Abstract
To find out an analytical method to determine H{sub 2}O content in UO{sub 2} powder as fuel elements of power reactors which is simple, economical, precise, and accurate, it is necessary to do comparison study of H{sub 2}O content determination using MEA method which is based on electrolysis process with two helically wound electrodes which contains P{sub 2} O{sub 5} that has function to absorb water steam. The platinum electrodes have a 67 Volt potential on them. The quantity of charge required to electrolyse 0.1 {mu}gr of H{sub 2}O is a constant which is the basic of the electronic measurement. In KFT method is based on volumetric titration using the one component reagent hydronol composite contain all reactants i.e. iodine, sulfur dioxide and imidazole as the base, dissolved in a suitable alcohol. The t- (student) test show that there is no different result significantly between those method. The H{sub 2}O contain obtained is 0.956{+-}0.0095 %, for MEA method and 0.953{+-}0.023 % for KFT method. (author)
Farida,;
Yudhi, N;
Lilis, W;
Putro, P K
[1]
- Center for Development of Nuclear Fuel and Recycling Technology, National Atomic Energy Agency, Serpong (Indonesia)
Citation Formats
Farida,, Yudhi, N, Lilis, W, and Putro, P K.
Comparison study Of H{sub 2}O determination in UO{sub 2} powder by using MEA (Moisture Evaluation Analysis) and KFT (Karl Fischer Titration); Studi banding penentuan kadar H{sub 2}O dalam serbuk UO{sub 2} menggunakan metoda MEA (Moisture Evaluation Analysis) dan KFT (Karl Fischer Titration).
Indonesia: N. p.,
2000.
Web.
Farida,, Yudhi, N, Lilis, W, & Putro, P K.
Comparison study Of H{sub 2}O determination in UO{sub 2} powder by using MEA (Moisture Evaluation Analysis) and KFT (Karl Fischer Titration); Studi banding penentuan kadar H{sub 2}O dalam serbuk UO{sub 2} menggunakan metoda MEA (Moisture Evaluation Analysis) dan KFT (Karl Fischer Titration).
Indonesia.
Farida,, Yudhi, N, Lilis, W, and Putro, P K.
2000.
"Comparison study Of H{sub 2}O determination in UO{sub 2} powder by using MEA (Moisture Evaluation Analysis) and KFT (Karl Fischer Titration); Studi banding penentuan kadar H{sub 2}O dalam serbuk UO{sub 2} menggunakan metoda MEA (Moisture Evaluation Analysis) dan KFT (Karl Fischer Titration)."
Indonesia.
@misc{etde_20253719,
title = {Comparison study Of H{sub 2}O determination in UO{sub 2} powder by using MEA (Moisture Evaluation Analysis) and KFT (Karl Fischer Titration); Studi banding penentuan kadar H{sub 2}O dalam serbuk UO{sub 2} menggunakan metoda MEA (Moisture Evaluation Analysis) dan KFT (Karl Fischer Titration)}
author = {Farida,, Yudhi, N, Lilis, W, and Putro, P K}
abstractNote = {To find out an analytical method to determine H{sub 2}O content in UO{sub 2} powder as fuel elements of power reactors which is simple, economical, precise, and accurate, it is necessary to do comparison study of H{sub 2}O content determination using MEA method which is based on electrolysis process with two helically wound electrodes which contains P{sub 2} O{sub 5} that has function to absorb water steam. The platinum electrodes have a 67 Volt potential on them. The quantity of charge required to electrolyse 0.1 {mu}gr of H{sub 2}O is a constant which is the basic of the electronic measurement. In KFT method is based on volumetric titration using the one component reagent hydronol composite contain all reactants i.e. iodine, sulfur dioxide and imidazole as the base, dissolved in a suitable alcohol. The t- (student) test show that there is no different result significantly between those method. The H{sub 2}O contain obtained is 0.956{+-}0.0095 %, for MEA method and 0.953{+-}0.023 % for KFT method. (author)}
place = {Indonesia}
year = {2000}
month = {Mar}
}
title = {Comparison study Of H{sub 2}O determination in UO{sub 2} powder by using MEA (Moisture Evaluation Analysis) and KFT (Karl Fischer Titration); Studi banding penentuan kadar H{sub 2}O dalam serbuk UO{sub 2} menggunakan metoda MEA (Moisture Evaluation Analysis) dan KFT (Karl Fischer Titration)}
author = {Farida,, Yudhi, N, Lilis, W, and Putro, P K}
abstractNote = {To find out an analytical method to determine H{sub 2}O content in UO{sub 2} powder as fuel elements of power reactors which is simple, economical, precise, and accurate, it is necessary to do comparison study of H{sub 2}O content determination using MEA method which is based on electrolysis process with two helically wound electrodes which contains P{sub 2} O{sub 5} that has function to absorb water steam. The platinum electrodes have a 67 Volt potential on them. The quantity of charge required to electrolyse 0.1 {mu}gr of H{sub 2}O is a constant which is the basic of the electronic measurement. In KFT method is based on volumetric titration using the one component reagent hydronol composite contain all reactants i.e. iodine, sulfur dioxide and imidazole as the base, dissolved in a suitable alcohol. The t- (student) test show that there is no different result significantly between those method. The H{sub 2}O contain obtained is 0.956{+-}0.0095 %, for MEA method and 0.953{+-}0.023 % for KFT method. (author)}
place = {Indonesia}
year = {2000}
month = {Mar}
}