You need JavaScript to view this

Commentary and contributions to green paper (alphabetical sort. Towards a European strategy for the security supply)

Abstract

This document provides the answers formulated by the nuclear industry operators to the thirteen following questions: 1. Can the European Union accept an increase in its dependence on external energy sources without undermining its security of supply and European competitiveness? If this were the case, for which sources of energy would it be appropriate to contemplate a framework policy for imports? In this case, is it appropriate to favour an economic approach, in terms of energy cost, or a geopolitical approach in terms of the risk of disruption? 2. Does not Europe increasingly integrated internal market, where decisions taken in one country have an impact on others, call for a consistent and coordinated policy at Community level? What should such a policy consist of and where should competition rules fit in? 3. Do tax and State aid policies in the energy sector impair competitiveness in the European Union or not? Given the failure of attempts to harmonize indirect taxation, should the whole issue of energy taxation not be re-examined in view, in particular, of the energy and environmental targets? 4. In the framework of an ongoing dialogue with producer countries, what should supply and investment promotion agreements contain? Given the  More>>
Publication Date:
Jul 01, 2005
Product Type:
Miscellaneous
Report Number:
INIS-FR-4284
Subject:
29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; CLIMATIC CHANGE; EMISSIONS TRADING; ENERGY DEMAND; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY RECOVERY; ENERGY SUPPLIES; EUROPE; RESERVES; SUPPLY DISRUPTION
OSTI ID:
20736782
Research Organizations:
Commission Europeenne, DG III, Bruxelles (Belgium)
Country of Origin:
France
Language:
English
Other Identifying Numbers:
TRN: FR0601194046941
Availability:
Available from INIS in electronic form
Submitting Site:
FRN
Size:
1512 pages
Announcement Date:
Jun 19, 2006

Citation Formats

None. Commentary and contributions to green paper (alphabetical sort. Towards a European strategy for the security supply). France: N. p., 2005. Web.
None. Commentary and contributions to green paper (alphabetical sort. Towards a European strategy for the security supply). France.
None. 2005. "Commentary and contributions to green paper (alphabetical sort. Towards a European strategy for the security supply)." France.
@misc{etde_20736782,
title = {Commentary and contributions to green paper (alphabetical sort. Towards a European strategy for the security supply)}
author = {None}
abstractNote = {This document provides the answers formulated by the nuclear industry operators to the thirteen following questions: 1. Can the European Union accept an increase in its dependence on external energy sources without undermining its security of supply and European competitiveness? If this were the case, for which sources of energy would it be appropriate to contemplate a framework policy for imports? In this case, is it appropriate to favour an economic approach, in terms of energy cost, or a geopolitical approach in terms of the risk of disruption? 2. Does not Europe increasingly integrated internal market, where decisions taken in one country have an impact on others, call for a consistent and coordinated policy at Community level? What should such a policy consist of and where should competition rules fit in? 3. Do tax and State aid policies in the energy sector impair competitiveness in the European Union or not? Given the failure of attempts to harmonize indirect taxation, should the whole issue of energy taxation not be re-examined in view, in particular, of the energy and environmental targets? 4. In the framework of an ongoing dialogue with producer countries, what should supply and investment promotion agreements contain? Given the importance of a partnership with Russia in particular, how can stable quantities, prices and investment be guaranteed? 5. Should more reserves be stockpiled and should other energy sources be included, such as gas or coal? Should the Community take on a greater role in stock management and, if so, what should the objectives and modalities be? Does the risk of physical disruption to energy supply justify more onerous measures for access to resources? 6. How can we ensure the development and better operation of energy transport networks in the European Union and neighbouring countries that enable the internal market to function properly and guarantee security of supply? 7. The development of some renewable energy sources calls for major efforts in terms of Research and Development, investment aid and operational aid. Should co-financing of this aid include a contribution from sectors which received substantial initial development aid and which are now highly profitable? 8. Since nuclear energy is one of the factors in the debate on tackling climate change and energy self-sufficiency, how can the Community find a solution to the problem of nuclear waste, enhancing nuclear safety and expanding research into the reactors of the future, and in particular fusion technology? 9. Which policies should enable the European Union to meet its obligations under the Kyoto Protocol? What action could be taken in order fully to exploit potential energy savings which would help to reduce both our external dependence and CO{sub 2} emissions? 10. Can an ambitious programme to promote biofuels and other substitute fuels, including hydrogen, geared to 20% of total fuel consumption by 2020, continue to be implemented via national initiatives, or are co-ordinated decisions required on taxation, distribution and prospects for agricultural production? 11. Should energy saving in buildings, whether public or private, new or under renovation, be promoted through incentives such as tax breaks, or are regulatory measures required along the lines of those adopted for major industrial installations? 12. Energy saving in the transport sector depends on redressing the growing imbalance between road haulage and rail. Is this imbalance inevitable, or could corrective action be taken, however unpopular, notably to encourage lower use of cars in urban areas? How can the aims of opening up the sector to competition, investment in infrastructure to remove bottlenecks and inter-modality be reconciled? 13. How can we develop more collaborative visions and integrate the long-term dimension into deliberations and actions undertaken by public authorities and other involved parties in order to evolve a sustainable system of energy supply. How are we to prepare the energy options for the future. (A.L.B.)}
place = {France}
year = {2005}
month = {Jul}
}