You need JavaScript to view this

Post-test analysis of LOBI BT-01 using RELAP5/MOD2 and RELAP5/MOD3

Abstract

LOBI is a high pressure, electrically heated integral system test facility simulating a KWU 1300 MW PWR scaled 1:712 by volume, although full scale has been maintained in the vertical direction. This report describes the results of an analysis of test BT-01, which simulates a 10% steam line break. The bulk of the analysis was performed using the Project Version of RELAP5/MOD2, with additional calculations using RELAP5/MOD3 for comparison. The codes provided generally good agreement with data. In particular, the break flows were well modelled, although the mass flow data proved to be unreliable, and this conclusion had to be derived from interpreting other signals. RELAP over-predicted primary/secondary heat transfer in the broken loop, however, leading to a more rapid cool-down of the primary circuit. Furthermore, the primary side pressure response was critically dependent upon the pressuriser behaviour, and the correct timing of the uncovery of the surge line. Inter-phase drag was not well predicted in the broken loop steam generator intermals, although some improvement was seen in the RELAP5/MOD3 predictions. MOD3 gave a reduction in primary/secondary heat transfer during the test pre-conditioning phase, resulting in a lower secondary side pressure at the start of the transient compared with MOD2.  More>>
Authors:
Publication Date:
Aug 01, 1991
Product Type:
Technical Report
Report Number:
AEA-RS-1081
Reference Number:
SCA: 210200; PA: AIX-23:040022; SN: 92000732846
Resource Relation:
Other Information: DN: Work carried out for Nuclear Electric.; PBD: Aug 1991
Subject:
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS; REACTOR COOLING SYSTEMS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; TEST FACILITIES; PWR TYPE REACTORS; DATA ANALYSIS; HEAT TRANSFER; PRIMARY COOLANT CIRCUITS; R CODES; SECONDARY COOLANT CIRCUITS; STEAM LINES; VERIFICATION; 210200; POWER REACTORS, NONBREEDING, LIGHT-WATER MODERATED, NONBOILING WATER COOLED
OSTI ID:
10142512
Research Organizations:
AEA Reactor Services, Winfrith (United Kingdom)
Country of Origin:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Other Identifying Numbers:
Other: ON: DE92628196; CNN: Contract A036a; A129a; TRN: GB9201004040022
Availability:
OSTI; NTIS (US Sales Only); INIS
Submitting Site:
GBN
Size:
111 p.
Announcement Date:
Jul 05, 2005

Citation Formats

Holmes, B J. Post-test analysis of LOBI BT-01 using RELAP5/MOD2 and RELAP5/MOD3. United Kingdom: N. p., 1991. Web.
Holmes, B J. Post-test analysis of LOBI BT-01 using RELAP5/MOD2 and RELAP5/MOD3. United Kingdom.
Holmes, B J. 1991. "Post-test analysis of LOBI BT-01 using RELAP5/MOD2 and RELAP5/MOD3." United Kingdom.
@misc{etde_10142512,
title = {Post-test analysis of LOBI BT-01 using RELAP5/MOD2 and RELAP5/MOD3}
author = {Holmes, B J}
abstractNote = {LOBI is a high pressure, electrically heated integral system test facility simulating a KWU 1300 MW PWR scaled 1:712 by volume, although full scale has been maintained in the vertical direction. This report describes the results of an analysis of test BT-01, which simulates a 10% steam line break. The bulk of the analysis was performed using the Project Version of RELAP5/MOD2, with additional calculations using RELAP5/MOD3 for comparison. The codes provided generally good agreement with data. In particular, the break flows were well modelled, although the mass flow data proved to be unreliable, and this conclusion had to be derived from interpreting other signals. RELAP over-predicted primary/secondary heat transfer in the broken loop, however, leading to a more rapid cool-down of the primary circuit. Furthermore, the primary side pressure response was critically dependent upon the pressuriser behaviour, and the correct timing of the uncovery of the surge line. Inter-phase drag was not well predicted in the broken loop steam generator intermals, although some improvement was seen in the RELAP5/MOD3 predictions. MOD3 gave a reduction in primary/secondary heat transfer during the test pre-conditioning phase, resulting in a lower secondary side pressure at the start of the transient compared with MOD2. (author).}
place = {United Kingdom}
year = {1991}
month = {Aug}
}