National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for bryan mound cxs

  1. Sulphur Extraction at Bryan Mound

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Kirby, Carolyn L; Lord, Anna C. Snider

    2015-08-01

    The Bryan Mound caprock was subjected to extens ive sulphur mining prior to the development of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Undoubtedl y, the mining has modified the caprock integrity. Cavern wells at Bryan Mound have been subject to a host of well integr ity concerns with many likely compromised by the cavernous capro ck, surrounding corrosive environment (H 2 SO 4 ), and associated elevated residual temperatures al l of which are a product of the mining activities. The intent of this study was to understand the sulphur mining process and how the mining has affected the stability of the caprock and how the compromised caprock has influenced the integrity of the cavern wells. After an extensiv e search to collect pert inent information through state agencies, literature sear ches, and the Sandia SPR librar y, a better understanding of the caprock can be inferred from the knowledge gaine d. Specifically, the discovery of the original ore reserve map goes a long way towards modeling caprock stability. In addition the gained knowledge of sulphur mining - subs idence, superheated corrosive wa ters, and caprock collapse - helps to better predict the post mi ning effects on wellbore integrity. This page intentionally left blank

  2. Bryan Mound SPR cavern 113 remedial leach stage 1 analysis. ...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Title: Bryan Mound SPR cavern 113 remedial leach stage 1 analysis. The U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve implemented the first stage of a leach plan in 2011-2012 to expand storage ...

  3. Investigation of the September 13, 2011, Fatality at the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Bryan Mound Site

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    On September 13, 2011, a recently-hired, untrained subcontractor employee struck three large elevated pipes while operating a front deck mower at the Cavern 5 area of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Bryan Mound (SPR-BM) site.

  4. Conversion of the Bryan Mound geological site characterization reports to a three-dimensional model.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Stein, Joshua S.; Rautman, Christopher Arthur

    2005-04-01

    The Bryan Mound salt dome, located near Freeport, Texas, is home to one of four underground crude oil-storage facilities managed by the U. S. Department of Energy Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) Program. Sandia National Laboratories, as the geotechnical advisor to the SPR, conducts site-characterization investigations and other longer-term geotechnical and engineering studies in support of the program. This report describes the conversion of two-dimensional geologic interpretations of the Bryan Mound site into three-dimensional geologic models. The new models include the geometry of the salt dome, the surrounding sedimentary units, mapped faults, and the 20 oil-storage caverns at the site. This work provides an internally consistent geologic model of the Bryan Mound site that can be used in support of future work.

  5. EIS-0001: Strategic Petroleum Reserve, Bryan Mound Salt Dome, Brazoria County, Texas

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Strategic Petroleum Reserve prepared this SEIS to address the environmental impacts of construction and operation of two types of brine disposal systems and a new water supply system. This EIS supplements FES 76/77-6, Bryan Mound Storage Site.

  6. Chemistry and mineralogy of samples from the strategic petroleum reserve Bryan Mound site

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Bild, R. W.

    1980-08-01

    The goal of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) program is to protect the United States from a temporary cutoff of imported crude oil by stockpiling a reserve of oil in caverns in Gulf Coast salt domes. Some suitable caverns already exist as a result of solution mining activities by commercial mining companies. Most of the caverns for the program, however, will be solution mined specifically for the SPR program. The tasks assigned to Sandia National Laboratories include conducting a geotechnical program and providing interim technical support for the leaching of the first five caverns in the Bryan Mound, Texas, salt dome. This report describes chemical, mineralogical and petrological work done at Sandia as of May 1, 1980 in support of Bryan Mound activities. Samples of Bryan Mound salt cores, sidewall samples and drill cuttings have been subjected to chemical, mineralogical and petrographic analysis. Halite (NaCl) was the major mineral in all samples with anhydrite (CaSO/sub 4/) a common accessory. Minor or trace sylvite (KCl) and quartz (SiO/sub 2/) were detected in some sidewall samples. Other minor minerals found in drill cuttings included quartz; mixed carbonates of Fe, Ca and Mg; and several iron oxides. Possibly the carbonates are reaction products with the basic drilling mud or possibly pieces of caprock which contaminated the cuttings. The iron oxides were probably produced by corrosion of the drill stem or bit. Densities of several core samples were determined and insoluble residue was counted for radioactivity.

  7. Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) additional geologic site characterization studies, Bryan Mound Salt Dome, Texas

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Neal, J.T.; Magorian, T.R.; Ahmad, S.

    1994-11-01

    This report revises the original report that was published in 1980. Some of the topics covered in the earlier report were provisional and it is now practicable to reexamine them using new or revised geotechnical data and that obtained from SPR cavern operations, which involves 16 new caverns. Revised structure maps and sections show interpretative differences as compared with the 1980 report and more definition in the dome shape and caprock structural contours, especially a major southeast-northwest trending anomalous zone. The original interpretation was of westward tilt of the dome, this revision shows a tilt to the southeast, consistent with other gravity and seismic data. This interpretation refines the evaluation of additional cavern space, by adding more salt buffer and allowing several more caverns. Additional storage space is constrained on this nearly full dome because of low-lying peripheral wetlands, but 60 MMBBL or more of additional volume could be gained in six or more new caverns. Subsidence values at Bryan Mound are among the lowest in the SPR system, averaging about 11 mm/yr (0.4 in/yr), but measurement and interpretation issues persist, as observed values are about the same as survey measurement accuracy. Periodic flooding is a continuing threat because of the coastal proximity and because peripheral portions of the site are at elevations less than 15 ft. This threat may increase slightly as future subsidence lowers the surface, but the amount is apt to be small. Caprock integrity may be affected by structural features, especially the faulting associated with anomalous zones. Injection wells have not been used extensively at Bryan Mound, but could be a practicable solution to future brine disposal needs. Environmental issues center on the areas of low elevation that are below 15 feet above mean sea level: the coastal proximity and lowland environment combined with the potential for flooding create conditions that require continuing surveillance.

  8. Evaluation of brine disposal from the Bryan Mound site of the strategic petroleum reserve program. Final report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Case, Robert J.; Chittenden, Jr, Mark E.; Harper, Jr, Donald E.; Kelly, Jr, Francis J.; Loeblich, Laurel A.; McKinney, Larry D.; Minello, Thomas J.; Park, E. Taisoo; Randall, Robert E.; Slowey, J. Frank

    1981-01-01

    On March 10, 1980, the Department of Energy's Strategic Petroleum Reserve Program began leaching the Bryan Mound salt dome and discharging the resulting brine into the coastal waters off Freeport, Texas. During the months of March and April, a team of scientists and engineers from Texas A and M University conducted an intensive environmental study of the area surrounding the diffuser site. A pipeline has been laid from the Bryan Mound site to a location 12.5 statute miles (20 km) offshore. The last 3060 ft (933 m) of this pipeline is a 52-port diffuser through which brine can be discharged at a maximum rate of 680,000 barrels per day. Initially, 16 ports were open which permitted a maximum discharge rate of 350,000 barrels per day and a continuous brine discharge was achieved on March 13, 1980. The purpose of this report is to describe the findings of the project team during the intensive postdisposal study period of March and April, 1980. The major areas of investigation are physical oceanography, analysis of the discharge plume, water and sediment quality, nekton, benthos, phytoplankton, zooplankton, and data management.

  9. Environmental assessment of the brine pipeline replacement for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Bryan Mound Facility in Brazoria County, Texas

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1993-09-01

    The Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA), DOE/EA-0804, for the proposed replacement of a deteriorated brine disposal pipeline from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) Bryan Mound storage facility in Brazoria County, Texas, into the Gulf of Mexico. In addition, the ocean discharge outfall would be moved shoreward by locating the brine diffuser at the end of the pipeline 3.5 miles offshore at a minimum depth of 30 feet. The action would occur in a floodplain and wetlands; therefore, a floodplain/wetlands assessment has been prepared in conjunction with this EA. Based on the analyses in the EA, DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 USC. 4321, et seg.). Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required, and the Department is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). This FONSI also includes a Floodplain Statement of Findings in accordance with 10 CFR Part 1022.

  10. Offshore oceanographic and environmental monitoring services for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Volume I. Appendices. Annual report for the Bryan Mound Site, September 1982-August 1983

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1984-03-01

    The Department of Energy's Strategic Petroleum Reserve Program began leaching the Bryan Mound salt dome and discharging brine into the coastal waters offshore of Freeport, Texas on March 10, 1980. This report describes the findings of a team of Texas A and M University scientists and engineers who have conducted a study to evaluate the effects of the Bryan Mound brine discharge on the marine environment. The study addresses the areas of physical oceanography, analysis of the discharge plume, water and sediment quality, nekton, benthos and data management. It focuses on the period from September 1982 through August 1983. The ambient physical environment and its temporal and spatial variability were studied by means of continuously recording in situ current/conductivitiy/temperature meters and twelve, one-day synoptic hydrographic cruises. The quarterly water and sediment quality data show a small increase in salinity, sodium and chloride ions occurs in the bottom waters and sediment pore waters near the diffuser relative to those values measured at stations farther away. Data from the brine plume study for this reporting study show the largest areal extent within the +1 o/oo above ambient salinity contour was 40.0 km/sup 2/ which occurred on August 11, 1983. It appears that brine disposal at Bryan Mound has had neglible if any influence on the nekton community surrounding the diffuser. The benthic quarterly data from 26 stations, including 7 collections made after the diffuser outflow rate was increased to 1,000,000 barrels/day, show the total numbers of species at the diffuser station were higher than most other nearfield stations as well as many farfield stations in both the pre- and post-1,000,000 barrels/day brine flow periods. 138 references, 175 figures, 53 tables.

  11. Shrimp and redfish studies, bryan mound brine disposal site off Freeport, Texas, 1979-1981. Volume IV. Interview sampling survey of shrimp catch and effort. Technical memo

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Johnson, M.F.

    1981-06-01

    An interview sampling survey of shrimp catch and fishing effort was conducted at specified ports along the Texas coast to strengthen the information base required to determine the effect of the disposal of brine from the Bryan Mound salt dome off Freeport, Texas on commercial brown shrimp (Penaeus aztecus) and white shrimp (Penaeus setiferus) populations in the Gulf of Mexico. The data recorded included port number, vessel name, official vessel number, shrimp dealer number, date of landing, area fished, depth of capture, days fished, and pounds of shrimp caught by species and size categories.

  12. A. Lawrence Bryan, Jr.

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    to the ecology, behavior and conservation of Wood Storks, including foraging ... Conservation Biology 14:414-419. Snodgrass, J.W., C.H. Jagoe, A.L. Bryan, Jr., H.A. Brant, ...

  13. Bryan Fry | Photosynthetic Antenna Research Center

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    Bryan Fry Bryan Fry Bryan Fry Graduate Student E-mail: bryanfry@mail.med.upenn.edu Website: University of Pennsylvania Graduate...

  14. Bryan Hannegan | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Bryan Hannegan About Us Bryan Hannegan - Associate Lab Director, Energy Systems Integration, at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory Most Recent Energy Systems Integration Facility Delivering on Promise to Strengthen America's Clean Energy Innovation September 1

  15. Bryan Wheeler | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Bryan Wheeler About Us Bryan Wheeler - Intern, Office of Science Bryan Wheeler was an intern in the Energy Department's Office of Science in the summer of 2011. He is currently a student at Johns Hopkins University Most Recent Maximizing Potential of Diesel and Gasoline for a Cleaner, More Efficient Engine September 27

  16. Rice, Bryan Joseph

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    The (4)He(gamma,dd) reaction at E(gamma) = 150--250 MeV Rice, Bryan Joseph ProQuest Dissertations and Theses; 1998; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) pg. n/a Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with

  17. Paul Bryan | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Bryan About Us Paul Bryan - Biomass Program Manager, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Paul Bryan is Program Manager for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy's Biomass Program. Most Recent Producing Clean, Renewable Diesel from Biomass November 30 The How's and Why's of Replacing the Whole Barrel October 19 Billion-Ton Update: Home-Grown Energy Resources Across the Nation August 1

  18. Bryan Mound SPR cavern 113 remedial leach stage 1 analysis. ...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    sonar surveys in order to aid in the analysis and offer projections of likely outcomes ... Sponsoring Org: USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Country of ...

  19. CX-004344: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bryan Mound Replace Interior and Exterior Entryway to Building 201CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 10/13/2010Location(s): Bryan Mound, TexasOffice(s): Fossil Energy, Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  20. William Bryan, OE-30 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    William Bryan, OE-30 About Us William Bryan, OE-30 - Deputy Assistant Secretary, Infrastructure Security & Energy Restoration Mr. Bryan is the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Infrastructure Security and Energy Restoration in the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE). The office of Infrastructure Security and Energy Restoration (ISER) works with the National Security Staff, other U.S. government agencies, and international partners to

  1. Lightning strike at Bryan, Ohio

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Nichols, B. E.

    1980-02-01

    A week before the 29 August 1979 dedication of the photovoltaic power system at daytime AM radio station WBNO, in Bryan, Ohio, a lightning superbolt struck the FM radio tower, one of two towers at the station. Minor damage to the station and to components of the photovoltaic system, the latter designed by MIT Lincoln Laboratory under US Department of Energy sponsorship, is described. This rare strike suggested the need for increased protection and more voltage-transient suppressors were added to those already in place as a preventive measure in the event that such a phenomenon reoccurs.

  2. Bryan County, Georgia: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Information (Open El) [EERE & EIA]

    Number 2 Climate Zone Subtype A. Places in Bryan County, Georgia Pembroke, Georgia Richmond Hill, Georgia Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgwindex.php?titleBryanCounty,Ge...

  3. Bryan Texas Utilities- SmartHOME Program

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Bryan Texas Utilities (BTU) SmartHOME Programs offers incentives to owners of single- and multi-family homes for insulation, windows, and solar screens.The incentive amount may not be less than...

  4. City of Bryan, Texas (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Information (Open El) [EERE & EIA]

    Texas (Utility Company) Jump to: navigation, search Name: City of Bryan Place: Texas Phone Number: (979) 821-5700 Website: www.btutilities.com Twitter: @CityofBryan Facebook:...

  5. Dr. Bryan Hannegan - Associate Laboratory Director, Energy Systems

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    Integration | NREL Bryan Hannegan - Associate Laboratory Director, Energy Systems Integration A photo of Bryan Hannegan In this role, Bryan Hannegan leads NREL's global initiative to optimize links between electricity, fuel, thermal, water, and communication networks in order to enable a more sustainable society. Prior to joining NREL, Hannegan held several research leadership positions in fossil energy, renewable energy, and environmental science and technology at the Electric Power

  6. Monsanto MOUND FACILITY

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Monsanto . MOUND FACILITY Operated for the United States Department of Energy March 26, 1981 Dr. William E. Mott, Director Environmental and Safety Engineering Division U. S. ...

  7. Mound Supports Galileo

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Monsanto Research Corporation

    1986-01-01

    This video describes the invention of Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators (RTGs) at Mound Laboratory, and radioisotope heat source production from 1 watt-thermal to 2400 watts-thermal. RTGs have been used in many space vehicles, but the RTG built for the Galileo mission to orbit Jupiter is the largest. This RTG unit will produce 4400 watts-thermal and convert to 300 watts-electric. The plutonium-238 heat source assembly and test at Mound is described. The RTGs are tested under simulated mission conditions. The RTG leakage radiation is carefully measured for background compensation for on-board radiation monitoring instruments.

  8. Mound, Ohio, Site Fact Sheet

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Mound, Ohio, Site This fact sheet provides information about the Mound, Ohio, Site. These sites are managed by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. Location of the Mound, Ohio, Site Site Description and History The Mound site 1 in Miamisburg, Ohio, named for a nearby Native American burial ground, is located approximately 10 miles southwest of Dayton, Ohio. The Great Miami River fows southwest

  9. Mound publications for 1991

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Nowka, Stephen L.

    1992-05-01

    This document is a compilation of all Mound formal technical publications and oral presentations for calendar year 1991. It is intended to serve as an aid to personnel in obtaining or referring to specific publications by giving the proper complete reference for each information item published during the year. Some items, such as proceedings publications, may have issue dates or periods of coverage prior to 1991; however, they were formally published during 1991.

  10. Mound facility physical characterization

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Tonne, W.R.; Alexander, B.M.; Cage, M.R.; Hase, E.H.; Schmidt, M.J.; Schneider, J.E.; Slusher, W.; Todd, J.E.

    1993-12-01

    The purpose of this report is to provide a baseline physical characterization of Mound`s facilities as of September 1993. The baseline characterizations are to be used in the development of long-term future use strategy development for the Mound site. This document describes the current missions and alternative future use scenarios for each building. Current mission descriptions cover facility capabilities, physical resources required to support operations, current safety envelope and current status of facilities. Future use scenarios identify potential alternative future uses, facility modifications required for likely use, facility modifications of other uses, changes to safety envelope for the likely use, cleanup criteria for each future use scenario, and disposition of surplus equipment. This Introductory Chapter includes an Executive Summary that contains narrative on the Functional Unit Material Condition, Current Facility Status, Listing of Buildings, Space Plans, Summary of Maintenance Program and Repair Backlog, Environmental Restoration, and Decontamination and Decommissioning Programs. Under Section B, Site Description, is a brief listing of the Site PS Development, as well as Current Utility Sources. Section C contains Site Assumptions. A Maintenance Program Overview, as well as Current Deficiencies, is contained within the Maintenance Program Chapter.

  11. CX-009212: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Replace Three Wood Poles-In-Kind at Bryan Mound West Gate CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 08/23/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  12. CX-011848: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bryan Mound Upgrade Wood to Steel Light Poles CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 02/14/2014 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  13. CX-008350: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Re-work Bryan Mound 30” Crude Oil Pipeline Mainline Valves CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 04/10/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  14. CX-009718: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace Brine Disposal System Header to Bryan Mound Brine Tank, GFE CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 12/11/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  15. CX-013886: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Remove Oil from Bryan Mound Crude Oil Tank BMT-4 Sump CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 07/06/2015 Location(s): None ProvidedOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  16. CX-014107: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace Windows on Big Hill and Bryan Mound Entry Portal Buildings CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 08/03/2015 Location(s): TexasOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  17. CX-009218: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace Sparge Piping at Bryan Mound Raw Water Intake Structure CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 09/20/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  18. CX-011223: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bryan Mound Brine Disposal Pump Replacement (Install) CX(s) Applied: B5.2 Date: 10/28/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  19. CX-010711: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bryan Mound Brine Disposal Pump Replacement CX(s) Applied: B5.2 Date: 07/03/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  20. CX-007513: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Record of Categorical Exclusion for Driver Inspection of Bryan Mound 36 inch Raw Water Pipeline CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 12/20/2011 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  1. CX-009509: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Power Monitoring, Communication and Control Upgrade at Bryan Mound Degas Plant (Install) CX(s) Applied: B1.7 Date: 10/31/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  2. CX-014467: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Clean Bryan Mound Crude Oil Tank, BMT-4 (BM-MM-738B) CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 11/11/2015 Location(s): Multiple LocationsOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  3. CX-009792: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Video Inspection of Bryan Mound 36-inch Raw Water Pipeline CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 01/07/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  4. CX-009511: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Alternate Source of Firewater at Bryan Mound CX(s) Applied: B5.2 Date: 11/05/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  5. CX-012731: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace Windows of Bryan Mound Portal Building #281 CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41884 Location(s): TexasOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  6. CX-014288: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Dredging of Bryan Mound Raw Water Intake Structure Inlet Channel CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 09/28/2015 Location(s): TexasOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  7. CX-013883: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Clean Bryan Mound Crude Oil Tank, BMT-4 CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 07/06/2015 Location(s): None ProvidedOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  8. EIS-0014: Mound Facility, Miamisburg, Ohio

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy prepared this EIS to assess the environmental implications of its continuing and future programs at the Mound Facility (formerly designated Mound Laboratory), located in Miamisburg, Ohio.

  9. Evaluation of brine disposal from the Bryan Mound site of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Program. Final report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hann, R.W. Jr.; Randall, R.E.

    1980-12-01

    The purpose of this report is to describe the environmental conditions found by the principal investigators during the predisposal study conducted from September 1977 through February 1980 prior to the start of brine discharge in March 1980. The major areas of investigation are physical oceanography, analysis of the discharge plume, water and sediment quality, nekton, benthos, phytoplankton, zooplankton, and data management. Volume 1 describes the results of the predisposal study, and it is divided into eight chapters entitled: Physical Oceanography, Analysis of the Discharge Plume, Water and Sediment Quality, Nekton, Benthos, Zooplankton, Phytoplankton, and Data Management. Volume 2 consists of appendices which contain additional supporting data in the form of figures and tables.

  10. Microsoft Word - 20110322_MoundNotice.docx

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Legal Notice for Mound Site 2011 CERCLA Five-Year Review has been removed from the LM website. This document is outdated and no longer neededrequired...

  11. Mound Site Community Involvement Plan 2012

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Involvement Plan for the U.S. Department of Energy Mound, Ohio, Site January 2015 LMS/MND/S02885-0.0 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy Mound Community Involvement Plan January 2015 Doc. No. S02885-0.0 Page i Contents Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................. ii 1.0 Purpose and Introduction

  12. Reindustrialization Workshop Held at Mound Site

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has partnered with local communities to determine the best reuse of land, assets, and facilities, and the Mound-site community is no exception. In May, DOE’s...

  13. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Mound Site

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ohio Mound, Ohio, Site Site Documents and Links All documents are Adobe Acrobat files. pdf_icon Key Documents Fact Sheet Annual Institutional Controls Report Community Involvement Plan Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Plan Operations and Maintenance Plan Internal Links Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Administrative Records External Links Mound Development Corporation (MDC) Ohio Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Environmental Protection

  14. Enforcement Letter, EG&G Mound Applied Technologies- August 22, 1996

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Issued to EG&G Mound Applied Technologies related to the Inadvertent Transfer of Radiological Contamination at the Mound Plant

  15. City of Blue Mound, Kansas (Utility Company) | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Information (Open El) [EERE & EIA]

    Mound, Kansas (Utility Company) Jump to: navigation, search Name: City of Blue Mound Place: Kansas Phone Number: (913) 756-2447 Outage Hotline: (913) 756-2447 References: EIA Form...

  16. Mound, Ohio, Second Five-Year Review

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Report Second Five-Year Review for the Mound, Ohio, Site Miamisburg, Ohio September 2006 Office of Legacy Management DOE M/1308-2006 -L Work Performed Under DOE Contract No. for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management. DE-AC01-02GJ79491 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Office of Legacy Management Office of Legacy Management Office of Legacy Management U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy Mound, Ohio, Second Five-Year Review September 2006

  17. "Conflict Between Economic Growth and Environmental Protection", Dr. Bryan

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    Czech, resident, Center for the Advancement of the Steady State of the Economy | Princeton Plasma Physics Lab 9, 2012, 4:15pm Colloquia MBG Auditorium "Conflict Between Economic Growth and Environmental Protection", Dr. Bryan Czech, resident, Center for the Advancement of the Steady State of the Economy Presentation: Office presentation icon Presentation Abstract: PDF icon Abstract Conflict Between Economic Growth and Environmental Protectio Colloquium Committee: The Princeton

  18. Investigation of the September 13, 2011, Fatality at the Strategic...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    September 13, 2011, Fatality at the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Bryan Mound Site Investigation of the September 13, 2011, Fatality at the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Bryan Mound ...

  19. Mound site environmental report for calendar year 1991

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Bauer, L.R.

    1992-06-01

    Mound is a government-owned facility operated by EG&G Mound Applied Technologies for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). This integrated production, development, and research site performs work in support of DOE`s weapon and energy related programs, with emphasis on explosive, nuclear, and energy technology. The purpose of this report is to inform the public about the impact of Mound`s operations on the population and the environment. This report summarizes data from the Environmental Monitoring Program, through which Mound maintains continuous surveillance of radiological and nonradiological substances released from the facility.

  20. Independent technical review of the Mound Plant

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-06-01

    This report documents an Independent Technical Review (ITR) of the facilities, organizations, plans, and activities required to transition particular elements of the Mound Plant from Defense Program (DP) funded operation as appropriate either to community developed reuse or safe deactivation leading to decontamination and decommissioning (D&D). The review was conducted at the request of the Dr. Willis Bixby, Deputy Assistant Secretary, U.S. Department of Energy EM-60, Office of Facility Transition and Management and is a consensus of the nine member ITR Team. Information for the review was drawn from documents provided to the ITR Team by the Miamisburg Area Office (MB) of the DOE, EG&G, the City of Miamisburg, and others; and from presentations, discussions, interviews, and facility inspections at the Mound Plant during the weeks of March 14 and March 28, 1994. During the week of April 25, 1994, the ITR Team met at Los Alamos, New Mexico to develop consensus recommendations. A presentation of the core recommendations was made at the Mound Plant on May 5, 1994. This is an independent assessment of information available to, and used by, the Mound Plant personnel. Repetition of the information is not meant to imply discovery by the ITR Team. Team members, however, acting as independent reviewers, frequently assess the information from a perspective that differs significantly from that of the Mound Plant personnel. The report is based on information obtained and conditions observed during the March 1994 review interval. The ITR process and normal site work often initiate rapid, beneficial changes in understanding and organization immediately following the review. These changes frequently alter conditions observed during the review, but the report does not address changes subsequent to the review interval.

  1. CX-013440: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Record of Categorical Exclusion Determination to Replace Piping Header at Bryan Mound RWIS and RWIP (BM-MM-1027) CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 02/18/2015 Location(s): TexasOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  2. CX-014462: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace Oil Water Separators at Bryan Mound Caverns 1, 2, 4 and 5 - GFE (BM-MM-1203A) CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 12/15/2015 Location(s): Multiple LocationsOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  3. CX-014463: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace Oil Water Separators at Bryan Mound Caverns 1, 2, 4 and 5 - Install (BM-MM-1203) CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 12/15/2015 Location(s): Multiple LocationsOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  4. CX-007508: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Record of Categorical Exclusion for Rework Bryan Mound Seaway Dock Terminal Bypass Valve MOV-C308 CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 11/16/2011 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  5. CX-012334: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Install Single Split System Air Conditioning Unit in Bryan Mound Building No. 281 (BM-OM-1229) CX(s) Applied: B1.4 Date: 06/30/2014 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  6. Mound site environmental report for calendar year 1992

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Bauer, L.R.

    1993-07-01

    The purpose of this report is to inform the public about the impact of Mound operations on the population and the environment. Mound is a government-owned facility operated by EG&G Mound Applied Technologies for the US Department of Energy (DOE). This integrated production, development, and research site performs work in support of DOE`s weapon and energy related programs, with emphasis on explosive, nuclear and energy technologies.

  7. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Mound_Benefits

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Ohio > Mound_Benefits Mound, Ohio, Site Former Workers' Employment Verification and Benefits Administration Contractor Employment Verification Mercer, Mound Benefits Center (866) 296-5036 Medical and Life Insurance for Former EG&G, BWXTO, and CH2M HILL Employees For questions about health insurance coverage and/or dependent information, life insurance and/or beneficiaries, etc.: Mound Benefits Center P.O. Box 10361 Des Moines, IA 50306-0361 Benefit Center Website (866) 296-5036 9:00 a.m.

  8. Mound Museum Volunteers: Preserving a Laboratory’s Legacy

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Mound Science and Energy Museum (MSEM) owes its success to dedicated volunteers and supporters. The MSEM currently has 40 active volunteers and 200 dues-paying members.

  9. Miamisburg Mound Community Improvement Corp | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Information (Open El) [EERE & EIA]

    finances; Manufacturing; Research and development; Trainining and education;Other:Economic Development Phone Number: 937-865-4462 Website: www.mound.com...

  10. Renewed Importance of the Mound Site Annual Institutional Controls...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Annual, routine IC inspections are conducted at many LM sites. However, inspections at the Mound site are anything but routine, due to its unique nature. 1862.jpg Collaboration ...

  11. Enforcement Letter-Mound-08/22/1996

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    of Energy (DOE) by EG&G Mound (EG&G) in the Noncompliance Tracking System (NTS). ... We also reviewed your Contamination Control Review Team investigation report which ...

  12. Environmental assessment for Mound Plant decontamination and decommissioning projects, Mound Plant, Miamisburg, Ohio

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-05-01

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) for seven decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) projects at the Mound Plant in Miamisburg, Ohio, that have not been previously addressed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Mound Facility (June 1979). Based on the information presented in the EA, the DOE has determined that the proposed action is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required and the Department is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).

  13. EA-1001: Commercialization of the Mound Plant, Golden, Colorado

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of the proposal to commercialize surplus facilities such as the U.S. Department of Energy's Mound Plant in Miamisburg, Ohio.  Commercialization will make...

  14. EA-1239: Disposition of Mound Plant's South Property, Miamisburg, Ohio

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE prepared an EA for the proposed title transfer of 123 acres of land referred to as the “South Property” at the Miamisburg Environmental Management Project Mound Plant in Miamisburg, Ohio.

  15. Blue Mounds, Wisconsin: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Information (Open El) [EERE & EIA]

    Hide Map This article is a stub. You can help OpenEI by expanding it. Blue Mounds is a village in Dane County, Wisconsin. It falls under Wisconsin's 2nd...

  16. Microsoft Word - S07757_2011 Mound IC Report

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    No. S07757 Page A-1 Scope: Entire Mound Site Preliminary inspections performed on: April 5 and 7, 2011 Physical Inspection Walk around on: April 12, 2011 Review led by: Art ...

  17. Renewed Importance of the Mound Site Annual Institutional Controls Assessments

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) completed its 2014 annual institutional controls (IC) assessment of the Mound site in Miamisburg, Ohio, and confirmed that the...

  18. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Mound Laboratory - OH 19

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) is conducting the fourth ... and current Office of Legacy Management activities at the Mound Site in Miamisburg, Ohio. ...

  19. Environmental assessment for commercialization of the Mound Plant

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-10-26

    In November 1993 US DOE decided to phase out operations at the Mound Plant in Miamisburg, Ohio, with the goal of releasing the site for commercial use. The broad concept is to transform the plant into an advanced manufacturing center with the main focus on commercializing products and other technology. DOE proposes to lease portions of the Mound Plant to commercial enterprises. This Environmental Impact statement has a finding of no significant impact in reference to such action.

  20. Microsoft Word - S07757_2011 Mound IC Report

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Site-Wide Institutional Controls Applied to the Former DOE Mound Site Property June 2011 LMS/MND/S07757 This page intentionally left blank LMS/MND/S07757 Annual Assessment of the Effectiveness of Site-Wide Institutional Controls Applied to the Former DOE Mound Site Property June 2011 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy Annual Assessment of the Effectiveness of Site-Wide Institutional Controls June 2011 Doc. No. S07757 Page i Contents Abbreviations

  1. Mounded LPG storage - Experience and developments

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Barber, D.

    1988-01-01

    Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) is stored after production, and for distribution and use, in pressure vessels which vary in size from a few kilogrammes to many thousands of tons. The types of LPG under consideration are commercial butane, commercial propane, or mixtures of the two gases in varying proportions. Mounded storage systems are becoming popular as an alternative to the better-known traditional systems. The most widely used and therefore best-known of the traditional systems are the above-ground pressure-vessel designs. These more commonly comprise factory-made cylinders which are installed horizontally, being supported on saddles at each end of the vessel. When such vessels are installed in an LPG terminal, depot, or filling plant, they are required in multiple units to facilitate the storage of more than one grade of product and to enable regular maintenance and inspection to be carried out. Today's safety regulations require such installations to be divided into sub-groups of six tanks, with all the tanks located at a safe distance from one another, and from other facilities in the immediate area. These safety distances are being increased as a result of experience, which means terminals now require large areas of land.

  2. Environmental survey preliminary report, Mound Plant, Miamisburg, Ohio

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1987-03-01

    This report presents the preliminary findings from the first phase of the Environmental Survey of the United States Department of Energy (DOE) Mound Plant, conducted August 18 through 29, 1986. The objective of the Survey is to identify environmental problems and areas of environmental risk associated with the Mound Plant. The Survey covers all environmental media and all areas of environmental regulation. It is being performed in accordance with the DOE Environmental Survey Manual. The on-site phase of the Survey involves the review of existing site environmental data, observations of the operations carried on at the Mound Plant, and interviews with site personnel. The Survey found no environmental problems at the Mound Plant that represent an immediate threat to human life. The environmental problems identified at the Mound Plant by the Survey confirm that the site is confronted with a number of environmental problems which are by and large a legacy from past practices at a time when environmental problems were less well understood. Theses problems vary in terms of their magnitude and risk, as described in this report. Although the sampling and analysis performed by the Mound Plant Survey will assist in further identifying environmental problems at the site, a complete understanding of the significance of some of the environmental problems identified requires a level of study and characterization that is beyond the scope of the Survey. Actions currently under way or planned at the site, particularly the Phase II activities of the Comprehensive Environmental Analysis and Response Program (CEARP) as developed and implemented by the Albuquerque Operations Office, will contribute toward meeting this requirement. 85 refs., 24 figs., 20 tabs.

  3. Test fire environmental testing operations at Mound Applied Technologies

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1992-03-01

    This paper describes Mound Laboratory`s environmental testing operations. The function of environmental testing is to perform quality environmental (thermal, mechanical, spin, resistance, visual) testing/conditioning of inert/explosive products to assure their compliance with specified customer acceptance criteria. Capabilities, organization, equipment specifications, and test facilities are summarized.

  4. CX-009717: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    717: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-009717: Categorical Exclusion Determination Pumping System for 100 MBD Cavern Capacity Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 12/12/2012 Location(s): Texas, Louisiana, Texas Offices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office Subcontractor shall provide all labor, tools, materials, equipment, services, transportation, storage and supervision required to install new Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) buildings at the Big Hill (BH), Bryan Mound (BM), and

  5. Strategic Petroleum Reserve | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Strategic Petroleum Reserve Strategic Petroleum Reserve Crude oil pipes at SPR Bryan Mound site near Freeport, TX. Crude oil pipes at SPR Bryan Mound site near Freeport, TX. The ...

  6. Strategic Petroleum Reserve | Department of Energy

    Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Crude oil pipes at SPR Bryan Mound site near Freeport, TX. Crude oil pipes at SPR Bryan Mound site near Freeport, TX. The Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) is the world's largest...

  7. Audit of Shutdown and Transition of the Mound Plant, IG-0408 | Department

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    of Energy Shutdown and Transition of the Mound Plant, IG-0408 Audit of Shutdown and Transition of the Mound Plant, IG-0408 Audit of Shutdown and Transition of the Mound Plant, IG-0408 (68.17 KB) More Documents & Publications EIS-0302: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement EIS-0302: Withdrawal of Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement Semiannual Report to Congress: April 1 - September 30, 1997

  8. Enforcement Letter, CH2M Hill Mound, Inc- December 22, 2004

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Issued to CH2M Hill Mound, Inc. related to a Radioactive Contamination Event during Remediation Activities at the Miamisburg Closure Project

  9. Fourth Five-Year Review for the Mound, Ohio, Site Miamisburg, Ohio

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    for the Mound, Ohio, Site Miamisburg, Ohio September 2016 LMS/MND/S14085 This page intentionally left blank Approved by: Five-Year Review Report Fourth Five-Year Review for the Mound, Ohio, Site Miamisburg, Ohio September 2016 ~ ~ '"-..._ ~ :~.< Susan Smiley Mound Site Manager U .S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management LMS/MND/S14085 Date: I I This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy Mound, Ohio, Fourth Five-Year Review September 2016 Doc. No. S14085 Page

  10. Characteristics and origin of Earth-mounds on the Eastern Snake River Plain, Idaho

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Tullis, J.A.

    1995-09-01

    Earth-mounds are common features on the Eastern Snake River Plain, Idaho. The mounds are typically round or oval in plan view, <0.5 m in height, and from 8 to 14 m in diameter. They are found on flat and sloped surfaces, and appear less frequently in lowland areas. The mounds have formed on deposits of multiple sedimentary environments. Those studied included alluvial gravel terraces along the Big Lost River (late Pleistocene/early Holocene age), alluvial fan segments on the flanks of the Lost River Range (Bull Lake and Pinedale age equivalents), and loess/slopewash sediments overlying basalt flows. Backhoe trenches were dug to allow characterization of stratigraphy and soil development. Each mound has features unique to the depositional and pedogenic history of the site; however, there are common elements to all mounds that are linked to the history of mound formation. Each mound has a {open_quotes}floor{close_quotes} of a sediment or basement rock of significantly different hydraulic conductivity than the overlying sediment. These paleosurfaces are overlain by finer-grained sediments, typically loess or flood-overbank deposits. Mounds formed in environments where a sufficient thickness of fine-grained sediment held pore water in a system open to the migration to a freezing front. Heaving of the sediment occurred by the growth of ice lenses. Mound formation occurred at the end of the Late Pleistocene or early in the Holocene, and was followed by pedogenesis. Soils in the mounds were subsequently altered by bioturbation, buried by eolian deposition, and eroded by slopewash runoff. These secondary processes played a significant role in maintaining or increasing the mound/intermound relief.

  11. U.S. Department of Energy N N E E W W S S For Immediate Release Media Contact: Bryan Wilkes

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    N N E E W W S S For Immediate Release Media Contact: Bryan Wilkes October 10, 2002 (202) 586-7371 NNSA Names Tyler Przybylek as Acting Chief Operating Officer WASHINGTON, D.C. - National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Acting Administrator Linton Brooks today named NNSA General Counsel Tyler Przybylek the organization's acting chief operating officer. In his new position, Przybylek will coordinate the work of the NNSA headquarters and field components, and oversee day-to-day continuity

  12. Independent Review of the July 8, 2010 Fatality at the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Bryan Mound Site- May 25, 2011 Addendum closing the Investigation based upon the Galveston County Medical Examiner's Report

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    In consultation with the Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy (FE), the Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer appointed an Independent Review Board (IRE3) on July 20,201 0, under the provisions of the Department of Energy (DOE) Order 225.1 A, Accident Investigations, that represented a modified Type A accident investigation.

  13. EIS-0075: Strategic Petroleum Reserve Phase III Development, Texoma and Seaway Group Salt Domes (West Hackberry and Bryan Mound Expansion, Big Hill Development) Cameron Parish, Louisiana, and Brazoria and Jefferson Counties, Texas

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Also see EIS-0021 and EIS-0029. The Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) Office developed this EIS to assess the environmental impacts of expanding the existing SPR storage capacity from 538 million to 750 million barrels of storage and increasing the drawdown capability from 3.5 million to 4.5 million barrels per day. This EIS incorperates two previously issued EISs: DOE/EIS-0021, Seaway Group of Salt Domes, and DOE/EIS-0029, Texoma Group of Salt Domes.

  14. Overview of surface studies on high energy materials at Mound

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Moddeman, W.E.; Collins, L.W.; Wang, P.S.; Haws, L.D.; Wittberg, T.N.

    1980-01-01

    Since 1975 Mound has been examining the surface structure of high energy materials and the interaction of these materials with various metal containers. The high energy materials that have been studied include: the pyrotechnic TiH/sub x//KClO/sub 4/, the Al/Cu/sub 2/O machinable thermite, the PETN, HMX and RDX explosives, and two plastic bonded explosives (PBX). Aluminum and alloys of Fe, Ni and Cr have been used as the containment materials. Two aims in this research are: (1) the elucidation of the mechanism of pyrotechnic ignition and (2) the compatibility of high energy materials with their surroundings. New information has been generated by coupling Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) with thermal data. In particular, AES and XPS studies on the pyrotechnic materials and on thermites have shown the mechanism of ignition to be nearly independent of the type of oxidizer present but directly related to surface chemistry of the fuels. In studies on the two PBX's, PBX-9407 and LX-16, it was concluded that the Exon coating on 9407 was complete and greater than or equal to 100A; whereas in LX-16, the coating was < 100A or even incomplete. AES and scanning Auger have been used to characterize the surface composition and oxide thickness for an iron-nickel alloy and showed the thicker oxides to have the least propensity for atmospheric hydrocarbon adsorption. Data are presented and illustrations made which highlight this new approach to studying ignition and compatibility of high energy materials. Finally, the salient features of the X-SAM-800 purchased by Mound are discussed in light of future studies on high energy materials.

  15. Progress Toward Operable Unit 1 Groundwater Cleanup at the Mound, Ohio,

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Site | Department of Energy Progress Toward Operable Unit 1 Groundwater Cleanup at the Mound, Ohio, Site Progress Toward Operable Unit 1 Groundwater Cleanup at the Mound, Ohio, Site July 2, 2015 - 12:41pm Addthis What does this project do? Goal 1. Protect human health and the environment. Groundwater in Operable Unit 1 (OU-1) has been impacted by volatile organic compound (VOC)-contaminated materials in the former solid waste landfill. The remedy for controlling contamination from residual

  16. Cost estimate for muddy water palladium production facility at Mound

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    McAdams, R.K.

    1988-11-30

    An economic feasibility study was performed on the ''Muddy Water'' low-chlorine content palladium powder production process developed by Mound. The total capital investment and total operating costs (dollars per gram) were determined for production batch sizes of 1--10 kg in 1-kg increments. The report includes a brief description of the Muddy Water process, the process flow diagram, and material balances for the various production batch sizes. Two types of facilities were evaluated--one for production of new, ''virgin'' palladium powder, and one for recycling existing material. The total capital investment for virgin facilities ranged from $600,000 --$1.3 million for production batch sizes of 1--10 kg, respectively. The range for recycle facilities was $1--$2.3 million. The total operating cost for 100% acceptable powder production in the virgin facilities ranged from $23 per gram for a 1-kg production batch size to $8 per gram for a 10-kg batch size. Similarly for recycle facilities, the total operating cost ranged from $34 per gram to $5 per gram. The total operating cost versus product acceptability (ranging from 50%--100% acceptability) was also evaluated for both virgin and recycle facilities. Because production sizes studied vary widely and because scale-up factors are unknown for batch sizes greater than 1 kg, all costs are ''order-of-magnitude'' estimates. All costs reported are in 1987 dollars.

  17. Earth-mounded concrete bunker PLAP technical approach

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Eng, R.

    1989-11-01

    Under the US DOE Prototype License Application Project (PLAP), Ebasco Services Incorporated was commissioned to develop a preliminary design of the Earth-Mounded Concrete Bunker (EMCB) concept for low-level radioactive waste (LLW) disposal. The EMCB disposal concept is of great interest because it represents the only engineered LLW disposal technology currently in use in the commercial sector. By definition, the EMCB disposal structure is located partially below grade and partially above grade. The concrete bunker is an engineered structure designed to be structurally stable for the prerequisite time horizon. The basic design parameters of the disposal facility were stipulated by US DOE, a northeast site location, representative waste, 30 year operational life, and a 250,000 ft{sup 3}/year disposal capacity. The design was developed to satisfy only US NRC Part 61 disposal requirements, not individual state requirements that may go beyond Part 61 requirements. The technical safety analysis of the preliminary design was documented according to the format specifications of NUREG-1199, to the extent practicable with quite limited resources.

  18. Concentration of Actinides in Plant Mounds at Safety Test Nuclear Sites in Nevada

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    David S. Shafer; Jenna Gommes

    2008-09-15

    Plant mounds or blow-sand mounds are accumulations of soil particles and plant debris around large shrubs and are common features in deserts in the southwestern United States. Believed to be an important factor in their formation, the shrubs create surface roughness that causes wind-suspended particles to be deposited and resist further suspension. Shrub mounds occur in some plant communities on the Nevada Test Site, the Nevada Test and Training Range (NTTR), and Tonopah Test Range (TTR), including areas of surface soil contamination from past nuclear testing. In the 1970s as part of early studies to understand properties of actinides in the environment, the Nevada Applied Ecology Group (NAEG) examined the accumulation of isotopes of Pu, {sup 241}Am, and U in plant mounds at safety test sites. The NAEG studies found concentrations of these contaminants to be greater in shrub mounds than in the surrounding areas of desert pavement. For example, at Project 57 on the NTTR, it was estimated that 15 percent of the radionuclide inventory of the site was associated with shrub mounds, which accounted for 17 percent of the surface area of the site, a ratio of inventory to area of 0.85. At Clean Slate III at the TTR, 29 percent of the inventory was associated with approximately 32 percent of the site covered by shrub mounds, a ratio of 0.91. While the total inventory of radionuclides in intershrub areas was greater, the ratio of radionuclide inventory to area was 0.40 and 0.38, respectively, at the two sites. The comparison between the shrub mounds and adjacent desert pavement areas was made for only the top 5 cm since radionuclides at safety test sites are concentrated in the top 5 cm of intershrub areas. Not accounting for radionuclides associated with the shrub mounds would cause the inventory of contaminants and potential exposure to be underestimated. As part of its Environmental Restoration Soils Subproject, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear

  19. Office of Inspector General report on audit of shutdown and transition of the Mound Plant

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1997-06-24

    With the end of the Cold War, the Department of Energy (Department) has greatly reduced the production of nuclear weapons and redirected the capabilities and focus of the weapons complex. As part of this redirection, the Mound Plant was transferred from a Defense Program site to an Environmental Management site with emphasis on accelerated cleanup and transition of facilities and personal property to the local community. This audit was initiated to determine if the shutdown and transition of the Mound Plant was progressing effectively and efficiently. The Department prepared a Nonnuclear Consolidation Plan (NCP) designed to reduce its costs of operation by closing and consolidating facilities. In contrast to the goal of the NCP, the Department plans to keep a portion of the Mound Plant open solely to perform work for other Federal agencies. Specifically, the Department has decided to continue assembling and testing isotopic heat sources and radioisotope thermoelectric generators (HS/RTG) at the Mound Plant despite the transfer or planned transfer of all other production operations.The Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology decided to continue its HS/RTG operations at the Mound Plant without adequately considering the overall economic goals of the Department. As a result, the Department may not achieve the savings envisioned by the NCP. Also, the Department may incur between $4 million and $8.5 million more than necessary each year to continue its HS/RTG operations at the Mound Plant. Additionally, if the HS/RTG operations stay at the Mound Plant, the Department will spend more than $3 million to consolidate these operations into one location.

  20. Environmental assessment and planning at Mound - environmental monitoring capabilities and personnel profiles

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-07-01

    Through its long experience with radioactive materials, Mound has developed a comprehensive, routine, offsite, environmental surveillance program to safeguard its employees, the physical plant, and the integrity of the surrounding environment from any potential adverse effects of its widely diverse operations. Effluent samples are analyzed for radiological and non-radiological parameters. The environment surrounding Mound Facility is continuously monitored - air, water, foodstuffs, vegetation, soil, and silt samples are analyzed to ensure that radioisotopic concentrations and other possible pollutants are well within the stringent standards adopted by the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agencies (both federal and state), and various regional and local agencies. Moreover, this environmental surveillance program has been designed to ensure that the facility is designed, constructed, managed, operated, and maintained in a manner that continues to meet all federal, state, and local standards for environmental protection. Work in environmental science has been broadened to assess environmental factors associated with various aspects of the National Energy Plan. Both the management and staff at Mound have undertaken a firm commitment to make Mound`s environmental monitoring capabilities available to agencies that have the responsibility for the resolution of important environmental issues.

  1. From Hydrogen Fuel Cells to High-Altitude-Pilot Protection Suits— Mound Science and Energy Museum Programs Cover a Wide Range of Topics

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The Mound Science and Energy Museum (MSEM) is an active, volunteer-led organization located at the former U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Mound site in Miamisburg, Ohio. MSEM keeps the 60-year...

  2. Overview of the earth mounded concrete bunker prototype license application project: Objectives and approach

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Conner, J.E.

    1989-11-01

    This paper presents an overview of the objectives and approach taken in developing the Earth-mounded Concrete Bunker Prototype License Application Project. The Prototype License Application Project was initiated by the Department of Energy`s National Low-Level Waste Management Program in early 1987 and completed in November 1988. As part of this project a prototype safety analysis report was developed. The safety analysis report evaluates the licensibility of an earth-mounded concrete bunker for a low-level radioactive waste (LLW) disposal facility located on a hypothetical site in the northeastern United States. The project required approximately five person-years and twenty months to develop.

  3. Annual Assessment of the Effectiveness of Institutional Controls at the Mound, Ohio, Site Miamisburt, Ohio

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    6 LMS/MND/S14084 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy Annual Assessment of the Effectiveness of Institutional Controls, Mound Site June 2016 Doc. No. S14084 Page i Contents Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................................v 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 2.0 Period of

  4. Marketing research for EE G Mound Applied Technologies' heat treatment process of high strength materials

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Shackson, R.H.

    1991-10-09

    This report summarizes research conducted by ITI to evaluate the commercialization potential of EG G Mound Applied Technologies' heat treatment process of high strength materials. The remainder of the report describes the nature of demand for maraging steel, extent of demand, competitors, environmental trends, technology life cycle, industry structure, and conclusion. (JL)

  5. EIS-0302: Transfer of the Heat Source/Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator Assembly and Test Operations From the Mound Site

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EIS analyzes DOE's proposed transfer of the Heat Source/Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (HS/RTG) operations at the Mound Site near Miamisburg, Ohio, to an alternative DOE site.

  6. Pre-operational safety appraisal Tritiated Scrap Recovery Facility, Mound facility

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Dauby, J.J.; Flanagan, T.M.; Metcalf, L.W.; Rhinehammer, T.B.

    1996-07-01

    The purpose of this report is to identify, assess, and document the hazards which are associated with the proposed operation of the Tritiated Scrap Recovery Facility at Mound Facility. A Pre-operational Safety Appraisal is a requirement as stated in Department of Energy Order 5481.1, Safety Analysis and Review System. The operations to be conducted in the new Tritiated Scrap Waste Recovery Facility are not new, but a continuation of a prime mission of Mound`s i.e. recovery of tritium from waste produced throughout the DOE complex. The new facility is a replacement of an existing process started in the early 1960`s and incorporates numerous design changes to enhance personnel and environmental safety. This report also documents the safety of a one time operation involving the recovery of tritium from material obtained by the Department of Energy from the State of Arizona. This project will involve the processing of 240,000 curies of tritium contained in glass ampoules that were to be used in items such as luminous dial watches. These were manufactured by the now defunct American Atomics Corporation, Tucson, Arizona.

  7. Operating Experience Summary- 2014-02 – April 23, 2014

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Inside this issue: Laboratory Worker Safety: Work Planning, Hazard Analysis, and Supervision - Page 1 Accident Investigation into Mower Fatality at the Bryan Mound Site - Page 13

  8. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Strategic Petroleum Reserve Annual Report

    Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    and planned projects for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. ... Oil Inventory Status 18 Oil Acquisition Market ... 32 Bayou Choctaw Pipeline: 32 Bryan Mound Pipelines: 32 St. ...

  9. Operating Experience Summary- 2012-02 – May 11, 2012

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Inside this issue: Improper Use of Dewar Carts Results in Serious Hand Injuries - Page 1 Strategic Petroleum Reserve Investigation Results - Fatality at the Bryan Mound Site - Page 5

  10. DOE F 3304.2 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    More Documents & Publications Investigation of the September 13, 2011, Fatality at the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Bryan Mound Site DOE F 241 5 Headquarters Facilities Master ...

  11. POTENTIAL IMPACT OF BLENDING RESIDUAL SOLIDS FROM TANKS 18/19 MOUNDS WITH TANK 7 OPERATIONS

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Eibling, R; Erich Hansen, E; Bradley Pickenheim, B

    2007-03-29

    High level waste tanks 18F and 19F have residual mounds of waste which may require removal before the tanks can be closed. Conventional slurry pump technology, previously used for waste removal and tank cleaning, has been incapable of removing theses mounds from tanks 18F and 19F. A mechanical cleaning method has been identified that is potentially capable of removing and transferring the mound material to tank 7F for incorporation in a sludge batch for eventual disposal in high level waste glass by the Defense Waste Processing Facility. The Savannah River National Laboratory has been requested to evaluate whether the material transferred from tanks 18F/19F by the mechanical cleaning technology can later be suspended in Tank 7F by conventional slurry pumps after mixing with high level waste sludge. The proposed mechanical cleaning process for removing the waste mounds from tanks 18 and 19 may utilize a high pressure water jet-eductor that creates a vacuum to mobilize solids. The high pressure jet is also used to transport the suspended solids. The jet-eductor system will be mounted on a mechanical crawler for movement around the bottom of tanks 18 and 19. Based on physical chemical property testing of the jet-eductor system processed IE-95 zeolite and size-reduced IE-95 zeolite, the following conclusions were made: (1) The jet-eductor system processed zeolite has a mean and median particle size (volume basis) of 115.4 and 43.3 microns in water. Preferential settling of these large particles is likely. (2) The jet-eductor system processed zeolite rapidly generates settled solid yield stresses in excess of 11,000 Pascals in caustic supernates and will not be easily retrieved from Tank 7 with the existing slurry pump technology. (3) Settled size-reduced IE-95 zeolite (less than 38 microns) in caustic supernate does not generate yield stresses in excess of 600 Pascals in less than 30 days. (4) Preferential settling of size-reduced zeolite is a function of the amount of

  12. The Mound site survey project for the characterization of radioactive materials in site soils

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Stought, R.L.; Edling, D.A.; Draper, D.G.

    1988-05-16

    This report summarizes the results of a site survey project conducted at Monsanto Research Corporation's Mound Facility during 1982--1985. The objectives of the site survey were: To characterize the nineteen sites previously identified as having known levels of contamination; to identify and characterize by quantity and type of radionuclide(s) any additional major sites having levels of contamination exceeding 10 pCi/g (for Pu-238) of soil; to estimate the volume of contaminated soil; and to estimate the cost of stabilizing or removing the contaminated soil. This report provides information on objectives 1 and 2 above. A separate report will address objectives 3 and 4.

  13. The Mound site survey project for the characterization of radioactive materials in site soils

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Stought, R.L.; Edling, D.A.; Draper, D.G.

    1988-05-16

    This report summarizes the results of a site survey project conducted at Monsanto Research Corporation`s Mound Facility during 1982--1985. The objectives of the site survey were: To characterize the nineteen sites previously identified as having known levels of contamination; to identify and characterize by quantity and type of radionuclide(s) any additional major sites having levels of contamination exceeding 10 pCi/g (for Pu-238) of soil; to estimate the volume of contaminated soil; and to estimate the cost of stabilizing or removing the contaminated soil. This report provides information on objectives 1 and 2 above. A separate report will address objectives 3 and 4.

  14. Focused risk assessment: Mound Plant, Miami-Erie Canal Operable Unit 4

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Rogers, D.R.; Dunning, D.F.

    1994-09-29

    In 1969, an underground waste line at Mound Plant ruptured and released plutonium-238 in a dilute nitric acid solution to the surrounding soils. Most of the acid was neutralized by the native soils. The plutonium, which in a neutral solution is tightly sorbed onto clay particles, remained within the spill area. During remediation, a severe storm eroded some of the contaminated soil. Fine grained plutonium-contaminated clay particles were carried away through the natural drainage courses to the remnants of the Miami-Erie Canal adjacent to Mound Plant, and then into the Great Miami River. This focused risk assessment considers exposure pathways relevant to site conditions, including incidental ingestion of contaminated soils, ingestion of drinking water and fish, and inhalation of resuspended soils and sediments. For each potential exposure pathway, a simplified conceptual model and exposure scenarios have been used to develop conservative estimates of potential radiation dose equivalents and health risks. The conservatism of the dose and risk estimates provides a substantive margin of safety in assuring that the public health is protected.

  15. An aerial radiological survey of the EG G Mound Applied Technologies and surrounding area, Miamisburg, Ohio

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1992-11-01

    An aerial radiological survey was conducted over EG G Mound Applied Technologies, Miamisburg, Ohio, during the period of June 9--24, 1989. The purpose of the 41-square-kilometer (16-square-mile) survey was to document the terrestrial gamma environment of the plant and surrounding area. In addition, ground-based exposure rate measurements and soil samples were obtained to support the aerial data. An exposure rate contour map at 1 meter above ground level was.constructed from the gamma data and overlaid on an aerial photograph and map of the area. Exposure rates measured in the area typically ranged from 9 to 11 microroentgens per hour ([mu]R/h).

  16. A radioactive waste excavation at Mound Area 7 using INEL dig-face monitoring technology

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Carpenter, M.V.; Josten, N.E.

    1996-12-31

    Dig-face characterization is a method to improve the safety and efficiency during hazardous waste retrieval. A dig-face characterization system consists of on-site hardware for collecting detailed information on the changing chemical, radiological, and physical conditions in the subsurface throughout a hazardous site excavation. The dig-face characterization concept originated at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory where it has been under development since 1992. In August 1995, a prototype dig-face system was taken to Mound Laboratory, Ohio, to monitor a hazardous waste site excavation. Mound Area 7 was the site of previous disposal of {sup 232}Th, {sup 227}Ac, and other waste. The dig-face characterization system was used to monitor a 20-ft x 20-ft x 5-ft-deep excavation intended to remove the {sup 227}Ac contaminated soils. Radiological, geophysical, and topographical sensors were scanned across each of four successive excavated soil levels, each 1-ft to 2-ft thick. The radiation sensors produced highly detailed images showing the location of the contaminants {sup 232}Th and {sup 227}Ac, and the clear delineation between them. When combined into a single data set, the four levels of collected data produced a three dimensional image of the contamination. The radiation sensor data indicated that only a small portion of the excavated soil was actually contaminated. The information produced by the dig-face system was used to direct precise excavation activities in the area containing the {sup 227}Ac and to plan subsequent removal of the separate {sup 232}Th plume.

  17. Dig-face monitoring during excavation of a radioactive plume at Mound Laboratory, Ohio

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Josten, N.E.; Gehrke, R.J.; Carpenter, M.V.

    1995-12-01

    A dig-face monitoring system consists of onsite hardware for collecting information on changing chemical, radiological, and physical conditions in the subsurface soil during the hazardous site excavation. A prototype dig-face system was take to Mount Laboratory for a first trial. Mound Area 7 was the site of historical disposals of {sup 232}Th, {sup 227}Ac, and assorted debris. The system was used to monitor a deep excavation aimed at removing {sup 227}Ac-contaminated soils. Radiological, geophysical, and topographic sensors were used to scan across the excavation dig-face at four successive depths as soil was removed. A 3-D image of the contamination plumes was developed; the radiation sensor data indicated that only a small portion of the excavated soil volume was contaminated. The spatial information produced by the dig-face system was used to direct the excavation activities into the area containing the {sup 227}Ac and to evaluate options for handling the separate {sup 232}Th plume.

  18. Certification of the Mound 1 kW package for shipping of plutonium dioxide source material

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Annese, C.E.; Mount, M.K.

    1994-01-01

    The Department of Energy (DOE) has established procedures for obtaining certification of packagings used by DOE and its contractors for the transport of radioactive materials. Specifically, DOE Orders 5480.3 and 1540.2 provide references for other DOE Orders which must be followed when an applicant submits a Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP). From the orders, Department EH of DOE, has internal oversight responsibility for transportation and Packaging safety; package certification falls under EH responsibility; transportation and packaging safety division in EH certifies packages for DOE; and use of DOE certified packages is authorized by DOT. An independent review of the SARP must confirm that the packaging designs and operations meet safety criteria at least equivalent to these standards. This paper will discuss the independent review process of the shielding section of the Mound 1 kW SARP; describe the geometry of the packaging and the load configurations; discuss the analysis of the various neutron and photon source terms that were used for the load configuration under analysis; and provide illustrations of the use of the monte-carlo code, COG{sup 3}, which was utilized to perform the shielding analysis.

  19. Early diagenesis of a phylloid algal-mound complex, Laborcita Formation, southeastern New Mexico

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Ward, W.B.; Meyers, W.J.; Goldstein, R.

    1985-02-01

    Marine carbonate cementation was the initial stage in the paragenesis of phylloid algal mounds in the Laborcita Formation (Wolfcampian), Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico, and the cements are almost identical to those in Holocene coral reefs of Belize. These cements include relics of botryoids and crusts of needle crystals, in part defined by inclusion patterns and luminescent ghosts in mosaic calcite. Individual needle crystals are pseudohexagonal in cross section and range from less than 1 to 30 ..mu..m wide. These nonluminescent early cements line cavity walls, coat phylloid-algal blades and stromatolites, and are interlayered with marine sediment. Early cements also include bladed, fibrous, and rare radiaxial fibrous calcites, which are microdolomite-rich. They have a proximal nonluminescent zone, a central bright-luminescent zone, and a distal blotchy, moderate-luminescent zone. The bright zone may be time equivalent to bright-luminescent micritic coatings on botryoids and grains. Botryoids are encrusted by isopachous bladed cement, some of which has prismatic overgrowths containing an early inclusion-rich zone. This initial cementation was followed closely by: (1) dissolution of algal blades and mollusks, (2) in-situ brecciation, and (3) cementation by blocky calcite. Botryoidal and acicular cements are interpreted as originally marine aragonite precipitates, based on morphology, occurrence, susceptibility to diagenesis, and similarity to Holocene reef cements. The same criteria, plus the microdolomite inclusions, indicate that the bladed, fibrous, and radiaxial cements had a marine Mg-calcite precursor. This assemblage followed by prismatic overgrowths, dissolution, and blocky-calcite cementation indicates an evolution from marine to freshwater diagenesis.

  20. Field test of plutonium and thorium contaminated clay soils from the Mound Site using the ACT*DE*CON Process

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Johnson, J.O.; Swift, N.A.; Church, R.H.; Neff, R.A.

    1998-12-31

    A treatability test was run during the summer and fall of 1997 to demonstrate the effectiveness of ACT*DE*CON for removing plutonium and thorium from the clay soils around Mound. ACT*DE*CON is a proprietary solution patented by Selentec. The process utilized a highly selective dissolution of the contaminants by the use of a chemical wash. The pilot scale process involved pretreatment of the soil in an attrition scrubber with ACT*DE*CON solution. This blended solution was then passed through a counter-current extraction chamber where additional contact with ACT*DE*CON solution occurred, followed by a rinse cycle. During this process sand was added to aid contact of the solution with the soil particles. The sand is removed during the rinse step and reused. The chelating agent is separated from the contaminant and recycled back into the process, along with the reverse osmosis permeate. The resulting solution can be further treated to concentrate the contaminant. Three different types of environmental soils were tested -- plutonium and thorium contaminated soils with the natural clay content, and plutonium contaminated soils with a high percentage of fine clay particles. The goal of these tests was to reduce the plutonium levels from several hundreds of pCi/g to between 25 and 75 pCi/g and the thorium from a couple hundred pCi/g to less than 5 pCi/g. The results of these four tests are presented along with a discussion of the operating parameters and the lessons learned relating to full scale implementation at Mound as well as other potential applications of this process.

  1. CX-006600: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Bryan Mound Site Building Upgrades, Phase IICX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 07/12/2011Location(s): Freeport, TexasOffice(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  2. v7DOE OIG SemiAnn RPT.qxd

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    A barge shown docked at Phillips Terminal at the Strategic Petroleum Reserve in Bryan Mound, Texas. Wind turbines at Storm Lake, Iowa. High pressure water being used to blast salt ...

  3. EIS-0075: Final Environmental Impact Statement

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Petroleum Reserve Phase III Development, Texoma and Seaway Group Salt Domes (West Hackberry and Bryan Mound Expansion, Big Hill Development) Cameron Parish, Louisiana, and Brazoria and Jefferson Counties, Texas

  4. Mortality Among Mound Workers Exposed to Polonium-210 and Other Sources of Radiation, 1944–1979

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Boice, John D.; Cohen, Sarah S.; Mumma, Michael T.; Ellis, Elizabeth Dupree; Cragle, Donna L.; Eckerman, Keith F.; Wallace, Phillip W.; Chadda, Bandana; Sonderman, Jennifer S.; Wiggs, Laurie D.; Richter, Bonnie S.; Leggett, Richard W.

    2014-02-14

    Polonium-210 is a naturally occurring radioactive element that decays by emitting an alpha particle. It is in the air we breathe and also a component of tobacco smoke. Polonium-210 is used as an anti-static device in printing presses and gained widespread notoriety in 2006 after the poisoning and subsequent death of a Russian citizen in London. More is known about the lethal effects of polonium-210 at high doses than about late effects from low doses. In this paper, cancer mortality was examined among 7,270 workers at the Mound nuclear facility near Dayton, OH where polonium-210 was used (1944–1972) in combination with beryllium as a source of neutrons for triggering nuclear weapons. Other exposures included external gamma radiation and to a lesser extent plutonium-238, tritium and neutrons. Vital status and cause of death was determined through 2009. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were computed for comparisons with the general population. Lifetime occupational doses from all places of employment were sought and incorporated into the analysis. Over 200,000 urine samples were analyzed to estimate radiation doses to body organs from polonium and other internally deposited radionuclides. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate dose-response relationships for specific organs and tissues. Vital status was determined for 98.7% of the workers of which 3,681 had died compared with 4,073.9 expected (SMR 0.90; 95% CI 0.88–0.93). The mean dose from external radiation was 26.1 mSv (maximum 939.1 mSv) and the mean lung dose from external and internal radiation combined was 100.1 mSv (maximum 17.5 Sv). Among the 4,977 radiation workers, all cancers taken together (SMR 0.86; 95% CI 0.79–0.93), lung cancer (SMR 0.85; 95% CI 0.74–0.98), and other types of cancer were not significantly elevated. Cox regression analysis revealed a significant positive dose-response trend for esophageal cancer [relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval at 100 mSv of 1

  5. Mortality Among Mound Workers Exposed to Polonium-210 and Other Sources of Radiation, 1944–1979

    DOE PAGES-Beta [OSTI]

    Boice, John D.; Cohen, Sarah S.; Mumma, Michael T.; Ellis, Elizabeth Dupree; Cragle, Donna L.; Eckerman, Keith F.; Wallace, Phillip W.; Chadda, Bandana; Sonderman, Jennifer S.; Wiggs, Laurie D.; et al

    2014-02-14

    Polonium-210 is a naturally occurring radioactive element that decays by emitting an alpha particle. It is in the air we breathe and also a component of tobacco smoke. Polonium-210 is used as an anti-static device in printing presses and gained widespread notoriety in 2006 after the poisoning and subsequent death of a Russian citizen in London. More is known about the lethal effects of polonium-210 at high doses than about late effects from low doses. In this paper, cancer mortality was examined among 7,270 workers at the Mound nuclear facility near Dayton, OH where polonium-210 was used (1944–1972) in combinationmore » with beryllium as a source of neutrons for triggering nuclear weapons. Other exposures included external gamma radiation and to a lesser extent plutonium-238, tritium and neutrons. Vital status and cause of death was determined through 2009. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were computed for comparisons with the general population. Lifetime occupational doses from all places of employment were sought and incorporated into the analysis. Over 200,000 urine samples were analyzed to estimate radiation doses to body organs from polonium and other internally deposited radionuclides. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate dose-response relationships for specific organs and tissues. Vital status was determined for 98.7% of the workers of which 3,681 had died compared with 4,073.9 expected (SMR 0.90; 95% CI 0.88–0.93). The mean dose from external radiation was 26.1 mSv (maximum 939.1 mSv) and the mean lung dose from external and internal radiation combined was 100.1 mSv (maximum 17.5 Sv). Among the 4,977 radiation workers, all cancers taken together (SMR 0.86; 95% CI 0.79–0.93), lung cancer (SMR 0.85; 95% CI 0.74–0.98), and other types of cancer were not significantly elevated. Cox regression analysis revealed a significant positive dose-response trend for esophageal cancer [relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval at 100 m

  6. Operating Experience Summary, 2015-02

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Energy 4-02 - April 23, 2014 Operating Experience Summary - 2014-02 - April 23, 2014 April 23, 2014 OE Summary 2014-02 Inside this issue: Laboratory Worker Safety: Work Planning, Hazard Analysis, and Supervision - Page 1 Accident Investigation into Mower Fatality at the Bryan Mound Site - Page 13 Operating Experience Summary - 2014-02 - April 23, 2014 (3.61 MB) More Documents & Publications Investigation of the September 13, 2011, Fatality at the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Bryan Mound

  7. Strategic Plan for Groundwater Monitoring at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    Reserves » Strategic Petroleum Reserve Strategic Petroleum Reserve Crude oil pipes at the Bryan Mound site, the largest of the four SPR storage sites - near Freeport, TX. Crude oil pipes at the Bryan Mound site, the largest of the four SPR storage sites - near Freeport, TX. The Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) is the world's largest supply of emergency crude oil. The federally-owned oil stocks are stored in huge underground salt caverns along the coastline of the Gulf of Mexico. Decisions to

  8. Larry Bryan | Savannah River Ecology Laboratory

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    Barn swallows as biological indicators Contaminant uptake by grackles nesting in coal Combustion waste impoundments Aquatic ecology Characterization of aquatic species ...

  9. Bryan Long (Acting) | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    support; Project Management Office (PMO) support; and commodity IT services and infrastructure services supporting mission IT and corporate applications enterprise-wide. ...

  10. CX-014634: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace Section of Bryan Hill 36-Inch Crude Oil Pipeline at Hillebrandt Bayou CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 12/22/2015 Location(s): Multiple LocationsOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  11. Wet processing of palladium for use in the tritium facility at Westinghouse, Savannah River, SC. Preparation of palladium using the Mound Muddy Water process

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Baldwin, D.P.; Zamzow, D.S.

    1998-11-10

    Palladium used at Savannah River for tritium storage is currently obtained from a commercial source. In order to better understand the processes involved in preparing this material, Savannah River is supporting investigations into the chemical reactions used to synthesize this material and into the conditions necessary to produce palladium powder that meets their specifications. This better understanding may help to guarantee a continued reliable source for this material in the future. As part of this evaluation, a work-for-others contract between Westinghouse Savannah River Company and the Ames Laboratory Metallurgy and Ceramics Program was initiated. During FY98, the process for producing palladium powder developed in 1986 by Dan Grove of Mound Applied Technologies (USDOE) was studied to understand the processing conditions that lead to changes in morphology in the final product. This report details the results of this study of the Mound Muddy Water process, along with the results of a round-robin analysis of well-characterized palladium samples that was performed by Savannah River and Ames Laboratory. The Mound Muddy Water process is comprised of three basic wet chemical processes, palladium dissolution, neutralization, and precipitation, with a number of filtration steps to remove unwanted impurity precipitates.

  12. THE ROLE OF LAND USE IN ENVIRONMENTAL DECISION MAKING AT THREE DOE MEGA-CLEANUP SITES FERNALD & ROCKY FLATS & MOUND

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    JEWETT MA

    2011-01-14

    This paper explores the role that future land use decisions have played in the establishment of cost-effective cleanup objectives and the setting of environmental media cleanup levels for the three major U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) sites for which cleanup has now been successfully completed: the Rocky Flats, Mound, and Fernald Closure Sites. At each site, there are distinct consensus-building histories throughout the following four phases: (1) the facility shut-down and site investigation phase, which took place at the completion of their Cold War nuclear-material production missions; (2) the decision-making phase, whereby stakeholder and regulatory-agency consensus was achieved for the future land-use-based environmental decisions confronting the sites; (3) the remedy selection phase, whereby appropriate remedial actions were identified to achieve the future land-use-based decisions; and (4) the implementation phase, whereby the selected remedial actions for these high-profile sites were implemented and successfully closed out. At each of the three projects, there were strained relationships and distrust between the local community and the DOE as a result of site contamination and potential health effects to the workers and local residents. To engage citizens and interested stakeholder groups - particularly in the role of final land use in the decision-making process, the site management teams at each respective site developed new public-participation strategies to open stakeholder communication channels with site leadership, technical staff, and the regulatory agencies. This action proved invaluable to the success of the projects and reaching consensus on appropriate levels of cleanup. With the implementation of the cleanup remedies now complete, each of the three DOE sites have become models for future environmental-remediation projects and associated decision making.

  13. Environmental Assessment for the Operation of the Glass Melter Thermal Treatment Unit at the US Department of Energy`s Mound Plant, Miamisburg, Ohio

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-06-01

    The glass melter would thermally treat mixed waste (hazardous waste contaminated with radioactive constituents largely tritium, Pu-238, and/or Th-230) that was generated at the Mound Plant and is now in storage, by stabilizing the waste in glass blocks. Depending on the radiation level of the waste, the glass melter may operate for 1 to 6 years. Two onsite alternatives and seven offsite alternatives were considered. This environmental assessment indicates that the proposed action does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the human environment according to NEPA, and therefore the finding of no significant impact is made, obviating the need for an environmental impact statement.

  14. Multicomponent Seismic Analysis and Calibration to Improve Recovery from Algal Mounds: Application to the Roadrunner/Towaoc area of the Paradox Basin, UTE Mountain UTE Reservation, Colorado

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Joe Hachey

    2007-09-30

    The goals of this project were: (1) To enhance recovery of oil contained within algal mounds on the Ute Mountain Ute tribal lands. (2) To promote the use of advanced technology and expand the technical capability of the Native American Oil production corporations by direct assistance in the current project and dissemination of technology to other Tribes. (3) To develop an understanding of multicomponent seismic data as it relates to the variations in permeability and porosity of algal mounds, as well as lateral facies variations, for use in both reservoir development and exploration. (4) To identify any undiscovered algal mounds for field-extension within the area of seismic coverage. (5) To evaluate the potential for applying CO{sub 2} floods, steam floods, water floods or other secondary or tertiary recovery processes to increase production. The technical work scope was carried out by: (1) Acquiring multicomponent seismic data over the project area; (2) Processing and reprocessing the multicomponent data to extract as much geological and engineering data as possible within the budget and time-frame of the project; (3) Preparing maps and data volumes of geological and engineering data based on the multicomponent seismic and well data; (4) Selecting drilling targets if warranted by the seismic interpretation; (5) Constructing a static reservoir model of the project area; and (6) Constructing a dynamic history-matched simulation model from the static model. The original project scope covered a 6 mi{sup 2} (15.6 km{sup 2}) area encompassing two algal mound fields (Towaoc and Roadrunner). 3D3C seismic data was to acquired over this area to delineate mound complexes and image internal reservoir properties such as porosity and fluid saturations. After the project began, the Red Willow Production Company, a project partner and fully-owned company of the Southern Ute Tribe, contributed additional money to upgrade the survey to a nine-component (3D9C) survey. The purpose

  15. Temporal Characterization of Hydrates System Dynamics beneath Seafloor Mounds. Integrating Time-Lapse Electrical Resistivity Methods and In Situ Observations of Multiple Oceanographic Parameters

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lutken, Carol; Macelloni, Leonardo; D'Emidio, Marco; Dunbar, John; Higley, Paul

    2015-01-31

    This study was designed to investigate temporal variations in hydrate system dynamics by measuring changes in volumes of hydrate beneath hydrate-bearing mounds on the continental slope of the northern Gulf of Mexico, the landward extreme of hydrate occurrence in this region. Direct Current Resistivity (DCR) measurements were made contemporaneously with measurements of oceanographic parameters at Woolsey Mound, a carbonate-hydrate complex on the mid-continental slope, where formation and dissociation of hydrates are most vulnerable to variations in oceanographic parameters affected by climate change, and where changes in hydrate stability can readily translate to loss of seafloor stability, impacts to benthic ecosystems, and venting of greenhouse gases to the water-column, and eventually, the atmosphere. We focused our study on hydrate within seafloor mounds because the structurally-focused methane flux at these sites likely causes hydrate formation and dissociation processes to occur at higher rates than at sites where the methane flux is less concentrated and we wanted to maximize our chances of witnessing association/dissociation of hydrates. We selected a particularly well-studied hydrate-bearing seafloor mound near the landward extent of the hydrate stability zone, Woolsey Mound (MC118). This mid-slope site has been studied extensively and the project was able to leverage considerable resources from the team’s research experience at MC118. The site exhibits seafloor features associated with gas expulsion, hydrates have been documented at the seafloor, and changes in the outcropping hydrates have been documented, photographically, to have occurred over a period of months. We conducted observatory-based, in situ measurements to 1) characterize, geophysically, the sub-bottom distribution of hydrate and its temporal variability, and 2) contemporaneously record relevant environmental parameters (temperature, pressure, salinity, turbidity, bottom currents) to

  16. MOUND Environmental Restoration Program

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... Th de two aboveground propane tanks (Building 43 tank and' Building nk) and two piec ... The sandblasting operations were part of the cleaning of the large clariflocculator tanks ...

  17. Mound History and Information

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    weapons, devel- opment of radioisotopic thermoelectric generators used to provide electrical power for space exploration, and other non-nuclear research and development activities. ...

  18. Bryan County, Oklahoma: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Information (Open El) [EERE & EIA]

    Oklahoma Bennington, Oklahoma Bokchito, Oklahoma Caddo, Oklahoma Calera, Oklahoma Colbert, Oklahoma Durant, Oklahoma Hendrix, Oklahoma Kemp, Oklahoma Kenefic, Oklahoma Mead,...

  19. Microsoft PowerPoint - 8-Mound Connector Presentation for Mound...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    CONNECTOR Miamisburg-Springboro Pike and Benner Road Benner Road Miamisburg- Springboro Pike PURPOSE OF PROJECT * Improve access between the I-75Austin Boulevard interchange the ...

  20. CX-006881: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replacement of Obsolete Siemens S5-115H Programmable Logic ControllersCX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 09/22/2011Location(s): Big Hill, Bryan Mound, West Hackberry, Louisiana, TexasOffice(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  1. Contracts Awarded to Repurchase Oil for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The U. S. Department of Energy announced the award of contracts for delivery of crude oil to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. BP Products North America, Inc., will deliver 2,197,500 barrels and Noble Americas will deliver 2,000,000 barrels to the Reserve’s Bryan Mound site in Freeport, Texas. Deliveries are expected to be completed by July 31, 2015.

  2. CX-000482: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Project Number MS-09-116 - Structural Assessment of Big Hill Raw Water Intake Structure, Big Hill Brine Disposal Pump Pad and Bryan Mound Raw Water Intake StructureCX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 12/29/2009Location(s): TexasOffice(s): Fossil Energy, Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  3. CX-100599 Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Fleet Services EV Charging Station Installation, Richard H. Bryan State Office Building Award Number: DE-EE0006992 CX(s) Applied: B5.23 Weatherization & Intergovernmental Programs Office (SEP) Date: 03/31/2016 Location(s): NV Office(s): Golden Field Office

  4. Finding of No Significant Impact and Final Environmental Assessment for the Future Location of Heat Source/Radioisotope Power System Assembly and Testing and Operations Currently Located at the Mound Site

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    N /A

    2002-08-30

    The U.S. Department of Energy (the Department) has completed an Environmental Assessment for the Future Location of the Heat Source/Radioisotope Power System Assembly and Test. Operations Currently Located at the Mound Site. Based on the analysis in the environmental assessment, the Department has determined that the proposed action, the relocation of the Department's heat source and radioisotope power system operations, does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of the ''National Environmental Policy Act'' of 1969 (NEPA). Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement is not required, and the Department is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).

  5. International shipment of light weight radioisotopic heater units (LWRHU) using the USA/9516/B(U)F Mound 1 kW shipping package in support of the {open_quotes}Pluto Express{close_quotes} mission

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Barklay, C.D.; Merten, C.W.

    1997-01-01

    Radioisotopes have provided heat that has been used to maintain specific operating environments within remote satellites and spacecraft. For the {open_quotes}Pluto Express{close_quotes} mission the {sup 238}PuO{sub 2} fueled light weight radioisotopic heater unit (LWRHU) will be used within the spacecraft. Since the current plan for the {open_quotes}Pluto Express{close_quotes} mission incorporates the use of a Russian launch platform for the spacecraft, the LWRHUs must be transported in an internationally certified shipping container. An internationally certified shipping package that is versatile enough to be reconfigured to transport the LWRHUs that will be required to support the {open_quotes}Pluto Express{close_quotes} mission is the Mound USA/9516/B(U)F. {copyright} {ital 1997 American Institute of Physics.}

  6. Alternative methods for dispoal of low-level radioactive wastes. Task 1. Description of methods and assessment of criteria. [Alternative methods are belowground vaults, aboveground vaults; earth mounded concrete bunkers, mined cavities, augered holes

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Bennett, R.D.; Miller, W.O.; Warriner, J.B.; Malone, P.G.; McAneny, C.C.

    1984-04-01

    The study reported herein contains the results of Task 1 of a four-task study entitled Criteria for Evaluating Engineered Facilities. The overall objective of this study is to ensure that the criteria needed to evaluate five alternative low-level radioactive waste (LLW) disposal methods are available to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the Agreement States. The alternative methods considered are belowground vaults, aboveground vaults, earth mounded concrete bunkers, mined cavities, and augered holes. Each of these alternatives is either being used by other countries for low-level radioactive waste (LLW) disposal or is being considered by other countries or US agencies. In this report the performance requirements are listed, each alternative is described, the experience gained with its use is discussed, and the performance capabilities of each method are addressed. Next, the existing 10 CFR Part 61 Subpart D criteria with respect to paragraphs 61.50 through 61.53, pertaining to site suitability, design, operations and closure, and monitoring are assessed for applicability to evaluation of each alternative. Preliminary conclusions and recommendations are offered on each method's suitability as an LLW disposal alternative, the applicability of the criteria, and the need for supplemental or modified criteria.

  7. Property:Incentive/OwnRenewEnrgyCrdts | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Information (Open El) [EERE & EIA]

    Ridge EMC Bryan Texas Utilities - Solar Hot Water Rebate Program (Texas) + Bryan Texas Utility Bryan Texas Utilities - Solar PV Rebate Program (Texas) + Bryan Texas Utilities...

  8. 'Chemistry Summit' Aids Idaho Waste Treatment Facility Startup |

    Energy Savers

    Front Cover From left to right: A barge shown docked at Phillips Terminal at the Strategic Petroleum Reserve in Bryan Mound, Texas. Wind turbines at Storm Lake, Iowa. High pressure water being used to blast salt cake into manageable fragments in a waste tank mockup at the Hanford Site. The McNary Dam, which is one entity of the Bonneville Power Administration's responsibility for transmission and wholesale marketing of power generated at dams in the Federal River Power System. A sodium cooled

  9. Mound_2000_Risk_Management.pdf

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  10. DOE - Office of Legacy Management -- Mound Site

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    The site long-term monitoring responsibility transferred to the Office of Legacy Management(LM) in 2010 and requires operation and maintenance of a pump and treatment system, ...

  11. Microsoft PowerPoint - Bryan Hydro Conf 11 Jun 09.ppt

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    power, regulation of Red River flows, improvement of navigation, and recreation. ... Exceeded compliance goals. 4-year averages exceed compliance goals. - Red River: 625 ...

  12. Microsoft PowerPoint - 2-ECA Mound Presentation - Kirshenberg...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    agreements, tax credits) What Do Communities Want? * Assets - Use Existing PolicyLaw and Models - Land - Technology * Support and Commitment - DOE taking steps to implement ...

  13. Mound Plant Federal Facility Agreement, July 15, 1993 Summary

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Actions (IRAs) alternatives and implement US EPA and OEPA approved remedies for the site in accordance with CERCLA Parties EPA; Ohio EPA (OEPA); DOE Date 07151993 SCOPE * ...

  14. Mound Plant Director's Final Findings and Orders, October 4,...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    portions of the STP, public notice by the Ohio EPA of availability of the revised STP, and consultation by Ohio EPA with affected states and U.S. EPA, pursuant to these ...

  15. Mound Plant Director's Final Findings and Orders, October 4,...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Director's Final Findings and Orders State Ohio Agreement Type Compliance Agreement Legal Driver(s) FFCAct Scope Summary Approve the Compliance Plan Volume of the amended PSTP, ...

  16. Microsoft PowerPoint - 3-ARI presentation - Mound - Tania Smith

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... chips for the lab's biomass facility RSI Brightfield and Vis Solis provide energy via solar demonstration projects Environmental Dimensions Inc. (EDi), a woman-owned ...

  17. Mound Site Five-Year Review Appendix A Community Notification...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... Federal Government The White House USA.gov Services Sites Mission News About Us Page 1 of ... Between January and June 2016, DOE will review relevant documents and data; conduct site ...

  18. Microsoft Word - S07757_2011 Mound IC Report

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Listings and Photos of Monitoring Wells and Seeps This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy Annual Assessment of the Effectiveness of Site-Wide Institutional ...

  19. Microsoft Word - S07757_2011 Mound IC Report

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    U.S. Department of Energy Doc. No. S07757 June 2011 Page B-2 U.S. Department of Energy Annual Assessment of the Effectiveness of Site-Wide Institutional Controls June 2011 Doc. ...

  20. Mound Plant Federal Facility Agreement, July 15, 1993

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

  1. Microsoft PowerPoint - 4b-Mound Reindustrilaization Workshop...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Hanford 3000 Area Transferred by Maritime Administration to Port of Benton Richland Innovation (Industrial) Center Home to 18 Companies Tri-Cities Research District Long History ...

  2. Microsoft Word - S07757_2011 Mound IC Report

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Department of Energy Annual Assessment of the Effectiveness of Site-Wide Institutional ... the Effectiveness of Site-Wide Institutional Controls U.S. Department of Energy Doc. No. ...

  3. additive manufacturuing | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Laboratory engineer Bryan Moran won an award last month for his 3D printing innovation. It could revolutionize additive manufacturing.Lawrence Livermore Lab engineer Bryan Moran...

  4. Construction of hexahedral elements mesh capturing realistic geometries of Bayou Choctaw SPR site

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Park, Byoung Yoon; Roberts, Barry L.

    2015-09-01

    The three-dimensional finite element mesh capturing realistic geometries of Bayou Choctaw site has been constructed using the sonar and seismic survey data obtained from the field. The mesh is consisting of hexahedral elements because the salt constitutive model is coded using hexahedral elements. Various ideas and techniques to construct finite element mesh capturing artificially and naturally formed geometries are provided. The techniques to reduce the number of elements as much as possible to save on computer run time with maintaining the computational accuracy is also introduced. The steps and methodologies could be applied to construct the meshes of Big Hill, Bryan Mound, and West Hackberry strategic petroleum reserve sites. The methodology could be applied to the complicated shape masses for not only various civil and geological structures but also biological applications such as artificial limbs.

  5. Cultural resources survey and assessment of the proposed Department of Energy Freeport to Texas City pipeline, Brazoria and Galveston Counties, Texas. Final report

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Castille, G.J.; Whelan, J.P. Jr.

    1986-01-01

    An intensive survey and testing program of selected segments of a proposed Department of Energy pipeline were conducted by Coastal Environments, Inc., Baton Rouge, Louisiana, during December 1985 and January 1986. The proposed pipeline runs from Texas City, Galveston County to Bryan Mound, Brazoria County. The pedestrian survey was preceded by historical records survey to locate possible historic sites within the DOE righ-of-way. Four prehistoric sites within the ROW (41BO159, 160, 161, 162) and one outside the ROW (41BO163) were located. All are Rangia cuneata middens. The survey results are discussed with particular reference to the environmental settings of the sites and the effectiveness of the survey procedure. Two of the sites located within the ROW were subjected to additional testing. The results of the backhoe testing program are included in the site descriptions, and the scientific value of the sites are presented. 52 refs., 20 figs., 10 tabs.

  6. Environmental assessment of oil degasification at four Strategic Petroleum Reserve facilities in Texas and Louisiana

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1994-09-01

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) proposes to treat gassy oil at four Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) storage sites to lower the gas content of the stored crude oil and help ensure safe transfer of the oil during drawdown. The crude oil is stored underground in caverns created in salt domes. The degree of gassiness of the oil varies substantially among sites and among caverns within a site. This environmental assessment describes the proposed degasification operation, its alternatives, and potential environmental impacts. The need for degasification has arisen because over time, gases, principally methane and nitrogen, have migrated into and become dissolved in the stored crude oil. This influx of gas has raised the crude oil vapor pressure above limits required by safety and emission guidelines. When oil is drawn from the caverns, excess gases may come out of solution. Based on preliminary data from an ongoing sampling program, between 200 and 350 million of the 587 million barrels of crude oil stored at these four sites would require processing to remove excess gas. Degasification, a commonly used petroleum industry process, would be done at four crude oil storage facilities: Bryan Mound and Big Hill in Texas, and West Hackberry and Bayou Choctaw in Louisiana. DOE would use a turnkey services contract for engineering, procurement, fabrication, installation, operation and maintenance of two degasification plants. These would be installed initially at Bryan Mound and West Hackberry. Degasification would be complete in less than three years of continuous operations. This report summarizes the environmental impacts of this gasification process.

  7. Expediting the commercial disposal option: Low-level radioactive waste shipments from the Mound Plant

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Rice, S.; Rothman, R.

    1995-12-31

    In April, Envirocare of Utah, Inc., successfully commenced operation of its mixed waste treatment operation. A mixed waste which was (a) radioactive, (b) listed as a hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and (c) prohibited from land disposal was treated using Envirocare`s full-scale Mixed Waste Treatment Facility. The treatment system involved application of chemical fixation/stabilization technologies to reduce the leachability of the waste to meet applicable concentration-based RCRA treatment standards. In 1988, Envirocare became the first licensed facility for the disposal of naturally occurring radioactive material. In 1990, Envirocare received a RCRA Part B permit for commercial mixed waste storage and disposal. In 1994, Envirocare was awarded a contract for the disposal of DOE mixed wastes. Envirocare`s RCRA Part B permit allows for the receipt, storage, treatment, and disposal of mixed wastes that do not meet the land-disposal treatment standards of 40 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 268. Envirocare has successfully received, managed, and disposed of naturally occurring radioactive material, low-activity radioactive waste, and mixed waste from government and private generators.

  8. Closure of Project Chariot Soil Disposal Mound and Cesium 137 Plot.

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

  9. Five-Year Review Report Fourth Five-Year Review for the Mound...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... of, to the extent permitted by applicable law, utilities at reasonable cost, to the State ... of, to the extent permitted by applicable law, utilities at reasonable cost to Gran tor. ...

  10. Mound Facility activities in chemical and physical research: July-December 1979

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1980-06-18

    Research is reported in the following fields: isotope separation (Ar, C, He, Kr, Ne, O, Xe), low-temperature research (H intermolecular potential functions, gas analysis in trennschaukel), separation chemistry (/sup 229/Th, /sup 231/Pa, /sup 230/Th, /sup 234/U), separation research (liquid thermal diffusion, Ca isotope separation, molecular beam scattering, mutual diffusion of noble gas mixtures, lithium chemical exchange with cryptands), and calculations in plutonium chemistry (algorithms, valence in natural water). (DLC)

  11. MLM-462 Contract Number AT-33-l-GtiN-53 MOUND LABORATCRY Operatsd...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ... are presented in a letter to the Chief, .4pplieS BAopbys:zs Branch, Division of Biology and Xe.lcins (see TAB D). -5- m-451 3. Prelimlnsry Work in Connection with the ...

  12. Survivability of ancient man-made earthen mounds: implications for uranium mill tailings impoundments

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Lindsey, C.G.; Mishima, J.; King, S.E.; Walters, W.H.

    1983-06-01

    As part of a study for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) is investigating long-term stabilization techniques for uranium mill impoundments. Part of this investigation involves the design of a rock armoring blanket (riprap) to mitigate wind and water erosion of the underlying soil cover, which in turn prevents exposure of the tailings to the environment. However, the need for the armoring blanket, as well as the blanket's effectiveness, depends on the stability of the underlying soil cap (radon suppression cover) and on the tailings themselves. Compelling evidence in archaeological records suggests that large man-made earthen structures can remain sound and intact for time periods comparable to those required for the stabilization of the tailings piles if properly constructed. We present archaeological evidence on the existence and survivability of man-made earthen and rock structures through specific examples of such structures from around the world. We also review factors contributing to their survival or destruction and address the influence of climate, building materials, and construction techniques on survivability.

  13. Five-Year Review Report Fourth Five-Year Review for the Mound...

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    ...... 3. Tanks, Vaults, Storage Vessels X NA Good ...... 3. Tanks, Vaults, Storage Vessels NA Good ...

  14. LEGAL NOTICE for Mound Site 2016 CERCLA Five-Year Review

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Groundwater monitoring plans for each remedy are approved by the regulators. ICs are legal and administrative tools incorporated into deed restrictions on future land and ...

  15. Mound activities in chemical and physical research: July-December 1982

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1983-06-20

    Research is reported in the following areas: low-temperature research (kinetics of DT formation in D/sub 2/ + T/sub 2/ mixtures, calculation of charged particle density in tritium containing CT/sub 4/, deuterium triple point cell), separation research (liquid thermal diffusion of methyl chloride and bromine-81 in bromobenzene, separation of Ca and Zr isotopes, triple-pumped detector, magnesium two-phase chemical exchange, extraction columns for Ca isotope enrichment, reflux-electrochemical NO-HNO/sub 3/ chemical exchange for /sup 15/N enrichment, testing of boron phosphate for Pu adsorption), and metal hydride studies (prediction of nonmagnetic Kondo effect in metal hydrides). (DLC)

  16. Ultrasonic processor reduces drill-cuttings size and eliminates subsea mounds

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Gaddy, D.E.

    1997-10-06

    Drill cuttings size reduction using ultrasonics eliminated a subsea clean-up and significantly reduced the environmental impact in a North Sea drilling project. Reduction in cuttings size allows for a wider areal dispersion when released into the ocean because they are held in suspension longer than larger sizes. Thus, ocean currents carry the smaller cuttings farther away from the well template, leaving a much wider footprint than larger cuttings sizes. This eliminates the pile-up of cuttings that otherwise would contaminate and harm the marine habitat.

  17. Environmental/Interest Groups

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Road Springboro, OH 45066 (937) 748-4757 No email address available Mound Museum Association Dr. Don Sullenger President Mound Advanced Technology Center 720 Mound Road ...

  18. Dining - Local Information - Radiation Effects Facility / Cyclotron...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    The BryanCollege station area has a wide variety of restaurants ranging from fast food to fine dining. The bryan-College station Convention and Visitors bureau has a good...

  19. Gas intrusion into SPR caverns

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Hinkebein, T.E.; Bauer, S.J.; Ehgartner, B.L.; Linn, J.K.; Neal, J.T.; Todd, J.L.; Kuhlman, P.S.; Gniady, C.T.; Giles, H.N.

    1995-12-01

    The conditions and occurrence of gas in crude oil stored in Strategic Petroleum Reserve, SPR, caverns is characterized in this report. Many caverns in the SPR show that gas has intruded into the oil from the surrounding salt dome. Historical evidence and the analyses presented here suggest that gas will continue to intrude into many SPR caverns in the future. In considering why only some caverns contain gas, it is concluded that the naturally occurring spatial variability in salt permeability can explain the range of gas content measured in SPR caverns. Further, it is not possible to make a one-to-one correlation between specific geologic phenomena and the occurrence of gas in salt caverns. However, gas is concluded to be petrogenic in origin. Consequently, attempts have been made to associate the occurrence of gas with salt inhomogeneities including anomalies and other structural features. Two scenarios for actual gas intrusion into caverns were investigated for consistency with existing information. These scenarios are gas release during leaching and gas permeation through salt. Of these mechanisms, the greater consistency comes from the belief that gas permeates to caverns through the salt. A review of historical operating data for five Bryan Mound caverns loosely supports the hypothesis that higher operating pressures reduce gas intrusion into caverns. This conclusion supports a permeability intrusion mechanism. Further, it provides justification for operating the caverns near maximum operating pressure to minimize gas intrusion. Historical gas intrusion rates and estimates of future gas intrusion are given for all caverns.

  20. 1989 Annual environmental report for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Not Available

    1990-06-01

    This report, provided annually, summarizes monitoring data collected to assess Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) impacts on the environment. The report serves as a management tool for mitigating such impacts, thus serving the public interest by ensuring environmentally sound operation of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR). Included is a description of each site's environment, an overview of the SPR environmental program, and a recapitulation of special environmental activities and events associated with each SPR site during 1989. The active permits and the results of the environmental monitoring program (i.e., air, surface water, groundwater, and waste discharges) are discussed by site. The quality assurance program is presented which includes results from laboratory and field audits and studies performed internally and by regulatory agencies. In general, no significant adverse environmental impact resulted from SPR activities during 1989, except for a brine release from a pipeline perforation south of the Bryan Mound site adversely affecting a small area of marsh vegetation which is recovering at this time. 22 refs., 15 figs., 17 tabs.

  1. Literature Survey Concerning the Feasibility of Remedial Leach for Select Phase I Caverns

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Weber, Paula D.; Flores, Karen A.; Lord, David L.

    2015-09-01

    Bryan Mound 5 ( BM5 ) and West Hackberry 9 ( WH9 ) have the potential to create a significant amount of new storage space should the caverns be deemed "leach - ready". This study discusses the original drilling history of the caverns, surrounding geology, current stability, and, based on this culmination of data, makes a preliminary assessment of the leach potential for the cavern. The risks associated with leaching BM5 present substantial problems for the SPR . The odd shape and large amount of insoluble material make it difficult to de termine whether a targeted leach would have the desired effect and create useable ullage or further distort the shape with preferential leaching . T he likelihood of salt falls and damaged or severed casing string is significant . In addition, a targeted le ach would require the relocation of approximately 27 MMB of oil . Due to the abundance of unknown factors associated with this cavern, a targeted leach of BM5 is not recommended. A targeted leaching of the neck of WH 9 could potentially eliminate or diminis h the mid - cavern ledge result ing in a more stable cavern with a more favorable shape. A better understanding of the composition of the surrounding salt and a less complicated leaching history yields more confidence in the ability to successfully leach this region. A targeted leach of WH9 can be recommended upon the completion of a full leach plan with consideration of the impacts upon nearby caverns .

  2. Strategic Petroleum Reserve site environmental report for calendar year 1997

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1998-11-01

    The purpose of this Site Environmental Report (SER) is to characterize site environmental management performance, confirm compliance with environmental standards and requirements, and highlight significant programs and efforts for the US Department of Energy (DOE) Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR). The SER, provided annually in accordance with DOE order 5400.1, serves the public by summarizing monitoring data collected to assess how the SPR impacts the environment. The SER provides a balanced synopsis of non-radiological monitoring and regulatory compliance data and affirms that the SPR has been operating within acceptable regulatory limits. Included in this report is a describe of each site`s environment, an overview of the SPR environmental program, and a recapitulation of special environmental activities and events associated with each SPR site during 1997. Two of these highlights include decommissioning of the Weeks Island site, involving the disposition of 11.6 million m{sup 3} (73 million barrels) of crude oil inventory, as well as the degasification of over 12.6 million m{sup 3} (79.3 million barrels) of crude oil inventory at the Big Hill and Bryan Mound facilities.

  3. Sonar atlas of caverns comprising the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Volume 2, Big Hill Site, Texas.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Rautman, Christopher Arthur; Lord, Anna Snider

    2007-08-01

    Downhole sonar surveys from the four active U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve sites have been modeled and used to generate a four-volume sonar atlas, showing the three-dimensional geometry of each cavern. This volume 2 focuses on the Big Hill SPR site, located in southeastern Texas. Volumes 1, 3, and 4, respectively, present images for the Bayou Choctaw SPR site, Louisiana, the Bryan Mound SPR site, Texas, and the West Hackberry SPR site, Louisiana. The atlas uses a consistent presentation format throughout. The basic geometric measurements provided by the down-cavern surveys have also been used to generate a number of geometric attributes, the values of which have been mapped onto the geometric form of each cavern using a color-shading scheme. The intent of the various geometrical attributes is to highlight deviations of the cavern shape from the idealized cylindrical form of a carefully leached underground storage cavern in salt. The atlas format does not allow interpretation of such geometric deviations and anomalies. However, significant geometric anomalies, not directly related to the leaching history of the cavern, may provide insight into the internal structure of the relevant salt dome.

  4. Geothermal Development and the Use of Categorical Exclusions...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    of the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) geothermal CXs; Compare current CXs for oil, gas, and geothermal energy; Describe bills proposing new statutory CXs; Examine the ...

  5. Geothermal Development and the Use of Categorical Exclusions...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    history of the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) geothermal CXs;Compare current CXs for oil, gas, and geothermal energy; Describe bills proposing new statutory CXs; Examine the ...

  6. Microsoft Word - NO1113_Dewatering report.doc

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Dewatering Cost Estimate This page intentionally left blank Pinellas Site: Bryan Dairy Road Construction Dewatering Preliminary Layout Cost Estimate Dewatering Near Side and Far Side of Streets No. Item Qty. Unit Unit Cost Cost Cost Basis 1 6" Header w/Well Points 3 Bryan Dairy - North- No.1 A&B 200 LF $5.25 $1,050.00 Croy Dewatering 2 Bryan Dairy - North-No. 2 100 LF $5.25 $525.00 Croy Dewatering 2 Bryan Dairy - North-No. 3 520 LF $5.25 $2,730.00 Croy Dewatering 4 Bryan Dairy - South

  7. Staff | Energy Systems Integration | NREL

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    Staff NREL's Energy Systems Integration directorate includes the Power Systems Engineering Center, Computational Science Center, Cyber-Physical Systems Security and Resilience Center, and Energy Systems Integration Facility operations staff. Photo of Bryan Hannegan Bryan Hannegan Associate Lab Director, Energy Systems Integration Dr. Bryan Hannegan leads the lab's global initiative to optimize links among electricity, fuel, thermal, water, and communication networks to enable a more sustainable

  8. Bryant Polzin | Argonne National Laboratory

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    Bryan Long (Acting) About Us Bryan Long (Acting) - Deputy CIO for Enterprise Operations & Shared Services Mr. Bryan K. Long is the (Acting) Deputy Chief Information Officer (OCIO) for Enterprise Operations and Shared Services at the United States Department of Energy (DOE). In this position, he is responsible for providing reliable, secure, and cost-effective information technology support services that satisfy business needs. With more than 30 years of technical implementation and

  9. Appliance Standards and Building Codes

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    ... Team Lead - Test Procedures and Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement Ashley Armstrong, (202) 586-6590 * Lucas Adin, (202) 287-1317 * Bryan Berringer, (202) 586-0371 * Josh ...

  10. NREL to Advance Technologies for Microgrid Projects - News Releases...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    such as wind and solar energy, combined heat and power, energy storage, and demandresponse," NREL's Associate Director for Energy Systems Integration Bryan Hannegan said. ...

  11. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Sok, Devin ; Laserson, Uri ; Laserson, Jonathan ; Liu, Yi ; Vigneault, Francois ; Julien, Jean- Philippe ; Briney, Bryan ; Ramos, Alejandra ; Saye, Karen F. ; Le, Khoa ; et al ...

  12. Mr. Fred Cartwright Executive Director, Clemson University Internation...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    for Automotive Research Mr. Bryan Dods Executive & Chief Engineer GE Power & Water Mr. Tom Elswick Director of Business Development - Products & Systems Siemens Industry USA Mr. ...

  13. EIA - Energy Conferences & Presentations.

    Annual Energy Outlook

    (EIA) Speakers: Denise Bode (American Wind Energy Association) Bryan Hannegan ... University in 1995. Denise Bode, American Wind Energy Association U.S. Wind Industry: On ...

  14. Microsoft Word - Data Classification Security Framework V5.doc

    Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    2007 Security Framework for Control System Data Classification and Protection Bryan T. ... Security Framework for Control System Data Classification and Protection 2 Issued by ...

  15. "Conflict Between Economic Growth and Environmental Protection...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    9, 2012, 4:15pm Colloquia MBG Auditorium "Conflict Between Economic Growth and Environmental Protection", Dr. Bryan Czech, resident, Center for the Advancement of the Steady State...

  16. A MICROFLUIDIC PLATFORM FOR THE FLUIDIC ISOLATION AND OBSERVATION...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Authors: Moorman, Matthew Wallace ; James, Conrad D. ; Carson, Bryan D. ; Manginell, Ronald Paul ; Branda, Catherine 1 ; Renzi, Ronald F. 1 ; Singh, Anup K. 1 ; Martino, ...

  17. Sandia National Laboratories: News: Publications: Lab News

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    December 12, 2014 Turning biological cells to stone improves cancer and stem cell research Sandia researchers Bryan Kaehr (1815) and Kristin Meyer (1815) analyze a silicized...

  18. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Victoria (3) Iversen, Colleen M (2) Norby, Richard (2) Sullivan, Patrick F. (2) Allen, Michael F. (1) Brooks, Jonathan (1) Childs, Joanne (1) Curtis, Bryan (1) Eissenstat, David...

  19. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... channels Herbst, Daniel C. ; Witten, Thomas A. ; Tsai, Tsung-Han ; Coughlin, E. Bryan ... ; Chen, Lang ; Pasquarella, Joseph R. ; Holmes, Kathryn V. ; Li, Fang ; UMM) July 2013 ...

  20. Charles County, Maryland: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Information (Open El) [EERE & EIA]

    Bryans Road, Maryland Hughesville, Maryland Indian Head, Maryland La Plata, Maryland Port Tobacco Village, Maryland Potomac Heights, Maryland St. Charles, Maryland Waldorf,...

  1. Microsoft PowerPoint - SWL NERC status june 2009.ppt

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    Sandra Spence * SPA Gary Cox * SWD Sherman Jones * NWD Karl Bryan * MVD Jeff Artman 5 COE Status of NERC Compliance * Current Level of USACE compliance varies per District. ...

  2. Structural basis for bifunctional peptide recognition at human...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Raimund ; Fromme, Petra ; Tourw, Dirk ; Schiller, Peter W. ; Roth, Bryan L. ; Ballet, Steven ; Katritch, Vsevolod ; Stevens, Raymond C. ; Cherezov , Vadim 1 ; UNC) 2 ;...

  3. Engineer develops 'leap forward' with 3D-printer | National Nuclear...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    NNSA Blog Lawrence Livermore Laboratory engineer Bryan Moran won an award last month for his 3D printing innovation. It could revolutionize additive manufacturing. Lawrence ...

  4. Microsoft Word - Data Classification Security Framework V5.doc

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    888P Unlimited Release Printed July 2007 Security Framework for Control System Data Classification and Protection Bryan T. Richardson and John Michalski Prepared by Sandia National ...

  5. Strategic petroleum reserve site environmental report for calendar year 1995

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1996-05-31

    The purpose of this Site Environmental Report (SER) is to characterize site environmental management performance, confirm compliance with environmental standards and requirements, and highlight significant programs and efforts. Included in this report is a description of each site`s environment, an overview of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) environmental program, and a recapitulation of special environmental activities and events associated with each SPR site during 1995. Two of these highlights include decommissioning of 3 the weeks Island facility, involving the disposition of 11.6 million m{sup 3} (73 million barrels) of crude oil inventory, as well as the degasification of over 4.5 million m{sup 3} (30 million barrels) of crude oil inventory at the Bryan Mound and West Hackberry facilities. The decision to decommission the weeks Island facility is a result of diminishing mine integrity from ground water intrusion. Transfer of Weeks Island oil began in November, 1995 with 2.0 million m{sup 3} (12.5 million barrels) transferred by December 31, 1995. Degasifying the crude oil is a major pollution prevention initiative because it will reduce potentially harmful emissions that would occur during oil movements by three or more orders of magnitude. Spills to the environment, another major topic, indicates a positive trend. There were only two reportable oil and three reportable brine spills during 1995, down from a total of 10 reportable spills in 1994. Total volume of oil spilled in 1995 was 56.3 m{sup 3} (354 barrels), and the total volume of brine spilled was 131.1 m{sup 3} (825 barrels). The longer term trend for oil and brine spills has declined substantially from 27 in 1990 down to five in 1995. All of the spills were reported to appropriate agencies and immediately cleaned up, with no long term impacts observed.

  6. Strategic Petroleum Reserve Site Environmental Report for calendar year 1994

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    1995-05-31

    The purpose of this Site Environmental Report (SER) is to characterize site environmental management performance, confirm compliance with environmental standards and requirements, and highlight significant programs and efforts. The SER, provided annually in accordance with Department of Energy DOE Order 5400.1, serves the public by summarizing monitoring data collected to assess how the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) impacts the environment. This report (SER) provides a balanced synopsis of non-radiological monitoring and regulatory compliance data and affirms that the SPR has been operating within acceptable regulatory limits. Included in this report is a description of each site`s environment, an overview of the SPR environmental program, and a recapitulation of special environmental activities and events associated with each SPR site during 1994. Two of these highlights include decommissioning of the Weeks Island facility (disposition of 73 million barrels of crude oil inventory) as well as the degasification of up to 144 million barrels of crude oil inventory at the Bayou Choctaw, Big Hill, Bryan Mound, and West Hackberry facilities. The decision to decommission the Weeks Island facility is a result of diminishing mine integrity from ground water intrusion. Degasifying the crude oil is required to reduce potentially harmful emissions that would occur during oil movements. With regard to still another major environmental action, 43 of the original 84 environmental findings from the 1992 DOE Tiger Team Assessment were closed by the end of 1994. Spills to the environment, another major topic, indicates a positive trend. Total volume of oil spilled in 1994 was only 39 barrels, down from 232 barrels in 1993, and the total volume of brine spilled was only 90 barrels, down from 370 barrels in 1993. The longer term trend for oil and brine spills has declined substantially from 27 in 1990 down to nine in 1994.

  7. Microsoft Word - S08557_PhI

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Office of Legacy Management Mound, Ohio, Site Phase I Groundwater Monitoring Report ... left blank LMSMNDS08557 Office of Legacy Management Mound, Ohio, Site Phase I ...

  8. Preliminary laboratory study of plutonium-238 dissolution from Mound soil by means of the ACT*DE*CON{sup SM} process

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Brown, K.A.; Heinrich, R.R.; Johnson, D.O.; Edgar, D.E.

    1992-04-01

    The treatment of contaminated soil presents a significant technical problem. Soil-washing and chemical-extraction methods have proven to be effective for specific applications, but a process with more comprehensive treatment properties that is both cost-effective and environmentally propitious is needed. Bradtec, Inc., has developed a process, the ACT*DE*CON{sup SM} process, that has been tested on soil contaminated with plutonium. The process effectively extracted Pu-238 after three washes, reducing the contamination levels from approximately 20 Bq/g to 1.6--1.9 Bq/g and yielding a decontamination factor ranging from 11 to 13. By using four or more ACT*DE*CON{sup SM} washes or a continuous-flow process with ACT*DE*CON{sup SM} solvents on a pilot-scale test, a target decontamination level of 0.93 Bq/g might be achievable.

  9. Preliminary laboratory study of plutonium-238 dissolution from Mound soil by means of the ACT*DE*CON sup SM process

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Brown, K.A.; Heinrich, R.R.; Johnson, D.O.; Edgar, D.E. )

    1992-04-01

    The treatment of contaminated soil presents a significant technical problem. Soil-washing and chemical-extraction methods have proven to be effective for specific applications, but a process with more comprehensive treatment properties that is both cost-effective and environmentally propitious is needed. Bradtec, Inc., has developed a process, the ACT*DE*CON{sup SM} process, that has been tested on soil contaminated with plutonium. The process effectively extracted Pu-238 after three washes, reducing the contamination levels from approximately 20 Bq/g to 1.6--1.9 Bq/g and yielding a decontamination factor ranging from 11 to 13. By using four or more ACT*DE*CON{sup SM} washes or a continuous-flow process with ACT*DE*CON{sup SM} solvents on a pilot-scale test, a target decontamination level of 0.93 Bq/g might be achievable.

  10. EA-0821: Operation of the Glass Melter Thermal Treatment Unit at the U.S. Department of Energy's Mound Plant, Miamisburg, Ohio

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This EA evaluates the environmental impacts of a proposal to use an existing glass melter thermal treatment unit (also known as a Penberthy Pyro-Converter joule-heated glass furnace) for the...

  11. EIS-0302: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Transfer of the Heat Source / Radioisotope Themoelectric Generator Assembly and Test Operations From the Mound Site

  12. Microsoft Word - N01535_B100 Plume Delin Rpt

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Building 100 Off-Site Plume Delineation South of Bryan Dairy Road Data Report for Rally Stores Property November 2010 LMS/PIN/N01535 This page intentionally left blank LMS/PIN/N01535 Pinellas Environmental Restoration Project Building 100 Area Off-Site Plume Delineation South of Bryan Dairy Road Data Report for Rally Stores Property November 2010 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy Building 100 Area Off-Site Plume Delineation South of Bryan Dairy Road November 2010 Doc.

  13. Feasibility report on alternative methods for cooling cavern oils at the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Levin, Bruce L.; Lord, David L.; Hadgu, Teklu

    2005-06-01

    Oil caverns at the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) are subjected to geothermal heating from the surrounding domal salt. This process raises the temperature of the crude oil from around 75 F upon delivery to SPR to as high as 130 F after decades of storage. While this temperature regime is adequate for long-term storage, it poses challenges for offsite delivery, with warm oil evolving gases that pose handling and safety problems. SPR installed high-capacity oil coolers in the mid-1990's to mitigate the emissions problem by lowering the oil delivery temperature. These heat exchanger units use incoming raw water as the cooling fluid, and operate only during a drawdown event where incoming water displaces the outgoing oil. The design criteria for the heat exchangers are to deliver oil at 100 F or less under all drawdown conditions. Increasing crude oil vapor pressures due in part to methane intrusion in the caverns is threatening to produce sufficient emissions at or near 100 F to cause the cooled oil to violate delivery requirements. This impending problem has initiated discussion and analysis of alternative cooling methods to bring the oil temperature even lower than the original design basis of 100 F. For the study described in this report, two alternative cooling methods were explored: (1) cooling during a limited drawdown, and (2) cooling during a degas operation. Both methods employ the heat exchangers currently in place, and do not require extra equipment. An analysis was run using two heat transfer models, HEATEX, and CaveMan, both developed at Sandia National Laboratories. For cooling during a limited drawdown, the cooling water flowrate through the coolers was varied from 1:1 water:oil to about 3:1, with an increased cooling capacity of about 3-7 F for the test cavern Bryan Mound 108 depending upon seasonal temperature effects. For cooling in conjunction with a degas operation in the winter, cavern oil temperatures for the test cavern Big Hill 102 were

  14. Sensible Solar Fueling Energy Revolution in Georgia | Department...

    Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Bryan says the future of American energy lies in greater usage of renewables. "Solar PV has no emissions of any kind, doesn't use water, doesn't create noise, has no waste and has ...

  15. Microsoft Word - 11-0632 Better Business Forms Data Report.doc

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    by Better Business Forms at 10950 Belcher Road in April 2011. The purpose of this ... on the Young - Rainey STAR Center south across Bryan Dairy Road onto private property. ...

  16. Ex Parte Memorandum | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Tuesday, May 4, 2010, Kit Kennedy and Kate Houren of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) initiated a telephone call with Daniel Cohen and Bryan Miller of the Department of ...

  17. Los Alamos National Security LLC Selected to Manage Los Alamos...

    Energy Savers

    ... This is the first time since its creation that operation of the laboratory has been open to competition. Media contact(s): Anne Womack Kolton, 202586-4940 Bryan Wilkes, 202...

  18. The November WINDExchange Webinar: Offshore Wind Market Update

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Aaron Smith, an energy analyst at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, will present an overview and update of the U.S. offshore wind market. Stacy Tingley and Bryan Wilson of Deepwater Wind...

  19. User Science Images

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    in the Pegasus Toroidal Experiment at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Author(s): John O'Bryan and Carl Sovinnec | Category: Fusion Energy | URL: http:www.cptc.wisc.edu...

  20. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    O'Shea, Brian W. (2) Oishi, Jeffrey S. (2) Smith, Britton D. (2) Bordner, James (1) Bryan, ... Skillman, Samuel W. ; O'Shea, Brian W. ; Smith, Britton D., E-mail: stephen.skory@colorad...

  1. ENZO: AN ADAPTIVE MESH REFINEMENT CODE FOR ASTROPHYSICS (Journal...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Authors: Bryan, Greg L. ; Turk, Matthew J. 1 ; Norman, Michael L. ; Bordner, James ; Xu, Hao ; Kritsuk, Alexei G. 2 ; O'Shea, Brian W. ; Smith, Britton 3 ; Abel, Tom ; Wang, ...

  2. BCS Fuel Cells | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Information (Open El) [EERE & EIA]

    BCS Fuel Cells Jump to: navigation, search Name: BCS Fuel Cells Place: Bryan, Texas Zip: TX 77801 Product: A privately held corporation from Texas, BCS is a developer of PEM fuel...

  3. FRED User Group

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    Fuel Reliability: U.S. Leaker Status Courtesy: Mike Reitmeyer (Exelon) ... NextEra Energy 6. Security-Bryan Hanson, Exelon 7. Training-Randy Edington, APS 8. Work ...

  4. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Keith (1) Bryan Huff (1) Christina D,Moon (1) Christopher G,Knight (1) Christopher M,Thomas (1) David Williams (1) David,Harris (1) Douglas G. Patchen (1) Elizabeth,Saunders...

  5. U.S. Department of Energy N N E E W W S S For Immediate Release...

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    N N E E W W S S For Immediate Release Media Contact: Bryan Wilkes December 12, 2002 (202) 586-7371 Brooks Names New Diversity and Outreach Manager New diversity director hired for...

  6. Probabilistic Performance Assessment: SCC of SNF Interim Storage...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Probabilistic Performance Assessment: SCC of SNF Interim Storage Canisters C. Bryan1, C. ... Effect of Initial Heat Load Two alternative cases run, with 4 kW and 10 kW heat ...

  7. "Title","Creator/Author","Publication Date","OSTI Identifier...

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    Fundamental study of CO2-H2O-mineral interactions for carbon sequestration, with emphasis on the nature of the supercritical fluid-mineral interface.","Bryan, Charles R.; Dewers,...

  8. engineering

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    an award last month for his 3D printing innovation. It could revolutionize additive manufacturing.

    Lawrence Livermore Lab engineer Bryan Moran wasn't necessarily...

  9. additive manufacturuing

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    an award last month for his 3D printing innovation. It could revolutionize additive manufacturing.

    Lawrence Livermore Lab engineer Bryan Moran wasn't necessarily...

  10. EC Publications

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    Sampling, Crack Growth Modeling and Experimental PlansBryan admin 2016-04-18T20:58:24+00:00 Popular Downloads Solar Energy Grid Integration Systems: Final Report of ...

  11. BPA-2014-00537-FOIA Request

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    Act must be signed and, therefore, cannot be submitted on this form. Name Bryan Edwards Email Orga nizati on Mailin g Addre ss City State Phon C FAX Ex. xxx-xxx-xxxx...

  12. Document: 1095-0005 Actionee: Dorothy Riehie * Document Date...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    E. GANO JOHN K. JOHNSEN FAX (509) 453-6874 BRYAN G. EVENSON (1946-1993) SHAWN M. MURPHY MICHAEL J. THORNIER BRUCE P. HANSONOUFIENMR MEGAN K MURPHY (1922-2006)OUFIENMR 1095-0005...

  13. engineering | National Nuclear Security Administration

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Engineer develops 'leap forward' with 3D-printer Lawrence Livermore Laboratory engineer Bryan Moran won an award last month for his 3D printing innovation. It could revolutionize ...

  14. Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory : 2011

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    Make a left onto TowerView Road and then make another left at the first stop light onto Science Dr; You should park in the Bryan Center parking Garage which is located on the...

  15. SREL Reprint #3252

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    populations from three regions of the American continent Cynthia Martins Villar1, Albert Lawrence Bryan Jr.2, Stacey Lyn Lance2, Erika Martins Braga3, Carlos Congrains1, and...

  16. SREL Reprint #3299

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    9 Precipitation influences on uptake of a global pollutant by a coastal avian species Albert L. Bryan Jr.1, Joel W. Snodgrass2, Heather A. Brant1, Christopher S. Romanek1, Charles...

  17. Sandia Energy - Nanoscale Effects on Heterojunction Electron...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    in GaNAlGaN CoreShell Nanowires" published in Nano Letters, Sandia scientist Bryan M. Wong, and EFRC scientists Franois Lonard, Qiming Li, and George T. Wang, present a...

  18. Sandia Energy - Alyssa Christy

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    in GaNAlGaN CoreShell Nanowires" published in Nano Letters, Sandia scientist Bryan M. Wong, and EFRC scientists Franois Lonard, Qiming Li, and George T. Wang, present a...

  19. Biomass Program Monthly News Blast: June

    Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Meeting Summary, Paul Bryan, May 10, 2011 Update your subscriptions, modify your password or e-mail address, or stop subscriptions at any time on your Subscriber Preferences Page. ...

  20. Alumni | Photosynthetic Antenna Research Center

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    Alumni Alumni Chi Zhao Alumnus Read more about Chi Zhao Srinivasa Rao Allu Alumnus Read more about Srinivasa Rao Allu Ran Zhang Alumnus Read more about Ran Zhang Claire Mai Read more about Claire Mai Talia Rubnitz Alumna Read more about Talia Rubnitz Bryan Fry Alumnus Read more about Bryan Fry Peter Rosenquist Alumnus Read more about Peter Rosenquist Christine Ajinjeru Alumna Read more about Christine Ajinjeru Alicia Lohman Alumna Read more about Alicia Lohman Sudipa Ghimire-Rijal Alumna Read

  1. News Item

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    , 2016 Time: 11:00 am Speaker: Bryan Huey, University of Connecticut Title: Nanoscale Investigations of Solar Cell Performance Location: 67-3111 Chemla Room Biography: Associate Professor Bryan Huey's research group develops and applies novel variations of Atomic Force Microscopy. Research projects include: Tomographic AFM Switching dynamics in ferroelectric and multiferroic materials. Piezoactuation of novel Piezoelectrics. In-situ imaging of Micro-Electro-Mechanical-Systems Nanoscale

  2. Microsoft Word - N01628_Sitewide semiannual Dec-May 2011

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    A Building 100 Area South Plume Data Reports Pinellas Environmental Restoration Project Building 100 Off-Site Plume Delineation South of Bryan Dairy Road Data Report for Rally Stores Property November 2010 LMS/PIN/N01535 This page intentionally left blank LMS/PIN/N01535 Pinellas Environmental Restoration Project Building 100 Area Off-Site Plume Delineation South of Bryan Dairy Road Data Report for Rally Stores Property November 2010 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy

  3. Management Overview

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    SPECTROSCOPIC ON-LINE MONITORING OF RADIOCHEMICAL STREAMS NEET Review September 17, 2014 Sam Bryan, Tatiana Levitskaia, and Amanda Casella sam.bryan@pnnl.gov Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Process Monitoring Can Be Achieved Throughout the Flowsheet Global vision: Process monitoring/control at various points in flowsheet Every flowsheet contains Raman and/or UV-vis-NIR active species Coriolis and conductivity instruments can be used on all process streams Monitoring Is Not Flowsheet

  4. Management Overview

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    SPECTROSCOPIC ON-LINE MONITORING OF RADIOCHEMICAL STREAMS NEET Review September 17, 2014 Sam Bryan, Tatiana Levitskaia, and Amanda Casella sam.bryan@pnnl.gov Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Process Monitoring Can Be Achieved Throughout the Flowsheet Global vision: Process monitoring/control at various points in flowsheet Every flowsheet contains Raman and/or UV-vis-NIR active species Coriolis and conductivity instruments can be used on all process streams Monitoring Is Not Flowsheet

  5. January

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    January January We are your source for reliable, up-to-date news and information; our scientists and engineers can provide technical insights on our innovations for a secure nation. Steven Conradson and Bryan Henson, new Fellows of the Chemistry Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Conradson and Henson named AAAS Fellows Steven Conradson and Bryan Henson are new Fellows of the Chemistry Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. -

  6. H2 @ Scale Â… A Potential Opportunity Webinar

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    @SCALE : Deeply Decarbonizing our Energy System U.S. Department of Energy Fuel Cell Technologies Office July 28 th , 2016 Presenter: Bryan Pivovar : National Renewable Energy Laboratory DOE Host: Erika Gupta : Fuel Cell Technologies Office 2 | Fuel Cell Technologies Office eere.energy.gov Question and Answer * Please type your questions into the question box 2 H2 at Scale FCTO Webinar July 28, 2016 3 July 28, 2016 Webinar H 2 at Scale: Deeply Decarbonizing our Energy System Presented by Bryan

  7. CX-006107: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Texas-City-Flower Mound, Town ofCX(s) Applied: A9, B2.5, B5.1Date: 07/11/2011Location(s): Flower Mound, TexasOffice(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  8. Program Update: 1st Quarter 2015

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Inside this update: Successful Transition from Mound Site to Mound Business Park Continues; Second Five-Year Plan to Address Uranium Contamination in the Navajo Nation; Nuclear Weapons Program...

  9. Other Stakeholders

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Mound Science and Energy Museum (MSEM) 1075 Mound Road Miamisburg, Ohio 45342-6714 Website: http:www.moundmuseum.com (937) 353-4457 E-mail: msern0l @clearwire.net Mr. ...

  10. Microsoft Word - S07963_MND 5yr

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    blank U.S. Department of Energy Mound, Ohio, Third Five-Year Review September 2011 Doc. ... Mound, Ohio, Third Five-Year Review U.S. Department of Energy Doc. No. ...

  11. EA-0821: Finding of No Significant Impact

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Operation of the Glass Melter Thermal Treatment Unit at the U.S. Department of Energy's Mound Plant, Miamisburg, Ohio

  12. Innovative Approach Cuts Cleanup Time in Half, Potentially Saving $6

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Million | Department of Energy Cuts Cleanup Time in Half, Potentially Saving $6 Million Innovative Approach Cuts Cleanup Time in Half, Potentially Saving $6 Million October 31, 2016 - 12:05pm Addthis DOE and Mound Site personnel view an emulsified oil injection, part of SRNL's enhanced attenuation groundwater treatment approach at Mound. DOE and Mound Site personnel view an emulsified oil injection, part of SRNL's enhanced attenuation groundwater treatment approach at Mound. MIAMISBURG, Ohio

  13. EA-1438: Finding of No Significant Impact

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Future Location of the Heat Source/Radioisotope Power System Assembly and Test Operations at the Mound Site, Miamisburg, Ohio

  14. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... marine boundary layer (1) thorium (1) transmutation (1) transuranium ...

  15. DOE-HDBK-1079-94; Primer on Tritium Safe Handling Practices

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    previously developed by DOE sites (Savannah River, Rocky Flats, and Mound) and is intended ... . . . . . . 17 Bioassay and Internal Dosimetry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...

  16. More Information on Economic Development

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Mound Advanced Technology Center (MATC) is a business and scientific technology park at the Mound Site. MATC site - http://mound.com/ More Information on Economic Development at MATC: * Comprehensive Reuse Plan (future document) * Marketing Plan (future document) * Brochures (future documents) * Annual Reports (future document) * Miscellaneous Fact Sheets (future document)

  17. Did the Mississippian Lodgepole buildup at Dickinson Field (North Dakota) form as a gas seep ({open_quotes}vent{close_quotes}) community?

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    Longman, M.W.

    1996-10-01

    The Lower Mississippian Lodgepole carbonate buildup reservoir at Dickinson Field in Stark County, North Dakota, has been widely reported as being a Waulsortian (or Waulsortian-like) mound. The term {open_quotes}Waulsortian mound{close_quotes} is used for a variety of Early Mississippian carbonate buildups that share a number of features including an abundance of carbonate mud, a {open_quotes}framework{close_quotes} of organisms such as fenestrate bryozoans and crinoids that tended to trap or baffle sediment, and a general absence of marine-cemented reef framework. Although the age of the Lodgepole mound at Dickinson Field qualifies it to be a Waulsortian mound, petrographic study of cores reveals that the reservoir rocks are quite unlike those in true Waulsortian mounds. Instead of being dominated by carbonate mud, the Lodgepole mound core is dominated by marine cement. Furthermore, ostracods and microbial limestones are common in the mound core where they occur with crinoid debris and small amounts of bryozoan, coral, and brachiopod debris. The abundant microbial limestones and marine cement indicate that the Dickinson mound formed as a lithified reef on the sea floor rather than as a Waulsortian mud mound. The microbial limestones, marine cement, and common ostracods in the mount core, and the fact that the mound nucleated almost directly o top of the Bakken Shale, suggest that the Dickinson Lodgepole mound formed at the site of a submarine spring and gas seep.

  18. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Advanced Technology Vehicles...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Reequipping and Engineering CX(s) Applied: B1.31, B5.1 Date: 09062011 ... Aptera All-Electric and Hybrid Electric Vehicles CX(s) Applied: B1.31, B5.1 Date: 0620...

  19. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Idaho Operations Office...

    Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    Stack Modifications for Sample Probe Replacement CX(s) Applied: B2.2 Date: 05112015 ... Determination Test Reactor Area-774 Substation Equipment Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B2.5 ...

  20. ORISE receives its 12th DOE Star of Excellence Award for safety

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    ORISE receives its 12th DOE Star of Excellence Award for safety FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 4, 2016 FY16-50 Bryan Campbell, Brenda Longmire, Tom Wantland and Brad Davy Employees (L to R) Bryan Campbell, Brenda Longmire and Tom Wantland received DOE's Star of Excellence Award from Brad Davy (far right), DOE's director for the Office of Worker Safety and Health Assistance. Click image for full resolution version. OAK RIDGE, Tenn.-The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), which

  1. Alkaline Membrane Fuel Cell Workshop Welcome and OverviewInnovation

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Alkaline Membrane Fuel Cell Workshop Welcome and Overview Innovation for Our Energy Future Bryan Pivovar National Renewable Energy Laboratory AMFC Workshop May 8, 2011 Innovation for Our Energy Future 2 Welcome - Your participation is appreciated - Date of Workshop Innovation for Our Energy Future 3 Meeting Location Innovation for Our Energy Future Workshop Agenda SUNDAY, MAY 8, 2011 1:00 pm - 1:15 pm Welcome and Opening Remarks (Salon H) 1:15 pm - 1:45 pm Workshop Overview: Dr. Bryan Pivovar,

  2. SRS Reaches Milestone by Finishing Ash Basin Cleanup's First Phase |

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    Department of Energy SRS Reaches Milestone by Finishing Ash Basin Cleanup's First Phase SRS Reaches Milestone by Finishing Ash Basin Cleanup's First Phase November 16, 2016 - 12:30pm Addthis Workers add the geosynthetic layer to the protective mound capping the dirt and coal ash landfill. Workers add the geosynthetic layer to the protective mound capping the dirt and coal ash landfill. Several layers make up the protected mound capping the landfill containing coal ash and dirt. Several

  3. Microsoft Word - S07535_2010_GW_Mon

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Mound Site Phase I Groundwater Monitoring Report Calendar Year 2010 March 2011 LMS/MND/S07535 This page intentionally left blank LMS/MND/S07535 Mound Site Phase I Groundwater Monitoring Report Calendar Year 2010 March 2011 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy Mound Site Phase I Groundwater Monitoring Report-CY 2010 March 2011 Doc. No. S07535 Page i Contents Abbreviations

  4. Microsoft Word - S08562_6_7_8_GW_021512

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Mound, Ohio, Site Parcel 6, 7, and 8 Groundwater Monitoring Report Calendar Year 2011 September 2012 LMS/MND/S08562 This page intentionally left blank LMS/MND/S08562 Mound, Ohio, Site Parcel 6, 7, and 8 Groundwater Monitoring Report Calendar Year 2011 September 2012 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy Mound, Ohio, Parcel 6, 7, and 8 Groundwater Monitoring Report CY 2011 September 2012 Doc. No. S08562 Page i Contents Abbreviations

  5. Microsoft Word - S10173_2013_Annual_IC.docx

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Institutional Controls at the Mound Site Miamisburg, Ohio June 2013 LMS/MND/S10173 This page intentionally left blank LMS/MND/S10173 Annual Assessment of the Effectiveness of Institutional Controls at the Mound Site Miamisburg, Ohio June 2013 This page intentionally left blank U.S. Department of Energy Annual Assessment of the Effectiveness of Sitewide Institutional Controls, Mound Site June 2013 Doc. No. S10173 Page i Contents Abbreviations

  6. TITLEPG.PDF

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Mound's Land Transfer Process December 1999 Developed by: Department of Energy -- Miamisburg Environmental Management Project, in coordination with: the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, and the Miamisburg-Mound Community Improvement Corporation 1 DOE-Mound's Land Transfer Process: Supplemental Text INTRODUCTION This document provides a description of the land transfer process developed by the Department of Energy-Miamisburg Environmental

  7. Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors (CASL...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    that have included management of CERCLA and RCRA remediation projects at the INL, Rocky Flats, and Mound laboratories, management of special nuclear materials at the INL, and...

  8. Preliminary Notice of Violation, Babcock & Wilcox of Ohio, Inc- EA-98-12

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Issued to Babcock & Wilcox of Ohio, Inc., related to Radiological Work Controls and Bioassay Program Deficiencies at the Mound Site, November 16, 1998 (EA-98-12)

  9. Listing of Defense Nuclear Facilities

    Energy Savers

    Listing of Defense Nuclear Facilities The facilities listed below are considered DOE defense nuclear facilities for purposes of Section 3161. Kansas City Plant Pinellas Plant Mound ...

  10. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... August 2009 Thorium Energy Futures Peggs, Stephen ; Roser, Thomas ; Parks, G ; Lindroos, ...

  11. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... Advanced Burner Reactor with Breed-and-Burn Thorium Blankets for Improved Economics and ...

  12. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... reactor (4) bwr (4) lwr (4) nestle (4) thorium (4) Filter by Author Powers, Jeffrey J ...

  13. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... Self-Sustaining Thorium Boiling Water Reactors Greenspan, Ehud ; Gorman, Phillip M. ; ...

  14. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... Production of Actinium-225 via High Energy Proton Induced Spallation of Thorium-232 ...

  15. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... Thorium based power systems and relevant safeguards considerations Fane, Brian M ; Murphy, ...

  16. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... rods (5) reactivity (5) simulation (5) thorium (5) thorium oxides (5) control (4) mixed ...

  17. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... scenarios are typically envisioned for thorium fuel cycles: 'open' cycles based on ...

  18. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... Fission-suppressed fusion breeder on the thorium cycle and nonproliferation Moir, R. W. ...

  19. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... reactors and associated plants (1) thorium (1) thorium reactors (1) uranium (1) ...

  20. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... and associated plants (2) spectra (2) thorium (2) uranium tetrafluoride (2) void ...

  1. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... Filter Results Filter by Subject fuel cycle (3) nuclear (3) thorium (3) design (2) doe (2) ...

  2. What we know today.ai

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    ... radioactive materials like uranium and thorium * Naturally radioactive materials are ... The short-term change maps better display the intricacies of the mound decay (blues ...

  3. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... Have feedback or suggestions for a way to improve these results? Thorium Energy Futures ...

  4. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... physics (2) radioactive ion beams (2) thorium (2) accelerator facilities (1) actinide ...

  5. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... physics and radiation physics (2) thorium (2) vacuum (2) actinide targets (1) ...

  6. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... Thorium Energy Futures Peggs, Stephen ; Roser, Thomas ; Parks, G ; Lindroos, Mats ; ...

  7. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... (5) fuel cycle (3) nuclear fuels (3) thorium (3) accelerator driven transmutation (2) ...

  8. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... January 2008 Thorium Energy Futures Peggs, Stephen ; Roser, Thomas ; Parks, G ; Lindroos, ...

  9. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... Full Text Available August 2004 Thorium Energy Futures Peggs, Stephen ; Roser, Thomas ; ...

  10. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... of radioactive elements, uranium and thorium in particular, presents new challenges. ...

  11. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... reactors and associated plants (1) thorium (1) transmutation (1) transuranium ...

  12. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... are intended for high uranium or thorium utilization, produce fissile material ...

  13. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... Filter Results Filter by Subject fuel cycle (2) nuclear (2) thorium (2) depletion (1) doe ...

  14. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... nuclear power plants (4) simulation (4) thorium (4) accidents (3) actinides (3) ...

  15. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... and activity in the uranium and thorium decay chains - inconsequential to ...

  16. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... Center, Morgantown, WV (United States) Mound Area Office, Miamisburg, OH (United ... This report details these findings. less Full Text Available May 2014 Thorium Energy ...

  17. Microsoft Word - readingroom.docx

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    9/2011 Mound Public Reading Room The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Administrative Record (AR) Database will continue to be available in the Mound Public Reading Room, now located at the Mound Science and Energy Museum, located at 1075 Mound Road, Miamisburg, Ohio, 45342. The museum is open from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on Saturdays. You may contact the museum at (937) 353-4457 or at msern0l @clearwire.net to make an appointment to use the reading

  18. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    ... States) Mound Plant, Miamisburg, OH (United States) NE-75, USDOE Office of Space and Defense Power Systems NNSA Kansas City Site Office (United States) National Energy ...

  19. Microsoft PowerPoint - Triay - EM Program Update

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ... Accelerator Laboratory 8 M *Nevada Test Site 44 M *Energy Technology Engineering Center 54 M *Mound 20 M *12 States, 17 Sites UraniumThorium 69 M Management & ...

  20. Modern Geothermal Features | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Information (Open El) [EERE & EIA]

    seeps (fumaroles) or pure fluid manifestations (geysers and hot springs) causing spectacular mineral formations (e.g. sinter terraces, tufa mounds). These types of...

  1. I

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    ... White River National Forest Terry Reetz, Black Hills National Forest Doug Schleusner, ... or earth mounds) that produce an integrated whole reflecting a primary cultural activity. ...

  2. MHK Technologies/Tidal Lagoons | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Information (Open El) [EERE & EIA]

    to shape the output curve in order to dispatch power in response to demand price signals. The impoundment structure is a conventional rubble mound breakwater (loose rock,...

  3. Holt County, Missouri: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Information (Open El) [EERE & EIA]

    Missouri Corning, Missouri Craig, Missouri Forest City, Missouri Fortescue, Missouri Maitland, Missouri Mound City, Missouri Oregon, Missouri Retrieved from "http:en.openei.org...

  4. Preliminary Notice of Violation, EG&G Incorporated- EA-97-10

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Isued to EG&G Incorporated, related to Bioassay and Internal Dosimetry Program Deficiencies at the Mound Plant, (EA-97-10)

  5. Search for: All records | SciTech Connect

    Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)

    of Energy's (DOE) Nuclear Energy (NE) Radioisotope Power Systems (RPS) Program ... Mound Plant, Miamisburg, OH (United States) NE-75, USDOE Office of Space and Defense Power ...

  6. Madison Parish, Louisiana: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Information (Open El) [EERE & EIA]

    Zone Subtype A. Places in Madison Parish, Louisiana Delta, Louisiana Mound, Louisiana Richmond, Louisiana Tallulah, Louisiana Retrieved from "http:en.openei.orgw...

  7. Microsoft Word - salescontract2008.docx

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    Sales Contract by and between the United States Department of Energy and the Miamisburg Mound Community Improvement Corporation (August 28, 2008) has been removed from the LM ...

  8. Ohio's 3rd congressional district: Energy Resources | Open Energy...

    Open Energy Information (Open El) [EERE & EIA]

    Institute Registered Energy Companies in Ohio's 3rd congressional district Edison Material Technology Center EMTEC JatroDiesel Miamisburg Mound Community Improvement Corp...

  9. FY 2011 Budget Request

    Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    ... Those former contractor workers are associated with the following sites: Rocky Flats, Fernald, Mound, Pinellas, Grand Junction, Portsmouth and Paducah. Under LM oversight, the ...

  10. Higher Power Energy LLC | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Information (Open El) [EERE & EIA]

    Higher Power Energy LLC Jump to: navigation, search Name: Higher Power Energy, LLC Place: Flower Mound, Texas Zip: 78028 Sector: Renewable Energy, Wind energy Product: Higher Power...

  11. From Hydrogen Fuel Cells to High-Altitude-Pilot Protection Suits...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    From Hydrogen Fuel Cells to High-Altitude-Pilot Protection Suits- Mound Science and Energy Museum Programs Cover a Wide Range of Topics From Hydrogen Fuel Cells to ...

  12. http://emdev.apps.em.doe.gov/EMDEV/Pages/groundwaterReport.aspx

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Mound Plume Remediation Contractor: Unknown Report Last Updated: 2009 Contaminants Halogenated VOCsSVOCs Present? Yes VOC Name Concentration (ppb) Regulatory Driver Cleanup...

  13. Audit Report: IG-0501 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    and Closure of the Miamisburg Environmental Management Project With the end of the cold war, the Miamisburg Environmental Management Project (MEMP), formerly known as the Mound...

  14. Microsoft Word - S10184_GW.docx

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    left blank U.S. Department of Energy Sitewide Groundwater Monitoring Report, ... Groundwater Monitoring Report, CY 2012, Mound, Ohio U.S. Department of Energy Doc. No. ...

  15. 2011 Annual IC Assessment Report

    Office of Legacy Management (LM)

    left blank U.S. Department of Energy Annual Assessment of the Effectiveness of ... of Sitewide Institutional Controls, Mound Site U.S. Department of Energy Doc. No. ...

  16. SR0605

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) all webpages (Extended Search)

    Until recently, these drums were covered with mounds of earth at SRSs central waste management facility. The drums were generated during decades of nuclear operations at SRS. ...

  17. Tarrant County, Texas: Energy Resources | Open Energy Information

    Open Energy Information (Open El) [EERE & EIA]

    Benbrook, Texas Blue Mound, Texas Briar, Texas Burleson, Texas Colleyville, Texas Crowley, Texas Dalworthington Gardens, Texas Edgecliff Village, Texas Euless, Texas Everman,...

  18. Long Term Innovative Technologies | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Long Term Innovative Technologies Long Term Innovative Technologies Presentation by Bryan Pivovar on DOE's Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies, Fuel Cell Presolicitation Workshop - Lakewood, CO March 16, 2010 fuelcell_pre-solicitation_wkshop_mar10_pivovar.pdf (1.2 MB) More Documents & Publications Resonance-Stabilized Anion Exchange Polymer Electrolytes Advanced Cathode Catalysts 2016 Alkaline Membrane Fuel Cell Workshop

  19. Q&A With Byron Washom of the University of California at San Diego

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Bryan Washom was setting world records for efficiency in solar power long before it was cool. And now, as the Director of Strategic Initiatives at the University of California at San Diego, he's using that drive to bring clean energy technology to the marketplace.

  20. FIA-12-0001- In the Matter of Kevin Leary

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    OHA issued a decision denying a FOIA appeal filed by Kevin Leary of a final determination issued by the DOE Richland Operations Office (RO). Mr. Leary requested copies of e-mails, the associated metadata, and instant messages for Margot Voogd, Larry Romine and Bryan Foley, from August 1, 2005, through January 31, 2009.

  1. FIA-12-0001- In the Matter of Kevin Leary

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    OHA issued a decision denying a FOIA appeal filed by Kevin Leary of a final determination issued by the DOE Richland Operations Office (RO). Mr. Leary requested copies of e-mails, the associated metadata, and instant messages for Margot Voogd, Larry Romine and Bryan Foley, from August 1, 2005, through January 31, 2009. RO informed Mr. Leary that no documents existed.

  2. A Downtown Denver Law Firm Leverages Tenant Improvement Funds to Cut Operating Expenses

    SciTech Connect (OSTI)

    2013-03-01

    Bryan Cave HRO (formerly Holme Roberts & Owen LLP, headquartered in Denver, Colorado), an international law firm, partnered with the U.S Department of Energy (DOE) to develop and implement solutions to retrofit existing buildings to reduce annual energy consumption by at least 30% versus pre-retrofit energy use as part of DOE’s Commercial Building Partnership (CBP) program.

  3. Microsoft PowerPoint - Adams - American Recovery and Reinvestment...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    211,775,000 211,775,000 1,325,505 Moab 108,350,000 108,350,000 6,365,420 Mound ... 309 1,491 9 Los Alamos (NM) 706 82 16 98 1 Moab (UT) 2,363 37 130 167 0 Mound (OH) 0 28 0 ...

  4. CX-009419: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Magnetic Pulser CX(s) Applied: None applied. Date: 10/30/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Kansas City Site Office

  5. CX-006491: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-006491: Categorical Exclusion Determination Photovoltaic Manufacturing Consortium CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 09012011 Location(s): Florida...

  6. CX-007867: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Exclusion Determination CX-007867: Categorical Exclusion Determination Northeast Photovoltaic Regional Training Provider CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B5.16 Date: 01272012...

  7. CX-010028: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Flame Forming Proppants CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/17/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  8. CX-013995: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Meson Hill Well Abandonment CX CX(s) Applied: B3.1Date: 07/24/2015 Location(s): IllinoisOffices(s): Fermi Site Office

  9. CX-012809: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    LURR 20140313 City of Vancouver Sewer Lateral CX(s) Applied: B4.9Date: 41906 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  10. CX-012122: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    OCGen Module Mooring Project CX(s) Applied: B5.25 Date: 04/29/2014 Location(s): Maine Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  11. CX-008471: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Tree Planting Initiative - Rebuild Western Mass CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 06/08/2012 Location(s): Massachusetts Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  12. CX-010150: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Celilo Fiber System CX(s) Applied: B4.7 Date: 04/15/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  13. CX-010375: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace Existing Firehouse CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 09/20/2011 Location(s): California Offices(s): Berkeley Site Office

  14. CX-012231: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mica Peak Radio Station upgrade CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 06/09/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  15. CX-009515: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Tide Creek Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 11/08/2012 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  16. CX-011215: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Nepese Marsh Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B2.5 Date: 10/17/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Fermi Site Office

  17. FE Categorical Exclusions | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    8, 2011 CX-006459: Categorical Exclusion Determination Analytical Physics - Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08082011 Location(s): Albany, Oregon...

  18. CX-012606: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Preparing of Environmental Samples for Analysis CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41810 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  19. CX-012581: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Demolition of Outfall Sampling Station CX(s) Applied: B1.23Date: 41844 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  20. CX-012572: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    H-Area Vehicle Barrier Installation CX(s) Applied: B1.15Date: 41862 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  1. CX-012566: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Z-Area Fire Tank Painting CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41865 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  2. CX-012628: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Deactivation and Decommissioning of 711-L CX(s) Applied: B1.23Date: 41793 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  3. CX-012559: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Seal Access Plugs at 105-C CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41872 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  4. CX-012587: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    HB-Line Security Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41835 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  5. CX-012583: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Biofuels Production Experiment CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41841 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  6. CX-008973: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Petrography Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/01/2012 Location(s): West Virginia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  7. CX-010367: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Asbestos Abatement Actions CX(s) Applied: B1.16 Date: 11/19/2012 Location(s): Tennessee, California, Virginia Offices(s): Berkeley Site Office

  8. CX-009312: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pecan Street Smart Grid Extension Service CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/30/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  9. CX-011628: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Enclosure Modification Project CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/05/2013 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  10. CX-012580: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Tritium Responsive Infrastructure Modifications CX(s) Applied: B1.15Date: 41844 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  11. CX-007793: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Jonesboro Maintenance Facility Additions CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 05/10/2011 Location(s): Arkansas Offices(s): Southwestern Power Administration

  12. CX-007798: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Springfield Maintenance Garage CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 12/08/2010 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Southwestern Power Administration

  13. CX-005846: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-005846: Categorical Exclusion Determination Wood Pole Replacement and Minor Access Road Maintenance Along Various Transmission Line Rights-Of-Way in the Wenatchee District CX(s) ...

  14. CX-008729: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Reverse Osmosis System Removal CX(s) Applied: B1.26 Date: 06/25/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  15. CX-010768: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    ZIRCEX Nuclear Fuel Dissolution Testing CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 08/12/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  16. CX-003164: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-003164: Categorical Exclusion Determination Optimization of Biomass Production Across a Landscape CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 07262010...

  17. CX-011194: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Particle Physics Division Outback Garage CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 09/19/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Fermi Site Office

  18. CX-012310: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sawmill Creek Stream Bank Erosion CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/06/2014 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Argonne Site Office

  19. CX-012437: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    High Energy Density Lithium Battery CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41878 Location(s): New YorkOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  20. CX-012028: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    High Temperature Laboratory CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/21/2014 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  1. CX-011416: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Technology Integration Program CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 12/19/2013 Location(s): Ohio Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  2. CX-011538: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ninemile Creek Lower Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 11/26/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  3. CX-011536: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Aeneans Creek Spring Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 11/25/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  4. CX-011537: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Wanacut Creek Upper Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 11/26/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  5. CX-012793: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    15-Minute Transmission Scheduling CX(s) Applied: B4.4, B4.5Date: 41933 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  6. CX-012110: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Cowlitz Falls Fish Facility Access Agreement Extension CX(s) Applied: A2 Date: 04/02/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  7. CX-009707: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Alcoa Power Sales Contract CX(s) Applied: B4.1 Date: 12/04/2012 Location(s): Oregon, Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  8. CX-009513: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Aquatic Invasive Mussels Monitoring CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 10/15/2012 Location(s): CX: none Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  9. CX-013632: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Alcoa Power Sales Contract Amendment CX(s) Applied: B4.11Date: 04/23/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  10. CX-008989: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    State Energy Program CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 08/27/2012 Location(s): Kansas Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  11. CX-008144: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Planned Repair of Flow Lines CX(s) Applied: B5.4 Date: 08/09/2011 Location(s): Wyoming Offices(s): RMOTC

  12. CX-010195: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Polymer Synthesis Lab - Modification CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04/15/2013 Location(s): Pennsylvania Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  13. CX-010241: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hydrogen Pathway Analyses CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 02/28/2013 Location(s): Virginia Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  14. CX-011564: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Excess Facilities Deactivation and Demolition CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 11/05/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  15. CX-012705: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC)-703 Fire Alarm Replacement CX(s) Applied: B2.2Date: 41858 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  16. CX-012725: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Materials and Fuel Complex (MFC)-782 Fire Sprinkler Installation CX(s) Applied: B2.2Date: 41829 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  17. CX-001627: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    CX-001627: Categorical Exclusion Determination Test Reactor Cask Implementation CX(s) ... This proposed action is a process and facility modification. The Advanced Test Reactor ...

  18. CX-013825: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Lab A19 Cleanroom Construction CX(s) Applied: B1.31Date: 06/29/2015 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  19. CX-012729: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Hydrogen Sulfide Scavenger BOA (Multiple) CX(s) Applied: B5.2Date: 41880 Location(s): LouisianaOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  20. CX-012799: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Malin-Hilltop Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41915 Location(s): CaliforniaOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  1. CX-012805: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Brasada-Harney #1 Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41908 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  2. CX-008724: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Rexburg Bus Lot Lease Termination CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 07/05/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  3. CX-014379: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ouagga Mussel Study Funding CX(s) Applied: B3.16Date: 10/29/2015 Location(s): NevadaOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  4. CX-012283: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    USC Autoclave CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/14/2014 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  5. CX-013386: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chemical Vapor Deposition CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 01/07/2015 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  6. CX-007853: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Arizona Rooftop Challenge (ARC) CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Arizona Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  7. CX-007864: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Broward County SOLAR Project CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): Florida Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  8. CX-010514: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Center for Nanoscale Energy CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 06/24/2013 Location(s): North Dakota Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  9. CX-100596 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    (MCLBA), GA - Biomass Steam Turbine Generator Award Number: DE-EE0007461 CX(s) ... Command (MCICOM) in support of the proposed Biomass Steam Turbine Generator project. ...

  10. CX-014374: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Underwood Tap Structure Relocation CX(s) Applied: B4.13Date: 12/01/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  11. CX-012640: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Lexington-Longview #1 Access Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41865 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  12. CX-011065: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 08/29/2013 Location(s): Kansas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  13. CX-011788: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    I-75 Green Corridor Project CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 02/10/2014 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  14. CX-007497: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Clean Energy Coalition - Michigan Green Fleets CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 12/06/2011 Location(s): Michigan Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  15. CX-010938: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Midwest Region Alternative Fuels Project CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 09/17/2013 Location(s): Kansas, Kansas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  16. CX-011271: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Idaho Petroleum Reduction Leadership Project CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 09/30/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  17. CX-010756: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Solar Utility Network Deployment Acceleration CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 08/15/2013 Location(s): Virginia Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  18. CX-011102: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    American Solar Transformation Initiative CX(s) Applied: A11 Date: 08/09/2013 Location(s): California Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  19. CX-013721: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Solar Vacuum Furnace CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 04/28/2015 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  20. CX-013432: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Process Demonstration Unit Support Structure CX(s) Applied: B1.15Date: 02/04/2015 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Idaho Operations Office

  1. CX-014376: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ross Complex Road Project CX(s) Applied: B1.32Date: 11/12/2015 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  2. CX-014404: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Microgrid Research Laboratory Remodel CX(s) Applied: B1.31Date: 11/30/2015 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  3. CX-014005: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    INL Helicopter Training CX(s) Applied: B1.2Date: 07/22/2015 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  4. CX-012498: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advanced Light Extraction Structure for OLED Lighting CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41852 Location(s): MarylandOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  5. CX-009797: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Eni USA Gas Marketing, LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.7 Date: 02/06/2013 Location(s): Louisiana Offices(s): Fossil Energy

  6. CX-013534: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    ENI USA Gas Marketing, LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.7Date: 04/14/2015 Location(s): Multiple LocationsOffices(s): Fossil Energy

  7. CX-010338: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Eugene Substation Fiber Interconnection CX(s) Applied: B4.7 Date: 05/21/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  8. CX-006681: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    New Drilling Location in Section 29CX(s) Applied: B3.1Date: 12/23/2009Location(s): Casper, WyomingOffice(s): RMOTC

  9. CX-011634: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Closure Turf Installation CX(s) Applied: B6.1 Date: 08/27/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Pantex Site Office

  10. CX-008700: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Natapoc Property Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 06/12/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  11. CX-010091: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Power Line Configuration 2013-1 CX(s) Applied: B4.13 Date: 04/15/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  12. CX-011642: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Pantex Lake Land Utilization CX(s) Applied: B1.11 Date: 11/05/2013 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): Pantex Site Office

  13. CX-013605: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Electrochemistry Corrosion Testing CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 03/05/2015Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  14. CX-012658: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Chief Joseph and Custer Substations Security Fence Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.11Date: 41843 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  15. CX-007650: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Control Room Consolidation CX(s) Applied: B2.2 Date: 12/29/2011 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  16. CX-001856: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Exclusion Determination Rural Cooperative Geothermal Development Electric and Agriculture CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 04282010 Location(s): Paisley, Oregon Office(s): Energy...

  17. CX-010532: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Various Demolition Jobs CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 06/07/2013 Location(s): Illinois Offices(s): Fermi Site Office

  18. CX-012317: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    High Performance Computing Upgrades CX(s) Applied: B1.31 Date: 06/16/2014 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  19. CX-012708: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) Complex Training Trailer CX(s) Applied: B1.15Date: 41844 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  20. CX-003608: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-003608: Categorical Exclusion Determination Sustainable Algal Energy Production and Environmental Remediation CX(s) Applied: A9, B3.6 Date: 08252010 Location(s): Virginia ...

  1. CX-008926: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Texas Alternative Fuel Vehicle Pilot Program CX(s) Applied: A1 Date: 08/24/2012 Location(s): Texas Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  2. CX-008545: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Solar Energy Evolution and Diffusion Studies CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 06/19/2012 Location(s): CX: none Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  3. CX-011822: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Light Willow Demonstration CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 01/09/2014 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  4. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Golden Field Office | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Categorical Exclusion Determination U.S. Department of Energy Collegiate Entrepreneurship Prize Award Number: TBD FOA CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 12222014 Location(s): CO...

  5. CX-012656: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    North Bend Communication Site Engine Generator Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41848 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  6. CX-006520: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    CX-006520: Categorical Exclusion Determination High Energy Density Distributed Hydrostatic Direct Drive for Large Wind Turbine and Marine Hydro-Kinetic Device Applications CX(s) ...

  7. CX-012278: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Building 36 Use Permit CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 06/23/2014 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  8. CX-012434: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Low Cost Titanium Casting Technology CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41878 Location(s): OhioOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  9. CX-010155: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Augspurger Radio Tower Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 04/03/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  10. CX-008683: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Shaniko Radio Station Replacement Project CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 07/11/2012 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  11. CX-011190: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Alberton Communication Site Construction CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 08/26/2013 Location(s): Montana Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  12. CX-012790: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Haystack Butte Radio Site Land Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.24Date: 41939 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  13. CX-012495: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Building 6 Stack Replacement CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41855 Location(s): West VirginiaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  14. CX-012798: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Davis Creek Tap Wood Pole Replacements CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41915 Location(s): CaliforniaOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  15. CX-007549: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Harrisonville - Waste Water Treatment Plant CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01/10/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  16. CX-013332: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Magnesium Chloride Testing CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 12/15/2014 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  17. CX-007522: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Crane Removal Project CX(s) Applied: B1.23 Date: 12/15/2011 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  18. CX-009028: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Wisconsin Biodiesel Blending Program CX(s) Applied: B5.22 Date: 08/22/2012 Location(s): Wisconsin Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  19. CX-008250: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Geotechnical Core Drilling for USGS 138 CX(s) Applied: B3.1 Date: 04/18/2012 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Nuclear Energy

  20. CX-012632: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    LURR 20140456 - Salmon Creek Avenue Pathway Project CX(s) Applied: B4.9Date: 41885 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  1. CX-011625: Categorical Exclusion Determinationc

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    9103 Second Floor Refurbishment CX(s) Applied: B1.3 Date: 06/05/2013 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  2. CX-007856: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sacramento Regional Energy Alliance CX(s) Applied: B5.23 Date: 01/27/2012 Location(s): California Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  3. CX-011992: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Carib Energy (USA) LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.7 Date: 05/30/2014 Location(s): Nationwide Offices(s): Fossil Energy

  4. CX-012666: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Carib Energy (USA) LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.7Date: 05/30//2014 Location(s): FloridaOffices(s): Fossil Energy

  5. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: A9 | Department of Energy

    Energy Savers

    ... September 9, 2016 CX-100743 Categorical Exclusion Determination Biomass Gasification for Chemicals Production Using Chemical Looping Techniques Award Number: DE-EE0007530 CX(s) ...

  6. Categorical Exclusion Determinations: Ohio | Department of Energy

    Energy.gov (indexed) [DOE]

    September 9, 2016 CX-100743 Categorical Exclusion Determination Biomass Gasification for Chemicals Production Using Chemical Looping Techniques Award Number: DE-EE0007530 CX(s) ...

  7. CX-010590: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Kalispell Shunt Cap Addition Project CX(s) Applied: B4.11 Date: 07/01/2013 Location(s): Montana Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  8. CX-012637: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    LURR 20140521 - David King - Sewer Line Installation CX(s) Applied: B4.9Date: 41876 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  9. CX-007792: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Gore Substation Safety Lighting CX(s) Applied: B2.3 Date: 09/01/2011 Location(s): Oklahoma Offices(s): Southwestern Power Administration

  10. CX-014375: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Cinder Cones Property Acquisition Funding CX(s) Applied: B1.25Date: 11/23/2015 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  11. CX-013353: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Motor Silencer Installation CX(s) Applied: B1.21Date: 12/02/2014 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  12. CX-013428: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sempra LNG Marketing, LLC CX(s) Applied: B5.7Date: 01/23/2015 Location(s): LouisianaOffices(s): Fossil Energy

  13. CX-013780: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Troy Substation Tap Yard Expansion CX(s) Applied: B4.11Date: 07/14/2015 Location(s): MontanaOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  14. CX-009711: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Tucannon River Substation Expansion Project CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 11/01/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  15. CX-010148: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Merritt Radio Station Upgrade CX(s) Applied: B1.19 Date: 04/18/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  16. CX-013345: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Plant Accumulators Study CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 12/08/2014 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  17. CX-012482: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mid-Atlantic Regional Infrastructure Development Project CX(s) Applied: B5.22Date: 41862 Location(s): MarylandOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  18. CX-013604: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Corrosion Testing CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 03/05/2015 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  19. CX-012641: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Mossy Rock-Chehalis #1 Access Road Maintenance CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41865 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  20. CX-008234: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Whole Energy Glycerin Refinery CX(s) Applied: B5.15 Date: 04/20/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  1. CX-009543: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Sopogy Subcontract CX(s) Applied: A9, B5.15 Date: 11/28/2012 Location(s): Hawaii Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  2. CX-009753: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Propane Corridor Development Program CX(s) Applied: B5.22 Date: 12/06/2012 Location(s): Georgia Offices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  3. CX-011535: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    East Grangeville Substation Sale CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 11/14/2013 Location(s): Idaho Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  4. CX-012233: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Shed Acquisition at Kalispell Substation CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 06/09/2014 Location(s): Montana Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  5. CX-010157: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Fairmount Substation Equipment Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.24 Date: 03/27/2013 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  6. CX-012570: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Install Elevated Fire Water Storage Tank CX(s) Applied: B2.5Date: 41862 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  7. CX-012706: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Radiochemistry Laboratory (RCL) Supply Intake Filter Housing CX(s) Applied: B2.5Date: 41858 Location(s): IdahoOffices(s): Nuclear Energy

  8. CX-010113: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Compression Stress Relaxometer CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 03/28/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  9. CX-012472: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Technology Integration Program CX(s) Applied: A9, A11, B3.11Date: 41873 Location(s): OhioOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  10. CX-012791: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Grizzly Captain Jack Transmission Line Access Road Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.24Date: 41935 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  11. CX-012776: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Catalyst Processing, KCP14-05 CX(s) Applied: NOT NOTEDDate: 41857 Location(s): MissouriOffices(s): Kansas City Site Office

  12. CX-014616: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Biogasification CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 01/12/2016 Location(s): West VirginiaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  13. CX-009203: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ross Maintenance Headquarters Project CX(s) Applied: B1.15 Date: 09/19/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  14. CX-011686: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ross Communication Tower Fiber Installation CX(s) Applied: B4.7 Date: 01/15/2014 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  15. CX-009198: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Ross Transformer Oil Terminal Upgrade CX(s) Applied: B4.6 Date: 09/24/2012 Location(s): Washington Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  16. CX-012808: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    LURR 20140504 Ross Substation Comcast Fiber Installation CX(s) Applied: B4.9Date: 41906 Location(s): WashingtonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  17. CX-007844: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Energy Retrofits CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 12/01/2011 Location(s): Rhode Island Offices(s): Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  18. CX-001198: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    98: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-001198: Categorical Exclusion Determination Recovery Act: 1010 Avenue of the Arts - New School and Performing Arts Theater CX(s) Applied: ...

  19. CX-013565: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    65: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-013565: Categorical Exclusion Determination Analytical Methods for Radiochemical Measurements CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 04162015 ...

  20. CX-012557: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    557: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-012557: Categorical Exclusion Determination Electrodepositon of Molybdenum, NickelMolybdenum alloy, Cesium, and Strontium CX(s) Applied: ...

  1. CX-014082: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    4082: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-014082: Categorical Exclusion Determination Understanding Transient Combustion Phenomena in Low-NOx Gas Turbines CX(s) Applied: A9, ...

  2. CX-001199: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    9: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-001199: Categorical Exclusion Determination Tennessee Energy Efficient Schools Initiative Ground Source Heat Pump Program CX(s) Applied: ...

  3. CX-000703: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    03: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-000703: Categorical Exclusion Determination Maryland - Clean Energy Economic Development Initiative (CEEDI) CX(s) Applied: A1, A9, A11, ...

  4. CX-010117: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    10117: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-010117: Categorical Exclusion Determination Analytical Methods for Radiochemical Measurements CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 03282013 ...

  5. CX-004024: Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    24: Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-004024: Categorical Exclusion Determination Backside Contact Multijunction Solar Cells for High Concentration Applications CX(s) Applied: ...

  6. CX-100275 Categorical Exclusion Determination | Department of...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    75 Categorical Exclusion Determination CX-100275 Categorical Exclusion Determination High Performance Building Envelope Assemblies Award Number: DE- EE0007054, 7059, 7060 CX(s) ...

  7. CX-007550: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Kearney - Waste Water Treatment Plant CX(s) Applied: B5.1 Date: 01/10/2012 Location(s): Missouri Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  8. CX-012788: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Bio-Aviation Fuel LCA with GREET CX(s) Applied: B5.15Date: 41906 Location(s): IllinoisOffices(s): Argonne Site Office

  9. CX-012474: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Refractories/Ceramics Project CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41870 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  10. CX-012730: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Replace West Hackberry Radio Tower CX(s) Applied: B1.19Date: 41880 Location(s): LouisianaOffices(s): Strategic Petroleum Reserve Field Office

  11. CX-012531: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Distributed Wireless Antenna Sensors for Boiler Condition CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41836 Location(s): CaliforniaOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  12. CX-013309: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Burns Communication Site Upgrade CX(s) Applied: B4.6Date: 01/13/2015 Location(s): OregonOffices(s): Bonneville Power Administration

  13. CX-012539: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Distributed Wireless Antenna Sensors for Boiler Condition CX(s) Applied: B3.6Date: 41836 Location(s): TexasOffices(s): National Energy Technology Laboratory

  14. CX-008797: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Coal Pile Basin Project CX(s) Applied: B1.29 Date: 06/04/2012 Location(s): Tennessee Offices(s): Y-12 Site Office

  15. CX-010742: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Integrated Simulation Development and Decision Support CX(s) Applied: A9 Date: 08/15/2013 Location(s): California Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  16. CX-008146: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Advanced Formation Evaluator Tools (Haliburton) CX(s) Applied: B3.7 Date: 09/11/2011 Location(s): Wyoming Offices(s): RMOTC

  17. CX-012563: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Roof repairs at 735-A CX(s) Applied: B1.3Date: 41870 Location(s): South CarolinaOffices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  18. CX-011679: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Antifoam Degradation Testing CX(s) Applied: B3.6 Date: 12/05/2013 Location(s): South Carolina Offices(s): Savannah River Operations Office

  19. CX-008556: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Haiti Renewable Resource Study CX(s) Applied: A9, A11 Date: 07/23/2012 Location(s): Haiti Offices(s): Golden Field Office

  20. CX-010433: Categorical Exclusion Determination

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Memaloose Meadows Land Acquisition CX(s) Applied: B1.25 Date: 06/04/2013 Location(s): Oregon Offices(s): Bonneville Power Administration