Abstract
The aim of the 'Granite' collegial mission of dialogue is to inform the French authorities, associations and population about the project of construction of an underground laboratory for the study of the disposal of high level and long-life radioactive wastes in a granitic environment. The aim of the dialogue was not to select a site but to collect the public reactions and advices about such a project. However, such a dialogue has partially failed because of a misunderstanding of the population about the aims of the mission. However, the mission has collected many point of views and questions which are developed in this report. The first and second chapters recall the process of the mission and its progress, while a third chapter stresses on the questions asked by the public and which concern the fear of nuclear wastes and the incompatibility between the disposal of wastes and the socio-economical development of the region concerned. Thanks to the lessons drawn from this experience, the mission has formulated some recommendations (chapter 4) concerning the need for a better information of the population about any topic in relation with the radioactive wastes. Some complementary information is provided in appendixes. (J.S.)
Citation Formats
Boisson, P, Huet, Ph, and Mingasson, J.
The 'Granite' collegial mission of dialogue. Report; Mission collegiale de concertation Granite. Rapport.
France: N. p.,
2000.
Web.
Boisson, P, Huet, Ph, & Mingasson, J.
The 'Granite' collegial mission of dialogue. Report; Mission collegiale de concertation Granite. Rapport.
France.
Boisson, P, Huet, Ph, and Mingasson, J.
2000.
"The 'Granite' collegial mission of dialogue. Report; Mission collegiale de concertation Granite. Rapport."
France.
@misc{etde_20122209,
title = {The 'Granite' collegial mission of dialogue. Report; Mission collegiale de concertation Granite. Rapport}
author = {Boisson, P, Huet, Ph, and Mingasson, J}
abstractNote = {The aim of the 'Granite' collegial mission of dialogue is to inform the French authorities, associations and population about the project of construction of an underground laboratory for the study of the disposal of high level and long-life radioactive wastes in a granitic environment. The aim of the dialogue was not to select a site but to collect the public reactions and advices about such a project. However, such a dialogue has partially failed because of a misunderstanding of the population about the aims of the mission. However, the mission has collected many point of views and questions which are developed in this report. The first and second chapters recall the process of the mission and its progress, while a third chapter stresses on the questions asked by the public and which concern the fear of nuclear wastes and the incompatibility between the disposal of wastes and the socio-economical development of the region concerned. Thanks to the lessons drawn from this experience, the mission has formulated some recommendations (chapter 4) concerning the need for a better information of the population about any topic in relation with the radioactive wastes. Some complementary information is provided in appendixes. (J.S.)}
place = {France}
year = {2000}
month = {Jun}
}
title = {The 'Granite' collegial mission of dialogue. Report; Mission collegiale de concertation Granite. Rapport}
author = {Boisson, P, Huet, Ph, and Mingasson, J}
abstractNote = {The aim of the 'Granite' collegial mission of dialogue is to inform the French authorities, associations and population about the project of construction of an underground laboratory for the study of the disposal of high level and long-life radioactive wastes in a granitic environment. The aim of the dialogue was not to select a site but to collect the public reactions and advices about such a project. However, such a dialogue has partially failed because of a misunderstanding of the population about the aims of the mission. However, the mission has collected many point of views and questions which are developed in this report. The first and second chapters recall the process of the mission and its progress, while a third chapter stresses on the questions asked by the public and which concern the fear of nuclear wastes and the incompatibility between the disposal of wastes and the socio-economical development of the region concerned. Thanks to the lessons drawn from this experience, the mission has formulated some recommendations (chapter 4) concerning the need for a better information of the population about any topic in relation with the radioactive wastes. Some complementary information is provided in appendixes. (J.S.)}
place = {France}
year = {2000}
month = {Jun}
}