Abstract
Disregarding the actual nature of the diagnosis of pancreatic disease, scintigraphy with labeled selenomethionine significantly reveals pathological disorders, however general they may be. In the recognition of ''scintigraphically normal'' the homogeneous results of a linear scan are distributed on values of 85% and results with the gamma-camera on values of 88%. The scintigraphic response remains even more homogeneous with the pathologic pancreas, e.g. in chronic pancreatitis and cancer, where linear scintigraphy yields correct diagnoses in 84% and 92% of the cases, and the gamma-camera in 84% and 93% of the cases, respectively. In summary, scintigraphy offers an important identification of the normal, and a high percentage of correct diagnoses in the pathological realm; thus, it represents the most appropriate means for detection at the pancreatic level. The methodological choice based on clinical data first takes scintigraphic data and incorporates them with arteriography in the case of suspected carcinomas or with ductography when chronic pancreatitis is believed to exist. Arteriography has priority in the localization of adenomas, while ductography is relied upon in the diagnosis of pseudocysts.
Romani, S;
Oselladore, D;
Feltrin, G P;
Ravasini, R;
Zacchi, C;
Di Maggio, C;
Vedaldi, R;
Vio, S;
Maffessanti, M;
Perelli, R
[1]
- Padua Univ. (Italy)
Citation Formats
Romani, S, Oselladore, D, Feltrin, G P, Ravasini, R, Zacchi, C, Di Maggio, C, Vedaldi, R, Vio, S, Maffessanti, M, and Perelli, R.
Comparative considerations concerning scintigraphy, arteriography and reverse ductography in pancreas diseases.
France: N. p.,
1975.
Web.
Romani, S, Oselladore, D, Feltrin, G P, Ravasini, R, Zacchi, C, Di Maggio, C, Vedaldi, R, Vio, S, Maffessanti, M, & Perelli, R.
Comparative considerations concerning scintigraphy, arteriography and reverse ductography in pancreas diseases.
France.
Romani, S, Oselladore, D, Feltrin, G P, Ravasini, R, Zacchi, C, Di Maggio, C, Vedaldi, R, Vio, S, Maffessanti, M, and Perelli, R.
1975.
"Comparative considerations concerning scintigraphy, arteriography and reverse ductography in pancreas diseases."
France.
@misc{etde_7226332,
title = {Comparative considerations concerning scintigraphy, arteriography and reverse ductography in pancreas diseases}
author = {Romani, S, Oselladore, D, Feltrin, G P, Ravasini, R, Zacchi, C, Di Maggio, C, Vedaldi, R, Vio, S, Maffessanti, M, and Perelli, R}
abstractNote = {Disregarding the actual nature of the diagnosis of pancreatic disease, scintigraphy with labeled selenomethionine significantly reveals pathological disorders, however general they may be. In the recognition of ''scintigraphically normal'' the homogeneous results of a linear scan are distributed on values of 85% and results with the gamma-camera on values of 88%. The scintigraphic response remains even more homogeneous with the pathologic pancreas, e.g. in chronic pancreatitis and cancer, where linear scintigraphy yields correct diagnoses in 84% and 92% of the cases, and the gamma-camera in 84% and 93% of the cases, respectively. In summary, scintigraphy offers an important identification of the normal, and a high percentage of correct diagnoses in the pathological realm; thus, it represents the most appropriate means for detection at the pancreatic level. The methodological choice based on clinical data first takes scintigraphic data and incorporates them with arteriography in the case of suspected carcinomas or with ductography when chronic pancreatitis is believed to exist. Arteriography has priority in the localization of adenomas, while ductography is relied upon in the diagnosis of pseudocysts.}
journal = []
volume = {56:suppl.1}
place = {France}
year = {1975}
month = {Jan}
}
title = {Comparative considerations concerning scintigraphy, arteriography and reverse ductography in pancreas diseases}
author = {Romani, S, Oselladore, D, Feltrin, G P, Ravasini, R, Zacchi, C, Di Maggio, C, Vedaldi, R, Vio, S, Maffessanti, M, and Perelli, R}
abstractNote = {Disregarding the actual nature of the diagnosis of pancreatic disease, scintigraphy with labeled selenomethionine significantly reveals pathological disorders, however general they may be. In the recognition of ''scintigraphically normal'' the homogeneous results of a linear scan are distributed on values of 85% and results with the gamma-camera on values of 88%. The scintigraphic response remains even more homogeneous with the pathologic pancreas, e.g. in chronic pancreatitis and cancer, where linear scintigraphy yields correct diagnoses in 84% and 92% of the cases, and the gamma-camera in 84% and 93% of the cases, respectively. In summary, scintigraphy offers an important identification of the normal, and a high percentage of correct diagnoses in the pathological realm; thus, it represents the most appropriate means for detection at the pancreatic level. The methodological choice based on clinical data first takes scintigraphic data and incorporates them with arteriography in the case of suspected carcinomas or with ductography when chronic pancreatitis is believed to exist. Arteriography has priority in the localization of adenomas, while ductography is relied upon in the diagnosis of pseudocysts.}
journal = []
volume = {56:suppl.1}
place = {France}
year = {1975}
month = {Jan}
}