You need JavaScript to view this

Plutonium economy. Plutonium-Wirtschaft

Abstract

The author expresses his opinion on the situation, describes the energy-economic setting, indicates the alternatives: fuel reprocessing or immediate long-term storage, and investigates the prospects for economic utilization of the breeder reactors. All the facts suggest that the breeder reactor will never be able to stand economic competition with light-water reactors. However, there is no way to prove the future. It is naive to think that every doubt could and must be removed before stopping the development of breeder reactors - and thus also the reprocessing of the fuel of light-water reactors. On the basis of the current state of knowledge an unbiased cost-benefit-analysis can only lead to the recommendation to stop construction immediately. But can 'experts', who for years or even decades have called for and supported the development of breeder reactors be expected to make an unbiased analysis. Klaus Traube strikes the balance of the state Germany's nuclear economy is in: although there is no chance of definitively abandoning that energy-political cul-de-sac, no new adventures must be embarked upon. Responsible handling of currently used nuclear technology means to give up breeder technology and waive plutonium economy. It is no supreme technology with the aid of which structural unemployment  More>>
Authors:
Publication Date:
Jan 01, 1984
Product Type:
Book
Reference Number:
FRG-84-06988; EDB-85-123288
Subject:
29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; 11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS; 21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS; PLUTONIUM; ECONOMICS; BREEDER REACTORS; COMMERCIALIZATION; COST; FINANCING; FUEL CYCLE; FUEL REPROCESSING PLANTS; NUCLEAR ENERGY; PLUTONIUM RECYCLE; PUBLIC RELATIONS; RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL; SNR REACTOR; SPENT FUEL STORAGE; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; TECHNOLOGY UTILIZATION; WATER COOLED REACTORS; ACTINIDES; ELEMENTS; ENERGY; EPITHERMAL REACTORS; FAST REACTORS; FBR TYPE REACTORS; LIQUID METAL COOLED REACTORS; LMFBR TYPE REACTORS; MANAGEMENT; METALS; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; POWER REACTORS; REACTORS; SODIUM COOLED REACTORS; STORAGE; TRANSURANIUM ELEMENTS; WASTE DISPOSAL; WASTE MANAGEMENT; 290600* - Energy Planning & Policy- Nuclear Energy; 050800 - Nuclear Fuels- Spent Fuels Reprocessing; 210800 - Nuclear Power Plants- Economics; 210500 - Power Reactors, Breeding
OSTI ID:
5579203
Country of Origin:
Germany
Language:
German
Submitting Site:
DE
Size:
Pages: 121
Announcement Date:
May 13, 2001

Citation Formats

Traube, K. Plutonium economy. Plutonium-Wirtschaft. Germany: N. p., 1984. Web.
Traube, K. Plutonium economy. Plutonium-Wirtschaft. Germany.
Traube, K. 1984. "Plutonium economy. Plutonium-Wirtschaft." Germany.
@misc{etde_5579203,
title = {Plutonium economy. Plutonium-Wirtschaft}
author = {Traube, K}
abstractNote = {The author expresses his opinion on the situation, describes the energy-economic setting, indicates the alternatives: fuel reprocessing or immediate long-term storage, and investigates the prospects for economic utilization of the breeder reactors. All the facts suggest that the breeder reactor will never be able to stand economic competition with light-water reactors. However, there is no way to prove the future. It is naive to think that every doubt could and must be removed before stopping the development of breeder reactors - and thus also the reprocessing of the fuel of light-water reactors. On the basis of the current state of knowledge an unbiased cost-benefit-analysis can only lead to the recommendation to stop construction immediately. But can 'experts', who for years or even decades have called for and supported the development of breeder reactors be expected to make an unbiased analysis. Klaus Traube strikes the balance of the state Germany's nuclear economy is in: although there is no chance of definitively abandoning that energy-political cul-de-sac, no new adventures must be embarked upon. Responsible handling of currently used nuclear technology means to give up breeder technology and waive plutonium economy. It is no supreme technology with the aid of which structural unemployment or any other economic problem could be solved.}
place = {Germany}
year = {1984}
month = {Jan}
}