You need JavaScript to view this

Energy consumption, pollutant emissions and economic growth in South Africa

Abstract

This paper examines the long-run and the causal relationship between economic growth, pollutant emissions and energy consumption for South Africa for the period 1965-2006 in a multivariate framework which includes labour and capital as additional variables. Using the bound test approach to cointegration, we found a short-run as well as a long-run relationship among the variables with a positive and a statistically significant relationship between pollutant emissions and economic growth. Further, applying a modified version of the Granger causality test we also found a unidirectional causality running from pollutant emissions to economic growth; from energy consumption to economic growth and from energy consumption to CO{sub 2} emissions all without a feedback. The econometric evidence suggests that South Africa has to sacrifice economic growth or reduce its energy consumption per unit of output or both in order to reduce pollutant emissions. In the long-run however, it is possible to meet the energy needs of the country and at the same time reduce CO{sub 2} emissions by developing energy alternatives to coal, the main source of CO{sub 2} emissions. However, the econometric results upon which the policy suggestions are made should be interpreted with care, as they may not be sufficiently robust  More>>
Authors:
Menyah, Kojo; [1]  Wolde-Rufael, Yemane [2] 
  1. London Metropolitan Business School, London Metropolitan University (United Kingdom)
  2. Independent Researcher (United Kingdom)
Publication Date:
Nov 15, 2010
Product Type:
Journal Article
Resource Relation:
Journal Name: Energy Economics; Journal Volume: 32; Journal Issue: 6; Other Information: Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
Subject:
29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; CARBON DIOXIDE; SOUTH AFRICA; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; EMISSION; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; POLLUTANTS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS
OSTI ID:
21381603
Country of Origin:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Other Identifying Numbers:
Journal ID: ISSN 0140-9883; EECODR; TRN: GB10V5032
Availability:
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.08.002
Submitting Site:
GB
Size:
page(s) 1374-1382
Announcement Date:
Dec 30, 2010

Citation Formats

Menyah, Kojo, and Wolde-Rufael, Yemane. Energy consumption, pollutant emissions and economic growth in South Africa. United Kingdom: N. p., 2010. Web. doi:10.1016/J.ENECO.2010.08.002.
Menyah, Kojo, & Wolde-Rufael, Yemane. Energy consumption, pollutant emissions and economic growth in South Africa. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2010.08.002
Menyah, Kojo, and Wolde-Rufael, Yemane. 2010. "Energy consumption, pollutant emissions and economic growth in South Africa." United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2010.08.002.
@misc{etde_21381603,
title = {Energy consumption, pollutant emissions and economic growth in South Africa}
author = {Menyah, Kojo, and Wolde-Rufael, Yemane}
abstractNote = {This paper examines the long-run and the causal relationship between economic growth, pollutant emissions and energy consumption for South Africa for the period 1965-2006 in a multivariate framework which includes labour and capital as additional variables. Using the bound test approach to cointegration, we found a short-run as well as a long-run relationship among the variables with a positive and a statistically significant relationship between pollutant emissions and economic growth. Further, applying a modified version of the Granger causality test we also found a unidirectional causality running from pollutant emissions to economic growth; from energy consumption to economic growth and from energy consumption to CO{sub 2} emissions all without a feedback. The econometric evidence suggests that South Africa has to sacrifice economic growth or reduce its energy consumption per unit of output or both in order to reduce pollutant emissions. In the long-run however, it is possible to meet the energy needs of the country and at the same time reduce CO{sub 2} emissions by developing energy alternatives to coal, the main source of CO{sub 2} emissions. However, the econometric results upon which the policy suggestions are made should be interpreted with care, as they may not be sufficiently robust enough to categorically warrant the choice of an unpalatable policy option by South Africa. (author)}
doi = {10.1016/J.ENECO.2010.08.002}
journal = []
issue = {6}
volume = {32}
place = {United Kingdom}
year = {2010}
month = {Nov}
}