National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for ms k9-42 richland

  1. Richland Operations Office - Hanford Site

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Richland Operations Office Richland Operations Office Richland Operations Office River Corridor Central Plateau Groundwater Mission Support Newsroom Richland Operations Office...

  2. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    :4Tsc1 ~Richland, Washington 99352 December 18, 2009 CERTIFIED MAIL Ms. Shannon Dininny The Associated Press P.O. Box 1349 Yakima, Washington 98901 Dear Ms. Dininny: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST (FOI 20 10-00644) Your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request dated December 2, 2009, addressed to the U.S. Department of Energy, Headquarters FOJA Office has been forwarded to this office for response as well as to the DOE Office of Environmental Management (EM), the Oak Ridge Operations Office

  3. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    ATESORichland, Washington 99352 16-PRO-0061 DEC 17 2015 Ms. H. P. Mooers, President HPM Corporation 4304 West 2 4 th Aye, Suite 100 Kennewick, Washington 99338 Dear Ms. Mooers: CONTRACT NO. DE-EM0002043 - HPM CORPORATION (HPMC) FISCAL YEAR 2015 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MEASUREMENT PLAN (PEMP) FEE DETERMINATION The U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operation Office (RL) has completed its evaluation of I-PMC's performance for the period of October 1, 2014, through September 30, 2015. As the Fee

  4. PIA - Richland Occupational Medicine Contract | Department of...

    Energy Saver

    PIA - Richland Occupational Medicine Contract PIA - Richland Occupational Medicine Contract PIA - Richland Occupational Medicine Contract PDF icon PIA - Richland Occupational...

  5. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    /: -. !~t. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352 Nav 0 4 ?nn~ 05-AMCP-OO46 Mr. Todd Martin, Chair Hanford Advisory Board 1933 Jadwin, Suite 135 Richland, Washington 99352 Dear Mr. Martin: HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD (HAB) ADVICE #166 -FUND U PLANT AREA REMEDIATION ACTIVITIES In response to your letter dated September 10, 2004, the U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (RL), appreciates your recommendations contained in HAB Consensus

  6. Richland Operations Office - Hanford Site

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Richland Operations Office Richland Operations Office Richland Operations Office River Corridor Central Plateau Groundwater Mission Support Newsroom Richland Operations Office Email Email Page | Print Print Page | Text Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Hanford Forward UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Richland Operations Office RL2016LogoVert DougShoop Welcome to the Richland Operations Office page! At the Richland office, our 235 employees work toward protecting the workers, public, and

  7. Richland Operations Office - Hanford Site

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Richland Operations Office Richland Operations Office Richland Operations Office Richland Operations Office Email Email Page | Print Print Page | Text Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size RL2016LogoVert DougShoop Welcome to the Richland Operations Office page! At the Richland office, our 235 employees work toward protecting the workers, public, and environment by further reducing risk, providing the necessary infrastructure for continued safe and effective cleanup operations, and restoring

  8. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    ITEM 1 Department of Energy Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352 15-PRO-0175 APR 3 0 205 Mr. J. A. Ciucci, President and Chief Executive Officer CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Richland, Washington 99352 Dear Mr. Ciucci: CONTRACT NO. DE-ACO6-08RL 14788 - FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2014 FINAL FEE DETERMINATION FOR PLATEAU REMEDIATION CONTRACT The purpose of this letter is to provide the final fee determination for the FY 2014 evaluation period. Pursuant to the

  9. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Department of Energy Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550 &?ATES0~Richland, Washington 99352 10O-AMSE-0054 A PR I~ ~~ Mr. J. G. Lehew III, President and Chief Executive Officer CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Richland, Washington 99352 Dear Mr. Lehew: CONTRACT NO. DE-AC06-08RL14788 - DE MINIMIS CHANGES TO THE HANFORD ANALYTICAL SERVICES QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT (HASQARD) Compliance with the HASQARD, DOE/RL-96-68, is required by your Contract (Attachment J.2, List B:

  10. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    t P.O. Box 550 4TESRichland, Washington 99352 1 0-AMSE-0056 Anp 01 2019t Mr. F. A. Figueroa, President and General Manager Mission Support Alliance, LLC Richland, Washington...

  11. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    j;. ~.Department of Energy Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550 ZATES~Richland, Washington 99352 July 29, 2010 Certified Mail Mr. Alec Osenbach Heart of America Northwest 1314 NE 56 1hStreet Suite 100 Seattle, Washington 98105 Dear Mr. Osenbach: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST (FOI 20 10-01599) You requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOJA), the following information: 1 . Documents and records relating to the potential duration of storage for soil excavated since 2009

  12. Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office - November...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Richland Operations Office - November 2012 Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office - November 2012 November 2012 Review of the Richland Operations Office Oversight...

  13. PIA - Richland Personal Security Clearance Record | Department...

    Energy Saver

    Personal Security Clearance Record PIA - Richland Personal Security Clearance Record PIA - Richland Personal Security Clearance Record PIA - Richland Personal Security Clearance ...

  14. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    to) Department of Energy Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352 r OV( 4 2009 CERTIFIED MAIL Mr. Bryan Evenson Thorner, Kennedy & Gano P.S. P.O. Box 1410 Yakima, Washington 98907-14 10 Dear Mr. Evenson: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST (FOI 2010-00208) Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, you requested two prints, a negative, and a high resolution digital scan of May 1943 aerial photographs L26-12 and L-26-3. In addition, you requested the photographs be

  15. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    S2ATES~*Richland, Washington 99352 CERTIFIED MAIL NOV Ii~ 2009 Mr. Marvin Kinney Port of Benton 3 100 George Washington Way Richland, Washington 99354 Dear Mr. Kinney: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST (FOI 20 10-00296) Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, you requested Contract AT-45-1I-GEN 21 between the Atomic Energy Commission and the Northern Pacific Railway Company dated December 7, 1948. We have conducted a thorough search and were unable to locate the contract. This search was

  16. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    c~t2 Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550 ArES Richland, Washington 99352 July 7, 2010 Certified Mail Mr. Tom Carpenter Hanford Challenge 219 1 St Avenue South Suite 120 Seattle, Washington 98104 Dear Mr. Carpenter: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST (FOI 2010-015 17) You requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), "any and all DOE Surveillance reports generated at or related to the Hanford Site since January 1, 2009, to the present, and any and all responses to such

  17. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    ZATESO~'P.O. Box 550 E Richland, Washington 99352 11 -SED-0 124 JUL 0 7 2Mt Mr. J. G. Lehew 111, President and Chief Executive Officer CH2M HILL Plateau Remnediation Company Richland, Washington 99352 Dear Mr. Lehew: CONTRACT NO. DE-ACO6-08RL 14788 - TRANSN4ITTAL OF SURVEILLANCE REPORT PLANNING AND EXECUTION OF RADIOLOGICAL WORK (S-1I l-SFD-CHPRC-PFP-002) Pursuant to Clause E. 1, "DOE Inspection and Acceptance," this letter transmits Surveillance Report S-1 I -SED-CHPRC-PFP-002. The

  18. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    otoM of 06735761 53 ~ Department of Energy Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352 05-AMRC-OO38 Distribution TRANSMITTAL OF COMMENT RESPONSE MATRIX FOR THE, "RlSK ASSESSMENT WORK PLAN FOR THE 100 AREA AND 300 AREA COMPONENT OF THE RCBRA" (DOE/RL-2004-37 DRAFT A) Thank you for your comments submitted on Draft A of the Risk Assessment Work Plan for the 100 Area and 300 Area Component of the RCBRA (DOE~2004-37, Draft A). Attached is the comment-response matrix

  19. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    t P.O. Box 550 ~4TES~Richland, Washington 99352 1 0-AMSE-0056 Anp 01 2019t Mr. F. A. Figueroa, President and General Manager Mission Support Alliance, LLC Richland, Washington 99352 Dear Mr. Figueroa: CONTRACT NO. DE-AC06-09RL 14728 - DE MINIMIS CHANGES TO THE HANFORD ANALYTICAL SERVICES QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT (HASQARD) Compliance with the HASQARD, DOE/RL-96-68, is required by your Contract (Section J, Table J-2.9). The HASQARD contains the standards for site sampling and

  20. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    ' 5 ~7AE d~Richland, Washington 99352 10-AMSE-0055 APR 0 9 2010 Mr. M. N. Brosee, President Washington Closure Hanford LLC Richland, Washington 99354 Dear Mr. Brosee: CONTRACT NO. DE-AC06-05RL14655 - DE MINIMIS CHANGES TO THE HANFORD ANALYTICAL SERVICES QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT (HAS QARD) Compliance with the HASQARD, DOE/RL-96-68, is required by your Contract (Attachment J-2, List B: Applicable DOE Directives). The HASQARD contains the standards for site sampling and analytical

  1. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    QI b Richland, Washington 99352 July 23, 2010 Certified Mail Mr. Tom Carpenter Hanford Challenge 219 1st Avenue South Suite 120 Seattle, Washington 98104 Dear Mr. Carpenter: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST (FOL 2010-01517) You requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), "any and all DOE Surveillance reports generated at or related to the Hanford Site since January 1, 2009, to the present, and any and all responses to such concerns, including but not limited to

  2. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    4TES~Richland, Washington 99352 August 5, 2010 Certified Mail Mr. Alec Osenbach Heart of America Northwest 1314 NE 56 th Street Suite 100 Seattle, Washington 98105 Dear Mr. Osenbach: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST (FOI 2010-01599) You requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the following informnation: 1 . Documents and records relating to the potential duration of storage for soil excavated since 2009 from the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility (ERDF) at the

  3. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Richland, Washington 99352 May 3, 2012 CERTIFIED MAIL Mr. Thomas Carpenter Hanford Challenge 219 1 St Avenue South, Suite 120 Seattle, Washington 98104 Dear Mr. Carpenter: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST (FOI 20 12-00870) You requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOLA), the following records generated in connection with a surveillance report entitled, "Review of the 100 K Infrastructure Utilities Upgrade Project:" 1. "A copy of the Surveillance report." 2.

  4. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    ESO~Richland, Washington 99352 August 4, 2009 Certified Mail Mr. Thomas Zeilman Law Office of Thomas Zeilamn P.O. Box 34 Yakima, Washington 98907 Dear Mr. Zeilman: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST (FOI 2009-0041) You requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOJA), documents regarding any decisions made by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to prohibit hunting or trapping of the Rattlesnake Hills Elk Herd within the Fitzner-Eberhart Arid Lands Ecology Reserve at the Hanford

  5. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    E Richland, Washington 99352 Certified Mail Mr. Thomas Zeilman Law Office of Thomas Zeilamn JUN 1 5 2009 P.O. Box 34 Yakima, Washington 98907 Dear Mr. Zeilman: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST (FOI 2009-0041) You requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOJA), documents regarding any decisions made by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to prohibit hunting or trapping of the Rattlesnake Hills Elk Herd within the Fitzner-Eberhart Arid Lands Ecology Reserve at the Hanford Reach

  6. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    ATES Richland, Washington 99352 CERTIFIED MAIL SEP 1 4 2009 Mr. Ryan Jarvis Heart of America Northwest 1314 N.E. 5 6 th Street Suite 100 Seattle, Washington 98105 Dear Mr. Jarvis: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST (FOI 2009-0054) This letter is a partial response to your letters dated June 22, 2009, and July 15, 2009. In response to item 8, you requested "any records and documents relating to the contingency plan required pursuant to Washington Administrative Code Sections 173-303-806,

  7. Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    144 December 2014 Page 1 Activity Specific Categorical Exclusion for U.S. Army Training Exercises and Simulations at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington 1.0 BACKGROUND Title 10, Part 1021 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR 1021), "National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures," establishes procedures that the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) uses to comply with section 102(2) of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 [42 U.S.C. 4332(2)] and the

  8. Richland Energy Services - Residential Energy Efficiency Rebate...

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    Program Info Sector Name Utility Administrator City of Richland Website http:www.ci.richland.wa.usindex.aspx?nid174 State Washington Program Type Rebate Program Rebate...

  9. Richland Operations Office Cleanup Strategy, Scope

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Richland Operations Office Cleanup Strategy, Scope Matt McCormick Manager Richland ...EM 14 Intro -- River Corridor Cleanup Scope * 9 production reactors * 1 large research ...

  10. Town of Richland | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Town of Richland Sector Wind energy Facility Type Small Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Owner Sustainable Energy Development Energy Purchaser Town of Richland Location...

  11. Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Richland...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Richland Operations Office - 2014 Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Richland Operations Office - 2014 The Richland Operations Office (RL) Technical ...

  12. 2012 Annual Planning Summary for Richland Office

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2012 and 2013 within Richland Office.

  13. Richland Operations Office technology summary

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1994-05-01

    This document has been prepared by the Department of Energy`s Environmental Management Office of Technology Development to highlight its research, development, demonstration, testing, and evaluation activities funded through the Richland Operations Office. Technologies and processes described have the potential to enhance cleanup and waste management efforts.

  14. Richland Operations Office Cleanup Strategy, Scope

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Richland Operations Office Cleanup Strategy, Scope Matt McCormick Manager Richland Operations Office May 1, 2014 John Ciucci Chief Operating Officer CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Scott Sax President and Project Manager Washington Closure Hanford Frank Armijo President and General Manager Mission Support Alliance www.energy.gov/EM 2 Richland Operations Office Hanford Site History Hanford * Hanford began in 1943 as part of the Manhattan Project * Production of plutonium increased during

  15. Richland Electric Coop | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Coop Place: Wisconsin Phone Number: (608) 647-3173 Website: www.richec.comindex.html Facebook: https:www.facebook.compagesRichland-Electric-Cooperative156038837800606...

  16. Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office and...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    and work management and control processes in the areas of conduct of operations, quality assurance, and integrated safety management. Independent Oversight Review, Richland...

  17. 2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland Operations Office 2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report - Richland Operations Office Managers ...

  18. Josh Allen of Richland Operations Office Named 2014 Facility...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Josh Allen of Richland Operations Office Named 2014 Facility Representative of the Year Josh Allen of Richland Operations Office Named 2014 Facility Representative of the Year May ...

  19. DOE Issues Request for Information for Richland Operations Office...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Contract Acquisition Planning- Occupational Medical Services (OccMed) DOE Issues Request for Information for Richland Operations Office Richland Acquisitions - Post Fiscal Year ...

  20. Mark R. Hahn of the Richland Operations Office presented 2014...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Mark R. Hahn of the Richland Operations Office presented 2014 Safety System Oversight Annual Award Mark R. Hahn of the Richland Operations Office presented 2014 Safety System ...

  1. Independent Specific Administrative Controls Review, Richland Operations Office- December 2010

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Specific Administrative Controls Review with the Office of Environmental Management at DOE-Richland Operations Office

  2. Badge Request System PIA, Richland Operations Office | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Badge Request System PIA, Richland Operations Office Badge Request System PIA, Richland Operations Office Badge Request System PIA, Richland Operations Office Badge Request System PIA, Richland Operations Office (67.95 KB) More Documents & Publications Integrated Safety Management Workshop Registration, PIA, Idaho National Laboratory Occupational Medicine - Assistant PIA, Idaho National Laboratory Manchester Software 1099 Reporting PIA, Idaho National Laboratory

  3. Hanford Identification (HID) PIA, Richland Operations Office | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    of Energy Identification (HID) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford Identification (HID) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford Identification (HID) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford Identification (HID) PIA, Richland Operations Office (69.08 KB) More Documents & Publications Integrated Safety Management Workshop Registration, PIA, Idaho National Laboratory Occupational Medicine - Assistant PIA, Idaho National Laboratory Manchester Software 1099 Reporting PIA, Idaho National

  4. DOE Names New Richland Operations Manager

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced today the selection of Stacy Charboneau as the Manager of the Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) at the Hanford Site in southwest Washington State.

  5. Richland, Washington: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Richland is a city in Benton County, Washington. It falls under Washington's 4th congressional...

  6. Resources | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Resources Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) PNSO Home About Projects Contract Management NEPA Documents Resources Contact Information Pacific Northwest Site Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 350, MS K9-42 Richland, WA 99352 P: (509) 372-4005 Resources Print Text Size: A A A FeedbackShare Page Contact Pacific Northwest Site Office P.O. Box 350, MS K9-42 Richland, WA 99352 (509) 372-4005 Public Affairs Jacob A. Skeels (509) 372-4365 Email: jacob.skeels@science.doe.gov Links

  7. DOE, City of Richland and Benton PUD Increase Fiber Optic Telecommunic...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    DOE and contractor Mission Support Alliance (MSA) collaborated with Benton PUD and the city of Richland to deploy 360 strands of fiber from downtown Richland to north Richland....

  8. City of Richland, Washington (Utility Company) | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Name: City of Richland Place: Washington Phone Number: (509) 942-7421 Website: www.ci.richland.wa.usindex.as Outage Hotline: After Hours and Weekends: (509) 943-4428...

  9. EM's Richland Operations Office Completes Chromium Cleanup along Columbia River

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    RICHLAND, Wash. – EM’s Richland Operations Office and cleanup contractor Washington Closure Hanford have completed cleanup of chromium-contaminated soil along the Columbia River at the Hanford Site.

  10. Richland County, Wisconsin: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Cazenovia, Wisconsin Henrietta, Wisconsin Ithaca, Wisconsin Lone Rock, Wisconsin Orion, Wisconsin Richland Center, Wisconsin Richwood, Wisconsin Rockbridge, Wisconsin...

  11. Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) PIA, Richland Operations Office...

    Energy Saver

    (EJTA) PIA, Richland Operations Office More Documents & Publications Occupational Medicine - Assistant PIA, Idaho National Laboratory Occupational Injury & Illness System...

  12. Much Accomplished at Hanford in 2010: Richland Operations Office Prime

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Contractors Cite Past Year's Cleanup Progress | Department of Energy Much Accomplished at Hanford in 2010: Richland Operations Office Prime Contractors Cite Past Year's Cleanup Progress Much Accomplished at Hanford in 2010: Richland Operations Office Prime Contractors Cite Past Year's Cleanup Progress January 5, 2011 - 12:00pm Addthis Media Contact Cameron Hardy, DOE (509) 376-5365 Cameron.Hardy@rl.doe.gov RICHLAND, WASH. - The Department of Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office

  13. Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) PIA, Richland Operations Office |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Department of Energy Job Task Analysis (EJTA) PIA, Richland Operations Office Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) PIA, Richland Operations Office Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) PIA, Richland Operations Office Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) PIA, Richland Operations Office (58.17 KB) More Documents & Publications Occupational Medicine - Assistant PIA, Idaho National Laboratory Occupational Injury & Illness System (01&15) PIA, Idaho National Laboratory PIA - GovTrip (DOE data)

  14. Hanford People Core (HCP) PIA, Richland Operations Office | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Energy People Core (HCP) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford People Core (HCP) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford People Core (HCP) PIA, Richland Operations Office Hanford People Core (HCP) PIA, Richland Operations Office (140.49 KB) More Documents & Publications E-IDR (Inventory Disclosure Record) PIA, Idaho National Laboratory Occupational Medicine - Assistant PIA, Idaho National Laboratory Integrated Safety Management Workshop Registration, PIA, Idaho National Laboratory

  15. ERSUG Meeting: January 12 - 13, 1995 (Richland, WA)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    ERSUG Meeting: January 12 - 13, 1995 (Richland, WA) Dates January 12th & 13th, 1995 Location Pacific Northwest Laboratory Richland, Washington Presentations Summary of ERSUG Meeting January 12 - 13, 1995, Richland, Washington The latest Energy Research Supercomputer Users Group (ERSUG) meeting was held at Pacific Northwest Laboratory in Richland, Washington, on January 12 - 13, 1995. Some of the talks are summarized below. The View from Washington (Tom Kitchens) Tom Kitchens presented the

  16. PIA - Richland Occupational Medicine Contract | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Medicine Contract PIA - Richland Occupational Medicine Contract PIA - Richland Occupational Medicine Contract PIA - Richland Occupational Medicine Contract (60.05 KB) More Documents & Publications Occupational Medical Surveillance System (OMSS) PIA, Idaho National Laboratory Occupational Medicine - Assistant PIA, Idaho National Laboratory

  17. Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Richland

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Operations Office - 2014 | Department of Energy Richland Operations Office - 2014 Technical Qualification Program Self-Assessment Report - Richland Operations Office - 2014 The Richland Operations Office (RL) Technical Qualification Program Plan establishes a process to objectively determine that individuals performing activities related to the technical support, management, oversight, or operation possess the necessary knowledge, skills, and abilities to perform their assigned duties and

  18. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Opperations Office | Department of Energy River Protection-Richland Opperations Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection-Richland Opperations Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Office of River Protection-Richland Office. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD December 31, 2015 CX-014441: Categorical Exclusion Determination MSA Annual Categorical Exclusion for Repair or Replacement of Pipelines CX(s) Applied: B5.4 Date: 12/31/2015 Location(s):

  19. Contractor Fee Payments - Richland Operations Office | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Richland Operations Office Contractor Fee Payments - Richland Operations Office See the amount of fees earned on EM's major contracts for each evaluated fee period and the total contract to date at the Richland Operations Office on these charts. Occupational Medical Services - HPM Corporation (34.22 KB) Infrastructure and Site Services Support (35.03 KB) Plateau Remediation (35.51 KB) River Corridor Closure (35.51 KB) Occupational Health Services (34.09 KB) More Documents & Publications

  20. Richland/Office of River Protection | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Richland/Office of River Protection Richland/Office of River Protection Below are compliance agreements and accompanying summaries for the Richland Operations Office and Office of River Protection at the Hanford site. Settlement Agreement re: Washington v. Bodman, January 6, 2006 (49.77 KB) Administrative Order, June 13, 2000 (1.61 MB) Administrative Order, June 13, 2000 Summary (40.7 KB) Federal Facility Compliance Agreement on Storage of Polychlorinated Biphenyls, August 8, 1996 (224.55 KB)

  1. Richland Prof Cert (4-22-2004).pdf

    Energy Saver

    Richland Operations Office Cleanup Strategy, Scope Matt McCormick Manager Richland Operations Office May 1, 2014 John Ciucci Chief Operating Officer CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Scott Sax President and Project Manager Washington Closure Hanford Frank Armijo President and General Manager Mission Support Alliance www.energy.gov/EM 2 Richland Operations Office Hanford Site History Hanford * Hanford began in 1943 as part of the Manhattan Project * Production of plutonium increased during

  2. 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Richland Operations Office ...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2011 and 2012 within the Richland Operations Office (RL) (see also Office of River Protection and Environmental Management). ...

  3. December 15-16, 2015 - Technical Exchange Meeting - Richland...

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    Technical Exchange Meeting, December 15 and 16, 2015, Washington State Department of Ecology Offices, Richland, WA. Theme: Interpretation of Performance and Risk Assessment...

  4. 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the Richland Operations Office...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    More Documents & Publications 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Richland Operations Office (RL) 2011 Annual Planning Summary for Office of River Protection (ORP) EIS-0222-SA-01: ...

  5. MEMORANDUM FORMA TTHEW S. MCCORMICK MANAGER RICHLAND OPERATIONS...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    , SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Delegation of Acquisition Executive AuthorJty for Capital Asset Projects at. Richland Operations Office In accordance with the guidelines of...

  6. Richland County, South Carolina: Energy Resources | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    LLC PFCT South Carolina Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Alliance US National Institute of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Commercialization Places in Richland County, South Carolina Arcadia...

  7. Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) PIA, Richland Operations Office...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    PIA, Richland Operations Office (58.17 KB) More Documents & Publications Occupational Medicine - Assistant PIA, Idaho National Laboratory Occupational Injury & Illness System ...

  8. Richland County, Ohio: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Braintree Business Development Center Places in Richland County, Ohio Bellville, Ohio Butler, Ohio Crestline, Ohio Galion, Ohio Lexington, Ohio Lucas, Ohio Mansfield, Ohio...

  9. Richland Operations Office Makes Progress Removing Drums at Hanford Site |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Makes Progress Removing Drums at Hanford Site Richland Operations Office Makes Progress Removing Drums at Hanford Site June 15, 2016 - 12:25pm Addthis Crews process some of the roughly 1,700 drums of waste that have been processed at the 618-10 Burial Ground. Crews process some of the roughly 1,700 drums of waste that have been processed at the 618-10 Burial Ground. RICHLAND, Wash. - EM's Richland Operations Office (RL) and cleanup contractor

  10. City of Richland Center, Wisconsin (Utility Company) | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Website: cityutilitiesofrc.com Facebook: https:www.facebook.compagesCity-of-Richland-Center120964331250544 Outage Hotline: (608) 647-3844 References: EIA Form EIA-861 Final...

  11. About | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    About Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) PNSO Home About Organization Chart .pdf file (275KB) Jobs Projects Contract Management NEPA Documents Resources Contact Information Pacific Northwest Site Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 350, MS K9-42 Richland, WA 99352 P: (509) 372-4005 About Print Text Size: A A A FeedbackShare Page Located in Richland, Washington, the Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) provides programmatic, operational, and institutional stewardship and oversight of the

  12. EMs Richland Operations Office Celebrates Disposal Achievement in 2013

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    RICHLAND, Wash. EM's Richland Operations Office's 2013 accomplishments ranged from cleaning up buildings and waste sites to treating a record amount of groundwater.

  13. Richland Environmental Restoration Project management action process document

    SciTech Connect

    1996-04-01

    This document is the prescribed means for providing direct input to the US Department of Energy Headquarters regarding the status, accomplishments, strategy, and issues of the Richland Environmental Restoration Project. The project mission, organizational interfaces, and operational history of the Hanford Site are provided. Remediation strategies are analyzed in detail. The document includes a status of Richland Environmental Restoration project activities and accomplishments, and it presents current cost summaries, schedules, and technical baselines.

  14. Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2011 |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy Richland Operations Office - April 2011 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2011 April 2011 Operational Awareness Review of the Hanford Sludge Treatment Project [HIAR-RL-2011-04-07] This Independent Activity Report documents operational awareness activities conducted by Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations between November 2010 and April 2011 at the Hanford Site Sludge Treatment Project.

  15. EM Richland Operations Office Manager Reflects on River Corridor's Safe, Successful Cleanup

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    RICHLAND, Wash. – This month, Stacy L. Charboneau marks her first year as manager of EM’s Richland Operations Office (RL), responsible for management and oversight of cleanup of the 586-square-mile Hanford Site.

  16. Removal of 1,082-Ton Reactor Among Richland Operations Office’s 2014 Accomplishments

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    RICHLAND, Wash. – Workers with EM’s Richland Operations Office and its contractors made progress this year in several areas of Hanford site cleanup that helped protect employees, the public, environment, and Columbia River.

  17. EM Richland Operations Office Contractor Earns 97 Percent of Available Fee

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    RICHLAND, Wash. – EM’s Richland Operations Office (RL) issued its fiscal year 2015 fee determination for Hanford Site contractor CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CH2M).

  18. Josh Allen of Richland Operations Office Named 2014 Facility Representative of the Year

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Congratulations to Josh Allen, Richland Operations Office, the winner of the 2014 DOE Facility Representative of the Year Award!

  19. Environmental Assessments (EA) / Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) |

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC) Environmental Assessments (EA) / Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) PNSO Home About Projects Contract Management NEPA Documents Categorical Exclusion Determinations Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements Resources Contact Information Pacific Northwest Site Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 350, MS K9-42 Richland, WA 99352 P: (509) 372-4005 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Documents

  20. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Documents | U.S. DOE Office of

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Science (SC) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Documents Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) PNSO Home About Projects Contract Management NEPA Documents Categorical Exclusion Determinations Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements Resources Contact Information Pacific Northwest Site Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 350, MS K9-42 Richland, WA 99352 P: (509) 372-4005 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Documents Print Text Size: A A A FeedbackShare

  1. Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) PNSO Home About Projects Contract Management NEPA Documents Categorical Exclusion Determinations Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements Resources Contact Information Pacific Northwest Site Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 350, MS K9-42 Richland, WA 99352 P: (509) 372-4005 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Documents Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations Print Text Size: A A A

  2. Annual Energy Consumption Analysis Report for Richland Middle School

    SciTech Connect

    Liu, Bing

    2003-12-18

    Richland Middle School is a single story, 90,000 square feet new school located in Richland, WA. The design team proposed four HVAC system options to serve the building. The proposed HVAC systems are listed as following: (1) 4-pipe fan coil units served by electrical chiller and gas-fired boilers, (2) Ground-source closed water loop heat pumps with water loop heat pumps with boiler and cooling tower, and (3) VAV system served by electrical chiller and gas-fired boiler. This analysis estimates the annual energy consumptions and costs of each system option, in order to provide the design team with a reasonable basis for determining which system is most life-cycle cost effective. eQuest (version 3.37), a computer-based energy simulation program that uses the DOE-2 simulation engine, was used to estimate the annual energy costs.

  3. Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Department of Energy June 2011 Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - June 2011 June 2011 Hanford Sludge Treatment Project Review [HIAR-RL-2011-06-17] This Independent Activity Report documents an operational awareness activity conducted by Office of Health, Safety and Security's Office of Safety and Emergency Management Evaluations June 13-17, 2011, at the Sludge Treatment Project at the Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site. The activity consisted of touring project

  4. Mark R. Hahn of the Richland Operations Office presented 2014 Safety System

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Oversight Annual Award | Department of Energy Mark R. Hahn of the Richland Operations Office presented 2014 Safety System Oversight Annual Award Mark R. Hahn of the Richland Operations Office presented 2014 Safety System Oversight Annual Award May 21, 2015 - 1:18pm Addthis Mark R. Hahn of the Richland Operations Office presented 2014 Safety System Oversight Annual Award About 70 Department of Energy (DOE) federal employees serve as Safety System Oversight (SSO) personnel, providing federal

  5. EIS-0119: Decommissioning of Eight Surplus Production Reactors at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EIS presents analyses of potential environmental impacts of decommissioning the eight surplus production reactors at the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington.

  6. 2014 Annual Planning Summary for the Richland Operations Office and the Office of River Protection

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2014 and 2015 within the Richland Operations Office and the Office of River Protection.

  7. Richland Operations Office Completes Cleanup in Hanford’s 300 Area North Section

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    RICHLAND, Wash. – EM met a Tri-Party Agreement milestone by completing cleanup of the north portion of Hanford’s 300 Area.

  8. EIS-0119: Decommissioning of Eight Surplus Production Reactors at the Harford Site, Richland, WA

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EIS presents analyses of potential environmental impacts of decommissioning the eight surplus production reactors at the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington.

  9. 2013 Annual Planning Summary for the Office of River Protection and Richland Operations Office

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The ongoing and projected Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for 2013 and 2014 within the Office of River Protection and Richland Operations Office.

  10. Jobs | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    About » Jobs Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) PNSO Home About Organization Chart .pdf file (275KB) Jobs Projects Contract Management NEPA Documents Resources Contact Information Pacific Northwest Site Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 350, MS K9-42 Richland, WA 99352 P: (509) 372-4005 About Jobs Print Text Size: A A A Subscribe FeedbackShare Page Current Open Federal Positions The Pacific Northwest Site Office is located in Richland, Washington. All open federal positions listed

  11. Independent Oversight Review, Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance- April 2012

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Review of Richland Operations Office and CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company and Mission Support Alliance Conduct of Operations

  12. Routine environmental audit of the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1994-05-01

    This report documents the results of the routine environmental audit of the Hanford Site (Hanford), Richland, Washington. During this audit, the activities conducted by the audit team included reviews of internal documents an reports from previous audits and assessments; interviews with US Department of Energy (DOE), State of Washington regulatory, and contractor personnel; and inspections and observations of selected facilities and operations. The onsite portion of the audit was conducted May 2--13, 1994, by the DOE Office of Environmental Audit (EH-24), located within the Office of Environment, Safety and Health (EH). The audit evaluated the status of programs to ensure compliance with Federal, State, and local environmental laws and regulations; compliance with DOE orders, guidance, and directives; and conformance with accepted industry practices and standards of performance. The audit also evaluated the status and adequacy of the management systems developed to address environmental requirements.

  13. EIS-0189: Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS), Richland, WA (Programmatic)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This environmental impact statement evaluates the Department of Energy (DOE)'s, in cooperation with the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), decisions on how to properly manage and dispose of Hanford Site tank waste and encapsulated cesium and strontium to reduce existing and potential future risk to the public, Site workers, and the environment. The waste includes radioactive, hazardous, and mixed waste currently stored in 177 underground storage tanks, approximately 60 other smaller active and inactive miscellaneous underground storage tanks (MUSTs), and additional Site waste likely to be added to the tank waste, which is part of the tank farm system. In addition, DOE proposes to manage and dispose of approximately 1,930 cesium and strontium capsules that are by-products of tank waste. The tank waste and capsules are located in the 200 Areas of the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington.

  14. Richland Environmental Restoration Project management action process document

    SciTech Connect

    1996-04-01

    A critical mission of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is the planning, implementation, and completion of environmental restoration programs at DOE facilities. An integral part of this mission involves the safe and cost-effective environmental restoration of the Hanford Site. For over 40 years the Hanford Site supported United States national defense programs, largely through the production of nuclear materials. One legacy of historical Hanford Site operations is a significant waste inventory of radioactive and/or regulated chemical materials. Releases of these materials have, in some cases, contaminated the Hanford Site environment. The DOE Richland Operations Office (RL) is responsible for protecting human health and the environment from potential Hanford Site environmental hazards by identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks posed by contaminated sites.

  15. EA-1211: Relocation and Storage of Isotopic Heat Sources, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EA evaluates the environmental impacts for the proposal for relocation and storage of the isotopic heat sources at the U.S. Department of Energy Hanford Site in Richland, Washington.

  16. Columbia River monitoring: Distribution of tritium in Columbia River water at the Richland Pumphouse

    SciTech Connect

    Dirkes, R.L.

    1993-02-01

    The Surface Environmental Surveillance Project (SESP) is conducted by the Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) for the US Department of Energy (DOE). This report presents the results of a special study conducted as part of the SESP to supplement the routine Columbia River monitoring program and provide information relative to the dispersion and distribution of Hanford origin contaminants entering the river through the seepage of ground water along the Hanford Site. Sampling was conducted along cross sections to determine the distribution of tritium within the Columbia River at Richland, Washington. The investigation was also designed to evaluate the relationship between the average tritium concentrations in the river water at this location and in water collected from the routine SESP river monitoring system located at the city of Richland drinking water intake (Richland Pumphouse). This study was conducted during the summers of 1987 and 1988. Water samples were collected along cross sections located at or near the Richland Pumphouse monitoring station.

  17. Physical Sciences Facility at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    to the Final Environmental Assessment of Construction and Operation of a Physical Sciences Facility at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington DOE/EA-1562 - SA-1 SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS TO FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A PHYSICAL SCIENCES FACILITY AT THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON June 2013 U.S. Department of Energy Pacific Northwest Site Office Supplement Analysis to the Final Environmental Assessment of

  18. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    DOE/EIS-0391 Final Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington Summary U.S. Department of Energy November 2012 1 Cover Sheet Responsible Agency: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Cooperating Agencies: Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Title: Final Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington (TC & WM EIS)

  19. EA-1915: Proposed Conveyance of Land at the Hanford Site, Richland,

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Washington | Department of Energy 15: Proposed Conveyance of Land at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington EA-1915: Proposed Conveyance of Land at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington Summary The EA assesses the potential environmental effects of conveying approximately 1,641 acres of Hanford Site land to the local economic development organization, the Tri-City Development Council (TRIDEC), a DOE-recognized Community Reuse Organization. TRIDEC has requested the transfer of land located

  20. Environmental Management Richland Operations Office FY 2014 President's Budget FY 2015 Budget Request Regulator Briefing

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Public Briefing FY 2013 Appropriations FY 2014 President's Budget FY 2015 Budget Request Jon Peschong, Richland Operations Office Central Plateau and River Corridor May 8, 2013 Draft Pre-Decisional Information Public Briefing - Richland Operations Office May 2013 Draft Pre-Decisional Information 2 "Complete the safe cleanup of the environmental legacy brought about from five decades of nuclear weapons development, production, and Government-sponsored nuclear energy research" EM

  1. 10 CFR 850 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Public Hearing Transcript, Richland, Washington – June 28-30, 2016

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Transcript of the Richland, WA public hearings to received comments on the proposed amendments to 10 CFR 850, Chronic Beryllium Disease Prevention Program.

  2. Media Contact: Mark Heeter, DOE Richland Operations Office, 509-373-1970

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Mark Heeter, DOE Richland Operations Office, 509-373-1970 For Immediate Release March 31, 2016 Manhattan Project National Historical Park at Hanford Expands 2016 Tour Season RICHLAND, Wash. - In partnership with the National Park Service (NPS), the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will open registration for the Manhattan Project National Historical Park's 2016 public tour season at the Hanford, Wash., sites on Monday, April 4, at 8:00 a.m. PDT. Hanford is one of the three primary Manhattan

  3. EIS-0364: Decommissioning of the Fast Flux Test Facility, Hanford Site, Richland, WA

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announces its intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), on proposed decommissioning of the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington.

  4. Projects | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Projects Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) PNSO Home About Projects Contract Management NEPA Documents Resources Contact Information Pacific Northwest Site Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 350, MS K9-42 Richland, WA 99352 P: (509) 372-4005 Projects Print Text Size: A A A FeedbackShare Page F&O delivers unique facilities to house highly sophisticated collections of equipment. EMSL's new $4.5 million Radiochemistry Annex opens for science and research at the end of April, 2013. The

  5. Contract Management | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Contract Management Pacific Northwest Site Office (PNSO) PNSO Home About Projects Contract Management NEPA Documents Resources Contact Information Pacific Northwest Site Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 350, MS K9-42 Richland, WA 99352 P: (509) 372-4005 Contract Management Print Text Size: A A A FeedbackShare Page The beginnings of this Laboratory are rooted in the history of the Hanford Site and its evolution over time, from a production effort, to a Cold War deterrent, evolving to

  6. DOE, City of Richland and Benton PUD Increase Fiber Optic Telecommunication Capacity in Benton County- Upgrade improves communications at Hanford Site, schools and libraries

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    RICHLAND, Wash. ― The Department of Energy (DOE), city of Richland, and Benton County’s Public Utility District (Benton PUD) jointly implemented a high-capacity fiber optic cable in Richland and at the Hanford Site. The project will improve communications throughout the area.

  7. DOE Issues Request for Information for Richland Operations Office Richland Acquisitions – Post Fiscal Year 2018 Contract Acquisition Planning- Occupational Medical Services (OccMed)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Cincinnati -- The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management Consolidated Business Center today issued a Sources Sought/Request for Information (RFI) seeking interested parties with specialized capabilities necessary to successfully perform all or a portion of the elements of scope for the upcoming competitive Environmental Management (EM) procurement for the Hanford Site occupational medical services, hereafter referred to as “Richland Acquisitions – Post Fiscal Year 2018 OccMed Contract” and to further determine whether or not all or a portion of the work can be set-aside for small and disadvantaged businesses.

  8. EA-0904: Access Road from State Route 240 to the 200 West Area Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal to construct an access road on the U.S. Department of Energy's Hanford Site in Richland, Washington, from State Route 240 to Beloit Avenue...

  9. U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And Mission Support Alliance, LLC Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) and the Mission Support Alliance, LLC (MSA) are committed to continuous improvement and will partner together to enchance teaming...

  10. EA-1203: Trench 33 Widening in 218-W-5 Low-level Burial Ground, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EA evaluates the environmental impacts for the proposal to widen and operate the unused Trench 33 in the 218-W-5 Low-Level Burial Ground at the U.S. Department of Energy's Richland Operations...

  11. EIS-0245: Management of Spent Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site- Supplement Analysis, Richland, Washington

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The identification of, and subsequent changes to the Preferred Alternative for the Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K Basins at the Hanford Site in Richland, Washington, are analyzed in...

  12. DOE Announces Additional Tour Seats Available: Tours of B Reactor at the Hanford Site Begin and End in Richland, Wash.

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    RICHLAND, Wash. – The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has made additional seats available for tours of the B Reactor National Historic Landmark this July and August.

  13. Groundwater Update K. Michael Thompson Soil and Groundwater Division Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Update Jon Peschong Richland Operations Office May 2015 2 billion gallons of contaminated groundwater treated tons of contaminants removed in all pump and treat systems since the facilities began operating 12 171 HANFORD SITE GROUNDWATER NUMBERS billion of gallons of groundwater treated in 2014 1.95 tons of contaminants removed in 2014 62 3 Groundwater Key Focus Areas * Expand pump and treat systems - Continue pump and treat operations - Install and connect new and existing wells to maximize

  14. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    APPENDIX B CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTOR NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR PREPARATION OF THE TANK CLOSURE AND WASTE MANAGEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON The Council of Environmental Quality regulations at Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulatiolls (CFR), Section 1506.5(c), which have been adopted by the U.S. Department of Energy (10 CFR 1021), require contractors and

  15. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    D-1 APPENDIX D WASTE INVENTORIES This appendix provides additional information about the inventories that drive the proposed alternatives described in Chapter 2 of this Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington (TC & WM EIS). Information provided in this appendix forms the basis for determining the short- and long-term environmental impacts under each alternative, which are described in Chapters 4 and 5, respectively, of this

  16. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    E-1 APPENDIX E DESCRIPTIONS OF FACILITIES, OPERATIONS, AND TECHNOLOGIES Appendix E provides additional information about the technologies, processes, and facilities for the three key activities of this Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington: tank closure, Fast Flux Test Facility decommissioning, and waste management. Section E.1 includes this information for tank closure; Section E.2, for Fast Flux Test Facility

  17. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    APPENDIX F DIRECT AND INDIRECT IMPACTS: ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY This appendix briefly describes the methods used to assess the potential direct and indirect effects of the alternatives in this Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington. Included in this appendix are discussions of general impact assessment methodologies for land resources, infrastructure, noise and vibration, air quality, geology and soils, water resources,

  18. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    APPENDIX I WORKFORCE ESTIMATES This appendix presents the estimated number of workers required to perform construction, operations, deactivation, closure, and decommissioning tasks under each of the alternatives presented in this Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington. I.1 INTRODUCTION Full-time-equivalent (FTE) estimates were based on information provided in data reports prepared to support this environmental impact statement

  19. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    L-1 APPENDIX L GROUNDWATER FLOW FIELD DEVELOPMENT This appendix describes the development of the regional-scale groundwater flow field used for the groundwater modeling that supports assessment of the groundwater quality impacts discussed in the Draft and Final Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington (TC & WM EIS), Chapters 5 and 6 and Appendices O and V. Included are an overview of groundwater flow at the site; the purpose

  20. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    P-1 APPENDIX P ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES AND RISK ANALYSIS This appendix presents the ecological resources (see Section P.1) at the Hanford Site and lists the plants and animals evaluated in this Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington. Potential impacts of both airborne releases during operations and groundwater discharges under the various alternatives are evaluated in this appendix. The purpose of the risk analysis is to compare

  1. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    R-1 APPENDIX R CUMULATIVE IMPACTS: ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY This appendix describes the cumulative impacts methodology for the U.S. Department of Energy's Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington. The appendix is organized into sections on (1) regulations and guidance, (2) previous studies, (3) history of land use at the Hanford Site and in surrounding regions, (4) future land use at the Hanford Site, (5) future land use in

  2. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    APPENDIX S WASTE INVENTORIES FOR CUMULATIVE IMPACT ANALYSES Integral to development of the inventory data set for the cumulative impact analyses presented in this Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington was identification of those waste sites potentially contributing to cumulative impacts on groundwater. Their identification involved two semi-independent, convergent processes: a Waste Information Data System screen and a

  3. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    X-1 APPENDIX X SUPPLEMENT ANALYSIS OF THE DRAFT TANK CLOSURE AND WASTE MANAGEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE HANFORD SITE, RICHLAND, WASHINGTON Consistent with U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Regulations (10 CFR 1021.314(c)(3)), "DOE shall make the determination and the related Supplement Analysis available to the public for information. Copies of the determination and Supplement Analysis shall be provided upon written request. DOE shall make copies available for inspection in

  4. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    -1 CHAPTER 1 PROPOSED ACTIONS: BACKGROUND, PURPOSE AND NEED Chapter 1 describes the background, purpose and need for the agency action presented in this Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington (TC & WM EIS). Section 1.1 provides summary information on the size and distribution of the waste inventory at the Hanford Site (Hanford), the specific objectives of this TC & WM EIS, and the regulatory basis for the proposed

  5. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington 5-394 5.2 FFTF DECOMMISSIONING ALTERNATIVES This section describes the potential long-term environmental and human health impacts associated with implementation of alternatives considered to decommission FFTF and auxiliary facilities at Hanford; to manage waste from the decommissioning process, including waste designated as remote-handled special components (RH-SCs); and to manage the disposition of the Hanford inventory of radioactively contaminated

  6. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Volume 3, Book 1 Section 1: Overview Section 2: Topics of Interest Section 3: Individual Commentors U.S. Department of Energy November 2012 1 Cover Sheet Responsible Agency: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Cooperating Agencies: Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Title: Final Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington (TC & WM EIS) (DOE/EIS-0391) Location: Benton County,

  7. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Reader's Guide U.S. Department of Energy November 2012 1 Cover Sheet Responsible Agency: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Cooperating Agencies: Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Title: Final Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington (TC & WM EIS) (DOE/EIS-0391) Location: Benton County, Washington Contacts: For copies of this Final TC & WM EIS, call toll-free

  8. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington (Final TC & WM EIS) Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) Foreword Summary Ecology believes that the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and its contractor have prepared a Final TC & WM EIS that presents many important issues for discussion. Ecology's involvement in the production of this TC & WM EIS shows that this document has benefited from quality reviews and quality assurance procedures. In addition, this document benefited from

  9. Environmental Management Richland Operations Office FY 2014 President's Budget FY 2015 Budget Request Regulator Briefing

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Acquisition Planning Presented by: Karen Flynn and Ellen Mattlin March 16, 2016 March 2016 2 * River Corridor (WCH) 9/30/2016 * Tank Operations (WRPS) 9/30/2018 * Plateau Remediation (CHPRC) 9/30/2018 * Mission Support (MSA) 5/25/2019 * Occupational Medicine (HPM) 9/30/2018 * Miscellaneous small contracts 2018-2021 DOE Contract Expiration Dates March 2016 3 * The Richland Operations Office created the Office of Hanford Acquisitions (OHA) and the Office of River Protection created an Acquisition

  10. Economics of power plant district and process heating in Richland, Washington

    SciTech Connect

    Fassbender, L.L.; Bloomster, C.H.

    1981-04-01

    The economic feasibility of utilizing hot water from nuclear reactors to provide district heating for private residences in Richland, Washington, and space and process heating for nearby offices, part of the Hanford Reservation, and the Lamb-Weston potato processing plant is assessed. Specifically, the practicality of using hot water from the Washington Public Power Supply System's WNP-1 reactor, which is currently under construction on the Hanford Reservation, just north of the City of Richland is established. World-wide experience with district heating systems and the advantages of using these systems are described. The GEOCITY computer model used to calculate district heating costs is described and the assumptions upon which the costs are based are presented. District heating costs for the city of Richland, process heating costs for the Lamb-Weston potato processing plant, district heating costs for the Horn Rapids triangle area, and process heating costs for the 300 and 3000 areas are discussed. An economic analysis is discussed and institutional restraints are summarized. (MCW)

  11. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    1 OVERVIEW OF THE PUBLIC COMMENT PROCESS 1-1 SECTION 1 OVERVIEW OF THE PUBLIC COMMENT PROCESS This section of this Comment-Response Document (CRD) describes the public comment process for the Draft Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington (Draft TC & WM EIS) and the procedures used to respond to public comments. Section 1.1 summarizes the organization of this CRD. Section 1.2 discusses the public comment process and the means

  12. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    3 ▪ Public Comments and DOE Responses 3-1053 Campaign A March 16, 2010 As a resident of the Pacifc Northwest, I oppose the "preferred alternative" to ship nuclear waste from other Department of Energy sites to Hanford, as outlined in the Draft Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington (DOE/EIS--0391). I vehemently oppose the plan to add more radioactive waste to the Hanford site. Shipping this waste along Northwest

  13. Lead test assembly irradiation and analysis Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Tennessee and Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    SciTech Connect

    1997-07-01

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) needs to confirm the viability of using a commercial light water reactor (CLWR) as a potential source for maintaining the nation`s supply of tritium. The Proposed Action discussed in this environmental assessment is a limited scale confirmatory test that would provide DOE with information needed to assess that option. This document contains the environmental assessment results for the Lead test assembly irradiation and analysis for the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Tennessee, and the Hanford Site in Richland, Washington.

  14. Richland C

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Bald Eagle Night Roosts Nov. 15 to Mar. 15 Hanford Site Boundary Industrial Areas Protected Bald Eagle Winter Night Roost Areas for FY2017 / 0 2 4 6 8 10 Miles 0 5 10 15 20 Kilometers

  15. Richland C

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Roads Protected March 1 to July 31 Protected November 15 to July 31 Protected February 15 to July 31 Protected November 15 to March 15 Hanford Site Boundary Industrial Areas / 0 1.5 3 4.5 6 7.5 Miles 0 4.5 9 13.5 18 Kilometers Natural Resource Protective Buffer Zones

  16. Richland C

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    November 15 to July 31 Hanford Site Boundary Industrial Areas 0 2 4 6 8 10 Miles 0 5 10 15 20 Kilometers Natural Resource Protective Buffer Zones for FY2015 (Version 04-20-15)...

  17. EA-1889: Disposal of Decommissioned, Defueled Naval Reactor Plants from USS Enterprise (CVN 65) at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EA, prepared by the Department of the Navy, evaluates the environmental impacts of the disposal of decommissioned, defueled, naval reactor plants from the USS Enterprise at DOE’s Hanford Site, Richland, Washington. DOE participated as a cooperating agency in the preparation of this EA. The Department of the Navy issued its FONSI on August 23, 2012.

  18. Evaluation of Machine Guarding course taught in Richland, Washington, September 1--3, 1992

    SciTech Connect

    Wright, T.S.

    1993-03-01

    This section summarizes trainee evaluations for the Safety Training Section course, ``Machine Guarding`` which was conducted September 1-3, 1992 in Richland, Washington. This was the fifth time the course has been taught. This report summarizes the quantitative course evaluations that trainees provided upon completion of the course. Sections 1.3 and 1.4 provide written comments and examination results. Also provided are instructors` suggestions for improvement. Ratings were generally high, especially for the section on Subpart 0 guarding, which was consistent with the trainees` comments. Most of the trainees wanted a more in-depth look at Machine Guarding regulations. Lockout/ragout information and more site tours were frequently requested. In addition, the trainees were not interested in the subsection on personal protective equipment and electrical regulations.

  19. Evaluation of Machine Guarding course taught in Richland, Washington, September 1--3, 1992

    SciTech Connect

    Wright, T.S.

    1993-03-01

    This section summarizes trainee evaluations for the Safety Training Section course, Machine Guarding'' which was conducted September 1-3, 1992 in Richland, Washington. This was the fifth time the course has been taught. This report summarizes the quantitative course evaluations that trainees provided upon completion of the course. Sections 1.3 and 1.4 provide written comments and examination results. Also provided are instructors' suggestions for improvement. Ratings were generally high, especially for the section on Subpart 0 guarding, which was consistent with the trainees' comments. Most of the trainees wanted a more in-depth look at Machine Guarding regulations. Lockout/ragout information and more site tours were frequently requested. In addition, the trainees were not interested in the subsection on personal protective equipment and electrical regulations.

  20. Structural testing of corrugated asbestos-cement roof panels at the Hanford Facilities, Richland, Washington

    SciTech Connect

    Moustafa, S.E.; Rodehaver, S.M.; Frier, W.A.

    1993-10-01

    This report describes a roof testing program that was carried out at the 105KE/KW Spent Fuel Storage Basins and their surrounding facilities at the Hanford Site in Richland, Washington. The roof panels were constructed in the mid 1950`s of corrugated asbestos-cement (A/C), which showed common signs of aging. Based on the construction specifications, the panels capacity to meet current design standards was questioned. Both laboratory and in-situ load testing of the corrugated A/C panels was conducted. The objective of the complete test program was to determine the structural integrity of the existing A/C roof panels installed in the 105KE and 105KW facilities. The data from these tests indicated that the roofs are capable of resisting the design loads and are considered safe. A second phase test to address the roof resistance to personnel and roof removal/roofing system installation equipment was recommended and is underway.

  1. Environmental Monitoring Plan United States Department of Energy Richland Operations Office. Revision 2

    SciTech Connect

    1997-11-10

    This Environmental Monitoring Plan was prepared for the US Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) Richland Operations Office (RL) to implement the requirements of DOE Order 5400.1. According to the Order, each DOE site, facility, or activity that uses, generates, releases, or manages significant pollutants or hazardous materials shall prepare a written environmental monitoring plan covering two major activities: (1) effluent monitoring and (2) environmental surveillance. The plan is to contain information discussing the rationale and design criteria for the monitoring programs, sampling locations and schedules, quality assurance requirements, program implementation procedures, analytical procedures, and reporting requirements. The plan`s purpose is to assist DOE in the management of environmental activities at the Hanford Site and to help ensure that operations on the site are conducted in an environmentally safe and sound manner.

  2. Columbia River monitoring: Summary of chemical monitoring along cross sections at Vernita Bridge and Richland

    SciTech Connect

    Dirkes, R.L.; Patton, G.W.; Tiller, B.L.

    1993-05-01

    This report presents the results of the chemical monitoring performed by the Surface Environmental Surveillance Project (SESP) along cross sections of the Columbia River established at Vernita Bridge and the Richland Pumphouse. Potential Hanford-origin chemical constituents of interest were selected based on their presence in ground water near the river, past surveillance efforts that have documented their entry into the river, and reviews of special study reports, CERCIA remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) documentation, RCRA facility investigation/corrective measure (FI/CW) study plans, and preliminary risk assessments. Results presented in this report include volatile organic compounds, metals, and anions. The data were generated as part of the routine Columbia River monitoring program currently conducted as part of the SESP.

  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office And CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Partnering Charter For Partnering Performance Agreement

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) and CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) are committed to continuous improvement and will utilize principles of the...

  4. MS/MS Automated Selected Ion Chromatograms

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center

    2005-12-12

    This program can be used to read a LC-MS/MS data file from either a Finnigan ion trap mass spectrometer (.Raw file) or an Agilent Ion Trap mass spectrometer (.MGF and .CDF files) and create a selected ion chromatogram (SIC) for each of the parent ion masses chosen for fragmentation. The largest peak in each SIC is also identified, with reported statistics including peak elution time, height, area, and signal to noise ratio. It creates severalmore » output files, including a base peak intensity (BPI) chromatogram for the survey scan, a BPI for the fragmentation scans, an XML file containing the SIC data for each parent ion, and a "flat file" (ready for import into a database) containing summaries of the SIC data statistics.« less

  5. Environmental restoration and waste management site-specific plan for Richland Operations Office. [Contains glossary

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1991-09-01

    This document was prepared to implement and support the US Department of Energy-Headquarters (DOE-HQ) national plan. The national plan, entitled Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Five-Year Plan (DOE 1990b) (hereinafter referred to as the DOE-HQ Five-Year Plan) is the cornerstone of the US Department of Energy's (DOE) long-term strategy in environmental restoration and waste management. The DOE-HQ Five-Year Plan addresses overall philosophy and environmental and waste-related activities under the responsibilities of the DOE Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management. The plan also reaffirms DOE-HQ goals to bring its nuclear sites into environmental compliance in cooperation with its regulators and the public, and to clean up and restore the environment by 2019 (the commitment for the Hanford Site is for one year sooner, or 2018). This document is part of the site-specific plan for the US Department of Energy-Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL). It is the first revision of the original plan, which was dated December 1989 (DOE-RL 1989a). This document is a companion document to the Overview of the Hanford Cleanup Five-Year Plan (DOE-RL 1989d) and The Hanford Site Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Five-Year Plan Activity Data Sheets (DOE-RL 1991). Although there are three documents that make up the complete DOE-RL plan, this detailed information volume was prepared so it could be used as a standalone document. 71 refs., 40 figs., 28 tabs.

  6. Ms. Maggie Owen, Chair

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    March 7, 2012 Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board P.O. Box 2001 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 Dear Ms. Owen: RESPONSE TO SITE SPECIFIC ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION 208:...

  7. LA-13859-MS

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    13859-MS Issued: September 2001 Nevada Test Site Radionuclide Inventory, 1951-1992 Scott ... O R Y Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 Nevada Test Site Radionuclide Inventory, 1951-1992 ...

  8. LA-11224-MS

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    and UC-70 Issued: March 1988 LA--112 2 4-MS DE88 005902 FEHM: Finite Element Heat and Mass Transfer Code George Zyvoloski Zora Dash Sharad Kelkar DISCLAIMER This report was ...

  9. MS, II-J

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    I' ; ,' Departm&th of Energy 1 MS, II-J Washington. DC 20585 ' . I I The Honorable John ... ,, If.you have,any questions, please feel free to call me at 301-427-1721 or Dr. ...

  10. MS Based Metabonomics

    SciTech Connect

    Want, Elizabeth J.; Metz, Thomas O.

    2010-03-01

    Metabonomics is the latest and least mature of the systems biology triad, which also includes genomics and proteomics, and has its origins in the early orthomolecular medicine work pioneered by Linus Pauling and Arthur Robinson. It was defined by Nicholson and colleagues in 1999 as the quantitative measurement of perturbations in the metabolite complement of an integrated biological system in response to internal or external stimuli, and is often used today to describe many non-global types of metabolite analyses. Applications of metabonomics are extensive and include toxicology, nutrition, pharmaceutical research and development, physiological monitoring and disease diagnosis. For example, blood samples from millions of neonates are tested routinely by mass spectrometry (MS) as a diagnostic tool for inborn errors of metabolism. The metabonome encompasses a wide range of structurally diverse metabolites; therefore, no single analytical platform will be sufficient. Specialized sample preparation and detection techniques are required, and advances in NMR and MS technologies have led to enhanced metabonome coverage, which in turn demands improved data analysis approaches. The role of MS in metabonomics is still evolving as instrumentation and software becomes more sophisticated and as researchers realize the strengths and limitations of current technology. MS offers a wide dynamic range, high sensitivity, and reproducible, quantitative analysis. These attributes are essential for addressing the challenges of metabonomics, as the range of metabolite concentrations easily exceeds nine orders of magnitude in biofluids, and the diversity of molecular species ranges from simple amino and organic acids to lipids and complex carbohydrates. Additional challenges arise in generating a comprehensive metabolite profile, downstream data processing and analysis, and structural characterization of important metabolites. A typical workflow of MS-based metabonomics is shown in Figure

  11. IMS - MS Data Extractor

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center

    2015-10-20

    An automated drift time extraction and computed associated collision cross section software tool for small molecule analysis with ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry (IMS-MS). The software automatically extracts drift times and computes associated collision cross sections for small molecules analyzed using ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry (IMS-MS) based on a target list of expected ions provided by the user.

  12. Ms. Margaret Owen, Chair

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Todd Mullins Department of Energy Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office 1017 Majestic Drive, Suite 200 Lexington, Kentucky 40513 (859) 219-4000 NOV 1 4 1014 Federal Facility Agreement Manager Division of Waste Management Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection 200 Fair Oaks Lane, 2 nd Floor Frankfort, Kentucky 40601 Ms. Jennifer Tufts Federal Facility Agreement Manager U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 61 Forsyth Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Dear Mr. Mullins and Ms. Tufts:

  13. Environmental consequences of postulated plutonium releases from Exxon Nuclear MOFP, Richland, Washington, as a result of severe natural phenomena

    SciTech Connect

    Jamison, J.D.; Watson, E.C.

    1980-02-01

    Potential environmental consequences in terms of radiation dose to people are presented for postulated plutonium releases caused by severe natural phenomena at the Exxon Nuclear Company Mixed Oxide Fabrication Plant (MOFP), Richland, Washington. The severe natural phenomena considered are earthquakes, tornadoes, high straight-line winds, and floods. Maximum plutonium deposition values are given for significant locations around the site. All important potential exposure pathways are examined. The most likely 50-year committed dose equivalents are given for the maximum-exposed individual and the population within a 50-mile radius of the plant. The maximum plutonium deposition values most likely to occur offsite are also given.

  14. Analyses of soils at commercial radioactive-waste-disposal sites. [Barnwell, SC; Richland, WA

    SciTech Connect

    Piciulo, P.L.; Shea, C.E.; Barletta, R.E.

    1982-01-01

    Brookhaven National Laboratory, in order to provide technical assistance to the NRC, has measured a number of physical and chemical characteristics of soils from two currently operating commercial radioactive waste disposal sites; one at Barnwell, SC, and the other near Richland, WA. Soil samples believed to be representative of the soil that will contact the buried waste were collected and analyzed. Earth resistivities (field measurements), from both sites, supply information to identify variations in subsurface material. Barnwell soil resistivities (laboratory measurements) range from 3.6 x 10/sup 5/ ohm-cm to 8.9 x 10/sup 4/ ohm-cm. Soil resistivities of the Hanford sample vary from 3.0 x 10/sup 5/ ohm-cm to 6.6 x 10/sup 3/ ohm-cm. The Barnwell and Hanford soil pH ranges from 4.8 to 5.4 and from 4.0 to 7.2 respectively. The pH of a 1:2 mixture of soil to 0.01 M CaCl/sub 2/ resulted in a pH for the Barnwell samples of 3.9 +- 0.1 and for the Hanford samples of 7.4 +- 0.2. These values are comparable to the pH measurements of the water extract of the soils used for the analyses of soluble ion content of the soils. The exchange acidity of the soils was found to be approximately 7 mg-eq per 100 g of dry soil for clay material from Barnwell, whereas the Hanford soils showed an alkaline reaction. Aqueous extracts of saturated pastes were used to determine the concentrations of the following ions: Ca/sup 2 +/, Mg/sup 2 +/, K/sup +/, Na/sup +/, HCO/sub 3//sup -/, SO/sub 4//sup =/, and Cl/sup -/. The sulfide content of each of the soils was measured in a 1:2.5 mixture of soil to an antioxidant buffer solution. The concentrations of soluble ions found in the soils from both sites are consistent with the high resistivities.

  15. ICP-MS Workshop

    SciTech Connect

    Carman, April J.; Eiden, Gregory C.

    2014-11-01

    This is a short document that explains the materials that will be transmitted to LLNL and DNN HQ regarding the ICP-MS Workshop held at PNNL June 17-19th. The goal of the information is to pass on to LLNL information regarding the planning and preparations for the Workshop at PNNL in preparation of the SIMS workshop at LLNL.

  16. Ms. Maria Galanti

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    HAR 2 4 lDII Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Southeast District Office 2195 Front Street Logan, Ohio 43138 Dear Ms. Galanti: PPPO-03-1158259-11 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION REPORT FOR REMOVAL OF THE X-533 SWITCHYARD COMPLEX AT THE PORTSMOUTH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT, PIKETON, OHIO The Department of Energy is submitting the enclosed Construction Completion Report for Removal of the X-533 Switchyard Complex at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Piketon, Ohio (DOEIPPPO/03-0174&D1) to the

  17. EIS-0063: Waste Management Operations, Double-Shell Tanks for Defense High-Level Radioactive Waste Storage, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy developed this statement to evaluate the existing tank design and consider additional specific design and safety feature alternatives for the thirteen tanks being constructed for storage of defense high-level radioactive liquid waste at the Hanford Site in Richland, Washington. This statement supplements ERDA-1538, "Final Environmental Statement on Waste Management Operation."

  18. EIS-0356: Retrieval, Treatment and Disposal of Tank Wastes and Closure of Single-Shell Tanks at the Hanford Site, Richland, WA

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EIS analyzes DOE's proposed retrieval, treatment, and disposal of the waste being managed in the high-level waste (HLW) tank farms at the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington, and closure of the 149 single-shell tanks (SSTs) and associated facilities in the HLW tank farms.

  19. Masters Thesis- Criticality Alarm System Design Guide with Accompanying Alarm System Development for the Radioisotope Production Laboratory in Richland, Washington

    SciTech Connect

    Greenfield, Bryce A.

    2009-12-01

    A detailed instructional manual was created to guide criticality safety engineers through the process of designing a criticality alarm system (CAS) for Department of Energy (DOE) hazard class 1 and 2 facilities. Regulatory and technical requirements were both addressed. A list of design tasks and technical subtasks are thoroughly analyzed to provide concise direction for how to complete the analysis. An example of the application of the design methodology, the Criticality Alarm System developed for the Radioisotope Production Laboratory (RPL) of Richland, Washington is also included. The analysis for RPL utilizes the Monte Carlo code MCNP5 for establishing detector coverage in the facility. Significant improvements to the existing CAS were made that increase the reliability, transparency, and coverage of the system.

  20. Ms. Susan Leckband, Chair W

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    MAR 1 9 2009 Ms. Susan Leckband, Chair W o r d Advisory Board 713 Jadwin, Suite 4 achland, WA 99352 Dear Ms. Leckband: Thank you for your letter dated December 5,2008, providing...

  1. LA-10256-MS

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    LA-10256-MS Los Alamos National Laboratory is operated by the University of California for the United States Department of Energy under contract W-7405-ENG-36. Radiological Survey and Evaluation of the Fallout Area fom the Trinity Test: Chupadera Mesa and White Sands Misile Range, New Mexco - ~ ~S1S' :ts rV T Los Alamos National Laboratory Ly© /.aU U UwHjm ©,Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 An Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer Prepared by Kathy Derouin, Group HSE-8 DISCLAIMER This

  2. LA-983%MS

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    LA-983%MS p 1);: 3 -: ,,i .' . ,~ _,~ -- ._. >: /1.\. . bob ~l~,,,o* ~atlonal t&,oratov is operated by the University of California for the United States Department of Energy under contract W-7405-ENG-36. .I Los Alamos National Laboratory Los k$!kdmos Los Alamos,New Mexico 87545 -- -..--- u I <- -._ _- -. An Affiitive Actioo&ual Opportuttity Employer DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United

  3. Ms. Margaret Owen, Chair

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    November 23,2011 Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board P.O. Box 2001 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 3 7831 Dear Ms. Owen: Thank you for your September 19, 2011, letter recommending that we identify waste that could be transported for disposal by rail instead of highway, and improve communication with local communities impacted by the loading and unloading of the waste from one conveyance to the other. Within the Office of Environmental Management (EM), we routinely look at our transport options when we

  4. Safety assessment for proposed pump mixing operations to mitigate episodic gas releases in tank 241-101-SY: Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    SciTech Connect

    Lentsch, J.W., Westinghouse Hanford

    1996-05-16

    This safety assessment addresses each of the elements required for the proposed action to remove a slurry distributor and to install, operate, and remove a mixing pump in Tank 241-SY-101, which is located within the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington. The proposed action is required as part of an ongoing evaluation of various mitigation concepts developed to eliminate episodic gas releases that result in hydrogen concentrations in the tank dome space that exceed the lower flammability limit.

  5. Evaluation of P-101 course ``Orientation to Occupational Safety Compliance in DOE`` taught in Richland, Washington, June 16--June 26, 1992

    SciTech Connect

    Colley, D.L.

    1993-03-01

    This report summarizes trainee evaluations for the Safety Training Section course, ``Orientation to Occupational Safety in DOE``, (P-101) which was conducted June 16 to 26, 1992 at Hanford, in Richland, Washington. Sections 1.1 and 1.2 of this report summarize the quantitative course evaluations that trainees provided upon completion of the course. Appendix A provides a transcript of the trainees` written comments.

  6. Evaluation of P-101 course Orientation to Occupational Safety Compliance in DOE'' taught in Richland, Washington, June 16--June 26, 1992

    SciTech Connect

    Colley, D.L.

    1993-03-01

    This report summarizes trainee evaluations for the Safety Training Section course, Orientation to Occupational Safety in DOE'', (P-101) which was conducted June 16 to 26, 1992 at Hanford, in Richland, Washington. Sections 1.1 and 1.2 of this report summarize the quantitative course evaluations that trainees provided upon completion of the course. Appendix A provides a transcript of the trainees' written comments.

  7. A safety assessment for proposed pump mixing operations to mitigate episodic gas releases in tank 241-SY-101: Hanford Site,Richland, Washington

    SciTech Connect

    Lentsch, J.W.

    1996-07-01

    This safety assessment addresses each of the elements required for the proposed action to remove a slurry distributor and to install, operate, and remove a mixing pump in Tank 241-SY-101,which is located within the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington.The proposed action is required as part of an ongoing evaluation of various mitigation concepts developed to eliminate episodic gas releases that result in hydrogen concentrations in the tank dome space that exceed the lower flammability limit.

  8. Report on Follow-up Inspection of the Double Funding of Security for Special Nuclear Material at Richland Operations, IG-0378

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    1 INFORMATION: Report on "Follow-up Inspection of the Double Funding of Security for Special Nuclear Material at the Richland Operations Office" The Secretary BACKGROUND: On June 3, 1993, the Deputy Assistant Inspector General for Inspections issued a Letter Report to the Department's Acting Chief Financial Officer which stated that during Fiscal Year 1993 the Department had requested and received $60 million, double the funding needed, for the safeguard and security of special nuclear

  9. Environmental assessment for the resiting, construction, and operation of the Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1994-07-01

    This environmental assessment (EA) presents estimated environmental impacts from the resiting, construction, and operation of the US Department of Energy`s (DOE`s) Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL), which is proposed to be constructed and operated on land near the south boundary of the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington. The EMSL, if constructed, would be a modern research facility in which experimental, theoretical, and computational techniques can be focused on environmental restoration problems, such as the chemical and transport behavior of complex mixtures of contaminants in the environment. The EMSL design includes approximately 18,500 square meters (200,000 square feet) of floor space on a 12-hectare (30-acre) site. The proposed new site is located within the city limits of Richland in north Richland, at the south end of DOE`s 300 Area, on land to be deeded to the US by the Battelle Memorial Institute. Approximately 200 persons are expected to be employed in the EMSL and approximately 60 visiting scientists may be working in the EMSL at any given time. State-of-the-art equipment is expected to be installed and used in the EMSL. Small amounts of hazardous substances (chemicals and radionuclides) are expected to be used in experimental work in the EMSL.

  10. Ms. Paula Call NEPA Document Manager US Department of Energy

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    ... to Richland utilities and the future natural gas pipeline. ... Fir'st oods or cultural keystone species. 'Treaity Junew ... tin it I I 0010- I), * A spill or dlump oif ...

  11. METLIN: MS/MS metabolite data from the MAGGIE Project

    DOE Data Explorer

    METLIN is a metabolite database for metabolomics containing over 50,000 structures, it also represents a data management system designed to assist in a broad array of metabolite research and metabolite identification by providing public access to its repository of current and comprehensive MS/MS metabolite data. An annotated list of known metabolites and their mass, chemical formula, and structure are available on the METLIN website. Each metabolite is conveniently linked to outside resources such as the the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) for further reference and inquiry. MS/MS data is also available on many of the metabolites. The list is expanding continuously as more metabolite information is being deposited and discovered. [from http://metlin.scripps.edu/] Metlin is a component of the MAGGIE Project. MAGGIE is funded by the DOE Genomics: GTL and is an acronym for "Molecular Assemblies, Genes, and Genomics Integrated Efficiently."

  12. Radiological dose assessment for the decontaminated concrete removed from 183-H solar evaporation basins at the Hanford site, Richland, Washington

    SciTech Connect

    Kamboj, S.; Faillace, E.; Yu, C.

    1997-01-01

    Potential maximum radiation dose rates over a 1,000-year time horizon were calculated for exposure to the decontaminated concrete removed from the 183-H Solar Evaporation Basins at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington. The RESRAD computer code, Version 5.62, which implements the methodology described in the US Department of Energy`s manual for developing residual radioactive material guidelines, was used in this evaluation. Currently, the concrete is not being used. Four potential exposure scenarios were developed for the land area where the decontaminated concrete will be stored. In Scenario A industrial use of the land is assumed; in Scenario B recreational use of the land is assumed; in Scenario C residential use of the land is assumed; and in Scenario D (a plausible but unlikely land-use scenario), the presence of a subsistence farmer in the immediate vicinity of the land is assumed. For Scenarios A and B, water used for drinking is assumed to be surface water from the Columbia River; for Scenarios C and D, groundwater drawn from a well located at the downgradient edge of the storage area is the only source of water for drinking, irrigation, and raising livestock. Conservative parameters values were used to estimate the radiation doses. The results of the evaluation indicate that the US Department of Energy`s dose limit of 100 mrem/yr would not be exceeded for any of the scenarios analyzed. The potential maximum dose rates for Scenarios A, B, C, and D are 0.75, 0.022, 29, 29 mrem/yr, respectively. An uncertainty analysis was performed to determine which parameters have the greatest impact on the estimated doses. The doses in Scenarios C and D were found to be very sensitive to the magnitude of the irrigation rate.

  13. Richland Operations (DOE-RL) Environmental Safety Health (ES and H) FY 2000 and FY 2001 Execution Commitment Summary

    SciTech Connect

    REEP, I.E.

    2000-12-01

    All sites in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Complex prepare this report annually for the DOE Office of Environment, Safety and Health (EH). The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of the previous and current year's Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) execution commitments and the Safety and Health (S&H) resources that support these activities. The fiscal year (FY) 2000 and 2001 information and data contained in the Richland Operations Environment, Safefy and Health Fiscal Year 2002 Budget-Risk Management Summary (RL 2000a) were the basis for preparing this report. Fiscal year 2001 activities are based on the President's Amended Congressional Budget Request of $689.6 million for funding Ofice of Environmental Management (EM) $44.0 million for Fast Flux Test Facility standby less $7.0 million in anticipated DOE, Headquarters holdbacks for Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology (NE); and $55.3 million for Safeguards and Security (SAS). Any funding changes as a result of the Congressional appropriation process will be reflected in the Fiscal Year 2003 ES&H Budget-Risk Management Summary to be issued in May 2001. This report provides the end-of-year status of FY 2000 ES&H execution commitments, including actual S&H expenditures, and describes planned FY 2001 ES&H execution commitments and the S&H resources needed to support those activities. This requirement is included in the ES&H guidance contained in the FY 2002 Field Budget Call (DOE 2000).

  14. Environmental Assessment for the Transfer of 1100 AREA, Southern Rail Connection and Rolling Stock, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    SciTech Connect

    N /A

    1998-08-01

    This environmental assessment (EA) has been prepared to assess potential environmental impacts associated with the U.S. Department of Energy's proposed action: the transfer of the 1100 Area, southern rail connection and rolling stock to a non-federal entity. Impact information contained herein will be used by the U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office Manager, to determine if the proposed action is a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. If the proposed action is determined to be major and significant, an environmental impact statement will be prepared. If the proposed action is determined not to be major and significant, a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) will be issued and the action can proceed. Criteria used to evaluate significance can be found in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1508.27. This EA was prepared in compliance with the ''National Environmental Policy Act'' (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 CFR 1500-1508), and the U.S. Department of Energy Implementing Procedures for NEPA (10 CFR 1021). The following is a description of each section of the EA. (1) Purpose and Need for Action. This provides a brief statement concerning the problem or opportunity the U.S. Department of Energy is addressing with the proposed action. As necessary, background information is provided. (2) Description of the Proposed Action. A description with sufficient detail to identify potential environmental impacts is provided. (3) Alternatives to the Proposed Action. Reasonable alternative actions, which would address the Purpose and Need, are described. A no action alternative, as required by 10 CFR 1021, also is described. (4) Affected Environment. This provides a brief description of the locale in which the proposed action takes place, and which may be environmentally impacted. (5) Environmental

  15. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    EVALUATION AND MEASUREMENT PLAN (PEMP) FEE DETERMINATION The U.S. Department of ... Basis of Evaluation: Performance Evaluation and Measurement Plan (PEMP) for FY 2015 Award ...

  16. Richland Badge Request PIA

    Energy Saver

    Research, Development, and Demonstration Research, Development, and Demonstration The Bioenergy Technologies Office's research, development, and demonstration efforts are organized around three key technical and three key crosscutting elements. The first two technical elements-Feedstock Supply and Logistics R&D and Conversion R&D-primarily focus on research and development (R&D). The third technical element-Demonstration and Market Transformation-focuses on integrated biorefineries

  17. Richland Analytical Building Blocks

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    5 $ in Thousands Draft Pre-Decisional PBS ABB Title FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2015 Description (Range $000) Cumulative Range RL-0030 Groundwater Monitoring (GWM), integration & Assessment, and Operations & Maintenance 100,000 - 120,000 100,000 - 120,000 Accomplishes continued integration of Site-wide groundwater and vadose zone cleanup activities, groundwater contamination monitoring, as well as operations, maintenance, and necessary modifications of existing remediation systems. RL-0041 River

  18. Richland Analytical Building Blocks

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    4 Draft Pre-Decisional ($ in 000's) PBS Work Description Title FY 2014 Description FY 2014 ($000) FY 2014 Cumulative ($000) RL-0011 PFP Surveillance and Maintenance (S&M) and Min Safe Provide minimum safe and essential services for industrial, radiological and nuclear Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP) facilities/structures and systems. PFP surveillance includes the monitoring of residual radioactive and chemical contamination to ensure safe and compliant condition. Activities include

  19. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    7 TL~ Rich land, Washington 99352 APR 0 22012 1 2-EMD-0057 Addressees - See Attached SUPPLEMENT TO DOE/RL-201 1-27, HANFORD SITE AIR OPERATING PERMIT (AOP) RENEWAL APPLICATION: COVERING THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2011, THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2011 (DOE/RL-201 2-04, REV. 0) Enclosed is DOE/RL-20 12-04, Supplement to DOE/RL-20 11-27, "Hanford Site AOP Renewal Application: Covering the period January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2011." The AOP Renewal Application Supplement is being submitted in

  20. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    ... Title: Planning and Execution of Radiological Work Guide: 10 CFR 835 Surveillance Scope: ... (OA 35469). " S-11-SED-CHPRC-PFP-002-F02: Scope of Work was not always adequately defined ...

  1. Richland Analytical Building Blocks

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    appropriate and compliant Safeguards and Security programs for the Hanford site. ... operations necessary to support safe and compliant interim storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF). ...

  2. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    unique in that it was issued by RL in 1996, and has been maintained and interpreted by a Focus Group with invited membership by technical experts from the Office of River...

  3. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    -M-24 GROUNDWATER WELL-DRILLING CHANGE PACKAGE Dear Mr. Martin: This letter is in response to HAB's advice 152 regarding the M-24 groWldwaterwell-drilling Tri- party Agreement ...

  4. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    ... Suffered heat stress after performing release survey in AN-Farm Extent of Condition ... Causes PIECIM Evaluation of PIE CIM Initiative An evaluation was done by Jim McAuley. ...

  5. Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Focus Group determines a change or interpretation to the HASQARD is de minimis (an editorial change or interpretation clarifying but not modifying a requirement - example...

  6. Accident investigation board report on the May 14, 1997, chemical explosion at the Plutonium Reclamation Facility, Hanford Site,Richland, Washington - final report

    SciTech Connect

    Gerton, R.E.

    1997-07-25

    On May 14, 1997, at 7:53 p.m. (PDT), a chemical explosion occur-red in Tank A- 109 in Room 40 of the Plutonium Reclamation Facility (Facility) located in the 200 West Area of the Hanford Site, approximately 30 miles north of Richland, Washington. The inactive processing Facility is part of the Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP). On May 16, 1997, Lloyd L. Piper, Deputy Manager, acting for John D. Wagoner, Manager, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Richland Operations Office (RL), formally established an Accident Investigation Board (Board) to investigate the explosion in accordance with DOE Order 225. 1, Accident Investigations. The Board commenced its investigation on May 15, 1997, completed the investigation on July 2, 1997, and submitted its findings to the RL Manager on July 26, 1997. The scope of the Board`s investigation was to review and analyze the circumstances of the events that led to the explosion; to analyze facts and to determine the causes of the accident; and to develop conclusions and judgments of need that may help prevent a recurrence of the accident. The scope also included the application of lessons learned from similar accidents within DOE. In addition to this detailed report, a companion document has also been prepared that provides a concise summary of the facts and conclusions of this report, with an emphasis on management issues (DOE/RL-97-63).

  7. Report on follow-up inspection of the double funding of security for special nuclear material at the Richland Operations Office

    SciTech Connect

    1995-08-28

    In a June 3, 1993, Office of Inspections Letter Report, the Office of Inspector General notified the Department`s Acting Chief Financial Officer that the Department had requested and received $60 million, double the funds needed, for the safeguard and security of special nuclear material at the Department`s Richland Operations Office in Fiscal Year 1993. In response to the Letter Report, in a June 28, 1993, memorandum, the Acting Chief Financial Officer advised the Office of Inspector General that the extra $30 million received by the Office of Environmental Management would either be: (1) applied to unanticipated requirements in Fiscal Year 1993; (2) applied to the anticipated Congressional reduction to the Department`s Fiscal Year 1994 budget request; or (3) used as an offset to the Fiscal Year 1995 budget request. The purpose of this follow-up inspection was to review the circumstances surrounding the Fiscal Year 1993 double funding for the security of special nuclear material at Richland. The principal objectives of this inspection were to: (1) identify contributing factors to the double funding and corrective actions needed to prevent the double funding from reoccurring; and (2) review Departmental Managers` response to the double funding issue.

  8. Ms. Maria Galanti Site Coordinator

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    DEC 23 ZDto PPPO-03-1088949-11 Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 2195 Front Street Logan, Ohio 43138 Dear Ms. Galanti: REVISED CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION REPORT FOR PHASE I OF THE REMOVAL OF THE X-633 RECIRCULATING COOLING WATER COMPLEX AT THE PORTSMOUTH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT, PIKETON, OHIO AND RESPONSES TO COMMENTS The Department of Energy is SUbmitting the enclosed revised Construction Completion Report for Phase I of the Removal of the X-633 ReCirculating Cooling Water Complex at the

  9. Ms. Maria Galanti Site Coordinator

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    3 0 2015 Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Southeast District Office 2195 Front Street Logan, Ohio 43138 Dear Ms. Galanti: PPP0-03-3065331-15 FINAL RECORD OF DECISION FOR THE PROCESS BUILDINGS AND COMPLEX FACILITIES DECONTAMINATION AND DECOMMISSIONING EVALUATION PROJECT AT THE PORTSMOUTH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT, PIKETON, OHIO (DOE/PPP0/03-0425&Dl) References: 1. Letter from W. Murphie to M. Galanti, "Record of Decision for the Process Buildings and Complex Facilities Decontamination

  10. Category:Jackson, MS | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Jackson, MS Jump to: navigation, search Go Back to PV Economics By Location Media in category "Jackson, MS" The following 16 files are in this category, out of 16 total....

  11. Ms. Maria Galanti Site Coordinator

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    ? 5 2011 PPPO-03-1251788-11 Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Southeast District Office 2195 Front Street Logan, Ohio 43138 Dear Ms. Galanti: TRANSMITTAL OF Dl CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION REPORT FOR PHASES I AND II OF THE REMOVAL OF THE X-760 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING BUILDING AT THE PORTSMOUTH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT, PIKETON, OHIO (DOE/PPPO/03-0196&Dl) Reference: Letter from M. Galanti to J. Bradbume, "Construction Completion Report for Phases I and II ofthe Removal of the X-760 Chemical

  12. Enerkem Mississippi Biofuels Pontotoc, MS Facility

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Enerkem Mississippi Biofuels Pontotoc, MS Facility 2013 IBR Peer Review May 21 st , 2013 ... as part of the first wave of advanced biofuels projects in the U.S. The advanced and ...

  13. DOE Issues Request for Information for Richland Operations Office Richland

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy Hosts Workshop on Transition to Electric Vehicles DOE Hosts Workshop on Transition to Electric Vehicles July 21, 2010 - 12:00am Addthis Washington, DC - On Thursday, July 22, 2010, the Department of Energy will host an electric vehicle workshop at DOE Headquarters in Washington, DC, bringing together more than 150 city officials, vehicle manufacturers, utility companies and other stakeholders. The workshop will help participants better coordinate their efforts to expand the

  14. ARM - Campaign Instrument - pyran-eko-ms-801

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    eko-ms-801 Comments? We would love to hear from you! Send us a note below or call us at 1-888-ARM-DATA. Send Campaign Instrument : Pyranometer-eko-ms-801 (PYRAN-EKO-MS-801

  15. Mr. Christopher Lawrence and Ms. Julie Smith Office of Electricity...

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    Mr. Christopher Lawrence and Ms. Julie Smith Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy ... Lawrence and Ms. Smith, The Western Governors' Association (WGA) is submitting these ...

  16. Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact: Widening Trench 36 of the 218-E-12B Low-Level Burial Ground, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    SciTech Connect

    N /A

    1999-02-11

    This environmental assessment was prepared to assess potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed action to widen and operate unused Trench 36 in the 218-E-12B Low-Level Burial Ground for disposal of low-level waste. Information contained herein will be used by the Manager, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, to determine if the Proposed Action is a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. If the Proposed Action is determined to be major and significant, an environmental impact statement will be prepared. If the Proposed Action is determined not to be major and significant, a Finding of No Significant Impact will be issued and the action may proceed. Criteria used to evaluate significance can be found in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations 1508.27. This environmental assessment was prepared in compliance with the ''National Environmental Policy Act of1969'', as amended, the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of ''National Environmental Policy Act'' (Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations 1500-1508), and the U.S. Department of Energy Implementing Procedures for ''National Environmental Polio Act'' (Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations 1021). The following is a description of each section of this environmental assessment. (1) Purpose and Need for Action. This section provides a brief statement concerning the problem or opportunity the U.S, Department of Energy is addressing with the Proposed Action. Background information is provided. (2) Description of the Proposed Action. This section provides a description of the Proposed Action with sufficient detail to identify potential environmental impacts. (3) Alternatives to the Proposed Action. This section describes reasonable,alternative actions to the Proposed Action, which addresses the Purpose and Need. A No Action Alternative, as required by Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations 1021

  17. LC-IMS-MS Feature Finder

    SciTech Connect

    2013-03-07

    LC-IMS-MS Feature Finder is a command line software application which searches for possible molecular ion signatures in multidimensional liquid chromatography, ion mobility spectrometry, and mass spectrometry data by clustering deisotoped peaks with similar monoisotopic mass values, charge states, elution times, and drift times. The software application includes an algorithm for detecting multiple conformations and co-eluting species in the ion mobility dimension. LC-IMS-MS Feature Finder is designed to create an output file with detected features that includes associated information about the detected features.

  18. LC-IMS-MS Feature Finder

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center

    2013-03-07

    LC-IMS-MS Feature Finder is a command line software application which searches for possible molecular ion signatures in multidimensional liquid chromatography, ion mobility spectrometry, and mass spectrometry data by clustering deisotoped peaks with similar monoisotopic mass values, charge states, elution times, and drift times. The software application includes an algorithm for detecting multiple conformations and co-eluting species in the ion mobility dimension. LC-IMS-MS Feature Finder is designed to create an output file with detected features thatmore » includes associated information about the detected features.« less

  19. Analysis of Phosphonic Acids: Validation of Semi-Volatile Analysis by HPLC-MS/MS by EPA Method MS999

    SciTech Connect

    Owens, J; Vu, A; Koester, C

    2008-10-31

    The Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Region 5 Chicago Regional Laboratory (CRL) developed a method titled Analysis of Diisopropyl Methylphosphonate, Ethyl Hydrogen Dimethylamidophosphate, Isopropyl Methylphosphonic Acid, Methylphosphonic Acid, and Pinacolyl Methylphosphonic Acid in Water by Multiple Reaction Monitoring Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry: EPA Version MS999. This draft standard operating procedure (SOP) was distributed to multiple EPA laboratories and to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, which was tasked to serve as a reference laboratory for EPA's Environmental Reference Laboratory Network (ERLN) and to develop and validate analytical procedures. The primary objective of this study was to validate and verify the analytical procedures described in EPA Method MS999 for analysis of the listed phosphonic acids and surrogates in aqueous samples. The gathered data from this validation study will be used to: (1) demonstrate analytical method performance; (2) generate quality control acceptance criteria; and (3) revise the SOP to provide a validated method that would be available for use during a homeland security event. The data contained in this report will be compiled, by EPA CRL, with data generated by other EPA Regional laboratories so that performance metrics of EPA Method MS999 can be determined.

  20. Bioenergia Brasil S A MS | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Brasil S A MS Jump to: navigation, search Name: Bioenergia Brasil SA (MS) Place: Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil Product: Company developing a 100m litre per year ethanol plant in Mato...

  1. LA-9252-MS UC-70a

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    /p/j ,()i --' z!- LA-9252-MS UC-70a Issued: May 1982 Environmental Analysis of the Bayo Canyon (TA-10) Site, Los Alamos, New Mexico Roger W. Ferenbaugh Thomas E. Buhl Alan K. Stoker Wayne FL Hansen kos A[am@ Los Alamos,New Mexico 87545 Los Alamos National Laboratory CONTENTS ABSTRACT 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1.1 The FUSRAP Program 1.2 Preferred Alternative 2.0 THE BAY0 CANYON SITE 2.1 Summary History and Description of Site 2.1.1 Description of Site 2.1.2 History of Site 2.2 Need for

  2. LA--12O48-MS DE91

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    -12O48-MS DE91 010299 I ~ I i Tm Thou.mwl Yews of Solitude? 0)1 llzfuhwh!lll Illfrlwiml i)ffo fhc Wmtefsolfltiwl Pilot Project Rqwsitory GrL~gor!/B L')/fo)"(i* Craig W. Kirhood** HmwjOfwf7y Marfit~/. Pmquak!!i+ ~~~~n~~~~L..Al...s.Me. M.xico 87541 L A N L % D I O T D I U E Table of Contents Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. D O . . . . . . . . . . . ...ooOO.OO..OOOOO"OO".OO """"."" 'ti 1. Introduction . .

  3. Neutron and Nuclear Science To/MS: Distribution From/MS: Stephen Wender/H855

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    memorandum Neutron and Nuclear Science To/MS: Distribution From/MS: Stephen Wender/H855 Phone/Fax: 7-1344/5-3705 E-mail: wender@lanl.gov Symbol: LANSCE-NS-14-02 Date: February 4, 2014 Subject: AUTHORIZATIONS AND ASSIGNMENTS I. LANSCE-NS Additional Duty Assignments ALARA Coordinator Ron Nelson Crane Coordinator Gregg Chaparro Facility Coordinator Steve Wender Electrical Safety Officer William Waganaar ES&H Officer Steve Wender Forklift Coordinator Tim Medina Lockout/Tagout Coordinator Ron

  4. ICP-MS Data Analysis Software

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center

    1999-01-14

    VG2Xl - this program reads binary data files generated by VG instrumentals inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometers using PlasmaQuad Software Version 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 running under IBM OS/2. ICPCalc - this module is a macro for Microsoft Excel written in VBA (Virtual Basic for Applications) that performs data analysis for ICP-MS data required for nuclear materials that cannot readily be done with the vendor''s software. VG2GRAMS - This program reads binary data files generated by VGmore » instruments inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometers using PlasmaQuad software versions 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 running under IBM OS/2.« less

  5. Municipal Energy Agency of MS | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Name: Municipal Energy Agency of MS Place: Mississippi Phone Number: (601) 362-2252 Facebook: https:www.facebook.compagesMunicipal-Energy-Agency-of-Mississippi Outage...

  6. Ms. Julie A. Smith Mr. Christopher Lawrence Office of Electricity...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    October 30, 2013 Ms. Julie A. Smith Mr. Christopher Lawrence Office of Electricity ... Smith and Mr. Lawrence: The Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (AFWA) would like to ...

  7. CONCURRENC RTG. SYMBOL GC-34 Ms. Mary Beth Brado

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    CONCURRENC RTG. SYMBOL GC-34 Ms. Mary Beth Brado "*N'W Town of Lewiston * i.., 1375 Ridge Road r'8 Lewiston, New York 14092 RTG.SYuBOL Dear Ms. Brado: .- ,l13. INirIA Lss iQ. ...

  8. Ms. Kimberly Krizanovic U.S. Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    0, 2012 Ms. Kimberly Krizanovic U.S. Department of Energy Office of the Chief Financial Officer 4 th Floor, Suite 4A-236 1000 Independence Avenue Washington, DC 20585 Dear Ms. Krizanovic: The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) is the national, professional association of CPAs, with 369,000 CPA members worldwide in business and industry, public practice, government, education, student affiliates and international associates. It sets ethical standards for the profession and

  9. http://www.hanford.gov/boards/hab/response/088.htm

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    8 From: Jackson Kinzer Ms. Merilyn Reeves, Chair Hanford Advisory Board 723 The Parkway, Suite 200 Richland, Washington 99352 January 5, 1999 Dear Ms. Reeves: HANFORD ADVISORY...

  10. http://www.hanford.gov/boards/hab/response/090-2.htm

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Jackson Kinzer Ms. Merilyn Reeves, Chair Hanford Advisory Board 723 The Parkway, Suite 200 Richland, Washington 99352 February 10, 1999 Dear Ms. Reeves: HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD...

  11. http://www.hanford.gov/boards/hab/response/100-2.htm

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Michael F. Gearheard Ms. Merilyn Reeves, Chair Hanford Advisory Board 723 The Parkway, Suite 200 Richland, Washington 99352 November 10, 1999 Dear Ms Reeves: Thank you for the...

  12. http://www.hanford.gov/boards/hab/response/082.htm

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    2 From: John D. Wagoner, Tom Fitzsimmons, and Chuck Clarke Ms. Merilyn Reeves, Chair Hanford Advisory Board 723 The Parkway, Suite 200 Richland, Washington 99352 Dear Ms. Reeves:...

  13. http://www.hanford.gov/boards/hab/response/086.htm

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    6 From: Jay Rhoderick and Martha Crosland Ms. Merilyn Reeves, Chair Hanford Advisory Board 723 The Parkway, Suite 200 Richland, Washington 99352 December 10, 1998 Dear Ms. Reeves:...

  14. HANFORD SITE SUSTAINABILITY PROGRAM RICHLAND WASHINGTON - 12464

    SciTech Connect

    FRITZ LL

    2012-01-12

    In support of implementation of Executive Order (EO) 13514, Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy and Economic Performance, the Hanford Site Sustainability Plan was developed to implement strategies and activities required to achieve the prescribed goals in the EO as well as demonstrate measurable progress in environmental stewardship at the Hanford Site. The Hanford Site Sustainability Program was developed to demonstrate progress towards sustainability goals as defined and established in Executive Order (EO) 13514, Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy and Economic Performance; EO 13423, Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy and Transportation Management, and several applicable Energy Acts. Multiple initiatives were undertaken in Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 to implement the Program and poise the Hanford Site as a leader in environmental stewardship. In order to implement the Hanford Site Sustainability Program, a Sustainability Plan was developed in conjunction with prime contractors, two U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Offices, and key stakeholders to serve as the framework for measuring progress towards sustainability goals. Based on the review of these metrics and future plans, several activities were initiated to proactively improve performance or provide alternatives for future consideration contingent on available funding. A review of the key metric associated with energy consumption for the Hanford Site in FY 2010 and 2011 indicated an increase over the target reduction of 3 percent annually from a baseline established in FY 2003 as illustrated in Figure 1. This slight increase was attributed primarily from the increased energy demand from the cleanup projects funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) in FY 2010 and 2011. Although it is forecasted that the energy demand will decrease commensurate with the completion of ARRA projects, several major initiatives were launched to improve energy efficiency.

  15. DOE Climate Change Adaptation Training (Richland, WA)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This free training is a primer on climate science, identifying climate hazards, conducting vulnerability assessments, leveraging climate change data and tools and understanding the energy-water-food nexus.

  16. Hanford Identification (HID) PIA, Richland Operations Office...

    Energy Saver

    Safety Management Workshop Registration, PIA, Idaho National Laboratory Occupational Medicine - Assistant PIA, Idaho National Laboratory Manchester Software 1099 Reporting PIA,...

  17. Richland Community College | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Community College Sector Wind energy Facility Type Small Scale Wind Facility Status In Service Location Decatur IL Coordinates 39.88666061, -88.89538586 Show Map Loading...

  18. U Department of Energy Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Dvija Bertish Director of Environmnental & Conservation Rosemere Neighborhood Association ... I'm with the Rosmere 9 Neighborhood Association. We're a conservation 10 group in ...

  19. Richland AFGE 788 non-professional

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for one of the largest nuclear cleanup efforts in the world, managing the legacy of five decades of nuclear weapons production. The Hanford site,...

  20. Hanford Site Sustainability Program, Richland, Washington - 12464

    SciTech Connect

    Fritz, Lori

    2012-07-01

    In support of implementation of Executive Order (EO) 13514, Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy and Economic Performance, the Hanford Site Sustainability Plan [1] was developed to implement strategies and activities required to achieve the prescribed goals in the EO as well as demonstrate measurable progress in environmental stewardship at the Hanford Site. The Hanford Site has made significant progress in the area of environmental stewardship through multiple initiatives to reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions, despite increased demands in those areas due to accelerated cleanup work driven by ARRA funding. Future plans, contingent on available funding, include additional enhancements in the areas of fleet management, including installation of additional charging stations and continued acquisition of alternate fueled vehicles, implementation of one or more of the recommendations from the Feasibility Study on reducing GHG emissions from employee commuting, and potential diversion of solid waste from on-site landfills. (author)

  1. This is a paper model of the MS2 virus

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    a paper model of the MS2 virus. MS2 is a nanoscale virus that lives in the human gut. It is benign and doesn't interfere with us. A virus, it attaches to a host cell that it identifies using protein markers on its exterior. Once attached, it injects its RNA genetic material into the cell. This material then co-opts the cell's metabolism to produce copies of the virus, which the cell releases back into the organism's tissues. Researchers have found that this mechanism has potential as a treatment

  2. When worlds collide - Mac to MS-DOS. [Data transfer to and from Apple Macintosh computers and MS-DOS based personal computers

    SciTech Connect

    Busbey, A.B.

    1989-04-01

    A number of methods and products, both hardware and software, to allow data exchange between Apple Macintosh computers and MS-DOS based systems. These included serial null modem connections, MS-DOS hardware and/or software emulation, MS-DOS disk-reading hardware and networking.

  3. PNM Resources 2401 Aztec NE, MS-Z100

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    PNM Resources 2401 Aztec NE, MS-Z100 Albuquerque, NM 87107 505-241-2025 Fax 505 241-2384 PNMResources.com October 29, 2013 Mr. Christopher Lawrence Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE-20) U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Submitted electronically via email to: Christopher.Lawrence@hq.doe.gov Dear Mr. Lawrence: Subject: Department of Energy (DOE)- Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects,

  4. Method for factor analysis of GC/MS data

    DOEpatents

    Van Benthem, Mark H; Kotula, Paul G; Keenan, Michael R

    2012-09-11

    The method of the present invention provides a fast, robust, and automated multivariate statistical analysis of gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy (GC/MS) data sets. The method can involve systematic elimination of undesired, saturated peak masses to yield data that follow a linear, additive model. The cleaned data can then be subjected to a combination of PCA and orthogonal factor rotation followed by refinement with MCR-ALS to yield highly interpretable results.

  5. EA-1860: Richland Renewable Energy Waste-to-Energy Project, Richland, Wisconsin

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE is preparing a draft Environmental Assessment to analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed construction and operation of a new wastewater treatment facility and the alternative of not implementing this project.

  6. http://www.hanford.gov/boards/hab/response/092b.htm

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Richland, Washington 99352 May 24, 1999 Re: EPA Response to Consensus Advice 92 Dear Ms. ... The Board's advice clearly articulates goals that EPA shares regarding our communications ...

  7. http://www.hanford.gov/boards/hab/response/100.htm

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Tom Fitzsimmons Ms. Merilyn Reeves, Chair Hanford Advisory Board 723 The Parkway Suite 200 Richland, Washington 99352 September 27, 1999 Dear Merilyn: Perhaps it is appropriate...

  8. Characterization of Fatty Acids in Crenarchaeota by GC-MS and...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Title: Characterization of Fatty Acids in Crenarchaeota by GC-MS and NMR Lipids composed ... Because lipids are energy currency and cell signaling molecules, their presence in Archaea ...

  9. PIK M.S. Onegin Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute 2015 Super...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    isotopes production in high-flux reactor PIK M.S. Onegin Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute 2015 Super Heavy Elements Symposium Reactor PIK 2011 - Criticality reached 2013 - ...

  10. Issues Pertaining to the Termination of Ms. Donna Busche, a Contractor...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    REVIEW Issues Pertaining to the Termination of Ms. Donna Busche, a Contractor Employee at ... Donna Busche, a Contractor Employee at the Waste Treatment Plant Project" On March 6, ...

  11. ICP MS selection of radiopure materials for the GERDA experiment

    SciTech Connect

    Di Vacri, M. L.; Nisi, S.; Cattadori, C.; Janicsko, J.; Lubashevskiy, A.; Smolnikov, A.; Walter, M.

    2015-08-17

    The GERDA (GERmanium Detector Array) experiment, located in the Gran Sasso Underground Laboratory (LNGS, Italy) aims to search for neutrinoless double beta (0νββ) decay of the {sup 76}Ge isotope. Both an ultra-low radioactivity background environment and active techniques to abate the residual background are required to reach the background index (of 10{sup −3} counts/keV kg y) at the Q{sub ββ}. In order to veto and suppress those events that partially deposit energy in Ge detectors, the readout of liquid argon (LAr) scintillation light (SL) has been implemented for the second GERDA experimental Phase. A double veto system has been designed and constructed using highly radiopure materials (scintillating fibers, wavelength shifters, polymeric foils, reflective foils). This work describes the study of lead, thorium and uranium ultra-trace content, performed at the LNGS Chemistry Laboratory by High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HR ICP MS), for the selection of all materials involved in the construction of the veto system.

  12. Gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer (GC/MS) system for quantitative analysis of reactive chemical compounds

    DOEpatents

    Grindstaff, Quirinus G.

    1992-01-01

    Described is a new gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer (GC/MS) system and method for quantitative analysis of reactive chemical compounds. All components of such a GC/MS system external to the oven of the gas chromatograph are programmably temperature controlled to operate at a volatilization temperature specific to the compound(s) sought to be separated and measured.

  13. On the Ionization and Ion Transmission Efficiencies of Different ESI-MS Interfaces

    DOE PAGES [OSTI]

    Cox, Jonathan T.; Marginean, Ioan; Smith, Richard D.; Tang, Keqi

    2014-09-30

    It is well known that the achievable sensitivity of electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) is largely determined by the ionization efficiency in the ESI source and ion transmission efficiency through the ESI-MS interface. In this report we systematically study the ion transmission and ionization efficiencies in different ESI-MS interface configurations. The configurations under investigation include a single emitter/single inlet capillary, single emitter/multi-inlet capillary, and a subambient pressure ionization with nanoelectrospray (SPIN) MS interfaces with a single emitter and an emitter array, respectively. We present an effective method to evaluate the overall ion utilization efficiency of an ESI-MS interface by measuringmore » the total gas phase ion current transmitted through the interface and correlating it to the observed ion abundance measured in the corresponding mass spectrum. Our experimental results suggest that the overall ion utilization efficiency in the SPIN-MS interface configurations is better than that in the inlet capillary based ESI-MS interface configurations.« less

  14. On the Ionization and Ion Transmission Efficiencies of Different ESI-MS Interfaces

    SciTech Connect

    Cox, Jonathan T.; Marginean, Ioan; Smith, Richard D.; Tang, Keqi

    2014-09-30

    It is well known that the achievable sensitivity of electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) is largely determined by the ionization efficiency in the ESI source and ion transmission efficiency through the ESI-MS interface. In this report we systematically study the ion transmission and ionization efficiencies in different ESI-MS interface configurations. The configurations under investigation include a single emitter/single inlet capillary, single emitter/multi-inlet capillary, and a subambient pressure ionization with nanoelectrospray (SPIN) MS interfaces with a single emitter and an emitter array, respectively. We present an effective method to evaluate the overall ion utilization efficiency of an ESI-MS interface by measuring the total gas phase ion current transmitted through the interface and correlating it to the observed ion abundance measured in the corresponding mass spectrum. Our experimental results suggest that the overall ion utilization efficiency in the SPIN-MS interface configurations is better than that in the inlet capillary based ESI-MS interface configurations.

  15. Paul W. King, Ph.D., M.S. | Bioenergy | NREL

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Paul W. King Paul W. King, Ph.D., M.S. Scientist VI - Supervisor, Photobiology Group Paul.King@nrel.gov | 303-384-6277 Research Interests Paul King's research interests are broadly ...

  16. File:USDA-CE-Production-GIFmaps-MS.pdf | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    MS.pdf Jump to: navigation, search File File history File usage Mississippi Ethanol Plant Locations Size of this preview: 776 600 pixels. Full resolution (1,650 1,275...

  17. To: Ms. Brenda Edwards U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologi...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    0048 and RIN 1904-AC04 Dear Ms. Edwards, In a letter dated September 26, 2006, Exelon (the parent company to ComEd) supported the current DOE distribution transformer ...

  18. Training is sponsoring two MS PowerPoint Courses. The course...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Training is sponsoring two MS PowerPoint Courses. The course options feature level 1 and level 2. This email is to gauge interest. The associated cost per class is 200.00. If...

  19. Ms. Brenda Edwards U.S. Department of Energy, Buildings Technology Program

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    8, 2013 Ms. Brenda Edwards U.S. Department of Energy, Buildings Technology Program Mail Stop EE-2J 1000 Independence Ave. SW Washington DC 20585-0121 RE: Revisions to Energy Efficiency Enforcement Regulations EERE-2011-BT-TD- 0005 Dear Ms. Edwards: The National Marine Manufacturers Association (NMMA) appreciates the opportunity to respond to the Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy's request for information published in the Federal Register (78 Fed. Reg.

  20. http://www.hanford.gov/boards/hab/response/108.htm

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    136 Advice 108 From: Harry L. Boston Ms. Merilyn B. Reeves, Chair Hanford Advisory Board 723 The Parkway, Suite 200; B1 -41 Richland, Washington 99352 Dear Ms. Reeves: RESPONSE...

  1. Department

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    April 30, 2010 CERTIFIED MAIL Ms. Lisa Anderson Tri-City Railroad Company P.O. Box 1700 Richland, Washington 99352 Dear Ms. Anderson: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST (FOI...

  2. http://www.hanford.gov/boards/hab/response/111.htm

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    1 From: Tom Fitzsimmons September 25, 2000 Ms Merilyn Reeves, Chair Hanford Advisory Board 723 The Parkway, Suite 200 Richland, WA 99352 Dear Ms. Reeves: Thank you for your letter...

  3. http://www.hanford.gov/boards/hab/response/102.htm

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    WMD-062 Advice 102 From: Keith A. Klein Ms. Merilyn B. Reeves, Chair Hanford Advisory Board 723 The Parkway, Suite 200: B1 -41 Richland, Washington 99352 Dear Ms. Reeves:...

  4. http://www.hanford.gov/boards/hab/response/097.htm

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    PRO-759 Advice 97 From: Keith A. Klein Ms. Merilyn Reeves, Chair Hanford Advisory Board 723 The Parkway, Suite 200: B1 -41 Richland, Washington 99352 September 9, 1999 Dear Ms....

  5. http://www.hanford.gov/boards/hab/response/098.htm

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    8 From: Carolyn L. Huntoon Ms. Merilyn Reeves, Chair Hanford Advisory Board 723 The Parkway Suite 200 Richland, Washington 99352 September 13, 1999 Dear Ms. Reeves: In your letter...

  6. STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    APR 2 1 2015 Ms. Stacy Charboneau, Man er Mr. Ijevin Smith, Manager Richland Operations ... Dear Ms. Charboneau and Mr. Smith: As you work with the Assistant Secretary for ...

  7. Isotope Production at the Hanford Site in Richland, Washington

    SciTech Connect

    Ammoniums

    1999-06-01

    This report was prepared in response to a request from the Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee (NERAC) subcommittee on ''Long-Term Isotope Research and Production Plans.'' The NERAC subcommittee has asked for a reply to a number of questions regarding (1) ''How well does the Department of Energy (DOE) infrastructure sme the need for commercial and medical isotopes?'' and (2) ''What should be the long-term role of the federal government in providing commercial and medical isotopes?' Our report addresses the questions raised by the NERAC subcommittee, and especially the 10 issues that were raised under the first of the above questions (see Appendix). These issues are related to the isotope products offered by the DOE Isotope Production Sites, the capabilities and condition of the facilities used to produce these products, the management of the isotope production programs at DOE laboratories, and the customer service record of the DOE Isotope Production sites. An important component of our report is a description of the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) reactor at the Hbford Site and the future plans for its utilization as a source of radioisotopes needed by nuclear medicine physicians, by researchers, and by customers in the commercial sector. In response to the second question raised by the NERAC subcommittee, it is our firm belief that the supply of isotopes provided by DOE for medical, industrial, and research applications must be strengthened in the near future. Many of the radioisotopes currently used for medical diagnosis and therapy of cancer and other diseases are imported from Canada, Europe, and Asia. This situation places the control of isotope availability, quality, and pricing in the hands of non-U.S. suppliers. It is our opinion that the needs of the U.S. customers for isotopes and isotope products are not being adequately served, and that the DOE infrastructure and facilities devoted to the supply of these products must be improved This perception forms one of the fundamental bases for our proposal that the FFTF, which is currently in a standby condition, be reactivated to supply nuclear services and products such as radioisotopes needed by the U.S. medical, industrial, and research communities.

  8. EM Richland Operations Office Manager Reflects on River Corridor...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    the F Reactor Area during plutonium production operations, and the larger image shows an ... Office (RL), responsible for management and oversight of cleanup of the ...

  9. 2010 Annual Planning Summary for Richland Operations Office (RL)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Annual Planning Summaries briefly describe the status of ongoing NEPA compliance activities, any EAs expected to be prepared in the next 12 months, any EISs expected to be prepared in the next 24...

  10. Richland Operations Office FY 14/15 Funding Marks

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Office FY 1415 Funding Marks PBS PBS Title FY 2014 Omnibus (Enacted) FY 2015 President's Budget FY 2015 Omnibus Allocation RL-0011 NM Stabilization and Disposition - PFP 142,670 ...

  11. DOE Recognizes EM Richland Operations Office Employees for Excellence in

    Energy Saver

    Reaches $1.9M Settlement DOE Reaches $1.9M Settlement September 30, 2013 - 3:19pm Addthis The General Counsel's enforcement office settled an enforcement action against Ningbo Hicon International Industry Company, Ltd. for $1,927,097. Ningbo Hicon is a Chinese company that manufactures consumer refrigeration products for a variety of private labelers. Ningbo Hicon agreed to the settlement after manufacturing and distributing chest freezers that consumed about 30% more energy than permitted under

  12. Fluor Federal Services, Richland, Washington, Report from the...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    ... U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Regulatory Liaison 21 conduct or conduct that ... employee presentations, employee handbooks and guides, and bulletin board postings. ...

  13. EIS-0244: Plutonium Finishing Plant Stabilization, Hanford Site, Richland, WA

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EIS evaluates the impacts on the human environment of: Stabilization of residual, plutonium-bearing materials at the PFP Facility to a form suitable for interim storage at the PFP Facility. Immobilization of residual plutonium-bearing materials at the PFP Facility. Removal of readily retrievable, plutonium-bearing materials left behind in process equipment, process areas, and air and liquid waste management systems as a result of historic uses.

  14. Richland Operations Office's Fiscal Year 2014 Fee Evaluation Summary

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Operations Office's Fiscal Year 2014 Fee Evaluation Summary Contractor: CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) Contract: Plateau Remediation Contract Contract Number: DE-AC06-08RL14788 Award Period: October 2013 through September 2014 (fiscal year 2014) Basis of Evaluation: Performance Evaluation and Measurement Plan (PEMP) Award Fee Available: $9,815,000 Award Fee Earned: $9,659,555 Award Fee Area Adjectival Ratings: Excellent (Earnings represent 98 percent of available fee) Significant

  15. Richland Operations Office's Fiscal Year 2015 Fee Evaluation Summary

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Office's Fiscal Year 2015 Fee Evaluation Summary Contractor: CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) Contract: Plateau Remediation Contract Contract Number: DE-AC06-08RL14788 Award Period: October 2014 through September 2015 (fiscal year 2015) Basis of Evaluation: Performance Evaluation and Measurement Plan (PEMP) Award Fee Available: $10,899,475 Award Fee Earned: $10,591,975 Award Fee Area Adjectival Ratings: Excellent (Earnings represent 95 percent of available fee) Significant

  16. Richland Operations Office FY 14/15 Funding Marks

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    FY 14/15 Funding Marks PBS PBS Title FY 2014 Omnibus (Enacted) FY 2015 President's Budget FY 2015 Omnibus Allocation RL-0011 NM Stabilization and Disposition - PFP 142,670 168,228 137,130 RL-0012 SNF Stabilization and Disposition 98,369 76,777 67,746 RL-0012 15-D-401 Containerized Sludge Line Item 26,290 46,055 RL-0013 Solid Waste Stabilization and Disposition - 200 Area 130,126 112,371 107,651 RL-0030 Soil and Water Remediation - Groundwater/Vadose Zone 141,500 116,916 184,929 Subtotal Central

  17. Richland Operations Office's Fiscal Year 2013 Fee Evaluation Summary

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Office's Fiscal Year 2013 Fee Evaluation Summary Contractor: CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) Contract: Plateau Remediation Contract Contract Number: DE-AC06-08RL14788 Award Period: October 2012 through September 2013 (fiscal year 2013) Basis of Evaluation: Performance Evaluation and Measurement Plan (PEMP) Award Fee Available: $14,092,235 (includes fee set aside for multi-year incentives for the Plutonium Finishing Plant project) Award Fee Earned: $4,910,099 Award Fee Area

  18. EM's Richland Operations Office Marks Milestone in Preparing its

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy Award for Role as Strong Small Businesses Advocate EM Wins Award for Role as Strong Small Businesses Advocate June 28, 2012 - 12:00pm Addthis DOE Office of Economic Impact and Diversity Director Dot Harris, left, presents the Sub-to-Prime Small Business Champion of the Year Award to EM Small Business Advocate Kay Rash, center, and EM Deputy Assistant Secretary for Acquisition and Project Management Jack Surash during DOE’s Fiscal Year 2011 DOE Secretarial Small Business Awards

  19. Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office - April 2013 |

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    | Department of Energy Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office - April 2013 Independent Activity Report, Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office - April 2013 April 2003 Operational Awareness Oversight of the Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office (PPPO) Performance of the Contractor Assurance System Program [HIAR PORTS-2012-09-24] The Office of Health, Safety and Security (HSS) shadowed PPPO's review of specific elements of the Fluor-B&W Portsmouth (FBP) CAS program at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion

  20. DOE Recognizes EM Richland Operations Office Employees for Excellence...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    ... construction with Waste Treatment and Immobilization Project Assistant Manager Bill Hamel, left; EM Acting Assistant Secretary Mark Whitney, second from left; and EM Waste ...

  1. December 15-16, 2015 - Technical Exchange Meeting - Richland...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Assurance for Performance Assessment Modeling Managing Uncertainty and Demonstrating ... Data for Radiological Impact Assessment Context and Overview Hanford Site Waste ...

  2. EIS-0189-S1: Tank Waste Remediation System, Richland, Washington

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    For this Supplement Analysis, in each of the potential impact areas for Project W-314, the proposed action was evaluated and compared to the TWRS EIS evaluation of the preferred alternative (Section 5.0). Qualitative and/or quantitative comparisons are then provided in this Supplement Analysis to support a determination on the need for additional National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis. Based on this Supplement Analysis, the potential impacts for Project W -314 would be small in comparison to and are bounded by the impacts assessed for the TWRS EIS preferred alternative, and therefore no additional NEPA analysis is required.

  3. EM's Richland Operations Office Marks Milestone in Preparing...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    The tanks are nicknamed pencil tanks due to their long, narrow shape. Removing the tanks was a major step toward preparing PFP for demolition because it reduces chemical and ...

  4. Hanford People Core (HCP) PIA, Richland Operations Office | Department...

    Energy Saver

    E-IDR (Inventory Disclosure Record) PIA, Idaho National Laboratory Occupational Medicine - Assistant PIA, Idaho National Laboratory Integrated Safety Management Workshop...

  5. Badge Request System PIA, Richland Operations Office | Department...

    Energy Saver

    Safety Management Workshop Registration, PIA, Idaho National Laboratory Occupational Medicine - Assistant PIA, Idaho National Laboratory Manchester Software 1099 Reporting PIA,...

  6. EIS-0467: Hanford Site Natural Gas Pipeline, Richland, WA

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE has postponed preparation of this EIS to better align the completion of the EIS with planned future operations of facilities on Hanford’s Central Plateau (such as Hanford’s Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant).

  7. Environmental Survey preliminary report, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1987-08-01

    This report presents the preliminary findings from the first phase of the Environmental Survey of the United States Department of Energy (DOE) Hanford Site, conducted August 18 through September 5, 1986. The Survey is being conducted by an interdisciplinary team of environmental specialists, led and managed by the Office of Environment, Safety and Health's Office of Environmental Audit. Individual team components are being supplied by a private contractor. The objective of the Survey is to identify environmental problems and areas of environmental risk associated with the Hanford Site. The Survey covers all environmental media and all areas of environmental regulation. It is being performed in accordance with the DOE Environmental Survey Manual. This phase of the Survey involves the review of existing site environmental data, observations of the operations carried on at the Hanford Site, and interviews with site personnel. The Survey team developed a Sampling and Analysis Plan to assist in further assessing certain of the environmental problems identified during its on-site activities. The Sampling and Analysis Plan will be executed by a DOE National Laboratory or a support contractor. When completed, the results will be incorporated into the Environmental Survey Interim Report for the Hanford Site. The Interim Report will reflect the final determinations of the Hanford Site Survey. 44 refs., 88 figs., 74 tabs.

  8. EM's Richland Operations Office Completes Chromium Cleanup along...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    soil from a massive waste site near Hanfords D and DR Reactors. Workers cleaned up chromium plumes at least 85-feet deep to remove the source of chromium-contaminated soil ...

  9. Richland County, Montana: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Montana: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 47.9200496, -104.8017491 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"goo...

  10. EA-1111: K Pool Fish Rearing, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposal to enter into a use permit or lease agreement with the Yakama Indian Nation or other parties who would rear fish in the 100-K Area Pools.

  11. DOE Issues Request for Information for Richland Operations Office...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Contract(s) Acquisition Planning October 15, 2015 - 2:00pm ... specialized capabilities necessary to successfully perform ... the environmental cleanup projects and Hanford Site ...

  12. Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office- June 2011

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hanford Cold Vacuum Drying Facility, Multi-Canister Overpack, Operational Proficiency Demonstration [HIAR-RL-2011-06-22

  13. EIS-0391: Hanford Tank Closure and Waste Management, Richland...

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    decommissioning of the Fast Flux Test Facility, a nuclear test reactor, and (3) disposal of Hanford's waste and other DOE sites' low-level and mixed low-level radioactive waste. ...

  14. Media Contact: Mark Heeter, DOE Richland Operations Office,...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Project locations created during World War II for the top- secret mission to beat the ... Japan, to help bring an end to the war in the Pacific, with Japan surrendering on ...

  15. FTCP Site Specific Information – Richland Operations Office

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Site Specific Information including Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Reports and TQP Self-Assessments

  16. Independent Activity Report, Richland Operations Office- January 2011

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Presentation of Questions Associated With the Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (Onsite) Multi-Canister Overpack Cask [ARPT-RL-2011-001

  17. PIA - Richland Occupational Injury and Illness | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Injury and Illness More Documents & Publications Occupational Injury & Illness System (01&15) PIA, Idaho National Laboratory PIA - Bonneville Power Adminstration Ethics Helpline

  18. Modeling and simulation of Red Teaming. Part 1, Why Red Team M&S?

    SciTech Connect

    Skroch, Michael J.

    2009-11-01

    Red teams that address complex systems have rarely taken advantage of Modeling and Simulation (M&S) in a way that reproduces most or all of a red-blue team exchange within a computer. Chess programs, starting with IBM's Deep Blue, outperform humans in that red-blue interaction, so why shouldn't we think computers can outperform traditional red teams now or in the future? This and future position papers will explore possible ways to use M&S to augment or replace traditional red teams in some situations, the features Red Team M&S should possess, how one might connect live and simulated red teams, and existing tools in this domain.

  19. The Clinical Impact of Recent Advances in LC-MS for Cancer Biomarker Discovery and Verification

    SciTech Connect

    Wang, Hui; Shi, Tujin; Qian, Weijun; Liu, Tao; Kagan, Jacob; Srivastava, Sudhir; Smith, Richard D.; Rodland, Karin D.; Camp, David G.

    2016-01-01

    Mass spectrometry-based proteomics has become an indispensable tool in biomedical research with broad applications ranging from fundamental biology, systems biology, and biomarker discovery. Recent advances in LC-MS have made it become a major technology in clinical applications, especially in cancer biomarker discovery and verification. To overcome the challenges associated with the analysis of clinical samples, such as extremely wide dynamic range of protein concentrations in biofluids and the need to perform high throughput and accurate quantification, significant efforts have been devoted to improve the overall performance of LC-MS bases clinical proteomics. In this review, we summarize the recent advances in LC-MS in the aspect of cancer biomarker discovery and quantification, and discuss its potentials, limitations, and future perspectives.

  20. Ms. Chris Andres, Chief Bureau of Federal Facilities Division of Environmental Protection

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ms. Chris Andres, Chief Bureau of Federal Facilities Division of Environmental Protection 2030 E. Flamingo Road, Suite 230 Las Vegas, NV 89119-0818 June 16,2014 PATH FORWARD: 2014 SHORT-TERM DATA ACQUISITION PLAN PROJECT SHOAL AREA, SUB SURF ACE CORRECTIVE ACTION UNIT 44 7, NEVADA Dear Ms. Andres: The U.S. Departtnent of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) is providing this Short- Term Data Acquisition Plan for the Shoal, Nevada, Site, Subsurface Corrective Action Unit 447, near

  1. Active and realistic passive marijuana exposure tested by three immunoassays and GC/MS in urine

    SciTech Connect

    Mule, S.J.; Lomax, P.; Gross, S.J.

    1988-05-01

    Human urine samples obtained before and after active and passive exposure to marijuana were analyzed by immune kits (Roche, Amersham, and Syva) and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Seven of eight subjects were positive for the entire five-day test period with one immune kit. The latter correlated with GC/MS in 98% of the samples. Passive inhalation experiments under conditions likely to reflect realistic exposure resulted consistently in less than 10 ng/mL of cannabinoids. The 10-100-ng/mL cannabinoid concentration range essential for detection of occasional and moderate marijuana users is thus unaffected by realistic passive inhalation.

  2. Improving Alpha Spectrometry Energy Resolution by Ion Implantation with ICP-MS

    SciTech Connect

    Dion, Michael P.; Liezers, Martin; Farmer, Orville T.; Miller, Brian W.; Morley, Shannon M.; Barinaga, Charles J.; Eiden, Gregory C.

    2015-01-01

    We report results of a novel technique using an Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer (ICP-MS) as a method of source preparation for alpha spectrometry. This method produced thin, contaminant free 241Am samples which yielded extraordinary energy resolution which appear to be at the lower limit of the detection technology used in this research.

  3. Dear Ms

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    31, 2012 Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy Dear Mr. Cohen, Unfortunately we missed the dead line for the first set of comments regarding regulatory burden. We've searched the web at http://www.regulations.gov for any comments from the first round due on January 5, 2012 and could not find any. The situation we described last year (see below) has not improved. We are waiting for additional rules from DOE but don't believe they'll provide the needed relief from regulatory burden.

  4. Dear Ms

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    oral, as well as written. The main purpose of these discussions is to notify [insert name of offeror] of deficiencies and weaknesses in its proposal, as well as other aspects of its proposal that could be altered or explained. These deficiencies, weaknesses and other aspects of the proposal that could be altered or explained are specified in Attachment 1. [insert name of offeror] is requested to meet with the DOE SEB on [insert date] , beginning at [insert time] in [insert location] to discuss

  5. Dear Ms

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    in writing. The main purpose of these discussions is to notify [insert name of offeror] of deficiencies and weaknesses in its proposal, as well as other aspects of its proposal that could be altered or explained. These deficiencies, weaknesses and other aspects of the proposal that could be altered or explained are specified in Attachment 1. [insert name of offeror] should address each issue identified in Attachment 1 thoroughly in a written response to DOE. Your response is required no later

  6. An enhanced droplet-based liquid microjunction surface sampling system coupled with HPLC-ESI-MS/MS for spatially resolved analysis

    DOE PAGES [OSTI]

    Van Berkel, Gary J.; Weiskittel, Taylor M.; Kertesz, Vilmos

    2014-11-07

    Droplet-based liquid microjunction surface sampling coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-electrospray ionization (ESI)-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) for spatially resolved analysis provides the possibility of effective analysis of complex matrix samples and can provide a greater degree of chemical information from a single spot sample than is typically possible with a direct analysis of an extract. Described here is the setup and enhanced capabilities of a discrete droplet liquid microjunction surface sampling system employing a commercially available CTC PAL autosampler. The system enhancements include incorporation of a laser distance sensor enabling unattended analysis of samples and sample locations of dramatically disparatemore » height as well as reliably dispensing just 0.5 μL of extraction solvent to make the liquid junction to the surface, wherein the extraction spot size was confined to an area about 0.7 mm in diameter; software modifications improving the spatial resolution of sampling spot selection from 1.0 to 0.1 mm; use of an open bed tray system to accommodate samples as large as whole-body rat thin tissue sections; and custom sample/solvent holders that shorten sampling time to approximately 1 min per sample. Lastly, the merit of these new features was demonstrated by spatially resolved sampling, HPLC separation, and mass spectral detection of pharmaceuticals and metabolites from whole-body rat thin tissue sections and razor blade (“crude”) cut mouse tissue.« less

  7. Response Model for Kodak Biomax-MS Film to X Rays

    SciTech Connect

    Knauer, J.P.; Marshall, F.J.; Yaakobi, B.; Anderson, D.; Schmitt, B.A.; Chandler, K.M.; Pikuz, S.A.; Shelkovenko, T.A.; Mitchell, M.D.; Hammer, D.A.

    2007-01-24

    X-raysensitive film is used for a variety of imaging and spectroscopic diagnostics for high-temperature plasmas. New film becomes available as older films are phased out of production. Biomax-MS is a T-grain class of film that is proposed as a replacement for Kodak DEF film. A model of its response to x rays is presented. Data from dimensional measurements of the film, x-ray transmission measurements, SEM micrograph images, and x-ray calibration are used to develop this sensitivity model of Biomax-MS film as a function of x-ray energy and angle of incidence. Relative response data provide a check of the applicability of this model to determine the x-ray flux from spectrum data. This detailed film characterization starts with simple mathematical models and extends them to T-grain type film.

  8. Response model for Kodak Biomax-MS film to x rays

    SciTech Connect

    Knauer, J. P.; Marshall, F. J.; Yaakobi, B.; Anderson, D.; Schmitt, B. A.; Chandler, K. M.; Pikuz, S. A.; Shelkovenko, T. A.; Mitchell, M. D.; Hammer, D. A.

    2006-10-15

    X-ray-sensitive film is used for a variety of imaging and spectroscopic diagnostics for high-temperature plasmas. Replacement film must be found as older films are phased out of production. Biomax-MS is a 'T-grain' class of film that is proposed as a replacement for Kodak DEF and a model of its response to x rays is presented. Data from dimensional measurements of the film, x-ray transmission measurements, scanning electron microscopy micrograph images, and x-ray calibration are used to develop this sensitivity model of Biomax-MS film as a function of x-ray energy and angle of incidence. Relative response data provide a check of the applicability of this model to determine the x-ray flux from spectrum data. This detailed film characterization starts with simple mathematical models and extends them to T-grain-type film.

  9. Cyclotron Institute, MS-3366 Texas A&M University College Station,

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Institute, MS-3366 Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843-3366 tel: (979)845-1411, email: mio@comp.tamu.edu Saskia Mioduszewski curriculum vitae Education and Honors * APS Maria Goeppert Mayer Award, 2009. * Sloan Fellowship Award, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, 2006. * Sambamurti Award, Brookhaven National Laboratory, 2005. * Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers, U.S. Department of Energy, 2004. * Ph.D., Experimental Nuclear Physics, University of Tennessee,

  10. Ms Van T Nguyen | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)

    Office of Science (SC)

    Van T Nguyen Scientific User Facilities (SUF) Division SUF Home About Staff Dr. James B. Murphy What's New User Facilities Projects Accelerator & Detector Research Science Highlights Principal Investigators' Meetings BES Home Staff Ms. Van T Nguyen Print Text Size: A A A FeedbackShare Page Van T. Nguyen Program Manager Facility Coordination, Metrics, and Assessment Office of Basic Energy Sciences SC-22.3/Germantown Building U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington,

  11. To: Ms. Brenda Edwards U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies Program

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    8, 2011 To: Ms. Brenda Edwards U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies Program Mailstop EE-2J, 1000 Independence Avenue Washington, DC 20585-0121 Phone: (202) 586-2945 cc: Michelle Blaise (VP, ComEd Engineering & Project Management) Joseph Watson (Director, Federal Government Affairs) Martin Rave (Prin Engineer, ComEd Distribution Standards) From: Peter Tyschenko (Manager, ComEd Distribution Standards) Two Lincoln Centre Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181-4260 Phone: (630) 576-6998 Subject:

  12. Evaluation of ultra-low background materials for uranium and thorium using ICP-MS

    SciTech Connect

    Hoppe, E. W.; Overman, N. R.; LaFerriere, B. D.

    2013-08-08

    An increasing number of physics experiments require low background materials for their construction. The presence of Uranium and Thorium and their progeny in these materials present a variety of unwanted background sources for these experiments. The sensitivity of the experiments continues to drive the necessary levels of detection ever lower as well. This requirement for greater sensitivity has rendered direct radioassay impractical in many cases requiring large quantities of material, frequently many kilograms, and prolonged counting times, often months. Other assay techniques have been employed such as Neutron Activation Analysis but this requires access to expensive facilities and instrumentation and can be further complicated and delayed by the formation of unwanted radionuclides. Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) is a useful tool and recent advancements have increased the sensitivity particularly in the elemental high mass range of U and Th. Unlike direct radioassay, ICP-MS is a destructive technique since it requires the sample to be in liquid form which is aspirated into a high temperature plasma. But it benefits in that it usually requires a very small sample, typically about a gram. This paper discusses how a variety of low background materials such as copper, polymers, and fused silica are made amenable to ICP-MS assay and how the arduous task of maintaining low backgrounds of U and Th is achieved.

  13. Evaluation of Ultra-Low Background Materials for Uranium and Thorium Using ICP-MS

    SciTech Connect

    Hoppe, Eric W.; Overman, Nicole R.; LaFerriere, Brian D.

    2013-08-08

    An increasing number of physics experiments require low background materials for their construction. The presence of Uranium and Thorium and their progeny in these materials present a variety of unwanted background sources for these experiments. The sensitivity of the experiments continues to drive the necessary levels of detection ever lower as well. This requirement for greater sensitivity has rendered direct radioassay impractical in many cases requiring large quantities of material, frequently many kilograms, and prolonged counting times, often months. Other assay techniques have been employed such as Neutron Activation Analysis but this requires access to expensive facilities and instrumentation and can be further complicated and delayed by the formation of unwanted radionuclides. Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) is a useful tool and recent advancements have increased the sensitivity particularly in the elemental high mass range of U and Th. Unlike direct radioassay, ICP-MS is a destructive technique since it requires the sample to be in liquid form which is aspirated into a high temperature plasma. But it benefits in that it usually requires a very small sample, typically about a gram. Here we will discuss how a variety of low background materials such as copper, polymers, and fused silica are made amenable to ICP-MS assay and how the arduous task of maintaining low backgrounds of U and Th is achieved.

  14. Fingerprinting of ground water by ICP-MS; Progress report, July 1, 1991--December 31, 1991

    SciTech Connect

    Stetzenbach, K.

    1991-12-31

    The purpose of this project is to investigate the use of minor constituents of ground water and vadose zone water such as the rare earths and some lighter elements, to delineate ground water flow paths and recharge zones in the Yucca Mountain area. The major piece of equipment required to perform this task is an inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer (ICP-MS). This instrument has been purchased and should be delivered in February 1992. During this reporting period, three ICP-MS systems were evaluated the Perkin-Elmer Elan 5000 was chosen. As part of the evaluation process, samples of J-13 water and tuff were prepared and analyzed by each of the competing companies. This gave us the opportunity to make initial observations as to the number of compounds and their concentrations present in the J-13 samples. Table 1 lists the results of the analysis of J-13 water. Once the ICP-MS is operational, we will be collecting and analyzing waters from existing wells, springs, and seeps to determine which of these minor chemical constituents will be most helpful in establishing chemical signatures for the ground waters beneath Yucca Mountain.

  15. Sources of Technical Variability in Quantitative LC-MS Proteomics: Human Brain Tissue Sample Analysis.

    SciTech Connect

    Piehowski, Paul D.; Petyuk, Vladislav A.; Orton, Daniel J.; Xie, Fang; Moore, Ronald J.; Ramirez Restrepo, Manuel; Engel, Anzhelika; Lieberman, Andrew P.; Albin, Roger L.; Camp, David G.; Smith, Richard D.; Myers, Amanda J.

    2013-05-03

    To design a robust quantitative proteomics study, an understanding of both the inherent heterogeneity of the biological samples being studied as well as the technical variability of the proteomics methods and platform is needed. Additionally, accurately identifying the technical steps associated with the largest variability would provide valuable information for the improvement and design of future processing pipelines. We present an experimental strategy that allows for a detailed examination of the variability of the quantitative LC-MS proteomics measurements. By replicating analyses at different stages of processing, various technical components can be estimated and their individual contribution to technical variability can be dissected. This design can be easily adapted to other quantitative proteomics pipelines. Herein, we applied this methodology to our label-free workflow for the processing of human brain tissue. For this application, the pipeline was divided into four critical components: Tissue dissection and homogenization (extraction), protein denaturation followed by trypsin digestion and SPE clean-up (digestion), short-term run-to-run instrumental response fluctuation (instrumental variance), and long-term drift of the quantitative response of the LC-MS/MS platform over the 2 week period of continuous analysis (instrumental stability). From this analysis, we found the following contributions to variability: extraction (72%) >> instrumental variance (16%) > instrumental stability (8.4%) > digestion (3.1%). Furthermore, the stability of the platform and its suitability for discovery proteomics studies is demonstrated.

  16. Microsoft Word - 2012O-01.doc

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    1 Subject: PW 1,3,6 and CW-5 February 10, 2012 Page 1 February 10, 2012 Matt McCormick, Manager U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations P.O. Box 550 (A7-50) Richland, WA 99352 Dennis Faulk, Manager U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 309 Bradley Blvd,, Suite 115 Richland WA 99352 Jane Hedges, Program Manager Washington State Department of Ecology 3100 Port of Benton Blvd. Richland, WA 99354 Re: PW 1,3,6 and CW-5 Record of Decision Dear Messrs. McCormick, Faulk and Ms. Hedges,

  17. Ion mobility spectrometry–mass spectrometry (IMS–MS) for on- and offline analysis of atmospheric gas and aerosol species

    DOE PAGES [OSTI]

    Krechmer, Jordan E.; Groessl, Michael; Zhang, Xuan; Junninen, Heikki; Massoli, Paola; Lambe, Andrew T.; Kimmel, Joel R.; Cubison, Michael J.; Graf, Stephan; Lin, Ying-Hsuan; et al

    2016-07-25

    Measurement techniques that provide molecular-level information are needed to elucidate the multiphase processes that produce secondary organic aerosol (SOA) species in the atmosphere. Here we demonstrate the application of ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry (IMS–MS) to the simultaneous characterization of the elemental composition and molecular structures of organic species in the gas and particulate phases. Molecular ions of gas-phase organic species are measured online with IMS–MS after ionization with a custom-built nitrate chemical ionization (CI) source. This CI–IMS–MS technique is used to obtain time-resolved measurements (5 min) of highly oxidized organic molecules during the 2013 Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS) ambientmore » field campaign in the forested SE US. The ambient IMS–MS signals are consistent with laboratory IMS–MS spectra obtained from single-component carboxylic acids and multicomponent mixtures of isoprene and monoterpene oxidation products. Mass-mobility correlations in the 2-D IMS–MS space provide a means of identifying ions with similar molecular structures within complex mass spectra and are used to separate and identify monoterpene oxidation products in the ambient data that are produced from different chemical pathways. Water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) constituents of fine aerosol particles that are not resolvable with standard analytical separation methods, such as liquid chromatography (LC), are shown to be separable with IMS–MS coupled to an electrospray ionization (ESI) source. The capability to use ion mobility to differentiate between isomers is demonstrated for organosulfates derived from the reactive uptake of isomers of isoprene epoxydiols (IEPOX) onto wet acidic sulfate aerosol. Controlled fragmentation of precursor ions by collisionally induced dissociation (CID) in the transfer region between the IMS and the MS is used to validate MS peak assignments, elucidate structures of

  18. Toward Joint Hypothesis-Tests Seismic Event Screening Analysis: Ms|mb and Event Depth

    SciTech Connect

    Anderson, Dale; Selby, Neil

    2012-08-14

    Well established theory can be used to combine single-phenomenology hypothesis tests into a multi-phenomenology event screening hypothesis test (Fisher's and Tippett's tests). Commonly used standard error in Ms:mb event screening hypothesis test is not fully consistent with physical basis. Improved standard error - Better agreement with physical basis, and correctly partitions error to include Model Error as a component of variance, correctly reduces station noise variance through network averaging. For 2009 DPRK test - Commonly used standard error 'rejects' H0 even with better scaling slope ({beta} = 1, Selby et al.), improved standard error 'fails to rejects' H0.

  19. WILLIAM C. LOUIS Los Alamos National Laboratory M.S. H846 Los

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    WILLIAM C. LOUIS Los Alamos National Laboratory M.S. H846 Los Alamos, NM 87545 louis@lanl.gov, 505/667-6723 EMPLOYMENT Technical Staff Member, Los Alamos National Laboratory, P-Division, 1987-present Assistant Professor, Princeton University, 1981-1987 Research Associate, Rutherford Laboratory, 1978-1981 POSITIONS LANL Program Manager for Nuclear Physics, 2004-2009 Co-Spokesperson of the BooNE Neutrino Experiment at Fermilab, 1998-2007 Spokesperson of the LSND Neutrino Experiment at Los Alamos,

  20. Recent advances in the speciation of selenium in petroleum refinery and municipal waste using ICP-MS and ICP-MS coupled with liquid chromatography

    SciTech Connect

    Roehl, R.

    1996-09-01

    An analytical scheme for the speciation of selenium in petroleum refinery waste waters reported at the 1994 Winter Plasma Conference included methods for the determination of total, dissolved, particulate and volatile selenium, as well as for the separate quantitation of dissolved selenite, selenate and selenocyanate. Several of those methods have been improved significantly. Determinations of total, dissolved, and particulate selenium are based on the ICP-MS quantitation of the {sup 82}Se isotope in waste water samples or sample fractions digested with hydrogen peroxide and nitric acid. These analyses now include corrections for potential isobaric interferences are minimized by monitoring the signals for Br{sup +} and m/z 79 and SO{sub 3}H{sup +} at m/z 83 and correcting the apparent {sup 82}Se{sup +} signal using appropriate equations with correction factors derived from the analysis of calibration solutions containing sulfate and bromide. The correction factors used in those equations relate ionic species of different composition to each other (e.g., Br{sup +} and HBr{sup +}). To help ensure that the relative rate of formation of those ions in the plasma is not sample dependent, high concentrations of sodium and other easily ionized elements are removed from the sample digests by cation-exchange.

  1. Market Research Survey of Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Portable MS Systems for IAEA Safeguards Applications

    SciTech Connect

    Hart, Garret L.; Hager, George J.; Barinaga, Charles J.; Duckworth, Douglas C.

    2013-02-01

    This report summarizes the results for the market research survey of mass spectrometers that are deemed pertinent to International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) needs and strategic objectives. The focus of the report is on MS instruments that represent currently available (or soon to be) commercial off-the shelf (COTS) technology and weigh less than 400 pounds. A compilation of all available MS instruments (36 COTS and 2 R&D) is presented, along with pertinent information regarding each instrument.

  2. Characterization of CMPO and its radiolysis products by Direct Infusion ESI-MS

    SciTech Connect

    G. S. Groenewold; G. Elias; B. J. Mincher; S. P. Mezyk

    2012-09-01

    Direct infusion electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) approaches were developed for rapid identification of octyl,phenyl,(N,N-(diisobutyl)carbamoylmethyl) phosphine oxide (CMPO) and impurity compounds formed during alpha and gamma irradiation experiments. CMPO is an aggressive Lewis base, and produces extremely abundant metal complex ions in the ESI-MS analysis that make identification of low abundance compounds that are less nucleophilic challenging. Radiolysis products were identified using several approaches including restricting ion trapping so as to exclude the abundant natiated CMPO ions, extraction of acidic products using aqueous NaOH, and extraction of basic products using HNO3. These approaches generated protonated, natiated and deprotonated species derived from CMPO degradation products formed via radiolytic cleavages of several different bonds. Cleavages of the amide and methylene-phosphoryl bonds appear to be favored by both forms of irradiation, while alpha irradiation also appears to induce cleavage of the methylene-carbonyl bond. The degradation products observed are formed from recombination of the initially formed radicals with hydrogen, methyl, isopropyl and hydroxyl radicals that are derived either from CMPO, or the dodecane solvent.

  3. Reduction of Solvent Effect in Reverse Phase Gradient Elution LC-ICP-MS

    SciTech Connect

    Sullivan, Patrick Allen

    2005-12-17

    Quantification in liquid chromatography (LC) is becoming very important as more researchers are using LC, not as an analytical tool itself, but as a sample introduction system for other analytical instruments. The ability of LC instrumentation to quickly separate a wide variety of compounds makes it ideal for analysis of complex mixtures. For elemental speciation, LC is joined with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to separate and detect metal-containing, organic compounds in complex mixtures, such as biological samples. Often, the solvent gradients required to perform complex separations will cause matrix effects within the plasma. This limits the sensitivity of the ICP-MS and the quantification methods available for use in such analyses. Traditionally, isotope dilution has been the method of choice for LC-ICP-MS quantification. The use of naturally abundant isotopes of a single element in quantification corrects for most of the effects that LC solvent gradients produce within the plasma. However, not all elements of interest in speciation studies have multiple naturally occurring isotopes; and polyatomic interferences for a given isotope can develop within the plasma, depending on the solvent matrix. This is the case for reverse phase LC separations, where increasing amounts of organic solvent are required. For such separations, an alternative to isotope dilution for quantification would be is needed. To this end, a new method was developed using the Apex-Q desolvation system (ESI, Omaha, NE) to couple LC instrumentation with an ICP-MS device. The desolvation power of the system allowed greater concentrations of methanol to be introduced to the plasma prior to destabilization than with direct methanol injection into the plasma. Studies were performed, using simulated and actual linear methanol gradients, to find analyte-internal standard (AIS) pairs whose ratio remains consistent (deviations {+-} 10%) over methanol concentration ranges of 5

  4. WBU-13-0003- In the Matter of Cassondra B. Stark

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    On March 27, 2013, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision granting in part and denying in part Ms. Starks’s Appeal of the DOE’s Richland Operations Office’s (RL) Employee...

  5. http://www.hanford.gov/boards/hab/response/092a.htm

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    99352 99-OEA-105 Advice 92 From: Lloyd Piper for Keith Klein Ms. Merilyn Reeves, Chair Hanford Advisory Board 723 The Parkway, Suite 200: B1 -41 Richland, Washington 99352 May...

  6. Dorothy Riehle FOIA Office U.S. Department of Energy P. O. Box...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    6, 2012 Dorothy Riehle FOIA Office U.S. Department of Energy P. O. Box 550 Richland, WA 99352 Re: FOIA Request Dear Ms. Riehle: Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (5...

  7. Dorothy Riehle FOIA Office U.S. Department of Energy P. O. Box...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    4, 2013 Dorothy Riehle FOIA Office U.S. Department of Energy P. O. Box 550 Richland, WA 99352 Re: FOIA RequestTWINS database Dear Ms. Riehle: Pursuant to the Freedom of...

  8. Microsoft Word - 2009 06.22 FOIA for PERS.docx

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    2, 2009 Dorothy Riehle FOIA Office U.S. Department of Energy P. O. Box 550 Richland, WA 99352 Re: FOIA Request - PERS Dear Ms. Riehle: Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (5...

  9. Dorothy Riehle FOIA Office U.S. Department of Energy P. O. Box...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    December 1, 2014 Dorothy Riehle FOIA Office U.S. Department of Energy P. O. Box 550 Richland, WA 99352 Re: FOIA Request Dear Ms. Riehle: Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act...

  10. April S,

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    April S, 2012 Dorothy Riehle FOIA Office U.S. Department of Energy P. O. Box 550 Richland, WA 99352 Re: FOIA RequestlEnvironmentallogbooks Dear Ms. Riehle: Pursuant to the Freedom...

  11. Dorothy Riehle FOIA Office U.S. Department of Energy P. O. Box...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    8, 2014 Dorothy Riehle FOIA Office U.S. Department of Energy P. O. Box 550 Richland, WA 99352 Re: FOIA RequestWaste Treatment Plant Dear Ms. Riehle: Pursuant to the Freedom of...

  12. Application of Printed Circuit Board Technology to FT-ICR MS Analyzer Cell Construction and Prototyping

    SciTech Connect

    Leach, Franklin E.; Norheim, Randolph V.; Anderson, Gordon A.; Pasa-Tolic, Ljiljana

    2014-12-01

    Although Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICRMS) remains themass spectrometry platform that provides the highest levels of performance for mass accuracy and resolving power, there is room for improvement in analyzer cell design as the ideal quadrupolar trapping potential has yet to be generated for a broadband MS experiment. To this end, analyzer cell designs have improved since the field’s inception, yet few research groups participate in this area because of the high cost of instrumentation efforts. As a step towards reducing this barrier to participation and allowing for more designs to be physically tested, we introduce a method of FT-ICR analyzer cell prototyping utilizing printed circuit boards at modest vacuum conditions. This method allows for inexpensive devices to be readily fabricated and tested over short intervals and should open the field to laboratories lacking or unable to access high performance machine shop facilities because of the required financial investment.

  13. Evaluation of chelation preconcentration for the determination of actinide elements by flow injection ICP-MS

    SciTech Connect

    Evans, E.H.; Truscott, J.B.; Bromley, L.; Jones, P.; Turner, J.; Fairman, B.E.

    1998-12-31

    A chelation column preconcentration method has been developed for the determination of uranium and thorium in waters by ICP-MS. Detection limits of 24 pg and 60 pg respectively were obtained, but these were blank limited. Uranium and Thorium were determined in certified reference materials. Results for uranium were 121 {+-} 21 and 15 {+-} 3 ng/g in NIST 1566a and NIST 1575 compared with certified values of 132 {+-} 12 and 20 {+-} 4 ng/g respectively. Results for thorium were 29 {+-} 8 and 28 {+-} 5 ng/g in NIST 1566a and NIST 1575 compared with indicative and certified values of 40 and 37 {+-} 3 ng/g respectively. The on-line separation of actinide radionuclides was achieved by selective elution of U, Th, Pu, Np, and Am.

  14. Pentaerythritol Tetranitrate (PETN) Surveillance by HPLC-MS: Instrumental Parameters Development

    SciTech Connect

    Harvey, C A; Meissner, R

    2005-11-04

    Surveillance of PETN Homologs in the stockpile here at LLNL is currently carried out by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultra violet (UV) detection. Identification of unknown chromatographic peaks with this detection scheme is severely limited. The design agency is aware of the limitations of this methodology and ordered this study to develop instrumental parameters for the use of a currently owned mass spectrometer (MS) as the detection system. The resulting procedure would be a ''drop-in'' replacement for the current surveillance method (ERD04-524). The addition of quadrupole mass spectrometry provides qualitative identification of PETN and its homologs (Petrin, DiPEHN, TriPEON, and TetraPEDN) using a LLNL generated database, while providing mass clues to the identity of unknown chromatographic peaks.

  15. Elemental speciation in biomolecules by LC-ICP-MS with magnetic sector and collision cell instruments

    SciTech Connect

    Wang, Jin

    1999-11-08

    A methodology that can monitor and identify inorganic elements in biological and environmental systems was developed. Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) separates biomolecules, which are then nebulized by a microconcentric nebulizer. The resulting aerosol is desolved and introduced into either a high resolution ICP-MS device or a quadrupole device with a collision cell. Because of the high sensitivity and spectral resolution and high sample introduction efficiency, many unusual or difficult elements, such as Cr, Se, Cd and U, can be observed at ambient levels bound to proteins in human serum. These measurements are made in only a few minutes without preliminary isolation and preconcentration steps. Serum samples can be titrated with spikes of various elements to determine which proteins bind a given metal and oxidation state. Experiments concerning the effects of breaking disulfide linkages and denaturation on metal binding in proteins were also investigated. Elemental distribution in liver extract was also obtained.

  16. Mass Spectrometry Data from the Biological MS Data and Software Distribution Center

    DOE Data Explorer

    Anderson, Gordon

    The mass spectrometry capabilities at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) are primarily applied to biological research, with an emphasis on proteomics and metabolomics. Many of these cutting-edge mass spectrometry capabilities and bioinformatics methods are housed in the Department of Energy's Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL), a national scientific user facility operated by PNNL. These capabilities have been developed and acquired through cooperation between the EMSL national scientific user program and PNNL programmatic research. At the website of the Biological MS Data and Software Distribution Center, the following resources are made available: PNNL-developed software tools and source code, PNNL-generated raw data and processed results, links to publications that used the data and results available on this site, and tutorials and user manuals. [taken from http://omics.pnl.gov/

  17. Studies on the content of heavy metals in Aries River using ICP-MS

    SciTech Connect

    Voica, Cezara Kovacs, Melinda Feher, Ioana

    2013-11-13

    Among the industrial branches, the mining industry has always been an important source of environmental pollution, both aesthetically and chemically. Through this paper results of ICP-MS characterization of Aries River Basin are reported. Mining activities from this area has resulted in contamination of environment and its surrounding biota. This is clearly evidenced in analyzed water samples, especially from Baia de Aries site where increased amount of trace elements as Cr, Zn, As, Se, Cd, Pb and U were founded. Also in this site greater amount of rare earth elements was evidenced also. Through monitoring of Aries River from other non-mining area it was observed that the quantitative content of heavy metals was below the maximum permissible levels which made us to conclude that the water table wasn't seriously affected (which possibly might be attributed to the cessation of mining activities in this area from a few years ago)

  18. Fingerprinting of ground water by ICP-MS. Progress report, January 1, 1995--March 31, 1995

    SciTech Connect

    Stetzenbach, K.

    1995-05-01

    This report contains the results of the chemical analysis of water from springs in Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada. Each spring was sampled two to five times between July, 1992 and March, 1994. Samples were collected and analyzed by the Harry Reid Center for Environmental Studies (HRC) Environmental/Analytical Laboratory, at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Chemical analyses included major cations and anions and trace elements. The analyses for the major anions were performed by atomic absorption (AA) spectrophotometry, the anions by ion chromatography (IC) and the trace elements by inductively coupled plasma - mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The standard operating procedures (SOP) used for each method are included. The concentrations of the analytes range from the part per million (ppm) levels for the major cations and anions to the sub part per trillion (ppt) levels for a number of the trace elements. Approximately nine orders of magnitude are covered from the highest to the lowest concentrations. The formation of molecular species in the ICP-MS, plasma produces false positives for a number of elements. None of the elements reported here, that the HRC is aware of, are subject to these isobaric interferences, with the exception of europium (Eu). Europium values are reported for samplings four and five where the HRC used an extraction procedure that extracted Eu but not barium (Ba), whose oxides cause the interference. In order to overcome matrix effects in the samples from high concentrations of cations and other elements, the method of standard additions was instituted for the analysis of samplings four and five as an alternative to external standardization. It is believed that these data, and those for the Death Valley Spring reported in January, 1995 are the first efforts at such a comprehensive trace element analysis of ground waters. HRC has had to develop, test, and refine sampling and analysis procedures throughout the course of this study.

  19. Profiling of Adrenocorticotropic Hormone and Arginine Vasopressin in Human Pituitary Gland and Tumor Thin Tissue Sections using Droplet-Based Liquid Microjunction Surface Sampling-HPLC-ESI-MS/MS

    SciTech Connect

    Kertesz, Vilmos; Van Berkel, Gary J; Calligaris, David; Feldman, Daniel R; Changelian, Armen; Laws, Edward R; Santagata, Sandro; Agar, Nathalie YR

    2015-01-01

    Described here are the results from the profiling of the proteins arginine vasopressin (AVP) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) from normal human pituitary gland and pituitary adenoma tissue sections using a fully automated droplet-based liquid microjunction surface sampling-HPLC-ESI-MS/MS system for spatially resolved sampling, HPLC separation, and mass spectral detection. Excellent correlation was found between the protein distribution data obtained with this droplet-based liquid microjunction surface sampling-HPLC-ESI-MS/MS system and those data obtained with matrix assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) chemical imaging analyses of serial sections of the same tissue. The protein distributions correlated with the visible anatomic pattern of the pituitary gland. AVP was most abundant in the posterior pituitary gland region (neurohypophysis) and ATCH was dominant in the anterior pituitary gland region (adenohypophysis). The relative amounts of AVP and ACTH sampled from a series of ACTH secreting and non-secreting pituitary adenomas correlated with histopathological evaluation. ACTH was readily detected at significantly higher levels in regions of ACTH secreting adenomas and in normal anterior adenohypophysis compared to non-secreting adenoma and neurohypophysis. AVP was mostly detected in normal neurohypophysis as anticipated. This work demonstrates that a fully automated droplet-based liquid microjunction surface sampling system coupled to HPLC-ESI-MS/MS can be readily used for spatially resolved sampling, separation, detection, and semi-quantitation of physiologically-relevant peptide and protein hormones, such as AVP and ACTH, directly from human tissue. In addition, the relative simplicity, rapidity and specificity of the current methodology support the potential of this basic technology with further advancement for assisting surgical decision-making.

  20. http://www.hanford.gov/boards/hab/response/089.htm

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    9 From: Karen Randolph Ms. Merilyn Reeves, Chair Hanford Advisory Board 723 The Parkway, Suite 200 Richland, Washington 99352 January 14, 1999 Dear Ms. Reeves: This letter is in response to your Hanford Advisory Board letter of advice regarding openness at Hanford, Advice Letter #89 to John Wagoner, RL Manager, and Ralph Lightner, DOE Headquarters, dated December 4, 1998. We appreciate your support for the Hanford Openness Workshops' (HOW) recommendations to the DOE Richland Operations Office

  1. A comparison of the y-Radiolysis of TODGA and T(EH)DGA using UHPLC-ESI-MS analysis

    DOE PAGES [OSTI]

    Zarzana, Christopher A.; Groenewold, Gary S.; Mincher, Bruce J.; Mezyk, Stephen P.; Wilden, Andreas; Schmidt, Holger; Modolo, Giuseppe; Wishart, James F.; Cook, Andrew R.

    2015-04-27

    Solutions of the diglycolamide extractants TODGA and T(EH)DGA in n-dodecane were subjected to γ- irradiation in the presence and absence of an acidic aqueous phase. These solutions were then analyzed using UHPLC-ESI-MS to determine the rates of radiolytic decay of the two extractants neat and in contact with respect to the acidity of the contacted aqueous phase, as well as to identify radiolysis products. The presence or absence of an acidic aqueous phase was shown to have no influence on the measured decay rates, nor did the side-chain have an influence. A number of radiolysis products were identified, consistent with thosemore » previously identified for these two compounds using GC-MS. The identity of these radiolysis products suggests that the bonds most vulnerable to radiolytic attack are those in the dyglycolamide center of these molecules, and not on the side-chains.  The agreement of these results with previous work using GC-MS indicates supports the further use of UHPLC-ESI-MS as a tool for studying diglycolamide extractant systems.« less

  2. A comparison of the y-Radiolysis of TODGA and T(EH)DGA using UHPLC-ESI-MS analysis

    SciTech Connect

    Zarzana, Christopher A.; Groenewold, Gary S.; Mincher, Bruce J.; Mezyk, Stephen P.; Wilden, Andreas; Schmidt, Holger; Modolo, Giuseppe; Wishart, James F.; Cook, Andrew R.

    2015-04-27

    Solutions of the diglycolamide extractants TODGA and T(EH)DGA in n-dodecane were subjected to γ- irradiation in the presence and absence of an acidic aqueous phase. These solutions were then analyzed using UHPLC-ESI-MS to determine the rates of radiolytic decay of the two extractants neat and in contact with respect to the acidity of the contacted aqueous phase, as well as to identify radiolysis products. The presence or absence of an acidic aqueous phase was shown to have no influence on the measured decay rates, nor did the side-chain have an influence. A number of radiolysis products were identified, consistent with those previously identified for these two compounds using GC-MS. The identity of these radiolysis products suggests that the bonds most vulnerable to radiolytic attack are those in the dyglycolamide center of these molecules, and not on the side-chains.  The agreement of these results with previous work using GC-MS indicates supports the further use of UHPLC-ESI-MS as a tool for studying diglycolamide extractant systems.

  3. A comparison of the y-Radiolysis of TODGA and T(EH)DGA using UHPLC-ESI-MS analysis

    SciTech Connect

    Zarzana, Christopher A.; Groenewold, Gary S.; Mincher, Bruce J.; Mezyk, Stephen P.; Wilden, Andreas; Schmidt, Holger; Modolo, Giuseppe; Wishart, James F.; Cook, Andrew R.

    2015-04-27

    Solutions of the diglycolamide extractants TODGA and T(EH)DGA in n-dodecane were subjected to?- irradiation in the presence and absence of an acidic aqueous phase. These solutions were then analyzed using UHPLC-ESI-MS to determine the rates of radiolytic decay of the two extractants neat and in contact with respect to the acidity of the contacted aqueous phase, as well as to identify radiolysis products. The presence or absence of an acidic aqueous phase was shown to have no influence on the measured decay rates, nor did the side-chain have an influence. A number of radiolysis products were identified, consistent with those previously identified for these two compounds using GC-MS. The identity of these radiolysis products suggests that the bonds most vulnerable to radiolytic attack are those in the dyglycolamide center of these molecules, and not on the side-chains.The agreement of these results with previous work using GC-MS indicates supports the further use of UHPLC-ESI-MS as a tool for studying diglycolamide extractant systems.

  4. Characterization of Fatty Acids in Crenarchaeota by GC-MS and NMR

    DOE PAGES [OSTI]

    Hamerly, Timothy; Tripet, Brian; Wurch, Louie; Hettich, Robert L.; Podar, Mircea; Bothner, Brian; Copié, Valérie

    2015-01-01

    Lipids composed of condensed isoprenyl units connected to glycerol backbones by ether linkages are a distinguishing feature of Archaea. Data suggesting that fatty acids with linear hydrocarbon chains are present in some Archaea have been available for decades. However, lack of genomic and biochemical evidence for the metabolic machinery required to synthesize and degrade fatty acids has left the field unclear on this potentially significant biochemical aspect. Because lipids are energy currency and cell signaling molecules, their presence in Archaea is significant for understanding archaeal biology. A recent large-scale bioinformatics analysis reignited the debate as to the importance ofmore » fatty acids in Archaea by presenting genetic evidence for the presence of enzymes required for anabolic and catabolic fatty acid metabolism across the archaeal domain. Here, we present direct biochemical evidence from gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy for the presence of fatty acids in two members of the Crenarchaeota, Sulfolobus solfataricus and Ignicoccus hospitalis . This is the first report providing biochemical data for the existence of fatty acids in these Crenarchaeota, opening new discussions on energy balance and the potential for the discovery of new thermostable enzymes for industry.« less

  5. Surface Cleaning Techniques: Ultra-Trace ICP-MS Sample Preparation and Assay of HDPE

    SciTech Connect

    Overman, Nicole R.; Hoppe, Eric W.; Addleman, Raymond S.

    2013-06-01

    The world’s most sensitive radiation detection and assay systems depend upon ultra-low background (ULB) materials to reduce unwanted radiological backgrounds. Herein, we evaluate methods to clean HDPE, a material of interest to ULB systems and the means to provide rapid assay of surface and bulk contamination. ULB level material and ultra-trace level detection of actinide elements is difficult to attain, due to the introduction of contamination from sample preparation equipment such as pipette tips, sample vials, forceps, etc. and airborne particulate. To date, literature available on the cleaning of such polymeric materials and equipment for ULB applications and ultra-trace analyses is limited. For these reasons, a study has been performed to identify an effective way to remove surface contamination from polymers in an effort to provide improved instrumental detection limits. Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectroscopy (ICP-MS) was utilized to assess the effectiveness of a variety of leachate solutions for removal of inorganic uranium and thorium surface contamination from polymers, specifically high density polyethylene (HDPE). HDPE leaching procedures were tested to optimize contaminant removal of thorium and uranium. Calibration curves for thorium and uranium ranged from 15 ppq (fg/mL) to 1 ppt (pg/mL). Detection limits were calculated at 6 ppq for uranium and 7 ppq for thorium. Results showed the most effective leaching reagent to be clean 6 M nitric acid for 72 hour exposures. Contamination levels for uranium and thorium found in the leachate solutions were significant for ultralow level radiation detection applications.

  6. Characterization of Two Different Clay Materials by Thermogravimetry (TG), Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), Dilatometry (DIL) and Mass Spectrometry (MS) - 12215

    SciTech Connect

    Post, Ekkehard; Henderson, Jack B.

    2012-07-01

    An illitic clay containing higher amounts of organic materials was investigated by dilatometry, thermogravimetry and differential scanning calorimetric. The evolved gases were studied during simultaneous TG-DSC (STA) and dilatometer measurements with simultaneous mass spectrometry in inert gas and oxidizing atmosphere. The dilatometer results were compared with the STA-MS results which confirmed and explained the reactions found during heating of the clay, like dehydration, dehydroxylation, shrinkage, sintering, quartz phase transition, combustion or pyrolysis of organics and the solid state reactions forming meta-kaolinite and mullite. The high amount of organic material effects in inert gas atmosphere most probably a reduction of the oxides which leads to a higher mass loss than in oxidizing atmosphere. Due to this reduction an additional CO{sub 2} emission at around 1000 deg. C was detected which did not occur in oxidizing atmosphere. Furthermore TG-MS results of a clay containing alkali nitrates show that during heating, in addition to water and CO{sub 2}, NO and NO{sub 2} are also evolved, leading to additional mass loss steps. These types of clays showed water loss starting around 100 deg. C or even earlier. This relative small mass loss affects only less shrinkage during the expansion of the sample. The dehydroxylation and the high crystalline quartz content result in considerable shrinkage and expansion of the clay. During the usual solid state reaction where the clay structure collapses, the remaining material finally shrinks down to a so-called clinker. With the help of MS the TG steps can be better interpreted as the evolved gases are identified. With the help of the MS it is possible to distinguish between CO{sub 2} and water (carbonate decomposition, oxidation of organics or dehydration/dehydroxylation). The MS also clearly shows that mass number 44 is found during the TG step of the illitic clay at about 900 deg. C in inert gas, which was interpreted

  7. Project Final Report: Ubiquitous Computing and Monitoring System (UCoMS) for Discovery and Management of Energy Resources

    SciTech Connect

    Tzeng, Nian-Feng; White, Christopher D.; Moreman, Douglas

    2012-07-14

    The UCoMS research cluster has spearheaded three research areas since August 2004, including wireless and sensor networks, Grid computing, and petroleum applications. The primary goals of UCoMS research are three-fold: (1) creating new knowledge to push forward the technology forefronts on pertinent research on the computing and monitoring aspects of energy resource management, (2) developing and disseminating software codes and toolkits for the research community and the public, and (3) establishing system prototypes and testbeds for evaluating innovative techniques and methods. Substantial progress and diverse accomplishment have been made by research investigators in their respective areas of expertise cooperatively on such topics as sensors and sensor networks, wireless communication and systems, computational Grids, particularly relevant to petroleum applications.

  8. Ms. Elizabeth Withers, EIS Document Manager U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    August 14, 2002 Ms. Elizabeth Withers, EIS Document Manager U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Office of Los Alamos Site Operations (OLASO) 528 35 th Street Los Alamos, NM 87544 Re: Comments regarding the scope of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed Chemistry and Metallurgy Research (CMR) Building Replacement (CMRR) Project (CMRRP) at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) (the "CMRRP EIS") Dear Elizabeth - I won't be

  9. Generation, characterization and in vivo biological activity of two distinct monoclonal anti-PEG IgMs

    SciTech Connect

    Hashimoto, Yosuke; Shimizu, Taro; Mima, Yu; Abu Lila, Amr S.; Ishida, Tatsuhiro; Kiwada, Hiroshi

    2014-05-15

    PEGylation, the attachment of polyethylene glycol (PEG) to nanocarriers and proteins, is a widely accepted approach to improving the in vivo efficacy of the non-PEGylated products. However, both PEGylated liposomes and PEGylated proteins reportedly trigger the production of specific antibodies, mainly IgM, against the PEG moiety, which possibly leads to a reduction in safety and therapeutic efficacy of the PEGylated products. In the present study, two monoclonal anti-PEG IgMs — HIK-M09 via immunization with an intravenous injection of PEGylated liposomes (SLs) and HIK-M11 via immunization with a subcutaneous administration of PEGylated ovalbumin (PEG-OVA) were successfully generated. The generated IgMs showed efficient reactivity to mPEG{sub 2000} conjugated to 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-ethanolamine (DSPE), PEGylated liposome (SL) and PEG-OVA. It appears that HIK-M09 recognizes ethoxy (OCH{sub 2}CH{sub 2}) repeat units along with a terminal motif of PEG, while HIK-M11 recognizes only ethoxy repeat units of PEG. Such unique properties allow HIK-M09 to bind with dense PEG. In addition, their impact on the in vivo clearance of the PEGylated products was investigated. It was found that the generated ant-PEG IgMs induced a clearance of SL as they were intravenously administered with SL. Interestingly, the HIK-M11, generated by PEG-OVA, induced the clearance of both SL and PEG-OVA, while the HIK-M09, generated by SL, induced the clearance of SL only. We here revealed that the presence of serum anti-PEG IgM and the subsequent binding of anti-PEG IgM to the PEGylated products are not necessarily related to the enhanced clearance of the products. It appears that subsequent complement activation following anti-PEG IgM binding is the most important step in dictating the in vivo fate of PEGylated products. This study may have implications for the design, development and clinical application of PEGylated products and therapeutics. - Highlights: • Two monoclonal

  10. HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD A Site Specific Advisory Board, Chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    PFP Worker Commendation September 10, 2015 2015O-03 Page 1 September 10, 2015 Stacy Charboneau U.S. Department of Energy - Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550 (A7-75) Richland, WA 99352 John Ciucci CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company P.O. Box 1600 MSIN H7-30 Richland, WA 99352 Dear Ms. Charboneau and Mr. Ciucci, Reducing the risk to human health and the environment from the Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP) has been a significant issue for the Hanford Advisory Board (Board) for many years.

  11. HANFORD ADVISORY BOARD A Site Specific Advisory Board, Chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    PW 1/3/6 Adopted: February 4, 2016 2016O-04 Page 1 February 4, 2016 Stacy Charboneau, Manager U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550 (A7-75) Richland, WA 99352 Dennis Faulk, Manager U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 825 Jadwin Ave., Suite 210 (A1-43) Richland, WA 99352 Re: PW 1/3/6 Operable Units Dear Ms. Charboneau and Mr. Faulk, Recognizing that the Tri-Party Agreement (TPA) agencies are in the process of negotiating the remediation of 200-CW-5,

  12. Microsoft Word - 2010O-01_DOE Response to Beryllium.doc

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Response to DOE's Response to Beryllium Advice 2010O-01 February 5, 2010 Page 1 February 5, 2010 David Brockman, Manager U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550 (A7-75) Richland, WA 99352 Shirley Olinger, Manager U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection P.O. Box 450 (H6-60) Richland, WA 99352 Re: DOE's Response to HAB Beryllium Advice #217 and #218 Dear Mr. Brockman and Ms. Olinger, On April 3, 2009 the Hanford Advisory Board (Board) provided two pieces of

  13. Microsoft Word - HABAdv#221FY20011Budget.doc

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Hanford Advisory Board Advice #221 Subject: FY 2011 Hanford Clean-Up Budgets & Priorities Adopted September 4, 2009 Page 1 September 4, 2009 Dave Brockman, Manager U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations P.O. Box 550 (A7-50) Richland, WA 99352 Shirley Olinger, Manager U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection P.O. Box 450 (H6-60) Richland, WA 99352 Subject: Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Hanford Clean-Up Budgets and Priorities Dear Mr. Brockman and Ms. Olinger, Background The

  14. Microsoft Word - HABAdv#243_SWBurialGrounds.doc

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    3 Subject: 200-SW-2 Radioactive Solid Waste Burial Grounds Adopted: April 1, 2011 Page 1 April 1, 2011 Matt McCormick, Manager U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations P.O. Box 550 (A7-50) Richland, WA 99352 Jane Hedges, Program Manager Washington State Department of Ecology 3100 Port of Benton Blvd. Richland, WA 99354 Re: 200-SW-2, Radioactive Solid Waste Burial Grounds Dear Mr. McCormick and Ms. Hedges, Background Hanford operations generated solid waste that went into radioactive solid

  15. Hanford Advisory Board Draft Letter Topic: PFP Workers Appreciation

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    PFP Workers Appreciation Authors: Leckband, Hudson & Catrell Originating Committee: River & Plateau Version #1 08.18.15 v.3 Stacy Charboneau U.S. Department of Energy - Richland Operations Office P.O. Box 550 (A7-75) Richland, WA 99352 John Ciucci CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company P.O. Box 1600 MSIN H7-30 Richland, WA 99352 Dear Ms. Charboneau and Mr. Ciucci, Reducing the risk to human health and the environment from the Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP) has been a significant issue

  16. Benchmarking the New RESRAD-OFFSITE Source Term Model with DUST-MS and GoldSim - 13377

    SciTech Connect

    Cheng, J.J.; Kamboj, S.; Gnanapragasam, E.; Yu, C.

    2013-07-01

    RESRAD-OFFSITE is a computer code developed by Argonne National Laboratory under the sponsorship of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). It is designed on the basis of RESRAD (onsite) code, a computer code designated by DOE and NRC for evaluating soil-contaminated sites for compliance with human health protection requirements pertaining to license termination or environmental remediation. RESRAD-OFFSITE has enhanced capabilities of modeling radionuclide transport to offsite locations and calculating potential radiation exposure to offsite receptors. Recently, a new source term model was incorporated into RESRAD-OFFSITE to enhance its capability further. This new source term model allows simulation of radionuclide releases from different waste forms, in addition to the soil sources originally considered in RESRAD (onsite) and RESRAD-OFFSITE codes. With this new source term model, a variety of applications can be achieved by using RESRAD-OFFSITE, including but not limited to, assessing the performance of radioactive waste disposal facilities. This paper presents the comparison of radionuclide release rates calculated by the new source term model of RESRAD-OFFSITE versus those calculated by DUST-MS and GoldSim, respectively. The focus of comparison is on the release rates of radionuclides from the bottom of the contaminated zone that was assumed to contain radioactive source materials buried in soil. The transport of released contaminants outside of the primary contaminated zone is beyond the scope of this paper. Overall, the agreement between the RESRAD-OFFSITE results and the DUST-MS and GoldSim results is fairly good, with all three codes predicting identical or similar radionuclide release profiles over time. Numerical dispersion in the DUST-MS and GoldSim results was identified as potentially contributing to the disagreement in the release rates. In general, greater discrepancy in the release rates was found for short

  17. Measurement of elemental speciation by liquid chromatography -- inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LC-ICP-MS) with the direct injection nebulizer (DIN)

    SciTech Connect

    Shum, S.

    1993-05-01

    This thesis is divided into 4 parts: elemental speciation, speciation of mercury and lead compounds by microbore column LC-ICP-MS with direct injection nebulization, spatially resolved measurements of size and velocity distributions of aerosol droplets from a direct injection nebulizer, and elemental speciation by anion exchange and size exclusion chromatography with detection by ICP-MS with direct injection nebulization. Tabs, figs, refs.

  18. NanoLC-FT-ICR MS improves proteome coverage attainable for ~3000 laser microdissected breast carcinoma cells

    SciTech Connect

    Umar, Arzu; Luider, Theo N.; Foekens, J. A.; Pasa-Tolic, Liljiana

    2007-01-29

    Genomics and proteomics assays hold great promise for unrevealing molecular events that underlie human disease. Essential to this quest is the ability to effectively analyze clinical samples, but this task is considerably complicated by tissue heterogeneity. Laser capture microdissection (LCM) can be used to selectively isolate targeted cell populations (such as tumor cells) from their native tissue environment. However, the small number of cells that are typically procured by LCM severely limits the proteome coverage and biomarker discovery potential achievable by conventional proteomics platforms. Herein, we report on the use of a nano liquid chromatography-Fourier transform ion clyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (nLC-FTICR MS) platform for analyzing protein digests of approximately 3,000 LCM-derived tumor cells from breast carcinoma tissue, which corresponds to approximately 300 ng of total protein. A total of 2,836 peptides were identified by matching LC-MS data to accurate mass and time (AMT) tag databases that were previously established for the human mammary epithelium and several breast cancer cell lines. The peptide identifications correspond to 1,139 unique proteins confidently identified with 2 or more peptides. Based on categorization by Gene Ontology, identified proteins appear to cover a wide variety of biological functions and cellular compartments. This work demonstrates that a substantial number of proteins can be identified from a limited number of cells using the AMT tag approach and opens a door for high throughput in-depth proteomics analysis of clinical samples.

  19. Study of organic compounds evolved during the co-firing of coal and refuse derived fuel using TG/MS

    SciTech Connect

    Puroshothama, Shobha; Lu, R.; Yang, Xiaodong

    1996-10-01

    The evolution of organic compounds during the combustion of carbonaceous fuel coupled with solid waste disposal and limited landfill space has been a cause for concern. Co-firing high sulfur coal with refuse derived fuel seems an attractive alternative technique to tackle the dual problem of controlling SO{sub x} emissions as well as those of the chlorinated organic toxins. The TG serves to emulate the conditions of the fluidized bed combustor and the MS serves as the detector for evolved gases. This versatile combination is used to study the decomposition pathway as well as predict the conditions at which various compounds are formed and may serve as a means of reducing the formation of these chlorinated organic compounds.

  20. Identification and decay of the 0.48 ms 13/2{sup +} isomer in {sup 181}Hg

    SciTech Connect

    Andreyev, A. N.; Antalic, S.; Saro, S.; Ackermann, D.; Comas, V. F.; Heinz, S.; Heredia, J. A.; Hessberger, F. P.; Khuyagbaatar, J.; Kojouharov, I.; Kindler, B.; Lommel, B.; Mann, R.; Cocolios, T. E.; Elseviers, J.; Huyse, M.; Duppen, P. Van; Venhart, M.; Franchoo, S.; Hofmann, S.

    2009-10-15

    A new isomer with a half-life of 0.48(2) ms was identified in the nuclide {sup 181}Hg, which was produced in the complete fusion reaction {sup 40}Ca+{sup 144}Sm{yields}{sup 184}Pb* at the velocity filter SHIP (GSI, Darmstadt). The isomeric state was tentatively assigned a spin-parity of 13/2{sup +}. We propose that this isomer de-excites by a yet unobserved low-energy, strongly converted {gamma}-ray transition, followed by a newly identified cascade composed of a 90.3 keV M1 and a 71.4 keV E2 {gamma}-ray transition.

  1. A Comparison of the ?-Radiolysis of TODGA and T(EH)DGA Using UHPLC-ESI-MS Analysis

    SciTech Connect

    Zarzana, Chris A.; Groenewold, Gary S.; Mincher, Bruce J.; Mezyk, Stephen P.; Modolo, Giuseppe; Wildens, Andreas; Schmidt, Holgar; Wishart, James F.; Cook, Andrew R.

    2015-03-01

    Solutions of TODGA and T(EH)DGA in n-dodecane were subjected to ?-irradiation in the presence and absence of an aqueous nitric acid phase and analyzed using UHPLC-ESI-MS to determine the rates of radiolytic decay of the two extractants, as well as to identify radiolysis products. The DGA concentrations decreased exponentially with increasing dose, and the measured degradation rate constants were uninfluenced by the presence or absence of an acidic aqueous phase, or by chemical variations in the alkyl side-chains. The DGA degradation was attributed to reactions of the dodecane radical cation, whose kinetics were measured for TODGA using picosecond electron pulse radiolysis to be k2 = (9.72 ± 1.10) × 109 M-1 s-1. The identified radiolysis products suggest that the bonds most vulnerable to radiolytic attack are those in the diglycolamide center of these molecules and not on the side-chains.

  2. Absolute calibration of Kodak Biomax-MS film response to x rays in the 1.5- to 8-keV energy range

    SciTech Connect

    Marshall, F. J.; Knauer, J. P.; Anderson, D.; Schmitt, B. L

    2006-10-15

    The absolute response of Kodak Biomax-MS film to x rays in the range from 1.5- to 8-keV has been measured using a laboratory electron-beam generated x-ray source. The measurements were taken at specific line energies by using Bragg diffraction to produce monochromatic beams of x rays. Multiple exposures were taken on Biomax MS film up to levels exceeding optical densities of 2 as measured by a microdensitometer. The absolute beam intensity for each exposure was measured with a Si(Li) detector. Additional response measurements were taken with Kodak direct exposure film (DEF) so as to compare the results of this technique to previously published calibrations. The Biomax-MS results have been fitted to a semiempirical mathematical model (Knauer et al., these proceedings). Users of the model can infer absolute fluences from observed exposure levels at either interpolated or extrapolated energies. To summarize the results: Biomax MS has comparable sensitivity to DEF film below 3 keV but has reduced sensitivity above 3 keV ({approx}50%). The lower exposure results from thinner emulsion layers, designed for use with phosphor screens. The ease with which Biomax-MS can be used in place of DEF (same format film, same developing process, and comparable sensitivity) makes it a good replacement.

  3. Groundwater Update K. Michael Thompson Soil and Groundwater Division Richland Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Class 2 Permit Modification Request to the Hanford Facility Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Permit, Dangerous Waste Portion 2 Overview * Introduction and Meeting Purpose * History and Regulatory Background * Proposed Permit Modification Request * Proposed Changes - Closure * Class 2 Permit Modification Process * Conclusion * Questions 3 Introduction and Meeting Purpose * Presented by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - Bryan Foley River Corridor Division * Purpose: - Provide information

  4. EIS-0212: Safe Interim Storage of Hanford Tank Wastes, Hanford Site, Richland, WA

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This environmental impact statement asseses Department of Energy and Washington State Department of Ecology maintanence of safe storage of high-level radioactive wastes currently stored in the older single-shell tanks, the Watchlist Tank 101-SY, and future waste volumes associated with tank farm and other Hanford facility operations, including a need to provide a modern safe, reliable, and regulatory-compliant replacement cross-site transfer capability. The purpose of this action is to prevent uncontrolled releases to the environment by maintaining safe storage of high-level tank wastes.

  5. Operation of N Reactor and Fuels Fabrication Facilities, Hanford Reservation, Richland, Benton County, Washington: Environmental assessment

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1980-08-01

    Environmental data, calculations and analyses show no significant adverse radiological or nonradiological impacts from current or projected future operations resulting from N Reactor, Fuels Fabrication and Spent Fuel Storage Facilities. Nonoccupational radiation exposures resulting from 1978 N Reactor operations are summarized and compared to allowable exposure limits.

  6. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    K-1 APPENDIX K SHORT-TERM HUMAN HEALTH RISK ANALYSIS This appendix presents the methodologies and assumptions used for estimating potential impacts on, and risks to, individuals and the general public from exposure to releases of radioactive and hazardous chemical materials during normal operations and as a result of hypothetical accidents. It also presents the methodology that was used to assess industrial safety. This information is intended to support the public and occupational health and

  7. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Q-1 APPENDIX Q LONG-TERM HUMAN HEALTH DOSE AND RISK ANALYSIS This appendix presents methods and results for assessment of potential human health impacts due to releases of radionuclides and chemicals from the high-level radioactive waste tanks, Fast Flux Test Facility decommissioning, and waste management activities over long periods of time following stabilization or closure. Q.1 INTRODUCTION Adverse impacts on human health and the environment may occur over long periods of time following

  8. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    T-1 Cumulative Impacts Effects on the environment that result from the proposed action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions, regardless of what agency or person undertakes such other actions (40 CFR 1508.7). APPENDIX T SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR THE SHORT-TERM CUMULATIVE IMPACT ANALYSES This appendix contains the detailed tables that support the short-term cumulative impacts presented in Chapter 6 of this Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental

  9. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    1-1 CHAPTER 11 DISTRIBUTION LIST The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is committed to communicating with the public to ensure that potentially affected communities and other interested parties are given opportunities to receive information on the project and notice of public meetings and to comment. In 2003, the environmental impact statement database used existing site mailing information. Over time, the database has evolved through additions from scoping meetings held in 2003, 2004, and 2006

  10. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    2-1 TC & WM EIS Proposed Actions (1) Retrieve, treat, and dispose of waste in single-shell tank (SST) and double-shell tank (DST) farms and close the SST system. (2) Decommission the Fast Flux Test Facility, manage the resulting waste, and manage the disposition of the Hanford Site's (Hanford's) inventory of bulk sodium. (3) Manage waste from tank closure and other Hanford activities, as well as limited volumes received from U.S. Department of Energy sites. CHAPTER 2 PROPOSED ACTIONS AND

  11. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    3-1 CHAPTER 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT In Chapter 3, the affected environment descriptions of the Hanford Site and Idaho National Laboratory are presented to provide the context for understanding the environmental consequences described in Chapter 4. As such, they serve as a baseline from which any environmental changes that may be brought about by implementing the proposed actions and alternatives can be identified and evaluated; the baseline conditions are the existing conditions. The affected

  12. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    4-1 Dates for Alternatives The dates referenced in this environmental impact statement (EIS) for the alternatives were selected to support relationships between, and durations for, activities, thus allowing comparisons of the alternatives. They do not necessarily represent the current dates. For example, this EIS used a Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) startup date of 2018; the current WTP startup date is 2022. Note that the durations, rather than the startup dates, of the activities evaluated in

  13. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Chapter 5 ▪ Long-Term Environmental Consequences 5-1163 5.3.3 Ecological Risk This section presents the results of the evaluation of long-term impacts on ecological resources of releases to air and groundwater under the Waste Management alternatives. Risk indices-Hazard Quotient and Hazard Index-were calculated by comparing the predicted dose to the benchmark dose (see Appendix P). Risk indices could not be calculated for soil-dwelling invertebrates, lizards, toads, or birds exposed to organic

  14. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    -1 Region of Influence A site-specific geographic area in which the principal direct and indirect effects of the proposed actions are likely to occur. Cumulative Impact Impact on the environment that results from the incremental impact of the action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions, regardless of what agency or person undertakes such other actions (40 CFR 1508.7). Reasonably foreseeable actions are ongoing and will continue into the future, are funded

  15. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    -1 CHAPTER 7 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES AND MITIGATION DISCUSSION Chapter 7 discusses environmental consequences that would occur due to implementation of the reasonable alternatives for each of the following: (1) tank waste retrieval, treatment, and disposal and single-shell tank system closure at the Hanford Site (i.e., tank closure); (2) decommissioning of the Fast Flux Test Facility and auxiliary facilities and disposition of the inventory of radioactively contaminated bulk sodium (i.e.,

  16. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    CHAPTER 8 POTENTIALLY APPLICABLE LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS Chapter 8 presents the laws, regulations, and other requirements that apply to the alternatives. Federal, state, and U.S. Department of Energy environmental, safety, and health requirements are summarized in Section 8.1. Permits or licenses that may be required to implement the alternatives are discussed in Section 8.2. Consultations with Federal, state, and local agencies and federally recognized American Indian groups

  17. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    -1 CHAPTER 9 GLOSSARY absorbed dose - The energy imparted to matter by ionizing radiation per unit mass of the irradiated material (e.g., biological tissue). The units of absorbed dose are the rad and the gray. (One rad equals 0.01 grays, which equals 100 ergs per gram of material.) (See erg, gray, ionizing radiation, irradiated, and radiation absorbed dose [rad].) accelerator (particle) - An apparatus for imparting high velocities by electromagnetic or electrostatic means to charged particles

  18. Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Table of Contents List of Figures .......................................................................................................................................... xviii List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................. lvii List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ......................................................................................................... cvi Measurement

  19. 2013 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Richland Operations Office

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

  20. 2014 Annual Workforce Analysis and Staffing Plan Report- Richland Operations Office

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Managers perform an annual workforce analysis of their organization and develop staffing plans that identify technical capabilities and positions they need to ensure safe operation of defense nuclear facilities.

  1. Final Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement Richland, Washington

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    HSW EIS January 2004 1.6 Figure 1.2. States with Radioactive Waste Disposal Activities Final HSW EIS January 2004 1.12 Figure 1.3. Relationship of the HSW EIS to Other Hanford Cleanup Operations, Material Management Activities, and Key Environmental Reviews 2.17 Final HSW EIS January 2004 Figure 2.6. Waste Receiving and Processing Facility Figure 2.7. X-Ray Image of Transuranic Waste Drum Contents M0212-0286.11 HSW EIS 12-10-02 M0212-0286.12 HSW EIS 12-10-02 2.17 Final HSW EIS January 2004

  2. Westinghouse P.O. Box 1970 Hanford COlTlpany Richland, Washington...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Historical data on the amounts and components of wastes discharged, from which locations ... Revision 2 brought about by the agricultural shortages and price rises of World War ...

  3. EIS-0017: Fusion Materials Irradiation Testing Facility, Hanford Reservation, Richland, Washington

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy developed this statement to evaluate the environmental impacts associated with proposed construction and operation of an irradiation test facility, the Deuterium-Lithium High Flux Neutron Source Facility, at the Hanford Reservation.

  4. EA-0993: Shutdown of the Fast Flux Testing Facility, Richland, Washington

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the U.S. Department of Energy's Hanford Site's proposal to place the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) in a radiologically and industrially safe shutdown...

  5. Startup of the New 200 West Pump-and-Treat, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington - 13214

    SciTech Connect

    Byrnes, Mark E.; Simmons, Sally; Morse, John

    2013-07-01

    On June 28, 2012, CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) completed the construction and acceptance testing for a new 2,500 gallon-per-minute (gpm) pump-and-treat (P and T) system in the 200 West Area of the Hanford Site in Washington State. This system is designed to remove Tc-99, carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethene (TCE), nitrate, and total and hexavalent chromium from groundwater using ion exchange, anoxic and aerobic bioreactors, and air stripping. The system will eventually remove uranium from groundwater using ion exchange as well. The startup of the P and T system is important because it will ensure that contaminants from the 200 West Area never reach the Columbia River. When fully operational, the 200 West P and T will include approximately 23 extraction wells and 21 injection wells. The extraction wells are 8 inches in diameter, are completed with well screens 100 feet or more in length, and are distributed throughout the central portion of the 5-square-mile carbon tetrachloride plume. The injection wells are also 8 inches in diameter and are installed up-gradient of the plumes to recharge the aquifer and down-gradient of the plumes for flow-path control. Groundwater in the 200 West Area is approximately 250 feet below ground surface, and the aquifer is 200 feet or more in thickness. All of the contaminants (except nitrate) are found within the perimeter of the carbon tetrachloride plume and occur at various depths throughout the aquifer. The 200 West P and T consists of two separate buildings to conduct groundwater treatment. The RAD building contains an ion exchange system to remove Tc-99 from groundwater at a maximum flow rate of 600 gpm. The RAD building only accepts water from those extraction wells showing elevated Tc-99 concentrations. Groundwater initially fills an influent tank, is then pumped through particulate filters (to remove suspended materials), and then passes through two parallel treatment trains containing Purolite{sup R} A530E resin (which has been proven effective in removing Tc-99). The water is then transferred to the biological treatment building for further treatment. When the lead vessel in each of the two treatment trains becomes fully loaded with Tc-99, the Purolite A530E resin is transferred to a separate tank where it is heated to 160 deg. F to remove volatile organics prior to disposal at the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility. The biological treatment building has a maximum flow capacity of 2,500 gpm. Groundwater from the nonradiological extraction wells and treated groundwater from the RAD building are initially pumped into an equalization tank and then into two parallel fluidized bed reactors (FBRs). The FBRs contain granulated activated carbon in suspension for microbes to populate, a carbon-based food source for the microbes to eat (e.g., MicroCg{sup TM}, molasses, or sodium lactate), and nitrate for the microbes to breathe (represents 'anoxic' conditions that contain little or no dissolved oxygen). The FBRs are maintained at a temperature between 55 deg. F and 90 deg. F, and at a pH between 6.5 and 6.8, to maximize microbial growth. The FBRs break down the nitrate, reduce the hexavalent chromium to trivalent chromium, and break down a good portion of the carbon tetrachloride and TCE. From the FBRs, groundwater is pumped through a carbon separation tank, then through a splitter box that divides the water evenly between four membrane bioreactors (MBRs) that further break down the contaminants. The MBRs have aeration capacity to provide sufficient oxygen for maintaining the aerobic biological process. The MBRs use submerged membranes for filtration. Vertically strung fibers are found in the membrane zone where a vacuum draws water through tiny pores in the fibers. The liquid is then pumped to air strippers to remove any volatile organics that have passed through the bioreactors. Solids from the MBRs are pumped to rotary drum thickeners and centrifuges for dewatering prior to lime being added to kill the bacteria and control odor. The conditioned sludge is then disposed at the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility. The final treated water is then pumped to the injection well field. The 200 West P and T is a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) gold-certified facility that has an expected 70% energy cost savings over the lifetime of the plant. Fifty percent of the steel used in construction was recycled, 420 tons of recycled concrete were used, and over 75% of construction waste was diverted from landfills. The plant is only staffed one shift per day, and it uses a call-out system if the plant goes down during off-shift hours. Initial sampling results have shown that the 200 West P and T is successfully reducing contaminant levels well below the cleanup levels specified in the Record of Decision, Hanford 200 Area 200-ZP-1 Superfund Site, Benton County, Washington [1]. CHPRC and the U.S. Department of Energy are continuing to look for ways to reduce operational costs, such as testing alternative resins for removing radionuclides and finding less expensive carbon substrate sources. The benefit to others is a LEED gold-certified, 2,500 gpm P and T system that may be used as a model for other complex sites. (authors)

  6. Waste Treatment Plant External Independent Review, Office of River Protection, Richland

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    External Independent Review (EIR).  On March 28 - April 1, the Office of Project Management Oversight and Assessments (PM) will lead the site visit for the first phase of the WTP Baseline Change...

  7. Final Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan Environmental Impact Statement, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    SciTech Connect

    N /A

    1999-10-01

    This Final ''Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan Environmental Impact Statement'' (HCP EIS) is being used by the Department of Energy (DOE) and its nine cooperating and consulting agencies to develop a comprehensive land-use plan (CLUP) for the Hanford Site. The DOE will use the Final HCP EIS as a basis for a Record of Decision (ROD) on a CLUP for the Hanford Site. While development of the CLUP will be complete with release of the HCP EIS ROD, full implementation of the CLUP is expected to take at least 50 years. Implementation of the CLUP would begin a more detailed planning process for land-use and facility-use decisions at the Hanford Site. The DOE would use the CLUP to screen proposals. Eventually, management of Hanford Site areas would move toward the CLUP land-use goals. This CLUP process could take more than 50 years to fully achieve the land-use goals.

  8. EIS-0089: PUREX Plant and Uranium Oxide Plant Facilities, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy developed this statement to evaluate the environmental impacts of resumption of operations of the PUREX/Uranium Oxide facilities at the Hanford Site to produce plutonium and other special nuclear materials for national defense needs.

  9. Technical support for authorization of 242-A evaporator campaign 97-2, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    SciTech Connect

    Daling, P.M.; Lavender, J.C.

    1997-07-01

    An analysis was performed to determine the acceptability of processing 242-A Evaporator/Crystallizer Campaign 97-2 feed. Inhalation unit liter doses (ULDs) were calculated using the methods and data described in the Tank Waste Remediation System Basis for Interim Operation (TWRS BIO) and 242-A Evaporator/Crystallizer Safety Analysis Report. The ULD calculated for the Campaign 97-2 slurry was found to be less than the TWRS BIO evaporator slurry ULD and so would be within the analyzed safety envelope defined in the TWRS BIO. The Evaporator slurry ULD established in the TWRS BIO and supporting documents was calculated using the bounding source strength defined in the 242-A Evaporator SAR. Consequently, the risks and consequences associated with the Campaign 97-2 slurry would be lower than those already accepted by DOE and documented in the TWRS BIO and 242-A Evaporator SAR. The direct radiation exposures from formation of a liquid pool of Campaign 97-2 slurry were demonstrated to be less than the exposures from a pool formed by bounding source strength evaporator slurry as defined in the 242-A Evaporator SAR. This was demonstrated via a comparison of the Campaign 97-2 slurry composition and the 242-A Evaporator SAR bounding source strength. It was concluded that the direct radiation exposures from Campaign 97-2 slurry would be within the analyzed safety envelope in the 242-A Evaporator SAR.

  10. Safe interim storage of Hanford tank wastes, draft environmental impact statement, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1994-07-01

    This Draft EIS is prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). DOE and Ecology have identified the need to resolve near-term tank safety issues associated with Watchlist tanks as identified pursuant to Public Law (P.L.) 101-510, Section 3137, ``Safety Measures for Waste Tanks at Hanford Nuclear Reservation,`` of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991, while continuing to provide safe storage for other Hanford wastes. This would be an interim action pending other actions that could be taken to convert waste to a more stable form based on decisions resulting from the Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS) EIS. The purpose for this action is to resolve safety issues concerning the generation of unacceptable levels of hydrogen in two Watchlist tanks, 101-SY and 103-SY. Retrieving waste in dilute form from Tanks 101-SY and 103-SY, hydrogen-generating Watchlist double shell tanks (DSTs) in the 200 West Area, and storage in new tanks is the preferred alternative for resolution of the hydrogen safety issues.

  11. Environmental Monitoring Plan, United States Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office. Revision 1

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1994-11-09

    This report describes environmental monitoring activities at Hanford Reservation. Attention is focused on effluent monitoring and environmental surveillance. All Hanford contractors reviewed potential sources of contamination. A facility effluent monitoring plan was written for each facility with the potential to release significant quantities of hazardous materials, addressing both radiological and nonradiological effluent monitoring. The environmental surveillance program assesses onsite and offsite environmental impacts and offsite human health exposures. The program monitors air, surface water, sediment, agricultural products, vegetation, soil, and wildlife. In addition, independent onsite surveillance is conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of Hanford Site effluent controls in order to comply with applicable environmental standards and regulations.

  12. EA-1189: Non-thermal Treatment of Hanford Site Low-level Mixed Waste, Richland, Washington

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EA evaluates the environmental impacts for the proposal to demonstrate the feasibility of commercial treatment of contact-handled low-level mixed waste to meet existing Federal and State...

  13. MEMORANDUM FORMA ffiiEW S. MCCORMICK MANAGER RICHLAND OPERA TTONS...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    0, "Approve Mission Need." You must demonstrate and affirm the ability to perform all duties of nn AE as identified in the DOE 0 413.3B. As such, RL must have a robust project...

  14. Removal of 1,082-Ton Reactor Among Richland Operations Office...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    from groundwater across the site ahead of schedule and pumped a record volume of water through treatment facilities to remove contamination, with more than 130 tons of...

  15. Environmental Management Richland Operations Office FY 2014 President's Budget FY 2015 Budget Request Regulator Briefing

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management Advisory Board (EMAB) Environmental Management

  16. Environmental Management Richland Operations Office FY 2014 President's Budget FY 2015 Budget Request Regulator Briefing

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

  17. Environmental Management Richland Operations Office FY 2014 President's Budget FY 2015 Budget Request Regulator Briefing

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Public Meeting FY 2016 President's Budget FY 2017 Estimated Requirements Jonathan (JD) Dowell, Deputy Manager April 28, 2015 Public Meeting - Office of River Protection April 2015 2 Hanford Cleanup Work - Office of River Protection (ORP)  Manage 56 million gallons of waste in single-shell and double-shell tanks  Construct Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP)  Treat tank waste for disposition C-102 Single Shell Tank Public Meeting - Office of River Protection April 2015 3 2015

  18. Environmental assessment of SP-100 ground engineering system test site: Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1988-12-01

    The US Department of Energy (DOE) proposes to modify an existing reactor containment building (decommissioned Plutonium Recycle Test Reactor (PRTR) 309 Building) to provide ground test capability for the prototype SP-100 reactor. The 309 Building (Figure 1.1) is located in the 300 Area on the Hanford Site in Washington State. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires that Federal agencies assess the potential impacts that their actions may have on the environment. This Environmental Assessment describes the consideration given to environmental impacts during reactor concept and test site selection, examines the environmental effects of the DOE proposal to ground test the nuclear subsystem, describes alternatives to the proposed action, and examines radiological risks of potential SP-100 use in space. 73 refs., 19 figs., 7 tabs.

  19. EA-1707: Closure of Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill and Solid Waste Landfill, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EA evaluates the potential environmental impacts of closing the Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Landfill and the Solid Waste Landfill. The Washington State Department of Ecology is a cooperating agency in preparing this EA.

  20. EA-1934: Expansion of Active Borrow Areas, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EA evaluate the potential environmental impacts of expansion or continued use of existing sand and gravel pits located on the Hanford Site (Pits F, H, N, 6, 9, 18, 21, 23, 24, 30, and 34) and establishing one new borrow area source in the 100 Area for ongoing construction activities and fill material following remediation activities. The scope of this EA does not include borrow sources for silt-loam material.

  1. Valley Co. McCone Co. Roosevelt Co. Richland Co. Sheridan Co...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Liquids Reserve Class Montana North Dakota South Dakota Wyoming INDEX MAP 0 10 20 5 15 Miles Williston Basin Oil and Gas Fields 2004 Liquids Reserve Class No 2004 Liquids ...

  2. Valley Co. McCone Co. Roosevelt Co. Richland Co. Sheridan Co...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    BOE Reserve Class Montana North Dakota South Dakota Wyoming INDEX MAP 0 10 20 5 15 Miles Williston Basin Oil & Gas Field Boundaries 2004 BOE Reserve Class No 2004 reserves 0.1 - ...

  3. Valley Co. McCone Co. Roosevelt Co. Richland Co. Sheridan Co...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gas Reserve Class Montana North Dakota South Dakota Wyoming INDEX MAP 0 10 20 5 15 Miles Williston Basin Oil and Gas Fields 2004 Gas Reserve Class No 2004 Gas Reserves 0.1 - 10 ...

  4. EA-1135: Offsite Thermal Treatment of Low-level Mixed Waste, Richland, Washington

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposal to treat contact-handled low-level mixed waste, containing polychlorinated biphenyls and other organics, to meet existing regulatory...

  5. Final Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement Richland, Washington

    SciTech Connect

    N /A

    2004-02-13

    This Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement (HSW EIS) provides environmental and technical information concerning U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) ongoing and proposed waste management practices at the Hanford Site in Washington State. The HSW EIS updates some analyses of environmental consequences from previous documents and provides evaluations for activities that may be implemented consistent with the Waste Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (WM PEIS; DOE 1997c) Records of Decision (RODs). The draft HSW EIS was initially issued in April 2002 for public comment (DOE 2002b). A revised draft HSW EIS was issued in March 2003 to address new waste management alternatives that had been proposed since the initial draft HSW EIS was prepared, and to address comments received during the public review period for the first draft (DOE 2003d). The revised draft HSW EIS also incorporated alternatives for disposal of immobilized low-activity waste (ILAW) from treatment of Hanford Site tank waste in the waste treatment plant (WTP) currently under construction, an activity that was not included in the first draft (68 FR 7110). This final HSW EIS describes the DOE preferred alternative, and in response to public comments received on the March 2003 revised draft, provides additional analyses for some environmental consequences associated with the preferred alternative, with other alternatives, and with cumulative impacts. Public comments on the revised draft HSW EIS are addressed in the comment response document (Volume III of this final EIS). This HSW EIS describes the environmental consequences of alternatives for constructing, modifying, and operating facilities to store, treat, and/or dispose of low-level (radioactive) waste (LLW), transuranic (TRU) waste, ILAW, and mixed low-level waste (MLLW) including WTP melters at Hanford. In addition, the potential long-term consequences of LLW, MLLW, and ILAW disposal on groundwater and surface water are evaluated for a 10,000-year period, although the DOE performance standards only require assessment for the first 1000 years after disposal (DOE 2001f). This document does not address non-radioactive waste that contains ''hazardous'' or ''dangerous'' waste, as defined under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 (42 USC 6901) and Washington State Dangerous Waste regulations (WAC 173-303). Following a previous National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA, 42 USC 4321) review (DOE 1997d), DOE decided to dispose of TRU waste in New Mexico at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), a repository that meets the requirements of 40 CFR 191 (63 FR 3623). This HSW EIS has been prepared in accordance with NEPA, the DOE implementing procedures for NEPA 10 CFR 1021, and the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 CFR 1500-1508).

  6. Lead Test Assembly Irradiation and Analysis Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Tennessee and Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EA evaluates the environmental impacts associated with the U.S. Department of Energy proposed action to conduct a lead test assembly program to confirm the viability of using a commercial...

  7. Valley Co. McCone Co. Roosevelt Co. Richland Co. Sheridan Co.

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    BOE Reserve Class Montana North Dakota South Dakota Wyoming INDEX MAP ± 0 10 20 5 15 Miles Williston Basin Oil & Gas Field Boundaries 2004 BOE Reserve Class No 2004 reserves 0.1 - 10 MBOE 10.1 - 100 MBOE 100.1 - 1,000 MBOE 1,000.1 - 10,000 MBOE 10,000.1 - 100,000 MBOE >100,000 MBOE

  8. Valley Co. McCone Co. Roosevelt Co. Richland Co. Sheridan Co.

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gas Reserve Class Montana North Dakota South Dakota Wyoming INDEX MAP ± 0 10 20 5 15 Miles Williston Basin Oil and Gas Fields 2004 Gas Reserve Class No 2004 Gas Reserves 0.1 - 10 MMCF 10.1 - 100 MMCF 100.1 - 1,000 MMCF 1,000 - 10,000 MMCF 10,000 - 100,000 MMCF > 100,000 MMCF

  9. Valley Co. McCone Co. Roosevelt Co. Richland Co. Sheridan Co.

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Liquids Reserve Class Montana North Dakota South Dakota Wyoming INDEX MAP ± 0 10 20 5 15 Miles Williston Basin Oil and Gas Fields 2004 Liquids Reserve Class No 2004 Liquids Reserves 0.1 - 10 Mbbl 10.1 - 100 Mbbl 100.1 - 1,000 Mbbl 1,000.1 - 10,000 Mbbl > 10,000 Mbbl

  10. Measurement of Fukushima Aerosol Debris in Sequim and Richland, WA and Ketchikan, AK

    SciTech Connect

    Miley, Harry S.; Bowyer, Ted W.; Engelmann, Mark D.; Eslinger, Paul W.; Friese, Judah I.; Greenwood, Lawrence R.; Haas, Derek A.; Hayes, James C.; Keillor, Martin E.; Kiddy, Robert A.; Kirkham, Randy R.; Landen, Jonathan W.; Lepel, Elwood A.; Lidey, Lance S.; Litke, Kevin E.; Morris, Scott J.; Olsen, Khris B.; Thompson, Robert C.; Valenzuela, Blandina R.; Woods, Vincent T.; Biegalski, Steven R.

    2013-05-01

    Aerosol collections were initiated at several locations by PNNL shortly after the Great East Japan Earthquake of May 2011. Aerosol samples were transferred to laboratory high-resolution gamma spectrometers for analysis. Similar to treaty monitoring stations operating across the Northern hemisphere, iodine and other isotopes which could be volatilized at high temperature were detected. Though these locations are not far apart, they have significant variations with respect to water, mountain-range placement, and local topography. Variation in computed source terms will be shown to bound the variability of this approach to source estimation.

  11. EIS-0080: Decommissioning of the Shippingport Atomic Power Station, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy's Remedial Actions Program Office developed this statement to assess the impacts of decommissioning the Shippingport Atomic Power Station as well as analyze possible decommissioning alternatives, evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with each alternative, and present cost estimates for each alternative.

  12. A comparison of the γ-radiolysis of TODGA and T(EH)DGA using UHPLC-ESI-MS analysis

    DOE PAGES [OSTI]

    Chris A. Zarzana; Cook, Andrew R.; Groenewold, Gary S.; Mincher, Bruce J.; Mezyk, Stephen P.; Wilden, Andreas; Schmidt, Holger; Modolo, Giuseppe; Wishart, James F.

    2015-03-11

    Solutions of TODGA and T(EH)DGA in n-dodecane were subjected to γ-irradiation in the presence and absence of an aqueous nitric acid phase and analyzed using UHPLC-ESI-MS to determine the rates of radiolytic decay of the two extractants, as well as to identify radiolysis products. The DGA concentrations decreased exponentially with increasing dose, and the measured degradation rate constants were uninfluenced by the presence or absence of an acidic aqueous phase, or by chemical variations in the alkyl side-chains. The DGA degradation was attributed to reactions of the dodecane radical cation, whose kinetics were measured for TODGA using picosecond electron pulsemore » radiolysis to be k2 = (9.72 ± 1.10) × 109 M–1 s–1. Furthermore, the identified radiolysis products suggest that the bonds most vulnerable to radiolytic attack are those in the diglycolamide center of these molecules and not on the side-chains.« less

  13. Distributed computing strategies for processing of FT-ICR MS imaging datasets for continuous mode data visualization

    SciTech Connect

    Smith, Donald F.; Schulz, Carl; Konijnenburg, Marco; Kilic, Mehmet; Heeren, Ronald M.

    2015-03-01

    High-resolution Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) mass spectrometry imaging enables the spatial mapping and identification of biomolecules from complex surfaces. The need for long time-domain transients, and thus large raw file sizes, results in a large amount of raw data (“big data”) that must be processed efficiently and rapidly. This can be compounded by largearea imaging and/or high spatial resolution imaging. For FT-ICR, data processing and data reduction must not compromise the high mass resolution afforded by the mass spectrometer. The continuous mode “Mosaic Datacube” approach allows high mass resolution visualization (0.001 Da) of mass spectrometry imaging data, but requires additional processing as compared to featurebased processing. We describe the use of distributed computing for processing of FT-ICR MS imaging datasets with generation of continuous mode Mosaic Datacubes for high mass resolution visualization. An eight-fold improvement in processing time is demonstrated using a Dutch nationally available cloud service.

  14. Validation predictions of a 13 m/s cross-wind fire for Fuego and the University of Waterloo dataset.

    SciTech Connect

    Brown, Alexander L.; Evans, Gregory Herbert; Gill, Walter; Jarboe, Daniel T.

    2008-03-01

    Detailed herein are the results of a validation comparison. The experiment involved a 2 meter diameter liquid pool of Jet-A fuel in a 13 m/s crosswind. The scenario included a large cylindrical blocking object just down-stream of the fire. It also included seven smaller calorimeters and extensive instrumentation. The experiments were simulated with Fuego. The model included several conduction regions to model the response of the calorimeters, the floor, and the large cylindrical blocking object. A blind comparison was used to compare the simulation predictions with the experimental data. The more upstream data compared very well with the simulation predictions. The more downstream data did not compare very well with the simulation predictions. Further investigation suggests that features omitted from the original model contributed to the discrepancies. Observations are made with respect to the scenario that are aimed at helping an analyst approach a comparable problem in a way that may help improve the potential for quantitative accuracy.

  15. Ms. Maria Galanti

    Energy Saver

    ... CERCLA CRO DOE DOT EEiCA HVA C LLW Ohi o EPA PCBs PORTS pr E RAW) RCRA TSCA AC RONYMS ... A field change was submitted to the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) on ...

  16. LA-23336-MS

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    do not BCSSBT- ily state or renect those o f the ... It is a white solid with densities that may vary between 4.3-5.2 gcm3 depending on the method of preparation and ...

  17. Ms. Maggie Owen, Chair

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Myron Iwanski, Anderson County Mayor Mark Watson, Oak Ridge city Mayor Ron Woody, Roan ... FORS David Adler, EM-92 Melyssa Noe, EM-95 Joy Sager, EM-91 Susan M.Cange, Acting Manager ...

  18. Is LA-12152-MS

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... its introduction at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, the widely used ABAQUS code has become a production code for many users who deal with stress analysis and heat transfer. ...

  19. Ms. Margaret Owen, Chair

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    recommending that the Department of Energy (DOE) consider using Federal transport and/or disposition funds to relocate designated cultural/historic property items to outside organizations, when the organizations are unable to fund the relocation themselves. As you summarized in your letter, it is the current policy of DOE and Office of Environmental Management (EM) to donate property with cultural or historic value when that property no longer has reuse value to the Government, has been deemed

  20. ms.dvi

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    to difference images in the context of the Nearby Supernova Factory supernova search. ... feature, but it requires a detailed modeling of the PDF of each feature, including ...

  1. MS FORTRAN Extended Libraries

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center

    1986-09-01

    DISPPAK is a set of routines for use with Microsoft FORTRAN programs that allows the flexible display of information on the screen of an IBM PC in both text and graphics modes. The text mode routines allow the cursor to be placed at an arbitrary point on the screen and text to be displayed at the cursor location, making it possible to create menus and other structured displays. A routine to set the color ofmore » the characters that these routines display is also provided. A set of line drawing routines is included for use with IBM''s Color Graphics Adapter or an equivalent board (such as the Enhanced Graphics Adapter in CGA emulation mode). These routines support both pixel coordinates and a user-specified set of real number coordinates. SUBPAK is a function library which allows Microsoft FORTRAN programs to calculate random numbers, issue calls to the operating system, read individual characters from the keyboard, perform Boolean and shift operations, and communicate with the I/O ports of the IBM PC. In addition, peek and poke routines, a routine that returns the address of any variable, and routines that can access the system time and date are included.« less

  2. LA-11224-MS

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... conduction example. 42 ****** 3-d test mode1(1,4*4*4)***... node 08 001 003 011 013 ... 0.0e+00 res mass0.000000 kg vap mass-.212595e-09 kq energy 33.7959 mj net discharge ...

  3. LA-23336-MS

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... potential fouling of the heat exchanger are undesirable. The relative resistance to mass transfer of 24 metals and ... Ser. 4, Technology a d Engineering, Vol. 1, R. Hurst and S. ...

  4. Is LA-12152-MS

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    the ABAOUS subroutine UMAT 12 5. The MOR test specimen configuration corresponding to ... There are various ways to handle the test data, but, from the test data, a Weibull ...

  5. Operations Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    (~ii~,Richland Operations Office ~Z4TESO~Richland, Washington 99352 SEP 2 2009 CERTIFIED MAIL Ms. Sarah Washburn Heart of America Northwest 1314 N.E. 5 6 th Street Suite 100 Seattle, Washington 98105 Dear Ms. Washburn: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST (FOI 2009-0067) You requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOJA), the following documents relating to: 1 . "The authorization, decision to use, and actual use of any and all pesticides and herbicides anywhere within the

  6. Microsoft Word - HABAdv #233_System Plan Rev4_Planning Rev5.doc

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    3 Subject: Tank Waste System Plan Rev 4 & Planning for Rev 5 Adopted: June 4, 2010 Page 1 June 4, 2010 Shirley Olinger, Manager U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection P.O. Box 450 (H6-60) Richland, WA 99352 Jane Hedges, Program Manager Washington State Department of Ecology 3100 Port of Benton Blvd. Richland, WA 99354 Re: Tank Waste System Plan Revision 4 and Planning Assumptions for Revision 5 Dear Ms. Olinger and Ms. Hedges, Background Safe tank waste retrieval, treatment

  7. Absolute Calibration of Kodak Biomax-MS Film Response to X Rays in the 1.5- to 8-keV Energy Range

    SciTech Connect

    Marshall, F.J.; Knauer, J.P.; Anderson, D.; Schmitt, B.L.

    2006-09-28

    The absolute response of Kodak Biomax-MS film to x rays in the range from 1.5- to 8-keV has been measured using a laboratory e-beam generated x-ray source. The measurements were taken at specific line energies by using Bragg diffraction to produce monochromatic beams of x rays. Multiple exposures were taken on Biomax MS film up to levels exceeding optical densities of 2 as measured by a microdensitometer. The absolute beam intensity for each exposure was measured with a Si(Li) detector. Additional response measurements were taken with Kodak direct exposure film (DEF) so as to compare the results of this technique to previously published calibrations.

  8. Enhancing Biological Analyses with Three Dimensional Field Asymmetric Ion Mobility, Low Field Drift Time Ion Mobility and Mass Spectrometry (FAIMS/IMS-MS) Separations

    SciTech Connect

    Zhang, Xing; Ibrahim, Yehia M.; Chen, Tsung-Chi; Kyle, Jennifer E.; Norheim, Randolph V.; Monroe, Matthew E.; Smith, Richard D.; Baker, Erin Shammel

    2015-06-30

    We report the first evaluation of a platform coupling a high speed field asymmetric ion mobility spectrometry microchip (FAIMS) with drift tube ion mobility and mass spectrometry (IMS-MS). The FAIMS/IMS-MS platform was used to analyze biological samples and simultaneously acquire multidimensional information of detected features from the measured FAIMS compensation fields and IMS drift times, while also obtaining accurate ion masses. These separations thereby increase the overall separation power, resulting increased information content, and provide more complete characterization of more complex samples. The separation conditions were optimized for sensitivity and resolving power by the selection of gas compositions and pressures in the FAIMS and IMS separation stages. The resulting performance provided three dimensional separations, benefitting both broad complex mixture studies and targeted analyses by e.g. improving isomeric separations and allowing detection of species obscured by chemical noise and other interfering peaks.

  9. Fluorescence spectra and biological activity of aerosolized bacillus spores and MS2 bacteriophage exposed to ozone at different relative humidities in a rotating drum

    DOE PAGES [OSTI]

    Ratnesar-Shumate, Shanna; Pan, Yong-Le; Hill, Steven C.; Kinahan, Sean; Corson, Elizabeth; Eshbaugh, Jonathan; Santarpia, Joshua L.

    2015-10-14

    Biological aerosols (bioaerosols) released into the environment may undergo physical and chemical transformations when exposed to atmospheric constituents such as solar irradiation, reactive oxygenated species, ozone, free radicals, water vapor and pollutants. Aging experiments were performed in a rotating drum chamber subjecting bioaerosols, Bacillus thuringiensis Al Hakam (BtAH) spores and MS2 bacteriophages to ozone at 0 and 150 ppb, and relative humidities (RH) at 10%, 50%, and 80+%. Fluorescence spectra and intensities of the aerosols as a function of time in the reaction chamber were measured with a single particle fluorescence spectrometer (SPFS) and an Ultra-Violet Aerodynamic Particle Sizer® Spectrometermore » (UV-APS). Losses in biological activity were measured by culture and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR) assay. For both types of aerosols the largest change in fluorescence emission was between 280 and 400 nm when excited at 263 nm followed by fluorescence emission between 380 and 700 nm when excited at 351 nm. The fluorescence for both BtAH and MS2 were observed to decrease significantly at high ozone concentration and high RH when excited at 263 nm excitation. The decreases in 263 nm excited fluorescence are indicative of hydrolysis and oxidation of tryptophan in the aerosols. Fluorescence measured with the UV-APS (355-nm excitation) increased with time for both BtAH and MS2 aerosols. A two log loss of MS2 bacteriophage infectivity was observed in the presence of ozone at ~50% and 80% RH when measured by culture and normalized for physical losses by q-PCR. Viability of BtAH spores after exposure could not be measured due to the loss of genomic material during experiments, suggesting degradation of extracelluar DNA attributable to oxidation. The results of these studies indicate that the physical and biological properties of bioaerosols change significantly after exposure to ozone and water vapor.« less

  10. Quantification of Semi-Volatile Oxygenated Components of Pyrolysis Bio-Oil by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS): Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Quantification of Semi-Volatile Oxygenated Components of Pyrolysis Bio-Oil by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP) Issue Date: March 2, 2016 Earl Christensen and Jack Ferrell National Renewable Energy Laboratory Mariefel V. Olarte and Asanga B. Padmaperuma Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Technical Report NREL/TP-5100-65889 March 2016 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable

  11. Fluorescence spectra and biological activity of aerosolized bacillus spores and MS2 bacteriophage exposed to ozone at different relative humidities in a rotating drum

    SciTech Connect

    Ratnesar-Shumate, Shanna; Pan, Yong-Le; Hill, Steven C.; Kinahan, Sean; Corson, Elizabeth; Eshbaugh, Jonathan; Santarpia, Joshua L.

    2015-10-14

    Biological aerosols (bioaerosols) released into the environment may undergo physical and chemical transformations when exposed to atmospheric constituents such as solar irradiation, reactive oxygenated species, ozone, free radicals, water vapor and pollutants. Aging experiments were performed in a rotating drum chamber subjecting bioaerosols, Bacillus thuringiensis Al Hakam (BtAH) spores and MS2 bacteriophages to ozone at 0 and 150 ppb, and relative humidities (RH) at 10%, 50%, and 80+%. Fluorescence spectra and intensities of the aerosols as a function of time in the reaction chamber were measured with a single particle fluorescence spectrometer (SPFS) and an Ultra-Violet Aerodynamic Particle Sizer® Spectrometer (UV-APS). Losses in biological activity were measured by culture and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR) assay. For both types of aerosols the largest change in fluorescence emission was between 280 and 400 nm when excited at 263 nm followed by fluorescence emission between 380 and 700 nm when excited at 351 nm. The fluorescence for both BtAH and MS2 were observed to decrease significantly at high ozone concentration and high RH when excited at 263 nm excitation. The decreases in 263 nm excited fluorescence are indicative of hydrolysis and oxidation of tryptophan in the aerosols. Fluorescence measured with the UV-APS (355-nm excitation) increased with time for both BtAH and MS2 aerosols. A two log loss of MS2 bacteriophage infectivity was observed in the presence of ozone at ~50% and 80% RH when measured by culture and normalized for physical losses by q-PCR. Viability of BtAH spores after exposure could not be measured due to the loss of genomic material during experiments, suggesting degradation of extracelluar DNA attributable to oxidation. The results of these studies indicate that the physical and biological properties of bioaerosols change significantly after exposure to ozone and water vapor.

  12. EIS-0286: Revised Draft Environmental Import Statement

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Richland Operations Office, Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program, Richland, Washington

  13. EIS-0119-SA-01: Supplement Analysis

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Decommissioning of Eight Surplus Production Reactors at the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington, Richland Operations Office

  14. The use of DRIFTS-MS and kinetic studies to determine the role of acetic acid in the palladium-catalyzed vapor-phase synthesis of vinyl acetate

    SciTech Connect

    Augustine, S.M.; Blitz, J.P. (Quantum Chemical Corp., Cincinnati, OH (United States))

    1993-07-01

    Supported palladium catalyzes the synthesis of vinyl acetate (VA) by oxyacetylation of ethylene. Alkali promoters increase activity and selectivity. The role of acetic acid (HOAc) in these processes is not well understood. Activation energy studies show that HOAc alters the catalyst site and lowers the reaction barrier to VA formation. After correction for this effect, the kinetics reveal that as a reagent HOAc is zero order. This is probably due to a strong adsorption of HOAc and Pd which forms the catalyst active phase. Detailed spectroscopic studies support this conclusion. The surface processes on a supported vinyl acetate catalyst were studied using a method which couples diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) with mass spectrometry (MS). The DRIFTS-MS technique combines the capability of selectively analyzing IR-active surface species with sensitive detection of transient reaction products. By comparing the catalyst with mixtures of palladium acetate powder physically dispersed in potassium chloride, it is determined that the active phase on the catalyst is a form of palladium acetate. Compound formation is consistent with the strong chemisorption of HOAc on Pd. Kinetic analysis of temperature-programmed reaction(TPRxn) data suggests that Pd metal or metal oxide adjacent to the active site is important in the reaction mechanism. 25 refs., 10 figs., 2 tabs.

  15. Subcellular-level resolution MALDI-MS imaging of maize leaf metabolites by MALDI-linear ion trap-Orbitrap mass spectrometer

    DOE PAGES [OSTI]

    Korte, Andrew R.; Yandeau-Nelson, Marna D.; Nikolau, Basil J.; Lee, Young Jin

    2015-01-25

    A significant limiting factor in achieving high spatial resolution for matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) imaging is the size of the laser spot at the sample surface. We present modifications to the beam-delivery optics of a commercial MALDI-linear ion trap-Orbitrap instrument, incorporating an external Nd:YAG laser, beam-shaping optics, and an aspheric focusing lens, to reduce the minimum laser spot size from ~50 μm for the commercial configuration down to ~9 μm for the modified configuration. This improved system was applied for MALDI-MS imaging of cross sections of juvenile maize leaves at 5-μm spatial resolution using an oversampling method. Theremore » are a variety of different metabolites including amino acids, glycerolipids, and defense-related compounds were imaged at a spatial resolution well below the size of a single cell. Such images provide unprecedented insights into the metabolism associated with the different tissue types of the maize leaf, which is known to asymmetrically distribute the reactions of C4 photosynthesis among the mesophyll and bundle sheath cell types. The metabolite ion images correlate with the optical images that reveal the structures of the different tissues, and previously known and newly revealed asymmetric metabolic features are observed.« less

  16. Subcellular-level resolution MALDI-MS imaging of maize leaf metabolites by MALDI-linear ion trap-Orbitrap mass spectrometer

    SciTech Connect

    Korte, Andrew R.; Yandeau-Nelson, Marna D.; Nikolau, Basil J.; Lee, Young Jin

    2015-01-25

    A significant limiting factor in achieving high spatial resolution for matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) imaging is the size of the laser spot at the sample surface. We present modifications to the beam-delivery optics of a commercial MALDI-linear ion trap-Orbitrap instrument, incorporating an external Nd:YAG laser, beam-shaping optics, and an aspheric focusing lens, to reduce the minimum laser spot size from ~50 μm for the commercial configuration down to ~9 μm for the modified configuration. This improved system was applied for MALDI-MS imaging of cross sections of juvenile maize leaves at 5-μm spatial resolution using an oversampling method. There are a variety of different metabolites including amino acids, glycerolipids, and defense-related compounds were imaged at a spatial resolution well below the size of a single cell. Such images provide unprecedented insights into the metabolism associated with the different tissue types of the maize leaf, which is known to asymmetrically distribute the reactions of C4 photosynthesis among the mesophyll and bundle sheath cell types. The metabolite ion images correlate with the optical images that reveal the structures of the different tissues, and previously known and newly revealed asymmetric metabolic features are observed.

  17. HABAdv#1671.doc

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    6 Subject: U Plant Closure Plan Adopted: September 10, 2004 Page 1 September 10, 2004 Keith Klein, Manager U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations P.O. Box 550 (A7-50) Richland, WA 99352 Linda Hoffman, Director Washington State Department of Ecology P.O. Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 Ron Kreizeneeck, Acting Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, WA 98101 Subject: U Plant Closure Plan Dear Mssrs. Klein, Kreizeneeck, and Ms.

  18. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATIONIMODIFICATION OF CONTRACT I CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    I CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES 1 14 2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3 EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE RED. NO 5. PRtOJECT NO. (if pplicable) 186 See Block 16CL 6. ISSUED BY CODE j 0603 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE 00603 office of River Protection Office of River Protection U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy office of River Protection office of River Protection P.O. Box 450 P.O. Box 450 Richland WA 99352 MS: H6-60 Richland WA 99352 6. NAME AND ADDRESS OF

  19. DE-AC27-08RV14800

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    See Schedule BOISE ID 837290073 806500521 WASHINGTON RIVER PROTECTION SOLUTIONS LLC Richland WA 99352 MS: H6-60 00603 P.O. Box 450 Office of River Protection U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection Richland WA 99352 00603 P.O. Box 450 Office of River Protection U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection 04/14/2016 0378 2 1 13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14. 12. ACCOUNTING AND

  20. DE-AC27-08RV14800

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    N/A BOISE ID 837290073 806500521 WASHINGTON RIVER PROTECTION SOLUTIONS LLC Richland WA 99352 MS: H6-60 00603 P.O. Box 450 Office of River Protection U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection Richland WA 99352 00603 P.O. Box 450 Office of River Protection U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection 05/05/2015 0333 2 1 13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14. 12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

  1. DE-AC27-08RV14800

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    01 806500521 WASHINGTON RIVER PROTECTION SOLUTIONS LLC Richland WA 99352 MS: H6-60 00603 P.O. Box 450 Office of River Protection U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection Richland WA 99352 00603 P.O. Box 450 Office of River Protection U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection 10EM003843 See Block 16C 073 4 1 13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14. 12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If

  2. DE-AC27-08RV14800

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    AIKEN SC 298013852 806500521 WASHINGTON RIVER PROTECTION SOLUTIONS LLC Richland WA 99352 MS: H6-60 00603 P.O. Box 450 Office of River Protection U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection Richland WA 99352 00603 P.O. Box 450 Office of River Protection U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection 09EM001555 08/20/2009 023 3 1 13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14. 12. ACCOUNTING AND

  3. DE-AC27-08RV14800

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    BOISE ID 837290001 806500521 WASHINGTON RIVER PROTECTION SOLUTIONS LLC Richland WA 99352 MS: H6-60 00603 P.O. Box 450 Office of River Protection U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection Richland WA 99352 00603 P.O. Box 450 Office of River Protection U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection See Schedule 09/14/2009 026 3 1 13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14. 12. ACCOUNTING AND

  4. DE-AC27-08RV14800

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    BOISE ID 837290001 806500521 WASHINGTON RIVER PROTECTION SOLUTIONS LLC Richland WA 99352 MS: H6-60 00603 P.O. Box 450 Office of River Protection U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection Richland WA 99352 00603 P.O. Box 450 Office of River Protection U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection 09EM001986 09/17/2009 027 2 1 13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14. 12. ACCOUNTING AND

  5. 2D MODIFICATION OF A CONTRACT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    2 2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. M145 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. N/A 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland,

  6. 2D MODIFICATION OF A CONTRACT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    8 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 04RV14136.006 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION

  7. 2D MODIFICATION OF A CONTRACT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    0 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 04RV14136.006 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION

  8. 2D MODIFICATION OF A CONTRACT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    2 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 04RV14136.006 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION

  9. 2D MODIFICATION OF A CONTRACT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    3 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 04RV14136.009 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION

  10. 2D MODIFICATION OF A CONTRACT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    4 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 05RV14136.001 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION

  11. 2D MODIFICATION OF A CONTRACT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    5 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 05RV14136.002 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION

  12. 2D MODIFICATION OF A CONTRACT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    6 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 05RV14136.003 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION

  13. 2D MODIFICATION OF A CONTRACT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    8 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. See Block 14 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION

  14. 2D MODIFICATION OF A CONTRACT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    1 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 02RV14136.006 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 3000 George Washington Way 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A.

  15. 2D MODIFICATION OF A CONTRACT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    2 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 02RV14136.007 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 3000 George Washington Way 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A.

  16. 2D MODIFICATION OF A CONTRACT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    4 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 03RV14136.001 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 3000 George Washington Way 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A.

  17. 2D MODIFICATION OF A CONTRACT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    5 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 03RV14136.002 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 3000 George Washington Way 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A.

  18. 2D MODIFICATION OF A CONTRACT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    6 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 03RV14136.003 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 3000 George Washington Way 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A.

  19. 2D MODIFICATION OF A CONTRACT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    7 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 03RV14136.004 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 3000 George Washington Way 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A.

  20. 2D MODIFICATION OF A CONTRACT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    8 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 03RV14136.005 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF

  1. 2D MODIFICATION OF A CONTRACT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    29 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. AN-NOPR 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) COD U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF

  2. file://L:\DOE-hanford.gov\public\boards\hab\advice\advice14.htm

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Olympia, WA 98504-7600 John Wagoner, Manager Department of Energy, Richland Operations PO Box 550 (A7-50) Richland, WA 99352 February 8, 1995 RE: Pursuit of Possible Economic Opportunities at Hanford Dear Messrs. Clarke and Wagoner, and Ms. Riveland: As Chair of the Hanford Advisory Board, I am forwarding to you the following advice, which was adopted by consensus by the Board at its meeting February 2 and 3, 1995 in Pasco, Washington: The Hanford Advisory Board endorses the pursuit of possible

  3. Microsoft Word - 2010O-03 DOE-RL Manager.doc

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    DOE-RL Manager Recommendations 2010O-03 Adopted June 4, 2010 Page 1 June 4, 2010 Inés Triay Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management EM-1/Forestal Building U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue Washington, D.C. 20585 Re: Department of Energy Richland Operations Manager Recommendations Dear Ms Triay, Thank you for encouraging the Hanford Advisory Board (Board) and me to provide recommendations regarding the selection of the next U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Richland

  4. Microsoft Word - 413 mod Page 2 UNILATERAL VERSION.doc

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    5 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) see block 16 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  5. Microsoft Word - A089 Funding.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    9 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  6. Microsoft Word - A094_SF30.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    A094 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF

  7. Microsoft Word - A100 Funding.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    A100 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF

  8. Microsoft Word - A105 Funding.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    5 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  9. Microsoft Word - A109 Funding.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    9 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  10. Microsoft Word - A111 Funding.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    1 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  11. Microsoft Word - A112, Funding.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    2 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  12. Microsoft Word - A113 Funding.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    3 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  13. Microsoft Word - A116 Funding.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    6 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  14. Microsoft Word - A119 Funding.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    9 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  15. Microsoft Word - A121- Word Version.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    1 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  16. Microsoft Word - A125- Word Version.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    5 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  17. Microsoft Word - A132- Word Version _2_.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    2 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  18. Microsoft Word - A137- Word Version.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    7 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  19. Microsoft Word - A138- Draft.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    8 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 27-08RV14136.010 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A.

  20. Microsoft Word - Draft A142 _2_.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    2 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 27-09RV14136.002 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A.

  1. Microsoft Word - Draft M141 _10-28-08_.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    1 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. N/A 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF

  2. Microsoft Word - FOI 2009-0067.REQUEST.doc

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    7, 2009 Dorothy Riehle FOIA Officer Richland Operations Office United States Department of Energy P.O. Box 550, Mail Stop A7-75 Richland, WA 99352 FOIA Request Dear Ms. Riehle, Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), we are requesting copies of public records (including email, electronic, and paper records) relating to: 1) The authorization, decision to use, and actual use of any and all pesticides and herbicides anywhere within the Hanford Reach and/or the 100 and 300 Areas

  3. Microsoft Word - Final A139.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    9 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 27-09RV14136.001 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A.

  4. Microsoft Word - Final M136 Rev3 9-30-08 _2_.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    6 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  5. Microsoft Word - HABAdv#238SystemPlanning.doc

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    8 Subject: System Planning Process Adopted: Nov. 5, 2010 Page 1 November 5, 2010 Dave Brockman, Manager U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection P.O. Box 450 (H6-60) Richland, WA 99352 Jane Hedges, Program Manager Washington State Department of Ecology 3100 Port of Benton Blvd. Richland, WA 99354 Re: System Planning Process Dear Mr. Brockman and Ms. Hedges, Background The System Plan integrates various Single-Shell Tank (SST) retrieval scenarios with potential treatment options for

  6. Microsoft Word - M051 SF 30.doc

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    M051 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF

  7. Microsoft Word - M057 Page 2.doc

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    7 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) see block 16 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  8. Microsoft Word - M063 SF 30.doc

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    3 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) see block 16 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  9. Microsoft Word - M066 SF 30.doc

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    5 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) see block 16 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  10. Microsoft Word - M068 SF 30.doc

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    8 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) see block 16 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  11. Microsoft Word - M069 SF 30.doc

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    9 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) see block 16 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  12. Microsoft Word - M071 SF 30.doc

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    1 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) see block 16 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  13. Microsoft Word - M073 SF 30.doc

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    3 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) see block 16 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  14. Microsoft Word - M084.doc

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    4 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  15. Microsoft Word - M086, Referal Bonus.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    M086 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF

  16. Microsoft Word - M087, Impact Analysis.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    7 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  17. Microsoft Word - M088.SF30.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    88 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  18. Microsoft Word - M090.SF30.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    90 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  19. Microsoft Word - M091.SF30.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    1 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  20. Microsoft Word - M092.SF30.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    2 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  1. Microsoft Word - M093.SF30.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    3 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  2. Microsoft Word - M093.SF30.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    1 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  3. Microsoft Word - M095, DOE M442.1-1.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    5 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  4. Microsoft Word - M096 Standard1 Revision.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    6 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  5. Microsoft Word - M097 DOE M450 4-1 ISMS.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    7 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  6. Microsoft Word - M099 No Cost.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    9 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  7. Microsoft Word - M103 Section G.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    3 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  8. Microsoft Word - M106 H I Clause.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    6 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  9. Microsoft Word - M107 $10 million Consent.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    7 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  10. Microsoft Word - M108 DOE O226 1A.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    8 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  11. Microsoft Word - M110 POC Change.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    4 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  12. Microsoft Word - M110 POC Change.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    10 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  13. Microsoft Word - M114 10 CFR 851.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    3 2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. M114 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA

  14. Microsoft Word - M115 Conceptual Design.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    5 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  15. Microsoft Word - M117 Melter.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    7 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  16. Microsoft Word - M118 $25 million Consent.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    8 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  17. Microsoft Word - M120- Word Version.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    0 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  18. Microsoft Word - M122 - Word Version.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    M122 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF

  19. Microsoft Word - M123- Word Version.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    3 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/

  20. Microsoft Word - M124- Word Version.DOC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    4 3. EFFECTIVE DATE (M/D/Y) See Block 16C 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection P. O. Box 450, MS H6-60 Richland, WA 99352 8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO. Bechtel National, Inc. 2435 Stevens Center Place 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) Richland, WA 99352 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/