Abstract
The negotiation starts from the postulate that environmental conflicts are a standing datum in the future of our societies. Environmental instance is based in deep and not reversible manner inside the attitude and value changes and, consequently, inside the quality of life. The different hopes about the environmental consequences constitute an internal element of democratic development and it is not thinkable to ignore or neglect these diversities. With regard to this last point the inadequacy of the present legal systems must be underlined. They are constructed to settle a controversy about 'the facts' and not about 'the values'. Often some environmental disputes may last quite a few years without facing the real essence of the question. The environmental negotiation intends as a 'consensual approach' that should give more possibilities for the conflict solution. It is based on the presupposition to create the terms for final result. In comparison with the legislative acts, the direct negotiation table permits a best exploration of options and a best mobilization of technical competencies. At last, because the negotiators should live together on the basis of obtained agreement, they will have more sensibility for the problems attached to the application than the laymen, for which
More>>
Sartori, S;
[1]
Squillacioti, M T
[2]
- ENEA - Direzione Centrale Studi - Centro Ricerche Energia, Casaccia, Rome (Italy)
- Contrattista ENEA (Italy)
Citation Formats
Sartori, S, and Squillacioti, M T.
Instruments for public environment policies: The negotiation; Strumenti per le politiche ambientali pubbliche: La negoziazione.
Italy: N. p.,
1990.
Web.
Sartori, S, & Squillacioti, M T.
Instruments for public environment policies: The negotiation; Strumenti per le politiche ambientali pubbliche: La negoziazione.
Italy.
Sartori, S, and Squillacioti, M T.
1990.
"Instruments for public environment policies: The negotiation; Strumenti per le politiche ambientali pubbliche: La negoziazione."
Italy.
@misc{etde_21298772,
title = {Instruments for public environment policies: The negotiation; Strumenti per le politiche ambientali pubbliche: La negoziazione}
author = {Sartori, S, and Squillacioti, M T}
abstractNote = {The negotiation starts from the postulate that environmental conflicts are a standing datum in the future of our societies. Environmental instance is based in deep and not reversible manner inside the attitude and value changes and, consequently, inside the quality of life. The different hopes about the environmental consequences constitute an internal element of democratic development and it is not thinkable to ignore or neglect these diversities. With regard to this last point the inadequacy of the present legal systems must be underlined. They are constructed to settle a controversy about 'the facts' and not about 'the values'. Often some environmental disputes may last quite a few years without facing the real essence of the question. The environmental negotiation intends as a 'consensual approach' that should give more possibilities for the conflict solution. It is based on the presupposition to create the terms for final result. In comparison with the legislative acts, the direct negotiation table permits a best exploration of options and a best mobilization of technical competencies. At last, because the negotiators should live together on the basis of obtained agreement, they will have more sensibility for the problems attached to the application than the laymen, for which the process ends with the publication of the law. The strongest argumentation in favor of environmental negotiation is that it is more difficult to avoid the substantial questions as well as often happens inside the legislative acts. (author)}
place = {Italy}
year = {1990}
month = {Dec}
}
title = {Instruments for public environment policies: The negotiation; Strumenti per le politiche ambientali pubbliche: La negoziazione}
author = {Sartori, S, and Squillacioti, M T}
abstractNote = {The negotiation starts from the postulate that environmental conflicts are a standing datum in the future of our societies. Environmental instance is based in deep and not reversible manner inside the attitude and value changes and, consequently, inside the quality of life. The different hopes about the environmental consequences constitute an internal element of democratic development and it is not thinkable to ignore or neglect these diversities. With regard to this last point the inadequacy of the present legal systems must be underlined. They are constructed to settle a controversy about 'the facts' and not about 'the values'. Often some environmental disputes may last quite a few years without facing the real essence of the question. The environmental negotiation intends as a 'consensual approach' that should give more possibilities for the conflict solution. It is based on the presupposition to create the terms for final result. In comparison with the legislative acts, the direct negotiation table permits a best exploration of options and a best mobilization of technical competencies. At last, because the negotiators should live together on the basis of obtained agreement, they will have more sensibility for the problems attached to the application than the laymen, for which the process ends with the publication of the law. The strongest argumentation in favor of environmental negotiation is that it is more difficult to avoid the substantial questions as well as often happens inside the legislative acts. (author)}
place = {Italy}
year = {1990}
month = {Dec}
}