Abstract
We have carried out photometry of Nova Andromedae 1986 and find that it should be classified as a fast nova. We have also made polarimetry simultaneously at six wavelengths between 0.36-0.70 ..mu..m. The polarization increased between 2 and 22 days after the light maximum showing that dust formation was associated with the nova explosion.
Citation Formats
Kikuchi, Sen, Mikami, Yoshitaka, and Kondo, Masayuki.
Photometry and polarimetry of Nova Andromedae 1986.
Japan: N. p.,
1988.
Web.
Kikuchi, Sen, Mikami, Yoshitaka, & Kondo, Masayuki.
Photometry and polarimetry of Nova Andromedae 1986.
Japan.
Kikuchi, Sen, Mikami, Yoshitaka, and Kondo, Masayuki.
1988.
"Photometry and polarimetry of Nova Andromedae 1986."
Japan.
@misc{etde_6494816,
title = {Photometry and polarimetry of Nova Andromedae 1986}
author = {Kikuchi, Sen, Mikami, Yoshitaka, and Kondo, Masayuki}
abstractNote = {We have carried out photometry of Nova Andromedae 1986 and find that it should be classified as a fast nova. We have also made polarimetry simultaneously at six wavelengths between 0.36-0.70 ..mu..m. The polarization increased between 2 and 22 days after the light maximum showing that dust formation was associated with the nova explosion.}
journal = []
volume = {40:4}
journal type = {AC}
place = {Japan}
year = {1988}
month = {Jan}
}
title = {Photometry and polarimetry of Nova Andromedae 1986}
author = {Kikuchi, Sen, Mikami, Yoshitaka, and Kondo, Masayuki}
abstractNote = {We have carried out photometry of Nova Andromedae 1986 and find that it should be classified as a fast nova. We have also made polarimetry simultaneously at six wavelengths between 0.36-0.70 ..mu..m. The polarization increased between 2 and 22 days after the light maximum showing that dust formation was associated with the nova explosion.}
journal = []
volume = {40:4}
journal type = {AC}
place = {Japan}
year = {1988}
month = {Jan}
}