National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for locations utah officess

  1. Utah Geothermal Area | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Utah Geothermal Area Utah Geothermal Area Utah has two geothermal electric plants: the 23-megawatt Roosevelt Hot Springs facility near Milford run by Utah Power and CalEnergy Corp., and the Utah Municipal Power Association's Cove Fort Station, which is located north of Beaver, Utah. Photo of the Bud L. Bonnett Geothermal Plant in Cove Fort Sulphurdale, UT

  2. University of Utah | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    University of Utah University of Utah FORGE logos 010416-06.jpg The Milford, Utah FORGE team, led by the University of Utah - Energy & Geoscience Institute (EGI), has identified a location where they propose to establish a geothermal laboratory. The proposed area has an established history of geothermal research and development, with a vast set of data from exploration wells and seismic stations that will help the Milford, Utah FORGE team characterize their potential site. The Milford, Utah

  3. Monticello, Utah, Disposal and Processing Sites

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Monticello, Utah, Disposal and Processing Sites This fact sheet provides information about the Monticello, Utah, Disposal and Processing Sites. These sites are managed by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. Location of the Monticello, Utah, Disposal and Processing Sites Site Description and History The Monticello, Utah, Disposal and Processing Sites are located in and near the city of

  4. Salt Lake County, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Creek Valley, Utah Magna, Utah Midvale, Utah Millcreek, Utah Mount Olympus, Utah Murray, Utah Riverton, Utah Salt Lake City, Utah Sandy, Utah South Jordan, Utah South Salt...

  5. Davis County, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Utah Fruit Heights, Utah Kaysville, Utah Layton, Utah North Salt Lake, Utah South Weber, Utah Sunset, Utah Syracuse, Utah West Bountiful, Utah West Point, Utah Woods Cross,...

  6. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Utah | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Utah Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Utah Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Utah. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 8, 2016 CX-100734 Categorical Exclusion Determination Multi-Scale Ordered Cell Structure for Cost Effective Production of Hydrogen by HTWS Award Number: DE-EE0007645 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Fuel Cell Technologies Office Date: 8/19/2016 Location(s): UT Office(s): Golden Field Office August 11, 2016 CX-100680 Categorical Exclusion

  7. Mexican Hat, Utah, Disposal Site Fact Sheet

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Mexican Hat, Utah, Disposal Site This fact sheet provides information about the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978 Title I processing site at Mexican Hat, Utah. This site is managed by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management. Location of the Mexican Hat, Utah, Disposal Cell Site Location and History The Mexican Hat disposal site is located on the Navajo Reservation in southeast Utah, 1.5 miles southwest of the town of Mexican Hat and 1 mile south of the San

  8. Emery County, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Clawson, Utah Cleveland, Utah Elmo, Utah Emery, Utah Ferron, Utah Green River, Utah Huntington, Utah Orangeville, Utah Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleEmery...

  9. Wasatch County, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Green Joules Pan Am Biofuels Inc Places in Wasatch County, Utah Charleston, Utah Daniel, Utah Heber, Utah Midway, Utah Park City, Utah Timber Lakes, Utah Wallsburg, Utah...

  10. Green River, Utah, Disposal Site Fact Sheet

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Green River, Utah, Disposal Site This fact sheet provides information about the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978 Title I disposal site near Green River, Utah. This site is managed by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management. Location of the Green River, Utah, Disposal Site Site Description and History The Green River disposal site is about 0.5 mile east of the Green River and 1.5 miles southeast of the city of Green River, Utah. The site consists of an

  11. Workplace Charging Challenge Partner: Utah Paperbox | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Utah Paperbox Workplace Charging Challenge Partner: Utah Paperbox Workplace Charging Challenge Partner: Utah Paperbox Joined the Challenge: May 2014 Headquarters: Salt Lake City, UT Charging Location: Salt Lake City, UT Domestic Employees: 220 Salt Lake City has a unique air quality problem. In the wintertime, the city gets temperature inversions which can trap pollution. This can make the city's air quality very unhealthy in a matter of days. While there is no magic bullet, Utah PaperBox

  12. Cache County, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Climate Zone Number 6 Climate Zone Subtype B. Places in Cache County, Utah Amalga, Utah Avon, Utah Benson, Utah Cache, Utah Clarkston, Utah Cornish, Utah Cove, Utah Hyde Park, Utah...

  13. Milford, Utah FORGE Logo | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Logo Milford, Utah FORGE Logo Milford, Utah FORGE Logo More Documents & Publications Milford, Utah FORGE Logo Milford, Utah FORGE Map Milford, Utah FORGE Logo West Flank FORGE Logo Milford, Utah FORGE Logo Newberry FORGE Logo

  14. Milford, Utah FORGE Map | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Map Milford, Utah FORGE Map Milford, Utah FORGE Map More Documents & Publications Milford, Utah FORGE Map Milford, Utah FORGE Logo University of Utah Phase 1 Report Milford, Utah FORGE Map Newberry FORGE Map

  15. Juab County, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    169-2006 Climate Zone Number 5 Climate Zone Subtype B. Places in Juab County, Utah Eureka, Utah Levan, Utah Mona, Utah Nephi, Utah Rocky Ridge, Utah Santaquin, Utah Retrieved...

  16. ,"Utah Natural Gas Summary"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ..."N3050UT3","N3010UT3","N3020UT3","N3035UT3","NA1570SUT3","N3045UT3" "Date","Utah Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Utah Natural Gas Pipeline and ...

  17. ,"Utah Natural Gas Summary"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Prices" "Sourcekey","N3050UT3","N3010UT3","N3020UT3","N3035UT3","N3045UT3" "Date","Natural Gas Citygate Price in Utah (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)","Utah Price of Natural Gas ...

  18. 1999 ESH&Q Liability Assessment Report of Envirocare of Utah, Inc. Clive, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Trump, D. E.; Vilord, C. E.

    1999-07-01

    This report contains the results of an environment, safety, health, and quality (ESH&Q) assessment of the treatment technologies and treatment-related operations that was conducted of Envirocare of Utah, Inc. (EOU). EOU is a lowlevel radioactive and mixed Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)- regulated haz.ardous low-level radioactive waste (mixed low-level waste) treatment/disposal facility located near Clive, Utah. An ESH&Q assessment of the EOU Clive, Utah facility treatment technologies and related treatment operations was conducted in mid-April 1999. The assessment was required as part of the technical evaluation of proposals received by Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company (LMITCO) for modification of a mixed low-level radioactive waste disposal subcontract (No.K79-180572). The EOU Clive, Utah facility is proposed as a potential treatment/disposal facility for mixed low-level radioactive waste regulated under the RCRA and the Atomic Energy Act

  19. CX-012037: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Jordan School District and Utah Transit Authority Compressed Natural Gas Buses CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B3.6 Date: 04/15/2014 Location(s): Utah, Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  20. Utah Department of Commerce | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Commerce Jump to: navigation, search Name: Utah Department of Commerce Address: 160 East 300 South Place: Salt Lake City, Utah Zip: 84111 References: Utah Commerce Website1 This...

  1. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- University of Utah Medical...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Name: None Location: Salt Lake City , Utah UT.02-2 Evaluation Year: 1987 UT.02-1 Site Operations: Research and development on animal inhalation of uranium dust during the 1950s. ...

  2. Bibliography of Utah radioactive occurrences. Volume I

    SciTech Connect

    Doelling, H.H. comp.

    1983-07-01

    The references in this bibliography were assembled by reviewing published bibliographies of Utah geology, unpublished reports of the US Geological Survey and the Department of Energy, and various university theses. Each of the listings is cross-referenced by location and subject matter. This report is published in two volumes.

  3. Bibliography of Utah radioactive occurrences. Volume II

    SciTech Connect

    Doelling, H.H.

    1983-07-01

    The references in this bibliography were assembled by reviewing published bibliographies of Utah geology, unpublished reports of the US Geological Survey and the Department of Energy, and various university theses. Each of the listings is cross-referenced by location and subject matter. This report is published in two volumes.

  4. BLM Utah State Office | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Utah State Office Jump to: navigation, search Logo: BLM Utah State Office Name: BLM Utah State Office Abbreviation: Utah Address: 440 West 200 South, Suite 500 Place: Salt Lake...

  5. Field Projects: Monticello, Utah

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    A permeable reactive barrier (PRB) of zero-valent iron is helping to clean up groundwater at a former uranium and vanadium ore processing mill at Monticello, Utah. LM managed remediation of...

  6. Utah_cm_smith

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Cindy and Mack Smith Site - Utah Wind Anemometer Loan Program Latitude: N. 37 deg. 44.034' Longitude: W. 109 deg. 17.28' Elevation: 6762' Placed in service: November 21, 2002...

  7. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Utah

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Utah Utah ut_map Green River Site Mexican Hat Site Monticello Site Salt Lake City Sites (2)

  8. Beaver County, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Facility Blundell 2 Geothermal Facility Places in Beaver County, Utah Beaver, Utah Milford, Utah Minersville, Utah Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleBeaver...

  9. Utah DEQ Air Permitting Branch Webpage | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    link for Utah DEQ Air Permitting Branch Webpage Citation Utah Department of Environmental Quality. Utah DEQ Air Permitting Branch Webpage Internet. State of Utah. cited 201411...

  10. Utah Air Guidance Documents Webpage | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    link for Utah Air Guidance Documents Webpage Citation Utah Department of Environmental Quality. Utah Air Guidance Documents Webpage Internet. State of Utah. cited 201411...

  11. Washington County, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Number 3 Climate Zone Subtype B. Registered Energy Companies in Washington County, Utah Verdi Energy Group Places in Washington County, Utah Apple Valley, Utah Enterprise, Utah...

  12. Utah Natural Gas Processed in Utah (Million Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Utah (Million Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas Processed in Utah (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 489,947 526,290 440,712 411,399 379,487 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 10/31/2016 Next Release Date: 11/30/2016 Referring Pages: Natural Gas Processed Utah-Utah

  13. EA-1870: Utah Coal and Biomass Fueled Pilot Plant, Kanab, Kane County, Utah

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy prepared an Environmental Assessment to evaluate the potential impacts of providing financial assistance to Viresco Energy, LLC, for its construction and operation of a Coal and Biomass Fueled Pilot Plant, which would be located in Kanab, Utah.

  14. CX-008571: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Project Blue Energy CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 06/20/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  15. Utah + workshop + GRR | OpenEI Community

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    2012 - 14:45 Utah Meeting 1 Utah + workshop + GRR On Thursday, September 6, we met in Salt Lake City with Utah state agencies to review geothermal permitting flowcharts developed...

  16. Draper, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Draper is a city in Salt Lake County and Utah County, Utah. It falls under Utah's 2nd congressional...

  17. Utah DEQ Website | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Website Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Utah DEQ Website Author Utah Department of Environmental Quality Published Utah Department of...

  18. Utah Geological Survey | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Logo: Utah Geological Survey Name: Utah Geological Survey Address: 1594 W. North Temple Place: Salt Lake City, Utah Zip: 84114-6100 Phone Number: 801.537.3300 Website:...

  19. Utah's Public Notice Website | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Not Provided DOI Not Provided Check for DOI availability: http:crossref.org Online Internet link for Utah's Public Notice Website Citation Utah.gov. Utah's Public Notice Website...

  20. Utah/Incentives | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    RecruitmentSupport Yes City of St. George - Energy Efficient Homes Rebate Program (Utah) Utility Rebate Program No City of St. George - Energy Star Appliance Rebate Program (Utah)...

  1. Utah Municipal Power Agency | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Municipal Power Agency Place: Utah Phone Number: (801) 798-7489 Website: www.umpa.cc Facebook: https:www.facebook.compagesUtah-Municipal-Power-Agency152219714819535 Outage...

  2. Utah/Wind Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    UtahWind Resources < Utah Jump to: navigation, search Print PDF Print Full Version WIND ENERGY STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT & OUTREACHSmall Wind Guidebook OpenEI Home >> Wind >>...

  3. Orem, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Utah's 3rd congressional district.12 Registered Energy Companies in Orem, Utah Better Biodiesel Domestic Energy Partners Trulite Inc References US Census Bureau...

  4. Lehi, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Utah's 3rd congressional district.12 Registered Energy Companies in Lehi, Utah Tasco Engineering Inc References US Census Bureau Incorporated place and minor civil...

  5. Utah Code Annotated | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Code Ann. DOI Not Provided Check for DOI availability: http:crossref.org Online Internet link for Utah Code Annotated Citation Utah Code Annotated (2014). Retrieved from...

  6. Utah Solar Outlook March 2010

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This presentation provides an overview of Utah's solar market, policy initiatives, and progress to date on the Solar America Cities Project: Solar Salt Lake.

  7. CX-009471: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Utah Expansion of Alternative Fuel Infrastructure - Lehi Compressed Natural Gas Station CX(s) Applied: B5.22 Date: 10/15/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  8. CX-009267: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Basin-Scale Produced Water Management Tools and Options CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1 Date: 09/11/2012 Location(s): Utah, Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  9. CX-010303: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Utah Expansion of Alternative Fueling Infrastructure CX(s) Applied: B5.22 Date: 04/30/2013 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  10. CX-011731: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    University of Utah - Electromagnetic Sorting of Light Metals and Alloys CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/12/2013 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy

  11. CX-008247: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Association of American State Geologist Submissions to the National Geothermal Data System - Utah CX(s) Applied: B3.1, B3.6 Date: 05/01/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  12. CX-007756: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Routine Activities at the Green River, Utah, Disposal Site CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B3.1 Date: 01/18/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Legacy Management

  13. CX-008794: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Transformer Replacement and Foundation Work at Flaming Gorge Substation Daggett County, Utah CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 10/05/2011 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Rocky Mountain Region

  14. CX-008570: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    State Energy Program Formula Grant for the State of Utah CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 06/25/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  15. Reconnaissance of the hydrothermal resources of Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Rush, F.E.

    1983-01-01

    Geologic factors in the Basin and Range province in Utah are more favorable for the occurrence of geothermal resources than in other areas on the Colorado Plateaus or in the Middle Rocky Mountains. These geologic factors are principally crustal extension and crustal thinning during the last 17 million years. Basalts as young as 10,000 years have been mapped in the area. High-silica volcanic and intrusive rocks of Quaternary age can be used to locate hydrothermal convection systems. Drilling for hot, high-silica, buried rock bodies is most promising in the areas of recent volcanic activity. Southwestern Utah has more geothermal potential than other parts of the Basin and Range province in Utah. The Roosevelt Hot Springs area, the Cove Fort-Sulphurdale area, and the area to the north as far as 60 kilometers from them probably have the best potential for geothermal development for generation of electricity. Other areas with estimated reservoir temperatures greater than 150/sup 0/C are Thermo, Monroe, Red Hill (in the Monroe-Joseph Known Geothermal Resource Area), Joseph Hot Springs, and the Newcastle area. The rates of heat and water discharge are high at Crater, Meadow, and Hatton Hot Springs, but estimated reservoir temperatures there are less than 150/sup 0/C. Additional exploration is needed to define the potential in three additional areas in the Escalante Desert. 28 figs., 18 tabs.

  16. Utah/Wind Resources/Full Version | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    info@distributedwind.org Distributed Wind Energy Association Utah Wind Resources Utah Office of Energy Development: Wind Energy Information AWEA State Wind Energy Statistics: Utah...

  17. Utah - UAC R907-1 - Utah Administrative Procedures | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    07-1 - Utah Administrative Procedures Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: Utah - UAC R907-1 - Utah...

  18. MAJOR OIL PLAYS IN UTAH AND VICINITY

    SciTech Connect

    Thomas C. Chidsey, Jr.

    2003-01-01

    Utah oil fields have produced a total of 1.2 billion barrels (191 million m{sup 3}). However, the 15 million barrels (2.4 million m{sup 3}) of production in 2000 was the lowest level in over 40 years and continued the steady decline that began in the mid-1980s. The Utah Geological Survey believes this trend can be reversed by providing play portfolios for the major oil producing provinces (Paradox Basin, Uinta Basin, and thrust belt) in Utah and adjacent areas in Colorado and Wyoming. Oil plays are geographic areas with petroleum potential caused by favorable combinations of source rock, migration paths, reservoir rock characteristics, and other factors. The play portfolios will include: descriptions and maps of the major oil plays by reservoir; production and reservoir data; case-study field evaluations; summaries of the state-of-the-art drilling, completion, and secondary/tertiary techniques for each play; locations of major oil pipelines; descriptions of reservoir outcrop analogs; and identification and discussion of land use constraints. All play maps, reports, databases, and so forth, produced for the project will be published in interactive, menu-driven digital (web-based and compact disc) and hard-copy formats. This report covers research activities for the first quarter of the first project year (July 1 through September 30, 2002). This work included producing general descriptions of Utah's major petroleum provinces, gathering field data, and analyzing best practices in the Utah Wyoming thrust belt. Major Utah oil reservoirs and/or source rocks are found in Devonian through Permian, Jurassic, Cretaceous, and Tertiary rocks. Stratigraphic traps include carbonate buildups and fluvial-deltaic pinchouts, and structural traps include basement-involved and detached faulted anticlines. Best practices used in Utah's oil fields consist of waterflood, carbon-dioxide flood, gas-injection, and horizontal drilling programs. Nitrogen injection and horizontal drilling

  19. Utah School Children "Help Utah Out, Turn off the Spout!" | Department...

    Energy Saver

    winning poster from Utah's Water Energy in Action slogan competition. | Photo by Julie Howe, Energy Department The winning poster from Utah's Water Energy in Action slogan ...

  20. MAJOR OIL PLAYS IN UTAH AND VICINITY

    SciTech Connect

    Thomas C. Chidsey Jr; Craig D. Morgan; Roger L. Bon

    2003-07-01

    Utah oil fields have produced over 1.2 billion barrels (191 million m{sup 3}). However, the 13.7 million barrels (2.2 million m{sup 3}) of production in 2002 was the lowest level in over 40 years and continued the steady decline that began in the mid-1980s. The Utah Geological Survey believes this trend can be reversed by providing play portfolios for the major oil producing provinces (Paradox Basin, Uinta Basin, and thrust belt) in Utah and adjacent areas in Colorado and Wyoming. Oil plays are geographic areas with petroleum potential caused by favorable combinations of source rock, migration paths, reservoir rock characteristics, and other factors. The play portfolios will include: descriptions and maps of the major oil plays by reservoir; production and reservoir data; case-study field evaluations; summaries of the state-of-the-art drilling, completion, and secondary/tertiary techniques for each play; locations of major oil pipelines; descriptions of reservoir outcrop analogs; and identification and discussion of land use constraints. All play maps, reports, databases, and so forth, produced for the project will be published in interactive, menu-driven digital (web-based and compact disc) and hard-copy formats. This report covers research activities for the third quarter of the first project year (January 1 through March 31, 2003). This work included gathering field data and analyzing best practices in the eastern Uinta Basin, Utah, and the Colorado portion of the Paradox Basin. Best practices used in oil fields of the eastern Uinta Basin consist of conversion of all geophysical well logs into digital form, running small fracture treatments, fingerprinting oil samples from each producing zone, running spinner surveys biannually, mapping each producing zone, and drilling on 80-acre (32 ha) spacing. These practices ensure that induced fractures do not extend vertically out of the intended zone, determine the percentage each zone contributes to the overall

  1. Utah Heavy Oil Program

    SciTech Connect

    J. Bauman; S. Burian; M. Deo; E. Eddings; R. Gani; R. Goel; C.K. Huang; M. Hogue; R. Keiter; L. Li; J. Ruple; T. Ring; P. Rose; M. Skliar; P.J. Smith; J.P. Spinti; P. Tiwari; J. Wilkey; K. Uchitel

    2009-10-20

    The Utah Heavy Oil Program (UHOP) was established in June 2006 to provide multidisciplinary research support to federal and state constituents for addressing the wide-ranging issues surrounding the creation of an industry for unconventional oil production in the United States. Additionally, UHOP was to serve as an on-going source of unbiased information to the nation surrounding technical, economic, legal and environmental aspects of developing heavy oil, oil sands, and oil shale resources. UHOP fulGilled its role by completing three tasks. First, in response to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 Section 369(p), UHOP published an update report to the 1987 technical and economic assessment of domestic heavy oil resources that was prepared by the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission. The UHOP report, entitled 'A Technical, Economic, and Legal Assessment of North American Heavy Oil, Oil Sands, and Oil Shale Resources' was published in electronic and hard copy form in October 2007. Second, UHOP developed of a comprehensive, publicly accessible online repository of unconventional oil resources in North America based on the DSpace software platform. An interactive map was also developed as a source of geospatial information and as a means to interact with the repository from a geospatial setting. All documents uploaded to the repository are fully searchable by author, title, and keywords. Third, UHOP sponsored Give research projects related to unconventional fuels development. Two projects looked at issues associated with oil shale production, including oil shale pyrolysis kinetics, resource heterogeneity, and reservoir simulation. One project evaluated in situ production from Utah oil sands. Another project focused on water availability and produced water treatments. The last project considered commercial oil shale leasing from a policy, environmental, and economic perspective.

  2. Annotated geothermal bibliography of Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Budding, K.E.; Bugden, M.H.

    1986-01-01

    The bibliography includes all the Utah geothermal references through 1984. Some 1985 citations are listed. Geological, geophysical, and tectonic maps and reports are included if they cover a high-temperature thermal area. The references are indexed geographically either under (1) United States (national studies), (2) regional - western United States or physiographic province, (3) Utah - statewide and regional, or (4) county. Reports concerning a particular hot spring or thermal area are listed under both the thermal area and the county names.

  3. Utah Clean Cities Transportation Sector Petroleum Reduction Technologi...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    More Documents & Publications Utah Clean Cities Transportation Sector Petroleum Reduction Technologies Program Utah Clean Cities Transportation Sector Petroleum Reduction ...

  4. RAPID/Overview/Geothermal/Exploration/Utah | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Utah < RAPID | Overview | Geothermal | Exploration(Redirected from RAPIDAtlasGeothermalExplorationUtah) Redirect page Jump to: navigation, search REDIRECT...

  5. MAJOR OIL PLAYS IN UTAH AND VICINITY

    SciTech Connect

    Thomas C. Chidsey; Craig D. Morgan; Kevin McClure; Grant C. Willis

    2003-09-01

    Utah oil fields have produced over 1.2 billion barrels (191 million m{sup 3}). However, the 13.7 million barrels (2.2 million m{sup 3}) of production in 2002 was the lowest level in over 40 years and continued the steady decline that began in the mid-1980s. The Utah Geological Survey believes this trend can be reversed by providing play portfolios for the major oil-producing provinces (Paradox Basin, Uinta Basin, and thrust belt) in Utah and adjacent areas in Colorado and Wyoming. Oil plays are geographic areas with petroleum potential caused by favorable combinations of source rock, migration paths, reservoir rock characteristics, and other factors. The play portfolios will include: descriptions and maps of the major oil plays by reservoir; production and reservoir data; case-study field evaluations; summaries of the state-of-the-art drilling, completion, and secondary/tertiary techniques for each play; locations of major oil pipelines; descriptions of reservoir outcrop analogs; and identification and discussion of land use constraints. All play maps, reports, databases, and so forth, produced for the project will be published in interactive, menu-driven digital (web-based and compact disc) and hard-copy formats. This report covers research activities for the fourth quarter of the first project year (April 1 through June 30, 2003). This work included describing outcrop analogs to the Jurassic Nugget Sandstone and Pennsylvanian Paradox Formation, the major oil producers in the thrust belt and Paradox Basin, respectively. Production-scale outcrop analogs provide an excellent view, often in three dimensions, of reservoir-facies characteristics and boundaries contributing to the overall heterogeneity of reservoir rocks. They can be used as a ''template'' for evaluation of data from conventional core, geophysical and petrophysical logs, and seismic surveys. The Nugget Sandstone was deposited in an extensive dune field that extended from Wyoming to Arizona. Outcrop

  6. Utah Antidegradation Review Form | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Utah Antidegradation Review Form Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Form: Utah Antidegradation Review Form Form Type ApplicationNotice Form Topic...

  7. Utah Public Service Commission | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Lake City, Utah Zip: 84114 Phone Number: 801.530.6716 Website: www.psc.utah.govindex.html References: PSC homepage1 This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding...

  8. Sandy, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Sandy is a city in Salt Lake County, Utah. It falls under Utah's 2nd congressional district.12 Registered...

  9. Milford, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Milford is a city in Beaver County, Utah. It falls under Utah's 3rd congressional...

  10. Utah Meeting #1 | OpenEI Community

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Utah Meeting 1 Home > Blogs > Kyoung's blog Kyoung's picture Submitted by Kyoung(150) Contributor 10 September, 2012 - 13:45 Utah + workshop + GRR On Thursday, September 6, we met...

  11. Utah Water Rights Flowchart | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Flowchart Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Utah Water Rights Flowchart Abstract Provides access to flowchart of Utah's water rights...

  12. OpenEI Community - Utah + workshop + GRR

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Utah Meeting 1 http:en.openei.orgcommunityblogutah-meeting-1

    On Thursday, September 6, we met in Salt Lake City with Utah state agencies to review geothermal permitting...

  13. Utah Department of Transportation | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Lake City, Utah Zip: 84114 Phone Number: 801.965.4000 Website: www.udot.utah.govmainf?p100 References: UDOT homepage1 This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by...

  14. Major Oil Plays in Utah and Vicinity

    SciTech Connect

    Thomas C. Chidsey; Craig D. Morgan; Kevin McClure; Douglas A. Sprinkel; Roger L. Bon; Hellmut H. Doelling

    2003-12-31

    Utah oil fields have produced over 1.2 billion barrels (191 million m{sup 3}). However, the 13.7 million barrels (2.2 million m{sup 3}) of production in 2002 was the lowest level in over 40 years and continued the steady decline that began in the mid-1980s. The Utah Geological Survey believes this trend can be reversed by providing play portfolios for the major oil-producing provinces (Paradox Basin, Uinta Basin, and thrust belt) in Utah and adjacent areas in Colorado and Wyoming. Oil plays are geographic areas with petroleum potential caused by favorable combinations of source rock, migration paths, reservoir rock characteristics, and other factors. The play portfolios will include: descriptions and maps of the major oil plays by reservoir; production and reservoir data; case-study field evaluations; locations of major oil pipelines; identification and discussion of land-use constraints; descriptions of reservoir outcrop analogs; and summaries of the state-of-the-art drilling, completion, and secondary/tertiary techniques for each play. This report covers research activities for the sixth quarter of the project (October 1 through December 31, 2003). This work included describing outcrop analogs for the Jurassic Twin Creek Limestone and Mississippian Leadville Limestone, major oil producers in the thrust belt and Paradox Basin, respectively, and analyzing best practices used in the southern Green River Formation play of the Uinta Basin. Production-scale outcrop analogs provide an excellent view of reservoir petrophysics, facies characteristics, and boundaries contributing to the overall heterogeneity of reservoir rocks. They can be used as a ''template'' for evaluation of data from conventional core, geophysical and petrophysical logs, and seismic surveys. In the Utah/Wyoming thrust belt province, the Jurassic Twin Creek Limestone produces from subsidiary closures along major ramp anticlines where the low-porosity limestone beds are extensively fractured and sealed

  15. Prospects for Utah look good

    SciTech Connect

    Buchsbaum, L.

    2006-01-15

    Utah enjoys its first boom in over a generation. Recently Arch Coal, Andalex, CONSOl Energy and PacifiCorp ramped up their coal mining operations or re-opened closed facilities. Arch Coal's Skyline mine was able to mine over 200,0000 tons of coal throughout 2005 and its SUFCO mine produced 7.5 mt of coal during 2005. The article based largely on the recent 'Annual review and forecast of Utah coal', reports on developments in the state whose coal production could break records in 2006. 1 ref., 4 photos.

  16. EIS-0099: Remedial Actions at the Former Vitro Chemical Company Site, South Salt Lake, Salt Lake County, Utah

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy developed this statement to evaluate the environmental impacts of various scenarios associated with the cleanup of those residues remaining at the abandoned uranium mill tailings site located in South Salt Lake, Utah.

  17. Technical analysis of prospective photovoltaic systems in Utah.

    SciTech Connect

    Quiroz, Jimmy Edward; Cameron, Christopher P.

    2012-02-01

    This report explores the technical feasibility of prospective utility-scale photovoltaic system (PV) deployments in Utah. Sandia National Laboratories worked with Rocky Mountain Power (RMP), a division of PacifiCorp operating in Utah, to evaluate prospective 2-megawatt (MW) PV plants in different locations with respect to energy production and possible impact on the RMP system and customers. The study focused on 2-MW{sub AC} nameplate PV systems of different PV technologies and different tracking configurations. Technical feasibility was evaluated at three different potential locations in the RMP distribution system. An advanced distribution simulation tool was used to conduct detailed time-series analysis on each feeder and provide results on the impacts on voltage, demand, voltage regulation equipment operations, and flicker. Annual energy performance was estimated.

  18. Utah State Historic Preservation Office | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Office Jump to: navigation, search Name: Utah State Historic Preservation Offic Address: 300 S. Rio Grande Street Place: Salt Lake City, Utah Zip: 84101 Website: history.utah.gov...

  19. City of Murray, Utah (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    City of Murray, Utah (Utility Company) Jump to: navigation, search Name: City of Murray Place: Utah Phone Number: (801) 264-2730 Website: www.murray.utah.govindex.aspx Outage...

  20. Utah Division of State History | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    History Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Utah Division of State History Name: Utah Division of State History Address: 300 S. Rio Grande St. Place: Salt Lake City, Utah Zip: 84101...

  1. American Fork, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. American Fork is a city in Utah County, Utah. It falls under Utah's 2nd congressional...

  2. Utah Oil and Gas Board | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Board Jump to: navigation, search Name: Utah Oil and Gas Board Address: 1594 West North Temple Place: Utah Zip: 84116 Website: oilgas.ogm.utah.gov Coordinates: 40.7721389,...

  3. Spanish Fork, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Spanish Fork is a city in Utah County, Utah. It falls under Utah's 3rd congressional...

  4. Utah Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)

    Office of Science (SC)

    state, county, city, or district. For more information, please visit the Middle School Coach page. Utah Region Middle School Regional Utah Nevada Regional Middle School Science...

  5. Utah Regions | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)

    Office of Science (SC)

    for your school's state, county, city, or district. For more information, please visit the High School Coach page. Utah Region High School Regional Utah Nevada Regional High School...

  6. Energy & Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah | Open...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah Jump to: navigation, search Name: Energy & Geoscience Institute at the University of Utah Address: 423 Wakara Way Suite 300 Place:...

  7. Utah Office of Energy Development | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Jump to: navigation, search Name: Utah Office of Energy Development Address: PO Box 144845 Place: Salt Lake City, Utah Zip: 84114 Phone Number: 801-538-8732 Website:...

  8. Guide to Permitting Electric Transmission Lines in Utah | Open...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    GuidanceGuideHandbook Abstract Guide to permitting requirements of federal, state, and local agencies. Author Utah Office of Energy Development Published Utah Office of Energy...

  9. Gamma Survey of a Permeable Reactive Barrier at Monticello, Utah...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Gamma Survey of a Permeable Reactive Barrier at Monticello, Utah Gamma Survey of a Permeable Reactive Barrier at Monticello, Utah Gamma Survey of a Permeable Reactive Barrier at...

  10. Enel North America Utah Geothermal Working Group Meeting | Open...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    America Utah Geothermal Working Group Meeting Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library General: Enel North America Utah Geothermal Working Group Meeting...

  11. Utah State Parks and Recreation | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Recreation Jump to: navigation, search Name: Utah State Parks and Recreation Address: 1594 W North Temple, Suite 116 Place: Salt Lake City, Utah Zip: 84116 Phone Number:...

  12. Utah State Prison Space Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Prison Space Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Utah State Prison Space Heating Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Facility Utah State...

  13. Utah Code Title 73, Chapter 3, Appropriation | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    (Manner of acquiring water rights) as established by the Utah Legislature in Salt Lake City, Utah. Published NA Year Signed or Took Effect 2012 Legal Citation Not...

  14. Utah Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production (Million Cubic Feet...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Liquids Production (Million Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production (Million ... NGPL Production, Gaseous Equivalent Utah Natural Gas Plant Processing NGPL Production, ...

  15. Utah Application to Appropriate Water | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Utah Application to Appropriate Water Abstract Required application for obtaining a right to appropriate water in Utah. Form Type ApplicationNotice Form Topic Filing for Water...

  16. Utah Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use (Million Cubic...

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    (Million Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use (Million Cubic Feet) ... 10312016 Referring Pages: Natural Gas Pipeline & Distribution Use Utah Natural Gas ...

  17. Utah Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use Price (Dollars...

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use ... Referring Pages: Price for Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use Utah Natural Gas ...

  18. Utah R850-27 Geothermal Steam | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    in Utah outlining the authority for the Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (UTLA) to administer trust land in the state, including the leasing of trust land...

  19. Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration | Open...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration Jump to: navigation, search Logo: Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration Name: Utah School and Institutional...

  20. Utah Roses Greenhouse Low Temperature Geothermal Facility | Open...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Roses Greenhouse Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Utah Roses Greenhouse Low Temperature Geothermal Facility Facility Utah Roses Sector...

  1. Utah Division of Public Utilities | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Salt Lake City, Utah. The Division of Public Utilities, makes recommendations to the Utah Public Service Commission for rate-making purposes, applications, hearings and other...

  2. Utah's 3rd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    district in Utah. Registered Energy Companies in Utah's 3rd congressional district Better Biodiesel Composite Tower Solutions Domestic Energy Partners Evergreen Clean Energy FT...

  3. Utah Division of Water Rights Information Webpage | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Not Provided DOI Not Provided Check for DOI availability: http:crossref.org Online Internet link for Utah Division of Water Rights Information Webpage Citation Utah Division of...

  4. Steven K. Krueger, University of Utah

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    of Cumulus Convection and the Boundary Layer at the Southern Great Plains ACRF Steven K. Krueger, University of Utah from Arakawa and Jung (2003) Interactions of Cumulus...

  5. Utah Geothermal Presentation Bloomquist | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    on geothermal energy development in Utah. Authors Dr. R. Gordon Bloomquist and Ph.D Organization Washington State University Energy Program Published Bloomquist, 2004 DOI...

  6. ,"Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","72016","01151989" ,"Release ...

  7. Daniel, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Daniel, Utah: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 40.4707885, -111.4146275 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappingservice"...

  8. Utah Antidegradation Review Implementation Guidance | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library PermittingRegulatory Guidance - GuideHandbook: Utah Antidegradation Review Implementation GuidancePermittingRegulatory...

  9. Utah Geothermal Institutional Handbook | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library PermittingRegulatory Guidance - GuideHandbook: Utah Geothermal Institutional HandbookPermittingRegulatory GuidanceGuide...

  10. Utah Labor Commission | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    The Utah Labor Commission is the regulatory agency responsible for preserving the balance established by the legislature for protecting the health, safety, and economic...

  11. ,"Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","62016","01151989" ,"Release ...

  12. Utah Antidegradation FAQ | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library PermittingRegulatory Guidance - Supplemental Material: Utah Antidegradation FAQPermittingRegulatory GuidanceSupplemental Material Abstract...

  13. Elberta, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    2006 CBSA Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleElberta,Utah&oldid233710" Feedback Contact needs updating Image needs updating Reference needed Missing...

  14. Utah Antiquities Section | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    sites and artifacts, educate the public about them, and assist professionals who are researching these cultural resources. References "Utah State History: Archaeology Website"...

  15. Teacher and Students Bring Renewables to Utah

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The light bulb went off for high school teacher Andy Swapp in 1999 when he realized he could do something good with Milford, Utah's powerful wind.

  16. ,"Utah Underground Natural Gas Storage - All Operators"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ...282016 11:29:56 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Total Underground Storage" ... Natural Gas in Underground Storage (Base Gas) (MMcf)","Utah Natural Gas in ...

  17. Recovery Act State Memos Utah

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    Utah For questions about DOE's Recovery Act activities, please contact the DOE Recovery Act Clearinghouse: 1-888-DOE-RCVY (888-363-7289), Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. Eastern Time https://recoveryclearinghouse.energy.gov/contactUs.htm. All numbers and projects listed as of June 1, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS RECOVERY ACT SNAPSHOT................................................................................... 1 FUNDING ALLOCATION

  18. Utah Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Extracted in Utah (Million Cubic

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Feet) Utah (Million Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Extracted in Utah (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 18,183 15,051 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 10/31/2016 Next Release Date: 11/30/2016 Referring Pages: NGPL Production, Gaseous Equivalent Utah-Utah

  19. Major Oil Plays In Utah And Vicinity

    SciTech Connect

    Thomas Chidsey

    2007-12-31

    Utah oil fields have produced over 1.33 billion barrels (211 million m{sup 3}) of oil and hold 256 million barrels (40.7 million m{sup 3}) of proved reserves. The 13.7 million barrels (2.2 million m3) of production in 2002 was the lowest level in over 40 years and continued the steady decline that began in the mid-1980s. However, in late 2005 oil production increased, due, in part, to the discovery of Covenant field in the central Utah Navajo Sandstone thrust belt ('Hingeline') play, and to increased development drilling in the central Uinta Basin, reversing the decline that began in the mid-1980s. The Utah Geological Survey believes providing play portfolios for the major oil-producing provinces (Paradox Basin, Uinta Basin, and thrust belt) in Utah and adjacent areas in Colorado and Wyoming can continue this new upward production trend. Oil plays are geographic areas with petroleum potential caused by favorable combinations of source rock, migration paths, reservoir rock characteristics, and other factors. The play portfolios include descriptions and maps of the major oil plays by reservoir; production and reservoir data; case-study field evaluations; locations of major oil pipelines; identification and discussion of land-use constraints; descriptions of reservoir outcrop analogs; and summaries of the state-of-the-art drilling, completion, and secondary/tertiary recovery techniques for each play. The most prolific oil reservoir in the Utah/Wyoming thrust belt province is the eolian, Jurassic Nugget Sandstone, having produced over 288 million barrels (46 million m{sup 3}) of oil and 5.1 trillion cubic feet (145 billion m{sup 3}) of gas. Traps form on discrete subsidiary closures along major ramp anticlines where the depositionally heterogeneous Nugget is also extensively fractured. Hydrocarbons in Nugget reservoirs were generated from subthrust Cretaceous source rocks. The seals for the producing horizons are overlying argillaceous and gypsiferous beds in the

  20. Utah Success Story—A Performance Contracting Program

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Provides an overview case study of Utah's Performance Contracting Program. Author: Energy Services Coalition

  1. CX-012032: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Measurement of Hydrocarbon and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Uncharacterized Area Sources CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.1, B3.6 Date: 04/17/2014 Location(s): Utah, Utah, Utah, Colorado, Colorado Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  2. CX-007762: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Development of Nuclear Energy-Related Infrastructure and Capabilities at the Utah Nuclear Engineering Radiation Measurement Laboratory - University of Utah CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/28/2011 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Nuclear Energy, Idaho Operations Office

  3. Alternative Fuels Data Center: Utah Transportation Data for Alternative

    Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center

    Fuels and Vehicles Utah Transportation Data for Alternative Fuels and Vehicles to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Utah Transportation Data for Alternative Fuels and Vehicles on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Utah Transportation Data for Alternative Fuels and Vehicles on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Utah Transportation Data for Alternative Fuels and Vehicles on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Utah Transportation

  4. Alternative Fuels Data Center: Utah Paperbox Adds Workplace Charging to

    Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center

    Boost Sustainability Utah Paperbox Adds Workplace Charging to Boost Sustainability to someone by E-mail Share Alternative Fuels Data Center: Utah Paperbox Adds Workplace Charging to Boost Sustainability on Facebook Tweet about Alternative Fuels Data Center: Utah Paperbox Adds Workplace Charging to Boost Sustainability on Twitter Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Utah Paperbox Adds Workplace Charging to Boost Sustainability on Google Bookmark Alternative Fuels Data Center: Utah Paperbox

  5. Utah Coalbed Methane Production (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Production (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Coalbed Methane Production (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 74 83 103...

  6. Utah

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

  7. CX-009551: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Brigham City Hydro Generation Project CX(s) Applied: B1.8, B5.2 Date: 11/08/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  8. CX-012260: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Geomechanics investigation of Carbon Dioxide Reservoir Seals CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 07/02/2014 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  9. CX-008522: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)/Infrastructure Development (New Station) CX(s) Applied: B5.22 Date: 07/11/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  10. CX-011749: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ceramatec, Inc. - Advanced Planar Li/S Battery CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 10/31/2013 Location(s): Utah, Illinois, Texas Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy

  11. CX-008269: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Beaver Natural Gas Fueling Station CX(s) Applied: B5.22 Date: 05/15/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  12. CX-011702: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Novel Geothermal Development of Deep Sedimentary Systems in the United States CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 01/02/2014 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  13. CX-010523: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Fracture Evolution Following Hydraulic Stimulations within EGS Reservoirs CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1, B3.6 Date: 05/20/2013 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  14. CX-009457: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    California Avenue Natural Gas Fueling Station CX(s) Applied: B5.22 Date: 10/31/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  15. CX-009589: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Novel Photon Management for Thin-Film Photovoltaics CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 12/13/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  16. CX-007879: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Wasatch SunShot Streamlining and Simplifying Solar CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  17. CX-010613: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hyper Scratcher Tool: A Patented Oil, Gas, Disposal, & Injection Well Tool for Enhancing Production CX(s) Applied: B5.12 Date: 07/22/2013 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  18. CX-010106: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Flaming Gorge Microwave Site Communications Building Access Road Repairs CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 04/01/2013 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Rocky Mountain Region

  19. CX-009023: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Recovery Act: Rocky Mountain Provider of Solar Instructor Training CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.16 Date: 08/08/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  20. CX-008406: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Structure Replacement Flaming Gorge-Vernal No.3 138 Kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 03/06/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Rocky Mountain Region

  1. CX-012015: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Enhanced Wind Resource Assessment with Sonic Ranging and Detection at Tooele Army Depot CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1 Date: 04/24/2014 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  2. CX-008928: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    High Efficiency Molten-Bed Oxy-Coal Combustion with Low Flue Gas Recirculation CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/23/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  3. CX-011128: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Novel Electro-Deoxygenation Process for Bio-oil Upgrading CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.15 Date: 08/26/2013 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  4. CX-008675: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sustainable Energy Solutions LLC - Cryogenic Carbon Capture (Phase 2) CX(s) Applied: B3.6, B3.9 Date: 01/24/2012 Location(s): Utah, Wyoming Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy

  5. CX-009022: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    A Novel Flash lronmaking Process CX(s) Applied: A9, B1.31, B3.6 Date: 08/22/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  6. CX-012294: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Hyper Scratcher Tool: A Patented Oil, Gas, Disposal, & Injection Well Tool for Enhancing Production CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 06/03/2014 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  7. CX-012293: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Hyper Scratcher Tool: A Patented Oil, Gas, Disposal, & Injection Well Tool for Enhancing Production CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 06/03/2014 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  8. CX-011549: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Optical Fiber Based Laser System for Thermophysical Properties at Very High Temperatures CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/26/2013 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  9. CX-011589: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Risk Assessment of Structural Integrity of Transportation Casks CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/04/2013 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  10. CX-009448: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Plug-In Hybrid Electric Medium Duty Commercial Fleet Demonstration and Evaluation CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 11/08/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  11. CX-010414: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Vernal Substation 138 Kilovolt Breaker Replacement CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 05/08/2013 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Rocky Mountain Region

  12. CX-011398: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Independent Energy Community Renewable Power System CX(s) Applied: B5.15 Date: 12/02/2013 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  13. An Examination of Avoided Costs in Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Bolinger, Mark; Wiser, Ryan

    2005-01-07

    The Utah Wind Working Group (UWWG) believes there are currently opportunities to encourage wind power development in the state by seeking changes to the avoided cost tariff paid to qualifying facilities (QFs). These opportunities have arisen as a result of a recent renegotiation of Pacificorp's Schedule 37 tariff for wind QFs under 3 MW, as well as an ongoing examination of Pacificorp's Schedule 38 tariff for wind QFs larger than 3 MW. It is expected that decisions made regarding Schedule 38 will also impact Schedule 37. Through the Laboratory Technical Assistance Program (Lab TAP), the UWWG has requested (through the Utah Energy Office) that LBNL provide technical assistance in determining whether an alternative method of calculating avoided costs that has been officially adopted in Idaho would lead to higher QF payments in Utah, and to discuss the pros and cons of this method relative to the methodology recently adopted under Schedule 37 in Utah. To accomplish this scope of work, I begin by summarizing the current method of calculating avoided costs in Utah (per Schedule 37) and Idaho (the ''surrogate avoided resource'' or SAR method). I then compare the two methods both qualitatively and quantitatively. Next I present Pacificorp's four main objections to the use of the SAR method, and discuss the reasonableness of each objection. Finally, I conclude with a few other potential considerations that might add value to wind QFs in Utah.

  14. ,"Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    8:00:06 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","NGMEPG0FGSSUTMMCF" "Date","Utah Natural Gas ...

  15. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Name: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Address: 1594 W North Temple, Suite 2110, Box 146301 Place: Salt Lake City, Utah Zip: 84114-6301 Phone Number: 801-538-4745 Website:...

  16. RAPID/Geothermal/Exploration/Utah | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Temperature Gradient Wells UAC Rule R655-1 Wells Used for the Discovery and Production of Geothermal Energy in the State of Utah UC 73-22 Utah Geothermal Resource Conservation Act...

  17. Utah Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    of Forestry, Fire and State Lands Address: 1594 W. North Temple, Ste 3520 Place: Salt Lake City, Utah Zip: 84114-5703 Phone Number: 801.538.5555 Website: forestry.utah.gov...

  18. Utah Division of Water Rights | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Name: Utah Division of Water Rights Address: 1594 West North Temple, Suite 220 Place: Salt Lake City, Utah Zip: 84114-6300 Phone Number: 801.538.7240 Website:...

  19. Mt Wheeler Power, Inc (Utah) | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Mt Wheeler Power, Inc (Utah) Jump to: navigation, search Name: Mt Wheeler Power, Inc Place: Utah Phone Number: 1 775-289-8981 Website: mwpower.net Facebook: https:...

  20. Iron County, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    is classified as ASHRAE 169-2006 Climate Zone Number 5 Climate Zone Subtype B. Registered Energy Companies in Iron County, Utah Solar Unlimited USA Places in Iron County, Utah...

  1. File:UtahEnergyForumSiting.pdf | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    UtahEnergyForumSiting.pdf Jump to: navigation, search File File history File usage File:UtahEnergyForumSiting.pdf Size of this preview: 800 600 pixels. Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7...

  2. West Mountain, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. West Mountain is a census-designated place in Utah County, Utah.1 References US Census...

  3. Spring Lake, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Spring Lake is a census-designated place in Utah County, Utah.1 References US Census...

  4. Utah DEQ Energy Pre-Design Program | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Pre-Design Program Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Utah DEQ Energy Pre-Design Program Abstract Provides information about Utah's...

  5. Utah Sensitive Species List Webpage | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Species List Webpage Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Utah Sensitive Species List Webpage Abstract Provides access to Utah Sensitive...

  6. City of Blanding, Utah (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    City of Blanding, Utah (Utility Company) Jump to: navigation, search Name: City of Blanding Place: Utah Phone Number: 435-678-2791 Website: www.blanding-ut.gov Outage Hotline:...

  7. City of Santa Clara, Utah (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Santa Clara, Utah (Utility Company) Jump to: navigation, search Name: City of Santa Clara Place: Utah Phone Number: (435) 673-6712 Website: www.sccity.org Outage Hotline: (435)...

  8. Park City, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Park City is a city in Summit County and Wasatch County, Utah. It falls under Utah's 1st...

  9. Norton v Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 US 55 | Open...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    v Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 US 55 Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal CaseHearing: Norton v Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance,...

  10. City of Logan, Utah (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Logan, Utah (Utility Company) Jump to: navigation, search Name: City of Logan Place: Utah Phone Number: (435) 716-9090 Website: www.loganutah.orgLP Outage Hotline: (435) 716-9090...

  11. Remedial Action Plan and final design for stabilization of the inactive uranium mill tailings at Green River, Utah. Volume 1, Text, Appendices A, B, and C: Final report

    SciTech Connect

    Matthews, M.L.; Alkema, K.

    1991-03-01

    This Remedial Action Plan (RAP) has been developed to serve a threefold purpose. It presents the series of activities that are proposed by the US Department of Energy (DOE) to accomplish long-term stabilization and control of radioactive materials at the inactive uranium processing site located near Green River, Utah. It provides a characterization of the present conditions of the site. It also serves to document the concurrence of the state of Utah and the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in the remedial action. This agreement, upon execution by the DOE and the state of Utah, and concurrence by the NRC, becomes Appendix 8 of the Cooperative Agreement.

  12. Utah Total Electric Power Industry Net Summer Capacity, by Energy...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Utah" "Energy Source",2006,2007,2008,2009,2010 "Fossil",6398,6830,6819,6897,6969 " ... " Other Gases","-","-","-","-","-" "Nuclear","-","-","-","-","-" ...

  13. Utah Recovery Act State Memo | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Utah Recovery Act State Memo Utah Recovery Act State Memo Utah has substantial natural resources, including oil, coal, natural gas, wind, geothermal, and solar power. The American Recovery & Reinvestment Act (ARRA) is making a meaningful down payment on the nation's energy and environmental future. The Recovery Act investments in Utah are supporting a broad range of clean energy projects, from energy efficiency and the smart grid to wind and geothermal, alternative fuel vehicles, and the

  14. EIS-0355: Remediation of the Moab Uranium Mill Tailings, Grand and San Juan Counties, Utah

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The Remediation of the Moab Uranium Mill Tailings, Grand and San Juan Counties, Utah, Environmental Impact Statement and associated supplements and amendments provides information on the environmental impacts of the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) proposal to (1) remediate approximately 11.9 million tons of contaminated materials located on the Moab site and approximately 39,700 tons located on nearby vicinity properties and (2) develop and implement a ground water compliance strategy for the Moab site using the framework of the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Ground Water Project (DOE/EIS-0198, October 1996). The surface remediation alternatives analyzed in the EIS include on-site disposal of the contaminated materials and off-site disposal at one of three alternative locations in Utah using one or more transportation options: truck, rail, or slurry pipeline.

  15. Geothermal exploration program, Hill Air Force Base, Davis and Weber Counties, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Glenn, W.E.; Chapman, D.S.; Foley, D.; Capuano, R.M.; Cole, D.; Sibbett, B.; Ward, S.H.

    1980-03-01

    Results obtained from a program designed to locate a low- or moderate-temperature geothermal resource that might exist beneath Hill Air Force Base (AFB), Ogden, Utah are discussed. A phased exploration program was conducted at Hill AFB. Published geological, geochemical, and geophysical reports on the area were examined, regional exploration was conducted, and two thermal gradient holes were drilled. This program demonstrated that thermal waters are not present in the shallow subsurface at this site. (MHR)

  16. National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Wells Quadrangle, Nevada, Idaho, and Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Proffitt, J.L.; Mayerson, D.L.; Parker, D.P.; Wolverson, N.; Antrim, D.; Berg, J.; Witzel, F.

    1982-08-01

    The Wells 2/sup 0/ Quadrangle, Nevada, Idaho, and Utah, was evaluated using National Uranium Resource Evaluation criteria to delineate areas favorable for uranium deposits. Our investigation has resulted in the delineation of areas that contain Tertiary sedimentary rocks favorable for hydroallogenic deposits in the Mountain City area (Favorable Area A) and in the Oxley Peak area north of Wells (Favorable Area B). Environments considered to be unfavorable for uranium deposits include Tertiary felsic volcanic, felsic plutonic, intermediate to mafic volcanic, Paleozoic and Mesozoic sedimentary rocks, Precambrian rocks, and most Tertiary sedimentary rocks located outside the favorable areas. Present-day basins are unevaluated environments because of a paucity of adequate outcrop and subsurface data. However, the scarce data indicate that some characteristics favorable for uranium deposits are present in the Susie Creek-Tule Valley-Wild Horse basin, the Contact-Granite Range-Tijuana John stocks area, the Charleston Reservoir area, and the Wells-Marys River basin.

  17. Regional economic activity and petroleum industry incentive policies: Utah`s Uintah Basin

    SciTech Connect

    Duffy-Deno, K.T.; Robinson, M.H.

    1995-12-31

    Proponents of petroleum industry subsidies often assert that such policies will have positive economic implications for rural communities. This paper examines the economic impacts of such a policy in Utah. Specifically, this paper quantifies the direct and indirect economic and fiscal impacts of a tax credit granted for oil and gas well workovers in Utah`s Uintah Basin. The analysis is made possible by an input-output model constructed specifically for Utah`s oil producing economy. The tax credit policy was found to generate a net fiscal loss for the state. However, it does generate employment in the Uintah Basin. The total per job cost to the state of generating an average of one job per year for 5 years through the tax credit policy is $24,056 (1991 dollars). However, if the public expenditure impacts are taken into account, then the cost per job could be as high as $48,423 (1991 dollars). Whether there are other ways to generate the same employment gains at a lower cost was lost in the political debate surrounding this petroleum industry tax credit. 8 refs., 2 figs., 9 tabs.

  18. DOE Announces Preferred Alternatives For Moab, Utah, Uranium Mill Tailings

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    | Department of Energy Preferred Alternatives For Moab, Utah, Uranium Mill Tailings DOE Announces Preferred Alternatives For Moab, Utah, Uranium Mill Tailings April 6, 2005 - 11:33am Addthis WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy today announced the department's preferred alternatives for remediation of the Moab, Utah, Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project Site: active groundwater remediation, and offsite disposal of the tailings pile and other contaminated materials to the

  19. Camp William Utah National Guard Wind Farm II | Open Energy Informatio...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    II Jump to: navigation, search Name Camp William Utah National Guard Wind Farm II Facility Camp William Utah National Guard Sector Wind energy Facility Type Community Wind Facility...

  20. Microsoft Word - DOE-ID-13-027 Utah EC B3-6.doc

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    7 SECTION A. Project Title: Risk Assessment of Structural Integrity of Transportation Casks - University of Utah SECTION B. Project Description The University of Utah proposes to...

  1. Utah's 1st congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Energy Companies in Utah's 1st congressional district Blue Source LLC Ciralight Emery Energy Company Eneco Inc EnergySolutions Inc Genifuel Green Joules GreenFire Energy...

  2. Utah Underground Storage Tank Installation Permit | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Storage Tank Installation Permit Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Form: Utah Underground Storage Tank Installation Permit Form Type Application...

  3. Utah Division of Environmental Response and Remediation Underground...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Environmental Response and Remediation Underground Storage Tank Branch Webpage Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Utah Division of...

  4. Red Cliffs Campground, Cedar City District, Utah | Department...

    Energy Saver

    This photograph shows the field station at Red Cliffs Campground in Utah's Cedar City District. Photovoltaic power systems allow the people working in these remote areas to have ...

  5. Utah Nonpoint Source Pollution Management Plan | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Nonpoint Source Pollution Management Plan Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library PermittingRegulatory Guidance - GuideHandbook: Utah Nonpoint Source...

  6. Conjunctive Surface and Groundwater Management in Utah. Implications...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Conjunctive Surface and Groundwater Management in Utah. Implications for Oil Shale and Oil Sands Development Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Conjunctive Surface and ...

  7. RAPID/Geothermal/Land Access/Utah | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    RAPIDGeothermalLand AccessUtah < RAPID | Geothermal | Land Access Jump to: navigation, search RAPID Regulatory and Permitting Information Desktop Toolkit BETA About Bulk...

  8. Utah Water Quality Standards Workgroup Website | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Quality Standards Workgroup Website Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Utah Water Quality Standards Workgroup Website Abstract This...

  9. Saratoga Springs, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Springs, Utah: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 40.3491173, -111.9046567 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappingservice...

  10. Changes in Vegetation at the Monticello, Utah, Disposal Site...

    Energy Saver

    the Performance of an Alternative Landfill Cover at the Monticello, Utah, Uranium Mill Tailings Disposal Site Monitoring the Performance of an Alternative Cover Using Caisson...

  11. Salt Lake City, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Salt Lake City, Utah: Energy Resources (Redirected from Salt Lake City, UT) Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 40.7607793, -111.8910474 Show Map...

  12. Salt Lake City, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Salt Lake City, Utah: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 40.7607793, -111.8910474 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mapping...

  13. Utah Natural Gas Plant Fuel Consumption (Million Cubic Feet)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Fuel Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas Plant Fuel Consumption (Million ... Release Date: 06302016 Next Release Date: 07292016 Referring Pages: Natural Gas Plant ...

  14. RAPID/Geothermal/Water Use/Utah | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    RAPIDGeothermalWater UseUtah < RAPID | Geothermal | Water Use Jump to: navigation, search RAPID Regulatory and Permitting Information Desktop Toolkit BETA About Bulk...

  15. Utah Water Right Information Webpage | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Utah Water Right Information Webpage Abstract Provides information about obtaining a water rights...

  16. ,"Utah Natural Gas Underground Storage Net Withdrawals (MMcf...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Natural Gas Underground Storage Net Withdrawals (MMcf)",1,"Monthly","102015" ,"Release...

  17. Utah Division of Water Quality | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Ground Water Quality Protection Permitting Contact 2 Contacts.png Woody Campbell http:www.waterquality.utah.gov Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgw...

  18. RAPID/Geothermal/Environment/Utah | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    may make modifications to the final permit based on any comments submitted during review. Air Quality Assessment Process In Utah, developers may be required to obtain an Air...

  19. Eagle Mountain, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Eagle Mountain, Utah: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 40.3141169, -112.006882 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappings...

  20. Utah Department of Environmental Quality Hazardous Waste Permits...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Hazardous Waste Permits Website Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Utah Department of Environmental Quality Hazardous Waste Permits...

  1. Utah Underground Injection Control Program Webpage | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Injection Control Program Webpage Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Utah Underground Injection Control Program Webpage Abstract Provides...

  2. Utah Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Date: 5312016 Referring Pages: Natural Gas Delivered to Electric Power Consumers Utah Natural Gas Consumption by End Use Electric Power Consumption of Natural Gas (Summary)

  3. Weber County, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Weber County, Utah: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 41.2602635, -111.9522491 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappingse...

  4. Utah Quantity of Production Associated with Reported Wellhead...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Quantity of Production Associated with Reported Wellhead Value (Million Cubic Feet) Utah Quantity of Production Associated with Reported Wellhead Value (Million Cubic Feet) Decade ...

  5. Utah Department of Natural Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    References: DNR Homepage1 The Department of Natural Resources helps ensure Utah's quality of life by managing and protecting the state's natural resources. The Department...

  6. Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, Lake Powell, Utah | Department...

    Energy Saver

    Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, Lake Powell, Utah Photo of the Photovoltaic System ... Consequently, the installation of a photovoltaic (PV) system presented many advantages. ...

  7. ,"Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at ... Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic ...

  8. Summit Park, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Park, Utah: Energy Resources Jump to: navigation, search Equivalent URI DBpedia Coordinates 40.7457808, -111.6115928 Show Map Loading map... "minzoom":false,"mappingservice":"...

  9. Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 ... Release Date: 11192015 Next Release Date: 12312016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus ...

  10. Utah Underground Natural Gas Storage Capacity

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Lower 48 States Alabama Arkansas California Colorado Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska New Mexico New York Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Tennessee Texas Utah Virginia Washington West Virginia Wyoming AGA Producing Region AGA Eastern Consuming Region AGA Western Consuming Region East Region South Central Region Midwest Region Mountain Region Pacific Region Period: Monthly Annual Download Series History Download

  11. CX-012354: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hayden-Vernal 138-kilovolt Transmission Line Road Maintenance and Structure Replacements, Uintah County, Utah CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/17/2014 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Rocky Mountain Region

  12. CX-009183: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    (0675 -1537) Utah State University - Robust Cell-Level Modeling and Control of Large Battery Packs CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/11/2012 Location(s): Utah, Colorado, Colorado, Colorado Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy

  13. CX-012031: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Measurement of Hydrocarbon and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Uncharacterized Area Sources CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.1, B3.6 Date: 04/17/2014 Location(s): Utah, Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  14. CX-007912: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Utah State Energy Program - Energy Improvement Fund CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B1.32, B1.35, B2.1, B2.2, B5.1 Date: 02/10/2010 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  15. CX-012352: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Flaming Gorge Microwave Site Communications Building Access Road Repairs, Daggett County, Utah (Amended) CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/03/2014 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Rocky Mountain Region

  16. CX-007700: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    University of Utah - A New Generation High Density Thermal Battery Based on Advanced Metal Hydrides CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 11/18/2011 Location(s): Utah, California, Michigan Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy

  17. Utah State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Energy Utah State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Utah State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Fully executed programmatic agreement between DOE, State Energy Office and State Historic Preservation Office. state_historic_preservation_programmatic_agreement_ut.pdf (681.47 KB) More Documents & Publications Kansas State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Washington State Historic Preservation Programmatic Agreement Virginia State Historic Preservation

  18. Draft Supplement Analysis for Location(s) to Dispose of Depleted...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... Adding a Fourth Line to the Conversion Plant at Portsmouth, Ohio......SA Supplement Analysis SRS Savannah River Site UAC Utah Administration Code UDEQ Utah ...

  19. Third (March 2006) Coring and Analysis of Zero-Valent Iron Permeable Reactive Barrier, Monticello, Utah

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Third (March 2006) Coring and Analysis of Zero-Valent Iron Permeable Reactive Barrier, Monticello, Utah

  20. Dispersivity Testing of Zero-Valent Iron Treatment Cells: Monticello, Utah, November 2005 Through February 2008

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dispersivity Testing of Zero-Valent Iron Treatment Cells: Monticello, Utah, November 2005 Through February 2008

  1. New Location

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Location Precision measurement for particle physics Peter W. Graham Stanford University May 18, 2016 4:00 p.m. - Wilson Hall, Curia II Precision measurement offers a powerful new approach for particle physics. I will discuss novel experiments using technologies such as atom interferometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, high precision magnetometry, and torsion balances for direct detection of dark matter and gravitational waves. These provide the optimal method for direct detection of light dark

  2. Colorado Natural Gas Processed in Utah (Million Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Utah (Million Cubic Feet) Colorado Natural Gas Processed in Utah (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 286 3,677 4,194 3,499 2,675 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 10/31/2016 Next Release Date: 11/30/2016 Referring Pages: Natural Gas Processed Colorado-Utah

  3. Colorado Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Extracted in Utah (Million

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Cubic Feet) Utah (Million Cubic Feet) Colorado Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Extracted in Utah (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 34 31 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 10/31/2016 Next Release Date: 11/30/2016 Referring Pages: NGPL Production, Gaseous Equivalent Colorado-Utah

  4. Survey of literature relating to energy development in Utah's Colorado Plateau

    SciTech Connect

    Larsen, A.

    1980-06-01

    This study examines various energy resources in Utah including oil impregnated rocks (oil shale and oil sand deposits), geothermal, coal, uranium, oil and natural gas in terms of the following dimensions: resurce potential and location; resource technology, development and production status; resource development requirements; potential environmental and socio-economic impacts; and transportation tradeoffs. The advantages of minemouth power plants in comparison to combined cycle or hybrid power plants are also examined. Annotative bibliographies of the energy resources are presented in the appendices. Specific topics summarized in these annotative bibliographies include: economics, environmental impacts, water requirements, production technology, and siting requirements.

  5. Geology and resources of the Tar Sand Triangle, southeastern Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Dana, G.F.; Oliver, R.L.; Elliott, J.R.

    1984-05-01

    The Tar Sand Triangle is located in southeastern Utah between the Dirty Devil and Colorado Rivers and covers an area of about 200 square miles. The geology of the area consists of gently northwest dipping strata exposed in the box canyons and slopes of the canyonlands morphology. Strata in the area range in age from Jurassic to Permian. The majority of tar sand saturation is found in the Permian White Rim Sandstone Member of the Cutler Formation. The White Rim Sandstone Member consists of a clean, well-sorted sandstone which was deposited in a shallow marine environment. Resources were calculated from analytical data from the three coreholes drilled by the Laramie Energy Technology Center and other available data. The total in-place resources, determined from this study, are 6.3 billion barels. Previous estimates ranged from 2.9 to 16 million barrels. More coring and analyses will be necessary before a more accurate determination of resources can be attempted. 8 references, 11 figures, 7 tables.

  6. Tiger Team Assessment of the Navel Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1992-07-01

    This report documents the Tiger Team Assessment of the Naval Petroleum Oil Shale Reserves in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming (NPOSR-CUW). NPOSR-CUW consists of Naval Petroleum Reserve Number 3 located near Casper, Wyoming; Naval Oil Shale Reserve Number I and Naval Oil Shale Reserve Number 3 located near Rifle, Colorado; and Naval Oil Shale Reserve Number 2 located near Vernal, Utah, which was not examined as part of this assessment. The assessment was comprehensive, encompassing environment, safety, and health (ES H) and quality assurance (QA) disciplines; site remediation; facilities management; and waste management operations. Compliance with applicable Federal, state, and local regulations; applicable DOE Orders; best management practices; and internal NPOSR-CUW requirements was assessed. The NPOSR-CUW Tiger Team Assessment is part of a larger, comprehensive DOE Tiger Team Independent Assessment Program planned for DOE facilities. The objective of the initiative is to provide the Secretary with information on the compliance status of DOE facilities with regard to ES H requirements, root causes for noncompliance, adequacy of DOE and contractor ES H management programs, response actions to address the identified problem areas, and DOE-wide ES H compliance trends and root causes.

  7. Box Elder County, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Box Elder County is a county in Utah. Its FIPS County Code is 003. It is classified as...

  8. Alternative Fuels Data Center: Utah's Clean Fuels and Vehicle...

    Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center

    A state legislature can establish the central revolving loan fund by law to encourage ... Utah law defines the "clean fuels" that are eligible for loans under the CFV Program: ...

  9. Empire Electric Assn, Inc (Utah) | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    search Name: Empire Electric Assn, Inc Place: Utah Phone Number: 970-565-4444 or 800-709-3726 Website: www.eea.coop Outage Hotline: 970-565-4444 or 800-709-3726 References:...

  10. Moon Lake Electric Assn Inc (Utah) | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    search Name: Moon Lake Electric Assn Inc Place: Utah Phone Number: ALTAMONT OFFICE (435) 454-3611 -- DUCHESNE OFFICE (435) 738-5322 -- RANGELY OFFICE (970) 675-2291 --...

  11. Utah Natural Gas Underground Storage Volume (Million Cubic Feet...

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Underground Storage Volume (Million Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas Underground Storage Volume (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 59,806 ...

  12. Utah Dry Natural Gas New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Dry Natural Gas New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 ...

  13. Shining Energy-saving LEDs on Utah Starry Nights

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Utah is known for its magnificent night skies, where stargazers can catch a glimpse of constellations or a rogue shooting star. Now some rural towns have found a way to create even better views—and conserve energy.

  14. Utah Natural Gas Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption (Million Cubic...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    and Plant Fuel Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 ...

  15. Utah Total Electric Power Industry Net Generation, by Energy...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Utah" "Energy Source",2006,2007,2008,2009,2010 "Fossil",40306,44634,45466,42034,40599 " Coal",36856,37171,38020,35526,34057 " Petroleum",62,39,44,36,50 " Natural ...

  16. Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    of Appellate Procedure Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: Utah Rules of Appellate ProcedureLegal Abstract...

  17. Utah Water Rights Fee Schedule | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Utah Water Rights Fee Schedule Abstract Water rights fee schedule based on amount appropriated....

  18. Utah Department of Environmental Quality | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    laws and works with individuals, community groups, and businesses to protect the quality of our air, land and water in the state of Utah. The following Divisions make up...

  19. Utah State Historic Preservation Office Webpage | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Office Webpage Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Utah State Historic Preservation Office Webpage Abstract Provides overview of the role...

  20. Utah Department of Environmental Quality Forms Webpage | Open...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Forms Webpage Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Utah Department of Environmental Quality Forms Webpage Abstract Provides access to forms...

  1. Utah Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers (Number of Elements...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Industrial Consumers (Number of Elements) Utah Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers (Number of Elements) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 ...

  2. Utah Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers (Number of Elements...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Residential Consumers (Number of Elements) Utah Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers (Number of Elements) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 ...

  3. Utah Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers (Number of Elements...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Commercial Consumers (Number of Elements) Utah Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers (Number of Elements) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 ...

  4. Utah - UDOT - Accommodation of Utilities and the Control and...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    UDOT - Accommodation of Utilities and the Control and Protection of State Highway Rights of Way Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library General: Utah -...

  5. Utah Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic...

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Vehicle Fuel Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6...

  6. Carbon County, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Carbon County is a county in Utah. Its FIPS County Code is 007. It is classified as ASHRAE...

  7. City of Monroe, Utah (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    (Utility Company) Jump to: navigation, search Name: City of Monroe Place: Utah Phone Number: 435.527.4621 Website: www.littlegreenvalley.com Outage Hotline: 435.527.4621...

  8. Utah Natural Gas in Underground Storage (Base Gas) (Million Cubic...

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Base Gas) (Million Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas in Underground Storage (Base Gas) (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 46,944 46,944 ...

  9. Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million Cubic...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 21,638 18,808 21,037 ...

  10. Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 ...

  11. BLM Offers Geothermal Leases in Utah, Idaho, and Oregon

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announced in early November that it will hold a competitive lease sale for geothermal energy development on 61 parcels totaling nearly 200,000 acres in the states of Utah, Oregon, and Idaho.

  12. US hydropower resource assessment for Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Francfort, J.E.

    1993-12-01

    The Department of Energy is developing an estimate of the hydropower development potential in this country. The Hydropower Evaluation Software (HES) is a computer model that was developed by the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory for this purpose. The HES measures the potential hydropower resources available in the United States, using uniform criteria for measurement. The software was developed and tested using hydropower information and data provided by the Southwestern Power Administration. It is a dBASE menu-driven software application that allows the personal computer user to assign environmental attributes to potential hydropower sites, calculate development suitability factors for each site based on the environmental attributes present, and generate reports based on these suitability factors. This report details the resource assessment results for the state of Utah.

  13. Respiratory disease in Utah coal miners

    SciTech Connect

    Rom, W.N.; Kanner, R.E.; Renzetti, A.D. Jr.; Shigeoka, J.W.; Barkman, H.W.; Nichols, M.; Turner, W.A.; Coleman, M.; Wright, W.E.

    1981-04-01

    Two hundred forty-two Utah underground coal miners volunteered to participate in a respiratory disease study. They were an older group (mean, 56 years of age) and had spent a mean of 29 years in the coal-mining industry. The prevalence of chronic bronchitis was 57%, and that of coal worker's pneumoconiosis, 25%; only one worker had progressive massive fibrosis. Significant impairment of pulmonary function was found among those with a history of cigarette smoking. Chronic bronchitis or coal worker's penumoconiosis among nonsmokers did not impair pulmonary function. There was a significant association among the nonsmokers between increasing exposure to coal dust and coal worker's pneumoconiosis, but not for changes in pulmonary function. Coal mine dust had a significant influence in causing the symptom complex of chronic cough and sputum production, and coal worker's pneumoconiosis.

  14. Respiratory disease in Utah coal miners

    SciTech Connect

    Rom, W.N.; Kanner, R.E.; Renzetti, A.D. Jr.; Shigeoka, J.W.; Barkman, H.W.; Nichols, M.; Turner, W.A.; Coleman, M.; Wright, W.E.

    1981-04-01

    Two hundred forty-two Utah underground coal miners volunteered to participate in a respiratory disease study. They were an older group (mean, 56 years of age) and had spent a mean of 29 years in the coal-mining industry. The prevalence of chronic bronchitis was 57%, and that of coal worker's pneumoconiosis, 25%; only one worker had progressive massive fibrosis. Significant impairment of pulmonary function was found among those with a history of cigarette smoking. Chronic bronchitis or coal worker's pneumoconiosis among nonsmokers did not impair pulmonary function. There was a significant association among the nonsmokers between increasing exposure to coal dust and coal worker's pneumoconiosis, but not for changes in pulmonary function. Coal mine dust had a significant influence in causing the symptom complex of chronic cough and sputum production, and coal worker's pneumoconiosis.

  15. Utah Natural Gas Processed (Million Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas Processed (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1960's 0 0 0 1970's 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1980's 68,211 95,670 93,934 98,598 99,233 241,904 274,470 286,592 286,929 1990's 334,067 333,591 319,017 348,010 368,585 308,174 265,546 249,930 242,070 211,514 2000's 169,553 166,505 136,843 161,275 193,093 187,524 193,836 195,701 202,380 412,639 2010's 454,832 490,233 535,365 448,687 419,773 386,823 - = No Data

  16. Energy Efficient Buildings, Salt Lake County, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Barnett, Kimberly

    2012-04-30

    Executive Summary Salt Lake County's Solar Photovoltaic Project - an unprecedented public/private partnership Salt Lake County is pleased to announce the completion of its unprecedented solar photovoltaic (PV) installation on the Calvin R. Rampton Salt Palace Convention Center. This 1.65 MW installation will be one the largest solar roof top installations in the country and will more than double the current installed solar capacity in the state of Utah. Construction is complete and the system will be operational in May 2012. The County has accomplished this project using a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) financing model. In a PPA model a third-party solar developer will finance, develop, own, operate, and maintain the solar array. Salt Lake County will lease its roof, and purchase the power from this third-party under a long-term Power Purchase Agreement contract. In fact, this will be one of the first projects in the state of Utah to take advantage of the recent (March 2010) legislation which makes PPA models possible for projects of this type. In addition to utilizing a PPA, this solar project will employ public and private capital, Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants (EECBG), and public/private subsidized bonds that are able to work together efficiently because of the recent stimulus bill. The project also makes use of recent changes to federal tax rules, and the recent re-awakening of private capital markets that make a significant public-private partnership possible. This is an extremely innovative project, and will mark the first time that all of these incentives (EECBG grants, Qualified Energy Conservation Bonds, New Markets tax credits, investment tax credits, public and private funds) have been packaged into one project. All of Salt Lake County's research documents and studies, agreements, and technical information is available to the public. In addition, the County has already shared a variety of information with the public through webinars

  17. Conjunctive Surface and Groundwater Management in Utah. Implications for

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Oil Shale and Oil Sands Development (Technical Report) | SciTech Connect Conjunctive Surface and Groundwater Management in Utah. Implications for Oil Shale and Oil Sands Development Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Conjunctive Surface and Groundwater Management in Utah. Implications for Oil Shale and Oil Sands Development Unconventional fuel development will require scarce water resources. In an environment characterized by scarcity, and where most water resources are fully

  18. Investigation of winter mountain storms in Utah during the 1989 Utah/NOAA field program. Final report

    SciTech Connect

    Huggins, A.W.

    1990-09-01

    A field research effort was conducted in the vicinity of the Tushar Mountains of southern Utah as part of the Federal-State Program in Atmospheric Modification Research involving the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the State of Utah. The field study took place in February and March 1989 and emphasized the studies of supercooled liquid water evolution in winter storms and attempts to measure the effects of ground-based silver iodide cloud seeding. Results of the field effort are presented.

  19. Utah - UC 54-14 - Utility Facility Review Board Act | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Utah - UC 54-14 - Utility Facility Review Board Act Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Utah - UC 54-14 - Utility...

  20. UC 19-6-401 et seq. - Utah Underground Storage Tank Act | Open...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    9-6-401 et seq. - Utah Underground Storage Tank Act Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: UC 19-6-401 et seq. - Utah...

  1. Utah Full Proof of Beneficial Use of Water | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Utah Full Proof of Beneficial Use of Water Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Form: Utah Full Proof of Beneficial Use of Water Abstract Proof of...

  2. File:03UTDGeothermalSteamLeaseUtahNonTrustLands.pdf | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    3UTDGeothermalSteamLeaseUtahNonTrustLands.pdf Jump to: navigation, search File File history File usage Metadata File:03UTDGeothermalSteamLeaseUtahNonTrustLands.pdf Size of this...

  3. File:03UTEGeothermalSteamLeaseUtahTrustLands.pdf | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    3UTEGeothermalSteamLeaseUtahTrustLands.pdf Jump to: navigation, search File File history File usage Metadata File:03UTEGeothermalSteamLeaseUtahTrustLands.pdf Size of this preview:...

  4. UC 73-22 Utah Geothermal Resource Conservation Act | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Utah Geothermal Resource Conservation Act Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: UC 73-22 Utah Geothermal Resource...

  5. UC 73-22 - Utah Geothermal Resource Conservation Act | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    - Utah Geothermal Resource Conservation Act Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: UC 73-22 - Utah Geothermal Resource...

  6. Paleontological overview of oil shale and tar sands areas in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming.

    SciTech Connect

    Murphey, P. C.; Daitch, D.; Environmental Science Division

    2009-02-11

    In August 2005, the U.S. Congress enacted the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Public Law 109-58. In Section 369 of this Act, also known as the ''Oil Shale, Tar Sands, and Other Strategic Unconventional Fuels Act of 2005,'' Congress declared that oil shale and tar sands (and other unconventional fuels) are strategically important domestic energy resources that should be developed to reduce the nation's growing dependence on oil from politically and economically unstable foreign sources. In addition, Congress declared that both research- and commercial-scale development of oil shale and tar sands should (1) be conducted in an environmentally sound manner using management practices that will minimize potential impacts, (2) occur with an emphasis on sustainability, and (3) benefit the United States while taking into account concerns of the affected states and communities. To support this declaration of policy, Congress directed the Secretary of the Interior to undertake a series of steps, several of which are directly related to the development of a commercial leasing program for oil shale and tar sands. One of these steps was the completion of a programmatic environmental impact statement (PEIS) to analyze the impacts of a commercial leasing program for oil shale and tar sands resources on public lands, with an emphasis on the most geologically prospective lands in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming. For oil shale, the scope of the PEIS analysis includes public lands within the Green River, Washakie, Uinta, and Piceance Creek Basins. For tar sands, the scope includes Special Tar Sand Areas (STSAs) located in Utah. This paleontological resources overview report was prepared in support of the Oil Shale and Tar Sands Resource Management Plan Amendments to Address Land Use Allocations in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming and PEIS, and it is intended to be used by Bureau of Land Management (BLM) regional paleontologists and field office staff to support future projectspecific analyses

  7. Environmental assessment: Davis Canyon site, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    none,

    1986-05-01

    In February 1983, the US Department of Energy (DOE) identified the Davis Canyon site in Utah as one of the nine potentially acceptable sites for a mined geologic repository for spent nuclear fuel and high- level radioactive waste. To determine their suitability, the Davis Canyon site and the eight other potentially acceptable sites have been evaluated in accordance with the DOE's General Guidelines for the Recommendation of Sites for the Nuclear Waste Repositories. These evaluations were reported in draft environmental assessments (EAs), which were issued for public review and comment. After considering the comments received on the draft EAs, the DOE prepared the final EA. The Davis Canyon site is in the Paradox Basin, which is one of five distinct geohydrologic settings considered for the first repository. This setting contains one other potentially acceptable site -- the Lavender Canyon site. Although the Lavender Canyon site is suitable for site characterization, the DOE has concluded that the Davis Canyon site is the preferred site in the Paradox Basin. On the basis of the evaluations reported in this EA, the DOE has found that the Davis Canyon site is not disqualified under the guidelines. Furthermore, the DOE has found that the site is suitable for site characterization because the evidence does not support a conclusion that the site will not be able to meet each of the qualifying conditions specified in the guidelines. On the basis of these findings, the DOE is nominating the Davis Canyon site as one of the five sites suitable for characterization.

  8. Environmental assessment: Davis Canyon site, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    none,

    1986-05-01

    In February 1983, the US Department of Energy (DOE) identified the Davis Canyon site in Utah as one of the nine potentially acceptable sites for a mined geologic repository for spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. To determine their suitability, the Davis Canyon site and the eight other potentially acceptable sites have been evaluated in accordance with the DOE's General Guidelines for the Recommendation of Sites for the Nuclear Waste Repositories. These evaluations were reported in draft environmental assessments (EAs), which were issued for public review and comment. After considering the comments received on the draft EAs, the DOE prepared the final EA. The Davis Canyon site is in the Paradox Basin, which is one of five distinct geohydrologic settings considering for the first repository. This setting contains one other potentially acceptable site -- the Lavender Canyon site. Although the Lavender Canyon site is suitable for site characterization, the DOE has concluded that the Davis Canyon site is the preferred site in the Paradox Basin. On the basis of the evaluations reported in this EA, the DOE has found that the Davis Canyon site is not disqualified under the guidelines. Furthermore, the DOE has found that the site is suitable for site characterization because the evidence does not support a conclusion that the site will not be able to meet each of the qualifying conditions specified in the guidelines. On the basis of these findings, the DOE is nominating the Davis Canyon site as one of five sites suitable for characterization.

  9. Microsoft Word - DOE-ID-14-014 Utah B1-31.doc

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    4 SECTION A. Project Title: Development of Capabilities to Study the Thermodynamics of Nuclear Energy Related Infrastructure at the Utah Nuclear Engineering Program - University of Utah SECTION B. Project Description The University of Utah proposes to acquire an isothermal titration calorimeter (ITC) for the measurement of thermodynamic properties of actinide complexes, and the enhancement of coursework and research efforts

  10. Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 1,464 37 720 690 953 0 1,189 541 251 133 2010's 7 833 22 640 31 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions Utah Dry Natural Gas

  11. Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Sales (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Sales (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Sales (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 568 17 978 729 946 6 1,147 484 258 92 2010's 530 758 12 478 23 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Dry Natural Gas Reserves Sales Utah Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves Dry

  12. Utah Natural Gas Number of Oil Wells (Number of Elements)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Oil Wells (Number of Elements) Utah Natural Gas Number of Oil Wells (Number of Elements) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 3,119 3,520 3,946 4,249 3,966 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 10/31/2016 Next Release Date: 11/30/2016 Referring Pages: Number of Gas Producing Oil Wells Number of Gas Producing Oil Wells (Summary) Utah Natural Gas

  13. Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves Based Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Based Production (Million Barrels) Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves Based Production (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 2 3 3 2010's 3 3 4 3 2 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Lease Condensate Estimated Production Utah Lease

  14. Utah Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Utah Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 59 1980's 127 277 2000's 108 116 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 Utah Natural Gas Liquids Proved Reserves

  15. Utah Natural Gas Processed in Wyoming (Million Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Wyoming (Million Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas Processed in Wyoming (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 11,554 9,075 7,975 8,374 7,336 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 10/31/2016 Next Release Date: 11/30/2016 Referring Pages: Natural Gas Processed Utah-Wyoming

  16. Utah Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Extracted in Wyoming (Million

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Cubic Feet) Wyoming (Million Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production Extracted in Wyoming (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 469 247 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 10/31/2016 Next Release Date: 11/30/2016 Referring Pages: NGPL Production, Gaseous Equivalent Utah-Wyoming

  17. Environmental assessment: Davis Canyon site, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    none,

    1986-05-01

    In February 1983, the US Department of Energy (DOE) identified the Davis Canyon site in Utah as one of the nine potentially acceptable sites for a mined geologic repository for spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. To determine their suitability, the Davis Canyon site and the eight other potentially acceptable sites have been evaluated in accordance with the DOE's General Guidelines for the Recommendation of Sites for the Nuclear Waste Repositories. These evaluations were reported in draft environmental assessments (EAs), which were issued for public review and comment. After considering the comments received on the draft EAs, the DOE prepared the final EA. The Davis Canyon site is in the Paradox Basin, which is one of five distinct geohydrologic settings considered for the first repository. This setting contains one other potentially acceptable site -- the Lavender Canyon site. Although the Lavender Canyon site is suitable for site characterization, the DOE has concluded that the Davis Canyon site is the preferred site in the Paradox Basin. On the basis of the evaluations reported in this EA, the DOE has found that the Davis Canyon site is not disqualified under the guidelines. Furthermore, the DOE has fond that the site is suitable for site characterization because the evidence does not support a conclusion that the site will not be able to meet each of the qualifying conditions specified in the guidelines. On the basis of these findings, the DOE is nominating the Davis Canyon site as one of five sites suitable for characterization. 181 figs., 175 tabs.

  18. Energy Department Recognizes University of Utah in Better Buildings Challenge

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    As part of President Obama’s Better Buildings Challenge, the Energy Department recognized the University of Utah today for its leadership in energy efficiency and for reducing energy use by 40 percent in a historic campus building, saving the University $57,000 a year.

  19. Utah Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity (Million Cubic Feet)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Connecticut Delaware Georgia Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina Tennessee Texas Utah Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming AGA Producing Region AGA Eastern Consuming Region AGA Western Consuming Region East Region South Central Region Midwest Region Mountain Region Pacific

  20. Health assessment for Midvale Slag Site, Midvale, Utah, Region 8. CERCLIS No. UTD081834277. Preliminary report

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1988-07-21

    The Midvale Slag Site (MSS) is on the National Priorities List. The site is located west of Midvale (Salt Lake County), Utah. MSS is a former copper and lead smelting facility. Approximately 2 million tons of slag containing lead, arsenic, cadmium, and potential radioactive contamination are present onsite. Arsenic, cadmium, copper, chromium, lead, silver, zinc slag, and bag-house dust are present on-site. Potential environmental pathways include contaminated ground water, surface water, soils, and contaminants entrained in air. MSS represents a public health concern to on-site employees, remedial workers, and area residents who have access to the site through inhalation and ingestion of, or direct contact with, contaminated media (soil, sediment, surface water, and ground water). Complete restriction of the site is warranted. In addition, the possibility for exposure through contaminated agricultural products, garden vegetables, fish, water fowl, and livestock cannot be overlooked.

  1. Bipole-dipole survey at Roosevelt Hot Springs, Thermal Area, Beaver County, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Frangos, W.; Ward, S.H.

    1980-09-01

    A bipole-dipole electrical resistivity survey at Roosevelt Hot Springs thermal area, Beaver County, Utah was undertaken to evaluate the technique in a well-studied Basin and Range geothermal prospect. The major electrical characteristics of the area are clearly revealed but are not particularly descriptive of the geothermal system. More subtle variations of electrical resistivity accompanying the geothermal activity are detectable, although the influence of near-surface lateral resistivity variations imposes upon the survey design the necessity of a high station density. A useful practical step is to conduct a survey using transmitter locations and orientations which minimize the response of known features such as the resistivity boundary due to a range front fault. Survey results illustrate the effects of transmitter orientation and placement, and of subtle lateral resistivity variations. A known near-surface conductive zone is detected while no evidence is found for a deep conductive region.

  2. Vegetation Cover Analysis of Hazardous Waste Sites in Utah and Arizona

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Using Hyperspectral Remote Sensing | Department of Energy Vegetation Cover Analysis of Hazardous Waste Sites in Utah and Arizona Using Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Vegetation Cover Analysis of Hazardous Waste Sites in Utah and Arizona Using Hyperspectral Remote Sensing January 17, 2012 Jungho Im, John R. Jensen, Ryan R. Jensen, John Gladden, Jody Waugh and Mike Serrato Vegetation Cover Analysis of Hazardous Waste Sites in Utah and Arizona Using Hyperspectral Remote Sensing (3.07 MB) More

  3. Small Wind Electric Systems: A Utah Consumer's Guide

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    2007-08-01

    Small Wind Electric Systems: A Utah Consumer's Guide provides Utah consumers with information to help them determine whether a small wind electric system can provide all or a portion of the energy they need for their home or business based on their wind resource, energy needs, and their economics. Topics discussed in the guide include how to make a home more energy efficient, how to choose the correct turbine size, the parts of a wind electric system, how to determine whether enough wind resource exists, how to choose the best site for a turbine, how to connect a system to the utility grid, and whether it's possible to become independent of the utility grid using wind energy. In addition, the cover of the guide contains a list of contacts for more information.

  4. Completion of the Five-Year Reviews for the Monticello, Utah...

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    ... Workshop on Uranium Legacy Sites Optimizing the Use of Federal Lands Through Disposition DOE Amends Decision for the Remediation of the Moab Uranium Mill Tailings in Moab, Utah

  5. Landslides and debris flows in Ephraim Canyon, central Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Baum, R.L.; Fleming, R.W.

    1989-01-01

    The geology of 36 km{sup 2} in Ephraim Canyon, on the west side of the Wasatch Plateau, central Utah, was mapped at a scale of 1:12,000 following the occurrence of numerous landslides in 1983. The geologic map shows the distribution of the landslides and debris flows of 1983-86, as well as older landslide deposits, other surficial deposits, and bedrock. Several of the recent landslides are described and illustrated by means of maps or photographs.

  6. Arsenic distribution in soils surrounding the Utah copper smelter

    SciTech Connect

    Ball, A.L.; Rom, W.N.; Glenne, B.

    1983-05-01

    We investigated the extent of arsenic contamination from a Utah copper smelter as reflected by arsenic residue accumulated in the surface soil. The highest arsenic concentrations occurred within 3 km of the smelter. Arsenic soil contamination was evident up to 10 km from the smelter, with the major transport direction being ESE. Data from the subsurface soil samples indicated that arsenic has also leached through the soil.

  7. Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 125 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Acquisitions

  8. Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 8 9 7 -3 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Adjustments

  9. Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 4 2 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Extensions

  10. Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Sales (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Sales (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Sales (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 130 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Sales

  11. Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Acquisitions (Million Barrels) Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 26 2010's 3 10 26 42 18 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions

  12. Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Adjustments (Million Barrels) Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 2 2010's 13 -16 36 -17 -10 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves

  13. Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions (Million Barrels)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Extensions (Million Barrels) Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 25 2010's 13 65 59 46 47 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions

  14. Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Sales (Million Barrels)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Sales (Million Barrels) Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Sales (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 8 2010's 24 9 2 28 13 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Reserves Sales

  15. CX-009233: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Flaming Gorge - Vernal 138 Kilovolt Transmission Line Private Lands Herbicide Treatment for Vegetation Management CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 09/21/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Rocky Mountain Region

  16. CX-007704: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pacific Northwest National Laboratory - Reversible Metal Hydride Thermal Storage for High Temeprative Power Generation Systems CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 11/21/2011 Location(s): Utah, Washington Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy

  17. CX-008755: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Acquisition of Specific Equipment to Enhance Performance, Control and Operational Capability of the University of Utah TRIGA Facilities CX(s) Applied: B2.2 Date: 05/17/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  18. CX-009751: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Southwest Regional Partnership on Carbon Sequestration: Phase III Commercial-Scale Geologic Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage Department CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/12/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  19. CX-008403: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Multiple Structure Replacement Flaming Gorge to Vernal No. 1 138 Kilovolt Transmission Line CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/29/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Rocky Mountain Region

  20. CX-011652: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Protection and Communication Facilities Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.7, B1.19 Date: 11/08/2013 Location(s): Arizona, Nevada, California, Utah Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Desert Southwest Region

  1. CX-011734: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pacific Northwest National Laboratory - Catalyzed Organo-Metathetical Process for Magnesium Production from Seawater CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/17/2013 Location(s): Washington, Arizona, Utah Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy

  2. CX-009026: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    "A New Method for Low-cost Production of Titanium Alloys for Reducing Energy Consumption of Mechanical Systems CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 08/14/2012 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Golden Field Office"

  3. CX-012030: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Recovery Act: Development of Ion-Transport Membrane Oxygen Technology for Integration in Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 04/18/2014 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  4. CX-007430: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Innovative Computational Tools for Reducing Exploration Risk Through Integration of Water-rock Interactions and Magnetotelluric Surveys CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 12/01/2011 Location(s): Utah Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  5. CX-011379: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Solid Power, LLC--An Ultra High Energy, Safe and Low-Cost All Solid-State Rechargeable Battery for Electric Vehicles CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 10/22/2013 Location(s): Colorado, Colorado, Michigan, Utah, New Mexico Offices(s): Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy

  6. Ombuds Office Location & Hours

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Ombuds Office Location & Hours Ombuds Office Location & Hours Committed to the fair and equitable treatment of all employees, contractors, and persons doing business with the...

  7. Alternative Fueling Station Locator

    Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center

    19,710 alternative fuel stations in the United States Excluding private stations Location details are subject to change. We recommend calling the stations to verify location, hours...

  8. Underground Coal Thermal Treatment: Task 6 Topical Report, Utah Clean Coal Program

    SciTech Connect

    Smith, P.J.; Deo, M.; Edding, E.G.; Hradisky, M.; Kelly, K.E.; Krumm, R.; Sarofim, Adel; Wang, D.

    2014-08-15

    The long-term objective of this task is to develop a transformational energy production technology by in- situ thermal treatment of a coal seam for the production of substitute natural gas and/or liquid transportation fuels while leaving much of the coal’s carbon in the ground. This process converts coal to a high-efficiency, low-greenhouse gas (GHG) emitting fuel. It holds the potential of providing environmentally acceptable access to previously unusable coal resources. This task focused on three areas: Experimental. The Underground Coal Thermal Treatment (UCTT) team focused on experiments at two scales, bench-top and slightly larger, to develop data to understand the feasibility of a UCTT process as well as to develop validation/uncertainty quantification (V/UQ) data for the simulation team. Simulation. The investigators completed development of High Performance Computing (HPC) simulations of UCTT. This built on our simulation developments over the course of the task and included the application of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)- based tools to perform HPC simulations of a realistically sized domain representative of an actual coal field located in Utah. CO2 storage. In order to help determine the amount of CO2 that can be sequestered in a coal formation that has undergone UCTT, adsorption isotherms were performed on coals treated to 325, 450, and 600°C with slow heating rates. Raw material was sourced from the Sufco (Utah), Carlinville (Illinois), and North Antelope (Wyoming) mines. The study indicated that adsorptive capacity for the coals increased with treatment temperature and that coals treated to 325°C showed less or similar capacity to the untreated coals.

  9. Sandia National Laboratories: Locations

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Locations Locations Sandia California CINT photo A national and international presence Sandia operates laboratories, testing facilities, and offices in multiple sites around the United States and participates in research collaborations around the world. Sandia's executive management offices and larger laboratory complex are located in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Our second principal laboratory is located in Livermore, California. Although most of our 9,840 employees work at these two locations,

  10. Water-related Issues Affecting Conventional Oil and Gas Recovery and Potential Oil-Shale Development in the Uinta Basin, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Berg, Michael Vanden; Anderson, Paul; Wallace, Janae; Morgan, Craig; Carney, Stephanie

    2012-04-30

    in the subsurface of the Uinta Basin using a combination of water chemistry data collected from various sources and by analyzing geophysical well logs. By re-mapping the base of the moderately saline aquifer using more robust data and more sophisticated computer-based mapping techniques, regulators now have the information needed to more expeditiously grant water disposal permits while still protecting freshwater resources. Part 2: Eastern Uinta Basin gas producers have identified the Birds Nest aquifer, located in the Parachute Creek Member of the Green River Formation, as the most promising reservoir suitable for large-volume saline water disposal. This aquifer formed from the dissolution of saline minerals that left behind large open cavities and fractured rock. This new and complete understanding the aquifer?s areal extent, thickness, water chemistry, and relationship to Utah?s vast oil shale resource will help operators and regulators determine safe saline water disposal practices, directly impacting the success of increased hydrocarbon production in the region, while protecting potential future oil shale production. Part 3: In order to establish a baseline of water quality on lands identified by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management as having oil shale development potential in the southeastern Uinta Basin, the UGS collected biannual water samples over a three-year period from near-surface aquifers and surface sites. The near-surface and relatively shallow groundwater quality information will help in the development of environmentally sound water-management solutions for a possible future oil shale and oil sands industry and help assess the sensitivity of the alluvial and near-surface bedrock aquifers. This multifaceted study will provide a better understanding of the aquifers in Utah?s Uinta Basin, giving regulators the tools needed to protect precious freshwater resources while still allowing for increased hydrocarbon production.

  11. April 2016 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling at the Monticello, Utah, Processing Site

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling at the Monticello, Utah, Disposal and Processing Sites August 2016 LMS/MNT/S00416 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy DVP-April 2016, Monticello, Utah June 2016 RIN 16047728 Page i Contents Sampling Event Summary ...............................................................................................................1 Data Assessment Summary

  12. June 2015 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling at the Green River, Utah, Disposal Site

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    5 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling at the Green River, Utah, Disposal Site August 2015 LMS/GRN/S00615 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy DVP-June 2015, Green River, Utah August 2015 RIN 15067102 Page i Contents Sampling Event Summary ...............................................................................................................1 Data Assessment Summary

  13. June 2016 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling at the Green River, Utah, Disposal Site

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    6 Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling at the Green River, Utah, Disposal Site October 2016 LMS/GRN/S00616 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy DVP-June 2016, Green River, Utah October 2016 Task GRN01-16060001 Page i Contents Sampling Event Summary ...............................................................................................................1 Data Assessment Summary

  14. ,"Utah Proved Nonproducing Reserves"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Proved Nonproducing Reserves" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Proved Nonproducing Reserves",5,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1996" ,"Release Date:","11/19/2015" ,"Next Release Date:","12/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  15. Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 0 44 -35 1980's -22 44 307 4 -44 -65 -68 -45 -424 260 1990's 8 126 136 43 -82 -63 44 -40 97 -56 2000's 4 135 13 40 113 65 -11 17 -4 1 2010's -80 134 289 -582 -20 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next

  16. Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Estimated Production (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Estimated Production (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Estimated Production (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 62 58 54 1980's 61 79 87 68 76 73 60 60 40 64 1990's 71 81 111 165 184 165 180 177 216 220 2000's 226 288 286 278 282 308 349 365 417 447 2010's 432 449 478 456 433 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date:

  17. Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 93 62 97 1980's 156 413 60 93 41 27 51 12 3 9 1990's 55 21 37 11 43 19 126 164 133 618 2000's 266 269 368 230 299 596 1,408 744 801 164 2010's 106 643 447 117 164 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next

  18. Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 79 202 89 1980's 123 84 99 42 257 83 78 144 277 84 1990's 101 83 99 24 201 74 79 34 110 322 2000's 110 606 490 767 278 112 502 325 564 491 2010's 219 341 1,926 444 617 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date:

  19. Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 37 117 62 1980's 293 414 55 176 80 111 51 281 86 87 1990's 112 204 161 337 172 69 125 293 645 801 2000's 177 805 207 188 475 186 218 1,113 379 1,342 2010's 872 813 1,349 484 752 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date:

  20. Utah Renewable Electric Power Industry Net Generation, by Energy Source

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Utah" "Energy Source",2006,2007,2008,2009,2010 "Geothermal",191,164,254,279,277 "Hydro Conventional",747,539,668,835,696 "Solar","-","-","-","-","-" "Wind","-","-",24,160,448 "Wood/Wood Waste","-","-","-","-","-" "MSW Biogenic/Landfill Gas",15,31,24,48,56 "Other

  1. Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs,

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Wet (Billion Cubic Feet) Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs, Wet (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs, Wet (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 107 94 74 101 2000's 190 155 200 143 127 78 140 167 129 371 2010's 351 416 618 479 377 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date:

  2. Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation,

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Estimated Production from Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Estimated Production from Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Estimated Production from Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 29 1980's 28 26 26 23 27 24 25 36 31 42 1990's 47 45 45 41 38 27 27 26 24 24 2000's 20 23 21 20 21 27 30 29 29 33 2010's 37 50 51 58 78 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not

  3. Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane New Field Discoveries Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production

  4. Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves New Reservoir Discoveries in Old

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Fields (Billion Cubic Feet) New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 4 2010's 0 0 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed

  5. Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 110 2010's 30 31 134 11 6 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Decreases

  6. Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 9 2010's 77 46 21 69 68 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Reserves Revision Increases

  7. Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Estimated Production from Reserves

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Estimated Production from Reserves (Million Barrels) Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Estimated Production from Reserves (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 23 2010's 25 27 31 36 43 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate

  8. Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 8 2010's 21 23 45 91 297 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Decreases, Wet After Lease

  9. Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 126 2010's 71 64 75 54 234 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Revision Increases

  10. Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Acquisitions

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Acquisitions (Million Barrels) Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Acquisitions (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 2010's 0 10 0 1 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Lease Condensate Reserves Acquisitions

  11. Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Adjustments

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Adjustments (Million Barrels) Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Adjustments (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 2 2010's 3 -3 2 -19 -3 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Lease Condensate Reserves Adjustments

  12. Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Decreases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Decreases (Million Barrels) Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Decreases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 7 2010's 3 3 31 11 5 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Decreases

  13. Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Extensions

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Extensions (Million Barrels) Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Extensions (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 1 2010's 0 3 15 0 1 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Lease Condensate Reserves Extensions

  14. Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Increases

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) Increases (Million Barrels) Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Increases (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 36 2010's 6 9 27 3 3 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Lease Condensate Reserves Revision Increases

  15. Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Sales (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Sales (Million Barrels) Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves Sales (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 1 2010's 24 4 0 1 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Lease Condensate Reserves Sales

  16. Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves in Nonproducing

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Reservoirs (Million Barrels) in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels) Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 1 1 2000's 1 1 2 2 5 13 32 28 34 11 2010's 40 44 57 33 28 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016

  17. Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Estimated

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Production from Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Estimated Production from Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Estimated Production from Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 29 1980's 37 58 65 49 59 59 46 36 30 41 1990's 42 49 77 137 160 151 166 169 204 208 2000's 218 276 275 266 268 286 323 340 393 423 2010's 405 413 441 414 374 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not

  18. Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, New Field

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet) New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 39 1980's 4 2 2 7 2 0 0 2 3 0 1990's 0 2 0 8 1 2 17 0 0 5 2000's 0 4 0 0 5 0 40 4 64 0 2010's 0 1 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.

  19. Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, New Reservoir

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Discoveries in Old Fields (Billion Cubic Feet) Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 0 1980's 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 1990's 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 2000's 16 5 2 7 11 5 0 0 0 4 2010's 0 0 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid

  20. Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet) Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 1,528 20 730 667 947 0 1,199 543 252 69 2010's 1 856 0 459 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016

  1. Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet) Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's -24 1980's -111 133 250 23 85 -38 -67 32 -46 18 1990's -28 17 150 1 -123 -46 17 17 31 -52 2000's 34 58 -9 23 90 33 -22 12 -11 67 2010's -50 157 304 -564 31 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid

  2. Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet) Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 98 1980's 156 436 59 80 38 25 40 11 3 4 1990's 68 11 38 5 43 18 124 175 138 653 2000's 273 279 366 232 284 590 1,382 713 761 108 2010's 89 514 358 26 87 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid

  3. Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 15 1980's 81 79 82 35 266 72 72 167 401 44 1990's 114 48 75 18 203 75 62 22 31 264 2000's 105 554 483 721 243 80 472 326 491 499 2010's 163 304 1,929 245 265 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W =

  4. Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 41 1980's 288 418 40 157 72 57 43 230 110 51 1990's 50 167 141 341 163 41 92 248 664 623 2000's 144 790 141 174 454 134 184 1,085 376 1,181 2010's 776 649 1,284 447 457 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available;

  5. Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Sales

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Billion Cubic Feet) Sales (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Sales (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 597 1 1,007 713 937 6 1,145 490 260 90 2010's 543 776 1 321 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages:

  6. ,"Utah Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Proved Reserves" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Dry Natural Gas Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1977" ,"Release Date:","11/19/2015" ,"Next Release Date:","12/31/2016" ,"Excel File Name:","ng_enr_dry_dcu_sut_a.xls"

  7. Utah Natural Gas Marketed Production (Million Cubic Feet)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 367 1980's 414 335 325 360 341 391 410 471 475 442 1990's 455 469 309 289 286 277 301 310 209 321 2000's 348 303 359 299 290 308 317 368 321 601 2010's 631 909 1,001 895 872 - =

  8. Utah and Wyoming Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves Based

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Production (Million Barrels) Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves Based Production (Million Barrels) Utah and Wyoming Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Reserves Based Production (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 4 1980's 5 11 8 20 26 31 31 28 25 23 1990's 16 17 15 14 14 9 8 8 8 14 2000's 7 11 11 10 10 12 13 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company

  9. Utah and Wyoming Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Reserves Based Production

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    (Million Barrels) Expected Future Production (Million Barrels) Utah and Wyoming Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Expected Future Production (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 280 1980's 294 363 381 483 577 681 700 701 932 704 1990's 641 580 497 458 440 503 639 680 600 531 2000's 858 782 806 756 765 710 686 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.

  10. Utah Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels) Utah Crude Oil Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's NA NA 36 58 2000's 91 100 91 76 61 52 164 174 140 235 2010's 257 258 368 312 261 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Proved

  11. Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) (Million Barrels) Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 52 62 90 2010's 69 78 87 57 51 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Lease Condensate Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31

  12. Utah Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Expected Future Production (Million

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Barrels) Liquids, Expected Future Production (Million Barrels) Utah Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Expected Future Production (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 56 54 116 2010's 132 196 181 169 206 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Natural Gas Plant Liquids Proved

  13. Utah and Wyoming Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Expected Future Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Million Barrels) and Wyoming Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Expected Future Production (Million Barrels) Utah and Wyoming Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Expected Future Production (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 280 1980's 294 363 381 483 577 681 700 701 932 704 1990's 641 580 497 458 440 503 639 680 600 531 2000's 858 782 806 756 765 710 686 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid

  14. Reversible micromachining locator

    DOEpatents

    Salzer, L.J.; Foreman, L.R.

    1999-08-31

    This invention provides a device which includes a locator, a kinematic mount positioned on a conventional tooling machine, a part carrier disposed on the locator and a retainer ring. The locator has disposed therein a plurality of steel balls, placed in an equidistant position circumferentially around the locator. The kinematic mount includes a plurality of magnets which are in registry with the steel balls on the locator. In operation, a blank part to be machined is placed between a surface of a locator and the retainer ring (fitting within the part carrier). When the locator (with a blank part to be machined) is coupled to the kinematic mount, the part is thus exposed for the desired machining process. Because the locator is removably attachable to the kinematic mount, it can easily be removed from the mount, reversed, and reinserted onto the mount for additional machining. Further, the locator can likewise be removed from the mount and placed onto another tooling machine having a properly aligned kinematic mount. Because of the unique design and use of magnetic forces of the present invention, positioning errors of less than 0.25 micrometer for each machining process can be achieved. 7 figs.

  15. Reversible micromachining locator

    DOEpatents

    Salzer, Leander J.; Foreman, Larry R.

    1999-01-01

    This invention provides a device which includes a locator, a kinematic mount positioned on a conventional tooling machine, a part carrier disposed on the locator and a retainer ring. The locator has disposed therein a plurality of steel balls, placed in an equidistant position circumferentially around the locator. The kinematic mount includes a plurality of magnets which are in registry with the steel balls on the locator. In operation, a blank part to be machined is placed between a surface of a locator and the retainer ring (fitting within the part carrier). When the locator (with a blank part to be machined) is coupled to the kinematic mount, the part is thus exposed for the desired machining process. Because the locator is removably attachable to the kinematic mount, it can easily be removed from the mount, reversed, and reinserted onto the mount for additional machining. Further, the locator can likewise be removed from the mount and placed onto another tooling machine having a properly aligned kinematic mount. Because of the unique design and use of magnetic forces of the present invention, positioning errors of less than 0.25 micrometer for each machining process can be achieved.

  16. Utah's "Solar For Schools" Program Is Bringing New Light to Education |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Department of Energy Utah's "Solar For Schools" Program Is Bringing New Light to Education Utah's "Solar For Schools" Program Is Bringing New Light to Education November 12, 2010 - 9:54am Addthis Gil Sperling, U.S. Department of Energy; Elise Brown, Utah State Energy Program; Janet Jameson, Hillside Teacher; Prathusha Boppana, Hillside Student; Martell Menlove, Deputy Supt of Schools; Chuck McGinnis, Johnson Controls at the Solar for Schools ribbon cutting. | Department

  17. Object locating system

    DOEpatents

    Novak, James L.; Petterson, Ben

    1998-06-09

    A sensing system locates an object by sensing the object's effect on electric fields. The object's effect on the mutual capacitance of electrode pairs varies according to the distance between the object and the electrodes. A single electrode pair can sense the distance from the object to the electrodes. Multiple electrode pairs can more precisely locate the object in one or more dimensions.

  18. Reversible micromachining locator

    DOEpatents

    Salzer, Leander J.; Foreman, Larry R.

    2002-01-01

    A locator with a part support is used to hold a part onto the kinematic mount of a tooling machine so that the part can be held in or replaced in exactly the same position relative to the cutting tool for machining different surfaces of the part or for performing different machining operations on the same or different surfaces of the part. The locator has disposed therein a plurality of steel balls placed at equidistant positions around the planar surface of the locator and the kinematic mount has a plurality of magnets which alternate with grooves which accommodate the portions of the steel balls projecting from the locator. The part support holds the part to be machined securely in place in the locator. The locator can be easily detached from the kinematic mount, turned over, and replaced onto the same kinematic mount or another kinematic mount on another tooling machine without removing the part to be machined from the locator so that there is no need to touch or reposition the part within the locator, thereby assuring exact replication of the position of the part in relation to the cutting tool on the tooling machine for each machining operation on the part.

  19. Environmental assessment of remedial action at the Mexican Hat uranium mill tailings site, Mexican Hat, Utah. [Contains glossary

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1987-10-01

    This document assesses the environmental impacts of the proposed remedial action at the Mexican Hat uranium mill tailings site located on the Navajo Reservation in southern Utah. The site covers 235 acres and contains 69 acres of tailings and several of the original mill structures. Remedial action must be performed in accordance with standards and with the concurrence of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Navajo Nation. The proposed action is to stabilize the tailings within the present tailings site by consolidating the tailings and associated contaminated soils into a recontoured pile. A radon barrier of compacted earth would be constructed over the pile, and various erosion control measures would be taken to assure the long-term stability of the pile. The no action alternative is also assessed in this document. 240 refs., 12 figs., 20 tabs.

  20. Characterization of LaVerkin Springs water and methods for its reuse in energy development. [Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Eisenhauer, R.J.

    1981-11-01

    Analytical water data obtained from a 9-month test program at the LVS (LaVerkin Springs) site, which is located in Washington County, Southwestern Utah, were evaluated. Fresh water and the water after processing through various pretreatment steps and after ED (electrodialysis) desalting were characterized. Upgrading water quality by various physical and chemical treatment methods and by desalting processes was demonstrated by the LVS site test program. The relative merit of different methods of treatment, disposal, and reuse of LVS water were studied. The objectives of the study were to evaluate methods for preventing high salinity LVS water from entering the Virginia River and for utilizing the processed water in energy development. The disposal of water by (1) deep well injection, (2) use as a secondary coolant in a binary cooling tower, (3) use in solar salt-gradient ponds, and (4) use as a transport media for coal slurry pipelines were found to be technically feasible. Use of LVS water to transport coal to a consuming powerplant and subsequent reuse in a binary cooling tower and/or solar salt-gradient ponds would achieve both objectives of salt reduction and energy conservation. Because LVS water has a salt content of 9500 mg/L and a boron content of 5 mg/L, it cannot be directly used for irrigation.

  1. Experimental plan and construction guidance for Hanford Protective Barrier Test at Hill AFB, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Kirkham, R.R.; Gee, G.W.

    1994-04-01

    Permanent isolation surface barriers are needed to fully isolate buried waste materials for long periods of time from the general environment. Multi-layer surface barriers that use natural earthen materials overlying bio-intrusion layers of rock and/or asphalt are expected to reduce infiltration or deep percolation to less than 0.5 mm (0.02 in.) of water. The layering also reduces root penetration, preventing uptake and translocation of hazardous materials to the surface vegetation. The opportunity exists to test the Hanford Barrier in a wetter, colder climate at an existing lysimeter facility located at Hill Air Force Base near Salt Lake, Utah. The use of an existing lysimeter facility simplifies the construction effort and allows comparison of the Hanford Protective Barrier with an existing US Environmental Protection Agency-Resource Conservation and Recovery Act clay cap already undergoing tests at the lysimeter site. This document presents the experimental plan for testing the Hanford Protective Barrier in a wetter, colder climate.

  2. Utah - UC 54-2 - Public Utilities Definitions | Open Energy Informatio...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    2 - Public Utilities Definitions Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Utah - UC 54-2 - Public Utilities...

  3. Utah UC 54-2-1, Public Utilities Definitions | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    2-1, Public Utilities Definitions Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: Utah UC 54-2-1, Public Utilities...

  4. Cost-Effectiveness of ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2010 for the State of Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Hart, Philip R.; Rosenberg, Michael I.; Xie, YuLong; Zhang, Jian; Richman, Eric E.; Elliott, Douglas B.; Loper, Susan A.; Myer, Michael

    2013-11-01

    Moving to the ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2010 version from the Base Code (90.1-2007) is cost-effective for all building types and climate zones in the State of Utah.

  5. Low-Temperature Geothermal Water in Utah: A compilation of Data...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Temperature Geothermal Water in Utah: A compilation of Data for Thermal Wells and Springs Through 1993 Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site:...

  6. Utah - T-223 Application for Right-of-Way Encroachment Permit...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    T-223 Application for Right-of-Way Encroachment Permit Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library General: Utah - T-223 Application for Right-of-Way...

  7. Utah - UAC R930-6 - Access Management | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    UAC R930-6 - Access Management Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- RegulationRegulation: Utah - UAC R930-6 - Access ManagementLegal...

  8. Utah Natural Gas Number of Gas and Gas Condensate Wells (Number...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gas and Gas Condensate Wells (Number of Elements) Utah Natural Gas Number of Gas and Gas Condensate Wells (Number of Elements) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 ...

  9. Utah UC 54-4, Authority of Commission Over Public Utilities ...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    4, Authority of Commission Over Public Utilities Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Utah UC 54-4, Authority of...

  10. Utah State Briefing Book for low-level radioactive waste management

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1981-10-01

    The Utah State Briefing Book is one of a series of state briefing books on low-level radioactive waste management practices. It has been prepared to assist state and federal agency officials in planning for safe low-level radioactive waste disposal. The report contains a profile of low-level radioactive waste generators in Utah. The profile is the result of a survey of NRC licensees in Utah. The briefing book also contains a comprehensive assessment of low-level radioactive waste management issues and concerns as defined by all major interested parties including industry, government, the media, and interest groups. The assessment was developed through personal communications with representatives of interested parties, and through a review of media sources. Lastly, the briefing book provides demographic and socioeconomic data and a discussion of relevant government agencies and activities, all of which may impact waste management practices in Utah.

  11. Utah R652-20-3400 Geothermal Steam Leases | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Ruleregulation in Utah outlining the lease process for geothermal resources on (non-trust) state land Published NA Year Signed or Took Effect 2014 Legal Citation R652-20-3400...

  12. Long-Term Flow Test No. 1, Roosevelt Hot Springs, Utah | Open...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Flow Test No. 1, Roosevelt Hot Springs, Utah Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Journal Article: Long-Term Flow Test No. 1, Roosevelt Hot Springs,...

  13. Utah. Code. Ann. § 19-5-115: Spills or discharges of oil or...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Utah. Code. Ann. 19-5-115: Spills or discharges of oil or other substance Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute:...

  14. National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Elko Quadrangle, Nevada and Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Percival, T.J.; Bright, J.H.

    1982-07-01

    The Elko Quadrangle (1/sup 0/ x 2/sup 0/), Nevada and Utah, was evaluated to identify and delineate geologic environments favorable for the occurrence of uranium deposits. Geologic reconnaissance, radiometric surveys, and geochemical sampling programs were carried out in all identified environments in the quadrangle. Known and newly identified uranium occurrences were evaluated. All geologic environments, both favorable and unfavorable for the occurrence of uranium, were evaluated and compared to analogous environments known to contain uranium deposits. This study concludes that tuffs and sediments of the Humboldt Formation are favorable for initial-magmatic and sandstone uranium occurrences. Contact metasomatic and allogenic environments developed within the Park City limestones adjacent to the Delcer Buttes quartz monzonite are also favorable for uranium concentration. With the exception of unevaluated basins adjacent to possible igneous source rocks, all other identified geologic environments are considered unfavorable for uranium deposits.

  15. Utah Natural Gas Lease Fuel Consumption (Million Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Fuel Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas Lease Fuel Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1980's 1,806 5,621 6,286 6,775 8,970 7,970 6,596 1990's 10,573 4,597 3,866 3,241 3,322 18,520 18,570 16,478 19,481 15,930 2000's 16,394 14,578 17,163 16,398 15,802 17,216 20,221 21,715 18,169 20,222 2010's 22,022 23,209 28,165 28,165 24,824 23,118 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld

  16. Utah Natural Gas Total Consumption (Million Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Total Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas Total Consumption (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 165,253 169,776 159,889 2000's 164,557 159,299 163,379 154,125 155,891 160,275 187,399 219,700 224,188 214,220 2010's 219,213 222,227 223,039 247,285 241,737 230,131 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 10/31/2016 Next

  17. Utah Natural Gas % of Total Residential Deliveries (Percent)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    % of Total Residential Deliveries (Percent) Utah Natural Gas % of Total Residential Deliveries (Percent) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 1.05 1.01 1.01 1.04 1.17 1.26 1.17 2000's 1.11 1.15 1.21 1.08 1.24 1.20 1.37 1.28 1.35 1.36 2010's 1.38 1.49 1.44 1.44 1.23 1.27 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 10/31/2016 Next Release Date: 11/30/2016

  18. Utah Natural Gas Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves in Nonproducing

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Reservoirs (Billion Cubic Feet) Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 365 441 669 1,278 2000's 1,567 1,578 1,202 983 1,263 1,457 2,118 2,439 2,799 2,110 2010's 3,476 3,646 3,573 3,100 2,837 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W =

  19. Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs, Wet

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Billion Cubic Feet) Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs, Wet (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Reserves in Nonproducing Reservoirs, Wet (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 258 347 595 1,177 2000's 1,377 1,423 1,002 840 1,136 1,379 1,978 2,272 2,670 1,739 2010's 3,125 3,230 2,955 2,621 2,460 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual

  20. Utah Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Reserves Based Production (Million Barrels)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Commercial Consumers (Number of Elements) Utah Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers (Number of Elements) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1980's 31,329 32,637 32,966 1990's 34,697 35,627 36,145 37,816 39,183 40,101 40,107 40,689 42,054 43,861 2000's 47,201 47,477 50,202 51,063 51,503 55,174 55,821 57,741 59,502 60,781 2010's 61,976 62,885 63,383 64,114 65,134 66,143 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to

  1. Utah Dry Natural Gas Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Dry Natural Gas Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 877 925 948 1980's 1,201 1,912 2,161 2,333 2,080 1,999 1,895 1,947 1,298 1,507 1990's 1,510 1,702 1,830 2,040 1,789 1,580 1,633 1,839 2,388 3,213 2000's 4,235 4,579 4,135 3,516 3,866 4,295 5,146 6,391 6,643 7,257 2010's 6,981 7,857 7,548 6,829 6,685 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA =

  2. Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 650 1980's 870 1,722 1,928 2,112 1,984 1,897 1,795 1,870 1,509 1,498 1990's 1,432 1,532 1,709 1,909 1,631 1,424 1,446 1,695 2,293 3,050 2000's 4,125 4,450 3,915 3,318 3,661 4,051 4,894 6,095 6,393 6,810 2010's 6,515 7,199 6,774 6,162 6,098 - = No Data

  3. Berkeley Lab Shower Locations

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    LBNL ShowerS Shower facilities are available at several locations: Bldg. 2-Main Entry Men's & Women's Bldg. 6-2204,2206 Men's & Women's (limited building access) Bldg. 46-143 Men's...

  4. Location and Infrastructure

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Facts, Figures » Location and Infrastructure Location and Infrastructure The Lab's mission is to develop and apply science and technology to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. nuclear deterrent; reduce global threats; and solve other emerging national security and energy challenges. April 12, 2012 Aerial View of Los Alamos National Laboratory The central Laboratory technical area is featured in this aerial view. Boundary Peak, separating the Santa Fe National Forest and

  5. Object locating system

    DOEpatents

    Novak, J.L.; Petterson, B.

    1998-06-09

    A sensing system locates an object by sensing the object`s effect on electric fields. The object`s effect on the mutual capacitance of electrode pairs varies according to the distance between the object and the electrodes. A single electrode pair can sense the distance from the object to the electrodes. Multiple electrode pairs can more precisely locate the object in one or more dimensions. 12 figs.

  6. Technical Assessment for the CPC FD-7x-1500 Wind Turbine located at Tooele Army Base, Tooele Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Robert J. Turk; Kurt S. Myers; Jason W. Bush

    2012-08-01

    The CPC FD-7x-1500 Wind Turbine was installed with funding from the Energy Conservation Investment Program (ECIP). Since its installation, the turbine has been plagued with multiple operational upsets causing unacceptable down time. In an effort to reduce down time, the Army Corps of Engineers requested the Idaho National Laboratory conduct an assessment of the turbine to determine its viability as an operational turbine.

  7. Electric current locator

    DOEpatents

    King, Paul E.; Woodside, Charles Rigel

    2012-02-07

    The disclosure herein provides an apparatus for location of a quantity of current vectors in an electrical device, where the current vector has a known direction and a known relative magnitude to an input current supplied to the electrical device. Mathematical constants used in Biot-Savart superposition equations are determined for the electrical device, the orientation of the apparatus, and relative magnitude of the current vector and the input current, and the apparatus utilizes magnetic field sensors oriented to a sensing plane to provide current vector location based on the solution of the Biot-Savart superposition equations. Description of required orientations between the apparatus and the electrical device are disclosed and various methods of determining the mathematical constants are presented.

  8. Dipole Well Location

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center

    1998-08-03

    The problem here is to model the three-dimensional response of an electromagnetic logging tool to a practical situation which is often encountered in oil and gas exploration. The DWELL code provide the electromagnetic fields on the axis of a borehole due to either an electric or a magnetic dipole located on the same axis. The borehole is cylindrical, and is located within a stratified formation in which the bedding planes are not horizontal. The anglemore » between the normal to the bedding planes and the axis of the borehole may assume any value, or in other words, the borehole axis may be tilted with respect to the bedding planes. Additionally, all of the formation layers may have invasive zones of drilling mud. The operating frequency of the source dipole(s) extends from a few Hertz to hundreds of Megahertz.« less

  9. Utah Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1960's 0.13 0.16 0.15 1970's 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.19 0.41 0.48 0.50 0.61 0.64 0.72 1980's 1.12 1.10 3.06 3.40 4.08 3.52 2.90 1.88 2.39 1.58 1990's 1.70 1.54 1.63 1.77 1.54 1.15 1.39 1.86 1.73 1.93 2000's 3.28 3.52 1.99 4.11 5.24 7.16 5.49 NA 6.15 3.38 2010's 4.23 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA =

  10. Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 919 931 941 945 953 956 948 987 1,010 1,023 1,046 1,053 2007 997 1,050 1,093 1,098 1,126 1,083 1,091 1,098 984 900 1,057 1,092 2008 1,092 1,130 1,148 1,185 1,196 1,198 1,200 1,277 1,276 1,241 1,275 1,259 2009 1,273 1,289 1,300 1,278 1,254 1,218 1,224 1,222 1,178 1,195 1,203 1,148 2010 1,146 1,169 1,188 1,223 1,234 1,216 1,198

  11. Utah Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed from Natural Gas (Million Cubic Feet)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Base Gas) (Million Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas in Underground Storage (Base Gas) (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 46,944 46,944 46,944 46,944 48,144 46,944 49,350 50,457 51,244 51,397 42,464 42,464 1991 42,454 42,454 44,628 44,342 45,120 49,179 51,258 49,908 48,558 47,678 47,118 47,118 1992 47,118 47,739 48,770 49,900 50,972 52,189 53,369 54,688 55,934 57,208 49,578 49,736 1993 49,736 49,742 49,749 50,238 51,803 51,028 52,377 53,704 54,973 54,847

  12. Evaluation of low-temperature geothermal potential in Cache Valley, Utah. Report of investigation No. 174

    SciTech Connect

    de Vries, J.L.

    1982-11-01

    Field work consisted of locating 90 wells and springs throughout the study area, collecting water samples for later laboratory analyses, and field measurement of pH, temperature, bicarbonate alkalinity, and electrical conductivity. Na/sup +/, K/sup +/, Ca/sup +2/, Mg/sup +2/, SiO/sub 2/, Fe, SO/sub 4//sup -2/, Cl/sup -/, F/sup -/, and total dissolved solids were determined in the laboratory. Temperature profiles were measured in 12 additional, unused walls. Thermal gradients calculated from the profiles were approximately the same as the average for the Basin and Range province, about 35/sup 0/C/km. One well produced a gradient of 297/sup 0/C/km, most probably as a result of a near-surface occurrence of warm water. Possible warm water reservoir temperatures were calculated using both the silica and the Na-K-Ca geothermometers, with the results averaging about 50 to 100/sup 0/C. If mixing calculations were applied, taking into account the temperatures and silica contents of both warm springs or wells and the cold groundwater, reservoir temperatures up to about 200/sup 0/C were indicated. Considering measured surface water temperatures, calculated reservoir temperatures, thermal gradients, and the local geology, most of the Cache Valley, Utah area is unsuited for geothermal development. However, the areas of North Logan, Benson, and Trenton were found to have anomalously warm groundwater in comparison to the background temperature of 13.0/sup 0/C for the study area. The warm water has potential for isolated energy development but is not warm enough for major commercial development.

  13. Geomorphology and failure history of the earthquake-induced Farmington Siding landslide complex, Davis County, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Lowe, M.; Harty, K.M. )

    1993-04-01

    The Farmington Siding landslide complex covers an area of 19.5 km[sup 2] in central Davis County. First identified and mapped in the 1970s, the feature was classified by previous researchers as a liquefaction-induced lateral spread based on surface geomorphology and exposures on the landslide complex. This was the first landslide in Utah to be attributed to earthquake-induced liquefaction. Geomorphic and geologic evidence indicate that the Farmington Sliding landslide complex likely consists of liquefaction-induced landslides that failed by means of both flow failure and lateral spreading. The landslide complex is located in an area underlain primarily by fine-grained deposits of Pleistocene Lake Bonneville and Holocene Great Salt Lake. Geomorphic features of the landslide complex include main and minor scarps, hummocks, closed depressions, and transverse lineaments. The main scarp consists mostly of a series of arcuate scallops near the left flank of the landslide, but it is a relatively linear, single scarp near the right flank of the landslide. Hummocks and closed depressions are most common near the head region of the landslide complex. Failure of the Farmington Sliding landslide complex has occurred at least twice. The older, distal portion of the landslide complex is cut by the Gilbert shoreline of the Bonneville lake cycle, indicating that landsliding occurred more than 10,000 years ago. In the younger portion of the landslide complex, landsliding has disrupted the Gilbert shoreline. Radiocarbon age estimates from trenches on a hummock near the main scarp of the younger landslide indicate that slope failure occurred sometime between about 2,730 [+-] 370 cal. yr B.P. and 4,530 [+-] 300 cal. yr B.P., possibly during the penultimate or antepenultimate surface-faulting earthquake on the Weber segment of the Wasatch fault zone.

  14. METHOD OF LOCATING GROUNDS

    DOEpatents

    Macleish, K.G.

    1958-02-11

    ABS>This patent presents a method for locating a ground in a d-c circult having a number of parallel branches connected across a d-c source or generator. The complete method comprises the steps of locating the ground with reference to the mildpoint of the parallel branches by connecting a potentiometer across the terminals of the circuit and connecting the slider of the potentiometer to ground through a current indicating instrument, adjusting the slider to right or left of the mildpoint so as to cause the instrument to indicate zero, connecting the terminal of the network which is farthest from the ground as thus indicated by the potentiometer to ground through a condenser, impressing a ripple voltage on the circuit, and then measuring the ripple voltage at the midpoint of each parallel branch to find the branch in which is the lowest value of ripple voltage, and then measuring the distribution of the ripple voltage along this branch to determine the point at which the ripple voltage drops off to zero or substantially zero due to the existence of a ground. The invention has particular application where a circuit ground is present which will disappear if the normal circuit voltage is removed.

  15. Heterogeneous Shallow-Shelf Carbonate Buildups in the Paradox Basin, Utah and Colorado: Targets for Increased Oil Production and Reserves Using Horizontal Drilling Techniques

    SciTech Connect

    Thomas C. Chidsey; Kevin McClure; Craig D. Morgan

    2003-10-05

    The Paradox Basin of Utah, Colorado, Arizona, and New Mexico contains nearly 100 small oil fields producing from carbonate buildups within the Pennsylvanian (Desmoinesian) Paradox Formation. These fields typically have one to 10 wells with primary production ranging from 700,000 to 2,000,000 barrels (111,300-318,000 m{sup 3}) of oil per field and a 15 to 20 percent recovery rate. At least 200 million barrels (31.8 million m{sup 3}) of oil will not be recovered from these small fields because of inefficient recovery practices and undrained heterogeneous reservoirs. Several fields in southeastern Utah and southwestern Colorado are being evaluated as candidates for horizontal drilling and enhanced oil recovery from existing vertical wells based upon geological characterization and reservoir modeling case studies. Geological characterization on a local scale is focused on reservoir heterogeneity, quality, and lateral continuity, as well as possible reservoir compartmentalization, within these fields. This study utilizes representative cores, geophysical logs, and thin sections to characterize and grade each field's potential for drilling horizontal laterals from existing development wells. The results of these studies can be applied to similar fields elsewhere in the Paradox Basin and the Rocky Mountain region, the Michigan and Illinois Basins, and the Midcontinent region. This report covers research activities for the first half of the fourth project year (April 6 through October 5, 2003). The work included (1) analysis of well-test data and oil production from Cherokee and Bug fields, San Juan County, Utah, and (2) diagenetic evaluation of stable isotopes from the upper Ismay and lower Desert Creek zones of the Paradox Formation in the Blanding sub-basin, Utah. Production ''sweet spots'' and potential horizontal drilling candidates were identified for Cherokee and Bug fields. In Cherokee field, the most productive wells are located in the thickest part of the mound

  16. National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Moab Quadrangle, Colorado and Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Campbell, J.A.; Franczyk, K.J.; Lupe, R.D.; Peterson, F.

    1982-09-01

    Portions of the Salt Wash Member of the Morrison, the Chinle, the Rico, the Cutler, and the Entrada Formations are favorable for uranium deposits that meet the minimum size and grade requirements of the US Department of Energy within the Moab 1' x 2' Quadrangle, Utah and Colorado. Nine areas are judged favorable for the Late Jurassic Salt Wash Member. The criteria used to evaluate these areas as favorable include the presence of (1) fluvial sandstone beds deposited by low-energy streams; (2) actively moving major and minor structures such as the Paradox basin and the many folds within it; (3) paleostream transport directions approximately perpendicular to the trend of many of the paleofolds; (4) presence of favorable gray lacustrine mudstone beds; and (5) known uranium occurrences associated with the favorable gray mudstones. Three favorable areas have been outlined for the Late Triassic Chinle Formation. The criteria used to evaluate these areas are the sandstone-to-shale ratios for the Chinle Formation and the distribution of the Petrified Forest Member of the Chinle, which is considered the source for the uranium. Two favorable areas have been delineated for the Permian Cutler Formation, and one for the Permian Rico Formation. The criteria used to outline favorable areas are the distribution of favorable facies within each formation. Favorable facies are those that are a result of deposition in environments that are transitional between fluvial and marine. One favorable area is outlined in the Jurassic Entrada Sandstone in the southeastern corner of the quadrangle in the Placerville district. Boundaries for this area were established by geologic mapping.

  17. National Uranium Resource Evaluation: Cortez quadrangle, Colorado and Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Campbell, J A

    1982-09-01

    Six stratigraphic units are recognized as favorable for the occurrence of uranium deposits that meet the minimum size and grade requirements of the U.S. Department of Energy in the Cortez 1/sup 0/ x 2/sup 0/ Quadrangle, Utah and Colorado. These units include the Jurassic Salt Wash, Recapture, and Brushy Basin Members of the Morrison Formation and the Entrada Sandstone, the Late Triassic Chinle Formation, and the Permian Cutler Formation. Four areas are judged favorable for the Morrison members which include the Slick Rock, Montezuma Canyon, Cottonwood Wash and Hatch districts. The criteria used to determine favorability include the presence of the following (1) fluvial sandstone beds deposited by low-energy streams; (2) actively moving major and minor structures such as the Paradox Basin and the many folds within it; (3) paleostream transport directions approximately perpendicular to the trend of many of the paleofolds; (4) presence of favorable gray lacustrine mudstone beds; and (5) known uranium occurrences associated with the favorable gray mudstones. Two areas of favorability are recognized for the Chinle Formation. These areas include the Abajo Mountain and Aneth-Ute Mountain areas. The criteria used to determine favorability include the sandstone-to-mudstone ratio for the Chinle Formation and the geographic distribution of the Petrified Forest Member of the Chinle Formation. Two favorable areas are recognized for the Cutler Formation. Both of these areas are along the northern border of the quadrangle between the Abajo Mountains and the Dolores River Canyon area. Two areas are judged favorable for the Entrada Sandstone. One area is in the northeast corner of the quadrangle in the Placerville district and the second is along the eastern border of the quadrangle on the southeast flank of the La Plata Mountains.

  18. Cedar City, Utah: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    lse,"poi":true,"imageoverlays":,"markercluster":false,"searchmarkers":"","locations":"text":"","title":"","link":null,"lat":37.6774769,"lon":-113.0618931,"alt":0,"address":"","...

  19. RAPID/Geothermal/Transmission Siting & Interconnection/Utah ...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    of 230 kV. The line must be located on state land for this to apply. Public Utility Definition for Transmission Facility: "Public utilities" include "electric corporations,"...

  20. UMTRA water sampling and analysis plan, Green River, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Papusch, R.

    1993-12-01

    The purpose of this water sampling and analysis plan (WSAP) is to provide a basis for groundwater and surface water sampling at the Green River Uranium Mill Tailing Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project site. This WSAP identifies and justifies the sampling locations, analytical parameters, detection limits, and sampling frequency for the monitoring locations.

  1. LONG-TERM SURVEILLANCE PLAN FOR THE GREEN RIVER, UTAH DISPOSAL SITE Ttable of Contents

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    LONG-TERM SURVEILLANCE PLAN FOR THE GREEN RIVER, UTAH DISPOSAL SITE Ttable of Contents DOE/AL/62350-89 May 20, 1998 REV. 1 VER.4 08914TOC.DOC (GRN) i TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Background .................................................................................................... 1- 2 1.2 Licensing process

  2. EECBG Success Story: Shining Energy-Saving LEDs on Utah Starry Nights

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Thanks to an Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG), Utah is replacing streetlights with efficient LEDs across 14 rural communities. About 2,500 streetlights will be replaced and could save the town 20% to 50% on electricity bills. Learn more.

  3. DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: Garbett Homes, Herriman, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    none,

    2013-09-01

    As the first net zero-energy production home certified in Utah, this house incorporates two 94% efficient tankless water heaters and two roof-mounted solar panels that preheat the home's water supply. This home won a 2013 Housing Innovation Award in the production builder category.

  4. Limited Groundwater Investigation of The Atlas Corporation Moab Mill, Moab, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Easterly, CE

    2001-11-05

    The project described in this report was conducted by personnel from Oak Ridge National Laboratory's Grand Junction Office (ORNL/GJ). The purpose was to refine information regarding groundwater contamination emanating from the Atlas Corporation's former uranium mill in Moab, Utah.

  5. Salt Lake City, Utah A White House Climate Action Champions Case Study

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Salt Lake City, Utah A White House Climate Action Champions Case Study INDEX Executive Summary.............................. 2 Climate Action Champion.................... 2 Project Spotlight.................................... 3 Challenges and lessons learned.......... 4 Resources & Contacts........................... 5 2 Executive Summary Salt Lake City has a robust set of ambitious climate goals that target reducing emissions while simultaneously prioritizing ways to become more resilient

  6. FFTF Asbestos Location Tracking Program

    SciTech Connect

    Reynolds, J.A.

    1994-09-15

    An Asbestos Location Tracking Program was prepared to list, locate, and determine Asbestos content and to provide baseline {open_quotes}good faith{close_quotes} for yearly condition inspections for the FFTF Plant and buildings and grounds.

  7. DIORAMA Location Type User's Guide

    SciTech Connect

    Terry, James Russell

    2015-01-29

    The purpose of this report is to present the current design and implementation of the DIORAMA location type object (LocationType) and to provide examples and use cases. The LocationType object is included in the diorama-app package in the diorama::types namespace. Abstractly, the object is intended to capture the full time history of the location of an object or reference point. For example, a location may be speci ed as a near-Earth orbit in terms of a two-line element set, in which case the location type is capable of propagating the orbit both forward and backward in time to provide a location for any given time. Alternatively, the location may be speci ed as a xed set of geodetic coordinates (latitude, longitude, and altitude), in which case the geodetic location of the object is expected to remain constant for all time. From an implementation perspective, the location type is de ned as a union of multiple independent objects defi ned in the DIORAMA tle library. Types presently included in the union are listed and described in subsections below, and all conversions or transformation between these location types are handled by utilities provided by the tle library with the exception of the \\special-values" location type.

  8. Spring loaded locator pin assembly

    DOEpatents

    Groll, T.A.; White, J.P.

    1998-03-03

    This invention deals with spring loaded locator pins. Locator pins are sometimes referred to as captured pins. This is a mechanism which locks two items together with the pin that is spring loaded so that it drops into a locator hole on the work piece. 5 figs.

  9. Spring loaded locator pin assembly

    DOEpatents

    Groll, Todd A.; White, James P.

    1998-01-01

    This invention deals with spring loaded locator pins. Locator pins are sometimes referred to as captured pins. This is a mechanism which locks two items together with the pin that is spring loaded so that it drops into a locator hole on the work piece.

  10. Mobile Alternative Fueling Station Locator

    Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center

    Energy - Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Alternative Fueling Station Locator Fuel Type Biodiesel (B20 and above) Compressed Natural Gas Electric Ethanol (E85) Hydrogen ...

  11. Long-term surveillance plan for the Green River, Utah, disposal site

    SciTech Connect

    1997-06-01

    The long-term surveillance plan (LTSP) for the Green River, Utah, Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project disposal site describes the surveillance activities for the Green River disposal cell. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will carry out these activities to ensure that the disposal cell continues to function as designed. This final LTSP was prepared as a requirement for acceptance under the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) general license for custody and long-term care of residual radioactive materials (RRM). This LTSP documents whether the land and interests are owned by the United States or an Indian tribe and details how the long-term care of the disposal site will be carried out. The Green River, Utah, LTSP is based on the DOE`s Guidance for Implementing the UMTRA Project Long-term Surveillance Program (DOE, 1992a).

  12. Long-term surveillance plan for the Green River, Utah disposal site. Revision 1

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1994-08-01

    The long-term surveillance plan (LTSP) for the Green River, Utah, Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project disposal site describes the surveillance activities for the Green River disposal cell. The US Department of Energy (DOE) will carry out these activities to ensure that the disposal cell continues to function as designed. This final LTSP was prepared as a requirement for acceptance under the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) general license for custody and long-term care of residual radioactive materials (RRM). This LTSP documents whether the land and interests are owned by the United States or an Indian tribe and details how the long-term care of the disposal site will be carried out. The Green River, Utah, LTSP is based on the DOE`s Guidance for Implementing the UMTRA Project Long-term Surveillance Program (DOE, 1992a).

  13. Primary oil-shale resources of the Green River Formation in the eastern Uinta Basin, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Trudell, L.G.; Smith, J.W.; Beard, T.N.; Mason, G.M.

    1983-04-01

    Resources of potential oil in place in the Green River Formation are measured and estimated for the primary oil-shale resource area east of the Green River in Utah's Uinta Basin. The area evaluated (Ts 7-14 S, Rs 19-25 E) includes most of, and certainly the best of Utah's oil-shale resource. For resource evaluation the principal oil-shale section is divided into ten stratigraphic units which are equivalent to units previously evaluated in the Piceance Creek Basin of Colorado. Detailed evaluation of individual oil-shale units sampled by cores, plus estimates by extrapolation into uncored areas indicate a total resource of 214 billion barrels of shale oil in place in the eastern Uinta Basin.

  14. Progress Report from University of Utah -- The Ultra-scale Visualization Climate Data Analysis Tools (UV-CDAT): Scientific Climate Data Visualization for BER and the Community

    SciTech Connect

    Silva, Claudio T

    2013-09-02

    Progress report from the work performed at the University of Utah for the UV-CDAT project before the team moved to NYU Poly.

  15. EIS-0450: TransWest Express Transmission Project; Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, and Nevada

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EIS, prepared jointly by DOE's Western Area Power Administration and the Department of the Interior's Bureau of Land Management (Wyoming State Office), evaluates the potential environmental impacts of granting a right-of-way for the TransWest Express Transmission Project and amending a land use plan. The project consists of an overhead transmission line that would extend approximately 725 miles from south-central Wyoming, through Colorado and Utah. Western proposes to be a joint owner of the project.

  16. This fact sheet describes wetlands in and around Monticello, Utah, and what the

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    wetlands in and around Monticello, Utah, and what the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is doing to restore wetlands that are adversely affected by Monticello cleanup project activities. The purpose of the Monticello cleanup projects is to minimize risks to the public and the environment from exposure to uranium mill tailings and radon gas. The cleanup is being performed in accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), also known as Superfund.

  17. Tailings Pile Seepage Model The Atlas Corporation Moab Mill Moab, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Easterly, CE

    2001-11-05

    The project described in this report was conducted by personnel from Oak Ridge National Laboratory's Grand Junction Office (ORNL/GJ). This report has been prepared as a companion report to the Limited Groundwater Investigation of the Atlas Corporation Moab Mill, Moab, Utah. The purpose of this report is to present the results of the tailings pile seepage modeling effort tasked by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).

  18. Precision zero-home locator

    DOEpatents

    Stone, William J.

    1986-01-01

    A zero-home locator includes a fixed phototransistor switch and a moveable actuator including two symmetrical, opposed wedges, each wedge defining a point at which switching occurs. The zero-home location is the average of the positions of the points defined by the wedges.

  19. Mobile Alternative Fueling Station Locator

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    2009-04-01

    The Department of Energy's Alternative Fueling Station Locator is available on-the-go via cell phones, BlackBerrys, or other personal handheld devices. The mobile locator allows users to find the five closest biodiesel, electricity, E85, hydrogen, natural gas, and propane fueling sites using Google technology.

  20. Precision zero-home locator

    DOEpatents

    Stone, W.J.

    1983-10-31

    A zero-home locator includes a fixed phototransistor switch and a moveable actuator including two symmetrical, opposed wedges, each wedge defining a point at which switching occurs. The zero-home location is the average of the positions of the points defined by the wedges.

  1. Locations of Industrial Assessment Centers

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    To apply for an assessment, contact one of the 24 schools across the country that currently participate in the IAC Program. Click on a university name below for contact information for each location.

  2. Bayesian Mulitple-Event Location

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center

    2010-03-30

    Bayesloc is a statistical model of the multiple seismic location system, including event hypocenters, corrections to model-based travel time predictions, assessments precision for measurement phase arrival times, and phase lavels which indicate phase ray path.

  3. HETEROGENEOUS SHALLOW-SHELF CARBONATE BUILDUPS IN THE PARADOX BASIN, UTAH AND COLORADO: TARGETS FOR INCREASED OIL PRODUCTION AND RESERVES USING HORIZONTAL DRILLING TECHNIQUES

    SciTech Connect

    David E. Eby; Thomas C. Chidsey, Jr.; Kevin McClure; Craig D. Morgan

    2003-07-01

    cores identified seven depositional facies: open marine, middle shelf, inner shelf/tidal flat, bryozoan mounds, phylloid-algal mounds, quartz sand dunes, and anhydritic salinas. Lower Desert Creek facies include open marine, middle shelf, protomounds/collapse breccia, and phylloid-algal mounds. Mapping the upper Ismay zone facies delineates very prospective reservoir trends that contain porous, productive buildups around the anhydrite-filled intra-shelf basins. Facies and reservoir controls imposed by the anhydritic intra-shelf basins should be considered when selecting the optimal location and orientation of any horizontal drilling from known phylloidalgal reservoirs to undrained reserves, as well as identifying new exploration trends. Although intra-shelf basins are not present in the lower Desert Creek zone of the Blanding sub-basin, drilling horizontally along linear shoreline trends could also encounter previously undrilled, porous intervals and buildups. Technology transfer activities consisted of a technical presentation at a Class II Review conference sponsored by the National Energy Technology Laboratory at the Center for Energy and Economic Diversification in Odessa, Texas. The project home page was updated on the Utah Geological Survey Internet web site.

  4. Completion of the Five-Year Reviews for the Monticello, Utah, Radioactively Contaminated Properties Site (Monticello Vicinity Properties) and the Monticello Mill Tailings Site

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Five-year reviews for the two Monticello, Utah, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) sites were completed in June 2012 by U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and Utah Department of Environmental Quality.

  5. LOCATION: Johnson County Sheriff's Office

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    LOCATION: Johnson County Sheriff's Office Criminalistics Laboratory 11890 Sunset Drive Olathe, Kansas 66061 DATE: JULY 15TH - JULY 18TH, 2013 TUITION: MAFS MEMBERS: $550 Non-MAFS Members: $650 HOW TO ENROLL: Follow this link and complete on-line registration. Pay- ment may be made online via PayPal or a company check may be mailed to MAFS Treasurer. Payment information is all located at the registration site: http://www.mafs.net/summer-workshop LODGING AND TRAVEL: Training Rate $107.77 per night

  6. Final audit report of remedial action construction at the UMTRA Project Mexican Hat, Utah -- Monument Valley, Arizona, sites

    SciTech Connect

    1995-10-01

    The final audit report for remedial action at the Mexican Hat, Utah, Monument Valley, Arizona, Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project sites consists of a summary of the radiological surveillances/audits, quality assurance (QA) in-process surveillances, and QA remedial action close-out inspections performed by the US Department of Energy (DOE) and the Technical Assistance Contractor (TAC); on-site construction reviews (OSCR) performed by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC); and a surveillance performed by the Navajo Nation. This report refers to remedial action activities performed at the Mexican Hat, Utah--Monument Valley, Arizona, Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project sites.

  7. Kennecott Utah Copper Corporation: Facility Utilizes Energy Assessments to Identify $930,000 in Potential Annual Savings

    SciTech Connect

    2004-07-01

    Kennecott Utah Copper Corporation (KUCC) used targeted energy assessments in the smelter and refinery at its Bingham Canyon Mine, near Salt Lake City, Utah. The assessment focused mainly on the energy-intensive processes of copper smelting and refining. By implementing the projects identified, KUCC could realize annual cost savings of $930,000 and annual energy savings of 452,000 MMBtu. The projects would also reduce maintenance, repair costs, waste, and environmental emissions. One project would use methane gas from an adjacent municipal dump to replace natural gas currently used to heat the refinery electrolyte.

  8. Six Utah plants help fuel rise in geothermal projects | Department of

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    Energy Geothermal power projects are developing quickly across the country, with Utah playing a role. A report released Thursday by the Geothermal Energy Association shows that the number of new geothermal projects under way in the United States grew 20 percent since January. "These new projects will result in the infusion of roughly $15 billion in capital investment in the Western states and create 7,000 permanent jobs and more than 25,000 person-years of construction and manufacturing

  9. ,"Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)",1,"Annual",2014 ,"Release Date:","11/19/2015" ,"Next Release Date:","12/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  10. ,"Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Natural Gas Liquids Lease Condensate, Proved Reserves (Million Barrels)",1,"Annual",2014 ,"Release Date:","11/19/2015" ,"Next Release Date:","12/31/2016"

  11. ,"Utah Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Expected Future Production (Million Barrels)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Liquids, Expected Future Production (Million Barrels)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Expected Future Production (Million Barrels)",1,"Annual",2014 ,"Release Date:","11/19/2015" ,"Next Release Date:","12/31/2016" ,"Excel

  12. ,"Utah Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2014 ,"Release Date:","11/19/2015" ,"Next Release

  13. ,"Utah and Wyoming Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Expected Future Production (Million Barrels)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    and Wyoming Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Expected Future Production (Million Barrels)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah and Wyoming Natural Gas Plant Liquids, Expected Future Production (Million Barrels)",1,"Annual",2006 ,"Release Date:","11/19/2015" ,"Next Release

  14. ,"Utah Natural Gas Lease Fuel Consumption (MMcf)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Fuel Consumption (MMcf)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Natural Gas Lease Fuel Consumption (MMcf)",1,"Annual",2015 ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File Name:","na1840_sut_2a.xls"

  15. ,"Utah Natural Gas Plant Fuel Consumption (MMcf)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Fuel Consumption (MMcf)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Natural Gas Plant Fuel Consumption (MMcf)",1,"Annual",2015 ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File Name:","na1850_sut_2a.xls"

  16. ,"Utah Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production (Million Cubic Feet)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Liquids Production (Million Cubic Feet)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production (Million Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2015 ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  17. ,"Utah Natural Gas Processed (Million Cubic Feet)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Processed (Million Cubic Feet)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Natural Gas Processed (Million Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2015 ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File Name:","na1180_sut_2a.xls"

  18. ,"Utah Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2012 ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  19. ,"Utah Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Natural Gas Wellhead Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2010 ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  20. ,"Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease Separation"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gas Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease Separation" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease Separation",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1979" ,"Release Date:","11/19/2015" ,"Next Release Date:","12/31/2016"

  1. Utah Renewable Electric Power Industry Net Summer Capacity, by Energy Source

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Utah" "Energy Source",2006,2007,2008,2009,2010 "Geothermal",23,33,34,34,42 "Hydro Conventional",255,255,256,256,255 "Solar","-","-","-","-","-" "Wind","-","-",19,222,222 "Wood/Wood Waste","-","-","-","-","-" "MSW/Landfill Gas",4,5,5,9,9 "Other

  2. Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, New

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet) Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 5 1980's 6 1 10 1 1 0 0 4 1 0 1990's 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000's 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 2 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.

  3. Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, New

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Billion Cubic Feet) Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, New Reservoir Discoveries in Old Fields (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 1 1980's 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1990's 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2000's 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W =

  4. Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet) Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 19 18 15 43 27 0 5 4 1 66 2010's 6 4 23 202 33 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016

  5. Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet) Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 54 1980's 83 -77 4 17 2 18 27 -13 32 4 1990's -17 20 -126 -1 23 -13 22 -10 -2 0 2000's -8 6 3 -3 3 5 1 0 5 4 2010's -15 38 -22 -12 11 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of

  6. Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet) Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 6 1980's 11 8 4 19 8 6 20 4 2 8 1990's 0 13 4 7 3 2 8 3 1 0 2000's 8 0 14 5 21 15 44 39 49 59 2010's 20 150 102 95 84 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company

  7. Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 80 1980's 50 12 20 9 21 23 19 6 22 65 1990's 13 50 34 8 13 3 20 15 86 79 2000's 11 75 24 68 41 34 37 3 80 2 2010's 61 48 55 213 378 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid

  8. Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 25 1980's 25 27 18 30 18 71 16 108 22 62 1990's 90 73 36 23 21 32 41 57 10 215 2000's 42 46 73 20 31 55 36 40 7 190 2010's 117 190 106 53 327 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to

  9. Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Sales (Billion Cubic Feet) Sales (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Reserves Sales (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 3 17 4 37 29 0 16 0 0 4 2010's 0 6 11 173 24 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages:

  10. ,"Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease Separation"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gas Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease Separation" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Wet After Lease Separation",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/1979" ,"Release Date:","11/19/2015" ,"Next Release

  11. ,"Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/2000" ,"Release Date:","11/19/2015" ,"Next Release Date:","12/31/2016"

  12. ,"Utah Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/2009" ,"Release Date:","11/19/2015" ,"Next Release Date:","12/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  13. ,"Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Acquisitions (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2014 ,"Release Date:","11/19/2015" ,"Next Release Date:","12/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  14. ,"Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Adjustments (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2014 ,"Release Date:","11/19/2015" ,"Next Release Date:","12/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  15. ,"Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Estimated Production (Billion Cubic Feet)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Estimated Production (Billion Cubic Feet)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Estimated Production (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2014 ,"Release Date:","11/19/2015" ,"Next Release Date:","12/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  16. ,"Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Extensions (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2014 ,"Release Date:","11/19/2015" ,"Next Release Date:","12/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  17. ,"Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2014 ,"Release Date:","11/19/2015" ,"Next Release Date:","12/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  18. ,"Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Decreases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2014 ,"Release Date:","11/19/2015" ,"Next Release Date:","12/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  19. ,"Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Revision Increases (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2014 ,"Release Date:","11/19/2015" ,"Next Release Date:","12/31/2016" ,"Excel File

  20. ,"Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Sales (Billion Cubic Feet)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Sales (Billion Cubic Feet)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves Sales (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2014 ,"Release Date:","11/19/2015" ,"Next Release Date:","12/31/2016" ,"Excel File Name:","rngr15sut_1a.xls"

  1. ,"Utah Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, Reserve Changes, and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, Reserve Changes, and Production" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, Reserve Changes, and Production",10,"Annual",2014,"6/30/2007" ,"Release Date:","11/19/2015" ,"Next Release

  2. Long-term surveillance plan for the Mexican Hat disposal site Mexican Hat, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    1997-06-01

    This long-term surveillance plan (LTSP) describes the U.S. Department of Energy`s (DOE) long-term care program for the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project Mexican Hat, Utah, disposal site. This LSTP describes the long-term surveillance program the DOE will implement to ensure the Mexican Hat disposal site performs as designed and is cared for in a manner that protects the public health and safety and the environment. Before each disposal site is licensed for custody and long-term care, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requires the DOE to submit such a site-specific LTSP.

  3. Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 367 1980's 414 335 325 360 341 391 410 471 475 442 1990's 455 469 309 289 286 277 301 310 209 321 2000's 348 303 359 299 290 308 317 368 321 601 2010's 631 909 1,001 895 872 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W =

  4. Vegetation Cover Analysis of Hazardous Waste Sites in Utah and Arizona Using Hyperspectral Remote Sensing

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Remote Sens. 2012, 4, 327-353; doi:10.3390/rs4020327 Remote Sensing ISSN 2072-4292 www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing Article Vegetation Cover Analysis of Hazardous Waste Sites in Utah and Arizona Using Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Jungho Im 1, *, John R. Jensen 2 , Ryan R. Jensen 3 , John Gladden 4 , Jody Waugh 5 and Mike Serrato 4 1 Department of Environmental Resources Engineering, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA 2

  5. Supplemental Modeling and Analysis Report, Atlas Corporation Moab Mill, Moab, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Easterly, CE

    2001-11-05

    The purpose of this report is to provide additional numerical modeling and data evaluation for the Atlas tailings pile near Moab, Utah. A previous report (Tailings Pile Seepage Model: The Atlas Corporation Moab Mill, Moab, Utah, January 9, 1998) prepared for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) by Oak Ridge National Laboratory/Grand Junction (ORNL/GJ) presented the results of steady-state modeling of water flow and subsequent discharge to the underlying groundwater system. At the request of the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), this model was expanded to evaluate the impact of drainage from the tailings pile in addition to recharge from precipitation in a transient mode simulation. In addition, the FWS requested transient simulations of contaminant transport in the alluvial aquifer. Subsequently, NRC requested an evaluation of additional hydrologic issues related to the results presented in the Tailings Pile Seepage Model (ORNL/GJ 1998a) and the Limited Groundwater Investigation (ORNL/GJ 1998b). Funding for the report was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy. The following section lists the individual tasks with subsequent sections providing the results. A map for the Atlas Moab Mill site is presented in Fig. 1.1.

  6. Geothermal rotary separator turbine: wellhead power system tests at Milford, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Hughes, E.E.

    1983-08-01

    Through development of a separator/expander engine EPRI is improving the efficiency of single flash geothermal power systems. Under cost-shared contracts with Biphase Energy Systems and Utah Power and Light Company (UP and L), a wellhead power generating system has been built and tested. The wellhead unit has been operated for 4000 hours at Roosevelt Hot Springs near Milford, Utah. Phillips Petroleum Company operates the geothermal field at this site. The rotary separator turbine (RST) is a separating expander that increases the resource utilization efficiency by extracting power upstream of a steam turbine in either a 1-stage or 2-stage flash power system. The first power output was achieved October 28, 1981, six weeks after arrival of the RST at the site. The RST system produced 3270 MWh(e) gross and 2770 MWh(e) net to the UP and L grid. Total equivalent power produced by the wellhead RST (actual power output of the RST plus the power obtainable from the steam flow out of the RST) is 15 to 20 percent above the power that would be produced by an optimum 1-stage direct flash plant operated on the same geothermal well.

  7. Cold-Air-Pool Structure and Evolution in a Mountain Basin: Peter Sinks, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Clements, Craig B.; Whiteman, Charles D.; Horel, John D.

    2003-06-01

    The evolution of potential temperature and wind structure during the buildup of nocturnal cold-air pools was investigated during clear, dry, September nights in Utah's Peter Sinks basin, a 1-km-diameter limestone sinkhole that holds the Utah minimum temperature record of -56 C. The evolution of cold-pool characteristics depended on the strength of prevailing flows above the basin. On an undisturbed day, a 30 C diurnal temperature range and a strong nocturnal potential temperature inversion (22 K in 100 m) were observed in the basin. Initially, downslope flows formed on the basin sidewalls. As a very strong potential temperature jump (17 K) developed at the top of the cold pool, however, the winds died within the basin and over the sidewalls. A persistent turbulent sublayer formed below the jump. Turbulent sensible heat flux on the basin floor became negligible shortly after sunset while the basin atmosphere continued to cool. Temperatures over the slopes, except for a 1 to 2-m-deep layer, became warmer than over the basin center at the same altitude. Cooling rates for the entire basin near sunset were comparable to the 90 W m-2 rate of loss of net longwave radiation at the basin floor, but these rates decreased to only a few watts per square meter by sunrise. This paper compares the observed cold-pool buildup in basins with inversion buildup in valleys.

  8. National uranium resource evaluation program: hydrogeochemical and stream sediment reconnaissance basic data for Ely quadrangle, Nevada; Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1981-10-15

    Field and laboratory data are presented for 1937 sediment samples from the Ely Quadrangle, Nevada; Utah. The samples were collected by Savannah River Laboratory; laboratory analysis and data reporting were performed by the Uranium Resource Evaluation Project at Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

  9. WINDExchange: School Wind Project Locations

    WindExchange

    School Wind Project Locations Tips for Using the Google Map On top of the Google Map, use the Country, State, Project Status, and Project Type dropdown lists to filter projects. Along the left margin, use the zooming meter to zoom in or out of your view. In the top left corner, click Reset View to reset all the filters and zooming. Click on Map, Satellite, and Terrain to view the map three different ways. Click and drag the map to move it around. Use the right scroll bar to view the project

  10. Short range radio locator system

    DOEpatents

    McEwan, Thomas E.

    1996-01-01

    A radio location system comprises a wireless transmitter that outputs two megahertz period bursts of two gigahertz radar carrier signals. A receiver system determines the position of the transmitter by the relative arrival of the radar bursts at several component receivers set up to have a favorable geometry and each one having a known location. One receiver provides a synchronizing gating pulse to itself and all the other receivers to sample the ether for the radar pulse. The rate of the synchronizing gating pulse is slightly offset from the rate of the radar bursts themselves, so that each sample collects one finely-detailed piece of information about the time-of-flight of the radar pulse to each receiver each pulse period. Thousands of sequential pulse periods provide corresponding thousand of pieces of information about the time-of-flight of the radar pulse to each receiver, in expanded, not real time. Therefore the signal processing can be done with relatively low-frequency, inexpensive components. A conventional microcomputer is then used to find the position of the transmitter by geometric triangulation based on the relative time-of-flight information.

  11. Short range radio locator system

    DOEpatents

    McEwan, T.E.

    1996-12-31

    A radio location system comprises a wireless transmitter that outputs two megahertz period bursts of two gigahertz radar carrier signals. A receiver system determines the position of the transmitter by the relative arrival of the radar bursts at several component receivers set up to have a favorable geometry and each one having a known location. One receiver provides a synchronizing gating pulse to itself and all the other receivers. The rate of the synchronizing gating pulse is slightly offset from the rate of the radar bursts themselves, so that each sample collects one finely-detailed piece of information about the time-of-flight of the radar pulse to each receiver each pulse period. Thousands of sequential pulse periods provide corresponding thousand of pieces of information about the time-of-flight of the radar pulse to each receiver, in expanded, not real time. Therefore the signal processing can be done with relatively low-frequency, inexpensive components. A conventional microcomputer is then used to find the position of the transmitter by geometric triangulation based on the relative time-of-flight information. 5 figs.

  12. Class I cultural resource overview for oil shale and tar sands areas in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming.

    SciTech Connect

    O'Rourke, D.; Kullen, D.; Gierek, L.; Wescott, K.; Greby, M.; Anast, G.; Nesta, M.; Walston, L.; Tate, R.; Azzarello, A.; Vinikour, B.; Van Lonkhuyzen, B.; Quinn, J.; Yuen, R.; Environmental Science Division

    2007-11-01

    In August 2005, the U.S. Congress enacted the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Public Law 109-58. In Section 369 of this Act, also known as the 'Oil Shale, Tar Sands, and Other Strategic Unconventional Fuels Act of 2005', Congress declared that oil shale and tar sands (and other unconventional fuels) are strategically important domestic energy resources that should be developed to reduce the nation's growing dependence on oil from politically and economically unstable foreign sources. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is developing a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) to evaluate alternatives for establishing commercial oil shale and tar sands leasing programs in Colorado, Wyoming, and Utah. This PEIS evaluates the potential impacts of alternatives identifying BLM-administered lands as available for application for commercial leasing of oil shale resources within the three states and of tar sands resources within Utah. The scope of the analysis of the PEIS also includes an assessment of the potential effects of future commercial leasing. This Class I cultural resources study is in support of the Draft Oil Shale and Tar Sands Resource Management Plan Amendments to Address Land Use Allocations in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming and Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement and is an attempt to synthesize archaeological data covering the most geologically prospective lands for oil shale and tar sands in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming. This report is based solely on geographic information system (GIS) data held by the Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming State Historic Preservation Offices (SHPOs). The GIS data include the information that the BLM has provided to the SHPOs. The primary purpose of the Class I cultural resources overview is to provide information on the affected environment for the PEIS. Furthermore, this report provides recommendations to support planning decisions and the management of cultural resources that could be impacted by future oil shale and tar

  13. Alternative Fueling Station Locator | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Alternative Fueling Station Locator Alternative Fueling Station Locator Find alternative fueling stations near an address or ZIP code or along a route in the United States. Enter a ...

  14. Gravity survey of the southwestern part of the sourthern Utah geothermal belt

    SciTech Connect

    Green, R.T.; Cook, K.L.

    1981-03-01

    A gravity survey covering an area of 6200 km/sup 2/ was made over the southwestern part of the southern Utah geothermal belt. The objective of the gravity survey is to delineate the geologic structures and assist in the understanding of the geothermal potential of the area. A total of 726 new gravity stations together with 205 existing gravity stations, are reduced to give: (1) a complete Bouguer gravity anomaly map, and (2) a fourth-order residual gravity anomaly map; both maps have a 2-mgal contour interval. The complete Bouguer gravity anomaly map shows an east-trending regional gravity belt with a total relief of about 70 mgal which crosses the central portion of the survey area. The gravity belt is attributed to a crustal lateral density variation of 0.1 gm/cc from a depth of 5 to 15 km.

  15. Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Dry Natural Gas Reserves New Field Discoveries (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 32 84 41 1980's 9 3 11 8 3 0 0 5 3 0 1990's 0 5 0 8 1 2 17 0 0 4 2000's 0 4 0 0 5 4 45 4 64 0 2010's 0 1 0 0 2 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring

  16. Utah Natural Gas Delivered to Commercial Consumers for the Account of

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Others (Million Cubic Feet) Delivered to Commercial Consumers for the Account of Others (Million Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas Delivered to Commercial Consumers for the Account of Others (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1980's 0 0 0 1990's 0 0 0 0 4,438 4,892 5,360 5,222 5,427 5,204 2000's 5,052 4,813 5,469 4,837 4,850 4,533 4,510 4,516 5,103 5,338 2010's 5,307 5,392 5,681 7,539 8,283 8,217 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not

  17. Utah Natural Gas in Underground Storage - Change in Working Gas from Same

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Month Previous Year (Million Cubic Feet) Million Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas in Underground Storage - Change in Working Gas from Same Month Previous Year (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 6,258 1,922 -2,167 -243 10 2,672 -2,738 -4,873 -6,032 -7,692 -923 338 1992 -6,698 -535 4,172 3,577 4,237 4,004 2,095 84 -3,541 -5,140 1,162 1,110 1993 -850 -4,870 -7,443 -9,206 -6,521 -660 270 742 2,661 8,010 4,211 6,489 1994 7,656 4,514 6,002 8,910 9,109 5,722

  18. Geological and reservoir characterization of shallow-shelf carbonate fields, Southern Paradox Basin, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Chidsey, T.C. Jr.; Eby, D.E.

    1996-12-31

    The Paradox basin of Utah, Colorado, and Arizona contains nearly 100 small oil fields producing from carbonate mounds within the Pennsylvanian (Desmoinesian) Paradox Formation. These fields typically have one to three wells with primary per field production ranging from 700 MBO to 2 MMBO at a 15-20% recovery rate. Five fields (Anasazi, Mule, Blue Hogan, Heron North, and Runway) within the Navajo Nation of southeastern Utah have been evaluated for CO{sub 2}-flood projects based upon geological characterization and reservoir modeling. Conventional cores from the five fields show that three compositional reservoir types are present: (1) phylloid algal, (2) bioclastic calcarenite, and (3) bryozoan-dominated. Phylloid algal mounds are abundant in four of the five fields, and exhibit the best overall porosity and permeability. This mound type developed where shallow water depths and low energy allowed establishment of calcareous algal colonies possibly on paleohighs. The principal reservoir rock is algal bafflestone composed mostly of the phylloid Ivanovia and occasionally dolomitized. The Heron North field is a bioclastic calcarenite reservoir. It represents high-energy conditions resulting in carbonate beaches developed over foreshore carbonate rubble. The principal reservoir rocks are grainstones and rudstones having grain-selective dissolution and complete dolomitization. Bryozoan-dominated mounds present in Runway field developed in quiet, below wave-base settings that appear to be localized along Mississippian fault blocks trends. The principal reservoir rocks are bindstone and framestone with no dolomitization. The resulting model suggests that CO{sub 2} miscible flooding of these and other small carbonate reservoirs in the Paradox basin could significantly increase ultimate recovery of oil.

  19. Geological and reservoir characterization of shallow-shelf carbonate fields, Southern Paradox Basin, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Chidsey, T.C. Jr. ); Eby, D.E. )

    1996-01-01

    The Paradox basin of Utah, Colorado, and Arizona contains nearly 100 small oil fields producing from carbonate mounds within the Pennsylvanian (Desmoinesian) Paradox Formation. These fields typically have one to three wells with primary per field production ranging from 700 MBO to 2 MMBO at a 15-20% recovery rate. Five fields (Anasazi, Mule, Blue Hogan, Heron North, and Runway) within the Navajo Nation of southeastern Utah have been evaluated for CO[sub 2]-flood projects based upon geological characterization and reservoir modeling. Conventional cores from the five fields show that three compositional reservoir types are present: (1) phylloid algal, (2) bioclastic calcarenite, and (3) bryozoan-dominated. Phylloid algal mounds are abundant in four of the five fields, and exhibit the best overall porosity and permeability. This mound type developed where shallow water depths and low energy allowed establishment of calcareous algal colonies possibly on paleohighs. The principal reservoir rock is algal bafflestone composed mostly of the phylloid Ivanovia and occasionally dolomitized. The Heron North field is a bioclastic calcarenite reservoir. It represents high-energy conditions resulting in carbonate beaches developed over foreshore carbonate rubble. The principal reservoir rocks are grainstones and rudstones having grain-selective dissolution and complete dolomitization. Bryozoan-dominated mounds present in Runway field developed in quiet, below wave-base settings that appear to be localized along Mississippian fault blocks trends. The principal reservoir rocks are bindstone and framestone with no dolomitization. The resulting model suggests that CO[sub 2] miscible flooding of these and other small carbonate reservoirs in the Paradox basin could significantly increase ultimate recovery of oil.

  20. Engineering assessment of inactive uranium mill tailings: Mexican Hat Site, Mexican Hat, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    1981-09-01

    Ford, Bacon and Davis Utah Inc. has reevaluated the Mexican Hat site in order to revise the March 1977 engineering assessment of the problems resulting from the existence of radioactive uranium mill tailings at Mexican Hat, Utah. This engineering assessment has included the preparation of topographic maps, the performance of core drillings and radiometric measurements sufficient to determine areas and volumes of tailings and radiation exposures of individuals and nearby populations, the investigations of site hydrology and meteorology, and the evaluation and costing of alternative corrective actions. Radon gas released from the 2.2 million tons of tailings at the Mexican Hat site constitutes the most significant environmental impact, although windblown tailings and external gamma radiation also are factors. The four alternative actions presented in this engineering assessment range from millsite decontamination with the addition of 3 m of stabilization cover material to removal of the tailings to remote disposal sites and decontamination of the tailings site. Cost estimates for the four options range from about $15,200,000 for stabilization in place, to about $45,500,000 for disposal at a distance of about 16 mi. Three principal alternatives for the reprocessing of the Mexican Hat tailings were examined: heap leaching; treatment at an existing mill; and reprocessing at a new conventional mill constructed for tailings reprocessing. The cost of the uranium recovered would be about $115/lb of U/sub 3/O/sub 8/ whether by heap leach or conventional plant processes. The spot market price for uranium was $25/lb early in 1981. Reprocessing the Mexican Hat tailings for uranium recovery is not economically attractive under present conditions.

  1. CARBON AND OXYGEN ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS: BUG, CHEROKEE, AND PATTERSON CANYON FIELDS, SAN JUAN COUNTY, UTAH

    SciTech Connect

    David E. Eby; Thomas C. Chidsey Jr; Kevin McClure; Craig D. Morgan; Stephen T. Nelson

    2003-12-01

    Over 400 million barrels (64 million m{sup 3}) of oil have been produced from the shallow-shelf carbonate reservoirs in the Pennsylvanian (Desmoinesian) Paradox Formation in the Paradox Basin, Utah and Colorado. With the exception of the giant Greater Aneth field, the other 100 plus oil fields in the basin typically contain 2 to 10 million barrels (0.3-1.6 million m{sup 3}) of original oil in place. Most of these fields are characterized by high initial production rates followed by a very short productive life (primary), and hence premature abandonment. Only 15 to 25 percent of the original oil in place is recoverable during primary production from conventional vertical wells. An extensive and successful horizontal drilling program has been conducted in the giant Greater Aneth field. However, to date, only two horizontal wells have been drilled in small Ismay and Desert Creek fields. The results from these wells were disappointing due to poor understanding of the carbonate facies and diagenetic fabrics that create reservoir heterogeneity. These small fields, and similar fields in the basin, are at high risk of premature abandonment. At least 200 million barrels (31.8 million m{sup 3}) of oil will be left behind in these small fields because current development practices leave compartments of the heterogeneous reservoirs undrained. Through proper geological evaluation of the reservoirs, production may be increased by 20 to 50 percent through the drilling of low-cost single or multilateral horizontal legs from existing vertical development wells. In addition, horizontal drilling from existing wells minimizes surface disturbances and costs for field development, particularly in the environmentally sensitive areas of southeastern Utah and southwestern Colorado.

  2. GE Global Research Locations | GE Global Research

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Locations GE Global Research is innovating around the clock. Select one of our locations to learn more about operations there.GE Global Research is innovating around the clock. Select a location to learn more about our operations. Home > Locations GE Global Research is ALWAYS OPEN Already know about our locations? Experience a special look at a day in our life around the world! See What We're Doing Dhahran, Saudi Arabia Founded: 2015 Employees: 15 Focus Areas: Material Characterization,

  3. Increased Oil Production and Reserves Utilizing Secondary/Tertiary Recovery Techniques on Small Reservoirs in the Paradox Basin, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Chidsey Jr., Thomas C.

    2003-02-06

    The primary objective of this project was to enhance domestic petroleum production by field demonstration and technology transfer of an advanced-oil-recovery technology in the Paradox Basin, southeastern Utah. If this project can demonstrate technical and economic feasibility, the technique can be applied to approximately 100 additional small fields in the Paradox Basin alone, and result in increased recovery of 150 to 200 million barrels (23,850,000-31,800,000 m3) of oil. This project was designed to characterize five shallow-shelf carbonate reservoirs in the Pennsylvanian (Desmoinesian) Paradox Formation and choose the best candidate for a pilot demonstration project for either a waterflood or carbon-dioxide-(CO2-) miscible flood project. The field demonstration, monitoring of field performance, and associated validation activities will take place within the Navajo Nation, San Juan County, Utah.

  4. Increased Oil Production and Reserves Utilizing Secondary/Tertiary Recovery Techniques on Small Reservoirs in the Paradox Basin, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Jr., Chidsey, Thomas C.; Allison, M. Lee

    1999-11-02

    The primary objective of this project is to enhance domestic petroleum production by field demonstration and technology transfer of an advanced- oil-recovery technology in the Paradox basin, southeastern Utah. If this project can demonstrate technical and economic feasibility, the technique can be applied to approximately 100 additional small fields in the Paradox basin alone, and result in increased recovery of 150 to 200 million barrels (23,850,000-31,800,000 m3) of oil. This project is designed to characterize five shallow-shelf carbonate reservoirs in the Pennsylvanian (Desmoinesian) Paradox Formation and choose the best candidate for a pilot demonstration project for either a waterflood or carbon-dioxide-(CO2-) miscible flood project. The field demonstration, monitoring of field performance, and associated validation activities will take place within the Navajo Nation, San Juan County, Utah.

  5. Conjunctive Surface and Groundwater Management in Utah. Implications for Oil Shale and Oil Sands Development

    SciTech Connect

    Keiter, Robert; Ruple, John; Tanana, Heather; Holt, Rebecca

    2011-12-01

    diverted for aquifer recharge or other uses. To better understand the rapidly evolving field of conjunctive use, this Topical Report begins with a discussion of Utah water law, with an emphasis on conjunctive use issues. We contrast Utah's approach with efforts undertaken in neighboring states and by the federal government. We then relate conjunctive use to the unconventional fuel industry and discuss how conjunctive use can help address pressing challenges. While conjunctive management cannot create water where none exists, it does hold promise to manage existing resources in a more efficient manner. Moreover, conjunctive management reflects an important trend in western water law that could provide benefit to those contemplating activities that require large-scale water development.

  6. FORGE Teams | Department of Energy

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    Ormat Technologies Inc., and Itasca Consulting Group University of Utah Location: Milford City, Utah Key Partners: Utah Geological Survey, Murphy-Brown LLC, Idaho National...

  7. Utah Natural Gas in Underground Storage - Change in Working Gas from Same

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Month Previous Year (Percent) Percent) Utah Natural Gas in Underground Storage - Change in Working Gas from Same Month Previous Year (Percent) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 48.7 19.2 -26.2 -3.2 0.1 32.2 -15.2 -19.1 -18.8 -21.7 -3.8 2.1 1992 -35.0 -4.5 68.2 48.2 46.1 36.5 13.8 0.4 -13.6 -18.6 5.0 6.8 1993 -6.8 -42.8 -72.3 -83.7 -48.5 -4.4 1.6 3.6 11.8 35.5 17.2 37.2 1994 66.2 69.4 210.9 497.9 131.8 40.0 34.2 32.4 40.9 25.7 26.4 36.0 1995 28.4 93.2 100.2 78.2 40.9

  8. Utah Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 1,017 1980's 1,284 2,057 2,253 2,472 2,325 2,288 2,205 2,341 1,984 1,940 1990's 1,887 2,001 2,018 2,198 1,917 1,701 1,747 2,005 2,502 3,371 2000's 4,472 4,753 4,274 3,617 3,951 4,359 5,211 6,463 6,714 7,411 2010's 7,146 8,108 7,775 7,057 6,970 - = No Data

  9. Eolian sabkha sandstones in the Nugget Sandstone (Jurassic), Vernal area, Utah

    SciTech Connect

    Schenk, C.J.; Peterson, F. (Geological Survey, Denver, CO (United States))

    1991-06-01

    The Jurassic Nugget Sandstone in the Vernal, Utah, area is characterized by thick (up to 25 m) sets of cross-stratified eolian dune sandstone separated by either erosional planar bounding surfaces or thin (mostly < 3 m) sandstones interpreted as sabkha sandstones. Structures in Nugget sabkha sandstones are predominantly wavy or irregular bedding and thin, remnant sets of dune cross-strata consisting of eolian ripple and avalanche strata. The types of sedimentary structures and erosional features in Nugget sabkha sandstones indicate a close relationship between sand deposition and erosion and fluctuations in the local water table. Thin, remnant eolian dune sets are common in Nugget sabkha sandstones. The remnant sets form when dunes migrating across a sabkha are partially wetted as the water table rises slightly (on a scale of tens of centimeters); the lower part of the dune with wetted sand remains on the sabkha as the rest of the dune continues to migrate. Typically, ripple strata of the dune apron and the toes of avalanche strata are preserved in dune remnants. The avalanche strata, being slightly coarser grained, are preferentially deflated, leaving microtopography. This topography is commonly filled in with ripple strata that form as dry sand again blows across the sabkha. Stacked sets of remnant dunes separated by erosional surfaces illustrate the control of sand deposition on eolian sabkhas by the local water table.

  10. Sequence stratigraphic re-interpretation of [open quotes]stray[close quotes] sandstones in the Cretaceous Mancos Shale, Book Cliffs, Utah: Implications for exploration models

    SciTech Connect

    Hampson, G.J.; Howell, J.A.; Flint, S.S. )

    1996-01-01

    The Mancos Shale, Book Cliffs, eastern Utah, represents the open marine mudstones of the Cretaceous Western Interior Seaway and contains a number of detached sandstone bodies ([open quotes]Mancos B[close quotes]) which are located 30-150 km down depositional dip from contemporaneous highstand shoreline deposits in the Blackhawk Formation. Examination of these [open quotes]stray[close quotes] sandstones reveals that they do not represent deep water deposition, as previously supposed, but instead comprise three shallow marine facies associations; (1) tidally-influenced fluvial channel fills, (2) fluvially-dominated delta front successions and (3) low-energy shorelines. Tidally-influenced fluvial channel fills are commonly stacked into multistorey bodies at discrete stratigraphic levels, thereby defining incised valley fill (IVF) networks. Fluvially-dominated deltas are eroded into by, and lie at the down-dip terminations of, IVFs and are therefore interpreted as falling stage and lowstand shorelines. Low-energy shorelines are inferred to lie along strike from these deltas. The above shallow marine deposits have been mapped at five discrete stratigraphic horizons, which can be either traced or projected up-dip to previously-documented IVFs in the Blackhawk Formation. Their paleocurrents imply that falling stage and lowstand shoreline trends were sub-parallel to mapped highstand shorelines, although there is evidence for a perpendicular lowstand shoreline trend in the east of the study area. This facies and sequence stratigraphic re-interpretation enables predictive exploration modelling of subsurface [open quotes]Mancos B[close quotes] gas reservoir sandstones.

  11. Sequence stratigraphic re-interpretation of {open_quotes}stray{close_quotes} sandstones in the Cretaceous Mancos Shale, Book Cliffs, Utah: Implications for exploration models

    SciTech Connect

    Hampson, G.J.; Howell, J.A.; Flint, S.S.

    1996-12-31

    The Mancos Shale, Book Cliffs, eastern Utah, represents the open marine mudstones of the Cretaceous Western Interior Seaway and contains a number of detached sandstone bodies ({open_quotes}Mancos B{close_quotes}) which are located 30-150 km down depositional dip from contemporaneous highstand shoreline deposits in the Blackhawk Formation. Examination of these {open_quotes}stray{close_quotes} sandstones reveals that they do not represent deep water deposition, as previously supposed, but instead comprise three shallow marine facies associations; (1) tidally-influenced fluvial channel fills, (2) fluvially-dominated delta front successions and (3) low-energy shorelines. Tidally-influenced fluvial channel fills are commonly stacked into multistorey bodies at discrete stratigraphic levels, thereby defining incised valley fill (IVF) networks. Fluvially-dominated deltas are eroded into by, and lie at the down-dip terminations of, IVFs and are therefore interpreted as falling stage and lowstand shorelines. Low-energy shorelines are inferred to lie along strike from these deltas. The above shallow marine deposits have been mapped at five discrete stratigraphic horizons, which can be either traced or projected up-dip to previously-documented IVFs in the Blackhawk Formation. Their paleocurrents imply that falling stage and lowstand shoreline trends were sub-parallel to mapped highstand shorelines, although there is evidence for a perpendicular lowstand shoreline trend in the east of the study area. This facies and sequence stratigraphic re-interpretation enables predictive exploration modelling of subsurface {open_quotes}Mancos B{close_quotes} gas reservoir sandstones.

  12. CX-010416: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    16: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-010416: Categorical Exclusion Determination Substation Maintenance and Renovation Activities CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.7, B1.11, B1.27, B1.31, B1.33, B2.2, B2.3, B2.5, B4.6 Date: 05/17/2013 Location(s): Colorado, Wyoming, Nebraska, Montana, Utah Offices(s): Western Area Power Administration-Rocky Mountain Region Western Area Power Administration (Western) has identified certain substations projects which require little or no environmental review.

  13. Helicopter magnetic survey conducted to locate wells

    SciTech Connect

    Veloski, G.A.; Hammack, R.W.; Stamp, V.; Hall, R.; Colina, K.

    2008-07-01

    A helicopter magnetic survey was conducted in August 2007 over 15.6 sq mi at the Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 3’s (NPR-3) Teapot Dome Field near Casper, Wyoming. The survey’s purpose was to accurately locate wells drilled there during more than 90 years of continuous oilfield operation. The survey was conducted at low altitude and with closely spaced flight lines to improve the detection of wells with weak magnetic response and to increase the resolution of closely spaced wells. The survey was in preparation for a planned CO2 flood for EOR, which requires a complete well inventory with accurate locations for all existing wells. The magnetic survey was intended to locate wells missing from the well database and to provide accurate locations for all wells. The ability of the helicopter magnetic survey to accurately locate wells was accomplished by comparing airborne well picks with well locations from an intense ground search of a small test area.

  14. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Techniques For Locating Geothermal...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Remote Sensing Techniques For Locating Geothermal Resources Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Poster: Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Techniques For...

  15. Population Sensitivity Evaluation of Two Candidate Locations...

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    Population Sensitivity Evaluation of Two Candidate Locations for Possible Small Modular Reactor Siting (3.84 MB) More Documents & Publications Evaluation of Proposed Hampton Roads ...

  16. Sandia National Laboratories: Locations: Kauai Test Facility

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    KTF provides the following location-enabled operations: Joint experiments with launches from Vandenberg Air Force Base or orbiting objects Experiments on phenomena occurring in the ...

  17. google-map-of-argonne-location

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Google Map of Argonne Location Map of Building 222 (TRACC)- Green Arrow TRACC RESEARCH Computational Fluid Dynamics Computational Structural Mechanics Transportation Systems Modeling

  18. The Mississippian Leadville Limestone Exploration Play, Utah and Colorado-Exploration Techniques and Studies for Independents

    SciTech Connect

    Thomas Chidsey

    2008-09-30

    The Mississippian (late Kinderhookian to early Meramecian) Leadville Limestone is a shallow, open-marine, carbonate-shelf deposit. The Leadville has produced over 53 million barrels (8.4 million m{sup 3}) of oil/condensate from seven fields in the Paradox fold and fault belt of the Paradox Basin, Utah and Colorado. The environmentally sensitive, 7500-square-mile (19,400 km{sup 2}) area that makes up the fold and fault belt is relatively unexplored. Only independent producers operate and continue to hunt for Leadville oil targets in the region. The overall goal of this study is to assist these independents by (1) developing and demonstrating techniques and exploration methods never tried on the Leadville Limestone, (2) targeting areas for exploration, (3) increasing deliverability from new and old Leadville fields through detailed reservoir characterization, (4) reducing exploration costs and risk especially in environmentally sensitive areas, and (5) adding new oil discoveries and reserves. The final results will hopefully reduce exploration costs and risks, especially in environmentally sensitive areas, and add new oil discoveries and reserves. The study consists of three sections: (1) description of lithofacies and diagenetic history of the Leadville at Lisbon field, San Juan County, Utah, (2) methodology and results of a surface geochemical survey conducted over the Lisbon and Lightning Draw Southeast fields (and areas in between) and identification of oil-prone areas using epifluorescence in well cuttings from regional wells, and (3) determination of regional lithofacies, description of modern and outcrop depositional analogs, and estimation of potential oil migration directions (evaluating the middle Paleozoic hydrodynamic pressure regime and water chemistry). Leadville lithofacies at Libon field include open marine (crinoidal banks or shoals and Waulsortian-type buildups), oolitic and peloid shoals, and middle shelf. Rock units with open-marine and restricted

  19. ,"Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Associated-Dissolved Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2014 ,"Release Date:","11/19/2015" ,"Next Release

  20. ,"Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Nonassociated Natural Gas, Wet After Lease Separation, Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet)",1,"Annual",2014 ,"Release Date:","11/19/2015" ,"Next Release