National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for facility security decision

  1. National Security Facility (NSF) | Argonne National Laboratory

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    National Security Facility (NSF) National Security Facility (NSF) Argonne National Laboratory's National Security Facility (NSF) is a flexible, state-of-the-art secure user facility that contains multiple national security networks, video teleconference capability, high-resolution graphics support, a fully powered and cooled data center, multi-level training facilities, and conferencing facilities. The NSF provides tools and resources to enable and strengthen connections between government

  2. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 10, Security

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Awareness Program | Department of Energy 0, Security Awareness Program Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 10, Security Awareness Program 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 10, Security Awareness Program This chapter covers all the security awareness briefings conducted at HQ. The following security briefings are required for all HQ Federal employees and contractors: an Initial Security Briefing, which is given when a new employee starts work; the

  3. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 14, Cyber...

    Energy Saver

    Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 14, Cyber Security 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 14, Cyber Security HQ cyber security ...

  4. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 1, Physical Security

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    | Department of Energy , Physical Security Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 1, Physical Security 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 1, Physical Security This chapter covers the procedures adopted by HQ to implement directives governing the physical protection of U.S security interests. These procedures include control of employee and visitor access to HQ buildings, detection and control of dangerous devices, issuance of security badges to HQ

  5. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 14, Cyber Security |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Department of Energy 4, Cyber Security Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 14, Cyber Security 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 14, Cyber Security HQ cyber security activities are managed by the Cyber Support Division (IM-622) within the Office of Chief Information Officer (IM-1). This chapter only covers the requirement for each HQ program element to appoint an Information Systems Security Officer (ISSO) to act as the point of contact between the

  6. Safety and Security at Trident Laser Facility

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Safety and Security Safety and Security at Trident Laser Facility Enabling world-class science in high-energy density physics and fundamental laser-matter interactions Contact ...

  7. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 8, Operations...

    Energy Saver

    Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 8, Operations Security Program 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 8, Operations Security Program This ...

  8. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 9, Technical...

    Energy Saver

    Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 9, Technical Surveillance Countermeasures 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 9, Technical ...

  9. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 4, FOCI, Facility

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Clearances, and Classified Contract Registration | Department of Energy 4, FOCI, Facility Clearances, and Classified Contract Registration Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 4, FOCI, Facility Clearances, and Classified Contract Registration 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 4, FOCI, Facility Clearances, and Classified Contract Registration Before any contract company or its employees is permitted access to U.S. classified information, it must

  10. Public Reading Facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    other records be maintained in public reading facilities. The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Electronic Reading Room for the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). ...

  11. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan | Department of...

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    Welcome to the 2016 version of the Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan (HQFMSP). ... This plan explains how these requirements are implemented at HQ and gives HQ personnel and ...

  12. Decisions regarding how to secure and invest in our

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Decisions regarding how to secure and invest in our Nation's energy infrastructure are often complex. Limited resources and investment returns, tight budgets, and lack of information can hinder the process of how to best maintain or improve existing infrastructure or build new energy facilities and systems. Threats or hazards that can impact energy infrastructure and the consequences of those impacts must be known to reduce vulnerabilities. Risk assessment can help to inform decision making when

  13. Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    2015) Special Message from the Corporate Investigations Office REPORTING PERSONNEL SECURITY CONCERNS If you report an incident of security concern involving yourself or a...

  14. Perimeter security for Minnesota correctional facilities

    SciTech Connect

    Crist, D.; Spencer, D.D.

    1996-12-31

    For the past few years, the Minnesota Department of Corrections, assisted by Sandia National Laboratories, has developed a set of standards for perimeter security at medium, close, and maximum custody correctional facilities in the state. During this process, the threat to perimeter security was examined and concepts about correctional perimeter security were developed. This presentation and paper will review the outcomes of this effort, some of the lessons learned, and the concepts developed during this process and in the course of working with architects, engineers and construction firms as the state upgraded perimeter security at some facilities and planned new construction at other facilities.

  15. Uranium Processing Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Uranium Processing Facility Uranium Processing Facility Project Celebrates Changing the Skyline of Y-12 Klotz visits Y-12 to see progress on new projects and ongoing work on NNSA's national security missions Last week, NNSA Administrator Lt. Gen. Frank Klotz (Ret.) visited the Y-12 National Security Complex to check on the status of ongoing projects like the Uranium Processing Facility as well as the site's continuing uranium operations. He also met with the Region 2 volunteers of the

  16. Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Security Tools Security Minutes New! SIMP Late Reporting Social Media Email Association Official Use Only (OUO) Majordomo Email List Risks Email Vacating Spaces Reporting Monitors Review and Approval Top of page

  17. Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    This order cancels DOE M 470.4-1, Chg 2, dated 102010, Safeguards and Security Program Planning and Management Physical Security DOE NAP 70.2, Chg 1, dated 72011, Physical ...

  18. Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    References: PERSEC F 5633.33, NNSA Personnel Security Clearance Action Request DOE F ... All SNL Members of the Worksforce granted a DOE Security Clearance are required to obtain ...

  19. Defense Nuclear Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Defense Nuclear Facility NNSA's safety office accredited and recognized for leadership in safe operation of defense nuclear facilities Part of NNSA's commitment to maintaining the nation's safe, secure, and effective nuclear deterrent are relentlessly high standards for technically capable nuclear enterprise personnel qualifications for all aspects of Defense Nuclear Facility operations. In December 2015, the Department of Energy

  20. Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    U.S. DOE SECURITY CLEARANCES Clearnce Home Initial Clearance Clearance Reinstate Clearance Upgrade Clearance Downgrade Clearance Extension Clearance Reciprocity Clearance ...

  1. Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    - Classified Matter Channels Maretta King mking@sandia.gov 505-284-0827 Clearance Office - Clearance Reinvestigations security@sandia.gov 505-845-1321 - Clearance Terminations ...

  2. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    The servicing badge office provides information on how to access the online briefing. The ... The briefing includes an overview of HQ security programs, access control procedures, ...

  3. Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Note: In circumstances where the potential danger associated with an item is questionable, consult the physical security contact for additional information. Illegal drugs (does not ...

  4. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan- Chapter 9, Technical Surveillance Countermeasures

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 9, Technical Surveillance Countermeasures Describes the DOE Headquarters Technical Security Countermeasures (TSCM) Program.

  5. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 16, Equivalenci...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 16, Equivalencies and Exemptions Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 16, Equivalencies and Exemptions June...

  6. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 5, Classified...

    Energy Saver

    Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 5, Classified Matter Protection and Control Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 5, Classified Matter ...

  7. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 2, Limited...

    Energy Saver

    Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 2, Limited Areas, Vault-Type Rooms and Temporary Limited Areas 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 2, ...

  8. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 12, Special...

    Energy Saver

    Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 12, Special Access Programs 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 12, Special Access Programs This very ...

  9. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 15, Outprocessi...

    Energy Saver

    Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 15, Outprocessing 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 15, Outprocessing This chapter describes the ...

  10. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 5, Classified...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 5, Classified Matter Protection and Control Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 5, Classified Matter...

  11. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 16, Equivalenci...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    6, Equivalencies and Exemptions Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 16, Equivalencies and Exemptions June 2015 2015 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan...

  12. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 7, Surveys...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    7, Surveys and Reviews Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 7, Surveys and Reviews 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 7, Surveys and ...

  13. Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    This correspondence course provides an overview of the roles and responsibilities of the DOE or DOE-contractor FSO. The course emphasizes facility clearance requirements, personnel ...

  14. Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    ... DOE has notified Sandia that all Members of the Workforce with a security clearance, ... All clearance requests can now be submitted as usual. The suspension of e-QIP was ...

  15. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    ... A Security Termination Briefing is available in DVD format from the HSO Program Manager. The DVD is especially useful in processing large numbers of employees departing in a short ...

  16. Assessing the Security Vulnerabilities of Correctional Facilities

    SciTech Connect

    Morrison, G.S.; Spencer, D.S.

    1998-10-27

    The National Institute of Justice has tasked their Satellite Facility at Sandia National Laboratories and their Southeast Regional Technology Center in Charleston, South Carolina to devise new procedures and tools for helping correctional facilities to assess their security vulnerabilities. Thus, a team is visiting selected correctional facilities and performing vulnerability assessments. A vulnerability assessment helps to identi~ the easiest paths for inmate escape, for introduction of contraband such as drugs or weapons, for unexpected intrusion fi-om outside of the facility, and for the perpetration of violent acts on other inmates and correctional employees, In addition, the vulnerability assessment helps to quantify the security risks for the facility. From these initial assessments will come better procedures for performing vulnerability assessments in general at other correctional facilities, as well as the development of tools to assist with the performance of such vulnerability assessments.

  17. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 3, Personnel

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Security | Department of Energy 3, Personnel Security Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 3, Personnel Security 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 3, Personnel Security This chapter addresses the HQ Personnel Security Program. The process to acquire a security clearance is explained. This process must be completed before an employee or contractor can be granted access to classified information. The applicant for a security clearance must provide

  18. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    » Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan Welcome to the 2016 version of the Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan (HQFMSP). The purpose of the HQFMSP is to inform employees, contractors, and visitors of the security procedures in place at Department of Energy (DOE) Headquarters (HQ) facilities in the Washington, DC area. The HQFMSP does not establish new security requirements; security requirements are established by various Federal laws

  19. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Table of Contents |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Department of Energy Facilities Master Security Plan - Table of Contents Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Table of Contents 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Table of Contents The Table of Contents is an outline of all the chapters and sections of the Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan (HQFMSP). It directs the reader to the portion of the HQFMSP that will most likely explain the Headquarters (HQ) security procedures he/she is seeking. 2016

  20. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 11, Incidents of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Security Concern | Department of Energy 1, Incidents of Security Concern Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 11, Incidents of Security Concern 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 11, Incidents of Security Concern Whenever a failure to properly protect classified matter is detected, it must be formally reported and investigated. This chapter describes the procedures for doing so. It also covers the process for administering security infractions to

  1. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 17, Headquarters

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Security Officer Program | Department of Energy 7, Headquarters Security Officer Program Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 17, Headquarters Security Officer Program 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 17, Headquarters Security Officer Program This chapter implements HQ Order 472.1, Headquarters Security Officer Program, which requires that all HQ program elements appoint a Federal employee to the position of HSO and a second Federal employee to

  2. Facility will focus on bioenergy, global food security

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Facility will focus on bioenergy, global food security Facility will focus on bioenergy, global food security The New Mexico Consortium expects to complete the 27,000 square foot ...

  3. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 4

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Revision History as of 7/27/16: Subsection Date Changed To HQ Implementation Procedures - HQ FOCI/Facility Clearance and Approval Program Manager 7/27/16 - Add following sentence to end of paragraph: Additionally, the HQ FOCI/Facility Clearance and Approval Program Manager will ensure that Key Management Personnel (KMP), who must have a security clearance due to requirements of FOCI and DOE M 470.4, and who do not receive a badge or onsite briefing by the HQ Badge Office, receive the

  4. Macro Security Methodology for Conducting Facility Security and Sustainability Assessments

    SciTech Connect

    Herdes, Greg A.; Freier, Keith D.; Wright, Kyle A.

    2007-07-09

    Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) has developed a macro security strategy that not only addresses traditional physical protection systems, but also focuses on sustainability as part of the security assessment and management process. This approach is designed to meet the needs of virtually any industry or environment requiring critical asset protection. PNNL has successfully demonstrated the utility of this macro security strategy through its support to the NNSA Office of Global Threat Reduction implementing security upgrades at international facilities possessing high activity radioactive sources that could be used in the assembly of a radiological dispersal device, commonly referred to as a dirty bomb. Traditional vulnerability assessments provide a snap shot in time of the effectiveness of a physical protection system without significant consideration to the sustainability of the component elements that make up the system. This paper describes the approach and tools used to integrate technology, plans and procedures, training, and sustainability into a simple, quick, and easy-to-use security assessment and management tool.

  5. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Acronyms | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Energy Acronyms Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Acronyms 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Acronyms The HQFMSP contains many security terms with specialized meanings. In many cases, these specialized terms have been reduced to acronyms in order to save space and improve readability. The acronym list is a handy reference allowing readers to understand the true meaning of unfamiliar security terms. 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Acronyms

  6. Record of Decision; Defense Waste Processing Facility at the...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Record of Decision; Defense Waste Processing Facility at the Savannah River Site, Aiken, SC AGENCY: Department of Energy, DOE. ACTION: Record of Decision, Defense Waste Processing ...

  7. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 10, Security...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    receives hisher security clearance; the Annual Security Refresher Briefing, which must be completed each year by all those who hold a security clearance; and the Security ...

  8. Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers, Solar Screening Evaluation Checklist, September 2010 Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility ...

  9. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 8, Operations

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Security Program | Department of Energy 8, Operations Security Program Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 8, Operations Security Program 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 8, Operations Security Program This chapter describes the HQ OPSEC Program and the procedures to be followed by HQ program elements for identifying their Critical Information. This chapter also discusses the appointment of OPSEC representatives, activities of the HQ OPSEC

  10. Facility Approvals, Security Surveys, and Nuclear Materials Surveys

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    1992-09-15

    To establish Department of Energy (DOE) requirements for granting facility approvals prior to permitting safeguards and security interests on the premises and the conduct of insite security and/or nuclear material surveys of facilities with safeguards and security interests. Cancels DOE 5634.1A. Canceled by DOE O 470.1 dated 9-28-95.

  11. Facility Approvals, Security Surveys, and Nuclear Materials Surveys

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    1988-02-03

    To establish the Department of Energy (DOE) requirements for granting facility approvals prior to permitting safeguards and security interests on the premises and the conduct of on-site security and/or nuclear material surveys of facilities with safeguards and security interests. Cancels DOE O 5630.7 and DOE O 5634.1. Canceled by DOE 5634.1B.

  12. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 5, Classified Matter

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Protection and Control | Department of Energy Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 5, Classified Matter Protection and Control Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 5, Classified Matter Protection and Control 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 5, Classified Matter Protection and Control This, the largest chapter in the HQFMSP, describes the procedures required to properly protect classified matter from the day it is created to the

  13. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 12, Special Access

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Programs | Department of Energy 2, Special Access Programs Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 12, Special Access Programs 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 12, Special Access Programs This very brief chapter merely identifies who to contact at HQ whenever a question arises about the administration of SAPs. This chapter is maintained by AU-1. It also covers the process for administering security infractions to those responsible for a security

  14. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 15, Outprocessing |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Department of Energy 5, Outprocessing Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 15, Outprocessing 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 15, Outprocessing This chapter describes the security actions that must be taken whenever a HQ Federal employee or contractor terminates their employment or transfers from one HQ program element to another. Such actions include terminating security clearances, changing safe/door combinations, revising access lists, removing

  15. Facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration | (NNSA...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Facilities Photo: DARHT's Accelerators help create the x-rays at DARHT, the world's most advanced radiography facility. Research and Development Facilities Research and Development ...

  16. Facility Energy Decision System (FEDS(tm)) Software - Energy...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Facility Energy Decision System (FEDS(tm)) Software Pacific Northwest National Laboratory ... Shown here, the FEDS Building Set Inputs interface is easy to populate. The FEDS software ...

  17. Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Solar Screening Evaluation Checklist, September 2010 Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers, Solar Screening Evaluation Checklist, September 2010 This ...

  18. Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Appendix B, September 2010 Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision ... process for successfully planning for and installing solar technology on a federal site. ...

  19. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 13, Controlled

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Unclassified Information | Department of Energy 3, Controlled Unclassified Information Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 13, Controlled Unclassified Information 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 13, Controlled Unclassified Information CUI consists of information that is not classified, but it is so sensitive that it requires special handling and protection. CUI includes Official Use Only (OUO) and its subcategories of Personally Identifiable

  20. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 6, Foreign

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Interaction | Department of Energy 6, Foreign Interaction Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 6, Foreign Interaction 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 6, Foreign Interaction DOE has adopted significant controls over the interaction of its employees and contractors with foreign nationals. When authorized by a treaty or international agreement, some DOE classified information can be shared with foreign government representatives. Unclassified

  1. Information security management system planning for CBRN facilities

    SciTech Connect

    Lenaeu, Joseph D.; O'Neil, Lori Ross; Leitch, Rosalyn M.; Glantz, Clifford S.; Landine, Guy P.; Bryant, Janet L.; Lewis, John; Mathers, Gemma; Rodger, Robert; Johnson, Christopher

    2015-12-01

    The focus of this document is to provide guidance for the development of information security management system planning documents at chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear (CBRN) facilities. It describes a risk-based approach for planning information security programs based on the sensitivity of the data developed, processed, communicated, and stored on facility information systems.

  2. Support Facilities | Y-12 National Security Complex

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Support Facilities Support Facilities The Y-12 site comprises more than 250 non-production facilities that help support ongoing and planned missions. We continue to maintain and modernize these support facilities - which include office buildings, maintenance shops, waste management and storage facilities, guard portals and posts, cooling towers and chiller buildings - with an emphasis on sustainment, cost savings and energy efficiency

  3. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 16, Equivalencies

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    and Exemptions | Department of Energy 6, Equivalencies and Exemptions Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 16, Equivalencies and Exemptions 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 16, Equivalencies and Exemptions This chapter describes the actions that can be taken by HQ program elements when they cannot meet the security requirements set forth in DOE orders. It provides instructions on how to request an equivalency or exemption to a DOE order and

  4. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 7, Surveys and

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Reviews | Department of Energy 7, Surveys and Reviews Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 7, Surveys and Reviews 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 7, Surveys and Reviews This chapter covers the HQ Security Survey Program, which has two primary functions. First, survey team members assist HQ program elements in establishing, maintaining, and deactivating their LAs, VTRs, and TLAs. Second, the survey team conducts an annual assessment of how well

  5. high explosives pressing facility | National Nuclear Security...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    pressing facility high explosives pressing facility Thornberry hosts House Majority Leader at Pantex visit Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Texas, hosted Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy,...

  6. Facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration | (NNSA)

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Evaluation / Research and Development Facilities Photo: DARHT's Accelerators help create the x-rays at DARHT, the world's most advanced radiography facility. Research and Development Facilities Research and Development manages and oversees the operation of an exceptional suite of science, technology and engineering facilities that support and further the national stockpile stewardship agenda. Of varying size, scope and capabilities, the facilities work in a concert to accomplish the following

  7. ICF Facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration | ...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Facilities Nike mirror array and lens array ICF operates a set of world-class experimental facilities to create HEDP conditions and to obtain quantitative data in support of its ...

  8. Facility Clearance Program | National Nuclear Security Administration |

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    (NNSA) Facility Clearance Program The Facility Clearance (FCL) Program regulates DOE approval of a Federal or contractor facility's eligibility to access, receive, generate, reproduce, store, transmit, or destroy classified information or matter, special nuclear material (SNM), other hazardous material presenting a potential radiological, chemical, or biological sabotage threat, and/or DOE property of significant monetary value, exclusive of facilities and land values (hereinafter referred

  9. ICF Facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration | (NNSA)

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Facilities Nike mirror array and lens array ICF operates a set of world-class experimental facilities to create HEDP conditions and to obtain quantitative data in support of its numerous stockpile stewardship-related activities. To learn about three high energy experimental facilities and two small lasers that provide ICF capabilities, select the links below. National Ignition Facility, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory OMEGA and OMEGA EP, University of Rochester Laboratory for Laser

  10. National Ignition Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    National Ignition Facility National Ignition Facility Tops 400 Shots in Fiscal Year 2016 LIVERMORE, Calif.-On September 18, 2016, the National Ignition Facility (NIF) performed its 400th experiment of fiscal year (FY) 2016, meeting the year's goal several weeks early. In comparison, the facility completed 356 experiments in FY 2015 and 191 experiments in FY 2014. NIF is on... Former Army Ranger wins Sandia-sponsored student of the year award Former Army Ranger Damon Alcorn recently received the

  11. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 2, Limited Areas,

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Vault-Type Rooms and Temporary Limited Areas | Department of Energy 2, Limited Areas, Vault-Type Rooms and Temporary Limited Areas Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 2, Limited Areas, Vault-Type Rooms and Temporary Limited Areas 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 2, Limited Areas, Vault-Type Rooms and Temporary Limited Areas This chapter covers the establishment, maintenance, and termination of areas within HQ buildings where classified activities

  12. Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility | Y-12 National Security Complex

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Highly Enriched Uranium ... Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility HEUMF The Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility is our nation's central repository for highly enriched uranium, a vital national security asset. HEUMF is a massive concrete and steel structure that provides maximum security for the highly enriched uranium material that it protects. Approximately 300 feet by 475 feet, HEUMF has areas for receiving, shipping and providing long-term storage of the enriched uranium, as well

  13. Infrastructure and Facilities Management | National Nuclear Security...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Home content Infrastructure and Facilities Management NNSA restores, rebuilds, and revitalizes the physical infrastructure of the nuclear weapons complex to ensure the vitality ...

  14. National Ignition Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    experiments are focusing on using the NIF laser and other ICF high energy density facilities leading to demonstrate fusion ignition and thermonuclear burn in the laboratory. ...

  15. Underground Facility at Nevada National Security Site | National Nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Security Administration | (NNSA) Underground Facility at Nevada National Security Site The U1a Complex is an underground laboratory at the Nevada National Security Site used for dynamic experiments with special nuclear material (SNM) and other weapon materials. The Complex provides an infrastructure of high-bandwidth diagnostics, data acquisition, timing and firing, control and monitor systems capable of supporting experiments designed to acquire information on fundamental materials

  16. National Ignition Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration |

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    (NNSA) National Ignition Facility Glass amplifiers in Laser Bay 2 at the National Ignition Facility. The construction of the 192-beam 1.8 MJ UV NIF, the world's most energetic laser, was completed in March 2009. Current experiments are focusing on using the NIF laser and other ICF high energy density facilities leading to demonstrate fusion ignition and thermonuclear burn in the laboratory. The NIF is also being used to support basic science and SSP experiments. By the end of FY 2012, the

  17. Contained Firing Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Contained Firing Facility The CFF firing chamber is the largest explosive chamber in the world, used for large-scale experiments using high-explosives with full containment of ...

  18. lasers. National Ignition Facility | National Nuclear Security...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    target shot of fiscal year 2015 WASHINGTON - Last week, the National Ignition Facility (NIF) fired its 300th laser target shot in fiscal year (FY) 2015, meeting the year's goal...

  19. Contained Firing Facility | National Nuclear Security Administration |

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    (NNSA) Contained Firing Facility The CFF firing chamber is the largest explosive chamber in the world, used for large-scale experiments using high-explosives with full containment of hazardous materials. The facility provides a combination of capabilities, including wide-angle flash radiography, laser velocimetry, pin-dome measurements, and high-speed optical cameras that are used to measure dynamics during the experiments. CFF is a key component of NNSA's national hydrotest strategy and was

  20. High Explosives Application Facility | National Nuclear Security

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Administration | (NNSA) High Explosives Application Facility A Livermore scientist uses a laser spectroscopic method with a diamond anvil DOE/NNSA has identified LLNL's High Explosives Applications Facility (HEAF) as the complex-wide "Center of Excellence" for High-Explosives Research and Development. In this capacity, HEAF is a source of subject matter expertise for high explosives and other energetic materials. Its mission is to provide this expertise to serve multiple government

  1. How to implement security controls for an information security program at CBRN facilities

    SciTech Connect

    Lenaeus, Joseph D.; O'Neil, Lori Ross; Leitch, Rosalyn M.; Glantz, Clifford S.; Landine, Guy P.; Bryant, Janet L.; Lewis, John; Mathers, Gemma; Rodger, Robert; Johnson, Christopher

    2015-12-01

    This document was prepared by PNNL within the framework of Project 19 of the European Union Chemical Biological Radiological and Nuclear Risk Mitigation Centres of Excellence Initiative entitled, ''Development of procedures and guidelines to create and improve secure information management systems and data exchange mechanisms for CBRN materials under regulatory control.'' It provides management and workers at CBRN facilities, parent organization managers responsible for those facilities, and regulatory agencies (governmental and nongovernmental) with guidance on the best practices for protecting information security. The security mitigation approaches presented in this document were chosen because they present generally accepted guidance in an easy-to-understand manner, making it easier for facility personnel to grasp key concepts and envision how security controls could be implemented by the facility. This guidance is presented from a risk management perspective.

  2. Congressmen tour Y-12 facilities | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    | (NNSA) Congressmen tour Y-12 facilities Wednesday, September 30, 2015 - 1:34pm NNSA Blog During a recent visit to the Y-12 National Security Complex, Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), chairman of the House Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee, is shown some of the technology in the Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility by Warehousing and Transportation Operations Manager Byron Hawkins. Simpson toured Y-12 with Rep. Chuck Fleischmann (R-Tenn.) as well as NNSA Production Office

  3. EM Issues Amended Decision to Expand Use of Nuclear Facility

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    AIKEN, S.C. – EM issued an amended Record of Decision (ROD) to the Savannah River Site (SRS) Spent Nuclear Fuel Environmental Impact Statement to expand the operations of the H-Canyon Facility at SRS to support a major nuclear non-proliferation goal and save taxpayer dollars.

  4. INDUSTRIAL CONTROL SYSTEM CYBER SECURITY: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS RELEVANT TO NUCLEAR FACILITIES, SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY

    SciTech Connect

    Robert S. Anderson; Mark Schanfein; Trond Bjornard; Paul Moskowitz

    2011-07-01

    Typical questions surrounding industrial control system (ICS) cyber security always lead back to: What could a cyber attack do to my system(s) and; how much should I worry about it? These two leading questions represent only a fraction of questions asked when discussing cyber security as it applies to any program, company, business, or organization. The intent of this paper is to open a dialog of important pertinent questions and answers that managers of nuclear facilities engaged in nuclear facility security and safeguards should examine, i.e., what questions should be asked; and how do the answers affect an organization's ability to effectively safeguard and secure nuclear material. When a cyber intrusion is reported, what does that mean? Can an intrusion be detected or go un-noticed? Are nuclear security or safeguards systems potentially vulnerable? What about the digital systems employed in process monitoring, and international safeguards? Organizations expend considerable efforts to ensure that their facilities can maintain continuity of operations against physical threats. However, cyber threats particularly on ICSs may not be well known or understood, and often do not receive adequate attention. With the disclosure of the Stuxnet virus that has recently attacked nuclear infrastructure, many organizations have recognized the need for an urgent interest in cyber attacks and defenses against them. Several questions arise including discussions about the insider threat, adequate cyber protections, program readiness, encryption, and many more. These questions, among others, are discussed so as to raise the awareness and shed light on ways to protect nuclear facilities and materials against such attacks.

  5. Office of Enterprise Assessments Assessment of Nuclear Reactor Facility Operations at Nevada National Security Site – September 2016

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Assessment of Nuclear Reactor Facility Operations at Nevada National Security Site Assessment of the Uranium Processing Facility Project Engineering Processes

  6. Facts about the Plutonium Record of Decision | National Nuclear Security

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Administration | (NNSA) Facts about the Plutonium Record of Decision Facts about the Plutonium Record of Decision

  7. Oak Ridge Facilities Construction | Y-12 National Security Complex

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Facilities ... Oak Ridge Facilities Construction Work in wet and mud was common during the construction of Oak Ridge facilities

  8. Design of a decision fusion rule for power system security assessment

    SciTech Connect

    Chow, J.C.; Zhu, Q.; Fischl, R.; Kam, M. )

    1993-08-01

    An Integrated Decision Support system is designed via sensor fusion techniques, for assessing the security of power systems. The Integrated Decision Support system fuses information from various Approximated System Performance (ASP) models in order to minimize the risk of making the wrong decision under changing operating conditions. It uses the classification decisions provided by different ASP models together with information about their statistical performance (e.g. probabilities of misclassifications) to synthesize the globally optimal decision in the Bayesian risk sense. This global decision is often superior (and in no case inferior) to the one obtained using any single ASP model. The design of the integrated decision support system is illustrated for detecting static voltage collapse by fusing the security information from a set of existing security indices.

  9. Testing standards for physical security systems at Category 1 fuel cycle facilities

    SciTech Connect

    Dwyer, P.A.

    1991-10-01

    This NUREG is a compilation of physical security testing standards for use at fuel cycle facilities using or possessing formula quantities of strategic special nuclear material.

  10. National Laser User Facilities Program | National Nuclear Security...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    National Laser User Facilities Program National Laser Users' Facility Grant Program ... Omega is one of NNSA's large high energy density research facilities. LLE has provided ...

  11. Uranium Processing Facility | Y-12 National Security Complex

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Y-12 Uranium Processing Facility Uranium Processing Facility UPF will be a state-of-the-art, consolidated facility for enriched uranium operations including assembly,...

  12. Uranium Processing Facility | Y-12 National Security Complex

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Uranium Processing Facility Uranium Processing Facility UPF will be a state-of-the-art, consolidated facility for enriched uranium operations including assembly, disassembly, ...

  13. NNSA Issues Amended Record of Decision to Build Nuclear Facility...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    only support the safety, security, and reliability of existing nuclear weapons but also ... NNSA maintains and enhances the safety, security, reliability, and performance of the U.S. ...

  14. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 11, Incidents...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Security Plan - Chapter 11, Incidents of Security Concern Whenever a failure to properly protect classified matter is detected, it must be formally reported and investigated. ...

  15. Webinar: Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Video recording and text version of the webinar titled, Procuring Fuel Cells for Stationary Power: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers, originally presented on May 8, 2012.

  16. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 17, Headquarters Security Officer Program

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    7-1 Chapter 17 Headquarters Security Officer Program This chapter implements the requirements of HQ Order 472.1, Headquarters Security Officer Program. The goal of the Headquarters Security Officer or HSO Program is to have a knowledgeable security person within each HQ element to answer common security questions, process security documentation on behalf of the element's personnel, arrange for security services provided by AU-40, and serve as the element's security point of contact. In summary,

  17. Headquarters Security Operations Facility Clearance and Approval Program

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Headquarters Facility Clearance and Approval Program (FCAP) is established by DOE Order to administratively determine that a facility is or is not eligible to access, receive, produce, use, and...

  18. NNSA Holds Groundbreaking at MOX Facility | National Nuclear Security

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Administration | (NNSA) Holds Groundbreaking at MOX Facility NNSA Holds Groundbreaking at MOX Facility Aiken, SC NNSA's plutonium disposition program moved another step forward with the start of site preparation for its Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility at the Savannah River Site. NNSA Administrator Linton F. Brooks and U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham led a group of U.S. and Russian dignitaries in turning the first shovels of earth at the MOX facility site at SRS, located in F-

  19. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 3, Personnel...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    clearance is explained. This process must be completed before an employee or contractor can be granted access to classified information. The applicant for a security clearance ...

  20. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 1, Physical...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    and control of dangerous devices, issuance of security badges to HQ employees, protection of government and personal property, and operation of the HQ lock and key control program. ...

  1. Groundbreaking at National Ignition Facility | National Nuclear Security

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Administration | (NNSA) Groundbreaking at National Ignition Facility Groundbreaking at National Ignition Facility Livermore, CA Secretary Pena participates in the ground breaking ceremony for the National Ignition Facility, a centerpiece of the stockpile stewardship program, at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

  2. DOE/DHS INDUSTRIAL CONTROL SYSTEM CYBER SECURITY PROGRAMS: A MODEL FOR USE IN NUCLEAR FACILITY SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY

    SciTech Connect

    Robert S. Anderson; Mark Schanfein; Trond Bjornard; Paul Moskowitz

    2011-07-01

    Many critical infrastructure sectors have been investigating cyber security issues for several years especially with the help of two primary government programs. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National SCADA Test Bed and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Control Systems Security Program have both implemented activities aimed at securing the industrial control systems that operate the North American electric grid along with several other critical infrastructure sectors (ICS). These programs have spent the last seven years working with industry including asset owners, educational institutions, standards and regulating bodies, and control system vendors. The programs common mission is to provide outreach, identification of cyber vulnerabilities to ICS and mitigation strategies to enhance security postures. The success of these programs indicates that a similar approach can be successfully translated into other sectors including nuclear operations, safeguards, and security. The industry regulating bodies have included cyber security requirements and in some cases, have incorporated sets of standards with penalties for non-compliance such as the North American Electric Reliability Corporation Critical Infrastructure Protection standards. These DOE and DHS programs that address security improvements by both suppliers and end users provide an excellent model for nuclear facility personnel concerned with safeguards and security cyber vulnerabilities and countermeasures. It is not a stretch to imagine complete surreptitious collapse of protection against the removal of nuclear material or even initiation of a criticality event as witnessed at Three Mile Island or Chernobyl in a nuclear ICS inadequately protected against the cyber threat.

  3. Performing Energy Security Assessments: A How-To Guide for Federal Facility Managers

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Guide describes the best practices and recommended process for federal facility managers to prepare for the following sections of a facility’s energy security plan: vulnerability assessments, energy preparedness and operations plans, and remedial action plans.

  4. Facility Operations and User Support | National Nuclear Security

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Administration | (NNSA) Facility Operations and User Support This sub-program provides both necessary physical facility and operational support for reliable, cross-lab production computing and storage environments as well as a suite of user services for effective use of ASC tri-lab computing resources. The scope of the facility operations includes planning, integration and deployment, continuing product support, software license and maintenance fees, procurement of operational equipment and

  5. Security of Foreign Intelligence Information and Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    1993-07-23

    The order establishes responsibilities and authorities for protecting Foreign Intelligence Information (FII) and Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities (SCIFs) within DOE. Supersedes DOE 5639.8.

  6. Facility Operations and User Support | National Nuclear Security...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    The scope of the facility operations includes planning, integration and deployment, ... The scope of this product includes funded R&D projects to address gap areas identified by ...

  7. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 4, FOCI...

    Energy Saver

    These actions include obtaining a favorable FOCI determination, obtaining a facility clearance, and registering their classified contracts into Federal databases. This chapter ...

  8. Tag: uranium processing facility | Y-12 National Security Complex

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    uranium processing ... Tag: uranium processing facility Displaying 1 - 3 of 3... Category: News UPF Project celebrates changing the Y-12 skyline Groundbreaking Ceremony Held for ...

  9. Extreme behavior: New national security facility will open its doors to

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    study materials at extreme conditions | Argonne National Laboratory Extreme behavior: New national security facility will open its doors to study materials at extreme conditions August 4, 2016 Tweet EmailPrint A new, first-of-its-kind-worldwide research capability will help unravel the mysteries of material behavior at extreme conditions and short time scales in support of the National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA's) vital national security missions. NNSA, the Department of

  10. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 17, Headquarter...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    This chapter implements HQ Order 472.1, Headquarters Security Officer Program, which requires that all HQ program elements appoint a Federal employee to the position of HSO and a ...

  11. Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility | National Nuclear Security

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Administration Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility Documents related to the project: Plutonium Disposition Study Options Independent Assessment Phase 1 Report, April 13, 2015 Plutonium Disposition Study Options Independent Assessment Phase 2 Report, August 20, 2015 Final Report of the Plutonium Disposition Red Team, August 13, 2015 Commentary on

  12. Status of purification facility | Y-12 National Security Complex

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    (EIA) < NUCLEAR & URANIUM Data Status of U.S. Nuclear Outages Download Download Link to: Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Power Reactor Status Report

    Status of purification ... Status of purification facility Posted: March 26, 2015 - 2:16pm In a message to employees, Y-12 Site Manager Bill Tindal brought employees up-to-date regarding the status of the purification facility. In referencing the Dec. 16, 2014, acetonitrile spill, Tindal noted that the spill was relatively small (about

  13. Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility | National Nuclear Security

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Administration | (NNSA) fieldoffices / Savannah River Field Office Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility Documents related to the project: Plutonium Disposition Study Options Independent Assessment Phase 1 Report, April 13, 2015 Plutonium Disposition Study Options Independent Assessment Phase 2 Report, August 20, 2015 Final Report of the Plutonium Disposition Red Team, August 13, 2015 Commentary on Report by High Bridge Associates, Inc., Feb. 12, 2016 2016 Updated Performance Baseline

  14. Towards an Experimental Testbed Facility for Cyber-Physical Security Research

    SciTech Connect

    Edgar, Thomas W.; Manz, David O.; Carroll, Thomas E.

    2012-01-07

    Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) are under great scrutiny due to large Smart Grid investments and recent high profile security vulnerabilities and attacks. Research into improved security technologies, communication models, and emergent behavior is necessary to protect these systems from sophisticated adversaries and new risks posed by the convergence of CPSs with IT equipment. However, cyber-physical security research is limited by the lack of access to universal cyber-physical testbed facilities that permit flexible, high-fidelity experiments. This paper presents a remotely-configurable and community-accessible testbed design that integrates elements from the virtual, simulated, and physical environments. Fusing data between the three environments enables the creation of realistic and scalable environments where new functionality and ideas can be exercised. This novel design will enable the research community to analyze and evaluate the security of current environments and design future, secure, cyber-physical technologies.

  15. Acceptance criteria for the evaluation of Category 1 fuel cycle facility physical security plans

    SciTech Connect

    Dwyer, P.A.

    1991-10-01

    This NUREG document presents criteria developed from US Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulations for the evaluation of physical security plans submitted by Category 1 fuel facility licensees. Category 1 refers to those licensees who use or possess a formula quantity of strategic special nuclear material.

  16. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 570: Area 9 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect

    Matthews, Patrick

    2013-11-01

    This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report presents information supporting the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 570: Area 9 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada. This complies with the requirements of the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) that was agreed to by the State of Nevada; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Environmental Management; U.S. Department of Defense; and DOE, Legacy Management. The purpose of the CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed.

  17. DOE Releases Request for Information for Y-12 National Security Complex Water Treatment Facility Construction

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Cincinnati -- The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today issued a Request for Information (RFI) seeking to solicit input via capability statements from interested parties with the specialized capabilities necessary to meet the requirements of the Draft Statement of Work (SOW) for construction of a water treatment facility needed for mercury remediation at the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12), Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

  18. Facility Energy Decision System (FEDS) Assessment Report for US Army Garrison, Japan - Honshu Installations

    SciTech Connect

    Kora, Angela R.; Brown, Daryl R.; Dixon, Douglas R.

    2010-03-09

    This report documents an assessment was performed by a team of engineers from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) under contract to the Installation Management Command (IMCOM) Pacific Region Office (PARO). The effort used the Facility Energy Decision System (FEDS) model to determine how energy is consumed at five U.S. Army Garrison-Japan (USAG-J) installations in the Honshu area, identify the most cost-effective energy retrofit measures, and calculate the potential energy and cost savings.

  19. Headquarters Security Operations

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE strengthens national security by protecting personnel, facilities, property, classified information, and sensitive unclassified information for DOE Headquarters facilities in the National Capital Area under normal and abnormal (i.e., emergency) conditions; manages access authorization functions; ensures that executives and dignitaries are fully protected, and supports efforts to ensure the continuity of government in all circumstances as mandated by Presidential Decision Directive.

  20. Los Alamos National Laboratory Facilities, Security and Safeguards Division, Safeguards and Security Program Office, Protective Force Oversight Program

    SciTech Connect

    1995-11-30

    The purpose of this document is to identify and describe the duties and responsibilities of Facility Security and Safeguards (FSS) Safeguards and Security (SS) organizations (groups/offices) with oversight functions over the Protection Force (PF) subcontractor. Responsible organizations will continue their present PF oversight functions under the Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) assessment, but now will be required to also coordinate, integrate, and interface with other FSS S and S organizations and with the PF subcontractor to measure performance, assess Department of Energy (DOE) compliance, reduce costs, and minimize duplication of effort. The role of the PF subcontractor is to provide the Laboratory with effective and efficient protective force services. PF services include providing protection for the special nuclear material, government property and classified or sensitive information developed and/or consigned to the Laboratory, as well as protection for personnel who work or participate in laboratory activities. FSS S and S oversight of both performance and compliance standards/metrics is essential for these PF objectives to be met.

  1. Materials and Security Consolidation Complex Facilities Radioactive Waste Management Basis and DOE Manual 435.1-1 Compliance Tables

    SciTech Connect

    Not Listed

    2011-09-01

    Department of Energy Order 435.1, 'Radioactive Waste Management,' along with its associated manual and guidance, requires development and maintenance of a radioactive waste management basis for each radioactive waste management facility, operation, and activity. This document presents a radioactive waste management basis for Idaho National Laboratory's Materials and Security Consolidation Center facilities that manage radioactive waste. The radioactive waste management basis for a facility comprises existing laboratory-wide and facility-specific documents. Department of Energy Manual 435.1-1, 'Radioactive Waste Management Manual,' facility compliance tables also are presented for the facilities. The tables serve as a tool for developing the radioactive waste management basis.

  2. Security

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Security refers to the security of the stream of principal and interest repayments and what happens in the event that a secured loan defaults.

  3. VWC-0001 and VWC-0002- Deputy Secretary Decision- In the Matter of Daniel Holsinger, Complainant, v. K-Ray Security, Inc.

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This is a request for review by K-Ray Security, Inc., the current security operations contractor at DOE’s Federal Energy Technology Center (“FETC”), of the Decision of the Office of Hearings and...

  4. Facility Targeting, Protection and Mission Decision Making Using the VISAC Code

    SciTech Connect

    Morris, Robert Howard; Sulfredge, Charles David

    2011-01-01

    The Visual Interactive Site Analysis Code (VISAC) is a Java-based graphical expert system developed by ORNL for the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and other sponsors to aid in targeting facilities and to predict the associated collateral effects for the go, no go mission decision making process. VISAC integrates the three concepts of target geometric modeling, damage assessment capabilities, and an event/fault tree methodology for evaluating accident/incident consequences. It can analyze a variety of accidents/incidents at nuclear or industrial facilities, ranging from simple component sabotage to an attack with military or terroist weapons. For nuclear facilities, VISAC predicts the facility damage, estimated downtime, amount and timing of any radionuclides released. used in conunction with DTRA's HPAC code, VISAC also can analyze transport and dispersion of the radionuclides, levels of contamination of the surrounding area, and the population at risk. VISAC has also been used by the NRC to aid in the development of protective measures for nuclear facilities that may be subjected to attacks by car/truck bombs.

  5. Securing Operating Data From Passive Safety Tests at the Fast Flux Test Facility

    SciTech Connect

    Wootan, David W.; Omberg, Ronald P.; Makenas, Bruce J.; Nielsen, Deborah L.; Nelson, Joseph V.; Polzin, David L.

    2011-06-01

    The Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) is the most recent Liquid Metal Reactor (LMR) to operate in the United States, from 1982 to 1992. The technologies employed in designing and constructing this reactor, along with information obtained from tests conducted during its operation, are currently being secured and archived by the Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy Fuel Cycle Research and Development Program. This report is one in a series documenting the overall project efforts to retrieve and preserve critical information related to advanced reactors. A previous report summarized the initial efforts to review, retrieve and preserve the most salient documents related to Passive Safety Testing (PST) in the FFTF. Efforts continue to locate, secure, and retrieve record copies of original plant data tapes for the series of passive safety tests conducted between 1986 and 1991.

  6. Securing Operating Data From Passive Safety Tests at the Fast Flux Test Facility

    SciTech Connect

    Wootan, David W.; Omberg, Ronald P.; Makenas, Bruce J.; Nielsen, Deborah L.; Nelson, Joseph V.; Polzin, David L.

    2011-06-01

    The Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) is the most recent Liquid Metal Reactor (LMR) to operate in the United States, from 1982 to 1992. The technologies employed in designing and constructing this reactor, along with information obtained from tests conducted during its operation, are currently being secured and archived by the Department of Energy's Office of Nuclear Energy Fuel Cycle Research and Development Program. This report is one in a series documenting the overall project efforts to retrieve and preserve critical information related to advanced reactors. A previous report summarized the initial efforts to review, retrieve and preserve the most salient documents related to Passive Safety Testing (PST) in the FFTF. Efforts continue to locate, secure, and retrieve record copies of original plant data tapes for the series of passive safety tests conducted between 1986 and 1991.

  7. 3S (Safeguards, Security, Safety) based pyroprocessing facility safety evaluation plan

    SciTech Connect

    Ku, J.H.; Choung, W.M.; You, G.S.; Moon, S.I.; Park, S.H.; Kim, H.D.

    2013-07-01

    The big advantage of pyroprocessing for the management of spent fuels against the conventional reprocessing technologies lies in its proliferation resistance since the pure plutonium cannot be separated from the spent fuel. The extracted materials can be directly used as metal fuel in a fast reactor, and pyroprocessing reduces drastically the volume and heat load of the spent fuel. KAERI has implemented the SBD (Safeguards-By-Design) concept in nuclear fuel cycle facilities. The goal of SBD is to integrate international safeguards into the entire facility design process since the very beginning of the design phase. This paper presents a safety evaluation plan using a conceptual design of a reference pyroprocessing facility, in which 3S (Safeguards, Security, Safety)-By-Design (3SBD) concept is integrated from early conceptual design phase. The purpose of this paper is to establish an advanced pyroprocessing hot cell facility design concept based on 3SBD for the successful realization of pyroprocessing technology with enhanced safety and proliferation resistance.

  8. Noneconomic factors influencing scrap metal disposition decisions at DOE and NRC-licensed nuclear facilities

    SciTech Connect

    Ewen, M.D.; Robinson, L.A.

    1997-02-01

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is currently developing radiation protection standards for scrap metal, which will establish criteria for the unconditional clearance of scrap from nuclear facilities. In support of this effort, Industrial Economics, Incorporated is assessing the costs and benefits attributable to the rulemaking. The first step in this analysis is to develop an in-depth understanding of the factors influencing scrap disposition decisions, so that one can predict current and future practices under existing requirements and compare them to the potential effects of EPA`s rulemaking. These baseline practices are difficult to predict due to a variety of factors. First, because decommissioning activities are just beginning at many sites, current practices do not necessarily provide an accurate indicator of how these practices may evolve as site managers gain experience with related decisions. Second, a number of different regulations and policies apply to these decisions, and the interactive effects of these requirements can be difficult to predict. Third, factors other than regulatory constraints and costs may have a significant effect on related decisions, such as concerns about public perceptions. In general, research suggests that these factors tend to discourage the unconditional clearance of scrap metal.

  9. Waste Acceptance Decisions and Uncertainty Analysis at the Oak Ridge Environmental Management Waste Management Facility

    SciTech Connect

    Redus, K. S.; Patterson, J. E.; Hampshire, G. L.; Perkins, A. B.

    2003-02-25

    The Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) Attainment Team (AT) routinely provides the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Oak Ridge Operations with Go/No-Go decisions associated with the disposition of over 1.8 million yd3 of low-level radioactive, TSCA, and RCRA hazardous waste. This supply of waste comes from 60+ environmental restoration projects over the next 15 years planned to be dispositioned at the Oak Ridge Environmental Management Waste Management Facility (EMWMF). The EMWMF WAC AT decision making process is accomplished in four ways: (1) ensure a clearly defined mission and timeframe for accomplishment is established, (2) provide an effective organization structure with trained personnel, (3) have in place a set of waste acceptance decisions and Data Quality Objectives (DQO) for which quantitative measures are required, and (4) use validated risk-based forecasting, decision support, and modeling/simulation tools. We provide a summary of WAC AT structure and performance. We offer suggestions based on lessons learned for effective transfer to other DOE.

  10. Designing and constructing/installing technical security countermeasures (TSCM) into supersensitive facilities

    SciTech Connect

    Davis, D.L.

    1988-01-01

    The design and construction of supersensitive facilities and the installation of systems secure from technical surveillance and sabotage penetration involve ''TSCM'' in the broad sense of technical ''security'' countermeasures. When the technical threat was at a lower level of intensity and sophistication, it was common practice to defer TSCM to the future facility occupant. However, the New Moscow Embassy experience has proven this course of action subject to peril. Although primary concern with the embassy was audio surveillance, elsewhere there are other threats of equal or greater concern, e.g., technical implants may be used to monitor readiness status or interfere with the operation of C3I and weapons systems. Present and future technical penetration threats stretch the imagination. The Soviets have committed substantial hard scientific resources to a broad range of technical intelligence, even including applications or parapsychology. Countering these threats involves continuous TSCM precautions from initial planning to completion. Designs and construction/installation techniques must facilitate technical inspections and preclude the broadest range of known and suspected technical penetration efforts.

  11. Application of Framework for Integrating Safety, Security and Safeguards (3Ss) into the Design Of Used Nuclear Fuel Storage Facility

    SciTech Connect

    Badwan, Faris M.; Demuth, Scott F

    2015-01-06

    Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy, Fuel Cycle Research and Development develops options to the current commercial fuel cycle management strategy to enable the safe, secure, economic, and sustainable expansion of nuclear energy while minimizing proliferation risks by conducting research and development focused on used nuclear fuel recycling and waste management to meet U.S. needs. Used nuclear fuel is currently stored onsite in either wet pools or in dry storage systems, with disposal envisioned in interim storage facility and, ultimately, in a deep-mined geologic repository. The safe management and disposition of used nuclear fuel and/or nuclear waste is a fundamental aspect of any nuclear fuel cycle. Integrating safety, security, and safeguards (3Ss) fully in the early stages of the design process for a new nuclear facility has the potential to effectively minimize safety, proliferation, and security risks. The 3Ss integration framework could become the new national and international norm and the standard process for designing future nuclear facilities. The purpose of this report is to develop a framework for integrating the safety, security and safeguards concept into the design of Used Nuclear Fuel Storage Facility (UNFSF). The primary focus is on integration of safeguards and security into the UNFSF based on the existing Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approach to addressing the safety/security interface (10 CFR 73.58 and Regulatory Guide 5.73) for nuclear power plants. The methodology used for adaptation of the NRC safety/security interface will be used as the basis for development of the safeguards /security interface and later will be used as the basis for development of safety and safeguards interface. Then this will complete the integration cycle of safety, security, and safeguards. The overall methodology for integration of 3Ss will be proposed, but only the integration of safeguards and security will be applied to the design of the

  12. Office of Headquarters Security Operations

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Office of Headquarters Security Operations strengthens national security by protecting personnel, facilities, property, classified information, and sensitive unclassified information for DOE Headquarters facilities in the National Capital Area under normal and abnormal (i.e., emergency) conditions; managing access authorization functions for Headquarters; ensuring that executives and dignitaries are fully protected, and supporting efforts to ensure the continuity of government in all circumstances as mandated by Presidential Decision Directive.

  13. security

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    exan-Calvin-Nelson-secures-recognition-for-expertise.aspx">Pantex website.

    Apex Gold discussion fosters international cooperation in run-up to 2016 Nuclear Security Summit...

  14. Procuring Stationary Fuel Cells For CHP: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers

    SciTech Connect

    Stinton, David P; McGervey, Joseph; Curran, Scott

    2011-11-01

    Federal agency leaders are expressing growing interest in using innovative fuel cell combined heat and power (CHP) technology at their sites, motivated by both executive branch sustainability targets and a desire to lead by example in the transition to a clean energy economy. Fuel cell CHP can deliver reliable electricity and heat with 70% to 85% efficiency. Implementing this technology can be a high efficiency, clean energy solution for agencies striving to meet ambitious sustainability requirements with limited budgets. Fuel cell CHP systems can use natural gas or renewable fuels, such as biogas. Procuring Stationary Fuel Cells for CHP: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers presents an overview of the process for planning and implementing a fuel cell CHP project in a concise, step-by-step format. This guide is designed to help agency leaders turn their interest in fuel cell technology into successful installations. This guide concentrates on larger (100 kW and greater) fuel cell CHP systems and does not consider other fuel cell applications such as cars, forklifts, backup power supplies or small generators (<100 kW). Because fuel cell technologies are rapidly evolving and have high up front costs, their deployment poses unique challenges. The electrical and thermal output of the CHP system must be integrated with the building s energy systems. Innovative financing mechanisms allow agencies to make a make versus buy decision to maximize savings. This guide outlines methods that federal agencies may use to procure fuel cell CHP systems with little or no capital investment. Each agency and division, however, has its own set of procurement procedures. This guide was written as a starting point, and it defers to the reader s set of rules if differences exist. The fuel cell industry is maturing, and project developers are gaining experience in working with federal agencies. Technology improvements, cost reductions, and experienced project developers are making

  15. The National Criticality Experiments Research Center at the Device Assembly Facility, Nevada National Security Site: Status and Capabilities, Summary Report

    SciTech Connect

    S. Bragg-Sitton; J. Bess; J. Werner

    2011-09-01

    The National Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC) was officially opened on August 29, 2011. Located within the Device Assembly Facility (DAF) at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS), the NCERC has become a consolidation facility within the United States for critical configuration testing, particularly those involving highly enriched uranium (HEU). The DAF is a Department of Energy (DOE) owned facility that is operated by the National Nuclear Security Agency/Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO). User laboratories include the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). Personnel bring their home lab qualifications and procedures with them to the DAF, such that non-site specific training need not be repeated to conduct work at DAF. The NNSS Management and Operating contractor is National Security Technologies, LLC (NSTec) and the NNSS Safeguards and Security contractor is Wackenhut Services. The complete report provides an overview and status of the available laboratories and test bays at NCERC, available test materials and test support configurations, and test requirements and limitations for performing sub-critical and critical tests. The current summary provides a brief summary of the facility status and the method by which experiments may be introduced to NCERC.

  16. Office of Enterprise Assessments Assessment of Nuclear Reactor Facility Operations at Nevada National Security Site … September 2016

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Nuclear Reactor Facility Operations at Nevada National Security Site September 2016 Office of Nuclear Safety and Environmental Assessments Office of Environment, Safety and Health Assessments Office of Enterprise Assessments U.S. Department of Energy i Table of Contents Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................... ii Executive Summary

  17. Probabilistic Risk Based Decision Support for Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Facilities in Sensitive Ecosystems

    SciTech Connect

    Greg Thoma; John Veil; Fred Limp; Jackson Cothren; Bruce Gorham; Malcolm Williamson; Peter Smith; Bob Sullivan

    2009-05-31

    This report describes work performed during the initial period of the project 'Probabilistic Risk Based Decision Support for Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Facilities in Sensitive Ecosystems.' The specific region that is within the scope of this study is the Fayetteville Shale Play. This is an unconventional, tight formation, natural gas play that currently has approximately 1.5 million acres under lease, primarily to Southwestern Energy Incorporated and Chesapeake Energy Incorporated. The currently active play encompasses a region from approximately Fort Smith, AR east to Little Rock, AR approximately 50 miles wide (from North to South). The initial estimates for this field put it almost on par with the Barnett Shale play in Texas. It is anticipated that thousands of wells will be drilled during the next several years; this will entail installation of massive support infrastructure of roads and pipelines, as well as drilling fluid disposal pits and infrastructure to handle millions of gallons of fracturing fluids. This project focuses on gas production in Arkansas as the test bed for application of proactive risk management decision support system for natural gas exploration and production. The activities covered in this report include meetings with representative stakeholders, development of initial content and design for an educational web site, and development and preliminary testing of an interactive mapping utility designed to provide users with information that will allow avoidance of sensitive areas during the development of the Fayetteville Shale Play. These tools have been presented to both regulatory and industrial stakeholder groups, and their feedback has been incorporated into the project.

  18. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 567: Miscellaneous Soil Sites - Nevada National Security Site, Nevada

    SciTech Connect

    Matthews, Patrick

    2014-12-01

    This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report presents information supporting the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 567: Miscellaneous Soil Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada. The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 567 based on the implementation of the corrective actions. The corrective actions implemented at CAU 567 were developed based on an evaluation of analytical data from the CAI, the assumed presence of COCs at specific locations, and the detailed and comparative analysis of the CAAs. The CAAs were selected on technical merit focusing on performance, reliability, feasibility, safety, and cost. The implemented corrective actions meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated. The CAAs meet all applicable federal and state regulations for closure of the site. Based on the implementation of these corrective actions, the DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office provides the following recommendations: • No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 567. • The Nevada Division of Environmental Protection issue a Notice of Completion to the DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office for closure of CAU 567. • CAU 567 be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

  19. 2016 Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 5, Classified Matter Protection and Control

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    5-i Chapter 5 Revision History as of 8-30-16: Subsection Date Changed To Performance Plan Element 2/3/16 All HQ Federal employees with a Q or L security clearance must have an element in their Performance Plans describing their responsibilities for protecting classified information. A commonly accepted Performance Plan Element is: All original classification authorities, security managers or security specialists and all other personnel whose duties significantly involve the creation or handling

  20. Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 116: Area 25 Test Cell C Facility, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada

    SciTech Connect

    NSTec Environmental Restoration

    2011-09-29

    This Closure Report (CR) presents information supporting closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 116, Area 25 Test Cell C Facility. This CR complies with the requirements of the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) that was agreed to by the State of Nevada; the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Environmental Management; the U.S. Department of Defense; and DOE, Legacy Management (FFACO, 1996 [as amended March 2010]). CAU 116 consists of the following two Corrective Action Sites (CASs), located in Area 25 of the Nevada National Security Site: (1) CAS 25-23-20, Nuclear Furnace Piping and (2) CAS 25-41-05, Test Cell C Facility. CAS 25-41-05 consisted of Building 3210 and the attached concrete shield wall. CAS 25-23-20 consisted of the nuclear furnace piping and tanks. Closure activities began in January 2007 and were completed in August 2011. Activities were conducted according to Revision 1 of the Streamlined Approach for Environmental Restoration Plan for CAU 116 (U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office [NNSA/NSO], 2008). This CR provides documentation supporting the completed corrective actions and provides data confirming that closure objectives for CAU 116 were met. Site characterization data and process knowledge indicated that surface areas were radiologically contaminated above release limits and that regulated and/or hazardous wastes were present in the facility.

  1. Facilities

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Facilities Facilities World-class facilities provide unique problem-solving opportunities. Unique research facilities support data-driven, agile solutions. Los Alamos National Laboratory has a number of facilities that support work related to sensor technologies and solutions including: Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test Facility The Explosives Center Lujan Neutron Scattering Center Materials Science Laboratory National High Magnetic Field Laboratory

  2. Facilities

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Nuclear Energy Defense Waste Management Programs Advanced Nuclear Energy Nuclear Energy Safety Technologies Facilities Battery Abuse Testing Laboratory Cylindrical Boiling Facility ...

  3. Geothermal heating retrofit at the Utah State Prison Minimum Security Facility. Final report, March 1979-January 1986

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1986-01-01

    This report is a summary of progress and results of the Utah State Prison Geothermal Space Heating Project. Initiated in 1978 by the Utah State Energy Office and developed with assistance from DOE's Division of Geothermal and Hydropower Technologies PON program, final construction was completed in 1984. The completed system provides space and water heating for the State Prison's Minimum Security Facility. It consists of an artesian flowing geothermal well, plate heat exchangers, and underground distribution pipeline that connects to the existing hydronic heating system in the State Prison's Minimum Security Facility. Geothermal water disposal consists of a gravity drain line carrying spent geothermal water to a cooling pond which discharges into the Jordan River, approximately one mile from the well site. The system has been in operation for two years with mixed results. Continuing operation and maintenance problems have reduced the expected seasonal operation from 9 months per year to 3 months. Problems with the Minimum Security heating system have reduced the expected energy contribution by approximately 60%. To date the system has saved the prison approximately $18,060. The total expenditure including resource assessment and development, design, construction, performance verification, and reporting is approximately $827,558.

  4. Composite Data Products (CDPs) from the Hydrogen Secure Data Center (HSDC) at the Energy Systems Integration Facility (ESIF), NREL

    DOE Data Explorer

    The Hydrogen Secure Data Center (HSDC) at NREL's Energy Systems Integration Facility (ESIF) plays a crucial role in NREL's independent, third-party analysis of hydrogen fuel cell technologies in real-world operation. NREL partners submit operational, maintenance, safety, and cost data to the HSDC on a regular basis. NREL's Technology Validation Team uses an internal network of servers, storage, computers, backup systems, and software to efficiently process raw data, complete quarterly analysis, and digest large amounts of time series data for data visualization. While the raw data are secured by NREL to protect commercially sensitive and proprietary information, individualized data analysis results are provided as detailed data products (DDPs) to the partners who supplied the data. Individual system, fleet, and site analysis results are aggregated into public results called composite data products (CDPs) that show the status and progress of the technology without identifying individual companies or revealing proprietary information. These CDPs are available from this NREL website: 1) Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle and Infrastructure Learning Demonstration; 2) Early Fuel Cell Market Demonstrations; 3) Fuel Cell Technology Status [Edited from http://www.nrel.gov/hydrogen/facilities_secure_data_center.html].

  5. Facility Software Quality Assurance (SQA) for Captal Project Critical Decisions RM

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The purpose of this Software Quality Assurance for Capital Project Critical Decision Review Module (SQA RM) is to identify, integrate, and clarify, in one EM document, the SQA performance...

  6. Facilities

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Solar Energy Wind Energy Water Power Supercritical CO2 Geothermal Natural Gas Safety, Security & Resilience of the Energy Infrastructure Energy Storage Nuclear Power & Engineering ...

  7. Measurements at Los Alamos National Laboratory Plutonium Facility in Support of Global Security Mission Space

    SciTech Connect

    Stange, Sy; Mayo, Douglas R.; Herrera, Gary D.; McLaughlin, Anastasia D.; Montoya, Charles M.; Quihuis, Becky A.; Trujillo, Julio B.; Van Pelt, Craig E.; Wenz, Tracy R.

    2012-07-13

    The Los Alamos National Laboratory Plutonium Facility at Technical Area (TA) 55 is one of a few nuclear facilities in the United States where Research & Development measurements can be performed on Safeguards Category-I (CAT-I) quantities of nuclear material. This capability allows us to incorporate measurements of CAT-IV through CAT-I materials as a component of detector characterization campaigns and training courses conducted at Los Alamos. A wider range of measurements can be supported. We will present an overview of recent measurements conducted in support of nuclear emergency response, nuclear counterterrorism, and international and domestic safeguards. This work was supported by the NNSA Office of Counterterrorism.

  8. Facilities

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    ... It also provides an outstanding controlled environment for Sandia's recent spent nuclear fuel combustion experiments. HPC Facilities CSRIBldghomepg The Computer Science Research ...

  9. Facilities

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    First Power for SWiFT Turbine Achieved during Recommissioning Facilities, News, Renewable Energy, SWIFT, Wind Energy, Wind News First Power for SWiFT Turbine Achieved during ...

  10. Defense Nuclear Security | National Nuclear Security Administration |

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    (NNSA) Programs Defense Nuclear Security The Office of Defense Nuclear Security develops and implements NNSA security programs to protect, control, and account for materials, information, and facilities across the nuclear security enterprise. The Office of the Chief, Defense Nuclear Security (CDNS) executes responsibility for the overall direction and management of security programs employed across the nuclear security enterprise comprised of NNSA's operations and facilities. The CDNS is

  11. Record of Decision for the Electrical Interconnection of the COB Energy Facility (DOE/EIS-0343)

    SciTech Connect

    N /A

    2004-08-20

    The COB Energy Facility would be constructed on a site near the rural community of Bonanza, in Klamath County, Oregon. Generating components of the project would be constructed in either one or two phases, including four air-cooled combustion turbine generators fueled with natural gas, four heat recovery steam generators, and two steam turbines. Additional facilities include a new 7.2-mile-long 500-kV transmission line, a new 4.1-mile-long natural gas pipeline, a 2.8-mile-long water pipeline, a 20-acre wastewater evaporation pond or a 3,770-foot-long irrigation pipeline to deliver wastewater to a 31-acre pasture, a 4.7-acre stormwater infiltration basin, a 1.5-acre stormwater retention pond, and various tanks, buildings, exhaust stacks, parking, and storage areas. Natural gas to fuel the combustion turbines would be supplied by way of a new 4.1-mile-long, 20-inch-diameter pipeline from a Gas Transmission Northwest's Bonanza Compressor Station. The new pipeline would be constructed within private easements adjacent to or near Klamath County road rights-of-way. Although COB Energy Facility generators would use air-cooled condensers, the project would use an average of 72 gallons per minute for steam production and station service, up to a maximum of 210 gallons per minute. The source of this water would be one existing and two new wells near the project site, drawing from a deep aquifer consistent with a State of Oregon water right permit expected to be incorporated into the State energy facility site certificate. Process wastewater would either be used to irrigate pasture or held in a lined pond to evaporate. Sanitary water would be routed to an onsite septic tank then discharged to a leach field. No wastewater would be discharged to surface waters. The COB Energy Facility would interconnect to the FCRTS at Captain Jack Substation, 7.2 miles south of the project site. PERC would construct a new 500-kV transmission line from the project site to Captain Jack

  12. Radiological Security Partnership Information | National Nuclear Security

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Administration | (NNSA) About / Our Programs / Nonproliferation / Global Material Security / Radiological Security / Radiological Security Partnership Radiological Security Partnership Information Radioactive sources play an important role in a number of commercial, medical, and research facilities. The benefits of these sources must be balanced with proper security. The Department of Energy's (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is working with the Nuclear Regulatory

  13. Risk-Based Decision Process for Accelerated Closure of a Nuclear Weapons Facility

    SciTech Connect

    Butler, L.; Norland, R. L.; DiSalvo, R.; Anderson, M.

    2003-02-25

    Nearly 40 years of nuclear weapons production at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS or Site) resulted in contamination of soil and underground systems and structures with hazardous substances, including plutonium, uranium and hazardous waste constituents. The Site was placed on the National Priority List in 1989. There are more than 370 Individual Hazardous Substance Sites (IHSSs) at RFETS. Accelerated cleanup and closure of RFETS is being achieved through implementation and refinement of a regulatory framework that fosters programmatic and technical innovations: (1) extensive use of ''accelerated actions'' to remediate IHSSs, (2) development of a risk-based screening process that triggers and helps define the scope of accelerated actions consistent with the final remedial action objectives for the Site, (3) use of field instrumentation for real time data collection, (4) a data management system that renders near real time field data assessment, and (5) a regulatory agency consultative process to facilitate timely decisions. This paper presents the process and interim results for these aspects of the accelerated closure program applied to Environmental Restoration activities at the Site.

  14. Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers, Solar Screening Evaluation Checklist, September 2010

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This guide presents an overview of the process for successfully planning for and installing solar technology on a federal site. It is specifically targeted to managers of federal buildings and sites, contracting officers, energy and sustainability officers, and regional procurement managers. The solar project process is outlined in a concise, easy-to-understand, step-by-step format. Information includes a brief overview of legislation and executive orders related to renewable energy and the compelling reasons for implementing a solar project on a federal site. It also includes how to assess a facility to identify the best solar installation site, project recommendations and considerations to help avoid unforeseen issues, and guidance on financing and contracting options. Case studies with descriptions of successful solar deployments across multiple agencies are presented. In addition, detailed information and sample documents for specific tasks are referenced with Web links or included in the appendixes. The guide concentrates on distributed solar generation and not large, centralized solar energy generation.

  15. Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers, September 2010

    SciTech Connect

    Stoltenberg, B.; Partyka, E.

    2010-09-01

    This guide presents an overview of the process for successfully planning for and installing solar technology on a federal site. It is specifically targeted to managers of federal buildings and sites, contracting officers, energy and sustainability officers, and regional procurement managers. The solar project process is outlined in a concise, easy-to-understand, step-by-step format. Information includes a brief overview of legislation and executive orders related to renewable energy and the compelling reasons for implementing a solar project on a federal site. It also includes how to assess a facility to identify the best solar installation site, project recommendations and considerations to help avoid unforeseen issues, and guidance on financing and contracting options. Case studies with descriptions of successful solar deployments across multiple agencies are presented. In addition, detailed information and sample documents for specific tasks are referenced with Web links or included in the appendixes. The guide concentrates on distributed solar generation and not large, centralized solar energy generation.

  16. Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers, Appendix B, September 2010

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This guide presents an overview of the process for successfully planning for and installing solar technology on a federal site. It is specifically targeted to managers of federal buildings and sites, contracting officers, energy and sustainability officers, and regional procurement managers. The solar project process is outlined in a concise, easy-to-understand, step-by-step format. Information includes a brief overview of legislation and executive orders related to renewable energy and the compelling reasons for implementing a solar project on a federal site. It also includes how to assess a facility to identify the best solar installation site, project recommendations and considerations to help avoid unforeseen issues, and guidance on financing and contracting options. Case studies with descriptions of successful solar deployments across multiple agencies are presented. In addition, detailed information and sample documents for specific tasks are referenced with Web links or included in the appendixes. The guide concentrates on distributed solar generation and not large, centralized solar energy generation.

  17. Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers, September 2010

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This guide presents an overview of the process for successfully planning for and installing solar technology on a federal site. It is specifically targeted to managers of federal buildings and sites, contracting officers, energy and sustainability officers, and regional procurement managers. The solar project process is outlined in a concise, easy-to-understand, step-by-step format. Information includes a brief overview of legislation and executive orders related to renewable energy and the compelling reasons for implementing a solar project on a federal site. It also includes how to assess a facility to identify the best solar installation site, project recommendations and considerations to help avoid unforeseen issues, and guidance on financing and contracting options. Case studies with descriptions of successful solar deployments across multiple agencies are presented. In addition, detailed information and sample documents for specific tasks are referenced with Web links or included in the appendixes. The guide concentrates on distributed solar generation and not large, centralized solar energy generation.

  18. Amended Record of Decision: Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0287) (11/28/06)

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    811 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 28, 2006 / Notices Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339. [FR Doc. E6-20124 Filed 11-27-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Amended Record of Decision: Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement AGENCY: Department of Energy. ACTION: Amended Record of Decision. SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is amending its Record of Decision (ROD) published

  19. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect

    Matthews, Patrick and Sloop, Christy

    2011-04-01

    This Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD)/Closure Report (CR) has been prepared for Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 372, Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters, located within Areas 18 and 20 at the Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, in accordance with the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO). Corrective Action Unit 372 comprises four corrective action sites (CASs): • 18-45-02, Little Feller I Surface Crater • 18-45-03, Little Feller II Surface Crater • 20-23-01, U-20k Contamination Area • 20-45-01, U-20L Crater (Cabriolet) The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 372 based on the implementation of the corrective action of closure in place with administrative controls at all CASs. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from November 9, 2009, through December 10, 2010, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters. The approach for the CAI was divided into two facets: investigation of the primary release of radionuclides and investigation of other releases (migration in washes and chemical releases). The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 372 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Investigation results were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. A radiological dose FAL was established of 25 millirem per year based on the Remote Work Area exposure scenario (336 hours of annual exposure). Radiological doses exceeding the FAL were found to be present at all four CASs. It is assumed that radionuclide levels present within the Little Feller I and Cabriolet high

  20. Nuclear Facilities Production Facilities

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Facilities Production Facilities Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Sand 2011-4582P. ENERGY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF Gamma Irradiation Facility (GIF) The GIF provides test cells for the irradiation of experiments with high-intensity gamma ray sources. The main features

  1. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 365: Baneberry Contamination Area, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect

    Patrick Matthews

    2011-09-01

    Corrective Action Unit 365 comprises one corrective action site (CAS), CAS 08-23-02, U-8d Contamination Area. The purpose of this CADD/CR is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 365 based on the implementation of the corrective action of closure in place with a use restriction (UR). Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from January 18, 2011, through August 2, 2011, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 365: Baneberry Contamination Area. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process. The CAU 365 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is complete and acceptable for use in supporting the DQO decisions. Investigation results were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. A radiological dose FAL of 25 millirem per year was established based on the Remote Work Area exposure scenario (336 hours of annual exposure). Radiological doses exceeding the FAL were found to be present to the southwest of the Baneberry crater. It was also assumed that radionuclide levels present within the crater and fissure exceed the FAL. Corrective actions were undertaken that consisted of establishing a UR and posting warning signs for the crater, fissure, and the area located to the southwest of the crater where soil concentrations exceeded the FAL. These URs were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: (1) No further corrective actions beyond what are described in this document are necessary for CAU 365. (2) A Notice of Completion to

  2. Decision Summaries | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Information Center » Decision Summaries Decision Summaries November 4, 2016 Summary of Decisions - October 31, 2016 - November 4, 2016 Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal October 28, 2016 Summary of Decisions - October 24, 2016 - October 28, 2016 Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) October 21, 2016 Summary of Decisions - October 17, 2016 - October 21, 2016 Decisions were issued on: No decisions issued

  3. Security Review Process | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Security Review Process Security Review Process Security Review Process (107.09 KB) More Documents & Publications Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 3, Personnel Security Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 1, Physical Security PSH-14-0092 - In the Matter of Personnel Security

  4. Audit of Selected Aspects of the Unclassified Computer Security Program at a DOE Headquarters Computing Facility, AP-B-95-02

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL AUDIT OF SELECTED ASPECTS OF THE UNCLASSIFIED COMPUTER SECURITY PROGRAM AT A DOE HEADQUARTERS COMPUTING FACILITY The Office of Inspector General wants to make the distribution of its reports as customer friendly and cost effective as possible. Therefore, this report will be available electronically through the Internet five to seven days after publication at the alternative addresses: Department of Energy Headquarters Gopher gopher.hr.doe.gov Department of Energy

  5. Preliminary Notice of Violation, National Security Technologies...

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    Fire Seals and Other Components at the Nevada National Security Site On August 11, ... Experiments Facility and Device Assembly Facility at the Nevada National Security Site. ...

  6. Physical Security

    SciTech Connect

    2008-01-01

    The future of physical security at government facilities and national laboratories is rapidly progressing beyond the cliché of gates, guns and guards, and is quickly being replaced by radars, sensors and cameras. Learn more about INL's security research at http://www.facebook.com/idahonationallaboratory.

  7. Jeffrey R. Johnson | National Nuclear Security Administration...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    In that position, he was responsible for nuclear weapons security policy, security evaluations of Navy nuclear weapons facilities, and provided policy while coordinating security ...

  8. U.S. Energy Secretary Moniz and Chinese Atomic Energy Authority Open New Nuclear Security Training Facility

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    U.S. Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz, accompanied by senior officials from the Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA), the Department of Defense, and a host of international VIPs, participated with the China Atomic Energy Authority (CAEA) to commission China’s new nuclear security Center of Excellence (COE).

  9. Enterprise Assessments Targeted Review of the Safety System Management of the Secondary Confinement System and Power Distribution Safety System at the Y-12 National Security Complex Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility – December 2015

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Targeted Review of the Safety System Management of the Secondary Confinement System and Power Distribution Safety System at the Y-12 National Security Complex Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility

  10. Final Status Survey Report for Corrective Action Unit 117 - Pluto Disassembly Facility, Building 2201, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada

    SciTech Connect

    Jeremy Gwin and Douglas Frenette

    2010-09-30

    This document contains the process knowledge, radiological data and subsequent statistical methodology and analysis to support approval for the radiological release of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 117 – Pluto Disassembly Facility, Building 2201 located in Area 26 of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). Preparations for release of the building began in 2009 and followed the methodology described in the Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM). MARSSIM is the DOE approved process for release of Real Property (buildings and landmasses) to a set of established criteria or authorized limits. The pre-approved authorized limits for surface contamination values and corresponding assumptions were established by DOE O 5400.5. The release criteria coincide with the acceptance criteria of the U10C landfill permit. The U10C landfill is the proposed location to dispose of the radiologically non-impacted, or “clean,” building rubble following demolition. However, other disposition options that include the building and/or waste remaining at the NNSS may be considered providing that the same release limits apply. The Final Status Survey was designed following MARSSIM guidance by reviewing historical documentation and radiological survey data. Following this review a formal radiological characterization survey was performed in two phases. The characterization revealed multiple areas of residual radioactivity above the release criteria. These locations were remediated (decontaminated) and then the surface activity was verified to be less than the release criteria. Once remediation efforts had been successfully completed, a Final Status Survey Plan (10-015, “Final Status Survey Plan for Corrective Action Unit 117 – Pluto Disassembly Facility, Building 2201”) was developed and implemented to complete the final step in the MARSSIM process, the Final Status Survey. The Final Status Survey Plan consisted of categorizing each individual room

  11. Decision Summaries | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    December 21, 2012 Summary of Decisions - December 17, 2012 - December 21, 2012 Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)...

  12. Facility Floorplan

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    facility floorplan Facility Floorplan

  13. Y-12 National Security Campus | National Nuclear Security Administrati...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Vienna, Austria, recently visited two facilities to understand NNSA's mission better: the Y-12 National Security Complex and the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). At Y-12, he

  14. national security | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    visited the Y-12 National Security Complex to check on the status of ongoing projects like the Uranium Processing Facility as well as the site's continuing uranium operations. ...

  15. Secure Storage | Y-12 National Security Complex

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    The Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility is a massive concrete and steel structure ... HEUMF is a massive concrete and steel structure that provides maximum security for the ...

  16. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 367: Area 10 Sedan, Ess and Uncle Unit Craters Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect

    Patrick Matthews

    2011-06-01

    results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is complete and acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against final action levels (FALs) established in this document. For the primary release, radiological doses exceeding the FAL of 25 millirem per year were not found to be present in the surface or shallow subsurface soil outside the default contamination boundary. However, it was assumed that radionuclides are present in subsurface media within each of the three craters (Sedan, Ess, and Uncle) due to prompt injection of radionuclides from the tests. Based on the assumption of radiological dose exceeding the FAL, corrective actions were undertaken that consisted of implementing a use restriction and posting warning signs at each crater CAS. These use restrictions were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. With regard to other releases, no contaminants of concern were identified at the mud pits or any of the other release locations, with one exception. Potential source material in the form of lead was found at one location. A corrective action of clean closure was implemented at this location, and verification samples indicated that no further action is necessary. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 367. Corrective Action Unit 367 should be promoted from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

  17. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 374: Area 20 Schooner Unit Crater, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada with ROTC 1, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect

    Patrick Matthews

    2011-07-01

    Schooner sites exceed the FAL. It is also assumed that PSM in the form of lead-acid batteries at Schooner exceeds the FAL. Therefore, corrective actions were undertaken that consist of removing PSM, where present, and implementing a use restriction and posting warning signs at the Danny Boy and Schooner sites. These use restrictions were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: • No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 374. • A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 374. • Corrective Action Unit 374 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

  18. Facility Safety

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2002-05-20

    To establish facility safety requirements for the Department of Energy, including National Nuclear Security Administration. Cancels DOE O 420.1. Canceled by DOE O 420.1B.

  19. Security guide for subcontractors

    SciTech Connect

    Adams, R.C.

    1991-01-01

    This security guide of the Department of Energy covers contractor and subcontractor access to DOE and Mound facilities. The topics of the security guide include responsibilities, physical barriers, personnel identification system, personnel and vehicular access controls, classified document control, protecting classified matter in use, storing classified matter repository combinations, violations, security education clearance terminations, security infractions, classified information nondisclosure agreement, personnel security clearances, visitor control, travel to communist-controlled or sensitive countries, shipment security, and surreptitious listening devices.

  20. National Nuclear Security Administration

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    aspects relating to the Materials Security and Consolidation Project includine Energy Systems Acquisition Advisory Board equivalents, Critical Decisions, and Quarterly Project...

  1. Office of Security Assistance

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Office of Security Assistance manages the Technology Deployment Program to improve the security posture of the Department of Energy and the protection of its assets and facilities through the deployment of new safeguards and security technologies and development of advanced technologies that reduce operating costs, save protective force lives, and improve security effectiveness.

  2. Office of Security Policy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The Office of Security Policy is the central source within the Department of Energy for the development and analysis of safeguards and security policies and standards affecting facilities, nuclear materials, personnel, and classified information.

  3. Office of Information Security

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Office of Information Security is responsible for implementation of the Classified Matter Protection and Control Program (CMPC), the Operations Security Program (OPSEC) and the Facility Clearance Program and the Survey Program for Headquarters

  4. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 550: Smoky Contamination Area Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect

    Matthews, Patrick K.

    2015-02-01

    This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report presents information supporting the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 550: Smoky Contamination Area, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada. CAU 550 includes 19 corrective action sites (CASs), which consist of one weapons-related atmospheric test (Smoky), three safety experiments (Ceres, Oberon, Titania), and 15 debris sites (Table ES-1). The CASs were sorted into the following study groups based on release potential and technical similarities: • Study Group 1, Atmospheric Test • Study Group 2, Safety Experiments • Study Group 3, Washes • Study Group 4, Debris The purpose of this document is to provide justification and documentation supporting the conclusion that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 550 based on implementation of the corrective actions listed in Table ES-1. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed between August 2012 and October 2013 as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 550: Smoky Contamination Area; and in accordance with the Soils Activity Quality Assurance Plan. The approach for the CAI was to investigate and make data quality objective (DQO) decisions based on the types of releases present. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the DQO process. The CAU 550 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated the dataset is complete and acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs.

  5. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 105: Area 2 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect

    Matthews, Patrick

    2013-09-01

    This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report presents information supporting the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 105: Area 2 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada. CAU 105 comprises the following five corrective action sites (CASs): -02-23-04 Atmospheric Test Site - Whitney Closure In Place -02-23-05 Atmospheric Test Site T-2A Closure In Place -02-23-06 Atmospheric Test Site T-2B Clean Closure -02-23-08 Atmospheric Test Site T-2 Closure In Place -02-23-09 Atmospheric Test Site - Turk Closure In Place The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 105 based on the implementation of the corrective actions. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from October 22, 2012, through May 23, 2013, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 105: Area 2 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites; and in accordance with the Soils Activity Quality Assurance Plan, which establishes requirements, technical planning, and general quality practices.

  6. Security Conditions

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2004-07-08

    This Notice ensures that DOE uniformly meets the requirements of the Homeland Security Advisory System outlined in Homeland Security Presidential Directive-3, Threat Conditions and Associated Protective Measures, dated 3-11-02, and provides responses specified in Presidential Decision Directive 39, U.S. Policy on Counterterrorism (U), dated 6-21-95. It cancels DOE N 473.8, Security Conditions, dated 8-7-02. Extended until 7-7-06 by DOE N 251.64, dated 7-7-05 Cancels DOE N 473.8

  7. Successful Characterization Strategies for the Active High Risk Y-12 National Security Complex 9201-5 (Alpha-5) Facility, Oak Ridge, TN - 12164

    SciTech Connect

    Birchfield, Joseph W. III; Albrecht, Linda

    2012-07-01

    Building 9201-5 (Alpha 5) was completed in May 1944 and served as a production facility for National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Y-12 Weapons Plant. During the Manhattan Project, it functioned as a uranium enrichment facility. The facility was renovated and altered over the years, converting the calutrons to support other missions. Alpha 5 consists of 4 floors and a basement measuring approximately 600,000 square feet. The facility contains various pieces of equipment remaining from legacy operations. A significant amount (approximately 200,000 kgs) of mercury (Hg) has been spilled in the facility over the operational history of the building. To further complicate matters, beryllium (Be) contamination in 9201-5 is found throughout approximately sixty percent of the facility. Concentrations varying from very low (< 0.2 micrograms (μg)/100 cm{sup 2}) to areas where concentrations are relatively high, approximately 600 μg/100 cm{sup 2}, in regulated beryllium areas. The primary site related contaminants (SRCs) for the waste in this facility are enriched uranium, depleted uranium, beryllium and mercury. This facility represents the highest environmental risk for DOE-ORO EM and NNSA at Y-12 and must be quickly addressed to minimize impacts to future Y-12 missions, as well as human health and the environment. As part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), approximately 700,000 cubic feet of legacy material was removed in 2010 and 2011. In addition, characterization of the 9201-5 facility was scheduled in the winter and spring of 2011. This activity was initiated in January 2011 and was completed in July 2011. Heavy schedule pressure was further complicated by the fact that this building has active utility, security and process systems. Given these complex variables, a unique, out of the box characterization strategy was forged in an effort to bound radiological and chemical contaminants, as well as providing the appropriate level of quality to

  8. Improved Meteorological Input for Atmospheric Release Decision support Systems and an Integrated LES Modeling System for Atmospheric Dispersion of Toxic Agents: Homeland Security Applications

    SciTech Connect

    Arnold, E; Simpson, M; Larsen, S; Gash, J; Aluzzi, F; Lundquist, J; Sugiyama, G

    2010-04-26

    When hazardous material is accidently or intentionally released into the atmosphere, emergency response organizations look to decision support systems (DSSs) to translate contaminant information provided by atmospheric models into effective decisions to protect the public and emergency responders and to mitigate subsequent consequences. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS)-led Interagency Modeling and Atmospheric Assessment Center (IMAAC) is one of the primary DSSs utilized by emergency management organizations. IMAAC is responsible for providing 'a single piont for the coordination and dissemination of Federal dispersion modeling and hazard prediction products that represent the Federal position' during actual or potential incidents under the National Response Plan. The Department of Energy's (DOE) National Atmospheric Release Advisory Center (NARAC), locatec at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), serves as the primary operations center of the IMAAC. A key component of atmospheric release decision support systems is meteorological information - models and data of winds, turbulence, and other atmospheric boundary-layer parameters. The accuracy of contaminant predictions is strongly dependent on the quality of this information. Therefore, the effectiveness of DSSs can be enhanced by improving the meteorological options available to drive atmospheric transport and fate models. The overall goal of this project was to develop and evaluate new meteorological modeling capabilities for DSSs based on the use of NASA Earth-science data sets in order to enhance the atmospheric-hazard information provided to emergency managers and responders. The final report describes the LLNL contributions to this multi-institutional effort. LLNL developed an approach to utilize NCAR meteorological predictions using NASA MODIS data for the New York City (NYC) region and demonstrated the potential impact of the use of different data sources and data parameterizations on

  9. A Cercla-Based Decision Model to Support Remedy Selection for an Uncertain Volume of Contaminants at a DOE Facility

    SciTech Connect

    Christine E. Kerschus

    1999-03-31

    The Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PGDP) operated by the Department of Energy is challenged with selecting the appropriate remediation technology to cleanup contaminants at Waste Area Group (WAG) 6. This research utilizes value-focused thinking and multiattribute preference theory concepts to produce a decision analysis model designed to aid the decision makers in their selection process. The model is based on CERCLA's five primary balancing criteria, tailored specifically to WAG 6 and the contaminants of concern, utilizes expert opinion and the best available engineering, cost, and performance data, and accounts for uncertainty in contaminant volume. The model ranks 23 remediation technologies (trains) in their ability to achieve the CERCLA criteria at various contaminant volumes. A sensitivity analysis is performed to examine the effects of changes in expert opinion and uncertainty in volume. Further analysis reveals how volume uncertainty is expected to affect technology cost, time and ability to meet the CERCLA criteria. The model provides the decision makers with a CERCLA-based decision analysis methodology that is objective, traceable, and robust to support the WAG 6 Feasibility Study. In addition, the model can be adjusted to address other DOE contaminated sites.

  10. National Security Education Center

    SciTech Connect

    Hurd, Alan J.

    2015-04-22

    Information about the National Security Education Center is given. Information about the Center’s history and current practices, including its facilities and its practicality are outlined.

  11. Security Conditions

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2000-09-18

    To ensure that DOE uniformly meets the protection requirements specified in Presidential Decision Directive 39, "U.S. Policy on Counterterrorism (U)." Attachment 2 is no longer available online. Please e-mail your request for the Attachment to: Security.Directives@hq.doe.gov. DOE N 251.44, dated 05/06/02, extends this directive until 12/31/02.

  12. Portsmouth Decontamination and Decommissioning Record of Decision

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Portsmouth Process Buildings and Complex Facilities Decontamination and Decommissioning Evaluation Project Record of Decision (ROD)

  13. DOE Releases Request for Information for Y-12 National Security...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Y-12 National Security Complex Water Treatment Facility Construction DOE Releases Request for Information for Y-12 National Security Complex Water Treatment Facility Construction ...

  14. Broader National Security Missions | Y-12 National Security Complex

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Broader National Security ... Broader National Security Missions Learn more For 70 years, the Y-12 National Security Complex has transformed in response to changing national security priorities and assigned missions, evolving technological opportunities, and growing concerns regarding health and public safety. As the global security situation has changed, the site has adapted - beginning as a uranium enrichment facility, transforming to a weapons manufacturing facility, and accepting new

  15. ARM - Facility News Article

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    March 15, 2005 Facility News Japanese Collaborators Take A Long Look at Lightning Bookmark and Share Mounted on tripods, numerous interferometer antennas are secured to the roof...

  16. Summary of Decisions- April 7, 2014 – April 11, 2014

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  17. Summary of Decisions- December 23, 2013 – December 27, 2013

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  18. Summary of Decisions- December 16, 2013 – December 20, 2013

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  19. Summary of Decisions- October 27, 2014 – October 31, 2014

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

  20. Summary of Decisions- July 29, 2013- August 2, 2013

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Whistleblower Appeal (10 CFR Part 708)

  1. Summary of Decisions- July 18, 2016 – July 22, 2016

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

  2. Summary of Decisions- February 23, 2015 – February 27, 2015

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

  3. Summary of Decisions- September 30, 2013 – October 4, 2013

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Whistleblower Appeal (10 CFR Part 708)

  4. Summary of Decisions- December 9, 2013 – December 13, 2013

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  5. Summary of Decisions- December 2, 2013 – December 6, 2013

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  6. Summary of Decisions- October 8, 2012 – October 12, 2012

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  7. Summary of Decisions- October 21, 2013 – October 25, 2013

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  8. Summary of Decisions- February 9, 2015 – February 13, 2015

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

  9. Summary of Decisions- January 20, 2014 – January 24, 2014

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  10. Summary of Decisions- February 25, 2013 – March 1, 2013

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  11. Summary of Decisions- May 20, 2013 – May 24, 2013

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  12. Summary of Decisions- August 5, 2013- August 9, 2013

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Whistleblower Appeal (10 CFR Part 708)

  13. Summary of Decisions- March 14, 2016 – March 18, 2016

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

  14. Summary of Decisions- February 29, 2016 – March 4, 2016

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

  15. Summary of Decisions- August 12, 2013- August 16, 2013

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  16. Summary of Decisions- June 10, 2013- June 14, 2013

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  17. Summary of Decisions- September 9, 2013 – September 13, 2013

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  18. Summary of Decisions- July 15, 2013- July 19, 2013

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  19. Summary of Decisions- July 30 – August 3, 2012

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  20. Summary of Decisions- March 10, 2014 – March 14, 2014

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  1. Summary of Decisions- July 14, 2014 – July 18, 2014

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  2. Summary of Decisions- July 21, 2014 – July 25, 2014

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  3. Summary of Decisions- April 1, 2013 – April 5, 2013

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  4. Summary of Decisions- January 21, 2013 – January 25, 2013

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  5. Summary of Decisions- June 8, 2015 – June 12, 2015

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

  6. Summary of Decisions- December 21, 2015 – December 25, 2015

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

  7. Summary of Decisions- November 16, 2015 – November 20, 2015

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

  8. Summary of Decisions- August 17, 2015 – August 21, 2015

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

  9. Summary of Decisions- November 30, 2015 – December 4, 2015

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

  10. Summary of Decisions- November 9, 2015 – November 13, 2015

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

  11. Summary of Decisions- August 3, 2015 – August 7, 2015

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

  12. Summary of Decisions- March 23, 2015 – March 27, 2015

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

  13. Summary of Decisions- August 26, 2013- August 30, 2013

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  14. Summary of Decisions- September 21, 2015 – September 25, 2015

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

  15. Summary of Decisions- September 24, 2012 – September 28, 2012

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  16. Summary of Decisions- December 10, 2012 – December 14, 2012

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  17. Summary of Decisions- March 3, 2014 – March 7, 2014

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  18. Summary of Decisions- November 24, 2014 – November 28, 2014

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

  19. Summary of Decisions- August 13 – August 17, 2012

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  20. Summary of Decisions- June 23, 2014 – June 27, 2014

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Whistleblower Appeal (10 CFR Part 708)

  1. Summary of Decisions- September 14, 2015 – September 18, 2015

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

  2. Summary of Decisions- June 16, 2014 – June 20, 2014

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  3. Summary of Decisions- April 14, 2014 – April 18, 2014

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  4. Summary of Decisions- September 16, 2013 – September 20, 2013

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Whistleblower Appeal (10 CFR Part 708)

  5. Summary of Decisions- August 19, 2013- August 23, 2013

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  6. Summary of Decisions- April 29, 2013 – May 3, 2013

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  7. Summary of Decisions- November 17, 2014 – November 21, 2014

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal

  8. Summary of Decisions- September 3- September 7, 2012

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710)

  9. Oversight and Change | National Nuclear Security Administration...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Infrastructure and Operations Ten-Year Site Plans Infrastructure & Facilities Management ... Defense Nuclear Security Protective Forces Physical Security Systems Material Control and ...

  10. Independent Oversight Review, Nevada National Security Site,...

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    of Federal Assurance Capability at the Nevada National Security Site This report ... systems at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) Device Assembly Facility (DAF). ...

  11. Nuclear security

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1991-07-01

    This paper reports that despite an Executive Order limiting the authority to make original classification decisions to government officials, DOE has delegated this authority to a number of contractor employees. Although the number of original classification decisions made by these contractors is small, this neither negates nor diminishes the significance of the improper delegation of authority. If misclassification were to occur, particularly at the Top Secret level, U.S. national security interests could potentially be seriously affected and threatened. DOE's argument that the delegation of such authority is a long-standing policy and done on a selective basis does not legitimize the practice and does not relieve DOE of its responsibility to meet the requirements of the Executive Order. DOE needs to independently assess all original classification determinations made by contractors; otherwise, it cannot be sure that U.S. national security interests have been or are being adequately protected.

  12. Summary of Decisions- July 9- 13, 2012

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Application for Exception

  13. Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 568. Area 3 Plutonium Dispersion Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada Revision 0

    SciTech Connect

    Matthews, Patrick

    2015-08-01

    The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document is to identify and provide the rationale for the recommendation of corrective action alternatives (CAAs) for the 14 CASs within CAU 568. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from April 2014 through May 2015, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 568: Area 3 Plutonium Dispersion Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada; and in accordance with the Soils Activity Quality Assurance Plan, which establishes requirements, technical planning, and general quality practices. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill data needs as defined during the DQO process. The CAU 568 dataset of investigation results was evaluated based on a data quality assessment. This assessment demonstrated that the dataset is complete and acceptable for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Based on the evaluation of analytical data from the CAI, review of future and current operations at the 14 CASs, and the detailed and comparative analysis of the potential CAAs, the following corrective actions are recommended for CAU 568: • No further action is the preferred corrective action for CASs 03-23-17, 03-23-22, 03-23-26. • Closure in place is the preferred corrective action for CAS 03-23-19; 03-45-01; the SE DCBs at CASs 03-23-20, 03-23-23, 03-23-31, 03-23-32, 03-23-33, and 03-23-34; and the Pascal-BHCA at CAS 03-23-31. • Clean closure is the preferred corrective action for CASs 03-08-04, 03-23-30, and 03-26-04; and the four well head covers at CASs 03-23-20, 03-23-23, 03-23-31, and 03-23-33.

  14. safeguards and security | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    safeguards and security ProForce marks 65 years protecting Sandia resources, facilities, people Current and former members of the Lab's Protective Force gathered to reflect on and recognize the contributions ProForce has made to securing Sandia National Laboratory's resources, facilities, and people. Over the past 65 years, the force has changed in size and structure but its mission has... Nuclear Verification Challenge: Maintain the U.S. ability to monitor and verify nuclear reduction

  15. BPD Security | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Security BPD Security Information related to the Building Performance Database (BPD) security and software controls. Building Performance Database (BPD) Security (140.29 KB) More Documents & Publications Buildings Performance Database - 2013 BTO Peer Review BPD Webinar: Analyze Building Energy Data, Understand Market Trends, Inform Decisions Buildings Performance Database (BPD) - 2014

  16. Decision Summaries | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    June 21, 2013 Summary of Decisions - June 17, 2013 - June 21, 2013 Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) June 14,...

  17. Decision Summaries | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    July 10, 2015 Summary of Decisions - July 6, 2015 - July 10, 2015 Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Whistleblower Protection (10 CFR Part 708) July...

  18. Decision Summaries | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    July 25, 2014 Summary of Decisions - July 21, 2014 - July 25, 2014 Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) July 18,...

  19. Corrective Action Decision Document/Corrective Action Plan for the 92-Acre Area and Corrective Action Unit 111: Area 5 WMD Retired Mixed Waste Pits, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada

    SciTech Connect

    NSTec Environmental Restoration

    2010-11-22

    This Corrective Action Decision Document/Corrective Action Plan (CADD/CAP) has been prepared for the 92-Acre Area, the southeast quadrant of the Radioactive Waste Management Site, located in Area 5 of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). The 92-Acre Area includes Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 111, 'Area 5 WMD Retired Mixed Waste Pits.' Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) were developed for the 92-Acre Area, which includes CAU 111. The result of the DQO process was that the 92-Acre Area is sufficiently characterized to provide the input data necessary to evaluate corrective action alternatives (CAAs) without the collection of additional data. The DQOs are included as Appendix A of this document. This CADD/CAP identifies and provides the rationale for the recommended CAA for the 92-Acre Area, provides the plan for implementing the CAA, and details the post-closure plan. When approved, this CADD/CAP will supersede the existing Pit 3 (P03) Closure Plan, which was developed in accordance with Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 265, 'Interim Status Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.' This document will also serve as the Closure Plan and the Post-Closure Plan, which are required by 40 CFR 265, for the 92-Acre Area. After closure activities are complete, a request for the modification of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Permit that governs waste management activities at the NNSS will be submitted to the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection to incorporate the requirements for post-closure monitoring. Four CAAs, ranging from No Further Action to Clean Closure, were evaluated for the 92-Acre Area. The CAAs were evaluated on technical merit focusing on performance, reliability, feasibility, safety, and cost. Based on the evaluation of the data used to develop the conceptual site model; a review of past, current, and future operations at the site; and the detailed and comparative

  20. Voluntary Protection Program Onsite Review, Facility Engineering Services KCP, LLC- November 2008

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This report summarizes the results of the HSS DOE-VPP Team’s evaluation of Facilities Engineering Services KCP, LLC during the period of November 10-21, 2008, and provides the Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer with the necessary information to make the final decision regarding the company’s continued participation in DOE-VPP as a Star site.

  1. accreditation | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    NNSA's safety office accredited and recognized for leadership in safe operation of defense nuclear facilities Part of NNSA's commitment to maintaining the nation's safe, secure, ...

  2. preparedness | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    preparedness NNSA & Nuclear Security Enterprise support nation's preparedness Scientists at NNSA facilities study climate and meteorology. Other sites are key players in weather ...

  3. readiness | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    readiness NNSA & Nuclear Security Enterprise support nation's preparedness Scientists at NNSA facilities study climate and meteorology. Other sites are key players in weather ...

  4. TQP | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    NNSA's safety office accredited and recognized for leadership in safe operation of defense nuclear facilities Part of NNSA's commitment to maintaining the nation's safe, secure, ...

  5. weather | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    weather NNSA & Nuclear Security Enterprise support nation's preparedness Scientists at NNSA facilities study climate and meteorology. Other sites are key players in weather ...

  6. Secure Data Center (Fact Sheet)

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    2012-08-01

    This fact sheet describes the purpose, lab specifications, applications scenarios, and information on how to partner with NREL's Secure Data Center at the Energy Systems Integration Facility.

  7. leadership | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    for a facility tour of the new National Security Campus and to receive project briefings on its proliferation deterrence programs. During the visit, Harrington toured the... ...

  8. Facility Representative, Technical Area (TA-55) Plutonium Facility, Los

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Alamos Site Office | National Nuclear Security Administration | (NNSA) Facility Representative, Technical Area (TA-55) Plutonium Facility, Los Alamos Site Office John Krepps John Krepps June 2010 U.S. Department of Energy Facility Representative of the Year John Krepps, a facility representative for the National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) Los Alamos Site Office, received the Department of Energy's top award for oversight of nuclear and non-nuclear facilities. Krepps, a Los

  9. Biosafety Facilities - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    5, Biosafety Facilities by David Freshwater Functional areas: Defense Nuclear Facility Safety and Health Requirement, Safety and Security, The Guide assists DOENNSA field elements...

  10. Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    EXPORT/IMPORT CONTROL Contractors and subcontractors who engage in exporting and importing need to have an export/import control program. It is the responsibility of each contractor to: Interpret and comply with U.S. Export and Import Control Laws and Regulations. Make accurate Export Control determinations for information, technologies, and commodities they generate. Obtain required export and import licenses, permit, or other authorizations. Protect the information, technologies or commodities

  11. Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    that may be exempt from public release under the Freedom of Information Act ... Examples include: audit criteria, guidelines for investigations. Exemption 3- Statutory ...

  12. Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    and Canada. The term "official" international travel is defined by DOE as: "Official" International Travel - Approved travel (whether wholly or partly on official business)...

  13. Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Defense Biometric Identification System (DBIDS) at Kirtland Air Force Base (KAFB) What is DBIDS? The Defense Biometric Identification System (DBIDS) manages access to Department of ...

  14. Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    ... On the Use of Medical Marijuana or Another Person's Prescription Drugs The use of medical marijuana, even for medical purposes is prohibited in accordance with 10CFR710 and ...

  15. Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    This will allow DOE to make any necessary determinations that may affect clearance eligibility. For example, simply including "terminated" or "for cause" does not provide enough ...

  16. Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Note: New Clearance applicants will receive an email advising them to enroll, with a ... SEC225, Termination Briefing Required For Clearance-holders who no longer need their ...

  17. Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    to stop adversaries from obtaining classified or sensitive information Basic OPSEC Practices Properly handle and destroy classified and sensitive unclassified information ...

  18. Facility Security Officer Contractor Toolcart

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Plans take approximately 5 days to approve. If access to Kirtland Air Force Base is needed, then these plans must be submitted 30 days in advance of the planned visit start date. ...

  19. Nuclear Facilities | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Nuclear Facilities Nuclear Facilities Nuclear Facilities Locator Map Numerical map data points indicate two or more nuclear facilities in the same geographic location. Nuclear Facilities List: Argonne National Laboratory East Tennessee Technology Park Hanford Idaho Site Los Alamos National Laboratory Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Nevada National Security Site New Brunswick Laboratory Oak Ridge National Laboratory cont. Paducah Pantex Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Portsmouth

  20. Secure Transportation Management

    SciTech Connect

    Gibbs, P. W.

    2014-10-15

    Secure Transport Management Course (STMC) course provides managers with information related to procedures and equipment used to successfully transport special nuclear material. This workshop outlines these procedures and reinforces the information presented with the aid of numerous practical examples. The course focuses on understanding the regulatory framework for secure transportation of special nuclear materials, identifying the insider and outsider threat(s) to secure transportation, organization of a secure transportation unit, management and supervision of secure transportation units, equipment and facilities required, training and qualification needed.

  1. Safeguards and Security Program

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2016-02-10

    The Safeguards and Security Program ensures that the Department of Energy efficiently and effectively meets all its obligations to protect Special Nuclear Material, other nuclear materials, classified matter, sensitive information, government property and facilities, and the safety and security of employees, contractors, and the general public. Supersedes DOE P 470.1A.

  2. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 375: Area 30 Buggy Unit Craters, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect

    Patrick Matthews

    2011-08-01

    consisted of removing the PSM. Use restrictions and warning signs were implemented for the remaining radiological contamination at CASs 25-23-22 and 30-45-01. These use restrictions were recorded in the FFACO database; the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) Facility Information Management System; and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: (1) No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 375; (2) A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 375; and (3) Move CAU 375 from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

  3. testing | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    testing Meet a Machine: Explosive science is booming at Livermore Lab's Contained Firing Facility A key mission of the National Nuclear Security Administration is to maintain the safety, security, and effectiveness of the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile without nuclear explosive testing. Data gathered from experiments at the Contained Firing Facility (CFF) help validate computer

  4. Global Material Security | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Global Material Security

  5. Plutonium Record of Decision Statement from NNSA Adminstrator Frank Klotz |

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    National Nuclear Security Administration | (NNSA) Plutonium Record of Decision Statement from NNSA Adminstrator Frank Klotz Plutonium Record of Decision Statement from NNSA Administrator Frank G. Klotz

  6. Y-12 replaces Fort Knox? as standard for security

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    for security On Monday, September 29, 2008, an historic milestone was reached at the Y-12 National Security Complex. The Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility (HEUMF) was...

  7. Security Policy

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Office of Security Policy analyzes, develops and interprets safeguards and security policy governing national security functions and the protection of related critical assets entrusted to the...

  8. Summary of Decisions- February 4, 2013- February 8, 2013

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Application for Exception

  9. Summary of Decisions- November 4, 2013 – November 8, 2013

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Application for Exception

  10. Summary of Decisions- February 24, 2014 – February 28, 2014

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Application for Exception

  11. Summary of Decisions- June 1, 2015 – June 5, 2015

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Hydroelectric Production Incentives Program

  12. Summary of Decisions- July 16- July 20, 2012

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Application for Exception

  13. Summary of Decisions- December 15, 2014 – December 19, 2014

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Application for Exception

  14. NNSA Celebrates 10 Years of Cooperation with Russia in Securing...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    material in Russia and the former Soviet Union by completing security upgrades at two Russian nuclear facilities. Upgrades at a third facility were completed in September. ...

  15. Labor Day Weekend 2015 | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    "Mission First, People Always" SRS emergency training SRS emergency training Trident laser facility at LANL Trident laser facility at LANL NNSA Blog Nevada National Security Site ...

  16. PSH-12-0076- Personnel Security Hearing

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    On October 26, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individuals security clearance should not be granted . A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel...

  17. Global Security Sciences | Argonne National Laboratory

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Global Security Sciences Advancing world-class science and engineering to protect, mitigate, respond to and recover from threats The Global Security Sciences (GSS) division delivers actionable, defensible and powerful information and technologies to decision makers who impact and shape our global security. Innovative decision support tools (including simulation models), databases and analytical methodologies are developed and used to provide quantitative information to decision makers in the

  18. Workshop on Current Issues in Predictive Approaches to Intelligence and Security Analytics: Fostering the Creation of Decision Advantage through Model Integration and Evaluation

    SciTech Connect

    Sanfilippo, Antonio P.

    2010-05-23

    The increasing asymmetric nature of threats to the security, health and sustainable growth of our society requires that anticipatory reasoning become an everyday activity. Currently, the use of anticipatory reasoning is hindered by the lack of systematic methods for combining knowledge- and evidence-based models, integrating modeling algorithms, and assessing model validity, accuracy and utility. The workshop addresses these gaps with the intent of fostering the creation of a community of interest on model integration and evaluation that may serve as an aggregation point for existing efforts and a launch pad for new approaches.

  19. Using Common Sense to Effectively Integrate Security Technologies within a School's Security Strategy

    SciTech Connect

    Gree, M.W.

    1998-11-03

    Security technologies are not the answer to all school security problems. However, they can be an excellent tool for school administrators and security personnel when incorporated into a total security strategy involving personnel, procedures, and facility layout. Unfortunately, very few of the tougher security problems in schools have solutions that are affordable, effective, and acceptable. Like any other type of facility, a school's security staff must understand the strengths and limitations of the security measures they are csecurity practices, which will rarely increase new building costs if included in the initial planning.

  20. A Busy Year Securing Vulnerable Nuclear Material and Making the World Safer

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    NNSA assisted in reclaiming highly enriched uranium from the Ukraine to a secure facility in Russia.

  1. Comparison of two methods to quantify cyber and physical security effectiveness.

    SciTech Connect

    Wyss, Gregory Dane; Gordon, Kristl A.

    2005-11-01

    With the increasing reliance on cyber technology to operate and control physical security system components, there is a need for methods to assess and model the interactions between the cyber system and the physical security system to understand the effects of cyber technology on overall security system effectiveness. This paper evaluates two methodologies for their applicability to the combined cyber and physical security problem. The comparison metrics include probabilities of detection (P{sub D}), interruption (P{sub I}), and neutralization (P{sub N}), which contribute to calculating the probability of system effectiveness (P{sub E}), the probability that the system can thwart an adversary attack. P{sub E} is well understood in practical applications of physical security but when the cyber security component is added, system behavior becomes more complex and difficult to model. This paper examines two approaches (Bounding Analysis Approach (BAA) and Expected Value Approach (EVA)) to determine their applicability to the combined physical and cyber security issue. These methods were assessed for a variety of security system characteristics to determine whether reasonable security decisions could be made based on their results. The assessments provided insight on an adversary's behavior depending on what part of the physical security system is cyber-controlled. Analysis showed that the BAA is more suited to facility analyses than the EVA because it has the ability to identify and model an adversary's most desirable attack path.

  2. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 105: Area 2 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 1

    SciTech Connect

    Matthews, Patrick

    2014-01-01

    The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 105 based on the implementation of the corrective actions. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from October 22, 2012, through May 23, 2013, as set forth in the Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 105: Area 2 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites; and in accordance with the Soils Activity Quality Assurance Plan, which establishes requirements, technical planning, and general quality practices.

  3. SRNL Science and Innovation - National Security

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    SRNL Home Mobile Plutonium Facility National Security Science and Innovation National Security Tritium Stewardship Non-Proliferation Nuclear Materials Recovery Homeland Security Forensics/Law Enforcement Atmospheric Technologies Throughout its history, SRNL has strongly supported the national defense through its capabilities and experience in defense, homeland security, and nuclear material issues. Since its earliest days, SRNL has developed technologies to enhance the safety and

  4. Independent Oversight Appraisal, Y-12 National Security Complex- May 2013

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Appraisal of the Uranium Processing Facility Safety Basis Preliminary Safety Design Report Process at the Y-12 National Security Complex

  5. Office of Headquarters Security Operations | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    personnel, facilities, property, classified information, and sensitive unclassified ... personnel security, compromise of classified or sensitive information, violations of ...

  6. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 569: Area 3 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites Nevada National Security Site, Nevada with ROTC 1, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect

    Sloop, Christy

    2013-04-01

    This Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report presents information supporting the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 569: Area 3 Yucca Flat Atmospheric Test Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada. CAU 569 comprises the following nine corrective action sites (CASs): • 03-23-09, T-3 Contamination Area • 03-23-10, T-3A Contamination Area • 03-23-11, T-3B Contamination Area • 03-23-12, T-3S Contamination Area • 03-23-13, T-3T Contamination Area • 03-23-14, T-3V Contamination Area • 03-23-15, S-3G Contamination Area • 03-23-16, S-3H Contamination Area • 03-23-21, Pike Contamination Area The purpose of this Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report is to provide justification and documentation supporting the recommendation that no further corrective action is needed for CAU 569 based on the implementation of the corrective actions listed in Table ES-2.

  7. Addendum to the Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 113: Area 25 R-MAD Facility, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada

    SciTech Connect

    NSTec Environmental Restoration

    2011-02-24

    This addendum to the Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 113: Area 25, Reactor Maintenance, Assembly, and Disassembly Facility, Building 3110, Nevada Test Site, Nevada, DOE/NV--891-VOL I-Rev. 1, dated July 2003, provides details of demolition, waste disposal, and use restriction (UR) modification for Corrective Action Unit 113, Area 25 R-MAD Facility. Demolition was completed on July 15, 2010, when the last of the building debris was disposed. Final field activities were concluded on August 30, 2010, after all equipment was demobilized and UR signs were posted. This work was funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

  8. EIS-0345: Record of Decision | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Record of Decision EIS-0345: Record of Decision Electrical Interconnection of the Plymouth Generating Facility The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to implement...

  9. EIS-0230: Record of Decision | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    30: Record of Decision EIS-0230: Record of Decision Electrical Interconnection of the Chehalis Generation Facility Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to offer...

  10. EIS-0343: Record of Decision | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Record of Decision EIS-0343: Record of Decision Electrical Interconnection of the COB Energy Facility The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) has decided to offer contract terms...

  11. EIS-0161: Record of Decision | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    of Decision Tritium Supply and Recycling The Department of Energy (DOE) is issuing this Record of Decision regarding DOE's proposal for Tritium Supply and Recycling Facilities. ...

  12. Weapons production | Y-12 National Security Complex

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Weapons production Weapons production An effective production infrastructure is critical to national security. Y-12 continues to replace World War II-era facilities to increase efficiency and security, reduce costs and condense our high-security footprint. Nuclear Deterrence Completing the connection Sharing resources: the benefits of consolidation Stockpile Weapons production Material Management/Strategic Reserve Material Recycle and Recovery Processing Secure Storage Support Facilities

  13. OHA Security Cases Archive File

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is a archive file of our Security decisions, Please download this file to your local computer and use the build in adobe search feature. Individual cases are listed in the bookmark section of...

  14. Corrective Action Decision Document/Corrective Action Plan for Corrective Action Unit 98: Frenchman Flat, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 1

    SciTech Connect

    Irene Farnham and Sam Marutzky

    2011-07-01

    This CADD/CAP follows the Corrective Action Investigation (CAI) stage, which results in development of a set of contaminant boundary forecasts produced from groundwater flow and contaminant transport modeling of the Frenchman Flat CAU. The Frenchman Flat CAU is located in the southeastern portion of the NNSS and comprises 10 underground nuclear tests. The tests were conducted between 1965 and 1971 and resulted in the release of radionuclides in the subsurface in the vicinity of the test cavities. Two important aspects of the corrective action process are presented within this CADD/CAP. The CADD portion describes the results of the Frenchman Flat CAU data-collection and modeling activities completed during the CAI stage. The corrective action objectives and the actions recommended to meet the objectives are also described. The CAP portion describes the corrective action implementation plan. The CAP begins with the presentation of CAU regulatory boundary objectives and initial use restriction boundaries that are identified and negotiated by NNSA/NSO and the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP). The CAP also presents the model evaluation process designed to build confidence that the flow and contaminant transport modeling results can be used for the regulatory decisions required for CAU closure. The first two stages of the strategy have been completed for the Frenchman Flat CAU. A value of information analysis and a CAIP were developed during the CAIP stage. During the CAI stage, a CAIP addendum was developed, and the activities proposed in the CAIP and addendum were completed. These activities included hydrogeologic investigation of the underground testing areas, aquifer testing, isotopic and geochemistry-based investigations, and integrated geophysical investigations. After these investigations, a groundwater flow and contaminant transport model was developed to forecast contaminant boundaries that enclose areas potentially exceeding the Safe Drinking

  15. Maintaining the Stockpile | National Nuclear Security Administration...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    NNSA ensures the Nation sustains a safe, secure, and effective nuclear deterrent through ... Test and Evaluation Research and Development Facilities Academic Alliances Inertial ...

  16. NNSA Production Office | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    NNSA's safety office accredited and recognized for leadership in safe operation of defense nuclear facilities Part of NNSA's commitment to maintaining the nation's safe, secure, ...

  17. Technical Qualification Program | National Nuclear Security Administra...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    NNSA's safety office accredited and recognized for leadership in safe operation of defense nuclear facilities Part of NNSA's commitment to maintaining the nation's safe, secure, ...

  18. Nuclear and Radiological Material Security | National Nuclear...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    This includes NNSA's work to advance physical protection standards for nuclear facilities and to strengthen nuclear safeguards, which are criteria for the physical security and the ...

  19. Radiological Assistance Program | National Nuclear Security Administra...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    visited the Y-12 National Security Complex to check on the status of ongoing projects like the Uranium Processing Facility as well as the site's continuing uranium operations. ...

  20. January 2014 | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Y-12 Press Release Jan 3, 2014 Construction on Pantex High Explosives Pressing Facility Reaches 85% Mark Work on the National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) High...

  1. Office of Safeguards, Security & Emergency Preparedness | Department...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    to security and emergency management. Foster continuous improvement across the Environmental Management (EM) complex through ... managed risk, for EM's nuclear materials, facilities, ...

  2. Site Information | National Nuclear Security Administration | (NNSA)

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Site Information Facilities & Projects Nuclear Operations Environment, Safety & Health Safeguards & Security Performance & Quality Assurance Programs NEPA Reading Room

  3. LOW-LEVEL WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY FEDERAL REVIEW GROUP EXECUTION...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    LOW-LEVEL WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY FEDERAL REVIEW GROUP EXECUTION PLAN Los Alamos National ... Safety and Security LFRG Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group LLW ...

  4. Intelligent mobile security systems

    SciTech Connect

    Allen, M.S. )

    1991-01-01

    This paper reports that mobile security systems are becoming increasingly important to military (Army, Air Force) and non-military (Drug Enforcement Agency, Border Patrol) organizations as the level and sophistication of terrorist activity increases. Frequently, organizations are required to deploy at remote sites on little notice. To ensure protection of life and equipment, security systems are sometimes required. Often, the personnel deployed on these missions are not adequately trained in the selection, installation, and operation of today's complex security equipment. The Intelligent Mobile Security System (IMSS) concept, as being developed by Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), allows untrained, non-technical personnel to configure, deploy, operate, and troubleshoot temporary/mobile physical security system. The IMSS may be used at nuclear facilities.

  5. International Nuclear Security

    SciTech Connect

    Doyle, James E.

    2012-08-14

    This presentation discusses: (1) Definitions of international nuclear security; (2) What degree of security do we have now; (3) Limitations of a nuclear security strategy focused on national lock-downs of fissile materials and weapons; (4) What do current trends say about the future; and (5) How can nuclear security be strengthened? Nuclear security can be strengthened by: (1) More accurate baseline inventories; (2) Better physical protection, control and accounting; (3) Effective personnel reliability programs; (4) Minimize weapons-usable materials and consolidate to fewer locations; (5) Consider local threat environment when siting facilities; (6) Implement pledges made in the NSS process; and (7) More robust interdiction, emergency response and special operations capabilities. International cooperation is desirable, but not always possible.

  6. NNSA Completes Successful Facilities and Infrastructure Recapitalization

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Program | National Nuclear Security Administration | (NNSA) NNSA Completes Successful Facilities and Infrastructure Recapitalization Program February 20, 2013 WASHINGTON, D.C. - The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) today announced the successful completion of the Facilities and Infrastructure Recapitalization Program (FIRP). FIRP was created to reduce a substantial accumulation of backlogged facility maintenance, repair and demolition projects across NNSA's eight sites. NNSA

  7. Security enhanced with increased vehicle inspections

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Security Cases Security Cases RSS October 31, 2016 PSH-16-0068 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing On October 31, 2016, an Administrative Judge (AJ) issued a decision in which she determined that an individual's access authorization should be restored. In February 2016, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address concerns about her alcohol use. The individual had tested positive on a

  8. Security, LLC

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Security Security Preventing nuclear weapons materials and technologies from falling into the hands of adversaries seeking to develop weapons of mass destruction is the top priority of the Department of Energy's corporate security programs. All Secretarial objectives are supported by a tailored level of security requirements for a wide range of Departmental scientific, research, and national security objectives based on the security significance of their national assets. DOE ensures that

  9. Corrective Action Decision Document/Corrective Action Plan for Corrective Action Unit 547: Miscellaneous Contaminated Waste Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect

    Mark Krauss

    2011-09-01

    The purpose of this CADD/CAP is to present the corrective action alternatives (CAAs) evaluated for CAU 547, provide justification for selection of the recommended alternative, and describe the plan for implementing the selected alternative. Corrective Action Unit 547 consists of the following three corrective action sites (CASs): (1) CAS 02-37-02, Gas Sampling Assembly; (2) CAS 03-99-19, Gas Sampling Assembly; and(3) CAS 09-99-06, Gas Sampling Assembly. The gas sampling assemblies consist of inactive process piping, equipment, and instrumentation that were left in place after completion of underground safety experiments. The purpose of these safety experiments was to confirm that a nuclear explosion would not occur in the case of an accidental detonation of the high-explosive component of the device. The gas sampling assemblies allowed for the direct sampling of the gases and particulates produced by the safety experiments. Corrective Action Site 02-37-02 is located in Area 2 of the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) and is associated with the Mullet safety experiment conducted in emplacement borehole U2ag on October 17, 1963. Corrective Action Site 03-99-19 is located in Area 3 of the NNSS and is associated with the Tejon safety experiment conducted in emplacement borehole U3cg on May 17, 1963. Corrective Action Site 09-99-06 is located in Area 9 of the NNSS and is associated with the Player safety experiment conducted in emplacement borehole U9cc on August 27, 1964. The CAU 547 CASs were investigated in accordance with the data quality objectives (DQOs) developed by representatives of the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office. The DQO process was used to identify and define the type, amount, and quality of data needed to determine and implement appropriate corrective actions for CAU 547. Existing radiological survey data and historical knowledge of

  10. User Facilities | Argonne National Laboratory

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Advanced Photon Source Argonne Leadership Computing Facility Argonne Tandem Linear Accelerator System Center for Nanoscale Materials Transportation Research and Analysis Computing Center Science Work with Argonne About Safety News Careers Education Community Diversity Directory Argonne National Laboratory About Safety News Careers Education Community Diversity Directory Energy Environment Security User Facilities Science Work with Argonne User Facilities Advanced Photon Source Argonne

  11. Security Officer

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This position is located in the Security and Continuity of Operations (NN) organization of the Chief Administrative Office (N), Bonneville Power Administration. The Security and Continuity of...

  12. FOIA-Summary of Findings: Circumstances surrounding decisions regarding the

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    security clearance, access and work assignments | Department of Energy FOIA-Summary of Findings: Circumstances surrounding decisions regarding the security clearance, access and work assignments FOIA-Summary of Findings: Circumstances surrounding decisions regarding the security clearance, access and work assignments FOIA request FOIA-Summary of Findings: Circumstances surrounding decisions regarding the security clearance, access and work assignments (4.61 MB) More Documents &

  13. UPF | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    UPF Uranium Processing Facility Project Celebrates Changing the Skyline of Y-12 Klotz visits Y-12 to see progress on new projects and ongoing work on NNSA's national security missions Last week, NNSA Administrator Lt. Gen. Frank Klotz (Ret.) visited the Y-12 National Security Complex to check on the status of ongoing projects like the Uranium Processing Facility as well as the site's continuing uranium operations. He also met with the Region 2 volunteers of the Radiogical... NNSA projects win

  14. explosives | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    explosives Meet a Machine: Explosive science is booming at Livermore Lab's Contained Firing Facility A key mission of the National Nuclear Security Administration is to maintain the safety, security, and effectiveness of the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile without nuclear explosive testing. Data gathered from experiments at the Contained Firing Facility (CFF) help validate computer... NNSA Conducts Fifth Experiment aimed to Improve U.S. Ability to Detect Foreign Nuclear Explosions WASHINGTON,

  15. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 106: Area 5, 11 Frenchman Flat Atmospheric Sites, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect

    Patrick Matthews and Dawn Peterson

    2011-09-01

    samples. Results of verification samples show that remaining soil does not contain contamination exceeding the FALs. Therefore, the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office (NNSA/NSO) provides the following recommendations: (1) No further corrective actions are necessary for CAU 106. (2) A Notice of Completion to NNSA/NSO is requested from the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection for closure of CAU 106. (3) Corrective Action Unit 106 should be moved from Appendix III to Appendix IV of the FFACO.

  16. National Security and Cyber Security

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    National Security and Cyber Security National Security and Cyber Security National security depends on science and technology. The United States relies on Los Alamos National Laboratory for the best of both. No place on Earth pursues a broader array of world-class scientific endeavors. Contact thumbnail of Business Development Business Development Richard P. Feynman Center for Innovation (505) 665-9090 Email National security and weapons science at the laboratory spans essentially all the

  17. Review of July 2013 Nuclear Security Insider Threat Exercise November 2013

    SciTech Connect

    Pederson, Ann C.; Snow, Catherine L.; Townsend, Jeremy; Shannon, Michael

    2013-11-01

    This document is a review of the Nuclear Security Insider Threat Exercise which was hosted at ORNL in July 2013. Nuclear security culture and the insider threat are best learned through experience. Culture is inherently difficult to teach, and as such is best learned through modeled behaviors and learning exercise. This TTX, NSITE, is a tool that strives to aid students in learning what an effective (and ineffective) nuclear security culture might look like by simulating dynamic events that strengthen or weaken the nuclear security regime. The goals of NSITE are to stimulate complex thought and discussion and assist decision makers and management in determining the most effective policies and procedures for their country or facility.

  18. Computer Security Risk Assessment

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center

    1992-02-11

    LAVA/CS (LAVA for Computer Security) is an application of the Los Alamos Vulnerability Assessment (LAVA) methodology specific to computer and information security. The software serves as a generic tool for identifying vulnerabilities in computer and information security safeguards systems. Although it does not perform a full risk assessment, the results from its analysis may provide valuable insights into security problems. LAVA/CS assumes that the system is exposed to both natural and environmental hazards and tomore » deliberate malevolent actions by either insiders or outsiders. The user in the process of answering the LAVA/CS questionnaire identifies missing safeguards in 34 areas ranging from password management to personnel security and internal audit practices. Specific safeguards protecting a generic set of assets (or targets) from a generic set of threats (or adversaries) are considered. There are four generic assets: the facility, the organization''s environment; the hardware, all computer-related hardware; the software, the information in machine-readable form stored both on-line or on transportable media; and the documents and displays, the information in human-readable form stored as hard-copy materials (manuals, reports, listings in full-size or microform), film, and screen displays. Two generic threats are considered: natural and environmental hazards, storms, fires, power abnormalities, water and accidental maintenance damage; and on-site human threats, both intentional and accidental acts attributable to a perpetrator on the facility''s premises.« less

  19. RCRA Permit for a Hazardous Waste Management Facility Permit Number NEV HW0101 Annual Summary/Waste Minimization Report Calendar Year 2012, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada

    SciTech Connect

    Arnold, P. M.

    2013-02-21

    This report summarizes the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) identification number of each generator from which the Permittee received a waste stream, a description and quantity of each waste stream in tons and cubic feet received at the facility, the method of treatment, storage, and/or disposal for each waste stream, a description of the waste minimization efforts undertaken, a description of the changes in volume and toxicity of waste actually received, any unusual occurrences, and the results of tank integrity assessments. This Annual Summary/Waste Minimization Report is prepared in accordance with Section 2.13.3 of Permit Number NEV HW0101, issued 10/17/10.

  20. PSH-13-0113 - In the Matter of Personnel Security | Department...

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    January 31, 2014, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office began ...

  1. PSH-12-0059 - In the Matter of Personnel Security Hearing | Department...

    Energy Saver

    On September 13, 2012, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be granted. The Local Security Office ...

  2. Safety, Security

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Safety, Security Safety, Security The Lab's mission is to develop and apply science and technology to ensure the safety, security, and reliability of the U.S. nuclear deterrent; reduce global threats; and solve other emerging national security and energy challenges. Contact Operator Los Alamos National Laboratory (505) 667-5061 We do not compromise safety for personal, programmatic, or operational reasons. Safety: we integrate safety, security, and environmental concerns into every step of our

  3. Security Perimeter

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Security Perimeter Security Perimeter Protecting the Laboratory against threats and vulnerabilities. Contact Security Perimeter Coordinators Email The security perimeter helps to protect the Laboratory Vehicle Access Portal graphic The security perimeter is intended to protect the Laboratory against the possibility of terrorist attacks. At each point of the perimeter, access is controlled by vehicle access portals (VAPs) at the following locations: East Jemez Road VAPs (pdf) (shown above) West

  4. Laser Facilities

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Laser Facilities Current Schedule of Experiments Operation Schedule Janus Titan Europa COMET Facility Floorplan

  5. Preparation of Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    DOE-STD-3009-2014 November 2014 DOE STANDARD PREPARATION OF NONREACTOR NUCLEAR FACILITY ... be used by DOE, including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), and their ...

  6. HEUMF | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    HEUMF Congressmen tour Y-12 facilities During a recent visit to the Y-12 National Security Complex, Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), chairman of the House Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee, is shown some of the technology in the Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility by Warehousing and Transportation Operations Manager Byron

  7. congressmen | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    congressmen Congressmen tour Y-12 facilities During a recent visit to the Y-12 National Security Complex, Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), chairman of the House Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee, is shown some of the technology in the Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility by Warehousing and Transportation Operations Manager Byron

  8. hepf | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    hepf Construction on Pantex High Explosives Pressing Facility Reaches 85% Mark WASHINGTON, D.C. - Work on the National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) High Explosives Pressing Facility at its Pantex Plant, located near Amarillo, Texas, this month passed the 85 percent construction completion mark and is on schedule and under budget. The new 45,000 square-foot state-...

  9. Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 561: Waste Disposal Areas, Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect

    Mark Krauss

    2011-08-01

    counterweights were also removed, and the soil below these items does not contain contamination that exceeds the FAL for lead. (4) The concrete-like material at CAS 25-08-02 contains arsenic above the FAL of 23 mg/kg. This concrete-like material was removed, and the soil that remains at this CAS does not contain contamination exceeding the FALs. Lead-acid batteries were also removed, and the soil below the batteries does not contain contamination that exceeds the FAL for lead. (5) The surface soils within the main waste dump at the posted southern radioactive material area (RMA) at CAS 25-23-21 contain cesium (Cs)-137 and PCBs above the FALs of 72.9 picocuries per gram (pCi/g) and 0.74 mg/kg, respectively. The soil was removed from the RMA, and the soil that remains at this CAS does not contain contamination exceeding the FALs. (6) The surface and subsurface soils at CAS 25-25-19 do not contain contamination exceeding the FALs. In addition, lead bricks were removed, and the soil below these items does not contain contamination that exceeds the FAL for lead. The following best management practices were implemented: (1) Housekeeping debris at CASs 02-08-02, 23-21-04, 25-08-02, 25-23-21, and 25-25-19 was removed and disposed of; (2) The open trenches at CAS 23-21-04 were backfilled; (3) The waste piles at CAS 25-08-02 were removed and the area leveled to ground surface; and (4) The remaining waste piles at the main waste dump at CAS 25-23-21 were leveled to ground surface. Therefore, NNSA/NSO provides the following recommendations: (1) No further action for CASs 01-19-01, 03-19-02, 05-62-01, 12-23-09, and 22-19-06; (2) Closure in place with an FFACO use restriction (UR) at CAS 02-08-02 for the remaining PAH-, arsenic-, and lead-contaminated soil, and the melted lead PSM. The UR form and map have been filed in the NNSA/NSO Facility Information Management System, the FFACO database, and the NNSA/NSO CAU/CAS files; (3) No further corrective action at CAS 23-21-04, as the lead bricks

  10. Requirements for security signalling

    SciTech Connect

    Pierson, L.G.; Tarman, T.D.

    1995-02-05

    There has been some interest lately in the need for ``authenticated signalling``, and the development of signalling specifications by the ATM Forum that support this need. The purpose of this contribution is to show that if authenticated signalling is required, then supporting signalling facilities for directory services (i.e. key management) are also required. Furthermore, this contribution identifies other security related mechanisms that may also benefit from ATM-level signalling accommodations. For each of these mechanisms outlined here, an overview of the signalling issues and a rough cut at the required fields for supporting Information Elements are provided. Finally, since each of these security mechanisms are specified by a number of different standards, issues pertaining to the selection of a particular security mechanism at connection setup time (i.e. specification of a required ``Security Quality of Service``) are also discussed.

  11. Public involvement in the regulatory activities regarding nuclear fuel cycle facilities: A case study

    SciTech Connect

    Austin, D.E.

    1995-12-01

    This paper reviews the involvement of a community-based organization in the activities of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regarding a uranium conversion facility that operated near Gore, Oklahoma from 1970 until 1992. Effective participation requires access to decision making. Access is a complex phenomenon that includes: (1) opportunity, both procedural and physical, (2) a common language, and (3) time and resources. The paper describes how both the community organization and the NRC responded to these requirements for access, the strategies that were most effective in securing meaningful public involvement in the decision making, and the impacts of that involvement on the organization.

  12. security | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    security NNSA Announces 2015 Bradley A. Peterson Federal and Contractor Security Professional of the Year Awards WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA) announced the recipients of the Bradley A. Peterson Federal and Contractor Security Professional of the Year Awards. Joseph Houghton from the Los Alamos Field Office will receive... Apex Gold discussion fosters international cooperation in run-up to 2016 Nuclear Security Summit

  13. Robust Decision Making

    SciTech Connect

    Christopher A. Dieckmann, PE, CSEP-Acq

    2010-07-01

    The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is funded through the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy and other customers who have direct contracts with the Laboratory. The people, equipment, facilities and other infrastructure at the laboratory require continual investment to maintain and improve the laboratory’s capabilities. With ever tightening federal and customer budgets, the ability to direct investments into the people, equipment, facilities and other infrastructure which are most closely aligned with the laboratory’s mission and customers’ goals grows increasingly more important. The ability to justify those investment decisions based on objective criteria that can withstand political, managerial and technical criticism also becomes increasingly more important. The Systems Engineering tools of decision analysis, risk management and roadmapping, when properly applied to such problems, can provide defensible decisions.

  14. TA-55: Lab Plutonium-Processing Facilities

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Facilities » TA-55: Lab Plutonium-Processing Facilities TA-55: Lab Plutonium-Processing Facilities TA-55 supports a wide range of national security programs that involve stockpile stewardship, plutonium processing, nuclear materials stabilization, materials disposition, nuclear forensics, nuclear counter-terrorism, and nuclear energy. ...the only fully operational, full capability plutonium facility in the nation. National Security At Los Alamos National Laboratory, virtually all plutonium

  15. Infrastructure Security

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Nuclear Energy Defense Waste Management Programs Advanced Nuclear Energy Nuclear Energy Safety Technologies Facilities Battery Abuse Testing Laboratory Cylindrical Boiling Facility ...

  16. Programs & User Facilities

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Science Programs » Office of Science » Programs & User Facilities Programs & User Facilities Enabling remarkable discoveries, tools that transform our understanding of energy and matter and advance national, economic, and energy security Advanced Scientific Computing Research Applied Mathematics Co-Design Centers Exascale Co-design Center for Materials in Extreme Environments (ExMatEx) Center for Exascale Simulation of Advanced Reactors (CESAR) Center for Exascale Simulation of

  17. Water Security

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    SunShot Grand Challenge: Regional Test Centers Water Security HomeTag:Water Security Electricity use by water service sector and county. Shown are electricity use by (a) ...

  18. Page 10, Security Forms and Information

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    10 of 11 Previous Page Security Forms and Information Building Access and DOE Badges Employees entering DOE facilities must have either a DOE photo identification Security Badge or a DOE Temporary Badge. Either badge must be displayed above the waist in plain view at all times while in DOE facilities. Employees must present said badges to Protective Force personnel for inspection prior to entry into the facilities. You should have been provided instruction by email regarding training that must

  19. Security Policy, Guidance & Reports | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Policy, Guidance & Reports Security Policy, Guidance & Reports The Office of Headquarters Security Operations strengthens national security by protecting personnel, facilities, property, classified information, and sensitive unclassified information for DOE Headquarters facilities in the National Capital Area under normal and abnormal (i.e., emergency) conditions; managing access authorization functions for Headquarters; ensuring that executives and dignitaries are fully protected, and

  20. radiological protection | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    protection NNSA Receives Excellence Award for Radiological Security Enhancements in Hawaii HONOLULU - At an official event this week, the City and County of Honolulu presented the Department of Energy's (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) with the Homeland Security Excellence Award for DOE/NNSA's Office of Radiological Security's (ORS) efforts... Dedication of Radioactive Source Storage Facilities in Tajikistan (Dushanbe, Tajikistan) - On May 11, the United States' Embassy of

  1. Waste-to-energy: Decision making and the decisions made

    SciTech Connect

    Schexnayder, S.M. ); Wolfe, A.K. )

    1993-01-01

    During the early 1980s, it was projected that waste-to-energy (WTE) facilities would manage as much as half of all municipal solid waste by the turn of the century. However, during the latter part of the 1980s, the cancellation rate for WTE facilities grew to the point that the portion of the waste stream WTE will handle in the long-term future is less certain. This study, conducted as part of a larger study, identifies factors that influence municipalities, decisions regarding WTE. This study takes a broad perspective about decision-making within communities, emphasizing the context within which decisions were made and the decision-making process. It does not seek to judge the correctness of the decisions.

  2. Waste-to-energy: Decision making and the decisions made

    SciTech Connect

    Schexnayder, S.M.; Wolfe, A.K.

    1993-05-01

    During the early 1980s, it was projected that waste-to-energy (WTE) facilities would manage as much as half of all municipal solid waste by the turn of the century. However, during the latter part of the 1980s, the cancellation rate for WTE facilities grew to the point that the portion of the waste stream WTE will handle in the long-term future is less certain. This study, conducted as part of a larger study, identifies factors that influence municipalities, decisions regarding WTE. This study takes a broad perspective about decision-making within communities, emphasizing the context within which decisions were made and the decision-making process. It does not seek to judge the correctness of the decisions.

  3. PSH-13-0037- In the Matter of Personnel Security

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    On July 25, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual’s security clearance should not be restored.  A Local Security Office began an investigation of...

  4. PSH-13-0122- In the Matter of Personnel Security

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    On February 21, 2014, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual should not be granted a security clearance.  A Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a...

  5. PSH-14-0069- In the Matter of Personnel Security

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    On November 12, 2014, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual’s security clearance should not be restored.  A Local Security Office conducted a...

  6. PSH-14-0067- In the Matter of Personnel Security

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    On September 26, 2014, an Administrative Judge issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual’s security clearance should not be restored.  During a periodic security reinvestigation,...

  7. PSH-13-0057- In the Matter of Personnel Security

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    On August 28, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual’s security clearance should not be restored.  A Local Security Office suspended the individual...

  8. PSH-14-0045- In the Matter of Personnel Security

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    On July 30, 2014, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual’s security clearance should be not restored.  A Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a...

  9. PSH-14-0027- In the Matter of Personnel Security

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    On June 23, 2014, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual’s security clearance should be restored.  A Local Security Office (LSO) conducted a...

  10. EIS-0387: Amended Record of Decision | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    : Amended Record of Decision EIS-0387: Amended Record of Decision Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Y-12 National Security Complex The National Nuclear Security Administration, a separately organized agency within the Department of Energy, is issuing this Amended Record of Decision for the Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Y-12 National Security Complex issued on March 4, 2011. A Supplement Analysis was issued on May 2, 2016. For more information, see:

  11. Summary of Decisions - December 22, 2014 - December 26, 2014 | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    of Energy 22, 2014 - December 26, 2014 Summary of Decisions - December 22, 2014 - December 26, 2014 December 26, 2014 - 1:32pm Addthis Personnel Security Decision (10 CFR Part 710) On December 23, 2014, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. A local security office suspended the individual's access authorization for falsification on a QNSP (Criterion F) and for financial irresponsibility (e.g.,

  12. SWIFT Facility

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Secure & Sustainable Energy Future Stationary Power Energy Conversion Efficiency Solar Energy Wind Energy Water Power Supercritical CO2 Geothermal Natural Gas Safety, Security & ...

  13. ARM - SGP Extended Facility

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Extended Facility SGP Related Links Virtual Tour Facilities and Instruments Central Facility Boundary Facility Extended Facility Intermediate Facility Radiometric Calibration...

  14. ARM - SGP Intermediate Facility

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Intermediate Facility SGP Related Links Virtual Tour Facilities and Instruments Central Facility Boundary Facility Extended Facility Intermediate Facility Radiometric Calibration...

  15. ARM - SGP Central Facility

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Central Facility SGP Related Links Virtual Tour Facilities and Instruments Central Facility Boundary Facility Extended Facility Intermediate Facility Radiometric Calibration...

  16. Summary of Decisions - December 7, 2015 - December 11, 2015 | Department

    Energy Saver

    Energy 24, 2015 - August 28, 2015 Summary of Decisions - August 24, 2015 - August 28, 2015 August 28, 2015 - 2:03pm Addthis Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) On August 27 2015, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a decision in which she concluded that an individual's request for a security clearance should not be granted. A Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview of the individual to address concerns about his alcohol-related incidents, alcohol use and

  17. Big Explosives Experimental Facility - BEEF

    SciTech Connect

    2014-10-31

    The Big Explosives Experimental Facility or BEEF is a ten acre fenced high explosive testing facility that provides data to support stockpile stewardship and other national security programs. At BEEF conventional high explosives experiments are safely conducted providing sophisticated diagnostics such as high speed optics and x-ray radiography.

  18. Big Explosives Experimental Facility - BEEF

    ScienceCinema

    None

    2015-01-07

    The Big Explosives Experimental Facility or BEEF is a ten acre fenced high explosive testing facility that provides data to support stockpile stewardship and other national security programs. At BEEF conventional high explosives experiments are safely conducted providing sophisticated diagnostics such as high speed optics and x-ray radiography.

  19. National Nuclear Security Administration

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Nuclear Security Administration Savannah River Site 1 NNSA Budget ($ Millions) By Program Office FY 2015 Enacted FY 2016 Enacted FY 2017 President Request Delta FY Request Weapon Activities 241 242 252 10 Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility (MOX) 340 332 270 (62) Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation (DNN) 77 58 91 33 Federal Expenses 4.7 5.2 5.4 .2 Total Budget for NNSA at SRS 662.7 637.2 618.4 (18.8)

  20. Summary of Decisions- July 11, 2016 – July 15, 2016

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Whistleblower Protection (10 CFR Part 708)

  1. Summary of Decisions- October 1, 2012 – October 5, 2012

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Contractor Employee Protection (10 CFR Part 708)

  2. FOIA-Summary of Findings: Circumstances surrounding decisions...

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    FOIA request FOIA-Summary of Findings: Circumstances surrounding decisions regarding the security clearance, access and work assignments (4.61 MB) More Documents & Publications ...

  3. Summary of Decisions - March 21, 2016 - March 25, 2016 | Department...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    On March 23, 2016, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A DOE consulting psychiatrist ...

  4. Summary of Decisions - January 26, 2015 - January 30, 2015 |...

    Energy Saver

    On January 30, 2015, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. The individual voluntarily ...

  5. Summary of Decisions - September 29, 2014 - October 3, 2014 ...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    On October 3, 2014, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should be restored. Following the individual's ...

  6. Summary of Decisions- May 25, 2015 – May 29, 2015

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Whistleblower Protection (10 CFR Part 708)

  7. Summary of Decisions- March 24, 2014 – March 28, 2014

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Whistleblower Appeal (10 CFR Part 708)

  8. Summary of Decisions- December 17, 2012 – December 21, 2012

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Whistleblower Appeal (10 CFR Part 708)

  9. EIS-0380: Amended Record of Decision | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    of Decision Continued Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), a semi-autonomous agency within...

  10. Summary of Decisions- April 28, 2014 – May 2, 2014

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) -Contractor Employee Protection Program (10 CFR Part 708) -Application for Exception

  11. Summary of Decisions- September 10 – September 14, 2012

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Decisions were issued on: - Freedom of Information Act Appeal - Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) - Contractor Employee Protection (10 CFR Part 708)

  12. National Security Complex | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    National Security Complex Y-12 National Security Complex Completes W69 Dismantlement

  13. Radiological Security Partnership | National Nuclear Security

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Administration | (NNSA) Programs / Nonproliferation / Global Material Security / Radiological Security Radiological Security Partnership Radiological Security Partnership Secure Your Business, Your Community, and Your Country. Sign Up Today for Services Provided by the Radiological Security Partnership. RSP Logo Initiative of the Global Material Security Program Formerly the Global Threat Reduction Initiative RSP Registration RSP More Info Learn More Radiological Security Partnership

  14. physical security

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    5%2A en Physical Security Systems http:nnsa.energy.govaboutusourprogramsnuclearsecurityphysicalsecuritysystems

  15. Global security

    SciTech Connect

    Lynch, Patrick

    2014-07-14

    Patrick Lynch helps technical staff, academic leaders and governments around the world improve the safety and security of their nuclear power programs.

  16. Water Security

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Water Security - Sandia Energy Energy Search Icon Sandia Home Locations Contact Us ... Energy Conversion Efficiency Solar Energy Wind Energy Water Power Supercritical CO2 ...

  17. Global security

    ScienceCinema

    Lynch, Patrick

    2016-07-12

    Patrick Lynch helps technical staff, academic leaders and governments around the world improve the safety and security of their nuclear power programs.

  18. Infrastructure Security

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Solar Energy Wind Energy Water Power Supercritical CO2 Geothermal Natural Gas Safety, Security & Resilience of the Energy Infrastructure Energy Storage Nuclear Power & Engineering ...

  19. Infrastructure Security

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    address safe and secure management of these radioactive materials includes a broad set of engineering and scientific disciplines such as physics; nuclear, mechanical, civil, and ...

  20. Security Specialist

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    These positions are located in the Office of Enterprise Assessments (EA), Office of Security Enforcement. A successful candidate in this position will rovide technical assistance to the Director,...

  1. Infrastructure Security

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    and Small Modular reactors projects. the collaboration takes place under the umbrella of a joint oUSnl "Center for Energy, Security and Society". the Center serves to...

  2. Huntington Resource Recovery Facility Biomass Facility | Open...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Resource Recovery Facility Biomass Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Huntington Resource Recovery Facility Biomass Facility Facility Huntington Resource Recovery Facility...

  3. Wheelabrator Sherman Energy Facility Biomass Facility | Open...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Sherman Energy Facility Biomass Facility Jump to: navigation, search Name Wheelabrator Sherman Energy Facility Biomass Facility Facility Wheelabrator Sherman Energy Facility Sector...

  4. Secure videoconferencing equipment switching system and method

    DOEpatents

    Hansen, Michael E.

    2009-01-13

    A switching system and method are provided to facilitate use of videoconference facilities over a plurality of security levels. The system includes a switch coupled to a plurality of codecs and communication networks. Audio/Visual peripheral components are connected to the switch. The switch couples control and data signals between the Audio/Visual peripheral components and one but nor both of the plurality of codecs. The switch additionally couples communication networks of the appropriate security level to each of the codecs. In this manner, a videoconferencing facility is provided for use on both secure and non-secure networks.

  5. Security-by-design handbook.

    SciTech Connect

    Snell, Mark Kamerer; Jaeger, Calvin Dell; Scharmer, Carol; Jordan, Sabina Erteza; Tanuma, Koji; Ochiai, Kazuya; Iida, Toru

    2013-01-01

    This document is a draft SecuritybyDesign (SeBD) handbook produced to support the Work Plan of the Nuclear Security Summit to share best practices for nuclear security in new facility design. The Work Plan calls on States to %E2%80%9Cencourage nuclear operators and architect/engineering firms to take into account and incorporate, where appropriate, effective measures of physical protection and security culture into the planning, construction, and operation of civilian nuclear facilities and provide technical assistance, upon request, to other States in doing so.%E2%80%9D The materials for this document were generated primarily as part of a bilateral project to produce a SeBD handbook as a collaboration between the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) Nuclear Nonproliferation Science and Technology Center and Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), which represented the US Department Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) under a Project Action Sheet PASPP04. Input was also derived based on tours of the Savannah River Site (SRS) and Japan Nuclear Fuel Limited (JNFL) Rokkasho Mixed Oxide Fuel fabrication facilities and associated project lessonslearned. For the purposes of the handbook, SeBD will be described as the systemlevel incorporation of the physical protection system (PPS) into a new nuclear power plant or nuclear facility resulting in a PPS design that minimizes the risk of malicious acts leading to nuclear material theft; nuclear material sabotage; and facility sabotage as much as possible through features inherent in (or intrinsic to) the design of the facility. A fourelement strategy is presented to achieve a robust, durable, and responsive security system.

  6. uranium | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    uranium Klotz visits Y-12 to see progress on new projects and ongoing work on NNSA's national security missions Last week, NNSA Administrator Lt. Gen. Frank Klotz (Ret.) visited the Y-12 National Security Complex to check on the status of ongoing projects like the Uranium Processing Facility as well as the site's continuing uranium operations. He also met with the Region 2 volunteers of the Radiogical... NNSA Announces Arrival of Plutonium and Uranium from Japan's Fast Critical Assembly at

  7. construction | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    construction Y-12 employee engineering success for group that serves people with disabilities in East Tennessee Jennifer Enderson, president of Emory Valley Center, and Bill Hevrdeys look over plans for the new facility. Bill Hevrdeys, a Consolidated Nuclear Security Construction engineer who has worked at Y-12 for more than 12 years, has worked on hundreds of construction projects all over the... NNSA's Asset Management Program Completes First Pilot The National Nuclear Security Administration

  8. infrastructure | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    infrastructure NNSA Achieves Major Milestone in BUILDER Implementation WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA) achieved a major milestone in improving the management of the Nuclear Security Enterprise's infrastructure through the successful migration of all current information on building... Extended Life Program asks 'How do you make your buildings last?' The challenge is this: Preserve two key processing facilities at Y-12 National

  9. lep | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    lep KCNSC expands manufacturing capacity to support mission The Kansas City National Security Campus celebrated another facility milestone on July 26 with a ribbon cutting ceremony to mark the completion of a manufacturing expansion area. The new space adds about 10,000 square feet of low-humidity manufacturing capacity for assembly and testing of... NNSA Reaches Important Milestone with B61-12 Life Extension Program WASHINGTON - The Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security

  10. Celebrating NFRR success | Y-12 National Security Complex

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Celebrating NFRR success Celebrating NFRR success Posted: March 20, 2015 - 12:36pm DOE Undersecretary for Nuclear Security and NNSA Administrator Frank Klotz congratulates Anna Beard, title, for successful completion of the Nuclear Facilities Risk Reduction project. DOE Undersecretary for Nuclear Security and NNSA Administrator Frank Klotz visited the Y-12 National Security Complex to celebrate the successful completion of the Nuclear Facilities Risk Reduction project. The Nuclear Facilities

  11. Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD)-12 | National Nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Security Administration | (NNSA) Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD)-12 HSPD-12 mandates a common identification standard for all Federal employees and contractors who have a need to access government facilities and information systems. The NNSA goal is to develop a common solution for effective and secure logical and physical access for longer than six months. Individuals who have a valid need to access NNSA-owned security areas, facilities and information systems will be issued

  12. PSH-13-0029- Personnel Security Hearing

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    On July 1, 2013, an OHA Hearing Officer issued a decision in which he determined that an individual’s DOE security clearance should not be restored.  The individual had exhibited a pattern of...

  13. Facility Energy Decision System | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    System (FEDS) AgencyCompany Organization: Federal Energy Management Program Sector: Energy Focus Area: Buildings Phase: Evaluate Effectiveness and Revise as Needed Topics:...

  14. Leveraging Safety Programs to Improve and Support Security Programs

    SciTech Connect

    Leach, Janice; Snell, Mark K.; Pratt, R.; Sandoval, S.

    2015-10-01

    There has been a long history of considering Safety, Security, and Safeguards (3S) as three functions of nuclear security design and operations that need to be properly and collectively integrated with operations. This paper specifically considers how safety programmes can be extended directly to benefit security as part of an integrated facility management programme. The discussion will draw on experiences implementing such a programme at Sandia National Laboratories’ Annular Research Reactor Facility. While the paper focuses on nuclear facilities, similar ideas could be used to support security programmes at other types of high-consequence facilities and transportation activities.

  15. Workshop at Nevada National Security Site Brings Together Experts...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    This workshop, building on NNSA's continuing collaboration with WINS, focused on best security practices for nuclear power plants and other major nuclear facilities. Workshop ...

  16. Security by Design in the United States: Fact Sheet | National...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    March 23, 2012 Since the events of September 11, 2001, security requirements for nuclear facilities have increased primarily due to changes in the Design Basis Threat against which ...

  17. NNSA Selects Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC to Manage the...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    The contract also includes construction project management of the Uranium Processing Facility (UPF) at the Y-12 National Security Complex, and an option for unexercised option for ...

  18. Security Upgrades Completed in Russian Northern Fleet | National...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    An important mission of NNSA is to reduce the threat of the proliferation of nuclear weapons by working cooperatively with Russia to upgrade the security of nuclear facilities. ...

  19. Independent Activity Report, Nevada National Security Site- July 2011

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Review of Nevada National Security Site Device Assembly Facility Justification for Continued Operations for Inoperable HEPA-Filtered Ventilation System [HIAR-NNSS-2011-07-08

  20. Statement of Matt Moury Deputy Assistant Secretary, Safety, Security...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Matt Moury Deputy Assistant Secretary, Safety, Security, and Quality Programs for Environmental Management Office ... Plan for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board ...

  1. Los Alamos National Security invests in Santa Fe Community College...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Los Alamos National Security invests in Santa Fe Community College Foundation The new center is an educational and training facility for alternative energy and green jobs. July 16, ...

  2. NNSA Celebrates 10 Years of Cooperation with Russia in Securing Nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Material | National Nuclear Security Administration | (NNSA) Celebrates 10 Years of Cooperation with Russia in Securing Nuclear Material NNSA Celebrates 10 Years of Cooperation with Russia in Securing Nuclear Material Moscow, Russia The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) commemorated ten years of work securing nuclear and radiological material in Russia and the former Soviet Union by completing security upgrades at two Russian nuclear facilities. Upgrades at a third facility

  3. Ashton Extended Facility

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Ashton Extended Facility Map

  4. Byron Extended Facility

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Byron Extended Facility Map

  5. High Explosives Application Facility | National Nuclear Security...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    properties research, studying explosives at the micron scale in its microdetonics laboratory, and utilizing multiple firing tanks for larger scale explosives experiments. ...

  6. Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan - Chapter 4

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    - HQ FOCIFacility Clearance and Approval Program Manager 72716 - Add following sentence to end of paragraph: Additionally, the HQ FOCIFacility Clearance and Approval Program ...

  7. narac | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    narac NNSA stays prepared with world-class response units September is National Preparedness Month, but for the Department of Energy (DOE) and NNSA, preparedness is a priority every month of the year. NNSA can respond to an emergency at any DOE facility, and it is also the nation's premier technical resource for response to nuclear or radiological... NNSA & Nuclear Security Enterprise support nation's preparedness Scientists at NNSA facilities study climate and meteorology. Other sites are

  8. workforce | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    workforce NNSA administrator shows NM congressional delegation the Albuquerque Complex to make case for new facility WASHINGTON, DC - Lt. Gen. Frank Klotz (Ret.), Administrator of the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration, hosted two members of the New Mexico congressional delegation on Feb. 18 for a tour of the aging facilities occupied by 1,200 NNSA employees at the Albuquerque Complex... DOE Celebrates LGBT Pride Month To recognize the accomplishments of Lesbian,

  9. fusion | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    fusion Inertial Confinement Fusion The Office of ICF provides experimental capabilities and scientific understanding in high energy density physics (HEDP) necessary to ensure a safe, secure, and effective nuclear weapons stockpile without underground testing. The demonstration of laboratory ignition and its use to support the... ICF Facilities ICF operates a set of world-class experimental facilities to create HEDP conditions and to obtain quantitative data in support of its numerous stockpile

  10. Infrastructure Security

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    at a defined boundary. these vulnerability analyses provided realistic data that to support decision-making to enhance physical protection designs and mitigation features. ...

  11. User Facilities

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    User Facilities User Facilities User facility agreements allow Los Alamos partners and other entities to conduct research at our unique facilities. In 2011, LANL hosted more than 1,200 users at CINT, LANSCE, and NHMFL. Users came from across the DOE complex, from international academia, and from industrial companies from 45 states across the U.S. Unique world-class user facilities foster rich research opportunities Through its technology transfer efforts, LANL can implement user facility

  12. User Facilities

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Collaboration User Facilities collaborationassetsimagesicon-collaboration.jpg User Facilities A new research frontier awaits Our door is open and we thrive on mutually...

  13. Nuclear Security Enterprise | National Nuclear Security Administration

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    About Our Programs Defense Programs Nuclear Security Enterprise The Nuclear Security Enterprise (NSE) mission is to ensure the Nation sustains a safe, secure, and effective ...

  14. Security Equipment and Systems Certification Program (SESCP)

    SciTech Connect

    Steele, B.J.; Papier, I.I.

    1996-06-20

    Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) and Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., (UL) have jointly established the Security Equipment and Systems Certification Program (SESCP). The goal of this program is to enhance industrial and national security by providing a nationally recognized method for making informed selection and use decisions when buying security equipment and systems. The SESCP will provide a coordinated structure for private and governmental security standardization review. Members will participate in meetings to identify security problems, develop ad-hoc subcommittees (as needed) to address these identified problems, and to maintain a communications network that encourages a meaningful exchange of ideas. This program will enhance national security by providing improved security equipment and security systems based on consistent, reliable standards and certification programs.

  15. National Nuclear Security Administration | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Administration National Nuclear Security Administration National Nuclear Security Administration (704.88 KB) More Documents & Publications Global Threat Reduction Initiative U.S. Global Threat Reduction Initiative/U.S.-Origin Nuclear Fuel Removals EIS-0249: Record of Decision (September 1996)

  16. National Security & Safety Reports | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    National Laboratories April 23, 2012 Audit Report: OAS-L-12-05 The Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research Facility at the Nevada National Security Site March 6,...

  17. 2016 DOE Safety and Security Enforcement Workshop

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The DOE Office of Enterprise Assessments’ (EA) Office of Enforcement will host the 2015 DOE Safety and Security Enforcement Workshop on May 10 and 11, 2016, at the Nevada Support Facility/Nevada Field Office in Las Vegas, Nevada.

  18. house of representatives | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Congressmen tour Y-12 facilities During a recent visit to the Y-12 National Security Complex, Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), chairman of the House Energy and Water Appropriations ...

  19. Reimbursable Work for Department of Homeland Security

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2003-02-28

    To authorize a modified process for the acceptance, performance, and administration of work from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) by Department of Energy (DOE) contractor and federally operated laboratories, sites, and other facilities.

  20. Secure PVM

    SciTech Connect

    Dunigan, T.H.; Venugopal, N.

    1996-09-01

    This research investigates techniques for providing privacy, authentication, and data integrity to PVM (Parallel Virtual Machine). PVM is extended to provide secure message passing with no changes to the user`s PVM application, or, optionally, security can be provided on a message-by message basis. Diffe-Hellman is used for key distribution of a single session key for n-party communication. Keyed MD5 is used for message authentication, and the user may select from various secret-key encryption algorithms for message privacy. The modifications to PVM are described, and the performance of secure PVM is evaluated.

  1. Computer Security

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    computer security Computer Security All JLF participants must fully comply with all LLNL computer security regulations and procedures. A laptop entering or leaving B-174 for the sole use by a US citizen and so configured, and requiring no IP address, need not be registered for use in the JLF. By September 2009, it is expected that computers for use by Foreign National Investigators will have no special provisions. Notify maricle1@llnl.gov of all other computers entering, leaving, or being moved

  2. Oversight and Change | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Oversight and Change Construction on Pantex High Explosives Pressing Facility Reaches 85% Mark WASHINGTON, D.C. - Work on the National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) High Explosives Pressing Facility at its Pantex Plant, located near Amarillo, Texas, this month passed the 85 percent construction completion mark and is on schedule and under budget. The new 45,000 square-foot state-... Performance Evaluations Kansas City National Security Campus (formerly Kansas City Plant) Lawrence

  3. Personnel Security

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2005-08-26

    The manual establishes the overall objectives and requirements for the Department of Energy Personnel Security Program. Cancels DOE M 472.1-1B. Canceled by DOE O 472.2.

  4. Security Specialist

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    These positions are located in the Office of Enterprise Assessments (EA), Office of Security Enforcement. A successful candidate in this position will serve as a senior staff member of the Office...

  5. Headquarters Security Quick Reference Book | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Security Quick Reference Book Headquarters Security Quick Reference Book June 2013 This quick reference book provides an overview of Department of Energy (DOE) Headquarters (HQ) security programs. It is not meant to replace the DOE Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan (HQFMSP), which provides detailed instructions for the implementation of DOE safeguards and security requirements as published in a number of DOE orders, policies, notices, and guides. This book is a tool that can be used

  6. Nuclear Materials Safeguards and Security Upgrade Project Completed Under

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Budget | National Nuclear Security Administration | (NNSA) Nuclear Materials Safeguards and Security Upgrade Project Completed Under Budget April 03, 2014 WASHINGTON, D.C. - The National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) Nuclear Materials Safeguards and Security Upgrade Project (NMSSUP) was recently completed approximately $1 million under its original budget of $245 million. NMSSUP upgrades security at Los Alamos National Laboratory's (LANL) Technical Area-55, a facility that houses

  7. Security Rulemaking

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Program (WP) | Department of Energy Securing Clean, Domestic, Affordable Energy with Wind (Fact Sheet), Wind Program (WP) Securing Clean, Domestic, Affordable Energy with Wind (Fact Sheet), Wind Program (WP) This fact sheet provides a brief description of the Wind Energy Market and describes the U.S. Department of Energy's Wind Program research and development efforts. eere_wind_water.pdf (499.36 KB) More Documents & Publications Offshore Wind Projects Wind Program Accomplishments Wind

  8. Information Security

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2011-06-20

    The protection and control of classified information is critical to our nations security. This Order establishes requirements and responsibilities for Department of Energy (DOE) Departmental Elements, including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), to protect and control classified information as required by statutes, regulation, Executive Orders, government-wide policy directives and guidelines, and DOE policy and directives. Cancels DOE M 470.4-4A Chg except for Section D.

  9. Personnel Security

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2011-07-27

    The Order establishes requirements for a successful, efficient and cost-effective personnel security program to ensure accurate, timely and equitable determinations of individuals eligibility for access to classified information and fitness for placement or retention in national security positions. Cancels DOE M 470.4-5, DOE N 470.4 and DOE N 470.5. Admin Chg 1, 10-8-13.

  10. EIS-0082-S1: Record of Decision | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    -S1: Record of Decision EIS-0082-S1: Record of Decision Defense Waste Processing Facility, Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina For more information, see the project page: ...

  11. Security | Y-12 National Security Complex

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Security Security The Y-12 National Security Complex places the highest priority on maintaining and improving its security posture. We employ security police officers, cyber security specialists, and other personnel to safeguard our security assets. Y-12 continuously monitors local and world events to prepare for potential risks to the site, our information and our employees. Security personnel also participate in numerous assessments each year to ensure readiness in protecting the site's vital

  12. National Nuclear Security Administration | National Nuclear Security...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    National Nuclear Security Administration | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing...

  13. EIS-0387: Record of Decision | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Record of Decision EIS-0387: Record of Decision Y-12 National Security Complex The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is issuing this Record of Decision (ROD) for the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee based on information and analyses contained in the Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Y-12 National Security Complex, DOE/EIS-0387 (Y-12 Final SWEIS, Y-12 SWEIS or 2011 Y- 12 SWEIS) issued on March

  14. Ceremony celebrates new NNSA facility in Kansas City | National Nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Security Administration | (NNSA) Ceremony celebrates new NNSA facility in Kansas City Friday, August 22, 2014 - 3:00pm Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz and Under Secretary for Nuclear Security and NNSA Administrator Lt. Gen. Frank Klotz today hailed the completion of the new National Security Campus at a dedication ceremony in Kansas City, Mo. The new facility was completed ahead of schedule, $10 million under budget, and with the site's best safety and security performance on record. The event

  15. Facility Representatives

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2011-03-01

    This standard, DOE-STD-1063, Facility Representatives, defines the duties, responsibilities and qualifications for Department of Energy (DOE) Facility Representatives, based on facility hazard classification; risks to workers, the public, and the environment; and the operational activity level. This standard provides the guidance necessary to ensure that DOE’s hazardous nuclear and non-nuclear facilities have sufficient staffing of technically qualified facility representatives (FRs) to provide day-to-day oversight of contractor operations.

  16. Presidential Initiatives | National Nuclear Security Administration |

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    (NNSA) Home Presidential Initiatives Bratislava Nuclear Security Initiative: President Putin and President Bush agreed to pursue an initiative on nuclear security cooperation at a February 2005 summit in Bratislava, Slovak Republic. This agreement includes for the first time a comprehensive joint action plan for the cooperation on security upgrades of Russian nuclear facilities at Rosatom and Ministry of Defense sites, and cooperation in the areas of nuclear regulatory development,

  17. Clearance Adjudication | National Nuclear Security Administration | (NNSA)

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Clearance Adjudication The Office of Personnel and Facility Clearances and Classification (OPFCC) submits the clearance paperwork to the proper investigative agency, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) or the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Upon receipt of the investigation, the paperwork is matched to the Personnel Security File and assigned to a Personnel Security Specialist, who will adjudicate the investigation, using the Presidential Adjudicative Guidelines. If security concerns

  18. EIS-0309: Record of Decision | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Record of Decision EIS-0309: Record of Decision The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), is issuing this Record of Decision on the operation of the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) in the State of Tennessee. (67 FR 11296) National Nuclear Security Administration; Record of Decision of the Final Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Oak Ridge Y-12 National Security Complex, EIS-0309 (March 2002) (62.08 KB) More Documents & Publications EA-0387: DOE Notice of Availability of the

  19. Addendum to the Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters Nevada National Security Site, Nevada, Revision 0

    SciTech Connect

    Patrick Matthews and Christy Sloop

    2012-01-01

    This document constitutes an addendum to the Corrective Action Decision Document/Closure Report for Corrective Action Unit 372: Area 20 Cabriolet/Palanquin Unit Craters, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (Revision 0), April 2011.

  20. ADP computer security classification program

    SciTech Connect

    Augustson, S.J.

    1984-01-01

    CG-ADP-1, the Automatic Data Processing Security Classification Guide, provides for classification guidance (for security information) concerning the protection of Department of Energy (DOE) and DOE contractor Automatic Data Processing (ADP) systems which handle classified information. Within the DOE, ADP facilities that process classified information provide potentially lucrative targets for compromise. In conjunction with the security measures required by DOE regulations, necessary precautions must be taken to protect details of those ADP security measures which could aid in their own subversion. Accordingly, the basic principle underlying ADP security classification policy is to protect information which could be of significant assistance in gaining unauthorized access to classified information being processed at an ADP facility. Given this policy, classification topics and guidelines are approved for implementation. The basic program guide, CG-ADP-1 is broad in scope and based upon it, more detailed local guides are sometimes developed and approved for specific sites. Classification topics are provided for system features, system and security management, and passwords. Site-specific topics can be addressed in local guides if needed.

  1. Dedication of Radioactive Source Storage Facilities in Tajikistan...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Nuclear Security Administration (DOENNSA), the United Kingdom's Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), and the Government of Tajikistan dedicated two facilities for ...

  2. KCP celebrates production milestone at new facility | National...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    celebrates production milestone at new facility | National Nuclear Security Administration Facebook Twitter Youtube Flickr RSS People Mission Managing the Stockpile Preventing...

  3. Facility Energy Management Guidelines and Criteria for Energy...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    for Energy and Water Evaluations in Covered Facilities Guidelines and criteria describe meeting requirements within Section 432 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 ...

  4. Microsoft Word - News Release - Clemson Drivetrain Test Facility...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Contributes to Clemson University's Wind Turbine Drivetrain Testing Facility and ... nuclear security and clean energy challenges. For more information, visit http:...

  5. Assessment of Facilities, Materials, and Wastes Proposed for...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    for Environmental Management (EM-1) invited the DOE ... National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) to propose facilities and legacy waste for transfer to Environmental ...

  6. National Laser Users' Facility Grant Program Awards | National Nuclear

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Security Administration | (NNSA) National Laser Users' Facility Grant Program Awards 2015 Awards 2012 Awards Learn More 2012 NLUF Awards 2015 NLUF Awards

  7. Record of Decision for Construction and Operation of a Depleted...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Record of Decision for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride ... Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the ...

  8. Record of Decision for Construction and Operation of a Depleted...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ... Record of Decision for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride ... Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the ...

  9. EIS-0287: Amended Record of Decision | Department of Energy

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    Facilities Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement. This document corrects an error in that notice. DOEEIS-0287, Department of Energy, Amended Record of Decision: Idaho...

  10. EIS-0236-S1: Record of Decision | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    is issuing this Record of Decision (ROD) for the National Ignition Facility (NIF), a key component of DOE's science-based stewardship of the nation's nuclear weapons stockpile. ...

  11. EIS-0287: Amended Record of Decision | Department of Energy

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    Record of Decision: Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0287 (November 2006) (71 FR 68811) More Documents & Publications...

  12. EIS-0228: Record of Decision | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Hydrodynamic Test Facility The Department of Energy (DOE) is issuing this Record of Decision (ROD) regarding the DOE's proposed Dual Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT) ...

  13. Summary of Decisions - October 31, 2016 - November 4, 2016 | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    of Energy 31, 2016 - November 4, 2016 Summary of Decisions - October 31, 2016 - November 4, 2016 November 4, 2016 - 3:08pm Addthis Personnel Security Hearing (10 CFR Part 710) On October 31, 2016, an Administrative Judge (AJ) issued a decision in which she determined that an individual's access authorization should be restored. In February 2016, as part of a background investigation, the Local Security Office conducted a Personnel Security Interview (PSI) of the individual to address

  14. Summary of Decisions - January 11, 2016 - January 15, 2016 | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    of Energy 1, 2016 - January 15, 2016 Summary of Decisions - January 11, 2016 - January 15, 2016 January 15, 2016 - 3:43pm Addthis Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) On January 15, 2015, an Administrative Judge issued a decision in which she determined that an individual's access authorization should not be restored. During a personnel security interview in April 2014 and a credit report review, the Local Security Office (LSO) learned that the individual had a number of delinquent debts,

  15. Summary of Decisions - January 27, 2014 - January 31, 2014 | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    of Energy 7, 2014 - January 31, 2014 Summary of Decisions - January 27, 2014 - January 31, 2014 January 31, 2014 - 10:19am Addthis Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) On January 31, 2014, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's security clearance should not be restored. A Local Security Office began an investigation of an individual's eligibility for access authorization after the individual failed a field sobriety test (BAC of .10 to .11)

  16. Summary of Decisions - October 12, 2015 - October 16, 2015 | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    of Energy 2, 2015 - October 16, 2015 Summary of Decisions - October 12, 2015 - October 16, 2015 October 16, 2015 - 9:11am Addthis Personnel Security (10 CFR Part 710) On October 15, 2015, an OHA Administrative Judge issued a decision in which he concluded that an individual's request for a security clearance should be granted. During the investigation of the individual's eligibility for access authorization, the local security office (LSO) received police reports which indicated: (1) the

  17. Facility Safety - DOE Directives, Delegations, and Requirements

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    O 420.1C Chg 1, Facility Safety by Pranab Guha Functional areas: DNFSB, Defense Nuclear Facility Safety and Health Requirement, Facility Safety, Requires Crosswalk When Revised, Safety, Security The Order establishes facility and programmatic safety requirements for DOE and NNSA for nuclear safety design criteria, fire protection, criticality safety, natural phenomena hazards (NPH) mitigation, and System Engineer Program. This Page Change is limited in scope to changes necessary to invoke

  18. CMR: Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    CMR: Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility CMR: Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility The Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Chemistry and Metallurgy Research (CMR) building supports research and experimental activities for plutonium and uranium analytical chemistry and metallurgy. CMR capabilities support a number of national security programs, such as non-proliferation and nuclear safeguards. The CMR Facility In 1952, the first LANL CMR facility was completed. At that time, the

  19. Information Security

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2011-06-20

    The protection and control of classified information is critical to our nations security. This Order establishes requirements and responsibilities for Department of Energy (DOE) Departmental Elements, including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), to protect and control classified information as required by statutes, regulation, Executive Orders, government-wide policy directives and guidelines, and DOE policy and directives. Cancels DOE M 470.4-4A Chg except for Section D. Admin Chg 1, dated 11-23-2012, cancels DOE O 471.6. Canceled by Admin Chg 2 dated 5-15-15.

  20. Information Security

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2007-06-29

    Establishes security requirements for the protection and control of information and matter required to be classified or controlled by statutes, regulations, or Department of Energy directives. Section E, Technical Surveillance Countermeasures Program, is Official Use Only. Please contact the DOE Office of Health, Safety and Security at 301-903-0292 if your official duties require you to have access to this part of the directive. Cancels: DOE M 471.2-1B, DOE M 471.2-1C, DOE M 471.2-4, and DOE O 471.2A

  1. Information Security

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2005-08-26

    This Manual establishes security requirements for the protection and control of information and matter required to be classified or controlled by statutes, regulations, or Department of Energy directives. Attachment E, Technical Surveillance Countermeasures Program, is for Official Use Only. Contact the Office of Security and Safety Performance Assurance at 301-903-3653 if your official duties require you to have access to this part of the directive. Cancels: DOE M 471.2-1B, DOE M 471.2-1C, DOE M 471.2-4, and DOE O 471.2A.

  2. National Ignition Facility Project Execution Plan

    SciTech Connect

    Moses, E

    2000-08-14

    The ''National Ignition Facility (NIF) Justification of Mission Need'', which was approved by the Secretary of Energy in January 1993, defines the mission of the National Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) Program and discusses the specific mission of the NIF Project. The NIF experimental capability will allow nuclear-weapons scientists to assess stockpile problems, verify computational tools, test for nuclear-weapons effects, and increase their understanding of weapons physics. The three weapons laboratory directors and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs have reviewed the role of the NIT; in Stockpile Stewardship in a joint letter. Along with the Accelerated Strategic Computing Initiative numerical simulations and other aboveground experimental facilities, the NIF will provide critical data that will allow the United States to maintain its technical capabilities in nuclear weapons in the absence of underground testing. As a secondary objective, the NIF will advance our understanding of ICF and help to assess its potential as an energy source. Achieving fusion ignition in the NIF will advance both defense and energy objectives. In affirming the Project's Critical Decision 2,* ''Approval of New Start'', the Secretary of Energy verified the mission need and emphasized that the NIF has the potential to contribute significantly to the DOE missions.

  3. Computer-implemented security evaluation methods, security evaluation systems, and articles of manufacture

    SciTech Connect

    Muller, George; Perkins, Casey J.; Lancaster, Mary J.; MacDonald, Douglas G.; Clements, Samuel L.; Hutton, William J.; Patrick, Scott W.; Key, Bradley Robert

    2015-07-28

    Computer-implemented security evaluation methods, security evaluation systems, and articles of manufacture are described. According to one aspect, a computer-implemented security evaluation method includes accessing information regarding a physical architecture and a cyber architecture of a facility, building a model of the facility comprising a plurality of physical areas of the physical architecture, a plurality of cyber areas of the cyber architecture, and a plurality of pathways between the physical areas and the cyber areas, identifying a target within the facility, executing the model a plurality of times to simulate a plurality of attacks against the target by an adversary traversing at least one of the areas in the physical domain and at least one of the areas in the cyber domain, and using results of the executing, providing information regarding a security risk of the facility with respect to the target.

  4. ORISE: Facilities

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    ORISE Facilities Unique laboratories and training centers among the assets managed on behalf of the U.S. Department of Energy The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) is home to a number of on- and off-site facilities that support the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) science education and research mission. From on-site medical laboratories to radiation emergency medicine training facilities, ORISE facilities are helping to address national needs in the following areas:

  5. Facility Safety

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    1996-10-24

    Establishes facility safety requirements related to: nuclear safety design, criticality safety, fire protection and natural phenomena hazards mitigation.

  6. Facility Safety

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    1995-11-16

    Establishes facility safety requirements related to: nuclear safety design, criticality safety, fire protection and natural phenomena hazards mitigation.

  7. PCS Security Technology Evaluation Tool

    Energy Science and Technology Software Center

    2007-01-30

    P-STET assists in the security technology decision making process from a costlbeneflt perspective. It aids in addressing such questions as whether to acquire and deploy new security technology, to re-configure an existing product or system, or to maintain status quo. P-STET offers both a qualitative and quantitative option. P-STET is most efficient when tailored to an organization’s security cost/benefit environment. It then serves as both a guide to show what types of security questions shouldmore » be addressed and as a means to analyze the data gathered from the questions to make an informed decision. The quantitative option provides a straightforward way to express costs/benefits in terms of dollars. It relies on the organization to quantify benefits or cost avoidances, and, therefore, best serves as a guide to ensure various cost and benefit angles are evaluated. The qualitative option allows the organization to assess costs by levels with respect to security and PCS budgets, operational impacts, and opportunity costs. Benefits are represented in terms of improvements to the organization’s operations and are also assessed by levels with respect to some benchmark such as compliance with best practices. Results are displayed graphically using radar charts, allowing the user to make a more intuitive decision. The shaded area of each chart represents the overall cost and benefit of the security investment. A good investment is denoted when the ratio of benefit shaded area to cost shaded area is large.« less

  8. Y-12s Building 9212 and the Uranium Processing Facility, part...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    2 The Uranium Processing Facility is planned to replace aged facilities at the Y-12 National Security Complex. Support for moving the construction of the facility ahead has caused...

  9. Facility Safety Policy, Guidance & Reports | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Facility Safety Policy, Guidance & Reports Facility Safety Policy, Guidance & Reports The Office of Nuclear Facility Safety Programs within the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Environment, Health, Safety and Security organization, establishes nuclear safety requirements related to safety management programs that are essential to the safety of DOE nuclear facilities. In addition, establishes requirements for facility design and operation for facility-wide hazards that are not unique to

  10. 2016 Nuclear and Facility Safety Program Workshop

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Office of Environmental Health, Safety, and Security will sponsor the 2016 Nuclear and Facility Safety Program Workshop which will be held May 2-6, 2016 at the Alexis Park in Las Vegas, Nevada.

  11. Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility | National Nuclear...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Congressmen tour Y-12 facilities During a recent visit to the Y-12 National Security Complex, Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), chairman of the House Energy and Water Appropriations ...

  12. Personnel Security

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2011-07-21

    The order establishes requirements that will enable DOE to operate a successful, efficient, cost-effective personnel security program that will ensure accurate, timely and equitable determinations of individuals eligibility for access to classified information and Special Nuclear Material (SNM). Admin Chg 1, 10-8-13.

  13. Security Rulemaking | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Rulemaking Security Rulemaking Transportation Security Rulemaking Activities PDF icon Security Rulemaking More Documents & Publications Transportation Security Rulemaking...

  14. Emergency Management: Facility Emergency Plan Template

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Laboratory Building 219, 274 and 278 SSRL Building Facility Emergency Plan In Case of Emergency 9-911 from a SLAC phone 911 from a non-SLAC phone Then notify SLAC Site Security, Ext. 5555 SLAC Emergency Resources SLAC Site Security 5555 On-site Palo Alto Fire Station Number 7 2776 Conventional and Experimental Facilities 8901 Normal working hours only SLAC Medical Department 2281 Waste Management 2399 Building manager Larry Cadapan Assistant building manager Brian Choi Publication date

  15. Energy Security Council

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Energy Security Council Reliable, secure, sustainable carbon energy solutions for the ... new ideas for reliable, secure and sustainable carbon neutral energy solutions for the ...

  16. ENERGY SUPPLY SECURITY 2014

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    Sustainable Together ENERGY SUPPLY SECURITY 2014 Emergency Response of IEA Countries Secure Sustainable Together ENERGY SUPPLY SECURITY 2014 Emergency Response of IEA Countries ...

  17. Security Conditions

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    2002-08-07

    To ensure that the Department of Energy (DOE) uniformly meets the protection requirements specified in Presidential Decision Directive 39, "U.S. Policy on Counterterrorism (U)." DOE N 251.54, dated 07/08/2003, extends this directive until 07/08/04. Cancels DOE N 473.6

  18. Wheelabrator Millbury Facility Biomass Facility | Open Energy...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Facility Facility Wheelabrator Millbury Facility Sector Biomass Facility Type Municipal Solid Waste Location Worcester County, Massachusetts Coordinates 42.4096528, -71.8571331...

  19. Sandia National Laboratories: Research: Facilities: Technology Deployment

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Centers: Weapon and Force Protection Center Weapon and Force Protection Center Video Cameras Weapon and Force Protection Center The Center for Security Systems is a fully integrated research-to- development-to-application center that provides systems and technologies that understand, identify, and solve the nation's security problems. The Center includes extensive development and testing facilities for all aspects of physical security including the following: sensors video image processing

  20. Procuring Solar for Federal Facilities | Department of Energy

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    Procuring Solar Energy: A Guide for Federal Facility Decision Makers is a Web guide for federal site managers, site contractors, and procurement specialists to help them navigate ...