Abstract
We hypothesized that the photosynthetic performance of mangrove stands restored by the single planting of mangroves species would be lowered due to residual stressors. The photosynthetic parameters of the vegetation of three planted mangrove stands, each with a different disturbance history, were compared to reference sites and correlated with edaphic environmental variables. A permutational analysis of variance showed significant interaction when the factors were compared, indicating that the photosynthetic parameters of the restoration areas differed from the reference sites. A univariate analysis of variance showed that all the photosynthetic parameters differed between sites and treatments, except for photosynthetic efficiency (α{sub ETR}). The combination of environmental variables that best explained the variations observed in the photosynthetic performance indicators were Cu, Pb and elevation disruptions. Fluorescence techniques proved efficient in revealing important physiological differences, representing a powerful tool for rapid analysis of the effectiveness of initiatives aimed at restoring coastal environments. -- Highlights: •Photosynthetic efficiency of natural and restored mangroves are compared. •Natural stands present higher photosynthetic performance. •Photosynthetic performance of mangroves is reduced due to Cu and Pb contamination. •Chlorophyll a fluorescence is a useful indicator to assess short-term restoration. -- Photosynthetic performance of mangroves is reduced due to Cu and
More>>
Rovai, André Scarlate, E-mail: rovaias@hotmail.com;
[1]
Barufi, José Bonomi, E-mail: jose.bonomi@gmail.com;
[2]
Pagliosa, Paulo Roberto, E-mail: paulo.pagliosa@ufsc.br;
[3]
Scherner, Fernando;
[4]
Torres, Moacir Aluísio, E-mail: moatorres@cav.udesc.br;
[5]
Horta, Paulo Antunes, E-mail: pahorta@ccb.ufsc.br;
[2]
others, and
- Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Ecologia e Zoologia, Campus Universitário, Trindade, 88040-900 Florianópolis, SC (Brazil)
- Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Botânica, Campus Universitário, Trindade, 88040-900 Florianópolis, SC (Brazil)
- Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Geociências, Campus Universitário, Trindade, 88040-900 Florianópolis, SC (Brazil)
- Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Laboratório de Ficologia, Campus Universitário, Dois Irmãos, 52171-900 Recife, PE (Brazil)
- Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Engenharia Ambiental, Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Av Luiz de Camões 2090, Conta Dinheiro, 88520-000 Lages, SC (Brazil)
Citation Formats
Rovai, André Scarlate, E-mail: rovaias@hotmail.com, Barufi, José Bonomi, E-mail: jose.bonomi@gmail.com, Pagliosa, Paulo Roberto, E-mail: paulo.pagliosa@ufsc.br, Scherner, Fernando, Torres, Moacir Aluísio, E-mail: moatorres@cav.udesc.br, Horta, Paulo Antunes, E-mail: pahorta@ccb.ufsc.br, and others, and.
Photosynthetic performance of restored and natural mangroves under different environmental constraints.
United Kingdom: N. p.,
2013.
Web.
doi:10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2013.06.023.
Rovai, André Scarlate, E-mail: rovaias@hotmail.com, Barufi, José Bonomi, E-mail: jose.bonomi@gmail.com, Pagliosa, Paulo Roberto, E-mail: paulo.pagliosa@ufsc.br, Scherner, Fernando, Torres, Moacir Aluísio, E-mail: moatorres@cav.udesc.br, Horta, Paulo Antunes, E-mail: pahorta@ccb.ufsc.br, & others, and.
Photosynthetic performance of restored and natural mangroves under different environmental constraints.
United Kingdom.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2013.06.023
Rovai, André Scarlate, E-mail: rovaias@hotmail.com, Barufi, José Bonomi, E-mail: jose.bonomi@gmail.com, Pagliosa, Paulo Roberto, E-mail: paulo.pagliosa@ufsc.br, Scherner, Fernando, Torres, Moacir Aluísio, E-mail: moatorres@cav.udesc.br, Horta, Paulo Antunes, E-mail: pahorta@ccb.ufsc.br, and others, and.
2013.
"Photosynthetic performance of restored and natural mangroves under different environmental constraints."
United Kingdom.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2013.06.023.
@misc{etde_22242913,
title = {Photosynthetic performance of restored and natural mangroves under different environmental constraints}
author = {Rovai, André Scarlate, E-mail: rovaias@hotmail.com, Barufi, José Bonomi, E-mail: jose.bonomi@gmail.com, Pagliosa, Paulo Roberto, E-mail: paulo.pagliosa@ufsc.br, Scherner, Fernando, Torres, Moacir Aluísio, E-mail: moatorres@cav.udesc.br, Horta, Paulo Antunes, E-mail: pahorta@ccb.ufsc.br, and others, and}
abstractNote = {We hypothesized that the photosynthetic performance of mangrove stands restored by the single planting of mangroves species would be lowered due to residual stressors. The photosynthetic parameters of the vegetation of three planted mangrove stands, each with a different disturbance history, were compared to reference sites and correlated with edaphic environmental variables. A permutational analysis of variance showed significant interaction when the factors were compared, indicating that the photosynthetic parameters of the restoration areas differed from the reference sites. A univariate analysis of variance showed that all the photosynthetic parameters differed between sites and treatments, except for photosynthetic efficiency (α{sub ETR}). The combination of environmental variables that best explained the variations observed in the photosynthetic performance indicators were Cu, Pb and elevation disruptions. Fluorescence techniques proved efficient in revealing important physiological differences, representing a powerful tool for rapid analysis of the effectiveness of initiatives aimed at restoring coastal environments. -- Highlights: •Photosynthetic efficiency of natural and restored mangroves are compared. •Natural stands present higher photosynthetic performance. •Photosynthetic performance of mangroves is reduced due to Cu and Pb contamination. •Chlorophyll a fluorescence is a useful indicator to assess short-term restoration. -- Photosynthetic performance of mangroves is reduced due to Cu and Pb contamination.}
doi = {10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2013.06.023}
journal = []
volume = {181}
journal type = {AC}
place = {United Kingdom}
year = {2013}
month = {Oct}
}
title = {Photosynthetic performance of restored and natural mangroves under different environmental constraints}
author = {Rovai, André Scarlate, E-mail: rovaias@hotmail.com, Barufi, José Bonomi, E-mail: jose.bonomi@gmail.com, Pagliosa, Paulo Roberto, E-mail: paulo.pagliosa@ufsc.br, Scherner, Fernando, Torres, Moacir Aluísio, E-mail: moatorres@cav.udesc.br, Horta, Paulo Antunes, E-mail: pahorta@ccb.ufsc.br, and others, and}
abstractNote = {We hypothesized that the photosynthetic performance of mangrove stands restored by the single planting of mangroves species would be lowered due to residual stressors. The photosynthetic parameters of the vegetation of three planted mangrove stands, each with a different disturbance history, were compared to reference sites and correlated with edaphic environmental variables. A permutational analysis of variance showed significant interaction when the factors were compared, indicating that the photosynthetic parameters of the restoration areas differed from the reference sites. A univariate analysis of variance showed that all the photosynthetic parameters differed between sites and treatments, except for photosynthetic efficiency (α{sub ETR}). The combination of environmental variables that best explained the variations observed in the photosynthetic performance indicators were Cu, Pb and elevation disruptions. Fluorescence techniques proved efficient in revealing important physiological differences, representing a powerful tool for rapid analysis of the effectiveness of initiatives aimed at restoring coastal environments. -- Highlights: •Photosynthetic efficiency of natural and restored mangroves are compared. •Natural stands present higher photosynthetic performance. •Photosynthetic performance of mangroves is reduced due to Cu and Pb contamination. •Chlorophyll a fluorescence is a useful indicator to assess short-term restoration. -- Photosynthetic performance of mangroves is reduced due to Cu and Pb contamination.}
doi = {10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2013.06.023}
journal = []
volume = {181}
journal type = {AC}
place = {United Kingdom}
year = {2013}
month = {Oct}
}