You need JavaScript to view this

Environment friendly, reasonable, low-energy dwellings; Miljoevennlige, rimelige lavenergiboliger

Abstract

The prospectus and documentation of an example of a low-energy dwelling are shown in an appendix of this report. The objective has primarily been to reduce the energy consumption as much as possible with use of available technology. The chosen system solution is therefore not optimized with respect to costs. In the report, the chosen solution has been worked up further, with a view also to a more economically optimal design. 15 figs., 10 tabs.
Authors:
Publication Date:
May 01, 1992
Product Type:
Technical Report
Report Number:
NBI-PR-105
Reference Number:
SCA: 320100; PA: NW-93:005079; SN: 93000968037
Resource Relation:
Other Information: PBD: May 1992
Subject:
32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION; RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; OPTIMIZATION; ECONOMICS; NORWAY; 320100; BUILDINGS
OSTI ID:
10140282
Research Organizations:
Norges Byggforskningsinstitutt, Oslo (Norway)
Country of Origin:
Norway
Language:
Norwegian
Other Identifying Numbers:
Other: ON: DE93778406; ISBN 82-536-0391-6; TRN: NO9305079
Availability:
OSTI; NTIS
Submitting Site:
NW
Size:
134 p.
Announcement Date:
Jul 05, 2005

Citation Formats

Gundersen, P. Environment friendly, reasonable, low-energy dwellings; Miljoevennlige, rimelige lavenergiboliger. Norway: N. p., 1992. Web.
Gundersen, P. Environment friendly, reasonable, low-energy dwellings; Miljoevennlige, rimelige lavenergiboliger. Norway.
Gundersen, P. 1992. "Environment friendly, reasonable, low-energy dwellings; Miljoevennlige, rimelige lavenergiboliger." Norway.
@misc{etde_10140282,
title = {Environment friendly, reasonable, low-energy dwellings; Miljoevennlige, rimelige lavenergiboliger}
author = {Gundersen, P}
abstractNote = {The prospectus and documentation of an example of a low-energy dwelling are shown in an appendix of this report. The objective has primarily been to reduce the energy consumption as much as possible with use of available technology. The chosen system solution is therefore not optimized with respect to costs. In the report, the chosen solution has been worked up further, with a view also to a more economically optimal design. 15 figs., 10 tabs.}
place = {Norway}
year = {1992}
month = {May}
}