Abstract
We comment on the numerical calculation of the Lipatov Pomeron in the measurement of `Hot Spots` in deep inelastic scattering. We illustrate that previous analytic estimates based upon the leading term in the Lipatov equation are accurate within 20%. We present evidence that numerical calculations should be done with a fixed {alpha}{sub s}. The use of a running {alpha}{sub s} appears as an unnecessary complication. We argue that at low Q{sup 2} the BFKL Pomeron requires higher order corrections. (orig.)
Citation Formats
Bartels, J, and Lotter, H.
A note on the BFKL Pomeron and the `Hot Spot` cross section.
Germany: N. p.,
1993.
Web.
Bartels, J, & Lotter, H.
A note on the BFKL Pomeron and the `Hot Spot` cross section.
Germany.
Bartels, J, and Lotter, H.
1993.
"A note on the BFKL Pomeron and the `Hot Spot` cross section."
Germany.
@misc{etde_10135162,
title = {A note on the BFKL Pomeron and the `Hot Spot` cross section}
author = {Bartels, J, and Lotter, H}
abstractNote = {We comment on the numerical calculation of the Lipatov Pomeron in the measurement of `Hot Spots` in deep inelastic scattering. We illustrate that previous analytic estimates based upon the leading term in the Lipatov equation are accurate within 20%. We present evidence that numerical calculations should be done with a fixed {alpha}{sub s}. The use of a running {alpha}{sub s} appears as an unnecessary complication. We argue that at low Q{sup 2} the BFKL Pomeron requires higher order corrections. (orig.)}
place = {Germany}
year = {1993}
month = {Mar}
}
title = {A note on the BFKL Pomeron and the `Hot Spot` cross section}
author = {Bartels, J, and Lotter, H}
abstractNote = {We comment on the numerical calculation of the Lipatov Pomeron in the measurement of `Hot Spots` in deep inelastic scattering. We illustrate that previous analytic estimates based upon the leading term in the Lipatov equation are accurate within 20%. We present evidence that numerical calculations should be done with a fixed {alpha}{sub s}. The use of a running {alpha}{sub s} appears as an unnecessary complication. We argue that at low Q{sup 2} the BFKL Pomeron requires higher order corrections. (orig.)}
place = {Germany}
year = {1993}
month = {Mar}
}