Abstract
The research work relates to semi-industrial scale testing in air of various relevant cutting tools (plasma torch, arc-air, grinder, alternating saw) for mild steel and stainless steel with thicknesses of 10, 30 and 50 mm. Its originality is a comparison between tools in the same normalized conditions of use in order to determine the performances of the different techniques and to measure all the generated secondary solid wastes. Among the tested tools, the plasma torch is the fastest and the alternating saw the slowest. The arc-air produces the widest kerf and thus the most wastes. The electrode of the arc-air and the wheel of the grinder wear the swiftest. The alternating saw generates the least mass of aerosols. (author). 1 ref., 7 figs.
Pilot, G;
Bernard, J;
[1]
Lorin, C;
Ravera, J P
[2]
- CEA Centre d`Etudes de Fontenay-aux-Roses, 92 (France). Dept. de Protection de l`Environnement et des Installations
- CEA Centre d`Etudes de la Vallee du Rhone, 30 - Marcoule (France). Direction du Cycle du Combustible
Citation Formats
Pilot, G, Bernard, J, Lorin, C, and Ravera, J P.
Comparative assessment of several dismantling cutting tools.
France: N. p.,
1992.
Web.
Pilot, G, Bernard, J, Lorin, C, & Ravera, J P.
Comparative assessment of several dismantling cutting tools.
France.
Pilot, G, Bernard, J, Lorin, C, and Ravera, J P.
1992.
"Comparative assessment of several dismantling cutting tools."
France.
@misc{etde_10111349,
title = {Comparative assessment of several dismantling cutting tools}
author = {Pilot, G, Bernard, J, Lorin, C, and Ravera, J P}
abstractNote = {The research work relates to semi-industrial scale testing in air of various relevant cutting tools (plasma torch, arc-air, grinder, alternating saw) for mild steel and stainless steel with thicknesses of 10, 30 and 50 mm. Its originality is a comparison between tools in the same normalized conditions of use in order to determine the performances of the different techniques and to measure all the generated secondary solid wastes. Among the tested tools, the plasma torch is the fastest and the alternating saw the slowest. The arc-air produces the widest kerf and thus the most wastes. The electrode of the arc-air and the wheel of the grinder wear the swiftest. The alternating saw generates the least mass of aerosols. (author). 1 ref., 7 figs.}
place = {France}
year = {1992}
month = {Dec}
}
title = {Comparative assessment of several dismantling cutting tools}
author = {Pilot, G, Bernard, J, Lorin, C, and Ravera, J P}
abstractNote = {The research work relates to semi-industrial scale testing in air of various relevant cutting tools (plasma torch, arc-air, grinder, alternating saw) for mild steel and stainless steel with thicknesses of 10, 30 and 50 mm. Its originality is a comparison between tools in the same normalized conditions of use in order to determine the performances of the different techniques and to measure all the generated secondary solid wastes. Among the tested tools, the plasma torch is the fastest and the alternating saw the slowest. The arc-air produces the widest kerf and thus the most wastes. The electrode of the arc-air and the wheel of the grinder wear the swiftest. The alternating saw generates the least mass of aerosols. (author). 1 ref., 7 figs.}
place = {France}
year = {1992}
month = {Dec}
}