National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for determination bryan mound

  1. Sulphur Extraction at Bryan Mound

    SciTech Connect

    Kirby, Carolyn L; Lord, Anna C. Snider

    2015-08-01

    The Bryan Mound caprock was subjected to extens ive sulphur mining prior to the development of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Undoubtedl y, the mining has modified the caprock integrity. Cavern wells at Bryan Mound have been subject to a host of well integr ity concerns with many likely compromised by the cavernous capro ck, surrounding corrosive environment (H 2 SO 4 ), and associated elevated residual temperatures al l of which are a product of the mining activities. The intent of this study was to understand the sulphur mining process and how the mining has affected the stability of the caprock and how the compromised caprock has influenced the integrity of the cavern wells. After an extensiv e search to collect pert inent information through state agencies, literature sear ches, and the Sandia SPR librar y, a better understanding of the caprock can be inferred from the knowledge gaine d. Specifically, the discovery of the original ore reserve map goes a long way towards modeling caprock stability. In addition the gained knowledge of sulphur mining - subs idence, superheated corrosive wa ters, and caprock collapse - helps to better predict the post mi ning effects on wellbore integrity. This page intentionally left blank

  2. Bryan Mound SPR cavern 113 remedial leach stage 1 analysis. ...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Title: Bryan Mound SPR cavern 113 remedial leach stage 1 analysis. The U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve implemented the first stage of a leach plan in 2011-2012 to expand storage ...

  3. Chemistry and mineralogy of samples from the strategic petroleum reserve Bryan Mound site

    SciTech Connect

    Bild, R. W.

    1980-08-01

    The goal of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) program is to protect the United States from a temporary cutoff of imported crude oil by stockpiling a reserve of oil in caverns in Gulf Coast salt domes. Some suitable caverns already exist as a result of solution mining activities by commercial mining companies. Most of the caverns for the program, however, will be solution mined specifically for the SPR program. The tasks assigned to Sandia National Laboratories include conducting a geotechnical program and providing interim technical support for the leaching of the first five caverns in the Bryan Mound, Texas, salt dome. This report describes chemical, mineralogical and petrological work done at Sandia as of May 1, 1980 in support of Bryan Mound activities. Samples of Bryan Mound salt cores, sidewall samples and drill cuttings have been subjected to chemical, mineralogical and petrographic analysis. Halite (NaCl) was the major mineral in all samples with anhydrite (CaSO/sub 4/) a common accessory. Minor or trace sylvite (KCl) and quartz (SiO/sub 2/) were detected in some sidewall samples. Other minor minerals found in drill cuttings included quartz; mixed carbonates of Fe, Ca and Mg; and several iron oxides. Possibly the carbonates are reaction products with the basic drilling mud or possibly pieces of caprock which contaminated the cuttings. The iron oxides were probably produced by corrosion of the drill stem or bit. Densities of several core samples were determined and insoluble residue was counted for radioactivity.

  4. Investigation of the September 13, 2011, Fatality at the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Bryan Mound Site

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    On September 13, 2011, a recently-hired, untrained subcontractor employee struck three large elevated pipes while operating a front deck mower at the Cavern 5 area of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Bryan Mound (SPR-BM) site.

  5. Conversion of the Bryan Mound geological site characterization reports to a three-dimensional model.

    SciTech Connect

    Stein, Joshua S.; Rautman, Christopher Arthur

    2005-04-01

    The Bryan Mound salt dome, located near Freeport, Texas, is home to one of four underground crude oil-storage facilities managed by the U. S. Department of Energy Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) Program. Sandia National Laboratories, as the geotechnical advisor to the SPR, conducts site-characterization investigations and other longer-term geotechnical and engineering studies in support of the program. This report describes the conversion of two-dimensional geologic interpretations of the Bryan Mound site into three-dimensional geologic models. The new models include the geometry of the salt dome, the surrounding sedimentary units, mapped faults, and the 20 oil-storage caverns at the site. This work provides an internally consistent geologic model of the Bryan Mound site that can be used in support of future work.

  6. EIS-0001: Strategic Petroleum Reserve, Bryan Mound Salt Dome, Brazoria County, Texas

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Strategic Petroleum Reserve prepared this SEIS to address the environmental impacts of construction and operation of two types of brine disposal systems and a new water supply system. This EIS supplements FES 76/77-6, Bryan Mound Storage Site.

  7. Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) additional geologic site characterization studies, Bryan Mound Salt Dome, Texas

    SciTech Connect

    Neal, J.T.; Magorian, T.R.; Ahmad, S.

    1994-11-01

    This report revises the original report that was published in 1980. Some of the topics covered in the earlier report were provisional and it is now practicable to reexamine them using new or revised geotechnical data and that obtained from SPR cavern operations, which involves 16 new caverns. Revised structure maps and sections show interpretative differences as compared with the 1980 report and more definition in the dome shape and caprock structural contours, especially a major southeast-northwest trending anomalous zone. The original interpretation was of westward tilt of the dome, this revision shows a tilt to the southeast, consistent with other gravity and seismic data. This interpretation refines the evaluation of additional cavern space, by adding more salt buffer and allowing several more caverns. Additional storage space is constrained on this nearly full dome because of low-lying peripheral wetlands, but 60 MMBBL or more of additional volume could be gained in six or more new caverns. Subsidence values at Bryan Mound are among the lowest in the SPR system, averaging about 11 mm/yr (0.4 in/yr), but measurement and interpretation issues persist, as observed values are about the same as survey measurement accuracy. Periodic flooding is a continuing threat because of the coastal proximity and because peripheral portions of the site are at elevations less than 15 ft. This threat may increase slightly as future subsidence lowers the surface, but the amount is apt to be small. Caprock integrity may be affected by structural features, especially the faulting associated with anomalous zones. Injection wells have not been used extensively at Bryan Mound, but could be a practicable solution to future brine disposal needs. Environmental issues center on the areas of low elevation that are below 15 feet above mean sea level: the coastal proximity and lowland environment combined with the potential for flooding create conditions that require continuing surveillance.

  8. Shrimp and redfish studies, bryan mound brine disposal site off Freeport, Texas, 1979-1981. Volume IV. Interview sampling survey of shrimp catch and effort. Technical memo

    SciTech Connect

    Johnson, M.F.

    1981-06-01

    An interview sampling survey of shrimp catch and fishing effort was conducted at specified ports along the Texas coast to strengthen the information base required to determine the effect of the disposal of brine from the Bryan Mound salt dome off Freeport, Texas on commercial brown shrimp (Penaeus aztecus) and white shrimp (Penaeus setiferus) populations in the Gulf of Mexico. The data recorded included port number, vessel name, official vessel number, shrimp dealer number, date of landing, area fished, depth of capture, days fished, and pounds of shrimp caught by species and size categories.

  9. Environmental assessment of the brine pipeline replacement for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Bryan Mound Facility in Brazoria County, Texas

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1993-09-01

    The Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA), DOE/EA-0804, for the proposed replacement of a deteriorated brine disposal pipeline from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) Bryan Mound storage facility in Brazoria County, Texas, into the Gulf of Mexico. In addition, the ocean discharge outfall would be moved shoreward by locating the brine diffuser at the end of the pipeline 3.5 miles offshore at a minimum depth of 30 feet. The action would occur in a floodplain and wetlands; therefore, a floodplain/wetlands assessment has been prepared in conjunction with this EA. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 USC. 4321, et seg.). Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required, and the Department is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). This FONSI also includes a Floodplain Statement of Findings in accordance with 10 CFR Part 1022.

  10. Evaluation of brine disposal from the Bryan Mound site of the strategic petroleum reserve program. Final report

    SciTech Connect

    Case, Robert J.; Chittenden, Jr, Mark E.; Harper, Jr, Donald E.; Kelly, Jr, Francis J.; Loeblich, Laurel A.; McKinney, Larry D.; Minello, Thomas J.; Park, E. Taisoo; Randall, Robert E.; Slowey, J. Frank

    1981-01-01

    On March 10, 1980, the Department of Energy's Strategic Petroleum Reserve Program began leaching the Bryan Mound salt dome and discharging the resulting brine into the coastal waters off Freeport, Texas. During the months of March and April, a team of scientists and engineers from Texas A and M University conducted an intensive environmental study of the area surrounding the diffuser site. A pipeline has been laid from the Bryan Mound site to a location 12.5 statute miles (20 km) offshore. The last 3060 ft (933 m) of this pipeline is a 52-port diffuser through which brine can be discharged at a maximum rate of 680,000 barrels per day. Initially, 16 ports were open which permitted a maximum discharge rate of 350,000 barrels per day and a continuous brine discharge was achieved on March 13, 1980. The purpose of this report is to describe the findings of the project team during the intensive postdisposal study period of March and April, 1980. The major areas of investigation are physical oceanography, analysis of the discharge plume, water and sediment quality, nekton, benthos, phytoplankton, zooplankton, and data management.

  11. Offshore oceanographic and environmental monitoring services for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Volume I. Appendices. Annual report for the Bryan Mound Site, September 1982-August 1983

    SciTech Connect

    1984-03-01

    The Department of Energy's Strategic Petroleum Reserve Program began leaching the Bryan Mound salt dome and discharging brine into the coastal waters offshore of Freeport, Texas on March 10, 1980. This report describes the findings of a team of Texas A and M University scientists and engineers who have conducted a study to evaluate the effects of the Bryan Mound brine discharge on the marine environment. The study addresses the areas of physical oceanography, analysis of the discharge plume, water and sediment quality, nekton, benthos and data management. It focuses on the period from September 1982 through August 1983. The ambient physical environment and its temporal and spatial variability were studied by means of continuously recording in situ current/conductivitiy/temperature meters and twelve, one-day synoptic hydrographic cruises. The quarterly water and sediment quality data show a small increase in salinity, sodium and chloride ions occurs in the bottom waters and sediment pore waters near the diffuser relative to those values measured at stations farther away. Data from the brine plume study for this reporting study show the largest areal extent within the +1 o/oo above ambient salinity contour was 40.0 km/sup 2/ which occurred on August 11, 1983. It appears that brine disposal at Bryan Mound has had neglible if any influence on the nekton community surrounding the diffuser. The benthic quarterly data from 26 stations, including 7 collections made after the diffuser outflow rate was increased to 1,000,000 barrels/day, show the total numbers of species at the diffuser station were higher than most other nearfield stations as well as many farfield stations in both the pre- and post-1,000,000 barrels/day brine flow periods. 138 references, 175 figures, 53 tables.

  12. CX-004344: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bryan Mound Replace Interior and Exterior Entryway to Building 201CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 10/13/2010Location(s): Bryan Mound, TexasOffice(s): Fossil Energy, Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  13. A. Lawrence Bryan, Jr.

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    to the ecology, behavior and conservation of Wood Storks, including foraging ... Conservation Biology 14:414-419. Snodgrass, J.W., C.H. Jagoe, A.L. Bryan, Jr., H.A. Brant, ...

  14. Bryan Fry | Photosynthetic Antenna Research Center

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Bryan Fry Bryan Fry Bryan Fry Graduate Student E-mail: bryanfry@mail.med.upenn.edu Website: University of Pennsylvania Graduate...

  15. Bryan Hannegan | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Bryan Hannegan About Us Bryan Hannegan - Associate Lab Director, Energy Systems Integration, at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory Most Recent Energy Systems Integration Facility Delivering on Promise to Strengthen America's Clean Energy Innovation September 1

  16. Bryan Wheeler | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Bryan Wheeler About Us Bryan Wheeler - Intern, Office of Science Bryan Wheeler was an intern in the Energy Department's Office of Science in the summer of 2011. He is currently a student at Johns Hopkins University Most Recent Maximizing Potential of Diesel and Gasoline for a Cleaner, More Efficient Engine September 27

  17. Rice, Bryan Joseph

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    The (4)He(gamma,dd) reaction at E(gamma) = 150--250 MeV Rice, Bryan Joseph ProQuest Dissertations and Theses; 1998; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) pg. n/a Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with

  18. Paul Bryan | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Bryan About Us Paul Bryan - Biomass Program Manager, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Paul Bryan is Program Manager for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy's Biomass Program. Most Recent Producing Clean, Renewable Diesel from Biomass November 30 The How's and Why's of Replacing the Whole Barrel October 19 Billion-Ton Update: Home-Grown Energy Resources Across the Nation August 1

  19. CX-013440: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Record of Categorical Exclusion Determination to Replace Piping Header at Bryan Mound RWIS and RWIP (BM-MM-1027) CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 02/18/2015 Location(s): TexasOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  20. Bryan Mound SPR cavern 113 remedial leach stage 1 analysis. ...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    sonar surveys in order to aid in the analysis and offer projections of likely outcomes ... Sponsoring Org: USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Country of ...

  1. William Bryan, OE-30 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    William Bryan, OE-30 About Us William Bryan, OE-30 - Deputy Assistant Secretary, Infrastructure Security & Energy Restoration Mr. Bryan is the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Infrastructure Security and Energy Restoration in the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE). The office of Infrastructure Security and Energy Restoration (ISER) works with the National Security Staff, other U.S. government agencies, and international partners to

  2. Lightning strike at Bryan, Ohio

    SciTech Connect

    Nichols, B. E.

    1980-02-01

    A week before the 29 August 1979 dedication of the photovoltaic power system at daytime AM radio station WBNO, in Bryan, Ohio, a lightning superbolt struck the FM radio tower, one of two towers at the station. Minor damage to the station and to components of the photovoltaic system, the latter designed by MIT Lincoln Laboratory under US Department of Energy sponsorship, is described. This rare strike suggested the need for increased protection and more voltage-transient suppressors were added to those already in place as a preventive measure in the event that such a phenomenon reoccurs.

  3. Bryan County, Georgia: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Number 2 Climate Zone Subtype A. Places in Bryan County, Georgia Pembroke, Georgia Richmond Hill, Georgia Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleBryanCounty,Ge...

  4. CX-009717: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    717: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-009717: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pumping System for 100 MBD Cavern Capacity Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 12/12/2012 Location(s): Texas, Louisiana, Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office Subcontractor shall provide all labor, tools, materials, equipment, services, transportation, storage and supervision required to install new Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) buildings at the Big Hill (BH), Bryan Mound (BM), and

  5. Bryan Texas Utilities- SmartHOME Program

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Bryan Texas Utilities (BTU) SmartHOME Programs offers incentives to owners of single- and multi-family homes for insulation, windows, and solar screens.The incentive amount may not be less than...

  6. City of Bryan, Texas (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Texas (Utility Company) Jump to: navigation, search Name: City of Bryan Place: Texas Phone Number: (979) 821-5700 Website: www.btutilities.com Twitter: @CityofBryan Facebook:...

  7. CX-009212: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Replace Three Wood Poles-In-Kind at Bryan Mound West Gate CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/23/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  8. CX-011848: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bryan Mound Upgrade Wood to Steel Light Poles CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 02/14/2014 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  9. CX-006600: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bryan Mound Site Building Upgrades, Phase IICX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 07/12/2011Location(s): Freeport, TexasOffice(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  10. CX-008350: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Re-work Bryan Mound 30” Crude Oil Pipeline Mainline Valves CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 04/10/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  11. CX-009718: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace Brine Disposal System Header to Bryan Mound Brine Tank, GFE CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 12/11/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  12. CX-013886: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Remove Oil from Bryan Mound Crude Oil Tank BMT-4 Sump CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 07/06/2015 Location(s): None ProvidedOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  13. CX-014107: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace Windows on Big Hill and Bryan Mound Entry Portal Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 08/03/2015 Location(s): TexasOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  14. CX-009218: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace Sparge Piping at Bryan Mound Raw Water Intake Structure CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 09/20/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  15. CX-011223: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bryan Mound Brine Disposal Pump Replacement (Install) CX(s) Applied: B5.2 Date: 10/28/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  16. CX-010711: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bryan Mound Brine Disposal Pump Replacement CX(s) Applied: B5.2 Date: 07/03/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  17. CX-007513: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Record of Categorical Exclusion for Driver Inspection of Bryan Mound 36 inch Raw Water Pipeline CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 12/20/2011 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  18. CX-009509: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Power Monitoring, Communication and Control Upgrade at Bryan Mound Degas Plant (Install) CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 10/31/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  19. CX-014467: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Clean Bryan Mound Crude Oil Tank, BMT-4 (BM-MM-738B) CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 11/11/2015 Location(s): Multiple LocationsOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  20. CX-009792: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Video Inspection of Bryan Mound 36-inch Raw Water Pipeline CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 01/07/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  1. CX-009511: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Alternate Source of Firewater at Bryan Mound CX(s) Applied: B5.2 Date: 11/05/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  2. CX-012731: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace Windows of Bryan Mound Portal Building #281 CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41884 Location(s): TexasOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  3. CX-014288: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dredging of Bryan Mound Raw Water Intake Structure Inlet Channel CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 09/28/2015 Location(s): TexasOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  4. CX-013883: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Clean Bryan Mound Crude Oil Tank, BMT-4 CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 07/06/2015 Location(s): None ProvidedOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  5. Dr. Bryan Hannegan - Associate Laboratory Director, Energy Systems

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Integration | NREL Bryan Hannegan - Associate Laboratory Director, Energy Systems Integration A photo of Bryan Hannegan In this role, Bryan Hannegan leads NREL's global initiative to optimize links between electricity, fuel, thermal, water, and communication networks in order to enable a more sustainable society. Prior to joining NREL, Hannegan held several research leadership positions in fossil energy, renewable energy, and environmental science and technology at the Electric Power

  6. Monsanto MOUND FACILITY

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Monsanto . MOUND FACILITY Operated for the United States Department of Energy March 26, 1981 Dr. William E. Mott, Director Environmental and Safety Engineering Division U. S. ...

  7. Reindustrialization Workshop Held at Mound Site

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has partnered with local communities to determine the best reuse of land, assets, and facilities, and the Mound-site community is no exception. In May, DOE’s...

  8. Mound Supports Galileo

    SciTech Connect

    Monsanto Research Corporation

    1986-01-01

    This video describes the invention of Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators (RTGs) at Mound Laboratory, and radioisotope heat source production from 1 watt-thermal to 2400 watts-thermal. RTGs have been used in many space vehicles, but the RTG built for the Galileo mission to orbit Jupiter is the largest. This RTG unit will produce 4400 watts-thermal and convert to 300 watts-electric. The plutonium-238 heat source assembly and test at Mound is described. The RTGs are tested under simulated mission conditions. The RTG leakage radiation is carefully measured for background compensation for on-board radiation monitoring instruments.

  9. Mound, Ohio, Site Fact Sheet

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Mound, Ohio, Site This fact sheet provides information about the Mound, Ohio, Site. These sites are managed by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. Location of the Mound, Ohio, Site Site Description and History The Mound site 1 in Miamisburg, Ohio, named for a nearby Native American burial ground, is located approximately 10 miles southwest of Dayton, Ohio. The Great Miami River fows southwest

  10. Mound publications for 1991

    SciTech Connect

    Nowka, Stephen L.

    1992-05-01

    This document is a compilation of all Mound formal technical publications and oral presentations for calendar year 1991. It is intended to serve as an aid to personnel in obtaining or referring to specific publications by giving the proper complete reference for each information item published during the year. Some items, such as proceedings publications, may have issue dates or periods of coverage prior to 1991; however, they were formally published during 1991.

  11. Mound facility physical characterization

    SciTech Connect

    Tonne, W.R.; Alexander, B.M.; Cage, M.R.; Hase, E.H.; Schmidt, M.J.; Schneider, J.E.; Slusher, W.; Todd, J.E.

    1993-12-01

    The purpose of this report is to provide a baseline physical characterization of Mound`s facilities as of September 1993. The baseline characterizations are to be used in the development of long-term future use strategy development for the Mound site. This document describes the current missions and alternative future use scenarios for each building. Current mission descriptions cover facility capabilities, physical resources required to support operations, current safety envelope and current status of facilities. Future use scenarios identify potential alternative future uses, facility modifications required for likely use, facility modifications of other uses, changes to safety envelope for the likely use, cleanup criteria for each future use scenario, and disposition of surplus equipment. This Introductory Chapter includes an Executive Summary that contains narrative on the Functional Unit Material Condition, Current Facility Status, Listing of Buildings, Space Plans, Summary of Maintenance Program and Repair Backlog, Environmental Restoration, and Decontamination and Decommissioning Programs. Under Section B, Site Description, is a brief listing of the Site PS Development, as well as Current Utility Sources. Section C contains Site Assumptions. A Maintenance Program Overview, as well as Current Deficiencies, is contained within the Maintenance Program Chapter.

  12. CX-006881: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replacement of Obsolete Siemens S5-115H Programmable Logic ControllersCX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 09/22/2011Location(s): Big Hill, Bryan Mound, West Hackberry, Louisiana, TexasOffice(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  13. CX-014462: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace Oil Water Separators at Bryan Mound Caverns 1, 2, 4 and 5 - GFE (BM-MM-1203A) CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 12/15/2015 Location(s): Multiple LocationsOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  14. CX-014463: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace Oil Water Separators at Bryan Mound Caverns 1, 2, 4 and 5 - Install (BM-MM-1203) CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 12/15/2015 Location(s): Multiple LocationsOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  15. CX-007508: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Record of Categorical Exclusion for Rework Bryan Mound Seaway Dock Terminal Bypass Valve MOV-C308 CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 11/16/2011 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  16. CX-012334: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Install Single Split System Air Conditioning Unit in Bryan Mound Building No. 281 (BM-OM-1229) CX(s) Applied: B1.4 Date: 06/30/2014 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  17. CX-000482: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Project Number MS-09-116 - Structural Assessment of Big Hill Raw Water Intake Structure, Big Hill Brine Disposal Pump Pad and Bryan Mound Raw Water Intake StructureCX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 12/29/2009Location(s): TexasOffice(s): Fossil Energy, Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  18. EIS-0014: Mound Facility, Miamisburg, Ohio

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy prepared this EIS to assess the environmental implications of its continuing and future programs at the Mound Facility (formerly designated Mound Laboratory), located in Miamisburg, Ohio.

  19. Evaluation of brine disposal from the Bryan Mound site of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Program. Final report

    SciTech Connect

    Hann, R.W. Jr.; Randall, R.E.

    1980-12-01

    The purpose of this report is to describe the environmental conditions found by the principal investigators during the predisposal study conducted from September 1977 through February 1980 prior to the start of brine discharge in March 1980. The major areas of investigation are physical oceanography, analysis of the discharge plume, water and sediment quality, nekton, benthos, phytoplankton, zooplankton, and data management. Volume 1 describes the results of the predisposal study, and it is divided into eight chapters entitled: Physical Oceanography, Analysis of the Discharge Plume, Water and Sediment Quality, Nekton, Benthos, Zooplankton, Phytoplankton, and Data Management. Volume 2 consists of appendices which contain additional supporting data in the form of figures and tables.

  20. Environmental assessment for Mound Plant decontamination and decommissioning projects, Mound Plant, Miamisburg, Ohio

    SciTech Connect

    1995-05-01

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) for seven decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) projects at the Mound Plant in Miamisburg, Ohio, that have not been previously addressed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Mound Facility (June 1979). Based on the information presented in the EA, the DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required and the Department is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).

  1. Microsoft Word - 20110322_MoundNotice.docx

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Legal Notice for Mound Site 2011 CERCLA Five-Year Review has been removed from the LM website. This document is outdated and no longer neededrequired...

  2. Mound Site Community Involvement Plan 2012

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Involvement Plan for the U.S. Department of Energy Mound, Ohio, Site January 2015 LMS/MND/S02885-0.0 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy Mound Community Involvement Plan January 2015 Doc. No. S02885-0.0 Page i Contents Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................. ii 1.0 Purpose and Introduction

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Mound Site

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ohio Mound, Ohio, Site Site Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Annual Institutional Controls Report Community Involvement Plan Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Plan Operations and Maintenance Plan Internal Links Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Administrative Records External Links Mound Development Corporation (MDC) Ohio Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Environmental Protection

  4. Enforcement Letter, EG&G Mound Applied Technologies- August 22, 1996

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Issued to EG&G Mound Applied Technologies related to the Inadvertent Transfer of Radiological Contamination at the Mound Plant

  5. City of Blue Mound, Kansas (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Mound, Kansas (Utility Company) Jump to: navigation, search Name: City of Blue Mound Place: Kansas Phone Number: (913) 756-2447 Outage Hotline: (913) 756-2447 References: EIA Form...

  6. Mound, Ohio, Second Five-Year Review

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Report Second Five-Year Review for the Mound, Ohio, Site Miamisburg, Ohio September 2006 Office of Legacy Management DOE M/1308-2006 -L Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management. DE-AC01-02GJ79491 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Office of Legacy Management Office of Legacy Management Office of Legacy Management U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy Mound, Ohio, Second Five-Year Review September 2006

  7. Office of Inspector General report on audit of shutdown and transition of the Mound Plant

    SciTech Connect

    1997-06-24

    With the end of the Cold War, the Department of Energy (Department) has greatly reduced the production of nuclear weapons and redirected the capabilities and focus of the weapons complex. As part of this redirection, the Mound Plant was transferred from a Defense Program site to an Environmental Management site with emphasis on accelerated cleanup and transition of facilities and personal property to the local community. This audit was initiated to determine if the shutdown and transition of the Mound Plant was progressing effectively and efficiently. The Department prepared a Nonnuclear Consolidation Plan (NCP) designed to reduce its costs of operation by closing and consolidating facilities. In contrast to the goal of the NCP, the Department plans to keep a portion of the Mound Plant open solely to perform work for other Federal agencies. Specifically, the Department has decided to continue assembling and testing isotopic heat sources and radioisotope thermoelectric generators (HS/RTG) at the Mound Plant despite the transfer or planned transfer of all other production operations.The Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology decided to continue its HS/RTG operations at the Mound Plant without adequately considering the overall economic goals of the Department. As a result, the Department may not achieve the savings envisioned by the NCP. Also, the Department may incur between $4 million and $8.5 million more than necessary each year to continue its HS/RTG operations at the Mound Plant. Additionally, if the HS/RTG operations stay at the Mound Plant, the Department will spend more than $3 million to consolidate these operations into one location.

  8. "Conflict Between Economic Growth and Environmental Protection", Dr. Bryan

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Czech, resident, Center for the Advancement of the Steady State of the Economy | Princeton Plasma Physics Lab 9, 2012, 4:15pm Colloquia MBG Auditorium "Conflict Between Economic Growth and Environmental Protection", Dr. Bryan Czech, resident, Center for the Advancement of the Steady State of the Economy Presentation: Office presentation icon Presentation Abstract: PDF icon Abstract Conflict Between Economic Growth and Environmental Protectio Colloquium Committee: The Princeton

  9. Investigation of the September 13, 2011, Fatality at the Strategic...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    September 13, 2011, Fatality at the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Bryan Mound Site Investigation of the September 13, 2011, Fatality at the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Bryan Mound ...

  10. Mound site environmental report for calendar year 1991

    SciTech Connect

    Bauer, L.R.

    1992-06-01

    Mound is a government-owned facility operated by EG&G Mound Applied Technologies for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). This integrated production, development, and research site performs work in support of DOE`s weapon and energy related programs, with emphasis on explosive, nuclear, and energy technology. The purpose of this report is to inform the public about the impact of Mound`s operations on the population and the environment. This report summarizes data from the Environmental Monitoring Program, through which Mound maintains continuous surveillance of radiological and nonradiological substances released from the facility.

  11. Independent technical review of the Mound Plant

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1994-06-01

    This report documents an Independent Technical Review (ITR) of the facilities, organizations, plans, and activities required to transition particular elements of the Mound Plant from Defense Program (DP) funded operation as appropriate either to community developed reuse or safe deactivation leading to decontamination and decommissioning (D&D). The review was conducted at the request of the Dr. Willis Bixby, Deputy Assistant Secretary, U.S. Department of Energy EM-60, Office of Facility Transition and Management and is a consensus of the nine member ITR Team. Information for the review was drawn from documents provided to the ITR Team by the Miamisburg Area Office (MB) of the DOE, EG&G, the City of Miamisburg, and others; and from presentations, discussions, interviews, and facility inspections at the Mound Plant during the weeks of March 14 and March 28, 1994. During the week of April 25, 1994, the ITR Team met at Los Alamos, New Mexico to develop consensus recommendations. A presentation of the core recommendations was made at the Mound Plant on May 5, 1994. This is an independent assessment of information available to, and used by, the Mound Plant personnel. Repetition of the information is not meant to imply discovery by the ITR Team. Team members, however, acting as independent reviewers, frequently assess the information from a perspective that differs significantly from that of the Mound Plant personnel. The report is based on information obtained and conditions observed during the March 1994 review interval. The ITR process and normal site work often initiate rapid, beneficial changes in understanding and organization immediately following the review. These changes frequently alter conditions observed during the review, but the report does not address changes subsequent to the review interval.

  12. Mound site environmental report for calendar year 1992

    SciTech Connect

    Bauer, L.R.

    1993-07-01

    The purpose of this report is to inform the public about the impact of Mound operations on the population and the environment. Mound is a government-owned facility operated by EG&G Mound Applied Technologies for the US Department of Energy (DOE). This integrated production, development, and research site performs work in support of DOE`s weapon and energy related programs, with emphasis on explosive, nuclear and energy technologies.

  13. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Mound_Benefits

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ohio > Mound_Benefits Mound, Ohio, Site Former Workers' Employment Verification and Benefits Administration Contractor Employment Verification Mercer, Mound Benefits Center (866) 296-5036 Medical and Life Insurance for Former EG&G, BWXTO, and CH2M HILL Employees For questions about health insurance coverage and/or dependent information, life insurance and/or beneficiaries, etc.: Mound Benefits Center P.O. Box 10361 Des Moines, IA 50306-0361 Benefit Center Website (866) 296-5036 9:00 a.m.

  14. Mound Museum Volunteers: Preserving a Laboratory’s Legacy

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Mound Science and Energy Museum (MSEM) owes its success to dedicated volunteers and supporters. The MSEM currently has 40 active volunteers and 200 dues-paying members.

  15. Miamisburg Mound Community Improvement Corp | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    finances; Manufacturing; Research and development; Trainining and education;Other:Economic Development Phone Number: 937-865-4462 Website: www.mound.com...

  16. Renewed Importance of the Mound Site Annual Institutional Controls...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Annual, routine IC inspections are conducted at many LM sites. However, inspections at the Mound site are anything but routine, due to its unique nature. 1862.jpg Collaboration ...

  17. Enforcement Letter-Mound-08/22/1996

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    of Energy (DOE) by EG&G Mound (EG&G) in the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS). ... We also reviewed your Contamination Control Review Team investigation report which ...

  18. EA-1001: Commercialization of the Mound Plant, Golden, Colorado

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposal to commercialize surplus facilities such as the U.S. Department of Energy's Mound Plant in Miamisburg, Ohio.  Commercialization will make...

  19. EA-1239: Disposition of Mound Plant's South Property, Miamisburg, Ohio

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE prepared an EA for the proposed title transfer of 123 acres of land referred to as the “South Property” at the Miamisburg Environmental Management Project Mound Plant in Miamisburg, Ohio.

  20. Blue Mounds, Wisconsin: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Blue Mounds is a village in Dane County, Wisconsin. It falls under Wisconsin's 2nd...

  1. Microsoft Word - S07757_2011 Mound IC Report

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    No. S07757 Page A-1 Scope: Entire Mound Site Preliminary inspections performed on: April 5 and 7, 2011 Physical Inspection Walk around on: April 12, 2011 Review led by: Art ...

  2. Renewed Importance of the Mound Site Annual Institutional Controls Assessments

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) completed its 2014 annual institutional controls (IC) assessment of the Mound site in Miamisburg, Ohio, and confirmed that the...

  3. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Mound Laboratory - OH 19

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) is conducting the fourth ... and current Office of Legacy Management activities at the Mound Site in Miamisburg, Ohio. ...

  4. Environmental assessment for commercialization of the Mound Plant

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1994-10-26

    In November 1993 US DOE decided to phase out operations at the Mound Plant in Miamisburg, Ohio, with the goal of releasing the site for commercial use. The broad concept is to transform the plant into an advanced manufacturing center with the main focus on commercializing products and other technology. DOE proposes to lease portions of the Mound Plant to commercial enterprises. This Environmental Impact statement has a finding of no significant impact in reference to such action.

  5. Microsoft Word - S07757_2011 Mound IC Report

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Site-Wide Institutional Controls Applied to the Former DOE Mound Site Property June 2011 LMS/MND/S07757 This page intentionally left blank LMS/MND/S07757 Annual Assessment of the Effectiveness of Site-Wide Institutional Controls Applied to the Former DOE Mound Site Property June 2011 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy Annual Assessment of the Effectiveness of Site-Wide Institutional Controls June 2011 Doc. No. S07757 Page i Contents Abbreviations

  6. Mounded LPG storage - Experience and developments

    SciTech Connect

    Barber, D.

    1988-01-01

    Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) is stored after production, and for distribution and use, in pressure vessels which vary in size from a few kilogrammes to many thousands of tons. The types of LPG under consideration are commercial butane, commercial propane, or mixtures of the two gases in varying proportions. Mounded storage systems are becoming popular as an alternative to the better-known traditional systems. The most widely used and therefore best-known of the traditional systems are the above-ground pressure-vessel designs. These more commonly comprise factory-made cylinders which are installed horizontally, being supported on saddles at each end of the vessel. When such vessels are installed in an LPG terminal, depot, or filling plant, they are required in multiple units to facilitate the storage of more than one grade of product and to enable regular maintenance and inspection to be carried out. Today's safety regulations require such installations to be divided into sub-groups of six tanks, with all the tanks located at a safe distance from one another, and from other facilities in the immediate area. These safety distances are being increased as a result of experience, which means terminals now require large areas of land.

  7. Cost estimate for muddy water palladium production facility at Mound

    SciTech Connect

    McAdams, R.K.

    1988-11-30

    An economic feasibility study was performed on the ''Muddy Water'' low-chlorine content palladium powder production process developed by Mound. The total capital investment and total operating costs (dollars per gram) were determined for production batch sizes of 1--10 kg in 1-kg increments. The report includes a brief description of the Muddy Water process, the process flow diagram, and material balances for the various production batch sizes. Two types of facilities were evaluated--one for production of new, ''virgin'' palladium powder, and one for recycling existing material. The total capital investment for virgin facilities ranged from $600,000 --$1.3 million for production batch sizes of 1--10 kg, respectively. The range for recycle facilities was $1--$2.3 million. The total operating cost for 100% acceptable powder production in the virgin facilities ranged from $23 per gram for a 1-kg production batch size to $8 per gram for a 10-kg batch size. Similarly for recycle facilities, the total operating cost ranged from $34 per gram to $5 per gram. The total operating cost versus product acceptability (ranging from 50%--100% acceptability) was also evaluated for both virgin and recycle facilities. Because production sizes studied vary widely and because scale-up factors are unknown for batch sizes greater than 1 kg, all costs are ''order-of-magnitude'' estimates. All costs reported are in 1987 dollars.

  8. Environmental survey preliminary report, Mound Plant, Miamisburg, Ohio

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1987-03-01

    This report presents the preliminary findings from the first phase of the Environmental Survey of the United States Department of Energy (DOE) Mound Plant, conducted August 18 through 29, 1986. The objective of the Survey is to identify environmental problems and areas of environmental risk associated with the Mound Plant. The Survey covers all environmental media and all areas of environmental regulation. It is being performed in accordance with the DOE Environmental Survey Manual. The on-site phase of the Survey involves the review of existing site environmental data, observations of the operations carried on at the Mound Plant, and interviews with site personnel. The Survey found no environmental problems at the Mound Plant that represent an immediate threat to human life. The environmental problems identified at the Mound Plant by the Survey confirm that the site is confronted with a number of environmental problems which are by and large a legacy from past practices at a time when environmental problems were less well understood. Theses problems vary in terms of their magnitude and risk, as described in this report. Although the sampling and analysis performed by the Mound Plant Survey will assist in further identifying environmental problems at the site, a complete understanding of the significance of some of the environmental problems identified requires a level of study and characterization that is beyond the scope of the Survey. Actions currently under way or planned at the site, particularly the Phase II activities of the Comprehensive Environmental Analysis and Response Program (CEARP) as developed and implemented by the Albuquerque Operations Office, will contribute toward meeting this requirement. 85 refs., 24 figs., 20 tabs.

  9. Test fire environmental testing operations at Mound Applied Technologies

    SciTech Connect

    1992-03-01

    This paper describes Mound Laboratory`s environmental testing operations. The function of environmental testing is to perform quality environmental (thermal, mechanical, spin, resistance, visual) testing/conditioning of inert/explosive products to assure their compliance with specified customer acceptance criteria. Capabilities, organization, equipment specifications, and test facilities are summarized.

  10. Strategic Petroleum Reserve | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Strategic Petroleum Reserve Strategic Petroleum Reserve Crude oil pipes at SPR Bryan Mound site near Freeport, TX. Crude oil pipes at SPR Bryan Mound site near Freeport, TX. The ...

  11. Strategic Petroleum Reserve | Department of Energy

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    Crude oil pipes at SPR Bryan Mound site near Freeport, TX. Crude oil pipes at SPR Bryan Mound site near Freeport, TX. The Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) is the world's largest...

  12. Audit of Shutdown and Transition of the Mound Plant, IG-0408 | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    of Energy Shutdown and Transition of the Mound Plant, IG-0408 Audit of Shutdown and Transition of the Mound Plant, IG-0408 Audit of Shutdown and Transition of the Mound Plant, IG-0408 (68.17 KB) More Documents & Publications EIS-0302: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0302: Withdrawal of Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Semiannual Report to Congress: April 1 - September 30, 1997

  13. Enforcement Letter, CH2M Hill Mound, Inc- December 22, 2004

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Issued to CH2M Hill Mound, Inc. related to a Radioactive Contamination Event during Remediation Activities at the Miamisburg Closure Project

  14. Fourth Five-Year Review for the Mound, Ohio, Site Miamisburg, Ohio

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    for the Mound, Ohio, Site Miamisburg, Ohio September 2016 LMS/MND/S14085 This page intentionally left blank Approved by: Five-Year Review Report Fourth Five-Year Review for the Mound, Ohio, Site Miamisburg, Ohio September 2016 ~ ~ '"-..._ ~ :~.< Susan Smiley Mound Site Manager U .S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management LMS/MND/S14085 Date: I I This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy Mound, Ohio, Fourth Five-Year Review September 2016 Doc. No. S14085 Page

  15. Characteristics and origin of Earth-mounds on the Eastern Snake River Plain, Idaho

    SciTech Connect

    Tullis, J.A.

    1995-09-01

    Earth-mounds are common features on the Eastern Snake River Plain, Idaho. The mounds are typically round or oval in plan view, <0.5 m in height, and from 8 to 14 m in diameter. They are found on flat and sloped surfaces, and appear less frequently in lowland areas. The mounds have formed on deposits of multiple sedimentary environments. Those studied included alluvial gravel terraces along the Big Lost River (late Pleistocene/early Holocene age), alluvial fan segments on the flanks of the Lost River Range (Bull Lake and Pinedale age equivalents), and loess/slopewash sediments overlying basalt flows. Backhoe trenches were dug to allow characterization of stratigraphy and soil development. Each mound has features unique to the depositional and pedogenic history of the site; however, there are common elements to all mounds that are linked to the history of mound formation. Each mound has a {open_quotes}floor{close_quotes} of a sediment or basement rock of significantly different hydraulic conductivity than the overlying sediment. These paleosurfaces are overlain by finer-grained sediments, typically loess or flood-overbank deposits. Mounds formed in environments where a sufficient thickness of fine-grained sediment held pore water in a system open to the migration to a freezing front. Heaving of the sediment occurred by the growth of ice lenses. Mound formation occurred at the end of the Late Pleistocene or early in the Holocene, and was followed by pedogenesis. Soils in the mounds were subsequently altered by bioturbation, buried by eolian deposition, and eroded by slopewash runoff. These secondary processes played a significant role in maintaining or increasing the mound/intermound relief.

  16. U.S. Department of Energy N N E E W W S S For Immediate Release Media Contact: Bryan Wilkes

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    N N E E W W S S For Immediate Release Media Contact: Bryan Wilkes October 10, 2002 (202) 586-7371 NNSA Names Tyler Przybylek as Acting Chief Operating Officer WASHINGTON, D.C. - National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Acting Administrator Linton Brooks today named NNSA General Counsel Tyler Przybylek the organization's acting chief operating officer. In his new position, Przybylek will coordinate the work of the NNSA headquarters and field components, and oversee day-to-day continuity

  17. Independent Review of the July 8, 2010 Fatality at the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Bryan Mound Site- May 25, 2011 Addendum closing the Investigation based upon the Galveston County Medical Examiner's Report

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    In consultation with the Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy (FE), the Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer appointed an Independent Review Board (IRE3) on July 20,201 0, under the provisions of the Department of Energy (DOE) Order 225.1 A, Accident Investigations, that represented a modified Type A accident investigation.

  18. EIS-0075: Strategic Petroleum Reserve Phase III Development, Texoma and Seaway Group Salt Domes (West Hackberry and Bryan Mound Expansion, Big Hill Development) Cameron Parish, Louisiana, and Brazoria and Jefferson Counties, Texas

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Also see EIS-0021 and EIS-0029. The Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) Office developed this EIS to assess the environmental impacts of expanding the existing SPR storage capacity from 538 million to 750 million barrels of storage and increasing the drawdown capability from 3.5 million to 4.5 million barrels per day. This EIS incorperates two previously issued EISs: DOE/EIS-0021, Seaway Group of Salt Domes, and DOE/EIS-0029, Texoma Group of Salt Domes.

  19. Overview of surface studies on high energy materials at Mound

    SciTech Connect

    Moddeman, W.E.; Collins, L.W.; Wang, P.S.; Haws, L.D.; Wittberg, T.N.

    1980-01-01

    Since 1975 Mound has been examining the surface structure of high energy materials and the interaction of these materials with various metal containers. The high energy materials that have been studied include: the pyrotechnic TiH/sub x//KClO/sub 4/, the Al/Cu/sub 2/O machinable thermite, the PETN, HMX and RDX explosives, and two plastic bonded explosives (PBX). Aluminum and alloys of Fe, Ni and Cr have been used as the containment materials. Two aims in this research are: (1) the elucidation of the mechanism of pyrotechnic ignition and (2) the compatibility of high energy materials with their surroundings. New information has been generated by coupling Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) with thermal data. In particular, AES and XPS studies on the pyrotechnic materials and on thermites have shown the mechanism of ignition to be nearly independent of the type of oxidizer present but directly related to surface chemistry of the fuels. In studies on the two PBX's, PBX-9407 and LX-16, it was concluded that the Exon coating on 9407 was complete and greater than or equal to 100A; whereas in LX-16, the coating was < 100A or even incomplete. AES and scanning Auger have been used to characterize the surface composition and oxide thickness for an iron-nickel alloy and showed the thicker oxides to have the least propensity for atmospheric hydrocarbon adsorption. Data are presented and illustrations made which highlight this new approach to studying ignition and compatibility of high energy materials. Finally, the salient features of the X-SAM-800 purchased by Mound are discussed in light of future studies on high energy materials.

  20. Progress Toward Operable Unit 1 Groundwater Cleanup at the Mound, Ohio,

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Site | Department of Energy Progress Toward Operable Unit 1 Groundwater Cleanup at the Mound, Ohio, Site Progress Toward Operable Unit 1 Groundwater Cleanup at the Mound, Ohio, Site July 2, 2015 - 12:41pm Addthis What does this project do? Goal 1. Protect human health and the environment. Groundwater in Operable Unit 1 (OU-1) has been impacted by volatile organic compound (VOC)-contaminated materials in the former solid waste landfill. The remedy for controlling contamination from residual

  1. Earth-mounded concrete bunker PLAP technical approach

    SciTech Connect

    Eng, R.

    1989-11-01

    Under the US DOE Prototype License Application Project (PLAP), Ebasco Services Incorporated was commissioned to develop a preliminary design of the Earth-Mounded Concrete Bunker (EMCB) concept for low-level radioactive waste (LLW) disposal. The EMCB disposal concept is of great interest because it represents the only engineered LLW disposal technology currently in use in the commercial sector. By definition, the EMCB disposal structure is located partially below grade and partially above grade. The concrete bunker is an engineered structure designed to be structurally stable for the prerequisite time horizon. The basic design parameters of the disposal facility were stipulated by US DOE, a northeast site location, representative waste, 30 year operational life, and a 250,000 ft{sup 3}/year disposal capacity. The design was developed to satisfy only US NRC Part 61 disposal requirements, not individual state requirements that may go beyond Part 61 requirements. The technical safety analysis of the preliminary design was documented according to the format specifications of NUREG-1199, to the extent practicable with quite limited resources.

  2. Concentration of Actinides in Plant Mounds at Safety Test Nuclear Sites in Nevada

    SciTech Connect

    David S. Shafer; Jenna Gommes

    2008-09-15

    Plant mounds or blow-sand mounds are accumulations of soil particles and plant debris around large shrubs and are common features in deserts in the southwestern United States. Believed to be an important factor in their formation, the shrubs create surface roughness that causes wind-suspended particles to be deposited and resist further suspension. Shrub mounds occur in some plant communities on the Nevada Test Site, the Nevada Test and Training Range (NTTR), and Tonopah Test Range (TTR), including areas of surface soil contamination from past nuclear testing. In the 1970s as part of early studies to understand properties of actinides in the environment, the Nevada Applied Ecology Group (NAEG) examined the accumulation of isotopes of Pu, {sup 241}Am, and U in plant mounds at safety test sites. The NAEG studies found concentrations of these contaminants to be greater in shrub mounds than in the surrounding areas of desert pavement. For example, at Project 57 on the NTTR, it was estimated that 15 percent of the radionuclide inventory of the site was associated with shrub mounds, which accounted for 17 percent of the surface area of the site, a ratio of inventory to area of 0.85. At Clean Slate III at the TTR, 29 percent of the inventory was associated with approximately 32 percent of the site covered by shrub mounds, a ratio of 0.91. While the total inventory of radionuclides in intershrub areas was greater, the ratio of radionuclide inventory to area was 0.40 and 0.38, respectively, at the two sites. The comparison between the shrub mounds and adjacent desert pavement areas was made for only the top 5 cm since radionuclides at safety test sites are concentrated in the top 5 cm of intershrub areas. Not accounting for radionuclides associated with the shrub mounds would cause the inventory of contaminants and potential exposure to be underestimated. As part of its Environmental Restoration Soils Subproject, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear

  3. Environmental assessment and planning at Mound - environmental monitoring capabilities and personnel profiles

    SciTech Connect

    1996-07-01

    Through its long experience with radioactive materials, Mound has developed a comprehensive, routine, offsite, environmental surveillance program to safeguard its employees, the physical plant, and the integrity of the surrounding environment from any potential adverse effects of its widely diverse operations. Effluent samples are analyzed for radiological and non-radiological parameters. The environment surrounding Mound Facility is continuously monitored - air, water, foodstuffs, vegetation, soil, and silt samples are analyzed to ensure that radioisotopic concentrations and other possible pollutants are well within the stringent standards adopted by the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agencies (both federal and state), and various regional and local agencies. Moreover, this environmental surveillance program has been designed to ensure that the facility is designed, constructed, managed, operated, and maintained in a manner that continues to meet all federal, state, and local standards for environmental protection. Work in environmental science has been broadened to assess environmental factors associated with various aspects of the National Energy Plan. Both the management and staff at Mound have undertaken a firm commitment to make Mound`s environmental monitoring capabilities available to agencies that have the responsibility for the resolution of important environmental issues.

  4. From Hydrogen Fuel Cells to High-Altitude-Pilot Protection Suits— Mound Science and Energy Museum Programs Cover a Wide Range of Topics

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The Mound Science and Energy Museum (MSEM) is an active, volunteer-led organization located at the former U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Mound site in Miamisburg, Ohio. MSEM keeps the 60-year...

  5. Overview of the earth mounded concrete bunker prototype license application project: Objectives and approach

    SciTech Connect

    Conner, J.E.

    1989-11-01

    This paper presents an overview of the objectives and approach taken in developing the Earth-mounded Concrete Bunker Prototype License Application Project. The Prototype License Application Project was initiated by the Department of Energy`s National Low-Level Waste Management Program in early 1987 and completed in November 1988. As part of this project a prototype safety analysis report was developed. The safety analysis report evaluates the licensibility of an earth-mounded concrete bunker for a low-level radioactive waste (LLW) disposal facility located on a hypothetical site in the northeastern United States. The project required approximately five person-years and twenty months to develop.

  6. Annual Assessment of the Effectiveness of Institutional Controls at the Mound, Ohio, Site Miamisburt, Ohio

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    6 LMS/MND/S14084 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy Annual Assessment of the Effectiveness of Institutional Controls, Mound Site June 2016 Doc. No. S14084 Page i Contents Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................................v 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 2.0 Period of

  7. Marketing research for EE G Mound Applied Technologies' heat treatment process of high strength materials

    SciTech Connect

    Shackson, R.H.

    1991-10-09

    This report summarizes research conducted by ITI to evaluate the commercialization potential of EG G Mound Applied Technologies' heat treatment process of high strength materials. The remainder of the report describes the nature of demand for maraging steel, extent of demand, competitors, environmental trends, technology life cycle, industry structure, and conclusion. (JL)

  8. EIS-0302: Transfer of the Heat Source/Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator Assembly and Test Operations From the Mound Site

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EIS analyzes DOE's proposed transfer of the Heat Source/Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (HS/RTG) operations at the Mound Site near Miamisburg, Ohio, to an alternative DOE site.

  9. Pre-operational safety appraisal Tritiated Scrap Recovery Facility, Mound facility

    SciTech Connect

    Dauby, J.J.; Flanagan, T.M.; Metcalf, L.W.; Rhinehammer, T.B.

    1996-07-01

    The purpose of this report is to identify, assess, and document the hazards which are associated with the proposed operation of the Tritiated Scrap Recovery Facility at Mound Facility. A Pre-operational Safety Appraisal is a requirement as stated in Department of Energy Order 5481.1, Safety Analysis and Review System. The operations to be conducted in the new Tritiated Scrap Waste Recovery Facility are not new, but a continuation of a prime mission of Mound`s i.e. recovery of tritium from waste produced throughout the DOE complex. The new facility is a replacement of an existing process started in the early 1960`s and incorporates numerous design changes to enhance personnel and environmental safety. This report also documents the safety of a one time operation involving the recovery of tritium from material obtained by the Department of Energy from the State of Arizona. This project will involve the processing of 240,000 curies of tritium contained in glass ampoules that were to be used in items such as luminous dial watches. These were manufactured by the now defunct American Atomics Corporation, Tucson, Arizona.

  10. Operating Experience Summary- 2014-02 – April 23, 2014

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Inside this issue: Laboratory Worker Safety: Work Planning, Hazard Analysis, and Supervision - Page 1 Accident Investigation into Mower Fatality at the Bryan Mound Site - Page 13

  11. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Strategic Petroleum Reserve Annual Report

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    and planned projects for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. ... Oil Inventory Status 18 Oil Acquisition Market ... 32 Bayou Choctaw Pipeline: 32 Bryan Mound Pipelines: 32 St. ...

  12. Operating Experience Summary- 2012-02 – May 11, 2012

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Inside this issue: Improper Use of Dewar Carts Results in Serious Hand Injuries - Page 1 Strategic Petroleum Reserve Investigation Results - Fatality at the Bryan Mound Site - Page 5

  13. DOE F 3304.2 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    More Documents & Publications Investigation of the September 13, 2011, Fatality at the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Bryan Mound Site DOE F 241 5 Headquarters Facilities Master ...

  14. POTENTIAL IMPACT OF BLENDING RESIDUAL SOLIDS FROM TANKS 18/19 MOUNDS WITH TANK 7 OPERATIONS

    SciTech Connect

    Eibling, R; Erich Hansen, E; Bradley Pickenheim, B

    2007-03-29

    High level waste tanks 18F and 19F have residual mounds of waste which may require removal before the tanks can be closed. Conventional slurry pump technology, previously used for waste removal and tank cleaning, has been incapable of removing theses mounds from tanks 18F and 19F. A mechanical cleaning method has been identified that is potentially capable of removing and transferring the mound material to tank 7F for incorporation in a sludge batch for eventual disposal in high level waste glass by the Defense Waste Processing Facility. The Savannah River National Laboratory has been requested to evaluate whether the material transferred from tanks 18F/19F by the mechanical cleaning technology can later be suspended in Tank 7F by conventional slurry pumps after mixing with high level waste sludge. The proposed mechanical cleaning process for removing the waste mounds from tanks 18 and 19 may utilize a high pressure water jet-eductor that creates a vacuum to mobilize solids. The high pressure jet is also used to transport the suspended solids. The jet-eductor system will be mounted on a mechanical crawler for movement around the bottom of tanks 18 and 19. Based on physical chemical property testing of the jet-eductor system processed IE-95 zeolite and size-reduced IE-95 zeolite, the following conclusions were made: (1) The jet-eductor system processed zeolite has a mean and median particle size (volume basis) of 115.4 and 43.3 microns in water. Preferential settling of these large particles is likely. (2) The jet-eductor system processed zeolite rapidly generates settled solid yield stresses in excess of 11,000 Pascals in caustic supernates and will not be easily retrieved from Tank 7 with the existing slurry pump technology. (3) Settled size-reduced IE-95 zeolite (less than 38 microns) in caustic supernate does not generate yield stresses in excess of 600 Pascals in less than 30 days. (4) Preferential settling of size-reduced zeolite is a function of the amount of

  15. Multicomponent Seismic Analysis and Calibration to Improve Recovery from Algal Mounds: Application to the Roadrunner/Towaoc area of the Paradox Basin, UTE Mountain UTE Reservation, Colorado

    SciTech Connect

    Joe Hachey

    2007-09-30

    of this upgrade to nine components was to provide additional shear wave component data that might prove useful in delineating internal mound reservoir attributes. Also, Red Willow extended the P-wave portion of the survey to the northwest of the original 6 mi{sup 2} (15.6 km{sup 2}) 3D9C area in order to extend coverage further to the northwest to the Marble Wash area. In order to accomplish this scope of work, 3D9C seismic data set covering two known reservoirs was acquired and processed. Three-dimensional, zero-offset vertical seismic profile (VSP) data was acquired to determine the shear wave velocities for processing the sh3Dseismic data. Anisotropic velocity, and azimuthal AVO processing was carried out in addition to the conventional 3D P-wave data processing. All P-, PS- and S-wave volumes of the seismic data were interpreted to map the seismic response. The interpretation consisted of conventional cross-plots of seismic attributes vs. geological and reservoir engineering data, as well as multivariate and neural net analyses to assess whether additional resolution on exploration and engineering parameters could be achieved through the combined use of several seismic variables. Engineering data in the two reservoirs was used to develop a combined lithology, structure and permeability map. On the basis of the seismic data, a well was drilled into the northern mound trend in the project area. This well, Roadrunner No.9-2, was brought into production in late April 2006 and continues to produce modest amounts of oil and gas. As of the end of August 2007, the well has produced approximately 12,000 barrels of oil and 32,000 mcf of gas. A static reservoir model was created from the seismic data interpretations and well data. The seismic data was tied to various markers identified in the well logs, which in turn were related to lithostratigraphy. The tops and thicknesses of the various units were extrapolated from well control based upon the seismic data that was

  16. The Mound site survey project for the characterization of radioactive materials in site soils

    SciTech Connect

    Stought, R.L.; Edling, D.A.; Draper, D.G.

    1988-05-16

    This report summarizes the results of a site survey project conducted at Monsanto Research Corporation's Mound Facility during 1982--1985. The objectives of the site survey were: To characterize the nineteen sites previously identified as having known levels of contamination; to identify and characterize by quantity and type of radionuclide(s) any additional major sites having levels of contamination exceeding 10 pCi/g (for Pu-238) of soil; to estimate the volume of contaminated soil; and to estimate the cost of stabilizing or removing the contaminated soil. This report provides information on objectives 1 and 2 above. A separate report will address objectives 3 and 4.

  17. The Mound site survey project for the characterization of radioactive materials in site soils

    SciTech Connect

    Stought, R.L.; Edling, D.A.; Draper, D.G.

    1988-05-16

    This report summarizes the results of a site survey project conducted at Monsanto Research Corporation`s Mound Facility during 1982--1985. The objectives of the site survey were: To characterize the nineteen sites previously identified as having known levels of contamination; to identify and characterize by quantity and type of radionuclide(s) any additional major sites having levels of contamination exceeding 10 pCi/g (for Pu-238) of soil; to estimate the volume of contaminated soil; and to estimate the cost of stabilizing or removing the contaminated soil. This report provides information on objectives 1 and 2 above. A separate report will address objectives 3 and 4.

  18. Focused risk assessment: Mound Plant, Miami-Erie Canal Operable Unit 4

    SciTech Connect

    Rogers, D.R.; Dunning, D.F.

    1994-09-29

    In 1969, an underground waste line at Mound Plant ruptured and released plutonium-238 in a dilute nitric acid solution to the surrounding soils. Most of the acid was neutralized by the native soils. The plutonium, which in a neutral solution is tightly sorbed onto clay particles, remained within the spill area. During remediation, a severe storm eroded some of the contaminated soil. Fine grained plutonium-contaminated clay particles were carried away through the natural drainage courses to the remnants of the Miami-Erie Canal adjacent to Mound Plant, and then into the Great Miami River. This focused risk assessment considers exposure pathways relevant to site conditions, including incidental ingestion of contaminated soils, ingestion of drinking water and fish, and inhalation of resuspended soils and sediments. For each potential exposure pathway, a simplified conceptual model and exposure scenarios have been used to develop conservative estimates of potential radiation dose equivalents and health risks. The conservatism of the dose and risk estimates provides a substantive margin of safety in assuring that the public health is protected.

  19. An aerial radiological survey of the EG G Mound Applied Technologies and surrounding area, Miamisburg, Ohio

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1992-11-01

    An aerial radiological survey was conducted over EG G Mound Applied Technologies, Miamisburg, Ohio, during the period of June 9--24, 1989. The purpose of the 41-square-kilometer (16-square-mile) survey was to document the terrestrial gamma environment of the plant and surrounding area. In addition, ground-based exposure rate measurements and soil samples were obtained to support the aerial data. An exposure rate contour map at 1 meter above ground level was.constructed from the gamma data and overlaid on an aerial photograph and map of the area. Exposure rates measured in the area typically ranged from 9 to 11 microroentgens per hour ([mu]R/h).

  20. A radioactive waste excavation at Mound Area 7 using INEL dig-face monitoring technology

    SciTech Connect

    Carpenter, M.V.; Josten, N.E.

    1996-12-31

    Dig-face characterization is a method to improve the safety and efficiency during hazardous waste retrieval. A dig-face characterization system consists of on-site hardware for collecting detailed information on the changing chemical, radiological, and physical conditions in the subsurface throughout a hazardous site excavation. The dig-face characterization concept originated at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory where it has been under development since 1992. In August 1995, a prototype dig-face system was taken to Mound Laboratory, Ohio, to monitor a hazardous waste site excavation. Mound Area 7 was the site of previous disposal of {sup 232}Th, {sup 227}Ac, and other waste. The dig-face characterization system was used to monitor a 20-ft x 20-ft x 5-ft-deep excavation intended to remove the {sup 227}Ac contaminated soils. Radiological, geophysical, and topographical sensors were scanned across each of four successive excavated soil levels, each 1-ft to 2-ft thick. The radiation sensors produced highly detailed images showing the location of the contaminants {sup 232}Th and {sup 227}Ac, and the clear delineation between them. When combined into a single data set, the four levels of collected data produced a three dimensional image of the contamination. The radiation sensor data indicated that only a small portion of the excavated soil was actually contaminated. The information produced by the dig-face system was used to direct precise excavation activities in the area containing the {sup 227}Ac and to plan subsequent removal of the separate {sup 232}Th plume.

  1. Mortality Among Mound Workers Exposed to Polonium-210 and Other Sources of Radiation, 1944–1979

    SciTech Connect

    Boice, John D.; Cohen, Sarah S.; Mumma, Michael T.; Ellis, Elizabeth Dupree; Cragle, Donna L.; Eckerman, Keith F.; Wallace, Phillip W.; Chadda, Bandana; Sonderman, Jennifer S.; Wiggs, Laurie D.; Richter, Bonnie S.; Leggett, Richard W.

    2014-02-14

    Polonium-210 is a naturally occurring radioactive element that decays by emitting an alpha particle. It is in the air we breathe and also a component of tobacco smoke. Polonium-210 is used as an anti-static device in printing presses and gained widespread notoriety in 2006 after the poisoning and subsequent death of a Russian citizen in London. More is known about the lethal effects of polonium-210 at high doses than about late effects from low doses. In this paper, cancer mortality was examined among 7,270 workers at the Mound nuclear facility near Dayton, OH where polonium-210 was used (1944–1972) in combination with beryllium as a source of neutrons for triggering nuclear weapons. Other exposures included external gamma radiation and to a lesser extent plutonium-238, tritium and neutrons. Vital status and cause of death was determined through 2009. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were computed for comparisons with the general population. Lifetime occupational doses from all places of employment were sought and incorporated into the analysis. Over 200,000 urine samples were analyzed to estimate radiation doses to body organs from polonium and other internally deposited radionuclides. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate dose-response relationships for specific organs and tissues. Vital status was determined for 98.7% of the workers of which 3,681 had died compared with 4,073.9 expected (SMR 0.90; 95% CI 0.88–0.93). The mean dose from external radiation was 26.1 mSv (maximum 939.1 mSv) and the mean lung dose from external and internal radiation combined was 100.1 mSv (maximum 17.5 Sv). Among the 4,977 radiation workers, all cancers taken together (SMR 0.86; 95% CI 0.79–0.93), lung cancer (SMR 0.85; 95% CI 0.74–0.98), and other types of cancer were not significantly elevated. Cox regression analysis revealed a significant positive dose-response trend for esophageal cancer [relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval at 100 mSv of 1

  2. Mortality Among Mound Workers Exposed to Polonium-210 and Other Sources of Radiation, 1944–1979

    DOE PAGES [OSTI]

    Boice, John D.; Cohen, Sarah S.; Mumma, Michael T.; Ellis, Elizabeth Dupree; Cragle, Donna L.; Eckerman, Keith F.; Wallace, Phillip W.; Chadda, Bandana; Sonderman, Jennifer S.; Wiggs, Laurie D.; et al

    2014-02-14

    Polonium-210 is a naturally occurring radioactive element that decays by emitting an alpha particle. It is in the air we breathe and also a component of tobacco smoke. Polonium-210 is used as an anti-static device in printing presses and gained widespread notoriety in 2006 after the poisoning and subsequent death of a Russian citizen in London. More is known about the lethal effects of polonium-210 at high doses than about late effects from low doses. In this paper, cancer mortality was examined among 7,270 workers at the Mound nuclear facility near Dayton, OH where polonium-210 was used (1944–1972) in combinationmore » with beryllium as a source of neutrons for triggering nuclear weapons. Other exposures included external gamma radiation and to a lesser extent plutonium-238, tritium and neutrons. Vital status and cause of death was determined through 2009. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were computed for comparisons with the general population. Lifetime occupational doses from all places of employment were sought and incorporated into the analysis. Over 200,000 urine samples were analyzed to estimate radiation doses to body organs from polonium and other internally deposited radionuclides. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate dose-response relationships for specific organs and tissues. Vital status was determined for 98.7% of the workers of which 3,681 had died compared with 4,073.9 expected (SMR 0.90; 95% CI 0.88–0.93). The mean dose from external radiation was 26.1 mSv (maximum 939.1 mSv) and the mean lung dose from external and internal radiation combined was 100.1 mSv (maximum 17.5 Sv). Among the 4,977 radiation workers, all cancers taken together (SMR 0.86; 95% CI 0.79–0.93), lung cancer (SMR 0.85; 95% CI 0.74–0.98), and other types of cancer were not significantly elevated. Cox regression analysis revealed a significant positive dose-response trend for esophageal cancer [relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval at 100 m

  3. Dig-face monitoring during excavation of a radioactive plume at Mound Laboratory, Ohio

    SciTech Connect

    Josten, N.E.; Gehrke, R.J.; Carpenter, M.V.

    1995-12-01

    A dig-face monitoring system consists of onsite hardware for collecting information on changing chemical, radiological, and physical conditions in the subsurface soil during the hazardous site excavation. A prototype dig-face system was take to Mount Laboratory for a first trial. Mound Area 7 was the site of historical disposals of {sup 232}Th, {sup 227}Ac, and assorted debris. The system was used to monitor a deep excavation aimed at removing {sup 227}Ac-contaminated soils. Radiological, geophysical, and topographic sensors were used to scan across the excavation dig-face at four successive depths as soil was removed. A 3-D image of the contamination plumes was developed; the radiation sensor data indicated that only a small portion of the excavated soil volume was contaminated. The spatial information produced by the dig-face system was used to direct the excavation activities into the area containing the {sup 227}Ac and to evaluate options for handling the separate {sup 232}Th plume.

  4. Certification of the Mound 1 kW package for shipping of plutonium dioxide source material

    SciTech Connect

    Annese, C.E.; Mount, M.K.

    1994-01-01

    The Department of Energy (DOE) has established procedures for obtaining certification of packagings used by DOE and its contractors for the transport of radioactive materials. Specifically, DOE Orders 5480.3 and 1540.2 provide references for other DOE Orders which must be followed when an applicant submits a Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP). From the orders, Department EH of DOE, has internal oversight responsibility for transportation and Packaging safety; package certification falls under EH responsibility; transportation and packaging safety division in EH certifies packages for DOE; and use of DOE certified packages is authorized by DOT. An independent review of the SARP must confirm that the packaging designs and operations meet safety criteria at least equivalent to these standards. This paper will discuss the independent review process of the shielding section of the Mound 1 kW SARP; describe the geometry of the packaging and the load configurations; discuss the analysis of the various neutron and photon source terms that were used for the load configuration under analysis; and provide illustrations of the use of the monte-carlo code, COG{sup 3}, which was utilized to perform the shielding analysis.

  5. Early diagenesis of a phylloid algal-mound complex, Laborcita Formation, southeastern New Mexico

    SciTech Connect

    Ward, W.B.; Meyers, W.J.; Goldstein, R.

    1985-02-01

    Marine carbonate cementation was the initial stage in the paragenesis of phylloid algal mounds in the Laborcita Formation (Wolfcampian), Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico, and the cements are almost identical to those in Holocene coral reefs of Belize. These cements include relics of botryoids and crusts of needle crystals, in part defined by inclusion patterns and luminescent ghosts in mosaic calcite. Individual needle crystals are pseudohexagonal in cross section and range from less than 1 to 30 ..mu..m wide. These nonluminescent early cements line cavity walls, coat phylloid-algal blades and stromatolites, and are interlayered with marine sediment. Early cements also include bladed, fibrous, and rare radiaxial fibrous calcites, which are microdolomite-rich. They have a proximal nonluminescent zone, a central bright-luminescent zone, and a distal blotchy, moderate-luminescent zone. The bright zone may be time equivalent to bright-luminescent micritic coatings on botryoids and grains. Botryoids are encrusted by isopachous bladed cement, some of which has prismatic overgrowths containing an early inclusion-rich zone. This initial cementation was followed closely by: (1) dissolution of algal blades and mollusks, (2) in-situ brecciation, and (3) cementation by blocky calcite. Botryoidal and acicular cements are interpreted as originally marine aragonite precipitates, based on morphology, occurrence, susceptibility to diagenesis, and similarity to Holocene reef cements. The same criteria, plus the microdolomite inclusions, indicate that the bladed, fibrous, and radiaxial cements had a marine Mg-calcite precursor. This assemblage followed by prismatic overgrowths, dissolution, and blocky-calcite cementation indicates an evolution from marine to freshwater diagenesis.

  6. CX-014634: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace Section of Bryan Hill 36-Inch Crude Oil Pipeline at Hillebrandt Bayou CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 12/22/2015 Location(s): Multiple LocationsOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  7. Finding of No Significant Impact and Final Environmental Assessment for the Future Location of Heat Source/Radioisotope Power System Assembly and Testing and Operations Currently Located at the Mound Site

    SciTech Connect

    N /A

    2002-08-30

    The U.S. Department of Energy (the Department) has completed an Environmental Assessment for the Future Location of the Heat Source/Radioisotope Power System Assembly and Test. Operations Currently Located at the Mound Site. Based on the analysis in the environmental assessment, the Department has determined that the proposed action, the relocation of the Department's heat source and radioisotope power system operations, does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the ''National Environmental Policy Act'' of 1969 (NEPA). Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement is not required, and the Department is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).

  8. CX-006107: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Texas-City-Flower Mound, Town ofCX(s) Applied: A9, B2.5, B5.1Date: 07/11/2011Location(s): Flower Mound, TexasOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  9. Field test of plutonium and thorium contaminated clay soils from the Mound Site using the ACT*DE*CON Process

    SciTech Connect

    Johnson, J.O.; Swift, N.A.; Church, R.H.; Neff, R.A.

    1998-12-31

    A treatability test was run during the summer and fall of 1997 to demonstrate the effectiveness of ACT*DE*CON for removing plutonium and thorium from the clay soils around Mound. ACT*DE*CON is a proprietary solution patented by Selentec. The process utilized a highly selective dissolution of the contaminants by the use of a chemical wash. The pilot scale process involved pretreatment of the soil in an attrition scrubber with ACT*DE*CON solution. This blended solution was then passed through a counter-current extraction chamber where additional contact with ACT*DE*CON solution occurred, followed by a rinse cycle. During this process sand was added to aid contact of the solution with the soil particles. The sand is removed during the rinse step and reused. The chelating agent is separated from the contaminant and recycled back into the process, along with the reverse osmosis permeate. The resulting solution can be further treated to concentrate the contaminant. Three different types of environmental soils were tested -- plutonium and thorium contaminated soils with the natural clay content, and plutonium contaminated soils with a high percentage of fine clay particles. The goal of these tests was to reduce the plutonium levels from several hundreds of pCi/g to between 25 and 75 pCi/g and the thorium from a couple hundred pCi/g to less than 5 pCi/g. The results of these four tests are presented along with a discussion of the operating parameters and the lessons learned relating to full scale implementation at Mound as well as other potential applications of this process.

  10. v7DOE OIG SemiAnn RPT.qxd

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    A barge shown docked at Phillips Terminal at the Strategic Petroleum Reserve in Bryan Mound, Texas. Wind turbines at Storm Lake, Iowa. High pressure water being used to blast salt ...

  11. EIS-0075: Final Environmental Impact Statement

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Petroleum Reserve Phase III Development, Texoma and Seaway Group Salt Domes (West Hackberry and Bryan Mound Expansion, Big Hill Development) Cameron Parish, Louisiana, and Brazoria and Jefferson Counties, Texas

  12. Operating Experience Summary, 2015-02

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy 4-02 - April 23, 2014 Operating Experience Summary - 2014-02 - April 23, 2014 April 23, 2014 OE Summary 2014-02 Inside this issue: Laboratory Worker Safety: Work Planning, Hazard Analysis, and Supervision - Page 1 Accident Investigation into Mower Fatality at the Bryan Mound Site - Page 13 Operating Experience Summary - 2014-02 - April 23, 2014 (3.61 MB) More Documents & Publications Investigation of the September 13, 2011, Fatality at the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Bryan Mound

  13. Strategic Plan for Groundwater Monitoring at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Reserves » Strategic Petroleum Reserve Strategic Petroleum Reserve Crude oil pipes at the Bryan Mound site, the largest of the four SPR storage sites - near Freeport, TX. Crude oil pipes at the Bryan Mound site, the largest of the four SPR storage sites - near Freeport, TX. The Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) is the world's largest supply of emergency crude oil. The federally-owned oil stocks are stored in huge underground salt caverns along the coastline of the Gulf of Mexico. Decisions to

  14. Larry Bryan | Savannah River Ecology Laboratory

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Barn swallows as biological indicators Contaminant uptake by grackles nesting in coal Combustion waste impoundments Aquatic ecology Characterization of aquatic species ...

  15. Bryan Long (Acting) | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    support; Project Management Office (PMO) support; and commodity IT services and infrastructure services supporting mission IT and corporate applications enterprise-wide. ...

  16. Wet processing of palladium for use in the tritium facility at Westinghouse, Savannah River, SC. Preparation of palladium using the Mound Muddy Water process

    SciTech Connect

    Baldwin, D.P.; Zamzow, D.S.

    1998-11-10

    Palladium used at Savannah River for tritium storage is currently obtained from a commercial source. In order to better understand the processes involved in preparing this material, Savannah River is supporting investigations into the chemical reactions used to synthesize this material and into the conditions necessary to produce palladium powder that meets their specifications. This better understanding may help to guarantee a continued reliable source for this material in the future. As part of this evaluation, a work-for-others contract between Westinghouse Savannah River Company and the Ames Laboratory Metallurgy and Ceramics Program was initiated. During FY98, the process for producing palladium powder developed in 1986 by Dan Grove of Mound Applied Technologies (USDOE) was studied to understand the processing conditions that lead to changes in morphology in the final product. This report details the results of this study of the Mound Muddy Water process, along with the results of a round-robin analysis of well-characterized palladium samples that was performed by Savannah River and Ames Laboratory. The Mound Muddy Water process is comprised of three basic wet chemical processes, palladium dissolution, neutralization, and precipitation, with a number of filtration steps to remove unwanted impurity precipitates.

  17. THE ROLE OF LAND USE IN ENVIRONMENTAL DECISION MAKING AT THREE DOE MEGA-CLEANUP SITES FERNALD & ROCKY FLATS & MOUND

    SciTech Connect

    JEWETT MA

    2011-01-14

    This paper explores the role that future land use decisions have played in the establishment of cost-effective cleanup objectives and the setting of environmental media cleanup levels for the three major U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) sites for which cleanup has now been successfully completed: the Rocky Flats, Mound, and Fernald Closure Sites. At each site, there are distinct consensus-building histories throughout the following four phases: (1) the facility shut-down and site investigation phase, which took place at the completion of their Cold War nuclear-material production missions; (2) the decision-making phase, whereby stakeholder and regulatory-agency consensus was achieved for the future land-use-based environmental decisions confronting the sites; (3) the remedy selection phase, whereby appropriate remedial actions were identified to achieve the future land-use-based decisions; and (4) the implementation phase, whereby the selected remedial actions for these high-profile sites were implemented and successfully closed out. At each of the three projects, there were strained relationships and distrust between the local community and the DOE as a result of site contamination and potential health effects to the workers and local residents. To engage citizens and interested stakeholder groups - particularly in the role of final land use in the decision-making process, the site management teams at each respective site developed new public-participation strategies to open stakeholder communication channels with site leadership, technical staff, and the regulatory agencies. This action proved invaluable to the success of the projects and reaching consensus on appropriate levels of cleanup. With the implementation of the cleanup remedies now complete, each of the three DOE sites have become models for future environmental-remediation projects and associated decision making.

  18. Environmental Assessment for the Operation of the Glass Melter Thermal Treatment Unit at the US Department of Energy`s Mound Plant, Miamisburg, Ohio

    SciTech Connect

    1995-06-01

    The glass melter would thermally treat mixed waste (hazardous waste contaminated with radioactive constituents largely tritium, Pu-238, and/or Th-230) that was generated at the Mound Plant and is now in storage, by stabilizing the waste in glass blocks. Depending on the radiation level of the waste, the glass melter may operate for 1 to 6 years. Two onsite alternatives and seven offsite alternatives were considered. This environmental assessment indicates that the proposed action does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the human environment according to NEPA, and therefore the finding of no significant impact is made, obviating the need for an environmental impact statement.

  19. CX-100599 Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Fleet Services EV Charging Station Installation, Richard H. Bryan State Office Building Award Number: DE-EE0006992 CX(s) Applied: B5.23 Weatherization & Intergovernmental Programs Office (SEP) Date: 03/31/2016 Location(s): NV Office(s): Golden Field Office

  20. Temporal Characterization of Hydrates System Dynamics beneath Seafloor Mounds. Integrating Time-Lapse Electrical Resistivity Methods and In Situ Observations of Multiple Oceanographic Parameters

    SciTech Connect

    Lutken, Carol; Macelloni, Leonardo; D'Emidio, Marco; Dunbar, John; Higley, Paul

    2015-01-31

    This study was designed to investigate temporal variations in hydrate system dynamics by measuring changes in volumes of hydrate beneath hydrate-bearing mounds on the continental slope of the northern Gulf of Mexico, the landward extreme of hydrate occurrence in this region. Direct Current Resistivity (DCR) measurements were made contemporaneously with measurements of oceanographic parameters at Woolsey Mound, a carbonate-hydrate complex on the mid-continental slope, where formation and dissociation of hydrates are most vulnerable to variations in oceanographic parameters affected by climate change, and where changes in hydrate stability can readily translate to loss of seafloor stability, impacts to benthic ecosystems, and venting of greenhouse gases to the water-column, and eventually, the atmosphere. We focused our study on hydrate within seafloor mounds because the structurally-focused methane flux at these sites likely causes hydrate formation and dissociation processes to occur at higher rates than at sites where the methane flux is less concentrated and we wanted to maximize our chances of witnessing association/dissociation of hydrates. We selected a particularly well-studied hydrate-bearing seafloor mound near the landward extent of the hydrate stability zone, Woolsey Mound (MC118). This mid-slope site has been studied extensively and the project was able to leverage considerable resources from the team’s research experience at MC118. The site exhibits seafloor features associated with gas expulsion, hydrates have been documented at the seafloor, and changes in the outcropping hydrates have been documented, photographically, to have occurred over a period of months. We conducted observatory-based, in situ measurements to 1) characterize, geophysically, the sub-bottom distribution of hydrate and its temporal variability, and 2) contemporaneously record relevant environmental parameters (temperature, pressure, salinity, turbidity, bottom currents) to

  1. MOUND Environmental Restoration Program

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... Th de two aboveground propane tanks (Building 43 tank and' Building nk) and two piec ... The sandblasting operations were part of the cleaning of the large clariflocculator tanks ...

  2. Mound History and Information

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    weapons, devel- opment of radioisotopic thermoelectric generators used to provide electrical power for space exploration, and other non-nuclear research and development activities. ...

  3. Bryan County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Oklahoma Bennington, Oklahoma Bokchito, Oklahoma Caddo, Oklahoma Calera, Oklahoma Colbert, Oklahoma Durant, Oklahoma Hendrix, Oklahoma Kemp, Oklahoma Kenefic, Oklahoma Mead,...

  4. Microsoft PowerPoint - 8-Mound Connector Presentation for Mound...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    CONNECTOR Miamisburg-Springboro Pike and Benner Road Benner Road Miamisburg- Springboro Pike PURPOSE OF PROJECT * Improve access between the I-75Austin Boulevard interchange the ...

  5. Contracts Awarded to Repurchase Oil for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The U. S. Department of Energy announced the award of contracts for delivery of crude oil to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. BP Products North America, Inc., will deliver 2,197,500 barrels and Noble Americas will deliver 2,000,000 barrels to the Reserve’s Bryan Mound site in Freeport, Texas. Deliveries are expected to be completed by July 31, 2015.

  6. International shipment of light weight radioisotopic heater units (LWRHU) using the USA/9516/B(U)F Mound 1 kW shipping package in support of the {open_quotes}Pluto Express{close_quotes} mission

    SciTech Connect

    Barklay, C.D.; Merten, C.W.

    1997-01-01

    Radioisotopes have provided heat that has been used to maintain specific operating environments within remote satellites and spacecraft. For the {open_quotes}Pluto Express{close_quotes} mission the {sup 238}PuO{sub 2} fueled light weight radioisotopic heater unit (LWRHU) will be used within the spacecraft. Since the current plan for the {open_quotes}Pluto Express{close_quotes} mission incorporates the use of a Russian launch platform for the spacecraft, the LWRHUs must be transported in an internationally certified shipping container. An internationally certified shipping package that is versatile enough to be reconfigured to transport the LWRHUs that will be required to support the {open_quotes}Pluto Express{close_quotes} mission is the Mound USA/9516/B(U)F. {copyright} {ital 1997 American Institute of Physics.}

  7. Alternative methods for dispoal of low-level radioactive wastes. Task 1. Description of methods and assessment of criteria. [Alternative methods are belowground vaults, aboveground vaults; earth mounded concrete bunkers, mined cavities, augered holes

    SciTech Connect

    Bennett, R.D.; Miller, W.O.; Warriner, J.B.; Malone, P.G.; McAneny, C.C.

    1984-04-01

    The study reported herein contains the results of Task 1 of a four-task study entitled Criteria for Evaluating Engineered Facilities. The overall objective of this study is to ensure that the criteria needed to evaluate five alternative low-level radioactive waste (LLW) disposal methods are available to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the Agreement States. The alternative methods considered are belowground vaults, aboveground vaults, earth mounded concrete bunkers, mined cavities, and augered holes. Each of these alternatives is either being used by other countries for low-level radioactive waste (LLW) disposal or is being considered by other countries or US agencies. In this report the performance requirements are listed, each alternative is described, the experience gained with its use is discussed, and the performance capabilities of each method are addressed. Next, the existing 10 CFR Part 61 Subpart D criteria with respect to paragraphs 61.50 through 61.53, pertaining to site suitability, design, operations and closure, and monitoring are assessed for applicability to evaluation of each alternative. Preliminary conclusions and recommendations are offered on each method's suitability as an LLW disposal alternative, the applicability of the criteria, and the need for supplemental or modified criteria.

  8. Property:Incentive/OwnRenewEnrgyCrdts | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    Ridge EMC Bryan Texas Utilities - Solar Hot Water Rebate Program (Texas) + Bryan Texas Utility Bryan Texas Utilities - Solar PV Rebate Program (Texas) + Bryan Texas Utilities...

  9. 'Chemistry Summit' Aids Idaho Waste Treatment Facility Startup |

    Energy Saver

    Front Cover From left to right: A barge shown docked at Phillips Terminal at the Strategic Petroleum Reserve in Bryan Mound, Texas. Wind turbines at Storm Lake, Iowa. High pressure water being used to blast salt cake into manageable fragments in a waste tank mockup at the Hanford Site. The McNary Dam, which is one entity of the Bonneville Power Administration's responsibility for transmission and wholesale marketing of power generated at dams in the Federal River Power System. A sodium cooled

  10. Mound_2000_Risk_Management.pdf

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  11. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Mound Site

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    The site long-term monitoring responsibility transferred to the Office of Legacy Management(LM) in 2010 and requires operation and maintenance of a pump and treatment system, ...

  12. Microsoft PowerPoint - Bryan Hydro Conf 11 Jun 09.ppt

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    power, regulation of Red River flows, improvement of navigation, and recreation. ... Exceeded compliance goals. 4-year averages exceed compliance goals. - Red River: 625 ...

  13. Temperature determination using pyrometry

    DOEpatents

    Breiland, William G.; Gurary, Alexander I.; Boguslavskiy, Vadim

    2002-01-01

    A method for determining the temperature of a surface upon which a coating is grown using optical pyrometry by correcting Kirchhoff's law for errors in the emissivity or reflectance measurements associated with the growth of the coating and subsequent changes in the surface thermal emission and heat transfer characteristics. By a calibration process that can be carried out in situ in the chamber where the coating process occurs, an error calibration parameter can be determined that allows more precise determination of the temperature of the surface using optical pyrometry systems. The calibration process needs only to be carried out when the physical characteristics of the coating chamber change.

  14. NEPA Determination Complete

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE has determined that this proposed project is a major Federal action that may significantly affect the quality of the human environment. To comply with the National Environmental Policy Act ...

  15. Microsoft PowerPoint - 2-ECA Mound Presentation - Kirshenberg...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    agreements, tax credits) What Do Communities Want? * Assets - Use Existing PolicyLaw and Models - Land - Technology * Support and Commitment - DOE taking steps to implement ...

  16. Mound Plant Federal Facility Agreement, July 15, 1993 Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Actions (IRAs) alternatives and implement US EPA and OEPA approved remedies for the site in accordance with CERCLA Parties EPA; Ohio EPA (OEPA); DOE Date 07151993 SCOPE * ...

  17. Mound Plant Director's Final Findings and Orders, October 4,...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    portions of the STP, public notice by the Ohio EPA of availability of the revised STP, and consultation by Ohio EPA with affected states and U.S. EPA, pursuant to these ...

  18. Mound Plant Director's Final Findings and Orders, October 4,...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Director's Final Findings and Orders State Ohio Agreement Type Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) FFCAct Scope Summary Approve the Compliance Plan Volume of the amended PSTP, ...

  19. Microsoft PowerPoint - 3-ARI presentation - Mound - Tania Smith

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... chips for the lab's biomass facility RSI Brightfield and Vis Solis provide energy via solar demonstration projects Environmental Dimensions Inc. (EDi), a woman-owned ...

  20. Mound Site Five-Year Review Appendix A Community Notification...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... Federal Government The White House USA.gov Services Sites Mission News About Us Page 1 of ... Between January and June 2016, DOE will review relevant documents and data; conduct site ...

  1. Microsoft Word - S07757_2011 Mound IC Report

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Listings and Photos of Monitoring Wells and Seeps This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy Annual Assessment of the Effectiveness of Site-Wide Institutional ...

  2. Microsoft Word - S07757_2011 Mound IC Report

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    U.S. Department of Energy Doc. No. S07757 June 2011 Page B-2 U.S. Department of Energy Annual Assessment of the Effectiveness of Site-Wide Institutional Controls June 2011 Doc. ...

  3. Mound Plant Federal Facility Agreement, July 15, 1993

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  4. Microsoft PowerPoint - 4b-Mound Reindustrilaization Workshop...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Hanford 3000 Area Transferred by Maritime Administration to Port of Benton Richland Innovation (Industrial) Center Home to 18 Companies Tri-Cities Research District Long History ...

  5. Microsoft Word - S07757_2011 Mound IC Report

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Department of Energy Annual Assessment of the Effectiveness of Site-Wide Institutional ... the Effectiveness of Site-Wide Institutional Controls U.S. Department of Energy Doc. No. ...

  6. Solids mass flow determination

    DOEpatents

    Macko, Joseph E.

    1981-01-01

    Method and apparatus for determining the mass flow rate of solids mixed with a transport fluid to form a flowing mixture. A temperature differential is established between the solids and fluid. The temperature of the transport fluid prior to mixing, the temperature of the solids prior to mixing, and the equilibrium temperature of the mixture are monitored and correlated in a heat balance with the heat capacities of the solids and fluid to determine the solids mass flow rate.

  7. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Environmental Management...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Consolidated Business Service Center Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Environmental Management Consolidated Business Service Center Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued ...

  8. Waste Determination Equivalency - 12172

    SciTech Connect

    Freeman, Rebecca D.

    2012-07-01

    The Savannah River Site (SRS) is a Department of Energy (DOE) facility encompassing approximately 800 square kilometers near Aiken, South Carolina which began operations in the 1950's with the mission to produce nuclear materials. The SRS contains fifty-one tanks (2 stabilized, 49 yet to be closed) distributed between two liquid radioactive waste storage facilities at SRS containing carbon steel underground tanks with storage capacities ranging from 2,800,000 to 4,900,000 liters. Treatment of the liquid waste from these tanks is essential both to closing older tanks and to maintaining space needed to treat the waste that is eventually vitrified or disposed of onsite. Section 3116 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2005 (NDAA) provides the Secretary of Energy, in consultation with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), a methodology to determine that certain waste resulting from prior reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel are not high-level radioactive waste if it can be demonstrated that the waste meets the criteria set forth in Section 3116(a) of the NDAA. The Secretary of Energy, in consultation with the NRC, signed a determination in January 2006, pursuant to Section 3116(a) of the NDAA, for salt waste disposal at the SRS Saltstone Disposal Facility. This determination is based, in part, on the Basis for Section 3116 Determination for Salt Waste Disposal at the Savannah River Site and supporting references, a document that describes the planned methods of liquid waste treatment and the resulting waste streams. The document provides descriptions of the proposed methods for processing salt waste, dividing them into 'Interim Salt Processing' and later processing through the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). Interim Salt Processing is separated into Deliquification, Dissolution, and Adjustment (DDA) and Actinide Removal Process/Caustic Side Solvent Extraction Unit (ARP/MCU). The Waste Determination was signed by the

  9. Interim Action Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Interim Action Determination Processing of Plutonium Materials from the DOE Standard 3013 Surveillance Program in H-Canyon at the Savannah River Site The Department of Energy (DOE) is preparing the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SPD SEIS, DOE/EIS-0283-S2). DOE is evaluating alternatives for disposition of non-pit plutonium that is surplus to the national security needs of the United States. Although the Deputy Secretary of Energy approved Critical

  10. NEPA Determination Form

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    LA NEPA COMPLIANCE DETERMINATION FORM PRID - 09P-0059 V2 Page 1 of 8 Project/Activity Title: TA-3 Substation Replacement Project PRID: 09P-0059 V2 Date: February 16, 2016 Purpose: The proposed demolition and replacement of the Los Alamos National Laboratory's (LANL) Technical Area (TA)-3 electrical power substation is needed to provide reliable and efficient electrical distribution systems with sufficient electrical capacity to support the national security missions. The electrical distribution

  11. Award Fee Determination Summary

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    2 CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company Contract Number: DE-AC06-08RL14788 Final Fee Determination for Base funded Performance Measures Basis of Evaluation: Completion of Performance Measures contained in Section J, Attachment J.4, Performance Evaluation and Measurement Plan, according to the identified completion criteria. Evaluation Results: FY 2012 Base Period Fee Available Fee allocated to FY 2012* Performance Measures $10,399,033.60 Incremental Fee $4,490,000.00 Provisional Fee

  12. Award Fee Determination Summary

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    1 CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company Contract Number: DE-AC06-08RL14788 Final Fee Determination for Base funded and American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery) funded Performance Measures Basis of Evaluation: Completion of Performance Measures contained in Section J, AttachmentJ.4, Performance Evaluation and Measurement Plan, according to the identified completion criteria. Evaluation Results: Fiscal Year 2011 (Oct 1, 2010 - Sept 30, 2011) Base Funded Fee Recovery Funded Fee Available

  13. Determination of radar MTF

    SciTech Connect

    Chambers, D.

    1994-11-15

    The ultimate goal of the Current Meter Array (CMA) is to be able to compare the current patterns detected with the array with radar images of the water surface. The internal wave current patterns modulate the waves on the water surface giving a detectable modulation of the radar cross-section (RCS). The function relating the RCS modulations to the current patterns is the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF). By comparing radar images directly with co-located CMA measurements the MTF can be determined. In this talk radar images and CMA measurements from a recent experiment at Loch Linnhe, Scotland, will be used to make the first direct determination of MTF for an X and S band radar at low grazing angles. The technical problems associated with comparing radar images to CMA data will be explained and the solution method discussed. The results suggest the both current and strain rate contribute equally to the radar modulation for X band. For S band, the strain rate contributes more than the current. The magnitude of the MTF and the RCS modulations are consistent with previous estimates when the wind is blowing perpendicular to the radar look direction.

  14. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Mississippi | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    March 30, 2015 CX-013741: Categorical Exclusion Determination Statistical Analysis of ... March 30, 2015 CX-013758: Categorical Exclusion Determination Statistical Analysis of ...

  15. CX-010689: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Generic CX Determination for Financial Assistance Awards CX(s) Applied: Unknown Date: 07/17/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Chicago Office

  16. CX-012200: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Determination of Excess Real Property CX(s) Applied: B1.36 Date: 05/01/2014 Location(s): Colorado Offices(s): Legacy Management

  17. Determination

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    ... Spectral transmission and reflection measurements were col- lected with a Varian Cary 5000 UVvisNIR spectrophotometer equipped with a DRA-2500 diffuse reflectance accessory. The ...

  18. FIA-12-0001- In the Matter of Kevin Leary

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    OHA issued a decision denying a FOIA appeal filed by Kevin Leary of a final determination issued by the DOE Richland Operations Office (RO). Mr. Leary requested copies of e-mails, the associated metadata, and instant messages for Margot Voogd, Larry Romine and Bryan Foley, from August 1, 2005, through January 31, 2009.

  19. FIA-12-0001- In the Matter of Kevin Leary

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    OHA issued a decision denying a FOIA appeal filed by Kevin Leary of a final determination issued by the DOE Richland Operations Office (RO). Mr. Leary requested copies of e-mails, the associated metadata, and instant messages for Margot Voogd, Larry Romine and Bryan Foley, from August 1, 2005, through January 31, 2009. RO informed Mr. Leary that no documents existed.

  20. Method of determining glass durability

    DOEpatents

    Jantzen, Carol Maryanne; Pickett, John Butler; Brown, Kevin George; Edwards, Thomas Barry

    1998-01-01

    A process for determining one or more leachate concentrations of one or more components of a glass composition in an aqueous solution of the glass composition by identifying the components of the glass composition, including associated oxides, determining a preliminary glass dissolution estimator, .DELTA.G.sub.p, based upon the free energies of hydration for the component reactant species, determining an accelerated glass dissolution function, .DELTA.G.sub.a, based upon the free energy associated with weak acid dissociation, .DELTA.G.sub.a.sup.WA, and accelerated matrix dissolution at high pH, .DELTA.G.sub.a.sup.SB associated with solution strong base formation, and determining a final hydration free energy, .DELTA.G.sub.f. This final hydration free energy is then used to determine leachate concentrations for elements of interest using a regression analysis and the formula log.sub.10 (N C.sub.i (g/L))=a.sub.i +b.sub.i .DELTA.G.sub.f. The present invention also includes a method to determine whether a particular glass to be produced will be homogeneous or phase separated. The present invention is also directed to methods of monitoring and controlling processes for making glass using these determinations to modify the feedstock materials until a desired glass durability and homogeneity is obtained.

  1. Method of determining glass durability

    DOEpatents

    Jantzen, C.M.; Pickett, J.B.; Brown, K.G.; Edwards, T.B.

    1998-12-08

    A process is described for determining one or more leachate concentrations of one or more components of a glass composition in an aqueous solution of the glass composition by identifying the components of the glass composition, including associated oxides, determining a preliminary glass dissolution estimator, {Delta}G{sub p}, based upon the free energies of hydration for the component reactant species, determining an accelerated glass dissolution function, {Delta}G{sub a}, based upon the free energy associated with weak acid dissociation, {Delta}G{sub a}{sup WA}, and accelerated matrix dissolution at high pH, {Delta}G{sub a}{sup SB} associated with solution strong base formation, and determining a final hydration free energy, {Delta}G{sub f}. This final hydration free energy is then used to determine leachate concentrations for elements of interest using a regression analysis and the formula log{sub 10}(N C{sub i}(g/L))=a{sub i} + b{sub i}{Delta}G{sub f}. The present invention also includes a method to determine whether a particular glass to be produced will be homogeneous or phase separated. The present invention is also directed to methods of monitoring and controlling processes for making glass using these determinations to modify the feedstock materials until a desired glass durability and homogeneity is obtained. 4 figs.

  2. CX-010776: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) Primary Coolant Leak Rate Determination System Equipment Replacement CX(s) Applied: B2.2 Date: 07/24/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  3. CX-008905: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Optimizing Accuracy of Determinations of Carbon Dioxide Storage Capacity and Permanence CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B3.6 Date: 08/29/2012 Location(s): Wyoming Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  4. CX-004264: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Phase II, Determination of Uranium in GroundwaterCX(s) Applied: B3.8Date: 09/27/2010Location(s): Richland, WashingtonOffice(s): Environmental Management, Office of River Protection-Richland Office

  5. CX-010493: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Determining Distribution Coefficients by Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/14/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  6. CX-012121: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Notice of Preliminary Determination of Energy Savings for ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2013 CX(s) Applied: A6 Date: 04/25/2014 Location(s): CX: none Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  7. CX-014390: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    National Environmental Policy Act Determination at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B1.15Date: 12/03/2015 Location(s): IllinoisOffices(s): Fermi Site Office

  8. CX-000768: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Determining the Variability of Continuous Mercury Monitors at Low Mercury LevelsCX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 02/07/2010Location(s): Grand Forks, North DakotaOffice(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  9. CX-014511: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Density Determination by Gas Displacement Picnometry CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 10/05/2015 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  10. Gender determination of avian embryo

    DOEpatents

    Daum, Keith A.; Atkinson, David A.

    2002-01-01

    Disclosed is a method for gender determination of avian embryos. During the embryo incubation process, the outer hard shells of eggs are drilled and samples of allantoic fluid are removed. The allantoic fluids are directly introduced into an ion mobility spectrometer (IMS) for analysis. The resulting spectra contain the relevant marker peaks in the positive or negative mode which correlate with unique mobilities which are sex-specific. This way, the gender of the embryo can be determined.

  11. additive manufacturuing | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Laboratory engineer Bryan Moran won an award last month for his 3D printing innovation. It could revolutionize additive manufacturing.Lawrence Livermore Lab engineer Bryan Moran...

  12. Construction of hexahedral elements mesh capturing realistic geometries of Bayou Choctaw SPR site

    SciTech Connect

    Park, Byoung Yoon; Roberts, Barry L.

    2015-09-01

    The three-dimensional finite element mesh capturing realistic geometries of Bayou Choctaw site has been constructed using the sonar and seismic survey data obtained from the field. The mesh is consisting of hexahedral elements because the salt constitutive model is coded using hexahedral elements. Various ideas and techniques to construct finite element mesh capturing artificially and naturally formed geometries are provided. The techniques to reduce the number of elements as much as possible to save on computer run time with maintaining the computational accuracy is also introduced. The steps and methodologies could be applied to construct the meshes of Big Hill, Bryan Mound, and West Hackberry strategic petroleum reserve sites. The methodology could be applied to the complicated shape masses for not only various civil and geological structures but also biological applications such as artificial limbs.

  13. Cultural resources survey and assessment of the proposed Department of Energy Freeport to Texas City pipeline, Brazoria and Galveston Counties, Texas. Final report

    SciTech Connect

    Castille, G.J.; Whelan, J.P. Jr.

    1986-01-01

    An intensive survey and testing program of selected segments of a proposed Department of Energy pipeline were conducted by Coastal Environments, Inc., Baton Rouge, Louisiana, during December 1985 and January 1986. The proposed pipeline runs from Texas City, Galveston County to Bryan Mound, Brazoria County. The pedestrian survey was preceded by historical records survey to locate possible historic sites within the DOE righ-of-way. Four prehistoric sites within the ROW (41BO159, 160, 161, 162) and one outside the ROW (41BO163) were located. All are Rangia cuneata middens. The survey results are discussed with particular reference to the environmental settings of the sites and the effectiveness of the survey procedure. Two of the sites located within the ROW were subjected to additional testing. The results of the backhoe testing program are included in the site descriptions, and the scientific value of the sites are presented. 52 refs., 20 figs., 10 tabs.

  14. MEANS FOR DETERMINING CENTRIFUGE ALIGNMENT

    DOEpatents

    Smith, W.Q.

    1958-08-26

    An apparatus is presented for remotely determining the alignment of a centrifuge. The centrifage shaft is provided with a shoulder, upon which two followers ride, one for detecting radial movements, and one upon the shoulder face for determining the axial motion. The followers are attached to separate liquid filled bellows, and a tube connects each bellows to its respective indicating gage at a remote location. Vibrations produced by misalignment of the centrifuge shaft are transmitted to the bellows, and tbence through the tubing to the indicator gage. This apparatus is particularly useful for operation in a hot cell where the materials handled are dangerous to the operating personnel.

  15. CX-100144 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Exclusion Determination CX-100144 Categorical Exclusion Determination Solar and Distributed Generation as Key Elements in Meeting Vermont's Comprehensive Energy Plan...

  16. CX-007711: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    711: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-007711: Categorical Exclusion Determination Solar Thermochemical Fuel Production via a Novel Low Pressure, Magnetically Stabilized, ...

  17. EA-1835: Environmental Assessment Determination | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    35: Environmental Assessment Determination EA-1835: Environmental Assessment Determination Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (MRCSP) Phase II Michigan Basin Project ...

  18. CX-005728: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    28: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-005728: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: Rural Electric Cooperative Geothermal Development Electric and Agriculture ...

  19. CX-100267 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Exclusion Determination CX-100267 Categorical Exclusion Determination Next Generation Logistics Systems for Delivering Optimal Biomass Feedstocks to Biorefining Industries in...

  20. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Electricity Delivery...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued ...

  1. CX-100363 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Exclusion Determination CX-100363 Categorical Exclusion Determination Marine Algae Industrialization Consortium (MAGIC): Combining biofuel and high-value bioproducts to...

  2. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: North Carolina | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Carolina Categorical Exclusion Determinations: North Carolina Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in North Carolina. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD ...

  3. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Civilian Radioactive Waste...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Civilian ...

  4. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: West Valley Demonstration...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Valley Demonstration Project Categorical Exclusion Determinations: West Valley Demonstration Project Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by West Valley Demonstration ...

  5. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Carlsbad Field Office ...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Carlsbad Field Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Carlsbad Field Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Carlsbad Field Office. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR ...

  6. CX-008738: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Determination of Microstructure and Chemical State Changes in Ion-Irradiated Fuels and Structural Components with a High Kinetic Energy Electron Detector – Illinois Institute of Technology CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05/22/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  7. Plasma digital density determining device

    DOEpatents

    Sprott, Julien C.; Lovell, Thomas W.; Holly, Donald J.

    1976-01-01

    The density of a decaying plasma in an electrically conducting enclosure is determined by applying an excitation to the cavity formed by the enclosure and counting digitally the number of resonant frequencies traversed by the combination of the cavity and the decaying plasma.

  8. CX-002602: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Determining Optimal Fuel Performance in Adapting Onsite Electrical Generation Platforms to Operate on Producer Gas from Fuels of OpportunityCX(s) Applied: A9, A11Date: 12/11/2009Location(s): Minneapolis, MinnesotaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  9. CX-002600: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Determining Optimal Fuel Performance in Adapting Onsite Electrical Generation Platforms to Operate on Producer Gas from Fuels of OpportunityCX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 12/11/2009Location(s): Minneapolis, MinnesotaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  10. CX-002599: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Determining Optimal Fuel Performance in Adapting Onsite Electrical Generation Platforms to Operate on Producer Gas from Fuels of OpportunityCX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 12/11/2009Location(s): Berkeley, CaliforniaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  11. CX-002598: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Determining Optimal Fuel Performance in Adapting Onsite Electrical Generation Platforms to Operate on Producer Gas from Fuels of OpportunityCX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 12/11/2009Location(s): Morris, MinnesotaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  12. CX-002601: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Determining Optimal Fuel Performance in Adapting Onsite Electrical Generation Platforms to Operate on Producer Gas from Fuels of OpportunityCX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 12/11/2009Location(s): Fridley, MinnesotaOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  13. CX-100019: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Determination of Rare Earths in Geothermal Brines and Evaluation of Potential Extraction Techniques CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1, B3.6 Date: 08/18/2014 Location(s): California Offices(s): Golden Field Office Technology Office: Geothermal Technologies Award Number: DE-EE0006750

  14. CX-000373: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Measurements of 222 Radon, 220 Radon, and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Natural Carbon Dioxide Fields in Wyoming: Monitoring, Verification, and Analysis Techniques for Determining Gas Transport and Caprock IntegrityCX(s) Applied: A1, A9, B3.6, B3.8Date: 11/20/2009Location(s): Laramie, WyomingOffice(s): Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  15. CX-011193: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Categorical Exclusion Determination for Indoor, Small- and Pilot-Scale Research and Development CX(s) Applied: A9, B1.7, B3.6, B3.10, B3.12, B3.15, B5.1, B5.15 Date: 08/05/2013 Location(s): California Offices(s): Berkeley Site Office

  16. CX-100558 Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Final Determination of Coverage for Portable Air Conditioners (1904-AD02) RIN 1904-AD02 CX(s) Applied: A6 EERE-Buildings Technology Program Date: 03/03/2016 Location(s): Nationwide Office(s): Golden Field Office

  17. CX-100312 Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Withdrawal of Proposed Determination Regarding Energy Conservation Program: Natural Draft Commercial Boilers RIN: 1904-AD01 CX(s) Applied: A5 EERE- Buildings Technology Program Date: 07/20/2015 Location(s): Nationwide Office(s): Golden Field Office

  18. CX-012693: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Experimental Determination and Mechanistic Modeling of Used Fuel Drying by Vacuum and Gas Circulation for Dry Cask Storage – University of South Carolina CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41869 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  19. Environmental assessment of oil degasification at four Strategic Petroleum Reserve facilities in Texas and Louisiana

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1994-09-01

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) proposes to treat gassy oil at four Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) storage sites to lower the gas content of the stored crude oil and help ensure safe transfer of the oil during drawdown. The crude oil is stored underground in caverns created in salt domes. The degree of gassiness of the oil varies substantially among sites and among caverns within a site. This environmental assessment describes the proposed degasification operation, its alternatives, and potential environmental impacts. The need for degasification has arisen because over time, gases, principally methane and nitrogen, have migrated into and become dissolved in the stored crude oil. This influx of gas has raised the crude oil vapor pressure above limits required by safety and emission guidelines. When oil is drawn from the caverns, excess gases may come out of solution. Based on preliminary data from an ongoing sampling program, between 200 and 350 million of the 587 million barrels of crude oil stored at these four sites would require processing to remove excess gas. Degasification, a commonly used petroleum industry process, would be done at four crude oil storage facilities: Bryan Mound and Big Hill in Texas, and West Hackberry and Bayou Choctaw in Louisiana. DOE would use a turnkey services contract for engineering, procurement, fabrication, installation, operation and maintenance of two degasification plants. These would be installed initially at Bryan Mound and West Hackberry. Degasification would be complete in less than three years of continuous operations. This report summarizes the environmental impacts of this gasification process.

  20. Means of determining extrusion temperatures

    DOEpatents

    McDonald, Robert E.; Canonico, Domenic A.

    1977-01-01

    In an extrusion process comprising the steps of fabricating a metal billet, heating said billet for a predetermined time and at a selected temperature to increase its plasticity and then forcing said heated billet through a small orifice to produce a desired extruded object, the improvement comprising the steps of randomly inserting a plurality of small metallic thermal tabs at different cross sectional depths in said billet as a part of said fabricating step, and examining said extruded object at each thermal tab location for determining the crystal structure at each extruded thermal tab thus revealing the maximum temperature reached during extrusion in each respective tab location section of the extruded object, whereby the thermal profile of said extruded object during extrusion may be determined.

  1. Method for determining gene knockouts

    DOEpatents

    Maranas, Costas D.; Burgard, Anthony R.; Pharkya, Priti

    2011-09-27

    A method for determining candidates for gene deletions and additions using a model of a metabolic network associated with an organism, the model includes a plurality of metabolic reactions defining metabolite relationships, the method includes selecting a bioengineering objective for the organism, selecting at least one cellular objective, forming an optimization problem that couples the at least one cellular objective with the bioengineering objective, and solving the optimization problem to yield at least one candidate.

  2. Range determination for scannerless imaging

    DOEpatents

    Muguira, Maritza Rosa; Sackos, John Theodore; Bradley, Bart Davis; Nellums, Robert

    2000-01-01

    A new method of operating a scannerless range imaging system (e.g., a scannerless laser radar) has been developed. This method is designed to compensate for nonlinear effects which appear in many real-world components. The system operates by determining the phase shift of the laser modulation, which is a physical quantity related physically to the path length between the laser source and the detector, for each pixel of an image.

  3. Method for determining gene knockouts

    DOEpatents

    Maranas, Costa D; Burgard, Anthony R; Pharkya, Priti

    2013-06-04

    A method for determining candidates for gene deletions and additions using a model of a metabolic network associated with an organism, the model includes a plurality of metabolic reactions defining metabolite relationships, the method includes selecting a bioengineering objective for the organism, selecting at least one cellular objective, forming an optimization problem that couples the at least one cellular objective with the bioengineering objective, and solving the optimization problem to yield at least one candidate.

  4. Shape Determination for Deformed Cavities

    SciTech Connect

    Lee, Lie-Quan; Akcelik, Volkan; Chen, Sheng; Ge, Lixin; Li, Zenghai; Ng, Cho; Xiao, Liling; Ko, Kwok; Ghattas, Omar; /Texas U.

    2006-10-04

    A realistic superconducting RF cavity has its shape deformed comparing to its designed shape due to the loose tolerance in the fabrication process and the frequency tuning for its accelerating mode. A PDE-constrained optimization problem is proposed to determine the deformation of the cavity. A reduce space method is used to solve the PDE-constrained optimization problem where design sensitivities were computed using a continuous adjoint approach. A proof-of-concept example is given in which the deformation parameters of a single cavity-cell with two different types of deformation were computed.

  5. SPECIAL REREVIEW FINAL DETERMINATION UNCLASSIFIED

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    SPECIAL REREVIEW FINAL DETERMINATION UNCLASSIFIED , ?4~0180N SctuAnr P. 0. 00x *a STATION F New YORK, N. Y. IN RLPLY RCFSRTO EID?f A- 43 MS ~-7405 eng-8 ". Subject: Contract No.H-7405 eng-8 with Metal Hydrides Incorporated. MEMORAhDUM to the Files. 1. Reference is made to basi.c communication dated 27 September 1945, Symbol No. EIDM 1%-30-b, requesting certain information with respect to the subject contract. 2. Reference pars,?-raph a. The Government committed to restore Contractor's plant

  6. Liquid chromatographic determination of water

    DOEpatents

    Fortier, Nancy E.; Fritz, James S.

    1990-11-13

    A sensitive method for the determination of water in the presence of common interferences is presented. The detection system is based on the effect of water on the equilibrium which results from the reaction aryl aldehydes, such as cinnamaldehyde and methanol in the eluent to form cinnamaldehyde dimethylacetal, plus water. This equilibrium is shifted in a catalytic atmosphere of a hydrogen ion form past column reactor. The extent of the shift and the resulting change in absorbance are proportional to the amount of water present.

  7. Liquid chromatographic determination of water

    DOEpatents

    Fortier, N.E.; Fritz, J.S.

    1990-11-13

    A sensitive method for the determination of water in the presence of common interferences is presented. The detection system is based on the effect of water on the equilibrium which results from the reaction aryl aldehydes, such as cinnamaldehyde and methanol in the eluent to form cinnamaldehyde dimethylacetal, plus water. This equilibrium is shifted in a catalytic atmosphere of a hydrogen ion form past column reactor. The extent of the shift and the resulting change in absorbance are proportional to the amount of water present. 1 fig.

  8. Crystal face temperature determination means

    DOEpatents

    Nason, D.O.; Burger, A.

    1994-11-22

    An optically transparent furnace having a detection apparatus with a pedestal enclosed in an evacuated ampule for growing a crystal thereon is disclosed. Temperature differential is provided by a source heater, a base heater and a cold finger such that material migrates from a polycrystalline source material to grow the crystal. A quartz halogen lamp projects a collimated beam onto the crystal and a reflected beam is analyzed by a double monochromator and photomultiplier detection spectrometer and the detected peak position in the reflected energy spectrum of the reflected beam is interpreted to determine surface temperature of the crystal. 3 figs.

  9. Determination of a mutational spectrum

    DOEpatents

    Thilly, William G.; Keohavong, Phouthone

    1991-01-01

    A method of resolving (physically separating) mutant DNA from nonmutant DNA and a method of defining or establishing a mutational spectrum or profile of alterations present in nucleic acid sequences from a sample to be analyzed, such as a tissue or body fluid. The present method is based on the fact that it is possible, through the use of DGGE, to separate nucleic acid sequences which differ by only a single base change and on the ability to detect the separate mutant molecules. The present invention, in another aspect, relates to a method for determining a mutational spectrum in a DNA sequence of interest present in a population of cells. The method of the present invention is useful as a diagnostic or analytical tool in forensic science in assessing environmental and/or occupational exposures to potentially genetically toxic materials (also referred to as potential mutagens); in biotechnology, particularly in the study of the relationship between the amino acid sequence of enzymes and other biologically-active proteins or protein-containing substances and their respective functions; and in determining the effects of drugs, cosmetics and other chemicals for which toxicity data must be obtained.

  10. CX-006491: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-006491: Categorical Exclusion Determination Photovoltaic Manufacturing Consortium CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09012011 Location(s): Florida...

  11. CX-007867: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Exclusion Determination CX-007867: Categorical Exclusion Determination Northeast Photovoltaic Regional Training Provider CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.16 Date: 01272012...

  12. CX-003164: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-003164: Categorical Exclusion Determination Optimization of Biomass Production Across a Landscape CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 07262010...

  13. CX-100635 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    5 Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-100635 Categorical Exclusion Determination Enabling Automation for <0.10W High-Efficiency Kerfless Wafers Manufactured in the U.S. Award ...

  14. CX-001198: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    98: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-001198: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: 1010 Avenue of the Arts - New School and Performing Arts Theater CX(s) Applied: ...

  15. CX-013565: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    65: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-013565: Categorical Exclusion Determination Analytical Methods for Radiochemical Measurements CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04162015 ...

  16. Islandaire: Noncompliance Determination (2015-SE-43008) | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    8) Islandaire: Noncompliance Determination (2015-SE-43008) February 25, 2016 DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Islandaire, Inc. finding that the Islandaire ...

  17. CX-012557: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    557: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-012557: Categorical Exclusion Determination Electrodepositon of Molybdenum, NickelMolybdenum alloy, Cesium, and Strontium CX(s) Applied: ...

  18. CX-014082: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    4082: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-014082: Categorical Exclusion Determination Understanding Transient Combustion Phenomena in Low-NOx Gas Turbines CX(s) Applied: A9, ...

  19. CX-100576 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    6 Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-100576 Categorical Exclusion Determination Structurally Controlled Geothermal Systems in the Eastern Great Basin Extensional Regime, Utah ...

  20. CX-001199: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    9: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-001199: Categorical Exclusion Determination Tennessee Energy Efficient Schools Initiative Ground Source Heat Pump Program CX(s) Applied: ...

  1. CX-000703: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    03: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-000703: Categorical Exclusion Determination Maryland - Clean Energy Economic Development Initiative (CEEDI) CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, ...

  2. CX-010117: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    10117: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-010117: Categorical Exclusion Determination Analytical Methods for Radiochemical Measurements CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 03282013 ...

  3. Islandaire: Noncompliance Determination (2015-SE-43009) | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    9) Islandaire: Noncompliance Determination (2015-SE-43009) February 25, 2016 DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Islandaire, Inc. finding that the Islandaire ...

  4. CX-004024: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    24: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-004024: Categorical Exclusion Determination Backside Contact Multijunction Solar Cells for High Concentration Applications CX(s) Applied: ...

  5. CX-100275 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    75 Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-100275 Categorical Exclusion Determination High Performance Building Envelope Assemblies Award Number: DE- EE0007054, 7059, 7060 CX(s) ...

  6. CX-005689: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-005689: Categorical Exclusion Determination Joint Inversion of Electrical and Seismic ... Determination Time-lapse Joint Inversion of Geophysical Data and its Applications ...

  7. Secretarial Determination Pursuant to USEC Privatization Act...

    Energy Saver

    or Transfer of Low-Enriched Uranium Secretarial Determination Pursuant to USEC Privatization Act for the Sale or Transfer of Low-Enriched Uranium Secretarial determination ...

  8. CX-004247: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Exclusion Determination CX-004247: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carolina Blue Skies Initiative CX(s) Applied: A1, B5.1 Date: 10142010 Location(s): Indian Trail,...

  9. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency...

    Energy Saver

    Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Energy ...

  10. CX-100421 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    21 Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-100421 Categorical Exclusion Determination Wastewater Treatment Plant Grant - Marion Utilities FOA Number: DE-FOA-0001479 CX(s) Applied: ...

  11. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Pantex Site Office | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    March 18, 2015 CX-013480: Categorical Exclusion Determination Lightning Mapping Array ... December 27, 2013 CX-011714: Categorical Exclusion Determination Lightning Mapping Array ...

  12. DETERMINATION OF SPECIFIC NEUTRONIC REACTIVITY

    DOEpatents

    Dessauer, G.

    1960-05-10

    A method is given for production-line determination of the specific neutronic reactivity of such objects as individual nuclear fuel or neutron absorber elements and is notable for rapidity and apparatus simplicity. The object is incorporated in a slightly sub-critical chain fission reactive assembly having a discrete neutron source, thereby establishing a K/sub eff/ within the crucial range of 0.95 to 0.995. The range was found to afford, uniquely, flux- transient damped response in a niatter of seconds simultaneously with acceptable analytical sensitivity. The resulting neutron flux measured at a situs spaced from both object and source within the assembly serves as a calibrable indication of said reactivity.

  13. Crystal structure determination of Efavirenz

    SciTech Connect

    Popeneciu, Horea Dumitru, Ristoiu; Tripon, Carmen Borodi, Gheorghe Pop, Mihaela Maria

    2015-12-23

    Needle-shaped single crystals of the title compound, C{sub 14}H{sub 9}ClF{sub 3}NO{sub 2}, were obtained from a co-crystallization experiment of Efavirenz with maleic acid in a (1:1) ratio, using methanol as solvent. Crystal structure determination at room temperature revealed a significant anisotropy of the lattice expansion compared to the previously reported low-temperature structure. In both low- and room temperature structures the cyclopropylethynyl fragment in one of the asymmetric unit molecules is disordered. While at low-temperature only one C atom exhibits positional disorder, at room temperature the disorder is present for two C atoms of the cyclopropane ring.

  14. Crystal face temperature determination means

    DOEpatents

    Nason, Donald O.; Burger, Arnold

    1994-01-01

    An optically transparent furnace (10) having a detection apparatus (29) with a pedestal (12) enclosed in an evacuated ampule (16) for growing a crystal (14) thereon. Temperature differential is provided by a source heater (20), a base heater (24) and a cold finger (26) such that material migrates from a polycrystalline source material (18) to grow the crystal (14). A quartz halogen lamp (32) projects a collimated beam (30) onto the crystal (14) and a reflected beam (34) is analyzed by a double monochromator and photomultiplier detection spectrometer (40) and the detected peak position (48) in the reflected energy spectrum (44) of the reflected beam (34) is interpreted to determine surface temperature of the crystal (14).

  15. NEPA Determination FY16 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    NEPA Determination FY16 NEPA Determination FY16 The document below is the State Energy Program''s NEPA Determination for Fiscal Year 2016. NEPA Determination FY16 (233.8 KB) More Documents & Publications EECBG Guidance SEP Guidance EA-1972: Final Environmental Assessment

  16. 2015 Secretarial Determination | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Secretarial Determination 2015 Secretarial Determination On May 1, 2015, the Secretary of Energy determined that continued uranium transfers for cleanup services at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant and for down-blending of highly-enriched uranium to low-enriched uranium will not have an adverse material impact on the domestic uranium mining, conversion, or enrichment industry ("2015 Secretarial Determination"). This Determination covers continued transfers at the rates specified

  17. Ballistic projectile trajectory determining system

    DOEpatents

    Karr, Thomas J.

    1997-01-01

    A computer controlled system determines the three-dimensional trajectory of a ballistic projectile. To initialize the system, predictions of state parameters for a ballistic projectile are received at an estimator. The estimator uses the predictions of the state parameters to estimate first trajectory characteristics of the ballistic projectile. A single stationary monocular sensor then observes the actual first trajectory characteristics of the ballistic projectile. A comparator generates an error value related to the predicted state parameters by comparing the estimated first trajectory characteristics of the ballistic projectile with the observed first trajectory characteristics of the ballistic projectile. If the error value is equal to or greater than a selected limit, the predictions of the state parameters are adjusted. New estimates for the trajectory characteristics of the ballistic projectile are made and are then compared with actual observed trajectory characteristics. This process is repeated until the error value is less than the selected limit. Once the error value is less than the selected limit, a calculator calculates trajectory characteristics such a the origin and destination of the ballistic projectile.

  18. Ballistic projectile trajectory determining system

    DOEpatents

    Karr, T.J.

    1997-05-20

    A computer controlled system determines the three-dimensional trajectory of a ballistic projectile. To initialize the system, predictions of state parameters for a ballistic projectile are received at an estimator. The estimator uses the predictions of the state parameters to estimate first trajectory characteristics of the ballistic projectile. A single stationary monocular sensor then observes the actual first trajectory characteristics of the ballistic projectile. A comparator generates an error value related to the predicted state parameters by comparing the estimated first trajectory characteristics of the ballistic projectile with the observed first trajectory characteristics of the ballistic projectile. If the error value is equal to or greater than a selected limit, the predictions of the state parameters are adjusted. New estimates for the trajectory characteristics of the ballistic projectile are made and are then compared with actual observed trajectory characteristics. This process is repeated until the error value is less than the selected limit. Once the error value is less than the selected limit, a calculator calculates trajectory characteristics such a the origin and destination of the ballistic projectile. 8 figs.

  19. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Energy Technology Engineering Center

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    | Department of Energy Energy Technology Engineering Center Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Energy Technology Engineering Center Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Energy Technology Engineering Center. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD No downloads found for this office.

  20. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Health, Safety, and Security |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Department of Energy Health, Safety, and Security Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Health, Safety, and Security Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Health, Safety, and Security. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD No downloads found for this office.

  1. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Intelligence and Counterintelligence

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    | Department of Energy Intelligence and Counterintelligence Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Intelligence and Counterintelligence Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Intelligence and Counterintelligence. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD No downloads found for this office.

  2. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Western Area Power Administration |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Department of Energy Administration Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Western Area Power Administration Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Western Area Power Administration. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD No downloads found for this office.

  3. CX-100322 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Exclusion Determination CX-100322 Categorical Exclusion Determination Plug and Play Photovoltaics for American Homes Award Number: DE-EE0006035 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6, B5.15...

  4. CX-006929: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    929: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-006929: Categorical Exclusion Determination Florida-City-Gainesville CX(s) Applied: A9, B1.32, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 09272011 Location(s): ...

  5. CX-100269 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    69 Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-100269 Categorical Exclusion Determination Soboba Band of Luiseo Indians Award Number: DE-EE0006950 CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.16 Tribal ...

  6. CX-100464 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    64 Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-100464 Categorical Exclusion Determination Blade Shipping Joint for Simple Assembly Award Number: DE-EE0007259 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 ...

  7. CX-100644 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    4 Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-100644 Categorical Exclusion Determination San Diego Tribal Energy Collaborative Award Number: DE-IE0000043 CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Office ...

  8. CX-001187: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    87: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-001187: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: Blaine School District Geothermal Project CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.1 Date: ...

  9. CX-100193 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Exclusion Determination CX-100193 Categorical Exclusion Determination Installation of Solar Panels at Municipal Owned Facilities Award Number: DE-EE0003195 CX(s) Applied: B5.1...

  10. CX-100587 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    7 Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-100587 Categorical Exclusion Determination H2 Refuel H-Prize Selection of Finalist Award Number: NA CX(s) Applied: A9 Fuel Cells Technology ...

  11. CX-100317 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    7 Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-100317 Categorical Exclusion Determination Solar Hot Water Project in Greenburgh, NY Award Number: DE-EE0003193 CX(s) Applied: B5.16...

  12. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Alaska | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Alaska Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Alaska Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Alaska. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD July 20, 2016 CX-100663 Categorical Exclusion Determination Pitka's Point/Saint Mary's Wind Energy Construction Project Award Number: DE-EE0000035 CX(s) Applied: A9 Office of Indian Energy Date: 7/14/2016 Location(s): AK Office(s): Golden Field Office May 19, 2016 CX-100617 Categorical Exclusion Determination The Vacuum Sanitation Energy

  13. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Colorado | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Colorado Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Colorado Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Colorado. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD November 10, 2016 CX-100767 Categorical Exclusion Determination FTLB Architectural Maintenance Award Number: DE-AC36-08GO28308 CX(s) Applied: DOE/EA-1968 (NREL STM) National Renewable Energy Lab Date: 11/3/2016 Location(s): CO Office(s): Golden Field Office September 22, 2016 CX-100758 Categorical Exclusion Determination STM

  14. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Connecticut | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Connecticut Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Connecticut Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Connecticut. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 9, 2016 CX-100751 Categorical Exclusion Determination High Performance PEFC Electrode Structures Award Number: DE-EE0007652 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6, B3.15 Fuel Cell Technologies Office Date: 8/11/2016 Location(s): CT Office(s): Golden Field Office September 8, 2016 CX-100740 Categorical Exclusion Determination

  15. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Environmental Management | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    of Energy Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Environmental Management Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Environmental Management. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD October 13, 2011 CX-006923: Categorical Exclusion Determination Design and Install a Modification to the HB-Line Exhaust Fan Dampers CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 10/13/2011 Location(s): Aiken, South Carolina Office(s): Environmental Management October 13, 2011 CX-006920: Categorical Exclusion Determination Install

  16. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Hawaii | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Hawaii Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Hawaii Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Hawaii. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD June 12, 2016 CX-100638 Categorical Exclusion Determination Comprehensive analysis of Hawaii's geothermal potential through Play Fairway Award Number: DE-EE0006729 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1 Geothermal Technologies Office Date: 6/2/2016 Location(s): HI Office(s): Golden Field Office May 2, 2016 CX-100598 Categorical Exclusion Determination

  17. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Idaho | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Idaho Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Idaho Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Idaho. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD March 2, 2016 CX-014557: Categorical Exclusion Determination Critical Infrastructure Test Range Complex (CITRC) High Frequency Test Bed Expansion CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 03/02/2016 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy March 2, 2016 CX-014558: Categorical Exclusion Determination B27-601 and B8-601 Emergency Generator Replacement

  18. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Kansas | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Kansas Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Kansas Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Kansas. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD February 26, 2015 CX-013396: Categorical Exclusion Determination Field Demonstration of Chemical Flooding of the Trembley Oilfield, Reno County, Kansas CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 02/26/2015 Location(s): Kansas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory January 26, 2015 CX-100179 Categorical Exclusion Determination Wind Energy

  19. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Kentucky | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Kentucky Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Kentucky Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Kentucky. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD March 4, 2016 CX-100532 Categorical Exclusion Determination 5m/W Solar/Photovoltaic Array on Abandoned Landfill #5 Award Number: DE-EE0006623 CX(s) Applied: B5.16 Solar Energy Technologies Office Date: 07/11/2014 Location(s): KY Office(s): Golden Field Office March 4, 2016 CX-100532 Categorical Exclusion Determination 5m/W

  20. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Maine | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Maine Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Maine Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Maine. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD August 26, 2016 CX-100702 Categorical Exclusion Determination High-performance Bi-Directional Inverter for Solar Plus Storage Award Number: DE-EE0007593 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Solar Energy Technologies Office Date: 8/15/2016 Location(s): ME Office(s): Golden Field Office July 24, 2015 CX-014069: Categorical Exclusion Determination

  1. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Natural Gas Regulation | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    of Energy Natural Gas Regulation Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Natural Gas Regulation Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Natural Gas Regulation. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD May 25, 2016 CX-200007 Categorical Exclusion Determination Cheniere Marketing, LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.7 Date: 05/25/2016 Location(s): Texas Office(s): Fossil Energy, Natural Gas Regulation May 18, 2016 CX-200008 Categorical Exclusion Determination Flint Hills Resources, LP CX(s) Applied: B5.7 Date:

  2. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Oklahoma | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Oklahoma Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Oklahoma Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Oklahoma. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD March 3, 2016 CX-014714: Categorical Exclusion Determination Chimney Hill Solar Project Interconnection with PEC and Interface with the SWPA Tupelo Switchyard CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 03/03/2016 Location(s): Oklahoma Offices(s): Southwestern Power Administration November 20, 2015 CX-014539: Categorical Exclusion Determination Robert

  3. NREL Programmatic NEPA Determinations | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Programmatic NEPA Determinations NREL Programmatic NEPA Determinations The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy has developed five Programmatic NEPA Determinations (PND) to address routine activities and ongoing research conducted at National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) facilities. These determinations were conducted as part of a joint DOE and NREL NEPA Enhancement Project that was developed to help streamline the NEPA process for activities

  4. Record of Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determination: National...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    National Electric Transmission Congestion Study Record of Categorical Exclusion (CX) ... More Documents & Publications Record of Categorical Exclusion (CS) Determination, Office ...

  5. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Advanced Technology Vehicles

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Manufacturing Loan Program | Department of Energy Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 6, 2011 CX-006488: Categorical Exclusion Determination Chrysler Group LLC, Revised Specific Project Application 2, Retooling, Reequipping and Engineering

  6. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: NNSA-Proliferation Detection |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Department of Energy Proliferation Detection Categorical Exclusion Determinations: NNSA-Proliferation Detection Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by NNSA-Proliferation Detection. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 17, 2010 CX-004080: Categorical Exclusion Determination Fisk University Nonproliferation Grant CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09/17/2010 Location(s): Tennessee Office(s): NNSA-Proliferation Detection

  7. Expediting the commercial disposal option: Low-level radioactive waste shipments from the Mound Plant

    SciTech Connect

    Rice, S.; Rothman, R.

    1995-12-31

    In April, Envirocare of Utah, Inc., successfully commenced operation of its mixed waste treatment operation. A mixed waste which was (a) radioactive, (b) listed as a hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and (c) prohibited from land disposal was treated using Envirocare`s full-scale Mixed Waste Treatment Facility. The treatment system involved application of chemical fixation/stabilization technologies to reduce the leachability of the waste to meet applicable concentration-based RCRA treatment standards. In 1988, Envirocare became the first licensed facility for the disposal of naturally occurring radioactive material. In 1990, Envirocare received a RCRA Part B permit for commercial mixed waste storage and disposal. In 1994, Envirocare was awarded a contract for the disposal of DOE mixed wastes. Envirocare`s RCRA Part B permit allows for the receipt, storage, treatment, and disposal of mixed wastes that do not meet the land-disposal treatment standards of 40 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 268. Envirocare has successfully received, managed, and disposed of naturally occurring radioactive material, low-activity radioactive waste, and mixed waste from government and private generators.

  8. Closure of Project Chariot Soil Disposal Mound and Cesium 137 Plot.

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  9. Five-Year Review Report Fourth Five-Year Review for the Mound...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... of, to the extent permitted by applicable law, utilities at reasonable cost, to the State ... of, to the extent permitted by applicable law, utilities at reasonable cost to Gran tor. ...

  10. Mound Facility activities in chemical and physical research: July-December 1979

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1980-06-18

    Research is reported in the following fields: isotope separation (Ar, C, He, Kr, Ne, O, Xe), low-temperature research (H intermolecular potential functions, gas analysis in trennschaukel), separation chemistry (/sup 229/Th, /sup 231/Pa, /sup 230/Th, /sup 234/U), separation research (liquid thermal diffusion, Ca isotope separation, molecular beam scattering, mutual diffusion of noble gas mixtures, lithium chemical exchange with cryptands), and calculations in plutonium chemistry (algorithms, valence in natural water). (DLC)

  11. MLM-462 Contract Number AT-33-l-GtiN-53 MOUND LABORATCRY Operatsd...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... are presented in a letter to the Chief, .4pplieS BAopbys:zs Branch, Division of Biology and Xe.lcins (see TAB D). -5- m-451 3. Prelimlnsry Work in Connection with the ...

  12. Survivability of ancient man-made earthen mounds: implications for uranium mill tailings impoundments

    SciTech Connect

    Lindsey, C.G.; Mishima, J.; King, S.E.; Walters, W.H.

    1983-06-01

    As part of a study for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) is investigating long-term stabilization techniques for uranium mill impoundments. Part of this investigation involves the design of a rock armoring blanket (riprap) to mitigate wind and water erosion of the underlying soil cover, which in turn prevents exposure of the tailings to the environment. However, the need for the armoring blanket, as well as the blanket's effectiveness, depends on the stability of the underlying soil cap (radon suppression cover) and on the tailings themselves. Compelling evidence in archaeological records suggests that large man-made earthen structures can remain sound and intact for time periods comparable to those required for the stabilization of the tailings piles if properly constructed. We present archaeological evidence on the existence and survivability of man-made earthen and rock structures through specific examples of such structures from around the world. We also review factors contributing to their survival or destruction and address the influence of climate, building materials, and construction techniques on survivability.

  13. Five-Year Review Report Fourth Five-Year Review for the Mound...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ...... 3. Tanks, Vaults, Storage Vessels X NA Good ...... 3. Tanks, Vaults, Storage Vessels NA Good ...

  14. LEGAL NOTICE for Mound Site 2016 CERCLA Five-Year Review

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Groundwater monitoring plans for each remedy are approved by the regulators. ICs are legal and administrative tools incorporated into deed restrictions on future land and ...

  15. Mound activities in chemical and physical research: July-December 1982

    SciTech Connect

    Not Available

    1983-06-20

    Research is reported in the following areas: low-temperature research (kinetics of DT formation in D/sub 2/ + T/sub 2/ mixtures, calculation of charged particle density in tritium containing CT/sub 4/, deuterium triple point cell), separation research (liquid thermal diffusion of methyl chloride and bromine-81 in bromobenzene, separation of Ca and Zr isotopes, triple-pumped detector, magnesium two-phase chemical exchange, extraction columns for Ca isotope enrichment, reflux-electrochemical NO-HNO/sub 3/ chemical exchange for /sup 15/N enrichment, testing of boron phosphate for Pu adsorption), and metal hydride studies (prediction of nonmagnetic Kondo effect in metal hydrides). (DLC)

  16. Ultrasonic processor reduces drill-cuttings size and eliminates subsea mounds

    SciTech Connect

    Gaddy, D.E.

    1997-10-06

    Drill cuttings size reduction using ultrasonics eliminated a subsea clean-up and significantly reduced the environmental impact in a North Sea drilling project. Reduction in cuttings size allows for a wider areal dispersion when released into the ocean because they are held in suspension longer than larger sizes. Thus, ocean currents carry the smaller cuttings farther away from the well template, leaving a much wider footprint than larger cuttings sizes. This eliminates the pile-up of cuttings that otherwise would contaminate and harm the marine habitat.

  17. Categorical Exclusion Determinations | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    NEPA Documents » Categorical Exclusion Determinations Categorical Exclusion Determinations To further transparency and openness in its implementation of the NEPA process, DOE established a policy and, subsequently, requirements under the Department's NEPA regulations (10 CFR Part 1021) and NEPA Order (DOE Order 451.1B) to document and post online its categorical exclusion (CX) determinations involving classes of actions listed in Appendix B to Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021. Additional

  18. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Advanced Research Projects

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Agency-Energy | Department of Energy Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD December 19, 2013 CX-011762: Categorical Exclusion Determination Arzeda Corp. - Design of Metalloenzymes for Methane Activation CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/19/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Advanced

  19. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Arizona | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Arizona Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Arizona Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Arizona. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 9, 2016 CX-100742 Categorical Exclusion Determination A Novel Platform for Algal Biomass Production Using Cellulosic Mixotrophy Award Number: DE-EE0007562 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6, B5.15 Bioenergy Technologies Office Date: 8/29/2016 Location(s): AZ Office(s): Golden Field Office August 26, 2016 CX-100700 Categorical Exclusion

  20. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Arkansas | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Arkansas Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Arkansas Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Arkansas. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 7, 2016 CX-100719 Categorical Exclusion Determination High-Performance Self-Cleaning, Antireflective, and Anti-fog Coating for PV Glass to Increase Module Output and Decrease BOS Costs Award Number: DE-EE0007582 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Solar Energy Technologies Office Date: 8/22/2016 Location(s): AR Office(s): Golden

  1. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: California | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    California Categorical Exclusion Determinations: California Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in California. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 22, 2016 CX-100759 Categorical Exclusion Determination Accelerating Market Adoption of Best-in-class Building Technologies, the Technology Demonstration Initiative (TDI) Award Number: DE-EE0007065 CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Buildings Technologies Office Date: 9/20/2016 Location(s): CA Office(s): Golden Field Office

  2. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Florida | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Florida Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Florida Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Florida. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 9, 2016 CX-100749 Categorical Exclusion Determination Improving Data Center Energy Efficiency through End-to-End Cooling Modeling and Optimization Award Number: DE-EE0007688 CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.1 Building Technologies Office Date: 8/11/2016 Location(s): FL Office(s): Golden Field Office September 7, 2016 CX-100721

  3. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Georgia | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Georgia Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Georgia Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Georgia. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD May 2, 2016 CX-100596 Categorical Exclusion Determination Energy Savings Performance Contract (ESPC) at Marine Corps Logistics Base Albany (MCLBA), GA - Biomass Steam Turbine Generator Award Number: DE-EE0007461 CX(s) Applied: A9 Federal Energy Management Program Date: 04/13/2016 Location(s): GA Office(s): Golden Field Office March 4,

  4. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Illinois | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Illinois Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Illinois Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Illinois. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD July 20, 2016 CX-100656 Categorical Exclusion Determination Improving reliability and reducing cost in CdTe photovoltaics via grain boundary engineering Award Number: DE-EE0007545 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Solar Energy Technologies Office Date: 7/12/2016 Location(s): IL Office(s): Golden Field Office April 6, 2016 CX-100589

  5. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Indiana | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Indiana Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Indiana Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Indiana. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD March 7, 2016 CX-100543 Categorical Exclusion Determination Renewable Acid-hydrolysis Condensation Hydrotreating (REACH) Pilot Plant Award Number: DE-EE0006244 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Bioenergy Technology Office Date: 07/31/2014 Location(s): IN Office(s): Golden Field Office January 12, 2016 CX-100450 Categorical Exclusion

  6. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Iowa | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Iowa Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Iowa Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Iowa. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD August 22, 2016 CX-100698 Categorical Exclusion Determination Novel Infiltration Diagnostics based on Laser-line Scanning and Infrared Temperature Field Imaging Award Number: DE-EE0007686 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Buildings Technology Office Date: 8/15/2016 Location(s): IA Office(s): Golden Field Office March 4, 2016 CX-100528 Categorical

  7. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Lawrence Livermore Site Office |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Department of Energy Lawrence Livermore Site Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Lawrence Livermore Site Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Lawrence Livermore Site Office. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD February 29, 2016 CX-014555: Categorical Exclusion Determination Livermore Site Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Modernization CX(s) Applied: B1.3, B1.4, B1.11 Date: 02/29/2016 Location(s): California Offices(s): Lawrence Livermore Site Office December

  8. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Loan Guarantee Program Office |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Department of Energy Loan Guarantee Program Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Loan Guarantee Program Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Loan Guarantee Program Office. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD February 22, 2013 CX-011970: Categorical Exclusion Determination Tuscarora Phase II Geothermal Observation Wells CX(s) Applied: B3.7 Date: 02/22/2013 Location(s): Nevada Offices(s): Loan Guarantee Program Office May 29, 2012 CX-012201: Categorical Exclusion

  9. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Louisiana | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Louisiana Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Louisiana Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Louisiana. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD March 4, 2016 CX-100533 Categorical Exclusion Determination Pump Station Improvements (Transcontinental) Award Number: DE-EE0006212 CX(s) Applied: B5.1, B5.4 Weatherization & Intergovernmental Programs Office Date: 07/10/2014 Location(s): LA Office(s): Golden Field Office May 27, 2015 CX-013764: Categorical Exclusion

  10. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Maryland | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Maryland Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Maryland Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Maryland. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 9, 2016 CX-100748 Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Serpentine Heat Exchangers to Minimize the Number of Joints and Leakage in HVAC&R Systems Award Number: DE-EE0007680 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Building Technologies Office Date: 8/11/2016 Location(s): MD Office(s): Golden Field Office June 12, 2016 CX-100642

  11. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Massachusetts | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Massachusetts Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Massachusetts Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Massachusetts. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 8, 2016 CX-100732 Categorical Exclusion Determination Achieving Ubiquitous Solar Through Market Transformation and Grid Integration Award Number: DE-EE0007589 CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.6 Solar Energy Technologies Office Date: 8/18/2016 Location(s): MA Office(s): Golden Field Office July 20, 2016 CX-100664

  12. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Michigan | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Michigan Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Michigan Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Michigan. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD October 6, 2016 CX-100761 Categorical Exclusion Determination Durable High-Power Membrane Electrode Assemblies with Low-Pt-Loading Award Number: DE-EE0007651 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Fuel Cell Technologies Office Date: 10/4/2016 Location(s): MI Office(s): Golden Field Office September 16, 2016 CX-100753 Categorical Exclusion

  13. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Minnesota | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Minnesota Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Minnesota Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Minnesota. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD August 26, 2016 CX-100703 Categorical Exclusion Determination Creation of an online B2B platform specifically designed for the US solar marketplace that facilitates the brokering and commerce around grey market excess inventory and vintage replacement parts Award Number: DE-EE0007587 CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Solar Energy

  14. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Missouri | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Missouri Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Missouri Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Missouri. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD August 26, 2016 CX-100704 Categorical Exclusion Determination Fundamental Studies of Surface-Functionalized Mesoporous Carbons for Thermodynamic Stabilizationand Reversibility of Metal Hydrides Award Number: DE-EE0007656 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6, B3.15 Fuel Cell Technologies Office Date: 8/15/2016 Location(s): MO Office(s): Golden

  15. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Nationwide | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Nationwide Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Nationwide Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions nationwide. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD November 7, 2016 CX-100766 Categorical Exclusion Determination Notice of Final Rule Rulemaking for Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial Packaged Boilers RIN 1904-AD07 CX(s) Applied: B5.1 EERE-Buildings Technology Program Date: 11/7/2016 Location(s): Nationwide Office(s): Golden Field Office October 27, 2016 CX-100764

  16. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Department of Energy Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 25, 2015 CX-014279: Categorical Exclusion Determination Lower Level Guard Post Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.11, B1.15, B2.2 Date: 09/25/2015 Location(s): New York Offices(s): Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program July 6, 2015 CX-013878:

  17. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Nevada | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Nevada Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Nevada Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Nevada. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 9, 2016 CX-100744 Categorical Exclusion Determination A novel approach to map permeability using passive seismic emission tomography Award Number: DE-EE0007698 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1 Geothermal Technologies Office Date: 8/29/2016 Location(s): OH Office(s): Golden Field Office April 4, 2016 CX-100588 Categorical Exclusion

  18. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Pennsylvania | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Pennsylvania Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Pennsylvania Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Pennsylvania. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 9, 2016 CX-100747 Categorical Exclusion Determination Developing a Novel Hydrogen Sponge with Ideal Binding Energy and Hugh Surface Area for Practical Hydrogen Storage Award Number: DE-EE0007655 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Fuel Cell Technologies Office Date: 8/11/2016 Location(s): PA Office(s): Golden Field Office

  19. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Portsmouth Paducah Project Office |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Department of Energy Portsmouth Paducah Project Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Portsmouth Paducah Project Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Portsmouth Paducah Project Office. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD August 9, 2012 CX-009253: Categorical Exclusion Determination Optimization of Electrical Power at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Facility CX(s) Applied: B4.6, B4.11 Date: 08/09/2012 Location(s): Ohio Offices(s): Portsmouth Paducah Project Office May 9,

  20. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Savannah River Operations Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Savannah River Operations Office. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD February 29, 2016 CX-014636: Categorical Exclusion Determination Micro-encapsulation of PuO2 Surrogates in a Low-water Cement-based Waste Form CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 02/29/2016 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  1. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Southeastern Power Administration |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Department of Energy Southeastern Power Administration Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Southeastern Power Administration Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Southeastern Power Administration. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD August 17, 2016 CX-100674 Categorical Exclusion Determination Monolithic silicon module manufacturing at less than 0.40 $/W Award Number: DE-EE0007538 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Solar Energy Technology Office Date: 7/25/2016 Location(s): AZ Office(s):

  2. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Office | Department of Energy Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD March 1, 2016 CX-014628: Categorical Exclusion Determination Big Hill Remote Control for Pipeline Valve BH-3 CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 03/01/2016 Location(s): Multiple Locations Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field

  3. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Texas | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Texas Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Texas Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Texas. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 7, 2016 CX-100722 Categorical Exclusion Determination Development of a novel, near real time approach to geothermal seismic exploration and Monitoring Via Ambient Seismic Noise Interferometry Award Number: DE-EE0007699 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.1 Geothermal Technologies Office Date: 8/29/2016 Location(s): TX Office(s): Golden Field

  4. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Utah | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Utah Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Utah Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Utah. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 8, 2016 CX-100734 Categorical Exclusion Determination Multi-Scale Ordered Cell Structure for Cost Effective Production of Hydrogen by HTWS Award Number: DE-EE0007645 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Fuel Cell Technologies Office Date: 8/19/2016 Location(s): UT Office(s): Golden Field Office August 11, 2016 CX-100680 Categorical Exclusion

  5. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Vermont | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Vermont Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Vermont Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Vermont. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD January 27, 2016 CX-100465 Categorical Exclusion Determination Training for State Officials to Make Solar More Inclusive, Affordable, and Consumer Friendly Award Number: DE-EE0007321 CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Solar Energy Technologies Office Date: 01/27/2016 Location(s): VT Office(s): Golden Field Office October 2, 2015 CX-100384

  6. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Virginia | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Virginia Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Virginia Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Virginia. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD September 7, 2016 CX-100725 Categorical Exclusion Determination Optimization of concentrator photovoltaic solar cell performance through photonic engineering Award Number: DE-EE0007544 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Solar Energy Technologies Office Date: 8/31/2016 Location(s): VA Office(s): Golden Field Office September 7, 2016 CX-100724

  7. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Washington Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Washington Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Washington. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD August 11, 2016 CX-100683 Categorical Exclusion Determination Developing a low cost, high volume and scalable manufacturing technology for undoped and heavily p-type doped CdTe feedstock materials Award Number: DE-EE0007537 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Solar Energy Technologies Office Date: 8/1/2016 Location(s): WA Office(s):

  8. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Western Area Power

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Administration-Desert Southwest Region | Department of Energy Desert Southwest Region Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Western Area Power Administration-Desert Southwest Region Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Western Area Power Administration-Desert Southwest Region. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD March 16, 2016 CX-014718: Categorical Exclusion Determination License Outgrant for the Quarry 187 Road Improvements CX(s) Applied: B1.13 Date: 03/16/2016 Location(s): Nevada

  9. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Western Area Power

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Administration-Upper Great Plains Region | Department of Energy Upper Great Plains Region Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Western Area Power Administration-Upper Great Plains Region Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Western Area Power Administration-Upper Great Plains Region. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD July 15, 2015 CX-014172: Categorical Exclusion Determination Fullerton Tap CX(s) Applied: B4.11 Date: 07/15/2015 Location(s): North Dakota Offices(s): Western Area

  10. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Wisconsin | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Wisconsin Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Wisconsin Location Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued for actions in Wisconsin. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD November 2, 2016 CX-100765 Categorical Exclusion Determination SCC Emission-Free and Treaty Resources Protection Clean Energy Initiative Award Number: DE-IE0000036 CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.16 Office of Indian Energy Date: 10/21/2016 Location(s): WI Office(s): Golden Field Office August 22, 2016 CX-100697 Categorical Exclusion

  11. CX-003799: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    DOCUMENT(S) AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD CX-003799.pdf (212.85 KB) More Documents & Publications CX-003728: Categorical Exclusion Determination EA-1645: Finding of No Significant Impact ...

  12. CX-010269: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-010269: Categorical Exclusion Determination Renewable Energy Initiatives for Clark ... The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is proposing to provide federal funding to the Clark ...

  13. Electrolux: Compliance Determination (2010-SE-0108)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    After conducting testing of Electrolux's Frigidaire chest freezer model FFN09M5HWC, DOE determined that the model met the applicable energy conservation standard.

  14. CX-100686 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Energy Saver

    CX-100686 Categorical Exclusion Determination U.S. Photovoltaic Manufacturing ... DOE is proposing to provide federal funding to U.S. Photovoltaic Manufacturing Consortium ...

  15. CX-005846: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-005846: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wood Pole Replacement and Minor Access Road Maintenance Along Various Transmission Line Rights-Of-Way in the Wenatchee District CX(s) ...

  16. CX-001627: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    CX-001627: Categorical Exclusion Determination Test Reactor Cask Implementation CX(s) ... This proposed action is a process and facility modification. The Advanced Test Reactor ...

  17. CX-008779: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    CX-008779: Categorical Exclusion Determination Curecanti-Poncha-Canon City West-Midway 230-Kilovolt Transmission Line Road Maintenance Gunnison, Chaffee, Fremont, Pueblo, and El ...

  18. CX-009914: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-009914: Categorical Exclusion Determination Plug & Play Solar Photovoltaic for American ... installed cost of residential solar photovoltaic (PV) systems by developing a ...

  19. CX-010509: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-010509: Categorical Exclusion Determination Plug & Play Solar Photovoltaic for American ... installed cost of residential solar photovoltaic (PV) systems by developing a ...

  20. CX-012011: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-012011: Categorical Exclusion Determination Plug and Play Solar Photovoltaic for ... installed cost of residential solar photovoltaic (PV) systems by developing a ...

  1. CX-009430: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-009430: Categorical Exclusion Determination Cascaded Micro Inverter Photovoltaic System ... to develop and demonstrate a cascaded photovoltaic inverter architecture, which would ...

  2. CX-004249: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-004249: Categorical Exclusion Determination Low Cost High Concentration Photovoltaic ... (Amonix 7700 High Concentration Photovoltaic systems) for field testing at SolarTac ...

  3. CX-001856: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Exclusion Determination Rural Cooperative Geothermal Development Electric and Agriculture CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 04282010 Location(s): Paisley, Oregon Office(s): Energy...

  4. CX-003608: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-003608: Categorical Exclusion Determination Sustainable Algal Energy Production and Environmental Remediation CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 08252010 Location(s): Virginia ...

  5. CX-006863: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-006863: Categorical Exclusion Determination Production ... Minnesota Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable ... aims to establish a sustainable supply of ...

  6. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Golden Field Office | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Categorical Exclusion Determination U.S. Department of Energy Collegiate Entrepreneurship Prize Award Number: TBD FOA CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 12222014 Location(s): CO...

  7. CX-006520: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-006520: Categorical Exclusion Determination High Energy Density Distributed Hydrostatic Direct Drive for Large Wind Turbine and Marine Hydro-Kinetic Device Applications CX(s) ...

  8. CX-100343 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-100343 Categorical Exclusion Determination RPM Solar Asset Management Software Award ... Management to develop a cloud based software platform that manages the financial and ...

  9. CX-008761: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-008761: Categorical Exclusion Determination Surface Water and Groundwater Sampling Near the Naturita, Colorado Title I Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) ...

  10. Methods for threshold determination in multiplexed assays

    DOEpatents

    Tammero, Lance F. Bentley; Dzenitis, John M; Hindson, Benjamin J

    2014-06-24

    Methods for determination of threshold values of signatures comprised in an assay are described. Each signature enables detection of a target. The methods determine a probability density function of negative samples and a corresponding false positive rate curve. A false positive criterion is established and a threshold for that signature is determined as a point at which the false positive rate curve intersects the false positive criterion. A method for quantitative analysis and interpretation of assay results together with a method for determination of a desired limit of detection of a signature in an assay are also described.

  11. CX-100274 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-100274 Categorical Exclusion Determination An Integrated Approach to Offshore Wind ... University to develop best practices for offshore wind measurements that are used to ...

  12. Zoe Industries: Noncompliance Determination (2011-SW-2912)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Zoe Industries, Inc. finding that Giessdorf 150043 model, a showerhead, does not comport with the water conservation standards.

  13. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: RMOTC | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    RMOTC Categorical Exclusion Determinations: RMOTC Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by RMOTC. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD December 30, 2013 CX-011724: Categorical Exclusion Determination Repair Corroded Flow Line Near 33-SX-11 CX(s) Applied: B5.4, B5.6 Date: 12/30/2013 Location(s): Wyoming Offices(s): RMOTC July 26, 2013 CX-010688: Categorical Exclusion Determination Optimization Project #3 CX(s) Applied: B2.5, B5.2, B5.4, B5.5 Date: 07/26/2013 Location(s): Wyoming Offices(s):

  14. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: National Energy Technology...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Laboratory September 9, 2014 CX-012155: Categorical Exclusion Determination Subsea High Voltage Direct Current Connectors for Environmentally Safe and Reliable Powering of UDW... ...

  15. CX-013314: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-013314: Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Reactor Technologies Tristructural ... in INL-08-082 (OA 7) as Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) Technology Development. ...

  16. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Ohio | Department of Energy

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    September 9, 2016 CX-100743 Categorical Exclusion Determination Biomass Gasification for Chemicals Production Using Chemical Looping Techniques Award Number: DE-EE0007530 CX(s) ...

  17. CX-004656: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-004656: Categorical Exclusion Determination Small Wind Turbine Regional Test Center - ... RTCs that would offer small wind turbine certification testing to the industry by ...

  18. CX-002995: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    CX-002995: Categorical Exclusion Determination Defense Waste Processing Facility Water ... 1-liter frit decon wet solids samples from Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF). ...

  19. Vitrification Melter Waste Incidental to Reprocessing Determination...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Reprocessing Determination For The West Valley Demonstration Project Concentrator Feed Makeup Tank and Melter Feed Hold Tank Responses to Public Comments on Draft Vitrification...

  20. POLICY GUIDANCE MEMORANDUM #26 Official Worksite Determinations...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    MEMORANDUM 26 Official Worksite Determinations Responsible Contacts Ahtora Brooks Human Resource Specialists E-mail Ahtora.Brooks@Hq.Doe.Gov Phone 202-586-1239 More...

  1. CX-100664 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-100664 Categorical Exclusion Determination Physics-Based Interval Data Models to ... to provide federal funding to Fraunhofer USA, Inc. to develop, demonstrate, and validate ...

  2. CX-007391: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-007391: Categorical Exclusion Determination Time-lapse Joint Inversion of Geophysical ... reservoirs by developing joint inversion of several geophysical techniques to ...

  3. CX-007889: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-007889: Categorical Exclusion Determination Time-lapse Joint Inversion of Geophysical ... reservoirs by developing joint inversion of several geophysical techniques to ...

  4. CX-011580: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    CX-011580: Categorical Exclusion Determination Model Validation Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)-Grade Experimental Database for Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP) ...

  5. Arçelik A.?: Compliance Determination (2010-SE-0105)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Compliance Determination after test results revealed that Arçelik's Blomberg BRFB1450 refrigerator-freezer complies with the applicable energy conservation standards.

  6. CX-100526 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    This NEPA determination applies to the remaining Tasks 2.0-6.0, including outdoor test support, strain improvement, control optimization, preprocessing unit operations and ...

  7. Adjudicative Guidelines for Determining Eligibility for Access...

    Energy Saver

    to include sensitive compartmented information and special access programs, and are to be used by government departments and agencies in all final clearance determinations. ...

  8. CX-011250: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Determination Transforming Photovoltaic Installations Toward Dispatchable, Schedulable Energy Solutions CX(s) Applied: B3.6, B5.15 Date: 10172013 Location(s): Oregon...

  9. DNA Sequence Determinants Controlling Affinity, Stability and...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    the Nucleoid Protein Fis Citation Details In-Document Search Title: DNA Sequence Determinants Controlling Affinity, Stability and Shape of DNA Complexes Bound by the Nucleoid ...

  10. CX-007901: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-007901: Categorical Exclusion Determination Improving Atmospheric Models for Offshore Wind Resource Mapping and Prediction Using LIDAR, Aircraft, and In-Ocean...

  11. ET Industries: Noncompliance Determination (2012-SE-2902)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to ET Industries, Inc. finding that showerhead basic model TH-1 does not comport with the water conservation standards.

  12. Computational Procedures for Determining Parameters in Ramberg...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    2 RAMBO: A Computer Code for Determining Parameters in Ramberg-Osgood Elastoplastic Model Based on Modulus and Damping Versus Strain ABSTRACT A computer code, RAMBO, is ...

  13. Watermark: Noncompliance Determination (2011-SW-2908)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Watermark Designs, Ltd. finding that model SH-FAL-90, a showerhead, does not comport with the water conservation standards.

  14. Quantitative Experimental Determination of the Solid Solution...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Quantitative Experimental Determination of the Solid Solution Hardening Potential of Rhenium, Tungsten and Molybdenum in Single Crystal Nickel-based Superalloys Citation Details ...

  15. Determining Memory Use | Argonne Leadership Computing Facility

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Allinea DDT Core File Settings Determining Memory Use Using VNC with a Debugger bgqstack gdb Coreprocessor Runjob termination TotalView Performance Tools & APIs Software &...

  16. CX-006216: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-006216: Categorical Exclusion Determination Oklahoma State Energy Program American Recovery and Reinvestment Act - Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority Large System Request R ...

  17. CX-005301: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    wind turbine(s); conducting business and organizational planning to determine whether a wind-diesel plant is feasible; developing and conducting educational and informational...

  18. CX-006830: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-006830: Categorical Exclusion Determination Hydrogen Storage System Cost Assessment CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 09222011 Location(s): Virginia Office(s): Energy Efficiency and ...

  19. CX-100658 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-100658 Categorical Exclusion Determination Hydrogen Storage System Cost Assessment Award Number: DE-EE0007601 CX(s) Applied: A9 Fuel Cell Technologies Office Date: 7122016 ...

  20. Determinations and Coverage Rulemakings | Department of Energy

    Energy Saver

    Determinations and Coverage Rulemakings The Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) (42 ... which the Secretary of Energy is authorized to establish energy conservation standards. ...

  1. CX-011753: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-011753: Categorical Exclusion Determination LanzaTech Inc. - Process Intensification of Biological Natural Gas Conversion through Novel Bioreactors Designs CX(s) Applied: B3.6 ...

  2. CABLE TECHNOLOGY LABORATORIES, INC. DETERMINATION OF THRESHOLD...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    CABLE TECHNOLOGY LABORATORIES, INC. DETERMINATION OF THRESHOLD AND MAXIMUM OPERATING ELECTRIC STRESSES FOR SELECTED HIGH VOLTAGE INSULATIONS Investigation of Aged Polymeric ...

  3. CX-002452: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Assessment of the Environmental Effects of Hydrokinetic Turbines on Fish CX(s) Applied: ... to determine injury and survival rates for fish passing through hydrokinetic turbines. ...

  4. CX-006211: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Exclusion Determination Missouri Independent Energy Efficiency Program: Henniges Automotive - Process Air Compressor Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 07182011 Location(s):...

  5. CX-100451 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-100451 Categorical Exclusion Determination Integrated ... A9, B3.6 Advanced Manufacturing Date: 01192016 ... power converters using computer-aided engineering tools. ...

  6. CX-100327 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-100327 Categorical Exclusion Determination Proposed Rulemaking for Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial Water Heating Equipment RIN: 1904-AD34 CX(s)...

  7. Felix Storch: Noncompliance Determination (2010-SCE-0111)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Felix Storch finding that basic model FS62, a compact upright freezer, does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  8. Morris: Noncompliance Determination (2013-SE-5403)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Morris Products, Inc. finding that various models of metal halide lamp fixtures do not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  9. CX-009549: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-009549: Categorical Exclusion Determination Vapor Transport Deposition for Thin Film ... to conduct research and development activities that advance solar photovoltaic technology. ...

  10. Zinc Speciation in Contaminated Sediments: Quantitative Determination...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Zinc Speciation in Contaminated Sediments: Quantitative Determination of Zinc Coordination by X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy Citation Details In-Document Search Title: Zinc ...

  11. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Golden Field Office | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Program Date: 03252015 Location(s): Nationwide Office(s): Golden Field Office March 24, 2015 CX-100203 Categorical Exclusion Determination Solar Hot Water Project in Greenburgh,...

  12. Perlick: Noncompliance Determination (2013-SE-14002)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Perlick Corporation finding that refrigerator basic model HP48RR does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  13. CX-010763: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-010763: Categorical Exclusion Determination Nevada Desert Research Institute- Photovoltaic Installation CX(s) Applied: B5.16 Date: 07172013 Location(s): Nevada Offices(s):...

  14. Perlick: Noncompliance Determination (2013-SE-14001)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Perlick Corporation finding that freezer basic model HP24F does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  15. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Sandia Site Office | Department...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ... May 25, 2011 CX-007089: Categorical Exclusion Determination Dynamic Integrated Compression Experimental Facility: Three-Inch Light Gas Gun & Small Pulser - Operations CX(s) ...

  16. CX-007147: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    CX-007147: Categorical Exclusion Determination Flagstaff Substation Breaker Replacement & Control Cable Addition CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 02182011 Location(s): Coconino County, ...

  17. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Wyoming | Department of...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Amended Boysen-Thermopolis 115 Kilovolt Transmission Line Structure Replacement Project ... Determination Happy Jack 230 Kilovolt Substation Fiber Optic Installation Laramie ...

  18. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Bonneville Power Administration...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Coyote Hills Radio Station Electrical Service Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B4.13 ... November 12, 2015 CX-014377: Categorical Exclusion Determination Olympia Substation ...

  19. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Montana | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    ... BPA Idaho Falls District 2015 Wood Pole Replacement and Access Road Maintenance CX(s) ... March 11, 2015 CX-013448: Categorical Exclusion Determination Taft Substation Retaining ...

  20. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Nebraska | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    ... February 10, 2014 CX-012081: Categorical Exclusion Determination Kimball Substation KY1A Transformer Replacement and Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 02102014 ...

  1. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Southwestern Power Administratio...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    NERC Alert Phase III Transmission Line Structure Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B4.6 ... May 5, 2014 CX-012212: Categorical Exclusion Determination Doniphan Substation Backup ...

  2. Hydac: Noncompliance Determination (2012-SE-4107)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Hydac Technology Corporation finding that a variety of electric motor basic models do not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  3. Mueller Streamline: Noncompliance Determination (2011-SW-2802)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Mueller Streamline Co. finding that faucet model 120-003NL does not comport with the water conservation standards.

  4. Whirlpool: Noncompliance Determination (2013-SE-1420)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Whirlpool Corporation finding that refrigerator-freezer basic model 8TAR81 does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  5. CX-100654 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-100654 Categorical Exclusion Determination Fuel Cell Systems Analysis Award Number: ... Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) fuel cell power plants for vehicles and buses. ...

  6. CX-000321: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-000321: Categorical Exclusion Determination Kentucky Revision 2 - Green and Healthy ...232009 Location(s): Kentucky Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, National ...

  7. CX-000322: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-000322: Categorical Exclusion Determination Kentucky Revision 2 - Green Bank of Kentucky Date: 11232009 Location(s): Kentucky Office(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable ...

  8. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Environmental Management Consolidated

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Business Service Center | Department of Energy Consolidated Business Service Center Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Environmental Management Consolidated Business Service Center Categorical Exclusion Determinations issued by Environmental Management Consolidated Business Service Center. DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD No downloads found for this office.

  9. Determination Of Ph Including Hemoglobin Correction

    DOEpatents

    Maynard, John D.; Hendee, Shonn P.; Rohrscheib, Mark R.; Nunez, David; Alam, M. Kathleen; Franke, James E.; Kemeny, Gabor J.

    2005-09-13

    Methods and apparatuses of determining the pH of a sample. A method can comprise determining an infrared spectrum of the sample, and determining the hemoglobin concentration of the sample. The hemoglobin concentration and the infrared spectrum can then be used to determine the pH of the sample. In some embodiments, the hemoglobin concentration can be used to select an model relating infrared spectra to pH that is applicable at the determined hemoglobin concentration. In other embodiments, a model relating hemoglobin concentration and infrared spectra to pH can be used. An apparatus according to the present invention can comprise an illumination system, adapted to supply radiation to a sample; a collection system, adapted to collect radiation expressed from the sample responsive to the incident radiation; and an analysis system, adapted to relate information about the incident radiation, the expressed radiation, and the hemoglobin concentration of the sample to pH.

  10. Determining Price Reasonableness in Federal ESPCs

    SciTech Connect

    Shonder, J.A.

    2005-03-08

    This document reports the findings and implementation recommendations of the Price Reasonableness Working Group to the Federal ESPC Steering Committee. The working group was formed to address concerns of agencies and oversight organizations related to pricing and fair and reasonable price determination in federal energy savings performance contracts (ESPCs). This report comprises the working group's recommendations and is the proposed draft of a training curriculum on fair and reasonable price determination for users of federal ESPCs. The report includes: (1) A review of federal regulations applicable to determining price reasonableness of federal ESPCs (section 2), (2) Brief descriptions of the techniques described in Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) 15.404-1 and their applicability to ESPCs (section 3), and (3) Recommended strategies and procedures for cost-effectively completing price reasonableness determinations (sections 4). Agencies have struggled with fair and reasonable price determinations in their ESPCs primarily because this alternative financing vehicle is relatively new and relatively rare in the federal sector. The methods of determining price reasonableness most familiar to federal contracting officers (price competition based on the government's design and specifications, in particular) are generally not applicable to ESPCs. The regulatory requirements for determining price reasonableness in federal ESPCs have also been misunderstood, as federal procurement professionals who are inexperienced with ESPCs are further confused by multiple directives, including Executive Order 13123, which stresses life-cycle cost-effectiveness. Uncertainty about applicable regulations and inconsistent practice and documentation among agencies have fueled claims that price reasonableness determinations have not been sufficiently rigorous in federal ESPCs or that the prices paid in ESPCs are generally higher than the prices paid for similar goods and services

  11. Hicon: Noncompliance Determination (2013-SE-1426)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Ningbo Hicon International Industry Company, Ltd. finding that model number BD-200, a compact chest freezer, does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  12. CX-100389 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-100389 Categorical Exclusion Determination Magnetic Communication Network for Smart Photovoltaic Solar Power Modules Award Number: DE- EE-0007194 CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.15, B5.16 ...

  13. CX-012612: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    CX-012612: Categorical Exclusion Determination Remove Two Sets of Railroad Tracks on Road ... Remove two sets of railroad tracks ( Crossings 3 & 4) on Road D in A-Area. Document(s) ...

  14. CX-100021: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-100021: Categorical Exclusion Determination National Wind Technology Center Road Repairs; NREL Tracking No. 14-016 Award Number: DE-AC36-08GO28308 CX(s) Applied: DOEEA-1914 ...

  15. CX-005069: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-005069: Categorical Exclusion Determination Shuttle Service to South Golden Road RTD Bus Stop CX(s) Applied: A7 Date: 01202011 Location(s): Golden, Colorado Office(s): Energy ...

  16. Friedrich: Noncompliance Determination (2014-SE-15010)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Friedrich Air Conditioning Co. finding that room air conditioner basic model SQ10N10 does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  17. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Office of River Protection...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    ... May 21, 2014 CX-012209: Categorical Exclusion Determination Small-Scale Research and Development Projects Using Nanoscale Materials, 300 Area CX(s) Applied: B3.15 Date: 05212014 ...

  18. CX-008551: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-008551: Categorical Exclusion Determination 1366 Project Silicon: Reclaiming US Silicon Photovoltaic Leadership CX(s) Applied: A9, B1.31, B3.6, B5.1 Date: 06212012 ...

  19. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Golden Field Office | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    31, 2015 CX-100349 Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Trough with Lower-cost System-architecture (ATLAS) Award Number: DE-EE0007121 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6, B5.17...

  20. Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    31, 2015 CX-100349 Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Trough with Lower-cost System-architecture (ATLAS) Award Number: DE-EE0007121 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6, B5.17...

  1. CX-001062: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Exclusion Determination High-Temperature, High-Pressure Devices for Zonal Isolation in Geothermal Wells CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 03102010 Location(s): Lafayette, Colorado...

  2. Fuzhou Sunlight: Noncompliance Determination (2010-SE-1402)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Fuzhou Sunlight Lighting Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. finding that a variety of models of incandescent reflector lamps do not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  3. CX-007529: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-007529: Categorical Exclusion Determination Missouri-City-St. Charles CX(s) Applied: ... efficient lighting at City Hall, 2) develop and write "green" building codes for the city. ...

  4. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Golden Field Office | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Determination Current Energy Harnessing using Synergistic Kinematics of Schools of Fish-Shaped Bodies Award Number: DE-EE0006780 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 12112014...

  5. Sunshine Lighting: Noncompliance Determination (2014-SE-54008)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Sunshine Lighting Company finding that Sunlite brand metal halide lamp fixture basic models 04937-SU, 04938-SU, 04952 SU, and 04956 SU do not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  6. CX-010658: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    CX-010658: Categorical Exclusion Determination Analytical Development Laser Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06172013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River ...

  7. YMGI: Noncompliance Determination (2011-SCE-1605)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to YMGI Group, LLC, finding that YMGI's through-the-wall split system central air conditioner basic model TTWC-18K-31B fails to meet applicable DOE energy conservation standards.

  8. CX-100743 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-100743 Categorical Exclusion Determination Biomass Gasification for Chemicals Production Using Chemical Looping Techniques Award Number: DE-EE0007530 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 ...

  9. CX-100230 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-100230 Categorical Exclusion Determination Advanced Energy Harvesting Control Schemes for Marine Renewable Energy Devices Award Number: DE-EE0006397 CX(s) Applied: B5.25 Water ...

  10. CX-008246: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-008246: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: Tennessee Energy Efficient Schools Initiative Ground Source Heat Pump Program CX(s) Applied: A9, B2.1, B5.19 Date: 05...

  11. CX-008246: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Determination Recovery Act: Tennessee Energy Efficient Schools Initiative Ground Source Heat Pump Program CX(s) Applied: A9, B2.1, B5.19 Date: 05152012 Location(s): Tennessee...

  12. CX-010792: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-010792: Categorical Exclusion Determination Gulf of Mexico Miocene Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Site Characterization Mega Transect - Task 8 CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11 Date: 08142013 ...

  13. Bigwall: Noncompliance Determination (2013-SE-1412)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Bigwall Enterprises, Inc. finding that freezer model W1CF106 under the Wellington brand (''the Wellington W1CF106") does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  14. Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Categorical Exclusion Determination Reducing Soft Costs through Hardware Innovation - Phase II Award Number: DE- EE-0007199 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Solar Energy Technologies...

  15. CX-009911: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-009911: Categorical Exclusion Determination Geothermal Retrofit of Illinois National Guard's State Headquarters Building CX(s) Applied: A9, B2.1, B5.19 Date: 01142013 ...

  16. Victory: Noncompliance Determination (2015-SE-42033) | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Victory Refrigeration finding that commercial refrigeration equipment basic model number RFS-1D-S1-EW-PT-HD (including each ...

  17. Demagnetization using a determined estimated magnetic state

    DOEpatents

    Denis, Ronald J; Makowski, Nathanael J

    2015-01-13

    A method for demagnetizing comprising positioning a core within the electromagnetic field generated by a first winding until the generated first electrical current is not substantially increasing, thereby determining a saturation current. A second voltage, having the opposite polarity, is then applied across the first winding until the generated second electrical current is approximately equal to the magnitude of the determined saturation current. The maximum magnetic flux within the core is then determined using the voltage across said first winding and the second current. A third voltage, having the opposite polarity, is then applied across the first winding until the core has a magnetic flux equal to approximately half of the determined maximum magnetic flux within the core.

  18. CX-012251: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-012251: Categorical Exclusion Determination A Hybrid Catalytic Route to Fuels from Biomass Syngas CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 05292014 Location(s): Georgia, Illinois Offices(s): ...

  19. Patterson: Noncompliance Determination (2011-SW-2911)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Dan Patterson finding that the "ThunderHead" showerhead basic model manufactured by ET Industries, Inc. and imported by Dan Patterson does not comport with the water conservation standards.

  20. CX-100270 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Determination Proposed Rulemaking for Energy Conservation Standards for Ceiling Fan Light Kits RIN: 1904-AC87 CX(s) Applied: B5.1 EERE- Buildings Technology Program Date:...

  1. Precision: Noncompliance Determination (2013-SE-1410)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Precision Trading Corp. finding that Precision brand model Premium PFR515M, a freezer, does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  2. FY 14 Award Fee Determination Scorecard

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    14 Award Fee Determination Scorecard Contractor: Swift and Staley Inc. (SST) Contract: DE-AC30-10CC40021 Award Period: October 1,2013 - September 30,2014 Basis of Evaluation: FY 14 ...

  3. Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determinations By Date | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Categorical Exclusion Determination Highly Active, Durable, and Ultra-low PGM NSTF Thin Film ORR Catalysts and Supports Award Number: DE-FOA-0007270 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6...

  4. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Golden Field Office | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Categorical Exclusion Determination Highly Active, Durable, and Ultra-low PGM NSTF Thin Film ORR Catalysts and Supports Award Number: DE-FOA-0007270 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6...

  5. Golden Opportunity: Noncompliance Determination (2013-SE-1418)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Golden Opportunity, Inc. finding that freezer models Golden GFC51 and Golden GFC69 do not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  6. Goodman Manufacturing: Noncompliance Determination (2011-SE-4301)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Goodman Manufacturing finding that model CPC180XXX3BXXXAA (CPC180*) of commercial package air conditioner does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  7. CX-012666: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-012666: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carib Energy (USA) LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.7 Date: 41789 Location(s): Florida Offices(s): Fossil Energy Carib Energy (USA), LLC, a ...

  8. Midea: Noncompliance Determination (2012-SE-1404)

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Midea America Corp. finding that basic models UL-WD195-D and UL-WD145-D of freezers do not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  9. CX-100236 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-100236 Categorical Exclusion Determination Ocean Energy Demonstration of the Ocean Energy (OE) Buoy at US Navy's Wave Energy Test Site Award Number: DE-EE0006924 CX(s) Applied: ...

  10. CX-002682: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-002682: Categorical Exclusion Determination Landfill Gas Utilization Project CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 06082010 Location(s): Madison County, New York Office(s): Energy ...

  11. LG: Noncompliance Determination (2014-SE-15011)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to LG Electronics USA, Inc. finding that room air conditioner basic model LT143CNR does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  12. Central Moloney: Noncompliance Determination (2013-SE-4702)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Central Moloney, Inc. finding that liquid-immersed distribution transformer basic models 30300150 and 32500095 do not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  13. CX-100326 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-100326 Categorical Exclusion Determination STM and NWTC Biocontrol for Noxious Weeds, NREL Tracking No. 15-028 Award Number: DE-AC36-08GO28308 CX(s) Applied: DOEEA-1914, DOE...

  14. CX-100273 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-100273 Categorical Exclusion Determination RSF Visitor Parking Lot Low Beam Hazards Retrofit; NREL Tracking No. 15-018 Award Number: DE-AC36-08GO28308 CX(s) Applied: B1.16, ...

  15. CX-100643 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-100643 Categorical Exclusion Determination NWTC Diesel Storage Tank; NREL Tracking No. 16-015 Award Number: DE-AC36-08GO28308 CX(s) Applied: DOEEA-1914, B1.15 National ...

  16. CX-100101: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-100101: Categorical Exclusion Determination Laufer Wind Group NWTC Structure Lighting Tests; NREL Tracking No. 13-014 Award Number: DE-AC36-08GO28308 CX(s) Applied: A9, B1.31, ...

  17. CX-100252 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-100252 Categorical Exclusion Determination NREL - NWTC Site 3.3 Cable Repair; NREL Tracking No. 15-019 Award Number: DE-AC36-08GO28308 DOEEA 1914 (NREL NWTC) National Renewable ...

  18. Philips: Noncompliance Determination (2014-SE-48006)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Philips Lighting North America Corp. finding that a variety of illuminated exit sign models do not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  19. Aspen: Noncompliance Determination (2010-SE-0305)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Aspen Manufacturing finding that a variety of basic models of split-system air conditioning heat pumps do not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  20. Philips: Noncompliance Determination (2012-SE-2605)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Philips Lighting Electronics N. A. finding that basic model VEL-I S40-SC, a fluorescent lamp ballast, does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  1. Cone Penetrometer N Factor Determination Testing Results

    SciTech Connect

    Follett, Jordan R.

    2014-03-05

    This document contains the results of testing activities to determine the empirical 'N Factor' for the cone penetrometer in kaolin clay simulant. The N Factor is used to releate resistance measurements taken with the cone penetrometer to shear strength.

  2. Engineered Products: Noncompliance Determination (2012-SE-5401)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Engineered Products Company finding that basic model 15701 of metal halide lamp fixture does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  3. Lutron Electronics: Noncompliance Determination (2012-SE-3796)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Lutron Electronics Co., Inc. finding that a variety of Class A external power supply basic models do not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  4. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Legacy Management | Department...

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    September 14, 2015 CX-014191: Categorical Exclusion Determination Lease of the Cabin Portion of Building 12, Grand Junction, Colorado, Site CX(s) Applied: B1.24, B1.25 Date: 0914...

  5. CX-001013: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    CX-001013: Categorical Exclusion Determination Resource Conservation and a Sustainable Las Vegas CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 03012010 Location(s): Las Vegas, Nevada Office(s): ...

  6. CX-005286: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-005286: Categorical Exclusion Determination North Carolina-City-Fayetteville CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B1.32, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 02172011 Location(s): Fayetteville, North Carolina ...

  7. CX-006218: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-006218: Categorical Exclusion Determination Aptera All-Electric and Hybrid Electric Vehicles CX(s) Applied: B1.31, B5.1 Date: 06202011 Location(s): Grand Rapids, Michigan ...

  8. Midea: Noncompliance Determination (2010-SE-0110)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Midea America Corporation finding that basic model number HS-390C, a chest freezer, does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  9. Felix Storch: Noncompliance Determination (2011-SE-1420)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Felix Storch, Inc., finding that model number CF11ES, a chest freezer does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  10. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: NNSA-Headquarters | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    February 8, 2013 CX-010705: Categorical Exclusion Determination National Laser Facility Program Funding Opportunity CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, B3.6 Date: 02082013 Location(s): ...

  11. WAI Contract & Fee Determination | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    It is contract DE-EM0000323, and it includes all sections through MOD80. PDF icon WAI Contract (DE-EM0000323) PDF icon Fee determination letter (Oct. 2014) More Documents & ...

  12. CX-008824: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-008824: Categorical Exclusion Determination X-608 Well Field Transfer CX(s) Applied: ... The wells, well pumps and related underground piping are located within the X-608 well ...

  13. Haier: Noncompliance Determination (2011-SE-1408)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Haier America Trading, L.L.C. finding that model number HNCM070, a chest freezer, does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  14. Haier: Noncompliance Determination (2011-SE-1428)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Haier America Trading, LLC finding that Haier model HMCM106EA, a freezer, does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  15. Mile High: Noncompliance Determination (2012-SE-4501)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Mile High Equipment, LLC finding that Ice-O-Matic brand automatic commercial ice maker basic model ICE2106 FW, HW does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  16. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: New York | Department of...

    Energy Saver

    ... February 26, 2016 CX-100505 Categorical Exclusion Determination Watt-sun: A Multi-scale, ... EE-0007274 CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Fuel Cell Technologies Office Date: 11032015 ...

  17. Sanyo: Noncompliance Determination (2013-SE-1428)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Sanyo E & E Corporation finding that model number SBC-500, a compact refrigerator with manual defrost, does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  18. Simkar: Noncompliance Determination (2012-SE-5408)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Simkar Corporation finding that magnetic probe-start and pulse-start basic models of metal halide lamp fixtures do not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  19. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: New Mexico | Department...

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    May 19, 2016 CX-100613 Categorical Exclusion Determination Workplace and Fleet Electric Charging Stations on New Mexico State Property Award Number: DE-EE0006218 CX(s) Applied: ...

  20. CX-005472: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Energy Saver

    CX-005472: Categorical Exclusion Determination Charging Stations - McCollum Park CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 03142011 Location(s): Everett, Washington Office(s): Energy Efficiency ...

  1. Bu Sung: Noncompliance Determination (2015-SE-42007)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Bu Sung America Corporation d/b/a Everest Refrigeration finding that basic model ESRF2, a commercial refrigerator-freezer does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  2. CX-007065: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Categorical Exclusion Determination Slipstream Pilot-Scale Demonstration of a Novel Amine-Based Post-Combustion Technology for Carbon Dioxide Capture CX(s) Applied: B3.6...

  3. Everest Refrigeration: Noncompliance Determination (2015-SE-42001)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Bu Sung America Corporation (dba Everest Refrigeration) finding that commercial refrigeration equipment model number ESGR3 does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  4. Traulsen: Noncompliance Determination (2015-SE-42002)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Traulsen – ITW Food Group, LLC finding that commercial refrigeration equipment basic model number RDT132DUT-HHS does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  5. Seaga: Noncompliance Determination (2015-SE-52001)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Seaga Manufacturing, Inc. finding that the refrigerated bottle and canned beverage vending machine (BVM) basic model with name plate model SP536R does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  6. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Idaho Operations Office...

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    Stack Modifications for Sample Probe Replacement CX(s) Applied: B2.2 Date: 05112015 ... Determination Test Reactor Area-774 Substation Equipment Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B2.5 ...

  7. CX-013631: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-013631: Categorical Exclusion Determination Alvey Substation 230-Kilovolt Reactor Replacement CX(s) Applied: B4.11 Date: 04242015 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville ...

  8. Maxx: Noncompliance Determination (2012-SE-4506)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Maxx Cold Food Service finding that automatic commercial ice maker model MIM450 does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  9. Universal: Noncompliance Determination (2013-SE-26004)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Universal Lighting Technologies, Inc. finding that fluorescent lamp ballast model B140R277HP does not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  10. Cooper: Noncompliance Determination (2012-SE-4701)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Cooper Power Systems, LLC finding that basic models 277-99.28, 277-99.26, and 277-99.22 of distribution transformers do not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  11. Harrington: Noncompliance Determination (2014-SW-28011)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Harrington Brass Works finding that kitchen faucet individual model 20-210-026 does not comport with the water conservation standards.

  12. Whirlpool: Compliance Determination (2010-SE-0103)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Compliance Determination to Whirlpool Corporation after DOE testing confirmed that the Maytag refrigerator-freezer model MSD2578VE comports with the applicable energy conservation standard.

  13. Bigwall: Noncompliance Determination (2014-SE-15006)

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE issued a Notice of Noncompliance Determination to Bigwall Enterprises, Inc. finding that PerfectAire brand model PACH8000 ("Bigwall model PACH8000") of room air conditioners do not comport with the energy conservation standards.

  14. CX-007373: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-007373: Categorical Exclusion Determination Minnesota-City-Lakeville CX(s) Applied: B1.32, B2.5, B5.1 Date: 11222011 Location(s): Minnesota Offices(s): Energy Efficiency and ...

  15. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Delaware | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    January 28, 2014 CX-011805: Categorical Exclusion Determination Carbon Dioxide Capture By Cold Membrane Operation with Actual Coal-Fired Power Plant Flue Gas CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, ...

  16. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Other Location | Department...

    Energy Saver

    ... July 30, 2013 CX-010829: Categorical Exclusion Determination Coil Tubing (CT) Drilling and Intervention System Using Cost-Effective Vessels (10121-4505-01) CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: ...

  17. Categorical Exclusion (CX) Determination Form | Department of...

    Energy Saver

    It also features an electronic means to submit categorical exclusion determinations for web posting. CXD-Form-2011Ver2.pdf (971.24 KB) More Documents & Publications CX-008030: ...

  18. Substrates and method for determining enzymes

    DOEpatents

    Smith, Robert E. (574 Escondido Cir., Livermore, CA 94550); Bissell, Eugene R. (101 Via Lucia, Alamo, CA 94507)

    1981-01-01

    A method is disclosed for determining the presence of an enzyme in a biological fluid, which includes the steps of contacting the fluid with a synthetic chromogenic substrate, which is an amino acid derivative of 7-amino-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin; incubating the substrate-containing fluid to effect enzymatic hydrolysis; and fluorometrically determining the presence of the free 7-amino-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin chromophore in the hydrolyzate.

  19. Quantitative determination of atmospheric hydroperoxyl radical

    DOEpatents

    Springston, Stephen R.; Lloyd, Judith; Zheng, Jun

    2007-10-23

    A method for the quantitative determination of atmospheric hydroperoxyl radical comprising: (a) contacting a liquid phase atmospheric sample with a chemiluminescent compound which luminesces on contact with hydroperoxyl radical; (b) determining luminescence intensity from the liquid phase atmospheric sample; and (c) comparing said luminescence intensity from the liquid phase atmospheric sample to a standard luminescence intensity for hydroperoxyl radical. An apparatus for automating the method is also included.

  20. CHPRC Fee Determination Summaries - Hanford Site

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    CHPRC Fee Determination Summaries DOE-RL Contracts/Procurements RL Contracts & Procurements Home Prime Contracts Current Solicitations Other Sources DOE RL Contracting Officers DOE RL Contracting Officer Representatives CHPRC Fee Determination Summaries Email Email Page | Print Print Page | Text Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size CHPRC Fiscal Year 2015 Fee Evaluation Summary CHPRC Fiscal Year 2014 Fee Evaluation Summary CHPRC Fiscal Year 2013 Fee Evaluation Summary CHPRC Fiscal Year 2012