National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for gross court reporters

  1. Project Reports for Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians- 2007 Project

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa will gather and compile information on the tribe's energy use, conduct energy audits of reservation facilities, identify where conservation efforts would be worthwhile, and evaluate policy changes needed to implement conservation measures.

  2. Samantha Gross

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Samantha Gross is the Director for International Climate and Clean Energy at the Office of International Affairs in the U.S. Department of Energy. She directs U.S. activities under the Clean Energy...

  3. Genetics in the courts

    SciTech Connect

    Coyle, Heather; Drell, Dan

    2000-12-01

    Various: (1)TriState 2000 Genetics in the Courts (2) Growing impact of the new genetics on the courts (3)Human testing (4) Legal analysis - in re G.C. (5) Legal analysis - GM ''peanots'', and (6) Legal analysis for State vs Miller

  4. What is Gross Up?

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Gross up on relocation refers to money that is added to your pay to offset the federal and state tax deducted from the relocation reimbursement amount. You do not see the money in ...

  5. Michael Gross | Photosynthetic Antenna Research Center

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Michael Gross Michael Gross Michael Gross Principal Investigator E-mail: mgross@wustl.edu Phone: (314) 935-4814 Website: Washington University in St. Louis Principal Investigator...

  6. Atkinson-Baker Court Reporters

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    ... River Site. 6 These 900,000 graphite balls are from two long-closed 7 commercial ... In the document, DOE has rejected 8 the option of direct disposal of the graphite balls, ...

  7. Health hazard evaluation report HETA 94-0300-2528, Cape May County Board of Taxation, Cape May Court House, New Jersey

    SciTech Connect

    Moss, C.E.; Ragab, M.

    1995-09-01

    In response to a request from the County Tax Administrator, an investigation was begun into exposure to electric and magnetic fields at the Cape May County Board of Taxation (SIC-7389), Cape May Court House, New Jersey. Employees there suspected they were receiving high exposure to extremely low frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields. Measurements were taken with particular attention given to the areas around four large switchboards which were located directly behind the wall of the the tax office. At the outside corners of the building and in the parking lot outside, the magnetic field levels ranged from 0.1 to 10.7 milligauss (mG). At similar locations, electric field levels ranged from 1.9 to 6.9 volts/meter (V/m). Inside the building, magnetic and electric field levels ranged from 0.1 to 900mG and 1.4 to 5.7V/m, respectively.

  8. Colorado Water Courts | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Web Site: Colorado Water Courts Abstract This is the website for Colorado Water Courts. Author Colorado...

  9. ,"West Virginia Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: West Virginia Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)" "Sourcekey","N9010WV2" "Date","West Virginia Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)" ...

  10. ,"New York Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ...2016 10:10:10 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: New York Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)" "Sourcekey","N9010NY2" "Date","New York Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)" ...

  11. ,"New Mexico Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ...2016 10:10:09 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: New Mexico Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)" "Sourcekey","N9010NM2" "Date","New Mexico Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)" ...

  12. Alaska--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Alaska--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross ... Release Date: 06302016 Next Release Date: 07292016 Referring Pages: Offshore Gross ...

  13. US--Federal Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) US--Federal Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals ... Release Date: 06302016 Next Release Date: 07292016 Referring Pages: Offshore Gross ...

  14. Louisiana--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Louisiana--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross ... Release Date: 06302016 Next Release Date: 07292016 Referring Pages: Offshore Gross ...

  15. Federal Offshore--Alabama Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Federal Offshore--Alabama Natural Gas Gross ... Release Date: 06302016 Next Release Date: 07292016 Referring Pages: Offshore Gross ...

  16. Texas--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Texas--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals ... Release Date: 06302016 Next Release Date: 07292016 Referring Pages: Offshore Gross ...

  17. Federal Offshore--Texas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Federal Offshore--Texas Natural Gas Gross ... Release Date: 06302016 Next Release Date: 07292016 Referring Pages: Offshore Gross ...

  18. US--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) US--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals ... Release Date: 06302016 Next Release Date: 07292016 Referring Pages: Offshore Gross ...

  19. Alabama--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Alabama--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross ... Release Date: 06302016 Next Release Date: 07292016 Referring Pages: Offshore Gross ...

  20. Federal Offshore--Louisiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Federal Offshore--Louisiana Natural Gas Gross ... Release Date: 06302016 Next Release Date: 07292016 Referring Pages: Offshore Gross ...

  1. Nevada Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    from Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Nevada Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells ... Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells Nevada Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and ...

  2. New Mexico Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) New Mexico Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas ... Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas Wells New Mexico Natural Gas Gross ...

  3. Lac Courte Oreilles Band - Energy Analysis

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Location of Lac Courte Oreilles * The Lac Courte Oreilles (LCO) Reservation is in Northern Wisconsin, 90 miles from Duluth, Minnesota and 11 miles from Hayward. About Lac Courte Oreilles * The reservation is presently 76,465 acres and is 15 miles wide. * We have a seven member Tribal Governing Board with four year terms. * LCO's membership is about 6,700 with nearly half of its members residing on or near the reservation * There are 25 distinctly different communities within the reservation for

  4. Monthly Natural Gas Gross Production Report

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

  5. Sustaining the natural and economical resources of the Lac Courte Oreilles, Leslie Isham; Jason Weaver

    SciTech Connect

    Isham, Leslie; Weaver, Jason

    2013-09-30

    The Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, located in northwest Wisconsin has developed a project, entitled Sustaining the Natural and Economic Resources of the LCO Ojibwe. This technical report is a summary of the project.

  6. ,"Florida Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Florida Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","72016","01151989" ,"Release ...

  7. ,"Colorado Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ...ame","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Colorado Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","72016","01151989" ,"Release ...

  8. ,"Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","72016","01151989" ,"Release ...

  9. ,"Michigan Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ...ame","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Michigan Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","72016","01151989" ,"Release ...

  10. ,"Wyoming Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Wyoming Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","72016","01151989" ,"Release ...

  11. ,"Kansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Kansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","72016","01151989" ,"Release ...

  12. ,"Montana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Montana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","72016","01151989" ,"Release ...

  13. ,"Louisiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Louisiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","72016","01151989" ,"Release ...

  14. ,"California Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","California Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","72016","01151989" ,"Release ...

  15. ,"Illinois Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ...ame","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Illinois Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","72016","01151991" ,"Release ...

  16. David J. Gross and the Strong Force

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    from Cal Alum David Gross (PhD '66) Shares Nobel Prize in Physics, University of California Berkeley Resources with Additional Information Additional information about David ...

  17. ,"Texas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Texas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","62016","01151989" ,"Release ...

  18. ,"Florida Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Florida Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","62016","01151989" ,"Release ...

  19. ,"Michigan Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ...ame","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Michigan Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","62016","01151989" ,"Release ...

  20. ,"California Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","California Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","62016","01151989" ,"Release ...

  1. ,"Ohio Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Ohio Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","62016","01151991" ,"Release ...

  2. ,"Wyoming Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Wyoming Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","62016","01151989" ,"Release ...

  3. ,"Kansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Kansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","62016","01151989" ,"Release ...

  4. ,"Oklahoma Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ...ame","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Oklahoma Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","62016","01151989" ,"Release ...

  5. ,"Louisiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Louisiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","62016","01151989" ,"Release ...

  6. ,"Montana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Montana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","62016","01151989" ,"Release ...

  7. ,"Illinois Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ...ame","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Illinois Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","62016","01151991" ,"Release ...

  8. ,"Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","62016","01151989" ,"Release ...

  9. ,"Oregon Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Name","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Oregon Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","62016","01151991" ,"Release ...

  10. ,"Colorado Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ...ame","Description"," Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Colorado Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","62016","01151989" ,"Release ...

  11. ,"Pennsylvania Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Pennsylvania Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","62016","01151991" ,"Release ...

  12. David J. Gross and the Strong Force

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    published their proposal simultaneously with H. David Politzer, a graduate student at Harvard University who independently came up with the same idea. ... The discovery of Gross,...

  13. David J. Gross and the Strong Force

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    David J. Gross and the Strong Force Resources with Additional Information The 2004 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to David Gross for "the discovery of asymptotic freedom in the theory of the strong interaction". 'Gross, who obtained his PhD in physics in 1966, currently is a professor of physics and director of the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics at UC Santa Barbara. ... David Gross Courtesy of UC Santa Barbara [When on the faculty at Princeton University,] he and

  14. DOE Tour of Zero Floorplans: Jewels Court by Greenhill Contracting |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Department of Energy Jewels Court by Greenhill Contracting DOE Tour of Zero Floorplans: Jewels Court by Greenhill Contracting DOE Tour of Zero Floorplans: Jewels Court by Greenhill Contracting

  15. ,"Arkansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ,,"(202) 586-8800",,,"10072016 7:57:22 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Arkansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production" "Sourcekey","N9010AR2","N9011AR2","N9012AR2","NGME...

  16. ,"Alabama Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ,,"(202) 586-8800",,,"10072016 7:57:21 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Alabama Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production" "Sourcekey","N9010AL2","N9011AL2","N9012AL2","NGME...

  17. ,"Alabama Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ,,"(202) 586-8800",,,"10072016 7:57:22 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Alabama Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production" "Sourcekey","N9010AL2","N9011AL2","N9012AL2","NGME...

  18. ,"Arkansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ,,"(202) 586-8800",,,"08292016 11:11:29 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Arkansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production" "Sourcekey","N9010AR2","N9011AR2","N9012AR2","NGME...

  19. ,"Arizona Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ,,"(202) 586-8800",,,"08292016 11:11:29 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Arizona Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production" "Sourcekey","N9010AZ2","N9011AZ2","N9012AZ2","NGME...

  20. ,"Arizona Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ,,"(202) 586-8800",,,"08292016 11:11:30 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Arizona Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production" "Sourcekey","N9010AZ2","N9011AZ2","N9012AZ2","NGME...

  1. ,"Alabama Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ,,"(202) 586-8800",,,"08292016 11:11:28 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Alabama Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production" "Sourcekey","N9010AL2","N9011AL2","N9012AL2","NGME...

  2. ,"Alaska Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ,,"(202) 586-8800",,,"4292016 6:48:19 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Alaska Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production" "Sourcekey","N9010AK2","N9011AK2","N9012AK2","NGME...

  3. Illinois Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Release Date: 09302016 Next Release Date: 10312016 Referring Pages: Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas Wells Illinois Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production ...

  4. Floating Offshore Wind in California: Gross Potential for Jobs...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Floating Offshore Wind in California: Gross Potential for Jobs and Economic Impacts from ... April 2016 Floating Offshore Wind in California: Gross Potential for Jobs ...

  5. ,"Federal Offshore--Texas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Data for" ,"Data 1","Federal Offshore--Texas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals ... AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Federal Offshore--Texas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals ...

  6. ,"Federal Offshore--Alabama Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Data for" ,"Data 1","Federal Offshore--Alabama Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals ... AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Federal Offshore--Alabama Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals ...

  7. ,"Louisiana--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Data for" ,"Data 1","Louisiana--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals ... to Contents","Data 1: Louisiana--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)" ...

  8. ,"Alaska--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Data for" ,"Data 1","Alaska--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals ... to Contents","Data 1: Alaska--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)" ...

  9. ,"Federal Offshore--Louisiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals ...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Data for" ,"Data 1","Federal Offshore--Louisiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals ... AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Federal Offshore--Louisiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals ...

  10. ,"Alabama--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Data for" ,"Data 1","Alabama--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals ... to Contents","Data 1: Alabama--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)" ...

  11. Quantification of the Potential Gross Economic Impacts of Five...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Quantification of the Potential Gross Economic Impacts of Five Methane Reduction Scenarios Quantification of the Potential Gross Economic Impacts of Five Methane Reduction Scenarios ...

  12. Nevada Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million...

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Release Date: 05312016 Next Release Date: 06302016 Referring Pages: Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells Nevada Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production Natural Gas ...

  13. Property:DailyOpWaterUseGross | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Property Name DailyOpWaterUseGross Property Type Number Description Daily Operation Water Use (afday) Gross. Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleProperty:...

  14. ,"Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gulf of Mexico Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production" ,"Click worksheet name or tab ... for" ,"Data 1","Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and ...

  15. Texas--onshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Texas--onshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 5,296,865 5,461,594 5,518,978 5,525,982 5,626,448 5,665,074 5,738,595 5,526,033 2000's 5,681,726 5,698,798 5,603,941 5,737,755 5,688,972 5,969,905 6,301,649 6,931,629 7,753,869 7,615,836 2010's 7,565,123 7,910,898 8,127,004 8,285,436 8,647,988 8,791,961 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not

  16. Louisiana--onshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Louisiana--onshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 1,535,033 1,538,511 1,552,603 1,608,633 1,469,698 1,357,155 1,386,478 1,434,389 2000's 1,342,963 1,370,802 1,245,270 1,244,672 1,248,050 1,202,328 1,280,758 1,309,960 1,301,523 1,482,252 2010's 2,148,447 2,969,297 2,882,193 2,289,193 1,907,296 1,731,680 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not

  17. Alabama Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals Total Offshore (Million Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gross Withdrawals Total Offshore (Million Cubic Feet) Alabama Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals Total Offshore (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1980's 0 9 13 1990's 19,861 32,603 191,605 218,023 349,380 356,598 361,068 409,091 392,320 376,435 2000's 361,289 200,862 202,002 194,339 165,630 152,902 145,762 134,451 125,502 109,214 2010's 101,487 84,270 87,398 75,660 70,829 64,184 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not

  18. Alaska--onshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Alaska--onshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 2,409,336 2,545,144 2,861,599 3,256,352 3,247,533 3,257,096 3,245,736 3,236,241 2000's 3,265,436 3,164,843 3,183,857 3,256,295 3,309,960 3,262,379 2,850,934 3,105,086 3,027,696 2,954,896 2010's 2,826,952 2,798,220 2,857,485 2,882,956 2,803,410 2,804,644 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not

  19. Calif--onshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Calif--onshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 386,382 346,733 334,987 322,544 326,919 317,137 315,701 347,667 2000's 334,983 336,629 322,138 303,480 287,205 291,271 301,921 286,584 281,088 258,983 2010's 273,136 237,388 214,509 219,386 218,668 217,517 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of

  20. DOE Tour of Zero Floorplans: Chamberlain Court #75 by High Performance...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Chamberlain Court 75 by High Performance Homes DOE Tour of Zero Floorplans: Chamberlain Court 75 by High Performance Homes DOE Tour of Zero Floorplans: Chamberlain Court 75 by...

  1. Superfund awakes in state supreme courts

    SciTech Connect

    Sutherland, D.

    1998-01-01

    Superfund, often referred to as a sleeping giant, is waking up in state courts with rulings the insurance industry is on the hook for a large share of the nation`s environmental cleanup. While Congress has been quagmired in legislative reauthorization attempts, 40% of the state supreme courts (20 states) have passed laws favoring policyholders of comprehensive general liability insurance (CGL) to be compensated for their cleanup and litigation costs. These rulings vary in terms from state to state, but their collective action is giving the insurance industry grave concerns because of the increase in settlements with CGL policyholders.

  2. ARS 12 - Courts and Civil Proceedings | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    ARS 12 - Courts and Civil Proceedings Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: ARS 12 - Courts and Civil ProceedingsLegal...

  3. Oregon Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    2012 2013 2014 View History Gross Withdrawals 821 1,407 1,344 770 770 950 1979-2014 From Gas Wells 821 1,407 1,344 770 770 950 1979-2014 From Oil Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 1996-2014 From ...

  4. Kansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    10 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 View History Gross Withdrawals 325,591 309,952 296,299 292,467 286,080 292,450 1967-2015 From Gas Wells 247,651 236,834 264,610 264,223 260,715 ...

  5. Court decision dropping toxic substance rules stands

    SciTech Connect

    Bryant, C.R.

    1993-06-01

    In a somewhat surprising move, the U.S. Department of Labor has decided not to appeal a court decision essentially dropping regulations established by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for about 400 hazardous substances. The decision leaves unregulated or subject to reduced standards substances that range from carbon monoxide to perchloroethylene. The Labor Department had until March 22, 1993, to appeal the court decision. On July 8, 1992, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit overturned OSHA's final Air Contaminants Standard, which was promulgated in 1989. The standard established permissible exposure limits (PELs) for 428 toxic substances. In AFL-CIO vs. OSHA, the Court ruled that OSHA failed to make a separate scientific case for evaluating health risks of each chemical. Because of the decision not to appeal, PELs for more than half of the substances regulated by OSHA now are removed from the books or revert to the voluntary industry standards adopted by OSHA in 1970 and in force prior to the 1989 final rule.

  6. Kentucky Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Coalbed Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 ... Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells Kentucky Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals ...

  7. Maryland Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Coalbed Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 ... Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells Maryland Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals ...

  8. Nebraska Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Coalbed Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 ... Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells Nebraska Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals ...

  9. New York Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Coalbed Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 ... Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells New York Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals ...

  10. Missouri Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Oil Wells (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Oil Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 0 ... Referring Pages: Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Oil Wells Missouri Natural Gas Gross ...

  11. Michigan Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Michigan Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Michigan Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 ...

  12. Maryland Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Maryland Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Maryland Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 0 ...

  13. Indiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Indiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Indiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 21 ...

  14. Colorado Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Colorado Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Colorado Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 ...

  15. Louisiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Louisiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Louisiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 ...

  16. Kansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Kansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Kansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 64,057 ...

  17. Montana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Montana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Montana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 ...

  18. Oregon Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Oregon Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Oregon Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1996 159 ...

  19. Nevada Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Nevada Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Nevada Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 3 3 5 ...

  20. California Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    California Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) California Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ...

  1. Ohio Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Ohio Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Ohio Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 13,138 ...

  2. Pennsylvania Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Pennsylvania Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Pennsylvania Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ...

  3. Mississippi Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Mississippi Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Mississippi Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ...

  4. Nebraska Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Nebraska Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Nebraska Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 57 ...

  5. Oklahoma Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Oklahoma Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 ...

  6. Florida Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Florida Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Florida Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 562 ...

  7. Missouri Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Missouri Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Missouri Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 0 ...

  8. Illinois Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Illinois Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Illinois Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 41 ...

  9. Kentucky Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Kentucky Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Kentucky Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 ...

  10. California--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) California--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 14,763 14,963 1980's 14,080 13,929 14,153 13,916 13,844 19,504 18,277 13,030 11,141 9,098 1990's 8,083 7,610 7,242 6,484 7,204 5,904 6,309 7,171 6,883 6,738 2000's 7,808 7,262 7,068 6,866 6,966 6,685 6,809 7,289 7,029 6,052 2010's 5,554 5,163 5,051 5,470 5,805 5,146 - = No Data Reported;

  11. Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Ojibwe

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Ojibwe Leslie Isham, Director/Assistant Director Lac Courte Oreilles Energy Project Lac Courte Oreilles Public works Department First Steps towards Tribal Weatherization Assessing the Feasibility of the Hydro Dam About Lac Courte Oreilles (LCO) * Located in Upper Northwest Wisconsin * 76,000 acres and 15 miles wide * 90 miles from Duluth 100 miles from Eau Claire 10 miles from Hayward * Close to 6,000 members, 50% live on or near the reservation * 68% unemployment

  12. Lac Courte Oreilles Lake Superior Band of Ojibwe Energy Projects

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    OdaawaaZaga'iganing or Lac Courte Oreilles Lake Superior Band Of Ojibwe LCO Energy Department Staff: Director: Leslie Isham Coordinator: Denise Johnson Energy Projects: Assessing Hydro Dam First Steps Toward Tribal Weatherization Lac Courte Oreilles's Mission We, the Anishinaabeg, the people of OdaawaaZaaga'iganing, the Lac Courte Oreilles Tribe, will sustain our heritage by preserving our past, strengthening our present and embracing our future. We will defend our inherent sovereign rights and

  13. In addition, the court properly has jurisdiction over a counterclaim...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    specific questions. In response to the Court's remand order, Bonneville commenced this administrative process. On May 6, 2015, Bonneville issued a notice requesting public...

  14. Cape May Court House, New Jersey: Energy Resources | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    County, New Jersey.1 Registered Energy Companies in Cape May Court House, New Jersey Cap May County Municipal Utilities Authority References US Census Bureau 2005 Place to...

  15. Missouri Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Missouri Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2008 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2009 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2010 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2011 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2013 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2014 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA

  16. ,"West Virginia Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: West Virginia Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","NGMEPG0FGSSWVMMCF" "Date","West Virginia ...

  17. ,"California Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: California Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","NGMEPG0FGSSCAMMCF" "Date","California Natural ...

  18. ,"Mississippi Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Mississippi Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","NGMEPG0FGSSMSMMCF" "Date","Mississippi Natural ...

  19. ,"Louisiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Louisiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","NGMEPG0FGSSLAMMCF" "Date","Louisiana Natural ...

  20. ,"West Virginia Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","West Virginia Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","22016","1151991" ,"Release ...

  1. Assessing the Hydro Dam at Lac Courte Oreilles

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    "Assessing the Hydro Dam at Lac Courte Oreilles" Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Ojibwe Leslie Isham, Director, LCO Energy Project Assistant Director, LCO Public Works 9796N Cty. Hwy K Hayward, WI 54843 About Lac Courte Oreilles (LCO) * Located in upper Northwest Wisconsin * Land base is about 76,000 acres * 7,275 members * Adopted Kyoto Protocol in 2005 * Land Use Comprehensive Plan adopted in 2006 * 2008 DOE First Steps Grant Awarded LCO Tribal Mission We, the Anishinaabeg,

  2. Gross Gamma-Ray Calibration Blocks (May 1978) | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Gross Gamma-Ray Calibration Blocks (May 1978) Gross Gamma-Ray Calibration Blocks (May 1978) Gross Gamma-Ray Calibration Blocks (May 1978) Gross Gamma-Ray Calibration Blocks (May 1978) (1.74 MB) More Documents & Publications Grade Assignments for Models Used for Calibration of Gross-Count Gamma-Ray Logging Systems (December 1983) A Brief Review of the Basis for, and the Procedures Currently Utilized in, Gross Gamma-Ray Log Calibration (October 1976) Parameter Assignments for Spectral

  3. ,"Virginia Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    8:00:06 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Virginia Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","NGMEPG0FGSSVAMMCF" "Date","Virginia Natural Gas ...

  4. ,"Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    8:00:06 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","NGMEPG0FGSSUTMMCF" "Date","Utah Natural Gas ...

  5. ,"Florida Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    8:00:00 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Florida Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","NGMEPG0FGSSFLMMCF" "Date","Florida Natural Gas ...

  6. ,"Arkansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    7:59:58 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Arkansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","NGMEPG0FGSSARMMCF" "Date","Arkansas Natural Gas ...

  7. ,"Montana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    8:00:02 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Montana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","NGMEPG0FGSSMTMMCF" "Date","Montana Natural Gas ...

  8. ,"Wyoming Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    8:00:06 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Wyoming Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","NGMEPG0FGSSWYMMCF" "Date","Wyoming Natural Gas ...

  9. ,"Indiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    8:00:00 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Indiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","NGMEPG0FGSSINMMCF" "Date","Indiana Natural Gas ...

  10. ,"Missouri Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    8:00:02 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Missouri Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","NGMEPG0FGSSMOMMCF" "Date","Missouri Natural Gas ...

  11. Other States Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Other States Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 13,204 ...

  12. ,"Alabama Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    7:59:58 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Alabama Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","NGMEPG0FGSSALMMCF" "Date","Alabama Natural Gas ...

  13. ,"Michigan Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    8:00:01 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Michigan Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","NGMEPG0FGSSMIMMCF" "Date","Michigan Natural Gas ...

  14. ,"Arizona Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    7:59:59 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Arizona Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","NGMEPG0FGSSAZMMCF" "Date","Arizona Natural Gas ...

  15. ,"Kansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    8:00:00 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Kansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","NGMEPG0FGSSKSMMCF" "Date","Kansas Natural Gas ...

  16. ,"Colorado Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    7:59:59 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Colorado Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","NGMEPG0FGSSCOMMCF" "Date","Colorado Natural Gas ...

  17. ,"Wyoming Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    8:00:07 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Wyoming Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","NGMEPG0FGSSWYMMCF" "Date","Wyoming Natural Gas ...

  18. ,"Florida Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    7:59:59 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Florida Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","NGMEPG0FGSSFLMMCF" "Date","Florida Natural Gas ...

  19. ,"Missouri Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    8:00:01 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: Missouri Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","NGMEPG0FGSSMOMMCF" "Date","Missouri Natural Gas ...

  20. Fact #564: March 30, 2009 Transportation and the Gross Domestic...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Housing, health care, and food are the only categories with greater shares of the GDP. GDP ... Gross Domestic Product, 2007 Housing 24.3% Health Care 17.4% Food 11.6% ...

  1. Other States Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Other States Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 72,328 ...

  2. Other States Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Coalbed Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Other States Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2002 0 0 ...

  3. Nevada Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million...

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    from Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Nevada Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 ...

  4. Missouri Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Oil Wells (Million...

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    from Oil Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Missouri Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Oil Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 ...

  5. Physics Nobel winner David Gross gives public lecture at Jefferson...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Nobel winner David Gross gives public lecture at Jefferson Lab on June 12 (Monday) Physics ... "The Coming Revolutions in Fundamental Physics" beginning at 8 p.m. at Jefferson Lab on ...

  6. Montana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Montana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 4,561 3,826 4,106 ...

  7. Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million Cubic...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 21,638 18,808 21,037 ...

  8. Oklahoma Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Oklahoma Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 7,051 6,368 ...

  9. Louisiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Louisiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 425,704 369,500 ...

  10. Ohio Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Ohio Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...

  11. Michigan Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Michigan Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 9,579 8,593 ...

  12. Montana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Montana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 1,239 1,119 1,239 ...

  13. Michigan Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Michigan Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 11,582 10,461 ...

  14. Louisiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Louisiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 1,273 1,150 ...

  15. Oregon Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    from Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Oregon Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 246 244 232 ...

  16. Colorado Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Colorado Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 11,749 10,612 ...

  17. Mississippi Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Mississippi Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 14,797 13,076 ...

  18. Wyoming Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Wyoming Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 58,111 51,244 ...

  19. Wyoming Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Wyoming Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 331 299 331 320 ...

  20. Colorado Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Colorado Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 15,390 18,697 ...

  1. Pennsylvania Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Pennsylvania Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 0 0 0 0 ...

  2. Texas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Texas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 107,415 97,020 ...

  3. Other States Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Oil Wells (Million...

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Oil Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Other States Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Oil Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1991 3,459 3,117 ...

  4. Federal Offshore--Gulf of Mexico Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Federal Offshore--Gulf of Mexico Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov ...

  5. Fact# 904: December 21, 2015 Gross Domestic Product and Vehicle...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    With the growth of VMT in 2015, the gap between the two series has narrowed for the first time since the Great Recession. GDP and VMT Trends, 1960-2015 Graph showing gross national ...

  6. Property:CoolingTowerWaterUseSummerGross | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Property Name CoolingTowerWaterUseSummerGross Property Type Number Description Cooling Tower Water use (summer average) (afday) Gross. Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgw...

  7. Nevada Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Nevada Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2008 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2009 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2011 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2013 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2014 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2016 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available;

  8. Maryland Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Maryland Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2008 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2009 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2011 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2013 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2014 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2016 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not

  9. Gross alpha analytical modifications that improve wastewater treatment compliance

    SciTech Connect

    Tucker, B.J.; Arndt, S.

    2007-07-01

    This paper will propose an improvement to the gross alpha measurement that will provide more accurate gross alpha determinations and thus allow for more efficient and cost-effective treatment of site wastewaters. To evaluate the influence of salts that may be present in wastewater samples from a potentially broad range of environmental conditions, two types of efficiency curves were developed, each using a thorium-230 (Th-230) standard spike. Two different aqueous salt solutions were evaluated, one using sodium chloride, and one using salts from tap water drawn from the Bergen County, New Jersey Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW). For each curve, 13 to 17 solutions were prepared, each with the same concentration of Th-230 spike, but differing in the total amount of salt in the range of 0 to 100 mg. The attenuation coefficients were evaluated for the two salt types by plotting the natural log of the counted efficiencies vs. the weight of the sample's dried residue retained on the planchet. The results show that the range of the slopes for each of the attenuation curves varied by approximately a factor of 2.5. In order to better ensure the accuracy of results, and thus verify compliance with the gross alpha wastewater effluent criterion, projects depending on gross alpha measurements of environmental waters and wastewaters should employ gross alpha efficiency curves prepared with salts that mimic, as closely as possible, the salt content of the aqueous environmental matrix. (authors)

  10. Montana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Montana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 317 313 314 307 308 303 307 309 309 312 320 329 2007 330 329 324 320 328 330 325 331 335 334 340 339 2008 334 330 332 331 327 323 324 327 330 330 326 302 2009 304 311 305 302 297 292 286 281 279 275 268 263 2010 265 264 267 265 259 258 256 251 251 249 247 236 2011 229 223 221 221 219 217 218 217 225 211 208 206 2012 202 202

  11. Ohio Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Ohio Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Ohio Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 247 244 238 236 230 228 224 224 228 240 249 252 2007 252 249 243 240 234 232 228 228 233 245 254 257 2008 243 232 234 232 226 224 220 220 224 236 245 248 2009 254 251 245 242 236 234 230 230 235 247 256 259 2010 223 221 215 213 208 206 203 203 206 217 225 228 2011 226 223 217 215 210 208 204 204 208 220 227 230

  12. Virginia Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Virginia Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 271 275 277 274 280 287 282 285 290 284 291 290 2007 295 299 302 298 304 312 307 310 316 309 316 316 2008 338 331 346 342 349 358 352 355 362 354 362 362 2009 375 376 369 377 379 380 394 395 396 400 404 383 2010 404 406 400 397 403 403 403 404 408 401 406 406 2011 414 430 413 409 410 407 411 418 410 416 413 419 2012 421 414

  13. Alabama Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Alabama Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 850 862 874 869 858 823 817 832 816 829 815 822 2007 815 808 802 769 774 767 768 815 805 794 792 814 2008 785 794 775 748 783 770 747 743 693 760 749 753 2009 689 749 740 724 730 727 726 704 686 637 622 686 2010 664 670 700 684 683 677 631 628 603 684 669 620 2011 644 651 648 639 581 626 627 629 522 546 501 575 2012 627 629

  14. California Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) California Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 998 992 986 967 989 976 962 924 934 917 927 909 2007 971 965 958 942 963 950 936 898 907 887 899 883 2008 953 914 940 925 945 932 919 881 890 870 882 866 2009 876 871 864 850 869 857 845 810 819 801 812 797 2010 915 909 901 883 906 895 883 848 857 839 849 836 2011 798 816 790 796 776 776 757 748 734 714 744 732 2012 685 697

  15. Kentucky Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Kentucky Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 190 280 281 279 248 310 196 231 398 95 257 377 2007 115 404 361 105 315 441 45 268 270 240 268 320 2008 175 265 281 299 316 316 463 379 289 283 479 198 2009 254 445 151 174 402 368 109 359 391 339 339 406 2010 332 624 146 355 356 344 394 335 382 623 167 408 2011 308 359 379 366 292 327 365 295 339 307 340 410 2012 290 290 290

  16. Indiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Indiana Crude Oil + Lease Condensate Proved Reserves (Million Barrels) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 8 2010's 8 7 13 8 8 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Crude Oil plus Lease Condensate Proved Reserves, as of Dec. 31

  17. Kentucky Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Production (Billion Cubic Feet) Kansas Shale Production (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2010's 1 3 1 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Shale Natural Gas Estimated Production Kansas Shale Gas Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production Shale Gas

    Proved Reserves

  18. Mississippi Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Feet) Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 0 0 0 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 Mississippi Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production

    off) Shale

  19. Virginia Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet) Virginia Dry Natural Gas Expected Future Production (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1980's 122 175 216 235 253 248 230 217 1990's 138 225 904 1,322 1,833 1,836 1,930 2,446 1,973 2,017 2000's 1,704 1,752 1,673 1,717 1,742 2,018 2,302 2,529 2,378 3,091 2010's 3,215 2,832 2,579 2,373 2,800 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of

  20. Mississippi Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Mississippi Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2008 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...

  1. Nebraska Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2008 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...

  2. New Mexico Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gross Withdrawals 1,341,475 1,287,682 1,276,296 1,247,394 1,265,579 1,289,908 1967-2015 From Gas Wells 616,134 556,024 653,057 588,127 535,181 1967-2014 From Oil Wells 238,580 ...

  3. Leading the Charge: Doug MacCourt Advises Tribes on Energy Policy |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Department of Energy Doug MacCourt Advises Tribes on Energy Policy Leading the Charge: Doug MacCourt Advises Tribes on Energy Policy October 22, 2015 - 12:16pm Addthis MacCourt_Doug.jpg Leading the Charge is a regular feature spotlighting the movers and shakers in energy development on tribal lands. This issue we had the opportunity to speak with long-time Indian energy champion Doug MacCourt, who joined the DOE Office of Indian Energy as Senior Policy Advisor in July 2015. MacCourt has more

  4. Lac Courte Oreilles Hydro Dam Assessment

    SciTech Connect

    Weaver, Jason; Meyers, Amy

    2014-12-31

    The main objective of this project was to investigate upgrading the existing hydro power generating system at the Winter Dam. The tribe would like to produce more energy and receive a fair market power purchase agreement so the dam is no longer a drain on our budget but a contributor to our economy. We contracted Kiser Hydro, LLC Engineering for this project and received an engineering report that includes options for producing more energy with cost effective upgrades to the existing turbines. Included in this project was a negotiation of energy price sales negotiations.

  5. Texas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals Total Offshore (Million Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gross Withdrawals Total Offshore (Million Cubic Feet) Texas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals Total Offshore (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 88,258 418,474 760,566 1980's 949,177 1,010,772 1,120,830 992,041 1,021,260 942,413 1,169,038 1,330,604 1,376,093 1,457,841 1990's 1,555,568 1,494,494 1,411,147 1,355,333 1,392,727 1,346,674 1,401,753 1,351,067 1,241,264 1,206,045 2000's 1,177,257 53,649 57,063 53,569 44,946 36,932 24,785

  6. Louisiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals Total Offshore (Million Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gross Withdrawals Total Offshore (Million Cubic Feet) Louisiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals Total Offshore (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 3,838,521 4,600,197 4,750,119 1980's 4,617,585 4,584,491 4,246,464 3,635,942 4,070,279 3,542,827 3,279,165 3,610,041 3,633,594 3,577,685 1990's 3,731,764 3,550,230 3,442,437 3,508,112 3,673,494 3,554,147 3,881,697 3,941,802 3,951,997 3,896,569 2000's 3,812,991 153,871 137,192 133,456

  7. California Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals Total Offshore (Million Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Gross Withdrawals Total Offshore (Million Cubic Feet) California Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals Total Offshore (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 5,417 19,929 20,394 1980's 19,980 26,692 31,904 38,084 60,207 84,062 77,355 67,835 60,308 59,889 1990's 58,055 59,465 62,473 58,635 60,765 60,694 73,092 80,516 81,868 84,547 2000's 83,882 78,209 74,884 64,961 61,622 60,773 47,217 52,805 51,931 47,281 2010's 46,755 41,742

  8. Federal Offshore California Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Feet) Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Federal Offshore California Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 5,417 5,166 5,431 1980's 5,900 12,763 17,751 24,168 46,363 64,558 59,078 54,805 49,167 50,791 1990's 49,972 51,855 55,231 52,150 53,561 54,790 66,784 73,345 74,985 77,809 2000's 76,075 70,947 67,816 58,095 54,655 54,088 40,407 45,516 44,902 41,229 2010's 41,200 36,579 27,262 27,454

  9. Mississippi Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Mississippi Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 520 546 489 552 551 583 595 593 606 630 653 653 2007 678 690 709 736 749 756 714 717 752 809 845 813 2008 847 877 880 896 929 913 927 948 945 1,046 1,057 1,091 2009 1,079 1,098 941 876 853 840 880 916 917 964 1,084 1,161 2010 1,040 1,011 1,055 960 1,024 1,048 1,090 1,110 1,180 1,200 1,262 1,219 2011 1,233 1,223 1,201 1,236

  10. Pennsylvania Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Pennsylvania Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 503 534 487 469 459 480 455 469 481 481 465 505 2007 521 553 505 486 475 497 471 486 498 499 482 523 2008 567 581 549 529 517 540 512 529 542 543 524 569 2009 783 832 758 730 714 746 708 731 749 749 724 785 2010 733 733 733 1,284 1,284 1,284 1,779 1,779 1,779 2,461 2,461 2,461 2011 2,718 2,718 2,718 3,178 3,178 3,178

  11. Tennessee Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Tennessee Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Tennessee Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 7 7 7 7 6 6 7 8 8 8 8 8 2007 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 11 11 12 12 12 2008 12 12 12 12 11 11 13 13 14 14 15 15 2009 14 14 14 14 13 13 15 15 16 16 17 17 2010 13 13 13 13 13 12 14 15 15 15 16 16 2011 13 13 12 12 12 12 14 14 14 14 15 15 2012 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 2013 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15

  12. Arkansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Arkansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Arkansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 600 607 639 654 681 718 732 775 808 856 899 923 2007 596 603 636 651 680 717 731 774 810 861 899 923 2008 940 1,005 1,065 1,104 1,142 1,196 1,256 1,313 1,316 1,375 1,422 1,517 2009 1,605 1,627 1,679 1,774 1,816 1,877 1,839 2,047 1,571 2,028 2,217 2,273 2010 2,263 2,295 2,340 2,450 2,471 2,517 2,582 2,660

  13. Florida Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Florida Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Florida Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 8 8 9 9 8 7 8 8 8 7 7 7 2007 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 2008 8 8 9 8 8 7 7 7 8 7 7 7 2009 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2010 19 30 27 34 33 32 37 49 50 48 50 49 2011 49 54 48 50 49 51 42 34 45 47 47 47 2012 51 50 49 53 36 37 43 56 60 57 67 53 2013 55 54 47 23 37 45 44 59 53 55 58 62 2014 8 9 9 10 8 8 9 9 9 8 8 8

  14. Illinois Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 44,712 56,555 53,775 2000's 47,189 46,801 81,867 32,168 30,624 58,418 42,729 62,567 34,586 33,214 2010's 45,900 47,510 89,300 52,266 42,538 83,570

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Illinois Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007 4 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 2008 4 4 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3

  15. Indiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Indiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 7 8 8 8 8 8 6 8 9 9 9 9 2007 9 8 9 11 10 9 10 11 10 12 12 7 2008 11 13 13 14 14 13 13 12 12 14 14 11 2009 14 11 14 14 14 13 12 14 12 15 15 15 2010 15 16 14 17 15 18 19 18 21 24 24 23 2011 25 22 26 25 26 25 24 24 25 25 25 25 2012 20 25 26 25 24 24 24 25 25 24 24 24 2013 23 23 23 23 23 23 22 21 22 17 22 19 2014 16 19 20 20 19 17

  16. Kansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Kansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 1,049 1,035 1,041 1,046 1,041 1,057 1,030 1,024 988 979 975 968 2007 1,034 1,021 1,027 1,031 1,026 1,043 1,015 1,010 974 965 962 954 2008 1,017 1,028 1,032 1,024 979 1,024 1,034 1,033 1,032 1,026 1,092 988 2009 1,009 1,018 994 984 994 976 952 985 972 953 951 901 2010 903 923 911 907 812 902 876 904 890 899 895 886 2011 873 838

  17. Michigan Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Michigan Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 665 635 896 482 548 1,023 668 792 739 717 550 1,103 2007 941 681 675 563 869 679 741 790 832 695 776 642 2008 439 435 438 429 433 435 437 443 436 434 424 422 2009 408 412 503 404 388 406 482 402 427 392 511 504 2010 383 381 379 374 373 374 371 379 378 371 370 365 2011 394 399 399 399 393 390 393 395 399 391 393 385 2012 362

  18. Property:CoolingTowerWaterUseWinterGross | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    lingTowerWaterUseWinterGross Property Type Number Description Cooling Tower Water use (winter average) (afday) Gross. Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleProper...

  19. Property:CoolingTowerWaterUseAnnlAvgGross | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Property Name CoolingTowerWaterUseAnnlAvgGross Property Type Number Description Cooling Tower Water use (annual average) (afday) Gross. Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgw...

  20. Physics Nobel winner David Gross gives public lecture at Jefferson Lab on

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    June 12 (Monday) | Jefferson Lab Nobel winner David Gross gives public lecture at Jefferson Lab on June 12 (Monday) Physics Nobel winner David Gross gives public lecture at Jefferson Lab on June 12 (Monday) June 6, 2006 David Gross David Gross, Nobel Prize recipient and lecturer David Gross, Nobel Prize recipient is scheduled to give a free, public lecture titled "The Coming Revolutions in Fundamental Physics" beginning at 8 p.m. at Jefferson Lab on (Monday) June 12. He is one of

  1. New York State oil company gross receipts taxation

    SciTech Connect

    Brown, P.E., Jr.

    1983-12-01

    New York's Governor Cuomo was able to mediate a settlement with 18 major oil companies subject to gross receipts taxation. The compromise was intended to end three years of litigation and to assure a tax revenue flow to the state of hundreds of millions of dollars. It represents New York's effort to single out a handful of large national companies for special burdens and a final resolution of a dispute over the state's attempt to prevent these companies from passing through their tax liabilities to consumers in the prices of petroleum products. This article reviews oil company taxation in New York State and the effects of the recent accord. 95 references.

  2. Utilities, marketers identify with tax issures in Supreme Court case

    SciTech Connect

    Warkentin, D.

    1997-04-01

    A recent US Supreme Court decision effectively highlights the continuing disparity that exists in the taxation of regulated vs. nonregulated energy companies that engage in similar activities. While the federal case (General Motors Corp., vs. Tracy) and its decision involved natural gas utilities and natural gas marketers and how they are taxed locally, some noted electric utility industry professionals said the ruling has the potential of impacting the electric utility industry as it deregulates and works through the tax inequities that exist between it and independent unregulated power marketers. According to the Washington, DC-based law firm Chadbourne & Park LLP, under the Supreme Court ruling, which was handed down in late February and favored gas utilities, {open_quotes}a state can discriminate in favor of regulated utilities by exempting natural gas purchased from local distribution companies from sales taxes while collecting taxes on so-called selfhelp gas bought from gas producers at the wellhead or from independent marketers.{close_quotes} The US Supreme Court ruling appears to be important for the electric utility industry and independent power marketers in that there currently exists similar disparities with respect to taxation. The case involved Ohio and a tax it levies on natural gas. Ohio collects a 5 percent sales or use tax on gas purchased for consumption. According to Chadbourne & Park, in Ohio this tax can be as much as 7 percent when local taxes are tacked on to the state`s 5 percent tax. However, local distribution companies (LDC) are exempt from this tax. LDCs are essentially the local natural gas company or companies that many states, such as Ohio, have. In Ohio, these natural gas companies, which have generally been interpreted as those companies that produce, transport and deliver natural gas to Ohio consumers, are fully exempt from sales and use taxes.

  3. U.S. District Court Upholds DOE's Action Against LG to Enforce ENERGY STAR

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Requirements | Department of Energy District Court Upholds DOE's Action Against LG to Enforce ENERGY STAR Requirements U.S. District Court Upholds DOE's Action Against LG to Enforce ENERGY STAR Requirements January 19, 2010 - 12:00am Addthis Washington, D.C. - On Monday, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia upheld the Department of Energy's decision to remove the ENERGY STAR® label from certain inefficient LG refrigerator-freezer models. As part of its expanded

  4. U.S. District Court Upholds DOE's Action Against LG to Enforce...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    The Court's Memorandum Opinion denied LG's motion for a preliminary injunction that would ... products under an exception to the energy use-test procedures used by other manufacturers. ...

  5. Nebraska Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Nebraska Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 2007 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 7 6 6 2008 8 9 8 8 8 8 9 8 9 9 9 8 2009 9 10 10 9 9 9 7 7 7 7 7 6 2010 6 6 6 6 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 2011 5 5 5 6 5 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 2012 5 5 5 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 2013 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 2 4 2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2016 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - = No Data

  6. Oklahoma Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Oklahoma Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 4,412 4,442 4,472 4,563 4,567 4,760 4,700 4,664 4,722 4,747 4,732 4,739 2007 4,634 4,850 5,019 4,778 4,979 4,916 4,902 4,924 4,892 4,945 4,909 4,888 2008 5,018 5,144 5,074 5,208 5,215 5,241 5,256 4,896 5,224 5,126 5,145 5,318 2009 5,322 5,433 5,262 5,207 5,325 5,331 5,293 5,241 5,076 5,055 5,067 4,923 2010 4,915 4,976 5,005

  7. Oregon Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Oregon Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 2007 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 2008 3 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 2009 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 8 2010 6 7 5 5 5 4 3 1 2 2 3 4 2011 5 6 4 3 4 4 5 3 2 3 3 3 2012 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 1 1 2 2 3 2013 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 1 1 2 2 3 2014 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 2 2 3 3 2015 3 2 2 2 3 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 2016 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - = No Data

  8. Texas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Texas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 17,026 16,952 17,141 17,220 17,297 17,234 17,273 17,375 17,575 17,553 17,641 17,679 2007 17,566 18,044 18,509 18,549 18,805 19,080 19,125 19,431 19,564 19,755 20,088 20,268 2008 20,241 20,613 20,917 21,066 21,391 21,446 21,547 21,777 20,435 21,948 22,218 22,112 2009 22,211 22,025 22,007 21,633 21,304 21,058 20,772 20,705 20,303

  9. Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 919 931 941 945 953 956 948 987 1,010 1,023 1,046 1,053 2007 997 1,050 1,093 1,098 1,126 1,083 1,091 1,098 984 900 1,057 1,092 2008 1,092 1,130 1,148 1,185 1,196 1,198 1,200 1,277 1,276 1,241 1,275 1,259 2009 1,273 1,289 1,300 1,278 1,254 1,218 1,224 1,222 1,178 1,195 1,203 1,148 2010 1,146 1,169 1,188 1,223 1,234 1,216 1,198

  10. Wyoming Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Wyoming Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 5,624 5,636 5,666 5,613 5,495 5,656 5,823 5,730 5,658 6,063 6,164 6,284 2007 6,196 6,040 6,149 6,093 6,046 6,085 6,094 6,179 6,176 6,047 6,512 6,604 2008 6,469 6,436 6,722 6,767 6,771 6,839 6,940 6,835 6,447 6,909 7,126 7,297 2009 7,067 7,220 7,135 7,028 6,957 7,030 6,446 6,746 6,461 7,010 7,256 7,057 2010 7,074 7,092 7,110

  11. Alaska Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Alaska Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 9,244 9,681 9,288 8,745 7,770 8,330 7,865 8,192 8,642 9,084 9,268 9,369 2007 10,019 10,510 10,078 9,495 8,441 9,040 8,531 8,899 9,389 9,855 10,059 10,159 2008 9,833 9,963 9,894 9,323 8,290 8,875 8,375 8,739 9,221 9,674 9,876 9,972 2009 9,533 10,007 9,594 9,042 8,040 8,606 8,120 8,476 8,943 9,380 9,577 9,668 2010 9,389 9,849

  12. Arizona Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Arizona Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Arizona Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2007 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2008 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2009 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2010 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2011 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2013 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2014 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2016 NA NA NA NA NA NA

  13. Colorado Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Colorado Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 3,344 3,357 3,340 3,314 3,325 3,313 3,299 3,357 3,329 3,380 3,369 3,202 2007 3,377 3,358 3,396 3,475 3,462 3,485 3,477 3,393 3,617 3,456 3,543 3,209 2008 3,707 3,645 3,679 3,900 3,707 3,576 3,834 4,056 4,049 3,860 3,978 3,998 2009 4,330 4,353 4,298 4,238 4,244 4,149 4,148 4,104 4,032 3,985 4,025 3,810 2010 4,233 4,350 4,295

  14. Louisiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Louisiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 3,649 3,687 3,775 3,772 3,822 3,858 3,789 3,785 3,810 3,799 3,786 3,776 2007 3,718 3,672 3,750 3,794 3,866 3,875 3,869 3,759 3,784 3,789 3,785 3,793 2008 3,797 3,791 3,820 3,852 3,934 3,989 4,008 3,896 2,960 3,718 3,916 3,802 2009 3,829 3,925 3,941 4,034 4,119 4,134 4,220 4,382 4,448 4,616 4,801 4,772 2010 4,930 5,193 5,385

  15. Supreme court agrees: FERC must regulate wholesale markets

    SciTech Connect

    Wolak, Frank A.

    2008-08-15

    The author believes that wholesale markets in the United States would have a greater likelihood of ultimately benefiting consumers if the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission did not have the mandate under the Federal Power Act (FPA) to ensure that wholesale prices are ''just and reasonable.'' However, he continues to believe that the FERC cannot avoid having an ex post criteria for asssessing whether market prices are just and reasonable. Moreover, changes in the design and regulatory oversight of U.S. wholesale electricity markets in recent years, including the recent Supreme Court decision, have caused him to believe even more strongly in the guardrails-for-market-outcomes approach. Finally, several questions are addressed which relate to the pricing of fixed-price, long-term contracts and the impact of these obligations on the behavior of suppliers in short-term wholesale markets that are directly relevant to answering the two major questions that the Supreme Court remanded to FERC in its recent decision.

  16. Nevada Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 0 0 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 0 0

    from Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Nevada Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 0 0 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 1 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 10/31/2016 Next

  17. Fact# 904: December 21, 2015 Gross Domestic Product and Vehicle Travel:

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Both Increased during 2015 | Department of Energy 4: December 21, 2015 Gross Domestic Product and Vehicle Travel: Both Increased during 2015 Fact# 904: December 21, 2015 Gross Domestic Product and Vehicle Travel: Both Increased during 2015 SUBSCRIBE to the Fact of the Week The nation's highway vehicle miles of travel (VMT) and the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) reflect strikingly similar patterns, indicating the strong relationship between the nation's economy and its travel. Beginning in

  18. Fact #904: December 21, 2015 Gross Domestic Product and Vehicle Travel:

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Both Increased during 2015 - Dataset | Department of Energy Fact #904: December 21, 2015 Gross Domestic Product and Vehicle Travel: Both Increased during 2015 - Dataset Fact #904: December 21, 2015 Gross Domestic Product and Vehicle Travel: Both Increased during 2015 - Dataset Excel file and dataset for Gross Domestic Product and Vehicle Travel: Both Increased during 2015 fotw#904_web_rev.xlsx (19.75 KB) More Documents & Publications Vehicle Technologies Office Spring 2016 Quarterly

  19. Table 6.4 Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Natural Gas Well Productivity, 1960-2011

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Natural Gas Well Productivity, 1960-2011 Year Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals From Crude Oil, Natural Gas, Coalbed, and Shale Gas Wells Natural Gas Well Productivity Texas 1 Louisiana 1 Oklahoma Other States 1 Federal Gulf of Mexico 2 Total Onshore Offshore Total Gross With- drawals From Natural Gas Wells 3 Producing Wells 4 Average Productivity Federal State Total Million Cubic Feet Million Cubic Feet Million Cubic Feet Number Cubic Feet per Well 1960 6,964,900

  20. U.S. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Period: Monthly Annual Download Series History Download Series History Definitions, Sources & Notes Definitions, Sources & Notes Show Data By: Data Series Area 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 View History Gross Withdrawals 26,056,893 26,816,085 28,479,026 29,542,313 30,005,254 31,895,427 1936-2014 From Gas Wells 14,414,287 13,247,498 12,291,070 12,504,227 11,255,616 1967-2013 From Oil Wells 5,674,120 5,834,703 5,907,919 4,965,833 5,427,676 1967-2013 From Shale Gas Wells 3,958,315 5,817,122

  1. Gross national happiness as a framework for health impact assessment

    SciTech Connect

    Pennock, Michael; Ura, Karma

    2011-01-15

    The incorporation of population health concepts and health determinants into Health Impact Assessments has created a number of challenges. The need for intersectoral collaboration has increased; the meaning of 'health' has become less clear; and the distinctions between health impacts, environmental impacts, social impacts and economic impacts have become increasingly blurred. The Bhutanese concept of Gross National Happiness may address these issues by providing an over-arching evidence-based framework which incorporates health, social, environmental and economic contributors as well as a number of other key contributors to wellbeing such as culture and governance. It has the potential to foster intersectoral collaboration by incorporating a more limited definition of health which places the health sector as one of a number of contributors to wellbeing. It also allows for the examination of the opportunity costs of health investments on wellbeing, is consistent with whole-of-government approaches to public policy and emerging models of social progress.

  2. Spatial confinement and thermal deconfinement in the Gross-Neveu model

    SciTech Connect

    Malbouisson, J. M. C.; Khanna, F. C.; Malbouisson, A. P. C.

    2007-06-19

    We discuss the occurrence of spatial confinement and thermal deconfinement in the massive, D-dimensional, Gross-Neveu model with compactified spatial dimensions.

  3. Grade Assignments for Models Used for Calibration of Gross-Count Gamma-Ray

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Logging Systems (December 1983) | Department of Energy Grade Assignments for Models Used for Calibration of Gross-Count Gamma-Ray Logging Systems (December 1983) Grade Assignments for Models Used for Calibration of Gross-Count Gamma-Ray Logging Systems (December 1983) Grade Assignments for Models Used for Calibration of Gross-Count Gamma-Ray Logging Systems (December 1983) Grade Assignments for Models Used for Calibration of Gross-Count Gamma-Ray Logging Systems (December 1983) (2.28 MB)

  4. 1990 yearly calibration of Pacific Northwest Laboratory's gross-gamma borehole geophysical logging system

    SciTech Connect

    Arthur, R.J.

    1990-08-01

    This report describes the 1990 yearly calibration of a gross-gamma geophysical pulse logging system owned by the US Department of Energy (DOE) and operated by Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL). The calibration was conducted to permit the continued use of this system for geological and hydrologic studies associated with remedial investigation at the Hanford Site. Primary calibrations to equivalent uranium units were conducted in borehole model standards that were recently moved to the Hanford Site from the DOE field calibration facility in Spokane, Washington. The calibrations were performed in borehole models SBL/SBH and SBA/SBB, which contain low equivalent-uranium concentrations. The integrity of the system throughout the previous year from gamma-ray monitoring was demonstrated using the before- and after-logging field calibration readings with the field source in calibration Positions 1 and 2. Most of the Position 1 readings are within an 8% limit that is set by the governing PNL technical reference procedure as a critical value above which the instrument is considered suspect. Many of the Position 2 readings exceed the 8% limit; however, the fluctuation was traced to field-source geometry variability that affected Position 1 count rates by up to 6% and Position 2 count rates by as much as 16%. Correlations were established based on two similar approaches for relating observed count rate in before- and after-logging field calibrations to equivalent uranium concentrations. The temperature drift of the gamma-ray probe was documented and amounts to less than 0.1%/{degree}C within the temperature range 0{degree}C to 42{degree}C. The low-energy cutoff for the gross gamma-ray probe was determined to be between 46.5 and 59.5 keV. 10 refs., 4 figs., 13 tabs.

  5. Presidential Permit Holders- Annual Reports

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Presidential permit holders are responsible for reporting the gross amount electric energy which flows into and out of the United States over the permitted international transmission facility regardless if the energy is wheeled to or for another entity.

  6. Court denies review of contractor/utility feud: contractors fear denial sets precedent

    SciTech Connect

    Poplett, J.

    1986-02-03

    On Jan. 27, the US Supreme Court refused to review a recent federal circuit court decision allowing a California public utility to enter into energy-related contractor activities; this may set a precedent for future related cases, according to an attorney for the contractor plaintiffs. The Supreme Court's refusal lets stand the 9th Federal Circuit Court of Appeals decision on Grason Electric Co. et al. vs. the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD). That decision allows SMUD - a public utility - to engage in energy-related businesses such as the installation of energy management systems and lighting retrofits, according to the attorney. The plaintiffs in the case, 13 electrical contractors in the Sacramento area, originally brought the case against SMUD on antitrust grounds because, they alleged, the utility was encroaching upon their businesses.

  7. Colorado - C.R.S. 40-6-115, Review by District Court | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Colorado - C.R.S. 40-6-115, Review by District Court Jump to: navigation, search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: Colorado - C.R.S. 40-6-115,...

  8. I.C. 62-6 - Procedure Before Commission and in Courts | Open...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    search OpenEI Reference LibraryAdd to library Legal Document- StatuteStatute: I.C. 62-6 - Procedure Before Commission and in CourtsLegal Abstract This statute governs...

  9. Fact #768: February 25, 2013 New Light Vehicle Sales and Gross Domestic

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Product | Department of Energy 8: February 25, 2013 New Light Vehicle Sales and Gross Domestic Product Fact #768: February 25, 2013 New Light Vehicle Sales and Gross Domestic Product Over the last four decades, new light vehicle sales have gone from a low of 9.9 million vehicles in 1970 to a high of 17.1 million vehicles sold in 2001, but along the way, there have been significant ups and downs. Those ups and downs are also reflected in the change in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) over time

  10. Empirical investigation into the tax court assessment of the economic interest concept in natural resource taxation

    SciTech Connect

    Fenton, E.D. Jr.

    1986-01-01

    Within the natural resource taxation area, the concept of economic interest evolved as a crucial issue. The concept controls the allowance of the depletion deduction and, in some instances the availability for capital gain treatment. Economic interest, however, has become a very confusing issue over the years and is difficult to apply in many circumstances. This research study attempts to provide a better understanding of the economic interest concept by identifying significant factors that have been present in certain tax related court cases. The entire population of Tax Court cases from 1933 through 1984 in which economic interest was the main issue were read to determine the existence of twelve variables. Logit analysis was then used to identify these variables, which were significant. Other parts of the research study include the evaluation of a hold-out sample, determining whether the significant variables have changes over time, and comparing the results of the Tax Court cases with the results developed for Court of Claims cases. The logit model developed using all of the 140 Tax Court observations indicated five significant variables were present. A classification accuracy of 80% was obtained using the model to classify the Tax Court cases.

  11. Fact #621: May 3, 2010 Gross Vehicle Weight vs. Empty Vehicle Weight

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The gross weight of a vehicle (GVW) is the weight of the empty vehicle plus the weight of the maximum payload that the vehicle was designed to carry. In cars and small light trucks, the difference...

  12. ,"U.S. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    7:59:57 AM" "Back to Contents","Data 1: U.S. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" "Sourcekey","NGMEPG0FGSNUSMMCF" "Date","U.S. Natural Gas ...

  13. EIA Energy Efficiency-Table 4e. Gross Output by Selected Industries...

    Annual Energy Outlook

    e Page Last Modified: May 2010 Table 4e. Gross Output1by Selected Industries, 1998, 2002, and 2006 (Billion 2000 Dollars 2) MECS Survey Years NAICS Subsector and Industry 1998 2002...

  14. EIA Energy Efficiency-Table 3e. Gross Output by Selected Industries...

    Annual Energy Outlook

    e Page Last Modified: May 2010 Table 3e. Gross Output1 by Selected Industries, 1998, 2002, and 2006 (Current Billion Dollars) MECS Survey Years NAICS Subsector and Industry 1998...

  15. Fact #564: March 30, 2009 Transportation and the Gross Domestic Product, 2007

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Transportation plays a major role in the U.S. economy. About 10% of the U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2007 is related to transportation. Housing, health care, and food are the only...

  16. OSTIblog Articles in the David Gross Topic | OSTI, US Dept of...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    David Gross Topic 100th DOE R&D Accomplishments Feature Page Celebration by Linda McBrearty 07 Jul, 2013 in Products and Content 7566 Accomp100slide.preview.jpg 100th DOE R&D ...

  17. The one-dimensional Gross-Pitaevskii equation and its some excitation states

    SciTech Connect

    Prayitno, T. B.

    2015-04-16

    We have derived some excitation states of the one-dimensional Gross-Pitaevskii equation coupled by the gravitational potential. The methods that we have used here are taken by pursuing the recent work of Kivshar et. al. by considering the equation as a macroscopic quantum oscillator. To obtain the states, we have made the appropriate transformation to reduce the three-dimensional Gross-Pitaevskii equation into the one-dimensional Gross-Pitaevskii equation and applying the time-independent perturbation theory in the general solution of the one-dimensional Gross-Pitaevskii equation as a linear superposition of the normalized eigenfunctions of the Schrödinger equation for the harmonic oscillator potential. Moreover, we also impose the condition by assuming that some terms in the equation should be so small in order to preserve the use of the perturbation method.

  18. 23 V.S.A. Section 1392 Gross Weight Limits on Highways | Open...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Section 1392 Gross Weight Limits on HighwaysLegal Abstract Statute establishes the motor vehicle weight, load size, not to exceed 80,000 pounds without a permit. Published NA...

  19. Inspection Letter Report: INS-L-09-04 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    received an allegation that the FY 2007 TCU report contained a "gross unexplained error," and the complainant believed that the data was intentionally falsified....

  20. Maryland Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 0 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 0 0 - No Data Reported; -- Not ...

  1. Kentucky Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 0 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 0 0 - No Data Reported; -- Not ...

  2. Winter Hydroelectric Dam Feasibility Assessment: The Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Ojibwe

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    WINTER HYDROELECTRIC DAM FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT THE LAC COURTE OREILLES BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR OJIBWE PRESENTED BY JASON WEAVER LAC COURTE OREILLES HISTORY * WE ARE LOCATED IN SAWYER COUNTY IN THE NORTHWESTERN REGION OF WISCONSIN. * WE HAVE 7,310 ENROLLED TRIBAL MEMBERS * THE RESERVATION CONSIST OF 76,465 ACRES, ABOUT 10,500 ACRES ARE WATER * WE HAVE ENTERED 4 SOVEREIGN TREATIES WITH THE U.S. GOVERNMENT. 1825, 1837, 1842 AND THE LA POINTE TREATY OF 1854 WHICH ESTABLISHED THE CURRENT RESERVATIONS

  3. Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians - Energy Analysis

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Ojibwe Location of Lac Courte Oreilles About Lac Courte Oreilles (LCO) * The reservation is presently 76,465 acres and is 15 miles wide. * We have a seven member Tribal Governing Board with four year terms. * LCO's membership is about 7,000 with nearly half of its members residing on or near the reservation * There are 25 distinctly different communities within the reservation for a total of 1,019 households (2000 Census). * LCO operates two casinos; recently

  4. DOE Tour of Zero: Jewels Court by Greenhill Contracting | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Energy Jewels Court by Greenhill Contracting DOE Tour of Zero: Jewels Court by Greenhill Contracting Addthis 1 of 16 Greenhill Contracting built this 3,912-square-foot house in Esopus, New York, to the performance criteria of the U.S. Department of Energy Zero Energy Ready Home (ZERH) program, resulting in an estimated energy cost savings of nearly $5,400 per year compared to minimally code-compliant house. 2 of 16 All of the home's windows are ultra-efficient triple-paned with vinyl frames

  5. Reports

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Reports Reports Individual Permit reports are prepared annually to facilitate public review of activities for the previous year. Contact Environmental Communication & Public Involvement P.O. Box 1663 MS M996 Los Alamos, NM 87545 (505) 667-0216 Email Individual Permit for Storm Water Reports Annual Report 2015 (pdf) 2014 (pdf) 2013 (pdf) Submittal Letter (pdf) 2012 (pdf) Submittal Letter (pdf) 2011 (pdf) Background Metals and Radioactivity Report Background Metals Concentrations and

  6. ,"California--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","California--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)",1,"Annual",2015 ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  7. ,"Federal Offshore California Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Federal Offshore California Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)",1,"Annual",2015 ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  8. North Dakota Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    North Dakota Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) North Dakota Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 158 155 160 165 167 169 170 174 182 186 185 190 2007 187 188 185 189 191 194 196 204 202 203 207 182 2008 209 207 215 221 232 243 243 249 260 267 269 242 2009 241 243 245 250 247 249 258 263 260 255 267 262 2010 252 272 279 282 302 305 324 331 343 348 360 343 2011 340 342 360 359 364 397 434 466

  9. ,"Other States Total Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Total Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Other States Total Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Monthly","8/2016","01/15/1989" ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release

  10. ,"Texas--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Texas--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)",1,"Annual",2015 ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File Name:","na1060_rtxsf_2a.xls"

  11. ,"US--Federal Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","US--Federal Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)",1,"Annual",2015 ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File Name:","na1060_rusf_2a.xls"

  12. ,"US--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","US--State Offshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (MMcf)",1,"Annual",2015 ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File Name:","na1060_russf_2a.xls"

  13. New York Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Proved Reserves (Billion Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 0 0 0 0 0 2010's 0 0 0 0 0 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 11/19/2015 Next Release Date: 12/31/2016 Referring Pages: Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves as of Dec. 31 New York Coalbed Methane Proved Reserves, Reserves Changes, and Production

    Crude Oil Reserves in

  14. Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians- 2007 Project

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa will gather and compile information on the tribe's energy use, conduct energy audits of reservation facilities, identify where conservation efforts would be worthwhile, and evaluate policy changes needed to implement conservation measures.

  15. "Table 2. Real Gross Domestic Product Growth Trends, Projected vs. Actual"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Real Gross Domestic Product Growth Trends, Projected vs. Actual" "Projected Real GDP Growth Trend" " (cumulative average percent growth in projected real GDP from first year shown for each AEO)" ,1993,1994,1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013 "AEO

  16. Gross error detection and stage efficiency estimation in a separation process

    SciTech Connect

    Serth, R.W.; Srikanth, B. . Dept. of Chemical and Natural Gas Engineering); Maronga, S.J. . Dept. of Chemical and Process Engineering)

    1993-10-01

    Accurate process models are required for optimization and control in chemical plants and petroleum refineries. These models involve various equipment parameters, such as stage efficiencies in distillation columns, the values of which must be determined by fitting the models to process data. Since the data contain random and systematic measurement errors, some of which may be large (gross errors), they must be reconciled to obtain reliable estimates of equipment parameters. The problem thus involves parameter estimation coupled with gross error detection and data reconciliation. MacDonald and Howat (1988) studied the above problem for a single-stage flash distillation process. Their analysis was based on the definition of stage efficiency due to Hausen, which has some significant disadvantages in this context, as discussed below. In addition, they considered only data sets which contained no gross errors. The purpose of this article is to extend the above work by considering alternative definitions of state efficiency and efficiency estimation in the presence of gross errors.

  17. Project Reports for Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians- 2010 Project

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This weatherization training will result in a reduction of the use and cost of energy by increasing the number of homes that are weatherized.

  18. Project Reports for Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians- 2010 Project

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The feasibility study of hydropower will answer three questions: 1) How can hydropower be developed to create a sustainable economic stream that contributes to the financial viability of the tribe? 2) How can this venture meet the energy needs of the community? 3) How can hydropower be developed without jeopardizing Mother Earth or the cultural beliefs of the tribe?

  19. IRS (Internal Revenue Service) claim against oil firms heads for a court showdown

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1990-09-24

    During the gasoline crisis of the late Seventies, Saudi Arabia pumped oil to four U.S. oil companies at a price mutually agreed on. But the Internal Revenue Service says the companies sold the oil at a higher rate, raking in profits that they must pay taxes on. Exxon and Texaco dispute the ruling, while the other companies are being audited. The Tax Court is scheduled to try the case April of 1991.

  20. Environmental Impact Assessment Law in China's courts: A study of 107 judicial decisions

    SciTech Connect

    Zining, Jin

    2015-11-15

    The article explores the practices of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Law in China's courts by examining 107 judicial decisions. Each of the 107 judicial decisions has been analyzed to determine the time/location of the decision, what type of EIA document was referred to, what specific claim was made by the plaintiffs, and what the court's ruling was on the case. The results indicate that: unlike in Germany or Japan, all kinds of EIA decisions made by environment protect bureaus (EPBs) in China were widely taken as justiciable, and China's courts generally allowed local residents to have standing and thus challenge the EPBs' decisions made during the EIA process. On the other hand, the research also shows the EPBs overwhelmingly prevailed in those EIA lawsuits. It is also found that China's reviewing judges were highly self-restrained, giving obvious deference to the technocrat with the substantial contents of EIA documents. Also, the concept of “flaw” was created when it came to procedural issues. These two factors, among others, were both helping the EPBs' prevailing successes. - Highlights: • 107 judicial decisions referring to China's EIA law are examined. • The justiciability of EPB's EIA decisions were taken for granted. • The defenders overwhelmingly prevailed in those EIA lawsuits. • The reviewing judges were highly self-restrained, defering to the technocrat with the EIA documents. • A functional concept, “flaw”, was created by reviewing judges when it came to procedural issues.

  1. U.S. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals Offshore (Million Cubic Feet)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Gross Withdrawals Offshore (Million Cubic Feet) U.S. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals Offshore (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1970's 3,932,196 5,111,413 5,603,025 1980's 5,650,097 5,693,432 5,466,050 4,734,843 5,220,061 4,631,756 4,588,565 5,078,178 5,180,875 5,231,028 1990's 5,509,312 5,308,457 5,324,039 5,373,300 5,700,666 5,431,665 5,843,661 5,906,329 5,800,561 5,689,438 2000's 5,699,377 5,815,542 5,312,348 5,215,683 4,736,252

  2. New York Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) New York Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 149 147 143 142 138 137 156 155 158 167 172 175 2007 146 144 141 139 136 135 153 152 155 164 169 172 2008 134 128 129 128 124 123 140 139 142 150 155 157 2009 119 118 115 114 111 110 125 124 127 134 138 140 2010 95 94 92 91 89 88 99 99 101 107 110 112 2011 83 82 80 79 77 76 86 86 88 93 96 97 2012 73 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72

  3. South Dakota Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    South Dakota Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) South Dakota Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 31 32 31 26 29 29 28 28 28 30 29 28 2007 29 29 31 31 32 32 31 31 37 34 37 36 2008 34 31 32 34 17 34 36 37 37 36 34 32 2009 35 36 37 37 38 38 35 34 33 33 34 35 2010 33 36 35 34 35 34 33 33 43 35 32 29 2011 28 29 29 31 29 32 36 37 37 39 40 41 2012 41 42 43 43 45 43 42 40 40 39 41 35 2013 42 43 44 46

  4. West Virginia Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) West Virginia Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 588 611 599 584 608 616 606 654 628 622 645 652 2007 617 615 609 619 626 631 635 629 662 628 673 657 2008 662 676 663 662 658 670 674 678 657 692 681 657 2009 679 695 712 724 731 735 733 741 751 743 742 706 2010 702 711 708 714 717 727 729 730 738 751 754 737 2011 884 935 976 1,016 1,030 1,078 1,135 1,118 1,211 1,180

  5. Federal Offshore--Gulf of Mexico Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Cubic Feet per Day) Federal Offshore--Gulf of Mexico Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Federal Offshore--Gulf of Mexico Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 7,927 7,675 7,768 7,985 8,290 8,296 8,302 8,121 7,992 7,849 7,894 7,685 2007 7,628 7,682 7,741 7,786 7,857 7,672 7,490 7,395 7,410 7,720 7,778 8,322 2008 7,815 7,916 7,757 7,010 6,762 7,339 7,468 6,868 2,100 4,368 5,297 5,672 2009

  6. Relationship of the percentage depletion allowance and the dividends received deduction: a disagreement with the tax court

    SciTech Connect

    Orbach, K.N.

    1983-09-01

    Arguments against the Tax Court's holding in Lastarmo, Inc. v. Commissioner review the equations for solving the percentage depletion deduction (PD) and dividends received deduction (DRD) interrelationship to determine whether a corporate taxpayer has had a net operating loss (NOL). The Tax Court sought to fill a perceived gap in Internal Revenue Service statutory framework which the author considers invalid because of the calculations used to prove NOL. His calculations show that none existed. 48 references. (DCK)

  7. Reports

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    aehsed herewith ia Coaprehenaive Survey of USBEC mtp, Lewebldinge ad G~r~n&-owned Bpipment under SC & COntraCtCW'S COntrOl, as requested in AEC BULLETIN No. 48 dated April 26, 1917. .& Inols. Reports 10 acres NO. 5412 5435 5436 5421 5621 5432 5433 5434 5431 5437 Pipe Shop /j LOCATION Ij ij 88 1 / j Lske 'OntsTis Tohawanda !IS AEC Ordndnce 'Worki, Sllkffiqe ,Model wty, ,New York '8 I' j, i/ DESCRIPTION !! OF TT 'fro1 heti TX-2 fron inec s3n Die ylaed Ialst JS Eng- 1, 3x38 *ict 23, 144

  8. Reports

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Reports . . . . , Book -1. Service Open File Information for Project Rulison, Production Testing Phase, . , August 28,1970 : . "; DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. DESCRIPTION O F PU1:T41C I-l!lkI,T;-1 SE1:VICh: 0P:SN F I L E INPOPt4ATION i[ ' 7 S&u-~%uestcrn E a d i o l o g i c a l H e a l t h 1,aboratol-p r? U. S. Depaieraent o f I l e a l t h ,. E d u c a t i o n aud

  9. ,"Alaska Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals Total Offshore (MMcf)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Total Offshore (MMcf)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Alaska Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals Total Offshore (MMcf)",1,"Annual",2015 ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File Name:","na1090_sak_2a.xls"

  10. ,"California Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals Total Offshore (MMcf)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Total Offshore (MMcf)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","California Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals Total Offshore (MMcf)",1,"Annual",2015 ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File Name:","na1090_sca_2a.xls"

  11. ,"Indiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    and Production" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Indiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Annual",2015,"06/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  12. ,"Kentucky Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    and Production" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Kentucky Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Annual",2015,"06/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  13. ,"Maryland Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    and Production" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Maryland Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Annual",2015,"06/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  14. ,"Mississippi Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    and Production" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Mississippi Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Annual",2015,"06/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  15. ,"Missouri Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    and Production" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Missouri Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Annual",2015,"06/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  16. ,"Virginia Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    and Production" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Virginia Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Annual",2015,"06/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  17. Soliton solutions of the 3D Gross-Pitaevskii equation by a potential control method

    SciTech Connect

    Fedele, R.; Eliasson, B.; Shukla, P. K.; Haas, F.; Jovanovic, D.; De Nicola, S.

    2010-12-14

    We present a class of three-dimensional solitary waves solutions of the Gross-Pitaevskii (GP) equation, which governs the dynamics of Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs). By imposing an external controlling potential, a desired time-dependent shape of the localized BEC excitation is obtained. The stability of some obtained localized solutions is checked by solving the time-dependent GP equation numerically with analytic solutions as initial conditions. The analytic solutions can be used to design external potentials to control the localized BECs in experiment.

  18. ,"Nebraska Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    and Production" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Nebraska Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Annual",2015,"06/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  19. ,"Nevada Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    and Production" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Nevada Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Annual",2015,"06/30/1991" ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  20. ,"Nevada Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Nevada Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)",1,"Monthly","8/2016" ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  1. ,"New York Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    and Production" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","New York Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Annual",2015,"06/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  2. ,"Oregon Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Oregon Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)",1,"Monthly","8/2016" ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  3. ,"South Dakota Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    and Production" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","South Dakota Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Annual",2015,"06/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  4. ,"Tennessee Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    and Production" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Tennessee Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production",10,"Annual",2015,"06/30/1967" ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File

  5. ,"Texas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals Total Offshore (MMcf)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Total Offshore (MMcf)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","Texas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals Total Offshore (MMcf)",1,"Annual",2015 ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File Name:","na1090_stx_2a.xls"

  6. ,"U.S. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals Offshore (MMcf)"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Offshore (MMcf)" ,"Click worksheet name or tab at bottom for data" ,"Worksheet Name","Description","# Of Series","Frequency","Latest Data for" ,"Data 1","U.S. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals Offshore (MMcf)",1,"Annual",2015 ,"Release Date:","10/31/2016" ,"Next Release Date:","11/30/2016" ,"Excel File Name:","na1090_nus_2a.xls" ,"Available

  7. Recent tax court cases provide guide to accelerated cash flow from oil and gas transactions

    SciTech Connect

    Stevens, D.O.

    1982-12-01

    Three recent Tax Court decisions in the partnership taxation area point the way for owners of exploration and development properties to obtain cash without recognizing taxable gain and with no obligation to return any of the cash received or dedicate it to development. The review of these cases suggest the following general implications in the oil and gas taxation area: (1) the most important element in favor of contribution-distribution treatment is the nature of the property contributed and the plans and business risk assumed by the partners, since these elements appear to govern the substance of the transaction; (2) the trend of the cases in Tax Court seems to be in the direction of allowing the cash to come from the partners not contributing land, while still allowing nonrecognition treatment; and (3) where the landowning partner obtains his cash from a partnership production payment, the cash should not be taxed assuming production payment is adequately secured so that it is not in substance something else. (JMT)

  8. New Mexico Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) New Mexico Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 4,406 4,418 4,460 4,393 4,430 4,456 4,463 4,466 4,505 4,473 4,447 4,327 2007 4,201 4,250 4,287 4,273 4,345 4,341 4,323 4,217 4,363 4,284 4,262 3,997 2008 3,820 3,958 4,128 4,157 4,170 3,975 4,179 4,092 4,069 4,168 4,078 3,957 2009 3,968 4,063 4,018 3,979 3,960 3,857 3,863 3,927 3,818 3,914 3,865 3,635 2010 3,630 3,650 3,630

  9. Report of the Committee on antitrust

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1994-01-01

    This report of the Committee on Antitrust summarizes certain energy industry cases brought under the federal antitrust laws (i.e., Sherman Act, Clayton Act, Robinson-Patman Act) for the prior three years. This report also summarizes several significant Supreme Court decisions concerning the antitrust laws during this period. These cases did not involve energy matters, but they may have a significant bearing on antitrust situations involving energy companies.

  10. Suppressed gross erosion of high-temperature lithium via rapid deuterium implantation

    DOE PAGES [OSTI]

    Abrams, T.; Jaworski, M. A.; Chen, M.; Carter, E. A.; Kaita, R.; Stotler, D. P.; De Temmerman, G.; Morgan, T. W.; van den Berg, M. A.; van der Meiden, H. J.

    2015-12-17

    Lithium-coated high-Z substrates are planned for use in the NSTX-U divertor and are a candidate plasma facing component (PFC) for reactors, but it remains necessary to characterize the gross Li erosion rate under high plasma fluxes (>1023 m-2 s-1), typical for the divertor region. In this work, a realistic model for the compositional evolution of a Li/D layer is developed that incorporates first principles molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of D diffusion in liquid Li. Predictions of Li erosion from a mixed Li/D material are also developed that include formation of lithium deuteride (LiD). The erosion rate of Li from LiDmore » is predicted to be significantly lower than from pure Li. This prediction is tested in the Magnum-PSI linear plasma device at ion fluxes of 1023-1024 m-2 s-1 and Li surface temperatures. ≤800 °C. Li/LiD coatings ranging in thickness from 0.2 to 500 μm are studied. The dynamic D/Li concentrations are inferred via diffusion simulations. The pure Li erosion rate remains greater than Langmuir Law evaporation, as expected. For mixed-material Li/LiD surfaces, the erosion rates are reduced, in good agreement with modelling in almost all cases. Lastly, these results imply that the temperature limit for a Li-coated PFC may be significantly higher than previously imagined.« less

  11. Failure of the gross theory of beta decay in neutron deficient nuclei

    DOE PAGES [OSTI]

    Firestone, R. B.; Schwengner, R.; Zuber, K.

    2015-05-28

    The neutron deficient isotopes 117-121Xe, 117-124Cs, and 122-124Ba were produced by a beam of 28Si from the LBNL SuperHILAC on a target of natMo. The isotopes were mass separated and their beta decay schemes were measured with a Total Absorption Spectrometer (TAS). The beta strengths derived from these data decreased dramatically to levels above ≈1 MeV for the even-even decays; 3–4 MeV for even-Z, odd-N decays; 4–5 MeV for the odd-Z, even-N decays; and 7–8 MeV for the odd-Z, odd-N decays. The decreasing strength to higher excitation energies in the daughters contradicts the predictions of the Gross Theory of Betamore » Decay. The integrated beta strengths are instead found to be consistent with shell model predictions where the single-particle beta strengths are divided amoung many low-lying levels. The experimental beta strengths determined here have been used calculate the half-lives of 143 neutron deficient nuclei with Z=51–64 to a precision of 20% with respect to the measured values.« less

  12. Table 2. Real Gross Domestic Product Growth Trends, Projected vs. Actual

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Real Gross Domestic Product Growth Trends, Projected vs. Actual Projected Real GDP Growth Trend (cumulative average percent growth in projected real GDP from first year shown for each AEO) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 AEO 1994 3.09 3.15 2.86 2.78 2.73 2.65 2.62 2.60 2.56 2.53 2.52 2.49 2.45 2.41 2.40 2.36 2.32 2.29 AEO 1995 3.66 2.77 2.53 2.71 2.67 2.61 2.55 2.48 2.46 2.45 2.45 2.43 2.39 2.35 2.31 2.27 2.24 AEO 1996 2.61

  13. Failure of the gross theory of beta decay in neutron deficient nuclei

    SciTech Connect

    Firestone, R. B.; Schwengner, R.; Zuber, K.

    2015-05-28

    The neutron deficient isotopes 117-121Xe, 117-124Cs, and 122-124Ba were produced by a beam of 28Si from the LBNL SuperHILAC on a target of natMo. The isotopes were mass separated and their beta decay schemes were measured with a Total Absorption Spectrometer (TAS). The beta strengths derived from these data decreased dramatically to levels above ≈1 MeV for the even-even decays; 3–4 MeV for even-Z, odd-N decays; 4–5 MeV for the odd-Z, even-N decays; and 7–8 MeV for the odd-Z, odd-N decays. The decreasing strength to higher excitation energies in the daughters contradicts the predictions of the Gross Theory of Beta Decay. The integrated beta strengths are instead found to be consistent with shell model predictions where the single-particle beta strengths are divided amoung many low-lying levels. The experimental beta strengths determined here have been used calculate the half-lives of 143 neutron deficient nuclei with Z=51–64 to a precision of 20% with respect to the measured values.

  14. Weak decay processes in pre-supernova core evolution within the gross theory

    SciTech Connect

    Ferreira, R. C.; Dimarco, A. J.; Samana, A. R.; Barbero, C. A.

    2014-03-20

    The beta decay and electron capture rates are of fundamental importance in the evolution of massive stars in a pre-supernova core. The beta decay process gives its contribution by emitting electrons in the plasma of the stellar core, thereby increasing pressure, which in turn increases the temperature. From the other side, the electron capture removes free electrons from the plasma of the star core contributing to the reduction of pressure and temperature. In this work we calculate the beta decay and electron capture rates in stellar conditions for 63 nuclei of relevance in the pre-supernova stage, employing Gross Theory as the nuclear model. We use the abundances calculated with the Saha equations in the hypothesis of nuclear statistical equilibrium to evaluate the time derivative of the fraction of electrons. Our results are compared with other evaluations available in the literature. They have shown to be one order less or equal than the calculated within other models. Our results indicate that these differences may influence the evolution of the star in the later stages of pre-supernova.

  15. HIA 2015 DOE Zero Energy Ready Home Case Study: High Performance Homes, Chamberlain Court #75, Gettysburg, PA

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Performance Homes Chamberlain Court #75 Gettysburg, PA DOE ZERO ENERGY READY HOME(tm) The U.S. Department of Energy invites home builders across the country to meet the extraordinary levels of excellence and quality specified in DOE's Zero Energy Ready Home program (formerly known as Challenge Home). Every DOE Zero Energy Ready Home starts with ENERGY STAR Certified Homes Version 3.0 for an energy-efficient home built on a solid foundation of building science research. Advanced technologies are

  16. Gross Alpha Beta Radioactivity in Air Filters Measured by Ultra Low Level alpha/beta Counter

    SciTech Connect

    Cfarku, Florinda; Bylyku, Elida; Bakiu, Erjona; Perpunja, Flamur; Deda, Antoneta; Dhoqina, Polikron

    2010-01-21

    Study of radioactivity in air as very important for life is done regularly using different methods in every country. As a result of nuclear reactors, atomic centrals, institutions and laboratories, which use the radioactivity substances in open or closed sources, there are a lot radioactive wastes. Mixing of these wastes after treatment with rivers and lakes waters makes very important control of radioactivity. At the other side nuclear and radiological accidents are another source of the contamination of air and water. Due to their radio toxicity, especially those of Sr{sup 90}, Pu{sup 239}, etc. a contamination hazard for human begins exist even at low concentration levels. Measurements of radioactivity in air have been performed in many parts of the world mostly for assessment of the doses and risk resulting from consuming air. In this study we present the results of international comparison organized by IAEA Vienna, Austria for the air filters spiked with unknown Alpha and Beta Activity. For the calibration of system we used the same filters spiked: a) with Pu-239 as alpha source; b) Sr-90 as beta source and also the blank filter. The measurements of air filter samples after calibration of the system are done with Ultra Low Level alpha/beta Counter (MPC 9604) Protean Instrument Corporation. The high sensitivity of the system for the determination of the Gross Alpha and Beta activity makes sure detection of low values activity of air filters. Our laboratory results are: Aalpha = (0.19+-0.01) Bq/filter and Aalpha(IAEA) = (0.17+-0.009) Bq/filter; A{sub b}eta = (0.33+-0.009) Bq/filter and A{sub b}eta (IAEA) = (0.29+-0.01) Bq/filter. As it seems our results are in good agreement with reference values given by IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency).

  17. Suppressed gross erosion of high-temperature lithium via rapid deuterium implantation

    SciTech Connect

    Abrams, T.; Jaworski, M. A.; Chen, M.; Carter, E. A.; Kaita, R.; Stotler, D. P.; De Temmerman, G.; Morgan, T. W.; van den Berg, M. A.; van der Meiden, H. J.

    2015-12-17

    Lithium-coated high-Z substrates are planned for use in the NSTX-U divertor and are a candidate plasma facing component (PFC) for reactors, but it remains necessary to characterize the gross Li erosion rate under high plasma fluxes (>1023 m-2 s-1), typical for the divertor region. In this work, a realistic model for the compositional evolution of a Li/D layer is developed that incorporates first principles molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of D diffusion in liquid Li. Predictions of Li erosion from a mixed Li/D material are also developed that include formation of lithium deuteride (LiD). The erosion rate of Li from LiD is predicted to be significantly lower than from pure Li. This prediction is tested in the Magnum-PSI linear plasma device at ion fluxes of 1023-1024 m-2 s-1 and Li surface temperatures. ≤800 °C. Li/LiD coatings ranging in thickness from 0.2 to 500 μm are studied. The dynamic D/Li concentrations are inferred via diffusion simulations. The pure Li erosion rate remains greater than Langmuir Law evaporation, as expected. For mixed-material Li/LiD surfaces, the erosion rates are reduced, in good agreement with modelling in almost all cases. Lastly, these results imply that the temperature limit for a Li-coated PFC may be significantly higher than previously imagined.

  18. Report of the Committee on Antitrust

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1987-01-01

    The report covers antitrust cases involving fourteen natural gas and four oil companies and two electric utilities. There is a brief summary describing each suit and the court decision if one has been reached. Among the issues were whether a gas company can wholly own a pipeline subsidiary, pipeline power to refuse transport, mergers and acquisitions by stockholders, termination of service, oil futures, alleged price-fixing, and wholesale electric contracts.

  19. Simulation of gross and net erosion of high-Z materials in the DIII-D divertor

    SciTech Connect

    Wampler, William R.; Ding, R.; Stangeby, P. C.; Elder, J. D.; Tskhakaya, D.; Kirschner, A.; Guo, H. Y.; Chan, V. S.; McLean, A. G.; Snyder, P. B.; Rudakov, D. L.

    2015-12-17

    The three-dimensional Monte Carlo code ERO has been used to simulate dedicated DIII-D experiments in which Mo and W samples with different sizes were exposed to controlled and well-diagnosed divertor plasma conditions to measure the gross and net erosion rates. Experimentally, the net erosion rate is significantly reduced due to the high local redeposition probability of eroded high-Z materials, which according to the modelling is mainly controlled by the electric field and plasma density within the Chodura sheath. Similar redeposition ratios were obtained from ERO modelling with three different sheath models for small angles between the magnetic field and the material surface, mainly because of their similar mean ionization lengths. The modelled redeposition ratios are close to the measured value. Decreasing the potential drop across the sheath can suppress both gross and net erosion because sputtering yield is decreased due to lower incident energy while the redeposition ratio is not reduced owing to the higher electron density in the Chodura sheath. Taking into account material mixing in the ERO surface model, the net erosion rate of high-Z materials is shown to be strongly dependent on the carbon impurity concentration in the background plasma; higher carbon concentration can suppress net erosion. As a result, the principal experimental results such as net erosion rate and profile and redeposition ratio are well reproduced by the ERO simulations.

  20. Simulation of gross and net erosion of high-Z materials in the DIII-D divertor

    DOE PAGES [OSTI]

    Wampler, William R.; Ding, R.; Stangeby, P. C.; Elder, J. D.; Tskhakaya, D.; Kirschner, A.; Guo, H. Y.; Chan, V. S.; McLean, A. G.; Snyder, P. B.; et al

    2015-12-17

    The three-dimensional Monte Carlo code ERO has been used to simulate dedicated DIII-D experiments in which Mo and W samples with different sizes were exposed to controlled and well-diagnosed divertor plasma conditions to measure the gross and net erosion rates. Experimentally, the net erosion rate is significantly reduced due to the high local redeposition probability of eroded high-Z materials, which according to the modelling is mainly controlled by the electric field and plasma density within the Chodura sheath. Similar redeposition ratios were obtained from ERO modelling with three different sheath models for small angles between the magnetic field and themore » material surface, mainly because of their similar mean ionization lengths. The modelled redeposition ratios are close to the measured value. Decreasing the potential drop across the sheath can suppress both gross and net erosion because sputtering yield is decreased due to lower incident energy while the redeposition ratio is not reduced owing to the higher electron density in the Chodura sheath. Taking into account material mixing in the ERO surface model, the net erosion rate of high-Z materials is shown to be strongly dependent on the carbon impurity concentration in the background plasma; higher carbon concentration can suppress net erosion. As a result, the principal experimental results such as net erosion rate and profile and redeposition ratio are well reproduced by the ERO simulations.« less

  1. REPORT FOR COMMERCIAL GRADE NICKEL CHARACTERIZATION AND BENCHMARKING

    SciTech Connect

    2012-12-20

    Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU), under the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) contract, has completed the collection, sample analysis, and review of analytical results to benchmark the concentrations of gross alpha-emitting radionuclides, gross beta-emitting radionuclides, and technetium-99 in commercial grade nickel. This report presents methods, change management, observations, and statistical analysis of materials procured from sellers representing nine countries on four continents. The data suggest there is a low probability of detecting alpha- and beta-emitting radionuclides in commercial nickel. Technetium-99 was not detected in any samples, thus suggesting it is not present in commercial nickel.

  2. Microsoft Word - RLS0053 DE-EE0002795 Final Report.doc

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    DOE Award No.: DE-EE0002795 Final Report Submitted by: CSI Technologies, LLC 2202 Oil Center Court Houston, TX 77073 Prepared for: United States Department of Energy Geothermal Technologies Program December 21, 2011 2 Project Final Report January 2010 through December 2011 Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the Department of Energy - Geothermal Technologies Program. Neither the Department of Energy - Geothermal Technologies Program, nor any agency thereof,

  3. REPORT ON THE ELIMINATION OF EXCESS FACILITIES

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    FY 2013 Report on DOE's Disposition of Excess Real Property Status of Banked Square Feet for Future One-for-One Offsets Office of Acquisition and Project Management March 2014 2 FY 2002 to FY 2012 Dispositions (square feet) FY 2013 Dispositions (square feet) FY 2013 Gross Banked Dispositions (square feet) FY 2002 to FY 2012 Additions Subject to Offset (square feet) FY 2013 Additions subject to Offset (square feet) Total Additions Subject to Offset (square feet) FY 2013 Net Banked Area (square

  4. Other States Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet per Day)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    (Million Cubic Feet) Otay Mesa, CA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports (Million Cubic Feet) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013 3 5 2014 6 7 7 8 7 7 9 8 9 8 9 6 2015 8 7 8 8 8 9 9 7 7 7 5 5 2016 6 8 7 6 7 6 5 5 - = No Data Reported; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 10/31/2016 Next Release Date: 11/30/2016 Referring Pages: U.S. Cubic Feet)

    Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5

  5. Sensitivity of Global Terrestrial Gross Primary Production to Hydrologic States Simulated by the Community Land Model Using Two Runoff Parameterizations

    SciTech Connect

    Lei, Huimin; Huang, Maoyi; Leung, Lai-Yung R.; Yang, Dawen; Shi, Xiaoying; Mao, Jiafu; Hayes, Daniel J.; Schwalm, C.; Wei, Yaxing; Liu, Shishi

    2014-09-01

    The terrestrial water and carbon cycles interact strongly at various spatio-temporal scales. To elucidate how hydrologic processes may influence carbon cycle processes, differences in terrestrial carbon cycle simulations induced by structural differences in two runoff generation schemes were investigated using the Community Land Model 4 (CLM4). Simulations were performed with runoff generation using the default TOPMODEL-based and the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model approaches under the same experimental protocol. The comparisons showed that differences in the simulated gross primary production (GPP) are mainly attributed to differences in the simulated leaf area index (LAI) rather than soil moisture availability. More specifically, differences in runoff simulations can influence LAI through changes in soil moisture, soil temperature, and their seasonality that affect the onset of the growing season and the subsequent dynamic feedbacks between terrestrial water, energy, and carbon cycles. As a result of a relative difference of 36% in global mean total runoff between the two models and subsequent changes in soil moisture, soil temperature, and LAI, the simulated global mean GPP differs by 20.4%. However, the relative difference in the global mean net ecosystem exchange between the two models is small (2.1%) due to competing effects on total mean ecosystem respiration and other fluxes, although large regional differences can still be found. Our study highlights the significant interactions among the water, energy, and carbon cycles and the need for reducing uncertainty in the hydrologic parameterization of land surface models to better constrain carbon cycle modeling.

  6. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 View History U.S. 2,823,398 2,682,021 2,778,526 2,634,991 2,705,744 2,739,059 1973-2016 Alaska 295,244 246,120 269,204 233,820 239,444 250,325 1991-2016 Arkansas 74,543 70,831 71,791 67,340 68,207 67,140 1991-2016 California 18,166 17,618 18,074 17,229 17,573 17,822 1991-2016 Colorado 143,636 139,949 144,657 136,813 143,188 145,323 1991-2016 Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico 111,315 101,883 110,027 96,330 100,027 105,189 1997-2016 Kansas 22,110 21,173

  7. Sofia Mancheno-Gross

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sofia specializes in Communications strategies on behalf of the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

  8. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 View History U.S. 26,816,085 28,479,026 29,542,313 29,522,551 31,405,381 32,894,727 1936-2015 U.S. Offshore 2,875,945 2,416,644 2,044,643 1,859,469 1,804,544 1,820,202 1977-2015 U.S. State Offshore 575,601 549,151 489,505 505,318 514,291 502,425 1978-2015 Federal Offshore U.S. 2,300,344 1,867,492 1,555,138 1,354,151 1,290,253 1,317,777 1977-2015 Alaska 3,197,100 3,162,922 3,164,791 3,215,358 3,168,545 3,175,301 1967-2015 Alaska Onshore 2,826,952 2,798,220 2,857,485

  9. grossWCI.dvi

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Nuclear multifragmentation, Its relation to general physics A rich test-ground of the ... Taking this serious, fascinating perspectives open for statistical nuclear fragmentation ...

  10. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 View History U.S. 26,816,085 28,479,026 29,542,313 ... Alabama State Offshore 101,487 84,270 87,398 75,660 70,827 1987-2014 Arizona 183 168 117 ...

  11. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 View History U.S. 2,750,252 2,817,792 2,743,783 2,823,547 2,823,205 2,668,567 1973-2016 Alaska 261,150 279,434 289,770 304,048 298,809 ...

  12. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    through 1996) in Alabama (Million Cubic Feet) Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1960's 30,401 34,749 37,275 1970's 36,254 36,657 37,389 33,126 35,349 33,439 34,450 34,303 29,649 36,717 1980's 28,525 26,860 25,876 26,665 27,567 25,836 25,128 22,384 25,562 26,469 1990's 24,287 23,711 25,232 25,723 25,526 26,228 29,000 32,360 25,705 27,581 2000's 25,580 26,391 25,011 25,356 26,456 25,046 24,396 23,420 25,217 24,293 2010's 27,071 25,144 21,551 25,324

  13. Fixed conditions for achieving the real-valued partition function of one-dimensional Gross-Pitaevskii equation coupled with time-dependent potential

    SciTech Connect

    Prayitno, T. B.

    2014-03-24

    We have imposed the conditions in order to preserve the real-valued partition function in the case of onedimensional Gross-Pitaevskii equation coupled by time-dependent potential. In this case we have solved the Gross-Pitaevskii equation by means of the time-dependent perturbation theory by extending the previous work of Kivshar et al. [Phys. Lett A 278, 225–230 (2001)]. To use the method, we have treated the equation as the macroscopic quantum oscillator and found that the expression of the partition function explicitly has complex values. In fact, we have to choose not only the appropriate functions but also the suitable several values of the potential to keep the real-valued partition function.

  14. Heber Geothermal Binary Demonstration Project. Quarterly technical progress report, September 15, 1980-March 31, 1981

    SciTech Connect

    Hanenburg, W.H.; Lacy, R.G.; Van De Mark, G.D.

    1981-06-01

    Work completed on the nominal 65 Megawatt (Mwe gross) Heber Geothermal Binary Demonstration Project, located at Heber, California, during the period of September 15, 1980, through March 31, 1981 is documented. Topics covered in this quarterly report include progress made in the areas of Wells and Fluids Production and Injection Systems, Power Plant Design and Construction, Power Plant Demonstration, and Data Acquisition and Dissemination.

  15. Decision document for the sanitary sewer system interim response action at Rocky Mountain Arsenal. Final report

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1989-03-01

    The Interim Response Action (IRA) for the Sanitary Sewer System at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal (RMA) is being conducted as part of the IRA process for RMA in accordance with the June 5, 1987 report to the court in United States v. Shell Oil Co. and the proposed modified Consent Decree. This IRA project will consist of 'remediation of certain priority portions of the sanitary sewer to minimize the potential pathway of contaminant flow' (para 9.1(j), Consent Decree, 1988).

  16. Report of the Review of the Hanford Solid Waste Environmental Impact

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Statement regarding Data Quality Control and Management Issues | Department of Energy of the Review of the Hanford Solid Waste Environmental Impact Statement regarding Data Quality Control and Management Issues Report of the Review of the Hanford Solid Waste Environmental Impact Statement regarding Data Quality Control and Management Issues As part of the litigation involving receipt of offsite waste and the HSW EIS, the Court allowed the State of Washington a limited amount of discovery

  17. Model Documentation Report: Macroeconomic Activity Module (MAM...

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross State Product The MAM projects regional gross regional product in real per capita terms. The equations are in log form. There is an estimated equation for each of the nine...

  18. A Continuous Measure of Gross Primary Production for the Conterminous U.S. Derived from MODIS and AmeriFlux Data

    SciTech Connect

    Xia, Jingfeng; Zhuang, Qianlai; Law, Beverly E.; Chen, Jiquan; Baldocchi, Dennis D.; Cook, David R.; Oren, Ram; Richardson, Andrew D.; Wharton, Sonia; Ma, Siyan; Martin, Timothy A.; Verma, Shashi B.; Suyker, Andrew E.; Scott, Russell L.; Monson, Russell K.; Litvak, Marcy; Hollinger, David Y.; Sun, Ge; Davis, Kenneth J.; Bolstad, Paul V.; Burns, Sean P.; Curtis, Peter S.; Drake, Bert G.; Falk, Matthias; Fischer, Marc L.; Foster, David R.; Gu, Lianhong; Hadley, Julian L.; Katul, Gabriel G.; Matamala, Roser; McNulty, Steve; Meyers, Tilden P.; Munger, J. William; Noormets, Asko; Oechel, Walter C.; U, Kyaw Tha Paw; Schmid, Hans Peter; Starr, Gregory; Torn, Margaret S.; Wofsy, Steven C.

    2009-01-28

    The quantification of carbon fluxes between the terrestrial biosphere and the atmosphere is of scientific importance and also relevant to climate-policy making. Eddy covariance flux towers provide continuous measurements of ecosystem-level exchange of carbon dioxide spanning diurnal, synoptic, seasonal, and interannual time scales. However, these measurements only represent the fluxes at the scale of the tower footprint. Here we used remotely-sensed data from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) to upscale gross primary productivity (GPP) data from eddy covariance flux towers to the continental scale. We first combined GPP and MODIS data for 42 AmeriFlux towers encompassing a wide range of ecosystem and climate types to develop a predictive GPP model using a regression tree approach. The predictive model was trained using observed GPP over the period 2000-2004, and was validated using observed GPP over the period 2005-2006 and leave-one-out cross-validation. Our model predicted GPP fairly well at the site level. We then used the model to estimate GPP for each 1 km x 1 km cell across the U.S. for each 8-day interval over the period from February 2000 to December 2006 using MODIS data. Our GPP estimates provide a spatially and temporally continuous measure of gross primary production for the U.S. that is a highly constrained by eddy covariance flux data. Our study demonstrated that our empirical approach is effective for upscaling eddy flux GPP data to the continental scale and producing continuous GPP estimates across multiple biomes. With these estimates, we then examined the patterns, magnitude, and interannual variability of GPP. We estimated a gross carbon uptake between 6.91 and 7.33 Pg C yr{sup -1} for the conterminous U.S. Drought, fires, and hurricanes reduced annual GPP at regional scales and could have a significant impact on the U.S. net ecosystem carbon exchange. The sources of the interannual variability of U.S. GPP were dominated

  19. Trash, ash and the phoenix : a fifth anniversary review of the Supreme Court's City of Chicago waste-to-energy combustion ash decision.

    SciTech Connect

    Puder, M. G.; Environmental Assessment

    1999-01-01

    In 1994, the U.S. Supreme Court held that ash generated by waste-to-energy (WTE) facilities was not exempt from Subtitle C hazardous waste management regulations under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). As a result of City of Chicago v. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc., WTE installations are required to test their combustion ash and determine whether it is hazardous. The WTE industry and the municipalities utilizing WTE technologies initially feared that if significant amounts of their ash tested hazardous, the costs and liabilities associated with RCRA Subtitle C hazardous waste management requirements would pose a serious threat to the continued viability of the WTE concept. In this article, the author presents a review of the WTE industry in the five years following the decision, and finds that the specter of the decline of WTE has not materialized.

  20. Impact of sensitivity and throughput on optimum selection of a low-background alpha/beta gross counting system

    SciTech Connect

    Seymour, R.; Sergent, F.; Knight, K.; Kyker, B.

    1992-12-31

    Selection of the appropriate low-background counting system is determined by the laboratory`s measurement requirements including the radionuclide activities being measured, required sensitivity, sample volume, sample throughput, operator skill, automation, reporting requirements, budget, reliability, service, and upgrade capability. These requirements are ranked differently by each user. Nevertheless, any selection requires that the sensitivity and sample throughput be evaluated first because these parameters are instrument-specific, cannot be changed after the equipment is purchased and are easily quantified beforehand. Many of the other criteria are also related to sensitivity and affect the choice of instrument. Mathematical expressions, useful in evaluating sensitivity and throughput, are reviewed, extended, and applied to selecting a low-background alpha/beta counting system.

  1. Final report from VFL Technologies for the pilot-scale thermal treatment of Lower East Fork Poplar Creek floodplain soils. LEFPC Appendices, Volume 3, Appendix V-B

    SciTech Connect

    1994-09-01

    This report consists of appendix V-B which contains the final verification run data package. Validation of analytical data is presented for Ecotek LSI. Analytical results are included of both soil and creek bed samples for the following contaminants: metals; metals (TCLP); uranium; gross alpha/beta; and polychlorinated biphenyls.

  2. H-Area Seepage Basins groundwater monitoring report. First quarter 1992

    SciTech Connect

    Thompson, C.Y.

    1992-06-01

    During first quarter 1992, tritium, nitrate, nonvolatile beta, total alpha-emitting radium (radium-224 and radium-226), gross alpha, antimony, mercury, lead, tetrachloroethylene, arsenic, and cadmium exceeded the US Environmental Protection Agency Primary Drinking Water Standards (PDWS) in groundwater samples from monitoring wells at the H-Area Seepage Basins (HASB) at the Savannah River Site. This report presents and discusses the groundwater monitoring results in the H-Area for first quarter 1992.

  3. Total Gross Tumor Volume Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Patients Treated With Selective Nodal Irradiation for Stage I to III Small Cell Lung Cancer

    SciTech Connect

    Reymen, Bart; Van Loon, Judith; Baardwijk, Angela van; Wanders, Rinus; Borger, Jacques; Dingemans, Anne-Marie C.; Bootsma, Gerben; Pitz, Cordula; Lunde, Ragnar; Geraedts, Wiel; Lambin, Philippe; De Ruysscher, Dirk; University Hospital Leuven/ KU Leuven, Leuven

    2013-04-01

    Purpose: In non-small cell lung cancer, gross tumor volume (GTV) influences survival more than other risk factors. This could also apply to small cell lung cancer. Methods and Materials: Analysis of our prospective database with stage I to III SCLC patients referred for concurrent chemo radiation therapy. Standard treatment was 45 Gy in 1.5-Gy fractions twice daily concurrently with carboplatin-etoposide, followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in case of non-progression. Only fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)-positive or pathologically proven nodal sites were included in the target volume. Total GTV consisted of post chemotherapy tumor volume and pre chemotherapy nodal volume. Survival was calculated from diagnosis (Kaplan-Meier ). Results: A total of 119 patients were included between May 2004 and June 2009. Median total GTV was 93 ± 152 cc (7.5-895 cc). Isolated elective nodal failure occurred in 2 patients (1.7%). Median follow-up was 38 months, median overall survival 20 months (95% confidence interval = 17.8-22.1 months), and 2-year survival 38.4%. In multivariate analysis, only total GTV (P=.026) and performance status (P=.016) significantly influenced survival. Conclusions: In this series of stage I to III small cell lung cancer patients treated with FDG-PET-based selective nodal irradiation total GTV is an independent risk factor for survival.

  4. Annual Reports - SRSCRO

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    reports Annual Reports Annual Report 2015 Annual Report 2014 Annual Report 2013 Annual Report 2012 Annual Report 2011 Annual Report 2010 Annual Report 2009 Annual Report 2008...

  5. Department of the Interior and related agencies appropriation bill, 1984. Report from the Committee on Appropriations, Senate, Ninety-Eighth Congress, First Session, Report No. 98-184

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1983-01-01

    Information relating to changes recommended for the $6.7 billion Department of Interior (DOI) Appropriations Bill, 1984 (HR 3363) by the Senate Committee on Appropriations emphasizes Congressional efforts to limit speeding and committee concerns over some DOI procedures, especially filing declarations of taking that have received excessive court awards. The report details line-item changes in the proposed appropriations, and compares them with budget estimates and House allowances. The commtitee recommends less than the budget estimate and more than the House allowance for the overall Title I and II budgets, but both the House and Senate recommend substantial increases in the proposed land and water conservation fund. (DCK)

  6. Strategic Petroleum Reserve quarterly report

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1991-08-15

    This August 15, 1991, Strategic Petroleum Reserve Quarterly Report describes activities related to the site development, oil acquisition, budget and cost of the Reserve during the period April 1, 1991, through June 30, 1991. The Strategic Petroleum Reserve storage facilities development program is proceeding on schedule. The Reserve's capacity is currently 726 million barrels. A total of 5.5 million barrels of new gross cavern volume was developed at Big Hill and Bayou Choctaw during the quarter. There were no crude oil deliveries to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve during the calendar quarter ending June 30, 1991. Acquisition of crude oil for the Reserve has been suspended since August 2, 1990, following the invasion of Kuwait by Iraq. As of June 30, 1991, the Strategic Petroleum Reserve inventory was 568.5 million barrels. The reorganization of the Office of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve became effective June 28, 1991. Under the new organization, the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Project Management Office in Louisiana will report to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Program Office in Washington rather than the Oak Ridge Field Office in Tennessee. 2 tabs.

  7. Cervical Gross Tumor Volume Dose Predicts Local Control Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Diffusion-Weighted Imaging—Guided High-Dose-Rate and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography—Guided Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

    SciTech Connect

    Dyk, Pawel; Jiang, Naomi; Sun, Baozhou; DeWees, Todd A.; Fowler, Kathryn J.; Narra, Vamsi; Garcia-Ramirez, Jose L.; Schwarz, Julie K.; Grigsby, Perry W.

    2014-11-15

    Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging/diffusion weighted-imaging (MRI/DWI)-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy and {sup 18}F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) — positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the definitive treatment of cervical cancer is a novel treatment technique. The purpose of this study was to report our analysis of dose-volume parameters predicting gross tumor volume (GTV) control. Methods and Materials: We analyzed the records of 134 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IB1-IVB cervical cancer treated with combined MRI-guided HDR and IMRT from July 2009 to July 2011. IMRT was targeted to the metabolic tumor volume and lymph nodes by use of FDG-PET/CT simulation. The GTV for each HDR fraction was delineated by use of T2-weighted or apparent diffusion coefficient maps from diffusion-weighted sequences. The D100, D90, and Dmean delivered to the GTV from HDR and IMRT were summed to EQD2. Results: One hundred twenty-five patients received all irradiation treatment as planned, and 9 did not complete treatment. All 134 patients are included in this analysis. Treatment failure in the cervix occurred in 24 patients (18.0%). Patients with cervix failures had a lower D100, D90, and Dmean than those who did not experience failure in the cervix. The respective doses to the GTV were 41, 58, and 136 Gy for failures compared with 67, 99, and 236 Gy for those who did not experience failure (P<.001). Probit analysis estimated the minimum D100, D90, and Dmean doses required for ≥90% local control to be 69, 98, and 260 Gy (P<.001). Conclusions: Total dose delivered to the GTV from combined MRI-guided HDR and PET/CT-guided IMRT is highly correlated with local tumor control. The findings can be directly applied in the clinic for dose adaptation to maximize local control.

  8. Blue Ribbon Commission, Yucca Mountain Closure, Court Actions - Future of Decommissioned Reactors, Operating Reactors and Nuclear Power - 13249

    SciTech Connect

    Devgun, Jas S.

    2013-07-01

    Issues related to back-end of the nuclear fuel cycle continue to be difficult for the commercial nuclear power industry and for the decision makers at the national and international level. In the US, the 1982 NWPA required DOE to develop geological repositories for SNF and HLW but in spite of extensive site characterization efforts and over ten billion dollars spent, a repository opening is nowhere in sight. There has been constant litigation against the DOE by the nuclear utilities for breach of the 'standard contract' they signed with the DOE under the NWPA. The SNF inventory continues to rise both in the US and globally and the nuclear industry has turned to dry storage facilities at reactor locations. In US, the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future issued its report in January 2012 and among other items, it recommends a new, consent-based approach to siting of facilities, prompt efforts to develop one or more geologic disposal facilities, and prompt efforts to develop one or more consolidated storage facilities. In addition, the March 2011 Fukushima Daiichi accident had a severe impact on the future growth of nuclear power. The nuclear industry is focusing on mitigation strategies for beyond design basis events and in the US, the industry is in the process of implementing the recommendations from NRC's Near Term Task Force. (authors)

  9. Review and analysis of proposed EPA groundwater standards for the UMTRA Project. Summary report

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1987-10-01

    The Title I groundwater standards for inactive uranium mill tailings sites, which were promulgated on January 5, 1983, by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project, were remanded to the EPA on September 3, 1985, by the US Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Court instructed the EPA to compile general groundwater standards for all sites. On September 24, 1987, the EPA published proposed standards in response to the remand. This Summary Report includes an evaluation of the potential effects of the proposed EPA groundwater standards on the UMTRA Project as well as a discussion of the DOE`s position on the proposed standards. This report is accompanied by a detailed Technical Report and Appendices which provide supporting information and analyses. This Summary Report results from a study undertaken to: determine the impact of the proposed standards on the UMTRA Project; and recommend provisions for the implementation of the final standards that will minimize adverse impact to the conduct of the UMTRA Project while ensuring protection of human health and the environment. Specifically, the following were considered: the flexibility of the proposed standards; interpretations of the proposed standards; the extent of aquifer restoration that may be required to implement the proposed standards at each site; the costs of aquifer restoration; and design changes necessary to meet the standards.

  10. Effects of in-situ and reanalysis climate data on estimation of cropland gross primary production using the Vegetation Photosynthesis Model

    SciTech Connect

    Jin, Cui; Xiao, Xiangming; Wagle, Pradeep; Griffis, Timothy; Dong, Jinwei; Wu, Chaoyang; Qin, Yuanwei; Cook, David R.

    2015-11-01

    Satellite-based Production Efficiency Models (PEMs) often require meteorological reanalysis data such as the North America Regional Reanalysis (NARR) by the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) as model inputs to simulate Gross Primary Production (GPP) at regional and global scales. This study first evaluated the accuracies of air temperature (TNARR) and downward shortwave radiation (RNARR) of the NARR by comparing with in-situ meteorological measurements at 37 AmeriFlux non-crop eddy flux sites, then used one PEM – the Vegetation Photosynthesis Model (VPM) to simulate 8-day mean GPP (GPPVPM) at seven AmeriFlux crop sites, and investigated the uncertainties in GPPVPM from climate inputs as compared with eddy covariance-based GPP (GPPEC). Results showed that TNARR agreed well with in-situ measurements; RNARR, however, was positively biased. An empirical linear correction was applied to RNARR, and significantly reduced the relative error of RNARR by ~25% for crop site-years. Overall, GPPVPM calculated from the in-situ (GPPVPM(EC)), original (GPPVPM(NARR)) and adjusted NARR (GPPVPM(adjNARR)) climate data tracked the seasonality of GPPEC well, albeit with different degrees of biases. GPPVPM(EC) showed a good match with GPPEC for maize (Zea mays L.), but was slightly underestimated for soybean (Glycine max L.). Replacing the in-situ climate data with the NARR resulted in a significant overestimation of GPPVPM(NARR) (18.4/29.6% for irrigated/rainfed maize and 12.7/12.5% for irrigated/rainfed soybean). GPPVPM(adjNARR) showed a good agreement with GPPVPM(EC) for both crops due to the reduction in the bias of RNARR. The results imply that the bias of RNARR introduced significant uncertainties into the PEM-based GPP estimates, suggesting that more accurate surface radiation datasets are needed to estimate primary production of terrestrial ecosystems at regional and global scales.

  11. The Impact of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Edge Delineation of Gross Tumor Volume for Head and Neck Cancers

    SciTech Connect

    Ashamalla, Hani . E-mail: hashamalla@aol.com; Guirgius, Adel; Bieniek, Ewa; Rafla, Sameer; Evola, Alex; Goswami, Ganesh; Oldroyd, Randall; Mokhtar, Bahaa; Parikh, Kapila

    2007-06-01

    Purpose: To study anatomic biologic contouring (ABC), using a previously described distinct halo, to unify volume contouring methods in treatment planning for head and neck cancers. Methods and Materials: Twenty-five patients with head and neck cancer at various sites were planned for radiation therapy using positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). The ABC halo was used in all PET/CT scans to contour the gross tumor volume (GTV) edge. The CT-based GTV (GTV-CT) and PET/CT-based GTV (GTV-ABC) were contoured by two independent radiation oncologists. Results: The ABC halo was observed in all patients studied. The halo had a standard unit value of 2.19 {+-} 0.28. The mean halo thickness was 2.02 {+-} 0.21 mm. Significant volume modification ({>=}25%) was seen in 17 of 25 patients (68%) after implementation of GTV-ABC. Concordance among observers was increased with the use of the halo as a guide for GTV determination: 6 patients (24%) had a {<=}10% volume discrepancy with CT alone, compared with 22 (88%) with PET/CT (p < 0.001). Interobserver variability decreased from a mean GTV difference of 20.3 cm{sup 3} in CT-based planning to 7.2 cm{sup 3} in PET/CT-based planning (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Using the 'anatomic biologic halo' to contour GTV in PET/CT improves consistency among observers. The distinctive appearance of the described halo and its presence in all of the studied tumors make it attractive for GTV contouring in head and neck tumors. Additional studies are needed to confirm the correlation of the halo with presence of malignant cells.

  12. Find Reports

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Classified reports - contact the SI-RMS Technical Report Collection for an appointment: ... Office 94 Cities of Gold Road Santa Fe, NM 87506 Where can I find Classified Reports? ...

  13. US Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office annual site environmental report: 1993. Volume 2: Appendices

    SciTech Connect

    Black, S.C.; Glines, W.M.; Townsend, Y.E.

    1994-09-01

    This report is comprised of appendices which support monitoring and surveillance on and around the Nevada Test Site (NTS) during 1993. Appendix A contains onsite Pu-238, gross beta, and gamma-emitting radionuclides in air. Appendix B contains onsite tritium in air. Appendix C contains onsite Pu-238, Sr-90, gross alpha and beta, gamma-emitting radionuclides, Ra-226, Ra-228 and tritium in water. A summary of 1993 results of offsite radiological monitoring is included in Appendix D. Appendix E contains radioactive noble gases in air onsite. Appendix F contains onsite thermoluminescent dosimeter data. Historical trends in onsite thermoluminescent dosimeter data are contained in Appendix G. Appendix H summarizes 1993 compliance at the DOE/NV NTS and non-NTS facilities. Appendix I summarizes the 1993 results of non radiological monitoring.

  14. Monthly Reports

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Environmental Management Monthly Reports - FY 2015 The Department of Energy Nevada Field Office Environmental Management Program creates monthly reports for the NSSAB. These ...

  15. Reporting Requirements

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Reporting Requirements Reporting Requirements Contacts Director Albert Migliori Deputy Franz Freibert 505 667-6879 Email Professional Staff Assistant Susan Ramsay 505 665 0858...

  16. Monthly Reports

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Environmental Management Monthly Reports - FY 2014 The Department of Energy Nevada Field Office Environmental Management Program creates monthly reports for the NSSAB. These...

  17. Monthly Reports

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Environmental Management Monthly Reports - FY 2015 The Department of Energy Nevada Field Office Environmental Management Program creates monthly reports for the NSSAB. These...

  18. Monthly Reports

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Environmental Management Monthly Reports - FY 2013 The Department of Energy Nevada Field Office Environmental Management Program creates monthly reports for the NSSAB. These...

  19. Monthly Reports

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Environmental Management Monthly Reports - FY 2012 The Department of Energy Nevada Field Office Environmental Management Program creates monthly reports for the NSSAB. These...

  20. SANDIA REPORT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    ... 32 Figure 16. DowntimesSuspension Times SQL Query ......including installation details, customer contact information, and incident report history. ...

  1. Report A-94 T" PRODUCTION OF DgO FOR USE IN THE FISSION OP URANIUM

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    v_^ ' / * Report A-94 T" PRODUCTION OF DgO FOR USE IN THE FISSION OP URANIUM Report by Herold G. Urey, Arlstld V. Grosse, and George Walden, June 23, 1941 LEGAL N O T I C E This report was prepared as an account of Government sponsored work. Neither the United States, nor the Commission, nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission: A . Makes any warranty or representation, express or implied, with respect to the a c - curacy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in

  2. SPECIAL REPORT

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Allegations Related to the Energy Information Administration's Reporting Process DOE/IG-0940 June 2015 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 June 10, 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Special Report: "Allegations Related to the Energy Information Administration's Reporting Process" BACKGROUND The Energy Information Administration

  3. ASSESSMENT REPORT

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Assessment Report on "Audit Coverage of Cost Allowability for Babcock & Wilcox Technical Services Pantex LLC During Fiscal Year 2013 ...

  4. FINAL REPORT

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    FINAL REPORT Analytical and Elemental Analysis of Air and Soil Samples Facility and Public ... Information 4 Background 5 Stormwater Pollution 5 Erosion and Sediment Control Workshop ...

  5. AUDIT REPORT

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on the "Management and Oversight of ... Shortly after the audit began, Richland Operations Office officials stated that they had ...

  6. SPECIAL REPORT

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    Washington, DC 20585 September 3, 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Special Report: "The Department of Energy's...

  7. AUDIT REPORT

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    Activities at Y-12 include retrieving and storing nuclear materials, helping fuel the Nation's ... In June 2004, the Office of Inspector General's report on Management of the ...

  8. Report: Communications

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Board (EMAB) issued a report to the Assistant Secretary ... appraisals beginning in FY 2008. EMAB applauds the ... performance; however, the Board stresses that such an ...

  9. Special Report

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Special Report 1501 MACY DRIVE ROSWELL, GA 30076 PH +1 770 642-7745 FX +1 770 643-2954 Impact of DOE Inventory Sales on the Nuclear Fuel Markets January | 2015 A PUBLICATION OF UXC.COM PREPARED FOR Cameco Corporation - NOTICE - The Ux Consulting Company, LLC ("UxC") shall have title to, ownership of, and all proprietary rights in this Report. Under United States federal copyright law (17 USC 101 et seq.) it is illegal to reproduce this Report by any means without written permission

  10. AUDIT REPORT

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Enriched Uranium Operations at the Y-12 National Security Complex DOE-OIG-16-13 July 2016 ... INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Enriched Uranium Operations at the Y-12 National Security ...

  11. Final Report

    SciTech Connect

    Biros, George

    2014-08-18

    This the final report for the project "Large-Scale Optimization for Bayesian Inference in Complex Systems," for the work in the group of the co-PI George Biros.

  12. Final Report

    SciTech Connect

    DeTar, Carleton

    2012-12-10

    This document constitutes the Final Report for award DE-FC02-06ER41446 as required by the Office of Science. It summarizes accomplishments and provides copies of scientific publications with significant contribution from this award.

  13. AUDIT REPORT

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Treatment of Salt Waste at the Savannah River Site OAS-L-15-09 August 2015 U.S. Department ... Audit Report: "Treatment of Salt Waste at the Savannah River Site" BACKGROUND The ...

  14. Workshop Reports

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    we do not know why. Complete Executive Summary (pdf) Read entire Final Report (pdf) LA-UR 10-02959 Research Needs for Material Mixing at Extremes (pdf) Image of the Cover of...

  15. SAND REPORT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    SAND REPORT SAND2001 -2950 Unlimited Release Printed September 2001 Useful Equations fol Induced Voltage I n s L en ^trucC- ~ dissemination unlimited. mg.,jandia National laboratories i / . Issued by Sandia National Laboratories, operated for the United States Department of Energy by Sandia Corporation. NOTICE: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government, nor any agency thereof, nor any of their

  16. SANDIA REPORT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    SANDIA REPORT SAND 2011-3958 Unlimited Release Printed June 2011 Site Environmental Report for 2010 Sandia National Laboratories, California B.L. Larsen Prepared by Sandia National Laboratories Livermore, California 94550 Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under Contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.

  17. Reporting Requirements

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Reporting Requirements Reporting Requirements Contacts Director Albert Migliori Deputy Franz Freibert 505 667-6879 Email Professional Staff Assistant Susan Ramsay 505 665 0858 Email The Fellow will be required to participate in the Actinide Science lecture series by both attending lectures and presenting a scientific lecture on actinide science in this series. Submission of a viewgraph and brief write-up of the project. Provide metrics information as requested. Submission of an overview article

  18. SPECIAL REPORT

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    SPECIAL REPORT Enforcement Activities Conducted by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission DOE/IG-0947 September 2015 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 29, 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Special Report: "Enforcement Activities Conducted by the Federal Energy Regulatory

  19. SUMMARY REPORT

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    SUMMARY REPORT Department of Energy's Implementation of Selected Controls as Defined in the Cybersecurity Act of 2015 DOE-OIG-16-14 August 2016 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 August 4, 2016 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Rickey R. Hass Acting Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Summary Report on the "Department of Energy's Implementation of Selected Controls as Defined in the

  20. Audit Report: OAS-L-11-02 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    1-02 Audit Report: OAS-L-11-02 February 9, 2011 The Department of Energy's Energy Conservation Efforts The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) requires Federal agencies to apply energy efficiency measures to Federal buildings so that by Fiscal Year (FY) 2015, each agency's energy intensity is reduced by 30 percent from the baseline established in FY 2003. Energy intensity is calculated as the energy consumption in British Thermal Units (BTUs) per gross square foot of the Federal

  1. Annual Report

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    09 THROUGH 09/30/2010 The following Annual Freedom of Information Act report covers the Period 10/01/2009, through 09/30/2010, as required by 5 U.S.C. 552. I. BASIC INFORMATION REGARDING REPORT 1. Kevin T. Hagerty, Director Office of Information Resources, MA-90 U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 202-586-5955 Alexander Morris, FOIA Officer Sheila Jeter, FOIA/Privacy Act Specialist FOIA Office, MA-90 Office of Information Resources U.S. Department of Energy

  2. SANDIA REPORT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    .VUQ.SAUQ.P6.02; Apply VUQ Practices With Dakota to COBRA-TF for AMA-Relevant Problems Vincent Mousseau Brian Adams Kostadin Ivanov Maria Avramova Robert Salko Taylor Blyth Sandia National Laboratories April 2013: CASL-U-2013-0048-000 SANDIA REPORT SAND2013-3093 Unlimited Release Printed April 2013 CASL L3 Milestone Report: L3:VUQ.SAUQ.P6.02; Apply VUQ Practices with Dakota to COBRA-TF for AMA-Relevant Problems Vincent Mousseau Brian Adams Kostadin Ivanov Maria Avramova Robert Salko Taylor Blyth

  3. Lidar Report

    SciTech Connect

    Wollpert.

    2009-04-01

    This report provides an overview of the LiDAR acquisition methodology employed by Woolpert on the 2009 USDA - Savannah River LiDAR Site Project. LiDAR system parameters and flight and equipment information is also included. The LiDAR data acquisition was executed in ten sessions from February 21 through final reflights on March 2, 2009; using two Leica ALS50-II 150kHz Multi-pulse enabled LiDAR Systems. Specific details about the ALS50-II systems are included in Section 4 of this report.

  4. Usage Reports

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Reports Usage Reports Batch Job Statistics See queue wait times, hours used, top users and other summary statistics for jobs run at NERSC (login required). Read More » Parallel Job Statistics [rest... Read More » Edison Job Size Charts Fraction of Hours Used per Job Size Note: Interactive charts with current and past Cori and Edison data are now available on MyNERSC This chart shows the fraction of hours used on Edison in each of 5 job-core-size bins. 2015 2014 Fraction of Hours Used by Big

  5. Activity report

    SciTech Connect

    Yu, S W

    2008-08-11

    This report is aimed to show the author's activities to support the LDRD. The title is 'Investigation of the Double-C Behavior in the Pu-Ga Time-Temperature-Transformation Diagram' The sections are: (1) Sample Holder Test; (2) Calculation of x-ray diffraction patterns; (3) Literature search and preparing publications; (4) Tasks Required for APS Experiments; and (5) Communications.

  6. Occurrence Reporting

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    1995-09-25

    To establish and maintain a system for reporting operations information related to DOE-owned or -operated facilities and processing that information to identify the root causes of Unusual, Off-Normal, and Emergency Occurrences and provide for appropriate corrective action. Cancels DOE 5000.3B.

  7. WORKSHOP REPORT:Light-Duty Vehicles Technical Requirements and...

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    ... Gross vehicle weight rating ICE Internal combustion engine MMC Metal matrix composites NVH ... the engine, transmission, turbocharger, differential, drive shafts, fuel ...

  8. DOE Releases Climate VISION Progress Report 2007 | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    as emissions per unit of gross domestic ... Each Climate VISION partner has made a commitment to improve ... sectors: oil and gas; electricity generation; coal and ...

  9. RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT AND ONSITE AREA MONITORING REPORT FOR THE

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    ... Tritium in Air Sampling Stations 28 NTS Environmental Surveillance Noble Gas Sampling Stations 5. 31 6. NTS Environmental Surveillance Supply Well Sampling Stations Gross ...

  10. Special Report

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Special Report 193 Chemical Weekly June 16, 2015 T he Japanese rightly called them the seeds of technology'; while in US it is the techno- logy metals'. Unknown to most lay persons, these elements make possible the high-tech world we take for granted today - from electronics, medical technologies and novel green' energy solutions, to supporting a myriad of essential telecommunications and de- fence systems. These elements have come to be recognised as the vital cog in the world of technology

  11. INSPECTION REPORT

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Worker Safety and Health at the Y-12 National Security Complex OAI-L-16-06 December 2015 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 22, 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINSTRATION PRODUCTION OFFICE FROM: April G. Stephenson Assistant Inspector General for Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Inspection Report on "Worker Safety and Health at the

  12. ASSESSMENT REPORT

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    REPORT Audit Coverage of Cost Allowability for Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, During Fiscal Year 2013 Under Department of Energy Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344 OAI-V-16-01 October 2015 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 October 27, 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, LIVERMORE FIELD OFFICE FROM: David Sedillo, Director Western Audits Division Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION:

  13. ASSESSMENT REPORT

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    National Security Technologies LLC During Fiscal Years 2012 Through 2014 Under Department of Energy Contract No. DE-AC52-06NA25946 OAI-V-16-07 April 2016 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 April 12, 2016 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, NEVADA FIELD OFFICE FROM: David Sedillo Deputy Assistant Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Assessment Report on

  14. SANDIA REPORT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    09 Unlimited Release SAND2010-7245P Printed October 2010 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report Prepared by Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Approved for public release; further dissemination unlimited Issued

  15. Report Template

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    (03-94) Replaces EIA-459B U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FEDERAL ASSISTANCE MILESTONE PLAN OMB Control No. 1910-0400 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,

  16. SANDIA REPORT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    3-3735 Unlimited Release Printed June 2013 Site Environmental Report for 2012 Sandia National Laboratories, California Barbara L. Larsen Prepared by Sandia National Laboratories Livermore, California 94550 Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Approved for public

  17. SANDIA REPORT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    5-4277 Unlimited Release Printed June 2015 Site Environmental Report for 2014 Sandia National Laboratories, California Barbara L. Larsen Prepared by Sandia National Laboratories Livermore, California 94550 Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Approved for public

  18. SANDIA REPORT

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    5630 Unlimited Release Printed June 2016 Site Environmental Report for 2015 Sandia National Laboratories, California Barbara L. Larsen Prepared by Sandia National Laboratories Livermore, California 94550 Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Approved for public

  19. Final Report

    SciTech Connect

    Marchant, Gary E.

    2013-04-23

    This is the final report of a two year project entitled "Governing Nanotechnology Risks and Benefits in the Transition to Regulation: Innovative Public and Private Approaches." This project examined the role of new governance or "soft law" mechanisms such as codes of conduct, voluntary programs and partnership agreements to manage the risks of emerging technologies such as nanotechnology. A series of published or in publication papers and book chapters are attached.

  20. AUDIT REPORT

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    5 Consolidated Financial Statements OAI-FS-16-01 November 2015 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 16, 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Rickey R. Hass Acting Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report: "Department of Energy's Fiscal Year 2015 Consolidated Financial Statements" Pursuant to requirements established by the Government Management Reform Act of 1994, the

  1. AUDIT REPORT

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    5 Financial Statement Audit OAI-FS-16-09 May 2016 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 May 6, 2016 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ADMINISTRATOR, WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION FROM: Ricky R. Hass Acting Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report for the "Management Letter on the Western Federal Power System's Fiscal Year 2015 Financial Statement Audit" KPMG LLP (KPMG), our contract auditors,

  2. CRD Report

    SciTech Connect

    Wang, Ucilia

    2007-12-18

    This report has the following articles: (1) Deconstructing Microbes--metagenomic research on bugs in termites relies on new data analysis tools; (2) Popular Science--a nanomaterial research paper in Nano Letters drew strong interest from the scientific community; (3) Direct Approach--researchers employ an algorithm to solve an energy-reduction issue essential in describing complex physical system; and (4) SciDAC Special--A science journal features research on petascale enabling technologies.

  3. AUDIT REPORT

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Management of Information Technology Hardware DOE/IG-0926 October 2014 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 October 30, 2014 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Follow-up on the Department of Energy's Management of Information Technology Hardware" BACKGROUND The Department of Energy and its facility contractors rely on

  4. AUDIT REPORT

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Status of Cleanup at the Department of Energy's Paducah Site DOE/IG-0937 June 2015 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 June 2, 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report: "The Status of Cleanup at the Department of Energy's Paducah Site" BACKGROUND The Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant is located on the Department of Energy's

  5. AUDIT REPORT

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Lithium Operations at the Y-12 National Security Complex OAI-L-16-05 December 2015 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 15, 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR THE ASSISTANT DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR OF STOCKPILE MANAGEMENT FROM: April G. Stephenson Assistant Inspector General for Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Lithium Operations at the Y-12 National Security

  6. AUDIT REPORT

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Issues Management at the Los Alamos Field Office OAI-M-16-02 December 2015 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 December 7, 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, LOS ALAMOS FIELD OFFICE FROM: Daniel M. Weeber Assistant Inspector General for Audits and Administration Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Issues Management at the Los Alamos Field Office" BACKGROUND The

  7. AUDIT REPORT

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Office of Headquarters Procurement Services Contract Awards Made to Alaska Native Corporations OAI-M-16-09 April 2016 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 April 6, 2016 MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT FROM: April G. Stephenson Assistant Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "The Department of Energy's Office of

  8. AUDIT REPORT

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Implementation of the Department of Energy's CyberOne Initiative OAI-L-16-11 June 2016 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 June 17, 2016 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER FROM: Sarah B. Nelson Assistant Inspector General for Audits and Administration Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on the "Implementation of the Department of Energy's

  9. AUDIT REPORT

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    of Infrastructure at the Pantex Plant OAI-M-16-12 June 2016 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 June 23, 2016 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION PRODUCTION OFFICE FROM: Michelle Anderson Assistant Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Audit Report on "Management of Infrastructure at the Pantex Plant"

  10. Annual Report

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Report Fiscal Year 2011 Office of Environment, Security, Safety and Health The Office of Fossil Energy: Striving for Environmental, Security, Safety and Health (ESS&H) and Sustainability Excellence I The Department of Energy's Office of Fossil Energy (FE) is dedicated to ensuring that the nation can continue to rely on traditional resources for clean, affordable energy while enhancing sustainability across its three sites: the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), the National Energy Technology

  11. SPECIAL REPORT

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    The Department of Energy's Freedom of Information Act Process DOE/IG-0946 September 2015 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 18, 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT FROM: Gregory H. Friedman Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Special Report: "The Department of Energy's Freedom of Information Act Process" BACKGROUND The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA or the

  12. SPECIAL REPORT

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Management Challenges at the Department of Energy - Fiscal Year 2016 OIG-SR-16-01 November 2015 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 November 16, 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY FROM: Rickey R. Hass Acting Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Special Report: "Management Challenges at the Department of Energy - Fiscal Year 2016" INTRODUCTION The Department of Energy is responsible for some

  13. ASSESSMENT REPORT

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Stanford University During Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013 Under Department of Energy Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515 OAS-V-15-04 September 2015 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 September 21, 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, SLAC SITE OFFICE FROM: David Sedillo, Director Western Audits Division Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Assessment Report: "Audit Coverage of Cost Allowability for

  14. ASSESSMENT REPORT

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    the University of California During Fiscal Years 2013 and 2014 Under Department of Energy Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231 OAI-V-16-10 June 2016 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 June 28, 2016 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, BERKELEY SITE OFFICE FROM: David Sedillo Deputy Assistant Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Assessment Report on "Audit

  15. ASSESSMENT REPORT

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    UT-Battelle LLC During Fiscal Year 2014 Under Department of Energy Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 OAI-V-16-11 July 2016 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 July 29, 2016 MEMORANDUM FOR THE MANAGER, OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY SITE OFFICE FROM: Debra K. Solmonson Deputy Assistant Inspector General for Audits and Inspections Office of Inspector General SUBJECT: INFORMATION: Assessment Report on the

  16. Final Report

    SciTech Connect

    R Paul Drake

    2004-01-12

    OAK-B135 This is the final report from the project Hydrodynamics by High-Energy-Density Plasma Flow and Hydrodynamics and Radiation Hydrodynamics with Astrophysical Applications. This project supported a group at the University of Michigan in the invention, design, performance, and analysis of experiments using high-energy-density research facilities. The experiments explored compressible nonlinear hydrodynamics, in particular at decelerating interfaces, and the radiation hydrodynamics of strong shock waves. It has application to supernovae, astrophysical jets, shock-cloud interactions, and radiative shock waves.

  17. Final report

    SciTech Connect

    Dutta, Pulak

    2013-04-01

    The overall goal of this project was the exploration of new ways to make organic and hybrid (organic-inorganic) materials for energy-related applications. Towards this end, our research focused on the structure and behavior of molecular monolayers at interfaces (including floating monolayers, transferred Langmuir-Blodgett monolayers, and self-assembled monolayers), as well as the biomimetic nucleation of inorganic crystals at soft-hard interfaces. The project resulted in a number of 'firsts' and other notable achievements, which are described in the report.

  18. Monthly Biodiesel Production Report

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Monthly Biodiesel Production Report With data for July 2016 Independent Statistics & ... Information Administration | Monthly Biodiesel Production Report This report was ...

  19. Final Report

    SciTech Connect

    Webb, Robert C.; Kamon, Teruki; Toback, David; Safonov, Alexei; Dutta, Bhaskar; Dimitri, Nanopoulos; Pope, Christopher; White, James

    2013-11-18

    Overview The High Energy Physics Group at Texas A&M University is submitting this final report for our grant number DE-FG02-95ER40917. This grant has supported our wide range of research activities for over a decade. The reports contained here summarize the latest work done by our research team. Task A (Collider Physics Program): CMS & CDF Profs. T. Kamon, A. Safonov, and D. Toback co-lead the Texas A&M (TAMU) collider program focusing on CDF and CMS experiments. Task D: Particle Physics Theory Our particle physics theory task is the combined effort of Profs. B. Dutta, D. Nanopoulos, and C. Pope. Task E (Underground Physics): LUX & NEXT Profs. R. Webb and J. White(deceased) lead the Xenon-based underground research program consisting of two main thrusts: the first, participation in the LUX two-phase xenon dark matter search experiment and the second, detector R&D primarily aimed at developing future detectors for underground physics (e.g. NEXT and LZ).

  20. Proposals and Design Reports

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Proposals and Design Reports Proposals and Design Reports Proposal (1204) Proposal Addendum (29304) Physics Case and Detector Technology Report (1204) Technical Design Report ...

  1. Test and evaluation report for Westinghouse Hanford Company`s 1-L liquid shipper, docket 95-41-7A, Type A container

    SciTech Connect

    Kelly, D.L.

    1996-03-13

    This report incorporates the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Facility Safety Analysis (DOE/EH-32) approval letter for packaging use. This report documents the U.S. Department of Transportation Specification 7A Type A (DOT-7A) compliance test results of the 1-L Liquid Shipper packaging. The approved packaging system is designed to ship Type A quantities of radioactive materials, normal form. Contents may be liquid or solid form. Liquid contents must have a specific gravity {lt}2. Solid materials are limited in weight, to include packaging, to the gross weight of the as-tested liquids and bottles.

  2. Feasibility Assessment of the Water Energy Resources of the United States for New Low Power and Small Hydro Classes of Hydroelectric Plants: Main Report and Appendix A

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Main Report and Appendix A: Evaluates water energy resource sites identified in the resource assessment study reported in Water Energy Resources of the United States with Emphasis on Low Head/Low Power Resources, DOE/ID-11111, April 2004 to identify which could feasibly be developed using a set of feasibility criteria. The gross power potential of the sites estimated in the previous study was refined to determine the realistic hydropower potential of the sites using a set of development criteria assuming they are developed as low power (less than 1 MWa) or small hydro (between 1 and 30 MWa) projects.

  3. Final Report

    SciTech Connect

    Gurney, Kevin R

    2015-01-12

    This document constitutes the final report under DOE grant DE-FG-08ER64649. The organization of this document is as follows: first, I will review the original scope of the proposed research. Second, I will present the current draft of a paper nearing submission to Nature Climate Change on the initial results of this funded effort. Finally, I will present the last phase of the research under this grant which has supported a Ph.D. student. To that end, I will present the graduate student’s proposed research, a portion of which is completed and reflected in the paper nearing submission. This final work phase will be completed in the next 12 months. This final workphase will likely result in 1-2 additional publications and we consider the results (as exemplified by the current paper) high quality. The continuing results will acknowledge the funding provided by DOE grant DE-FG-08ER64649.

  4. Final Report

    SciTech Connect

    Yelton, John Martin; Mitselmakher, Guenakh; Korytov, Andrey; Avery, Paul; Furic, Ivan; Acosta, Darin; Konigsberg, Jacobo; Field, Richard; Matchev, Konstantin; Ramond, Pierre; Thorn, Richard; Sikivie, Pierre; Ray, Heather; Tanner, David

    2013-10-10

    We report on progress in a series of different directions within high energy physics research. 1. Neutrino research in hardware and software on the Minerva and MiniBooNE experiments 2. Experimental particle physics at the hadron colliders, with emphasis on research and development and data analysis on the CMS experiment operating at the CERN LHC. This includes research on the discovery and properties on the Higgs Boson. 3. Educational outreach through the Quarknet program, taking physics research into High School classrooms. 4. Theoretical and Phenomenological High Energy research, covering a broad range of activities ranging from fundamental theoretical issues to areas of immediate phenomenological importance. 5. Experiment searches for the Axion, as part of the ADMX experiment.

  5. Report on reports: nuclear energy

    SciTech Connect

    Darmstadter, J.

    1982-11-01

    A joint report by the Nuclear Energy Agency (of the OECD) and the International Energy Agency, nuclear energy prospects to 2000 surveys the factors shaping the future of nuclear power in the 24-country OECD grouping, 13 of whom were operating nuclear power plants as of the end of 1981. Among the factors reviewed are the long-term economic outlook and its effect on total energy consumption, the role of electricity within aggregate energy use, and the economic and policy determinants governing nuclear's future contribution to electric power capacity and generation. The way in which public confidence bears on the nuclear outlook is mentioned as one of the considerations in the policy process, but this is given rather short shrift for an issue which many feel to be at the heart of the present-day nuclear power dilemma. The report describes areas in which nuclear power could offer notable advantages: 1) competitive electricity costs; 2) resource adequacy; 3) security of supply; and 4) environmental integrity. (JMT)

  6. Indecent disclosure - what to do with problems identified in an environment auditing report

    SciTech Connect

    Becker, J.C.

    1995-12-01

    During the past year, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has solicited public comment on whether the federal government should be permitted to obtain the results of in-house environmental audits. This discussion was triggered, in part, by a trend in the states at the courts to treat audit reports as {open_quotes}privileged.{close_quotes} During EPA`s public meetings, industry environment managers argued that the federal government discourages environmental auditing by reserving the right to seek access to audit reports. This presentation and discussion will bring the audience up to date on proposed changes to the EPA`s policy on disclosure of environmental audit reports. It will describe the various state laws designed to protect the confidentiality of environmental audit reports and identify the criteria used by each state to qualify a report for the {open_quotes}self-audit privilege.{close_quotes} The panel will also discuss ways to establish and maintain other legal privilege claims for audit documents, and discuss what happens to privilege claims when portions of an audit report are shared with government, a potential buyer or another party. The panel will also cover the risks and benefits of documenting problems identified during a compliance review, and will explore how individual corporations decide what to do with their internal audit results.

  7. Reporting Fraud | U.S. DOE Office of Science (SC)

    Office of Science (SC)

    ... Aldissi was sentenced to 15 years in federal prison and Bogomolova was sentenced to a term of 13 years. As part of their sentences, the court entered a money judgment in the amount ...

  8. FY 2013 Reports - Hanford Site

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Impact Statements Environmental Management Performance Reports FY 2016 Reports FY 2015 Reports FY 2014 Reports FY 2013 Reports FY 2012 Reports FY 2011 Reports FY 2010 ...

  9. FY 2011 Reports - Hanford Site

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Impact Statements Environmental Management Performance Reports FY 2016 Reports FY 2015 Reports FY 2014 Reports FY 2013 Reports FY 2012 Reports FY 2011 Reports FY 2010 ...

  10. FY 2016 Reports - Hanford Site

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Impact Statements Environmental Management Performance Reports FY 2016 Reports FY 2015 Reports FY 2014 Reports FY 2013 Reports FY 2012 Reports FY 2011 Reports FY 2010 ...

  11. FY 2015 Reports - Hanford Site

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Impact Statements Environmental Management Performance Reports FY 2016 Reports FY 2015 Reports FY 2014 Reports FY 2013 Reports FY 2012 Reports FY 2011 Reports FY 2010 ...

  12. FY 2014 Reports - Hanford Site

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Impact Statements Environmental Management Performance Reports FY 2016 Reports FY 2015 Reports FY 2014 Reports FY 2013 Reports FY 2012 Reports FY 2011 Reports FY 2010 ...

  13. FY 2012 Reports - Hanford Site

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Impact Statements Environmental Management Performance Reports FY 2016 Reports FY 2015 Reports FY 2014 Reports FY 2013 Reports FY 2012 Reports FY 2011 Reports FY 2010 ...

  14. FY 2010 Reports - Hanford Site

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Impact Statements Environmental Management Performance Reports FY 2016 Reports FY 2015 Reports FY 2014 Reports FY 2013 Reports FY 2012 Reports FY 2011 Reports FY 2010 ...

  15. Oil and gas leasing in proposed wilderness areas: the Wyoming District Court's interpretation of Section 603 of the Federal Land Policy Management Act of 1976 - Rocky Mountain Oil and Gas Association v. Andrus, 500 F. Supp. 1338 (D. Wyo. 1980), appeal docketed, No. 81-1040 (10th Cir. Jan. 5, 1981)

    SciTech Connect

    Corbett, H.E.

    1982-01-01

    Plaintiff Rocky Mountain Oil and Gas Association, a non-profit trade association, brought suit against the Secretary of the Interior, challenging land management policies of the Department of the Interior which plaintiff contended have effectively prohibited oil and gas exploration in areas proposed as wilderness under the Federal Land Policy Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA). The principal issue at trial was Interior's interpretation of the wilderness study provisions contained in Section 603 of the Act, which directed that activities on oil and gas leases in proposed wilderness areas be managed so as to prevent impairment of wilderness values. The United States Court for the District of Wyoming, Kerr, J., held that strict application of the non-impairment standard of Section 603, FLPMA, by the Department of the Interior virtually halted oil and gas exploration in proposed wilderness areas, and is therefore statutorily erroneous, clearly contrary to Congressional intent, and counter-productive to public interest. The Trial Court's decision is being appealed to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals under the title Rocky Mountain Oil and Gas Association v. Watt. 91 references.

  16. Final report

    SciTech Connect

    Joseph H. Simmons; Tracie J. Bukowski

    2002-08-07

    determine if photocarriers could be collected. Thus, we tested a variety of semiconductor-glass nano-composite structures for photoconductivity. Tests were conducted in collaboration with the Laser Physics Division at Sandia National Laboratories. Nano-composite samples were formed consisting of Ge nanocrystals embedded in an indium-tin-oxide matrix. Photoconductivity measurements were conducted with exposure of the films to sub-bandgap and super-bandgap light. The results showed a clear photoconductivity effect arising from exposure to super-bandgap light only. These results suggest that the high-efficiency photovoltaic cell structure proposed in DOE sponsored U.S. Patent 5,720,827 is viable. The results of fabrication studies, structural characterization studies and photovoltaic measurements are presented in the report. This report is taken from a PhD dissertation of Tracie J. Bukowski submitted to the University of Florida in May 2002. ''The optical and photoconductive response in germanium quantum dots and indium tin oxide composite thin film structures,'' Dr. Bukowski conducted her PhD study under this grant at the University of Arizona and under Grant No DE-FG05-91ER45462 at the University of Florida, as well as during a two-year fellowship at Sandia National Laboratories.

  17. Heber geothermal binary demonstration project quarterly technical progress report, April 1, 1982--June 30, 1982

    SciTech Connect

    Lacy, R.G.; Allen, R.F.; Alsup, R.A.; Liparidis, G.S.; Van De Mark, G.D.

    1983-08-01

    The purpose of this quarterly technical progress report is to document work completed on the nominal 65 Megawatt (Mwe gross) Heber Geothermal Binary Demonstration Project, located at Heber, California, during the period of April 1, 1982-June 30, 1982. The work was performed by San Diego Gas and Electric Company under the support and cooperation of the U.S. Department of Energy, the Electric Power Research Institute, the Imperial Irrigation District, the California Department of Water Resources, and the Southern California Edison Company. Topics covered in this quarterly report include progress made in the areas of Wells and Fluid Production and Injection Systems, Power Plant Design and Construction, Power Plant Demonstration, and Data Acquisition and Dissemination.

  18. Heber geothermal binary demonstration project quarterly technical progress report, October 1, 1981--December 31, 1981

    SciTech Connect

    Lacy, R.G.; Allen, R.F.; Alsup, R.A.; Liparidis, G.S.; Van De Mark, G.D.

    1983-08-01

    The purpose of this quarterly technical progress report is to document work completed on the nominal 65 Megawatt (Mwe gross) Heber Geothermal Binary Demonstration Project, located at Heber, California, during the period of October 1, 1981, through December 31, 1981. The work was performed by San Diego Gas and Electric Company under the support and cooperation of the U.S. Department of Energy, the Electric Power Research Institute, the Imperial Irrigation District, the California Department of Water Resources, and the Southern California Edison Company. Topics covered in this quarterly report include progress made in the areas of Wells and Fluid Production and Injection Systems, Power Plant Design and Construction, Power Plant Demonstration, and Data Acquisition and Dissemination.

  19. Heber geothermal binary demonstration project quarterly technical progress report, January 1, 1982--March 31, 1982

    SciTech Connect

    Lacy, R.G.; Allen, R.F.; Alsup, R.A.; Liparidis, G.S.; Van De Mark, G.D.

    1983-08-01

    The purpose of this quarterly technical progress report is to document work completed on the nominal 65 Megawatt (Mwe gross) Heber Geothermal Binary Demonstration Project, located at Heber, California, during the period of January 1, 1982, through March 31, 1982. The work was performed by San Diego Gas and Electric Company under the support and cooperation of the U.S. Department of Energy, the Electric Power Research Institute, the Imperial Irrigation District, the California Department of Water Resources, and the Southern California Edison Company. Topics covered in this quarterly report include progress made in the areas of Wells and Fluid Production and Injection Systems, Power Plant Design and Construction, Power Plant Demonstration, and Data Acquisition and Dissemination.

  20. Heber geothermal binary demonstration project quarterly technical progress report, July 1, 1982--September 30, 1982

    SciTech Connect

    Lacy, R.G.; Allen, R.F.; Dixon, J.R.; Hsiao, W.P.; Liparidis, G.S.; Lombard, G.L.; Nelson, T.T.; Van De Mark, G.D.

    1983-03-01

    The purpose of this quarterly technical progress report is to document work completed on the nominal 65 Megawatt (Mwe gross) Heber Geothermal Binary Demonstration Project, located at Heber, California, during the period of July 1, 1982--September 30, 1982. The work was performed by San Diego Gas and Electric Company under the support and cooperation of the U.S. Department of Energy, the Electric Power Research Institute, the Imperial Irrigation District, the California Department of Water Resources, and the Southern California Edison Company. Topics covered in this quarterly report include progress made in the areas of Wells and Fluid Production and Injection Systems, Power Plant Design and Construction, Power Plant Demonstration, and Data Acquisition and Dissemination.

  1. Heber geothermal binary demonstration project quarterly technical progress report, October 1, 1982--December 31, 1982

    SciTech Connect

    Lacy, R.G.; Allen, R.F.; Dixon, J.R.; Hsiao, W.P.; Liparidis, G.S.; Lombard, G.L.; Nelson, T.T.; Van De Mark, G.D.

    1983-05-01

    The purpose of this quarterly technical progress report is to document work completed on the nominal 65 Megawatt (Mwe gross) Heber Geothermal Binary Demonstration Project, located at Heber, California, during the period of October 1, 1982--December 31, 1982. The work was performed by San Diego Gas and Electric Company under the support and cooperation of the U.S. Department of Energy, the Electric Power Research Institute, the Imperial Irrigation District, the California Department of Water Resources, and the Southern California Edison Company. Topics covered in this quarterly report include progress made in the areas of Wells and Fluid Production and Injection Systems, Power Plant Design and Construction, Power Plant Demonstration, and Data Acquisition and Dissemination.

  2. Heber geothermal binary demonstration project quarterly technical progress report, July 1, 1981--September 30, 1981

    SciTech Connect

    Lacy, R.G.; Allen, R.F.; Alsup, R.A.; Liparidis, G.S.; Van De Mark, G.D.

    1983-08-01

    The purpose of this quarterly technical progress report is to document work completed on the nominal 65 Megawatt (Mwe gross) Heber Geothermal Binary Demonstration Project, located at Heber, California, during the period of July 1, 1981, through September 30, 1981. The work was performed by San Diego Gas and Electric Company under the support and cooperation of the US Department of Energy, the Electric Power Research Institute, the Imperial Irrigation District, the California Department of Water Resources, and the Southern California Edison Company. Topics covered in this quarterly report include progress made in the areas of Wells and Fluid production and Injection Systems, Power Plant Design and Construction, Power Plant Demonstration, and Data Acquisition and Dissemination.

  3. Biogas Opportunities Roadmap Progress Report (Technical Report...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Biogas Opportunities Roadmap Progress Report Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Biogas Opportunities Roadmap Progress Report In support of the Obama Administration's ...

  4. Final Report

    SciTech Connect

    Michael C. Weinberg; Lori L. Burgner; Joseph H. Simmons

    2003-05-23

    OAK B135 The formation of metastable crystalline phases in lithium disilicate glass has been a subject of controversy for decades. Here, one aspect of this problem relating to the stability of these non-equilibrium phases when glasses are heated for extended time periods in the nucleation regime is addressed. The results of a systematic experimental investigation on the persistence of metastable phases and the factors that may influence the appearance of such phases, e.g., water content, impurities, glass composition, and glass preparation procedure are presented. Growth rates of lithium disilicate crystals in lithium disilicate glass are measured as a function water concentration in the glass and of temperature in the deeply undercooled regime. The growth rate data obtained in this work are combined with data reported in the literature and used to assess the applicability of standard models of crystal growth for the description of experimental results over a very broad temperature range. The reduced growth rate versus undercooling graph is found to consist of three regimes. For undercoolings less than 140C, the reduced growth rate curve is suggestive of either 2-D surface nucleation or screw dislocation growth. For undercoolings greater than 400C, the reduced growth rate plot suggests the operative crystal growth mechanism is 2-D surface nucleation, but detailed calculations cast doubt upon this conclusion. In the intermediate undercooling range, there appears to be some sort of transitional behavior for which none of the standard models appear to be applicable. Further, it is observed that small differences in the viscosity data employed can produce enormous differences in the predicted growth rates at larger undercoolings. Results of the kinetic analyses conducted herein seem to indicate that the nature of the kinetic rate coefficient used in the standard growth models may be incorrect. Nucleation rates of sodium metasilicate crystals in a sodium silicate

  5. Monthly Performance Report

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    ... ACCOMPLISHMENTS FY 2016 Hanford Lifecycle Scope, Schedule and Cost Report (Lifecycle ... the FY 2016 Hanford Lifecycle Scope, Schedule and Cost Report (Lifecycle Report). ...

  6. Annual Coal Distribution Report

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Annual Coal Distribution Report Release Date: April 16, 2015 | Next Release Date: March 2016 | full report | RevisionCorrection Revision to the Annual Coal Distribution Report ...

  7. Oklahoma Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    209,342 201,517 207,703 214,000 199,578 212,608 1991-2016 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA ... NA NA 1996-2016 Marketed Production 209,342 201,517 207,703 214,000 199,578 212,608 1989

  8. Tennessee Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    5,144 4,851 5,825 5,400 5,294 4,276 1967-2015 From Gas Wells 5,144 4,851 5,825 5,400 5,294 4,276 1967-2015 From Oil Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 1967-2015 From Shale Gas Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007-2015 From Coalbed Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2006-2015 Repressuring 0 0 0 0 0 0 1967-2015 Vented and Flared 0 0 0 0 0 0 1967-2015 Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed 0 0 0 0 0 0 1997-2015 Marketed Production 5,144 4,851 5,825 5,400 5,294 4,276 1967-2015 Dry Production 4,638 4,335 5,324 4,912 4,912 3,937

  9. Texas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    7,593,697 7,934,689 8,143,510 8,299,472 8,659,188 8,801,282 1967-2015 From Gas Wells 4,441,188 3,794,952 3,619,901 3,115,409 2,672,326 2,316,239 1967-2015 From Oil Wells 849,560 1,073,301 860,675 1,166,810 1,558,002 1,801,212 1967-2015 From Shale Gas Wells 2,302,950 3,066,435 3,662,933 4,017,253 4,428,859 4,683,831 2007-2015 From Coalbed Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2002-2015 Repressuring 558,854 502,020 437,367 423,413 440,153 533,047 1967-2015 Vented and Flared 39,569 35,248 47,530 76,113 90,125 113,786

  10. Texas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Alaska Arkansas California Colorado Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico Kansas Louisiana Montana New Mexico North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Texas Utah West Virginia Wyoming Other States Total Alabama Arizona Florida Illinois Indiana Kentucky Maryland Michigan Mississippi Missouri Nebraska Nevada New York Oregon South Dakota Tennessee Virginia Period-Unit: Monthly-Million Cubic Feet Monthly-Million Cubic Feet per Day Annual-Million Cubic Feet Download Series History Download Series History

  11. Arizona Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 From Shale Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2007-2016 From Coalbed Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA ...

  12. Pennsylvania Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    U.S. Offshore U.S. State Offshore Federal Offshore U.S. Alaska Alaska Onshore Alaska Offshore Alaska State Offshore Arkansas California California Onshore California Offshore California State Offshore Federal Offshore California Colorado Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore Alabama Federal Offshore Louisiana Federal Offshore Texas Kansas Louisiana Louisiana Onshore Louisiana Offshore Louisiana State Offshore Montana New Mexico North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Texas Texas

  13. Pennsylvania Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Alaska Arkansas California Colorado Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico Kansas Louisiana Montana New Mexico North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Texas Utah West Virginia Wyoming Other States Total Alabama Arizona Florida Illinois Indiana Kentucky Maryland Michigan Mississippi Missouri Nebraska Nevada New York Oregon South Dakota Tennessee Virginia Period-Unit: Monthly-Million Cubic Feet Monthly-Million Cubic Feet per Day Annual-Million Cubic Feet Download Series History Download Series History

  14. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    2002-2016 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA 2002-2016 Arkansas NA NA NA NA NA NA 2006-2016 California NA NA NA NA NA NA 2002-2016 Colorado NA NA NA NA NA NA 2002-2016 Federal Offshore Gulf ...

  15. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Oil Wells

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    1-2016 Illinois NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 Indiana NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 Kentucky NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 Maryland NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 Michigan NA NA NA NA NA NA ...

  16. Illinois Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    1-2016 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 From Shale Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2007-2016 From Coalbed Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2006-2016 Repressuring NA NA NA NA NA NA ...

  17. Colorado Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 From Shale Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2007-2016 From Coalbed Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA ...

  18. Kansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    23,819 23,559 22,451 22,896 22,535 20,900 1991-2016 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 From Shale Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA ...

  19. Maryland Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    43 43 34 44 32 20 1967-2014 From Gas Wells 43 43 34 44 32 20 1967-2014 From Oil Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2006-2014 From Shale Gas Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007-2014 From Coalbed Wells 0 0 0 0 0 ...

  20. Missouri Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    NA NA NA NA 9 9 1967-2014 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA 8 8 1967-2014 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA 1 * 2007-2014 From Shale Gas Wells NA NA NA NA 0 0 2007-2014 From Coalbed Wells NA NA ...

  1. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    6-2016 Illinois NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 Indiana NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 Kentucky NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 Maryland NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 Michigan NA NA NA NA NA NA ...

  2. Oregon Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2016 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1996-2016 From Shale Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2007-2016 From Coalbed ...

  3. Louisiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 From Shale Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2007-2016 From Coalbed Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA ...

  4. Michigan Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 From Shale Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2007-2016 From Coalbed ...

  5. Florida Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    3,938 17,129 18,681 18,011 3,178 5,790 1971-2015 From Gas Wells 0 0 17,182 16,459 43 69 1996-2015 From Oil Wells 13,938 17,129 1,500 1,551 3,135 5,720 1971-2015 From Shale Gas ...

  6. Arkansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Pennsylvania Texas Utah West Virginia Wyoming Other States Total Alabama Arizona Florida Illinois Indiana Kentucky Maryland Michigan Mississippi Missouri Nebraska Nevada New ...

  7. Alabama Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Pennsylvania Texas Utah West Virginia Wyoming Other States Total Alabama Arizona Florida Illinois Indiana Kentucky Maryland Michigan Mississippi Missouri Nebraska Nevada New ...

  8. Alaska Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Pennsylvania Texas Utah West Virginia Wyoming Other States Total Alabama Arizona Florida Illinois Indiana Kentucky Maryland Michigan Mississippi Missouri Nebraska Nevada New ...

  9. Florida Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    6-2016 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 From Shale Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2007-2016 From Coalbed Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2002-2016 Repressuring NA NA NA NA NA NA ...

  10. Arkansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    U.S. Offshore U.S. State Offshore Federal Offshore U.S. Alaska Alaska Onshore Alaska Offshore Alaska State Offshore Arkansas California California Onshore California Offshore ...

  11. Alaska Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    U.S. Offshore U.S. State Offshore Federal Offshore U.S. Alaska Alaska Onshore Alaska Offshore Alaska State Offshore Arkansas California California Onshore California Offshore ...

  12. Offshore Gross Withdrawals of Natural Gas

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    U.S. Total Offshore 2,875,945 2,416,644 2,044,643 1,859,469 1,818,267 1977-2014 State Offshore 575,601 549,151 489,505 505,318 514,809 1978-2014 From Gas Wells 234,236 208,970 ...

  13. Alabama Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    U.S. Offshore U.S. State Offshore Federal Offshore U.S. Alaska Alaska Onshore Alaska Offshore Alaska State Offshore Arkansas California California Onshore California Offshore ...

  14. Offshore Gross Withdrawals of Natural Gas

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 View History Federal Offshore 106,086 112,137 108,752 101,117 111,581 102,289 1997-2016 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1997-2016 From ...

  15. Arizona Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    U.S. Offshore U.S. State Offshore Federal Offshore U.S. Alaska Alaska Onshore Alaska Offshore Alaska State Offshore Arkansas California California Onshore California Offshore ...

  16. Louisiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    2,218,283 3,040,523 2,955,437 2,366,943 1,968,618 1,784,797 1967-2015 From Gas Wells 911,967 883,712 775,506 780,623 720,416 619,242 1967-2015 From Oil Wells 63,638 68,505 49,380 51,948 50,722 44,748 1967-2015 From Shale Gas Wells 1,242,678 2,088,306 2,130,551 1,534,372 1,197,480 1,120,806 2007-2015 From Coalbed Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2002-2015 Repressuring 3,606 5,015 0 2,829 3,199 4,248 1967-2015 Vented and Flared 4,578 6,302 0 3,912 4,606 3,748 1967-2015 Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed 0 0 0 0 0 0

  17. Michigan Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    136,782 143,826 129,333 123,622 115,065 107,634 1967-2015 From Gas Wells 7,345 18,470 17,041 17,502 14,139 12,329 1967-2015 From Oil Wells 9,453 11,620 4,470 4,912 5,560 4,796 1967-2015 From Shale Gas Wells 119,984 113,736 107,822 101,208 95,366 90,509 2007-2015 From Coalbed Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2002-2015 Repressuring 2,340 2,340 0 0 NA 0 1967-2015 Vented and Flared 3,324 3,324 0 0 NA 0 1967-2015 Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed 0 0 0 0 0 0 1996-2015 Marketed Production 131,118 138,162 129,333 123,622

  18. Mississippi Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    401,660 443,351 452,915 59,272 54,446 58,207 1967-2015 From Gas Wells 387,026 429,829 404,457 47,385 43,020 44,868 1967-2015 From Oil Wells 8,714 8,159 43,421 7,256 7,136 9,220 1967-2015 From Shale Gas Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007-2015 From Coalbed Wells 5,921 5,363 5,036 4,630 4,289 4,119 2002-2015 Repressuring 3,480 3,788 0 0 NA 0 1967-2015 Vented and Flared 8,685 9,593 0 0 NA 0 1967-2015 Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed 315,775 348,482 389,072 0 NA 0 1980-2015 Marketed Production 73,721 81,487 63,843

  19. Montana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    93,266 79,506 66,954 63,242 59,160 57,421 1967-2015 From Gas Wells 51,117 37,937 27,518 19,831 17,015 13,571 1967-2015 From Oil Wells 19,292 21,777 20,085 23,152 22,757 23,065 1967-2015 From Shale Gas Wells 12,937 13,101 15,619 18,636 18,910 20,428 2007-2015 From Coalbed Wells 9,920 6,691 3,731 1,623 478 357 2002-2015 Repressuring 5 4 0 0 NA 0 1967-2015 Vented and Flared 5,722 4,878 0 0 NA 0 1967-2015 Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed NA NA 0 0 NA 0 1996-2015 Marketed Production 87,539 74,624 66,954

  20. Montana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Alaska Arkansas California Colorado Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico Kansas Louisiana Montana New Mexico North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Texas Utah West Virginia Wyoming Other States Total Alabama Arizona Florida Illinois Indiana Kentucky Maryland Michigan Mississippi Missouri Nebraska Nevada New York Oregon South Dakota Tennessee Virginia Period-Unit: Monthly-Million Cubic Feet Monthly-Million Cubic Feet per Day Annual-Million Cubic Feet Download Series History Download Series History

  1. Wyoming Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    68,548 167,539 162,880 167,555 163,345 165,658 1991-2015 From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA ... NA NA 1991-2015 Marketed Production 150,260 149,361 145,208 149,375 145,622 147,684 1989

  2. Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Annual Energy Outlook

    From Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 From Oil Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 From Shale Gas Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA 2007-2016 From Coalbed Wells NA NA NA NA NA NA ...

  3. Nebraska Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    2,255 1,980 1,328 1,032 417 477 1967-2015 From Gas Wells 2,092 1,854 1,317 1,027 353 399 1967-2015 From Oil Wells 163 126 11 5 63 78 1967-2015 From Shale Gas Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007-2015 From Coalbed Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2006-2015 Repressuring 0 0 0 0 0 0 1967-2015 Vented and Flared 24 21 0 0 NA 0 1967-2015 Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed 0 0 0 0 NA 0 2006-2015 Marketed Production 2,231 1,959 1,328 1,032 417 477 1967-2015 Dry Production 2,231 1,959 1,328 1,032 417 477

  4. Ohio Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    78,122 78,858 84,482 166,017 512,371 1,014,848 1967-2015 From Gas Wells 73,459 30,655 65,025 55,583 51,541 46,237 1967-2015 From Oil Wells 4,651 45,663 6,684 10,317 13,022 32,674 1967-2015 From Shale Gas Wells 11 2,540 12,773 100,117 447,809 935,937 2007-2015 From Coalbed Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2006-2015 Repressuring 0 0 0 0 0 0 1967-2015 Vented and Flared 0 0 0 0 0 0 1967-2015 Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed 0 0 0 0 0 0 2006-2015 Marketed Production 78,122 78,858 84,482 166,017 512,371 1,014,848

  5. Ohio Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Alaska Arkansas California Colorado Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico Kansas Louisiana Montana New Mexico North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Texas Utah West Virginia Wyoming Other States Total Alabama Arizona Florida Illinois Indiana Kentucky Maryland Michigan Mississippi Missouri Nebraska Nevada New York Oregon South Dakota Tennessee Virginia Period-Unit: Monthly-Million Cubic Feet Monthly-Million Cubic Feet per Day Annual-Million Cubic Feet Download Series History Download Series History

  6. Oklahoma Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    U.S. Offshore U.S. State Offshore Federal Offshore U.S. Alaska Alaska Onshore Alaska Offshore Alaska State Offshore Arkansas California California Onshore California Offshore California State Offshore Federal Offshore California Colorado Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore Alabama Federal Offshore Louisiana Federal Offshore Texas Kansas Louisiana Louisiana Onshore Louisiana Offshore Louisiana State Offshore Montana New Mexico North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Texas Texas

  7. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ,916,762 1,779,055 1,539,395 1,425,783 1,307,072 1,181,320 2002-2015 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 2002-2015 Alaska Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007-2015 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 2006-2015 California 0 0 0 0 0 0 2002-2015 Colorado 529,891 514,531 376,543 449,281 420,383 398,298 2002-2015 Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico 0 0 0 0 0 0 2002-2015 Kansas 38,869 35,924 31,689 28,244 25,387 23,359 2002-2015 Louisiana 0 0 0 0 0 0 2002-2015 Louisiana Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007-2015 Montana 9,920 6,691 3,731 1,623 478 357 2002-2015

  8. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Oil Wells

    Annual Energy Outlook

    NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 Missouri NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 Nebraska NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 Nevada NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 New York NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 Oregon ...

  9. Nevada Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    4 3 4 3 3 1991-2014 From Gas Wells 0 0 0 0 0 3 2006-2014 From Oil Wells 4 4 3 4 3 * 1991-2014 From Shale Gas Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007-2014 From Coalbed Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2006-2014 ...

  10. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 Missouri NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 Nebraska NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 Nevada NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 New York NA NA NA NA NA NA 1991-2016 Oregon ...

  11. California Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    U.S. Offshore U.S. State Offshore Federal Offshore U.S. Alaska Alaska Onshore Alaska Offshore Alaska State Offshore Arkansas California California Onshore California Offshore California State Offshore Federal Offshore California Colorado Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore Alabama Federal Offshore Louisiana Federal Offshore Texas Kansas Louisiana Louisiana Onshore Louisiana Offshore Louisiana State Offshore Montana New Mexico North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Texas Texas

  12. California Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Alaska Arkansas California Colorado Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico Kansas Louisiana Montana New Mexico North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Texas Utah West Virginia Wyoming Other States Total Alabama Arizona Florida Illinois Indiana Kentucky Maryland Michigan Mississippi Missouri Nebraska Nevada New York Oregon South Dakota Tennessee Virginia Period-Unit: Monthly-Million Cubic Feet Monthly-Million Cubic Feet per Day Annual-Million Cubic Feet Download Series History Download Series History

  13. Colorado Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    U.S. Offshore U.S. State Offshore Federal Offshore U.S. Alaska Alaska Onshore Alaska Offshore Alaska State Offshore Arkansas California California Onshore California Offshore California State Offshore Federal Offshore California Colorado Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore Alabama Federal Offshore Louisiana Federal Offshore Texas Kansas Louisiana Louisiana Onshore Louisiana Offshore Louisiana State Offshore Montana New Mexico North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Pennsylvania Texas Texas

  14. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    2,010,171 1,916,762 1,779,055 1,539,395 1,425,783 1,285,189 2002-2014 Alaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 2002-2014 Alaska Onshore 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007-2014 Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 2006-2014 California 0...

  15. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells

    Annual Energy Outlook

    2002-2015 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA 2002-2015 Arkansas NA NA NA NA NA NA 2006-2015 California NA NA NA NA NA NA 2002-2015 Colorado NA NA NA NA NA NA 2002-2015 Federal Offshore Gulf...

  16. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    14,414,287 13,247,498 12,291,070 12,504,227 10,759,545 10,384,119 1967-2014 U.S. State Offshore 259,848 234,236 208,970 204,667 186,887 159,337 1978-2014 Federal Offshore U.S....

  17. Advanced Energy Gross Receipts Tax Deduction

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    To qualify for the exemption, the owner of a qualified generating facility must first obtain a certificate of eligibility from the Department of Environment. The owner must then present the...

  18. Virginia Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    147,255 151,094 146,405 139,382 133,661 127,584 1967-2015 From Gas Wells 23,086 20,375 21,802 26,815 10,143 10,679 1967-2015 From Oil Wells 0 0 9 9 12 8 2006-2015 From Shale Gas Wells 16,433 18,501 17,212 13,016 12,309 11,059 2007-2015 From Coalbed Wells 107,736 112,219 107,383 99,542 111,197 105,838 2006-2015 Repressuring 0 0 0 0 0 0 2003-2015 Vented and Flared NA NA 0 0 NA 0 1967-2015 Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed 0 0 0 0 0 0 1997-2015 Marketed Production 147,255 151,094 146,405 139,382 133,661

  19. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Gas Wells

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    1978-2014 Federal Offshore U.S. 1,878,928 1,701,665 1,355,489 1,028,474 831,636 720,400 1977-2014 Alaska 137,639 127,417 112,268 107,873 91,686 104,219 1967-2014 Alaska Onshore...

  20. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Oil Wells

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    355,472 1978-2014 Federal Offshore U.S. 606,403 598,679 512,003 526,664 522,515 583,058 1977-2014 Alaska 3,174,747 3,069,683 3,050,654 3,056,918 3,123,671 3,064,346 1967-2014...

  1. Kentucky Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    135,330 124,243 106,122 94,665 93,091 85,775 1967-2015 From Gas Wells 133,521 122,578 106,122 94,665 93,091 85,775 1967-2015 From Oil Wells 1,809 1,665 0 0 0 0 1967-2015 From Shale Gas Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007-2015 From Coalbed Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2006-2015 Repressuring 0 0 0 0 NA 0 2006-2015 Vented and Flared 0 0 0 0 NA 0 1967-2015 Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed 0 0 0 0 NA 0 2006-2015 Marketed Production 135,330 124,243 106,122 94,665 93,091 85,775 1967-2015 Dry Production 130,754 119,559 99,551

  2. Illinois Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    2,887 2,626 1967-2014 From Gas Wells 1,438 1,697 2,114 2,125 2,887 2,626 1967-2014 From Oil Wells 5 5 7 0 0 0 1967-2014 From Shale Gas Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007-2014 From Coalbed...

  3. Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    1967-2014 From Gas Wells 340,224 328,135 351,168 402,899 383,216 360,587 1967-2014 From Oil Wells 36,795 42,526 49,947 31,440 36,737 44,996 1967-2014 From Shale Gas Wells 0 0 0...

  4. Indiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    7,938 6,616 1967-2014 From Gas Wells 4,927 6,802 9,075 8,814 7,938 6,616 1967-2014 From Oil Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 1967-2014 From Shale Gas Wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 2007-2014 From Coalbed...

  5. Wyoming Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    From Gas Wells 1,806,807 1,787,599 1,709,218 1,762,095 1,673,667 1,671,442 1967-2014 From Oil Wells 135,269 151,871 152,589 24,544 29,134 38,974 1967-2014 From Shale Gas Wells...

  6. Total Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Summary)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Pipeline and Distribution Use Price Citygate Price Residential Price Commercial Price Industrial Price Vehicle Fuel Price Electric Power Price Proved Reserves as of 1231 Reserves ...

  7. Total Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals (Summary)

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    & Distribution Use Delivered to Consumers Residential Commercial Industrial Vehicle Fuel Electric Power Period: Monthly Annual Download Series History Download Series History ...

  8. ,"Arkansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production"

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    26480,169171,125319,43852,,,0,2649,,166522 26845,159476,120068,39408,,,0,1947,,157529 27210,125691,92265,33426,,,0,1716,,123975 27575,121518,91270,30248,,,3963,1318,...

  9. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Oil Wells

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Federal Offshore Gulf of Mexico 566,380 559,235 476,984 513,961 509,357 568,801 1997-2014 ... Montana 21,522 19,292 21,777 20,085 23,152 23,479 1967-2014 New Mexico 223,493 238,580 ...

  10. Solar Energy Gross Receipts Tax Deduction

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The seller must have a signed copy of Form RPD-41341 to claim the deduction or other evidence acceptable to EMNRD that the service or equipment was purchased for the sole use of the sale and...

  11. Maryland Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1980's 36 31 60 39 20 44 29 34 1990's 22 29 33 28 26 22 135 118 63 18 2000's 34 32 22 48 34 46 48 35 28 43 2010's 43 34 44 32 20 27 Foot)

    Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 1,038 1,035 1,037 2010's 1,027 1,027 1,037 1,045 1,053 1,055

    Foot)

    Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013 1,041 1,037 1,032 1,027 1,037 1,042 1,060 1,056 1,062

  12. Missouri Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    835,855 800,065 771,577 830,756 806,396 819,763 1984-2014 Residential 5 5 4 7 7 8 1984-2014 Commercial 26,641 23,713 26,383 26,386 24,019 28,803 1984-2014 Industrial 21,853 18,362 15,450 20,153 21,186 19,595 1984-2014 Oil Company 3,955 4,262 4,058 6,226 7,450 6,419 1984-2014 Farm 41,080 57,087 52,559 81,878 84,753 79,443 1984-2014 Electric Power 3,796 3,393 2,019 1,674 2,223 1,921 1984-2014 Railroad 24,727 17,936 37,741 29,848 32,550 35,578 1984-2014 Vessel Bunkering 141,302 93,384 58,285 58,505

  13. Nebraska Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    www.eia.gov Joe Benneche July 31, 2012, Washington, DC Major assumption changes for AEO2013 Oil and Gas Working Group Natural Gas Transmission and Distribution Module DRAFT WORKING GROUP PRESENTATION DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE Overview 2 Joe Benneche, Washington, DC, July 31, 2012 * Replace regional natural gas wellhead price projections with regional spot price projections * Pricing of natural gas vehicles fuels (CNG and LNG) * Methodology for modeling exports of LNG * Assumptions on charges related

  14. Nevada Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    -4,282 6,424 1,491 -309 559 7,371 1969-2015 Alabama -21 -75 -22 63 -206 226 1980-2015 Alaska 0 0 1969-2015 Arkansas 2 -7 9 12 14 -35 1980-2015 California 2 7 -5 3 1 2 1980-2015 Colorado 0 0 0 1980-2015 Connecticut 178 129 260 -68 -327 -558 1980-2015 Delaware -2 -31 51 -68 29 -17 1980-2015 Georgia 379 2,542 1,378 1,205 3,085 3,826 1980-2015 Idaho 70 -19 139 -259 -676 143 1981-2015 Illinois 74 127 419 -322 -442 437 1980-2015 Indiana 835 -380 -977 -81 771 205 1980-2015 Iowa 146 14 428 -151 -647 546

  15. Tennessee Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1980's 2,976 3,950 5,022 4,686 3,464 2,707 2,100 1,900 1990's 2,067 1,856 1,770 1,660 1,990 1,820 1,690 1,510 1,420 1,230 2000's 1,150 2,000 2,050 1,803 2,100 2,200 2,663 3,942 4,700 5,478 2010's 4,638 4,335 5,324 4,912 4,912 3,937 Cubic Foot)

    Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 2000's 1,038 1,037 1,028 2010's 1,023 1,014 1,014 1,019 1,027 1,029

    Cubic Foot)

    Year

  16. Property:GrossGen | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    B Blundell 1 Geothermal Facility + 213,599 + Blundell 2 Geothermal Facility + 85,633 + G Gumuskoy Geothermal Power Plant + 104,000 + L Las Tres Virgenes Geothermal Plant + 19 +...

  17. Weekly Petroleum Status Report

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Please go to the redesigned Weekly Petroleum Status Report.

  18. Papers and Reports

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Papers, Reports Papers and Reports Bringing together top space science students with internationally recognized researchers at Los Alamos in an educational and collaborative atmosphere. Contacts Director Misa Cowee Email Administrative Assistant Lynea Koshar Email Request more information Email Annual research reports Report 2015 (pdf - 9.35 MB) Report 2014 (pdf - 12.16 MB) Report 2013 (pdf - 29.06 MB) Report 2012 (pdf - 25.42 MB) Report 2011 (pdf - 10.46 MB) Papers, posters, presentations

  19. NERSC Annual Reports

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Annual Reports NERSC Annual Reports Sort by: Default | Name 2015AnnualReportcover NERSC Annual Report 2015 Download Image: 2015AnnualReportcover.png | png | 542 KB Download File: 2015NERSCAnnualReportFinal.pdf | pdf | 4.8 MB 2014cover.jpg NERSC Annual Report 2014 Download Image: 2014cover.jpg | jpg | 202 KB Download File: 2014NERSCAnnualReport.pdf | pdf | 6.1 MB 2013-Annual-Report-cover.png NERSC Annual Report 2013 Download Image: 2013-Annual-Report-cover.png | png | 645 KB Download File:

  20. Courts and Commissions: Fish or foul

    SciTech Connect

    Radford, B.W.

    1993-10-15

    Hydropower is under attack everywhere you look. It started back in the sixties during the battle over Arizona's Glen Canyon Dam. That case purportedly ended in a compromise with the Sierra Club to save the Grand Canyon from hydro development. But once built, the dam played havoc with Colorado River levels, disrupting rafting trips for Grand Canyon tourists. Even Barry Goldwater was later heard to rue the Glen Canyon project. Marc Reisner's 1986 book, Cadillac Desert, galvanized the antihydro faction. A few years later, calls arose for the City of San Francisco to dismantle its O'Shaughnessy Dam across the Hetch Hetchy Valley in the Sierra Nevada, just 15 miles north of famed Yosemite. That move failed. (Maybe San Francisco's oddball reputation had something to do with the result). But now we hear of plans underway to tear down dams on the Elwah River in Washington State's Olympic National Park, to reclaim lost salmon spawning grounds and return the parks to its natural state. This time the dam busters may win. These events are not unconnected. Strung together, they reveal a change in the popular opinion of how rivers, streams, and coastlines contribute to our economic well-being, and how the federal government should manage those economic resources. Federal hydropower control was born to govern our navigable waterways. It grew up as a tool to speed electrification and develop mining and logging. But forces today are seeking to make federal hydropower law more sympathetic to wildlife preservation. They argue that wildlife represents a national economic resource - no less so than timber, minerals, and shipping. This view is winning support from those in high positions, including the Chair of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Elizabeth Moler.