You need JavaScript to view this

Technique for comparing automatic quadrature routines

Journal Article:

Abstract

The present unconstrained proliferation of automatic quadrature routines is a phenomenon which is wasteful in human time and computing resources. At the root of the problem is an absence of generally acceptable standards or benchmarks for comparing or evaluating such routines. In this paper a general technique, based on the nature of the performance profile, is described which can be used for evaluation of routines.
Publication Date:
Feb 01, 1976
Product Type:
Journal Article
Reference Number:
ERA-03-054216; EDB-78-112846
Resource Relation:
Journal Name: Comput. J.; (United Kingdom); Journal Volume: 20:2
Subject:
99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS//MATHEMATICS, COMPUTING, AND INFORMATION SCIENCE; QUADRATURES; ALGORITHMS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTER CALCULATIONS; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; 990200* - Mathematics & Computers
OSTI ID:
6728361
Research Organizations:
Argonne National Lab., IL
Country of Origin:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Other Identifying Numbers:
Journal ID: CODEN: CMPJA
Submitting Site:
ANL
Size:
Pages: 170-177
Announcement Date:

Journal Article:

Citation Formats

Lyness, J N, and Kaganove, J J. Technique for comparing automatic quadrature routines. United Kingdom: N. p., 1976. Web.
Lyness, J N, & Kaganove, J J. Technique for comparing automatic quadrature routines. United Kingdom.
Lyness, J N, and Kaganove, J J. 1976. "Technique for comparing automatic quadrature routines." United Kingdom.
@misc{etde_6728361,
title = {Technique for comparing automatic quadrature routines}
author = {Lyness, J N, and Kaganove, J J}
abstractNote = {The present unconstrained proliferation of automatic quadrature routines is a phenomenon which is wasteful in human time and computing resources. At the root of the problem is an absence of generally acceptable standards or benchmarks for comparing or evaluating such routines. In this paper a general technique, based on the nature of the performance profile, is described which can be used for evaluation of routines.}
journal = {Comput. J.; (United Kingdom)}
volume = {20:2}
journal type = {AC}
place = {United Kingdom}
year = {1976}
month = {Feb}
}