69 16 19 22 13 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  17. 11. CONTRACT ID CODE

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    79120 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, state, ZIP Code) Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Pantex, LLC PO Box 30020 Amarillo, TX 79120 CODE I FACILITY ...

  18. Building Energy Code

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The Rhode Island Building Code Standards Committee adopts, promulgates and administers the state building code. Compliance is determined through the building permit and inspection process by local...

  19. Building Energy Codes Program

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    5 Introduction: Model Energy Codes ANSIASHRAEIES Standard 90.1 * Current Version: ... and Air-conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) International Energy Conservation Code ...

  20. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The North Carolina State Building Code Council is responsible for developing all state codes. By statute, the Commissioner of Insurance has general supervision over the administration and...

  1. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The West Virginia State Fire Commission is responsible for adopting and promulgating statewide construction codes. These codes may be voluntarily adopted at the local level. Local jurisdictions...

  2. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Public Act 093-0936 (Illinois Energy Conservation Code for Commercial Buildings) was signed into law in August, 2004. The Illinois Energy Conservation Code for Commercial Buildings became...

  3. New Code Compliance Briefs Assist in Resolving Codes and Standards...

    Energy Saver

    New Code Compliance Briefs Assist in Resolving Codes and Standards Concerns in Energy Innovations New Code Compliance Briefs Assist in Resolving Codes and Standards Concerns in ...

  4. User's manual for the ORIGEN2 computer code

    SciTech Connect

    Croff, A.G.

    1980-07-01

    This report describes how to use a revised version of the ORIGEN computer code, designated ORIGEN2. Included are a description of the input data, input deck organization, and sample input and output. ORIGEN2 can be obtained from the Radiation Shielding Information Center at ORNL.

  5. Revised Merit Review Guide for Financial Assistance

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Attached is the revised Merit Review Guide for Financial Assistance. Revisions include reformatting and updating of the information presented in the Guide and Attachments.

  6. Nevada Revised Statutes | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Not provided DOI Not Provided Check for DOI availability: http:crossref.org Online Internet link for Nevada Revised Statutes Citation Nevada Revised Statutes (2014). Retrieved...

  7. Oregon Revised Statutes | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Not provided DOI Not Provided Check for DOI availability: http:crossref.org Online Internet link for Oregon Revised Statutes Citation Oregon Revised Statutes (2014). Retrieved...

  8. Manually operated coded switch

    DOEpatents

    Barnette, Jon H.

    1978-01-01

    The disclosure relates to a manually operated recodable coded switch in which a code may be inserted, tried and used to actuate a lever controlling an external device. After attempting a code, the switch's code wheels must be returned to their zero positions before another try is made.

  9. EIA-748C 32 EVMS Guidelines Reference | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    EIA-748C 32 EVMS Guidelines Reference EIA-748C 32 EVMS Guidelines Reference 32 EVMS Guidelines are broken down into 5 areas: Organization, Planning & Budgeting, Accounting, Analysis, and Revisions. THis chart identified all 32 guidelines and the subject area they al into. Download 32 EVMS Guidelines Chart (664.13 KB) Key Resources Internal DOE Tools PMCDP EVMS PARS IIe FPD Resource Center PM Newsletter Forms and Templates More Documents & Publications EVMS Review Procedure DOE EVMSIH and

  10. Reference Model Project (RMP)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    and Application Center for Hydrogen Energy Research Programs ARPA-E Basic Energy Sciences ... Sea State Contour) Code Online Abstracts and Reports Water Power Personnel ...

  11. RH-TRU Waste Content Codes

    SciTech Connect

    Washington TRU Solutions

    2007-07-01

    based on a 10-day shipping period (rather than the standard 60-day shipping period) may be used as specified in an approved content code. Requests for new or revised content codes may be submitted to the WIPP RH-TRU Payload Engineer for review and approval, provided all RH-TRAMPAC requirements are met.

  12. System Plan Revision 5 + 6

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Plan Revision 7 General Overview DaBrisha Smith (DOEORP) April 10, 2013 System Plan 101 * What is System Planning - A process used by organizations to design, analyze and define ...

  13. Revised Guide for Financial Assistance

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Attached is a revised Guide for Financial Assistance. The Guide has been updated to reflect changes to web sites, organization names, systems, and DOE policies and practices since the guide was last issued.

  14. Coal Data Publication Revision Policy

    Annual Energy Outlook

    impact: WHAT happens next to the database and in our coal reports: Respondent provides data that are clearly incorrect or revised data for any period in the current reporting year. ...

  15. Revised accident source terms for light-water reactors

    SciTech Connect

    Soffer, L.

    1995-02-01

    This paper presents revised accident source terms for light-water reactors incorporating the severe accident research insights gained in this area over the last 15 years. Current LWR reactor accident source terms used for licensing date from 1962 and are contained in Regulatory Guides 1.3 and 1.4. These specify that 100% of the core inventory of noble gases and 25% of the iodine fission products are assumed to be instantaneously available for release from the containment. The chemical form of the iodine fission products is also assumed to be predominantly elemental iodine. These assumptions have strongly affected present nuclear air cleaning requirements by emphasizing rapid actuation of spray systems and filtration systems optimized to retain elemental iodine. A proposed revision of reactor accident source terms and some im implications for nuclear air cleaning requirements was presented at the 22nd DOE/NRC Nuclear Air Cleaning Conference. A draft report was issued by the NRC for comment in July 1992. Extensive comments were received, with the most significant comments involving (a) release fractions for both volatile and non-volatile species in the early in-vessel release phase, (b) gap release fractions of the noble gases, iodine and cesium, and (c) the timing and duration for the release phases. The final source term report is expected to be issued in late 1994. Although the revised source terms are intended primarily for future plants, current nuclear power plants may request use of revised accident source term insights as well in licensing. This paper emphasizes additional information obtained since the 22nd Conference, including studies on fission product removal mechanisms, results obtained from improved severe accident code calculations and resolution of major comments, and their impact upon the revised accident source terms. Revised accident source terms for both BWRS and PWRS are presented.

  16. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Legislation passed in March 2010 authorized the Alabama Energy and Residential Code (AERC) Board to adopt mandatory residential and commercial energy codes for all jurisdictions. In 2015, the AER...

  17. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    A mandatory energy code is not enforced at the state level. If a local energy code is adopted, it is enforced at the local level. Builders or sellers of new residential buildings (single-family or...

  18. Building Energy Code

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Note: Much of the information presented in this summary is drawn from the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Building Energy Codes Program and the Building Codes Assistance Project (BCAP). For more...

  19. Building Energy Code

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The Indiana Residential Building Code is based on the 2003 IRC with state amendments (eff. 9/11/05). This code applies to 1 and 2 family dwellings and townhouses. During the adoption process,...

  20. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The 1993 State Legislature updated the state energy code to the 1989 Model Energy Code (MEC) and established a procedure to update the standard. Then in 1995, following consultation with an...

  1. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Note: Much of the information presented in this summary is drawn from the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Building Energy Codes Program and the Building Codes Assistance Project (BCAP). For more...

  2. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Prior to 1997, South Carolina's local governments adopted and enforced the building codes. In 1997, the law required statewide use of the most up-to-date building codes, which then required the...

  3. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    In 2006 Iowa enacted H.F. 2361, requiring the State Building Commissioner to adopt energy conservation requirements based on a nationally recognized building energy code. The State Building Code...

  4. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    In September 2011 the Nebraska Building Energy Code was updated to the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) standards. As with the previous 2003 IECC standards, which had been in...

  5. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    In November of 2015, the Commission adopted the 2015 International Building Code (IBC) with amendments. The Commission did not adopt the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) as part...

  6. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Much of the information presented in this summary is drawn from the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Building Energy Codes Program and the Building Codes Assistance Project (BCAP). For more deta...

  7. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Changes to the energy code are submitted to the Uniform Building Code Commission. The proposed change is reviewed by the Commission at a monthly meeting to decide if it warrants further considera...

  8. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Much of the information presented in this summary is drawn from the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Building Energy Codes Program and the Building Codes Assistance Project (BCAP). For more...

  9. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code (USBC) is a statewide minimum requirement that local jurisdictions cannot amend. The code is applicable to all new buildings in the commonwealth. The...

  10. Guam- Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Much of the information presented in this summary is drawn from the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Building Energy Codes Program and the Building Codes Assistance Project (BCAP). For more...

  11. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Colorado is a home rule state, so no statewide energy code exists, although state government buildings do have specific requirements. Voluntary adoption of energy codes is encouraged and efforts...

  12. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    All residential and commercial structures are required to comply with the state’s energy code. The 2009 New Mexico Energy Conservation Code (NMECC), effective June 2013, is based on 2009...

  13. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The 2012 IECC is in effect for all residential and commercial buildings, Idaho schools, and Idaho jurisdictions that adopt and enforce building codes, unless a local code exists that is more...

  14. Cellulases and coding sequences

    DOEpatents

    Li, Xin-Liang; Ljungdahl, Lars G.; Chen, Huizhong

    2001-01-01

    The present invention provides three fungal cellulases, their coding sequences, recombinant DNA molecules comprising the cellulase coding sequences, recombinant host cells and methods for producing same. The present cellulases are from Orpinomyces PC-2.

  15. Cellulases and coding sequences

    DOEpatents

    Li, Xin-Liang; Ljungdahl, Lars G.; Chen, Huizhong

    2001-02-20

    The present invention provides three fungal cellulases, their coding sequences, recombinant DNA molecules comprising the cellulase coding sequences, recombinant host cells and methods for producing same. The present cellulases are from Orpinomyces PC-2.

  16. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    New Hampshire adopted a mandatory statewide building code in 2002 based on the 2000 IECC. S.B. 81 was enacted in July 2007, and it upgraded the New Hampshire Energy Code to the 2006 IECC. In Dece...

  17. Louisiana--North Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Billion Cubic Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Decreases

  18. Louisiana--North Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Billion Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Increases

  19. Alaska (with Total Offshore) Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Billion Cubic Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  20. Alaska (with Total Offshore) Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Billion Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  1. Texas--State Offshore Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Cubic Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  2. Texas--State Offshore Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  3. Code and model extensions of the THATCH code for modular high temperature gas-cooled reactors

    SciTech Connect

    Kroger, P.G.; Kennett, R.J. )

    1993-05-01

    This report documents several model extensions and improvements of the THATCH code, a code to model thermal and fluid flow transients in High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors. A heat exchanger model was added, which can be used to represent the steam generator of the main Heat Transport System or the auxiliary Shutdown Cooling System. This addition permits the modeling of forced flow cooldown transients with the THATCH code. An enhanced upper head model, considering the actual conical and spherical shape of the upper plenum and reactor upper head was added, permitting more accurate modeling of the heat transfer in thisregion. The revised models are described, and the changes and addition to the input records are documented.

  4. Notice of Intent to Revise DOE O 331.1C Chg 3, Employee Performance Management and Recognition Program

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2015-03-20

    The revision incorporates recommendations from the FY12 National Council on Federal Labor-Management Relation's "Goals-Engagement-Accountability-Results (GEAR)" report and program requirements currently contained in the DOE Supervisory/Non-Supervisory Employee Performance Management and Recognition Desk Reference (Desk Reference) such as the DOE Monetary Awards Scale, as well as program requirements that have been established via memoranda since the Order was revised in October 2010.

  5. Notice of Intent to Revise DOE O 331.1C, Chg 3, Employee Performance Management and Recognition Program

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    The revision incorporates recommendations from the FY12 National Council on Federal Labor-Management Relation's "Goals-Engagement-Accountability-Results (GEAR)" report and program requirements currently contained in the DOE Supervisory/Non-Supervisory Employee Performance Management and Recognition Desk Reference (Desk Reference) such as the DOE Monetary Awards Scale, as well as program requirements that have been established via memoranda since the Order was revised in October 2010.

  6. Building Energy Code

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    In March 2006, SB 459 was enacted to promote renewable energy and update the state's building energy codes.

  7. Top NAICS Codes

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Business opportunities » Top NAICS Codes Top NAICS Codes Below is a current listing of the top NAICS codes by volume and dollar value Contact Small Business Office 505-667-4419 Email Top Ten NAICS Codes Volume 339999 All Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing 339940 Office Supplies (except Paper) Manufacturing 339113 Surgical Appliance and Supplies Manufacturing 334118 Computer Terminal and Other Computer Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing 334220 Radio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless

  8. Calif--San Joaquin Basin onsh Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Billion Cubic Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Calif--San Joaquin Basin onsh Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) No Data Available For This Series - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  9. Calif--San Joaquin Basin onsh Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Billion Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Calif--San Joaquin Basin onsh Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) No Data Available For This Series - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  10. Texas--RRC District 10 Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Billion Cubic Feet) Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Increases

  11. Texas--RRC District 10 Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Cubic Feet) Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  12. Texas--RRC District 2 onsh Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Decreases

  13. Texas--RRC District 3 onsh Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Decreases

  14. Texas--RRC District 8A Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Cubic Feet) Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  15. Microsoft Word - FINAL Class 1 Revise TRUPACT-III Management Language 05-20-11.doc

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    May 24, 2011 Mr. John Kieling , Acting Bureau Chief Hazardous Waste Bureau New Mexico Environment Department 2905 Rodeo Park Drive East, Building 1 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505-6303 Subject: Notification of a Class 1 Permit Modification to the Hazardous Waste Facility Permit, Permit Number: NM4890139088-TSDF Dear Mr. Kieling: Enclosed is a Class 1 Permit Modification Notification to: * Revise TRUPACT-III Management Language * Revise Procedure Reference for the Bolting Station in Table E-1 We

  16. Texas--RRC District 10 Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Billion Cubic Feet) Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Texas--RRC District 10 Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 4 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision

  17. Texas--RRC District 10 Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Cubic Feet) Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Texas--RRC District 10 Shale Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 0 31 0 1 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases

  18. Texas--RRC District 8A Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Cubic Feet) Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Texas--RRC District 8A Shale Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 0 0 156 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases

  19. Local public document room directory. Revision 7

    SciTech Connect

    1998-04-01

    This directory (NUREG/BR-0088, Revision 7) lists local public document rooms (LPDRs) for commercial nuclear power plants with operating or possession-only licenses or under construction, plus the LPDRs for potential high-level radioactive waste repository sites, gaseous diffusion plants, certain fuel cycle facilities, certain low-level waste disposal facilities, and any temporary LPDRs established for the duration of licensing proceedings. In some instances, the LPDR libraries maintain document collections for more than one licensed facility. The library staff members listed are the persons most familiar with the LPDR collections. Reference librarians in the NRC Headquarters Public Document Room (PDR) are also available to assist the public in locating NRC documents.

  20. Reference Documents | National Nuclear Security Administration...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Reference Documents Summary References Main Draft SEIS References Additional SEIS References Appendix C References Appendix D References Appendix E References Appendix F References ...

  1. EIS-0183: Revised Record of Decision | Department of Energy

    Energy Saver

    Revised Record of Decision EIS-0183: Revised Record of Decision Electrical Interconnection ... Revised Record of Decision for the Electrical Interconnection of the SummitWestward ...

  2. XSOR codes users manual

    SciTech Connect

    Jow, Hong-Nian; Murfin, W.B.; Johnson, J.D.

    1993-11-01

    This report describes the source term estimation codes, XSORs. The codes are written for three pressurized water reactors (Surry, Sequoyah, and Zion) and two boiling water reactors (Peach Bottom and Grand Gulf). The ensemble of codes has been named ``XSOR``. The purpose of XSOR codes is to estimate the source terms which would be released to the atmosphere in severe accidents. A source term includes the release fractions of several radionuclide groups, the timing and duration of releases, the rates of energy release, and the elevation of releases. The codes have been developed by Sandia National Laboratories for the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in support of the NUREG-1150 program. The XSOR codes are fast running parametric codes and are used as surrogates for detailed mechanistic codes. The XSOR codes also provide the capability to explore the phenomena and their uncertainty which are not currently modeled by the mechanistic codes. The uncertainty distributions of input parameters may be used by an. XSOR code to estimate the uncertainty of source terms.

  3. DLLExternalCode

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center

    2014-05-14

    DLLExternalCode is the a general dynamic-link library (DLL) interface for linking GoldSim (www.goldsim.com) with external codes. The overall concept is to use GoldSim as top level modeling software with interfaces to external codes for specific calculations. The DLLExternalCode DLL that performs the linking function is designed to take a list of code inputs from GoldSim, create an input file for the external application, run the external code, and return a list of outputs, read frommore » files created by the external application, back to GoldSim. Instructions for creating the input file, running the external code, and reading the output are contained in an instructions file that is read and interpreted by the DLL.« less

  4. DLLExternalCode

    SciTech Connect

    Greg Flach, Frank Smith

    2014-05-14

    DLLExternalCode is the a general dynamic-link library (DLL) interface for linking GoldSim (www.goldsim.com) with external codes. The overall concept is to use GoldSim as top level modeling software with interfaces to external codes for specific calculations. The DLLExternalCode DLL that performs the linking function is designed to take a list of code inputs from GoldSim, create an input file for the external application, run the external code, and return a list of outputs, read from files created by the external application, back to GoldSim. Instructions for creating the input file, running the external code, and reading the output are contained in an instructions file that is read and interpreted by the DLL.

  5. Department of Energy Construction Safety Reference Guide

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1993-09-01

    DOE has adopted the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1926 ``Safety and Health Regulations for Construction,`` and related parts of 29 CFR 1910, ``Occupational Safety and Health Standards.`` This nonmandatory reference guide is based on these OSHA regulations and, where appropriate, incorporates additional standards, codes, directives, and work practices that are recognized and accepted by DOE and the construction industry. It covers excavation, scaffolding, electricity, fire, signs/barricades, cranes/hoists/conveyors, hand and power tools, concrete/masonry, stairways/ladders, welding/cutting, motor vehicles/mechanical equipment, demolition, materials, blasting, steel erection, etc.

  6. Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Shale natural gas proved reserves, reserves changes, and production, wet after lease separation, 2014 billion cubic feet Published New Reservoir Proved Revision Revision New Field Discoveries Estimated Proved Reserves Adjustments Increases Decreases Sales Acquisitions Extensions Discoveries in Old Fields Production Reserves State and Subdivision 12/31/13 (+,-) (+) (-) (-) (+) (+) (+) (+) (-) 12/31/14 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lower 48 States 159,115 12,113 27,643 26,199 5,029 7,657 35,401

  7. High frequency reference electrode

    DOEpatents

    Kronberg, James W.

    1994-01-01

    A high frequency reference electrode for electrochemical experiments comprises a mercury-calomel or silver-silver chloride reference electrode with a layer of platinum around it and a layer of a chemically and electrically resistant material such as TEFLON around the platinum covering all but a small ring or "halo" at the tip of the reference electrode, adjacent to the active portion of the reference electrode. The voltage output of the platinum layer, which serves as a redox electrode, and that of the reference electrode are coupled by a capacitor or a set of capacitors and the coupled output transmitted to a standard laboratory potentiostat. The platinum may be applied by thermal decomposition to the surface of the reference electrode. The electrode provides superior high-frequency response over conventional electrodes.

  8. High frequency reference electrode

    DOEpatents

    Kronberg, J.W.

    1994-05-31

    A high frequency reference electrode for electrochemical experiments comprises a mercury-calomel or silver-silver chloride reference electrode with a layer of platinum around it and a layer of a chemically and electrically resistant material such as TEFLON around the platinum covering all but a small ring or halo' at the tip of the reference electrode, adjacent to the active portion of the reference electrode. The voltage output of the platinum layer, which serves as a redox electrode, and that of the reference electrode are coupled by a capacitor or a set of capacitors and the coupled output transmitted to a standard laboratory potentiostat. The platinum may be applied by thermal decomposition to the surface of the reference electrode. The electrode provides superior high-frequency response over conventional electrodes. 4 figs.

  9. Colorado Code of Regulations 2 CCR 601-18, State Utility Accommodation...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Colorado Code of Regulations 2 CCR 601-18, State Utility Accommodation Code Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation:...

  10. Tex. Water Code, Title 2, Chapter 11 Water Rights | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Tex. Water Code, Title 2, Chapter 11 Water Rights Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Tex. Water Code, Title 2,...

  11. Optical voltage reference

    DOEpatents

    Rankin, R.; Kotter, D.

    1994-04-26

    An optical voltage reference for providing an alternative to a battery source is described. The optical reference apparatus provides a temperature stable, high precision, isolated voltage reference through the use of optical isolation techniques to eliminate current and impedance coupling errors. Pulse rate frequency modulation is employed to eliminate errors in the optical transmission link while phase-lock feedback is employed to stabilize the frequency to voltage transfer function. 2 figures.

  12. Optical voltage reference

    DOEpatents

    Rankin, Richard; Kotter, Dale

    1994-01-01

    An optical voltage reference for providing an alternative to a battery source. The optical reference apparatus provides a temperature stable, high precision, isolated voltage reference through the use of optical isolation techniques to eliminate current and impedance coupling errors. Pulse rate frequency modulation is employed to eliminate errors in the optical transmission link while phase-lock feedback is employed to stabilize the frequency to voltage transfer function.

  13. Appendix A: Reference case

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Reference case Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2014 Table A17. Renewable energy consumption by sector and source (quadrillion Btu) Sector and source...

  14. Appendix A: Reference case

    Annual Energy Outlook

    4 Reference case Table A2. Energy consumption by sector and source (quadrillion Btu per year, unless otherwise noted) Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2014...

  15. EFRC Management Reference Document

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    EFRC management reference document Energy Frontier Research Centers Acknowledgments of Support (v.1, October 2009) Office of Basic Energy Sciences Office of Science US Department ...

  16. TPWC 68 - Parks and Wildlife Code Endangered Species | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    TPWC 68 - Parks and Wildlife Code Endangered Species Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: TPWC 68 - Parks and Wildlife...

  17. Montana Code 76-2-301 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Montana Code 76-2-301Legal Abstract This statute covers local government zoning ordinances and planning....

  18. Montana Code 76-2-201 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    201 Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Montana Code 76-2-201Legal Abstract This statute covers county zoning...

  19. Title 18 Alaska Administrative Code Chapter 70 Water Quality...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    0 Water Quality Standards Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: Title 18 Alaska Administrative Code Chapter 70...

  20. Montana Code 75-20-102 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Montana Code 75-20-102Legal Abstract A Certificate of Compliance is required for the development of...

  1. Montana Code 75-20-104 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Montana Code 75-20-104Legal Abstract Definition of facilities. Published NA Year Signed or Took Effect...

  2. Montana Code 75-20-101 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Montana Code 75-20-101Legal Abstract Montana Major facility siting act Published NA Year Signed or Took...

  3. Montana Code 75-20-211 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Montana Code 75-20-211Legal Abstract This section includes the requirements for the Certificate of...

  4. Montana Code 75-20-301 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Montana Code 75-20-301Legal Abstract Decision of department - findings necessary for certification...

  5. Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 6301 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Cal. Pub. Res. Code 6301Legal Abstract This section grants the California State Lands...

  6. Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 6502 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Cal. Pub. Res. Code 6502Legal Abstract Statutory chapter providing for leasing of public...

  7. Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 5020 et seq.: Historical Resources | Open...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Cal. Pub. Res. Code 5020 et seq.: Historical ResourcesLegal Abstract This section...

  8. Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 30603 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- OtherOther: Cal. Pub. Res. Code 30603Legal Abstract Delegation of local authority for Coastal Zone...

  9. Title 11 Alaska Administrative Code Chapter 5 Fees | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    5 Fees Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: Title 11 Alaska Administrative Code Chapter 5 FeesLegal Abstract...

  10. Title 18 Alaska Administrative Code Chapter 50 Air Quality Control...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    50 Air Quality Control Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: Title 18 Alaska Administrative Code Chapter 50 Air...

  11. Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Chapter I, Subchapter C...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Page Edit with form History Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Chapter I, Subchapter C - Air Programs Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal...

  12. Title 18 Alaska Administrative Code Section 60.020 Hazardous...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    60.020 Hazardous Waste Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: Title 18 Alaska Administrative Code Section 60.020...

  13. Title 18 Alaska Administrative Code Chapter 60 Solid Waste Management...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    60 Solid Waste Management Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: Title 18 Alaska Administrative Code Chapter 60...

  14. Montana Code 70-30-102 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: Montana Code 70-30-102Legal Published NA Year Signed or Took Effect 2014 Legal Citation Not...

  15. Title 11 Alaska Administrative Code 82 Mineral Leasing Procedures...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    2 Mineral Leasing Procedures Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: Title 11 Alaska Administrative Code 82 Mineral...

  16. Title 18 Alaska Administrative Code Chapter 78 Underground Storage...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    8 Underground Storage Tanks Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: Title 18 Alaska Administrative Code Chapter 78...

  17. Mechanical code comparator

    DOEpatents

    Peter, Frank J.; Dalton, Larry J.; Plummer, David W.

    2002-01-01

    A new class of mechanical code comparators is described which have broad potential for application in safety, surety, and security applications. These devices can be implemented as micro-scale electromechanical systems that isolate a secure or otherwise controlled device until an access code is entered. This access code is converted into a series of mechanical inputs to the mechanical code comparator, which compares the access code to a pre-input combination, entered previously into the mechanical code comparator by an operator at the system security control point. These devices provide extremely high levels of robust security. Being totally mechanical in operation, an access control system properly based on such devices cannot be circumvented by software attack alone.

  18. Generating code adapted for interlinking legacy scalar code and extended vector code

    DOEpatents

    Gschwind, Michael K

    2013-06-04

    Mechanisms for intermixing code are provided. Source code is received for compilation using an extended Application Binary Interface (ABI) that extends a legacy ABI and uses a different register configuration than the legacy ABI. First compiled code is generated based on the source code, the first compiled code comprising code for accommodating the difference in register configurations used by the extended ABI and the legacy ABI. The first compiled code and second compiled code are intermixed to generate intermixed code, the second compiled code being compiled code that uses the legacy ABI. The intermixed code comprises at least one call instruction that is one of a call from the first compiled code to the second compiled code or a call from the second compiled code to the first compiled code. The code for accommodating the difference in register configurations is associated with the at least one call instruction.

  19. Ray Effect Mitigation Through Reference Frame Rotation

    DOE PAGES [OSTI]

    Tencer, John

    2016-05-01

    The discrete ordinates method is a popular and versatile technique for solving the radiative transport equation, a major drawback of which is the presence of ray effects. Mitigation of ray effects can yield significantly more accurate results and enhanced numerical stability for combined mode codes. Moreover, when ray effects are present, the solution is seen to be highly dependent upon the relative orientation of the geometry and the global reference frame. It is an undesirable property. A novel ray effect mitigation technique of averaging the computed solution for various reference frame orientations is proposed.

  20. Compiling Codes on Cori

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Compiling Codes on Cori Compiling Codes on Cori Overview Cray provides a convenient set of wrapper commands that should be used in almost all cases for compiling and linking parallel programs. Invoking the wrappers will automatically link codes with MPI libraries and other Cray system software. All MPI and Cray system include directories are also transparently imported. In addition the wrappers append the compiler's target processor arguments for the Cori compute node processors. NOTE: The

  1. Compiling Codes on Hopper

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Compiling Codes Compiling Codes on Hopper Overview Cray provides a convenient set of wrapper commands that should be used in almost all cases for compiling and linking parallel programs. Invoking the wrappers will automatically link codes with MPI libraries and other Cray system software. All MPI and Cray system include directories are also transparently imported. In addition the wrappers append the compiler's target processor arguments for the hopper compute node processors. NOTE: The intention

  2. NMED Presentation on Revised Consent Order | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Presentation on Revised Consent Order NMED Presentation on Revised Consent Order NMED Secretary Ryan Flynn provided a presentation on the Revisions to the 2005 Order on Consent. NMED Revised CO - November 12, 2015 (334.24

  3. Tokamak Systems Code

    SciTech Connect

    Reid, R.L.; Barrett, R.J.; Brown, T.G.; Gorker, G.E.; Hooper, R.J.; Kalsi, S.S.; Metzler, D.H.; Peng, Y.K.M.; Roth, K.E.; Spampinato, P.T.

    1985-03-01

    The FEDC Tokamak Systems Code calculates tokamak performance, cost, and configuration as a function of plasma engineering parameters. This version of the code models experimental tokamaks. It does not currently consider tokamak configurations that generate electrical power or incorporate breeding blankets. The code has a modular (or subroutine) structure to allow independent modeling for each major tokamak component or system. A primary benefit of modularization is that a component module may be updated without disturbing the remainder of the systems code as long as the imput to or output from the module remains unchanged.

  4. " Row: NAICS Codes;" " ...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    of Purchased Electricity, Natural Gas, and Steam, 1998;" " Level: National Data; " " Row: NAICS Codes;" " Column: Supplier Sources of Purchased Electricity, Natural Gas, and ...

  5. Shields - Code Coupling

    SciTech Connect

    Vernon, Louis James

    2015-03-02

    This PowerPoint presentation focuses on the history and benefits of the Space Weather Modeling Framework (SWMF) code and collaborative software development.

  6. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Kansas adopted the 2006 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) as "the applicable state standard" for commercial and industrial buildings. Enforcement is provided by local jurisdictions; t...

  7. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry (DLI) has the authority to upgrade commercial and residential energy standards through the regulatory process. The current code, the 2009 UCC, became...

  8. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Maryland Building Performance Standards (MBPS) are adopted by the Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) Codes Administration. As required by legislation passed in...

  9. Building Energy Code

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Connecticut Office of the State Building Inspector establishes and enforces building, electrical, mechanical, plumbing and energy code requirements by reviewing, developing, adopting and...

  10. Building Energy Codes

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    David Cohan Program Manager Building Energy Codes April 22, 2014 Presentation Outline * Mission * Goals * Program Organization * StrategiesRoles * Near-Term Focus * Measuring ...

  11. Improving Code Compliance

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    provisions in International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) through proof-of-concept ... This includes updating recommendations based on newer CBECs or BPD energy statistics. ...

  12. Acquisition Career Management Program Handbook, Partial Revision...

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    Procurement and Assistance Management SUBJECT: Acquisition Career Management Program Handbook, Partial Revision of Chapter 11, Contracting Officer's Representative SUMMARY: The...

  13. EIS-0218: Revised Record of Decision

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Revision of the Record of Decision for a Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Policy Concerning Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel

  14. Acquisition Career Management Handbook Change - Revised Contracting

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Officer's Representative Certification (COR) | Department of Energy Career Management Handbook Change - Revised Contracting Officer's Representative Certification (COR) Acquisition Career Management Handbook Change - Revised Contracting Officer's Representative Certification (COR) A recent review of the January 2009 issue of the Department of Energy (DOE) Acquisition Career Management Program (ACMP) Handbook identified many areas that require an update. Although the ACMP Handbook revisions

  15. Ariz. Admin. Code § R-14-3-219 | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    (2006). Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleAriz.Admin.CodeR-14-3-219&oldid801084" Feedback Contact needs updating Image needs updating Reference...

  16. U-110: Samba Bug Lets Remote Users Execute Arbitrary Code | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    code on the target system. reference LINKS: Vendor Advisory Security Tracker ID 1026739 CVE-2012-0870 IMPACT ASSESSMENT: Medium Discussion: A vulnerability was reported in Samba....

  17. Title 11 Alaska Administrative Code 82.400 - 82.475 Competitive...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: Title 11 Alaska Administrative Code 82.400 - 82.475 Competitive BiddingLegal Abstract Implementing...

  18. Code of Colorado Regulations 5 CCR 1002-61, Colorado Discharge...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Code of Colorado Regulations 5 CCR 1002-61, Colorado Discharge Permit System Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document-...

  19. Colorado Code of Regulations 4 CCR 723-3, Rules Regulating Electric...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Colorado Code of Regulations 4 CCR 723-3, Rules Regulating Electric Utilities Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document-...

  20. Code of Colorado Regulations 4 CCR 723-3, Rules Regulating Electric...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Code of Colorado Regulations 4 CCR 723-3, Rules Regulating Electric Utilities Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document-...

  1. OM Code Requirements For MOVs -- OMN-1 and Appendix III

    SciTech Connect

    Kevin G. DeWall

    2011-08-01

    The purpose or scope of the ASME OM Code is to establish the requirements for pre-service and in-service testing of nuclear power plant components to assess their operational readiness. For MOVs this includes those that perform a specific function in shutting down a reactor to the safe shutdown condition, maintaining the safe shutdown condition, and mitigating the consequences of an accident. This paper will present a brief history of industry and regulatory activities related to MOVs and the development of Code requirements to address weaknesses in earlier versions of the OM Code. The paper will discuss the MOV requirements contained in the 2009 version of ASME OM Code, specifically Mandatory Appendix III and OMN-1, Revision 1.

  2. Uranium reference materials

    SciTech Connect

    Donivan, S.; Chessmore, R.

    1987-07-01

    The Technical Measurements Center has prepared uranium mill tailings reference materials for use by remedial action contractors and cognizant federal and state agencies. Four materials were prepared with varying concentrations of radionuclides, using three tailings materials and a river-bottom soil diluent. All materials were ground, dried, and blended thoroughly to ensure homogeneity. The analyses on which the recommended values for nuclides in the reference materials are based were performed, using independent methods, by the UNC Geotech (UNC) Chemistry Laboratory, Grand Junction, Colorado, and by C.W. Sill (Sill), Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Idaho Falls, Idaho. Several statistical tests were performed on the analytical data to characterize the reference materials. Results of these tests reveal that the four reference materials are homogeneous and that no large systematic bias exists between the analytical methods used by Sill and those used by TMC. The average values for radionuclides of the two data sets, representing an unbiased estimate, were used as the recommended values for concentrations of nuclides in the reference materials. The recommended concentrations of radionuclides in the four reference materials are provided. Use of these reference materials will aid in providing uniform standardization among measurements made by remedial action contractors. 11 refs., 9 tabs.

  3. Revised OMB Circular A-76 (Revised November 14, 2002) | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Energy OMB Circular A-76 (Revised November 14, 2002) Revised OMB Circular A-76 (Revised November 14, 2002) Revised OMB Circular A-76 (Revised November 14, 2002) (246.94 KB) More Documents & Publications Operating Guidelines Appendix A B.DOC� DOE HR Guidebook 12_15_05.DOC� Operating Guidelines Appendix C D.DOC�

  4. Sandia Energy - Reference Model Documents

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Documents Home Stationary Power Energy Conversion Efficiency Water Power Reference Model Project (RMP) Reference Model Documents Reference Model DocumentsTara Camacho-Lopez2015-05-...

  5. reference | OpenEI Community

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    reference Home Jweers's picture Submitted by Jweers(88) Contributor 7 August, 2013 - 18:23 New Robust References citation citing developer formatting reference Semantic Mediawiki...

  6. Multifunctional reference electrode (Patent) | DOEPatents

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Multifunctional reference electrode Title: Multifunctional reference electrode A multifunctional, low mass reference electrode of a nickel tube, thermocouple means inside the ...

  7. Lichenase and coding sequences

    DOEpatents

    Li, Xin-Liang; Ljungdahl, Lars G.; Chen, Huizhong

    2000-08-15

    The present invention provides a fungal lichenase, i.e., an endo-1,3-1,4-.beta.-D-glucanohydrolase, its coding sequence, recombinant DNA molecules comprising the lichenase coding sequences, recombinant host cells and methods for producing same. The present lichenase is from Orpinomyces PC-2.

  8. Preserving Envelope Efficiency in Performance Based Code Compliance

    SciTech Connect

    Thornton, Brian A.; Sullivan, Greg P.; Rosenberg, Michael I.; Baechler, Michael C.

    2015-06-20

    The City of Seattle 2012 Energy Code (Seattle 2014), one of the most progressive in the country, is under revision for its 2015 edition. Additionally, city personnel participate in the development of the next generation of the Washington State Energy Code and the International Energy Code. Seattle has pledged carbon neutrality by 2050 including buildings, transportation and other sectors. The United States Department of Energy (DOE), through Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) provided technical assistance to Seattle in order to understand the implications of one potential direction for its code development, limiting trade-offs of long-lived building envelope components less stringent than the prescriptive code envelope requirements by using better-than-code but shorter-lived lighting and heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) components through the total building performance modeled energy compliance path. Weaker building envelopes can permanently limit building energy performance even as lighting and HVAC components are upgraded over time, because retrofitting the envelope is less likely and more expensive. Weaker building envelopes may also increase the required size, cost and complexity of HVAC systems and may adversely affect occupant comfort. This report presents the results of this technical assistance. The use of modeled energy code compliance to trade-off envelope components with shorter-lived building components is not unique to Seattle and the lessons and possible solutions described in this report have implications for other jurisdictions and energy codes.

  9. Energy Conservation Code Decoded

    SciTech Connect

    Cole, Pam C.; Taylor, Zachary T.

    2006-09-01

    Designing an energy-efficient, affordable, and comfortable home is a lot easier thanks to a slime, easier to read booklet, the 2006 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC), published in March 2006. States, counties, and cities have begun reviewing the new code as a potential upgrade to their existing codes. Maintained under the public consensus process of the International Code Council, the IECC is designed to do just what its title says: promote the design and construction of energy-efficient homes and commercial buildings. Homes in this case means traditional single-family homes, duplexes, condominiums, and apartment buildings having three or fewer stories. The U.S. Department of Energy, which played a key role in proposing the changes that resulted in the new code, is offering a free training course that covers the residential provisions of the 2006 IECC.

  10. REFERENCES Baines, W. D.

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    REFERENCES Baines, W. D. aud Peterson, E. G., 1951, "An Investigation of Flow Through ... D 50.8 m. A flow facility has been constructed for experiments with these screens. Air ...

  11. Value of Information References

    DOE Data Explorer

    Morency, Christina

    This file contains a list of relevant references on value of information (VOI) in RIS format. VOI provides a quantitative analysis to evaluate the outcome of the combined technologies (seismology, hydrology, geodesy) used to monitor Brady's Geothermal Field.

  12. Value of Information References

    DOE Data Explorer

    Morency, Christina

    2014-12-12

    This file contains a list of relevant references on value of information (VOI) in RIS format. VOI provides a quantitative analysis to evaluate the outcome of the combined technologies (seismology, hydrology, geodesy) used to monitor Brady's Geothermal Field.

  13. Precision displacement reference system

    DOEpatents

    Bieg, Lothar F.; Dubois, Robert R.; Strother, Jerry D.

    2000-02-22

    A precision displacement reference system is described, which enables real time accountability over the applied displacement feedback system to precision machine tools, positioning mechanisms, motion devices, and related operations. As independent measurements of tool location is taken by a displacement feedback system, a rotating reference disk compares feedback counts with performed motion. These measurements are compared to characterize and analyze real time mechanical and control performance during operation.

  14. Membrane reference electrode

    DOEpatents

    Redey, Laszlo; Bloom, Ira D.

    1989-01-01

    A reference electrode utilizes a small thin, flat membrane of a highly conductive glass placed on a small diameter insulator tube having a reference material inside in contact with an internal voltage lead. When the sensor is placed in a non-aqueous ionic electrolytic solution, the concentration difference across the glass membrane generates a low voltage signal in precise relationship to the concentration of the species to be measured with high spatial resolution.

  15. Membrane reference electrode

    DOEpatents

    Redey, L.; Bloom, I.D.

    1988-01-21

    A reference electrode utilizes a small thin, flat membrane of a highly conductive glass placed on a small diameter insulator tube having a reference material inside in contact with an internal voltage lead. When the sensor is placed in a non-aqueous ionic electrolytic solution, the concentration difference across the glass membrane generates a low voltage signal in precise relationship to the concentration of the species to be measured, with high spatial resolution. 2 figs.

  16. NRC comprehensive records disposition schedule. Revision 3

    SciTech Connect

    1998-02-01

    Title 44 US Code, ``Public Printing and Documents,`` regulations issued by the General Service Administration (GSA) in 41 CFR Chapter 101, Subchapter B, ``Management and Use of Information and Records,`` and regulations issued by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) in 36 CFR Chapter 12, Subchapter B, ``Records Management,`` require each agency to prepare and issue a comprehensive records disposition schedule that contains the NARA approved records disposition schedules for records unique to the agency and contains the NARA`s General Records Schedules for records common to several or all agencies. The approved records disposition schedules specify the appropriate duration of retention and the final disposition for records created or maintained by the NRC. NUREG-0910, Rev. 3, contains ``NRC`s Comprehensive Records Disposition Schedule,`` and the original authorized approved citation numbers issued by NARA. Rev. 3 incorporates NARA approved changes and additions to the NRC schedules that have been implemented since the last revision dated March, 1992, reflects recent organizational changes implemented at the NRC, and includes the latest version of NARA`s General Records Schedule (dated August 1995).

  17. A Comparison of the 2003 and 2006 International Energy Conservation Codes to Determine the Potential Impact on Residential Building Energy Efficiency

    SciTech Connect

    Stovall, Therese K; Baxter, Van D

    2008-03-01

    The IECC was updated in 2006. As required in the Energy Conservation and Production Act of 1992, Title 3, DOE has a legislative requirement to "determine whether such revision would improve energy efficiency in residential buildings" within 12 months of the latest revision. This requirement is part of a three-year cycle of regular code updates. To meet this requirement, an independent review was completed using personnel experienced in building science but not involved in the code development process.

  18. Report number codes

    SciTech Connect

    Nelson, R.N.

    1985-05-01

    This publication lists all report number codes processed by the Office of Scientific and Technical Information. The report codes are substantially based on the American National Standards Institute, Standard Technical Report Number (STRN)-Format and Creation Z39.23-1983. The Standard Technical Report Number (STRN) provides one of the primary methods of identifying a specific technical report. The STRN consists of two parts: The report code and the sequential number. The report code identifies the issuing organization, a specific program, or a type of document. The sequential number, which is assigned in sequence by each report issuing entity, is not included in this publication. Part I of this compilation is alphabetized by report codes followed by issuing installations. Part II lists the issuing organization followed by the assigned report code(s). In both Parts I and II, the names of issuing organizations appear for the most part in the form used at the time the reports were issued. However, for some of the more prolific installations which have had name changes, all entries have been merged under the current name.

  19. The NEPA reference guide

    SciTech Connect

    Swartz, L.L.; Reinke, D.C.

    1999-10-01

    The NEPA Reference Guide conveniently organizes and indexes National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations and guidance, along with relevant federal case law, all in one place. It allows the user to quickly learn the statutory, regulatory, and case law authority for a large number of NEPA subjects. A unique feature of The NEPA Reference Guide is its detailed index that includes a large number of diverse NEPA subjects. The index enables users to find and compile any statutory, regulatory (including CEQ guidance), and case law original source material and references on virtually any NEPA subject. This will be an especially useful tool for new NEPA practitioners who need to become immersed in a particular subject quickly.

  20. Codes and standards and other guidance cited in regulatory documents

    SciTech Connect

    Nickolaus, J.R.; Vinther, R.W.; Maguire-Moffitt, N.E.; Hammer, J.A.; Sherfey, L.L.; Warner, R.D. )

    1993-01-01

    As part of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standard Review Plan Update and Development Program, Pacific Northwest Laboratory developed a listing of industry consensus codes and standards and other government and industry guidance referred to in regulatory documents. This listing identifies the version of the code or standard cited in the regulatory document, and the current version of the code or standard. It also provides a summary characterization of the nature of the citation. This listing was developed from electronic searches of the Code of Federal Regulations and NRC's Bulletins, Information Notices, Circulars, Generic Letters, Policy Statements, Regulatory Guides, and Standard Review Plan (NUREG-08000).