National Library of Energy BETA

Sample records for aeo retrospective review

  1. Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review

    Reports and Publications

    2015-01-01

    The Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review provides a yearly comparison between realized energy outcomes and the Reference case projections included in previous Annual Energy Outlooks (AEO) beginning with 1982. This edition of the report adds the AEO 2012 projections and updates the historical data to incorporate the latest data revisions.

  2. Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review - Energy Information

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Administration ‹ Analysis & Projections Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review Release Date: March 25, 2015 | Next Release Date: April 2017 | Report Number: DOE/EIA-0640(2014) Evaluation of 2014 and Prior Reference Case Projections The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) produces projections of energy production, consumption and prices each year in the Annual Energy Outlook (AEO). Each year, EIA also produces an AEO Retrospective Review document, which presents a

  3. Renewable Electricity in the Annual Energy Outlook (AEO)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    For Renewable Electricity Working Group July 24, 2014 Christopher Namovicz and Gwen Bredehoeft Renewable Electricity Analysis Team AEO2014 results and status updates for the AEO2015 Agenda Renewable Electricity Analysis Team July 24, 2014 2 * Review of AEO2014 - Changes made for AEO2014 - Review of Results * Status of AEO2015 * Updates planned for AEO2015 WORKING GROUP PRESENTATION FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE AS RESULTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE Updates included in the AEO2014

  4. AEO2015 BWG

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Behjat Hojjati Kevin Jarzomski David Peterson Steve Wade Owen Comstock (currently on detail) August 7, 2014 AEO2015 Model Updates Discussion purposes only - do not cite or circulate Overview AEO2015 Builldings Working Group Washington, D.C., August 7, 2014 2 * Shorter AEO this year * Federal standards * End-use technology characterizations * Historical updates * Discussion Discussion purposes only - do not cite or circulate Federal standards AEO2015 Builldings Working Group Washington, D.C.,

  5. AEO2016 Preliminary Industrial Output Results

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    1: Preliminary macroeconomic results For Macro-Industrial Working Group December 3, 2015 | Washington, DC By Kay Smith, Macro Team Leader, Elizabeth Sendich, Russ Tarver, and Vipin Arora DO NOT CITE OR DISTRIBUTE Macro Team's AEO2016 Briefing Plans * Review incorporation of completed AEO macroeconomic initiatives - Revised commercial floorspace model using indices rather than levels so that EIA customers won't have to incur extra data costs to compensate Dodge - Enhancements of the industrial

  6. AEO2016 Electricity Working Group

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    in Reference Case: coal ash, cooling water intake, effluent limits (under ... Regulation AEO2015 Assumption AEO2016 Assumption Comment Cooling Water Intakes (Clean ...

  7. World Oil Prices in AEO2007 (released in AEO2007)

    Reports and Publications

    2007-01-01

    Over the long term, the Annual Energy Outlook 2007 (AEO) projection for world oil prices -- defined as the average price of imported low-sulfur, light crude oil to U.S. refiners -- is similar to the AEO2006 projection. In the near term, however, AEO2007 projects prices that are $8 to $10 higher than those in AEO2006.

  8. DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report | Department...

    Energy Saver

    DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July 2014 FINAL (85.01 KB) More Documents & Publications DOE Retrospective Review Plan Report May 2012 DOE EO 13563 ...

  9. AEO2014 results and status updates for the AEO2015

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    For AEO Electricity Working Group July 31, 2014, 1:00 PM Electricity Analysis Team Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis Electric Power in the Annual Energy Outlook AEO2014 results and status updates for the AEO2015 Working group presentation for discussion purposes. Do not quote or cite, as preliminary AEO2015 data and results are subject to change. Agenda Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear and Renewables Analysis | July 31, 2014 | Working group presentation for

  10. New EPA Guidelines for Review of Surface Coal Mining Operations in Appalachia (released in AEO2010)

    Reports and Publications

    2010-01-01

    On April 1, 2010, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a set of new guidelines to several of its Regional offices regarding the compliance of surface coal mining operations in Appalachia with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), the National Environmental Policy Act, and the environmental justice Executive Order (E.O. 12898). The stated purpose of the guidance was to explain more fully the approach that the EPA will be following in permit reviews, and to provide additional assurance that its Regional offices use clear, consistent, and science-based standards in reviewing the permits. Although the new guidelines go into effect immediately, they will be subjected to review both by the public and by the EPA's Science Advisory Board, with a set of final guidelines to be issued no later than April 1, 2011.

  11. Summary of Second AEO 2015 Working Group Meeting

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    November 7, 2014 MEMORANDUM FOR: John Conti Assistant Administrator for Energy Analysis Paul Holtberg Team Leader Analysis Integration Team FROM: Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis SUBJECT: Summary of Second AEO 2015 Working Group Meeting held on September 15, 2014 ATTENDEES: 21 EIA, 68 external (list provided following meeting summary) Presentation topics included a review of the AEO2015 publication schedule and contents, an overview of model assumptions updates in

  12. World Oil Prices in AEO2006 (released in AEO2006)

    Reports and Publications

    2006-01-01

    World oil prices in the Annual Energy Outlook 2006 (AEO) reference case are substantially higher than those in the AEO2005 reference case. In the AEO2006 reference case, world crude oil prices, in terms of the average price of imported low-sulfur, light crude oil to U.S. refiners, decline from current levels to about $47 per barrel (2004 dollars) in 2014, then rise to $54 per barrel in 2025 and $57 per barrel in 2030. The price in 2025 is approximately $21 per barrel higher than the corresponding price projection in the AEO2005 reference case.

  13. Reducing Regulatory Burden; Retrospective Review Under E.O. 13563 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Department of Energy Burden; Retrospective Review Under E.O. 13563 Reducing Regulatory Burden; Retrospective Review Under E.O. 13563 Request for information on reducing regulatory burden, E.O. 13563 Reducing Regulatory Burden; Retrospective Review Under E.O. 13563 (140.78 KB) More Documents & Publications Notice of Availability of Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Reducing Regulatory Burden

  14. AEO2014 Preliminary Results

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    September 26, 2013 AEO2014 Preliminary Results For discussion purposes only Not for citation Overview 2 * Residential projects - RECS update - Housing stock formation and decay - Lighting model - ENERGY STAR homes benchmarking - Weather elasticities * Commercial projects - Major end-use capacity factors - Data center servers - ENERGY STAR buildings - Hurdle rate floor * Both sectors - Usual annual updates - Miscellaneous end-use technology assumptions updates - Distributed generation * Contract

  15. Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2014...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2014 and Prior Reference Case Projections March 2015 Independent Statistics & Analysis www.eia.gov U.S. Department of Energy ...

  16. DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report - December...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report - December 18, 2012 DOE EO 13563 December 2012 Update Report and Burden Reduction Efforts PDF icon 13563andICR ...

  17. DOE Retrospective Review Report as of March 2016 | Department...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Report as of March 2016 DOE Retrospective Review Report as of March 2016 PDF icon March 2016 EO 12866 Report 21016 More Documents & Publications Department of Energy ...

  18. Reducing Regulatory Burden - EO 13563 Retrospective Review |...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Regulatory and Financial Reform of Federal Research Policy: Recommendations to the NRC Committee on Research Universities

  19. DOE Retrospective Review Plan Report May 2012 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Report May 2012 DOE Retrospective Review Plan Report May 2012 May_2012_ Report_DOE_5_25.pdf (55.96 KB) More Documents & Publications DOE EO 13563 January 2014 Update Report and Burden Reduction Efforts DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July 29, 2013 DOE 13563 and ICR Report

  20. AEO2016 Electricity Working Group

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis December 8, 2015 | Washington, DC AEO2016 Electricity Working Group WORKING GROUP PRESENTATION FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE AS RESULTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE What to look for: Electricity sector in AEO2016 * Inclusion of EPA final Clean Power Plan in Reference Case * Updated cost estimates for new generating technologies * Major data update on existing coal plant status: MATS- compliant technology or retirement

  1. Industrial Plans for AEO2014

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    30, 2013 | Washington, DC WORKING GROUP PRESENTATION FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE AS RESULTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE Industrial team plans for AEO2014 Overview -- AEO2014 * Process flow status & updates * Other model updates * Major data updates * CHP updates 2 Industrial Team Washington DC, July 30, 2013 WORKING GROUP PRESENTATION FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE AS RESULTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE Process flow models * General: - Replace energy consumption based on

  2. DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report | Department of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Energy July 2015 EO 12866 Report FINAL (233.74 KB) More Documents & Publications Department of Energy Retrospective Plan Update as of February 2015 DOE Retrospective Review Report as of March 2016 DOE EO 13563 January 2014 Update Report and Burden Reduction Efforts

  3. DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report - December 18,

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    2012 | Department of Energy - December 18, 2012 DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report - December 18, 2012 DOE EO 13563 December 2012 Update Report and Burden Reduction Efforts 13563_and_ICR_ Rpt_12_18_12.pdf (174.22 KB) More Documents & Publications DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July 29, 2013 DOE EO 13563 January 2014 Update Report and Burden Reduction Efforts DOE 13563 and ICR Report

  4. Industrial Team Plans for AEO2015

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Process flow models * General: - Replace energy consumption based on engineering judgment ... drivers * AEO2015 new model - DLM joint pricing model of ethane and propane - Automated ...

  5. Industrial Team Plans for AEO2015

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    CHANGE Data updates & regulation * Data - CHP historical data - Benchmarking total ... for AEO2015; may not be applicable to CHP * Size: greater than or equal to 25MW ...

  6. AEO2017 Liquid Fuels Markets Working Group Presentation

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Liquid Fuels Markets Working Group AEO2017 Liquid Fuels Markets Working Group Meeting #1 Office of Petroleum, Natural Gas, and Biofuels Analysis August 25, 2016 | Washington, DC WORKING GROUP PRESENTATION FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE AS RESULTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE Discussion topics * "Short" AEO2017 * World Oil Price Path * Assumptions/changes for AEO2017 - petroleum * Assumptions/changes for AEO2017 - biofuels/non-petroleum 2 AEO2017 LFMM/IEM Working Group Meeting

  7. AEO2015 Transportation Working Group Meeting

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    ... Vehicles with these technology options are not connected to the electrical grid. 7. Has EIA made any improvements to the VMT modeling? a. For AEO2014, EIA updated the population, ...

  8. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    202-586-6419 Vishakh Mantri, Ph.D, P.E. Chemical Engineer, Energy Information ... tcapehart@ers.usda.gov 202-694-5313 Chemical Production in the AEO Peter Gross Energy ...

  9. AEO2015 Coal Working Group Meeting Summary

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    AS AEO2015 MODELING ASSUMPTIONS AND INPUTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. 1 July 30, 2014 MEMORANDUM TO: John Conti Assistant Administrator for Energy Analysis Jim Diefenderfer Director, Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis FROM: Coal and Uranium Analysis Team SUBJECT: AEO2015 Coal Working Group Meeting I Summary Attendees (39) Name Affiliation Greg Adams (Moderator) US DOE: EIA Jim Diefenderfer Tyler Hodge Elias Johnson Ayaka Jones Eric Krall Laura Martin Mike Mellish Kate

  10. Coal Working Group - AEO2017 Summary Notes

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    AEO2017 MODELING ASSUMPTIONS AND NOTE INPUTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. 1 September 7, 2016 MEMORANDUM TO: Dr. Ian Mead Assistant Administrator for Energy Analysis Jim Diefenderfer Director, Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis FROM: Coal and Uranium Analysis Team SUBJECT: Notes from the AEO2017 1 st Coal Working Group held on August 31, 2016 Attendees (62) *Indicates participation via WebEx. In an effort to solicit feedback each year, the Coal and Uranium Analysis Team

  11. Second AEO2016 Macro-Induistrial Working Group Meeting summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    ... liquid feedstocks. - Projections of CHP generation in the AEO2016 are lower than in the AEO2015 reference case due to updates in historical CHP data and the new process flow models ...

  12. File:AEO2012earlyrelease.pdf | Open Energy Information

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    AEO2012earlyrelease.pdf Jump to: navigation, search File File history File usage File:AEO2012earlyrelease.pdf Size of this preview: 463 599 pixels. Other resolution: 464 600...

  13. Changing Trends in the Bulk Chemicals and Pulp and Paper Industries (released in AEO2005)

    Reports and Publications

    2005-01-01

    Compared with the experience of the 1990s, rising energy prices in recent years have led to questions about expectations of growth in industrial output, particularly in energy-intensive industries. Given the higher price trends, a review of expected growth trends in selected industries was undertaken as part of the production of Annual Energy Outlook 2005 (AEO). In addition, projections for the industrial value of shipments, which were based on the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) system in AEO2004, are based on the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) in AEO2005. The change in industrial classification leads to lower historical growth rates for many industrial sectors. The impacts of these two changes are highlighted in this section for two of the largest energy-consuming industries in the U.S. industrial sector-bulk chemicals and pulp and paper.

  14. DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July 29, 2013 |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Department of Energy July 29, 2013 DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July 29, 2013 DOE 13563 and ICR Report - Final.pdf (125.34 KB) More Documents & Publications DOE EO 13563 January 2014 Update Report and Burden Reduction Efforts DOE 13563 and ICR Report DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report - December 18, 2012

  15. Summary of AEO2015 Renewable Electricity Working Group Meeting

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    August 13, 2014 MEMORANDUM FOR: John Conti Assistant Administrator for Energy Analysis Jim Diefenderfer Office Director Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis Paul Holtberg Team Leader Analysis Integration Team FROM: Renewable Electricity Analysis Team SUBJECT: Summary of AEO2015 Renewable Electricity Working Group Meeting held on July 24, 2014 Presenters: Chris Namovicz, Gwen Bredehoeft Topics included AEO2014 model and data updates, a summary of AEO2014 model results,

  16. AEO 2015 Electricity, Coal, Nuclear and Renewables Preliminary Results

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Electricity, Coal, Nuclear and Renewables Preliminary Results For Joint Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables AEO2015 Working Group September 15, 2014 | Washington, DC By EIA, Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear & Renewables Analysis WORKING GROUP PRESENTATION FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE AS RESULTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE The AEO2015 will be abridged compared to AEO2014 * The U.S. Energy Information Administration is revising the schedule for production of the

  17. AEO2017 Modeling updates in the transportation sector

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    7 For AEO2017 Transportation Working Group August 31, 2016 | Washington, DC By Melissa Lynes, John Maples, Mark Schipper, and David Stone Office of Energy Consumption and Efficiency Analysis Modeling updates in the transportation sector Updates to the Annual Energy Outlook 2017 * Transportation demand model highlights - 10-year extension of last-year projection, AEO2016 is 2040 and AEO2017 is 2050 - Battery costs for electric vehicles - Phase 2 greenhouse gas and fuel efficiency standards for

  18. AEO2017 Liquid Fuels Markets Working Group Presentation

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ... assumptionschanges * Key assumptions maintained from AEO2016 - Ethanol and biodiesel tax credits are not extended beyond current end dates - GTL, CTL, BTL (xTL ...

  19. First AEO2015 Oil and Gas Working Group Meeting Summary

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    TEAM EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION and NATURAL GAS MARKETS TEAMS SUBJECT: First AEO2015 Oil and Gas Working Group ... to High Resource case * World oil price outlooks based on ...

  20. Second AEO2017 Industrial Working Group Meeting

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ONLY. DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE AS RESULTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. October 4, 2016 MEMORANDUM FOR: Ian Mead Assistant Administrator for Energy Analysis James Turnure Director, Office of Energy Consumption & Efficiency Analysis Paul Holtberg Team Leader, Analysis Integration Team FROM: Industrial Energy Consumption & Efficiency Analysis Team Subject: Second AEO2017 Industrial Working Group Meeting held on September 22, 2016 The Energy Consumption & Efficiency Analysis Team led a discussion

  1. World Oil Prices and Production Trends in AEO2009 (released in AEO2009)

    Reports and Publications

    2009-01-01

    The oil prices reported in Annual Energy Outlook 2009 (AEO) represent the price of light, low-sulfur crude oil in 2007 dollars. Projections of future supply and demand are made for "liquids," a term used to refer to those liquids that after processing and refining can be used interchangeably with petroleum products. In AEO2009, liquids include conventional petroleum liquids -- such as conventional crude oil and natural gas plant liquids -- in addition to unconventional liquids, such as biofuels, bitumen, coal-to-liquids (CTL), gas-to-liquids (GTL), extra-heavy oils, and shale oil.

  2. Energy Technologies on the Horizon (released in AEO2006)

    Reports and Publications

    2006-01-01

    A key issue in mid-term forecasting is the representation of changing and developing technologies. How existing technologies will evolve, and what new technologies might emerge, cannot be known with certainty. The issue is of particular importance in Annual Energy Outlook 2006 (AEO), the first AEO with projections out to 2030.

  3. Buildings Working Group Meeting AEO2016 Preliminary Results

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Buildings Working Group Meeting Office of Energy Consumption and Efficiency Analysis February 18, 2016 | Washington, DC By Buildings Energy Analysis Team AEO2016 Preliminary Results Discussion purposes only - do not cite or circulate Overview * Key policies - Clean Power Plan - Federal standards and ENERGY STAR specifications * Sector drivers - Fuel prices - Weather - Commercial floorspace * Distributed generation * Residential and commercial consumption AEO2016 Buildings Working Group,

  4. DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    ... DOEFE Strategic Petroleum Reserve rule DOE is considering revisions to its regulation ... the process for periodic review and publication of the standard contract provisions. ...

  5. World Oil Prices and Production Trends in AEO2008 (released in AEO2008)

    Reports and Publications

    2008-01-01

    Annual Energy Outlook 2008 (AEO) defines the world oil price as the price of light, low-sulfur crude oil delivered in Cushing, Oklahoma. Since 2003, both "above ground" and "below ground" factors have contributed to a sustained rise in nominal world oil prices, from $31 per barrel in 2003 to $69 per barrel in 2007. The AEO2008 reference case outlook for world oil prices is higher than in the AEO2007 reference case. The main reasons for the adoption of a higher reference case price outlook include continued significant expansion of world demand for liquids, particularly in non-OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries, which include China and India; the rising costs of conventional non-OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) supply and unconventional liquids production; limited growth in non-OPEC supplies despite higher oil prices; and the inability or unwillingness of OPEC member countries to increase conventional crude oil production to levels that would be required for maintaining price stability. The Energy Information Administration will continue to monitor world oil price trends and may need to make further adjustments in future AEOs.

  6. Clean Air Interstate Rule: Changes and Modeling in AEO2010 (released in AEO2010)

    Reports and Publications

    2010-01-01

    On December 23, 2008, the D.C. Circuit Court remanded but did not vacate the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), overriding its previous decision on February 8, 2008, to remand and vacate CAIR. The December decision, which is reflected in Annual Energy Outlook 2010 (AEO) , allows CAIR to remain in effect, providing time for the Environmental Protection Agency to modify the rule in order to address objections raised by the Court in its earlier decision. A similar rule, referred to as the Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR), which was to set up a cap-and-trade system for reducing mercury emissions by approximately 70%, is not represented in the AEO2010 projections, because it was vacated by the D.C. Circuit Court in February 2008.

  7. AEO2011: Energy Consumption by Sector and Source - Mountain ...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    comes from the Energy Information Administration (EIA), and is part of the 2011 Annual Energy Outlook Report (AEO2011). This dataset is table 8, and contains only the reference...

  8. AEO2011:Total Energy Supply, Disposition, and Price Summary ...

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    case. The dataset uses quadrillion Btu and the U.S. Dollar. The data is broken down into production, imports, exports, consumption and price. Data and Resources AEO2011:Total...

  9. Second AEO2014 Macro-Industrial Working Group Meeting Summary

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    In comparing the AEO2014 macro industrial forecast with the ... of robust supply and low price) and how this influenced ... allow multi-channel burners (burners of more than one fuel). ...

  10. Summary of AEO2017 Renewables Working Group Meeting

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    A separate working group will be held at a later date to present preliminary AEO2017 model results. Solar PV Load Shapes After EIA presented solar PV load shapes as one of the key ...

  11. EPACT2005: Status of Provisions (Update) (released in AEO2007)

    Reports and Publications

    2007-01-01

    The Energy Policy Act 2005 (EPACT) was signed into law by President Bush on August 8, 2005, and became Public Law 109-058. A number of provisions from EPACT2005 were included in the Annual Energy Outlook 2006 (AEO) projections. Many others were not considered in AEO2006particularly, those that require funding appropriations or further specification by federal agencies or Congress before implementation.

  12. First AEO2017 Liquid Fuels Markets Working Group Meeting Summary

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    AEO2017 MODELING ASSUMPTIONS AND NOTE INPUTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. 1 September 13, 2016 MEMORANDUM FOR: IAN MEAD ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR FOR ENERGY ANALYSYS FROM: JOHN STAUB TEAM LEADER, EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION TEAM ACTING TEAM LEADER, LIQUID FUELS MARKET TEAM SUBJECT: First AEO2017 Liquid Fuels Markets Working Group Meeting Summary (presented on 08-25-2016) Attendees: (EIA) John Staub, Mindi Farber-DeAnda, Adrian Geagla, Beth May, John Powell (DOE) Attending by Phone: Dale Nesbitt

  13. Handling Key AEO2017 Electric Sector Policy Assumptions and Key Model Updates

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Key AEO2017 Renewable Electricity Key Model Updates For EIA Renewables Working Group September 1, 2016 By Chris Namovicz Team Leader for Renewable Electricity Analysis Summary of key changes from AEO2016 * AEO 2017 will be a limited release year - Very few side cases and limited analytic write-up (similar to AEO 2015) * We plan on extending the projections to 2050 * Pending any relevant court rulings, the Clean Power Plan will continue to be in the Reference case. * This presentation will focus

  14. California's Move Toward E10 (released in AEO2009)

    Reports and Publications

    2009-01-01

    In Annual Energy Outlook 2009, (AEO) E10a gasoline blend containing 10% ethanolis assumed to be the maximum ethanol blend allowed in California erformulated gasoline (RFG), as opposed to the 5.7% blend assumed in earlier AEOs. The 5.7% blend had reflected decisions made when California decided to phase out use of the additive methyl tertiary butyl ether in its RFG program in 2003, opting instead to use ethanol in the minimum amount that would meet the requirement for 2.0% oxygen content under the Clean Air Act provisions in effect at that time.

  15. First AEO2017 Oil and Gas Working Group Meeting

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE AS RESULTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. September 12, 2016 MEMORANDUM FOR: Ian Mead Assistant Administrator for Energy Analysis FROM: John Staub Team Lead, Exploration and Production Analysis Mindi Farber-DeAnda Acting Team Lead, Natural Gas Markets Subject: First AEO2017 Oil and Gas Working Group Meeting held on August 25, 2016 The meeting began with an overview of the areas under focus for the AEO2017 in the Oil and Gas Supply Module (OGSM) and the Natural Gas Transmission and

  16. State Renewable Energy Requirements and Goals: Update Through 2007 (Update) (released in AEO2008)

    Reports and Publications

    2008-01-01

    In recent years, the Annual Energy Outlook (AEO) has tracked the growing number of states that have adopted requirements or goals for renewable energy. While there is no federal renewable generation mandate, the states have been adopting such standards for some time. AEO2005 provided a summary of all existing programs in effect at that time, and subsequent AEOs have examined new policies or changes to existing ones. Since the publication of AEO2007, four states have enacted new renewable portfolio standards (RPS) legislation, and five others have strengthened their existing RPS programs. In total, 25 states and the District of Columbia.

  17. Microsoft Word - AEO2012 SENR final markup 1 31 12 _2_.docx

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    nonpetroleum liquids, net petroleum imports make up a smaller share of total liquids consumption: U.S. dependence on imported petroleum liquids declines in the AEO2012 Reference...

  18. Federal Fuels Taxes and Tax Credits (released in AEO2007)

    Reports and Publications

    2007-01-01

    The Annual Energy Outlook 2007 (AEO) reference case and alternative cases generally assume compliance with current laws and regulations affecting the energy sector. Some provisions of the U.S. Tax Code are scheduled to expire, or may be subject to adjustment, before the end of the projection period. In general, scheduled expirations and adjustments provided in legislation or regulations are assumed to occur, unless there is significant historical evidence to support an alternative assumption. This section examines the AEO2007 treatment of three provisions that could have significant impacts on U.S. energy markets: the gasoline excise tax, biofuel (ethanol and biodiesel) tax credits, and the production tax credit for electricity generation from certain renewable resources.

  19. Second AEO2014 Macro-Industrial Working Group Meeting Summary

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    7, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR: JOHN CONTI ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR FOR ENERGY ANALYSIS PAUL HOLTBERG TEAM LEADER ANALYSIS INTEGRATION TEAM JAMES TURNURE DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION & EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS LYNN WESTFALL DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENERGY MARKETS & FINANCIAL ANALYSIS FROM: MACROECONOMIC & INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION & EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS TEAMS SUBJECT: Second AEO2014 Macro-Industrial Working Group Meeting Summary (presented on 09-26-2013) Attendees: Bob Adler (EIA) Robert

  20. Second AEO2014 Oil and Gas Working Group Meeting Summary

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    7 November 12, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR: JOHN CONTI ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR FOR ENERGY ANALYSIS FROM: ANGELINA LAROSE TEAM LEAD NATURAL GAS MARKETS TEAM JOHN STAUB TEAM LEAD EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION ANALYSIS TEAM EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION and NATURAL GAS MARKETS TEAMS SUBJECT: Second AEO2014 Oil and Gas Working Group Meeting Summary (presented September 26, 2013) Attendees: Robert Anderson (DOE) Peter Balash (NETL)* David Bardin (self) Joe Benneche (EIA) Philip Budzik (EIA) Kara Callahan

  1. Second AEO2015 Macro-Industrial Workiing Group Meeting Summary

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    6, 2014 MEMORANDUM FOR: JOHN CONTI ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR FOR ENERGY ANALYSIS PAUL HOLTBERG TEAM LEADER ANALYSIS INTEGRATION TEAM JAMES TURNURE DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION & EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS LYNN WESTFALL DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENERGY MARKETS & FINANCIAL ANALYSIS FROM: MACROECONOMIC & INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION & EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS TEAMS SUBJECT: Second AEO2015 Macro-Industrial Working Group Meeting Summary, presented on 09-29-2014 Attendees: Gary Ambach (Michaels

  2. Second AEO2016 Buildings Sector Workingb Group Meeting Summary

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    WORKING GROUP PRESENTATION FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE AS RESULTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE June 10, 2016 MEMORANDUM FOR: John Conti Assistant Administrator for Energy Analysis Paul Holtberg Team Leader, Analysis Integration Team James Turnure Director, Office of Energy Consumption & Efficiency Analysis FROM: Buildings Consumption & Efficiency Analysis Team Subject: Second AEO2016 Buildings Sector Working Group Meeting Summary, workshop held on February 18, 2016

  3. Second AEO2016 Macro-Induistrial Working Group Meeting summary

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    March 21, 2016 MEMORANDUM FOR: JOHN CONTI ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR FOR ENERGY ANALYSIS PAUL HOLTBERG TEAM LEADER ANALYSIS INTEGRATION TEAM JAMES TURNURE DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION & EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS LYNN WESTFALL DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENERGY MARKETS & FINANCIAL ANALYSIS FROM: MACROECONOMIC & INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION & EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS TEAMS SUBJECT: Second AEO2016 Macro-Industrial Working Group Meeting Summary, presented on 02-18-2016 Attendees: Nate Aden

  4. Second AEO2016 Oil and Gas Working Group Meeting Summary

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    April 8, 2016 MEMORANDUM FOR: JOHN CONTI ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR FOR ENERGY ANALYSIS FROM: MINDI FARBER-DEANDA ACTING TEAM LEAD NATURAL GAS MARKETS TEAM JOHN STAUB TEAM LEAD EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION ANALYSIS TEAM EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION and NATURAL GAS MARKETS TEAMS SUBJECT: Second AEO2016 Oil and Gas Working Group Meeting Summary (presented on February 29, 2016) Attendees: Joseph Benneche (EIA) Katie Dyl (EIA) Terry Yen (EIA) Danya Murali (EIA) Laura Singer (EIA) Faouzi Aloulou (EIA) Dana

  5. Summary of AEO2015 Renewable Electricity Working Group Meeting

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    WORKING GROUP PRESENTATION FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE AS RESULTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE February 29, 2016 MEMORANDUM FOR: John Conti Assistant Administrator for Energy Analysis Jim Diefenderfer Office Director Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis Paul Holtberg Team Leader Analysis Integration Team FROM: Renewable Electricity Analysis Team SUBJECT: Summary of AEO2015 Renewable Electricity Working Group Meeting held on February 9, 2016 Presenter: Chris

  6. Summary of AEO2016 Electricity Working Group Meeting

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    February 10, 2016 MEMORANDUM FOR: John Conti Assistant Administrator for Energy Analysis Jim Diefenderfer Office Director Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis Paul Holtberg Team Leader Analysis Integration Team FROM: Chris Namovicz Acting Team Leader for Electricity Analysis Team SUBJECT: Summary of AEO2016 Electricity Working Group Meeting held on February 10, 2016 PRESENTERS: Thad Huetteman and Chris Namovicz ATTENDEES: 14 EIA, 27 external (list provided following

  7. Summary of AEO2017 Electricity Working Group Meeting

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE AS RESULTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Summary of AEO2017 Electricity Working Group Meeting held on September 1, 2016 DATE: September 29, 2016 TO: Ian Mead Assistant Administrator for Energy Analysis Jim Diefenderfer Director, Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis Paul Holtberg Team Leader, Analysis Integration Team FROM: Thad Huetteman Team Leader for Electricity Analysis Team PRESENTERS: Thad Huetteman, Chris Namovicz, Nancy

  8. Summary of AEO2017 Renewables Working Group Meeting

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    September 20, 2016 MEMORANDUM FOR: Ian Mead Assistant Administrator for Energy Analysis Jim Diefenderfer Director Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis Paul Holtberg Team Leader Analysis Integration Team FROM: Chris Namovicz Team Leader for Renewable Electricity Analysis Team SUBJECT: Summary of AEO2017 Renewables Working Group Meeting held on September 1, 2016 PRESENTERS: Chris Namovicz ATTENDEES: 12 EIA, 30 external (list provided following meeting summary) Presentation

  9. Summary of First AEO2014 Electricity Working Group Meeting

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    9, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR: John Conti Assistant Administrator for Energy Analysis Alan Beamon Office Director Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis Paul Holtberg Team Leader Analysis Integration Team FROM: Electricity Analysis Team SUBJECT: Summary of First AEO 2014 Electricity Working Group Meeting held on July 24, 2013 ATTENDEES: Diefenderfer, Jim Aniti, Lori Milton, Carrie Jones, Jeff Martin, Laura Bredehoeft, Gwendolyn Eynon, Bob Leff, Mike Mellish, Mike Kearney, Diane

  10. Summary of First AEO2015 Electricity Working Group Meeting

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    August 8, 2014 MEMORANDUM FOR: John Conti Assistant Administrator for Energy Analysis Jim Diefenderfer Office Director Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis Paul Holtberg Team Leader Analysis Integration Team FROM: Electricity Analysis Team SUBJECT: Summary of First AEO 2015 Electricity Working Group Meeting held on July 31, 2014 ATTENDEES: Krall, Eric Diefenderfer, Jim †Aniti, Lori Bowman, Michelle Hodge, Tyler Mellish, Mike Slater-Thompson, Nancy Marcy, Cara

  11. Summary of Second AEO 2014 Electricity Working Group Meeting

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    7, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR: John Conti Assistant Administrator for Energy Analysis Alan Beamon Office Director Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis Paul Holtberg Team Leader Analysis Integration Team FROM: Electricity Analysis Team SUBJECT: Summary of Second AEO 2014 Electricity Working Group Meeting held on September 25, 2013 ATTENDEES: Adams, Greg (EIA OEA) Aniti, Lori (EIA OEA) Bredehoeft, Gwendolyn (EIA OEA) Crozat, Matthew P. (US DOE: Office of Nuclear Energy)

  12. AEO 2014 Renewable Electricity Working Group Meeting Summary

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    DATE: September 30, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR: John Conti Assistant Administrator for Energy Analysis Office of Energy Analysis Alan Beamon Office Director Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis FROM: Renewable Electricity Analysis Team SUBJECT: AEO 2014 Renewable Electricity Working Group Meeting Summary ATTENDEES: In person John Conti Alan Beamon Bob Eynon Chris Namovicz Danielle Lowenthal-Savy Erin Boedecker Gwen Bredehoeft Jim Diefenderfer Marie Rinkoski Spangler Michael

  13. AEO2014 Coal Working Group Meeting I Summary

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    July 22, 2013 MEMORANDUM TO: John Conti Assistant Administrator for Energy Analysis Alan Beamon Director, Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis FROM: Coal and Uranium Analysis Team SUBJECT: AEO2014 Coal Working Group Meeting I Summary Attendees (41) Name Affiliation Greg Adams (Moderator) US DOE: EIA Vlad Dorjets Bob Eynon Karen Freedman Tyler Hodge Paul Holtberg Elias Johnson Ayaka Jones Diane Kearney Mike Leff Mike Mellish Carrie Milton Nick Paduano Margaret Cook US

  14. AEO2014 Liquid Fuels Markets Working Group Meeting 1

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    2 AEO2014 Liquid Fuels Markets Working Group Meeting 1 July 24, 2013 Attendance (In Person) (EIA) John Powell, Mindi Farber-DeAnda, Mike Cole, Beth May, Adrian Geagla, Vish Mantri, Tony Radich, Irene Olson, Julie Harris (non-EIA) Jeff Meyer (HIS CERA, Oil Market Analyst), Adam Christensen (Johns Hopkin) Attendance (WebEx) Dave Schmalzer, Seth Snyder (Argonne National Laboratory), Donald Hanson (Argonne National Laboratory), Wyatt Thompson (FAPRI, University of Missouri), Jarrett Whistance

  15. AEO2014 Oil and Gas Working Group Meeting Summary

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    9 August 12, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR: JOHN CONTI ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR FOR ENERGY ANALYSIS FROM: ANGELINA LAROSE TEAM LEAD NATURAL GAS MARKETS TEAM JOHN STAUB TEAM LEAD EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION ANALYSIS TEAM EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION and NATURAL GAS MARKETS TEAMS SUBJECT: First AEO2014 Oil and Gas Working Group Meeting Summary (presented on July 25, 2013) Attendees: Anas Alhajji (NGP)* Samuel Andrus (IHS)* Emil Attanasi (USGS)* Andre Barbe (Rice University) David J. Barden (self) Joseph

  16. AEO2015 Liquid Fuels Markets Working Group Presentation

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Independent Statistics & Analysis Assumptions for Annual Energy Outlook 2015: Liquid Fuels Markets Working Group AEO2015 Liquid Fuels Markets Working Group Meeting Office of Petroleum, Natural Gas & Biofuels Analysis July 17, 2014 | Washington, DC WORKING GROUP PRESENTATION FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE AS RESULTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE Discussion topics Office of Petroleum, Natural Gas, & Biofuels Analysis Working Group Presentation for Discussion Purposes Washington

  17. AEO2017 Industrial Working Group Meeting 1: Preview of Updates

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    1: preview of updates Industrial Working Group Industrial Team: Kelly Perl, Team Leader; Peter Gross, Susan Hicks, Paul Otis, & Matt Skelton August 16, 2016| Washington, DC Preliminary Results. Do not Disseminate. Macro-Industrial Working Group has split in two! * Macro working group had meeting July 28; materials available on http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/workinggroup/macroindustrial/ * Industrial working group will have two meetings this year - Second date: September 22, 2016: 1:30-3:00

  18. AEO2017 Industrial Working Group Meeting Preliminary Results

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    2: Preliminary results Industrial Working Group Industrial Team: Kelly Perl, Team Leader; Chris Dickerson, Peter Gross, Susan Hicks, Paul Otis, & Matt Skelton September 22, 2016| Washington, DC Preliminary Results. Do not Disseminate. AEO2017 What we did * Extend model to 2050 (now complete) * Individual industry benchmark improvements * Regulation: Kept Boiler MACT as is * Lowered DRI and relaxed constraints on EAF usage * Running Limited side cases: macro, price, and resource Industrial

  19. First AEO2015 Liquid Fuels Markets Working Group Meeting

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    July 21, 2014 MEMORANDUM FOR: JOHN CONTI ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR FOR ENERGY ANALYSYS JOHN POWELL TEAM LEADER, LIQUID FUELS MARKET TEAM MICHAEL SCHAAL DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF ENERGY ANALYSIS FROM: LIQUID FUELS MARKET TEAM SUBJECT: First AEO2015 Liquid Fuels Markets Working Group Meeting Summary (presented on 07-17-2014) Attendees: (EIA) John Powell, Mindi Farber-DeAnda, Mike Cole, Adrian Geagla, Arup Mallik, David Manowitz, Vishakh Mantri, Beth May, Terry Yen, John Conti, Michael Schaal Bryan Just

  20. Federal Fuels Taxes and Tax Credits (Update) (released in AEO2008)

    Reports and Publications

    2008-01-01

    The Annual Energy Outlook 2008 (AEO) reference case incorporates current regulations that pertain to the energy industry. This section describes the handling of federal taxes and tax credits in AEO2008, focusing primarily on areas where regulations have changed or the handling of taxes or tax credits has been updated.

  1. Insertion of Balloon Retained Gastrostomy Buttons: A 5-Year Retrospective Review of 260 Patients

    SciTech Connect

    Power, Sarah Kavanagh, Liam N.; Shields, Mary C.; Given, Mark F.; Keeling, Aoife N.; McGrath, Frank P.; Lee, Michael J.

    2013-04-15

    Radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) is an established way of maintaining enteral nutrition in patients who cannot maintain nutrition orally. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of primary placement of a wide bore button gastrostomy in a large, varied patient population through retrospective review. All patients who underwent gastrostomy placement from January 1, 2004 to January 1, 2009 were identified. 18-Fr gastrostomy buttons (MIC-Key G) were inserted in the majority. Follow-up ranged from 6 months to 4.5 years. A total of 260 patients (M:F 140:120, average age 59.2 years) underwent gastrostomy during the study period. Overall success rate for RIG placement was 99.6 %, with success rate of 95.3 % for primary button insertion. Indications included neurological disorders (70 %), esophageal/head and neck malignancy (21 %), and other indications (9 %). Major and minor complication rates were 1.2 and 12.8 %, respectively. Thirty-day mortality rate was 6.8 %. One third of patients underwent gastrostomy reinsertion during the study period, the main indication for which was inadvertent catheter removal. Patency rate was high at 99.5 %. The maximum number of procedures in any patient was 8 (n = 2), and the average tube dwell time was 125 days. Primary radiological insertion of a wide bore button gastrostomy is a safe technique, with high success rate, high patency rate, and low major complication rate. We believe that it is feasible to attempt button gastrostomy placement in all patients, once tract length is within limits of tube length. If difficulty is encountered, then a standard tube may simply be placed instead.

  2. CONTINATION HEETIREFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED AEO

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED AEO COTIUTINSHE DE-AC27-08RV14800/044 2AG OF NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR WASHINGTON RIVER PROTECTION SOLUTIONS LLC ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) Account code: ARRA Appr Year 2009 Allottee 3 Reporting Entity 421301 Object Class 31003 Program 11113 70 Project 2002110 WFO 0000000 Local Use 0420660 TAS Agency Code 89 TAS Account Code 0253 TAS Subaccount Code Amount: -$100,000.00 Delivery Location Code: 010601 Richland

  3. CONTINATION HEETIREFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED AEO

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED AEO COTIUAIN IET DE-AC27--08RV14800/046 2G OF NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR WASHINGTON RIVER PROTECTION SOLUTIONS LLC ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) ORP-00014 TOO Funds Fund 01250 Appr Year 2010 Allottee 34 Reportng Enity 4231.11 Object Class 25200 Program 1111412 Project 0004262 WFO 0000000 Local Use 0000000 Amount: $1,200,000.00 ORP 0014 TOO Fund 01250 AppL Ye~ir 2010 Reporting Entity 421301 Object Class 25200

  4. CONTINATION HEETIREFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED AEO

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED AEO COTIUAIN HETDE-AC27-08RV14800/052 2A OF NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR WASHINGTON RIVER PROTECTION SOLUTIONS LLC ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNITI UNIT PRICE AMOUNT (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) Fund 01250 Appr Year 2010 Allottee 34 Reporting Entity 421301 Object Class 25200 Program 1110462 Project 0001539 WFO 0000000 Local Use 0420149 Amount: $10,214.00 Delivery Location Code: 00601 RichandOperations Office U.S Dep~artment of Energy Richland Operations

  5. CONTINUATION S EFIIERENCE NO OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED AEO

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    CONTINUATION S EFIIERENCE NO OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED AEO CONINUTIO SHETDE-AC27-08RV148OO/095 rG NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR WASH-INGTON RIVER PROTECTION SOLUTIONS LLC- ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT (A) (B) (C) (D) )/F New Total Amount for this Award: $7,094,451,000.00 Obligated Amount for this Modification: $30, 952, 500.00 New Total Obligated Amount for this Award: $1, 353,766,560.39 Incremental Funded Amount changed: from $1,293,125,180.69 to $1,323,766,560.39

  6. CONTINUATON SHEETREFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED AEO

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    CONTINUATON SHEETREFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED AEO COTNUTO SETDE-AC27-08RV14800/070 2AG OF NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR WASHINGTON RIVER PROTECTION SOLUTIONS LLC ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) De-obligating WEPS TDD funds for ATL Aluminum Solubility Sample Analysis Fund 01250 Appr Year 2009 Allottee 34 Reporting Entity 421301 Object Class 25200 Program 1110676 Project 0004022 WFO 0000000 Local Use 0000000 Amount: -$3,155.93

  7. CONTIUATIN SHET IREFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED AEO

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    CONTIUATIN SHET IREFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED AEO COTNUTO SETDE-AC27-08RVI4800/055 2AG OF NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR WASHINGTON RIVER PROTECTION SOLUTIONS LLC ITEM NO. SUPPLIESISERVICES QUANTITY NIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) Total Amount changed from $7,066,503,000.00 to $7,066,500,000.00 Obligated Amount for this modification: $140, 000.00 Incremental Funded Amount changed from $1,102, 822,315.05 to $1,102,962,315.05 NEW ACCOUNTING CODE ADDED: Account code: WTP

  8. AEO2014 - Issues in Focus articles - U.S. Energy Information...

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Past AEO analyses that remain relevant 2013 2012 2011 U.S. reliance on imported liquid fuels in alternative scenarios Competition between coal and natural gas in the electric...

  9. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007: Summary of Provisions (released in AEO2008)

    Reports and Publications

    2008-01-01

    The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 was signed into law on December 19, 2007, and became Public Law 110-140. Provisions in EISA2007 that require funding appropriations to be implemented, whose impact is highly uncertain, or that require further specification by federal agencies or Congress are not included in Annual Energy Outlook 2008 (AEO). For example, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) does not try to anticipate policy responses to the many studies required by EISA2007, nor to predict the impact of research and development (R&D) funding authorizations included in the bill. Moreover, AEO2008 does not include any provision that addresses a level of detail beyond that modeled in the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS), which was used to develop the AEO2008 projections. AEO2008 addresses only those provisions in EISA2007 that establish specific tax credits, incentives, or standards.

  10. Natural Gas Prices Forecast Comparison--AEO vs. Natural Gas Markets

    SciTech Connect

    Wong-Parodi, Gabrielle; Lekov, Alex; Dale, Larry

    2005-02-09

    This paper evaluates the accuracy of two methods to forecast natural gas prices: using the Energy Information Administration's ''Annual Energy Outlook'' forecasted price (AEO) and the ''Henry Hub'' compared to U.S. Wellhead futures price. A statistical analysis is performed to determine the relative accuracy of the two measures in the recent past. A statistical analysis suggests that the Henry Hub futures price provides a more accurate average forecast of natural gas prices than the AEO. For example, the Henry Hub futures price underestimated the natural gas price by 35 cents per thousand cubic feet (11.5 percent) between 1996 and 2003 and the AEO underestimated by 71 cents per thousand cubic feet (23.4 percent). Upon closer inspection, a liner regression analysis reveals that two distinct time periods exist, the period between 1996 to 1999 and the period between 2000 to 2003. For the time period between 1996 to 1999, AEO showed a weak negative correlation (R-square = 0.19) between forecast price by actual U.S. Wellhead natural gas price versus the Henry Hub with a weak positive correlation (R-square = 0.20) between forecasted price and U.S. Wellhead natural gas price. During the time period between 2000 to 2003, AEO shows a moderate positive correlation (R-square = 0.37) between forecasted natural gas price and U.S. Wellhead natural gas price versus the Henry Hub that show a moderate positive correlation (R-square = 0.36) between forecast price and U.S. Wellhead natural gas price. These results suggest that agencies forecasting natural gas prices should consider incorporating the Henry Hub natural gas futures price into their forecasting models along with the AEO forecast. Our analysis is very preliminary and is based on a very small data set. Naturally the results of the analysis may change, as more data is made available.

  11. Comparison of AEO 2010 Natural Gas Price Forecast to NYMEX Futures Prices

    SciTech Connect

    Bolinger, Mark A.; Wiser, Ryan H.

    2010-01-04

    On December 14, 2009, the reference-case projections from Annual Energy Outlook 2010 were posted on the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) web site. We at LBNL have, in the past, compared the EIA's reference-case long-term natural gas price forecasts from the AEO series to contemporaneous natural gas prices that can be locked in through the forward market, with the goal of better understanding fuel price risk and the role that renewables can play in itigating such risk. As such, we were curious to see how the latest AEO reference-case gas price forecast compares to the NYMEX natural gas futures strip. This brief memo presents our findings.

  12. State Renewable Energy Requirements and Goals: Update through 2009 (Update) (released in AEO2010)

    Reports and Publications

    2010-01-01

    To the extent possible,Annual Energy Outlook 2010 (AEO) incorporates the impacts of state laws requiring the addition of renewable generation or capacity by utilities doing business in the states. Currently, 30 states and the District of Columbia have enforceable renewable portfolio standards (RPS) or similar laws). Under such standards, each state determines its own levels of generation, eligible technologies, and noncompliance penalties. AEO2010 includes the impacts of all laws in effect as of September 2009 (with the exception of Hawaii, because the National Energy Modeling System provides electricity market projections for the continental United States only).

  13. Comparison of AEO 2006 Natural Gas Price Forecast to NYMEX FuturesPrices

    SciTech Connect

    Bolinger, Mark; Wiser, Ryan

    2005-12-19

    On December 12, 2005, the reference case projections from ''Annual Energy Outlook 2006'' (AEO 2006) were posted on the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) web site. We at LBNL have in the past compared the EIA's reference case long-term natural gas price forecasts from the AEO series to contemporaneous natural gas prices that can be locked in through the forward market, with the goal of better understanding fuel price risk and the role that renewables play in mitigating such risk (see, for example, http://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/EMS/reports/53587.pdf or http://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/ems/reports/54751.pdf). As such, we were curious to see how the latest AEO gas price forecast compares to the NYMEX natural gas futures strip. This brief memo presents our findings. As a refresher, our past work in this area has found that over the past five years, forward natural gas contracts (with prices that can be locked in--e.g., gas futures, swaps, and physical supply) have traded at a premium relative to contemporaneous long-term reference case gas price forecasts from the EIA. As such, we have concluded that, over the past five years at least, levelized cost comparisons of fixed-price renewable generation with variable price gas-fired generation that have been based on AEO natural gas price forecasts (rather than forward prices) have yielded results that are ''biased'' in favor of gas-fired generation, presuming that long-term price stability is valued. In this memo we simply update our past analysis to include the latest long-term gas price forecast from the EIA, as contained in AEO 2006. For the sake of brevity, we do not rehash information (on methodology, potential explanations for the premiums, etc.) contained in our earlier reports on this topic; readers interested in such information are encouraged to download that work from http://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/EMS/reports/53587.pdf or http://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/ems/reports/54751.pdf. As was the case in the past five AEO releases (AEO 2001-AEO

  14. Comparison of AEO 2007 Natural Gas Price Forecast to NYMEX FuturesPrices

    SciTech Connect

    Bolinger, Mark; Wiser, Ryan

    2006-12-06

    On December 5, 2006, the reference case projections from 'Annual Energy Outlook 2007' (AEO 2007) were posted on the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) web site. We at LBNL have, in the past, compared the EIA's reference case long-term natural gas price forecasts from the AEO series to contemporaneous natural gas prices that can be locked in through the forward market, with the goal of better understanding fuel price risk and the role that renewables play in mitigating such risk (see, for example, http://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/EMS/reports/53587.pdf or http://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/ems/reports/54751.pdf). As such, we were curious to see how the latest AEO gas price forecast compares to the NYMEX natural gas futures strip. This brief memo presents our findings. As a refresher, our past work in this area has found that over the past six years, forward natural gas contracts (with prices that can be locked in--e.g., gas futures, swaps, and physical supply) have traded at a premium relative to contemporaneous long-term reference case gas price forecasts from the EIA. As such, we have concluded that, over the past six years at least, levelized cost comparisons of fixed-price renewable generation with variable-price gas-fired generation that have been based on AEO natural gas price forecasts (rather than forward prices) have yielded results that are 'biased' in favor of gas-fired generation, presuming that long-term price stability is valued. In this memo we simply update our past analysis to include the latest long-term gas price forecast from the EIA, as contained in AEO 2007. For the sake of brevity, we do not rehash information (on methodology, potential explanations for the premiums, etc.) contained in our earlier reports on this topic; readers interested in such information are encouraged to download that work from http://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/EMS/reports/53587.pdf or http://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/ems/reports/54751.pdf. As was the case in the past six AEO releases (AEO 2001-AEO 2006), we

  15. Department of Energy Retrospective Plan Update as of February...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    DOE Retrospective Review Report as of March 2016 DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report DOE EO 13563 January 2014 Update Report and Burden Reduction Efforts

  16. Comparison of AEO 2005 natural gas price forecast to NYMEX futures prices

    SciTech Connect

    Bolinger, Mark; Wiser, Ryan

    2004-12-13

    On December 9, the reference case projections from ''Annual Energy Outlook 2005 (AEO 2005)'' were posted on the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) web site. As some of you may be aware, we at LBNL have in the past compared the EIA's reference case long-term natural gas price forecasts from the AEO series to contemporaneous natural gas prices that can be locked in through the forward market, with the goal of better understanding fuel price risk and the role that renewables play in mitigating such risk. As such, we were curious to see how the latest AEO gas price forecast compares to the NYMEX natural gas futures strip. This brief memo presents our findings. As a refresher, our past work in this area has found that over the past four years, forward natural gas contracts (e.g., gas futures, swaps, and physical supply) have traded at a premium relative to contemporaneous long-term reference case gas price forecasts from the EIA. As such, we have concluded that, over the past four years at least, levelized cost comparisons of fixed-price renewable generation with variable price gas-fired generation that have been based on AEO natural gas price forecasts (rather than forward prices) have yielded results that are ''biased'' in favor of gas-fired generation (presuming that long-term price stability is valued). In this memo we simply update our past analysis to include the latest long-term gas price forecast from the EIA, as contained in AEO 2005. For the sake of brevity, we do not rehash information (on methodology, potential explanations for the premiums, etc.) contained in our earlier reports on this topic; readers interested in such information are encouraged to download that work from http://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/EMS/reports/53587.pdf or, more recently (and briefly), http://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/ems/reports/54751.pdf. As was the case in the past four AEO releases (AEO 2001-AE0 2004), we once again find that the AEO 2005 reference case gas price forecast falls well below

  17. Industrial Sector Energy Demand: Revisions for Non-Energy-Intensive Manufacturing (released in AEO2007)

    Reports and Publications

    2007-01-01

    For the industrial sector, the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) analysis and projection efforts generally have focused on the energy-intensive industriesfood, bulk chemicals, refining, glass, cement, steel, and aluminumwhere energy cost averages 4.8% of annual operating cost. Detailed process flows and energy intensity indicators have been developed for narrowly defined industry groups in the energy-intensive manufacturing sector. The non-energy-intensive manufacturing industries, where energy cost averages 1.9% of annual operating cost, previously have received somewhat less attention, however. In Annual Energy Outlook 2006 (AEO), energy demand projections were provided for two broadly aggregated industry groups in the non-energy-intensive manufacturing sector: metal-based durables and other non-energy-intensive. In the AEO2006 projections, the two groups accounted for more than 50% of the projected increase in industrial natural gas consumption from 2004 to 2030.

  18. Second AEO2-015 Liquid Fuels Markets Working Group Meeting Summary

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    September 24, 2014 MEMORANDUM FOR: JOHN CONTI ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR FOR ENERGY ANALYSYS MICHAEL SCHAAL DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF ENERGY ANALYSIS JOHN POWELL TEAM LEADER, LIQUID FUELS MARKET TEAM FROM: LIQUID FUELS MARKET TEAM SUBJECT: Second AEO2015 Liquid Fuels Markets Working Group Meeting Summary (presented on 09-24-2014) Attendees: (EIA) John Powell, Mindi Farber-DeAnda, Mike Cole, Adrian Geagla, David Manowitz, Beth May Seth Meyer (USDA) Austin Brown (NREL) Robert Smith (US DOE) Ben Salisbury

  19. Summary of AEO2016 Electricity Working Group Meeting held on December 8, 2015

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    January7, 2016 MEMORANDUM FOR: John Conti Assistant Administrator for Energy Analysis Jim Diefenderfer Director, Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis Paul Holtberg Team Leader Analysis Integration Team Office of Integrated and International Energy Analysis FROM: Chris Namovicz Team Leader for Electricity Analysis (acting) And Thad Huetteman, Electricity Analysis Team SUBJECT: Summary of AEO2016 Electricity Working Group Meeting held on December 8, 2015 Presenters: Chris

  20. Microsoft PowerPoint - AEO2017 1st Electricity Working Group Presentation_v5

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Electricity Sector Working Group Policy Assumptions and Key Model Updates For Electricity Working Group September 1, 2016 By Thad Huetteman, Team Lead, Electricity Team Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis What to look for re: Electricity in AEO2017 * Evolution of new longer-term forecast horizon (extend Reference Case to 2050) including: - Renewables: integration/ distributed generation - Nuclear: retirements/uprates/plant life extension - Continued updates: generating

  1. WORKING GROUP PRESENTATION FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES. DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE AS AEO2016

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    February 1, 2016 MEMORANDUM TO: John Conti Assistant Administrator for Energy Analysis Jim Diefenderfer Director, Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis FROM: Coal and Uranium Analysis Team SUBJECT: Notes from the First AEO2016 Coal Working Group Meeting workshop held on December 1, 2015 Attendees (47) Name Affiliation Ross, Joey Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. Alfaro, Jose L. Alpha Natural Resources Blumenfeld, Andy Arch Coal, Inc. Lewandowski, David Clean Energy James,

  2. Liquid Fuels Taxes and Credits (released in AEO2010)

    Reports and Publications

    2010-01-01

    Provides a review of the treatment of federal fuels taxes and tax credits in Annual Energy Outlook 2010.

  3. A sensitivity analysis of the treatment of wind energy in the AEO99 version of NEMS

    SciTech Connect

    Osborn, Julie G; Wood, Frances; Richey, Cooper; Sanders, Sandy; Short, Walter; Koomey, Jonathan

    2001-01-01

    Each year, the U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Information Administration (EIA) publishes a forecast of the domestic energy economy in the Annual Energy Outlook (AEO). During the forecast period of the AEO (currently through 2020), renewable energy technologies have typically not achieved significant growth. The contribution of renewable technologies as electric generators becomes more important, however, in scenarios analyzing greenhouse gas emissions reductions or significant technological advancements. We examined the economic assumptions about wind power used for producing forecasts with the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) to determine their influence on the projected capacity expansion of this technology. This analysis should help illustrate to policymakers what types of issues may affect wind development, and improve the general understanding of the NEMS model itself. Figure 1 illustrates the model structure and factors relevant to wind deployment. We found that NEMS uses various cost multipliers and constraints to represent potential physical and economic limitations to growth in wind capacity, such as resource depletion, costs associated with rapid manufacturing expansion, and grid stability with high levels of capacity from intermittent resources. The model's flexibility allows the user to make alternative assumptions about the magnitude of these factors. While these assumptions have little effect on the Reference Case forecast for the 1999 edition of the AEO, they can make a dramatic difference when wind is more attractive, such as under a carbon permit trading system. With $100/ton carbon permits, the wind capacity projection for 2020 ranges from 15 GW in the unaltered model (AEO99 Reference Case) to 168 GW in the extreme case when all the multipliers and constraints examined in this study are removed. Furthermore, if modifications are made to the model allowing inter-regional transmission of electricity, wind capacity is forecast to reach 214

  4. AEO2016 - Issues in Focus articles - U.S. Energy Information Administration

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Issues in Focus Effects of the Clean Power Plan Release Date: 6/20/2016 The Clean Power Plan (CPP) [1] rule, issued under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act, is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) program to regulate carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions at existing fossil-fired electric power plants. EPA estimates that the CPP will reduce CO2 emissions from the power sector by 32% from 2005 levels by 2030. As described in the Annual Energy Outlook 2016 (AEO2016) Legislation and Regulations

  5. Buildings Working Group Meeting AEO2016 Preliminary Results

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Clean Power Plan * EIA issued analysis of proposed Clean Power Plan (CPP) in 2015; CPP was finalized by EPA and is currently under judicial review. The Supreme Court has issued a ...

  6. Federal Fuels Taxes and Tax Credits (released in AEO2009)

    Reports and Publications

    2009-01-01

    Provides a review and update of the handling of federal fuels taxes and tax credits, focusing primarily on areas for which regulations have changed or the handling of taxes or credits has been updated in Annual Energy Outlook 2009.

  7. Comparison of AEO 2009 Natural Gas Price Forecast to NYMEX Futures Prices

    SciTech Connect

    Bolinger, Mark; Wiser, Ryan

    2009-01-28

    On December 17, 2008, the reference-case projections from Annual Energy Outlook 2009 (AEO 2009) were posted on the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) web site. We at LBNL have, in the past, compared the EIA's reference-case long-term natural gas price forecasts from the AEO series to contemporaneous natural gas prices that can be locked in through the forward market, with the goal of better understanding fuel price risk and the role that renewables can play in mitigating such risk. As such, we were curious to see how the latest AEO reference-case gas price forecast compares to the NYMEX natural gas futures strip. This brief memo presents our findings. Note that this memo pertains only to natural gas fuel price risk (i.e., the risk that natural gas prices might differ over the life of a gas-fired generation asset from what was expected when the decision to build the gas-fired unit was made). We do not take into consideration any of the other distinct attributes of gas-fired and renewable generation, such as dispatchability (or lack thereof), differences in capital costs and O&M expenses, or environmental externalities. A comprehensive comparison of different resource types--which is well beyond the scope of this memo--would need to account for differences in all such attributes, including fuel price risk. Furthermore, our analysis focuses solely on natural-gas-fired generation (as opposed to coal-fired or nuclear generation, for example), for several reasons: (1) price volatility has been more of a concern for natural gas than for other fuels used to generate power; (2) for environmental and other reasons, natural gas has, in recent years, been the fuel of choice among power plant developers; and (3) natural gas-fired generators often set the market clearing price in competitive wholesale power markets throughout the United States. That said, a more-complete analysis of how renewables mitigate fuel price risk would also need to consider coal, uranium, and

  8. Comparison of AEO 2008 Natural Gas Price Forecast to NYMEX Futures Prices

    SciTech Connect

    Bolinger, Mark A; Bolinger, Mark; Wiser, Ryan

    2008-01-07

    On December 12, 2007, the reference-case projections from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 (AEO 2008) were posted on the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) web site. We at LBNL have, in the past, compared the EIA's reference-case long-term natural gas price forecasts from the AEO series to contemporaneous natural gas prices that can be locked in through the forward market, with the goal of better understanding fuel price risk and the role that renewables can play in mitigating such risk. As such, we were curious to see how the latest AEO reference-case gas price forecast compares to the NYMEX natural gas futures strip. This brief memo presents our findings. Note that this memo pertains only to natural gas fuel price risk (i.e., the risk that natural gas prices might differ over the life of a gas-fired generation asset from what was expected when the decision to build the gas-fired unit was made). We do not take into consideration any of the other distinct attributes of gas-fired and renewable generation, such as dispatchability (or lack thereof) or environmental externalities. A comprehensive comparison of different resource types--which is well beyond the scope of this memo--would need to account for differences in all such attributes, including fuel price risk. Furthermore, our analysis focuses solely on natural-gas-fired generation (as opposed to coal-fired generation, for example), for several reasons: (1) price volatility has been more of a concern for natural gas than for other fuels used to generate power; (2) for environmental and other reasons, natural gas has, in recent years, been the fuel of choice among power plant developers (though its appeal has diminished somewhat as prices have increased); and (3) natural gas-fired generators often set the market clearing price in competitive wholesale power markets throughout the United States. That said, a more-complete analysis of how renewables mitigate fuel price risk would also need to consider coal and

  9. Update to industrial drivers in the AEO2015 as a result of new input-output data

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Update to industrial drivers in the AEO2015 as a result of new input-output data Elizabeth Sendich May 4, 2015 Independent Statistics & Analysis www.eia.gov U.S. Energy Information Administration Washington, DC 20585 This paper is released to encourage discussion and critical comment. The analysis and conclusions expressed here are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the U.S. Energy Information Administration. WORKING PAPER SERIES April 2015 Elizabeth Sendich | U.S. Energy

  10. DOE Retrospective Review Plan Report

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Report May 2012 Agency/ Sub- agency RIN/ OMB Control Number Title of Initiative/ Rule/lCR Brief Description Actual or Target Completion Date Anticipated savings in costs and/or information collection burdens, together with any anticipated changes in benefits (please quantify, to the extent feasible, and also specify baseline, time horizon, and affected groups) Progress updates and anticipated accomplish- ments Notes DOE/GC N/A Request for information on reducing regulatory burden DOE is

  11. State Energy Program Retrospective Evaluation

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    of a major national evaluation of the State Energy Program (SEP), under the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. The Retrospective Evaluation of SEP's Program Year (PY) 2008, a typical year in SEP operations, was a multiyear, peer-reviewed, statistically robust effort led by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). It is the most comprehensive, detailed analysis ever conducted of SEP. The purpose of the evaluation was to develop independent estimates of key program outcomes, including:

  12. Treatment approach, delivery, and follow-up evaluation for cardiac rhythm disease management patients receiving radiation therapy: Retrospective physician surveys including chart reviews at numerous centers

    SciTech Connect

    Gossman, Michael S.; Wilkinson, Jeffrey D.; Mallick, Avishek

    2014-01-01

    In a 2-part study, we first examined the results of 71 surveyed physicians who provided responses on how they address the management of patients who maintained either a pacemaker or a defibrillator during radiation treatment. Second, a case review study is presented involving 112 medical records reviewed at 18 institutions to determine whether there was a change in the radiation prescription for the treatment of the target cancer, the method of radiation delivery, or the method of radiation image acquisition. Statistics are provided to illustrate the level of administrative policy; the level of communication between radiation oncologists and heart specialists; American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging and classification; National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines; tumor site; patient's sex; patient's age; device type; manufacturer; live monitoring; and the reported decisions for planning, delivery, and imaging. This survey revealed that 37% of patient treatments were considered for some sort of change in this regard, whereas 59% of patients were treated without regard to these alternatives when available. Only 3% of all patients were identified with an observable change in the functionality of the device or patient status in comparison with 96% of patients with normal behavior and operating devices. Documented changes in the patient's medical record included 1 device exhibiting failure at 0.3-Gy dose, 1 device exhibiting increased sensor rate during dose delivery, 1 patient having an irregular heartbeat leading to device reprogramming, and 1 patient complained of twinging in the chest wall that resulted in a respiratory arrest. Although policies and procedures should directly involve the qualified medical physicist for technical supervision, their sufficient involvement was typically not requested by most respondents. No treatment options were denied to any patient based on AJCC staging, classification, or NCCN practice standards.

  13. Mr. Rod Beever, Retrospective Review Comment

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The following content was created in response to the Federal Register, Vol. 81,No.90 published May 10, 2016 in regards to reducing regulatory burden via a Request for Information (RFI). This is...

  14. State Renewable Energy Requirements and Goals: Update Through 2006 (Update) (released in AEO2007)

    Reports and Publications

    2007-01-01

    Annual Energy Outlook 2006 provided a review of renewable energy programs that were in effect in 23 states at the end of 2005. Since then (as of September 1, 2006), no new state programs have been adopted; however, several states with renewable energy programs in place have made changes as they have gained experience and identified areas for improvement. Revisions made over the past year range from clarification or modification of program definitions, such as which resources qualify, to substantial increases in targets for renewable electricity generation or capacity. The following paragraphs provide an overview of substantive changes in the design or implementation of state renewable energy programs.

  15. AHAM Retrospective Preliminary Plan | Department of Energy

    Energy Saver

    Retrospective Preliminary Plan AHAM Retrospective Preliminary Plan The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) respectfully submits the following comments to the ...

  16. AHRI Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis | Department...

    Energy Saver

    Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis AHRI Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis These comments are submitted by the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration ...

  17. AEO2015 BWG

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    heaters, refrigerators, freezers, dishwashers, clothes washers, clothes dryers * Contract report from LeidosNavigant will be available online Discussion purposes only - do ...

  18. Intercomparison of Retrospective Radon Detectors

    SciTech Connect

    Field, R W.; Steck, D J.; Parkhurst, Maryann ); Mahaffey, Judith A. ); Alavanja, M C.

    1998-11-01

    We performed both a laboratory and field intercomparison of two novel glass-based retrospective radon detectors previously used in major radon case-control studies performed in Missouri and Iowa. The new detectors estimate retrospective residential radon exposure from the accumulation of a long-lived radon decay product, Pb-210, in glass. The detectors use track registration material in direct contact with glass surfaces to measure the alpha emission of a Pb-210 decay product, Po-210. The detector's track density generation rate (tracks cm{sup -2} hr{sup -1}) is proportional to the surface alpha activity. In the absence of other strong sources of alpha emission in the glass, the implanted surface alpha activity should be proportional to the accumulated Po-210 and hence, the cumulative radon gas exposure. The goals of the intercomparison were to: (1) perform collocated measurements using two different glass-based retrospective radon detectors in a controlled laboratory environment to compare their relative response to implanted polonium in the absence of environmental variation, (2) perform collocated measurements using two different retrospective radon progeny detectors in a variety of residential settings to compare their detection of glass implanted polonium activities, and (3) examine the correlation between track density rates and contemporary radon gas concentrations. The laboratory results suggested that the materials and methods used by the studies produced similar track densities in detectors exposed to the same implanted Po-210 activity. The field phase of the intercomparison found excellent agreement between the track density rates for the two types of retrospective detectors. The correlation between the track density rates and direct contemporary radon concentration measurements was relatively high, considering that no adjustments were performed to account for either the residential depositional environment or glass surface type.

  19. Impacts of Increased Access to Oil & Natural Gas Resources in the Lower 48 Federal Outer Continental Shelf (released in AEO2007)

    Reports and Publications

    2007-01-01

    This analysis was updated for Annual Energy Outlook 2009 (AEO): Impact of Limitations on Access to Oil and Natural Gas Resources in the Federal Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). The OCS is estimated to contain substantial resources of crude oil and natural gas; however, some areas of the OCS are subject to drilling restrictions. With energy prices rising over the past several years, there has been increased interest in the development of more domestic oil and natural gas supply, including OCS resources. In the past, federal efforts to encourage exploration and development activities in the deep waters of the OCS have been limited primarily to regulations that would reduce royalty payments by lease holders. More recently, the states of Alaska and Virginia have asked the federal government to consider leasing in areas off their coastlines that are off limits as a result of actions by the President or Congress. In response, the Minerals Management Service (MMS) of the U.S. Department of the Interior has included in its proposed 5-year leasing plan for 2007-2012 sales of one lease in the Mid-Atlantic area off the coastline of Virginia and two leases in the North Aleutian Basin area of Alaska. Development in both areas still would require lifting of the current ban on drilling.

  20. Restructuring in Retrospect, 2001 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    in Retrospect, 2001 This report provides policymakers with guidance as they examine past and future restructuring efforts and seek to determine how competitive markets can be...

  1. Annual Hanford Site GW Monitoring Report

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Annual Energy Outlook Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2014 and Prior Reference Case Projections March 2015 Independent Statistics & Analysis www.eia.gov U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 U.S. Energy Information Administration | AEO Retrospective Review: Evaluation of 2014 and Prior Reference Case Projections i This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's

  2. A retrospective of VAWT technology.

    SciTech Connect

    Ashwill, Thomas D.; Sutherland, Herbert J.; Berg, Dale E.

    2012-01-01

    The study of Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine (VAWT) technology at Sandia National Laboratories started in the 1970's and concluded in the 1990's. These studies concentrated on the Darrieus configurations because of their high inherent efficiency, but other configurations (e.g., the Savonius turbine) were also examined. The Sandia VAWT program culminated with the design of the 34-m 'Test Bed' Darrieus VAWT. This turbine was designed and built to test various VAWT design concepts and to provide the necessary databases to validate analytical design codes and algorithms. Using the Test Bed as their starting point, FloWind Corp. developed a commercial VAWT product line with composite blades and an extended height-to-diameter ratio. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the design process and results of the Sandia 34-m VAWT Test Bed program and the FloWind prototype development program with an eye toward future offshore designs. This paper is our retrospective of the design, analysis, testing and commercial process. Special emphasis is given to those lessons learned that will aid in the development of an off-shore VAWT.

  3. EERE Peer Review Guide

    SciTech Connect

    2009-01-18

    The primary purpose of this guide is to provide managers and staff guidance in establishing formal in-progress peer review that provides intellectually fair expert evaluation of EERE RD3 and supporting business administration programs, both retrospective and prospective.

  4. Residential Conservation Service: a retrospective

    SciTech Connect

    Praul, C.G.; Gunther, A.; Maier, G.

    1981-08-01

    A background of the Residential Conservation Service (RCS) program is presented and outstanding program design issues which include effectiveness, audit effectiveness, equity concerns, anticompetitive and antitrust considerations, and general concerns in state plan development are discussed. The purpose of the review is to provide background information to legislators and other decision makers who, though not immediately involved in program administration, will be evaluating the mandate and implementation progress over the next year. (MCW)

  5. Restructuring in Retrospect, 2001 | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Restructuring in Retrospect, 2001 Restructuring in Retrospect, 2001 This report provides policymakers with guidance as they examine past and future restructuring efforts and seek to determine how competitive markets can be of benefit to customers. Industrial and larger commercial customers may benefit from competitive markets, while residential and small commercial customers may not benefit unless legislators focus specifically on their needs. But it also has become evident that even the largest

  6. Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of DOE Investments in Photovolta...

    Energy Saver

    DOE Investments in Photovoltaic Energy Systems Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of DOE Investments in Photovoltaic Energy Systems This study is a retrospective analysis of net ...

  7. DOE Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules...

    Energy Saver

    Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules DOE Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules On January 18, 2011, the President issued Executive ...

  8. Energy Intensity Trends in AEO2010 (released in AEO2010)

    Reports and Publications

    2010-01-01

    Energy intensity (energy consumption per dollar of real GDP) indicates how much energy a country uses to produce its goods and services. From the early 1950s to the early 1970s, U.S. total primary energy consumption and real GDP increased at nearly the same annual rate. During that period, real oil prices remained virtually flat. In contrast, from the mid-1970s to 2008, the relationship between energy consumption and real GDP growth changed, with primary energy consumption growing at less than one-third the previous average rate and real GDP growth continuing to grow at its historical rate. The decoupling of real GDP growth from energy consumption growth led to a decline in energy intensity that averaged 2.8% per year from 1973 to 2008. In the Annual Energy Outlook 2010 Reference case, energy intensity continues to decline, at an average annual rate of 1.9% from 2008 to 2035.

  9. DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    January 2014 Agency/ Sub- agency RIN/ OMB Control Number Title of Initiative/ Rule/lCR Brief Description Actual or Target Completion Date Anticipated savings in costs and/or information collection burdens, together with any anticipated changes in benefits Progress updates and anticipated accomplish- ments Notes DOE/EE 1904- AB57 Energy Conservation Standards for Battery Chargers and External Power Supplies DOE is considering amended energy conservation standards for Class A EPSs and new energy

  10. DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    August 2014 Newly Added Actions Agency/ Sub-agency RIN/ OMB Control Number Title of Initiative/ Rule/lCR Brief Description Actual or Target Completion Date Anticipated savings in costs and/or information collection burdens, together with any anticipated changes in benefits Progress updates and anticipated accomplish- ments Notes DOE/OE N/A Export of Electricity & Permitting of Electricity Transmission Facilities at International Boundaries; New Administrative Procedures; Proposed Rule DOE is

  11. Mr. Rod Beever, Retrospective Review Comment.pdf

    Energy Saver

    Hydro-Quebec and H.Q. Energy Services (U.S.) Inc, on FE 99-1 | Department of Energy intervene and comments of the energy services group of Hydro-Quebec and H.Q. Energy Services (U.S.) Inc, on FE 99-1 Motion to intervene and comments of the energy services group of Hydro-Quebec and H.Q. Energy Services (U.S.) Inc, on FE 99-1 Motion to intervene and comments of the energy services group of Hydro-Quebec and H.Q. Energy Services, Inc on FE99-1. In July 1999, the DOE issued a notice of its

  12. DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report July...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    and Burden Reduction Report July 29, 2013 PDF icon DOE 13563 and ICR Report - Final.pdf More Documents & Publications DOE EO 13563 January 2014 Update Report and Burden ...

  13. DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    revisions to its regulation concerning sales from ... to respond to a severe energy supply interruption or to ... efficiency in the building sector, the transportation ...

  14. DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    ... inventories required by the Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR 970.5245-1). ... energy efficiency in the building sector, the DOE expects to submit this ...

  15. DOE Retrospective Review Plan and Burden Reduction Report

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    ... and quantify the potential impact of energy conservation standards on consumer choice. ... units of local government, and Indian tribes to create and implement strategies to: ...

  16. AEO2014: Preliminary Industrial Output

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    and demand computed from Input-Output basis * Major drivers: capacity utilization, interest rates, relative prices, ... For the energy industries (coal mining, oil & gas ...

  17. AEO2017 Preliminary Macroeconomic Results

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ... equations in the macro model. * Test the incorporation of price movements from the industrial output model into the macro model. * Test integration between the IHS macro ...

  18. AEO2014: Preliminary Industrial Output

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Insights' (GI) May Long-term Trend forecast and this year's ... demand is driven by the price level, income, wealth, ... NG 322 Pulp & paper Fuel Index 32511a9 Bulk ...

  19. AEO2017 Preliminary Macroeconomic Results

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Preliminary Macroeconomic Results For Macroeconomic Working Group July 28, 2016 | Washington, DC By Vipin Arora, Elizabeth Sendich, and Russ Tarver Macroeconomic Analysis Team Economic growth in major trading partners slows over the projection period while the dollar gradually depreciates Macroeconomic Working Group, Washington DC, July 28, 2016 2 -4.0 -3.0 -2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019 2024 2029 2034 2039 real trade-weighted GDP of major trading partners

  20. AEO2012 Early Release Overview

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Mellish, Carrie Milton, Brian Murphy, Kelly Perl, David Peterson, John Powell, Nancy Slater-Thompson, Kay A. Smith, John Staub, Charles L. Smith, Craig Federhen, and Peggy Wells. ...

  1. AEO Early Release 2013 - oil

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Growing U.S. oil output and rising vehicle fuel economy to cut U.S. reliance on foreign oil The United States is expected to continue cutting its dependence on petroleum and liquid ...

  2. AEO2012 Early Release Overview

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    9 U.S. Energy Information Administration | International Energy Outlook 2016 Chapter 2 Petroleum and other liquid fuels Overview In the International Energy Outlook 2016 (IEO2016) Reference case, worldwide consumption of petroleum and other liquid fuels increases from 90 million barrels per day (b/d) in 2012 to 100 million b/d in 2020 and 121 million b/d in 2040. Much of the growth in world liquid fuels consumption is projected for the emerging, non-Organization for Economic Cooperation and

  3. Industrial Plans for AEO2014

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ... * Quadrennial MECS update to 2010 * New nonmanufacturing data approach - Uses Census and USDA data to derive usage data from expenditures - Improves estimation of nonmanufacturing ...

  4. 2017 Project Peer Review | Department of Energy

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    AEO2016 Levelized Costs 1 August 2016 Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2016 This paper presents average values of levelized costs for generating technologies entering service in 2018, 2022, 1 and 2040 as represented in the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) for the Annual Energy Outlook 2016 (AEO2016) Reference case. 2 The levelized costs for generating technologies entering service in 2022 are presented in the body of the

  5. Notice of Availability of Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Existing Rules | Department of Energy Availability of Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Notice of Availability of Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules Through this notice, the Department of Energy (DOE) announces the availability of its preliminary plan for retrospective analysis of existing rules to make the agency's regulatory program more effective and less burdensome in achieving its regulatory objectives. As part of its implementation

  6. Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of DOE Investment in Photovoltai...

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) investment in photovoltaic (PV) technology development. ... Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of DOE Investments in Photovoltaic Energy Systems ...

  7. EERE Peer Review Guide - August 2004

    SciTech Connect

    2009-01-18

    Provides guidance in establishing formal in-progress peer review that provides intellectually fair expert evaluation of EERE research, development, demonstration, & deployment (supporting business administration) programs, both retrospective and pr

  8. Comment to NOI re Retrospective Risk Pooling Program For Suppliers

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Comment by Cameco Resources On Retrospective Risk Pooling Program For Suppliers, 75 Fed. Reg. 43945 (July 27, 2010), Section 934 Rule Making. As discussed below, Cameco believes that producers and...

  9. Retrospective examination of geothermal environmental assessments

    SciTech Connect

    Webb, J.W.; Eddlemon, G.K.; Reed, A.W.

    1984-03-01

    Since 1976, the Department of Energy (DOE) has supported a variety of programs and projects dealing with the exploration, development, and utilization of geothermal energy. This report presents an overview of the environmental impacts associated with these efforts. Impacts that were predicted in the environmental analyses prepared for the programs and projects are reviewed and summarized, along with measures that were recommended to mitigate these impacts. Also, for those projects that have gone forward, actual impacts and implemented mitigation measures are reported, based on telephone interviews with DOE and project personnel. An accident involving spills of geothermal fluids was the major environmental concern associated with geothermal development. Other important considerations included noise from drilling and production, emissions of H/sub 2/S and cooling tower drift, disposal of solid waste (e.g., from H/sub 2/S control), and the cumulative effects of geothermal development on land use and ecosystems. Mitigation measures were frequently recommended and implemented in conjunction with noise reduction; drift elimination; reduction of fugitive dust, erosion, and sedimentation; blowout prevention; and retention of wastes and spills. Monitoring to resolve uncertainties was often implemented to detect induced seismicity and subsidence, noise, drift deposition, concentrations of air and water pollutants, and effects on groundwater. The document contains an appendix, based on these findings, which outlines major environmental concerns, mitigation measures, and monitoring requirements associated with geothermal energy. Sources of information on various potential impacts are also listed.

  10. AEO Early Release 2013 - LNG exports

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    U.S. expected to become net exporter of natural gas by end of decade The United States is on track to become a net exporter of natural gas by 2020 as domestic gas production continues to increase faster than consumption through this decade. Growing production and low prices will help spur exports, according to the new long-term outlook from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Some of that gas will be sent overseas in huge ocean-going tankers carrying super-cooled liquefied natural gas,

  11. AEO Early Release 2013 - renewable generation

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Renewables account for a bigger share of U.S. electricity generation in decades ahead The United States will generate a bigger share of its electricity from renewable sources such as solar, wind, and biomass energy in the decades ahead, according to the new long-term outlook just released by the U.S. Energy Information Administration. EIA says that lower costs are making renewable electricity more economical, and along with federal and state policies that promote renewables, EIA projects that

  12. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ... of Congress, the General Accounting Office, or other Federal agencies authorized by law to receive such information. A court of competent jurisdiction may obtain this ...

  13. AEO2014 Renewables Working Group Meeting

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    ... Owen noted that there were no big projects in the works, but that they would be updating their core data sets for interconnection limits and baseline capacity and generation. A ...

  14. AEO2016 Preliminary Industrial Output Results

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    through network analysis will inform future work on analyzing supply matrices - We plan on incorporating detailed industrial price movements which will come from the ...

  15. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Annual Energy Outlook

    From a market perspective, commodity buyers do not typically care about the source of a product as long as its chemical composition meets specifications. We are proposing to rework ...

  16. State Appliance Standards (released in AEO2009)

    Reports and Publications

    2009-01-01

    State appliance standards have existed for decades, starting with Californias enforcement of minimum efficiency requirements for refrigerators and several other products in 1979. In 1987, recognizing that different efficiency standards for the same products in different states could create problems for manufacturers, Congress enacted the National Appliance Energy Conservation Act (NAECA), which initially covered 12 products. The Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPACT92), EPACT2005, and EISA2007 added additional residential and commercial products to the 12 products originally specified under NAECA.

  17. Energy Demand (released in AEO2010)

    Reports and Publications

    2010-01-01

    Growth in U.S. energy use is linked to population growth through increases in demand for housing, commercial floorspace, transportation, manufacturing, and services. This affects not only the level of energy use, but also the mix of fuels and consumption by sector.

  18. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: After reaching a four-month low in the beginning of August, crude oil prices rebounded close to the highest levels of the ...

  19. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Addendum to Potential Impacts of Reductions in Refinery Activity on Northeast Petroleum Product Markets 1 May 11, 2012 ADDENDUM Potential Impacts of Reductions in Refinery Activity on Northeast Petroleum Product Markets Additional Information on Jones Act Vessels' Potential Role in Northeast Refinery Closures The U.S. Energy Information Administration's (EIA) recent report exploring the potential impacts of reductions in refinery activity in the Northeast on petroleum product markets in that

  20. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    October 2014 1 October 2014 Short-Term Energy Outlook Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: International crude oil prices continued on a downward trajectory in September, falling under $100 per barrel (bbl) for the first time since June 2012. The North Sea Brent front month futures price settled at $93.42/bbl on October 2, a decrease of $6.92/bbl from September 2 (Figure 1). U.S. domestic crude oil benchmarks also declined, with the front month West Texas Intermediate (WTI)

  1. CAFE Standards (released in AEO2010)

    Reports and Publications

    2010-01-01

    Pursuant to the Presidents announcement of a National Fuel Efficiency Policy, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the EPA have promulgated nationally coordinated standards for tailpipe Carbon Dioxide (CO2)-equivalent emissions and fuel economy for light-duty vehicles (LDVs), which includes both passenger cars and light-duty trucks. In the joint rulemaking, the Environmental Protection Agency is enacting CO2-equivalent emissions standards under the Clean Air Act (CAA), and NHTSA is enacting companion Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended by the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007.

  2. Microsoft Word - macroeconomic_aeo2012.docx

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Gross State Product The MAM projects regional gross regional product in real per capita terms. The equations are in log form. There is an estimated equation for each of the nine...

  3. Coal Transportation Issues (released in AEO2007)

    Reports and Publications

    2007-01-01

    Most of the coal delivered to U.S. consumers is transported by railroads, which accounted for 64% of total domestic coal shipments in 2004. Trucks transported approximately 12% of the coal consumed in the United States in 2004, mainly in short hauls from mines in the East to nearby coal-fired electricity and industrial plants. A number of minemouth power plants in the West also use trucks to haul coal from adjacent mining operations. Other significant modes of coal transportation in 2004 included conveyor belt and slurry pipeline (12%) and water transport on inland waterways, the Great Lakes, and tidewater areas (9%).

  4. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    ... Those schedules include; * Schedule 2, General Information and Energy Sources and ... EIA-861. These schedules include Schedule 2C Green Pricing and Schedule 2D Net Metering. ...

  5. Coal Working Group - AEO2017 Summary Notes

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Clark Leidos *Bill Meroney Environmental Protection Agency *Leslie Coleman National Mining Association *Greg Moxness Department of Labor John Dean JD Energy, Inc. *Chris Nichols ...

  6. Comparing Efficiency Projections (released in AEO2010)

    Reports and Publications

    2010-01-01

    Realized improvements in energy efficiency generally rely on a combination of technology and economics. The figure below illustrates the role of technology assumptions in the Annual Energy Outlook 2010 projections for energy efficiency in the residential and commercial buildings sector. Projected energy consumption in the Reference case is compared with projections in the Best Available Technology, High Technology, and 2009 Technology cases and an estimate based on an assumption of no change in efficiency for building shells and equipment.

  7. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Annual Energy Outlook

    ... and other advanced technology vehicles (e.g., gasoline or diesel- electric hybrid vehicles) that vehicle suppliers made available in a calendar year and plan to make available ...

  8. Efficiency and Intensity in the AEO 2010

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Average annual rate of decrease Steve Wade, 2010 Energy Conference, April 7, 2010 6 * Conservation - Changes in energy use that reduce consumption by reducing services provided * ...

  9. AEO 2013 Liquid Fuels Markets Working Group

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    year Under the LCFS Brazilian sugarcane Ethanol is favorable due to its carbon intensity ... as it is more expensive than corn based ethanol Q: Is the California LCFS an attempt to ...

  10. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    6 11.7 44.2 83.7 12.9 46.8 83.8 13.8 46.1 83.4 14.4 46.2 85.1 14.3 46.6 84.9 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Residential Commercial Industrial 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Note: These deliveries included quantities covered by long-term contracts and gas involved in short-term or spot market sales. Source: Energy Information Administration (EIA), Form EIA -176, "Annual Report of Natural and Supplemental Gas Supply and Disposition." Figure 18. Percent of natural gas deliveries in the United

  11. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    1 July 2012 Short-Term Energy Outlook Highlights * EIA projects the West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil spot price to average about $88 per barrel over the second half of 2012 and the U.S. refiner acquisition cost (RAC) of crude oil to average $93 per barrel, both about $7 per barrel lower than last month's Outlook. EIA expects WTI and RAC crude oil prices to remain roughly at these second half levels in 2013. Beginning in this month's Outlook, EIA is also providing a forecast of Brent crude

  12. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    012 Short-Term Energy Outlook August 7, 2012 Notice of change to electricity generation and renewables forecast tables The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) has changed the format of the Short-Term Energy Outlook tables for electricity industry overview (Table 7a), electricity generation (Table 7d), electricity generation fuel consumption (Table 7e), and renewable energy (Table 8). Electricity Generation and Fuel Consumption The new electricity generation and fuel consumption tables

  13. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Outlook Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: International crude oil futures prices declined in March and are near the bottom of their recent trading range. The North Sea Brent front month futures price settled at $106.15 per barrel (bbl) on April 3, a decrease of $5.05/bbl from March 3 (Figure 1). The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) front month futures price declined by $4.63/bbl over the same period, settling at $100.29/bbl on April 3. An apparent decline in risks associated

  14. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    5 1 April 2015 Short-Term Energy Outlook Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: After increasing in February, global crude oil prices declined in March. The North Sea Brent front month futures price settled at $54.95/bbl on April 2, a decline of $4.59/bbl since the close on March 2 (Figure 1). The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) front month futures price declined by $0.45/bbl over the same period to settle at $49.14/bbl on April 2. The average Brent price for March was 3.2% lower

  15. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Outlook Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: After increasing at the start of March, crude oil prices stabilized and traded within a relatively narrow range through the first week of April. The North Sea Brent front month futures price rose $2.62 per barrel (b) from March 1 to settle at $39.43/b on April 7 (Figure 1). The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) front month futures price rose $2.86/b and settled at $37.26 over the same period. The increase in crude oil prices alongside

  16. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: Front month futures prices for both the Brent and WTI crude oil benchmarks rose over the last month, with WTI rising faster than Brent to sharply narrow the spread between the two benchmarks. Since July 1, Brent has increased by $6.54 per barrel to settle at $109.54 per barrel on August 1 (Figure 1). Over the same time period, WTI increased by $9.90 per barrel to settle at $107.89. While the August 1 settle was the highest price for Brent

  17. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: International crude oil prices, which reached their highest point of the year in June, fell to their lowest levels of the year in early August. The North Sea Brent front month futures price settled at $105.44/barrel on August 7, a decrease of $6.85/barrel from July 1 (Figure 1). The front month West Texas Intermediate (WTI) contract also fell, settling at $97.34/barrel on August 7, $8.00/barrel lower than on July 1. A further easing of

  18. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: Crude oil prices moved lower through much of July and early August. The North Sea Brent front month futures price declined $12.49 per barrel (b) since July 1 to settle at $49.52/b on August 6 (Figure 1). The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) front month futures price declined $12.30/b over the same time, settling at $44.66/b on August 6. Both benchmarks recorded their largest month-over-month decline since January 2015. One of the factors that

  19. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: Crude oil prices broke below $45/b and out of of a two-month-long trading range in July. The front-month Brent crude oil price decreased $6.06 per barrel (b) since July 1, settling at $44.29/b on August 4 (Figure 1). The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil price settled at $41.93/b, declining $7.06/b over the same time. Crude oil production outages, which removed more than 3.7 million barrels per day (b/d) of production in May, declined

  20. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: International crude oil benchmarks moved higher in November, showing their first month-over-month increase since August, while U.S. crude oil prices moved higher during the first week of December. The North Sea Brent front month futures price settled at $110.98 per barrel on December 5, an increase of $5.07 per barrel since its close on November 1 (Figure 1). The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) front month futures contract rose $2.77 per

  1. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    1 December 2014 Short-Term Energy Outlook Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: Crude oil prices continued to move lower in November and recorded their fifth consecutive month of declines. The North Sea Brent front month futures price settled at $69.64/bbl on December 4, a decline of $15.14/bbl from November 3 (Figure 1). The front month West Texas Intermediate (WTI) contract price settled at $66.81/bbl on December 4, decreasing by $11.97/bbl since the start of November. The

  2. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: Crude oil prices in November declined to the lowest levels since August. The North Sea Brent front month futures price settled at $43.84 per barrel (b) on December 3, a decrease of $4.95/b since November 2 (Figure 1). The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) front month futures price settled at $41.08/b on December 3, declining $5.06/b over the same period. The prospect of an oversupplied crude oil market continuing in the near term weighed on

  3. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    February 2014 Short-Term Energy Outlook Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: International crude oil prices were relatively stable to start the year. The North Sea Brent front month futures price settled at $107.19 per barrel (bbl) on February 6, a decline of less than $1/bbl from its settle price on January 2 (Figure 1). Over the same period, the West Texas Intermediate (WTI) front month futures contract rose $2.40/bbl, settling at $97.84/bbl on February 6. Crude oil has so

  4. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: Crude oil prices moved higher toward the end of January and into the first week of February. The North Sea Brent front month futures price settled at $56.57/bbl on February 5, an increase of $0.15/bbl from January 2 (Figure 1). The front month West Texas Intermediate (WTI) contract price settled at $50.48/bbl on February 5, $2.21/bbl lower than at the start of January. These changes were relatively small compared to an average

  5. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: The North Sea Brent front month futures price settled at $34.46/b on February 4 $2.76 per barrel (b) below its January 4 level (Figure 1). The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) front month futures price settled at $31.72, a decrease of $5.04/b over the same period. On January 20, both Brent and WTI were at their lowest levels since 2003. During the first three weeks of January, Brent and WTI front month futures prices declined 25% and 28%,

  6. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: International crude oil prices were relatively stable throughout December before declining at the beginning of January, while U.S. domestic prices moved higher in December. The North Sea Brent front month futures price settled at $107.78 per barrel (bbl) on January 2, a decline of $3.67/bbl from its close on December 2 (Figure 1). Over the same period, the West Texas Intermediate (WTI) front month futures contract rose $1.62/bbl, settling

  7. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: Crude oil markets continue to search for a bottom as prices declined again in December and the first week of January. The North Sea Brent front month futures price settled at $50.96/bbl on January 8, a decline of $21.58/bbl from December 1 (Figure 1). The front month West Texas Intermediate (WTI) contract price settled at $48.79/bbl on January 8, decreasing by $20.21/bbl since the start of December. Crude oil prices now have declined more

  8. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: Crude oil futures prices reached the lowest level in 12 years in December and early January. The North Sea Brent front month futures price settled at $33.75 per barrel (b) on January 7, $10.69/b lower than the close on December 1 (Figure 1). The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) front month futures price settled at $33.27, a decrease of $8.58/b over the same period. Global crude oil prices declined after the December 4 Organization of Petroleum

  9. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: After an upward move in mid-June, crude oil prices retreated close to previous levels. The North Sea Brent front month futures price settled at $111/barrel on July 3, an increase of $2.17/barrel from June 2 (Figure 1). The front month West Texas Intermediate (WTI) contract also rose, settling at $104.06/barrel on July 3, $1.59/barrel higher than on June 2. Tensions in Iraq were the primary driver of the crude oil price increase in mid-June.

  10. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: Global and domestic crude oil prices traded in a narrow range in June. The North Sea Brent front month futures price declined $2.87 per barrel (b) since June 1 to settle at $62.01/b on July 1 (Figure 1). The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) front month futures price declined $3.24/b over the month, settling at $56.96/b on July 1. As global crude oil supply remains robust, demand-side factors are likely contributing to renewed price stability

  11. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: Despite some price volatility in June and early July, crude oil prices remained in a narrow trading range near recent highs. The front-month Brent crude oil price decreased $3.32 per barrel (b) since June 1, settling at $46.40/b on July 7 (Figure 1). The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil price settled at $45.14/b, declining $3.87/b over the same time. Drilling activity in the United States, as measured by the Baker Hughes oil rig

  12. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    4 1 June 2014 Short-Term Energy Outlook Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: International crude oil futures prices increased slightly over the previous month but remained rangebound. The North Sea Brent front month futures price settled at $108.79 per barrel (bbl) on June 5, an increase of $1.03/bbl from May 1 (Figure 1). The front month West Texas Intermediate (WTI) contract also rose, settling at $102.48/bbl on June 5, $3.06/bbl higher than on May 1. Lower-than-previously

  13. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: International crude oil prices declined in May and in the first week of June while domestic crude oil prices stayed relatively stable. The North Sea Brent front month futures declined $4.43 per barrel (b) since May 1 to settle at $62.03/b on June 4 (Figure 1). The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) front month futures price decreased $1.15/b over the same period to settle at $58/b on June 4. Elevated crude oil production from members of The

  14. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: Global crude oil prices increased for the fourth consecutive month in May, closing at more than $50 per barrel (b) for the first time since November 2015. The front- month Brent crude oil price increased $4.21/b since May 2, settling at $50.04/b on June 2. The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil price increased $4.39 over the same period to settle at $49.17/b (Figure 1). Global unplanned supply outages were estimated at 3.7 million

  15. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: International crude oil futures prices rose over the previous month but remained within the recent, and relatively narrow, trading range. The North Sea Brent front month futures price settled at $108.10 per barrel (bbl) on March 6, an increase of $2.06/bbl from February 3 (Figure 1). Over the same period, the West Texas Intermediate (WTI) front month futures contract rose $5.13/bbl, settling at $101.56/bbl on March 6. The brief uptick in

  16. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    March 2015 Short-Term Energy Outlook Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: Over the past month, international crude oil prices recorded the first month- over-month increase since June 2014. The North Sea Brent front month futures price settled at $60.48/bbl on March 5, an increase of $5.73/bbl from February 2 (Figure 1). In the U.S. market, domestic crude oil prices continued to lag behind international benchmarks. The front month West Texas Intermediate (WTI) contract price

  17. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: The North Sea Brent front month futures price rose $2.83 per barrel (b) from February 1 to settle at $37.07/b on March 3 (Figure 1). The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) front month futures price rose $2.95/b and settled at $34.57 over the same period. Crude oil prices began to increase during the second half of February in response to potential future supply reductions and better economic data in the United States. Discussion of a potential

  18. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: International crude oil futures prices rebounded in April and approached the top of their recent trading range. The North Sea Brent front month futures price settled at $107.76 per barrel (bbl) on May 1, an increase of $2.14/bbl from April 1 (Figure 1). West Texas Intermediate (WTI) prices at the start of May were near the same levels as the beginning of April. The front month WTI contract settled at $99.42/bbl on May 1, a slight decrease

  19. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: Crude oil prices continued to rise in April and reached their highest levels of the year. The North Sea Brent front month futures price settled at $65.54 per barrel (b) on May 7, an increase of $8.44/b since the close on April 1 (Figure 1). The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) front month futures price rose by $8.85/b over the same period to settle at $58.94/b on May 7. Although current oil market conditions still show production outpacing

  20. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: Crude oil prices continued upward and reached the highest levels of the year. The North Sea Brent front-month futures price rose $6.34 per barrel (b) from April 1 to settle at $45.01/b on May 5 (Figure 1). The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) front-month futures price rose $7.53/b and settled at $44.32/b over the same period. Early data on petroleum product consumption in 2016 suggest that last year's strong growth may continue this year. U.S.

  1. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: North Sea Brent and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) front month futures contracts continued their recent decline in October and the first week of November as a larger-than-normal seasonal decrease in global refinery runs from August through October lessened demand for crude oil. The Brent contract settled at $103.46 per barrel on November 7, a decline of $4.48 per barrel compared to October 1 (Figure 1). The decreases in WTI futures prices

  2. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    4 1 November 2014 Short-Term Energy Outlook Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: Both international and domestic crude oil prices moved sharply lower over the previous five weeks. The North Sea Brent front month futures price settled at $82.86/bbl on November 6, a decline of $11.30/bbl from October 1 (Figure 1). The front month West Texas Intermediate (WTI) contract price settled at $77.91/bbl on November 6, decreasing by $12.82/bbl since the start of October. November marked

  3. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: Crude oil prices remained within the range established over the previous three months. The North Sea Brent front month futures price settled at $47.98 per barrel (b) on November 5, an increase of $0.29/b since October 1 (Figure 1). The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) front month futures price settled at $45.20/b on November 5, rising by 46 cents/b over the same time. Although prices were relatively stable, large uncertainty remains in the

  4. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    3 1 October 2013 Short-Term Energy Outlook Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: Front month futures prices for the Brent and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil benchmarks fell in September. The Brent contract settled at $109.00 per barrel on October 3, a decline of $6.68 per barrel since September 3, and WTI settled at $103.31 per barrel on October 3, falling by $5.23 per barrel over the same period (Figure 1). These changes marked the first month-over-month declines in

  5. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    4 1 October 2014 Short-Term Energy Outlook Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: International crude oil prices continued on a downward trajectory in September, falling under $100 per barrel (bbl) for the first time since June 2012. The North Sea Brent front month futures price settled at $93.42/bbl on October 2, a decrease of $6.92/bbl from September 2 (Figure 1). U.S. domestic crude oil benchmarks also declined, with the front month West Texas Intermediate (WTI) contract price

  6. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: The front month futures price for Brent, the world waterborne crude benchmark, increased by $5.72 per barrel to settle at $115.26 per barrel on September 5 (Figure 1). Front month futures prices for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil also increased over the same time period but by a lesser amount, to settle at $108.37 per barrel on September 5. The primary drivers of higher crude oil prices over the past five weeks included an uptick

  7. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: International crude oil prices fell in August and remain near their lowest levels of 2014. The North Sea Brent front month futures price settled at $101.83/barrel on September 4, a decrease of $3.01/barrel from August 1 (Figure 1). The front month West Texas Intermediate (WTI) contract price fell by $3.43/barrel over the same period, settling at $94.45/barrel on September 4. Although the U.S. economy showed robust growth in the second

  8. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: Crude oil prices declined through most of August before rising at the end of the month and in the first week of September. The North Sea Brent front month futures price rose $1.16 per barrel (b) since August 3 to settle at $50.68/b on September 3 (Figure 1). The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) front month futures price increased $1.58/b over the same period to settle at $46.75/b. In contrast to July, when crude oil prices may have responded

  9. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Market Prices and Uncertainty Report Crude Oil Prices: After reaching a four-month low in the beginning of August, crude oil prices rebounded close to the highest levels of the year. The front-month Brent crude oil price increased $3.31 per barrel (b) since August 1, settling at $45.45/b on September 1 (Figure 1). The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) front-month crude oil price settled at $43.16/b, an increase of $3.10/b over the same period. Price volatility in global equity markets declined in

  10. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    end uses such as space heating, air conditioning, water heating, refrigeration, and so on. ... Total Btu Space Heating AC Water Heating Etc. (known) total (unknown) end-use components ...

  11. 2017 Levelized Costs AEO 2012 Early Release

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Report," collects the cost and quality of fossil fuel purchases made by electric ... a reduction of approximately 9 percent of natural gas purchases, cost, and quality data. ...

  12. First AEO2017 Industrial Working Group Meeting

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    ... Among other differences, it also models heat while NEMS does not. 2. Do you have access to the U.S. Department of Census Manufacturing consumption data? Answer: We do not have ...

  13. Nonconventional Liquid Fuels (released in AEO2006)

    Reports and Publications

    2006-01-01

    Higher prices for crude oil and refined petroleum products are opening the door for nonconventional liquids to displace petroleum in the traditional fuel supply mix. Growing world demand for diesel fuel is helping to jump-start the trend toward increasing production of nonconventional liquids, and technological advances are making the nonconventional alternatives more viable commercially. Those trends are reflected in the Annual Energy Outlook 2006 projections.

  14. CONTINATIONSHEETREFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED AEO

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    COTIUTINSHE DE-AC27-08RV14800/067 2G OF NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR WASHINGTON RIVER PROTECTION SOLUTIONS LLC ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) -$1,000,000.00 New Total Obligated Amount tor this Award: $1, 180,251,170.41 incremental Funded Amount changed: from $1,181,251,170.41 to $1, 180,251,170.41 Account code: Reforming Treatability Fund 01250 Appr Year 2010 Allottee 34 Reporting Entity 421301 Object Class 25200 Program 1111412 Project

  15. CONTINATIONSHEETREFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED AEO

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    COTNUTO SETDE-AC27-08RV14800/048 rAG OF NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR WASHINGTON RIVER PROTECTION SOLUTIONS LLC ITEM NO. SUPPLIESISERVICES QUANTITY JNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) WRPS Operations (FY 2010) Fund 01250 Appr Year 2010 Aliottee 34 Reporting Entity 421301 Object Class 25200 Progrl~am~ 1110909 Project 0001481 WFO 0000000 Local Use 0000000 Amount: $70,000,000.00 Delivery Location Code: 00601 Richland Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office

  16. Retrospective dosimetry using EPR and TL techniques: a status report

    SciTech Connect

    Haskell, E.H.

    1996-12-31

    Methods of retrospective dosimetry, including luminescence and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy (EPR), rely on measurement of accident dose absorbed by naturally occurring materials - ceramics in the case of both thermoluminescence (TL) and optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) and organic materials and bio- minerals in the case of EPR. Each of these methods relies on measurement of radiation defects resulting from accidental exposure. Since defects also result from natural sources of radiation over the lifetime of a sample, analysis is usually restricted to materials for which the natural dose may be determined and subtracted from the measured cumulative dose. Luminescence dating techniques rely heavily on an accurate assessment of cumulative dose from natural radiation sources, and dating research has provided us with the bulk of our knowledge in this area. Virtually all of the work on natural dose determination can be directly applied to retrospective techniques. With EPR techniques the cumulative dose from diagnostic x- rays is also of importance.

  17. Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of U.S. DOE Geothermal...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of U.S. DOE Geothermal Technologies R&D Program Investments Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of U.S. DOE Geothermal Technologies R&D ...

  18. A.O. Smith Corporation Response to Preliminary Plan for Retrospective...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    A.O. Smith Corporation Response to Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of A.O. Smith Corporation Response to Preliminary Plan for Retrospective Analysis of A.O. Smith ...

  19. COLLOQUIUM: Achieving 10MW Fusion Power in TFTR: a Retrospective |

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Princeton Plasma Physics Lab November 18, 2014, 2:00pm to 3:00pm Colloquia MBG Auditorium COLLOQUIUM: Achieving 10MW Fusion Power in TFTR: a Retrospective Dr. Michael Bell Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory "The Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor (TFTR) operated at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) from 1982 to 1997. TFTR set a number of world records, including a plasma temperature of 510 million degrees centigrade -- the highest ever produced in a laboratory, and well beyond

  20. World Oil Prices and Production Trends in AEO2010 (released in AEO2010)

    Reports and Publications

    2010-01-01

    In Annual Energy Outlook 2010, the price of light, low-sulfur (or "sweet") crude oil delivered at Cushing, Oklahoma, is tracked to represent movements in world oil prices. The Energy Information Administration makes projections of future supply and demand for "total liquids,"" which includes conventional petroleum liquids -- such as conventional crude oil, natural gas plant liquids, and refinery gain -- in addition to unconventional liquids, which include biofuels, bitumen, coal-to-liquids (CTL), gas-to-liquids (GTL), extra-heavy oils, and shale oil.

  1. Natural Gas and Crude Oil Prices in AEO (released in AEO2009)

    Reports and Publications

    2009-01-01

    If oil and natural gas were perfect substitutes in all markets where they are used, market forces would be expected to drive their delivered prices to near equality on an energy-equivalent basis. The price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil generally is denominated in terms of barrels, where 1 barrel has an energy content of approximately 5.8 million Btu. The price of natural gas (at the Henry Hub), in contrast, generally is denominated in million Btu. Thus, if the market prices of the two fuels were equal on the basis of their energy contents, the ratio of the crude oil price (the spot price for WTI, or low-sulfur light, crude oil) to the natural gas price (the Henry Hub spot price) would be approximately 6.0. From 1990 through 2007, however, the ratio of natural gas prices to crude oil prices averaged 8.6; and in the Annual Energy Outlook 2009 projections from 2008 through 2030, it averages 7.7 in the low oil price case, 14.6 in the reference case, and 20.2 in the high oil price case.

  2. Macro-Industrial Working Group: meeting 1

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    4 Macro/Industrial Working Group Macroeconomic team: Kay Smith, Russ Tarver, Elizabeth Sendich and Vipin Arora Briefing on Macroeconomic Reference Case for the Annual Energy Outlook 2015 Macro's FY2015 AEO initiatives met 2 Kay Smith, AEO2015 Macroeconomic/Industrial Working Group July 24, 2014 PLEASE DO NOT CITE OR DISTRIBUTE * Review incorporation of completed AEO macroeconomic initiatives. - Incorporation of 2009 based GDP - Use of 2007 supply matrix and its extension to 2012 - The extension

  3. Annual Energy Outlook 2017 1st Coal Working Group

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    1 st Coal Working Group Coal and Uranium Analysis Team August 31, 2016| Washington, D.C. WORKING GROUP PRESENTATION FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES. DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE AS AEO2017 MODELING ASSUMPTIONS AND INPUTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. Agenda Coal and Uranium Analysis Team August 31, 2016 | Washington, D.C. 2 * EIA ongoing activities * Modeling focus for AEO2017 * Review of AEO2016 results * General Modeling Assumptions - Focus on productivity and other factors affecting price - Feedback from CWG

  4. Previous Reviews

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Reviews Science Engagement Move your data Programs & Workshops Science Requirements Reviews Network Requirements Reviews Documents and Background Materials FAQ for Case Study Authors BER Requirements Review 2015 ASCR Requirements Review 2015 Previous Reviews HEP/NP Requirements Review 2013 FES Requirements Review 2014 BES Requirements Review 2014 Requirements Review Reports Case Studies Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside US) 1 800-333-7638 (Inside US) 1 510-486-7600

  5. Annual Energy Review 2011 - Released September 2012

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Impact of the Clean Power Plan Annual Energy Outlook 2016 Reference/Alternative Cases 2016 EIA Energy Conference July 11, 2016 | Washington, D.C. by Thaddeus J. Huetteman, Senior Electricity Analyst Key conclusions: variety of potential impacts of Clean Power Plan (CPP) in AEO2016- Reference Case vs. Alternatives * How the states implement the Clean Power Plan influences its impact on the power sector * CO2 emission reduction requirements under Clean Power Plan accelerate a shift in generation

  6. Notice of Availability of Preliminary Plan for Retrospective...

    Energy Saver

    As part of its implementation of Executive Order 13563, ''Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' issued by the President on January 18, 2011, DOE sought public comments on ...

  7. Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of U.S. DOE Wind Energy...

    Energy Saver

    Public returns on the Program's investments from 1976 to 2008 are identified and analyzed using retrospective analysis. Technical Report (1.42 MB) More Documents & Publications ...

  8. Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of U.S. DOE Geothermal Technologies

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    R&D Program Investments | Department of Energy Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of U.S. DOE Geothermal Technologies R&D Program Investments Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of U.S. DOE Geothermal Technologies R&D Program Investments Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of U.S. DOE Geothermal Technologies R&D Program Investments: Impacts of a Cluster of Energy Technologies, August 2010. gtp_benefit-cost_eval_aug2010.pdf (1.69 MB) More Documents & Publications

  9. Determining the Uncertainty Associated with Retrospective Air Sampling for Optimization Purposes

    SciTech Connect

    Hadlock, D.J.

    2003-10-03

    NUREG 1400 contains an acceptable methodology for determining the uncertainty associated with retrospective air sampling. The method is a fairly simple one in which both the systemic and random uncertainties, usually expressed as a percent error, are propagated using the square root of the sum of the squares. Historically, many people involved in air sampling have focused on the statistical counting error as the deciding factor of overall uncertainty in retrospective air sampling. This paper looks at not only the counting error but also other errors associated with the performance of retrospective air sampling.

  10. Retrospective Benefit-Cost Analysis of U.S. DOE's Geothermal...

    Energy Saver

    Technical Report (1.63 MB) More Documents & Publications Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of U.S. DOE Geothermal Technologies R&D Program Investments Linkages from DOE's ...

  11. Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of DOE Investment in Photovoltaic Energy Systems

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of DOE Investment in Photovoltaic Energy Systems, a report from the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  12. Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of DOE Investments in Photovoltaic Energy Systems

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of DOE Investment in Photovoltaic Energy Systems, a report from the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  13. Analysis & Projections - Pub - U.S. Energy Information Administration...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Renewables AEO2016 Meetings First AEO2016 Meeting (December 23, 2015) Summary of meeting Presentation Second AEO2016 Meeting (February 9, 2016) Presentation AEO2015 Meetings First ...

  14. High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study of 226 Patients

    SciTech Connect

    Aumont-le Guilcher, Maud; Prevost, Bernard; Sunyach, Marie Pierre; Peiffert, Didier; Maingon, Philippe; Thomas, Laurence; Williaume, Daniele; Begue, Mickael; Lerouge, Delphine; Campion, Loic; Mahe, Marc-Andre

    2011-03-15

    Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in patients with inoperable endobronchial carcinoma. Methods and Materials: We retrospectively reviewed the records (April 1991-May 2004) of patients with non-small-cell carcinoma, with no extrabronchial spread on computed tomography scans, who underwent HDR brachytherapy because of contraindications to surgery and external beam radiation therapy. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared by the log-rank test. Prognostic factors were analyzed by multivariate analysis. Results: 226 patients (223 men, 3 women, mean age: 62.2 years (range, 40-84)) were included. Of those, 217 (97%) had squamous cell carcinoma (Tis/T1/T2/Tx: 60/153/9/4). Dose was prescribed at 1 cm from the radius (24-35 Gy in 4-6 fractions). Mean follow-up was 30.4 months (range, 9-116). Complete endoscopic response rate was 93.6% at 3 months. One hundred twenty-eight patients (56%) died of intercurrent disease (n = 45), local failure (n = 36), metastasis (n = 10), local failure and metastasis (n = 11), complications (n = 13), and other causes (n = 12). The 2-year and 5-year survival rates were, respectively, 57% and 29% (overall) (median, 28.6 months), 81% and 56% (cancer-specific), and 68% and 50% (local disease-free). Acute toxicity included pneumothorax (1.5%) and mucosal inflammation (10%). Late complications were hemoptysis (6.6% with 5% of fatalities), bronchitis (19.5%), and necrosis (3.5%). In multivariate analysis, a distal tumor location and the use of two catheters were associated with improved local disease-free survival (p = 0.003 and p = 0.007, respectively) and a distal tumor location with improved overall survival (p = 0.0001). Conclusions: This large retrospective study confirms that HDR brachytherapy is an efficient and safe treatment in patients with inoperable endobronchial carcinoma.

  15. Retrospective Benefit-Cost Analysis of U.S. DOE's Geothermal Technologies R&D Program Investments

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of U.S. DOE Geothermal Technologies R&D Program Investments: Impacts of a Cluster of Energy Technologies, August 2010.

  16. Document Reviews

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Office of Document Reviews, within the Office of Health, Safety and Security information and document declassification efforts promote the release of information needed by an informed citizenry...

  17. Environmental Review

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Environmental-Review Sign In About | Careers | Contact | Investors | bpa.gov Search News & Us Expand News & Us Projects & Initiatives Expand Projects & Initiatives Finance...

  18. Microsoft Word - Final AEO2007 Commercial Doc.doc

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    the State Energy Data System (SEDS) historical commercial sector consumption, applying an additive correction term to ensure that simulated model results correspond to published...

  19. Microsoft Word - Final Industrial Documentation AEO2008 _6-12...

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    factors are multiplicative for all fuels which have values greater than zero and are additive otherwise. ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) - - - max...

  20. Annual Energy Outlook (AEO) 2006 - Supplemental Tables - All Tables

    SciTech Connect

    2009-01-18

    Tables describing regional energy consumption and prices by sector; residential, commercial, and industrial demand sector data; transportation demand sector; electricity and renewable fuel; and petroleum, natural gas, and coal data.

  1. Liquefied Natural Gas: Global Challenges (released in AEO2008)

    Reports and Publications

    2008-01-01

    U.S. imports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in 2007 were more than triple the 2000 total, and they are expected to grow in the long term as North Americas conventional natural gas production declines. With U.S. dependence on LNG imports increasing, competitive forces in the international markets for natural gas in general and LNG in particular will play a larger role in shaping the U.S. market for LNG. Key factors currently shaping the future of the global LNG market include the evolution of project economics, worldwide demand for natural gas, government policies that affect the development and use of natural resources in countries with LNG facilities, and changes in seasonal patterns of LNG trade.

  2. REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED AEO CONTINUATION SHEET...

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    2010 Allottee 34 Reporting Entity 421301 Amount: 43,752,060.00 Account code: P&B Rocky Flats Post Retirement Benefits Fund 01050 Appr Year 2010 Allottee 34 Reporting Entity...

  3. Second AEO2014 Transportation Working Group Meeting Summary

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Maples (EIAOECEA) Steve Plotkin (ANL) Attending by Phone: Kevin Bollon (EPA) Dallas Burkholder (EPA) John Davies (DOT) Kaoru Horie (Honda) Ken Howden (DOEEERE) Ryan Keefe ...

  4. First AEO2014 Macro-Industrial Working Group Meeting Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Frances Wood (OnLocation) Bhima Sastri (DOE-EERE) Don Hanson (ANL) Betsy Dutrow (EPA) Gale Boyd (Duke University) 2 WORKING GROUP PRESENTATION FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES DO NOT ...

  5. First AEO2014 Buildings Sector Working Group Meeting Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    0, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR: JOHN CONTI ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR FOR ENERGY ANALYSIS PAUL HOLTBERG TEAM LEADER ANALYSIS INTEGRATION TEAM JAMES TURNURE DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENERGY ...

  6. First AEO2015 Macro-Industrial Working Group Meeting Summary

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ... period for the NAICS revisions is just ending now, so we don't expect the revisions to happen before 2017. 2. Do the macro or industrial models explicitly model climate change? a. ...

  7. AEO 2013 Liquid Fuels Markets Working Group 2

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Slide 12 - Corn Oil and Tallow are needed for biodiesel to meet the LCFS Slide 13 - Energy crops are needed to meet the LCFS There is not enough cellulosic production to meet the ...

  8. First AEO2017 Liquid Fuels Markets Working Group Meeting Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    ... The following assumptions related to biofuelsnon-petroleum production were also maintained: ethanol and biodiesel tax credits are not extended beyond current expiration dates; ...

  9. Second AEO2014 Liquids Fuels Markets Working Group Meeting Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    ... biofuels to California - corn ethanol, biodiesel, Brazilian sugarcane ethanol, etc. ... A- 10 billion gallons per year - Biodiesel is included in Northeast heating oil ...

  10. Second AEO2016 Macro-Induistrial Working Group Meeting summary

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ... recovers later in the forecast, thereby allowing for ... moderate growth in the long-term spurred on by the relative ... 7. Why is there petroleum fuel growth in the steel ...

  11. Workshop on Biofuels Projections in AEO Presenters Biographies

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Prior to his service at DOE, Howard was Senior Staff Economist at the Council of Economic ... of biofuels, the national Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), the California Low Carbon Fuel ...

  12. AEO2013 Early Release Base Overnight Project Technological Total...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    4.39 30.64 8,800 8,740 Integrated Coal-Gasification Comb Cycle (IGCC) 7 2016 1200 4 3,475 ... 1.05 1.00 1,759 7.62 17.14 10,042 9,880 Biomass 2016 50 4 3,685 1.07 1.02 4,041 5.17 ...

  13. Summary of AEO2015 Renewable Electricity Working Group Meeting

    Annual Energy Outlook

    ... tracking systems in the future. A participant wanted to know if the wind capacity is hitting any growth bounds, and if the wind growth bounds are specified at the EMM level. ...

  14. Updated State Air Emissions Regulations (released in AEO2010)

    Reports and Publications

    2010-01-01

    The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) is a program that includes 10 Northeast states that have agreed to curtail and reverse growth in their carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. The RGGI program includes all electricity generating units with a capacity of at least 25 megawatts and requires an allowance for each ton of CO2 emitted. The first year of mandatory compliance was in 2009.

  15. Energy Policy Act 2005 Summary (released in AEO2006)

    Reports and Publications

    2006-01-01

    The U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 6 EH, the Energy Policy Act of 2005, on April 21, 2005, and the Senate passed H.R. 6 EAS on June 28, 2005. A conference committee was convened to resolve differences between the two bills, and a report was approved and issued on July 27, 2005. The House approved the conference report on July 28, 2005, and the Senate followed on July 29, 2005. EPACT2005 was signed into law by President Bush on August 8, 2005, and became Public Law 109-058.

  16. Restricted Natural Gas Supply Case (released in AEO2005)

    Reports and Publications

    2005-01-01

    The restricted natural gas supply case provides an analysis of the energy-economic implications of a scenario in which future gas supply is significantly more constrained than assumed in the reference case. Future natural gas supply conditions could be constrained because of problems with the construction and operation of large new energy projects, and because the future rate of technological progress could be significantly lower than the historical rate. Although the restricted natural gas supply case represents a plausible set of constraints on future natural gas supply, it is not intended to represent what is likely to happen in the future.

  17. No Sunset and Extended Policies Cases (released in AEO2010)

    Reports and Publications

    2010-01-01

    The Annual Energy Outlook 2010 Reference case is best described as a current laws and regulations case, because it generally assumes that existing laws and fully promulgated regulations will remain unchanged throughout the projection period, unless the legislation establishing them specifically calls for them to end or change. The Reference case often serves as a starting point for the analysis of proposed legislative or regulatory changes, a task that would be difficult if the Reference case included projected legislative or regulatory changes.

  18. EPACT2005 Loan Guarantee Program (released in AEO2008)

    Reports and Publications

    2008-01-01

    Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act 2005 (EPACT) authorized the Department of Energy (DOE) to issue loan guarantees for projects involving new or improved technologies to avoid, reduce, or sequester greenhouse gases (GHGs). The law specified that the amount of the guarantee would be up to 80% of a project's cost. EPACT2005 also specified that DOE must receive funds equal to the subsidy cost either through the federal appropriations process or from the firm receiving the guarantee. As discussed in Annual Energy Outlook 2007, this program, by lowering borrowing costs, can have a major impact on the economics of capital-intensive technologies.

  19. American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (released in AEO2005)

    Reports and Publications

    2005-01-01

    The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 was signed into law on October 22, 2004. Most of the 650 pages of the Act are related to tax legislation. Provisions pertaining to energy are detailed in this analysis.

  20. New NHTSA CAFE Standards (released in AEO2009)

    Reports and Publications

    2009-01-01

    EISA2007 requires the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to raise the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for passenger cars and light trucks to ensure that the average tested fuel economy of the combined fleet of all new passenger cars and light trucks sold in the United States in model year (MY) 2020 equals or exceeds 35 mpg, 34% above the current fleet average of 26.4 mpg. Pursuant to this legislation, NHTSA recently proposed revised CAFE standards that substantially increase the minimum fuel economy requirements for passenger cars and light trucks for MY 2011 through MY 2015.

  1. Second AEO2016 Buildings Sector Workingb Group Meeting Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    equipment standards and ENERGY STAR specifications; an ... The presentation materials are provided as a separate ... generation (DG) and solar photovoltaics (PV): The ...

  2. AEO2012 Preliminary Assumptions: Oil and Gas Supply

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    3 Oil and Gas Supply Working Group Meeting Office of Petroleum, Gas, and Biofuels Analysis July 31, 2012 | Washington, DC WORKING GROUP PRESENTATION FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE AS RESULTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE Assumptions and Expectations for Annual Energy Outlook 2013: Oil and Gas Working Group Overview 2 Office of Petroleum, Gas, and Biofuels Analysis Working Group Presentation for Discussion Purposes Washington, DC, July 31, 2012 DO NOT QUOTE OR CITE as results are subject to

  3. Climate Stewardship Act of 2004 (released in AEO2005)

    Reports and Publications

    2005-01-01

    The Climate Stewardship Act of 2004 would establish a system of tradable allowances to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The bill includes requirements for mandatory emissions reporting by covered entities and for voluntary reporting of emissions reduction activities by noncovered entities; a national greenhouse gas database and registry of reductions; and a research program on climate change and related activities.

  4. AEO2014 - Legislation and Regulations articles - U.S. Energy...

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    and diesel fuel sold. There are four interrelated requirements, for cellulosic biofuels, biomass-based diesel, advanced biofuels, and total renewable fuels. State renewable...

  5. Mobile Source Air Toxics Rule (released in AEO2008)

    Reports and Publications

    2008-01-01

    On February 9, 2007, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released its MSAT2 rule, which will establish controls on gasoline, passenger vehicles, and portable fuel containers. The controls are designed to reduce emissions of benzene and other hazardous air pollutants. Benzene is a known carcinogen, and the EPA estimates that mobile sources produced more than 70% of all benzene emissions in 1999. Other mobile source air toxics, including 1,3-butadiene, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein, and naphthalene, also are thought to increase cancer rates or contribute to other serious health problems.

  6. AEO2017 Modeling updates in the transportation sector

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Vermont * CD2: New ... * Update total freight ton-mile and vehicle miles traveled ... - Stock is made up of three types of aircraft: ...

  7. Workshop on Biofuels Projections in AEO Attendance List

    Annual Energy Outlook

    ... Schremp California Energy Commission Anthony Shen Stifel Daniel Sinks Phillips 66 Russ Smith U.S. EPA Wyatt Thompson FAPRI-MU Paul Trupo USDA Lisa Twedt USDA - Foreign Agricultural ...

  8. EIA - Annual Energy Outlook (AEO) 2013 Data Tables

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Table 55.2. Electric Power Projections by Electricity Market Module Region - Florida Reliability Coordinating Council XLS Table 55.3. Electric Power Projections by Electricity...

  9. Summary of AEO2017 Electricity Working Group Meeting

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Director, Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis Paul Holtberg ... issues raised, including prospects for nuclear re-licensing, 2) continued inclusion of ...

  10. Summary of AEO2016 Electricity Working Group Meeting

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Director Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis Paul Holtberg ... The results shown include electricity sales, coal and nuclear retirements, electricity and ...

  11. Summary of Second AEO 2014 Electricity Working Group Meeting

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Director Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis Paul Holtberg ... Crozat, Matthew P. (US DOE: Office of Nuclear Energy) Diefenderfer, Jim (EIA OEA) ...

  12. Summary of AEO2016 Electricity Working Group Meeting held on...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    January7, 2016 MEMORANDUM FOR: John Conti Assistant Administrator for Energy Analysis Jim Diefenderfer Director, Office of Electricity, Coal, Nuclear, and Renewables Analysis Paul ...

  13. Electricity Plant Cost Uncertainties (released in AEO2009)

    Reports and Publications

    2009-01-01

    Construction costs for new power plants have increased at an extraordinary rate over the past several years. One study, published in mid-2008, reported that construction costs had more than doubled since 2000, with most of the increase occurring since 2005. Construction costs have increased for plants of all types, including coal, nuclear, natural gas, and wind.

  14. Multi-Pollutant Legislation and Regulations (released in AEO2005)

    Reports and Publications

    2005-01-01

    The 108th Congress proposed and debated a variety of bills addressing pollution control at electric power plants but did not pass any of them into law. In addition, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) currently is preparing two regulations-a proposed Clean Air Interstate Rule (pCAIR) and a Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR)-to address emissions from coal-fired power plants. Several states also have taken legislative actions to limit pollutants from power plants in their jurisdictions. This section discusses three Congressional air pollution bills and the EPA's pCAIR and CAMR regulations.

  15. Federal Air Emissions Regulations (released in AEO2006)

    Reports and Publications

    2006-01-01

    In 2005, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized two regulations, the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) and the Clean Air Mercury Rule CAMR, that would reduce emissions from coal-fired power plants in the United States. Both CAIR and CAMR are included in the Annual Energy Outlook 2006 reference case. The EPA has received 11 petitions for reconsideration of CAIR and has provided an opportunity for public comment on reconsidering certain aspects of CAIR. Public comments were accepted until January 13, 2006. The EPA has also received 14 petitions for reconsideration of CAMR and is willing to reconsider certain aspects of the rule. Public comments were accepted for 45 days after publication of the reconsideration notice in the Federal Register. Several states and organizations have filed lawsuits against CAMR. The ultimate decision of the courts will have a significant impact on the implementation of CAMR.

  16. Clean Air Mercury Rule (released in AEO2009)

    Reports and Publications

    2009-01-01

    On February 8, 2008, a three-judge panel on the D.C. Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals issued a decision to vacate the Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR). In its ruling, the panel cited the history of hazardous air pollutant regulation under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). Section 112, as written by Congress, listed emitted mercury as a hazardous air pollutant that must be subject to regulation unless it can be proved harmless to public welfare and the environment. In 2000, the Environmental Protection Agency ruled that mercury was indeed hazardous and must be regulated under Section 112 and, therefore, subjected to the best available control technology for mitigation.

  17. Distributed Generation in Buildings (released in AEO2005)

    Reports and Publications

    2008-01-01

    Currently, distributed generation provides a very small share of residential and commercial electricity requirements in the United States. The Annual Energy Outlook 2005 reference case projects a significant increase in electricity generation in the buildings sector, but distributed generation is expected to remain a small contributor to the sectors energy needs. Although the advent of higher energy prices or more rapid improvement in technology could increase the use of distributed generation relative to the reference case projection, the vast majority of electricity used in buildings is projected to continue to be purchased from the grid.

  18. Mercury Emissions Control Technologies (released in AEO2006)

    Reports and Publications

    2006-01-01

    The Annual Energy Outlook 2006 reference case assumes that states will comply with the requirements of the Environmental Protection Agency's new Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR) regulation. CAMR is a two-phase program, with a Phase I cap of 38 tons of mercury emitted from all U.S. power plants in 2010 and a Phase II cap of 15 tons in 2018. Mercury emissions in the electricity generation sector in 2003 are estimated at around 50 tons. Generators have a variety of options to meet the mercury limits, such as: switching to coal with a lower mercury content, relying on flue gas desulfurization or selective catalytic reduction equipment to reduce mercury emissions, or installing conventional activated carbon injection (ACI) technology.

  19. Second AEO2015 Macro-Industrial Workiing Group Meeting Summary

    Annual Energy Outlook

    TEAM LEADER ANALYSIS INTEGRATION TEAM JAMES TURNURE DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION & EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS LYNN WESTFALL DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENERGY MARKETS & FINANCIAL ...

  20. First AEO2014 Macro-Industrial Working Group Meeting Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    TEAM LEADER ANALYSIS INTEGRATION TEAM JAMES TURNURE DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION & EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS LYNN WESTFALL DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENERGY MARKETS & FINANCIAL ...

  1. First AEO2015 Macro-Industrial Working Group Meeting Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    TEAM LEADER ANALYSIS INTEGRATION TEAM JAMES TURNURE DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION & EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS LYNN WESTFALL DIRECTOR OFFICE OF ENERGY MARKETS & FINANCIAL ...

  2. Second AEO2014 Macro-Industrial Working Group Meeting Summary

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    net migration, a lower starting population size, and increased life expectancies, which ... Is it primarily aircraft or motor vehicles? a. Transportation equipment shipments are ...

  3. Handling Key AEO2017 Electric Sector Policy Assumptions and Key...

    Annual Energy Outlook

    time * PV load shapes * Renewables Integration - Energy Storage - Address Solar curtailments * Solar resource data update * Regional solar costs * State RPS policy updates ...

  4. First AEO2014 Transportation Working Group Meeting Summary

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    inform HDV model year, vehicle type and VMT aspects using the Polk data. 4. What does the measure "E85 market share" represent on the Consumer choice for E85 graph on slide 11? a. ...

  5. Clean Air Interstate Rule (released in AEO2009)

    Reports and Publications

    2009-01-01

    Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) is a cap-and-trade program promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency in 2005, covering 28 eastern U.S. states and the District of Columbia. It was designed to reduce sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions in order to help states meet their National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone and particulate matter (PM2.5) and to further emissions reductions already achieved through the Acid Rain Program and the NOx State Implementation Plan call program. The rule was set to commence in 2009 for seasonal and annual NOx emissions and in 2010 for SO2 emissions.

  6. Clean Air Nonroad Diesel Rule (released in AEO2005)

    Reports and Publications

    2005-01-01

    On June 29, 2004, the Environmental Protection Agency issued a comprehensive final rule regulating emissions from nonroad diesel engines and sulfur content in nonroad diesel fuel. The nonroad fuel market makes up more than 18% of the total distillate pool. The rule applies to new equipment covering a broad range of engine sizes, power ratings, and equipment types. There are currently about 6 million pieces of nonroad equipment operating in the United States, and more than 650,000 new units are sold each year.

  7. Electricity Prices in Transition (released in AEO2007)

    Reports and Publications

    2007-01-01

    The push by some states to restructure electricity markets progressed rapidly throughout the late 1990s. Although the energy crisis in California during 2000 and 2001 slowed the momentum, 19 states and the District of Columbia currently have some form of restructuring in place. In addition, Washington State, which has not restructured its electricity market, allows its largest industrial customers to choose their suppliers.

  8. Tax Credits and Renewable Generation (released in AEO2009)

    Reports and Publications

    2009-01-01

    Tax incentives have been an important factor in the growth of renewable generation over the past decade, and they could continue to be important in the future. The Energy Tax Act of 1978 (Public Law 95-618) established ITCs for wind, and EPACT92 established the Renewable Electricity Production Credit (more commonly called the PTC) as an incentive to promote certain kinds of renewable generation beyond wind on the basis of production levels. Specifically, the PTC provided an inflation-adjusted tax credit of 1.5 cents per kilowatthour for generation sold from qualifying facilities during the first 10 years of operation. The credit was available initially to wind plants and facilities that used closed-loop biomass fuels and were placed in service after passage of the Act and before June 1999.

  9. Second AEO2014 Buildings Sector Working Group Meeting

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    JOHN CONTI ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR FOR ENERGY ANALYSIS PAUL HOLTBERG TEAM LEADER ... Ackerly (Alliance for Green Heat) Xiaojing Sun (Georgia Tech) Matt Cox (Georgia Tech) ...

  10. Overview of Levelized Cost of Energy in the AEO

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1990's 798,236 818,233 807,040 793,261 774,978 815,754 747,154 784,209 815,512 2000's 876,145 786,947 830,504 895,100 917,014 918,593 4,290,187 4,430,466 4,839,942 5,225,005 2010's 5,864,402 6,958,125 8,225,321 689,082 631,536 600,656

    Decade Year-0 Year-1 Year-2 Year-3 Year-4 Year-5 Year-6 Year-7 Year-8 Year-9 1980's 826,576 1990's 810,100 784,362 800,913 788,472 774,724 759,728 805,491 736,679 775,235 800,579 2000's

  11. EIA - Annual Energy Outlook (AEO) 2013 Data Tables

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Analysis & Projections Annual Energy Outlook 2016 Full Release Date: September 15, ... Summary Case Tables Table 1. Total Energy Supply, Disposition, and Price Summary Table 2. ...

  12. Alaskan Natural Gas Pipeline Developments (released in AEO2007)

    Reports and Publications

    2007-01-01

    The Annual Energy Outlook 2007 reference case projects that an Alaska natural gas pipeline will go into operation in 2018, based on the Energy Information Administration's current understanding of the projects time line and economics. There is continuing debate, however, about the physical configuration and the ownership of the pipeline. In addition, the issue of Alaskas oil and natural gas production taxes has been raised, in the context of a current market environment characterized by rising construction costs and falling natural gas prices. If rates of return on investment by producers are reduced to unacceptable levels, or if the project faces significant delays, other sources of natural gas, such as unconventional natural gas production and liquefied natural gas imports, could fulfill the demand that otherwise would be served by an Alaska pipeline.

  13. Expectations for Oil Shale Production (released in AEO2009)

    Reports and Publications

    2009-01-01

    Oil shales are fine-grained sedimentary rocks that contain relatively large amounts of kerogen, which can be converted into liquid and gaseous hydrocarbons (petroleum liquids, natural gas liquids, and methane) by heating the rock, usually in the absence of oxygen, to 650 to 700 degrees Fahrenheit (in situ retorting) or 900 to 950 degrees Fahrenheit (surface retorting). (Oil shale is, strictly speaking, a misnomer in that the rock is not necessarily a shale and contains no crude oil.) The richest U.S. oil shale deposits are located in Northwest Colorado, Northeast Utah, and Southwest Wyoming. Currently, those deposits are the focus of petroleum industry research and potential future production. Among the three states, the richest oil shale deposits are on federal lands in northwest Colorado.

  14. Changing Trends in the Refining Industry (released in AEO2006)

    Reports and Publications

    2006-01-01

    There have been some major changes in the U.S. refining industry recently, prompted in part by a significant decline in the quality of imported crude oil and by increasing restrictions on the quality of finished products. As a result, high-quality crudes, such as the West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude that serves as a benchmark for oil futures on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), have been trading at record premiums to the OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) Basket price.

  15. World Oil Price Cases (released in AEO2005)

    Reports and Publications

    2005-01-01

    World oil prices in Annual Energy Outlook 2005 are set in an environment where the members of OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) are assumed to act as the dominant producers, with lower production costs than other supply regions or countries. Non-OPEC oil producers are assumed to behave competitively, producing as much oil as they can profitability extract at the market price for oil. As a result, the OPEC member countries will be able effectively to set the price of oil when they can act in concert by varying their aggregate production. Alternatively, OPEC members could target a fixed level of production and let the world market determine the price.

  16. Economic Effects of High Oil Prices (released in AEO2006)

    Reports and Publications

    2006-01-01

    The Annual Energy Outlook 2006 projections of future energy market conditions reflect the effects of oil prices on the macroeconomic variables that affect oil demand, in particular, and energy demand in general. The variables include real gross domestic product (GDP) growth, inflation, employment, exports and imports, and interest rates.

  17. Energy Review

    Annual Energy Outlook

    M iggl-003504t11l)sar Energy Review 8 M. IM W I -W All* r ;ai*i el I gi In this issue: Energy-related housing characteristics Propane-provider fleet survey Ordering...

  18. Quarterly Review

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    3, 2009 Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS) FY 2009 FIRST QUARTER REVIEW Projection for FY 2009 Net Revenues and Reserves A B C D FY 2008 Audited Actuals without FAS 133 &...

  19. A Review

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Review of the Department of Energy's Implementation of Executive Order 12898 and Recommendations for a Second Five-Year Strategic Plan Submitted by: Office of Public Information and Community Outreach Medical University of South Carolina Charleston, South Carolina 12898 12898 A Review of the U.S. Department of Energy's Implementation of Executive Order 12898 and Recommendations for a Second Five-Year Strategic Plan Table of Contents Introduction

  20. A Retrospective Analysis of the Benefits and Impacts of U.S. Renewable Portfolio Standards

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Retrospective Analysis of the Benefits and Impacts of U.S. Renewable Portfolio Standards Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory is a Department of Energy Office of Science lab managed by University of California. NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications.

  1. Non-Constant Learning Rates in Retrospective Experience Curve Analyses and their Correlation to Deployment Programs

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This work provides retrospective experience curves and learning rates for several energy-related technologies, each of which have a known history of federal and state deployment programs. We derive learning rates for eight technologies including energy efficient lighting technologies, stationary fuel cell systems, and residential solar photovoltaics, and provide an overview and timeline of historical deployment programs such as state and federal standards and state and national incentive programs for each technology.

  2. Retrospective North American CFL Experience Curve Analysis and Correlation to Deployment Programs

    SciTech Connect

    Smith, Sarah J.; Wei, Max; Sohn, Michael D.

    2015-07-01

    Retrospective experience curves are a useful tool for understanding historic technology development, and can contribute to investment program analysis and future cost estimation efforts. This work documents our development of an analysis approach for deriving retrospective experience curves with a variable learning rate, and its application to develop an experience curve for compact fluorescent lamps for the global and North American markets over the years 1990-2007. Uncertainties and assumptions involved in interpreting data for our experience curve development are discussed, including the processing and transformation of empirical data, the selection of system boundaries, and the identification of historical changes in the learning rate over the course of 15 years. In the results that follow, we find that that the learning rate has changed at least once from 1990-2007. We also explore if, and to what degree, public deployment programs may have contributed to an increased technology learning rate in North America. We observe correlations between the changes in the learning rate and the initiation of new policies, abrupt technological advances, including improvements to ballast technology, and economic and political events such as trade tariffs and electricity prices. Finally, we discuss how the findings of this work (1) support the use of segmented experience curves for retrospective and prospective analysis and (2) may imply that investments in technological research and development have contributed to a change in market adoption and penetration.

  3. Analytical Review

    SciTech Connect

    Frank Stodolsky

    2000-04-11

    ANL Performs Independent Review for DOE on the following topics: (1) Systematic analysis--Depends on question asked; (2) Compare technologies and pathways--Examples: (a) fuels, power plant technologies, vehicle materials; (b) Total lifecycle analysis reveals national and global impacts; and (3) Direction of R&D to most fruitful areas.

  4. Analysis methods for fast impurity ion dynamics data

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Residential/Commercial Buildings AEO2016 Meetings First AEO2016 Meeting (December 8, 2015) Summary of meeting Presentation Second AEO2016 Meeting (February 18, 2016) Summary of meeting Presentation AEO2015 Meetings First AEO2015 Meeting (August 7, 2014) Summary of meeting Presentation AEO2014 Meetings First AEO2014 Meeting (July 22, 2013) Summary of meeting Presentation Second AEO2014 Meeting (September 26, 2013) Summary of meeting Presentation AEO2013 Meetings First AEO2013 Assumptions Meeting

  5. FES Requirements Review 2014

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    FES Requirements Review 2014 Science Engagement Move your data Programs & Workshops Science Requirements Reviews Network Requirements Reviews Documents and Background Materials FAQ for Case Study Authors BER Requirements Review 2015 ASCR Requirements Review 2015 Previous Reviews HEP/NP Requirements Review 2013 FES Requirements Review 2014 FES Attendees 2014 BES Requirements Review 2014 Requirements Review Reports Case Studies Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside US) 1

  6. BES Requirements Review 2014

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    BES Requirements Review 2014 Science Engagement Move your data Programs & Workshops Science Requirements Reviews Network Requirements Reviews Documents and Background Materials FAQ for Case Study Authors BER Requirements Review 2015 ASCR Requirements Review 2015 Previous Reviews HEP/NP Requirements Review 2013 FES Requirements Review 2014 BES Requirements Review 2014 BES Attendees 2014 Requirements Review Reports Case Studies Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside US) 1

  7. Monthly Data U.S. Energy Information Administration October 2016 Monthly Energy Review

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    Cost and Performance Characteristics of New Generating Technologies, Annual Energy Outlook 2016 1 June 2016 Cost and Performance Characteristics of New Generating Technologies, Annual Energy Outlook 2016 The tables presented below will be incorporated in the Electricity Market Module chapter of the AEO2016 Assumptions document. Table 8.2 represents EIA's assessment of the cost to develop and install various generating technologies used in the electric power sector. Generating technologies

  8. EPR dosimetry of teeth in past and future accidents: a prospective look at a retrospective method

    SciTech Connect

    Haskell, E.H.; Kenner, G.H.; Hayes, R.B.; Chumak, V.; Shalom, S.

    1996-01-01

    Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy (EPR) of tooth enamel is a relatively new technique for retrospective dosimetry that in the past two years has seen increasing effort towards its development and evaluation. Efforts have centered on determining the accuracy which may be achieved with current measurement techniques as well as the minimum doses detectable. The study was focused on evaluating some factors which influence the accuracy of EPR dosimetry of enamel. Reported are studies on sample intercomparisions, instrumental considerations, and effects of dental x-rays, environmental sunlight and ultraviolet radiation.

  9. Retrospective North American CFL Experience Curve Analysis and Correlation to Deployment Programs

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This work documents our development of an analysis approach for deriving retrospective experience curves with a variable learning rate, and its application to develop an experience curve for compact fluorescent lamps for the global and North American markets over the years 1990-2007. Uncertainties and assumptions involved in interpreting data for our experience curve development are discussed, including the processing and transformation of empirical data, the selection of system boundaries, and the identification of historical changes in the learning rate over the course of 15 years.

  10. BER Requirements Review 2015

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Reviews Network Requirements Reviews Documents and Background Materials FAQ for Case Study Authors BER Requirements Review 2015 BER Attendees 2015 ASCR Requirements...

  11. ASCR Requirements Review 2015

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    ASCR Requirements Review 2015 ASCR Attendees 2015 Previous Reviews Requirements Review Reports Case Studies News & Publications ESnet News Publications and Presentations Galleries ESnet Awards and Honors Blog ESnet Live Home » Science Engagement » Science Requirements Reviews » Network Requirements Reviews » ASCR Requirements Review 2015 Science Engagement Move your data Programs & Workshops Science Requirements Reviews Network Requirements Reviews Documents and Background Materials

  12. 2008 annual merit review

    SciTech Connect

    None, None

    2009-01-18

    The 2008 DOE Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review was held February 25-28, 2008 in Bethesda, Maryland. The review encompassed all of the work done by the Vehicle Technologies Program: a total of 280 individual activities were reviewed, by a total of just over 100 reviewers. A total of 1,908 individual review responses were received for the technical reviews, and an additional 29 individual review responses were received for the plenary session review.

  13. BER Requirements Review 2015

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    BER Attendees 2015 ASCR Requirements Review 2015 Previous Reviews Requirements Review Reports Case Studies News & Publications ESnet News Publications and Presentations Galleries ESnet Awards and Honors Blog ESnet Live Home » Science Engagement » Science Requirements Reviews » Network Requirements Reviews » BER Requirements Review 2015 Science Engagement Move your data Programs & Workshops Science Requirements Reviews Network Requirements Reviews Documents and Background Materials

  14. Retrospective Analysis of Communication Events - Understanding the Dynamics of Collaborative Multi-Party Discourse

    SciTech Connect

    Cowell, Andrew J.; Haack, Jereme N.; McColgin, Dave W.

    2006-06-08

    This research is aimed at understanding the dynamics of collaborative multi-party discourse across multiple communication modalities. Before we can truly make sig-nificant strides in devising collaborative communication systems, there is a need to understand how typical users utilize com-putationally supported communications mechanisms such as email, instant mes-saging, video conferencing, chat rooms, etc., both singularly and in conjunction with traditional means of communication such as face-to-face meetings, telephone calls and postal mail. Attempting to un-derstand an individuals communications profile with access to only a single modal-ity is challenging at best and often futile. Here, we discuss the development of RACE Retrospective Analysis of Com-munications Events a test-bed prototype to investigate issues relating to multi-modal multi-party discourse.

  15. A Retrospective Analysis of the Benefits and Impacts of U.S. Renewable Portfolio Standards

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This is the second in a series of reports exploring the costs, benefits, and other impacts of state renewable portfolio standards (RPS), both retrospectively and prospectively. This report focuses on the benefits and impacts of all state RPS programs, in aggregate, for the year 2013 (the most-recent year for which the requisite data were available). Relying on a well-vetted set of methods, the study evaluates a number of important benefits and impacts in both physical and monetary terms, where possible, and characterizes key uncertainties. The prior study in this series focused on historical RPS compliance costs, and future work will evaluate costs, benefits, and other impacts of RPS policies prospectively.

  16. LLE review

    SciTech Connect

    Keck, R.L.

    1991-01-01

    This volume of the LLE Review, covering the period October-December 1991, contains articles on the analysis of argon-filled target experiments, and a theoretical analysis of the impact of nonlocal heat transport in laser filamentation in plasmas. In the Advanced Technology section there is an article on mechanisms that affect thin-film conductivity, and a report on the gain characteristics of the 20-cm SSA prototype amplifier to be used in the OMEGA Upgrade. Finally, the activities of the National Laser Users Facility and the GDL and OMEGA laser facilities are summarized. Highlights of the research reported in this issue are: argon radiation from argon-filled, polymer-shell targets is used as a core-temperature diagnostic and density diagnostic of the surrounding region in a regime where the argon line radiation is strongly absorbed. A theoretical analysis of the impact of nonlocal heat transport on laser filamentation in plasmas is developed. The resulting model is compared with experimental observations and the implications for ICF are discussed. A study of thermal conductivity in thin films seeks to identify mechanisms that result in degradation of thin-film conductivity. Identifying these mechanisms can lead to changes in the thin-film manufacture that will improve their resistance to laser damage.

  17. Science Requirements Reviews

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Science Requirements Reviews Network Requirements Reviews Requirements Review Reports Case Studies News & Publications ESnet News Publications and Presentations Galleries ESnet Awards and Honors Blog ESnet Live Home » Science Engagement » Science Requirements Reviews Science Engagement Move your data Programs & Workshops Science Requirements Reviews Network Requirements Reviews Requirements Review Reports Case Studies Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside US) 1

  18. Network Requirements Reviews

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Reviews Science Engagement Move your data Programs & Workshops Science Requirements Reviews Network Requirements Reviews Documents and Background Materials FAQ for Case Study Authors BER Requirements Review 2015 ASCR Requirements Review 2015 Previous Reviews Requirements Review Reports Case Studies Contact Us Technical Assistance: 1 800-33-ESnet (Inside US) 1 800-333-7638 (Inside US) 1 510-486-7600 (Globally) 1 510-486-7607 (Globally) Report Network Problems: trouble@es.net Provide Web Site

  19. Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of U.S. DOE Wind Energy R&D Program: Impact of Selected Energy Technology Investments

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of U.S. DOE Wind Energy R&D Program: Impact of Selected Energy Technology Investments, June 2010.

  20. Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of U.S. DOE Vehicle Combustion Engine R&D Program: Impacts of a Cluster of Energy Technologies

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Retrospective Benefit-Cost Evaluation of U.S. DOE Vehicle Combustion Engine R&D Investments: Impacts of a Cluster of Energy Technologies, May 2010.

  1. Review comments from 2004 ATD Annual Review

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Report on the Annual Review of the FY 2005 Advanced Technology Development Program [pic] August 9 & 10, 2005 Argonne IL November 2005 U.S. Department of Energy Office of FreedomCAR and Vehicle Technologies High Power Energy Storage Program November 3, 2005 Dear Colleague: This document is a summary of the evaluation and comments provided by the review panel for the FY 2005 Department of Energy (DOE) Advanced Technology Development (ATD) program annual review. The review was held at the

  2. Analysis & Projections - Pub - U.S. Energy Information Administration...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Liquid Fuels Markets AEO2016 Meetings First AEO2016 Meeting (November 19, 2015) Summary of meeting Presentation Second AEO2016 Meeting (February 24, 2016) Summary of meeting ...

  3. Analysis & Projections - Pub - U.S. Energy Information Administration...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Electricity AEO2016 Meetings First AEO2016 Meeting (December 8, 2015) Summary of meeting Presentation Second AEO2016 Meeting (February 10, 2016) Summary of meeting Presentation ...

  4. Analysis & Projections - Pub - U.S. Energy Information Administration...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    ResidentialCommercial Buildings AEO2016 Meetings First AEO2016 Meeting (December 8, 2015) Summary of meeting Presentation Second AEO2016 Meeting (February 18, 2016) Summary of ...

  5. 2013 Annual Merit Review Results Report - Merit Review Attendees...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Merit Review Attendees 2013 Annual Merit Review Results Report - Merit Review Attendees Merit review of DOE Vehicle Technologies research activities 2013amr13.pdf (654.24 KB) ...

  6. 2014 Annual Merit Review Results Report - Merit Review Attendees...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Merit Review Attendees 2014 Annual Merit Review Results Report - Merit Review Attendees Merit review of DOE Vehicle Technologies research activities 2014amr13.pdf (833.06 KB) ...

  7. Program Evaluation and Review Technique Operational Review Meeting...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Program Evaluation and Review Technique Operational Review Meeting 2016 Program Evaluation and Review Technique Operational Review Meeting 2016 February 23, 2016 9:00AM PST to...

  8. Post-Review Feedback Questionnaire for Evaluating the Peer Review...

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Post-Review Feedback Questionnaire for Evaluating the Peer Review Process Post-Review Feedback Questionnaire for Evaluating the Peer Review Process EERE is committed to continuous ...

  9. Review of Test Results

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    4 Revision 1 Effective June 2008 Review of Test Results Prepared by Electric ... 7 Appendices Appendix A, Test Results Review and Approval Form ...

  10. Standard Review Plan Overview

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    and successfully by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for evaluating U.S. ... and Field reviews, existing project review guides and protocols, and consensus standards. ...

  11. HPC Requirements Reviews

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Reviews: Target 2017 Requirements Reviews: Target 2014 Overview Published Reports Case Study FAQs NERSC HPC Achievement Awards Accelerator Science Astrophysics & Cosmology...

  12. NGNP PHASE I REVIEW

    Energy.gov [DOE] (indexed site)

    NGNP PHASE I REVIEW NEAC REACTOR TECHNOLOGY SUBCOMMITTEE CURRENT STATUS DECEMBER 9, 2010 EPACT 2005 REQUIREMENTS * FIRST PROJECT PHASE REVIEW-On a determination by the Secretary...

  13. ORISE: Peer Review Management

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Management Man participating in a peer review The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) ensures that scientific reviews are conducted in a professional manner and...

  14. Readiness Review Training- Member

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Slides used for November 10, 2010 Readiness Review Member Training at the Idaho National Laboratory. Course provides tools and tips to be an effective readiness review team member.

  15. Diesel Emission Control Review

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Reviews regulatory requirements and technology approaches for diesel emission control for heavy and light duty applications

  16. Vehicle Emissions Review- 2012

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Reviews vehicle emission control highlighting representative studies that illustrate the state-of-the-art

  17. Full Reviews: Reservoir Characterization

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Below are the project presentations and respective peer reviewer comments for Reservoir Characterization.

  18. Non-Constant Learning Rates in Retrospective Experience Curve Analyses and their Correlation to Deployment Programs

    SciTech Connect

    Wei, Max; Smith, Sarah J.; Sohn, Michael D.

    2015-07-16

    A key challenge for policy-makers and technology market forecasters is to estimate future technology costs and in particular the rate of cost reduction versus production volume. A related, critical question is what role should state and federal governments have in advancing energy efficient and renewable energy technologies? This work provides retrospective experience curves and learning rates for several energy-related technologies, each of which have a known history of federal and state deployment programs. We derive learning rates for eight technologies including energy efficient lighting technologies, stationary fuel cell systems, and residential solar photovoltaics, and provide an overview and timeline of historical deployment programs such as state and federal standards and state and national incentive programs for each technology. Piecewise linear regimes are observed in a range of technology experience curves, and public investments or deployment programs are found to be strongly correlated to an increase in learning rate across multiple technologies. A downward bend in the experience curve is found in 5 out of the 8 energy-related technologies presented here (electronic ballasts, magnetic ballasts, compact fluorescent lighting, general service fluorescent lighting, and the installed cost of solar PV). In each of the five downward-bending experience curves, we believe that an increase in the learning rate can be linked to deployment programs to some degree. This work sheds light on the endogenous versus exogenous contributions to technological innovation and highlights the impact of exogenous government sponsored deployment programs. This work can inform future policy investment direction and can shed light on market transformation and technology learning behavior.

  19. A retrospective analysis for patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans

    SciTech Connect

    Li, Guangjun; Wu, Kui; Peng, Guang; Zhang, Yingjie; Bai, Sen

    2014-01-01

    Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is now widely used clinically, as it is capable of delivering a highly conformal dose distribution in a short time interval. We retrospectively analyzed patient-specific quality assurance (QA) of VMAT and examined the relationships between the planning parameters and the QA results. A total of 118 clinical VMAT cases underwent pretreatment QA. All plans had 3-dimensional diode array measurements, and 69 also had ion chamber measurements. Dose distribution and isocenter point dose were evaluated by comparing the measurements and the treatment planning system (TPS) calculations. In addition, the relationship between QA results and several planning parameters, such as dose level, control points (CPs), monitor units (MUs), average field width, and average leaf travel, were also analyzed. For delivered dose distribution, a gamma analysis passing rate greater than 90% was obtained for all plans and greater than 95% for 100 of 118 plans with the 3%/3-mm criteria. The difference (mean ± standard deviation) between the point doses measured by the ion chamber and those calculated by TPS was 0.9% ± 2.0% for all plans. For all cancer sites, nasopharyngeal carcinoma and gastric cancer have the lowest and highest average passing rates, respectively. From multivariate linear regression analysis, the dose level (p = 0.001) and the average leaf travel (p < 0.001) showed negative correlations with the passing rate, and the average field width (p = 0.003) showed a positive correlation with the passing rate, all indicating a correlation between the passing rate and the plan complexity. No statistically significant correlation was found between MU or CP and the passing rate. Analysis of the results of dosimetric pretreatment measurements as a function of VMAT plan parameters can provide important information to guide the plan parameter setting and optimization in TPS.

  20. Analysis & Projections - Pub - U.S. Energy Information Administration...

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Oil and Natural Gas AEO2016 Meetings First AEO2016 Meeting (December 15, 2015) Summary of meeting Oil and Gas presentation AEO2015 Meetings First AEO2015 Meeting (August 7, 2014) ...

  1. 2013 Annual Merit Review Results Report - Merit Review Attendees |

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Department of Energy 3 Annual Merit Review Results Report - Merit Review Attendees 2013 Annual Merit Review Results Report - Merit Review Attendees Merit review of DOE Vehicle Technologies research activities 2013_amr_13.pdf (654.24 KB) More Documents & Publications 2014 Annual Merit Review Results Report - Merit Review Attendees Event Attendee List (Knoxville July 2012) Final Participant List

  2. SOP for Peer Reviews

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Objective review and advice from peers - peer review - provides managers, staff, and researchers with a powerful and effective tool for enhancing the management, relevance, effectiveness, and productivity of all of the EERE research, development

  3. HUD's Environmental Review Training

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    An environmental review is the process of reviewing a project and its potential environmental impacts to determine whether it meets  federal, state, and local environmental standards. The...

  4. 2011 Peer Review Report

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Cover photo: Geysers Geothermal Power Plant, Calpine Geothermal Technologies Program 2011 Peer Review Report June 2011 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Geothermal Technologies Program 2011 Peer Review Report June 2011 Allan Jelacic Chair 2011 Geothermal Technologies Peer Review Panel Douglas Hollett Program Manager U.S. DOE Geothermal Technologies Program Greg Stillman Peer Review Lead U.S. DOE Geothermal Technologies Program Table of Contents Executive

  5. 2002 Program Review Meeting

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Here you'll find information from the Tribal Energy Program project kick-off and Review in October 2002.

  6. 2010 Program Review Meeting

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Here you'll find presentations from the October 2010 Tribal Energy Program Review in Denver, Colorado.

  7. Peer Reviews | Department of Energy

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Peer Reviews Peer Reviews The overall purpose of project peer reviews is to determine whether the scope of programs, projects, or activities; the underlying assumptions regarding ...

  8. Energy Efficiency Post-2011 Review

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Summer Goodwin Danielle Gidding Meeting Notes: 1 Welcome and roll call Review of agenda Overview of progress to date Review of action items BPA reviewed...

  9. Annual Review | netl.doe.gov

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    ON-SITE RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS Annual Reviews FY13 Annual Review FY12 Annual Review FY11 Annual Review...

  10. National Algal Biofuels Technology Review

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    Plenary V: National Algal Biofuels Technology Review National Algal Biofuels Technology Review Matthew Posewitz, Professor, Colorado School of Mines

  11. Peer Reviews | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Peer Reviews Peer Reviews September 30, 2015 Audit Peer Review 2015 Report on Quality Control Review of the Department of Energy, Office of Inspector General, Audit Organization July 14, 2014 Investigation Peer Review 2014 Report on the Quality Assessment Review of the Investigative Operations of the Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Energy February 20, 2014 Investigation Peer Review 2012 Report on the Quality Assessment Review of the Investigative Outcomes of the Office of

  12. Weatherization Works--Summary of Findings from the Retrospective Evaluation of the U.S. DOE's Weatherization Assistance Program

    SciTech Connect

    Tonn, Bruce Edward; Carroll, David; Pigg, Scott; Blasnik, Michael; Dalhoff, Greg; Berger, Jacqueline; Rose, Erin M; Hawkins, Beth A.; Eisenberg, Joel Fred; Ucar, Ferit; Bensch, Ingo; Cowan, Claire

    2015-10-01

    This report presents a summary of the studies and analyses that compose the retrospective evaluation of the U.S. Department of Energy s low-income Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP). WAP provides grants to Grantees (i.e., states) that then provide grants to Subgrantees (i.e., local weatherization agencies) to weatherize low-income homes. This evaluation focused on the WAP Program Year 2008. The retrospective evaluation produced twenty separate reports, including this summary. Four separate reports address the energy savings, energy cost savings, and cost effectiveness of WAP across four housing types: single family, mobile home, small multifamily, and large multifamily. Other reports address the environmental emissions, macroeconomic, and health and household-related benefits attributable to WAP, and characterize the program, its recipients, and those eligible for the program. Major field studies are also summarized, including a major indoor air quality study and a follow-up ventilation study, an in-depth in-field assessment of weatherization work and quality, and a study that assesses reasons for variations in energy savings across homes. Results of surveys of weatherization staff, occupants, occupants satisfaction with weatherization services provided, and weatherization trainees are summarized. Lastly, this report summarizes a set of fifteen case studies of high-performing and unique local weatherization agencies.

  13. ARM - Guidelines : Review Criteria

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Review Criteria Guidelines Overview Annual Facility Call Proposal Deadline Guidance Small Field Campaigns Review Criteria Expectations for Principal Investigators Forms Propose a Campaign Instrument Support Request (ISR) Form (Word, 89KB) Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Mission Request Form (Word, 72KB) Documentation Submitting Field Campaign Data and Metadata Field Campaign Guidelines (PDF, 574KB) Unmanned Aerial System Operation Safety at ARM Sites (PDF, 639KB) Guidelines : Review Criteria

  14. 2013 Year in Review

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    3 Year in Review i 2013 YIR May 2014 Year-in-Review: 2013 Energy Infrastructure Events and Expansions Infrastructure Security and Energy Restoration Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability U.S. Department of Energy DOE / 2013 Year in Review ii 2013 YIR For Further Information This report was prepared by the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability under the direction of Patricia Hoffman, Assistant Secretary, and William Bryan, Deputy Assistant Secretary. Specific

  15. Internal Program Review

    Energy Saver

    National Energy Laboratories | Department of Energy Interim Report of the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories Interim Report of the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories This Interim Report presents the preliminary observations and recommendations gleaned from Phase I of the study by the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories (Commission). Key issues of the report focus on the

  16. 2015 Project Peer Review

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Bioenergy Technologies Office is hosting the 2015 Peer Review on March 23–27, 2015, at the Hilton Mark Center, in Alexandria, Virginia.

  17. Vehicle Emissions Review- 2011

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Reviews regulatory requirements and general technology approaches for heavy- and light-duty vehicle emissions control - filter technology, new catalysts, NOx control, diesel oxidation catalysts, gasoline particulate filters

  18. Calculation note review

    SciTech Connect

    Ramble, A.L.

    1996-09-30

    This document contains a review of the calculation notes which were prepared for the Tank Waste Remediation System Basis for Interim Operation.

  19. External Technical Review Report

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    ... 34 Attachment F, ETR Report Format ... Readiness Review or Readiness Assessment ETRs are not required ... If a design technology, process, or system is new, ...

  20. 2015 Peer Review | Plenaries

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    The Energy Department conducted its periodic rigorous, independent peer review of the geothermal portfolio in May 2015. Plenary sessions provided insight into the progress in this energy sector.

  1. STANDARD REVIEW PLAN

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    Strengthening Line Management Oversight and Federal Monitoring of Nuclear Facilities Standard Review Plan Safety Design Strategy January 2015 OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ...

  2. Monthly Energy Review

    Annual Energy Outlook

    December 23, 1997 Electronic Access Monthly Energy Review (MER) data are also available through these electronic means: * ASCII text, Lotus (wk1), and Excel (xls) versions of the...

  3. Quadrennial Energy Review Meeting

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Quadrennial Energy Review Meeting September 8, 2014 Commissioner Garry Brown, NYS Public Service Commission Topic: Business Models and Regulation of Regulated Utilities - Do They ...

  4. Requirement-Reviews.pptx

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    1, 2 013 Requirements Reviews * 1½-day reviews with each Program Office * Computing and storage requirements for next 5 years * Participants - DOE ADs & Program Managers - Leading scientists using NERSC & key potential users - NERSC staff 2 High Energy Physics Fusion R esearch Reports From 6 Requirements Reviews Have Been Published 3 h%p://www.nersc.gov/science/requirements---reviews/ final---reports/ * Compu<ng a nd s torage requirements f or 2013/2014 * Execu<ve S ummary o f

  5. 2013 Financial Review

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Review Brief description of terms 3 * Cash from operations is a measure of income. * Capital expenditures represent cash used for property, plant, and equipment (investing...

  6. EERE Strategic Program Review

    SciTech Connect

    None, None

    2002-03-01

    This Strategic Program Review presents the result of recommendations of the National Energy Policy Development Group as stated in the National Energy Policy.

  7. EWONAP Environmental Review

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    HUD's Eastern Woodlands Office of Native American Programs in collaboration with the Seminole Tribe of Florida Native Learning Center invites you to attend the Environmental Review Training...

  8. EERE Strategic Program Review

    Energy Saver

    ... Light Source Basic Research Projects Materials ... At the same time, advances in materials science, information ... Lightweight Materials Program 1997 NRC Review of the ...

  9. EERE Strategic Program Review

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    This Strategic Program Review presents the result of recommendations of the National Energy Policy Development Group as stated in the National Energy Policy.

  10. Independent Peer Reviews

    SciTech Connect

    2012-03-16

    Independent Assessments: DOE's Systems Integrator convenes independent technical reviews to gauge progress toward meeting specific technical targets and to provide technical information necessary for key decisions.

  11. Readiness Review RM

    Office of Environmental Management (EM)

    ... ISMS Integrated Safety Management System IVR ... Management Oversight Review Board LOI Line of Inquiry MIP ... SER Safety Evaluation Report SME Subject Matter Expert ...

  12. From: Post 2011 Review

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Inform BPA of willingness to host regional meetings Sign up to receive future communication regarding the Post-2011 Review BPA will issue a final scoping document later...

  13. Quality Procedure- Document Review

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    This procedure establishes the process for the review and approval of Environmental Management (EM) Quality Assurance (QA) program documents as performed by the Office of Standards and Quality Assurance. This procedure also establishes the process for review and approval of other EM documents external to the EM Headquarters Office of Standards and Quality Assurance.

  14. 2016 Annual Merit Review

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    At the Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation, project investigators present information on their efforts that have been financially supported by the Vehicle Technologies Office in the last year. Expert reviewers then evaluate these projects based on how much they contribute to or advance the Energy Department’s missions and goals.

  15. Office of Document Reviews

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The Office of Document Reviews ensures that all documents prepared at DOE Headquarters are properly marked to identify the level and category of protected information they contain (if any) and to ensure that all documents the Department prepares or is required to review under applicable statutes for public release contain no information requiring protection under law, regulations and Executive orders.

  16. Technical Review Panel Report

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    TRP Report v7, 12 Aug 2012 TRP Report Final December 2012 Advanced Reactor Concepts Technical Review Panel Report Evaluation and Identification of future R&D on eight Advanced Reactor Concepts, conducted April - September 2012 December 2012 Public release version 2 Public release version 3 Table of Contents Summary ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Overview of the Technical Review Panel

  17. MELCOR Peer Review

    SciTech Connect

    Boyack, B.E.; Dhir, V.K.; Gieseke, J.A.; Haste, T.J.; Kenton, M.A.; Khatib-Rahbar, M.; Leonard, M.T.; Viskanta, R.

    1992-03-01

    MELCOR is a fully integrated, engineering-level computer code that models the progression of severe accidents in light water reactor nuclear power plants. The newest version of MELCOR is Version 1.8.1, July 1991. MELCOR development has reached the point that the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission sponsored a broad technical review by recognized experts to determine or confirm the technical adequacy of the code for the serious and complex analyses it is expected to perform. For this purpose, an eight-member MELCOR Peer Review Committee was organized. The Committee has completed its review of the MELCOR code: the review process and findings of the MELCOR Peer Review Committee are documented in this report. The Committee has determined that recommendations in five areas are appropriate: (1) MELCOR numerics, (2) models missing from MELCOR Version 1.8.1, (3) existing MELCOR models needing revision, (4) the need for expanded MELCOR assessment, and (5) documentation.

  18. Program Management Review Opening Presentation

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    July 30, 2013 Valerie Reed Acting Director Program Management Review Bioenergy Technologies Office 2 Program Management Review May 20-24 th - Alexandria, VA * 219 projects reviewed * $1.595 Billion * 42 External Reviewers July 30th - Washington, D.C. * Project Review Results * 7 Key Platforms * BETO Programmatic Presentations * 7 Steering Committee Members 3 Peer Review Process 2013 Peer Review BETO Steering Group  Valerie Reed, Acting Director  Kevin Craig, Conversion Program Manager 

  19. OFFICE: NEPA REVIEWS:

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    OFFICE: NEPA REVIEWS: No NEPA reviews are ongoing or planned. SITE-WIDE: Preparation of a site-wide EIS was not considered at this time. The ongoing and planned NEPA reviews are listed in Part 2 below. A site-wide EIS WOULD facilitate future NEPA compliance efforts. A site-wide EIS WOULD NOT facilitate future NEPA compliance efforts. Part 3 DATE: PAGE: of 2016 Annual NEPA Planning Summary NEPA COMPLIANCE OFFICER: Secretarial Officers and Heads of Field Organizations submit annual NEPA planning

  20. Readiness Review Training- Development of Criteria And Review Approach Documents

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    Slides used for November 8-9, 2010 Readiness Review Training - Development of Criteria And Review Approach Documents at the Idaho National Laboratory.

  1. Congressional Budget Review

    Directives, Delegations, and Other Requirements [Office of Management (MA)]

    1992-05-18

    The order outlines requirements and procedures for the preparation and submission of the Department of Energy (DOE) budget for Congressional Budget Review. Canceled by DOE O 130.1.

  2. Tribal Energy Program Review

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The 2015 Tribal Energy Program Review will include an overview of the Tribal Energy Program and a series of presentations by tribes exploring or deploying weatherization, energy efficiency, and...

  3. Welcome Year in Review

    National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

    Training Meeting Orlando, Florida-May 23-25, 2006 Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy & the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Welcome & Year In Review Peter Dessaules...

  4. Historical Monthly Energy Review

    Annual Energy Outlook

    73-92) Distribution Category UC-950 Historical Monthly Energy Review 1973-1992 Energy Information Administration Office of Energy Markets and End Use U.S. Department of Energy...

  5. Monthly Energy Review

    Annual Energy Outlook

    May 26, 1998 Electronic Access Monthly Energy Review (MER) data are also avail- able through these electronic means: * ASCII text, Lotus (wk1), and Excel (xls) versions of the MER...

  6. Tribal Energy Program Review

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Indian Energy holds annual Tribal Energy Program review meetings to provide an opportunity for tribes and Alaska Native villages to share their successes and best practices.

  7. PMCDP Certification Review Board

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

    FPD certification is awarded through a chartered and structured Board process. The PMCDP’s Certification Review Board (CRB) is the governing body responsible for granting FPD certifications and...

  8. Program Evaluation: Materials for Reviewers

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    So that the peer review is fair, credible, useful, and cost effective, the review leader should provide adequate and timely preparation materials to the peer review panel (via the panel chair) and...

  9. HEP Exascale Review Presentations

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Presentations HEP Exascale Review Presentations Sort by: Default | Name | Date (low-high) | Date (high-low) | Source | Category HEP Requirements Review June 10, 2015 | Author(s): Barbara Helland, DOE ASCR | Download File: RequirementsreviewsHellandV3150610.pdf | pdf | 2.1 MB Opening Remarks June 10, 2015 | Author(s): Rob Roser, Salman Habib, Richard Gerber | Download File: HEP-ASCR-Exascale-opening-remarkssh.pdf | pdf | 187 KB P5 Science Drivers: Accelerator Experiments June 10, 2015 |

  10. AMO Program Peer Review

    Energy.gov [DOE]

    DOE's Advanced Manufacturing Office (AMO) will be conducting a Peer Review of its Research and Development (R&D), Facilities, and Technology Assistance activities in Washington, DC, on May 6-7, 2014. Presentations will be given on individual R&D projects, Facilities, and the Technical Assistance activities. Leading technology experts from the industrial and academic sectors will review AMO's Program and provide their view on its effectiveness and impact.

  11. Appendix G: Peer review nondisclosure agreement

    SciTech Connect

    None, None

    2009-01-18

    This peer review nondisclosure agreement should be signed by each reviewer prior to the program sending review materials if sensitive or proprietary information will be provided reviewers or discussed during the review, and to everyone attending a review.

  12. review | OpenEI Community

    OpenEI (Open Energy Information) [EERE & EIA]

    review Home Graham7781's picture Submitted by Graham7781(2017) Super contributor 16 January, 2014 - 11:40 New Presidential Memorandum on establishing Quadrennial Energy Review...

  13. ORISE: Scientific Peer Review Planning

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Implementation of a sponsor's existing peer review protocols to evaluate the technical merit of each research proposal Design and management of an independent review program of ...

  14. Monthly Energy Review - April 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Released for Printing: May 25, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  15. Monthly Energy Review - August 2003

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Released for Printing: August 26, 2003 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  16. Monthly Energy Review - January 2003

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: January 30, 2003 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  17. Monthly Energy Review - May 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Released for Printing: May 26, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  18. Monthly Energy Review - October 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: October 26, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  19. Monthly Energy Review - November 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: November 23, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  20. Monthly Energy Review - September 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: September 28, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  1. Monthly Energy Review - May 2007

    Annual Energy Outlook

    7 DOEEIA-0035(200705) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy...

  2. Monthly Energy Review - November 2002

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: December 6, 2002 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  3. Monthly Energy Review -January 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: January 27, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  4. Monthly Energy Review - February 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: February 24, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  5. Monthly Energy Review - June 2007

    Annual Energy Outlook

    7 DOEEIA-0035(200706) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy...

  6. Monthly Energy Review - February 2007

    Annual Energy Outlook

    7 DOEEIA-0035(200702) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy...

  7. Monthly Energy Review - November 2003

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: November 24, 2003 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  8. Monthly Energy Review - October 2007

    Annual Energy Outlook

    0) October 2007 Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics....

  9. Monthly Energy Review - March 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Released for Printing: March 29, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  10. Monthly Energy Review - September 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: September 27, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  11. Monthly Energy Review - May 2003

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Released for Printing: June 10, 2003 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  12. Monthly Energy Review - June 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Released for Printing: June 27, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  13. Monthly Energy Review - February 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: February 23, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  14. Monthly Energy Review - December 2002

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: December 23, 2002 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  15. Monthly Energy Review - March 2003

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Released for Printing: April 2, 2003 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  16. Monthly Energy Review - October 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: October 26, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  17. Monthly Energy Review - July 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Released for Printing: July 27, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  18. Monthly Energy Review - February 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: February 23, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  19. Monthly Energy Review - June 2003

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Released for Printing: June 30, 2003 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  20. Monthly Energy Review - April 2007

    Annual Energy Outlook

    7 DOEEIA-0035(200704) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy...

  1. Monthly Energy Review - July 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Released for Printing: July 26, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  2. Monthly Energy Review - December 2003

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: December 23, 2003 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  3. Monthly Energy Review - June 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Released for Printing: June 25, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  4. Monthly Energy Review - April 2003

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Released for Printing: May 22, 2003 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  5. Monthly Energy Review - September 2003

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: September 26, 2003 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  6. Monthly Energy Review - May 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Released for Printing: May 25, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  7. Monthly Energy Review - September 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: September 27, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  8. Monthly Energy Review - November 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: November 23, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  9. Monthly Energy Review - April 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Released for Printing: April 27, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  10. Monthly Energy Review - August 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Released for Printing: August 29, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  11. Monthly Energy Review - March 2007

    Annual Energy Outlook

    7 DOEEIA-0035(200703) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy...

  12. Monthly Energy Review - December 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: December 21, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  13. Monthly Energy Review - August 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Released for Printing: August 28, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  14. Monthly Energy Review - April 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Released for Printing: April 25, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  15. Monthly Energy Review - November 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: November 22, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  16. Monthly Energy Review - March 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Released for Printing: March 31, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  17. Monthly Energy Review - October 2003

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: October 27, 2003 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  18. Monthly Energy Review - April 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Released for Printing: April 28, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  19. Monthly Energy Review - July 2007

    Annual Energy Outlook

    7 DOEEIA-0035(200707) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy...

  20. Monthly Energy Review - January 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: January 29, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  1. Monthly Energy Review - December 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: December 22, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  2. Monthly Energy Review - October 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: October 26, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  3. Monthly Energy Review - February 2003

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: February 28, 2003 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) presents an overview of the Energy Information...

  4. Monthly Energy Review - July 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Released for Printing: July 26, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  5. Monthly Energy Review - December 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: December 22, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  6. Monthly Energy Review - August 2004

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Released for Printing: August 25, 2004 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  7. Monthly Energy Review - March 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Released for Printing: March 27, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  8. Monthly Energy Review - June 2005

    Annual Energy Outlook

    Released for Printing: June 27, 2005 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  9. Monthly Energy Review - January 2006

    Annual Energy Outlook

    for Printing: January 25, 2006 Printed with soy ink on recycled paper. Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Admin- istration's...

  10. Review Reports | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - January 2012 Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility Fire...

  11. Review Reports | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Oversight Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory - July 2014 Review of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Transuranic Waste Facility Safety Basis and Design Development July...

  12. Monthly Energy review - July 2009

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    9 July 2009 DOEEIA-0035(200907) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical...

  13. Monthly Energy Review - January 2009

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    1) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are...

  14. Monthly Energy review - September 2009

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    9 September 2009 DOEEIA-0035(200909) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and...

  15. Monthly Energy Review - November 2008

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    1) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are...

  16. Monthly Energy review - August 2009

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    9 August 2009 DOEEIA-0035(200908) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical...

  17. Monthly Energy Review - December 2008

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    2) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are...

  18. Monthly Energy Review - November 2009

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    November 2009 DOEEIA-0035(200911) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical...

  19. Monthly Energy Review - October 2009

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    9 October 2009 DOEEIA-0035(200910) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical...

  20. Monthly Energy Review - September 2007

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    09) September 2007 Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics....

  1. Monthly Energy Review - February 2009

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    2) Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics. Included are...

  2. Monthly Energy Review - November 2007

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    1) November 2007 Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics....

  3. Monthly Energy Review - December 2007

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    2) December 2007 Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary report of recent and historical energy statistics....

  4. Monthly Energy Review - August 2007

    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) - all webpages (Extended Search)

    Energy Information Administration DOEEIA-0035(200708) August 2007 Monthly Energy Review The Monthly Energy Review (MER) is the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) primary...

  5. Review Reports | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    March 4, 2014 Independent Oversight Review, Bonneville Power Administration Safety Management Program - March 2014 Oversight Review of the Bonneville Power Administration Safety...

  6. Quadrennial Technology Review Workshops | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Quadrennial Technology Review Workshops Quadrennial Technology Review Workshops PDF icon Department of Energy Quadrennial Technology Review Building & Industrial Efficiency ...

  7. Security Review Processing Form | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    Security Review Processing Form Security Review Processing Form Security Review Process - Please review carefully. Security Acknowledge Form - Complete and return immediately. ...

  8. 2011 Peer Review Report | Department of Energy

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    1 Peer Review Report 2011 Peer Review Report Geothermal Technologies Program 2011 Peer Review Report, June 2011 peer_review_report_june2011.pdf (6

  9. Analysis & Projections - Pub - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

    Energy Information Administration (EIA) (indexed site)

    Macroeconomic AEO2017 Meetings First AEO2017 Meeting (July 28, 2016) Summary of meeting Macroeconomic modeling plans presentation Prior years meetings were combined with Industrial group AEO2016 Meetings First AEO2016 Meeting (December 3, 2015) Summary of meeting Macroeconomic modeling plans presentation Industrial modeling plans presentation Second AEO2016 Meeting (March 21, 2016) Summary of meeting Industrial modeling plans presentation AEO2015 Meetings First AEO2015 Meeting (July 24, 2014)

  10. Importance of Low Permeability Natural Gas Reservoirs (released in AEO2010)

    Reports and Publications

    2010-01-01

    Production from low-permeability reservoirs, including shale gas and tight gas, has become a major source of domestic natural gas supply. In 2008, low-permeability reservoirs accounted for about 40% of natural gas production and about 35% of natural gas consumption in the United States. Permeability is a measure of the rate at which liquids and gases can move through rock. Low-permeability natural gas reservoirs encompass the shale, sandstone, and carbonate formations whose natural permeability is roughly 0.1 millidarcies or below. (Permeability is measured in darcies.)

  11. Military Construction Appropriations and Emergency Hurricane Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2005 (released in AEO2005)

    Reports and Publications

    2005-01-01

    H.R. 4837, The Military Construction Appropriations and Emergency Hurricane Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2005, was signed into law on October 13, 2004. The Act provides for construction to support the operations of the U.S. Armed Forces and for military family housing. It also provides funds to help citizens in Florida and elsewhere in the aftermath of multiple hurricanes and other natural disasters. In addition, it authorizes construction of an Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline.

  12. FE LNG Exports-v1-aeo2014_8_29_14.xlsx

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    50.3 50.3 51.4 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.8 51.9 51.9 51.9 75.6 75.7 75.7 75.7 End-Use Electricity Price (2012 centsKwh) 10.4 10.5 10.5 10.6 10.6 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 11.1 11.4 11.4 11.5 10.5 ...

  13. Price Responsiveness in the AEO2003 NEMS Residential and Commercial Buildings Sector Models

    Reports and Publications

    2003-01-01

    This paper describes the demand responses to changes in energy prices in the Annual Energy Outlook 2003 versions of the Residential and Commercial Demand Modules of the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS). It updates a similar paper completed for the Annual Energy Outlook 1999 version of the NEMS.

  14. Microsoft Word - macro industrial AEO2013 working group 08-02...

    Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update

    GI's (Global Insights') long-term forecast of GDP. There was no ... of a dynamic price driver (comprised of the ... incentivize boiler fuel switching to natural gas ...

  15. Loan Guarantees and the Economics of Electricity Generating Technologies (released in AEO2007)

    Reports and Publications

    2007-01-01

    The loan guarantee program authorized in Title XVII of EPACT2005 is not included in the Annual Energy Outlook 2007, because the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 requires congressional authorization of loan guarantees in an appropriations act before a federal agency can make a binding loan guarantee agreement. As of October 2006, Congress had not provided the legislation necessary for the Department of Energy (DOE) to implement the loan guarantee program (see Legislation and Regulations). In August 2006, however, DOE invited firms to submit pre-applications for the first $2 billion in potential loan guarantees.

  16. Fuel Economy Standards for New Light Trucks (released in AEO2007)

    Reports and Publications

    2007-01-01

    In March 2006, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) finalized Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards requiring higher fuel economy performance for light-duty trucks in model year (MY) 2008 through 2011. Unlike the proposed CAFE standards discussed in Annual Energy Outlook 2006, which would have established minimum fuel economy requirements by six footprint size classes, the final reformed CAFE standards specify a continuous mathematical function that determines minimum fuel economy requirements by vehicle footprint, defined as the wheelbase (the distance from the front axle to the center of the rear axle) times the average track width (the distance between the center lines of the tires) of the vehicle in square feet.

  17. Proposed Revisions to Light Truck Fuel Economy Standard (released in AEO2006)

    Reports and Publications

    2006-01-01

    In August 2005, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) published proposed reforms to the structure of CAFE standards for light trucks and increases in light truck Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for model years 2008 through 201. Under the proposed new structure, NHTSA would establish minimum fuel economy levels for six size categories defined by the vehicle footprint (wheelbase multiplied by track width), as summarized in Table 3. For model years 2008 through 2010, the new CAFE standards would provide manufacturers the option of complying with either the standards defined for each individual footprint category or a proposed average light truck fleet standard of 22.5 miles per gallon in 2008, 23.1 miles per gallon in 2009, and 23.5 miles per gallon in 2010. All light truck manufacturers would be required to meet an overall standard based on sales within each individual footprint category after model year 2010.

  18. Update on Transition to Ultra-Low-Sulfur Diesel Fuel (released in AEO2006)

    Reports and Publications

    2006-01-01

    On November 8, 2005, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator signed a direct final rule that will shift the retail compliance date for offering ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD) for highway use from September 1, 2006, to October 15, 2006. The change will allow more time for retail outlets and terminals to comply with the new 15 parts per million (ppm) sulfur standard, providing time for entities in the diesel fuel distribution system to flush higher sulfur fuel out of the system during the transition. Terminals will have until September 1, 2006, to complete their transitions to ULSD. The previous deadline was July 15, 2006.

  19. Regulation of Emissions from Stationary Diesel Engines (released in AEO2007)

    Reports and Publications

    2007-01-01

    On July 11, 2006, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued regulations covering emissions from stationary diesel engines New Source Performance Standards that limit emissions of NOx, particulate matter, SO2, carbon monoxide, and hydrocarbons to the same levels required for nonroad diesel engines. The regulation affects new, modified, and reconstructed diesel engines. Beginning with model year 2007, engine manufacturers must specify that new engines less than 3,000 horsepower meet the same emissions standard as nonroad diesel engines. For engines greater than 3,000 horsepower, the standard will be fully effective in 2011. Stationary diesel engine fuel will also be subject to the same standard as nonroad diesel engine fuel, which reduces the sulfur content of the fuel to 500 parts per million by mid-2007 and 15 parts per million by mid-2010.

  20. California Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Light-Duty Vehicles (released in AEO2005)

    Reports and Publications

    2005-01-01

    In July 2002, California Assembly Bill 1493 (A.B. 1493) was signed into law. The law requires that the California Air Resources Board (CARB) develop and adopt, by January 1, 2005, greenhouse gas emission standards for light-duty vehicles that provide the maximum feasible reduction in emissions. In estimating the feasibility of the standard, CARB is required to consider cost-effectiveness, technological capability, economic impacts, and flexibility for manufacturers in meeting the standard.

  1. Energy Improvement and Extension Act of 2008: Summary of Provisions (released in AEO2009)

    Reports and Publications

    2009-01-01

    The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-343), which was signed into law on October 3, 2008, incorporates EIEA2008 in Division B. Provisions in EIEA2008 that require funding appropriations to be implemented, whose impact is highly uncertain or that require further specification by federal agencies or Congress, are not included in Annual Energy Outlook 2009.

  2. Limited Electricity Generation Supply and Limited Natural Gas Supply Cases (released in AEO2008)

    Reports and Publications

    2008-01-01

    Development of U.S. energy resources and the permitting and construction of large energy facilities have become increasingly difficult over the past 20 years, and they could become even more difficult in the future. Growing public concern about global warming and CO2 emissions also casts doubt on future consumption of fossil fuels -- particularly coal, which releases the largest amount of CO2 per unit of energy produced. Even without regulations to limit greenhouse gas emissions in the United States, the investment community may already be limiting the future use of some energy options. In addition, there is considerable uncertainty about the future availability of, and access to, both domestic and foreign natural gas resources.

  3. State Renewable Energy Requirements and Goals: Update Through 2005 (Update) (released in AEO2006)

    Reports and Publications

    2006-01-01

    Annual Energy Outlook 2005 provided a summary of 17 state renewable energy programs in existence as of December 31, 2003, in 15 states.

  4. Volumetric Excise Tax Credit for Alternative Fuels (released in AEO2006)

    Reports and Publications

    2006-01-01

    On August 10, 2005, President Bush signed into law the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU)]. The act includes authorization for a multitude of transportation infrastructure projects, establishes highway safety provisions, provides for research and development, and includes a large number of miscellaneous provisions related to transportation, most of which are not included in Annual Energy Outlook 2006 because their energy impacts are vague or undefined.

  5. State Restrictions on Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (released in AEO2006)

    Reports and Publications

    2006-01-01

    By the end of 2005, 25 states had barred, or passed laws banning, any more than trace levels of methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) in their gasoline supplies, and legislation to ban MTBE was pending in 4 others. Some state laws address only MTBE; others also address ethers such as ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE) and tertiary amyl methyl ether (TAME). Annual Energy Outlook 2006 assumes that all state MTBE bans prohibit the use of all ethers for gasoline blending.

  6. State Renewable Energy Requirements and Goals: Update Through 2003 (released in AEO2005)

    Reports and Publications

    2005-01-01

    As of the end of 2003, 15 states had legislated programs to encourage the development of renewable energy for electricity generation. Of the 17 programs (two states have multiple programs), 9 are renewable portfolio standards (RPS), 4 are renewable energy mandates, and 4 are renewable energy goals.

  7. Impacts of Temperature Variation on Energy Demand in Buildings (released in AEO2005)

    Reports and Publications

    2005-01-01

    In the residential and commercial sectors, heating and cooling account for more than 40% of end-use energy demand. As a result, energy consumption in those sectors can vary significantly from year to year, depending on yearly average temperatures.

  8. Economics of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles (released in AEO2009)

    Reports and Publications

    2009-01-01

    Plug-In hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) have gained significant attention in recent years, as concerns about energy, environmental, and economic securityincluding rising gasoline prices have prompted efforts to improve vehicle fuel economy and reduce petroleum consumption in the transportation sector. PHEVs are particularly well suited to meet these objectives, because they have the potential to reduce petroleum consumption both through fuel economy gains and by substituting electric power for gasoline use.

  9. 13 SEER Standard for Central Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps (released in AEO2005)

    Reports and Publications

    2005-01-01

    In January 2004, after years of litigation in a case that pitted environmental groups and Attorneys General from 10 states against the U.S. Secretary of Energy, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reestablished the central air conditioner and heat pump standard originally set in January 200. The Courts ruling, which struck down a May 2002 rollback of the 2001 standard to a 12 Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio (SEER) mandates that all new central air conditioners and heat pumps meet a 13 SEER standard by January 2006, requiring a 30% increase in efficiency relative to current law. The Annual Energy Outlook 2005 reference case incorporates the 13 SEER standard as mandated by the Courts ruling.

  10. Trends in Heating and Cooling Degree Days: Implications for Energy Demand Issues (released in AEO2008)

    Reports and Publications

    2008-01-01

    Weather-related energy use, in the form of heating, cooling, and ventilation, accounted for more than 40% of all delivered energy use in residential and commercial buildings in 2006. Given the relatively large amount of energy affected by ambient temperature in the buildings sector, the Energy Information Administration has reevaluated what it considers normal weather for purposes of projecting future energy use for heating, cooling, and ventilation. The Annual Energy Outlook 2008, estimates of normal heating and cooling degree-days are based on the population-weighted average for the 10-year period from 1997 through 2006.

  11. Impacts of Rising Construction and Equipment Costs on Energy Industries (released in AEO2007)

    Reports and Publications

    2007-01-01

    Costs related to the construction industry have been volatile in recent years. Some of the volatility may be related to higher energy prices. Prices for iron and steel, cement, and concrete -- commodities used heavily in the construction of new energy projects -- rose sharply from 2004 to 2006, and shortages have been reported. How such price fluctuations may affect the cost or pace of new development in the energy industries is not known with any certainty, and short-term changes in commodity prices are not accounted for in the 25-year projections in Annual Energy Outlook 2007. Most projects in the energy industries require long planning and construction lead times, which can lessen the impacts of short-term trends.

  12. State Renewable Energy Requirements and Goals: Update through 2008 (Update) (released in AEO2009)

    Reports and Publications

    2010-01-01

    State renewable portfolio standards (RPS) programs continue to play an important role in Annual Energy Outlook 2009, growing in number while existing programs are modified with more stringent targets. In total, 28 states and the District of Columbia now have mandatory RPS programs, and at least 4 other states have voluntary renewable energy programs. In the absence of a federal renewable electricity standard, each state determines its own levels of generation, eligible technologies, and noncompliance penalties. The growth in state renewable energy requirements has led to an expansion of renewable energy credit (REC) markets, which vary from state to state. Credit prices depend on the state renewable requirements and how easily they can be met.

  13. Impacts of Uncertainty in Energy Project Costs (released in AEO2008)

    Reports and Publications

    2008-01-01

    From the late 1970s through 2002, steel, cement, and concrete prices followed a general downward trend. Since then, however, iron and steel prices have increased by 8% in 2003, 10% in 2004, and 31% in 2005. Although iron and steel prices declined in 2006, early data for 2007 show another increase. Cement and concrete prices, as well as the composite cost index for all construction commodities, have shown similar trends but with smaller increases in 2004 and 2005.

  14. Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004 (released in AEO2005)

    Reports and Publications

    2005-01-01

    The Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004 was signed into law on October 13, 2004. Primarily, the Act reduces taxes for individuals and businesses. At least two provisions relate to energy: Depletion of marginal properties and qualified vehicles.

  15. State Regulations on Airborne Emissions: Update Through 2007 (Update) (released in AEO2008)

    Reports and Publications

    2008-01-01

    States are moving forward with implementation plans for the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR). The program, promulgated by the EPA in March 2005, is a cap-and-trade system designed to reduce emissions of SO2 and NOx. States originally had until March 2007 to submit implementation plans, but the deadline has been extended by another year. CAIR covers 28 eastern states and the District of Columbia. States have the option to participate in the cap-and trade plan or devise their own plans, which can be more stringent than the federal requirements. To date, no state has indicated an intent to form NOx and SO2 programs with emissions limits stricter than those in CAIR, and it is expected that all states will participate in the Environmental Protection Agency administered cap-and-trade program. CAIR remains on schedule for implementation, and Annual Energy Outlook 2008 includes CAIR by assuming that all required states will meet only the federal requirement and will trade credits.

  16. Natural Gas as a Fuel for Heavy Trucks: Issues and Incentives (released in AEO2010)

    Reports and Publications

    2010-01-01

    Environmental and energy security concerns related to petroleum use for transportation fuels, together with recent growth in U.S. proved reserves and technically recoverable natural gas resources, including shale gas, have sparked interest in policy proposals aimed at stimulating increased use of natural gas as a vehicle fuel, particularly for heavy trucks.

  17. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: Summary of Provisions (released in AEO2010)

    Reports and Publications

    2010-01-01

    The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), signed into law in mid-February 2009, provides significant new federal funding, loan guarantees, and tax credits to stimulate investments in energy efficiency and renewable energy. The provisions of ARRA were incorporated initially as part of a revision to the Annual Energy Outlook 2009 Reference case that was released in April 2009, and they also are included in Annual Energy Outlook 2010.

  18. Bringing Alaska North Slope Natural Gas to Market (released in AEO2009)

    Reports and Publications

    2009-01-01

    At least three alternatives have been proposed over the years for bringing sizable volumes of natural gas from Alaska's remote North Slope to market in the lower 48 states: a pipeline interconnecting with the existing pipeline system in central Alberta, Canada; a gas-to-liquids (GTL) plant on the North Slope; and a large liquefied natural gas (LNG) export facility at Valdez, Alaska. The National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) explicitly models the pipeline and GTL options. The what if LNG option is not modeled in NEMS.

  19. AEO2011_Newell_SENR_Testimony_2 03_11final revised

    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (indexed site)

    ... China alone accounts for 78 percent of the total net ... trends; current laws and regulations; and consumer behavior. ... and other State environmental rules; and (4) updates ...

  20. U.S. Greenhouse Gas Intensity and the Global Climate Change Initiative (released in AEO2005)

    Reports and Publications

    2005-01-01

    On February 14, 2002, President Bush announced the Administrations Global Climate Change Initiative. A key goal of the Climate Change Initiative is to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas intensity by 18% over the 2002 to 2012 time frame. For the purposes of the initiative, greenhouse gas intensity is defined as the ratio of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions to economic output.