|
NEGOTIATING INTERNATIONAL CONTROL
(December 1945-1946)
Events > Postscript -- The Nuclear Age, 1945-Present
- Informing the Public, August 1945
- The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946
- First Steps toward International Control, 1944-1945
- Search for a Policy on International Control, 1945
- Negotiating International Control, 1945-1946
- Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946
- Operation Crossroads, July 1946
- The VENONA Intercepts, 1946-1980
- The Cold War, 1945-1990
- Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-present
After American, British, and Canadian officials agreed at the November
1945 Washington meeting to a negotiating approach on international control, Secretary of State James F.
Byrnes quickly arranged for the Big Three foreign ministers to meet in Moscow in
mid-December. Atomic energy, which the Soviets placed last on a long list
of agenda items, was discussed only in terms of the United Nations
proposal. Surprising Byrnes with their willingness to cooperate, the Soviets
acquiesced to the American proposal, which was based on the Washington
joint declaration, but with one exception. They agreed that the commission
should be set up by the United Nations General Assembly, but, counter to the
American plan, they insisted that the commission report to the Security Council
and be accountable to it "in matters affecting security." This was no
mere procedural difference. Most of the members in the General Assembly,
where decisions were made by majority rule, were more closely aligned to the
United States than to the Soviet Union. In the Security Council, the
Soviet Union possessed the veto and could effectively halt any commission actions that it found objectionable.
On
returning from Moscow, Byrnes named Under Secretary of State Dean Acheson
to chair a committee to formulate policy on international control.
Also members were Vannevar Bush, General Leslie Groves, James Conant, and John J. McCloy. The committee, in
turn, set up a
five-member board of consultants headed by Tennessee Valley Authority
Chairman David E. Lilienthal and with Robert Oppenheimer as the
panel's resident physics expert. Charged with producing a report,
the board was granted considerable leeway as to its form and
content. The board followed Oppenheimer's lead in recommending
that an "Atomic Development Authority" be the centerpiece for
controlling the atom. The proposed international authority would
have a world-wide monopoly in most of the major areas of atomic
energy. The concept of control relied not so much on safeguards and
inspections as on a dynamic international organization of scientists and
administrators committed to developing atomic energy for peaceful purposes
and exercising proprietary authority over facilities, materials, and
processes required for making atomic weapons. Acheson's committee
warmly embraced the proposal and on March 17, 1946, forwarded to Byrnes
what became known as the Acheson-Lilienthal report.
That
same day, President Harry S. Truman asked Bernard Baruch to be the lead United States
negotiator at the United Nations. At age seventy-five an "elder
statesman" who had served American presidents in various capacities
since World War I, Baruch inclined toward drafting his own proposal and
feared being boxed in by the parameters set by the Acheson-Lilienthal
report, which had become a public document. After several months of
give and take, however, he accepted the Acheson-Lilienthal plan largely as
his own. Baruch's one major change was on the issue of
enforcement. The Acheson-Lilienthal plan intentionally remained
silent on enforcement, not wanting to put forth terms that suggested
mistrust of the Soviet Union. Baruch, by contrast, insisted on
specific penalties. Violations would be met, he asserted, with
"immediate and certain" punishment that would not be subject to
Security Council veto. On June 14, Baruch unveiled the proposal in a
speech to the United Nations Atomic Energy Commission. The Baruch
plan, as it came to be called, was, as Baruch paraphrased Abraham Lincoln, "the last, best hope of earth."
Not everyone saw it that
way. Five days later, Andrei Gromyko, the Soviet delegate, proposed
an international convention prohibiting the possession, production, and
use of nuclear weapons. Only after the convention was implemented,
Gromyko stated, should measures be considered to ensure "the strict
observance of the terms and obligations." He also rejected any
attempts to negate the veto. Gromyko later added that the Baruch
proposals could not be accepted "either as a whole or in their separate parts."
The debate in the United
Nations was a debate in name only. In the following six months,
neither side demonstrated the least inclination to alter its stated
position. For their part, the Soviets never expressed any intent
either to negotiate seriously or, as an analysis by the
American embassy in Moscow noted, abandon their "own gigantic atomic research
project." In one of the rare recorded instances of a private
diplomatic exchange, the Russian diplomat A. A. Sobolev told Franklin A.
Lindsay, an aide to Baruch, that the Soviet Union was not interested in the Baruch proposals but sought
"freedom to pursue its own policies in complete freedom and without any
interference or control from the outside." Discouraged by the
exchange, Lindsay concluded afterwards that stopping bomb production
would in "no way induce the Russians to accept any form of international
inspection and control." He added that this "strongly indicates
that no general understanding based on mutual trust and cooperation is
possible between the two systems of government."
As for United States policy, Baruch stayed the course. Although disagreement among American
officials existed on the veto issue, no consideration was given to making
concessions on the overall proposal consisting of the atomic development
authority and staged implementation of exchange and control. The United States, believing that Soviet troops
posed a threat in Europe with the rapid demobilization of
American conventional forces, refused to surrender its atomic deterrent
without adequate international controls. Unwilling to surrender its
veto power, the Soviet Union, in the end, abstained from the December 31, 1946, vote on Baruch's proposal on
the grounds that it did not prohibit the bomb. Token debate on the
plan continued into 1948, but the Baruch plan, in fact, was a dead letter
by early 1947. At the same time, the Soviet Union continued its
crash effort to develop its own bomb. The United States continued to
develop and expand its own nuclear arsenal. And, in an atmosphere of
mutual suspicion, the Cold War set in.
- Informing the Public, August 1945
- The Manhattan Engineer District, 1945-1946
- First Steps toward International Control, 1944-1945
- Search for a Policy on International Control, 1945
- Negotiating International Control, 1945-1946
- Civilian Control of Atomic Energy, 1945-1946
- Operation Crossroads, July 1946
- The VENONA Intercepts, 1946-1980
- The Cold War, 1945-1990
- Nuclear Proliferation, 1949-present
Previous Next
Sources and notes for this page.
The text for this page is original to the Department of Energy's Office of History
and Heritage Resources. Portions were adapted from the History Office
publication: F. G. Gosling, The Manhattan
Project: Making the Atomic Bomb (DOE/MA-0001; Washington: History Division,
Department of Energy, January 1999), 55-57, and Richard G. Hewlett and Oscar
E. Anderson, Jr., The New World, 1939-1946: Volume I, A History of the
United States Atomic Energy Commission (Washington: U.S. Atomic
Energy Commission, 1972), 469-476, 554-579, 583-584, 618-619. Also used were
McGeorge Bundy, Danger and Survival: Choices About the Bomb in the First
Fifty Years (New York: Random House, 1988), 156-168, and Gregg Herken,
The Winning Weapon: The Atomic Bomb in the Cold War, 1945-1950 (New York:
Alfred A. Knopf, 1980), 82-85. The Moscow Communiqué by the Foreign Ministers
of the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union [Extracts],
December 27, 1945; The Baruch Plan: Statement by the United States
Representative (Baruch) to the United Nations Atomic Energy Commission, June 14,
1946, and Address by the Soviet Representative (Gromyko) to the United Nations
Atomic Energy Commission, June 19, 1946, are in Documents on Disarmament,
1945-1959, Volume 1, 1945-1956 (Department of State Publication 7008, August
1960), 3-5, 7-24. The analysis of the American embassy in Moscow is in Walter
Bedell Smith to H. Freeman Matthews, November 19, 1946, and the A.A.
Sobolev/Franklin A. Lindsay exchange is in Lindsay to Bernard Baruch, October
21, 1946, both in Foreign Relations of the United States, 1946, Volume I,
General; The United Nations (Department of State Publication 8573, 1972),
955-960, 1016-1019. The photograph of Bernard Baruch presenting his plan to the
United States is reprinted in Hewlett and Anderson, The New World,
opposite page 561. The photographs of President Harry S. Truman and Dean
Acheson and Andrei Gromoyko (with Eleanor Roosevelt and Nikita and Nina
Khruschev) are courtesy the National
Archives. The photograph of Joseph Stalin with Vyacheslav Molotov is
courtesy the Roosevelt Presidential
Library (via the National Archives).
Home | History
Office | OpenNet | DOE | Privacy and Security Notices About this Site |
How to Navigate this Site |
Note on Sources |
Site Map |
Contact Us
|