Abstract
Sixteen low-grade gliomas were evaluated both with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging and with computed tomography (CT). In 13 cases (81%), the NMR images were much better in tissue contrast than the contrast-enhanced CT images. The tumors were shown as well-circumscribed oval lesions in the NMR, though they appeared as ill-defined, irregular, low-attenuation areas in the CT. The extent of the lesion, which was supposed to represent the active tumor tissue, was greater in the NMR than in the CT, because NMR tissue parameters (T/sub 1/, T/sub 2/) are more sensitive to pathological changes in brain tissue than is the X-ray attenuation coefficient. Though, in an optic glioma and a brain-stem astrocytoma, the CT with contrast enhancement displayed the contour of the mass as well as did NMR, it was inferior to the NMR in showing the cephalocaudal extension of the tumors. Calcification does not give a proton NMR signal under the present measuring conditions; thus the calcified cystic wall of a hypothalamic astrocytoma was displayed only in the CT images. In conclusion, the NMR imaging was apparently superior to contrast-enhanced CT in demonstrating the lesions due to low-grade glioma.
Citation Formats
Asato, Reinin, Tokuriki, Yasuhiko, Nakano, Yoshihisa, Itoh, Harumi, Torizuka, Kanji, Ueda, Tohru, Yamashita, Junkoh, and Handa, Hajime.
NMR characteristics of low-grade glioma. Comparison with CT.
Japan: N. p.,
1985.
Web.
Asato, Reinin, Tokuriki, Yasuhiko, Nakano, Yoshihisa, Itoh, Harumi, Torizuka, Kanji, Ueda, Tohru, Yamashita, Junkoh, & Handa, Hajime.
NMR characteristics of low-grade glioma. Comparison with CT.
Japan.
Asato, Reinin, Tokuriki, Yasuhiko, Nakano, Yoshihisa, Itoh, Harumi, Torizuka, Kanji, Ueda, Tohru, Yamashita, Junkoh, and Handa, Hajime.
1985.
"NMR characteristics of low-grade glioma. Comparison with CT."
Japan.
@misc{etde_5383962,
title = {NMR characteristics of low-grade glioma. Comparison with CT}
author = {Asato, Reinin, Tokuriki, Yasuhiko, Nakano, Yoshihisa, Itoh, Harumi, Torizuka, Kanji, Ueda, Tohru, Yamashita, Junkoh, and Handa, Hajime}
abstractNote = {Sixteen low-grade gliomas were evaluated both with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging and with computed tomography (CT). In 13 cases (81%), the NMR images were much better in tissue contrast than the contrast-enhanced CT images. The tumors were shown as well-circumscribed oval lesions in the NMR, though they appeared as ill-defined, irregular, low-attenuation areas in the CT. The extent of the lesion, which was supposed to represent the active tumor tissue, was greater in the NMR than in the CT, because NMR tissue parameters (T/sub 1/, T/sub 2/) are more sensitive to pathological changes in brain tissue than is the X-ray attenuation coefficient. Though, in an optic glioma and a brain-stem astrocytoma, the CT with contrast enhancement displayed the contour of the mass as well as did NMR, it was inferior to the NMR in showing the cephalocaudal extension of the tumors. Calcification does not give a proton NMR signal under the present measuring conditions; thus the calcified cystic wall of a hypothalamic astrocytoma was displayed only in the CT images. In conclusion, the NMR imaging was apparently superior to contrast-enhanced CT in demonstrating the lesions due to low-grade glioma.}
journal = []
volume = {7:4}
journal type = {AC}
place = {Japan}
year = {1985}
month = {Aug}
}
title = {NMR characteristics of low-grade glioma. Comparison with CT}
author = {Asato, Reinin, Tokuriki, Yasuhiko, Nakano, Yoshihisa, Itoh, Harumi, Torizuka, Kanji, Ueda, Tohru, Yamashita, Junkoh, and Handa, Hajime}
abstractNote = {Sixteen low-grade gliomas were evaluated both with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging and with computed tomography (CT). In 13 cases (81%), the NMR images were much better in tissue contrast than the contrast-enhanced CT images. The tumors were shown as well-circumscribed oval lesions in the NMR, though they appeared as ill-defined, irregular, low-attenuation areas in the CT. The extent of the lesion, which was supposed to represent the active tumor tissue, was greater in the NMR than in the CT, because NMR tissue parameters (T/sub 1/, T/sub 2/) are more sensitive to pathological changes in brain tissue than is the X-ray attenuation coefficient. Though, in an optic glioma and a brain-stem astrocytoma, the CT with contrast enhancement displayed the contour of the mass as well as did NMR, it was inferior to the NMR in showing the cephalocaudal extension of the tumors. Calcification does not give a proton NMR signal under the present measuring conditions; thus the calcified cystic wall of a hypothalamic astrocytoma was displayed only in the CT images. In conclusion, the NMR imaging was apparently superior to contrast-enhanced CT in demonstrating the lesions due to low-grade glioma.}
journal = []
volume = {7:4}
journal type = {AC}
place = {Japan}
year = {1985}
month = {Aug}
}