You need JavaScript to view this

Comparative performance of fluorescent iron-core ballasts and electronic ballasts. Rendement comparatif des ballasts a noyau de fer et des ballasts electroniques pour eclairage fluorescent

Technical Report:

Abstract

Commercially available one- and two-lamp fluorescent luminaires were tested, and a number of electrical parameters were measured using varying combinations of lamps and either iron-core or electronic ballasts. Comprehensive photometric tests and thermal measurements were also conducted. The test results were tabulated and compared. The performance of the iron-core ballasts was found to be sufficiently close to nominally rated values to not raise concerns. Results from testing the electronic ballasts showed that the user has to be careful when selecting these ballasts, as they far exceed standard specification limits for current and voltage crest factors. All other electrical, photometric and thermal parameters are within accepted levels. An economic analysis was undertaken to determine cost benefits and payback periods for using electronic ballasts, the use of which will result in higher efficiency and lower power consumption. A project life of 20 years was assumed, and analysis was run for a power cost of $0.04/kWh. A unit made by Fyrnetics showed the lowest total annual owning and operating costs and had a payback period of 12.1 years. 13 figs., 13 tabs.
Authors:
Publication Date:
Jan 01, 1987
Product Type:
Technical Report
Report Number:
PW-87-8; MICROLOG-89-01718
Reference Number:
CANM-89-001553; EDB-89-084363
Subject:
32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION; BALLASTS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FLUORESCENT LAMPS; PERFORMANCE TESTING; LIGHT BULBS; TESTING; 320106* - Energy Conservation, Consumption, & Utilization- Building Equipment- (1987-)
OSTI ID:
6229702
Research Organizations:
Public Works Canada, Ottawa, ON (Canada)
Country of Origin:
Canada
Language:
English and French
Availability:
Public Works Canada, Information Research and Library Services, Sir Charles Tupper Bldg., Confederation Heights, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1A 0M2; $N/C; MF CANMET/TID, Energy, Mines and Resources Canada, 555 Booth St., Ottawa, Ont., Canada K1A 0G1; $10 CAN.
Submitting Site:
CANM
Size:
Pages: 84
Announcement Date:

Technical Report:

Citation Formats

Pasini, I. Comparative performance of fluorescent iron-core ballasts and electronic ballasts. Rendement comparatif des ballasts a noyau de fer et des ballasts electroniques pour eclairage fluorescent. Canada: N. p., 1987. Web.
Pasini, I. Comparative performance of fluorescent iron-core ballasts and electronic ballasts. Rendement comparatif des ballasts a noyau de fer et des ballasts electroniques pour eclairage fluorescent. Canada.
Pasini, I. 1987. "Comparative performance of fluorescent iron-core ballasts and electronic ballasts. Rendement comparatif des ballasts a noyau de fer et des ballasts electroniques pour eclairage fluorescent." Canada.
@misc{etde_6229702,
title = {Comparative performance of fluorescent iron-core ballasts and electronic ballasts. Rendement comparatif des ballasts a noyau de fer et des ballasts electroniques pour eclairage fluorescent}
author = {Pasini, I}
abstractNote = {Commercially available one- and two-lamp fluorescent luminaires were tested, and a number of electrical parameters were measured using varying combinations of lamps and either iron-core or electronic ballasts. Comprehensive photometric tests and thermal measurements were also conducted. The test results were tabulated and compared. The performance of the iron-core ballasts was found to be sufficiently close to nominally rated values to not raise concerns. Results from testing the electronic ballasts showed that the user has to be careful when selecting these ballasts, as they far exceed standard specification limits for current and voltage crest factors. All other electrical, photometric and thermal parameters are within accepted levels. An economic analysis was undertaken to determine cost benefits and payback periods for using electronic ballasts, the use of which will result in higher efficiency and lower power consumption. A project life of 20 years was assumed, and analysis was run for a power cost of $0.04/kWh. A unit made by Fyrnetics showed the lowest total annual owning and operating costs and had a payback period of 12.1 years. 13 figs., 13 tabs.}
place = {Canada}
year = {1987}
month = {Jan}
}