You need JavaScript to view this

Transport synthetic acceleration with opposing reflecting boundary conditions

Abstract

The transport synthetic acceleration (TSA) scheme is extended to problems with opposing reflecting boundary conditions. This synthetic method employs a simplified transport operator as its low-order approximation. A procedure is developed that allows the use of the conjugate gradient (CG) method to solve the resulting low-order system of equations. Several well-known transport iteration algorithms are cast in a linear algebraic form to show their equivalence to standard iterative techniques. Source iteration in the presence of opposing reflecting boundary conditions is shown to be equivalent to a (poorly) preconditioned stationary Richardson iteration, with the preconditioner defined by the method of iterating on the incident fluxes on the reflecting boundaries. The TSA method (and any synthetic method) amounts to a further preconditioning of the Richardson iteration. The presence of opposing reflecting boundary conditions requires special consideration when developing a procedure to realize the CG method for the proposed system of equations. The CG iteration may be applied only to symmetric positive definite matrices; this condition requires the algebraic elimination of the boundary angular corrections from the low-order equations. As a consequence of this elimination, evaluating the action of the resulting matrix on an arbitrary vector involves two transport sweeps and a transmission  More>>
Publication Date:
Feb 01, 2000
Product Type:
Journal Article
Reference Number:
EDB-00:007367
Resource Relation:
Journal Name: Nuclear Science and Engineering; Journal Volume: 134; Journal Issue: 2; Other Information: PBD: Feb 2000
Subject:
66 PHYSICS; 22 NUCLEAR REACTOR TECHNOLOGY; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; NEUTRON TRANSPORT; ITERATIVE METHODS; ALGORITHMS; MATRICES
Sponsoring Organizations:
USDOE; National Science Foundation (NSF)
OSTI ID:
20014326
Research Organizations:
Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (US)
Country of Origin:
United States
Language:
English
Contract Number:
AC05-76OR00033; W-7405-ENG-48
Other Identifying Numbers:
Journal ID: ISSN 0029-5639; NSENAO; TRN: US0001056
Submitting Site:
DELTA
Size:
page(s) 159-170
Announcement Date:
Mar 22, 2000

Citation Formats

Zika, M R, and Adams, M L. Transport synthetic acceleration with opposing reflecting boundary conditions. United States: N. p., 2000. Web.
Zika, M R, & Adams, M L. Transport synthetic acceleration with opposing reflecting boundary conditions. United States.
Zika, M R, and Adams, M L. 2000. "Transport synthetic acceleration with opposing reflecting boundary conditions." United States.
@misc{etde_20014326,
title = {Transport synthetic acceleration with opposing reflecting boundary conditions}
author = {Zika, M R, and Adams, M L}
abstractNote = {The transport synthetic acceleration (TSA) scheme is extended to problems with opposing reflecting boundary conditions. This synthetic method employs a simplified transport operator as its low-order approximation. A procedure is developed that allows the use of the conjugate gradient (CG) method to solve the resulting low-order system of equations. Several well-known transport iteration algorithms are cast in a linear algebraic form to show their equivalence to standard iterative techniques. Source iteration in the presence of opposing reflecting boundary conditions is shown to be equivalent to a (poorly) preconditioned stationary Richardson iteration, with the preconditioner defined by the method of iterating on the incident fluxes on the reflecting boundaries. The TSA method (and any synthetic method) amounts to a further preconditioning of the Richardson iteration. The presence of opposing reflecting boundary conditions requires special consideration when developing a procedure to realize the CG method for the proposed system of equations. The CG iteration may be applied only to symmetric positive definite matrices; this condition requires the algebraic elimination of the boundary angular corrections from the low-order equations. As a consequence of this elimination, evaluating the action of the resulting matrix on an arbitrary vector involves two transport sweeps and a transmission iteration. Results of applying the acceleration scheme to a simple test problem are presented.}
journal = []
issue = {2}
volume = {134}
journal type = {AC}
place = {United States}
year = {2000}
month = {Feb}
}