You need JavaScript to view this

An examination of the proposals for the off-site electrical power sources at the Sizewell B PWR

Abstract

Over the past few years there has been an increase in the attention being given to the adequacy and reliability of alternative sources of power provided to supply safety equipment should off-site electrical sources fail. This paper discusses the rationale of HM Nuclear Installations Inspectorates assessment of the electrical systems proposed for the UK's first Pressurized water Reactor, Sizewell 3. The requirements for on-site sources are given, and a discussion is provided of the NII's Assessment Principles including common mode failure, single failure criterion and reliability targets. Where the assessment has resulted in notifications to the original design the reasons are given. The UK's large interconnected Grid System makes complete losses of off-site power comparatively rare. The potential exists however and this paper shows how the current approach ensures that not only are adequate on-site sources available but also that their siting, maintenance and testing are such that loss of off-site power will not cause an unacceptable risk to the public. (author)
Authors:
Woodhouse, P. A. [1] 
  1. HM Nuclear Installations Inspectorate, London (United Kingdom)
Publication Date:
Feb 15, 1986
Product Type:
Conference
Report Number:
NEA-CSNI-R-1986-115
Resource Relation:
Conference: CSNI specialist meeting on operating experience relating to on-site electric power sources, London (United Kingdom), 16-18 Oct 1985; Other Information: 1 ref.; Related Information: In: Operating experience relating to on-site electric power sources. Proceedings of a Specialist Meeting| 399 p.
Subject:
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS; 42 ENGINEERING; AC SYSTEMS; DC SYSTEMS; ELECTRIC GENERATORS; ON-SITE POWER GENERATION; OUTAGES; PROBABILISTIC ESTIMATION; QUALITY ASSURANCE; REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEMS; RELIABILITY; SIZEWELL-B REACTOR; SPECIFICATIONS
OSTI ID:
22505974
Research Organizations:
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency - OECD/NEA, Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations - CSNI, 46 quai Alphonse Le Gallo, 92100 Boulogne Billancourt (France)
Country of Origin:
NEA
Language:
English
Other Identifying Numbers:
TRN: XN1600287076531
Availability:
Available from INIS in electronic form
Submitting Site:
INIS
Size:
page(s) 340-349
Announcement Date:
Aug 10, 2016

Citation Formats

Woodhouse, P. A. An examination of the proposals for the off-site electrical power sources at the Sizewell B PWR. NEA: N. p., 1986. Web.
Woodhouse, P. A. An examination of the proposals for the off-site electrical power sources at the Sizewell B PWR. NEA.
Woodhouse, P. A. 1986. "An examination of the proposals for the off-site electrical power sources at the Sizewell B PWR." NEA.
@misc{etde_22505974,
title = {An examination of the proposals for the off-site electrical power sources at the Sizewell B PWR}
author = {Woodhouse, P. A.}
abstractNote = {Over the past few years there has been an increase in the attention being given to the adequacy and reliability of alternative sources of power provided to supply safety equipment should off-site electrical sources fail. This paper discusses the rationale of HM Nuclear Installations Inspectorates assessment of the electrical systems proposed for the UK's first Pressurized water Reactor, Sizewell 3. The requirements for on-site sources are given, and a discussion is provided of the NII's Assessment Principles including common mode failure, single failure criterion and reliability targets. Where the assessment has resulted in notifications to the original design the reasons are given. The UK's large interconnected Grid System makes complete losses of off-site power comparatively rare. The potential exists however and this paper shows how the current approach ensures that not only are adequate on-site sources available but also that their siting, maintenance and testing are such that loss of off-site power will not cause an unacceptable risk to the public. (author)}
place = {NEA}
year = {1986}
month = {Feb}
}