Abstract
An analysis is presented of the attenuation-scatter functions radial dose functions employed in brachytherapy dosimetry which accounts for the interplay between attenuation and scattering along the radial distance from the source. Some of the characteristics of these functions are still not established with certainty and are subject of misinterpretation. Such issues like whether they should be normalized or not, particularly in relation to the currently employed source strength specification in terms of air kerma, are not as yet agreed. In the literature, the functions are presented either as normalized or non-normalized but the differences between them are wrongly interpreted as being due to either computational or experimental uncertainties. Furthermore, there is uncertainty about the attenuation-scatter ratio very close to the brachytherapy sources and, in the case of some functions, at larger radial distances. Although the function`s value at close distance may seem of lesser dosimetric relevance, it is important if one wants the underlying physics to be correct. These problems were studied in this analysis on the basis of the available data. An experiment was also carried out in order to determine the scatter component in the close vicinity to the source. The study is based on the data for
More>>
Klevenhagen, S C
[1]
- The Royal London Hospital, London (United Kingdom). Dept. of Medical Physics
Citation Formats
Klevenhagen, S C.
An analysis of some aspects of the attenuation - Scatter functions in brachytherapy dosimetry.
IAEA: N. p.,
1996.
Web.
Klevenhagen, S C.
An analysis of some aspects of the attenuation - Scatter functions in brachytherapy dosimetry.
IAEA.
Klevenhagen, S C.
1996.
"An analysis of some aspects of the attenuation - Scatter functions in brachytherapy dosimetry."
IAEA.
@misc{etde_432293,
title = {An analysis of some aspects of the attenuation - Scatter functions in brachytherapy dosimetry}
author = {Klevenhagen, S C}
abstractNote = {An analysis is presented of the attenuation-scatter functions radial dose functions employed in brachytherapy dosimetry which accounts for the interplay between attenuation and scattering along the radial distance from the source. Some of the characteristics of these functions are still not established with certainty and are subject of misinterpretation. Such issues like whether they should be normalized or not, particularly in relation to the currently employed source strength specification in terms of air kerma, are not as yet agreed. In the literature, the functions are presented either as normalized or non-normalized but the differences between them are wrongly interpreted as being due to either computational or experimental uncertainties. Furthermore, there is uncertainty about the attenuation-scatter ratio very close to the brachytherapy sources and, in the case of some functions, at larger radial distances. Although the function`s value at close distance may seem of lesser dosimetric relevance, it is important if one wants the underlying physics to be correct. These problems were studied in this analysis on the basis of the available data. An experiment was also carried out in order to determine the scatter component in the close vicinity to the source. The study is based on the data for Iridium-192 but the discussion and conclusions are relevant to all types of brachytherapy sources. It is concluded in this analysis that: i) it is incorrect to be comparing the normalised with non-normalised functions; ii) only non-normalised (the natural) functions such as that derived by Mesiberger et al (1968) or Sakelliou et al (1992) are corrected for dose calculation systems based on the recommended air kerma source specification; iii) the function should not have a value of unity at r = 0 because of the scatter domination over attenuation in the space around the source and; iv) the Van Kleffens-Star function is in error at larger radial distances. 22 refs, 7 figs.}
place = {IAEA}
year = {1996}
month = {Aug}
}
title = {An analysis of some aspects of the attenuation - Scatter functions in brachytherapy dosimetry}
author = {Klevenhagen, S C}
abstractNote = {An analysis is presented of the attenuation-scatter functions radial dose functions employed in brachytherapy dosimetry which accounts for the interplay between attenuation and scattering along the radial distance from the source. Some of the characteristics of these functions are still not established with certainty and are subject of misinterpretation. Such issues like whether they should be normalized or not, particularly in relation to the currently employed source strength specification in terms of air kerma, are not as yet agreed. In the literature, the functions are presented either as normalized or non-normalized but the differences between them are wrongly interpreted as being due to either computational or experimental uncertainties. Furthermore, there is uncertainty about the attenuation-scatter ratio very close to the brachytherapy sources and, in the case of some functions, at larger radial distances. Although the function`s value at close distance may seem of lesser dosimetric relevance, it is important if one wants the underlying physics to be correct. These problems were studied in this analysis on the basis of the available data. An experiment was also carried out in order to determine the scatter component in the close vicinity to the source. The study is based on the data for Iridium-192 but the discussion and conclusions are relevant to all types of brachytherapy sources. It is concluded in this analysis that: i) it is incorrect to be comparing the normalised with non-normalised functions; ii) only non-normalised (the natural) functions such as that derived by Mesiberger et al (1968) or Sakelliou et al (1992) are corrected for dose calculation systems based on the recommended air kerma source specification; iii) the function should not have a value of unity at r = 0 because of the scatter domination over attenuation in the space around the source and; iv) the Van Kleffens-Star function is in error at larger radial distances. 22 refs, 7 figs.}
place = {IAEA}
year = {1996}
month = {Aug}
}