You need JavaScript to view this

What determines the acceptability of genetically modified food that can improve human nutrition?

Abstract

It has been predicted that by 2025 there will be an annual shortfall of cereals for feeding the human population of 68.5 million tonnes. One possible solution is the use of genetically modified (GM) crops, which are already grown extensively (59 million ha of GM crops were planted in 2002) in the USA, South America, Africa and China. Nevertheless, there is considerable disagreement about the advisability of using such crops, particularly in Europe. Obviously, the safety of the food derived from the GM crops is a primary consideration. Safety assessment relies on establishing that the food is substantially equivalent to its non-GM counterpart and specific testing for allergenicity of proteins and toxicity of metabolites and the whole food. There appears to be international agreement on the principles of safety assessment. Safety to the environment is equally important, but will not be covered in this presentation. The public's perception of the risk of new technology is critical to its acceptance. Perception of risk, in turn, depends on the credibility of the source of the information and trust in the regulatory process. In many countries, the public appears to have lost its trust in the scientists and government dealing with GM food,  More>>
Authors:
Purchase, Iain F.H. [1] 
  1. University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT (United Kingdom)
Publication Date:
Sep 01, 2005
Product Type:
Journal Article
Resource Relation:
Journal Name: Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology; Journal Volume: 207; Journal Issue: 2,suppl.1; Conference: ICT X 2004: 10. international congress of toxicology: Living in a safe chemical world, Tampere (Finland), 11-15 Jul 2004; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2004.12.025; PII: S0041-008X(05)00287-5; Copyright (c) 2005 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Subject:
60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES; AFRICA; CEREALS; CROPS; FOOD; HEALTH HAZARDS; METABOLITES; NUTRITION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS; SOUTH AMERICA; TOXICITY
OSTI ID:
20721884
Country of Origin:
United States
Language:
English
Other Identifying Numbers:
Journal ID: ISSN 0041-008X; TXAPA9; TRN: US05R6237034384
Submitting Site:
INIS
Size:
page(s) 19-27
Announcement Date:
May 15, 2006

Citation Formats

Purchase, Iain F.H. What determines the acceptability of genetically modified food that can improve human nutrition?. United States: N. p., 2005. Web. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2004.12.025.
Purchase, Iain F.H. What determines the acceptability of genetically modified food that can improve human nutrition?. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2004.12.025
Purchase, Iain F.H. 2005. "What determines the acceptability of genetically modified food that can improve human nutrition?" United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2004.12.025.
@misc{etde_20721884,
title = {What determines the acceptability of genetically modified food that can improve human nutrition?}
author = {Purchase, Iain F.H.}
abstractNote = {It has been predicted that by 2025 there will be an annual shortfall of cereals for feeding the human population of 68.5 million tonnes. One possible solution is the use of genetically modified (GM) crops, which are already grown extensively (59 million ha of GM crops were planted in 2002) in the USA, South America, Africa and China. Nevertheless, there is considerable disagreement about the advisability of using such crops, particularly in Europe. Obviously, the safety of the food derived from the GM crops is a primary consideration. Safety assessment relies on establishing that the food is substantially equivalent to its non-GM counterpart and specific testing for allergenicity of proteins and toxicity of metabolites and the whole food. There appears to be international agreement on the principles of safety assessment. Safety to the environment is equally important, but will not be covered in this presentation. The public's perception of the risk of new technology is critical to its acceptance. Perception of risk, in turn, depends on the credibility of the source of the information and trust in the regulatory process. In many countries, the public appears to have lost its trust in the scientists and government dealing with GM food, making the acceptability of GM crops uncertain. Of equal importance are the socio-economic factors that impinge on the viability of GM produce. These include intellectual property protection, trade liberalisation (through subsidy and tariff barriers in developed countries) and the intensity of bio safety regulations. The socio-economic interests of developed and developing countries may diverge and may even be contradictory in any one country. Acceptance of GM crops will thus depend on detailed issues surrounding particular crops and economies.}
doi = {10.1016/j.taap.2004.12.025}
journal = []
issue = {2,suppl.1}
volume = {207}
place = {United States}
year = {2005}
month = {Sep}
}