You need JavaScript to view this

Result of comparative experiment on environmental comfort in room using hot heat environment testing unit. Onnetsu kankyo shiken unit ni yoru shitsunai kankyo no kaitekisa no hikaku jikken kekka ni tsuite

Abstract

Measurements were carried out on three buildings having different heat insulation, airtightness and heat capacity for testing the hot heast enviroments (having a room size of about 4.6 m{times}3.7m{times}2.3 m) as to the temperature differences between the upper and lower parts of the room and the MRT (mean radiation temperature, representing the temperature of radiation from the wall face). These are compared according to types of heating appliance. The result is summarize as follows: The temperature difference in the upper and lower parts is affected largely by the airtightness of the building, the difference being capable of getting reduced by rasing the airtightness even in a buildings low in heat insulation. In a building with low airtightness, type of heating appliance and its installation location affect the temperature difference. The MRT is determined determined nearly completely by the heat insulation of the wall face in a room, but it tends to be affected easily by the specification and area of windows. A floor heating system increases the MRT and generates very little difference in temperatures in the upper and lower parts of the room. A comparison using a PMV (one of the indexes for enviromental comfort in a room) was  More>>
Authors:
Fujiwara, T; Kawashima, K [1] 
  1. The Hokkaido Electric Power Co. Inc., Sapporo (Japan)
Publication Date:
Nov 20, 1991
Product Type:
Journal Article
Reference Number:
NEDO-92-920138; EDB-92-108124
Resource Relation:
Journal Name: Soken Nenpo; (Japan); Journal Volume: 23
Subject:
32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE; THERMAL RADIATION; TEST FACILITIES; AIRTIGHTNESS; ENTHALPY; FLOORS; SPACE HEATING; TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION; THERMAL INSULATION; WINDOWS; THERMAL COMFORT; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION; EVALUATION; HEATING; OPENINGS; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; RADIATIONS; THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES; 320106* - Energy Conservation, Consumption, & Utilization- Building Equipment- (1987-); 320107 - Energy Conservation, Consumption, & Utilization- Building Systems- (1987-)
OSTI ID:
5291514
Country of Origin:
Japan
Language:
Japanese
Other Identifying Numbers:
Journal ID: ISSN 0915-2938; CODEN: XY744
Submitting Site:
NEDO
Size:
Pages: 47-56
Announcement Date:
Aug 01, 1992

Citation Formats

Fujiwara, T, and Kawashima, K. Result of comparative experiment on environmental comfort in room using hot heat environment testing unit. Onnetsu kankyo shiken unit ni yoru shitsunai kankyo no kaitekisa no hikaku jikken kekka ni tsuite. Japan: N. p., 1991. Web.
Fujiwara, T, & Kawashima, K. Result of comparative experiment on environmental comfort in room using hot heat environment testing unit. Onnetsu kankyo shiken unit ni yoru shitsunai kankyo no kaitekisa no hikaku jikken kekka ni tsuite. Japan.
Fujiwara, T, and Kawashima, K. 1991. "Result of comparative experiment on environmental comfort in room using hot heat environment testing unit. Onnetsu kankyo shiken unit ni yoru shitsunai kankyo no kaitekisa no hikaku jikken kekka ni tsuite." Japan.
@misc{etde_5291514,
title = {Result of comparative experiment on environmental comfort in room using hot heat environment testing unit. Onnetsu kankyo shiken unit ni yoru shitsunai kankyo no kaitekisa no hikaku jikken kekka ni tsuite}
author = {Fujiwara, T, and Kawashima, K}
abstractNote = {Measurements were carried out on three buildings having different heat insulation, airtightness and heat capacity for testing the hot heast enviroments (having a room size of about 4.6 m{times}3.7m{times}2.3 m) as to the temperature differences between the upper and lower parts of the room and the MRT (mean radiation temperature, representing the temperature of radiation from the wall face). These are compared according to types of heating appliance. The result is summarize as follows: The temperature difference in the upper and lower parts is affected largely by the airtightness of the building, the difference being capable of getting reduced by rasing the airtightness even in a buildings low in heat insulation. In a building with low airtightness, type of heating appliance and its installation location affect the temperature difference. The MRT is determined determined nearly completely by the heat insulation of the wall face in a room, but it tends to be affected easily by the specification and area of windows. A floor heating system increases the MRT and generates very little difference in temperatures in the upper and lower parts of the room. A comparison using a PMV (one of the indexes for enviromental comfort in a room) was also conducted. 12 figs., 7tabs.}
journal = []
volume = {23}
journal type = {AC}
place = {Japan}
year = {1991}
month = {Nov}
}