Abstract
Commercially available MgB{sub 2} powders were consolidated into bulk samples by two different shock wave consolidation methods: underwater shock consolidation method and gun method. Resistance vs. temperature of the samples was measured by the four-terminal method for pulsed currents of up to 3 A in self-field, as well as Vickers hardness, SEM micrographs of fraction surfaces, packing densities, and X-ray diffraction patterns. These results, in comparison with cold isostatic pressed samples, indicated that the underwater shock consolidated sample was superior in grain connectivity to the others. This is probably because the underwater shock consolidation generated most anisotropic and hence high frictional, compressive, intergrain forces.
Citation Formats
Matsuzawa, Hidenori, Tamaki, Hideyuki, Ohashi, Wataru, Kakimoto, Etsuji, Dohke, Kiyotaka, Atou, Toshiyuki, Fukuoka, Kiyoto, Kikuchi, Masae, Kawasaki, Masashi, and Takano, Yoshihiko.
Shock wave consolidated MgB{sub 2} bulk samples.
Netherlands: N. p.,
2004.
Web.
doi:10.1016/j.physc.2003.11.078.
Matsuzawa, Hidenori, Tamaki, Hideyuki, Ohashi, Wataru, Kakimoto, Etsuji, Dohke, Kiyotaka, Atou, Toshiyuki, Fukuoka, Kiyoto, Kikuchi, Masae, Kawasaki, Masashi, & Takano, Yoshihiko.
Shock wave consolidated MgB{sub 2} bulk samples.
Netherlands.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physc.2003.11.078
Matsuzawa, Hidenori, Tamaki, Hideyuki, Ohashi, Wataru, Kakimoto, Etsuji, Dohke, Kiyotaka, Atou, Toshiyuki, Fukuoka, Kiyoto, Kikuchi, Masae, Kawasaki, Masashi, and Takano, Yoshihiko.
2004.
"Shock wave consolidated MgB{sub 2} bulk samples."
Netherlands.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physc.2003.11.078.
@misc{etde_20618739,
title = {Shock wave consolidated MgB{sub 2} bulk samples}
author = {Matsuzawa, Hidenori, Tamaki, Hideyuki, Ohashi, Wataru, Kakimoto, Etsuji, Dohke, Kiyotaka, Atou, Toshiyuki, Fukuoka, Kiyoto, Kikuchi, Masae, Kawasaki, Masashi, and Takano, Yoshihiko}
abstractNote = {Commercially available MgB{sub 2} powders were consolidated into bulk samples by two different shock wave consolidation methods: underwater shock consolidation method and gun method. Resistance vs. temperature of the samples was measured by the four-terminal method for pulsed currents of up to 3 A in self-field, as well as Vickers hardness, SEM micrographs of fraction surfaces, packing densities, and X-ray diffraction patterns. These results, in comparison with cold isostatic pressed samples, indicated that the underwater shock consolidated sample was superior in grain connectivity to the others. This is probably because the underwater shock consolidation generated most anisotropic and hence high frictional, compressive, intergrain forces.}
doi = {10.1016/j.physc.2003.11.078}
journal = []
issue = {1-2}
volume = {412-414}
journal type = {AC}
place = {Netherlands}
year = {2004}
month = {Oct}
}
title = {Shock wave consolidated MgB{sub 2} bulk samples}
author = {Matsuzawa, Hidenori, Tamaki, Hideyuki, Ohashi, Wataru, Kakimoto, Etsuji, Dohke, Kiyotaka, Atou, Toshiyuki, Fukuoka, Kiyoto, Kikuchi, Masae, Kawasaki, Masashi, and Takano, Yoshihiko}
abstractNote = {Commercially available MgB{sub 2} powders were consolidated into bulk samples by two different shock wave consolidation methods: underwater shock consolidation method and gun method. Resistance vs. temperature of the samples was measured by the four-terminal method for pulsed currents of up to 3 A in self-field, as well as Vickers hardness, SEM micrographs of fraction surfaces, packing densities, and X-ray diffraction patterns. These results, in comparison with cold isostatic pressed samples, indicated that the underwater shock consolidated sample was superior in grain connectivity to the others. This is probably because the underwater shock consolidation generated most anisotropic and hence high frictional, compressive, intergrain forces.}
doi = {10.1016/j.physc.2003.11.078}
journal = []
issue = {1-2}
volume = {412-414}
journal type = {AC}
place = {Netherlands}
year = {2004}
month = {Oct}
}