You need JavaScript to view this

PSA methodology

Abstract

The purpose of this text is first to ask a certain number of questions on the methods related to PSAs. Notably we will explore the positioning of the French methodological approach - as applied in the EPS 1300{sup 1} and EPS 900{sup 2} PSAs - compared to other approaches (Part One). This reflection leads to more general reflection: what contents, for what PSA? This is why, in Part Two, we will try to offer a framework for definition of the criteria a PSA should satisfy to meet the clearly identified needs. Finally, Part Three will quickly summarize the questions approached in the first two parts, as an introduction to the debate. 15 refs.
Authors:
Publication Date:
Dec 31, 1996
Product Type:
Conference
Report Number:
IAEA-PC-3580; CONF-9411344-
Reference Number:
SCA: 210000; PA: AIX-28:059550; EDB-97:116368; SN: 97001844509
Resource Relation:
Conference: International meeting on probabilistic safety analysis and human reliability analysis, Paris (France), 21-23 Nov 1994; Other Information: PBD: 1996; Related Information: Is Part Of Probabilistic safety analysis and human reliability analysis. Proceedings. Working material; PB: 346 p.
Subject:
21 NUCLEAR POWER REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; SAFETY; PROBABILISTIC ESTIMATION; FAILURES; FRANCE; RELIABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT
OSTI ID:
519655
Research Organizations:
International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (Austria)
Country of Origin:
IAEA
Language:
English
Other Identifying Numbers:
Other: ON: DE97640106; TRN: XA9744338059550
Availability:
INIS; OSTI as DE97640106
Submitting Site:
INIS
Size:
pp. 51-82
Announcement Date:

Citation Formats

Magne, L. PSA methodology. IAEA: N. p., 1996. Web.
Magne, L. PSA methodology. IAEA.
Magne, L. 1996. "PSA methodology." IAEA.
@misc{etde_519655,
title = {PSA methodology}
author = {Magne, L}
abstractNote = {The purpose of this text is first to ask a certain number of questions on the methods related to PSAs. Notably we will explore the positioning of the French methodological approach - as applied in the EPS 1300{sup 1} and EPS 900{sup 2} PSAs - compared to other approaches (Part One). This reflection leads to more general reflection: what contents, for what PSA? This is why, in Part Two, we will try to offer a framework for definition of the criteria a PSA should satisfy to meet the clearly identified needs. Finally, Part Three will quickly summarize the questions approached in the first two parts, as an introduction to the debate. 15 refs.}
place = {IAEA}
year = {1996}
month = {Dec}
}